![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 37, 34545-34552, September 14, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Eicosanoid Biochemistry Section, Laboratory of Molecular
Carcinogenesis, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Received for publication, January 11, 2001, and in revised form, July 9, 2001
Human colon tumors have elevated levels of
15-lipoxygenase-1 (15-LO-1), suggesting that 15-LO-1 may play a role in
the development of colorectal cancer. Also, 15-LO-1 metabolites can
up-regulate epidermal growth factor signaling pathways, which
results in an increase in mitogenesis. However, metabolites of 15-LO-1
can serve as ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor Lipoxygenases (LOs)1 are
lipid-peroxidizing enzymes that are categorized according to their
position of oxygenation of arachidonic acid (1). For example, 15-LOs
oxygenate the substrate arachidonic acid at C-15. Two different human
15-LOs have been identified that differ in tissue distribution and
substrate preference. 15-LO-1 is expressed in reticulocytes,
eosinophils, macrophages, and skin (2). 15-LO-2 has limited tissue
distribution, with mRNA detected in prostate, lung, skin, and
cornea (3). In terms of enzymatic characteristics, 15-LO-1
preferentially metabolizes linoleic acid primarily to
13-(S)-HODE but also metabolizes arachidonic acid to
15-(S)-HETE. 15-LO-2, on the other hand, converts
arachidonic acid to 15-(S)-HETE and metabolizes linoleic acid poorly
(4).
In human colorectal carcinoma Caco-2 cells, sodium butyrate induces the
expression of reticulocyte 15-LO-1, and these cells undergo
differentiation and apoptosis (5). This study provided the first
evidence that 15-LO-1 is clearly expressed in human colorectal
carcinoma cells, and it was subsequently shown that the 15-LO-1 is
uniquely regulated by histone acetylation (6). Furthermore, human colon
tumors have elevated levels of 15-LO-1 compared with the normal
adjacent tissue (7). The increased expression in tumors and regulation
being linked to histone acetylation suggests a possible role for
15-LO-1 in tumor development.
Human colon carcinomas express peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor Recently, metabolites of 15-LO-1 have been reported to serve as ligands
for PPAR 15-LO-1 metabolites stimulate epidermal growth factor
(EGF)-dependent cell growth in Syrian hamster embryo cells. The
metabolites 13-(S)-HpODE and 13-(S)-HODE enhance
EGF-induced mitogenesis (19). In this system, EGF stimulated the
metabolism of exogenous or endogenous linoleic acid to
13-(S)-HpODE/13-(S)-HODE, dependent on tyrosine
kinase activity. The addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors inhibited
not only EGF-induced mitogenesis but also the formation of 15-LO-1
metabolites. Furthermore, the exogenous addition of 13-(S)-HpODE or 13-(S)-HODE, but not
15-(S)-HETE, in combination with EGF to Syrian hamster
embryo cells inhibited the dephosphorylation of the EGF receptor,
thereby up-regulating the EGF cascade and potentiating the mitogenic
response (20). The 15-LO-1 linoleic acid metabolites,
13-(S)-HpODE and 13-(S)-HODE, up-regulated
EGF-dependent cell proliferation and enhanced MAPK
activity, but the 15-LO-2 arachidonic acid metabolite, 15-(S)-HETE, was
not active.
In this study, we found that in HCT-116 cells overexpression of 15-LO-1
down-regulates PPAR Cell Culture--
The human colorectal cell line HCT-116 was
obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). HCT-116
cells were cultivated in McCoy's 5A medium (Life Technologies, Inc.)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Summit), and gentamicin (1 mg/100 ml; Life Technologies). 15-LO-1 constructs in pcDNA 3.1 vector were transfected into HCT-116 cells via LipofectAMINE (Life
Technologies). Clones were selected in the presence of zeocin
(Invitrogen). HCT-116 15-LO-1 clone cells were cultivated in the same
medium as the normal HCT-116 cells plus the addition of zeocin.
Experimental Conditions--
HCT-116 cells were grown to
75-80% confluency and then serum-deprived for 18 h. Cells were
treated with 13-(S)-HODE (5 µM) (Cayman
Chemical), 13-(R)-HODE (5 µM) (Cayman
Chemical), 13-(S)-HpODE (10 µM) (Cayman
Chemical), or 15-(S)-HETE (10 µM) (Cayman
Chemical) 45 min prior to the addition of EGF (10 ng/ml) (Collaborative Research Associates) unless otherwise noted. The
MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK)
inhibitor PD98059 (50 µM) (Calbiochem), when used, was
added to cells prior to the addition of 13-(S)-HODE. In the
case of the 15-LO-1 clones, linoleic acid (30 µM) was
added to the cells as described above prior to treatment with EGF.
After stimulation by EGF, cells were harvested at the various time
points indicated. Normal human tracheobronchial epithelial cells, as
previously described (21), were used as a positive control for the
expression of 15-LO. Differentiated 3T3-L1 cells, as previously
described (22), were used as a positive control for the expression of
PPAR SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis--
For Western
analysis, cells were lysed and normalized, and then Laemmli sample
buffer was added to the samples. 15-LO-1 proteins were separated by 8%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and MAPK and PPAR Immunoblot Analysis--
Blots were blocked with 10% skim milk
in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) and washed.
The blots were then incubated in 1 or 5% milk in TBS-T with the
appropriate specific antibody. The following antibodies were
used: CheY-human 15-LO-1 (Ref. 23; kindly provided by Dr. Elliot
Sigal), anti-phosphospecific MAPK (New England Biolabs), anti-MAPK
(ERK-1 and ERK-2) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA),
anti-PPAR Analysis of Arachidonic Acid and Linoleic Acid Metabolites in
Intact Cells--
HCT-116 or 15-LO-1 clone cells cultured in
150-cm2 dishes at each condition were washed with
serum-free medium twice. 10 ml of PBS supplemented with 10 µM CaCl2 was then added to each plate, the
appropriate treatments were added, and each plate was incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. NDGA was used at a concentration of 10 µM. Each plate was then reacted with
[3H]arachidonic acid (3 µCi, 30 µM)
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences) or [14C]linoleic acid (3 µCi, 30 µM) (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) for 1 h at
37 °C. The media were collected, and each plate was washed with 2 ml
of MeOH and 2 ml of 1% acetic acid. The cells were scraped into this
wash and then collected and added to the appropriate tube containing
the media previously collected. The total collected medium was
then acidified with acetic acid to pH 3 and applied to a C18-PrepSep
solid phase extraction column (Waters) pretreated with methanol. The
samples were washed with acidified water, eluted with methanol,
evaporated to dryness, and reconstituted with high pressure liquid
chromatography (HPLC) solvent.
High Pressure Liquid Chromatography--
Reverse-phase HPLC
analysis was performed using an Ultrasphere ODS column (5 µm;
4.6 × 250 mm; Beckman). The solvent system consisted of a
methanol/water gradient at a flow rate of 1.1 ml/min as previously
described (24). Radioactivity was monitored using a Flow Scintillation
Analyzer (Packard) with EcoLume (ICN Biochemicals) as the liquid
scintillation mixture. Authentic standards of 13-(S)-HODE and 15-(S)-HETE (Cayman Chemical) were used.
Analysis of Densitometry Measurements--
Autoradiograms from
Western blots were scanned using a UmaxTM Powerlook
IIITM scanner equipped with a transparency adapter and
scanning software. Bands were quantitated using Scion
ImageTM beta version 4.0.2. Western blot values were first
corrected using their corresponding actin levels. Values shown are
-fold increases versus vehicle or 0 h as described in
the figure legends.
Endogenous 15-LO-1 and PPAR Effect of 13-(S)-HODE on MAPK and PPAR 13-(S)-HODE Dose Response in MAPK and PPAR 15-LO-1 Overexpression and Activity--
To determine if
endogenous 15-LO-1 metabolites could affect MAPK and PPAR MAPK and PPAR
An increase in PPAR MAPK Phosphorylation of PPAR Effect of Other 15-LO Metabolites--
To examine whether the
effects we observed were specific to 13-(S)-HODE, we also
tested the effect of 13-(S)-HpODE, the precurser of
13-(S)-HODE, 13-(R)-HODE, and
15-(S)-HETE, on MAPK and PPAR Two metabolites of linoleic acid, 13-HODE and 9-HODE, and the
metabolite of arachidonic acid, 15-HETE, formed by 15-lipoxygenase have
been shown to bind and activate PPAR In this study, we have found that 13-HODE at 1-10 µM can
down-regulate PPAR To test the effects of endogenous 15-LO-1 metabolites, we constructed
stable 15-LO-1 overexpressing cells. By treating these cells with
linoleic acid, a substrate for 15-LO-1, we could examine if endogenous
15-LO-1 metabolites would increase MAPK and PPAR MAPK, a central regulator of cell growth, can modify PPAR In this study, 13-(S)-HODE, 13-(R)-HODE, and
13-(S)-HpODE all had similar effects resulting in the
down-regulation of PPAR The fact that loss-of-function mutations in PPAR The interaction between 15-LO-1 and PPAR We thank M. Geller and F. Bottone for
assistance with HPLC analysis and thank F. Bottone for measurement of
densities and data analysis. We thank E. Sigal for the 15-LO antibody.
We also thank Drs. D. Zeldin and S. J. Baek for critical reading
of the manuscript and helpful comments.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M100280200
The abbreviations used are:
LO, lipoxygenase;
15-LO-1, 15-lipoxygenase-1;
15-(S)-HETE, 15-(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid;
13-(S)-HODE, 13-(S)-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid;
13-(S)-HpODE, 13-(S)- hydroperoxyoctadecadienoic acid;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated
kinase;
MEK, MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
PPAR
15-Lipoxygenase-1 Metabolites Down-regulate Peroxisome
Proliferator-activated Receptor
via the MAPK Signaling Pathway*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(PPAR
), and activation of this receptor causes
most colon cancer cell lines to undergo a differentiative
response and reverse their malignant phenotype. Hence, the role 15-LO-1
plays in colon cancer is not clear. To clarify the role of 15-LO-1 in
carcinogenesis, the effect of 15-LO-1 and its metabolites on
epidermal growth factor signaling and PPAR
was investigated. In
HCT-116 cells, exogenously added 15-LO-1 metabolites,
13-(S)-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid,
13-(R)-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid, and
13-(S)-hydroperoxyoctadecadienoic acid, up-regulated
the MAPK signaling pathway, and an increase in PPAR
phosphorylation
was observed. Furthermore, in stable overexpressing 15-LO-1 HCT-116
cells, which produce endogenous 15-LO-1 metabolites, an up-regulation
in mitogen-activated protein kinase and PPAR
phosphorylation was
observed. Incubation with a MAPK inhibitor ablated MAPK and PPAR
phosphorylation. The 15-LO-1 up-regulates MAPK activity and increases
PPAR
phosphorylation, resulting in a down-regulation of PPAR
activity. Thus, 15-LO-1 metabolites may not only serve as ligands for
PPAR
but can down-regulate PPAR
activity via the MAPK signaling pathway.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(PPAR
), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily involved in fat cell differentiation and glucose homeostasis (8). Ligand activation of this receptor causes most, but not all, colon cancer cell lines to undergo a differentiative response and reverse their malignant phenotype (9). PPAR
regulates differentiation and/or
cell growth in a large and increasing number of cell types (9-15).
Furthermore, colon cancer in humans is associated with loss-of-function
mutations in PPAR
(16). All this taken together suggests that
PPAR
could be a tumor suppressor.
. Metabolites of 15-LO-1 show binding activity in a reporter
system for PPAR
ligand binding (17). 13-(S)-HODE, 13-(S)-HpODE, and 15-(S)-HETE all show binding
activity for PPAR
, but at relatively high concentrations (17). This
is supported by a recent study done in macrophages, where PPAR
activation has been shown in 15-LO-1 transfected macrophages using
linoleic and arachidonic acid as substrates (18). These data suggest that endogenous 15-LO-1 and its metabolites are ligands for PPAR
. Thus, based on these results, one could conclude that 15-LO-1 may have
anti-tumorigenic activity. However, this seems to be in conflict with
the finding that 15-LO-1 expression is elevated in tumors
versus normal tissue (7).
via the MAPK signaling pathway. The 15-LO-1
metabolite 13-HODE up-regulates MAPK activity and PPAR
phosphorylation, resulting in a down-regulation of PPAR
activity.
Thus, 15-LO-1 metabolites may not only serve as ligands for PPAR
but
can affect PPAR
activity via the MAPK signaling pathway. This is a
novel and potentially important mechanism involving 15-LO-1 and
PPAR
.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
.
proteins
were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins
were transferred onto Hybond-enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL)
nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or actin (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology). After washing, blots were incubated with anti-rabbit
IgG horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibody (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) for 15-LO-1 and MAPK, anti-mouse IgG horseradish
peroxidase-linked secondary antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for
PPAR
, or anti-goat IgG horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary
antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for actin, respectively. After
reacting by chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech ECL detection
system), bands were detected by exposure to Hyperfilm-MP (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Expression in HCT-116
Cells--
HCT-116 cells, a human colorectal cancer cell line, were
used for the experimental studies to follow. Basal levels of 15-LO-1 and PPAR
expression were first confirmed by Western analysis (Fig.
1). HCT-116 cells lack endogenous 15-LO-1
expression, while PPAR
1 is detectable. Differentiated 3T3-L1 cells,
which express both PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 isoforms, were used as a
positive control for PPAR
(25). Zhu et al. (26)
demonstrated that these two isotypes are derived from a single PPAR
gene by alternative promoter usage and RNA splicing. However, thus far,
no functional difference has been found between the two isotypes. It
has been established that human colorectal cells express only the
PPAR
1 isoform (9, 27). From this point on, we will refer to PPAR
1
as PPAR
, since all of the subsequent experiments are done in HCT-116
human colorectal cells.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Endogenous expression of 15-LO and
PPAR
in HCT-116 cells. Western analysis
of cell lysates demonstrated no 15-LO expression in HCT-116 cells
(A) and PPAR
expression in HCT-116 cells (B).
The data shown represents one of two separate experiments with similar
results. 30 µg of total protein was loaded per lane. A,
lane 1, 15-LO standard (10 µg); lane
2, HCT-116 cells. B, lane
1, PPAR
standard (10 µg); lane 2,
HCT-116 cells.
Phosphorylation--
Following serum deprivation, HCT-116 cells were
pretreated with 5 µM 13-(S)-HODE for 45 min
prior to treatment with EGF (10 ng/ml). The effect of
13-(S)-HODE on MAPK and PPAR
phosphorylation after EGF
stimulation was examined by Western analysis at the indicated time
points (Fig. 2). Using a phosphospecific
MAPK antibody, an increase in MAPK phosphorylation was observed in
cells treated with 13-(S)-HODE compared with cells treated
with EGF alone (Fig. 2A). An ~4-fold increase in MAPK
phosphorylation could be detected within 5 min after treatment, while a
2-fold increase was noted at later times. Total MAPK expression levels
were also examined by antibodies to ERK-1 and ERK-2 for this experiment
and all subsequent experiments measuring phosphorylated MAPK blots. In
all cases, total MAPK levels did not change, and thus only the level of
phosphorylated MAPK was altered by treatment with
13-(S)-HODE or the treatment indicated for each
experiment (data not shown). The densities of the phosphorylated
proteins (ERK-1/2 and PPAR
) were measured, normalized to actin, and
are reported in the brackets below the blots. The effect of
13-(S)-HODE on PPAR
phosphorylation after EGF stimulation
was also examined by Western analysis at the indicated time points
(Fig. 2B). A similar increase in PPAR
phosphorylation was
observed in 13-(S)-HODE-treated cells over cells treated
with only EGF (Fig. 2B). The upper band of the doublet
observed from samples is the phosphorylated form of PPAR
, while the
lower band of the doublet is the unphosphorylated form. The addition of
13-(S)-HODE increased PPAR
phosphorylation by ~4-fold
at 5 and 15 min and ~8-fold at 30 min. Similar results of increased
phosphorylation of MAPK and PPAR
with 13-(S)-HODE were
also obtained when serum was substituted for EGF stimulation to
activate the MAPK pathway, which suggests these findings are not
restricted to EGF signaling (data not shown). Thus, the 15-LO-1
metabolite, 13-(S)-HODE, causes an increase in both MAPK and
PPAR
phosphorylation in serum- or EGF-stimulated cells.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effect of 13-(S)-HODE on
MAPK and PPAR
phosphorylation. Western
analysis of cell lysates demonstrated phosphorylated MAPK
(A) or PPAR
expression (B) in HCT-116 cells
after treatment with EGF (10 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of
13-(S)-HODE (5 µM) for the indicated times.
The data shown represent one of three separate experiments with similar
results. 40 or 80 µg of total protein was loaded per lane for MAPK or
PPAR
, respectively. 10 µg of PPAR
standard was used.
Phosphorylation was measured by densitometry and normalized to actin.
The values are reported in the brackets above and
below the gels.
Phosphorylation--
In order to examine whether the response was
dependent on the concentration of 13-(S)-HODE, we tested
different 13-(S)-HODE concentrations on MAPK
phosphorylation. Following serum deprivation, HCT-116 cells were
pretreated with varying concentrations of 13-(S)-HODE, ranging from 0.1 to 50 µM, for 45 min prior to treatment
with EGF (10 ng/ml). The effect of 13-(S)-HODE on MAPK
phosphorylation after EGF stimulation was examined by Western analysis
(Fig. 3). Using a phosphospecific MAPK
antibody, an increase in MAPK phosphorylation was observed in cells
treated with 13-(S)-HODE over the cells treated with EGF
alone (Fig. 3A). An increase in MAPK phosphorylation was
observed at concentrations as low as 0.1 µM, but the
strongest increase in MAPK phosphorylation was detected at 5 µM 13-(S)-HODE. Total MAPK expression levels
were also examined using antibodies to ERK-1 and ERK-2. Fig.
3B reports the normalized data for 13-(S)-HODE stimulation of EGF-dependent MAPK phosphorylation. Thus, 5 µM 13-(S)-HODE seems to be an optimal
concentration for increases in MAPK phosphorylation in EGF-stimulated
cells. At higher concentrations, a diminished response was
observed.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
13-(S)-HODE dose response on
MAPK phosphorylation. A, Western analysis of cell
lysates demonstrated phosphorylated MAPK in HCT-116 cells after
treatment with EGF (10 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of
13-(S)-HODE at the indicated concentrations for 15 min. The
data shown represents one of two separate experiments with similar
results. 40 µg of total protein was loaded per lane for MAPK.
B, phosphorylation of ERK was measured by densitometry and
normalized to actin. The values are reported as -fold increase over
vehicle control.
phosphorylation, we prepared 15-LO-1-overexpressing cells. HCT-116
cells were transfected with either vector alone or the 15-LO-1
cDNA. Individual clones were isolated and tested for 15-LO-1
expression by Western analysis. Two separate clones, clones 20 and 22, were found to express 15-LO-1 abundantly (Fig. 4). Vector-transfected cells expressed no
15-LO-1, similar to the parent HCT-116 cells (Fig. 4). Actin was used
as a control for the amount of protein loaded. To determine if these
clones expressing 15-LO-1 were metabolically active, intact cells were reacted with radiolabeled linoleic acid (30 µM), and
15-LO-1 activity was examined by HPLC analysis of the metabolites (Fig.
5). Clone 20 produced
13-(S)-HODE, the main metabolite, with a retention time of
about 64 min (Fig. 5). This 15-LO-1 activity was inhibited by
nordihydroguaiaretic acid, a lipoxygenase inhibitor, consistent with a
15-LO-1 activity. Similar results were obtained for clone 22 (data not
shown). In contrast, vector-transfected cells and HCT-116 cells, when
reacted with radiolabeled linoleic acid, produced no 15-LO-1
metabolites (Fig. 5). Hence, we have established two catalytically
active 15-LO-1 overexpressing cell lines.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Expression of 15-LO-1 in 15-LO-1
overexpressing HCT-116 clones. Western analysis of cell lysates
demonstrated 15-LO-1 expression in 15-LO-1 clone 20 or clone 22 HCT-116
cells. The data shown represent one of two separate experiments with
similar results. 20 µg of total protein was loaded per lane.
Lane 1, 15-LO standard (10 µg); lane
2, HCT-116 cells; lane 3,
vector-transfected HCT-116 cells; lane 4, clone
20; lane 5, clone 22. Actin is a control for the
amount of protein loaded.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Analysis of 15-LO-1 activity in
intact cells of 15-LO-1 clone HCT-116 cells. HPLC analysis of
metabolites of [14C]linoleic acid from cells of 15-LO-1
HCT-116 cells is shown. The data shown represent one of three separate
experiments with similar results. Intact cells were reacted in 10 ml of
PBS containing 25 µM [14C]linoleic acid (3 µCi) and incubated for 45 min at 37 °C. Medium was harvested and
prepared for HPLC as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Radiolabeled products were separated by reverse-phase HPLC as described
under "Experimental Procedures." A, products formed in
the incubation of linoleic acid with clone 20. B, products
formed in the incubation of linoleic acid with clone 20 and
nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA). C, products
formed in the incubation of linoleic acid with vector-transfected
HCT-116 cells. D, products formed in the incubation of
linoleic acid with HCT-116 cells.
Phosphorylation in 15-LO-1 HCT-116 Cells--
The
exogenous addition of 13-(S)-HODE to EGF-stimulated HCT-116
cells increased both MAPK and PPAR
phosphorylation. Here we
investigate whether endogenous 13-(S)-HODE will have the
same effect by utilizing 15-LO-1-overexpressing cells. Following serum starvation, clone 20 or 22 was pretreated with 30 µM
linoleic acid for 45 min prior to treatment with EGF (10 ng/ml). MAPK
and PPAR
phosphorylation after EGF stimulation was examined by
Western analysis at the indicated time points (Fig.
6). Actin expression was measured and
used to normalize the data. The normalized density measurements are
reported in brackets. A greater than 2-fold increase in MAPK
phosphorylation was observed in cells treated with linoleic acid over
the cells treated with EGF alone (Fig. 6A). An increase in
MAPK phosphorylation was noted in both clones 20 and 22 (Fig. 6A, data not shown). In contrast, the addition of linoleic
acid to vector-transfected cells that do not express 15-LO-1 did not increase MAPK phosphorylation (Fig. 6A). Thus, the increase
in MAPK phosphorylation is dependent on the 15-LO-1 activity.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
MAPK and PPAR
phosphorylation in 15-LO-1 HCT-116 cells. Western analysis
of cell lysates demonstrated phosphorylated MAPK (A) or
PPAR
expression (B) in clone 20 or
vector-transfected HCT-116 cells after treatment with EGF (10 ng/ml) in
the presence or absence of linoleic acid (30 µM) for the
indicated times. The data shown represent one of three separate
experiments with similar results. 40 or 80 µg of total protein was
loaded per lane for MAPK or PPAR
, respectively. 10 µg of PPAR
standard was used. Phosphorylation was measured by densitometry and
normalized to actin. The values are reported in brackets
above and below the gels.
phosphorylation was also observed in linoleic
acid-treated cells over cells stimulated with only EGF (Fig.
6B). With either clone 20 or 22, the addition of the 15-LO-1 substrate increased PPAR
phosphorylation but was less than 2-fold. In contrast, the incubation of vector-transfected cells with linoleic acid did not increase PPAR
phosphorylation. Thus, endogenously produced 13-(S)-HODE causes an increase in both MAPK and
PPAR
phosphorylation similar to that observed by the addition of
exogenous 13-(S)-HODE.
--
To demonstrate that the
phosphorylation of PPAR
is dependent on MAPK activity, the effect of
PD98059 on PPAR
phosphorylation was examined. PD98059 is a specific
inhibitor of MEK (28). Following serum deprivation, HCT-116 cells were
pretreated with 5 µM 13-(S)-HODE for 45 min in
the presence or absence of PD98059 (50 µM) prior to
treatment with EGF (10 ng/ml). MAPK and PPAR
phosphorylation after
EGF stimulation was examined by Western analysis at the indicated time
points (Fig. 7). An increase in MAPK and
PPAR
phosphorylation was observed in cells treated with
13-(S)-HODE over the cells treated with EGF alone. However,
in the presence of the MEK inhibitor, PD98059, MAPK phosphorylation was
abolished. This is consistent with inhibition of MEK activity.
Likewise, PPAR
phosphorylation was ablated (Fig. 7B).
Total MAPK levels did not change; only the levels of phosphorylated
MAPK were altered by treatment with 13-(S)-HODE (data not
shown). Normalization of the phosphorylation density measurements was
done, and the values are reported in the brackets in Fig. 7.
These results are consistent with the hypothesis that phosphorylation
of PPAR
observed upon treatment with 13-(S)-HODE in
EGF-stimulated cells is dependent on MAPK activity and is occurring
through the MAPK signaling pathway.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
MAPK phosphorylation of
PPAR
. Western analysis of cell lysates
demonstrated phosphorylated MAPK (A) or PPAR
expression
(B) in HCT-116 cells after treatment with EGF (10 ng/ml) in
the presence or absence of PD98059 (50 µM) with
13-(S)-HODE (5 µM) for the indicated times.
The data shown represent one of three separate experiments with similar
results. 40 or 80 µg of total protein was loaded per lane for MAPK or
PPAR
, respectively. 10 µg of PPAR
standard was used.
Phosphorylation was measured by densitometry and normalized to actin.
The values are reported in the brackets above and
below the gels.
phosphorylation. Following
serum deprivation, HCT-116 cells were pretreated with 5 µM 13-(R)-HODE, 10 µM
13-(S)-HpODE, or 10 µM 15-(S)-HETE for 45 min
prior to treatment with EGF (10 ng/ml). The effect of
13-(R)-HODE and 13-(S)-HpODE were similar to that of 13-(S)-HODE on MAPK and PPAR
phosphorylation after EGF
stimulation at both time points tested (Fig.
8). An increase, between 2-4-fold, in
MAPK and PPAR
phosphorylation was observed in cells treated with
13-(R)-HODE or 13-(S)-HpODE over cells treated
with EGF alone. Interestingly, in contrast, 15-(S)-HETE
(from 1 to 10 µM) appeared to reduce the MAPK or PPAR
phosphorylation after EGF stimulation at the time points tested (Fig.
9). Thus, the increase in
MAPK-dependent phosphorylation appears to be restricted to
linoleic acid metabolites.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Effect of other 15-LO metabolites.
Western analysis of cell lysates demonstrated phosphorylated MAPK
(A) or PPAR
expression (B) in HCT-116 cells
after treatment with EGF (10 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of
13-(S)-HpODE (10 µM) or 13-(R)-HODE
(5 µM) for the indicated times. The data shown represent
one of two separate experiments with similar results. 40 or 80 µg of
total protein was loaded per lane for MAPK or PPAR
, respectively. 10 µg of PPAR
standard was used. Phosphorylation was measured by
densitometry and normalized to actin. The values are reported in the
brackets above and below the
gels.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Effect of 15-(S)-HETE.
Western analysis of cell lysates demonstrated phosphorylated MAPK
(A) or PPAR
expression (B) in HCT-116 cells
after treatment with EGF (10 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of
15-(S)-HETE (10 µM) for the indicated times.
The data shown represent one of two separate experiments with similar
results. 40 or 80 µg of total protein was loaded per lane for MAPK or
PPAR
, respectively. 10 µg of PPAR
standard was used.
Phosphorylation was measured by densitometry and normalized to actin.
The values are reported in the brackets above and
below the gels.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(17) in vitro. This finding suggests that 15-HETE, 13-HODE, and 9-HODE may function as
endogenous ligands for PPAR
. However, these findings were observed
with high concentrations of the metabolites (30-100 µM). Although many naturally occurring fatty acids and their metabolites can
activate PPAR
, they bind with relatively low affinities and must be
added to cells at high concentrations to stimulate transcription. It
has therefore been difficult to establish the physiological relevance
of any of these lipid substances as regulators of PPAR
in
vivo.
activity by increasing phosphorylation mediated via the MAPK signaling pathway. The addition of exogenous
13-(S)-HODE, at lower concentrations than used to observe
binding to PPAR
, up-regulates both the EGF- and
serum-dependent MAPK pathway and subsequently PPAR
phosphorylation. The addition of a MEK inhibitor results in the
inhibition of MAPK activity and subsequently PPAR
phosphorylation,
which supports the conclusion that PPAR
phosphorylation is mediated
by MAPK as reported in fat cells (29). This phenomenon is specific for
linoleic acid metabolites as 13-(S)-HODE,
13-(R)-HODE, and 13-(S)-HpODE all have the same
effect, while 15-(S)-HETE, an arachidonic acid metabolite,
was inactive and in fact appeared to inhibit phosphorylation.
phosphorylation.
Interestingly, endogenous metabolites had the same effect as addition
of exogenous 13-(S)-HODE, 13-(R)-HODE, or
13-(S)-HpODE. In HCT-116 cells, endogeneous 15-LO-1
metabolites up-regulate MAPK activity and hence increase PPAR
phosphorylation. It has been well documented in the literature that
phosphorylation of PPAR
results in a decrease in transcriptional
activity (29-32). Since phosphorylation of PPAR
inhibits its
transcriptional activity, 15-LO-1 metabolites down-regulate PPAR
activity via the MAPK signaling pathway.
in a way
that significantly reduces PPAR
transcriptional activity (30, 33).
The phosphorylation of a key residue, Ser82 on PPAR
1,
results in a decrease in transcriptional activity (29). MAPK may be
particularly suitable for this purpose because, among the signal
transduction machinery linked to the cell cycle, MAPK can enter the
nucleus to modify transcription factors (34). It is interesting to note
that MAPK has been implicated in the phosphorylation of another nuclear
receptor, the estrogen receptor, although this correlates with an
increase in transcriptional activity (35, 36).
activity. Interestingly, however,
15-(S)-HETE appeared to inhibit MAPK or PPAR
phosphorylation. 15-(S)-HETE is the main arachidonic acid
metabolite formed by 15-LO-2 activity. 15-LO-2 metabolizes arachidonic
acid to 15-(S)-HETE but metabolizes linoleic acid poorly
(4). This is in contrast to 15-LO-1, which preferentially metabolizes
linoleic acid primarily to 13-(S)-HODE. This result is
particularly intriguing given the fact that 15-LO-2 has been found to
be expressed higher in normal prostate tissue than in adjacent tumor
tissue (3). This is in contrast to 15-LO-1, which has been found to be
more highly expressed in tumor than normal colon tissue (7) and in
prostate adenocarcinoma compared with normal tissue (37). This suggests
that there may be different roles for 15-LO-1 and 15-LO-2. 15-LO-1 may
be involved in the tumorigenic process, while 15-LO-2 may be involved
in normal tissue function. The role of 15-LO-1 versus
15-LO-2 will need to be further investigated to clarify their functions.
are associated with
colon cancer suggests that activation of this receptor might have an
anti-cancer effect in this disease (16). Ligand activation of PPAR
stimulates a dramatic differentiation response in one type of solid
tumor, liposarcoma, in human patients (38). The fact that 15-LO-1
metabolites can shut down PPAR
via the MAPK signaling pathway
essentially has the same net effect as a loss-of-function mutation in
PPAR
. 15-LO-1 metabolites cause a down-regulation of PPAR
activity, and this suggests a pro-tumorigenic role in colorectal carcinogenesis.
signaling can occur at
several levels, and the balance between the two opposite biological
effects of the metabolites could be an important regulator of PPAR
transcriptional activity in colorectal cells (Fig.
10). The 15-LO-1 metabolites of
linoleic acid and arachidonic acid are ligands for PPAR
, but this
response is observed at relatively high concentrations, and most of
these studies employed exogenous metabolites (17). In contrast, the
15-LO-1 linoleic acid metabolites, 13-(S)-HODE,
13-(R)-HODE, and 13-(S)-HpODE, enhance growth
factor-dependent MAPK activity, which down-regulates
PPAR
by increasing phosphorylation. This effect was observed at
lower concentrations of the 15-LO-1 metabolites and from endogenously
generated metabolites. Thus, a balance between these two opposing
effects could determine the role 15-LO-1 plays in the development of
colorectal cancer. The down-regulation of PPAR
by linoleic acid
metabolites may provide the rationale to explain why 15-LO-1 is
up-regulated in colon cancer.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Proposed model for interaction of 15-LO-1
metabolites with the PPAR
receptor.
Growth factors (such as EGF) interact with their respective receptor
that activates MAPK signaling. Endogenous 13-HODE up-regulates growth
factor-initiated MAPK activity, and as a result,
MAPK-dependent PPAR
phosphorylation is increased. This
causes a down-regulation or loss of PPAR
transcriptional activity.
In contrast, 13-HODE is also thought to be an endogenous ligand for
PPAR
and cause activation of PPAR
receptor. Thus, a balance
between these two opposing effects may determine the role 15-LO-1
metabolites play in controlling the transcriptional activity of the
PPAR
nuclear receptor.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Tel.: 919-541-3911; Fax: 919-541-0146; E-mail: eling@niehs.nih.gov.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
, peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor
;
HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Yamamoto, S.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1128,
117-131
2.
Funk, C. D.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1304,
65-84
3.
Shappell, S. B.,
Boeglin, W. E.,
Olson, S. J.,
Kasper, S.,
and Brash, A. R.
(1999)
Am. J. Pathol.
155,
235-245
4.
Brash, A. R.,
Boeglin, W. E.,
and Chang, M. S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
6148-6152
5.
Kamitani, H.,
Geller, M.,
and Eling, T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21569-21577
6.
Kamitani, H.,
Taniura, S.,
Ikawa, H.,
Watanabe, T.,
Kelavkar, U. P.,
and Eling, T. E.
(2001)
Carcinogenesis
22,
187-191
7.
Ikawa, H.,
Kamitani, H.,
Calvo, B. F.,
Foley, J. F.,
and Eling, T. E.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
360-366
8.
Deleted in proof
9.
Sarraf, P.,
Mueller, E.,
Jones, D.,
King, F. J.,
DeAngelo, D. J.,
Partridge, J. B.,
Holden, S. A.,
Chen, L. B.,
Singer, S.,
Fletcher, C.,
and Spiegelman, B. M.
(1998)
Nat. Med.
4,
1046-1052
10.
Brockman, J. A.,
Gupta, R. A.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(1998)
Gastroenterology
115,
1049-1055
11.
Elstner, E.,
Muller, C.,
Koshizuka, K.,
Williamson, E. A.,
Park, D.,
Asou, H.,
Shintaku, P.,
Said, J. W.,
Heber, D.,
and Koeffler, H. P.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8806-8811
12.
Kubota, T.,
Koshizuka, K.,
Williamson, E. A.,
Asou, H.,
Said, J. W.,
Holden, S.,
Miyoshi, I.,
and Koeffler, H. P.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
3344-3352
13.
Mueller, E.,
Sarraf, P.,
Tontonoz, P.,
Evans, R. M.,
Martin, K. J.,
Zhang, M.,
Fletcher, C.,
Singer, S.,
and Spiegelman, B. M.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
465-470
14.
Ricote, M.,
Li, A. C.,
Willson, T. M.,
Kelly, C. J.,
and Glass, C. K.
(1998)
Nature
391,
79-82
15.
Tontonoz, P.,
Nagy, L.,
Alvarez, J. G.,
Thomazy, V. A.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1998)
Cell
93,
241-252
16.
Sarraf, P.,
Mueller, E.,
Smith, W. M.,
Wright, H. M.,
Kum, J. B.,
Aaltonen, L. A.,
de la Chapelle, A.,
Spiegelman, B. M.,
and Eng, C.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
3,
799-804
17.
Nagy, L.,
Tontonoz, P.,
Alvarez, J. G.,
Chen, H.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1998)
Cell
93,
229-240
18.
Huang, J. T.,
Welch, J. S.,
Ricote, M.,
Binder, C. J.,
Willson, T. M.,
Kelly, C.,
Witztum, J. L.,
Funk, C. D.,
Conrad, D.,
and Glass, C. K.
(1999)
Nature
400,
378-382
19.
Glasgow, W. C.,
Afshari, C. A.,
Barrett, J. C.,
and Eling, T. E.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10771-10779
20.
Glasgow, W. C.,
Hui, R.,
Everhart, A. L.,
Jayawickreme, S. P.,
Angerman-Stewart, J.,
Han, B. B.,
and Eling, T. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19269-19276
21.
Hill, E.,
Eling, T.,
and Nettesheim, P.
(1998)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
18,
662-669
22.
Schwarz, E. J.,
Reginato, M. J.,
Shao, D.,
Krakow, S. L.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1997)
Mol. Cell Biol.
17,
1552-1561
23.
Sigal, E.,
Grunberger, D.,
Highland, E.,
Gross, C.,
Dixon, R. A. F.,
and Craik, C. S.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
5113-5120
24.
Henke, D. C.,
Kouzan, S.,
and Eling, T. E.
(1984)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159
25.
Tontonoz, P.,
Graves, R.,
Budavari, A.,
Erdjument-Bromage, M.,
Hu, E.,
Tempst, P.,
and Spiegelman, B.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
5623-5634
26.
Zhu, Y.,
Qi, C.,
Korenberg, J.,
Chen, X.,
Noya, D.,
Rao, S.,
and Reddy, J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7921-7925
27.
DuBois, R. N.,
Gupta, R.,
Brockman, J.,
Reddy, B. S.,
Krakow, S. L.,
and Lazar, M.
(1998)
Carcinogenesis
19,
49-53
28.
Alessi, D. R.,
Cuenda, A.,
Cohen, P.,
Dudley, D. T.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27489-27494
29.
Camp, H. S.,
and Tafuri, S. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10811-10816
30.
Hu, E.,
Kim, J. B.,
Sarraf, P.,
and Spiegelman, B. M.
(1996)
Science
274,
2100-2103
31.
Reginato, M. J.,
Krakow, S. L.,
Bailey, S. T.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1855-1858
32.
Zhang, B.,
Berger, J.,
Zhou, G.,
Elbrecht, A.,
Biswas, S.,
White-Carrington, S.,
Szalkowski, D.,
and Moller, D. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31771-31774
33.
Adams, M.,
Reginato, M. J.,
Shao, D.,
Lazar, M. A.,
and Chatterjee, V. K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5128-5132
34.
Treisman, R.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
205-215
35.
Kato, S.,
Endoh, H.,
Masuhiro, Y.,
Kitamoto, T.,
Uchiyama, S.,
Sasaki, H.,
Masushuge, S.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Nishida, E.,
Kawashima, H,
Metzger, D.,
and Chambon, P.
(1995)
Science
270,
1491-1494
36.
Bunone, G.,
Briand, P. A.,
Miksicek, R. J.,
and Picard, D.
(1996)
EMBO J.
9,
2174-2183
37.
Kelavkar, U. P.,
Cohen, C.,
Kamitani, H.,
Eling, T. E.,
and Badr, K. F.
(2000)
Carcinogenesis
21,
1777-1787
38.
Demetri, G. D.,
Fletcher, C. D.,
Mueller, E.,
Sarraf, P.,
Naujoks, R.,
Campbell, N.,
Spiegelman, B. M.,
and Singer, S.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3951-3956
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. SZATMARI, E. RAJNAVOLGYI, and L. NAGY PPAR{gamma}, a Lipid-Activated Transcription Factor as a Regulator of Dendritic Cell Function Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 1, 2006; 1088(1): 207 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Hsi, X. Xi, Y. Wu, and S. M. Lippman The methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine induces apoptosis via induction of 15-lipoxygenase-1 in colorectal cancer cells Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2005; 4(11): 1740 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-S. Kim, S. J. Baek, F. G. Bottone Jr., T. Sali, and T. E. Eling Overexpression of 15-Lipoxygenase-1 Induces Growth Arrest through Phosphorylation of p53 in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells Mol. Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 3(9): 511 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Houston, M. A. Julien, S. Parthasarathy, and E. L. Chaikof Oxidized linoleic acid regulates expression and shedding of syndecan-4 Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): C458 - C466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Yu, P. J. Moos, P. Cassidy, M. Wade, and F. A. Fitzpatrick Conditional Expression of 15-Lipoxygenase-1 Inhibits the Selenoenzyme Thioredoxin Reductase: MODULATION OF SELENOPROTEINS BY LIPOXYGENASE ENZYMES J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28028 - 28035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-J. Cho, H.-E. Moon, H. Moini, L. Packer, D.-Y. Yoon, and A.-S. Chung {alpha}-Lipoic Acid Inhibits Adipocyte Differentiation by Regulating Pro-adipogenic Transcription Factors via Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Pathways J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2003; 278(37): 34823 - 34833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Matsushima-Nishiwaki, M. Okuno, Y. Takano, S. Kojima, S. L. Friedman, and H. Moriwaki Molecular mechanism for growth suppression of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells by acyclic retinoid Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2003; 24(8): 1353 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Shappell, S. J. Olson, S. E. Hannah, S. Manning, R. L. Roberts, N. Masumori, M. Jisaka, W. E. Boeglin, V. Vader, D. S. Dave, et al. Elevated Expression of 12/15-Lipoxygenase and Cyclooxygenase-2 in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Prostate Carcinoma Cancer Res., May 1, 2003; 63(9): 2256 - 2267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Jung, K. S. Park, J. H. Oh, S. Y. Jung, K. H. Yang, Y. S. Song, D. J. Son, Y. H. Park, Y. P. Yun, M. K. Lee, et al. Activation of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Activator Protein-1 during the Promotion of Neurite Extension of PC-12 Cells by 15-Deoxy-Delta 12,14-prostaglandin J2 Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2003; 63(3): 607 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Baek, L. C. Wilson, L. C. Hsi, and T. E. Eling Troglitazone, a Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor gamma (PPARgamma ) Ligand, Selectively Induces the Early Growth Response-1 Gene Independently of PPARgamma . A NOVEL MECHANISM FOR ITS ANTI-TUMORIGENIC ACTIVITY J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 5845 - 5853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|