JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103766200 on July 10, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 37, 34402-34407, September 14, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/37/34402    most recent
M103766200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kang, U. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kang, U. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Tetrahydrobiopterin Scavenges Superoxide in Dopaminergic Neurons*

Ken NakamuraDagger , Vytautas P. Bindokas, Devanand Kowlessur, Martyna Elas||, Sheldon Milstien**, Jeremy D. MarksDagger Dagger , Howard J. Halpern||, and Un Jung KangDagger §§¶¶

From the Dagger  Committee on Neurobiology, Departments of §§ Neurobiology, Pharmacology and Physiology, || Radiation and Cellular Oncology,  Neurology, and Dagger Dagger  Pediatrics, Center for EPR Imaging In Vivo Physiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 and the ** Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Regulation, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Received for publication, April 26, 2001, and in revised form, July 6, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Increased oxidative stresses are implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease, and dopaminergic neurons may be intrinsically susceptible to oxidative damage. However, the selective presence of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) makes dopaminergic neurons more resistant to oxidative stress caused by glutathione depletion. To further investigate the mechanisms of BH4 protection, we examined the effects of BH4 on superoxide levels in individual living mesencephalic neurons. Dopaminergic neurons have intrinsically lower levels of superoxide than nondopaminergic neurons. In addition, inhibiting BH4 synthesis increased superoxide in dopaminergic neurons, while BH4 supplementation decreased superoxide in nondopaminergic cells. BH4 is also a cofactor in catecholamine and NO production. In order to exclude the possibility that the antioxidant effects of BH4 are mediated by dopamine and NO, we used fibroblasts in which neither catecholamine nor NO production occurs. In fibroblasts, BH4 decreased baseline reactive oxygen species, and attenuated reactive oxygen species increase by rotenone and antimycin A. Physiologic concentrations of BH4 directly scavenged superoxide generated by potassium superoxide in vitro. We hypothesize that BH4 protects dopaminergic neurons from ordinary oxidative stresses generated by dopamine and its metabolites and that environmental insults or genetic defects may disrupt this intrinsic capacity of dopaminergic neurons and contribute to their degeneration in Parkinson's disease.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Parkinson's disease (PD)1 is characterized by the selective degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN) pars compacta. While the etiology and pathogenesis of this cell death in most cases of PD remain unknown, it has been widely hypothesized that increased oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction contribute to dopaminergic neuronal degeneration. Autopsy studies have noted numerous abnormalities indicative of increased oxidative damage in the SN (1-5). In particular, decreased glutathione in the SN has been found in autopsy brains from individuals with incidental Lewy bodies, presumed to represent presymptomatic PD (6). In addition, mitochondrial complex I activity is also decreased in the SN of PD patients (7, 8), and complex I inhibition can increase the formation of reactive oxygen species (9, 10).

Although these findings suggest that dopaminergic neurons are susceptible to oxidative stress, studies in vivo have not observed dopaminergic neuronal death following the oxidative stress generated by glutathione depletion (11-13). Furthermore, mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons in primary monolayer (14) and reaggregate (15) cultures are less susceptible to the toxicity of glutathione depletion than nondopaminergic neurons.

To explain this unanticipated resistance of dopaminergic neurons to oxidative stress, we hypothesized that dopaminergic neurons may contain additional antioxidants for the metabolism of ROS. One candidate is tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), which is present abundantly in dopaminergic neurons where it functions as a cofactor for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in catecholamine synthesis. Recently, BH4 has also been found to decrease superoxide formed by xanthine/xanthine oxidase (16), a macrophage/phorbol myristate acetate reaction system (17), and by NOS (18, 19), and to protect against a variety of oxidative stressors (20-23). BH4 also mediates the marked preferential resistance of dopaminergic neurons to glutathione depletion (15). Therefore, BH4 may provide dopaminergic neurons with an additional pathway for the metabolism of reactive oxygen species (ROS).

In this paper, we delineate a mechanism underlying the increased resistance of dopaminergic neurons to oxidative stress. First, using microfluorimetry of individual living neurons, we show that dopaminergic neurons have lower levels of superoxide than nondopaminergic neurons. We then show that the presence of BH4 is both sufficient and necessary to maintain low superoxide levels in dopaminergic neurons, and in fibroblasts that have been engineered to synthesize BH4 but do not produce dopamine or NO. Last, we show that BH4 decreases superoxide in vitro through a direct scavenging mechanism.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mesencephalic Cultures-- Cultures were prepared as described previously (15). Briefly, timed pregnant Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Harlan Sprague-Dawley (Madison, WI). Pieces of ventral mesencephalon were dissected from embryonic gestation day 14 (E14) rat embryos (day of conception defined as day 0), and then incubated for 20 min at 37 °C in 0.4% trypsin in calcium- and magnesium-free Hanks' balanced salt solution. Pieces were then triturated in 0.015% DNase using flame-polished Pasteur pipettes. Cells were plated onto poly-L-lysine-coated glass coverslips at a density of 200,000 viable cells/cm2. Cells were grown in high glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. After 48 h, the medium was changed, and 10 µg/ml 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine was added to inhibit glial growth. Cells were grown an additional 4-6 days prior to study. Glia represented less than 15% of the total cells in cultures, based on the number of cells that lacked immunoreactivity to neurofilament protein 200 or neuron-specific nuclear protein (NeuN) antibodies.

Measurement of ROS-- Relative superoxide levels were determined by measuring the rate of increase in ethidium (Et) fluorescence generated by the oxidation of hydroethidine (HEt) by superoxide (24). All measurements were made with a Nikon Diaphot epifluorescence microscope, and illumination with a 150 W Xe arc (attenuated by a neutral density 1.5, ultraviolet-grade filter; Omega Optical, Brattleboro, VT). Et imaging used standard rhodamine optics (excitation 510-560 nm; dichroic mirror 580 nm; emission >590 nm) (Nikon, Melville, NY). Images were formed using a 40X Fluor NA 0.85 objective (Nikon) and collected on a Hamamatsu ICCD (sensitivity set at 7.0). Images were 8-bit (256 intensity levels) and 16 frames were averaged every 10 s. Background subtraction was made using the first image obtained when HEt solution was added. Data acquisition was controlled by MetaFluor or MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging Corp.), and average intensity over identified regions of interest were logged to hard disc and displayed in real time. The relative superoxide level for each cell was determined from the slope of the increase in ethidium fluorescence over time, fit by linear regression. HEt, a dye freely permeable to cells (25, 26), was freshly prepared and used at a final concentration of 3.2 µM.

We also measured the oxidation of 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein to 2,7-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) which can be caused by various ROS and reactive nitrogen species (27). Images were obtained in the presence of 33 µM 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein at 5-s intervals for 15 min. Images were corrected by subtracting an autofluoresence image obtained before dye addition. Optics utilized excitation at 460-490, dichroic mirror 500, emission >515 nm. Rate of fluorescence increase was determined by fitting a line to the final 5 min by linear regression.

To quantify fluorescence, cell somata were circled, and the average cytosolic fluorescence computed. Because systematic differences in somal volumes between dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic neurons would alter fluorescence intensities, any volume difference could confound our interpretation of ROS differences. Accordingly, mean cross-sectional somal areas (and hence cell volume) were compared between dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons and were found to be comparable (data not shown).

Immunohistochemitry and Post-hoc Identification of Dopaminergic Neurons-- Neurons in which fluorescence measurements were made were identified as either dopaminergic or nondopaminergic based on post-hoc TH-immunohistochemistry. After each study, the location of the field of cells was marked on the slide. Cells were then washed with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 15 min. Cells were exposed to 0.6% H2O2 in phosphate-buffered saline for 15 min to remove endogenous peroxidase activity, and preincubated with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.2% Triton X-100 for 30 min. Cells were incubated at room temperature overnight in primary polyclonal anti-TH antiserum (1:1000). Cultures were next incubated for 1 h with anti-rabbit biotinylated secondary antibody at 1:200 dilution, and an additional 1 h with an avidin-biotin conjugate of peroxidase (Vectastain ABC kit). Dopaminergic neurons were visualized as a black reaction product, using diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride in the presence of cobalt chloride (0.02%) and nickel ammonium sulfate (0.02%).

Following immunohistochemistry, the original field of imaged cells field was found and re-imaged. The orientation and location of stained cells were matched, and neurons were identified as dopaminergic or nondopaminergic based on immunostaining.

Western Blot Analysis-- Fibroblasts were grown to confluence in T162 flasks prior to harvest. Cells were resuspended in 200 µl of phosphate-buffered saline, sonicated and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 2 min. The supernatant was frozen at -20 °C.

A total of 25 µl of supernatant from each sample were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels, and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Following transfer, membranes were incubated overnight in 5% nonfat milk, and then incubated 1 h with primary antibodies against endothelial NOS (eNOS) at 1:500, inducible NOS (iNOS) at 1:1000, or constitutive NOS (cNOS, neuronal or brain NOS) at 1:175 in 3% milk. Membranes were then incubated for 1 h with the appropriate secondary (anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase or anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase, 1:2000) in 3% milk, and then developed using ECL.

In Vitro Superoxide Measurements-- Saturated potassium superoxide (KO2) solution was made by mixing KO2 in dimethyl sulfoxide, centrifuging at 1500 rpm for 5 min, and then decanting the supernatant (24). This procedure yields about 3.6 mM solution (28). The stock solution of KO2 was then added to buffer containing 10 µM HEt (for a final concentration of 150 µM), and Et fluorescence was monitored every 20 s for 160 s, using a fluorometer. The superoxide level was determined from the slope of the increase in Et fluorescence over time, fit by linear regression. When indicated, BH4 was added immediately prior to adding KO2, at final concentrations ranging from 20 nM to 200 µM. Cu,Zn-SOD (9 units/ml) was used as a control.

The effects of BH4 on KO2-generated superoxide levels were also measured by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrometry using a spin trapping agent 5-diethoxyphosphoryl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DEPMPO) (19, 29). DEPMPO was prepared as a 40 mM solution in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, treated with an iron chelator, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (N,N-bis[2-(bis[carboxymethyl]amino)ethyl]glycine) (DPTA) (1 mM). Catalase (300 units/ml) was also added to prevent other oxygen radicals from contaminating the EPR spectra. Spectra were recorded within 1 min after mixing, with a Varian E-12 EPR spectrometer equipped with a century series bridge (E-102) and a TM011 cavity mounted horizontally in the magnet. EPR spectra were recorded at X-band (9.45 GHz), using 30 mW of power, a time constant of 0.1 s, and modulation amplitude of 0.5 G. Spectra were acquired in 30 s. The mean and standard error of the signal amplitude was calculated as the signal height of the 5th line of the DEPMPO spectrum taken from 9 to 10 measurements from each of three separate experiments.

Statistical Analysis-- Statistical analyses were performed using the GB-STAT statistical package (Dynamic Microsystems, Silver Spring, MD). Standard errors were calculated for each mean, and statistical differences between groups were determined by ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post-hoc test as indicated.

Materials-- Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and calcium- and magnesium-free Hanks' balanced salt solution were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY); and fetal bovine serum from Intergen (Purchase, NY). Trypsin was purchased from Worthington Biochemical Corp. (Freehold, NJ); 15-mm diameter glass coverslips from Carolina Biological (Burlington, NC); 2,4-diamino-6-hydroxypyrimidine (DAHP), N-acetylserotonin (NAS), DNase, L-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine, N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), DPTA, and potassium superoxide from Sigma, DEMPPO from OXIS Health Products (Portland, OR). Antibodies against TH antiserum were obtained from Pel-Freez (Rogers, AR); antibodies against eNOS, iNOS, and cNOS from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA); Vectastain ABC kit from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA); mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 and bovine pulmonary artery endothelium cell lines were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA); and whole rat brain extract from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA). HEt and 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein were from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), sepiapterin from RBI (Natick, MA), and BH4 from Schircks (Jona, Switzerland). SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis gel and polyvinylidene difluoride membranes were from Novex (Carlsbad, CA).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

BH4 Decreases Superoxide in Primary Mesencephalic Neurons-- We first examined the effects of BH4 on superoxide levels in individual mesencephalic dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons using Et fluorescence. Dopaminergic (n = 56) neurons had significantly lower baseline levels of superoxide than nondopaminergic neurons (n = 924), consistent with the endogenous presence of BH4 within dopaminergic neurons (Fig. 1). Sepiapterin (20 µM) is converted to BH4 intracellularly (30), and increases BH4 levels in total mesencephalic neurons comparable to those in dopaminergic neurons (31). Sepiapterin significantly decreased superoxide in nondopaminergic neurons to levels comparable to those in dopaminergic neurons, without further decreasing superoxide in dopaminergic neurons (n = 246 and 14, respectively) (Fig. 1). To decrease BH4 levels, we inhibited BH4 synthesis using DAHP (1 mM) and NAS (0.1 mM). Each of these compounds decreases BH4 to less than 5% of control levels in cell lines (30). In mesencephalic neurons, DAHP and NAS in combination decrease BH4 levels to about 16% of control (15). BH4 depletion increased superoxide in dopaminergic neurons without affecting superoxide in nondopaminergic neurons (n = 20 and 316, respectively). Furthermore, BH4 depletion increased superoxide levels in dopaminergic neurons beyond the levels of nondopaminergic neurons. The observation that DAHP and NAS failed to alter BH4 levels in nondopaminergic neurons is consistent with the absence of endogenous BH4 in these cells. Therefore, superoxide levels are inversely related to BH4 levels in mesencephalic neurons.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Superoxide levels of individual mesencephalic neurons. Superoxide levels were estimated in individual living mesencephalic neurons using HEt microfluorimetry as described previously (24). Cells were then processed for TH-immunohistochemistry, and the original field of cells was relocated to identify dopaminergic neurons. Sepiapterin (20 µM) (S) was given to provide BH4 intracellularly while DAHP (1 mM) and NAS (0.1 mM) (N+D) were used to block BH4 synthesis. Superoxide levels were normalized to the mean superoxide in control nondopaminergic neurons. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. (bars). a, p < 0.01 versus nondopaminergic neurons in the same treatment; b, p < 0.01 versus respective dopaminergic and nondopaminergic control groups by Newman-Keuls post-hoc test.

BH4 Decreases ROS Independent of Catecholamines and NOS-- BH4 is employed as a required cofactor by catecholamine synthesis enzymes and by nitric-oxide synthase, both of which are expressed in our cultures of mesencephalic neurons. Because products of both these enzyme systems can modulate superoxide production, altering BH4 levels in mesencephalic cultures could indirectly modulate superoxide by affecting levels of catecholamines or NO. To understand BH4 effects on superoxide levels in the absence of BH4-dependent enzymes, we examined superoxide levels in primary cultures of fibroblasts (PF) and cultures of a fibroblast line genetically engineered to express GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (PFG), the rate-limiting enzyme in BH4 synthesis. Neither of these cell types synthesizes catecholamines. PFG produce BH4 but not L-DOPA or dopamine (32).

PFG produced BH4 and PF did not (Table I). PFG also had much lower levels of superoxide compared with PF (Fig. 2K). Addition of sepiapterin (20 µM) to PF markedly increased BH4 levels (Table I) and also decreased Et fluorescence dramatically compared with controls (Fig. 2K). The decreased superoxide level in sepiapterin-treated PF was comparable to superoxide levels in PFG (Fig. 2K). Inhibition of BH4 synthesis in PFG by DAHP (1 mM) and NAS (1 mM) decreased BH4 PFG to undetectable levels (Table I), and increased superoxide levels. These data indicate that BH4 is sufficient to decrease superoxide, independent of its role as a cofactor for dopamine synthesis.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
BH4 levels of genetically modified fibroblasts
Control fibroblasts (PF) and fibroblasts expressing BH4 (PFG) were cultured in the presence of DAHP (1 mM) and NAS (1 mM) or sepiapterin (20 µM). After 2 days cultures were harvested and BH4 levels (pmol/mg protein) were measured. Data show mean ± S.E.


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   BH4effect on ROS levels in fibroblasts. A-E show differential interference contrast images of fibroblasts and F-J show Et microfluoimetry. A and F, show control fibroblasts (PF); B and G are PF incubated with sepiapterin (20 µM) (S); C and H are PF incubated with DAHP (1 mM) and NAS (1 mM) (N+D). D and I show BH4-expressing fibroblasts (PFG) and E and J show PFG incubated with N+D. K shows quantitation of the Et fluorescence values normalized to the mean levels in untreated PF. L shows quantitation of DCF fluorescence. The data are expressed as mean ± S.E. a, p < 0.05; b, p < 0.01 versus untreated PF; c, p < 0.01 versus untreated PFG, by Newman-Keuls post-hoc test, n = 23-56 cells per group for Et; n = 37-61 for DCF microfluorimetry.

To determine if BH4 lowers ROS through its effect on NOS, we examined whether fibroblasts express NOS. NOS has been shown to produce superoxide instead of NO in the absence of BH4 and NO can also scavenge superoxide (33). Western blot analyses did not detect eNOS, iNOS, or cNOS expression in either PF or PFG (Fig. 3). To provide further evidence for the absence of NOS effect on superoxide levels in our system, we examined the effect of L-NAME on superoxide levels. Treatment of fibroblasts with L-NAME (1 mM) for 2 h had no significant effect on basal superoxide levels or following treatment with sepiapterin (20 µM) (Table II). These data indicate that BH4 decreases superoxide levels in fibroblasts independent of NOS.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   NOS expression in fibroblasts. NOS expression was examined in PF and PFG by Western blot analysis using antibodies against cNOS, eNOS, and iNOS. Positive controls were obtained from extracts of mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells treated for 16 h with lipopolysaccharide (30 µg/ml) prior to harvest for iNOS (iN), bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells for eNOS (eN), and whole brain extract from rat (10 µg) for cNOS (cN). St, standard; B, blank. The expected molecular weight of each NOS protein is indicated.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Effect of NOS inhibitor on superoxide levels
Fibroblasts (PF) were treated with or without L-NAME (1 mM) for 2 h in the presence or absence of sepiapterin (20 µM) (PF/S) and superoxide levels were measured by the Et fluorescence method. Et fluorescence values are normalized to the mean level in untreated PF. Data are expressed as mean ± SE.

To further investigate the effects of BH4 on ROS, we employed DCF fluorescence. Oxidation of 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein to DCF by various ROS and reactive nitrogen species has been noted (27). Sepiapterin (20 µM) decreased DCF fluorescence in PF (Fig. 2L), and PFG had lower levels of DCF fluorescence than PF (Fig. 2L). In addition, inhibition of BH4 synthesis in PFG by DAHP (1 mM) and NAS (1 mM) increased DCF fluorescence. These DCF data were consistent with our Et fluorescence data. Taken together, our data using Et and DCF fluorescence suggest that BH4 decreases both superoxide and downstream superoxide metabolites such as peroxides and other ROS.

BH4 Decreases Mitochondrial ROS-- In order to assess the effects of BH4 on mitochondrial production of superoxide, rotenone and antimycin A were used to block electron transport distal to the primary sites of superoxide formation in complexes I and III, respectively (10, 34-36). Both rotenone (20 nM) and antimycin A (1 µM) significantly increased superoxide levels in control fibroblasts. In both cases, this increase in superoxide was significantly attenuated in cells that either expressed BH4 or were pretreated with sepiapterin (Fig. 4). These data indicate that BH4 either interferes with mitochondrial ROS generation, directly scavenges ROS formed within mitochondria, or both.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   BH4 effect on mitochondrial sources of ROS. Data shows the acute effects of rotenone (20 nM) and antimycin A (1 µM) on superoxide levels measured by Et fluorescence in control fibroblasts (PF), PF incubated with sepiapterin (20 µM) (PF/S), and BH4-expressing fibroblasts (PFG). Et fluorescence values were first normalized to the mean level in untreated PF. The increase in superoxide level was then calculated by subtracting the respective PF, PF/S, and PFG control groups. Data show mean ± S.E. a, p < 0.05 versus PF in the same treatment; b, p < 0.01 versus PF in the same treatment; c, p < 0.01 versus respective PF, PF/S, and PFG control groups by Newman-Keuls post-hoc test; n = 11-53 cells per group.

Mitochodrial depolarization-induced release of ethidium and subsequent fluorescence enhancement following binding to nucleic acids can complicate the interpretation of ethidium-based methods of superoxide measurement (37). To test for this complication in our system, we used myxothiazole to depolarize mitochondria without increasing superoxide production. Treatment of fibroblasts with myxothiazole (2 µM) plus oligomycin (2 µg/ml) inhibited the slow Et fluorescence increase observed under baseline conditions (data not shown). In addition, subsequent treatment with carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (1 µM) did not produce an increase in Et fluorescence, demonstrating the lack of artifactual increase in Et fluorescence under our experimental conditions.

BH4 Directly Scavenges ROS-- To investigate whether BH4 can scavenge superoxide directly, we used an in vitro model of KO2-generated superoxide (24, 38). Consistent with previous observations, KO2 increased superoxide as indicated by an increased rate of HEt conversion into Et (Fig. 5). However, this KO2-induced increase in superoxide levels was significantly attenuated by preincubation with BH4 at concentrations as low as 2 µM. The effect of 200 µM BH4 on scavenging superoxide was equivalent to that of 9 units/ml SOD. BH4 (20 µM) alone did not alter the fluorescence of 100 nM Et in vitro (data not shown), excluding the possibility that BH4 directly interferes with Et fluorescence.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   BH4 effect on superoxide in vitro measured by ethidium fluorescence. The effect of KO2 (O) on Et fluorescence was examined in the presence of HEt (H, 10 µM) and increasing concentrations of BH4 (B), as described under "Experimental Procedures." SOD (9 units/ml) was used as a control. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. a, p < 0.05; b, p < 0.01 versus HO, by Newman-Keuls post-hoc test, n = 3 per group.

Although KO2 generates primarily superoxide, other ROS may be subsequently generated and scavenged by BH4. Therefore, to provide more direct evidence that BH4 scavenges superoxide, we also used EPR with the spin trapping agent DEPMPO. DEPMPO is more sensitive and specific for superoxide detection than other spin traps, due to the formation of a more stable adduct (19, 29). The mean signal height of the fifth line of the DEPMPO spectrum corresponding to superoxide was 275.9 ± 7.5 (S.E., an arbitrary unit, n = 27) in the KO2 (50 µM) group. This value was attenuated to 127.7 ± 2.7 (n = 30, p < 0.01 by Fisher's LSD protected t-test) when 200 µM BH4 was added to the mixture (Fig. 6). There was no detectable superoxide signal when SOD (100 units/ml) was added as a positive control to scavenge superoxide (Fig. 6C). Taken together, these data strongly suggest that BH4 decreases ROS through a direct scavenging mechanism.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   BH4 effect on superoxide in vitro measured by electron paramagnetic resonance of a spin trap agent. The EPR spectra of DEPMPO-OOH spin trap adduct obtained from: A, KO2 in buffer solution; B, KO2 in the presence of 200 µM BH4; and C, KO2 and SOD (100 units/ml). The concentration of DEPMPO was 40 mM. The X-band spectrometer settings were: 30 milliwatts of power, sweep range 200G, time const. 0.1 s, scan time 30 s, modulation amplitute 0.63 G.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study provides the first evidence for intrinsic differences in antioxidant capacity between dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons. Dopaminergic neurons have intrinsically lower levels of superoxide than nondopaminergic neurons, consistent with their increased resistance to oxidative stresses such as glutathione depletion (14, 15, 31). In addition, our data indicate that physiologic levels of BH4 within dopaminergic neurons are necessary and sufficient for maintaining lower ROS, since the inhibition of BH4 synthesis selectively increased ROS within dopaminergic neurons and providing exogenous BH4 selectively decreased ROS in nondopaminergic neurons. Our data further demonstrate that BH4 decreases ROS generated from mitochondria and does so independent of any effect on dopamine synthesis or NOS. Finally, our in vitro experiments show that BH4 scavenges superoxide directly.

The lower ROS level in dopaminergic neurons is surprising given the overwhelming evidence for oxidative stress in PD and the selective degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in PD. One possible explanation is that the balance of oxidative stress to antioxidant defense in cultured rodent fetal mesencephalic neurons may be different from adult human dopaminergic neurons in vivo. In addition, the intrinsic oxidative capacity of dopaminergic neurons in the normal state may be different from that in disease states. Dopaminergic neurons are also likely to face a higher baseline level of oxidative stress, due to ROS formed from the degradation of dopamine. Thus, monoamine oxidase metabolizes dopamine to H2O2, which may be detoxified primarily by the glutathione/glutathione peroxidase system. In addition, ROS may be generated by TH through partial uncoupling of the hydroxylation reaction (39). Therefore, in order for normal dopaminergic neurons to survive, they may require an intrinsically increased antioxidant capacity.

Our results suggest that BH4 provides an intrinsic antioxidant capacity unique to dopaminergic neurons. Thus, BH4 protects against L-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine (15), H2O2, UV light (22), and paraquat toxicity (40). Compared with nondopaminergic neurons, dopaminergic neurons are also more resistant to NO toxicity, but equally vulnerable to peroxynitrite toxicity (41, 42). This observation, together with the fact that superoxide reacts rapidly with NO to form toxic peroxynitrite anions, led Sawada et al. (41, 42) to hypothesize that normal dopaminergic neurons have low superoxide levels. The protective effect of decreased superoxide against NO toxicity has also been inferred from data showing that high levels of MnSOD are protective (43). Our data provide direct evidence supporting the hypothesis that dopaminergic neurons have low superoxide levels and demonstrate that lower superoxide levels in dopaminergic neurons is due to BH4.

BH4 could lower superoxide levels by interfering with the production of superoxide or by scavenging it. In most cell types, mitochondria are the major site of superoxide generation (44, 45), and their metabolic products such as H2O2, peroxynitrite anions, and hydroxyl radicals constitute the majority of intracellular ROS. BH4 attenuated the superoxide levels generated by mitochondrial inhibitors such as rotenone and antimycin A (Fig. 4). Once superoxide is formed its two most characterized fates are SOD-catalyzed dismutation to H2O2 and reaction with NO to form toxic peroxynitrite anions. BH4 functions as an essential cofactor for NOS (46), and NOS can be uncoupled to produce superoxide when concentrations of either BH4 or the substrate arginine are suboptimal (19, 33). Conversely, NOS can also decrease superoxide levels, since NO formed by NOS reacts rapidly with superoxide to form peroxynitrite (47). Therefore, BH4 could lower superoxide levels both by decreasing production by NOS (48, 49), and by increasing superoxide scavenging by NO. To examine whether there are direct effects of BH4 on superoxide independent of NOS, we used fibroblasts that do not express NOS (Fig. 3). These fibroblasts had lower superoxide levels than control fibroblasts when genetically modified to produce BH4 or provided with the BH4 precursor sepiapterin (Fig. 2K). Thus, the superoxide lowering effect of BH4 is not mediated through NO.

We provide the first direct evidence that BH4 scavenges superoxide, by showing its effect on superoxide generated nonenzymatically by KO2 (24) using both Et fluorescence and EPR measurements. Although BH4 has previously been hypothesized to scavenge superoxide directly, these studies generated superoxide by xanthine/xanthine oxidase or a macrophage/phorbol myristate acetate reaction system (16, 17, 19, 22, 40), and hence BH4 could have inhibited these superoxide generating enzymes. We saw a BH4-mediated decrease in superoxide levels at a range of concentrations (2-200 µM) similar to the estimated concentrations of BH4 in nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons (50). Furthermore, the observation that BH4 significantly attenuates basal superoxide levels within dopaminergic neurons in culture demonstrates the physiological relevance of its effect.

A potential relationship between the role of BH4 as an antioxidant and the pathogenesis of PD is a tantalizing idea. Dopaminergic neurons in the SN have lower levels of GTP cyclohydrolase 1 mRNA than dopaminergic neurons in the VTA (51), and lower GTP cyclohydrolase 1 protein than norepinephrine neurons in the locus ceruleus or serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus (52), and are therefore presumed to have comparatively low levels of BH4. Low levels of BH4 could contribute to the greater susceptibility of dopaminergic neurons in the SN versus other catecholaminergic neurons in PD. In addition, the strongest known risk factor for PD is age, and BH4 levels are known to decrease significantly with increasing age in mice (53) and humans (54). In particular, Chen et al. (55) reported that the number of GTP cyclohydrolase 1-immunoreactive nigral neurons were decreased more than TH-immunoreactive neurons in aged monkeys.

In conclusion, BH4 directly scavenges superoxide, and thereby provides dopaminergic neurons with an enhanced antioxidant capacity. We propose that this intrinsic resistance of dopaminergic neurons to oxidative stress is critical to their survival, and disturbances in this capacity through genetic mutations or exposure to exogenous toxins could underlie their demise in PD. Understanding these processes may lead to therapeutic interventions to protect both dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons from a variety of oxidative stressors.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank David Wright for expert technical help.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Brain Research Foundation, National Institutes of Health Grant MH11986, and the Parkinson's Disease Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

¶¶ To whom the correspondence should be addressed: MC 2030, S225B, Dept. of Neurology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637. Tel.: 773-702-6389; Fax: 773-702-9060; E-mail: u-kang@uchicago.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103766200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PD, Parkinson's disease; SN, substantia nigra; ROS, reactive oxygen species; Et, ethidium; HEt, hydroethidine; DCF, 2,7-dichlorofluorescein; eNOS, endothelial NOS; DEPMPO, 5-diethoxyphosphoryl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide; DAHP, 2,4-diamino-6-hydroxypyrimidine; NAS, N-acetylserotonin; L-NAME, N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; TH, tyrosine hydroxylase; BH4, tetrahydrobiopterin; SOD, superoxide dismutase; DPTA, diethylene triaminepentaacetic acid (N,N-bis[2-(bis[carboxymethyl]amino) ethyl]glycine).

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Sian, J., Dexter, D. T., Lees, A. J., Daniel, S., Agid, Y., Javoy-Agid, F., Jenner, P., and Marsden, C. D. (1994) Ann. Neurol. 36, 348-355
2. Yoritaka, A., Hattori, N., Uchida, K., Tanaka, M., Stadtman, E. R., and Mizuno, Y. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 2696-2701
3. Alam, Z. I., Daniel, S. E., Lees, A. J., Marsden, D. C., Jenner, P., and Halliwell, B. (1997) J. Neurochem. 69, 1326-1329
4. Alam, Z. I., Jenner, A., Daniel, S. E., Lees, A. J., Cairns, N., Marsden, C. D., Jenner, P., and Halliwell, B. (1997) J. Neurochem. 69, 1196-1203
5. Jenner, P., and Olanow, C. W. (1998) Ann. Neurol. 44, S72-S84
6. Dexter, D. T., Sian, J., Rose, S., Hindmarsh, J. G., Mann, V. M., Cooper, J. M., Wells, F. R., Daniel, S. E., Lees, A. J., Schapira, A. H. V., Jenner, P., and Marsden, C. D. (1994) Ann. Neurol. 35, 38-44
7. Schapira, A. H. V., Mann, V. M., Cooper, J. M., Krige, D., Jenner, P. J., and Marsden, C. D. (1992) Ann. Neurol. 32, S116-S124
8. Mann, V. M., Cooper, J. M., Krige, D., Daniel, S. E., Schapira, A. H. V., and Marsden, C. D. (1992) Brain 115, 333-342
9. Kwong, L. K., and Sohal, R. S. (1998) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 350, 118-126
10. Turrens, J. F., and Boveris, A. (1980) Biochem. J. 191, 421-427
11. Toffa, S., Kunikowska, G. M., Zeng, B. Y., Jenner, P., and Marsden, C. D. (1997) J. Neural. Transm. 104, 67-75
12. Pileblad, E., Magnusson, T., and Fornstedt, B. (1989) J. Neurochem. 52, 978-980
13. Wullner, U., Loschmann, P., Schulz, J., Schmid, A., Dringen, R., Eblen, F., Turski, L., and Klockgether, T. (1996) Neuroreport 7, 921-923
14. Nakamura, K., Wang, W., and Kang, U. J. (1997) J. Neurochem. 69, 1850-1858
15. Nakamura, K., Won, L., Heller, A., and Kang, U. J. (2000) Brain Res. 873, 203-211
16. Wever, R. M. F., van Dam, T., nan Rijn, H. J. M., de Groot, F., and Rabelink, T. J. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 237, 340-344
17. Kojima, S., Icho, T., Kajiwara, Y., and Kubota, K. (1992) FEBS Lett. 304, 163-166
18. Stroes, E., Hijmering, M., Zandvoort, M., Wever, R., Rabelink, T. J., and Faassen, E. E. (1998) FEBS Lett. 438, 161-164
19. Vasquez-Vivar, J., Kalyanaraman, B., Martasek, P., Hogg, N., Masters, B. S. S., Karoui, H., Tordo, P., and Pritchard, K. A., Jr. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 9220-9225
20. Heales, S. J. R., Blair, J. A., Meinschad, C., and Ziegler, I. (1988) Cell Biochem. Funct. 6, 191-195
21. Koshimura, K., Murakami, Y., Tanaka, J., and Kato, Y. (1998) J. Neurosci. Res. 54, 664-672
22. Shen, R., and Zhang, Y. (1993) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 338, 351-354
23. Ishii, M., Shimizu, S., Momose, K., and Yamamoto, T. (1999) J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 33, 295-300
24. Bindokas, V., Jordan, J., Lee, C., and Miller, R. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 1324-1336
25. Gallop, P. M., Paz, M. A., Henson, E., and Latt, S. A. (1984) BioTechniques 2, 32-36
26. Carter, W. O., Narayanan, P. K., and Robinson, J. P. (1994) J. Leukoc. Biol. 55, 253-258
27. Ischiropoulos, H., Gow, A., Thom, S. R., Kooy, N. W., Royall, J. A., and Crow, J. P. (1999) Methods Enzymol. 301, 367-373
28. Reiter, C. D., Teng, R. J., and Beckman, J. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 32460-32466
29. Roubaud, V., Sankarapandi, S., Kuppusamy, P., Tordo, P., and Zweier, J. L. (1997) Anal. Biochem. 247, 404-411
30. Smith, G. K., Duch, D. S., Edelstein, M. P., and Bigham, E. C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 5599-5607
31. Nakamura, K., Wright, D. A., Wiatr, T., Kowlessur, D., Milstien, S., Lei, X. G., and Kang, U. J. (2000) J. Neurochem. 74, 2305-2315
32. Bencsics, C., Wachtel, S. R., Milstien, S., Hatakeyama, K., Becker, J. B., and Kang, U. J. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 4449-4456
33. Pou, S., Pou, W. S., Bredt, D. S., Snyder, S. H., and Rosen, G. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24173-24176
34. Herrero, A., and Barja, G. (1997) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 29, 241-249
35. Pitkanen, S., and Robinson, B. H. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 98, 345-351
36. Hensley, K., Pye, Q. N., Maidt, M. L., Stewart, C. A., Robinson, K. A., Jaffrey, F., and Floyd, R. A. (1998) J. Neurochem. 71, 2549-2557
37. Budd, S. L., Castilho, R. F., and Nicholls, D. G. (1997) FEBS Lett. 415, 21-24
38. Lokesh, B. R., and Cunningham, M. L. (1986) Toxicol. Lett. 34, 75-84
39. Haavik, J., Almas, B., and Flatmark, T. (1997) J. Neurochem. 68, 328-332
40. Kojima, S., Ona, S., Iizuka, I., Arai, T., Mori, H., and Kubota, K. (1995) Free Radic. Res. 23, 419-430
41. Sawada, H., Kawamura, T., Shimohama, S., Akaike, A., and Kimura, J. (1996) J. Neurosci. Res. 43, 503-510
42. Sawada, H., Shimohama, S., Kawamura, T., Akaike, A., Kitamura, Y., Taniguchi, T., and Kimura, J. (1996) J. Neurosci. Res. 46, 509-518
43. Gonzalez-Zuleta, M., Ensz, L. M., Mukhina, G., Lebovitz, R. M., Zwacka, R. M., Enmgelhardt, J. F., Oberley, L. W., Dawson, V. L., and Dawson, T. M. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 2040-2055
44. Skulachev, V. P. (1996) Q. Rev. Biophys. 29, 169-202
45. Turrens, J. F. (1997) Biosci. Rep. 17, 3-8
46. Mayer, B., and Werner, E. R. (1995) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 351, 453-463
47. Schmidt, H. H., Hofmann, H., Schindler, U., Shutenko, Z. S., Cunningham, D. D., and Feelisch, M. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14492-14497
48. Xia, Y., Tsai, A. L., Berka, V., and Zweier, J. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25804-25808
49. Vasquez-Vivar, J., Hogg, N., Martasek, P., Karoui, H., Pritchard, K. A., Jr., and Kalyanaraman, B. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26736-26742
50. Levine, R. A., Miller, L. P., and Lovenberg, W. (1981) Science 214, 919-921
51. Lentz, S. I., and Kapatos, G. (1996) Neurochem. Int. 28, 569-582
52. Hirayama, K., and Kapatos, G. (1998) J. Neurochem. 70, 164-170
53. Yoshida, Y., Eda, S., and Masada, M. (2000) Brain Dev. 22 Suppl. 1, 45-49
54. Furukawa, Y., and Kish, S. J. (1998) Neurology 51, 632-634
55. Chen, E. Y., Kallwitz, E., Leff, S. E., Cochran, E. J., Mufson, E. J., Kordower, J. H., and Mandel, R. J. (2000) J. Comp. Neurol. 426, 534-548


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. P. D'Agostino, R. W. Putnam, and J. B. Dean
Superoxide ({middle dot}O2 ) Production in CA1 Neurons of Rat Hippocampal Slices Exposed to Graded Levels of Oxygen
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 1030 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Chaudhuri, K. Bowling, C. Funderburk, H. Lawal, A. Inamdar, Z. Wang, and J. M. O'Donnell
Interaction of Genetic and Environmental Factors in a Drosophila Parkinsonism Model
J. Neurosci., March 7, 2007; 27(10): 2457 - 2467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
W. J. H. Koopman, S. Verkaart, H.-J. Visch, F. H. van der Westhuizen, M. P. Murphy, L. W. P. J. van den Heuvel, J. A. M. Smeitink, and P. H. G. M. Willems
Inhibition of complex I of the electron transport chain causes O2-{middle dot}-mediated mitochondrial outgrowth
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): C1440 - C1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G.-R. Kweon, J. D. Marks, R. Krencik, E. H. Leung, P. T. Schumacker, K. Hyland, and U. J. Kang
Distinct Mechanisms of Neurodegeneration Induced by Chronic Complex I Inhibition in Dopaminergic and Non-dopaminergic Cells
J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 51783 - 51792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Shang, S. Kotamraju, S. V. Kalivendi, C. J. Hillard, and B. Kalyanaraman
1-Methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced Apoptosis in Cerebellar Granule Neurons Is Mediated by Transferrin Receptor Iron-dependent Depletion of Tetrahydrobiopterin and Neuronal Nitric-oxide Synthase-derived Superoxide
J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 19099 - 19112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
G. Abou-Mohamed, J. A. Johnson, L. Jin, A. B. El-Remessy, K. Do, W. H. Kaesemeyer, R. B. Caldwell, and R. W. Caldwell
Roles of Superoxide, Peroxynitrite, and Protein Kinase C in the Development of Tolerance to Nitroglycerin
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2004; 308(1): 289 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. M. Kuhn and T. J. Geddes
Tetrahydrobiopterin Prevents Nitration of Tyrosine Hydroxylase by Peroxynitrite and Nitrogen Dioxide
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2003; 64(4): 946 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Canals, M. J. Casarejos, S. de Bernardo, E. Rodriguez-Martin, and M. A. Mena
Nitric Oxide Triggers the Toxicity due to Glutathione Depletion in Midbrain Cultures through 12-Lipoxygenase
J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2003; 278(24): 21542 - 21549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Li, K. Ragheb, G. Lawler, J. Sturgis, B. Rajwa, J. A. Melendez, and J. P. Robinson
Mitochondrial Complex I Inhibitor Rotenone Induces Apoptosis through Enhancing Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Production
J. Biol. Chem., February 28, 2003; 278(10): 8516 - 8525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Serova and E. L. Sabban
Involvement of alpha 7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Gene Expression of Dopamine Biosynthetic Enzymes in Rat Brain
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2002; 303(3): 896 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. M. Rosen, P. Tsai, J. Weaver, S. Porasuphatana, L. J. Roman, A. A. Starkov, G. Fiskum, and S. Pou
The Role of Tetrahydrobiopterin in the Regulation of Neuronal Nitric-oxide Synthase-generated Superoxide
J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 40275 - 40280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/37/34402    most recent
M103766200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted