![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 37, 34402-34407, September 14, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, April 26, 2001, and in revised form, July 6, 2001
Increased oxidative stresses are implicated in
the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease, and dopaminergic neurons may
be intrinsically susceptible to oxidative damage. However, the
selective presence of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) makes
dopaminergic neurons more resistant to oxidative stress caused by
glutathione depletion. To further investigate the mechanisms of
BH4 protection, we examined the effects of BH4
on superoxide levels in individual living mesencephalic neurons.
Dopaminergic neurons have intrinsically lower levels of superoxide than
nondopaminergic neurons. In addition, inhibiting BH4
synthesis increased superoxide in dopaminergic neurons, while BH4 supplementation decreased superoxide in nondopaminergic
cells. BH4 is also a cofactor in catecholamine and NO
production. In order to exclude the possibility that the antioxidant
effects of BH4 are mediated by dopamine and NO, we used
fibroblasts in which neither catecholamine nor NO production occurs. In
fibroblasts, BH4 decreased baseline reactive oxygen
species, and attenuated reactive oxygen species increase by rotenone
and antimycin A. Physiologic concentrations of BH4 directly
scavenged superoxide generated by potassium superoxide in
vitro. We hypothesize that BH4 protects dopaminergic
neurons from ordinary oxidative stresses generated by dopamine and its
metabolites and that environmental insults or genetic defects may
disrupt this intrinsic capacity of dopaminergic neurons and contribute
to their degeneration in Parkinson's disease.
Parkinson's disease
(PD)1 is characterized by the
selective degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra
(SN) pars compacta. While the etiology and pathogenesis of this cell death in most cases of PD remain unknown, it has been widely
hypothesized that increased oxidative stress and mitochondrial
dysfunction contribute to dopaminergic neuronal degeneration. Autopsy
studies have noted numerous abnormalities indicative of increased
oxidative damage in the SN (1-5). In particular, decreased glutathione in the SN has been found in autopsy brains from individuals with incidental Lewy bodies, presumed to represent presymptomatic PD (6). In
addition, mitochondrial complex I activity is also decreased in the SN
of PD patients (7, 8), and complex I inhibition can increase the
formation of reactive oxygen species (9, 10).
Although these findings suggest that dopaminergic neurons are
susceptible to oxidative stress, studies in vivo have not
observed dopaminergic neuronal death following the oxidative stress
generated by glutathione depletion (11-13). Furthermore, mesencephalic
dopaminergic neurons in primary monolayer (14) and reaggregate (15)
cultures are less susceptible to the toxicity of glutathione depletion than nondopaminergic neurons.
To explain this unanticipated resistance of dopaminergic neurons to
oxidative stress, we hypothesized that dopaminergic neurons may contain
additional antioxidants for the metabolism of ROS. One candidate is
tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), which is present abundantly in
dopaminergic neurons where it functions as a cofactor for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in catecholamine synthesis. Recently, BH4
has also been found to decrease superoxide formed by xanthine/xanthine oxidase (16), a macrophage/phorbol myristate acetate reaction system
(17), and by NOS (18, 19), and to protect against a variety of
oxidative stressors (20-23). BH4 also mediates the marked
preferential resistance of dopaminergic neurons to glutathione depletion (15). Therefore, BH4 may provide dopaminergic
neurons with an additional pathway for the metabolism of reactive
oxygen species (ROS).
In this paper, we delineate a mechanism underlying the increased
resistance of dopaminergic neurons to oxidative stress. First, using
microfluorimetry of individual living neurons, we show that dopaminergic neurons have lower levels of superoxide than
nondopaminergic neurons. We then show that the presence of
BH4 is both sufficient and necessary to maintain low
superoxide levels in dopaminergic neurons, and in fibroblasts that have
been engineered to synthesize BH4 but do not produce
dopamine or NO. Last, we show that BH4 decreases superoxide
in vitro through a direct scavenging mechanism.
Mesencephalic Cultures--
Cultures were prepared as described
previously (15). Briefly, timed pregnant Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats
were purchased from Harlan Sprague-Dawley (Madison, WI). Pieces of
ventral mesencephalon were dissected from embryonic gestation day 14 (E14) rat embryos (day of conception defined as day 0), and then
incubated for 20 min at 37 °C in 0.4% trypsin in calcium- and
magnesium-free Hanks' balanced salt solution. Pieces were then
triturated in 0.015% DNase using flame-polished Pasteur pipettes.
Cells were plated onto poly-L-lysine-coated glass
coverslips at a density of 200,000 viable cells/cm2. Cells
were grown in high glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. After 48 h, the medium
was changed, and 10 µg/ml 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine was added to
inhibit glial growth. Cells were grown an additional 4-6 days prior to
study. Glia represented less than 15% of the total cells in cultures,
based on the number of cells that lacked immunoreactivity to
neurofilament protein 200 or neuron-specific nuclear protein (NeuN) antibodies.
Measurement of ROS--
Relative superoxide levels were
determined by measuring the rate of increase in ethidium (Et)
fluorescence generated by the oxidation of hydroethidine (HEt) by
superoxide (24). All measurements were made with a Nikon Diaphot
epifluorescence microscope, and illumination with a 150 W Xe arc
(attenuated by a neutral density 1.5, ultraviolet-grade filter; Omega
Optical, Brattleboro, VT). Et imaging used standard rhodamine optics
(excitation 510-560 nm; dichroic mirror 580 nm; emission >590 nm)
(Nikon, Melville, NY). Images were formed using a 40X Fluor NA 0.85 objective (Nikon) and collected on a Hamamatsu ICCD (sensitivity set at
7.0). Images were 8-bit (256 intensity levels) and 16 frames were
averaged every 10 s. Background subtraction was made using the
first image obtained when HEt solution was added. Data acquisition was
controlled by MetaFluor or MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging
Corp.), and average intensity over identified regions of interest were logged to hard disc and displayed in real time. The relative superoxide level for each cell was determined from the slope of the increase in
ethidium fluorescence over time, fit by linear regression. HEt, a dye
freely permeable to cells (25, 26), was freshly prepared and used at a
final concentration of 3.2 µM.
We also measured the oxidation of 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein to
2,7-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) which can be caused by various ROS and
reactive nitrogen species (27). Images were obtained in the presence of
33 µM 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein at 5-s intervals for
15 min. Images were corrected by subtracting an autofluoresence image
obtained before dye addition. Optics utilized excitation at 460-490,
dichroic mirror 500, emission >515 nm. Rate of fluorescence increase
was determined by fitting a line to the final 5 min by linear regression.
To quantify fluorescence, cell somata were circled, and the average
cytosolic fluorescence computed. Because systematic differences in
somal volumes between dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic neurons would
alter fluorescence intensities, any volume difference could confound
our interpretation of ROS differences. Accordingly, mean cross-sectional somal areas (and hence cell volume) were compared between dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons and were found to be
comparable (data not shown).
Immunohistochemitry and Post-hoc Identification of Dopaminergic
Neurons--
Neurons in which fluorescence measurements were made were
identified as either dopaminergic or nondopaminergic based on post-hoc TH-immunohistochemistry. After each study, the location of the field of
cells was marked on the slide. Cells were then washed with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline, and fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde, 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 15 min.
Cells were exposed to 0.6% H2O2 in
phosphate-buffered saline for 15 min to remove endogenous peroxidase
activity, and preincubated with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.2% Triton X-100 for
30 min. Cells were incubated at room temperature overnight in primary
polyclonal anti-TH antiserum (1:1000). Cultures were next incubated for
1 h with anti-rabbit biotinylated secondary antibody at 1:200
dilution, and an additional 1 h with an avidin-biotin conjugate of
peroxidase (Vectastain ABC kit). Dopaminergic neurons were visualized
as a black reaction product, using diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride
in the presence of cobalt chloride (0.02%) and nickel ammonium sulfate
(0.02%).
Following immunohistochemistry, the original field of imaged cells
field was found and re-imaged. The orientation and location of stained
cells were matched, and neurons were identified as dopaminergic or
nondopaminergic based on immunostaining.
Western Blot Analysis--
Fibroblasts were grown to confluence
in T162 flasks prior to harvest. Cells were resuspended in 200 µl of
phosphate-buffered saline, sonicated and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 2 min. The supernatant was frozen at
A total of 25 µl of supernatant from each sample were electrophoresed
on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels, and transferred to a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Following transfer, membranes were
incubated overnight in 5% nonfat milk, and then incubated 1 h
with primary antibodies against endothelial NOS (eNOS) at 1:500,
inducible NOS (iNOS) at 1:1000, or constitutive NOS (cNOS, neuronal or
brain NOS) at 1:175 in 3% milk. Membranes were then incubated for
1 h with the appropriate secondary (anti-rabbit horseradish
peroxidase or anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase, 1:2000) in 3% milk,
and then developed using ECL.
In Vitro Superoxide Measurements--
Saturated potassium
superoxide (KO2) solution was made by mixing
KO2 in dimethyl sulfoxide, centrifuging at 1500 rpm for 5 min, and then decanting the supernatant (24). This procedure yields
about 3.6 mM solution (28). The stock solution of
KO2 was then added to buffer containing 10 µM
HEt (for a final concentration of 150 µM), and Et
fluorescence was monitored every 20 s for 160 s, using a
fluorometer. The superoxide level was determined from the slope of the
increase in Et fluorescence over time, fit by linear regression. When
indicated, BH4 was added immediately prior to adding
KO2, at final concentrations ranging from 20 nM
to 200 µM. Cu,Zn-SOD (9 units/ml) was used as a control.
The effects of BH4 on KO2-generated superoxide
levels were also measured by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)
spectrometry using a spin trapping agent
5-diethoxyphosphoryl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DEPMPO)
(19, 29). DEPMPO was prepared as a 40 mM solution in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, treated with an iron
chelator, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid
(N,N-bis[2-(bis[carboxymethyl]amino)ethyl]glycine) (DPTA) (1 mM). Catalase (300 units/ml) was also added to
prevent other oxygen radicals from contaminating the EPR spectra.
Spectra were recorded within 1 min after mixing, with a Varian E-12 EPR spectrometer equipped with a century series bridge (E-102) and a TM011
cavity mounted horizontally in the magnet. EPR spectra were recorded at
X-band (9.45 GHz), using 30 mW of power, a time constant of 0.1 s,
and modulation amplitude of 0.5 G. Spectra were acquired in 30 s.
The mean and standard error of the signal amplitude was calculated as
the signal height of the 5th line of the DEPMPO spectrum taken from 9 to 10 measurements from each of three separate experiments.
Statistical Analysis--
Statistical analyses were performed
using the GB-STAT statistical package (Dynamic Microsystems, Silver
Spring, MD). Standard errors were calculated for each mean, and
statistical differences between groups were determined by ANOVA
followed by Newman-Keuls post-hoc test as indicated.
Materials--
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and calcium-
and magnesium-free Hanks' balanced salt solution were purchased from
Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY); and fetal bovine serum from
Intergen (Purchase, NY). Trypsin was purchased from Worthington Biochemical Corp. (Freehold, NJ); 15-mm diameter glass coverslips from
Carolina Biological (Burlington, NC); 2,4-diamino-6-hydroxypyrimidine (DAHP), N-acetylserotonin (NAS), DNase,
L-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine, N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME), DPTA, and potassium superoxide from Sigma,
DEMPPO from OXIS Health Products (Portland, OR). Antibodies against TH
antiserum were obtained from Pel-Freez (Rogers, AR); antibodies against
eNOS, iNOS, and cNOS from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA); Vectastain ABC
kit from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA); mouse macrophage RAW
264.7 and bovine pulmonary artery endothelium cell lines were obtained
from ATCC (Manassas, VA); and whole rat brain extract from Biomol
(Plymouth Meeting, PA). HEt and 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein were
from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), sepiapterin from RBI (Natick, MA),
and BH4 from Schircks (Jona, Switzerland).
SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis gel and polyvinylidene difluoride
membranes were from Novex (Carlsbad, CA).
BH4 Decreases Superoxide in Primary Mesencephalic
Neurons--
We first examined the effects of BH4 on
superoxide levels in individual mesencephalic dopaminergic and
nondopaminergic neurons using Et fluorescence. Dopaminergic
(n = 56) neurons had significantly lower baseline
levels of superoxide than nondopaminergic neurons (n = 924), consistent with the endogenous presence of BH4 within dopaminergic neurons (Fig. 1).
Sepiapterin (20 µM) is converted to BH4
intracellularly (30), and increases BH4 levels in total mesencephalic neurons comparable to those in dopaminergic neurons (31).
Sepiapterin significantly decreased superoxide in nondopaminergic neurons to levels comparable to those in dopaminergic neurons, without
further decreasing superoxide in dopaminergic neurons (n = 246 and 14, respectively) (Fig. 1). To decrease
BH4 levels, we inhibited BH4 synthesis using
DAHP (1 mM) and NAS (0.1 mM). Each of these
compounds decreases BH4 to less than 5% of control levels
in cell lines (30). In mesencephalic neurons, DAHP and NAS in
combination decrease BH4 levels to about 16% of control (15). BH4 depletion increased superoxide in dopaminergic
neurons without affecting superoxide in nondopaminergic neurons
(n = 20 and 316, respectively). Furthermore,
BH4 depletion increased superoxide levels in dopaminergic
neurons beyond the levels of nondopaminergic neurons. The observation
that DAHP and NAS failed to alter BH4 levels in
nondopaminergic neurons is consistent with the absence of endogenous
BH4 in these cells. Therefore, superoxide levels are
inversely related to BH4 levels in mesencephalic
neurons.
BH4 Decreases ROS Independent of Catecholamines and
NOS--
BH4 is employed as a required cofactor by
catecholamine synthesis enzymes and by nitric-oxide synthase, both of
which are expressed in our cultures of mesencephalic neurons. Because
products of both these enzyme systems can modulate superoxide
production, altering BH4 levels in mesencephalic cultures
could indirectly modulate superoxide by affecting levels of
catecholamines or NO. To understand BH4 effects on
superoxide levels in the absence of
BH4-dependent enzymes, we examined superoxide
levels in primary cultures of fibroblasts (PF) and cultures of a
fibroblast line genetically engineered to express GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (PFG), the rate-limiting enzyme in BH4 synthesis. Neither
of these cell types synthesizes catecholamines. PFG produce
BH4 but not L-DOPA or dopamine (32).
PFG produced BH4 and PF did not (Table
I). PFG also had much lower levels of
superoxide compared with PF (Fig.
2K). Addition of sepiapterin
(20 µM) to PF markedly increased BH4 levels
(Table I) and also decreased Et fluorescence dramatically compared with controls (Fig. 2K). The decreased superoxide level in
sepiapterin-treated PF was comparable to superoxide levels in PFG (Fig.
2K). Inhibition of BH4 synthesis in PFG by DAHP
(1 mM) and NAS (1 mM) decreased BH4
PFG to undetectable levels (Table I), and increased superoxide levels.
These data indicate that BH4 is sufficient to decrease superoxide, independent of its role as a cofactor for dopamine synthesis.
To determine if BH4 lowers ROS through its effect on NOS,
we examined whether fibroblasts express NOS. NOS has been shown to
produce superoxide instead of NO in the absence of BH4 and NO can also scavenge superoxide (33). Western blot analyses did not
detect eNOS, iNOS, or cNOS expression in either PF or PFG (Fig.
3). To provide further evidence for the
absence of NOS effect on superoxide levels in our system, we examined
the effect of L-NAME on superoxide levels. Treatment of
fibroblasts with L-NAME (1 mM) for 2 h had
no significant effect on basal superoxide levels or following treatment
with sepiapterin (20 µM) (Table II). These data indicate that
BH4 decreases superoxide levels in fibroblasts independent
of NOS.
To further investigate the effects of BH4 on ROS, we
employed DCF fluorescence. Oxidation of
2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein to DCF by various ROS and
reactive nitrogen species has been noted (27). Sepiapterin (20 µM) decreased DCF fluorescence in PF (Fig. 2L), and PFG had lower levels of DCF fluorescence than PF
(Fig. 2L). In addition, inhibition of BH4
synthesis in PFG by DAHP (1 mM) and NAS (1 mM)
increased DCF fluorescence. These DCF data were consistent with our Et
fluorescence data. Taken together, our data using Et and DCF
fluorescence suggest that BH4 decreases both superoxide and
downstream superoxide metabolites such as peroxides and other ROS.
BH4 Decreases Mitochondrial ROS--
In order to
assess the effects of BH4 on mitochondrial production of
superoxide, rotenone and antimycin A were used to block electron
transport distal to the primary sites of superoxide formation in
complexes I and III, respectively (10, 34-36). Both rotenone (20 nM) and antimycin A (1 µM) significantly
increased superoxide levels in control fibroblasts. In both cases, this
increase in superoxide was significantly attenuated in cells that
either expressed BH4 or were pretreated with sepiapterin
(Fig. 4). These data indicate that
BH4 either interferes with mitochondrial ROS generation, directly scavenges ROS formed within mitochondria, or both.
Mitochodrial depolarization-induced release of ethidium and subsequent
fluorescence enhancement following binding to nucleic acids can
complicate the interpretation of ethidium-based methods of superoxide
measurement (37). To test for this complication in our system, we used
myxothiazole to depolarize mitochondria without increasing superoxide
production. Treatment of fibroblasts with myxothiazole (2 µM) plus oligomycin (2 µg/ml) inhibited the slow Et
fluorescence increase observed under baseline conditions (data not
shown). In addition, subsequent treatment with carbonyl cyanide
p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (1 µM) did
not produce an increase in Et fluorescence, demonstrating the lack of
artifactual increase in Et fluorescence under our experimental conditions.
BH4 Directly Scavenges ROS--
To investigate whether
BH4 can scavenge superoxide directly, we used an in
vitro model of KO2-generated superoxide (24, 38).
Consistent with previous observations, KO2
increased superoxide as indicated by an increased rate of HEt
conversion into Et (Fig. 5). However,
this KO2-induced increase in superoxide levels was
significantly attenuated by preincubation with BH4 at
concentrations as low as 2 µM. The effect of 200 µM BH4 on scavenging superoxide was
equivalent to that of 9 units/ml SOD. BH4 (20 µM) alone did not alter the fluorescence of 100 nM Et in vitro (data not shown), excluding the
possibility that BH4 directly interferes with Et
fluorescence.
Although KO2 generates primarily superoxide, other ROS may
be subsequently generated and scavenged by BH4. Therefore,
to provide more direct evidence that BH4 scavenges
superoxide, we also used EPR with the spin trapping agent DEPMPO.
DEPMPO is more sensitive and specific for superoxide detection than
other spin traps, due to the formation of a more stable adduct (19,
29). The mean signal height of the fifth line of the DEPMPO spectrum
corresponding to superoxide was 275.9 ± 7.5 (S.E., an arbitrary
unit, n = 27) in the KO2 (50 µM) group. This value was attenuated to 127.7 ± 2.7 (n = 30, p < 0.01 by Fisher's LSD
protected t-test) when 200 µM BH4
was added to the mixture (Fig. 6). There
was no detectable superoxide signal when SOD (100 units/ml) was added
as a positive control to scavenge superoxide (Fig. 6C).
Taken together, these data strongly suggest that BH4
decreases ROS through a direct scavenging mechanism.
This study provides the first evidence for intrinsic differences
in antioxidant capacity between dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons. Dopaminergic neurons have intrinsically lower levels of
superoxide than nondopaminergic neurons, consistent with their increased resistance to oxidative stresses such as glutathione depletion (14, 15, 31). In addition, our data indicate that physiologic
levels of BH4 within dopaminergic neurons are necessary and
sufficient for maintaining lower ROS, since the inhibition of
BH4 synthesis selectively increased ROS within dopaminergic neurons and providing exogenous BH4 selectively decreased
ROS in nondopaminergic neurons. Our data further demonstrate that BH4 decreases ROS generated from mitochondria and does so
independent of any effect on dopamine synthesis or NOS. Finally, our
in vitro experiments show that BH4 scavenges
superoxide directly.
The lower ROS level in dopaminergic neurons is surprising given the
overwhelming evidence for oxidative stress in PD and the selective
degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in PD. One possible explanation is
that the balance of oxidative stress to antioxidant defense in cultured
rodent fetal mesencephalic neurons may be different from adult human
dopaminergic neurons in vivo. In addition, the intrinsic
oxidative capacity of dopaminergic neurons in the normal state may be
different from that in disease states. Dopaminergic neurons are also
likely to face a higher baseline level of oxidative stress, due to ROS
formed from the degradation of dopamine. Thus, monoamine oxidase
metabolizes dopamine to H2O2, which may be
detoxified primarily by the glutathione/glutathione peroxidase system.
In addition, ROS may be generated by TH through partial uncoupling of
the hydroxylation reaction (39). Therefore, in order for normal
dopaminergic neurons to survive, they may require an intrinsically increased antioxidant capacity.
Our results suggest that BH4 provides an intrinsic
antioxidant capacity unique to dopaminergic neurons. Thus,
BH4 protects against
L-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine
(15), H2O2, UV light (22), and
paraquat toxicity (40). Compared with nondopaminergic neurons,
dopaminergic neurons are also more resistant to NO toxicity, but
equally vulnerable to peroxynitrite toxicity (41, 42). This
observation, together with the fact that superoxide reacts rapidly with
NO to form toxic peroxynitrite anions, led Sawada et al.
(41, 42) to hypothesize that normal dopaminergic neurons have low
superoxide levels. The protective effect of decreased superoxide
against NO toxicity has also been inferred from data showing that high
levels of MnSOD are protective (43). Our data provide direct evidence
supporting the hypothesis that dopaminergic neurons have low superoxide
levels and demonstrate that lower superoxide levels in dopaminergic
neurons is due to BH4.
BH4 could lower superoxide levels by interfering with the
production of superoxide or by scavenging it. In most cell types, mitochondria are the major site of superoxide generation (44, 45), and
their metabolic products such as H2O2,
peroxynitrite anions, and hydroxyl radicals constitute the majority of
intracellular ROS. BH4 attenuated the superoxide levels
generated by mitochondrial inhibitors such as rotenone and antimycin A
(Fig. 4). Once superoxide is formed its two most characterized fates
are SOD-catalyzed dismutation to H2O2 and
reaction with NO to form toxic peroxynitrite anions. BH4
functions as an essential cofactor for NOS (46), and NOS can be
uncoupled to produce superoxide when concentrations of either
BH4 or the substrate arginine are suboptimal (19, 33). Conversely, NOS can also decrease superoxide levels, since NO formed by
NOS reacts rapidly with superoxide to form peroxynitrite (47).
Therefore, BH4 could lower superoxide levels both by
decreasing production by NOS (48, 49), and by increasing superoxide
scavenging by NO. To examine whether there are direct effects of
BH4 on superoxide independent of NOS, we used fibroblasts
that do not express NOS (Fig. 3). These fibroblasts had lower
superoxide levels than control fibroblasts when genetically modified to
produce BH4 or provided with the BH4 precursor
sepiapterin (Fig. 2K). Thus, the superoxide lowering effect
of BH4 is not mediated through NO.
We provide the first direct evidence that BH4 scavenges
superoxide, by showing its effect on superoxide generated
nonenzymatically by KO2 (24) using both Et fluorescence and
EPR measurements. Although BH4 has previously been
hypothesized to scavenge superoxide directly, these studies generated
superoxide by xanthine/xanthine oxidase or a macrophage/phorbol
myristate acetate reaction system (16, 17, 19, 22, 40), and hence
BH4 could have inhibited these superoxide generating
enzymes. We saw a BH4-mediated decrease in superoxide
levels at a range of concentrations (2-200 µM) similar to the estimated concentrations of BH4 in nigrostriatal
dopaminergic neurons (50). Furthermore, the observation that
BH4 significantly attenuates basal superoxide levels within
dopaminergic neurons in culture demonstrates the physiological
relevance of its effect.
A potential relationship between the role of BH4 as an
antioxidant and the pathogenesis of PD is a tantalizing idea.
Dopaminergic neurons in the SN have lower levels of GTP cyclohydrolase
1 mRNA than dopaminergic neurons in the VTA (51), and lower GTP
cyclohydrolase 1 protein than norepinephrine neurons in the locus
ceruleus or serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus (52), and
are therefore presumed to have comparatively low levels of
BH4. Low levels of BH4 could contribute to the
greater susceptibility of dopaminergic neurons in the SN
versus other catecholaminergic neurons in PD. In addition,
the strongest known risk factor for PD is age, and BH4
levels are known to decrease significantly with increasing age in mice
(53) and humans (54). In particular, Chen et al. (55)
reported that the number of GTP cyclohydrolase 1-immunoreactive nigral
neurons were decreased more than TH-immunoreactive neurons in aged monkeys.
In conclusion, BH4 directly scavenges superoxide, and
thereby provides dopaminergic neurons with an enhanced antioxidant
capacity. We propose that this intrinsic resistance of dopaminergic
neurons to oxidative stress is critical to their survival, and
disturbances in this capacity through genetic mutations or exposure to
exogenous toxins could underlie their demise in PD. Understanding these processes may lead to therapeutic interventions to protect both dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons from a variety of oxidative stressors.
We thank David Wright for expert technical help.
*
This work was supported by the Brain Research Foundation,
National Institutes of Health Grant MH11986, and the Parkinson's Disease Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶¶
To whom the correspondence should be addressed: MC
2030, S225B, Dept. of Neurology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637. Tel.: 773-702-6389; Fax:
773-702-9060; E-mail: u-kang@uchicago.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103766200
The abbreviations used are:
PD, Parkinson's disease;
SN, substantia nigra;
ROS, reactive oxygen
species;
Et, ethidium;
HEt, hydroethidine;
DCF, 2,7-dichlorofluorescein;
eNOS, endothelial NOS;
DEPMPO, 5-diethoxyphosphoryl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide;
DAHP, 2,4-diamino-6-hydroxypyrimidine;
NAS, N-acetylserotonin;
L-NAME, N-nitro-L-arginine methyl
ester;
TH, tyrosine hydroxylase;
BH4, tetrahydrobiopterin;
SOD, superoxide dismutase;
DPTA, diethylene
triaminepentaacetic acid
(N,N-bis[2-(bis[carboxymethyl]amino)
ethyl]glycine).
Tetrahydrobiopterin Scavenges Superoxide in Dopaminergic
Neurons*
,
,
,
, and
¶§§¶¶
Committee on Neurobiology,
Departments of §§ Neurobiology, Pharmacology and
Physiology,
Radiation and Cellular Oncology, ¶ Neurology,
and 
Pediatrics, Center for EPR Imaging In
Vivo Physiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 and
the ** Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Regulation,
National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
20 °C.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Superoxide levels of individual mesencephalic
neurons. Superoxide levels were estimated in individual living
mesencephalic neurons using HEt microfluorimetry as described
previously (24). Cells were then processed for TH-immunohistochemistry,
and the original field of cells was relocated to identify dopaminergic
neurons. Sepiapterin (20 µM) (S) was given to
provide BH4 intracellularly while DAHP (1 mM)
and NAS (0.1 mM) (N+D) were used to block
BH4 synthesis. Superoxide levels were normalized to the
mean superoxide in control nondopaminergic neurons. Data are expressed
as mean ± S.E. (bars). a, p < 0.01 versus nondopaminergic neurons in the same
treatment; b, p < 0.01 versus
respective dopaminergic and nondopaminergic control groups by
Newman-Keuls post-hoc test.
BH4 levels of genetically modified fibroblasts

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
BH4effect on ROS levels in
fibroblasts. A-E show differential interference
contrast images of fibroblasts and F-J show Et
microfluoimetry. A and F, show control
fibroblasts (PF); B and G are PF incubated with
sepiapterin (20 µM) (S); C and H
are PF incubated with DAHP (1 mM) and NAS (1 mM) (N+D). D and I show
BH4-expressing fibroblasts (PFG) and E and
J show PFG incubated with N+D. K shows
quantitation of the Et fluorescence values normalized to the mean
levels in untreated PF. L shows quantitation of DCF
fluorescence. The data are expressed as mean ± S.E. a,
p < 0.05; b, p < 0.01 versus untreated PF; c, p < 0.01 versus untreated PFG, by Newman-Keuls post-hoc
test, n = 23-56 cells per group for Et;
n = 37-61 for DCF microfluorimetry.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
NOS expression in fibroblasts. NOS
expression was examined in PF and PFG by Western blot analysis using
antibodies against cNOS, eNOS, and iNOS. Positive controls were
obtained from extracts of mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells treated for
16 h with lipopolysaccharide (30 µg/ml) prior to harvest for
iNOS (iN), bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells for
eNOS (eN), and whole brain extract from rat (10 µg) for
cNOS (cN). St, standard; B, blank. The
expected molecular weight of each NOS protein is indicated.
Effect of NOS inhibitor on superoxide levels

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
BH4 effect on mitochondrial
sources of ROS. Data shows the acute effects of rotenone (20 nM) and antimycin A (1 µM) on superoxide
levels measured by Et fluorescence in control fibroblasts
(PF), PF incubated with sepiapterin (20 µM)
(PF/S), and BH4-expressing fibroblasts
(PFG). Et fluorescence values were first normalized to the
mean level in untreated PF. The increase in superoxide level was then
calculated by subtracting the respective PF, PF/S, and PFG control
groups. Data show mean ± S.E. a, p < 0.05 versus PF in the same treatment; b,
p < 0.01 versus PF in the same treatment;
c, p < 0.01 versus respective
PF, PF/S, and PFG control groups by Newman-Keuls post-hoc
test; n = 11-53 cells per group.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
BH4 effect on superoxide in
vitro measured by ethidium fluorescence. The effect of
KO2 (O) on Et fluorescence was examined in the
presence of HEt (H, 10 µM) and increasing
concentrations of BH4 (B), as described under
"Experimental Procedures." SOD (9 units/ml) was used as a control.
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. a, p < 0.05; b, p < 0.01 versus HO,
by Newman-Keuls post-hoc test, n = 3 per
group.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
BH4 effect on superoxide in
vitro measured by electron paramagnetic resonance of a spin
trap agent. The EPR spectra of DEPMPO-OOH spin trap adduct
obtained from: A, KO2 in buffer solution;
B, KO2 in the presence of 200 µM
BH4; and C, KO2 and SOD (100 units/ml). The concentration of DEPMPO was 40 mM. The
X-band spectrometer settings were: 30 milliwatts of power, sweep range
200G, time const. 0.1 s, scan time 30 s, modulation amplitute
0.63 G.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Sian, J.,
Dexter, D. T.,
Lees, A. J.,
Daniel, S.,
Agid, Y.,
Javoy-Agid, F.,
Jenner, P.,
and Marsden, C. D.
(1994)
Ann. Neurol.
36,
348-355
2.
Yoritaka, A.,
Hattori, N.,
Uchida, K.,
Tanaka, M.,
Stadtman, E. R.,
and Mizuno, Y.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
2696-2701
3.
Alam, Z. I.,
Daniel, S. E.,
Lees, A. J.,
Marsden, D. C.,
Jenner, P.,
and Halliwell, B.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
69,
1326-1329
4.
Alam, Z. I.,
Jenner, A.,
Daniel, S. E.,
Lees, A. J.,
Cairns, N.,
Marsden, C. D.,
Jenner, P.,
and Halliwell, B.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
69,
1196-1203
5.
Jenner, P.,
and Olanow, C. W.
(1998)
Ann. Neurol.
44,
S72-S84
6.
Dexter, D. T.,
Sian, J.,
Rose, S.,
Hindmarsh, J. G.,
Mann, V. M.,
Cooper, J. M.,
Wells, F. R.,
Daniel, S. E.,
Lees, A. J.,
Schapira, A. H. V.,
Jenner, P.,
and Marsden, C. D.
(1994)
Ann. Neurol.
35,
38-44
7.
Schapira, A. H. V.,
Mann, V. M.,
Cooper, J. M.,
Krige, D.,
Jenner, P. J.,
and Marsden, C. D.
(1992)
Ann. Neurol.
32,
S116-S124
8.
Mann, V. M.,
Cooper, J. M.,
Krige, D.,
Daniel, S. E.,
Schapira, A. H. V.,
and Marsden, C. D.
(1992)
Brain
115,
333-342
9.
Kwong, L. K.,
and Sohal, R. S.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
350,
118-126
10.
Turrens, J. F.,
and Boveris, A.
(1980)
Biochem. J.
191,
421-427
11.
Toffa, S.,
Kunikowska, G. M.,
Zeng, B. Y.,
Jenner, P.,
and Marsden, C. D.
(1997)
J. Neural. Transm.
104,
67-75
12.
Pileblad, E.,
Magnusson, T.,
and Fornstedt, B.
(1989)
J. Neurochem.
52,
978-980
13.
Wullner, U.,
Loschmann, P.,
Schulz, J.,
Schmid, A.,
Dringen, R.,
Eblen, F.,
Turski, L.,
and Klockgether, T.
(1996)
Neuroreport
7,
921-923
14.
Nakamura, K.,
Wang, W.,
and Kang, U. J.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
69,
1850-1858
15.
Nakamura, K.,
Won, L.,
Heller, A.,
and Kang, U. J.
(2000)
Brain Res.
873,
203-211
16.
Wever, R. M. F.,
van Dam, T.,
nan Rijn, H. J. M.,
de Groot, F.,
and Rabelink, T. J.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
237,
340-344
17.
Kojima, S.,
Icho, T.,
Kajiwara, Y.,
and Kubota, K.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
304,
163-166
18.
Stroes, E.,
Hijmering, M.,
Zandvoort, M.,
Wever, R.,
Rabelink, T. J.,
and Faassen, E. E.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
438,
161-164
19.
Vasquez-Vivar, J.,
Kalyanaraman, B.,
Martasek, P.,
Hogg, N.,
Masters, B. S. S.,
Karoui, H.,
Tordo, P.,
and Pritchard, K. A., Jr.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9220-9225
20.
Heales, S. J. R.,
Blair, J. A.,
Meinschad, C.,
and Ziegler, I.
(1988)
Cell Biochem. Funct.
6,
191-195
21.
Koshimura, K.,
Murakami, Y.,
Tanaka, J.,
and Kato, Y.
(1998)
J. Neurosci. Res.
54,
664-672
22.
Shen, R.,
and Zhang, Y.
(1993)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
338,
351-354
23.
Ishii, M.,
Shimizu, S.,
Momose, K.,
and Yamamoto, T.
(1999)
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
33,
295-300
24.
Bindokas, V.,
Jordan, J.,
Lee, C.,
and Miller, R.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
1324-1336
25.
Gallop, P. M.,
Paz, M. A.,
Henson, E.,
and Latt, S. A.
(1984)
BioTechniques
2,
32-36
26.
Carter, W. O.,
Narayanan, P. K.,
and Robinson, J. P.
(1994)
J. Leukoc. Biol.
55,
253-258
27.
Ischiropoulos, H.,
Gow, A.,
Thom, S. R.,
Kooy, N. W.,
Royall, J. A.,
and Crow, J. P.
(1999)
Methods Enzymol.
301,
367-373
28.
Reiter, C. D.,
Teng, R. J.,
and Beckman, J. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32460-32466
29.
Roubaud, V.,
Sankarapandi, S.,
Kuppusamy, P.,
Tordo, P.,
and Zweier, J. L.
(1997)
Anal. Biochem.
247,
404-411
30.
Smith, G. K.,
Duch, D. S.,
Edelstein, M. P.,
and Bigham, E. C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
5599-5607
31.
Nakamura, K.,
Wright, D. A.,
Wiatr, T.,
Kowlessur, D.,
Milstien, S.,
Lei, X. G.,
and Kang, U. J.
(2000)
J. Neurochem.
74,
2305-2315
32.
Bencsics, C.,
Wachtel, S. R.,
Milstien, S.,
Hatakeyama, K.,
Becker, J. B.,
and Kang, U. J.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
4449-4456
33.
Pou, S.,
Pou, W. S.,
Bredt, D. S.,
Snyder, S. H.,
and Rosen, G. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
24173-24176
34.
Herrero, A.,
and Barja, G.
(1997)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
29,
241-249
35.
Pitkanen, S.,
and Robinson, B. H.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
345-351
36.
Hensley, K.,
Pye, Q. N.,
Maidt, M. L.,
Stewart, C. A.,
Robinson, K. A.,
Jaffrey, F.,
and Floyd, R. A.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
71,
2549-2557
37.
Budd, S. L.,
Castilho, R. F.,
and Nicholls, D. G.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
415,
21-24
38.
Lokesh, B. R.,
and Cunningham, M. L.
(1986)
Toxicol. Lett.
34,
75-84
39.
Haavik, J.,
Almas, B.,
and Flatmark, T.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
68,
328-332
40.
Kojima, S.,
Ona, S.,
Iizuka, I.,
Arai, T.,
Mori, H.,
and Kubota, K.
(1995)
Free Radic. Res.
23,
419-430
41.
Sawada, H.,
Kawamura, T.,
Shimohama, S.,
Akaike, A.,
and Kimura, J.
(1996)
J. Neurosci. Res.
43,
503-510
42.
Sawada, H.,
Shimohama, S.,
Kawamura, T.,
Akaike, A.,
Kitamura, Y.,
Taniguchi, T.,
and Kimura, J.
(1996)
J. Neurosci. Res.
46,
509-518
43.
Gonzalez-Zuleta, M.,
Ensz, L. M.,
Mukhina, G.,
Lebovitz, R. M.,
Zwacka, R. M.,
Enmgelhardt, J. F.,
Oberley, L. W.,
Dawson, V. L.,
and Dawson, T. M.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
2040-2055
44.
Skulachev, V. P.
(1996)
Q. Rev. Biophys.
29,
169-202
45.
Turrens, J. F.
(1997)
Biosci. Rep.
17,
3-8
46.
Mayer, B.,
and Werner, E. R.
(1995)
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol.
351,
453-463
47.
Schmidt, H. H.,
Hofmann, H.,
Schindler, U.,
Shutenko, Z. S.,
Cunningham, D. D.,
and Feelisch, M.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
14492-14497
48.
Xia, Y.,
Tsai, A. L.,
Berka, V.,
and Zweier, J. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25804-25808
49.
Vasquez-Vivar, J.,
Hogg, N.,
Martasek, P.,
Karoui, H.,
Pritchard, K. A., Jr.,
and Kalyanaraman, B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26736-26742
50.
Levine, R. A.,
Miller, L. P.,
and Lovenberg, W.
(1981)
Science
214,
919-921
51.
Lentz, S. I.,
and Kapatos, G.
(1996)
Neurochem. Int.
28,
569-582
52.
Hirayama, K.,
and Kapatos, G.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
70,
164-170
53.
Yoshida, Y.,
Eda, S.,
and Masada, M.
(2000)
Brain Dev.
22 Suppl. 1,
45-49
54.
Furukawa, Y.,
and Kish, S. J.
(1998)
Neurology
51,
632-634
55.
Chen, E. Y.,
Kallwitz, E.,
Leff, S. E.,
Cochran, E. J.,
Mufson, E. J.,
Kordower, J. H.,
and Mandel, R. J.
(2000)
J. Comp. Neurol.
426,
534-548
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. P. D'Agostino, R. W. Putnam, and J. B. Dean Superoxide ({middle dot}O2 ) Production in CA1 Neurons of Rat Hippocampal Slices Exposed to Graded Levels of Oxygen J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 1030 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chaudhuri, K. Bowling, C. Funderburk, H. Lawal, A. Inamdar, Z. Wang, and J. M. O'Donnell Interaction of Genetic and Environmental Factors in a Drosophila Parkinsonism Model J. Neurosci., March 7, 2007; 27(10): 2457 - 2467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. H. Koopman, S. Verkaart, H.-J. Visch, F. H. van der Westhuizen, M. P. Murphy, L. W. P. J. van den Heuvel, J. A. M. Smeitink, and P. H. G. M. Willems Inhibition of complex I of the electron transport chain causes O2-{middle dot}-mediated mitochondrial outgrowth Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): C1440 - C1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-R. Kweon, J. D. Marks, R. Krencik, E. H. Leung, P. T. Schumacker, K. Hyland, and U. J. Kang Distinct Mechanisms of Neurodegeneration Induced by Chronic Complex I Inhibition in Dopaminergic and Non-dopaminergic Cells J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 51783 - 51792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shang, S. Kotamraju, S. V. Kalivendi, C. J. Hillard, and B. Kalyanaraman 1-Methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced Apoptosis in Cerebellar Granule Neurons Is Mediated by Transferrin Receptor Iron-dependent Depletion of Tetrahydrobiopterin and Neuronal Nitric-oxide Synthase-derived Superoxide J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 19099 - 19112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Abou-Mohamed, J. A. Johnson, L. Jin, A. B. El-Remessy, K. Do, W. H. Kaesemeyer, R. B. Caldwell, and R. W. Caldwell Roles of Superoxide, Peroxynitrite, and Protein Kinase C in the Development of Tolerance to Nitroglycerin J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2004; 308(1): 289 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Kuhn and T. J. Geddes Tetrahydrobiopterin Prevents Nitration of Tyrosine Hydroxylase by Peroxynitrite and Nitrogen Dioxide Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2003; 64(4): 946 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Canals, M. J. Casarejos, S. de Bernardo, E. Rodriguez-Martin, and M. A. Mena Nitric Oxide Triggers the Toxicity due to Glutathione Depletion in Midbrain Cultures through 12-Lipoxygenase J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2003; 278(24): 21542 - 21549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Li, K. Ragheb, G. Lawler, J. Sturgis, B. Rajwa, J. A. Melendez, and J. P. Robinson Mitochondrial Complex I Inhibitor Rotenone Induces Apoptosis through Enhancing Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Production J. Biol. Chem., February 28, 2003; 278(10): 8516 - 8525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Serova and E. L. Sabban Involvement of alpha 7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Gene Expression of Dopamine Biosynthetic Enzymes in Rat Brain J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2002; 303(3): 896 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Rosen, P. Tsai, J. Weaver, S. Porasuphatana, L. J. Roman, A. A. Starkov, G. Fiskum, and S. Pou The Role of Tetrahydrobiopterin in the Regulation of Neuronal Nitric-oxide Synthase-generated Superoxide J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 40275 - 40280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||