|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105293200 on July 10, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 36, 34105-34114, September 7, 2001
ESDN, a Novel Neuropilin-like Membrane Protein Cloned from
Vascular Cells with the Longest Secretory Signal Sequence among
Eukaryotes, Is Up-regulated after Vascular Injury*
Kazuhiro
Kobuke §,
Yutaka
Furukawa§,
Manabu
Sugai¶,
Kenji
Tanigaki ,
Naohiro
Ohashi§,
Akira
Matsumori§,
Shigetake
Sasayama§,
Tasuku
Honjo , and
Kei
Tashiro¶
From the Department of Medical Chemistry, the
§ Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University
Graduate School of Medicine, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto,
606-8501, Japan and the ¶ Center for Molecular Biology and
Genetics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
Received for publication, June 8, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
A novel cDNA has been isolated from
primary culture of human coronary arterial cells by a signal sequence
trap method, and designated ESDN (endothelial and
smooth muscle cell-derived
neuropilin-like molecule). ESDN is a type-I transmembrane
protein with the longest cleavable secretory signal sequence among
eukaryotes. ESDN contains a CUB domain and a coagulation
factor V/VIII homology domain, which reminds us of the structure
of neuropilins. ESDN also harbors an LCCL domain, which is shared by
Limulus factor C and Coch. Mouse and rat counterparts were also
identified revealing >84% amino acid identity with human ESDN. The
human ESDN gene was mapped between D3S1552 and D3S1271.
Northern blot analysis showed that ESDN mRNA was expressed in
various tissues; particularly highly expressed in cultured vascular
smooth muscle cells. The ESDN expression was up-regulated in
platelet-derived growth factor-BB-stimulated vascular smooth
muscle cells in vitro and neointima of the balloon-injured carotid artery in vivo. Overexpression of ESDN in 293T
cells suppressed their bromodeoxyuridine uptake. In addition, ESDN
protein was strongly expressed in nerve bundles in rodents. Thus, ESDN
is considered to play a role in regulation of vascular cell growth and
may have a wide variety of functions in other tissues including the
nervous system, like neuropilins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The vascular system is distributed throughout a body of
multicellular organisms like vertebrates and is essential for their life. Its disturbance is the bases of many human diseases including ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and many renal disorders. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus all
impair vascular integrity through the acceleration of atherosclerosis. Even tumor growth and metastasis require the development of new blood
vessel growth (1). In the field of cardiovascular medicine, much
therapeutic advance was made through the introduction of percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty for coronary heart disease
which is one of the leading causes of human morbidity and mortality.
Successful interventions, however, are followed by 20 to 50% of
restenosis within 6 months (2-4), which demands considerable burden to
patients and expense to the society due to the necessity of repeated
diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions.
Despite significance in human disorders, the basic study of the
vascular system lagged behind those of the immune and the nervous
system, whose initial major works were achieved by cell biological or
anatomical approach. The introduction of molecular biological methods
have changed such situations, and much progress has been made through
the study of extracellular signal transducing molecules. Using the gene
targeting strategy, the ligand and its receptor systems of
VEGF1-VEGFR (5-8) and
angiopoietin-Tie (9, 10) were shown to be essential for vasculogenesis
and angiogenesis, respectively. Recently, several molecules originally
studied in the nervous system have been shown to be involved in the
vascular system: Ephrin-Eph are the until now the only surface markers
discriminating between arteries and veins (11); and neuropilin-1 is
found to be a functional co-receptor for VEGFR2 in endothelium (12) as well as for plexin in axon guidance repulsive activity (13).
Growth factors (e.g. PDGF (14, 15), basic fibroblast growth
factor (16), and transforming growth factor- ) and inflammatory cytokines (e.g. monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (17),
interferon- , and interleukin-1 (18)), which had been extensively
studied in other fields like cancer biology or immunology, have been
shown to play important roles in restenosis or atherosclerosis as well. Many of them are aggravating factors, while some of them (transforming growth factor- (19), interferon- (20, 21), bone
morphogenetic protein-2 (22, 23)) have opposing reports as an
aggravating as well as a protecting factor. The regenerating
endothelium is considered to act protective in these pathological
processes (24, 25), and several candidates of intervening molecules
have been proposed which include nitric oxide (26), prostacyclin (27), and heparin/heparan sulfates (28, 29). However, little is known about
the existence of other protective extracellular signal transducing proteins.
We presumed the existence of much more extracellular signal transducing
molecules which are involved in the homeostasis and pathophysiology of
the vascular system. Therefore, we tried to clone such molecules by the
signal sequence trap method (30). Using this cDNA screening method,
many molecules on the secretory pathway with a wide variety of
functions have been efficiently isolated, for example, SDF-1 (31),
ESOP-1/MD2 (32), DANCE (33), FKBP23 (34), calumenin (35), syncytin
(36), and so on. We conducted a modified version of signal sequence
trap screening (37) to vascular cells, and succeeded in cloning several novel transmembrane or secretory proteins. One of these, ESDN, is a
novel type-I transmembrane protein, has a characteristic domain
structure reminding us of neuropilins, and will be described here.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents and Cell Culture--
Human angiotensin II (AT-II),
human recombinant PDGF-BB, and fetal calf serum (FCS) were purchased
from Sigma, Life Technologies, and JRH Biosciences, respectively.
Genomic DNAs of cow, rabbit, and Drosophila were purchased
from CLONTECH, and that of yeast from Promega. The
other genomic DNAs were isolated as previously described (38). Primary
culture of normal human coronary artery endothelial cells or smooth
muscle cells were purchased from Clonetics (San Diego, CA), cultured in
EGM-2-MV or SmGM-2 (BioWhittaker) according to the manufacturer's
instructions, and used between passages 5 and 8. To co-culture them, an
equal number of endothelial and smooth muscle cells were mixed and
maintained in EGM-2-MV for 2 days before RNA extraction. For smooth
muscle cell stimulation experiments, they were serum-starved in DMEM
supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine for 48 h before the medium was exchanged to DMEM + 2 mM
L-glutamine with or without PDGF-BB, AT-II, or FCS of
indicated concentrations. Mouse cell lines, A9(Neo3) and A9(Neo12),
were purchased from JCRB Cell Bank and cultured in DMEM with 10%
FCS. HEK293T cells were cultured in DMEM + 10% FCS. Rat aortic
vascular smooth muscle cells were prepared by the explant method (39) and used between passages 5 and 8.
Total RNA Extraction, Poly(A)+ RNA Purification, and
the Preparation of RT-PCR Templates--
Total RNA was extracted with
TRIzol or TRIzol LS (Life Technologies, Inc.).
Oligotex(dT)30 Super (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was
used for the purification of poly(A)+ RNA. The first strand
cDNA for the ordinary or quantitative RT-PCR was synthesized from
total RNA using the SuperScript Preamplification System for First
Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Life Technologies, Inc.).
Signal Sequence Trap Screening and cDNA Cloning of Human,
Mouse, and Rat ESDN--
Poly(A)+ RNAs from human coronary
artery endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and their co-cultured
cells were used for the construction of the cDNA libraries, and the
yeast signal sequence trap screening was carried out as described
previously (40). 5'- and 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends
methods were performed using the Marathon cDNA Amplification Kit
(CLONTECH). Coding sequences except the 5' most
region of mouse and rat were obtained with RT-PCR using two kinds of
primer pairs based on human sequence data:
5'-CTGCTCCAACTCCTCCTCCTTC-3' and 5'-CTGCTTCATTCCTTTCCACCAACCTG-3'; 5'-TGTGCTGGTCATGGTCCTCACTACTCTC-3' and 5'-TGTGCTTTAAAACGATGCTTTG-3'. The N-terminal region of cDNA (nucleotide 453 to 800 of
GenBankTM accession number AF387548) labeled with
[ -32P]dCTP was used for subsequent mouse genomic
library screening with Lambda FIX II library (Stratagene). A sense
primer of 5'-CTGGCCGCTCATTGGTCTCAGC-3' located on the obtained genomic
sequence was paired with an antisense primer of
5'-GGATGTAAGGGTTCCACTCTCAGG-3' situated in the downstream exon to
acquire the first methionine-containing coding region of mouse ESDN.
The above sense primer was replaced with another one,
5'-GCACTATGCGGGCGGATTGC-3', for cloning the first
methionine-containing region of human and rat ESDNs.
Computer Analysis and Data Base Search--
Handling of all the
nucleotide and amino acid sequence data and the construction of
hydrophobicity profiles were performed with GenetyxMac Version 9.0 (Software Development Co., Ltd.). Sequence alignment was executed with
MacVector (Oxford Molecular Group). BLAST and FASTA searches were
performed at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/blast.cgi and
www.fasta.genome.ad.jp/ideas/fasta/fasta_nr-aa.html, respectively. Motif search was done at www.motif.genome.ad.jp/. Prediction of signal
peptides and transmembrane regions were based on the methods previously
reported (41, 42).
Anti-ESDN Antibody Production and Western Blot
Analysis--
Rabbit anti-CUB and anti-FV/VIII polyclonal
antibodies were raised against keyhole limpet
homocyanin-conjugated polypeptides of GERIRIKFGDFDIEDSD and
QDKIFQGNKDYHKDVRNN, respectively, and affinity purified against
each polypeptide by Sawady Technology. Western analysis was carried out
following the ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) or Renaissance
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences) Western blot protocols. The other primary
antibodies used are anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody (Sigma) and
His-probe H-15 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz).
Overexpression of ESDN cDNA and Immunofluorescent Cell
Staining--
Human ESDN constructs of hESDN-FL, - EC, or - Cy
were cloned into pEF6V5-His (Invitrogen) with swapping the original V5
epitope to the FLAG tag. Mouse ESDN constructs of mESDN-Ex(Edns) or
-Ex(CD5) were cloned into pCAGGS (43). An amino acid sequence of human CD5 is MPMGSLQPLATLYLLGMLVASVLA. These expression vectors were transfected into 293T and COS7 cells with CellPhect (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) and LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.), respectively,
following their protocols. Transfected COS7 cells were stained
essentially as described (44). Used secondary antibodies were Texas
Red-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories) and fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson Laboratories).
Northern and Southern Blot Analyses--
Human ESDN (nucleotide
193-585 of GenBankTM accession number AF387547), rat ESDN
(332-830 of GenBankTM AF387549) and rat GAPDH (459-1001
of GenBankTM M17701) cDNAs were labeled with
[ -32P]dCTP and used as a probe for Northern and
Southern analyses. Southern zooblot was washed with 1 × SSC at
37 °C. The other blots were all washed with 0.2 × SSC at
65 °C.
A Rat Carotid Artery Balloon Injury Model and Immunohistochemical
Staining--
Fourteen- to fifteen-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats
were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (50 mg/kg), and the endothelium of the left common carotid artery was denuded with a 2F Fogarty embolectomy catheter (Baxter Healthcare), as previously described (17). The carotid arteries
were harvested at 0, 5, or 14 days after balloon injury and used for
quantitative RT-PCR analysis or immunohistochemistry. The latter
procedure was performed as previously described (45) with the following
modifications. Cold 4% paraformaldehyde was used for
perfusion-fixation; and as primary antibodies, rabbit anti-peptide
polyclonal antibodies at a concentration of 5-10 µg/ml or the
same concentration of normal rabbit IgG (DAKO) for negative controls
were used.
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis--
The mRNAs for human or rat
ESDN and GAPDH were measured by real-time quantitative RT-PCR using PE
Applied Biosystems Prism Model 7700 Sequence Detection System. The
nucleotide sequences of the dye-conjugated probe, forward and
reverse primers are as follows: ESDN probe,
5'-(6-FAM)-CCTGAGAGTGGAACCCTTACATCCATAAAC-(TAMRA)-3'; ESDN forward,
5'-CCCAGCAAGGTGATGGATG-3'; ESDN reverse,
5'-CAAGAATCAGAATCTTCAATGTCAAAG-3'. These were based on the human
sequence, but were confirmed to be applicable in quantitative
measurements of rodent transcripts as well. TaqMan GAPDH Control
Reagents and TaqMan Rodent GAPDH Control Reagents (PE Biosystems) were
used for measurements of human and rat GAPDH, respectively. Standard
curves were prepared from known amount of plasmids with ESDN or GAPDH
amplicon subcloned into pBlueScript SK( ) (Stratagene), and the ESDN
mRNA level normalized to that of GAPDH was used for further analyses.
BrdUrd Uptake Assay in 293T Cells--
293T cells were
transfected by CellPhect (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as the
manufacturer's instructions. After 12 h of incubation with
transfection solution, the medium was replaced with fresh DMEM + 10%
FCS and incubated for 2 h, trypsinized, and replated to 96-well
plates in duplicate. For one plate, a 2-h BrdUrd pulse was applied
after 24 h of culture and incorporated BrdUrd was measured by Cell
Proliferation ELISA, BrdUrd (colorimetric) (Roche Molecular
Diagnostics) following the manufacturer's instructions. The other
plate was used to estimate the cell number with tetrazolium/formazan assay using Premix WST-1 assay kit (TaKaRa Shuzo Co., Shiga, Japan) 2 h after replating.
Statistical Analysis--
Data are presented as mean ± S.E. and were analyzed by a paired t test with its
p value corrected according to the Bonferroni's method.
Normalization of mean1 ± S.E.1
(n = N) to mean2 ± S.E.2 (n = N) was performed as follows: normalized mean = mean1/mean2, normalized S.E. = (mean1/mean2) × [{(S.E.1/mean1)2 + (S.E.2/mean2)2}/N](1/2).
In this case, the number of degrees of freedom ranges from N-1 to
2x(N-1) depending on the variances (this calculation can be performed
with the Smith-Satterthwaite procedure), but we always assumed it to be
N-1, which is the most conservative estimate for yielding statistical
significance in subsequent analyses.
 |
RESULTS |
Signal Sequence Trap Screening from Primary Culture of Human
Coronary Arterial Cells and Cloning of the Full-length Human, Mouse,
and Rat ESDN cDNAs--
The three types of cDNA libraries
constructed from primary culture of human coronary artery endothelial
cells, smooth muscle cells, and their 2-day co-cultures yielded
3.2 × 106 Escherichia coli transformants,
which were screened by the yeast signal sequence trap method described
previously (40). Five thousand positive clones were obtained and all
the base sequences were determined with redundant clones being removed
by dot-blot hybridization. More than 90 different genes were
identified; >10 of them were novel genes. One such clone derived from
the co-culture library contained a CUB domain, which is found in an
increasing number of secretory or transmembrane proteins with various
functions (46), and was selected for a further study.
As the clones obtained by the signal sequence trap screening held only
part of 5'-untranslated region and portion of the coding region, 5'-
and 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends were performed to isolate
the full-length cDNA. We also isolated mouse and rat counterparts
by RT-PCR based on human sequence data. Alignment of human, mouse, and
rat amino acid sequences deduced from their nucleotide sequences showed
more than 84% amino acid identity between human and rodents, but
revealed that the first methionine of human gene obtained by the signal
sequence trap method was not conserved in rodents. Extensive 5'-rapid
amplification of cDNA ends could not reach the definitive first
methionine in any species. High GC content in the 5' region of ESDN
(data not shown) could cause a high-order structure of mRNA
hindering the performance of a reverse transcription in addition to the
difficulty in PCR reaction. Therefore, we conducted a genomic library
screening, which is dependent on neither process. Screening of a
1.2 × 106 mouse phage genomic library yielded two
positive clones, and the determinated base sequence of the neighborhood
of probe-hybridizing region revealed a candidate for the first
methionine with an upstream stop codon. A sense primer was designed 5'
side of this stop codon and paired with an antisense primer in the
downstream exon to yield genuine RT-PCR product without an intron.
Using human or rat RT-PCR templates, another primer pair covering mouse
first methionine could also yield counterparts of these species.
Alignment of three products showed conservation of the location of the
first methionine which agreed very well with the Kozak consensus site (data not shown) (47). The overall primary structure was also well
conserved (Fig. 1A), with an
amino acid identity between human and rodents and between mouse and rat
is 84-85 and 92%, respectively.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Primary structure of ESDN with the longest
secretory signal sequence. A, alignment of deduced amino
acid sequences of human, mouse, and rat ESDNs. Identical and homologous
amino acids are indicated by dark and light
shading, respectively. Closed triangles mark potential
N-linked glycosylation sites common to three species, and
open triangles are those found only in human.
Bi-directional arrows show the peptide region against which
rabbit polyclonal antibodies were raised. Limits of the domains are
also indicated. B, the domain structure of ESDN,
neuropilins, and Coch. Signal sequences at the N terminus
(S.S.), CUB domains (CUB), LCCL modules
(LCCL), transmembrane regions (TM), coagulation factor V/VIII-homology domains (FV/VIII),
a MAM domain (MAM), von Willebrand factor type A domains
(vWFA), and cytoplasmic domains (Cytoplasmic) are
indicated. C, alignment of LCCL modules from human, mouse,
or rat ESDN, Limulus factor C, two LCCL domains of predicted rat Lgl-1,
and human, mouse, or chicken Coch. Dark and light
shading means identical and homologous amino acids, respectively.
Four conserved cysteines are marked by asterisks (*).
Number symbols (#) indicate the four positions on human Coch
where mutations were found in DFNA9.
|
|
A Novel Clone, Named ESDN, Resembles Neuropilins in Its Domain
Structure and Harbors a Recently Reported LCCL
Domain--
Hydrophobicity profiles (Fig.
2A) of a novel clone showed an
atypically long secretory signal sequence (a further analysis will be
described below) and one transmembrane region, suggesting that it is a
type-I transmembrane protein. A motif search revealed that the novel
clone has two domains, a CUB domain and a coagulation factor V/factor
VIII homology (FV/VIII) domain. This domain structure reminds us of
neuropilins, which is a type-I transmembrane protein composed of two
CUB domains, two FV/VIII domains, and one MAM domain in its
extracellular portion (Fig. 1B). Based on the source and
this structural similarity, we named this novel clone ESDN (endothelial and smooth muscle
cell-derived neuropilin-like molecule). A
sequence homology search of the other area revealed that the region
between the CUB and FV/VIII domains has significant homology with Coch
(48) and Limulus factor C (49). This region has been recently
recognized and named as an LCCL module (50). The LCCL domain was not
pointed out in the original paper reporting Lgl-1 (51), but Trexler
et al. (50) demonstrated that a single base insertion
revealing that Lgl-1 contains two tandem LCCL domains. Alignment of
these proteins showed the conservation of four cysteines in this domain
(Fig. 1C).

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Recombinant expression of ESDN, functional
analysis of its signal sequence, and characterization of anti-peptide
antibodies. A, hydrophobicity profiles of human
and mouse ESDN calculated by the algorithm of Kyte and Doolittle (91).
B, a schematic view of the expression vectors. Human ESDN of
full-length (hESDN-FL), extracellular
(hESDN- EC), or cytoplasmic
(hESDN- Cy) constructs were all tagged with
C-terminal FLAG and 6xHis. For construction of secretory type, the
extracellular portion of mouse ESDN with C-terminal 6xHis tag was
prepared with its signal sequence intact (mESDN-Ex(Edns)) or swapped by
that of human CD5 (mESDN-Ex(CD5)). C, Western blot analysis
of the recombinant full-length ESDN. 293T cells were transiently
transfected with the human full-length construct. The cell lysates were
applied to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis. Western
blot detection was performed by anti-FLAG (left), anti-CUB
(middle), or anti-FV/VIII (right) antibodies.
D, surface expression of ESDN. COS7 cells were transiently
transfected with the human full-length ESDN construct. The protein was
detected at the cell surface both with an anti-FLAG (middle)
and with anti-peptide (left) antibodies, indicating
co-localization on the cell surface as observed in merged images
(right) under confocal laser microscopy. As an anti-peptide
antibody, anti-CUB, and anti-FV/VIII antibodies were used in
upper and lower panels, respectively.
E, the longest secretory signal sequence of ESDN is
cleavable at the predicted site. 293T cells were transiently
transfected with the constructs made up of extracellular portion of
ESDN and C-terminal 6xHis, harboring endogenous or CD5-derived signal
sequence. Culture media were harvested 2 days later and immunoblotted
with the anti-6xHis antibody. The product of exactly the same size
confirms the appropriateness of the predicted location of the signal
sequence cleavage.
|
|
Expression of Recombinant ESDN Protein, Characterization of
Anti-peptide Antibodies, and Confirmation of the Signal
Sequence--
293T cells were transiently transfected with an
expression vector containing the full-length human ESDN cDNA with a
C-terminal FLAG tag (and a 6xHis tag) driven by the human elongation
factor-1 promoter (Fig. 2B). Cell lysate was analyzed by
Western blot using anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody and two kinds of
polyclonal antibodies raised against polypeptide within the CUB or the
FV/VIII domain (bi-directional arrows in Fig.
1A). All three antibodies commonly recognized three sizes of
protein bands, ~127, 106, and 93 kDa (Fig. 2C). These
protein products were larger than the predicted molecular mass
of 80 kDa, which was calculated from signal sequence-removed 709 amino
acids plus 17 amino acids from the C-terminal FLAG and 6xHis tags. This
size difference can be due to N-glycosylation, considering
that 5-7 potential sites are there (Fig. 1A).
Because the predicted signal sequence of ESDN is very long and atypical
in its hydrophobicity profile (Fig. 2A), we analyzed the
suitability of this point by two ways. First, COS7 cells were transiently transfected with human full-length ESDN cDNA,
double-stained with anti-FLAG and anti-ESDN antibodies, and observed
under a confocal laser microscope. Fig. 2D confirmed the
cell-surface expression of this protein. Then, we tried to confirm the
location of a signal sequence cleavage site. The extracellular portion of mouse ESDN was recloned into an expression vector under the CAG
promoter with the C-terminal 6xHis tag. We prepared another construct
whose signal sequence was swapped with that of human CD5 (Fig.
2B). 293T cells were transiently transfected with these constructs, and culture media were analyzed by Western blot using the
anti-6xHis antibody. Both constructs yielded the protein product of
exactly the same size (Fig. 2E). As the size difference of the signal sequences between human CD5 and mouse ESDN is 39 amino acid
residues, corresponding approximately to a difference of 4 kDa, this
result supports the same location of signal sequence cleavage sites.
Conservation and the Chromosomal Localization of the Human ESDN
Gene--
To characterize the evolutionary conservation of
ESDN, a Southern zooblot analysis was performed with human
ESDN probe (Fig. 3A). In
addition to strong bands observed in all mammals (mouse, rat, rabbit,
cow, and human), weak bands were detected in Xenopus. No
bands were observed in fly and yeast. BLAST search also revealed that
there exist several ESTs from zebrafish (data not shown). Thus the
conservation of ESDN is high in mammals, with extension to
vertebrates.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Evolutionary conservation of ESDN
and its chromosomal localization in human. A, Southern
zooblot analysis of ESDN was performed with
32P-labeled human ESDN cDNA as a probe. The filter was
loaded with 200 ng (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), 1 µg
(D. melanogaster), or 10 µg (the other species) of
EcoRI-digested genomic DNA as normalized to genome size.
B, human ESDN gene is on chromosome 3. Genomic
DNAs from mouse cell lines, A9(Neo3) and A9(Neo12), were loaded and
hybridized with the 32P-labeled human ESDN cDNA
probe.
|
|
Search for STS in human ESDN sequence revealed that it contains two
independent STS clones, stSG29921 and sts-D29024, which are mapped to
D3S1603-D3S1271 and D3S1552-D3S1603, respectively (52). To confirm this
data base result experimentally, mouse cell lines A9(Neo3) and
A9(Neo12), which contain human chromosome 3 and 12, respectively, were
used for genomic Southern hybridization. Human ESDN probe identified a
cross-hybridized mouse band in both lanes, but two additional human
bands were present in the lane of A9(Neo3) but not in the negative
control lane of A9(Neo12) (Fig. 3B). Thus the human
ESDN gene is located around D3S1603 within the range between
D3S1552 and D3S1271, which corresponds to the cytogenetic region of
chromosome 3p12-q11 (53).
Expression Profile of ESDN in Human and Rat Cells or
Tissues--
Northern blot analysis using total RNA from cultured
human coronary arterial cells revealed that the major
and minor transcripts of 6.4 and 3 kilobases, respectively, were highly
expressed in smooth muscle cells, and significantly, but to a lesser
degree, in endothelial cells (Fig.
4A). Co-culture of the cells
neither up-regulated nor down-regulated its expression. Northern blot using poly(A)+ RNA from various rat cells or tissues
revealed that ESDN was expressed in many organs, with the highest
expression in cultured aortic smooth muscle cells, undetectable in
whole blood cells, and very faint in liver (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Northern blot analysis of ESDN. 15 µg
of total RNA from human coronary arterial cells (panel A)
and 3 µg of poly(A)+ RNA from rat organs or cultured
aortic smooth muscle cells (panel B) were subjected to
Northern blot analysis with human and rat cDNA, respectively, as a
probe. Equivalent loading of RNA was confirmed by ethidium bromide
staining of 18 S and 28 S rRNA (A) or rehybridization of the
same filter with rat GAPDH probe (B). hCAEC,
human coronary artery endothelial cells; hCASMC, human
coronary artery smooth muscle cells; HeLa, HeLa cells;
RASMC, rat aortic smooth muscle cells.
|
|
Augmented Expression of ESDN in PDGF-BB- but Not AT-II-stimulated
Human Coronary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells--
The result of Northern
blot analysis directed our attention to the regulation of ESDN
expression in vascular smooth muscle cells. First as an in
vitro study, we examined the effect of the stimulation with
PDGF-BB, AT-II, or FCS on primary culture of human coronary artery
smooth muscle cells. The stimulation was continued for 48 h
because AT-II, which is only a weak mitogen for vascular smooth muscle
cells in a short-term stimulation (<24 h), is reported to up-regulate
their DNA synthesis by 48 h stimulation (54). The results of
quantitative RT-PCR normalized to GAPDH (Fig.
5A) showed that ESDN was
up-regulated with PDGF-BB dose-dependently, but not with
AT-II stimulation. FCS also up-regulated ESDN expression dose-dependently, but much less than PDGF-BB. Thus, ESDN
mRNA expression is positively and specifically controlled by
PDGF-BB stimulation.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Up-regulation of ESDN mRNA in the setting
of vascular stimuli. A, an induction of ESDN mRNA in
human coronary artery smooth muscle cells in response to PDGF-BB or FCS
stimulation, but not to AT-II. Human coronary artery smooth muscle
cells were serum depleted for 2 days, and the medium was exchanged to
basal medium of DMEM supplemented with 2 mM
L-glutamine and either of PDGF-BB, AT-II, FCS, or the
mixture of PDGF-BB and AT-II at the indicated concentrations. After 2 days stimulation, total RNA was extracted and quantitative RT-PCR was
performed. ESDN and GAPDH were measured in triplicate and the ESDN
means and S.E. normalized to those of GAPDH were shown. Similar
response was observed in another experiment. A,
p < .01 versus basal medium. B,
p < .01 versus PDGF 2 ng/ml. C,
p < .01 versus AT-II 1 µM.
B, up-regulation of ESDN mRNA in balloon-injured rat
carotid arteries. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to calculate ESDN
mRNA normalized to GAPDH mRNA. Value of each time point
represents the mean ± S.E. (n = 5 at day 0 or 5 and n = 4 at day 14). At day 0, the results obtained
from the samples of normal control rats were shown. *,
p < .03 versus day 0.
|
|
Augmented Expression of ESDN in Balloon-injured Rat
Vessels--
To explore the significance of such in vitro
expression regulation in the in vivo system, an ESDN
expression profile in balloon-injured rat carotid arteries was studied.
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that rat ESDN mRNA expression
normalized to GAPDH mRNA showed a tendency of up-regulation at day
5, and an significant increase at day 14 by 30% (Fig. 5B).
To elucidate the expression and localization of ESDN at the protein
level, an immunohistochemical study was performed using anti-peptide
antibodies characterized in Fig. 2C. Two antibodies raised
against different portions of ESDN were used in parallel to rule out
the nonspecific staining. The anti-CUB and anti-FV/VIII antibodies
yielded the comparable staining results, and only the data obtained
with the former was shown in Fig. 6.
Nerve bundles surrounding a carotid artery (a vagus nerve and ansae
cervicales) were strongly stained with these two antibodies (Fig. 6,
A and B). At day 0, tunica media, which is mainly
composed of smooth muscle cells, was positively but weakly stained
(Fig. 6E). At day 14, stronger staining is observed throughout the neointima as well as in tunica media (Fig. 6,
B and F). Thus ESDN expression is up-regulated in
rat-injured arteries both at mRNA and at protein levels.

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Up-regulation of ESDN protein in the rat
carotid artery following balloon injury. Immunohistochemical
staining of rat carotid arteries with anti-CUB antibody (A,
B, E, and F). Negative control results
were shown just below of each sample (C, D,
G, and H) obtained by using an equal
concentration of normal rabbit IgG as a primary antibody. E
through H are the higher magnification (×400) images of
A through D (×100), respectively. The tunica
media (M) and neointima (N) are shown in
E-F. Arrows and arrowheads indicate
the surrounding vagus nerve and ansae cervicales, respectively.
|
|
ESDN Down-regulates BrdUrd Uptake in 293T Cells--
Up-regulation
of ESDN in the neointima, where vascular smooth muscle cells transform
from resting to proliferating phenotype, then returning finally to
resting, suggests the possibility that ESDN has some function related
to cell growth regulation. We analyzed, through BrdUrd uptake
experiments, the effect on 293 T-cell growth of the overexpressed
full-length or deletion mutants of ESDN driven by human elongation
factor-1 promoter. 293T cells were chosen because of the high
transfection efficiency (more than 50%). Preliminary experiments
showed that ESDN had a small growth-suppressive effect which was easily
masked by rapidly growing non-transfected cells and smaller than the
error of cell-counting manually by a Burker-Turk hemocytometer. Thus we
measured the BrdUrd uptake 1.5 days after transfection and normalized
cell number at replating to 96-well plates by measurement of an aqueous
soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay. The cell number can be more
accurately estimated in a variety of cell lines by this assay (55) than
by counting manually with the Burker-Turk hemocytometer in our
experience. Full-length ESDN down-regulated BrdUrd uptake
significantly. Deletion of an extracellular portion alleviated this
effect, and deletion of an intracellular portion completely and
significantly eliminated the suppressive effect (Fig.
7). The same results were reproducibly
obtained in three independent experiments. Thus ESDN down-regulates the
BrdUrd uptake in 293T cells in this experimental protocol.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Suppression of BrdUrd uptake in 293T cells
overexpressed with full-length ESDN. 293T cells were transfected
with the upper three constructs shown in Fig. 2B, and the
BrdUrd uptake was measured 1 day later. Values were expressed as
mean ± S.E. of octaplicate results in one representative
experiment. The same results were obtained in another two independent
experiments. *, p < .01 versus mock; #,
p < .025 versus hESDN-FL.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have cloned a novel cDNA from human coronary arterial
cells, termed ESDN, with its mouse and rat counterparts. Data base search revealed that there exist several matching sequences.
GenBankTM accession number D29810 partially covers the
human ESDN coding region with some errors (discussed later), and
GenBankTM AK001362 and AF104313 (56) both correspond to the
3'-untranslated region of human ESDN. The 3' region of
GenBankTM AK006805 matches the transmembrane and
cytoplasmic domains of mouse ESDN. This paper, however, is the first
report about identifying the full-length ESDN-coding region and its characterization.
A notable feature of this gene is its domain structure resembling that
of neuropilins. Neuropilin-1 was originally identified as an antigen
expressed in the developing optic neurons in Xenopus embryo
(57). The cloning of this gene revealed a unique domain structure made
up of two CUB domains, two FV/VIII domains, one MAM domain, and a
transmembrane segment attached to a short cytoplasmic tail (58).
Another family member, neuropilin-2 has the same domain structure (59).
The unique feature of neuropilins is the promiscuity for ligands and
co-receptors. They function as a receptor for class 3 semaphorins (60,
61) in a complex with a co-receptor partner of plexins (13), and
mediate chemorepulsive (59, 62) as well as chemoattractive (63) signals
to axons and the latter effect to dendrites (64). Neuropilin-1 is also a co-receptor of VEGFR2 for VEGF165 and enhances its
biological function in vascular endothelial cells (12). The mapping
study of the ligand-binding region has advanced in the study of
neuropilins revealing that the CUB domain is the primary binding site
and specificity determining region for semaphorins (65), whereas the
FV/VIII domain is responsible for binding with VEGF165
(66). The interaction with plexin A1 is mediated through the
extracellular portion of neuropilin-1 (13). The extracellular portion
of neuropilin-1 does not directly bind solely to VEGFR2, but it shows a
strong and reversible interaction with VEGFR-1, depriving VEGFR-1 of its affinity for VEGF (67). Although the exact partner has not been
identified, the existence of another heterophilic cell adhesion system
has also been suggested for neuropilin-1 (68). The CUB domain is shared
by a number of extracellular proteins, most of which are involved in
the developmental processes (46), and some of which are reported to be
involved in ligand binding (69, 70). The FV/VIII domain is also known
as a discoidin-like domain. Discoidin was originally identified in the
slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum and is thought to
facilitate cellular aggregation and migration by functioning as a
lectin (71, 72). It is also found in over 20 kinds of eukaryotic
proteins (73). Although it is presently unknown whether any of the
mammalian proteins with the discoidin-like domain could act as lectins
as well, many of them appear to be implicated in cell surface-mediated
regulatory events, as exemplified in blood coagulation factors (74),
discoidin domain receptor (75), or neurexin IV (76). As a molecule
containing both CUB and FV/VIII domains and because of its structural
similarity with neuropilins, ESDN can be considered to have a great
potential for binding with more than a kind of ligand or
co-receptor.
Another structural feature of ESDN is its long cytoplasmic tail,
whereas neuropilins contain a short cytoplasmic domain of about 40 amino acids long with no known catalytic or binding motif. Indeed, it
was shown that neuropilin-1 does not require its transmembrane and
cytoplasmic domains to mediate the biological activity of semaphorin
3A, implying that another transmembrane protein(s) transduces the
signals across the cell membrane (65). Such co-receptors for
VEGF165 and semaphorin 3A are VEGFR-2 and plexin A1,
respectively. VEGFR-2 harbors a kinase domain, whereas the long
cytoplasmic domain of plexin A1 is devoid of an apparent catalytic
domain or any known motifs. However, plexin A1 was shown to harbor a phosphorylation site(s) and associating kinase activity (77). The
cytoplasmic domains of human, mouse, and rat ESDN conserve 15 serines,
15 threonines, and 11 tyrosines, and 9, 5, and 5, respectively, are
candidate sites of phosphorylation (data not shown) according to the
predicting tool (78). Therefore, ESDN potentially makes complexes with
other transmembrane or soluble kinase receptors and offers
phosphoprotein as a docking site for adapter protein(s) to induce an
intracellular signal transduction.
An LCCL domain is a recently recognized motif which is shared by and
whose name is derived from Limulus factor
C, Coch, and Lgl-1 (50).
Factor C is an initiator in Limulus amoebocytes of the
coagulation cascade against lipopolysaccharide, and its LCCL domain is
located in the H chain which is responsible for lipopolysaccharide
binding (49, 79). Lgl-1 was cloned as a glucocorticoid-inducible gene
that surges in the late gestation lung and is highly expressed in its
mesenchyme (51). Coch is considered to be a secretory protein and a
causal gene for one human hereditary deafness disorder, DFNA9 (80). The
pathogenesis of this disease has not completely been elucidated, but
the deposition of acidophilic mucopolysaccharide-containing substance
is considered to cause strangulation of vestibular and cochlear neurons
(80). All four kinds of missense mutations identified to date in DFNA9 patients converge in this domain (Fig. 1C) (80, 81),
implicating the importance of this domain in Coch. Another LCCL domain
containing protein, cub1 predicted in (GenBankTM accession
number D29810)2 is identical
to human ESDN with some sequence mistakes, which spoil the alignment of
LCCL domain (50). With correct sequence, the alignment as shown in Fig.
1C revealed perfect conservation of four cysteines. Although
we cannot reach the exact role of the LCCL domain in ESDN at present,
its possession by ESDN should add scientific interest to the functional
analysis of the LCCL domain.
ESDN has a very long N-terminal secretory signal sequence of 67 (human)
or 64 (rodents) amino acid residues. While there are reports on viral
(82) or bacterial (83) proteins bearing a longer signal peptide for
secretory pathway with a long n-region (84), the signal peptide of ESDN
is to our knowledge the longest among eukaryotic proteins reported to
date (85). Therefore, we functionally assayed the activity of this long
signal peptide to guide mature protein to cell surface in Fig.
2D as well as the cleavage of this peptide in Fig.
2E.
Two independent STSs matched human ESDN sequence, and combined with
genomic Southern blot analysis of mouse cell lines containing a human
chromosome, human ESDN is mapped between D3S1552 and D3S1271 (chromosome 3p12-q11) (52, 53). One genetic disorder linked to this
region is familial nonspecific dementia, mapped between D3S1284 and
D3S1603 (chromosome 3p11.1-q11.2) (86). Considering the high expression
of ESDN in the nervous system (discussed later), further investigation
is needed to determine whether ESDN is involved in this disease.
Northern blot analysis revealed relatively ubiquitous expression of
ESDN, but the highest expression was observed in cultured vascular
smooth muscle cells in both human and rat, which directed our attention
to scrutinize the expression profile of ESDN in vascular smooth muscle
cells. Because cultured vascular smooth muscle cells are considered to
be in the synthetic phenotype in contrast to the contractile phenotype
observed in the physiologic adult vessel wall, we examined the effect
of growth factors on the expression regulation of ESDN in cultured
vascular smooth muscle cells. We tested PDGF-BB, AT-II, and FCS for
this purpose. PDGF-BB and, to a lesser extent, FCS up-regulated DNA
synthesis, whereas AT-II did not. PDGF-BB and AT-II partly share many
downstream signaling pathways (87, 88), but there is also some
difference, for example, a delayed mitogenic effect of the latter (54). The gene expression of ESDN is controlled specifically under the PDGF-BB signaling pathway. Next we investigated the ESDN expression in
a balloon-injured rat carotid artery as an in vivo model
where the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells is involved in the pathogenesis of the expansion of neointima (89). At the mRNA level,
ESDN was up-regulated by about 30% at day 14, but the up-regulation was more strikingly shown by the immunohistochemical study. ESDN protein was more highly expressed in neointima than in tunica media at
this later stage of vascular injury (Fig. 6F).
For further characterization of its function, we tried to examine the
effect of overexpression of ESDN in 293T cells, which endogenously
express a limited amount of ESDN at the mRNA level (data not
shown). As shown in Fig. 7, the full-length construct significantly
down-regulated the BrdUrd uptake, while constructs deleted with the
extracellular or intracellular portion were abrogated with this
suppressive effect. Because the principal difficulty in the detection
of the growth-suppressive effect by transient transfection assays,
ignorance of its ligand(s) and the results of small effects, we must
refine the system like the adoption of inducible-expression system or
check in other cells like vascular smooth muscle cells before
concluding its function. However, we could present a model that ESDN is
up-regulated in neointimal smooth muscle cells after vascular injury to
counteract the growth-promoting signal as a "brake." This is
reminiscent of our previous report about DANCE, which was cloned from
embryonic mouse heart as a novel secretory molecule by the yeast signal
sequence trap screening (33). Detailed expression analysis in the
balloon-injured rat carotid artery showed a similar expression profile,
which led to the speculation that DANCE may have the growth-suppressive effect. The study of expression profile of ESDN in human
atherosclerotic lesion is needed to further clarify the significance of
this gene in vascular pathology.
Another important feature of ESDN is its expression in the nervous
system. It is highly expressed in a vagus nerve or ansae cervicales in
adult rats (Fig. 6, A and B) and in brain or
vagus nerves of mouse embryos (data not shown). It is interesting that the structurally related neuropilins also have dual roles in the nervous system as well as the vascular system. Another example of dual
activity is the Ephrin-Eph system. Eph is the largest family of
receptor tyrosine kinase studied extensively in the nervous system
(90), and this ligand-receptor system has been re-identified as the
marker discriminating arteries and veins (11).
Considering the unique domain structure and rather ubiquitous
expression in addition to vascular cells and nerve bundles, it is
possible that ESDN has wide functions not confined in the setting of
vascular injury. Identification of its ligands, and possibly its
co-receptors, should add a new field in the extracellular signal
transduction network involving vascular, neural, and other systems.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Reiko Shinkura for helpful
advice in genomic DNA preparation and DNA sequencing, Dr. Nobuo
Kanazawa for the manipulation of mouse cell lines A9(Neo3)
and A9(Neo12), Dr. Tomoyuki Nakamura for modified pEF6V5-His plasmid,
Prof. Hiroshi Nakata (Kyoto Sangyo University) for discussion about
glycosylation, and Prof. Junichi Miyazaki (Osaka University) for
pCAGGS. We also thank Naoko Tomikawa and Masami Tanaka for excellent
technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF387547 (human ESDN), AF387548 (mouse ESDN), and AF387549 (rat ESDN).
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Center for
Molecular Biology and Genetics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507 Japan.
Tel.: 81-75-751-4192; Fax: 81-75-751-4190; E-mail:
ktashiro@mfour.med. kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105293200
2
T. Shibata, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
VEGF, vascular
endothelial growth factor;
AT-II, angiotensin II;
BrdUrd, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine;
CUB domain, domain found in complement
subcomponents C1r/C1s, Uegf, and bone morphogenetic protein-1;
cDNA, complementary DNA;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium;
EST, expressed sequence tag;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
FV/VIII
domain, coagulation factor V/factor VIII-homology domain;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
LCCL domain, domain found in
Limulus factor C, Coch and Lgl-1;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor;
rRNA, ribosomal RNA;
RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction;
STS, sequence-tagged site;
VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor
receptor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hanahan, D.,
and Folkman, J.
(1996)
Cell
86,
353-364
|
| 2.
|
Leimgruber, P. P.,
Roubin, G. S.,
Hollman, J.,
Cotsonis, G. A.,
Meier, B.,
Douglas, J. S.,
King, S. B.,
and Gruentzig, A. R.
(1986)
Circulation
73,
710-717
|
| 3.
|
Nobuyoshi, M.,
Kimura, T.,
Nosaka, H.,
Mioka, S.,
Ueno, K.,
Yokoi, H.,
Hamasaki, N.,
Horiuchi, H.,
and Ohishi, H.
(1988)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
12,
616-623
|
| 4.
|
RITA Trial Participants.
(1993)
Lancet
341,
573-580
|
| 5.
|
Shalaby, F.,
Rossant, J.,
Yamaguchi, T. P.,
Gertsenstein, M.,
Wu, X. F.,
Breitman, M. L.,
and Schuh, A. C.
(1995)
Nature
376,
62-66
|
| 6.
|
Fong, G. H.,
Rossant, J.,
Gertsenstein, M.,
and Breitman, M. L.
(1995)
Nature
376,
66-70
|
| 7.
|
Carmeliet, P.,
Ferreira, V.,
Breier, G.,
Pollefeyt, S.,
Kieckens, L.,
Gertsenstein, M.,
Fahrig, M.,
Vandenhoeck, A.,
Harpal, K.,
Eberhardt, C.,
Declercq, C.,
Pawling, J.,
Moons, L.,
Collen, D.,
Risau, W.,
and Nagy, A.
(1996)
Nature
380,
435-439
|
| 8.
|
Ferrara, N.,
Carver-Moore, K.,
Chen, H.,
Dowd, M.,
Lu, L.,
O'Shea, K. S.,
Powell-Braxton, L.,
Hillan, K. J.,
and Moore, M. W.
(1996)
Nature
380,
439-442
|
| 9.
|
Sato, T. N.,
Tozawa, Y.,
Deutsch, U.,
Wolburg-Buchholz, K.,
Fujiwara, Y.,
Gendron-Maguire, M.,
Gridley, T.,
Wolburg, H.,
Risau, W.,
and Qin, Y.
(1995)
Nature
376,
70-74
|
| 10.
|
Suri, C.,
Jones, P. F.,
Patan, S.,
Bartunkova, S.,
Maisonpierre, P. C.,
Davis, S.,
Sato, T. N.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1996)
Cell
87,
1171-1180
|
| 11.
|
Wang, H. U.,
Chen, Z. F.,
and Anderson, D. J.
(1998)
Cell
93,
741-753
|
| 12.
|
Soker, S.,
Takashima, S.,
Miao, H. Q.,
Neufeld, G.,
and Klagsbrun, M.
(1998)
Cell
92,
735-745
|
| 13.
|
Takahashi, T.,
Fournier, A.,
Nakamura, F.,
Wang, L. H.,
Murakami, Y.,
Kalb, R. G.,
Fujisawa, H.,
and Strittmatter, S. M.
(1999)
Cell
99,
59-69
|
| 14.
|
Ferns, G. A.,
Raines, E. W.,
Sprugel, K. H.,
Motani, A. S.,
Reidy, M. A.,
and Ross, R.
(1991)
Science
253,
1129-1132
|
| 15.
|
Jawien, A.,
Bowen-Pope, D. F.,
Lindner, V.,
Schwartz, S. M.,
and Clowes, A. W.
(1992)
J. Clin. Invest.
89,
507-511
|
| 16.
|
Lindner, V.,
Lappi, D. A.,
Baird, A.,
Majack, R. A.,
and Reidy, M. A.
(1991)
Circ. Res.
68,
106-113
|
| 17.
|
Furukawa, Y.,
Matsumori, A.,
Ohashi, N.,
Shioi, T.,
Ono, K.,
Harada, A.,
Matsushima, K.,
and Sasayama, S.
(1999)
Circ. Res.
84,
306-314
|
| 18.
|
Shimokawa, H.,
Ito, A.,
Fukumoto, Y.,
Kadokami, T.,
Nakaike, R.,
Sakata, M.,
Takayanagi, T.,
Egashira, K.,
and Takeshita, A.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
769-776
|
| 19.
|
McCaffrey, T. A.
(2000)
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.
11,
103-114
|
| 20.
|
Tellides, G.,
Tereb, D. A.,
Kirkiles-Smith, N. C.,
Kim, R. W.,
Wilson, J. H.,
Schechner, J. S.,
Lorber, M. I.,
and Pober, J. S.
(2000)
Nature
403,
207-211
|
| 21.
|
Hansson, G. K.,
and Holm, J.
(1991)
Circulation
84,
1266-1272
|
| 22.
|
Bostrom, K.,
Watson, K. E.,
Horn, S.,
Wortham, C.,
Herman, I. M.,
and Demer, L. L.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
91,
1800-1809
|
| 23.
|
Nakaoka, T.,
Gonda, K.,
Ogita, T.,
Otawara-Hamamoto, Y.,
Okabe, F.,
Kira, Y.,
Harii, K.,
Miyazono, K.,
Takuwa, Y.,
and Fujita, T.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
2824-2832
|
| 24.
|
Fishman, J. A.,
Ryan, G. B.,
and Karnovsky, M. J.
(1975)
Lab. Invest.
32,
339-351
|
| 25.
|
Haudenschild, C. C.,
and Schwartz, S. M.
(1979)
Lab. Invest.
41,
407-418
|
| 26.
|
Janero, D. R.,
and Ewing, J. F.
(2000)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
29,
1199-1221
|
| 27.
|
Todaka, T.,
Yokoyama, C.,
Yanamoto, H.,
Hashimoto, N.,
Nagata, I.,
Tsukahara, T.,
Hara, S.,
Hatae, T.,
Morishita, R.,
Aoki, M.,
Ogihara, T.,
Kaneda, Y.,
and Tanabe, T.
(1999)
Stroke
30,
419-426
|
| 28.
|
Castellot, J. J., Jr.,
Addonizio, M. L.,
Rosenberg, R.,
and Karnovsky, M. J.
(1981)
J. Cell Biol.
90,
372-379
|
| 29.
|
Karnovsky, M. J.,
Wright, T. C., Jr.,
Castellot, J. J., Jr.,
Choay, J.,
Lormeau, J. C.,
and Petitou, M.
(1989)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
556,
268-281
|
| 30.
|
Tashiro, K.,
Nakamura, T.,
and Honjo, T.
(1999)
Methods Enzymol.
303,
479-495
|
| 31.
|
Tashiro, K.,
Tada, H.,
Heilker, R.,
Shirozu, M.,
Nakano, T.,
and Honjo, T.
(1993)
Science
261,
600-603
|
| 32.
|
Kato, K.,
Morrison, A. M.,
Nakano, T.,
Tashiro, K.,
and Honjo, T.
(2000)
Blood
96,
362-364
|
| 33.
|
Nakamura, T.,
Ruiz-Lozano, P.,
Lindner, V.,
Yabe, D.,
Taniwaki, M.,
Furukawa, Y.,
Kobuke, K.,
Tashiro, K.,
Lu, Z.,
Andon, N. L.,
Schaub, R.,
Matsumori, A.,
Sasayama, S.,
Chien, K. R.,
and Honjo, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22476-22483
|
| 34.
|
Nakamura, T.,
Yabe, D.,
Kanazawa, N.,
Tashiro, K.,
Sasayama, S.,
and Honjo, T.
(1998)
Genomics
54,
89-98
|
| 35.
|
Yabe, D.,
Nakamura, T.,
Kanazawa, N.,
Tashiro, K.,
and Honjo, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18232-18239
|
| 36.
|
Mi, S.,
Lee, X.,
Li, X.,
Veldman, G. M.,
Finnerty, H.,
Racie, L.,
LaVallie, E.,
Tang, X. Y.,
Edouard, P.,
Howes, S.,
Keith, J. C.,
and McCoy, J. M.
(2000)
Nature
403,
785-789
|
| 37.
|
Jacobs, K. A.,
Collins-Racie, L. A.,
Colbert, M.,
Duckett, M.,
Evans, C.,
Golden-Fleet, M.,
Kelleher, K.,
Kriz, R.,
La Vallie, E. R.,
Merberg, D.,
Spaulding, V.,
Stover, J.,
Williamson, M. J.,
and McCoy, J. M.
(1999)
Methods Enzymol.
303,
468-479
|
| 38.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 39.
|
Ross, R.,
Glomset, J.,
Kariya, B.,
and Harker, L.
(1974)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
71,
1207-1210
|
| 40.
|
Jacobs, K. A.,
Collins-Racie, L. A.,
Colbert, M.,
Duckett, M.,
Golden-Fleet, M.,
Kelleher, K.,
Kriz, R.,
LaVallie, E. R.,
Merberg, D.,
Spaulding, V.,
Stover, J.,
Williamson, M. J.,
and McCoy, J. M.
(1997)
Gene (Amst.)
198,
289-296
|
| 41.
|
Nielsen, H.,
Engelbrecht, J.,
Brunak, S.,
and von Heijne, G.
(1997)
Protein Eng.
10,
1-6
|
| 42.
|
Hirokawa, T.,
Boon-Chieng, S.,
and Mitaku, S.
(1998)
Bioinformatics
14,
378-379
|
| 43.
|
Niwa, H.,
Yamamura, K.,
and Miyazaki, J.
(1991)
Gene (Amst.)
108,
193-199
|
| 44.
|
Tanigaki, K.,
Nogaki, F.,
Takahashi, J.,
Tashiro, K.,
Kurooka, H.,
and Honjo, T.
(2001)
Neuron
29,
45-55
|
| 45.
|
Ohashi, N.,
Matsumori, A.,
Furukawa, Y.,
Ono, K.,
Okada, M.,
Iwasaki, A.,
Miyamoto, T.,
Nakano, A.,
and Sasayama, S.
(2000)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
20,
2521-2526
|
| 46.
|
Bork, P.,
and Beckmann, G.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
231,
539-545
|
| 47.
|
Kozak, M.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
8125-8148
|
| 48.
|
Robertson, N. G.,
Khetarpal, U.,
Gutierrez-Espeleta, G. A.,
Bieber, F. R.,
and Morton, C. C.
(1994)
Genomics
23,
42-50
|
| 49.
|
Muta, T.,
Miyata, T.,
Misumi, Y.,
Tokunaga, F.,
Nakamura, T.,
Toh, Y.,
Ikehara, Y.,
and Iwanaga, S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
6554-6561
|
| 50.
|
Trexler, M.,
Banyai, L.,
and Patthy, L.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
5751-5757
|
| 51.
|
Kaplan, F.,
Ledoux, P.,
Kassamali, F. Q.,
Gagnon, S.,
Post, M.,
Koehler, D.,
Deimling, J.,
and Sweezey, N. B.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
L1027-1036
|
| 52.
|
Deloukas, P.,
Schuler, G. D.,
Gyapay, G.,
Beasley, E. M.,
Soderlund, C.,
Rodriguez-Tome, P.,
Hui, L.,
Matise, T. C.,
McKusick, K. B.,
Beckmann, J. S.,
Bentolila, S.,
Bihoreau, M.,
Birren, B. B.,
Browne, J.,
Butler, A.,
Castle, A. B.,
Chiannilkulchai, N.,
Clee, C.,
Day, P. J.,
Dehejia, A.,
Dibling, T.,
Drouot, N.,
Duprat, S.,
Fizames, C.,
Bentley, D. R.,
et al..
(1998)
Science
282,
744-746
|
| 53.
|
Naylor, S. L.,
Moore, S.,
Garcia, D.,
Xiang, X.,
Xin, X.,
Mohrer, M.,
Reus, B.,
Linn, R.,
Stanton, V.,
O'Connell, P.,
and Leach, R. J.
(1996)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
72,
90-94
|
| 54.
|
Weber, H.,
Taylor, D. S.,
and Molloy, C. J.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
93,
788-798
|
| 55.
|
Cory, A. H.,
Owen, T. C.,
Barltrop, J. A.,
and Cory, J. G.
(1991)
Cancer Commun.
3,
207-212
|
| 56.
|
Nadadur, S. S.,
Ehrke, M. J.,
and Gurtoo, H. L.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1489,
433-439
|
| 57.
|
Takagi, S.,
Tsuji, T.,
Amagai, T.,
Takamatsu, T.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(1987)
Dev. Biol.
122,
90-100
|
| 58.
|
Takagi, S.,
Hirata, T.,
Agata, K.,
Mochii, M.,
Eguchi, G.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(1991)
Neuron
7,
295-307
|
| 59.
|
Kolodkin, A. L.,
Levengood, D. V.,
Rowe, E. G.,
Tai, Y. T.,
Giger, R. J.,
and Ginty, D. D.
(1997)
Cell
90,
753-762
|
| 60.
|
Feiner, L.,
Koppel, A. M.,
Kobayashi, H.,
and Raper, J. A.
(1997)
Neuron
19,
539-545
|
| 61.
|
Chen, H.,
Chedotal, A.,
He, Z.,
Goodman, C. S.,
and Tessier-Lavigne, M.
(1997)
Neuron
19,
547-559
|
| 62.
|
He, Z.,
and Tessier-Lavigne, M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
739-751
|
| 63.
|
Bagnard, D.,
Lohrum, M.,
Uziel, D.,
Puschel, A. W.,
and Bolz, J.
(1998)
Development
125,
5043-5053
|
| 64.
|
Polleux, F.,
Morrow, T.,
and Ghosh, A.
(2000)
Nature
404,
567-573
|
| 65.
|
Nakamura, F.,
Tanaka, M.,
Takahashi, T.,
Kalb, R. G.,
and Strittmatter, S. M.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
1093-1100
|
| 66.
|
Giger, R. J.,
Urquhart, E. R.,
Gillespie, S. K.,
Levengood, D. V.,
Ginty, D. D.,
and Kolodkin, A. L.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
1079-1092
|
| 67.
|
Fuh, G.,
Garcia, K. C.,
and de Vos, A. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
26690-26695
|
| 68.
|
Shimizu, M.,
Murakami, Y.,
Suto, F.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
1283-1293
|
| 69.
|
Kristiansen, M.,
Kozyraki, R.,
Jacobsen, C.,
Nexo, E.,
Verroust, P. J.,
and Moestrup, S. K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20540-20544
|
| 70.
|
Thielens, N. M.,
Enrie, K.,
Lacroix, M.,
Jaquinod, M.,
Hernandez, J. F.,
Esser, A. F.,
and Arlaud, G. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9149-9159
|
| 71.
|
Poole, S.,
Firtel, R. A.,
Lamar, E.,
and Rowekamp, W.
(1981)
J. Mol. Biol.
153,
273-289
|
| 72.
|
Springer, W. R.,
Cooper, D. N.,
and Barondes, S. H.
(1984)
Cell
39,
557-564
|
| 73.
|
Baumgartner, S.,
Hofmann, K.,
Chiquet-Ehrismann, R.,
and Bucher, P.
(1998)
Protein Sci.
7,
1626-1631
|
| 74.
|
Kane, W. H.,
and Davie, E. W.
(1988)
Blood
71,
539-555
|
| 75.
|
Vogel, W.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13 (suppl.),
S77-82
|
| 76.
|
Baumgartner, S.,
Littleton, J. T.,
Broadie, K.,
Bhat, M. A.,
Harbecke, R.,
Lengyel, J. A.,
Chiquet-Ehrismann, R.,
Prokop, A.,
and Bellen, H. J.
(1996)
Cell
87,
1059-1068
|
| 77.
|
Tamagnone, L.,
Artigiani, S.,
Chen, H.,
He, Z.,
Ming, G.,
Song, H.,
Chedotal, A.,
Winberg, M. L.,
Goodman, C. S.,
Poo, M.,
Tessier-Lavigne, M.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1999)
Cell
99,
71-80
|
| 78.
|
Blom, N.,
Gammeltoft, S.,
and Brunak, S.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
294,
1351-1362
|
| 79.
|
Nakamura, T.,
Tokunaga, F.,
Morita, T.,
and Iwanaga, S.
(1988)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
103,
370-374
|
| 80.
|
Robertson, N. G.,
Lu, L.,
Heller, S.,
Merchant, S. N.,
Eavey, R. D.,
McKenna, M.,
Nadol, J. B.,
Miyamoto, R. T.,
Linthicum, F. H.,
Lubianca Neto, J. F.,
Hudspeth, A. J.,
Seidman, C. E.,
Morton, C. C.,
and Seidman, J. G.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
20,
299-303
|
| 81.
|
de Kok, Y. J.,
Bom, S. J.,
Brunt, T. M.,
Kemperman, M. H.,
van Beusekom, E.,
van der Velde-Visser, S. D.,
Robertson, N. G.,
Morton, C. C.,
Huygen, P. L.,
Verhagen, W. I.,
Brunner, H. G.,
Cremers, C. W.,
and Cremers, F. P.
(1999)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
8,
361-366
|
| 82.
|
Stephens, E. B.,
Butfiloski, E. J.,
and Monck, E.
(1992)
Virology
190,
569-578
|
| 83.
|
Lambert-Buisine, C.,
Willery, E.,
Locht, C.,
and Jacob-Dubuisson, F.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
28,
1283-1293
|
| 84.
|
von Heijne, G.
(1990)
J. Membr. Biol.
115,
195-201
|
| 85.
|
Ogata, R. T.,
Mathias, P.,
Bradt, B. M.,
and Cooper, N. R.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
150,
2273-2280
|
| 86.
|
Brown, J.,
Ashworth, A.,
Gydesen, S.,
Sorensen, A.,
Rossor, M.,
Hardy, J.,
and Collinge, J.
(1995)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
4,
1625-1628
|
| 87.
|
Hughes, A. D.,
Clunn, G. F.,
Refson, J.,
and Demoliou-Mason, C.
(1996)
Gen. Pharmacol.
27,
1079-1089
|
| 88.
|
Touyz, R. M.,
and Schiffrin, E. L.
(2000)
Pharmacol. Rev.
52,
639-672
|
| 89.
|
Schwartz, S. M.,
deBlois, D.,
and O'Brien, E. R.
(1995)
Circ. Res.
77,
445-465
|
| 90.
|
Flanagan, J. G.,
and Vanderhaeghen, P.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
21,
309-345
|
| 91.
|
Kyte, J.,
and Doolittle, R. F.
(1982)
J. Mol. Biol.
157,
105-132
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. O'Connor, I. I. Salles, A. Cvejic, N. A. Watkins, A. Walker, S. F. Garner, C. I. Jones, I. C. Macaulay, M. Steward, J.-J. Zwaginga, et al.
Functional genomics in zebrafish permits rapid characterization of novel platelet membrane proteins
Blood,
May 7, 2009;
113(19):
4754 - 4762.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Orso, E. Penna, D. Cimino, E. Astanina, F. Maione, D. Valdembri, E. Giraudo, G. Serini, P. Sismondi, M. De Bortoli, et al.
AP-2{alpha} and AP-2{gamma} regulate tumor progression via specific genetic programs
FASEB J,
August 1, 2008;
22(8):
2702 - 2714.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kim, K.-T. Lee, H.-R. Jang, J.-H. Kim, S.-M. Noh, K.-S. Song, J.-S. Cho, H.-Y. Jeong, S.-Y. Kim, H.-S. Yoo, et al.
Epigenetic Down-Regulation and Suppressive Role of DCBLD2 in Gastric Cancer Cell Proliferation and Invasion
Mol. Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2008;
6(2):
222 - 230.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-C. Han, K. J. Austin, P. W. Nathanielsz, S. P. Ford, M. J. Nijland, and T. R. Hansen
Maternal nutrient restriction alters gene expression in the ovine fetal heart
J. Physiol.,
July 1, 2004;
558(1):
111 - 121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. V. Warke, K. Xhaja, K. J. Martin, M. F. Fournier, S. K. Shaw, N. Brizuela, N. de Bosch, D. Lapointe, F. A. Ennis, A. L. Rothman, et al.
Dengue Virus Induces Novel Changes in Gene Expression of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
J. Virol.,
November 1, 2003;
77(21):
11822 - 11832.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Toda, M. Tsuji, I. Nakano, K. Kobuke, T. Hayashi, H. Kasahara, J. Takahashi, A. Mizoguchi, T. Houtani, T. Sugimoto, et al.
Stem Cell-derived Neural Stem/Progenitor Cell Supporting Factor Is an Autocrine/Paracrine Survival Factor for Adult Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 12, 2003;
278(37):
35491 - 35500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|