|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M100506200 on July 6, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 36, 33645-33651, September 7, 2001
Identification and Characterization of SppA, a Novel
Light-inducible Chloroplast Protease Complex Associated with
Thylakoid Membranes*
Martin
Lensch,
Reinhold G.
Herrmann, and
Anna
Sokolenko
From the Botanisches Institut der
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Menzingerstrasse 67, D-80638 München, Germany
Received for publication, January 18, 2001, and in revised form, July 5, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
A new component of the chloroplast proteolytic
machinery from Arabidopsis thaliana was identified as a
SppA-type protease. The sequence of the mature protein, deduced from a
full-length cDNA, displays 22% identity to the serine-type
protease IV (SppA) from Escherichia coli and 27% identity
to Synechocystis SppA1 (sll1703) but lacks the
putative transmembrane spanning segments predicted from the E. coli sequence. The N-terminal sequence exhibits typical features
of a cleavable chloroplast stroma-targeting sequence. The chloroplast
localization of SppA was confirmed by in organello import
experiments using an in vitro expression system and by immunodetection with antigen-specific antisera. Subfractionation of
intact chloroplasts demonstrated that SppA is associated exclusively with thylakoid membranes, predominantly stroma lamellae, and is a part
of some high molecular mass complex of about 270 kDa that exhibits proteolytic activity. Treatments with chaotropic salts and
proteases showed that SppA is largely exposed to the stroma but that it
behaves as an intrinsic membrane protein that may have an unusual
monotopic arrangement in the thylakoids. We demonstrate that SppA is a
light-inducible protease and discuss its possible involvement in the
light-dependent degradation of antenna and photosystem II
complexes that both involve serine-type proteases.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Protein degradation is one of the major regulatory processes that
allow the adaptation, repair, or removal of thylakoid proteins during
environmental or developmental changes (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2).
However, our knowledge about chloroplast proteases remains limited. To
date, the components of the degradation machinery that have been
identified in the organelle include the stroma-located members of the
Clp family, which are well conserved from prokaryotes to eukaryotes
(3-7), the stromal (8, 9) and thylakoid (10) processing proteases that
dissect imported protein precursors, the thylakoid-bound
metalloprotease FtsH (11), and two lumenal components, the heat shock
protease HtrA (DegP; Ref. 12) and CtpA, an enzyme involved in the
C-terminal processing of the D1 protein (13, 14). However, the actual
number of chloroplast-located proteases appears to be much higher as
judged from the biochemical purification of numerous chloroplast
proteolytic activities in chloroplast subfractions (15) and from the
genome analysis of one chloroplast progenic ancestor, the
Synechocystis genome, which displays about 40 different
protease sequences. Biochemical studies have provided information about
substrate and inhibitor specificity for some proteolytic activities
(6), but a detailed knowledge of proteolytic processes requires that
the enzymes themselves and the corresponding genes are characterized at
the molecular level.
Two kinds of proteases can be operationally distinguished from a
physiological point of view: constitutive proteases that, for instance,
are involved in the degradation of abnormal or damaged proteins and
inducible proteases that are produced or activated only under
conditions where specific degradation processes are required.
The latter include enzymes that are induced by high light regimes or
under heat shock. Well known representatives of that category from
plants and bacteria are the heat shock protease Lon (16, 17), the Clp
family (7, 15, 18-21), HslUV (22), and HtrA proteases (12, 23, 24). In
chloroplasts, several light-dependent degradation processes
point to the possible existence of light-regulated proteases. For
instance, the accumulation of early light-inducible proteins, a
class of proteins that are induced at early stages of illumination, has
been suggested to be controlled by a light-repressed protease (25, 26).
Conversely, degradation of
LHCII,1 the major peripheral
antenna protein of thylakoid membranes, is induced under high light and
probably involves extrinsic (27) as well as thylakoid-intrinsic
proteases (28). The best studied light-induced degradation process in
chloroplasts is that of photosystem II. Photosystem II repair under
light stress requires the specific removal and degradation of
photodamaged D1 (29-31) and of the chlorophyll a core
antenna protein CP 43 (32).
We describe here a new chloroplast-located protease encoded by a
nuclear gene in Arabidopsis that fulfills the requirements for participating in light-induced degradation processes in the organelle. This protease displays significant homology to prokaryotic SppA proteases.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plant Growth--
Arabidopsis and spinach seedlings
were grown for 3-4 weeks in a greenhouse at 25 °C under a 12-h
light period with a moderate light regime (150 µE m 2
s 1). To monitor the effect of light on RNA or protein
levels, the plants were transferred to darkness or high intensity light
(700 µE m 2 s 1) for periods of 0-52
h. Plants exposed to different light regimes were harvested and used
for preparation of total cellular RNA and protein fractions. For heat
shock treatment plants were transferred from 25 °C to 42 °C for
30 min and harvested immediately.
cDNA Library Screening and Nucleotide Sequence
Analysis--
The Arabidopsis expressed sequence E8A10T7
(accession number AA042706), which displayed homology to prokaryotic
SppA proteases, was obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological
Resource Center (Ohio State University). A full-length SppA cDNA
was isolated from an Arabidopsis cDNA library (33) using
radiolabeled E8A10T7 insert as a probe. Nucleotide sequences were
determined by energy transfer fluorochrome dideoxy nucleotide chain
termination (34, 35) with the 377 system from Applied Biosystems or by
fluorochrome primer labeling with the LI-COR 4200IR2 two-laser system
(MWG-BIOTECH, Ebersberg, Germany). Sequence analysis was
performed using the BLASTN and BLASTP programs on HUSAR Service.
Protein localizations and transit peptide cleavage sites were predicted
by PSORT (psort.nibb.ac.jp/), ChloroP
(www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ChloroP/), and Predotar
(www.inra.fr/Internet/Produits/Predotar) programs, respectively.
DNA/RNA Analysis, Protein Gel Electrophoresis, and
Immunodetection of Proteins--
Isolation of total genomic DNA and
RNA from Arabidopsis and Southern and Northern analysis were
performed as described in Ref. 36. For Northern analysis 5 µg of
total RNA were loaded per lane. Gel electrophoresis of proteins under
denaturing conditions was performed according to Ref. 37.
Immunodetection was performed using ECL and 125I-labeled
protein A according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech).
Overexpression of SppA in Escherichia coli and Antisera
Production--
The C- and N-terminal segments of SppA cDNA were
separately inserted into pQE-31 and pRSET5b vectors (Qiagen, Hilden,
Germany) and expressed in the E. coli strains M15 and BL21
(Qiagen and Promega) after induction with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranosides. Soluble and
membrane proteins of E. coli cells were fractionated according to Qiagen protocols. Fractions containing overexpressed protein were subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (37). The
component of interest was excised from the gel, and the gel slice was
homogenized in 0.025 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 0.9 M
glycine, 0.1% SDS and used for antibody production in rabbits.
Antisera were prepared according to Ref. 38.
Preparation and Fractionation of Etioplasts and Chloroplasts;
Protein Extraction--
Intact chloroplasts were isolated from
Arabidopsis thaliana (var. Landsberg erecta) and
spinach (var. Monatol), fractionated into stroma, thylakoid
membranes, and lumenal proteins as described in Ref. 39. Etioplasts
from spinach were isolated according to Ref. 40. Thylakoids were
separated from stroma proteins after osmotic shock of chloroplasts (1 mg/ml of chlorophyll) with 10 volumes of 10 mM
Tricine, pH 8.0, and following centrifugation for 10 min at 5.000 × g. The membranes were washed in buffer containing 10 mM Tricine-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 M sucrose, 5 mM MgCl2 and used for the separation of lumenal
and thylakoid membrane fractions as described in Ref. 6. The major
thylakoid complexes were isolated after partial, controlled
solubilization of thylakoid membranes by -dodecyl-maltoside and
separation in linear 0.1-1.0 M sucrose gradients (41).
Grana and stroma stacks were isolated from thylakoids after lysis with
0.2% digitonin as described in Ref. 42. To characterize protein
topology, thylakoids (0.5 mg/ml of chlorophyll) were incubated with
solutions of chaotropic salts (2 M NaBr, 2 M
NaSCN) or alkaline solutions (0.1 M
Na2CO3, 0.1 M NaOH) as described in
Ref. 43. For protease protection assays thylakoids were resuspended in
10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 8.0, 0.1 M sucrose at a
concentration of 0.5 mg/ml chlorophyll, and aliquots were incubated
with thermolysin (150 mg/ml), trypsin (10 mg/ml), or proteinase K (15 mg/ml) for 30 min at 20 °C. The reactions were stopped by the
addition of protease inhibitors: 20 mM EDTA for
thermolysin, 50 mg/ml of soybean trypsin inhibitors for trypsin, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for proteinase K. In
organello import experiments were performed according to Ref. 39.
Thylakoid proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
Partial Purification of SppA and Assay for Proteolytic
Activity--
SppA protease was separated from
-dodecyl-maltoside-solubilized thylakoid membrane fractions (0.2 mg
of chlorophyll/run) by size exclusion chromatography on Superose 6 columns (3.2 × 30 cm; Pharmacia) pre-equilibrated with buffer
containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10 mM
MgCl2, 20 mM KCl and 0.06%
-dodecyl-maltoside. The proteins were eluted at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min, and 1-ml fractions were collected. The column was calibrated
with Dextran Blue (2000 kDa), thyroglobulin (669 kDa), apoferritin (443 kDa), catalase (240 kDa), and bovine serum albumin (66 kDa). The
fractions were analyzed in gelatin-containing (0.2%) gels (6) under
nondenaturing conditions in a Tris-borate system (45 mM
Tris, pH 8.5, 45 mM boric acid). After electrophoresis the
gels were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C in 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, to activate proteases and then stained with 0.1%
Coomassie Blue R-250, 40% ethanol, 10% acetic acid for 30 min
followed by destaining in 40% ethanol, 10% acetic acid. The protease
activity became visible as a white zone in a Coomassie Blue-stained background.
Identification of Hybridizing DNA Fragments in the A. thaliana
Institut für Genbiologische Forschung-BAC
Library--
The library of BACs used was constructed at the
Institut für Genbiologische Forschung Berlin GmbH (Instit
für Genbiologische Forschung; Ref. 44). Individual recombinant
BACs of this library are currently being ordered into contigs that at
present represent more than 90% of the Arabidopsis genome.
Additionally, representative DNA probes with known map positions were
hybridized to BAC clones anchoring the available contigs on the genetic
map of molecular markers. Taking advantage of these data
(www.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/101/igf_bac_cont.html), sppA was
mapped by hybridization to library filters of 9216 BAC clones spotted
in duplicate in 3 × 3 arrays. The filters were obtained from the
Resorcezentrum im Deutschen Humangenomprojekt, (Berlin, Germany;
www.rzpd.de) and hybridized according to Legen et al.
(45).
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of the SppA Protease from A. thaliana and
Characterization of the Corresponding cDNA--
A search of the
Arabidopsis data base revealed a DNA sequence exhibiting
homology to the prokaryotic protease SppA. An expressed sequence tag
(E8A10T7, accession number AA042706) of 835 base pairs was used as a
probe for isolating the full-length cDNA by screening of an
appropriate A. thaliana cDNA library. Five positive clones were selected. The recombinant DNA with the largest insert, 2196 base pairs (accession number AF114385), was sequenced. The presence of
an in-frame stop codon at position 15, a typical translation
initiation sequence
6GAAACAATGGCA+6 (46) and a
poly(A) tail at the 3' end suggested that the insert comprised a
full-length cDNA. It contained a single open reading frame of 2068 nucleotides, which corresponds to a polypeptide of 680 amino acid
residues (Fig. 1) and a calculated
molecular mass of 74.8 kDa. The coding region is preceded by a 28-base
pair 5'-untranslated region and is trailed by an untranslated stretch of 119 base pairs. The N-terminal 68-residue domain of the protein displays typical features of a chloroplast stroma-targeting transit peptide (47); it initiates with MetAla characteristic of such presequences (48, 49) and contains positively charged (Arg) and
hydrophilic short side chain residues (Ser, Ala) and a predicted amphiphilic -sheet (residues 62-67). PSORT and ChloroP programs predicted two potential cleavage sites following Ala residues at
positions 60 and 69, respectively (see arrowheads in Fig.
1).

View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Amino acid alignment of SppA proteases from
A. thaliana (At), Synechocystis
(Syn), and E. coli
(Ec). Amino acid residues identical between
Arabidopsis and one of the other sequences are marked by
shaded gray boxes, and identical residues between all
sequences are indicated by black boxes. The three purported
transmembrane domains in the E. coli sequence are
underlined. Predicted cleavage sites for the
stroma-targeting transit peptide in the Arabidopsis sequence
are marked by arrowheads. Possible "catalytic" amino
acid residues are indicated by asterisks (see
"Discussion"). The amino acid residues in the
Arabidopsis and E. coli sequences, respectively,
are numbered above and below the
alignments.
|
|
SppA Is a Single Copy Gene in the Arabidopsis Genome--
Southern
analysis of total Arabidopsis genomic DNA as well as a
search through the A. thaliana Data Base (Stanford, CA)
provided no evidence for a second sppA gene in the
Arabidopsis genome. High density filters of BAC contigs
covering almost the entire Arabidopsis genome (44) were used
to substantiate the gene copy number and to determine the chromosomal
localization of sppA. A signal consistent with a single gene
copy was found on a single BAC (number F2P9) originating in chromosome
I (data not shown). The recent sequencing of the Arabidopsis
genome (internet information at mips.gsf.de/proj/thal/)
confirmed the presence of a single sppA gene on that
chromosome (accession number AC016662).
SppA Is a Chloroplast Protein Located in Thylakoid
Membranes--
To evaluate the chloroplast location of SppA, we
conducted in organello import experiments with radiolabeled
precursor protein made in vitro from the SppA cDNA. The
sample displayed various premature termination products together with
the precursor form of SppA, labeled p in Fig.
2 (lane TP). The radiolabeled
SppA precursor protein was successfully imported into intact
chloroplasts from spinach and processed to the mature form (labeled
m in Fig. 2). The imported mature SppA was resistant to
proteolytic attack upon incubation of intact spinach chloroplasts with
thermolysin or trypsin for 30 min (experiment not shown).
Subfractionation of the organelles into thylakoid (Fig. 2, lane
Th) and soluble stroma fractions (Fig. 2, lane S)
showed that the radiolabeled SppA mature protein was recovered
exclusively in the thylakoid fraction (Fig. 2, lane Th). The
thylakoid location of SppA within the organelle was confirmed by a
serological approach with stromal, thylakoid membrane and lumenal
proteins prepared from intact Arabidopsis chloroplasts using
an antiserum elicited against the C-terminal part of the protein (amino
acid residues 493-680; Fig.
3A). SppA could be detected as
a 68-kDa polypeptide that was exclusively associated with thylakoid
membranes (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Import of SppA precursor into isolated intact
spinach chloroplasts. Chloroplasts were incubated with in
vitro translated 35S-radiolabeled SppA pre-protein
(TP) and fractionated into stroma (S) and
thylakoids (Th). p, precursor protein;
m, mature protein.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Localization of SppA protease within
chloroplasts. A, intact chloroplasts were isolated from
Arabidopsis plants and fractionated into stroma
(S), thylakoid membranes (TM), and lumenal
(L) proteins. The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE,
transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and immunodecorated with an
antiserum against the C-terminal part of SppA. B, thylakoids
were partially lysed by digitonin and fractions enriched in grana
(G), grana margins (M), and stroma lamellae
(S) were separated by differential centrifugation. Antisera
against SppA and the 33-kDa subunit of oxygen-evolving complex of
photosystem II (control) were used for immunodetection in fractionated
thylakoid membranes.
|
|
We further fragmented thylakoid membranes by digitonin treatment and
subsequent differential centrifugation. This treatment allowed separate
fractions enriched in grana membranes, grana margins, and stroma
lamellae (for details see "Experimental Procedures"). As
illustrated by Fig. 3B, the immunodetection of the 33-kDa
subunit of the oxygen-evolving system of photosystem II showed a
preferential location in the grana membranes and grana margins
(lanes G and M in Fig. 3B) in
agreement with the well known distribution of that photosystem in the
thylakoid system (50). In contrast, SppA was highly enriched in stroma
lamellae. Its presence in the grana fraction can be probably attributed
to a cross-contamination inherent in the available procedures.
To estimate the nature of the association of SppA with the stroma
lamellae, purified thylakoids were treated with solutions of chaotropic
salts (NaBr and NaSCN) or with alkaline solutions (Na2CO3 and NaOH). The protein was partially
released from the membranes only after treatment with the strong
chaotropic reagent NaSCN (Fig. 4). That
the membrane association of SppA resisted alkaline treatments as well
as NaBr treatment suggests that SppA behaves rather as an integral than
as a peripheral membrane protein.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Association of SppA with thylakoid
membranes. The nature of association of SppA with the membrane was
monitored by extracting thylakoids with solutions of chaotropic salts
or alkaline solutions (see text) for 30 min at 20 °C. The samples
were centrifuged for 15 min at 10,000 × g to
fractionate peripheral and integrated membrane proteins and separated
into supernatant (S) and pellet (P).
|
|
The topology of SppA within thylakoid membranes was further
investigated by protease protection assays. Freshly prepared intact thylakoids or thylakoids permeabilized by sonication were treated with
thermolysin, trypsin, or proteinase K (Fig.
5). As a control experiment, we first
assayed the thylakoid samples with an antibody against the 33-kDa
protein of the oxygen-evolving system that is peripherally located at
the lumenal face of thylakoid membranes (51). In intact thylakoids
(Fig. 5, left bottom panel), the 33-kDa protein remained
fully protected against proteolytic attack, even using the harshest
treatment with proteinase K. Upon thylakoid sonication, the 33-kDa
protein became mildly sensitive to thermolysin and produced a
degradation product of low molecular mass seen at the gel bottom. It
was fully degraded by trypsin and proteinase K under the same
conditions. Thus, the externally added proteases got full access to the
lumenal membrane surface only upon sonication of the thylakoids.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
SppA topology within thylakoid
membranes. Arabidopsis intact thylakoids and thylakoids disrupted
by sonication were incubated with buffer ( ), thermolysin
(Tl), trypsin (Tr), or proteinase K
(Pr). Incubation was carried at 20 °C for 30 min.
Proteolysis was stopped by addition of EDTA, soybean trypsin inhibitor,
and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, respectively. Thylakoids were
reisolated and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western analysis using
monospecific polyclonal antisera elicited against SppA and the 33-kDa
polypeptide of the oxygen-evolving complex that served as a
control.
|
|
In intact thylakoids, SppA was partially digested by thermolysin or
trypsin, and it was extensively digested by proteinase K (Fig. 5,
left upper panel). Thus, SppA was readily accessible from
the stromal surface to externally added proteases. Sonicated thylakoids
that were also accessible to proteases from the lumenal surface
displayed the same SppA proteolytic patterns as those observed with
intact thylakoids. Thus, we conclude that SppA is exposed at the
stromal face of thylakoids and that it has no notable protease-sensitive domains exposed to the thylakoid lumen.
SppA Is a Proteolytically Active Enzyme--
To study the
proteolytic activity of SppA we first attempted to overexpress
precursor and mature forms of the protein in E. coli.
Overexpression of the precursor form proved unsuccessful, whereas that
of the mature form, starting from Phe60, resulted in
low yield production of two truncated products (data not shown). These
results suggest that the heterologous expression of chloroplast SppA
was detrimental to the bacteria most likely by virtue of its homology
to the bacterial SppA protease (59). Therefore, the proteolytic
activity of SppA was further analyzed by gel exclusion chromatography
after mild solubilization of the major protein complexes from the
thylakoid membranes. SppA was part of a high molecular mass complex of
~270 kDa that eluted in fractions 15-17 marked in Fig.
6A, consistent with the
homotetrameric structure of SppA from E. coli (59). The
fractions collected from size exclusion chromatography were analyzed
both for the presence of SppA by immunodetection (Fig. 6B)
and for proteolytic activity (Fig. 6C). The SppA-containing
fractions, when run on nondenaturing gels containing gelatin, showed
high proteolytic activity as visualized by the white band on a dark
background (Fig. 6C). The apparent molecular mass deduced
from the electrophoretic migration of this proteolytically active band,
~270 kDa, corresponded well with that of the complex eluted by size
exclusion chromatography. Similar data were obtained by sucrose
gradient centrifugation of thylakoid lysates according to Ref. 41 (data
not shown). The proteolytic activity of SppA was significantly
inhibited by the specific antiserum (~90%; no suppression occurred
with preimmune serum), by phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride but not
iodoacetamide consistent with a serine-type protease (data not
shown).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Partial purification of SppA by size
exclusion chromatography and assay for proteolytic activity.
Solubilized thylakoid membranes were separated on a Superose 6 column,
and 1-ml fractions were collected. A, absorbance profile
(280 nm) of eluates. The molecular masses of the proteins used for
column calibration are given on the upper x-scale: 2000 (blue dextran),
670 kDa (thyroglobulin), 443 kDa (apoferritin), 240 kDa (catalase), and
66 kDa (bovine serum albumin). The hatched area marks the
protease activity. B, immunodetection of SppA in the
collected fractions under denaturing conditions with a specific
antiserum raised against the protease (only the relevant and flanking
fractions 13-19 are shown). The protein molecular mass standards (in
kDa) are shown on the left. C, assay for the
proteolytic activity. The fractions were loaded onto
substrate-containing activity gels, the proteins were separated under
nondenaturing conditions, and the gels were incubated at 37 °C for
3 h. After incubation the gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant
Blue and destained, and the protease detected as a white
band by degraded substrate within the dark background
(as in B, fractions 13-19 are shown). Molecular mass
markers, catalase (240 kDa) and bovine serum albumin (66 kDa), were
loaded in large amounts (15-20 mg of each protein) to allow their
detection in the blue gelatin background.
|
|
SppA Is a Light-inducible Protease in Arabidopsis--
RNA filter
hybridization was employed to investigate the expression of SppA at the
transcript level (Fig. 7). When
Arabidopsis plants were grown under moderate light (150 mE
m 2 s 1), they displayed no detectable SppA
transcript (Fig. 7, lane 0). However, the more sensitive
combined the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction technique
on a Light Cycler machine (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) allowed to
detect minute amounts of the transcripts (data not shown). SppA
transcripts remained below detection using conventional Northern
procedures in plants after heat shock treatment (data not shown).
However, when Arabidopsis plants were transferred to higher
light intensities (e.g. 700 µE m 2
s 1), a 2.2-kilobase pair SppA transcript became
detectable after 10 h of exposure. The stationary mRNA
concentrations increased about five times during the next 40 h
under high light (Fig. 7, lanes 10-52 h). This
light-induced transcription was accompanied by a substantial increase
in the steady-state levels of the corresponding protein (Fig.
8). In this experiment
Arabidopsis plants grown under moderate light for 6 days
were either kept under the same light regime or transferred to darkness
or to higher light intensities for 52 h. A serological
identification of SppA using radiolabeled 125I-protein A
(Fig. 8A) or the ECL method (Fig. 8B) revealed
that the protein was already present in significant amounts in plants grown under moderate light conditions, although the corresponding transcript was hardly visible in Northern experiments (Fig. 7). Quantification using 125I-protein A showed that the SppA
protein increased approximately four times after transfer of
Arabidopsis plants to higher light intensities. The amount
of cytochrome f, used here as a control, remained virtually
unchanged under these conditions (Fig. 8C). Using the
nonquantitative but more sensitive ECL method (Fig. 8B), we
observed a lower molecular mass product that accumulated in much higher
amounts after transfer of the plants from moderate light to darkness
but became less abundant upon transfer to high light. These
observations indicate that mature SppA is slowly converted to a
truncated product, especially in low light or darkness. On the other
hand, the steady-state fraction of mature SppA increases drastically at
higher light intensities in parallel with the light induction of SppA
gene expression.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Expression of sppA in A. thaliana. Total genomic RNA was isolated from
Arabidopsis plants grown in a greenhouse at 150 µE
m 2 s 1 and subsequently placed at 700 µE
m 2 s 1 for different periods (0.5-52 h).
Lower panel, 18 and 16 S rRNA, respectively (loading
control).
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
SppA protein levels under different light
conditions. Spinach plants were grown under moderate light
(ML; 150 µE m 2 s 1) for 6 days.
Part of the plants was retained under moderate light (ML),
and the rest were transferred to darkness (D) and high light
regimes (HL; 700 µE m 2 s 1) for
52 h. The thylakoids were isolated from intact chloroplasts, and
the membrane proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and transferred onto
nitrocellulose filters. The SppA protein was detected with a SppA
antiserum using 125I-labeled protein A (A) or
strongly overexposed ECL detection (B). The truncated
product of SppA seen in the overexposed B is marked by an
arrowhead (see text). Anti-cytochrome f serum was
applied to the same protein fractions as a loading control
(C).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We provide evidence for a novel, light-regulated protease,
designated SppA, that is located in chloroplast thylakoids. This protease appears to be ubiquitous because it possesses homologues in
eubacteria, archaebacteria, and DNA viruses (MEROPS, peptidase data
base; www.merops.co.uk/). SppA was identified as a bona fide chloroplast protease in Arabidopsis, because (i) sequence
analysis predicted a transit peptide typical of a stroma-targeting
presequences, (ii) in vitro expressed SppA was successfully
imported into intact spinach chloroplast, and (iii) SppA could
be detected immunologically as well as functionally active among the
proteins from isolated chloroplasts.
Organelle subfractionation demonstrated that SppA is a membrane-bound
protease that is heterogeneously distributed along thylakoid membranes.
On a total protein basis, it was highly enriched in stroma lamellae and
grana margins rather than in grana. Purification of SppA by size
exclusion chromatography after limited detergent solubilization of the
thylakoid membranes showed that the protease is part of a high
molecular mass complex. This complex possesses a similar molecular mass
as SppA from E. coli, which was found to form a tetrameric
structure (60). Thus, chloroplast SppA most likely undergoes a
comparable oligomerization as in bacteria. The SppA complex showed
proteolytic activity in gelatin-containing gels, implying that it
constitutes a new chloroplast protease of the SppA family.
Interesting aspects emerge from comparisons of topology predictions for
SppA in chloroplasts (thylakoid membranes) and E. coli,
which may relate to different localizations and the relatively low
homology between the corresponding enzymes. In thylakoids, SppA was
largely exposed at the stromal surface of the thylakoid membrane
because it was extensively digested from the stromal side of the
membrane by proteinase K. However, its limited accessibility to trypsin
and thermolysin suggests that the stroma-exposed domains of SppA are
tightly folded. We found no evidence for the exposure of protein
domains at the lumenal face of the membrane, indicating that the
protease is a monotopic component. This is intriguing because the
association of SppA with the membranes resisted treatments with
alkaline or NaBr solutions that release most of the peripheral membrane
proteins. Thus, SppA behaved rather as an integral membrane protein.
Monotopic integral membrane proteins with comparable properties have
been described previously (for reviews see Refs. 52 and 53). The best
characterized monotopic integral membrane protein is prostaglandin
synthase, whose crystal structure has revealed an amphiphilic helix
that is most likely lying at the junction between the polar head groups
and the fatty acid chains of the membrane lipids (54).
To further understand the nature of the interaction of SppA with
membranes, we analyzed the SppA sequences from three sources in greater
detail, notably from Arabidopsis, Synechocystis,
and E. coli (Fig. 1). The SppA protease from the
Arabidopsis chloroplast displays 27% identity to
Synechocystis SppA1 (sll1703) and 22% to
E. coli SppA. Highest conservation was found in the central domain of the protein (Fig. 1; residues 418-485 of
Arabidopsis sequence), with a homology exceeding 50% within
two weakly hydrophobic stretches (underlined in the E. coli sequence included in Fig. 1). These stretches, together with
an N-terminal hydrophobic segment (also underlined in Fig.
1), have been previously suggested to contribute to the transmembrane
binding of the E. coli enzyme to the plasmalemma (55, 56).
However, the purported N-terminal transmembrane helix of the bacterial
protease, which is the most reasonable candidate for the membrane
anchoring of the E. coli protease, is absent in the
Arabidopsis sequence (Fig. 1). Therefore, the
chloroplast-located SppA protease should interact with the lipid
bilayer through one or both of the other hydrophobic stretches that are
homologous to the corresponding E. coli sequence (in the
domain defined by amino acid residues 398-441 in E. coli). As a serine-type protease (55), part of this SppA domain is likely to
contribute to the catalytic site of the enzyme because it contains the
four serine residues (Ser426, Ser453,
Ser460, and Ser482) that are strictly conserved
among all SppA proteases known so far. Studies of catalytic domains of
the serine-type proteases (57, 58) have indicated that serine residues
involved in catalysis should be found close to histidine or lysine
residues to form the so-called catalytic dyad. Only the two first
serine residues (Ser426 and Ser453) are located
at an appropriate distance from highly conserved lysines (positions 418 and 448). Because the two subsequent serines (positions 460 and 482)
are placed within a hydrophobic stretch without lysine or histidine
residues in their vicinity, we infer that Ser426 and
Ser453 are involved in the catalytic function of SppA,
whereas the latter may be part of a membrane anchor region. The
hydrophobic interaction of the protease with the membrane may then be
based on the domain encompassing residues 454-492 in
Arabidopsis. However, there are no hydrophobic stretches
that are long enough to span the membrane in this region. Instead, a
wheel presentation of this region from the three sources (Fig.
9A) shows the occurrence of an
amphiphilic helix. Its more polar face (Fig. 9A,
domains I-IV) could allow an interaction with the
polar head groups of the lipids, whereas the more hydrophobic face
(Fig. 9A, domains V-VII) could interact with the
fatty acid chains. This proposal is fully consistent with the
biochemical and topological analysis that we have discussed above. A
schematic view of the monotopic positioning of a single SppA molecule
with respect to the thylakoid membrane surface is given in Fig.
9B. The catalytic domains of the protease could thus be held
close to the thylakoid surface, in an appropriate position for an
interaction with membrane protein substrates (Fig. 9B).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Possible topology of a monomeric form of SppA
protease within thylakoid membranes. A, helical wheel
projection of the hydrophobic stretch, spanning residues 449-492 of
the Arabidopsis SppA protease. The most hydrophylic residues
are marked in bold type. Domains I-VII represent
the segmented surfaces of the helices. Ec, E. coli; S, Synechocystis; At,
A. thaliana. B, model of the monomeric SppA
polypeptide in thylakoid membranes. K (Lys) and S
(Ser) indicate hypothetical catalytic amino acid residues.
|
|
A most remarkable finding of our study is that SppA is a
light-inducible protease. Although the substrates of the chloroplast SppA enzyme are unknown at present, it is conceivable that this protease participates in the light-dependent turnover of
thylakoid membrane proteins or of peptides released from such proteins
under light stress conditions. If so, SppA is another example of a
light-induced protease, besides the metallo-protease FtsH (11), which
may be involved in the second step of D1, a photosystem II core
protein, degradation (60). SppA appears as a reasonable candidate for participating in the light-induced degradation of photosystem II
(61-63) and/or LHCII antenna proteins (27, 64) as well. Both
degradation processes were reported to involve serine-type endoproteases (27, 65). Two candidate enzymes for LHC degradation have
been described: a membrane-bound protease (28, 66) and an extrinsic
component that can be reversibly removed from thylakoids (27). Our
observation that SppA is firmly attached to the membranes and enriched
in stroma lamellae strongly argues for its involvement in LHC
degradation through the proteolytic activity described in Refs. 28 and
66. This suggestion is supported by the kinetics of the light-induced
LHC degradation process. Acclimation of thylakoid membranes, leading to
the disposal of part of the LHCII complexes, is a slow process and
requires an induction phase of ~48 h after transferring the plants
from low to higher light intensities (27, 64). Maximal induction of
SppA mRNA was reached between 26 and 52 h of illumination with
high light intensities, a period that corresponds with the maximum
degradation of LHC protein during light adaptation (28). LHCII was
shown to become highly accessible to proteolytic digestion upon its
dephosphorylation in nonappressed membranes. Thus, SppA should be
considered as a potential candidate for participating in the LHC
degradation process, because of its light induction, thylakoid
localization in nonappressed membrane domains, and serine content in
the purported catalytic domains. The physiological role of SppA in the
light-induced degradation processes of core and antenna complexes of
photosystem II is currently under study.
The outlined findings bear on an intriguing phylogenetic aspect.
Whereas the light induction of SppA points to its possible role in the
degradation of transmembrane proteins, knock-out mutants in E. coli have suggested that SppA functions in the degradation of
signal peptides once they are released from the precursor proteins (67,
68). A similar role has been suggested for SppA from Bacillus
subtilis (69). It will be interesting to see whether the
functional differences between bacterial and chloroplast SppAs, if
correct, reflect a phylogenetic change in substrate usage and correlate
with the limited sequence conservation that is restricted to the
predicted catalytic core domain of the protein, whereas other parts
involved in substrate recognition may have diverged during evolution.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Grant DFG SO448/2-1 (to A. S.) and SFB 184 (to R. H.) and the
Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-89-17861242; Fax: 49-89-1782274; E-mail:
anna@botanik.biologie.uni-muenchen.d.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 6, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M100506200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LHC, light
harvesting complex;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine;
contig, group of overlapping clones;
BAC, bacterial artificial
chromosome.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adam, Z.
(1996)
Plant Mol. Biol.
32,
773-783
|
| 2.
|
Andersson, B.,
and Aro, E.-M.
(1997)
Physiol. Plantarum
100,
780-793
|
| 3.
|
Gottesman, S.,
Squires, C.,
Pichersky, E.,
Carrington, M.,
Hobbs, M.,
Mattick, J. S.,
Dalrymple, B.,
Kuramitsu, H.,
Shiroza, T.,
Foster, T.,
Clark, W. P.,
Ross, B.,
Squires, C. L.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(1990)
Biochemistry
87,
3513-3517
|
| 4.
|
Maurizi, M. R.,
Clark, W. P.,
Katayama, Y.,
Rudikoff, S.,
Pumphrey, J.,
Bowers, B.,
and Gottesman, S.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
12536-12545
|
| 5.
|
Shanklin, J.,
DeWitt, N. D.,
and Flanagan, J. M.
(1995)
Plant Cell
7,
1713-1722
|
| 6.
|
Sokolenko, A.,
Altschmied, L.,
and Herrmann, R. G.
(1997)
Planta
207,
286-295
|
| 7.
|
Porankiewicz, J.,
Wang, J.,
and Clarke, A. K.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
32,
449-458
|
| 8.
|
VanderVere, P. S.,
Bennett, T. M.,
Oblong, J. E.,
and Lamppa, G. K.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7177-7181
|
| 9.
|
Richter, S.,
and Lamppa, G. K
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7463-7468
|
| 10.
|
Chaal, B. K.,
Mould, R. M.,
Barbrook, A. C.,
Gray, J. C.,
and How, C. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
689-692
|
| 11.
|
Lindahl, M.,
Tabak, S.,
Cseke, L.,
Pichersky, E.,
Andersson, B.,
and Adam, Z.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19329-29334
|
| 12.
|
Itzhaki, H.,
Naveh, L.,
Lindahl, M.,
Cook, M.,
and Adam, Z.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7094-7098
|
| 13.
|
Inagaki, N.,
Fujita, S.,
and Satoh, K.
(1996)
Plant Mol. Biol.
30,
39-50
|
| 14.
|
Oelmüller, R.,
Herrmann, R. G.,
and Pakrasi, H. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21848-21852
|
| 15.
|
Sokolenko, A.,
Lerbs-Mache, S.,
Altschmied, L.,
and Herrmann, R. G.
(1998)
Plant Physiol.
115,
827-832
|
| 16.
|
Charette, M.,
Henderson, G. W.,
and Morkovitz, S.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
4728-4732
|
| 17.
|
Sarria, R.,
Lyznik, A.,
Vallejos, C. E.,
and Mackenizie, S., A.
(1998)
Plant Cell
10,
1217-1228
|
| 18.
|
Kroh, H. E.,
and Simon, L., D.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
6026-6034
|
| 19.
|
Squires, C. L.,
Pedersen, S.,
Ross, B. M.,
and Squires, C.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
4254-4262
|
| 20.
|
Shirmer, E. C.,
Glover, J. R.,
Singer, M. A.,
and Lidquist, S.
(1996)
Trends in Biochem. Sci.
21,
289-296
|
| 21.
|
Wawrzynow, A.,
Wojtkowiak, D.,
Marszalek, J.,
Banecki, B.,
Jonsen, M.,
Graves, B,
Georgopoulos, C.,
and Zylicz, M.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
1867-1877
|
| 22.
|
Chuang, S.-E.,
Burland, V.,
Plunkett III, G.,
Daniels, D. L.,
and Blattner, F. R.
(1993)
Gene
134,
1-6
|
| 23.
|
Lipinska, B.,
Sharma, S.,
and Georgopoulos, C.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
10053-10067
|
| 24.
|
Lipinska, B.,
Fayet, O.,
Baird, L.,
and Georgopoulos, C.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
1574-1584
|
| 25.
|
Adamska, I.,
Kloppstech, K.,
and Ohad, I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5438-5444
|
| 26.
|
Adamska, I.,
Lindahl, M.,
Roobol-Boza, M.,
and Andersson, B.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
236,
591-599
|
| 27.
|
Lindahl, M.,
Yang, D.-H.,
and Andersson, B.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
231,
503-509
|
| 28.
|
Anastassiou, R.,
and Argyroudi-Akoyunoglou, J. H.
(1995)
Photosynth. Res.
43,
241-250
|
| 29.
|
Ohad, I.,
Kyle, D. J.,
and Arntzen, C. J.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
89,
481-485
|
| 30.
|
Virgin, I.,
Salter, A. H.,
Ghanotakis, D. F.,
and Andersson, B.
(1991)
FEBS
287,
125-128
|
| 31.
|
Spetea, C.,
Hundal, T.,
Lohmann, F.,
and Andersson, B.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6547-6552
|
| 32.
| Yamamoto, Y., and Akasaka, T. (1995) In Photosynthesis: from
light to biosphere, ed. P. Mathis IV, 267-270
|
| 33.
|
Kieber, J. J.,
Rothenberg, M.,
Roman, G.,
Feldmann, K. A.,
and Ecker, J. R.
(1993)
Cell
72,
427-441
|
| 34.
|
Sanger, F.,
Nicklen, S.,
and Coulsen, AS. R.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
5463-5467
|
| 35.
|
Rosenblum, B. B.,
Lee, L. G.,
Spurgeon, S. L.,
Khan, S. H.,
Menchen, S. M.,
Heiner, C. R.,
and Chen, S. M.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
4500-4504
|
| 36.
| Sambrook, J. U., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989)
Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual
|
| 37.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 38.
| Harlow, E., and Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies. A laboratory manual
|
| 39.
|
Clausmeyer, S.,
Klösgen, R. B.,
and Herrmann, R. G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13869-13876
|
| 40.
|
Eichacker, L. A.,
Müller, B.,
and Helfrich, M.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
395,
251-256
|
| 41.
|
Müller, B.,
and Eichacker, L. A.
(1999)
Plant Cell
11,
2365-2378
|
| 42.
|
Kyle, D. J.,
Kuang, T.-Y.,
Watson, J. L.,
and Arntzen, C. J.
(1984)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
765,
89-96
|
| 43.
|
Karnauchov, I.,
Herrmann, R. G.,
and Klösgen, R. B.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
408,
206-210
|
| 44.
|
Mozo, T.,
Fischer, S.,
Meier-Ewert, S.,
Lehrach, H.,
and Altmann, T.
(1998)
Plant J.
16,
377-384
|
| 45.
|
Legen, J.,
Miséra, S.,
Herrmann, R. G.,
and Meurer, J.
(2001)
DNA Res.
8,
53-60
|
| 46.
|
Lütcke, H. A.,
Chow, K. C.,
Mickel, F. S.,
Moss, K. A.,
Kern, H. F.,
and Scheele, G. A.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
43-48
|
| 47.
|
Heijne, G.,
Steppuhn, J.,
and Herrmann, R.
(1989)
Eur. J. Biochem.
180,
535-545
|
| 48.
|
Gavel, Y.,
and von Heijne, G.
(1990)
FEBS
261,
455-458
|
| 49.
|
Karamyschev, A. L.,
Karamyscheva, Z. N.,
Kajava, A. V.,
Ksenzenko, V. N.,
and Nesmeyanova, M. A.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
277,
859-870
|
| 50.
|
Andersson, B.,
and Anderson, J. M.,.
(1980)
Bot. Biophys. Acta
593,
427-440
|
| 51.
|
Yamamoto, Y.,
Doi, M.,
Tamura, N.,
and Nishimura, M.
(1981)
FEBS Lett.
133,
265-268
|
| 52.
|
Singer, S. J.,
and Nicolson, G. L.
(1972)
Science
175,
720-731
|
| 53.
|
Blobel, G.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
1496-1500
|
| 54.
|
Picot, D.,
and Garavito, R. M.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
346,
21-25
|
| 55.
|
Pacaud, M.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
4333-4338
|
| 56.
|
Pacaud, M.
(1982)
J. Bacteriol.
149,
6-14
|
| 57.
|
Slilaty, S. N.,
and Vu, H. K.
(1991)
Protein Engin.
4,
919-92
|
| 58.
|
Paetzel, M.,
and Dalbey, R. E.
(1997)
Trends in Biochem. Sci.
22,
28-31
|
| 59.
|
Ichihara, S.,
Suzuki, T.,
Suzuki, M.,
and Mizushima, S.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
9405-9411
|
| 60.
|
Lindahl, M.,
Spetea, C.,
Hundal, T.,
Oppenheim, A. B.,
Adam, Z.,
and Andersson, B.
(2000)
Plant Cell
12,
419-431
|
| 61.
|
Salter, A. H.,
Virgin, I.,
Hagman, Å.,
and Andersson, B.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
3990-3998
|
| 62.
|
De Las Rivas, J.,
Shipton, C. A.,
Ponticos, M.,
and Barber, J.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
6944-6950
|
| 63.
|
Aro, E.-M.,
Hundal, T.,
Carlberg, I.,
and Andersson, B.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1019,
269-275
|
| 64.
|
Yang, D.-H.,
Webster, J.,
Adam, Z.,
Lindahl, M.,
and Andersson, B.
(1998)
Plant Physiol.
118,
827-834
|
| 65.
|
Kanervo, E.,
Murata, N.,
and Aro, E.-M.
(1998)
Photosynth. Res.
57,
81-91
|
| 66.
|
Tziveleka, L.-A.,
and Argyroudi-Akoyunoglou, J. H.
(1998)
Plant Physiol.
117,
961-970
|
| 67.
|
Suzuki, T.,
Itoh, A.,
Ichihara, S.,
and Mizushima, S.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
2523-2528
|
| 68.
|
Novak, P.,
and Dev, I. K.
(1988)
J. Bacteriol.
170,
5067-5075
|
| 69.
|
Bolhuis, A.,
Matzen, A.,
Hyyryläinen, H.-L.,
Kontinen, V. P.,
Meima, R.,
Chapius, J.,
Venema, G.,
Bron, S.,
Freudl, R.,
and van Dij, J. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
24585-24592
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Horie, H. Ito, M. Kusaba, R. Tanaka, and A. Tanaka
Participation of Chlorophyll b Reductase in the Initial Step of the Degradation of Light-harvesting Chlorophyll a/b-Protein Complexes in Arabidopsis
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 26, 2009;
284(26):
17449 - 17456.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Wetzel, L. D. Harmacek, L. H. Yuan, J. L. M. Wopereis, R. Chubb, and P. Turini
Loss of chloroplast protease SPPA function alters high light acclimation processes in Arabidopsis thaliana L. (Heynh.)
J. Exp. Bot.,
April 6, 2009;
(2009)
erp051v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Majeran, B. Zybailov, A. J. Ytterberg, J. Dunsmore, Q. Sun, and K. J. van Wijk
Consequences of C4 Differentiation for Chloroplast Membrane Proteomes in Maize Mesophyll and Bundle Sheath Cells
Mol. Cell. Proteomics,
September 1, 2008;
7(9):
1609 - 1638.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nosenko, K. L. Lidie, F. M. Van Dolah, E. Lindquist, J.-F. Cheng, US Department of Energy-Joint Genome Institute, and D. Bhattacharya
Chimeric Plastid Proteome in the Florida "Red Tide" Dinoflagellate Karenia brevis
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
November 1, 2006;
23(11):
2026 - 2038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Rudella, G. Friso, J. M. Alonso, J. R. Ecker, and K. J. van Wijk
Downregulation of ClpR2 Leads to Reduced Accumulation of the ClpPRS Protease Complex and Defects in Chloroplast Biogenesis in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL,
July 1, 2006;
18(7):
1704 - 1721.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Giacomelli, A. Rudella, and K. J. van Wijk
High Light Response of the Thylakoid Proteome in Arabidopsis Wild Type and the Ascorbate-Deficient Mutant vtc2-2. A Comparative Proteomics Study
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2006;
141(2):
685 - 701.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Zelisko, M. Garcia-Lorenzo, G. Jackowski, S. Jansson, and C. Funk
AtFtsH6 is involved in the degradation of the light-harvesting complex II during high-light acclimation and senescence
PNAS,
September 20, 2005;
102(38):
13699 - 13704.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Pojidaeva, V. Zinchenko, S. V. Shestakov, and A. Sokolenko
Involvement of the SppA1 Peptidase in Acclimation to Saturating Light Intensities in Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803
J. Bacteriol.,
June 15, 2004;
186(12):
3991 - 3999.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. N. Henderson, J. Zhang, B. W. Evans, and K. Redding
Disassembly and Degradation of Photosystem I in an in Vitro System Are Multievent, Metal-dependent Processes
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 10, 2003;
278(41):
39978 - 39986.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Chassin, E. Kapri-Pardes, G. Sinvany, T. Arad, and Z. Adam
Expression and Characterization of the Thylakoid Lumen Protease DegP1 from Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 2002;
130(2):
857 - 864.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|