![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 36, 33821-33825, September 7, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of
Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
Received for publication, April 26, 2001, and in revised form, June 28, 2001
The smallest known open reading frame
encodes the ribosomal protein L41, which in yeast is composed of only
24 amino acids, 17 of which are arginine or lysine. Because of the
unique problems that might attend the translation of such a short open
reading frame, we have investigated the properties and the translation of the mRNAs encoding L41. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae
L41 is encoded by two linked genes, RPL41A and
RPL41B. These genes give rise to mRNAs that have short
5' leaders of 18 and 22 nucleotides and rather long 3' leaders of 203 and 210 nucleotides not including their poly(A) tails. The mRNAs
are translated exclusively on monosomes, suggesting that ribosomes do
not remain attached to the mRNA after termination of translation.
Calculations based on the abundance of ribosomes and of L41 mRNA
indicate that the entire translation event, from initiation through
termination, must occur in ~2 s. Termination of translation after
only 25 codons does not subject the mRNAs encoding L41 to
nonsense-mediated decay. Surprisingly, despite the L41 ribosomal
protein being conserved from the archaea through the mammalia, S. cerevisiae can grow relatively normally after deletion of both
RPL41A and RPL41B.
Our conventional view of translation is based on mRNAs that
can accommodate several ribosomes to form a polyribosome. During translation, their products will pass through a cavity in the large
subunit of the ribosome, before emerging at the bottom of the subunit.
This passage, originally identified by Yonath et al. (1) and
recently analyzed at high resolution (2), will accommodate some 30-40
amino acids (3). Because nearly all proteins are synthesized as
polypeptides larger than 50 amino acids, they will naturally emerge
from the ribosome during translation and be available for the folding
chaperones (4).
An exception to both these conventions is ribosomal protein L41. L41
was originally purified from the ribosomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identified as a very small, very basic protein that
appeared to have orthologues in the ribosomes of
Schizosaccharomyces pombe and of man. The first 25 amino
acids were sequenced by Edman degradation (5). Surprisingly, cloning of
the gene encoding L41 revealed that these 25 amino acids comprised its
entire open reading frame (6)! Seventeen of its 25 amino acids are Arg or Lys. Thus, L41 is not only the smallest but also the most basic eukaryotic protein. L41 is highly conserved in eukaryotes (7); indeed
its mRNA is among the ten most abundant in a recent serial analysis
of gene expression of human transcripts (8). L41 is present in certain
archaea, e.g. Methanococcus jannaschii (9), but
not in others. No clear orthologue has been found in eubacteria, although a protein with similar properties is present in certain thermophilic eubacteria, e.g. Thermus
thermophilus (10). (BEWARE: the name L41 has also been applied to
a different fungal ribosomal protein, mutant alleles of which can cause
resistance to cycloheximide (11, 12). In the official nomenclature
that protein is now known as L42 (13).)
In S. cerevisiae, L41 is encoded by two genes,
RPL41A and RPL41B (6) (Fig. 1). There is a single
base difference in the ORFs1
of the two genes, Ala-3 being encoded by GCC in RPL41A and
by GCT in RPL41B. However, the two genes differ almost
completely in both the 5'- and 3'-flanking regions. The mRNAs
encoding L41 in S. cerevisiae have been reported to be about
325 nucleotides in length (6), suggesting that they contain substantial
amounts of 5'- and/or 3'-untranslated sequence.
Because of the special features that might be apparent in the
translation of such a short ORF, we have explored in more detail the
mRNAs encoding L41 and their translation. We find that the mRNAs derived from the two genes both have short 5'-UTRs and
unusually long 3'-UTRs. They are translated almost exclusively on
single ribosomes. It is interesting that despite their translation
terminating after only 25 codons the mRNAs encoding L41 are not
subject to nonsense-mediated decay. Although L41 is found widely in
nature, deletion of the two RPL41 genes does not prevent the
growth of S. cerevisiae.
Strains and Growth Conditions--
S. cerevisiae
strain W303: MATa leu2-3,112 his3-11 trp1-1 ura3-1
ade2-1 can1-100 ssd1-1 (14) was used for most studies. For the
experiment in Fig. 3 two derivatives carrying the
upf1::LEU2 gene disruption were used
(15). Cells were grown in either yeast extract-peptone-dextrose or
dropout medium, depending on the plasmid markers.
Northern Blot Analysis--
Northern blot analysis was carried
out as described previously (16). 32P-labeled RNAs were
used as probes for RPL30, ACT1, and
RPL41 mRNAs. Oligonucleotide probes specific for
RPL41A and RPL41B mRNAs and for 18S rRNA and
25S rRNA were end-labeled with polynucleotide kinase and
[ Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE)--
The RACE method
was adopted from Frohman (17), using three adaptor primers referred to
as QT, QO, and QI:
QT:
CCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACGAGGACTCGAGCTCAAGCTTTTT- TTTTTTTTTTT
QO: CCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACG
QI: GAGGACTCGAGCTCAAGC
3'-RACE--
5 µg of total RNA (in a 2-µl volume) was primed
with 40 ng of QT primer and reverse transcribed by 1 µl
(200 units) of MMLV reverse transcriptase in a 10-µl reaction. The
reaction mixture was diluted to 100 µl, and then two consecutive
rounds of PCR amplification were carried out in a 50-µl PCR mixture
(1 mM dNTPs, 1× PCR buffer, 1.5 mM
Mg2+, 2.5 units Taq polymerase). For the first
round PCR, 1 µl of diluted cDNA pool together with 25 pmol of
QO primer and 25 pmol of gene-specific primer 1 were used.
For the second round, 25 pmol of QI primer and 25 pmol
gene-specific primer 2 were used. Oligonucleotides used (See Fig. 1,
lower panel) were:
GSP1(A) GAACCAGACCACATCGATTC
GSP2(A) CGATTCAATCGAAATGAGAGCC
GSP1(B) TCGACTTAATTCCAAATGAG
GSP2(B) GCTAAGTGGAGAAAGAAGAG
5'-RACE--
5 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using
12.5 pmol of gene-specific primer and MMLV reverse transcriptase in a
10-µl reaction. The 5' partial cDNA pool was diluted to 100 µl
purified, concentrated to 10 µl, added to terminal transferase
components (0.5 mM ATP, 1× TdT buffer, 0.5 µl of
terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase) to a final volume of
20 µl, and incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. The product was diluted
to 100 µl of which 1 µl was used for amplification by two rounds of
PCR similar to 3'-RACE. Oligonucleotides used (See Fig. 1, lower
panel) were:
GSP1(A) GAGTTATTTACTCATAATC
GSP2(A) TCCGCTTATTTGGATCTGG
GSP1(B) TAACGATTTGCTCTCAAGC
GSP2(B) TCCGCTTATTTGGATCTGG
Polyribosome Analysis--
Yeast cells were grown in 50 ml of
yeast extract-peptone-dextrose to mid-log phase and chilled by addition
of crushed ice immediately following the addition of cycloheximide (50 µg/ml). The cells were harvested and washed twice in 0.1 M NaCl, 0.03 M MgCl2, 0.01 M Tris, pH 7.4, 50 µg/ml cycloheximide, 200 µg/ml heparin and resuspended in 0.5 ml LHB buffer (0.1 M NaCl,
0.03 M MgCl2, 0.01 M Tris, pH 7.4).
Cells were lysed by vortexing with glass beads and the lysate
centrifuged twice for 15 min. at 15,000 × g. The
supernatant was layered onto a 7-47% sucrose gradient in TMN solution
(0.05 M Tris acetate, pH 7.0, 0.05 M
NH4Cl, 0.012 M MgCl2) and
centrifuged at 4° for 3 h at 39,000 rpm in a SW41 rotor.
Gradients were then collected through an ISCO fractionator into
Eppendorf tubes containing 0.1 ml of 10% SDS. Each fraction was
extracted with hot phenol and the RNA was collected by ethanol, fractionated on a denaturing agarose gel, and subjected to Northern analysis (16).
Primer Extension--
Primer Extension System-AMV Reverse
Transcriptase (Promega) was used for primer extension analysis. 10 pmol
of specific primer was labeled with [ One-step Gene Disruption--
The RPL41 genes were
deleted using a PCR-based one-step gene disruption (18). A set of
oligonucleotides that contain 45 nt of RPL41A flanking
sequence and 23 nt of HIS3 sequence were designed to carry
out PCR using the HIS3 gene in pRS303 as the template. An
analogous set of oligonucleotides for the RPL41B and
URA3 genes were used for PCR using the URA3 gene
of pRS306. Amplified DNA fragments were purified and used to transform
yeast cells by homologous recombination. Transformants were screened on
selective plates.
Southern Blot Analysis--
Total yeast DNA was digested with
EcoRI, separated by electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel,
and transferred onto a Zeta-Probe blotting membrane.
32P-labeled DNA probes were prepared by random primer
extension of a fragment containing either the RPL41A or
RPL41B gene and flanking sequences within the two
EcoRI cutting sites.
RPL41 mRNA Has Unusually Short 5'-UTRs and Unusually Long
3'-UTRs--
To identify the ends of the RPL41 transcripts,
we utilized the RACE method (17). cDNAs representing the
region between a single point in a mRNA transcript and its 3'- or
5'-end were amplified using PCR. Because the coding sequences of the
RPL41 genes are nearly identical, it was necessary to use
gene-specific primers, oriented in the direction of the missing
sequence. Extension of the partial cDNAs from the unknown end of
the message back to the known region is achieved using primers that
anneal to the preexisting or an appended poly(A) tail.
The amplified cDNA fragments were excised from an agarose gel and
sequenced (Fig. 1). Unique sequences were
found, suggesting that there is a single site of initiation and
termination for each gene. Both RPL41A and RPL41B
mRNA have unusually short 5'-UTRs, 22 nucleotides in the case of
RPL41A and 18 nucleotides for RPL41B. By contrast
the 3'-UTRs are unusually long, ~210 and ~203nts for RPL41A and RPL41B, respectively. A similarly long
3'-UTR has been observed for the human transcript encoding L41 (19).
Because the mRNAs end at a series of A residues in the gene
(underlined), the exact site of the cleavage that precedes
the addition of poly(A) is indeterminate. With the addition of ~50
poly(A) residues, the sizes described in Fig. 1 would be consistent
with a published size of 325 nt based on Northern analysis (6).
Although the signals for cleavage and polyadenylation in S. cerevisiae are less rigid than in mammals, three elements have been identified (reviewed in Refs. 20 and 21) and supplemented with an
extensive computer analysis (22). Comparison of the presence of these
signals in the two RPL41 genes is illuminating. An
"upstream" or "efficiency" element, UAUAUA, is present twice in
the A gene but not the B gene. A "positioning" element, AAUAAA, is
present in the B gene but only as a variant, AAUCAA, in the A gene. The
poly(A) site, itself, generally Y(A)n, is present in the B gene but as the variant YG(A)n
in the A gene. Termination at the latter may be enhanced by its
(U)7 element that is reported to facilitate 3'-cleavage and
poly(A) addition (22). Thus, the two genes each possess some but not all of the elements used to denote 3'-cleavage in yeast.
The non-coding sequences of the two genes diverge from position RPL41 mRNA Is Exclusively Translated on Single
Ribosomes--
To ask how RPL41 mRNA is translated, we
carried out a polyribosome analysis. Yeast ribosomes were separated in
a 7-47% sucrose gradient, and total RNA from each fraction was
extracted and subjected to a Northern analysis (Fig.
2). The positions of 18S rRNA and the 25S
rRNA indicate the 40S subunits and the 60S subunits, respectively. ACT1 mRNA, encoding a 478-amino acid protein, is
primarily translated on higher order polyribosomes, most of which have
run to the bottom of the gradient. RPL30 mRNA, encoding
a 104-amino acid protein, is translated largely on dimer and trimer
polysomes. By contrast, RPL41 mRNA, encoding its
25-amino acid protein, is translated exclusively on single ribosomes,
although there is some forward spreading of the peak.
The most recent estimate, based on sensitivity to hydroxyl radicals, is
that about 58 nucleotides of mRNA are protected by a translating
70S-ribosome of Escherichia coli (24). The larger eukaryotic
ribosome would probably protect a somewhat longer stretch. Thus, in
mid-translation a single ribosome should occupy essentially the entire
L41 ORF. When it reaches the termination codon, however, some 50 nucleotides should be available for the binding of a new 43S initiation
complex. The few mRNAs with both a 43S-initiation complex as well
as an 80S-ribosome might account for the forward spreading from the
80S-peak observed in Fig. 2, lower panel. Finally, Fig. 2
suggests that the extensive 3'-UTR does not stably associate with a
ribosome that has terminated translation. Nevertheless, it is possible
that the long 3'-UTR of the RPL41 mRNAs facilitates the
interaction of proteins bound to the 5'-CAP with those bound to
poly(A), as suggested in the "circular" polyribosome model recently
proposed (25).
Small RPL41 Transcripts Are Not Subject to Nonsense-mediated
Decay--
Nonsense mediated decay (NMD) is a highly conserved
mechanism used to rid the cell of mRNAs that are likely to produce
aberrant proteins because of premature stop codons introduced either by mutation or by errors in splicing (reviewed in Ref. 26).
UPF1 is one of the genes essential for NMD. Deletion of
UPF1 results in accumulation of aberrant mRNAs, such as
the unspliced transcripts of the ribosomal protein gene,
CYH2 (27) (Fig. 3). We asked whether the termination codon of either L41-encoding transcript, only
25 codons from the initiator, would invoke NMD. As shown in Fig. 3, it
does not. There is no detectable difference in the level of L41
mRNA between strains carrying a UPF1 or a
upf1::LEU2 allele, while the amount of
pre-CYH2 mRNA increases substantially. Although this is
perhaps to be expected because the L41 mRNAs are "natural",
this result emphasizes the extraordinary subtlety that one must invoke
to explain NMD. The 3'-UTRs of the two L41 transcripts do not appear to
contain a sequence match to the putative downstream elements that
activate NMD (28, 29) although such an element has been identified in
only a small fraction of yeast genes.
Is L41 Essential for Cell Growth?--
Because most ribosomal
proteins are essential, knockout experiments are usually conducted on
diploid strains. On the other hand, in cases such as L41 where there
are two genes, it is generally easier to analyze a double knockout by
mating two single knockout strains and dissecting the resulting spores.
However, in S. cerevisiae the two RPL41 genes are
tightly linked on chromosome IV, separated by only 8 kb. Therefore, we
started with a homozygous diploid strain, first disrupting
RPL41A with a HIS3 marker (see "Materials and
Methods"). Using this strain we disrupted RPL41B with
URA3. We expect that half the URA3 disruptants would be on
the same chromosome as the HIS3 disruptants. After the
second transformation, several colonies that grew on a
Relative Amount of RPL41A and RPL41B Transcripts--
To measure
the contribution of the RPL41A and RPL41B genes
to the cell, we made use of the fact that their mRNAs differ by 4 nt in the length of the 5'-UTR. Thus, the relative amount of the two
transcripts can be assayed by primer extension, using a primer
complementary to a sequence common to both ORFs. The primer used leads
to a 105-nt band from the RPL41A transcript and a 101-nt
band from the RPL41B transcript (Fig.
5). It is apparent that in wild type
cells the ratio of RPL41A mRNA to RPL41B
mRNA is about 2:1. The amount of RPL41A mRNA appears
to be similar to that of RPL30, determined to be about 35 copies/cell (31), leading to an estimate of about 50 mRNAs/cell for
mRNAs encoding L41. This is a useful value because the small L41
ORFs are omitted from many of the measurements of genome-wide
transcription. In heterozygous diploid strains of genotype
RPL41A/rpl41A or RPL41B/rpl41B, the amount of
L41A or L41B mRNA is reduced ~50%,
respectively, as expected. Interestingly, in a haploid
Translation of L41--
A rapidly growing yeast cell has
about 200,000 ribosomes. To accommodate a doubling time of 100 min, it
must synthesize 2000 ribosomes and 2000 molecules of L41 each minute
(33). Our estimate (Fig. 5) of 50-60 mRNAs/cell encoding L41 means
that each L41 mRNA is translated 30-40 times/min. Thus, the
entire translational process, from initiation through termination, must
occupy no more than about 2 s. Perhaps the extended 3'-UTR is
necessary for the short L41 mRNA to circularize during translation
through interaction of poly(A) binding protein and eIF4G (25).
The structure of the exit passage of the large ribosomal subunit has
been solved to 2.4 Å resolution (2). The passage is relatively narrow
and tortuous, lined almost entirely with RNA helices. It is remarkable
that L41 traverses this passage despite a) its high concentration of
positive charge that should interact electrostatically with the walls
of the passage, and b) its short length that should preclude
its interaction with chaperonins at the surface of the ribosome that
could assist its exit (4).
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants GM25532 (to J. R. W.) and CA13330 (to the Albert
Einstein Cancer Center).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 718-430-3022;
Fax: 718-430-8597; E-mail: warner@aecom.yu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 12, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103772200
The abbreviations used are:
ORF, open reading
frame;
UTR, untranslated region;
RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA
ends;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
nt, nucleotide(s);
NMD, nonsense
mediated decay;
kb, kilobase(s).
Expression of a Micro-protein*
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS and DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS and DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS and DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP.
-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol) using 10 units of T4 polynucleotide kinase, annealed to
10 µg of total RNA, and reverse transcribed using 1 unit of avian
myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase in a 20-µl reaction at
42 °C for 30 min. Primer extension products were electrophoresed on
a denaturing 8% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea.
The gel was dried and exposed in a phosphorimaging cassette.
![]()
RESULTS and DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS and DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (72K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The full-length of RPL41
cDNAs. Upper panel, gel analysis of
the 5' and 3' partial cDNAs of RPL41 after two rounds of
RACE (17) is shown. Lower panel, sequence of
RPL41 cDNAs is shown. The sequences of the transcripts
are in uppercase letters; the flanking sequences
are in lowercase. The coding sequences are in
bold with the single nucleotide difference
underlined. Numbers are the lengths of the 5'- and the
3'-ends from ATG and UAA, respectively. The signals that may be
involved in 3'-cleavage (20, 22) are also pointed out.
UE, upstream or efficiency element; PE,
positioning element (see "Materials and Methods").
3
upstream of the ORF and from position +8 downstream of the ORF. Indeed,
their putative transcription factor binding sites, from positions
200
to
600, differ substantially (23). Yet, the sum of the effects of
transcription factor binding sites, transcription initiation sites, and
3'-cleavage signals provide just the appropriate amount of mRNA to
enable equimolar synthesis of L41 with the other ribosomal proteins
(see below).

View larger version (110K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Dynamics of the translation of the
RPL41 ORF. A lysate of wild type cells was
subjected to sucrose gradient analysis of its polyribosomes
(lower panel). The sedimentation direction is shown by an
arrow. Peaks from left to right
represent respectively the 40S subunits, 60S subunits, 80S single
ribosomes, dimers, trimers, etc. Total RNA was prepared from each
fraction and subjected to Northern analysis, and the resulting blot was
probed for 25S rRNA, 18S rRNA, ACT1 mRNA,
RPL30 mRNA ,and RPL41 mRNA (upper
panel).

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
RPL41 transcripts are not subject to
nonsense-mediated decay. Total RNAs were extracted from either a
wild type (lane 1) or two Dupf1 strains (see
"Materials and Methods") (lanes 2 and 3). The
blot was probed by
-32P-labeled oligonucleotide probes
specific for RPL41, RPS3, RPS30, CYH2 (also known
as RPL28), and the snoRNA U3 as a loading control.
CYH2 gives two bands: the upper one is the
unspliced transcript that is subject to nonsense-mediated decay. The
values on the right represent the average of four
determinations of the ratio of the mRNA in a upf1 strain
compared with a UPF1 strain (in all cases normalized to
U3).
His
Ura plate were subjected to PCR to identify colonies in
which both the HIS3 and URA3 genes had integrated
into the correct loci (data not shown). These double mutants were
sporulated, and the resulting tetrads were analyzed. Unexpectedly,
colonies with the genotype His+Ura+ survived. A
Southern blot (Fig. 4) as well as primer
extension (see below) demonstrated that both RPL41A and
RPL41B had been successfully deleted. The haploid double
mutant grows well on a
His
Ura plate at 30 °C as well as
at 23 °C or 37 °C, showing that it is neither heat- nor
cold-sensitive. As with most ribosomal proteins, the function of
L41 is still unknown. Yet, it is surprising that this highly
conserved protein seems almost entirely dispensable for growth. On the
other hand, there is a report that L41 may be absent from the proteome
of Caenorhabditis elegans (30), suggesting that it is not
essential even in higher organisms. Unfortunately, the one
high-resolution structure of the large subunit is from Haloarcula
marismortui, (2) an archaeon that appears not to have a version of
L41.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Southern blot analysis of the
RPL41 deletion strains. Genomic DNAs of the
indicated strains were extracted, digested by EcoRI, and
separated on a 0.8% agarose gel, and the RPL41A and
RPL41B genes were identified with a random primer probe made
against the L41 ORF. The 1.2- and 3.1-kb bands in wild type represent
the EcoRI fragments of RPL41A and
RPL41B, respectively. The 2.2- and the 4.0-kb bands indicate
the insertion of HIS3 into RPL41A and
URA3 into RPL41B. D,
heterozygous diploid; H, haploid.
RPL41A strain the amount of L41B transcript
increases about 35%, suggesting some measure of dosage compensation as
has been shown for CRY2, encoding ribosomal protein S14
(32). No obvious change in the level of L41 mRNA was observed in a
haploid
RPL41B strain, perhaps reflecting the relatively
larger amount of RPL41A transcript that is normally present.
In the double knockout strain, no mRNA-encoding L41 is detected.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Primer extension analysis of RPL41
transcripts. 10 mg of total RNA from the indicated strains
were used as template. A primer complementary to a sequence common to
both RPL41A and RPL41B near the 3'-end of the
ORFs was end-labeled and used for reverse transcription to give a
105-nt band from RPL41A transcripts and a 101-nt band from
RPL41B transcripts. A primer specific for RPL30
was also labeled and included in the reverse transcription reactions as
a control. It yields a 67-nt band. The gel was quantified by
phosphorimaging analysis, and the L41 bands in each lane were
normalized first to that of L30 and then to wild type. D,
heterozygous diploid; H, haploid.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Current address: Bioinformatics Research Center, Campus Box
7566/1501 Partners II Bldg., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7566.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS and DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Yonath, A.,
Leonard, K. R.,
and Wittmann, H. G.
(1987)
Science
236,
813-816
2.
Ban, N.,
Nissen, P.,
Hansen, J.,
Moore, P. B.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(2000)
Science
289,
905-920
3.
Malkin, L. I.,
and Rich, A.
(1967)
J. Mol. Biol.
26,
329-346
4.
McCallum, C. D.,
Do, H.,
Johnson, A. E.,
and Frydman, J.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
591-602
5.
Otaka, E.,
Higo, K.,
and Itoh, T.
(1984)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
195,
544-546
6.
Suzuki, K.,
Hashimoto, T.,
and Otaka, E.
(1990)
Curr. Genet.
17,
185-190
7.
Chan, Y. L.,
Olvera, J.,
and Wool, I. G.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
214,
810-818
8.
Velculescu, V. E.,
Madden, S. L.,
Zhang, L.,
Lash, A. E., Yu, J.,
Rago, C.,
Lal, A.,
Wang, C. J.,
Beaudry, G. A.,
Ciriello, K. M.,
Cook, B. P.,
Dufault, M. R.,
Ferguson, A. T.,
Gao, Y.,
He, T. C.,
Hermeking, H.,
Hiraldo, S. K.,
Hwang, P. M.,
Lopez, M. A.,
Luderer, H. F.,
Mathews, B.,
Petroziello, J. M.,
Polyak, K.,
Zawel, L.,
and Kinzler, K. W.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
23,
387-388
9.
Bult, C. J.,
White, O.,
Olsen, G. J.,
Zhou, L.,
Fleischmann, R. D.,
Sutton, G. G.,
Blake, J. A.,
FitzGerald, L. M.,
Clayton, R. A.,
Gocayne, J. D.,
Kerlavage, A. R.,
Dougherty, B. A.,
Tomb, J. F.,
Adams, M. D.,
Reich, C. I.,
Overbeek, R.,
Kirkness, E. F.,
Weinstock, K. G.,
Merrick, J. M.,
Glodek, A.,
Scott, J. L.,
Geoghagen, N. S.,
and Venter, J. C.
(1996)
Science
273,
1058-1073
10.
Choli, T.,
Franceschi, F.,
Yonath, A.,
and Wittmann-Liebold, B.
(1993)
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
374,
377-383
11.
Kawai, S.,
Murao, S.,
Mochizuki, M.,
Shibuya, I.,
Yano, K.,
and Takagi, M.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
254-262
12.
Dehoux, P.,
Davies, J.,
and Cannon, M.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
213,
841-848
13.
Mager, W. H.,
Planta, R. J.,
Ballesta, J. P.,
Lee, J. C.,
Mizuta, K.,
Suzuki, K.,
Warner, J. R.,
and Woolford, J. L., Jr.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
4872-4875
14.
Thomas, B. J.,
and Rothstein, R.
(1989)
Cell
56,
619-630
15.
Vilardell, J.,
Chartrand, P.,
Singer, R. A.,
and Warner, J. R.
(2000)
RNA
6,
1773-1780
16.
Li, B.,
Nierras, C. R.,
and Warner, J. R.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
5393-5404
17.
Frohman, M. A.
(1994)
PCR Methods Applications
4,
S40-S58
18.
Lorenz, M. C.,
Muir, R. S.,
Lim, E.,
McElver, J.,
Weber, S. C.,
and Heitman, J.
(1995)
Gene
158,
113-117
19.
Klaudiny, J.,
von der, K. H.,
and Scheit, K. H.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
187,
901-906
20.
Guo, Z.,
and Sherman, F.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
477-481
21.
Zhao, J.,
Hyman, L.,
and Moore, C.
(1999)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63,
405-445
22.
Graber, J. H.,
Cantor, C. R.,
Mohr, S. C.,
and Smith, T. F.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
14055-14060
23.
Lascaris, R. F.,
Mager, W. H.,
and Planta, R. J.
(1999)
Bioinformatics
15,
267-277
24.
Huttenhofer, A.,
and Noller, H. F.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3892-3901
25.
Wells, S. E.,
Hillner, P. E.,
Vale, R. D.,
and Sachs, A. B.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
2,
135-140
26.
Czaplinski, K.,
Ruiz-Echevarria, M. J.,
Gonzalez, C. I.,
and Peltz, S. W.
(1999)
BioEssays
21,
685-696
27.
He, F.,
Peltz, S. W.,
Donahue, J. L.,
Rosbash, M.,
and Jacobson, A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
7034-7038
28.
Hagan, K. W.,
Ruiz-Echevarria, M. J.,
Quan, Y.,
and Peltz, S. W.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
809-823
29.
Zhang, S.,
Ruiz-Echevarria, M. J.,
Quan, Y.,
and Peltz, S. W.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2231-2244
30.
Wheelan, S. J.,
Boguski, M. S.,
Duret, L.,
and Makalowski, W.
(1999)
Gene
238,
163-170
31.
Holstege, F. C. P.,
Jennings, E. G.,
Wyrick, J. J.,
Lee, T. I.,
Hengartner, C. J.,
Green, M. R.,
Golub, T. R.,
Lander, E. S.,
and Young, R. A.
(1998)
Cell
95,
717-728
32.
Li, Z.,
Paulovich, A. G.,
and Woolford, J. L., Jr.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
6454-6464
33.
Warner, J. R.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
437-440
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Chaudhuri, K. Vyas, P. Kapasi, A. A. Komar, J. D. Dinman, S. Barik, and B. Mazumder Human ribosomal protein L13a is dispensable for canonical ribosome function but indispensable for efficient rRNA methylation RNA, December 1, 2007; 13(12): 2224 - 2237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chowdhury, J. Mukhopadhyay, and S. Tharun The decapping activator Lsm1p-7p-Pat1p complex has the intrinsic ability to distinguish between oligoadenylated and polyadenylated RNAs RNA, July 1, 2007; 13(7): 998 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Silva, F. J.C. Pereira, A. Morgado, J. Kong, R. Martins, P. Faustino, S. A. Liebhaber, and L. Romao The canonical UPF1-dependent nonsense-mediated mRNA decay is inhibited in transcripts carrying a short open reading frame independent of sequence context RNA, December 1, 2006; 12(12): 2160 - 2170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Inacio, A. L. Silva, J. Pinto, X. Ji, A. Morgado, F. Almeida, P. Faustino, J. Lavinha, S. A. Liebhaber, and L. Romao Nonsense Mutations in Close Proximity to the Initiation Codon Fail to Trigger Full Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32170 - 32180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. MacKay, X. Li, M. R. Flory, E. Turcott, G. L. Law, K. A. Serikawa, X. L. Xu, H. Lee, D. R. Goodlett, R. Aebersold, et al. Gene Expression Analyzed by High-resolution State Array Analysis and Quantitative Proteomics: Response of Yeast to Mating Pheromone Mol. Cell. Proteomics, May 1, 2004; 3(5): 478 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. MESKAUSKAS, J. W. HARGER, K. L. MULDOON JACOBS, and J. D. DINMAN Decreased peptidyltransferase activity correlates with increased programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting and viral maintenance defects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA, August 1, 2003; 9(8): 982 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Arava, Y. Wang, J. D. Storey, C. L. Liu, P. O. Brown, and D. Herschlag Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomycescerevisiae PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 3889 - 3894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dresios, P. Panopoulos, K. Suzuki, and D. Synetos A Dispensable Yeast Ribosomal Protein Optimizes Peptidyltransferase Activity and Affects Translocation J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3314 - 3322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |