|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M102472200 on July 3, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 36, 34082-34088, September 7, 2001
Peroxisome Proliferator-activated
Receptor- -independent Inhibition of Macrophage Activation by the
Non-thiazolidinedione Agonist L-796,449
COMPARISON WITH THE EFFECTS OF
15-DEOXY- 12,14-PROSTAGLANDIN J2*
Antonio
Castrillo §,
Marina
Mojena§¶,
Sonsoles
Hortelano , and
Lisardo
Boscá
From the Instituto de Bioquímica (Centro
Mixto CSIC-UCM), Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain, and ¶ Centro de Investigación Básica de
España (CIBE), Merck, Sharp and Dohme, Josefa Valcarcel 38, 28027 Madrid, Spain
Received for publication, March 20, 2001, and in revised form, June 26, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The effects of L-796,449
(3-chloro-4-(3-(3-phenyl-7-propylbenzofuran-6-yloxy)propylthio)phenylacetic
acid; referred to henceforth as compound G), a
thiazolidinedione-unrelated peroxisome proliferator activated-receptor- (PPAR- ) agonist, on early signaling in
lipopolysaccharide-activated RAW 264.7 macrophages were analyzed and
compared with those elicited by
15-deoxy- 12,14-prostaglandin J2 and
the thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone. Compound G inhibited the
activation of nuclear factor B through the impairment of the
targeting and degradation of I B proteins and promoted a
redistribution of I B and I B in the nucleus of activated cells. Compound G inhibited I B kinase (IKK) activity both in vivo and in vitro, suggesting a direct mechanism of
interaction between this molecule and the IKK complex. The effect of
compound G on IKK activity was independent of PPAR- engagement
because RAW 264.7 cells expressed negligible levels of this nuclear
receptor, and rosiglitazone failed to mimic these actions. Moreover,
treatment of activated macrophages with compound G enhanced the
synthesis of superoxide anion, which, in combination with the NO
produced under activation conditions, triggered apoptosis through the
intracellular synthesis of peroxynitrite. These results suggest
that compound G might contribute to the resolution of inflammation by
favoring the induction of apoptosis through mechanisms independent of
PPAR- engagement.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors
(PPARs)1 are
liganddependent nuclear transcription factors that have been
implicated in the regulation of lipid and glucose metabolism,
morphogenesis, and cell growth, differentiation, and homeostasis
(1-4). This family of nuclear receptors consists of three members
encoded by distinct genes, leading to the expression of PPAR- ,
PPAR- , PPAR- 1, and PPAR- 2, with the latter two isoforms
resulting from the presence of alternative promoters in the 5'-flanking
region of the gene (3, 5). Moreover, deficient signaling through these
receptors is involved in the onset of various metabolic diseases such
as diabetes, obesity, and atherosclerosis (6-9). PPARs exhibit
specific patterns of cellular distribution: whereas PPAR- is
expressed in tissues with high catabolic rates of fatty acids, such as
the liver, muscle, and heart (4, 10-12), PPAR- expression is more
restricted to adipose tissue and to selected cells of the immune system
such as macrophages, where it is induced during the
extravasation process of monocytes from the blood flow, especially in
the course of activation by pro-inflammatory stimuli (6, 7, 13, 14).
Both PPAR- and PPAR- have been identified as important regulators
of the immune response. In macrophages, activated PPAR- acts as a
transrepressor inhibiting the expression of genes requiring the binding
of NF- B, activator protein-1, and signal transducer and activator of
transcription-1 to their promoter regions (15, 16) . In addition
to this, a role for PPAR- in inflammation was deduced from animals
lacking this receptor because they exhibited prolonged responses to
pro-inflammatory cytokines (1). Moreover, activation of PPAR- and
PPAR- has been shown to induce apoptosis in human macrophages and
monocytes, suggesting a role for these PPARs in the resolution of
inflammation (17).
Most of the natural ligands of PPARs are derived from arachidonic acid
metabolism through the action of cyclooxygenase or lipooxygenase and
influence several inflammatory signaling pathways independently of PPAR
ligation. In particular, cyclopentenone PGs have been reported to be
lipids with the ability to react with key cysteine residues in proteins
via the formation of Michael adducts (18), which might result in the
modification of their biological activity (19, 20). Indeed, most of the
effects observed with potential physiological PPAR agonists
(i.e. PGs) cannot be obtained with pharmacological synthetic
ligands, such as the TZDs. In view of the preceding results, we decided
to investigate whether synthetic ligands of PPARs with a chemical
structure distinct from that of TZDs might exert actions independently
of the recruitment of these transcription factors. The macrophage cell
line RAW 264.7 is a likely candidate to carry out these studies because
these cells express very low levels of PPAR- , and the action of
cyclopentenone PGs has been well established in these cells (19,
21, 22). We have used the TZD-unrelated PPAR synthetic agonists
L-796,449 (3-chloro-4-(3-(3-phenyl-7-propylbenzofuran-6-yloxy)propylthio)phenylacetic acid; referred to henceforth as compound G) and L-165,041
(4-[3-[2-propyl-3-hydroxy-4-acetyl]phenoxy]propyloxyphenoxyacetic acid; referred to henceforth as compound P) and compared their effects
on the early signaling steps of macrophage activation with those of the
TZD rosiglitazone and the cyclopentenone 15dPGJ2. The
binding affinities of compounds G and P, as well as those of PGs and
rosiglitazone, have been measured in vitro with recombinant PPARs and in vivo using transactivation assays with reporter
genes (23, 24). Compound G exhibits a high affinity for PPAR- and PPAR- (apparent Kd = 2 and 20 nM,
respectively), and rosiglitazone has a high affinity for PPAR-
(Kd 100 nM), whereas compound P is a
poor agonist of both receptors (apparent Kd = 10 and
1 µM, respectively) (23). Compounds G and P exhibit
structural homology in some groups of the molecule (23, 25), and their
biological activities as antilipidemic and anti-inflammatory agents
have been assayed previously (26). Our data show that compound G, but
not rosiglitazone, inhibits the early steps of LPS signaling leading to
NF- B activation well above the Kd for PPAR
binding and enhances the synthesis of reactive oxygen and nitrogen
intermediates promoting apoptotic cell death.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Chemicals--
Reagents were from Sigma, Roche, and Merck. The
PPAR ligands compound G (L-796,449) and compound P (L-165,041) were
from Merck Research Laboratories (Rahway, NJ; Fig. 1A).
Antibodies and GST fusion proteins were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology
(Santa Cruz, CA). PGs were from Calbiochem.
Anti-(P)S32I B Ab was from New England Biolabs
(Beverly, MA). LPS was from Salmonella typhimurium (Sigma).
Serum and media were from Biowhittaker (Walkersville, MD).
Cell Culture--
RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at 6-8 × 104 cells/cm2 in RPMI 1640 medium containing 2 mM glutamine, 10% fetal calf serum, and 50 µg/ml
penicillin, streptomycin, and gentamicin. After 2 days in culture, the
medium was replaced by phenol-red free RPMI 1640 medium supplemented
with 0.5 mM arginine and 1% fetal calf serum, followed by
the addition of the indicated stimuli. PGs, compound G and P ligands,
and rosiglitazone were added 5 min before activation with LPS and
IFN- (21).
Description of Plasmids--
The following plasmids were used: a
1-kilobase fragment corresponding to the 5'-flanking region of
the NOS-2 gene and containing two B motifs was fused to a CAT
reporter (pNOS-2(+,+).CAT vector). The pNOS-2( , ).CAT vector
contained mutated B sequences corresponding to nucleotides 971 to
961 and 85 to 75. The ( B)3ConA.CAT plasmid, which
contains three copies of the B motif from the human immunodeficiency
virus long terminal repeat enhancer linked to the minimal conalbumin A
promoter, was used to measure B activity (21, 27). The ConA.CAT
vector lacking the B tandem was used as a control and was not
modulated by the ligands tested. The kSV2.CAT plasmid was
used as a reference for the efficiency of transfection. Plasmids were
purified using EndoFree Qiagen columns (Hilden, Germany).
Transfection of RAW 264.7 Cells and Assay of CAT
Activity--
Subconfluent cell cultures were washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline and maintained with 1.5 ml of RPMI 1640 medium and 1% fetal calf serum in 6-cm-diameter dishes. Cells were
transfected for 6 h with FuGENE following the instructions of the
supplier (Roche) and incubated overnight with 2 ml of RPMI 1640 medium plus 1% fetal calf serum before stimulation. Equal amounts of DNA were
used for the transfection experiments. CAT activity was determined
after 18 h of stimulation with the indicated factors, following a
previous protocol based on TLC separation of acetylated [14C]chloramphenicol. The amount of acetylated
substrate was quantified in a FUJI BAS1000 radioactivity detection system.
Expression and Purification of GST Fusion
Proteins--
GST-I B -(1-54) wild type and the
corresponding protein mutated in Ser32/36 to
Ala32/36 were expressed in DH5 F' Escherichia
coli and purified by glutathione-Sepharose 4B chromatography
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Alternatively, purified
GST-I B -(1-317) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Analysis of RNA by Northern Blot--
Total RNA (2-4 × 106 cells) was extracted using the guanidinium thiocyanate
method, followed by electrophoresis in a 0.9% agarose gel containing
2% formaldehyde (28). The RNA was transferred to a Nytran membrane (NY
13-N; Schleicher & Schuell), and the levels of NOS-2 mRNA were
determined using the EcoRI-HindII fragment from the NOS-2 cDNA, which was labeled with
[ -32P]dCTP (Rediprime labeling kit; Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). The membranes were exposed to x-ray films (Hyperfilm,
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and the intensity of the bands was
measured by laser densitometry (Molecular Dynamics). The lane charge
was normalized by hybridization with a ribosomal 18 S probe.
Preparation of Cytosolic and Nuclear Extracts--
Cells (3 × 106) were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered
saline, scraped off the dishes, and collected by centrifugation. Cell
pellets were homogenized with 100 µl of buffer A (10 mM
Hepes, pH 7.9, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml TLCK, 5 mM NaF, 1 mM NaVO4, and 10 mM
Na2MoO4). After 10 min at 4 °C, Nonidet P-40
was added (0.5%, v/v), and the tubes were vortexed (15 s) and
centrifuged at 8000 × g for 15 min. The supernatants
were stored at 80 °C (soluble extracts), and the pellets were
resuspended in 50 µl of buffer A supplemented with 20% glycerol and
0.4 M KCl and shaken for 30 min at 4 °C. After
centrifugation for 15 min at 13,000 × g, the
supernatants (nuclear protein extracts) were stored at 80 °C (29).
Protein was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay. Fractionation steps were carried out at 4 °C.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs)--
The
oligonucleotide sequence 5'-TGCTAGGGGG ATTTTCCCTCTCTCTGT-3'
corresponding to the consensus B site (nucleotides 978 to 952)
of the murine NOS-2 promoter was annealed with the complementary DNA
and end-labeled with Klenow enzyme in the presence of 50 µCi of
[ -32P]dCTP (30, 31). The DNA probe (5 × 104 dpm) was incubated for 15 min at 4 °C with nuclear
protein extracts (3 µg) and 2 µg of
polydeoxyguanylic-polydeoxy cytidylic acid, 5% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, in a final volume of 20 µl. The
DNA-protein complexes were separated on native 6% polyacrylamide gels
in 0.5% Tris borate-EDTA buffer. Supershift assays were carried out
after incubation for 1 h at 4 °C of the nuclear extracts with 2 µg of Ab (anti-p50, anti-c-Rel, and anti-p65), followed by EMSA (data not shown). Normalization for lane charge was accomplished using PPAR- as probe (21). When the effect of 15dPGJ2,
compound G, compound P, and rosiglitazone on the binding of Rel
proteins to the B motif was assayed in vitro, nuclear
extracts from LPS/IFN- -activated cells were treated for 5 min with
these ligands before the addition of the probe.
Characterization of Proteins by Western Blot--
Cytosolic
protein extracts were size-separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. The gels were blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and incubated with anti-NOS-2,
anti-I B , anti-I B , and anti-IKK2 Abs (Santa Cruz
Laboratories, Santa Cruz, CA). In experiments using
anti-(P)S32I B Ab, the blot incubation solution
contained 50 ng/ml GST-I B -(1-317) treated previously with
alkaline phosphatase-agarose (21). The blots were submitted to
sequential reprobing with Abs after treatment with 100 mM
-mercaptoethanol and 2% SDS in Tris-buffered saline and heated at
60 °C for 30 min. The blots were revealed by ECL following the
manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Different
exposure times of the films were used to ensure that bands were not
saturated. Quantification of the films was performed by laser
densitometry (Molecular Dynamics).
Determination of NO Synthesis--
NO release was determined
spectrophotometrically by the accumulation of nitrite in the medium
(phenol red-free). Nitrite was determined with Griess reagent by adding
1 mM sulfanilic acid, 100 mM HCl, and 1 mM naphthylenediamine (final concentrations). The
absorbance at 548 nm was compared with a standard of NaNO2. Results were expressed as the amount of nitrite released per milligram of cell protein.
Confocal Microscopy--
RAW 264.7 cells were grown on
coverslips and incubated for 45 min with the indicated stimuli. After
washing the covers twice with phosphate-buffered saline, the cells were
fixed for 2 min with methanol at 20 °C, blocked for 20 min with
3% bovine serum albumin at room temperature, and incubated for 30 min
with 1:100 anti-I B or anti-I B Abs. After three washes with
ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, the level of I B proteins was
determined using a secondary Ab (1:300) against rabbit IgG conjugated
with Cy3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Cells were visualized on a
MRC-1024 confocal microscope (Bio-Rad), and the fluorescence was
measured and electronically evaluated. Laser sharp software (Bio-Rad)
was used to determine the relative intensity of the fluorescence per
pixel and the percentage of cytosolic and nuclear localization.
Measurement of IKK2 Activity--
Cells (107) were
homogenized in buffer A and centrifuged for 10 min in a
microcentrifuge. The supernatant (1 ml) was precleared, and IKK2 was
immunoprecipitated with 1 µg of anti-IKK2 Ab (New England Biolabs).
After extensive washing of the immunoprecipitate with buffer A,
the pellet was resuspended in kinase buffer (20 mM Hepes,
pH 7.4, 0.1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml TLCK, 5 mM NaF, 1 mM NaVO4, 10 mM Na2MoO4, and 10 nM
okadaic acid). The kinase activity was assayed in 100 µl of kinase
buffer containing 100 ng of immunoprecipitation protein and 50 µM [ -32P]ATP (0.5 µCi), using as
substrate 100 ng of GST-I B -(1-317) or GST-I B -(1-54) and
the corresponding Ala32/36 mutated protein. Aliquots of
reaction were stopped at various times in 1 ml of ice-cold buffer A
supplemented with 5 mM EDTA. The same protocol was used
when the activity of IKK2 was followed by Western blot using
anti-(P)S32I B Ab, except that 1 mM MgATP
was used instead of [ -32P]ATP. GST-I B was
purified by glutathione-Sepharose 4B chromatography and analyzed by
10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The linearity of the
kinase reaction was confirmed over a period of 30 min (21).
Flow Cytometric Analysis of  m--
Cells were
incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in the presence of the
potential-sensitive probe CMXRos (40 nM), followed by
analysis in a FACScan flow cytometer. The fluorescence in the presence of uncoupling agent m-chlorophenylhydrazone carbonylcyanide
(10 µM) was considered to be 100%, and values were
calculated as a percentage of the change of fluorochrome fluorescence
(32, 33).
Measurement of ROI Synthesis--
Cells challenged for 8 h
with different stimuli were incubated for 15 min with 10 µM DCFH or HE, and the fluorescence corresponding to the
oxidized probes was followed by analysis in a flow cytometer as
described previously (32, 34). Incubation of cells with 50 µM t-butyl hydroperoxide and 20 µM
peroxynitrite was used as positive control of ROI and reactive
nitrogen intermediate release.
Analysis of Apoptosis--
Flow cytometric measurement of
propidium iodide staining was performed after incubation of the cells
with 0.005% propidium iodide, following a previous protocol (35, 36).
Cells were analyzed in a FACScan cytometer (Becton & Dickinson, San
Jose, CA) equipped with a 25-mW argon laser. The quantification of the percentage of apoptotic cells was calculated using a dot plot of the
forward scatter against the propidium iodide fluorescence. Cell sorting
and analysis of viable and apoptotic populations was performed to
confirm the criteria of gating (37). Activation of caspase 3 (and
caspase 7) was determined measuring the DEVDase activity in the
cytosolic extracts, following the appearance of fluorescence from
N-acetyl-DEVD-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin as substrate. The
corresponding peptide aldehyde and Z-VAD.fmk were used to inhibit
caspase activity and to ensure the specificity of the reaction. The
linearity of the caspase assay was determined over a 20-min reaction period.
Data Analysis--
The number of experiments analyzed is
indicated in each figure. Statistical differences (p < 0.05) between mean values were determined by one-way analysis of the
variance followed by Student's t test. In experiments
using x-ray films (Hyperfilm), different exposure times were used to
avoid saturation of the bands.
 |
RESULTS |
Compound G and, to a Lesser Extent, Compound P Inhibit NO Synthesis
in RAW Cells--
Incubation of RAW 264.7 cells with the PPAR ligands
compound G, compound P, 15dPGJ2, and rosiglitazone did not
promote the synthesis of NO. However, when cells were activated with
LPS and IFN- , the presence of compound G, compound P, and
15dPGJ2, but not rosiglitazone, significantly inhibited the
accumulation of NO in the culture medium through a mechanism that
involved a reduction in the levels of NOS-2 mRNA and protein (Fig.
1, B and C). The apparent Ki values for NO synthesis were 1.1, 6, and 0.6 µM for compound G, compound P, and
15dPGJ2, respectively.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Inhibition of NOS-2 expression and NO
synthesis by PPAR agonists. RAW 264.7 cells were incubated with
the indicated concentrations of compound G, compound P,
15dPGJ2, and rosiglitazone (see the chemical structures in
A), and 5 min later, the macrophages were activated with 200 ng/ml LPS and 20 units/ml IFN- . The release of nitrite to the medium
was measured after 18 h (100% = 48 nmol
NO2 + NO3 /mg
protein; B). The levels of NOS-2 and -actin protein (18 h) and RNA (4 h) were measured in activated cells treated with 2 µM 15dPGJ2 and 5 µM compound G, compound P,
and rosiglitazone (C). Normalization of RNA lane charge was
carried out with 18 S ribosomal RNA. Results show the mean of three
experiments (left) and one of four representative
experiments (right).
|
|
Compound G and 15dPGJ2 Inhibit NF- B
Activation--
The low level of NOS-2 mRNA measured in cells
treated for 4 h with compound G suggests that this molecule
interferes with the stimulatory signaling elicited after LPS/IFN-
challenge. Because NF- B activation has been reported as a necessary
event for NOS-2 expression (31, 38), the binding of NF- B proteins to
the B motif of the NOS-2 promoter was assayed by EMSA. As Fig.
2 shows, the binding of the dimers
p50.p50 and p50.p65 to the B sequence was impaired in cells
incubated with 15dPGJ2 and compound G. However, treatment
with compound P or rosiglitazone did not affect NF- B binding. When
the protein levels of cytosolic I B were determined after 30 min
of challenge, an inverse correlation was observed with respect to the
corresponding B activity. The subcellular distribution of I B
and I B in activated RAW 264.7 cells was further analyzed by
confocal microscopy, revealing an impaired degradation after incubation
with 15dPGJ2 and compound G (Fig.
3). These results suggest that compound G
inhibits early signaling after LPS and IFN- challenge (in
particular, the activation of NF- B). To investigate whether these
PPAR ligands can affect the transcription of genes requiring NF- B
activity, RAW 264.7 cells were transfected with CAT reporter plasmids
containing the B sites of the murine NOS-2 promoter or a 3× tandem
of B motifs linked to the minimal promoter of the conalbumin A gene.
After stimulation with LPS/IFN- for 18 h, CAT activity was
measured. As Fig. 4 shows,
15dPGJ2 and compound G inhibited CAT expression, whereas
this effect was not observed in cells treated with rosiglitazone. The
moderate inhibitory effect of compound P was more important on the
pNOS.CAT reporter than on the ( B)3ConA.CAT counterpart, suggesting an action on NOS-2 transcription distinct from NF- B activation.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of PPAR agonists on
NF- B activity. RAW 264.7 cells were
treated with 2 µM 15dPGJ2 and 5 µM compound G, compound P, and rosiglitazone and
activated for 30 min with LPS/IFN- . Cells were homogenized, and the
NF- B activity was determined in nuclear extracts by EMSA. Supershift
assays (data not shown) indicated that the upper and lower bands were
composed of p50.p65 and p50.p50 dimers, respectively. The binding of
nuclear extracts to a PPAR- motif was used to ensure a constant
level of proteins in the lanes. The levels of I B in the cytosol
were determined by Western blot. Results are from one of three
representative experiments. A densitometric analysis of the p50.p65 and
I B band intensities (mean + S.D.) is shown in the right
panel.
|
|

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Immunocytochemical analysis of
I B levels in RAW 264.7 cells treated with PPAR
agonists. Cells were treated for 45 min with the indicated
stimuli as described in the Fig. 2 legend. After fixation, the cells
were incubated with anti-I B and anti-I B Abs and stained
with Cy3-labeled anti-rabbit IgG Ab (red). The distribution
of fluorescence was analyzed by confocal microscopy, and the average
cell fluorescence (n = 50-70; mean + S.D.) was
quantified.
|
|

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of PPAR agonists on the expression of
CAT activity in RAW 264.7 cells transfected with the pNOS-2.CAT and
( B)3ConA.CAT reporter
plasmids. Cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids with
FuGENE, followed by treatment with 2 µM
15dPGJ2, 5 µM compound G and compound P, and
10 µM rosiglitazone. After activation with LPS/IFN- ,
the CAT activity was measured at 18 h. A kSV2.CAT
plasmid was used to normalize the efficiency of the transfection and to
discard nonspecific effects of the ligands. Results are the mean + S.D.
of three experiments assayed per duplicate. * and **,
p < 0.01 and p < 0.005 with respect
to the corresponding LPS/IFN- condition, respectively.
|
|
IKK2 Activity Was Inhibited by Compound G and
15dPGJ2--
NF- B activity is dependent on IKK2
activation (21, 39, 40). To investigate the effect of the PPAR agonists
on IKK2, the kinase was immunoprecipitated from LPS/IFN- -activated
cells, and the activity was measured in vitro. As Fig.
5 shows, the incorporation of
[32P]phosphate into GST-I B was impaired in cells
treated with compound G and 15dPGJ2, whereas compound P and
rosiglitazone did not exert a significant inhibition on this activity.
This phosphorylation involved Ser32 as deduced by Western
blot using a specific anti-(P)S32I B Ab. Moreover,
using a GST-A32/36-I B peptide, we confirmed that the
corresponding serine residues were the phosphorylation sites in the
peptide fragment assayed (amino acids 1-54). To evaluate the ability
of these molecules to inhibit IKK2 activity in vitro, cells
were activated with LPS/IFN- , and the kinase was immunoprecipitated.
As Fig. 6A shows, only compound G and
15dPGJ2 significantly inhibited the kinase activity. Following this in vitro approach, the NF- B activity of
nuclear extracts incubated in vitro with
15dPGJ2, compound G, compound P, and rosiglitazone was
assayed. As Fig. 6B shows, only 15dPGJ2 abrogated the binding activity.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of IKK2 activity. Cells were
treated for 15 min with the indicated stimuli at the concentrations
indicated in the Fig. 2 legend, and IKK2 was immunoprecipitated. The
kinase activity was determined in vitro by incorporation of
[32P]phosphate into GST-I B or by Western blot using
a specific anti-phospho-S32I B Ab. Results are from
one of three representative experiments.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
In vitro effect of PPAR agonists
on IKK2 and NF- B activity. IKK activity
was immunoprecipitated from LPS/IFN- -activated cells (15 min), and
the effect of 15dPGJ2, compound G, compound P, and
rosiglitazone on IKK2 was evaluated in vitro by measuring
the phosphorylation of GST-I B -(1-317) (A). Aliquots
of nuclear proteins from cells activated for 30 min with LPS/IFN-
were incubated for 5 min with the indicated concentrations of PPAR
agonists, followed by EMSA analysis of the binding to the B motif of
NOS-2 (B). Results show the dose-dependent
effect of two preparations of IKK assayed per triplicate (mean + S.D.)
and the mobility shift of one of three representative
experiments.
|
|
Compound G and 15dPGJ2 Increase the Synthesis of ROI
and Promote Apoptosis--
The aforementioned results suggest an
impairment of early inflammatory signaling in cells treated with
compound G and 15dPGJ2. However, under these conditions, we
observed morphological changes compatible with an enhanced apoptotic
rate, despite the attenuated synthesis of NO. Therefore, we
investigated the effect of the PPAR ligands on the induction of
oxidative stress in activated macrophages. Incubation of cells with
these PPAR agonists did not affect ROI synthesis as determined by the
oxidation of DCFH and HE (Fig. 7).
However, in LPS/IFN- -activated cells 15dPGJ2 and
compound G significantly enhanced the oxidation of DCFH but failed to
affect the oxidation of HE. Interestingly, in the absence of NO
synthesis accomplished after inhibition of NOS-2 with 1400W (N-(3-aminomethylbenzyl)acetamidine), the oxidation of DCFH
was drastically reduced, whereas that of HE increased in cells treated with 15dPGJ2 and compound G. These results suggest that
these compounds increase the synthesis of reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates in macrophages (see "Discussion") as described
previously (37). The effect of the enhanced synthesis of reactive
species on the mitochondrial permeability transition pore was evaluated using the potential-sensitive probe CMXRos. As Fig.
8A shows, the fluorescence
observed in LPS/IFN- -treated cells increased over the value of
control cells, data that are in agreement with the findings of previous
reports (32, 33). Moreover, the increase in CMXRos fluorescence can be
abolished after a short incubation with
m-chlorophenylhydrazone carbonylcyanide, which dissipates the mitochondrial inner membrane potential. Because the synthesis of
ROI and reactive nitrogen intermediate promotes apoptosis in macrophages, and the increase of CMXRos fluorescence is a
characteristic feature of mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic
triggering in these cells (37), we determined the extent of apoptosis
in RAW 264.7 cells treated with these PPAR ligands. As Fig.
8B shows, 15dPGJ2 and compound G promoted
apoptosis in activated cells, whereas compound P exerted a moderate
apoptotic effect, and rosiglitazone required concentrations higher than
10 µM. This induction of apoptosis was accompanied by an
increase in DEVDase activity, reflecting the activation of caspase
3/caspase 7 (Fig. 8C).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Synthesis of reactive species by PPAR
ligands. Cells were treated for 8 h with the indicated
stimuli in the absence or presence of the NOS-2 inhibitor 1400W (50 µM). The oxidation of DCFH and HE was determined by flow
cytometry. Results show the mean + S.D. of three experiments. *,
p < 0.005 with respect to the corresponding
control.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Changes of CMXRos fluorescence and induction
of apoptosis in macrophages treated with PPAR ligands. Cells were
treated for 8 h with the indicated stimuli, and the accumulation
of CMXRos fluorescence was determined by flow cytometry. Cells treated
for 10 min with the uncoupling agent m-chlorophenylhydrazone
carbonylcyanide were used to evaluate the minimal fluorescence per cell
(A). The percentage of apoptotic cells was determined at
18 h by flow cytometry after staining cells with propidium iodide
(B). The DEVDase activity of cell extracts treated for
8 h with the indicated stimuli was assayed fluorometrically
(C). Results show the mean (+ S.D.) of three experiments.
*, p < 0.05 with respect to the LPS/IFN-
condition.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Controversy exists in the literature with regard to the relative
contribution of some PPAR- agonists to the regulation of transcription through nuclear receptor ligation-dependent
(13-16) and -independent mechanisms (19, 21, 22). PPAR- activation in macrophages impairs the expression of genes requiring activator protein-1, NF- B, and signal transducer and activator of
transcription-1, resulting in the abrogation of the
transcription of NOS-2, gelatinase B, and other genes related to
inflammation (14). Similar results were observed in human monocytes
(13). However, other groups observed that prostanoids released after
the expression of cyclooxygenase-2, in particular, 15dPGJ2,
exerted rapid and early effects on the activation of NF- B that were
independent of PPAR- engagement and due to the formation of
Michael's adducts between the cyclopentenone moiety of the
prostaglandin and functional cysteine residues in target proteins (18).
Interestingly, these effects could not be reproduced after treatment of
the cells with TZDs. Moreover, the possibility of a direct interaction
of the cyclopentenone with key cysteine residues in the PPAR-
exists, and the diversity in the structure of its agonists might be
explained in this way.
The results reported in this work indicate that the high-affinity
PPAR- ligand compound G exerts effects on early
LPS-dependent signaling pathways, which are independent of
the transcriptional activity of this nuclear receptor. In RAW 264.7 cells, the protein levels of PPAR- determined by Western blotting
nuclear extracts were negligible when compared with those prevailing in
elicited peritoneal macrophages (14, 37). Moreover, Northern blot
analysis of the mRNA expressed in these cells showed minimal levels
of PPAR- 1 and undetectable amounts of PPAR- 2 (data not shown), data that were in agreement with those published previously (26). Therefore, it is likely that most of the effects of compound G in RAW
264.7 cells are independent of nuclear receptor engagement. Indeed,
when experiments on NOS-2 expression and NO synthesis similar to those
described in Fig. 1 were performed in elicited peritoneal macrophages
(which contain large amounts of PPAR- ), a notable increase in the
inhibitory capacity of compound G, compound P, and rosiglitazone was
observed, reflecting the additional contribution of the transrepression
mechanism dependent on PPAR- activation (16). Our data show that
compound G inhibited IKK2 activation in vitro and in
vivo, which resulted in the impairment of I B targeting in
the cytosol and abrogation of NF- B activity, as described previously
(15, 19, 40-42). Because I B is also expressed in RAW 264.7 cells
(21), and it was proposed that this form contributed to sustained
activation of NF- B (43), we analyzed the effect of compound G on the
subcellular distribution of I B proteins in the course of LPS
activation. An inhibition of the degradation of both I Bs, together
with an increase in the presence of these proteins in the nucleus, was
observed, presumably contributing to the impairment of NF- B activity
(44). However, we were unable to observe direct effects of compound G
on NF- B binding activity in vitro by measuring the
interaction of the p50-p65 complexes with the B motif of NOS-2. This
was not the case with 15dPGJ2, which exhibited an
inhibitory interaction with p65 in vitro, probably via
formation of a Michael adduct (20). Moreover, studies on the effect of
compound G on purified proteasome showed a significant inhibition of
the basal activity assayed with
N-succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr as substrate (data not
shown), suggesting that targeting of
I B by the proteasome was also affected.
Most of the results obtained with compound G on early LPS signaling
showed a pattern similar to that reported for 15dPGJ2 (21),
although this molecule does not contain a cyclopentenone motif.
However, previous work on the mechanism of activation of PPAR- by
L-764,406 identified the covalent modification of
Cys313 located in helix 3 of the nuclear receptor by a
chlorine residue of the agonist as a requirement for the activation
process (23, 25). Interestingly, both compound G and L-764,406 are
non-TZD agonists that share similar structures around the chlorine
residues. With these data in mind, it is possible that compound G
interacts with the cysteine residues of IKK2. Accordingly, IKK2
activity was inhibited by compound G both in vivo and
in vitro, although we cannot precisely determine the
mechanism of action. Moreover, the effects of compound G on LPS
signaling exhibited some degree of specificity because, for example,
the activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase, which has been well
documented in macrophages after LPS challenge (45, 46), was not
affected by compound G at doses up to 10 µM (data not shown).
In a previous report using RAW 264.7 cells and human monocytes
stimulated with a very low concentration of LPS from Salmonella minnesotta (0.1 ng/ml), pretreatment for 1 h with
compound G and compound P did not affect the secretion of tumor
necrosis factor and interleukin 6 as markers of cell activation,
whereas 15dPGJ2 inhibited the synthesis of these
pro-inflammatory cytokines (26). From these results, it was concluded
that compound G and compound P lacked anti-inflammatory activity
in vivo. However, the activation of NF- B elicited by 0.1 ng/ml LPS was barely detectable in the RAW 264.7 cells used in this
work, and a concerted action of LPS and IFN- was required to express
NOS-2 and to mediate a significant synthesis of NO (37). In this
regard, it is worth mentioning that 15dPGJ2 is more
efficient than TZDs in terms of inhibition of cytokine production by
human monocytes, suggesting that, in addition to PPAR- activation,
cyclopentenone prostaglandins act on additional targets that exert an
important control on the inflammatory process (13). In line with this,
it has been shown in macrophages that oxidized low density lipoproteins
inhibit the LPS-dependent production of interleukin 12, a
cytokine that potently induces the synthesis of IFN- and T-cell
activation, through a dual mechanism that involves both the inhibition
of the recognition between the NF- B complex and the DNA B sites
and the physical interaction between NF- B and PPAR- (47).
In addition to the inhibition of IKK2 activity, it has been shown that
compound G (but not rosiglitazone) increases the synthesis of reactive
oxygen species in activated RAW 264.7 cells, and this process
contributes to the induction of apoptosis. Indeed, treatment of
LPS/IFN- -activated cells with 15dPGJ2 triggers apoptosis
via an increase in the production of superoxide that results in the synthesis of significant amounts of peroxynitrite (37).
The contribution to apoptosis of PPAR- agonists has been described
in various cell types; activation of PPAR- with thiazolidinediones (49653; Life Technologies, Inc.) leads to apoptosis of activated human
macrophages (17, 48). However, as noted by Chinetti et al.
(17), the induction of apoptosis in human macrophages by TZD was
observed preferentially in activated cells and at much higher
concentrations (2-3 orders of magnitude) than those required for
PPAR- activation. Also, 15dPGJ2 and TZD potently induced caspase activation in human endothelial cells, both in human umbilical vascular endothelial cells and immortalized endothelial cells (49). In
the same vein, 15dPGJ2 and troglitazone induced apoptosis in synoviocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, which contributed to the amelioration of the inflammatory process (50), and
oxidized low density lipoprotein, which caused endothelial cell
apoptosis in part via caspase activation and also through enhancement of the synthesis of reactive oxygen species (51). In RAW
264.7 cells 15dPGJ2 and compound G, but not
rosiglitazone, triggered apoptosis, suggesting that this
process is mainly accomplished through PPAR- -independent mechanisms.
The ability of NF- B to sense oxidative stress and to integrate this
signaling in terms of regulation of cell viability (induction of
apoptosis and necrosis) has been a subject of current debate (52).
Because the main regulatory step controlling NF- B activity is
located at the IKK level (39, 40), it might be suggested that non-TZD
PPAR- agonists, such as 15dPGJ2 and compound G, which
inhibit IKK activity, offer the possibility to control NF- B activity at different points. This is important for the resolution of
inflammatory processes in which not only the synthesis of cytokines and
chemical mediators (NO and reactive oxygen species) needs to be
impaired, but the removal of activated cells by an efficient apoptotic
mechanism, reinforced by a deficient NF- B activation, is also
required (53, 54).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank E. Lunidn, Dr. M. A. Moro, and
Dr. B. de las Heras for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants PM98-0120 and FD97-1432
from the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y
Tecnología, and Sociedad Española de Nefrología,
Spain.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax:
3491-544-7254/3491-394-1782; E-mail: boscal@eucmax.sim.ucm.es
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 3, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102472200
2
A. Castrillo, M. Mojena, S. Hortelano, and L. Boscá, manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PPAR, peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor;
CMXRos, chloromethyl X-rosamine;
15dPGJ2, 15-deoxy- 12,14-prostaglandin
J2;
DCFH, 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate;
HE, hydroethidine;
IKK, I B kinase;
IFN, interferon;
NOS-2, NO
synthase-2;
NF- B, nuclear factor B;
PG, prostaglandin;
TZD, thiazolidinedione;
GST, glutathione S- transferase;
Ab, antibody;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
CAT, chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase;
TLCK, N -p-tosyl-L-lysine
chloromethyl ketone;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
ROI, reactive oxygen intermediate.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Devchand, P. R.,
Keller, H.,
Peters, J. M.,
Vazquez, M.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
and Wahli, W.
(1996)
Nature
384,
39-43
|
| 2.
|
Schoonjans, K.,
Martin, G.,
Staels, B.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
8,
159-166
|
| 3.
|
Glass, C. K.,
and Rosenfeld, M. G.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
121-141
|
| 4.
|
Fruchart, J. C.,
Duriez, P.,
and Staels, B.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
10,
245-257
|
| 5.
|
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
Thummel, C.,
Beato, M.,
Herrlich, P.,
Schutz, G.,
Umesono, K.,
Blumberg, B.,
Kastner, P.,
Mark, M.,
and Chambon, P.
(1995)
Cell
83,
835-839
|
| 6.
|
Spiegelman, B. M.
(1998)
Diabetes
47,
507-514
|
| 7.
|
Marx, N.,
Sukhova, G.,
Murphy, C.,
Libby, P.,
and Plutzky, J.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
153,
17-23
|
| 8.
|
Li, A. C.,
Brown, K. K.,
Silvestre, M. J.,
Willson, T. M.,
Palinski, W.,
and Glass, C. K.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
106,
523-531
|
| 9.
|
Tontonoz, P.,
and Nagy, L.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
10,
485-490
|
| 10.
|
Hanley, K.,
Jiang, Y.,
Crumrine, D.,
Bass, N. M.,
Appel, R.,
Elias, P. M.,
Williams, M. L.,
and Feingold, K. R.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
705-712
|
| 11.
|
Kliewer, S. A.,
Lenhard, J. M.,
Willson, T. M.,
Patel, I.,
Morris, D. C.,
and Lehmann, J. M.
(1995)
Cell
83,
813-819
|
| 12.
|
Reginato, M. J.,
Krakow, S. L.,
Bailey, S. T.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1855-1858
|
| 13.
|
Jiang, C.,
Ting, A. T.,
and Seed, B.
(1998)
Nature
391,
82-86
|
| 14.
|
Ricote, M.,
Li, A. C.,
Willson, T. M.,
Kelly, C. J.,
and Glass, C. K.
(1998)
Nature
391,
79-82
|
| 15.
|
Ricote, M.,
Huang, J. T.,
Welch, J. S.,
and Glass, C. K.
(1999)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
66,
733-739
|
| 16.
|
Li, M.,
Pascual, G.,
and Glass, C. K.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
4699-4707
|
| 17.
|
Chinetti, G.,
Griglio, S.,
Antonucci, M.,
Torra, I. P.,
Delerive, P.,
Majd, Z.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Chapman, J.,
Najib, J.,
and Staels, B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25573-25580
|
| 18.
|
Chen, Y.,
Morrow, J. D.,
and Roberts, L. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10863-10868
|
| 19.
|
Rossi, A.,
Kapahi, P.,
Natoli, G.,
Takahashi, T.,
Chen, Y.,
Karin, M.,
and Santoro, M. G.
(2000)
Nature
403,
103-108
|
| 20.
|
Straus, D. S.,
Pascual, G.,
Li, M.,
Welch, J. S.,
Ricote, M.,
Hsiang, C. H.,
Sengchanthalangsy, L. L.,
Ghosh, G.,
and Glass, C. K.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
4844-4849
|
| 21.
|
Castrillo, A.,
Diaz-Guerra, M. J.,
Hortelano, S.,
Martin-Sanz, P.,
and Bosca, L.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1692-1698
|
| 22.
|
Petrova, T. V.,
Akama, K. T.,
and Van Eldik, L. J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
4668-4673
|
| 23.
|
Berger, J.,
Leibowitz, M. D.,
Doebber, T. W.,
Elbrecht, A.,
Zhang, B.,
Zhou, G.,
Biswas, C.,
Cullinan, C. A.,
Hayes, N. S.,
Li, Y.,
Tanen, M.,
Ventre, J.,
Wu, M. S.,
Berger, G. D.,
Mosley, R.,
Marquis, R.,
Santini, C.,
Sahoo, S. P.,
Tolman, R. L.,
Smith, R. G.,
and Moller, D. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
6718-6725
|
| 24.
|
Krey, G.,
Braissant, O.,
L'Horset, F.,
Kalkhoven, E.,
Perroud, M.,
Parker, M. G.,
and Wahli, W.
(1997)
Mol. Endocrinol.
11,
779-791
|
| 25.
|
Elbrecht, A.,
Chen, Y.,
Adams, A.,
Berger, J.,
Griffin, P.,
Klatt, T.,
Zhang, B.,
Menke, J.,
Zhou, G.,
Smith, R. G.,
and Moller, D. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
7913-7922
|
| 26.
|
Thieringer, R.,
Fenyk-Melody, J. E.,
Le Grand, C. B.,
Shelton, B. A.,
Detmers, P. A.,
Somers, E. P.,
Carbin, L.,
Moller, D. E.,
Wright, S. D.,
and Berger, J.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
1046-1054
|
| 27.
|
Diaz-Guerra, M. J. M.,
Velasco, M.,
Martin-Sanz, P.,
and Bosca, L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30114-30120
|
| 28.
|
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159
|
| 29.
|
Schreiber, E.,
Matthias, P.,
Muller, M. M.,
and Schaffner, W.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
6419
|
| 30.
|
Xie, Q. W.,
Whisnant, R.,
and Nathan, C.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
177,
1779-1784
|
| 31.
|
Xie, Q. W.,
Kashiwabara, Y.,
and Nathan, C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
4705-4708
|
| 32.
|
Hortelano, S.,
Dallaporta, B.,
Zamzami, N.,
Hirsch, T.,
Susin, S. A.,
Marzo, I.,
Bosca, L.,
and Kroemer, G.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
410,
373-377
|
| 33.
|
Hortelano, S.,
Alvarez, A. M.,
and Bosca, L.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
2311-2317
|
| 34.
|
Kroemer, G.,
Dallaporta, B.,
and Resche-Rigon, M.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
60,
619-642
|
| 35.
|
Hortelano, S.,
López-Collazo, A.,
and Boscá, L.
(1999)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
126,
1139-1146
|
| 36.
|
Genaro, A. M.,
Hortelano, S.,
Alvarez, A.,
Martinez, C.,
and Bosca, L.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
95,
1884-1890
|
| 37.
|
Hortelano, S.,
Castrillo, A.,
Alvarez, A. M.,
and Boscá, L.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
165,
6525-6531
|
| 38.
|
Nathan, C.,
and Xie, Q. W.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13725-13728
|
| 39.
|
Mercurio, F.,
Zhu, H.,
Murray, B. W.,
Shevchenko, A.,
Bennett, B. L.,
Li, J.,
Young, D. B.,
Barbosa, M.,
Mann, M.,
Manning, A.,
and Rao, A.
(1997)
Science
278,
860-866
|
| 40.
|
Karin, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27339-27342
|
| 41.
|
Woronicz, J. D.,
Gao, X.,
Cao, Z.,
Rothe, M.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1997)
Science
278,
866-869
|
| 42.
|
Zandi, E.,
Rothwarf, D. M.,
Delhase, M.,
Hayakawa, M.,
and Karin, M.
(1997)
Cell
91,
243-252
|
| 43.
|
Thompson, J. E.,
Phillips, R. J.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
and Ghosh, S.
(1995)
Cell
80,
573-582
|
| 44.
|
Rodriguez, M. S.,
Thompson, J.,
Hay, R. T.,
and Dargemont, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9108-9115
|
| 45.
|
Procyk, K. J.,
Rippo, M. R.,
Testi, R.,
Hofmann, F.,
Parker, P. J.,
and Baccarini, M.
(2000)
Blood
96,
2592-2598
|
| 46.
|
Hambleton, J.,
Weinstein, S. L.,
Lem, L.,
and DeFranco, A. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
2774-2778
|
| 47.
|
Chung, S. W.,
Kang, B. Y.,
Kim, S. H.,
Pak, Y. K.,
Cho, D.,
Trinchieri, G.,
and Kim, T. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32681-32687
|
| 48.
|
Eguchi, Y.,
Eguchi, N.,
Oda, H.,
Seiki, K.,
Kijima, Y.,
Matsu-ura, Y.,
Urade, Y.,
and Hayaishi, O.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14689-14694
|
| 49.
|
Bishop-Bailey, D.,
and Hla, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17042-17048
|
| 50.
|
Kawahito, Y.,
Kondo, M.,
Tsubouchi, Y.,
Hashiramoto, A.,
Bishop-Bailey, D.,
Inoue, K.,
Kohno, M.,
Yamada, R.,
Hla, T.,
and Sano, H.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
106,
189-197
|
| 51.
|
Harada-Shiba, M.,
Kinoshita, M.,
Kamido, H.,
and Shimokado, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9681-9687
|
| 52.
|
Li, N.,
and Karin, M.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
1137-1143
|
| 53.
|
Albina, J. E.,
and Reichner, J. S.
(1998)
Cancer Metastasis Rev.
17,
39-53
|
| 54.
|
Anderson, G. P.
(1996)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
17,
438-442
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Okamura, Y. Takano, N. Hiramatsu, K. Hayakawa, J. Yao, A. W. Paton, J. C. Paton, and M. Kitamura
Suppression of cytokine responses by indomethacin in podocytes: a mechanism through induction of unfolded protein response
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
November 1, 2008;
295(5):
F1495 - F1503.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Lombardi, G. Cantini, E. Piscitelli, S. Gelmini, M. Francalanci, T. Mello, E. Ceni, G. Varano, G. Forti, M. Rotondi, et al.
A New Mechanism Involving ERK Contributes to Rosiglitazone Inhibition of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} and Interferon-{gamma} Inflammatory Effects in Human Endothelial Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
April 1, 2008;
28(4):
718 - 724.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Cuenca, N. Goren, P. Prieto, P. Martin-Sanz, and L. Bosca
Selective Impairment of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B-Dependent Gene Transcription in Adult Cardiomyocytes: Relevance for the Regulation of the Inflammatory Response in the Heart
Am. J. Pathol.,
September 1, 2007;
171(3):
820 - 828.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Kota, C. V. Ramana, F. A. Tenorio, R. I. Enelow, and J. C. Rutledge
Differential Effects of Lipoprotein Lipase on Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} and Interferon-{gamma}-mediated Gene Expression in Human Endothelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 2, 2005;
280(35):
31076 - 31084.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Lu, K. Imamura, S. Nomura, K.-i. Mafune, A. Nakajima, T. Kadowaki, N. Kubota, Y. Terauchi, G. Ishii, A. Ochiai, et al.
Chemopreventive Effect of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} on Gastric Carcinogenesis in Mice
Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2005;
65(11):
4769 - 4774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Crosby, J. L. Svenson, J. Zhang, C. J. Nicol, F. J. Gonzalez, and G. S. Gilkeson
Peroxisome Proliferation-Activated Receptor (PPAR){gamma} Is Not Necessary for Synthetic PPAR{gamma} Agonist Inhibition of Inducible Nitric-Oxide Synthase and Nitric Oxide
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
January 1, 2005;
312(1):
69 - 76.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Cheron, J. Peltier, J. Perez, A. Bellocq, B. Fouqueray, and L. Baud
15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-Prostaglandin J2 Inhibits Glucocorticoid Binding and Signaling in Macrophages through a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}-Independent Process
J. Immunol.,
June 15, 2004;
172(12):
7677 - 7683.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Saez, J. Rosenfeld, A. Livolsi, P. Olson, E. Lombardo, M. Nelson, E. Banayo, R. D. Cardiff, J. C. Izpisua-Belmonte, and R. M. Evans
PPAR{gamma} signaling exacerbates mammary gland tumor development
Genes & Dev.,
March 1, 2004;
18(5):
528 - 540.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Zingarelli, M. Sheehan, P. W. Hake, M. O'Connor, A. Denenberg, and J. A. Cook
Peroxisome Proliferator Activator Receptor-{gamma} Ligands, 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-Prostaglandin J2 and Ciglitazone, Reduce Systemic Inflammation in Polymicrobial Sepsis by Modulation of Signal Transduction Pathways
J. Immunol.,
December 15, 2003;
171(12):
6827 - 6837.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-W. Chen, Y.-H. Chang, C.-J. Tsi, and W.-W. Lin
Inhibition of IFN-{gamma}-Mediated Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Induction by the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Agonist, 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-Prostaglandin J2, Involves Inhibition of the Upstream Janus Kinase/STAT1 Signaling Pathway
J. Immunol.,
July 15, 2003;
171(2):
979 - 988.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|