![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 36, 33847-33853, September 7, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
§,
From the
Department Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
63104, the § Biological Research Center, Hungarian Academy
of Sciences, Szeged, H-6701 Hungary, and the ¶ Department
of Biopharmaceutical Science and Pharmaceutical Chemistry,
University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
Received for publication, February 19, 2001, and in revised form, May 30, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Phosphorylation of the MAPK isoform ERK by G
protein-coupled receptors involves multiple signaling pathways.
One of these pathways entails growth factor receptor transactivation
followed by ERK activation. This study demonstrates that a similar
signaling pathway is used by the µ-opioid receptor (MOR) expressed in
HEK293 cells and involves calmodulin (CaM). Stimulation of MOR resulted in both epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and ERK
phosphorylation. Data obtained with inhibitors of EGFR Tyr kinase and
membrane metalloproteases support an intermediate role of EGFR
activation, involving release of endogenous membrane-bound epidermal
growth factor. Previous studies had demonstrated a role for CaM in
opioid signaling based on direct CaM binding to MOR. To test whether CaM contributes to EGFR transactivation and ERK phosphorylation by MOR,
we compared wild-type MOR with mutant K273A MOR, which binds CaM
poorly, but couples normally to G proteins. Stimulation of K273A MOR
with
[D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin
(10-100 nM) resulted in significantly reduced ERK phosphorylation. Furthermore, wild-type MOR stimulated EGFR Tyr phosphorylation 3-fold more than K273A MOR, indicating that direct CaM-MOR interaction plays a key role in the transactivation process. Inhibitors of CaM and protein kinase C also attenuated
[D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin-induced
EGFR transactivation in wild-type (but not mutant) MOR-expressing
cells. This novel pathway of EGFR transactivation may be shared by
other G protein-coupled receptors shown to interact with
CaM.
Calmodulin (CaM)1 is a
Ca2+-binding protein known to play a role as an
intracellular Ca2+ sensor of many cellular processes such
as cytoskeletal organization, vesicular trafficking, mitogenesis, and
gene expression (1-3). Multiple interactions of CaM with proteins
involved in signal transduction by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)
indicate that it plays an extensive role in signaling (4-15). However,
evidence for direct binding of CaM to GPCRs has emerged only recently. A CaM-binding site has been located on the C-terminal region of subtypes 5 and 7 of the metabotropic glutamate receptors and the third
intracellular loop of the dopamine D2 receptors MOR and DOR (8-11,
13). Wang et al. (10) proposed that peptide motifs for
binding to G The ERK phosphorylation cascade ranks among the main signaling pathways
involved in mitogenic responses to external stimuli. This cascade
entails receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling pathways as well as a
highly interconnected network of multiple signals including input from
GPCRs (16). Diverse mechanisms are involved in these heterologous
signaling pathways. The GPCR signaling pathways to RTK-ERK activation
include adaptor proteins such as Grb2 and Shc; the GTP/GDP exchange
factor SOS; and the low molecular weight G protein Ras, which complexes
with Raf, a MEK kinase in many cell types.
The GPCR-mediated activation of the ERK phosphorylation cascade can be
initiated by release of either heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein
Gi/o GPCR signaling can converge at an early stage of the RTK pathway.
Recently, it has been reported that GPCR agonists can induce ERK
activation via tyrosine phosphorylation of the RTK itself (29-35).
Transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) appears
to occur via a plasma membrane-bound metalloprotease involved in
processing of EGF-like precursor molecules anchored on the cell surface
(36, 37). A similar EGFR transactivation mechanism involving an
autocrine metalloprotease-dependent release of
heparin-binding EGF resulting from insulin-like growth factor stimulation has been proposed (38).
Ca2+/CaM strongly influences MAPK pathways and particularly
that of ERK, the MAPK isozyme implicated in cell proliferation
(39-43). Ca2+/CaM can modulate Src activity and directly
or indirectly affect Ras activity or signaling elements downstream of
Ras. Ca2+/CaM can activate Ras by binding to guanine
nucleotide exchange factors (44, 45). On the other hand, CaM inhibitors
block EGF stimulation of ERK phosphorylation at an undefined site
downstream of Src and Ras, but upstream of Raf and MEK in HEK293 cells
(39). CaM antagonists abolish wild-type Raf kinase activity, and
CaM-Sepharose precipitates some (but not all) isoforms of Raf in PC12
cell lysates (46).
Calcium also plays a role in GPCR cross-talk with growth factor
pathways. However, the mechanisms involved in Ca2+/CaM
regulation of ERK via GPCRs and RTKs remain to be elucidated. Ca2+/CaM-dependent pathways have been
implicated in Gi/o- and Gq-coupled receptor-mediated Ras-dependent ERK activation (39,
41-43). Inhibition with Ca2+/CaM-dependent
kinases and phosphodiesterases does not interfere with
5-hydroxytryptamine type 1A receptor-mediated ERK activation or
bradykinin-induced EGFR transactivation (39, 40). It remains to be
clarified whether CaM affects GPCR-mediated ERK phosphorylation only at
points downstream of RTKs, at steps involved in transactivation of
RTKs, or within a GPCR pathway that bypasses RTKs. This question is
addressed here with MOR.
Interactions between opioid receptors and Ca2+/CaM occur in
some signaling pathways. Morphine and enkephalin were shown to regulate cellular redistribution of CaM in brain and in NG108-15 cell cultures (47, 48). In NG108-15 cells, DOR stimulates cAMP phosphodiesterase activity via a Ca2+/CaM-dependent enzyme (49).
CaM kinase II, a serine/threonine-dependent protein kinase,
can desensitize opioid receptors (50, 51). Morphine treatment increases
the expression of CaM kinase II in rat hippocampus, but not in some
other brain regions (52); and inhibition of CaM kinase II in rat
hippocampus attenuates morphine tolerance and dependence (53). Wang
et al. (10) discovered that by binding to the third
intracellular loop of MOR and DOR, Ca2+/CaM interferes with
G protein coupling. Agonist binding to the receptor precipitates the
release of CaM from the plasma membrane and its translocation to the
nucleus (54). Upon agonist stimulation of a mutant MOR (K273A MOR) that
binds CaM poorly, CaM is not released from the plasma membrane into the
cytosol, whereas the wild-type and mutant MORs stimulate free cytosolic
Ca2+ to a similar extent (10). Thus, a novel signaling
pathway for opioid receptors has been proposed involving CaM as a
possible second messenger.
Here we present evidence for the presence of a major
CaM-dependent and a minor CaM-independent MOR-mediated ERK
signaling pathway that involve transactivation of EGFR as an
intermediate step. EGFR transactivation by MOR appears to involve
direct CaM-MOR interactions.
Chemicals--
Chemicals were purchased from Sigma with the
following exceptions. DAMGO was obtained from Multiple Peptide Systems
(San Diego, CA). Diprenorphine was from National Institute on Drug
Abuse Drug Supply (Research Triangle, NC).
[3H]Diprenorphine (58 Ci/mmol) was from PerkinElmer Life
Sciences. EGF (human recombinant) was from Life Technologies, Inc. The
CaM inhibitor W-7, tyrphostin AG 1478, and bisindolylmaleimide I (GF 109203X (GFX)) were from Calbiochem. Anti-phospho-ERK antibody from
Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA); anti-ERK1 antibody was from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); anti-EGFR antibody (sheep
polyclonal or mouse monoclonal) was from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.
(Lake Placid, NY); and anti-phospho-EGFR antibody (activated form,
mouse monoclonal) was from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY).
Both forms of the EGFR antibodies detect the human growth factor
receptor. Protein G Plus A-Agarose suspension was purchased from
Oncogene Research Products (Cambridge, MA).
Cell Culture Growth--
HEK293 cells were grown at 37 °C in
a humidified CO2 (5%) incubator in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium and Ham's nutrient mixture F-12 containing 10% fetal
bovine serum. Stably transfected HEK293 cells expressing either the
empty vector (pcDNA3) or plasmids containing N-terminal FLAG-tagged
human wild-type or mutant K273A MOR or rat MOR were maintained in
medium containing 200 µg/ml G418 as described (10). Stably
transfected HEK293 cells with rat MOR and coexpressing
CaM-Zeo( Binding Assays--
HEK293 cells expressing MOR or MOR mutants
were collected and spun at 3000 × g for 5 min, and the
cell pellets were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. After
repeating the centrifugation, cells were suspended in ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and immediately used in binding
assays. Cells (0.3-3 × 105 cells/200 µl) were
incubated with saturating concentrations (3-10 nM) of
[3H]diprenorphine at 20 °C for 1 h in a final
volume of 250 µl. Nonspecific binding was measured in the presence of
10 µM diprenorphine. Both tritiated and unlabeled ligands
were diluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 1%
bovine serum albumin. Reactions were terminated by adding 5 ml of
ice-cold buffer, followed by rapid filtration over GF/B filters using a
Brandel cell harvester. Filters were washed twice with ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and then counted. Proteins were
extracted from cells with NaOH, and their levels were determined. Data
were analyzed with the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test
using GraphPAD Prism software.
ERK Assays--
ERK activity was measured by immunoblotting as
described (26, 27, 55). Briefly, cultures were pretreated with
different inhibitors, followed by DAMGO or EGF addition as described in the figure legends. Cells were then washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 40 mM EGFR Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting--
Cells were
serum-starved for 24 h and treated with DAMGO (0.1 µM, 10 min) or EGF (0.1 µg/ml, 5 min). In some
experiments, cells were pretreated with tyrphostin AG 1478 (0.1 µM) and then exposed to DAMGO (0.1 µM, 10 min). Cultures were lysed using a modified radioimmune precipitation
assay buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1%
Nonidet P-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; 1 µg/ml each leupeptin and aprotinin, 1 mM
Na3VO4, and 1 mM NaF. Cell lysates
of 0.8-1.5 mg of protein (diluted to ~1 µg/µl) were used. EGFR
was immunoprecipitated by adding 5-10 µg of either mouse monoclonal
or sheep polyclonal anti-EGFR antibody to the lysates and incubating
overnight at 4 °C. This step was followed by addition of a 50-µl
suspension of protein G Plus A-Agarose beads per sample and incubation
for 3-4 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times with
phosphate-buffered saline, resuspended in SDS loading buffer, and
boiled for 5 min before SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Proteins were blotted on Immobilon PTM polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes with a 1:200 or 1:400 dilution of
anti-phospho-EGFR antibody (active form) and then 1:2000 diluted horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. As described above, bands were visualized using the ECL detection system.
[35S]GTP cAMP Assays--
cAMP measurements were performed by
radioimmunoassay in suspensions of HEK293 cells as described (56).
Protein Assay and Statistical Analysis--
Protein
concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford (57) with
bovine serum albumin (1 mg/ml) as the standard. Statistical
determinations were made by Student's t test analysis using
GraphPAD Prism software.
Time and Concentration Dependence of DAMGO Modulation of ERK
Phosphorylation in Wild-type and Mutant K273A MOR-transfected HEK293
Cells--
Cells were treated with DAMGO for the times indicated in
Fig. 1A and then collected,
lysed, and assayed for ERK phosphorylation by immunoblotting. Wild-type
MOR showed a time course of ERK phosphorylation by DAMGO with a maximum
between 5 and 10 min. Mutant K273A MOR gave a similar time course (data
not shown). To compare wild-type and mutant MOR-mediated ERK
phosphorylation at different DAMGO concentrations, experiments on the
two cell lines were run on the same gel (Fig. 1B). At all
concentrations tested, DAMGO-induced ERK phosphorylation was greater in
wild-type than in mutant K273A MOR-transfected cells (Fig.
1C). At nanomolar levels of DAMGO, the CaM-insensitive
mutant MOR stimulated less ERK phosphorylation, whereas at micromolar
levels, differences between the wild-type and mutant MORs were
attenuated.
Since differences in efficacy between the wild-type and mutant MORs may
be due to the presence of different levels of expressed MOR, we
determined binding parameters for both receptors. Binding data
generated using wild-type and mutant MOR-expressing cells and the
antagonist [3H]diprenorphine suggested the presence of
similar levels of expressed MOR in wild-type (1.24 ± 0.28 pmol/mg
of protein) and mutant K273A (1.57 ± 0.19 pmol/mg of protein)
cell lines. This finding confirmed previous binding studies performed
with the same cells by Wang et al. (10).
[35S]GTP DAMGO- and EGF-induced ERK Phosphorylation Is Reduced in
CaM-antisense- and Rat MOR-cotransfected HEK293 Cells--
Since CaM
binds to MOR and appears to influence ERK signaling, we conducted
[35S]GTP The PKC Inhibitor GFX Differentially Affects DAMGO-induced ERK
Phosphorylation in Wild-type and Mutant MOR-transfected HEK293
Cells--
Since PKC, like CaM, is an important
Ca2+-binding protein that has been implicated in GPCR
activation of MAPKs, its possible involvement in this MOR signaling
pathway was tested. GFX, a relatively selective inhibitor of PKC, was
added to the media of wild-type and mutant MOR-transfected cells prior
to DAMGO exposure. Although GFX alone did not affect basal levels, it
inhibited DAMGO-induced phosphorylation of ERK in the wild-type
MOR-transfected cells (Fig. 4). In
contrast to wild-type MOR, GFX did not reduce mutant MOR signaling.
Tyrphostin AG 1478 Inhibits DAMGO- and EGF-induced ERK
Phosphorylation in Wild-type and Mutant K273A MOR-transfected HEK293
Cells--
To determine whether MOR-mediated activation of ERK
requires EGFR transactivation, we treated cells with the EGFR Tyr
kinase inhibitor tyrphostin AG 1478, followed by DAMGO, and measured ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 5). Again,
DAMGO was less effective in stimulating ERK activation via the mutant
compared with wild-type MOR. Tyrphostin AG 1478 alone attenuated basal
levels of ERK phosphorylation by 50% (n = 4-7;
p < 0.05), suggesting the existence of tonic autocrine
RTK activation. Similarly, tyrphostin AG 1478 reduced DAMGO-stimulated
ERK phosphorylation in both wild-type and mutant MOR-expressing cells,
suggesting that an EGFR transactivation mechanism may be involved in
both cases.
The Metalloprotease Inhibitors o-Phenanthroline and Phosphoramidon
Inhibit DAMGO-induced ERK Phosphorylation in Wild-type (but Not Mutant
K273A) MOR-transfected HEK293 Cells--
As discussed in the
Introduction, metalloproteases are involved in the shedding of some
endogenously expressed growth factor-like ligands from their plasma
membrane anchor. The use of metalloprotease inhibitors could provide
additional information on the involvement of growth factor receptor
activation by endogenously released ligands. Therefore, wild-type and
mutant K273A MOR-transfected HEK293 cells were pretreated with either
o-phenanthroline or phosphoramidon for 1 h before
exposure to DAMGO. Both inhibitors when used alone diminished basal
levels of ERK phosphorylation by 40-60% (n = 3-6;
p < 0.05), consistent with the existence of tonic
autocrine RTK activation as seen with tyrphostin. Moreover, as shown in Fig. 6, o-phenanthroline or
phosphoramidon affected DAMGO stimulation of ERK phosphorylation in the
wild-type line, but not in the mutant line. These data support the
hypothesis that wild-type MOR signals to ERK via at least two EGFR
transactivation mechanisms. A major EGFR-dependent pathway
to ERK appears to involve CaM-MOR interactions and membrane
metalloproteases.
DAMGO Induces Different Levels of EGFR Phosphorylation in Wild-type
and Mutant K273A MOR-transfected HEK293 Cells--
To further support
the hypothesis that DAMGO-induced MOR-stimulated ERK occurs via a
mechanism involving transactivation of EGFR, we determined whether the
µ-agonist induces phosphorylation of the growth factor receptor. For
this purpose, wild-type and mutant K273A MOR-transfected HEK293 cells
were exposed to DAMGO or EGF, and EGFR was immunoprecipitated.
Immunoblotting performed with anti-phospho-EGFR antibody revealed that
DAMGO stimulated a 4-fold increase in EGFR phosphorylation in wild-type
MOR cell lines compared with control cells (Fig.
7A). If cells were pretreated with tyrphostin AG 1478 before exposure to DAMGO, the EGFR
phosphorylation by DAMGO was diminished. DAMGO-induced EGFR
phosphorylation was only 30% in cells expressing the CaM
binding-deficient mutant MOR in comparison with the wild-type MOR (Fig.
7A). The data are in good agreement with the differential
rates of DAMGO-induced ERK phosphorylation by wild-type and mutant MORs
(Fig. 1, B and C).
Inhibitors of CaM and PKC Reduce DAMGO-induced EGFR Phosphorylation
in Wild-type (but Not Mutant K273A) MOR-transfected HEK293
Cells--
Since CaM binding to MOR appears to regulate its signaling
to ERK, it is important to determine whether there is a
CaM-dependent step preceding EGFR transactivation. To this
end, wild-type and mutant MOR-transfected cells were preincubated with
the CaM inhibitor W-7, and DAMGO-induced EGFR phosphorylation was
measured. W-7 significantly attenuated EGFR phosphorylation by DAMGO in
wild-type MOR-transfected cells, but failed to do so in mutant cells
(Fig. 7B). Similarly, the PKC inhibitor GFX also attenuated
MOR-mediated EGFR phosphorylation in wild-type MOR-transfected
cells, but not in mutant cells. These findings support the notion of a
CaM- and PKC-dependent step in the MOR signaling pathway
leading to EGFR transactivation in HEK293 cells.
The Metalloprotease Inhibitor o-Phenanthroline Differentially
Attenuates DAMGO-induced EGFR Phosphorylation in Rat
MOR-transfected and Rat MOR/CaM-antisense-cotransfected HEK293
Cells--
To obtain additional evidence for the CaM dependence of
DAMGO-induced EGFR phosphorylation and to determine the combined effect of low CaM levels and the presence of the metalloprotease inhibitor in
the process, experiments were also performed with HEK293 cells expressing rat MOR cotransfected with the CaM-antisense construct. Pretreatment of cells with o-phenanthroline reduced
DAMGO-induced EGFR phosphorylation in the wild-type rat MOR line, but
not in cells cotransfected with CaM-antisense (Fig. 7C). The
data support our previous evidence for CaM-dependent MOR
transactivation of EGFR.
The data presented here provide evidence that direct CaM
interactions with MOR play a role in opioid modulation of ERK
activation in HEK293 cells. The MOR-mediated pathway proceeds via a
CaM- and PKC-sensitive transactivation of EGFR and appears to involve the activation of metalloproteases and release of endogenous EGF-like factors (Fig. 8). This novel signaling
pathway is supported by the following findings of this study. 1)
DAMGO-induced ERK phosphorylation was greater in wild-type than in
mutant K273A MOR-transfected cells. 2) CaM-antisense inhibited
DAMGO-induced ERK phosphorylation. 3) Inhibition by tyrphostin AG 1478, o-phenanthroline, and phosphoramidon implicated EGFR
transactivation in MOR signaling to ERK. 4) More definitive evidence
for MOR-mediated EGFR transactivation was gained by demonstrating that
DAMGO induced tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and CaM are similar to each other, raising the possibility that GPCR-CaM interactions could represent a common phenomenon.

-subunits or Gq
-subunits and
often involves PKC along with non-receptor tyrosine kinases such as
PYK2 and Src (17-21). Similar ERK activation pathways have been
reported for the opioid family of GPCRs (22-28).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
)pcDNA3 (antisense; referred to below as
CaM-antisense) plasmids were maintained in medium containing 100 µg/ml ZeocinTM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as described
(10). Cells were routinely seeded in six-well plates for at least
48 h prior to maintenance in serum-free medium for 24 h. For
ERK experiments, serum-free medium was changed in all wells at the time
of pretreatment with inhibitor.
-glycerophosphate, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM sodium vanadate, 1%
Nonidet P-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 20 µg/ml each aprotinin and leupeptin. Lysates were spun at 14,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the protein concentration of
the supernatants was determined. Cell lysates (20-30 µg of
protein/lane) were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. Proteins were blotted on Immobilon PTM
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA).
Nonspecific sites were blocked with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline
and 0.2% Tween 20 (TBST). Blots were then washed three times with TBST
and incubated with anti-phospho-ERK antibody, diluted 1:2000 in TBST
for at least 15 h at 4 °C. After three washes with TBST, blots
were incubated with 1:2000 diluted horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature. Bands
were visualized using an ECL detection system (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) and exposure to Classic Blue sensitive x-ray film (Molecular
Technologies, St. Louis, MO). For assurance of equivalent total ERK
protein/lane, representative blots were stripped (0.2 M
glycine (pH 2.5), 60 min at room temperature) and exposed to antibodies
for ERK1, followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit IgG. Band intensities were determined by densitometric analysis using an Eastman Kodak DC120 digital camera (1.2 megapixels), Kodak ds 1D Version 3.0.2 software (Scientific Imaging Systems, New
Haven, CT), and Image software for Windows, a modification of
NIH Image Version 1.62 (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD).
S Binding
Studies--
[35S]GTP
S assays were conducted on
membranes prepared from HEK293 cells as described (10). Cell membranes
(10 µg) were incubated with different concentrations of morphine in
assay buffer containing 10 mM HEPES, 100 mM
NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 nM
[35S]GTP
S, and 1 µM GDP at 35 °C for
5 min. Reactions were stopped by centrifugation, and radioactivity was
measured by liquid scintillation counting.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Time course and concentration dependence of
DAMGO modulation of ERK phosphorylation in wild-type and mutant K273A
MOR-transfected HEK293 cells. Cells were treated with varying
concentrations of DAMGO and for different times as indicated. Cell
lysates (20-30 µg of protein) were resolved by 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Immunoblotting was performed
with anti-phospho-ERK antibody. A, time dependence of DAMGO
(1 µM) modulation of ERK phosphorylation in wild-type MOR
cells. The gel is a representative immunoblot showing the
phosphorylated ERK bands. The graph shows a representative
curve of quantified ERK phosphorylation. Data are the means ± S.E. of four experiments. B and C, DAMGO
concentration dependence of ERK phosphorylation in wild-type
(WT) and mutant MOR cells. Cells were exposed to several
different concentrations of DAMGO for 10 min before immunoblotting with
anti-phospho-ERK antibody. B shows a representative
immunoblot. In C, data are the means ± S.E. of 4-11
experiments. *, significantly different from ERK phosphorylation in
wild-type MOR (p < 0.05).
S experiments were performed on both wild-type
and mutant K273A MOR-transfected cells and compared. The mutant
receptor proved to be just as efficient as the wild-type receptor, if
not better, in mediating both [35S]GTP
S binding
activity (Fig. 2A) and
inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP production (Table
I). Thus, the mutation adversely
affects neither G protein coupling nor cAMP modulation of MOR,
consistent with earlier results (10).

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
G protein coupling to human wild-type and
K273 mutant MOR-transfected (A) and rat
MOR-transfected and rat MOR/CaM-antisense-cotransfected
(B) HEK293 cells. Cell membranes (10 µg) were
treated with different concentrations of morphine in assay buffer at
35 °C for 5 min as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Data are the means ± S.D. (n = 3).
hMOR, human wild-type MOR; rMOR, rat MOR;
ACaM, CaM-antisense.
Inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP production by morphine
9 to 10
5
M). Cells were harvested and lysed, and cAMP levels were
measured. hMOR, human MOR; rMOR, rat MOR; ACaM, CaM-antisense.
S binding, cAMP production, and ERK
phosphorylation experiments with HEK293 cells expressing CaM-antisense
and rat MOR. The expression of MOR and the reduced levels of CaM in
these cells have been previously characterized (10). Cells
cotransfected with CaM-antisense and rat MOR displayed greater activity
in both [35S]GTP
S binding and cAMP assays than those
overexpressing rat MOR alone (Fig. 2B and Table I). In
contrast, the presence of CaM-antisense significantly reduced (but did
not abolish) MOR-mediated ERK phosphorylation (Fig.
3). Assuming the involvement of growth factor signaling intermediates, one might ask whether there are CaM-dependent steps in the RTK segment of this heterologous
pathway. To answer this question, we determined whether CaM-antisense
blocks EGF-stimulated ERK phosphorylation in the rat MOR- and
CaM-antisense-cotransfected cell lines. CaM-antisense attenuated ERK
phosphorylation stimulated by EGF. The inhibitory effect was
less than that of CaM-antisense on DAMGO-elicited ERK (Fig. 3). Thus,
reduced levels of CaM accompany the attenuation of ERK phosphorylation
in both the GPCR and RTK pathways.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Abatement of DAMGO and EGF stimulation of ERK
phosphorylation in rat MOR-transfected and rat
MOR/CaM-antisense-cotransfected HEK293 cells. Cells transfected
with rat wild-type MOR (rMOR) with or without CaM-antisense
(ACaM) were treated with 0.1 or 10 µM DAMGO or
100 ng/ml EGF for 5-10 min, and ERK phosphorylation was measured. Data
are the means ± S.E. of four to six experiments. *, significantly
different from 0.1 µM DAMGO-treated rat MOR-expressing
cells (p < 0.05); **, significantly different from 10 µM DAMGO-treated rat MOR-expressing cells
(p < 0.05); #, significantly different from
EGF-treated rat MOR-expressing cells (p < 0.05).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
The PKC inhibitor GFX differentially affects
DAMGO-induced ERK phosphorylation in wild-type and mutant K273A
MOR-transfected HEK293 cells. Cells were pretreated with GFX (0.1 µM) for 30 min before exposure to DAMGO (0.1 µM) for 10 min. ERK phosphorylation is expressed as -fold
over control in the presence or absence of inhibitor. Data are the
means ± S.E. of four to five experiments. *, significantly
different from control cells (p < 0.01); #,
significantly different from DAMGO (p < 0.01).
WT, wild-type MOR.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Tyrphostin AG 1478 inhibits DAMGO- and
EGF-induced ERK phosphorylation in wild-type and mutant MOR-transfected
HEK293 cells. Cells were pretreated with tyrphostin AG 1478 (0.1 µM) for 20 min before exposure to EGF (0.1 µg/ml) for 5 min or DAMGO (0.1 µM) for 10 min. ERK phosphorylation is
expressed as -fold over control in the presence or absence of
inhibitor. Data are the means ± S.E. of four to seven
experiments. *, significantly different from EGF alone
(p < 0.01); #, significantly different from DAMGO
alone (p < 0.05). WT, wild-type MOR.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
The metalloprotease inhibitors
o-phenanthroline and phosphoramidon attenuate
DAMGO-induced ERK phosphorylation in wild-type (but not mutant)
MOR-transfected HEK293 cells. Cells were pretreated with either
o-phenanthroline (200 µM) or phosphoramidon
(300 µM) for 1 h before exposure to DAMGO (0.1 µM) for 10 min. ERK phosphorylation is expressed as -fold
over control in the presence or absence of inhibitor. Data are the
means ± S.E. of three to six experiments. *, significantly
different from control cells (p < 0.05); #,
significantly different from DAMGO alone (p < 0.05).
WT, wild-type MOR.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Dependence of DAMGO-induced EGFR
phosphorylation on CaM and PKC. A, DAMGO induces EGFR
phosphorylation in wild-type and mutant MOR-transfected HEK293 cells.
Cells were treated with DAMGO (0.1 µM) or EGF (0.1 µg/ml) for 10 min. In some experiments, cells were pretreated with
tyrphostin AG 1478 (0.1 µM) for 20 min before exposure to
DAMGO (0.1 µM) for 10 min. EGFR was immunoprecipitated
with anti-EGFR antibody, and immunoblotting was performed with
anti-phospho-EGFR antibody as described under "Experimental
Results." Data are the means ± S.E. of four to six experiments,
except for the tyrphostin treatment, where n = 2. *,
significantly different from control cells (p < 0.05);
#, significantly different from the DAMGO effect in wild-type cells
(WT) (p < 0.05). B,
DAMGO-induced EGFR phosphorylation is CaM- and PKC-sensitive in
wild-type (but not mutant) MOR-transfected HEK293 cells. Cells were
pretreated with either GFX (0.1 µM) or W-7 (50 µM) for 30 min before exposure to DAMGO (0.1 µM) for 10 min. EGFR immunoprecipitation and
immunoblotting were performed as described for A. Data are
the means ± S.E. of four to six experiments. *, significantly
different from control cells (p < 0.05); #,
significantly different from the DAMGO effect in wild-type cells
(p < 0.05). C, the metalloprotease
inhibitor o-phenanthroline differentially attenuates
DAMGO-induced EGFR phosphorylation in rat MOR
(rMOR)-transfected and rat MOR/CaM-antisense-cotransfected
HEK293 cells. Cells were pretreated with o-phenanthroline
(o-phe; 200 µM) for 1 h before exposure
to DAMGO (0.1 µM) for 10 min. EGFR immunoprecipitation
and immunoblotting were performed as described for A. Data
are the means ± S.E. of two to four experiments. *, significantly
different from control cells (p < 0.05); #,
significantly different from the DAMGO effect in rat MOR cells
(p < 0.05).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Model of CaM-mediated transactivation of EGFR
and ERK phosphorylation. Membrane-localized CaM either can bind to
the third intracellular loop of the opioid receptor or block the matrix
metalloprotease (MMP)-catalyzed limited proteolysis of
membrane-anchored EGF-like ligands and thereby EGFR transactivation.
Opioid agonist binding causes CaM bound to the third intracellular loop
of the receptor to be released into the cytoplasm, where it can
modulate a step just upstream of MEK. Dashed arrows show
multiple or uncharacterized steps.
Why does mutant MOR display less DAMGO-induced ERK phosphorylation than
the wild-type receptor even though it couples to GTP
S, inhibits cAMP
production, and activates cytosolic free Ca2+ to a
comparable extent? Wang et al. (10, 54) found that CaM binds
to MOR and that, upon agonist activation, wild-type MOR releases CaM
into the cytosol, where it can interact with other target proteins or
undergo further trafficking to the nucleus. It has been shown that
morphine treatment of striatum causes
50% increases in cytosolic and
intracellular membrane CaM content (47-48). Since CaM translocation
does not occur in mutant MOR-expressing lines, less CaM may become
available in the cytosol and other cellular compartments. As discussed
in the Introduction, the Ras-Raf complex may well be one of the sites
of CaM stimulation of ERK phosphorylation in the EGF pathway to ERK in
HEK293 cells. If the released cytosolic CaM is needed to optimally
activate this Ca2+/CaM-dependent opioid
signaling step, a decrease in ERK phosphorylation may ensue for mutant
MOR. The inhibition of ERK phosphorylation in CaM-antisense-expressing
cells is in accordance with this hypothesis.
Together with previous results implicating membrane-bound metalloproteases, the data reported here indicate that MOR stimulation leads mainly to transactivation of EGFR and only secondarily to ERK activation. CaM inhibitors have been shown to promote shedding of membrane-bound growth factors via matrix metalloproteases (58, 59). CaM antagonists were found to stimulate the cleavage of several membrane proteins, including EGFR-binding ligands in Chinese hamster ovary and human epithelial cells, and this process was PKC-independent. In addition, Bosch et al. (60) reported that the CaM inhibitor W-13 alone induced an increase in Ras, Raf, and ERK activation in cultured NIH3T3 and normal rat kidney cells. The stimulation of ERK by W-13 alone may be explained by its induction of the release of endogenous plasma membrane-bound EGFR-binding ligands, leading to the activation of this receptor and subsequent activation of Ras-Raf. In accordance with these previous results, the CaM inhibitor W-7 attenuated DAMGO stimulation of EGFR phosphorylation in the wild-type MOR cells. However, in K273A MOR cells, the major CaM-dependent pathway was not operative; and therefore, W-7 had no effect. Therefore, a minor pathway of ERK activation exists in mutant MOR cells, which appears to be CaM-independent.
How is it possible to reconcile the opposing actions of CaM on ERK activation? When CaM is localized in the plasma membrane, it can block heterologous signaling of MOR by preventing G protein coupling and retarding release of membrane-bound EGF-like ligands (Fig. 8). Under these conditions, the cell can respond to exogenous EGF, and there is sufficient intracellular CaM to interact with the Ras-Raf complex to activate ERK. As discussed above, a morphine-induced increase in intracellular CaM may additionally enhance the activation of the Ras-Raf complex. CaM release from the plasma membrane, initiated by opioid agonist binding to MOR, may alleviate the inhibitory effect of plasma membrane CaM on both MOR and metalloprotease, thereby stimulating shedding of endogenously expressed EGF-like ligands. The lack of inhibition by a metalloprotease inhibitor of DAMGO-induced EGFR phosphorylation in the CaM-antisense line supports the existence of a CaM-independent minor pathway. Since the mutant MOR cell line does not release CaM from the plasma membrane, it does not effectively utilize the EGF transactivation process in signaling to ERK. This is consistent with our observation that mutant MOR-mediated activation of ERK is insensitive to inhibitors of metalloproteases and PKC.
Taken together, the data suggest that wild-type MOR stimulates ERK
phosphorylation via a CaM- and PKC-dependent pathway that entails EGFR transactivation. It appears that Ca2+/CaM
plays a role not only at the level of MOR, but also at additional site(s) in the EGF segment of the pathway. However, as shown by the CaM
mutant MOR studies, minor pathways, independent of CaM and EGFR
transactivation, may also lead to activation of ERK. The components of
such putative signaling pathway(s), their possible compartmentation on
scaffolds, and their prevalence remain to be determined.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Research Grants DA05412 (to C. J. C.) and DA04166 (to W. S.) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, Research Grant OTKA T-033062 (to M. S.) from the Hungarian Research Fund, Research Grant JFNo-564 (to M. S. and C. J. C.) from the United States-Hungarian Joint Fund, and National Institute of General Medical Sciences Research Grant GM43102 (to W. S.) from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
314-577-8160; Fax: 314-577-8156; E-mail: cosciacc@slu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 16, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M101535200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
CaM, calmodulin;
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor;
MOR, µ-opioid receptor;
DOR,
-opioid receptor;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase;
MEK, mitogen-activated protein
kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase;
PKC, protein
kinase C;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
EGFR, epidermal growth factor
receptor;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
DAMGO, [D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin;
GFX, GF 109203X (bisindolylmaleimide I);
GTP
S, guanosine
5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Schulman, H., Hanson, P. I., and Meyer, T. (1992) Cell Calcium 13, 401-411 |
| 2. | James, P., Vorherr, T., and Carafoli, E. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 38-42 |
| 3. | Levitan, I. B. (1999) Neuron 22, 645-648 |
| 4. | Chuang, T. T., Paolucci, L., and De Blasi, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28691-28696 |
| 5. | Pronin, A. N., Satpaev, D. K., Slepak, V. Z., and Benovic, J. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18273-18280 |
| 6. | Joyal, J. L., Burks, D. J., Pons, S., Matter, W. F., Vlahos, C. J., White, M. F., and Sacks, D. B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28183-28186 |
| 7. | Liu, M., Yu, B., Nakanishi, O., Wieland, T., and Simon, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18801-18807 |
| 8. | Minakami, R., Jinnai, N., and Sugiyama, H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20291-20298 |
| 9. | O'Connor, V., El Far, O., Bofill-Cardona, E., Nanoff, C., Freissmuth, M., Karschin, A., Airas, J. M., Betz, H., and Boehm, S. (1999) Science 286, 1180-1184 |
| 10. | Wang, D., Sadée, W., and Quillan, J. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22081-22088 |
| 11. | Bofill-Cardona, E., Kudlacek, O., Yang, Q., Ahorn, H., Freissmuth, M., and Nanoff, C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 32672-32680 |
| 12. | Lee, A., Scheuer, T., and Catterall, W. A. (2000) J. Neurosci. 20, 6830-6838 |
| 13. | Nakajima, Y., Yamamoto, T., Nakayama, T., and Nakanishi, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27573-27577 |
| 14. | Iacovelli, L., Sallese, M., Mariggio, S., and De Blasi, A. (1999) FASEB J. 13, 1-8 |
| 15. | Zhang, S., Coso, O. A., Collins, R., Gutkind, J. S., and Simonds, W. F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20208-20212 |
| 16. | Schlessinger, J. (2000) Cell 103, 211-225 |
| 17. | Crespo, P., Cachero, T. G., Xu, N., and Gutkind, J. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25259-25264 |
| 18. | Lev, S., Moreno, H., Martinez, R., Canoll, P., Peles, E., Musacchio, J. M., Plowman, G. D., Rudy, B., and Schlessinger, J. (1995) Nature 376, 737-745 |
| 19. | van Biesen, T., Hawes, B. E., Luttrell, D. K., Krueger, K. M., Touhara, K., Porfiri, E., Sakaue, M., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) Nature 376, 781-784 |
| 20. | Luttrell, L. M., Della Rocca, G. J., van Biesen, T., Luttrell, D. K., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4637-4644 |
| 21. | Luttrell, L. M., Ferguson, S. S. G., Daaka, Y., Miller, W. E., Maudsley, S., Della Rocca, G. J., Lin, F.-T., Kawakatsu, H., Owada, K., Luttrell, D. K., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1999) Science 283, 655-661 |
| 22. | Fukuda, K., Kato, S., Morikawa, H., Shoda, T., and Mori, K. (1996) J. Neurochem. 67, 1309-1316 |
| 23. | Belcheva, M. M., Vogel, Z., Ignatova, E., Avidor-Reiss, T., Zippel, R., Levy, R., Young, E. C., Barg, J., and Coscia, C. J. (1998) J. Neurochem. 70, 635-645 |
| 24. | Hawes, B. E., van Biesen, T., Koch, W. J., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17148-17153 |
| 25. | Polakiewicz, R. D., Schieferl, S. M., Dorner, L. F., Kansra, V., and Comb, M. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12402-12406 |
| 26. | Bohn, L. M., Belcheva, M. M., and Coscia, C. J. (2000) J. Neurochem. 74, 564-573 |
| 27. | Bohn, L. M., Belcheva, M. M., and Coscia, C. J. (2000) J. Neurochem. 74, 574-581 |
| 28. | Kramer, H. K., Andria, M. L., Esposito, D. H., and Simon, E. J. (2000) Biochem. Pharmacol. 60, 781-792 |
| 29. | Daub, H., Weiss, F. U., Wallasch, C., and Ullrich, A. (1996) Nature 379, 557-560 |
| 30. | Eguchi, S., Numaguchi, K., Iwasaki, H., Matsumoto, T., Yamakawa, T., Utsunomiya, H., Motley, E. D., Kawakatsu, H., Owada, K. M., Hirata, Y., Marumo, F., and Inagami, T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8890-8896 |
| 31. | Cunnick, J. M., Dorsey, J. F., Standley, T., Turkson, J., Kraker, A. J., Fry, D. W., Jove, R., and Wu, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14468-14475 |
| 32. | Soltoff, S. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23110-23117 |
| 33. | Heeneman, S., Haendeler, J., Saito, Y., Ishida, M., and Berk, B. C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15926-15932 |
| 34. | Maudsley, S., Pierce, K. L., Zamah, A. M., Miller, W. E., Ahn, S., Daaka, Y., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Luttrell, L. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9572-9580 |
| 35. | Graness, A., Hanke, S., Boehmer, F. D., Presek, P., and Liebmann, C. (2000) Biochem. J. 347, 441-447 |
| 36. | Prenzel, N., Zwick, E., Daub, H., Leserer, M., Abraham, R., Wallasch, C., and Ullrich, A. (1999) Nature 402, 884-888 |
| 37. | Carpenter, G. (2000) Signal Transduc. Knowledge Environ. 15, 1-3 |
| 38. | Roudabush, F. L., Pierce, K. L., Maudsley, S., Khan, K. D., and Luttrell, L. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 22583-22589 |
| 39. | Della Rocca, G. J., Mukhin, Y. V., Garnovskaya, M. N., Daaka, Y., Clark, G. J., Luttrell, L. M., Lefowitz, R. J., and Raymond, J. R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4749-4753 |
| 40. | Zwick, E., Wallasch, C., Daub, H., and Ullrich, A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20989-20996 |
| 41. | Eguchi, S., Matsumoto, T., Motley, E. D., Utsunomiya, H., and Inagami, T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14169-14175 |
| 42. | Della Rocca, G. J., van Biesen, T., Daaka, Y., Luttrell, D. K., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19125-19132 |
| 43. | Egea, J., Espinet, C., and Comella, J. X. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 75-85 |
| 44. | Farnsworth, C. L., Freshney, N. W., Rosen, L. B., Ghosh, A., Greenberg, M. E., and Feig, L. A. (1995) Nature 376, 524-527 |
| 45. | Ebinu, J. O., Bottorff, D. A., Chan, E. Y., Stang, S. L., Dunn, R. J., and Stone, J. C. (1998) Science 280, 1082-1086 |
| 46. | Egea, J., Espinet, C., Soler, R. M., Peiró, S., Rocamora, N., and Comella, J. X. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 1931-1946 |
| 47. | Hanbauer, I., Gimble, J., Sankaran, K., and Sherard, R. (1979) Neuropharmacology 18, 859-864 |
| 48. | Nehmad, R., Nadler, H., and Simantov, R. (1982) Mol. Pharmacol. 22, 389-394 |
| 49. | Law, P. Y., and Loh, H. H. (1993) Mol. Pharmacol. 43, 684-693 |
| 50. | Mestek, A., Hurley, J. H., Bye, L. S., Campbell, A. D., Chen, Y., Tian, M., Liu, J., Schulman, H., and Yu, L. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 2396-2406 |
| 51. | Koch, T., Kroslak, T., Mayer, P., Raulf, E., and Höllt, V. (1997) J. Neurochem. 69, 1767-1770 |
| 52. | Lou, L. G., Zhou, T. H., Wang, P., and Pei, G. (1999) Mol. Pharmacol. 55, 557-563 |
| 53. | Fan, G., Wang, L., Qiu, H., Ma, L., and Pei, G. (1999) Mol. Pharmacol. 56, 39-45 |
| 54. | Wang, D., Tolbert, L. M., Carlson, K. W., and Sadee, W. (2000) J. Neurochem. 74, 1418-1425 |
| 55. | Belcheva, M. M., Wong, Y. H., and Coscia, C. J. (2000) Cell. Signal. 12, 481-489 |
| 56. | Arden, J. R., Segredo, V., Wang, Z., Lameh, J., and Sadee, W. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 1636-1645 |
| 57. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 |
| 58. | Díaz-Rodríguez, E., Esparís-Ogando, A., Montero, J. C., Yusta, L., and Pandiella, A. (2000) Biochem. J. 346, 359-367 |
| 59. | Dong, J., and Wiley, H. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 557-564 |
| 60. | Bosch, M., Gil, J., Bachs, O., and Agell, N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22145-22150 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Xu, M. R. Bruchas, D. L. Ippolito, L. Gendron, and C. Chavkin Sciatic Nerve Ligation-Induced Proliferation of Spinal Cord Astrocytes Is Mediated by {kappa} Opioid Activation of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase J. Neurosci., March 7, 2007; 27(10): 2570 - 2581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kim, A. L. Clark, A. Kiss, J. W. Hahn, R. Wesselschmidt, C. J. Coscia, and M. M. Belcheva {micro}- and {kappa}-Opioids Induce the Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells to Neural Progenitors J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33749 - 33760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Farooqui, Z. H. Geng, E. J. Stephenson, N. Zaveri, D. Yee, and K. Gupta Naloxone acts as an antagonist of estrogen receptor activity in MCF-7 cells. Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2006; 5(3): 611 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Ippolito, M. Xu, M. R. Bruchas, K. Wickman, and C. Chavkin Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Kir3.1 in Spinal Cord Is Induced by Acute Inflammation, Chronic Neuropathic Pain, and Behavioral Stress J. Biol. Chem., December 16, 2005; 280(50): 41683 - 41693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Turner and J. R. Raymond Interaction of Calmodulin with the Serotonin 5-Hydroxytryptamine2A Receptor: A PUTATIVE REGULATOR OF G PROTEIN COUPLING AND RECEPTOR PHOSPHORYLATION BY PROTEIN KINASE C J. Biol. Chem., September 2, 2005; 280(35): 30741 - 30750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Belcheva, A. L. Clark, P. D. Haas, J. S. Serna, J. W. Hahn, A. Kiss, and C. J. Coscia {micro} and {kappa} Opioid Receptors Activate ERK/MAPK via Different Protein Kinase C Isoforms and Secondary Messengers in Astrocytes J. Biol. Chem., July 29, 2005; 280(30): 27662 - 27669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Takayama and H. Ueda Morphine-Induced Chemotaxis and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Expression in Microglia J. Neurosci., January 12, 2005; 25(2): 430 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. UEDA Locus-Specific Involvement of Anti-Opioid Systems in Morphine Tolerance and Dependence Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2004; 1025(1): 376 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Tegeder and G. Geisslinger Opioids As Modulators of Cell Death and Survival--Unraveling Mechanisms and Revealing New Indications Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2004; 56(3): 351 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Shah, A. Yesilkaya, J. A. Olivares-Reyes, H.-D. Chen, L. Hunyady, and K. J. Catt Differential Pathways of Angiotensin II-Induced Extracellularly Regulated Kinase 1/2 Phosphorylation in Specific Cell Types: Role of Heparin-Binding Epidermal Growth Factor Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2004; 18(8): 2035 - 2048. [Abstract] |