|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M102056200 on July 10, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 37, 34553-34559, September 14, 2001
Inhibition of Translocation of -Lactamase into the Yeast
Endoplasmic Reticulum by Covalently Bound Benzylpenicillin*
Eija
Paunola,
Mingqiang
Qiao,
Anton
Shmelev, and
Marja
Makarow
From the Program in Cellular Biotechnology, Institute of
Biotechnology, P.O. Box 56, University of Helsinki,
00014 Helsinki, Finland
Received for publication, March 7, 2001, and in revised form, June 29, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
We found recently that -lactamase
folds in the yeast cytosol to a native-like, catalytically active, and
trypsin-resistant conformation, and is thereafter translocated into the
ER and secreted to the medium. Previously, it was thought that
pre-folded proteins cannot be translocated. Here we have studied in
living yeast cells whether -lactamase, a tight globule in authentic
form, must be unfolded for ER translocation. A -lactamase mutant
(E166A) binds irreversibly benzylpenicillin via Ser70
in the active site. We fused E166A to the C terminus of a yeast-derived polypeptide having a post-translational signal peptide. In the presence
of benzylpenicillin, the E166A fusion protein was not translocated into
the endoplasmic reticulum, whereas translocation of the unmutated
variant was not affected. The benzylpenicillin-bound protein adhered to
the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, where it prevented translocation of
BiP, carboxypeptidase Y, and secretory proteins. Although the 321-amino
acid-long N-terminal fusion partner adopts no regular secondary
structure and should have no constraints for pore penetration, the
benzylpenicillin-bound protein remained fully exposed to the cytosol,
maintaining its signal peptide. Our data suggest that the -lactamase
portion must unfold for translocation, that the unfolding machinery is
cytosolic, and that unfolding of the remote C-terminal
-lactamase is required for initiation of pore penetration.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Depending on the hydrophobicity of the signal peptide,
newly synthesized polypeptides are translocated into the yeast
endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1
either during translation or after completion of translation and
release from the ribosomes (1). Post-translational and co-translational
translocation occur through heterotrimeric Sec61p complexes, which are
composed of subunits Sec61p, Sbh1p, and Sss1p. Sec61p spans the ER
membrane 10 times and forms an aqueous pore. In addition to the
heterotrimeric translocon complex, post-translational translocation
requires also the Sec62-63 complex (Sec62p, Sec63p, Sec71p, and
Sec72p) embedded in the ER membrane, plus the soluble ER chaperone BiP,
also named Kar2p in yeast (2-6). By chemical cross-linking of
prepro- -factor to isolated microsomal membranes, it was possible to
dissect two steps that precede post-translational pore penetration,
docking of the precursor onto a receptor site where it interacts with
the translocon subcomplex composed of Sec62p, Sec71p, and Sec72p, and
its subsequent release for pore insertion (7). The release of the
translocation substrate from the subcomplex is mediated by BiP and its
co-chaperone Sec63p, and requires ATP (8). Thereafter, the signal
peptide intercalates into transmembrane domains 2 and 7 of Sec61p,
perhaps opening the pore, whereafter passage of pre-pro- -factor
proceeds in an ATP- and BiP-dependent manner (9).
Events preceding these steps have been much less studied. It has been
thought that cytosolic Hsp70s bind to completed precursor proteins to
prevent them from folding and to keep them in a translocation-competent form (10, 11). However, we showed recently that newly synthesized Escherichia coli RTEM-1 -lactamase folded to a
native-like, catalytically active, and trypsin-resistant conformation
in the cytosol of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Thereafter, it
was translocated into the ER lumen and secreted in active form to the
medium (12). -Lactamase was expressed as a chimeric protein, fused
to a yeast-derived polypeptide (Hsp150 ) having a signal peptide
conferring post-translational translocation. The crystal structure of
authentic RTEM-1 -lactamase is a tight two-domain globule measuring
32 × 37 × 53 Å (13), whereas the 321-amino acid-long
N-terminal Hsp150 fragment occurs as a random coil (14). As the
translocon pore has been estimated to be able to enlarge to a maximal
width of 60 Å (15), folded -lactamase could traverse the pore
without unfolding. Here we show that benzylpenicillin, which was
irreversibly bound to a mutated -lactamase portion, prevented ER
translocation of the fusion protein at a stage preceding signal peptide
cleavage, suggesting that unfolding by a cytosolic machinery was
required for initiation and completion of pore penetration.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strain Construction--
The DNA fragment coding for the
-lactamase mutants E166A or E166D was PCR-amplified with
Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) using wild type -lactamase
gene in plasmid pKTH4539 (16) as template, and oligonucleotides MS2
(5'-TTCTGCAGCCGCTACCTC), 92395 (5'-ATCGTTGGGCACCGGAGCT), 92396 (5'-AGCTCCGGTGCCCAACGAT), and 82629 (5'-GCAACCAAGCTTGAGTAAACTTGGTCTGACAG) for the E166A mutant, and
oligonucleotides MS2, 92397 (5'-CAGCTCCGGGTCCCAACGA), 92398 (5'-TCGTTGGGACCCGGAGCTG), and 82629 for the E166D mutant. The mutated
fragments were digested with KpnI-HindIII and
cloned into plasmid pKTH4539 to replace the wild type gene. The
plasmids were named pKTH4825 (E166D) and pKTH4826 (E166A) and the
mutations verified by sequencing. The BamHI fragments
containing the mutated HSP150 - -lactamase-ADC1
terminator cassettes were cloned into plasmid pFL34, designated
pKTH4828 (E166D) and pKTH4830 (E166A), and into plasmid pFL26,
designated pKTH4829 (E166A). The mutant -lactamase gene (E166A) with
a His6 tag was created by PCR using plasmid pKTH4829 as a
template, and MS2 and C2500
(5'-TTAAGCTTAGTGATGGTGATGGTGATGCCAATGCTTAATCAGT) as primers. The PCR
fragments were digested with KpnI and HindIII and
ligated to pKTH4539. The resulting plasmid pKTH4956 was verified by
sequencing. The BamHI fragment containing the
HSP150 - -lactamaseE166A-His6-ADC1 terminator cassette was cloned into pFL26, resulting in plasmid pKTH4960, which was transformed to yield strain H1248. The DNA fragment
of HSP150 - -lactamase lacking the signal
peptide codons was PCR-amplified using pKTH4539 as template, and
oligonucleotides 82629 and 82239 (5'-ATAAATGCATATGGCCTATGCTCCATCTGAGCC)
as primers. The product was digested with NsiI and
HindIII (Promega) and ligated to plasmid pKTH4700 containing
the HSP150 promotor and the ADH1 terminator to
produce plasmid pKTH4716. The XbaI-NheI fragment of pKTH4716 with the truncated 1-18HSP150 -
-lactamase fragment with promotor and terminator sequences was cloned
into pFL26 to produce plasmid pKTH4757, which was transformed to
Sey2101a (R. Schekman) to produce strain H977. The
NheI-KpnI fragment derived from pKTH4716
containing the truncated version of the HSP150 gene lacking
the signal sequence and flanked by the HSP150 promoter, and
the KpnI-SacI fragment of pKTH4828 containing the
-lactamaseE166A mutant gene flanked by the ADC1
terminator, were successively cloned into pFL34, to create pKTH4995
containing the signal sequence-less Hsp150 - -lactamase E166A
mutant ( 1-18E166A). pKTH4544 (16), pKTH4830, pKTH4828,
and pKTH4995 were transformed into CJY004 (17) to produce strains H987,
H1045, H1046, and H1376, respectively (Table I). Yeast cells were grown
overnight, in synthetic complete medium lacking appropriate amino acids
or nucleotides or in YPD medium, in shake flasks at 24 °C.
N-terminal Sequencing of E166A-His6--
Cells (2 liters, optical density of 1) treated with benzylpenicillin (5 mg/ml)
were lysed with a GlassBeater (Biospec) in 30 ml of Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 300 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 100 µl of Yeast Protease Inhibitor
Mixture (Sigma). The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at
10,000 × g for 50 min at 4 °C, and urea powder was
added to 8 M concentration and the pH adjusted to 8.0. The
lysate (80 ml) was mixed with 1 ml of Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic
acid-agarose (Qiagen) overnight at 4 °C. Further procedures were at
room temperature. The resin was loaded into a 2-ml column and washed
successively with 5-ml batches of buffers B, C, D, and E, which
consisted of 8 M urea, 100 mM
NaH2PO4, and 20 mM Tris, the pH of
which was 8.0, 6.3, 5.9, and 4.5, respectively. The final wash was with
2 ml of discharging buffer (100 mM EDTA, 300 mM
NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). Samples of the flow-through and the 1-ml fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (7.5%) and Western blotting using His5 antibody (Qiagen). The second fraction
eluted with buffer D, which contained the E166A-His6
protein of 66 kDa, was resolved in SDS-PAGE (7.5%) and blotted onto
PDVF membrane (ProBlottTM) in 10 mM CAPS buffer, pH 11, containing 10% methanol at 50 V for 2.5 h at 4 °C. The filter
was rinsed with MilliQ water, stained with Coomassie Blue, and washed
several times with 50% methanol, air-dried, and used for N-terminal
amino acid sequencing of the 66-kDa protein (18).
Other Methods and Materials--
Metabolic labeling with
[35S]methionine/cysteine (5 × 107
cells/ml), immunoprecipitation with -lactamase (1:100), Kar2p/BiP (1:400), and carboxypeptidase Y (CPY; 1:100) antisera, and trypsin and
proteinase K digestions were as described previously (12). Isolation of
microsomes and Western analysis have been described (12), as well as
-lactamase activity assays (16). Immunofluorescent staining with
-lactamase (1:500) and Lhs1p (1:500) antisera was as described
previously (19). Determination of 35S-labeled bulk protein
synthesis has been described previously (20). SDS-PAGE was in 8% gels
if not otherwise stated. Penicillin G (PenG), cloxacillin (CLX), and
cycloheximide (CHX) (Sigma) were used at final concentrations of 2, 2, and 0.1 mg/ml, respectively, unless otherwise stated. Labeling with
benzyl[14C]penicillin (57 mCi/mmol; Amersham Biotech) was
with 2 µCi/0.5 ml of cell suspension.
 |
RESULTS |
Covalently Bound Penicillin G Prevents Translocation of
Hsp150 --
-lactamaseE166A E. coli
RTEM-1 -lactamase was fused to the C terminus of Hsp150 , an
N-terminal portion of 321 amino acids of the secretory yeast
glycoprotein Hsp150 (18). The Hsp150 signal peptide of 18 amino acids
confers post-translational translocation (12). The fusion protein is
designated Hsp150 - -lactamase (or la for short). The Hsp150
fragment has 106 serine and threonine residues, most of which
acquire in the ER single mannose residues that are elongated in the
Golgi (14, 19), allowing distinction of the cytoplasmic (66 kDa), ER
(110 kDa), and mature (145 kDa) forms (12). Hsp150 consists mostly
of 11 repeats of a 19-amino acid peptide, which do not adopt any
regular secondary structure, as determined for the glycosylated protein
by CD spectroscopy and for the synthetic unglycosylated consensus
peptide by NMR spectrometry (14). Thus, conformational restrictions
that would require unfolding before ER translocation should be due to
the -lactamase portion only.
When glutamate 166 of RTEM-1 -lactamase is exchanged into alanine,
the enzyme becomes deacylation-defective, and PenG is covalently and
irreversibly bound to Ser70 of the active site (21). We
fused the E166A -lactamase variant to Hsp150 , creating
Hsp150 - -lactamaseE166A (designated E166A), and expressed it in
S. cerevisiae, from which the ERG6 gene was deleted (resulting in strain H1045, see Table
I). In erg6 cells synthesis
of the main yeast membrane sterol, ergosterol, is blocked, resulting in
efficient penetration of drugs across membranes (17). The H1045 cells
were preincubated with PenG and pulse-labeled with
[35S]methionine/cysteine. Immunoprecipitation with
-lactamase antiserum followed by SDS-PAGE analysis showed that E166A
was cell-associated and migrated mostly like the cytosolic 66-kDa
protein (Fig. 1A, lane 2). A small fraction migrated like the ER
form (110 kDa) and the mature protein (145 kDa), and very little was in
the medium (lane 1). After a chase of 20 min, the
cytosolic form persisted and the ER form migrated more slowly
(lane 4). Some protein was found in the medium
(lane 3). The -lactamase portion of the
cytosolic PenG-bound E166A molecules was trypsin-resistant (data not
shown), as shown previously for native cytosolic
Hsp150 - -lactamase molecules (12).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Translocation of E166A in the presence of
PenG. A and B, strain H1045 (E166A variant
in erg6 background) was preincubated for 20 min in the
presence (A) or absence (B) of PenG and
pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 5 min
(lanes 1 and 2). CHX was added and a
chase of 20 min was performed (lanes 3 and
4). The media (odd lane
numbers; m) were separated from the cells that
were lysed (even numbers; c), and all
samples were immunoprecipitated with -lactamase antiserum, followed
by SDS-PAGE analysis. Numbers on the right
indicate migration the cytosolic (66 kDa), ER (110 kDa), and mature
(145 kDa) forms of Hsp150 - -lactamase. The incubations were at
37 °C.
|
|
The mutation per se did not effect translocation or
secretion of E166A. In the absence of PenG after the pulse, cytosolic, ER, and mature forms could be immunoprecipitated from the lysate (Fig.
1B, lane 2) and some from the medium
(lane 1), whereas after chase most of the mutant
protein was in the medium (lane 3), and some
persisted in mature form with the cells (lane 4).
The mutation inactivated -lactamase completely (Fig.
2C, asterisks). In
WT (Fig. 2A) or erg6 (Fig. 2B)
cells expressing native Hsp150 - -lactamase, catalytic activity
increased in the medium (EX) and some remained intracellular
(IN) similarly in the absence (circles) and
presence (squares) of PenG. Thus, PenG did not effect
translocation, folding, or secretion of native Hsp150 - -lactamase.
We conclude that, when bound to PenG, the E166A fusion protein was
unable to translocate into the ER lumen.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
-Lactamase activity.
Strains H335 (A, Hsp150 - -lactamase in WT background),
H987 (B and D; Hsp150 - -lactamase in
erg6 background), and H1045 (C; E166A variant
in erg6 background) were incubated at 37 °C in the
absence (circles) or presence (squares) of PenG
as indicated. Intracellular (IN, open
symbols) and extracellular (EX, filled
symbols) -lactamase activity was determined and plotted against
incubation time. In C, no activity was detected in any of
the samples, indicated collectively by asterisks.
la, -lactamase.
|
|
ER Association of PenG-bound E166A--
Next we studied whether
cytosolic PenG-bound E166A was attached to the ER membrane. PenG-bound
E166A was accumulated for 30 min in H1045 cells
(E166A/ erg6), the cells were lysed under mild detergent
conditions, and the microsomal membranes were isolated. The cytosolic
and membrane fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western analysis
using -lactamase antiserum. Most of the 66-kDa form was detected in
the microsomal fraction (Fig.
3A, lane
2) and some in the soluble fraction (lane
1). The sec63-1 and sec18-1 mutants
expressing native Hsp150 - -lactamase served as controls. At
37 °C in sec63-1 an early step of translocation is
blocked, leading to cytosolic accumulation of pre-proteins and in the
latter mutant membrane traffic is halted before arrival in the Golgi
(22, 23). In both mutants most of the 66-kDa form was pelleted with the
microsomes (lanes 4 and 6). In
sec18-1 part of the Hsp150 - -lactamase pool had been
translocated and could be visualized as the glycosylated 110-kDa form
(lane 6). The 62-kDa form probably was an
artifactual degradation product rather than a biosynthetic
intermediate, because the signal peptide-less form runs like a 64-kDa
protein and no 62-kDa form was found after metabolic labeling (see
below). Moreover, the 62-kDa form was found in lysates of the
sec63-1 mutant, where no signal peptide cleavage should
occur, and even in the cytosolic fraction (lane 1). H1045 cells (E166A/ erg6) were
then incubated with PenG and subjected to immunofluorescent staining
using -lactamase antiserum. Mostly the plasma membrane was stained
(Fig. 3B, a). In yeast cells the ER is mostly
located beneath the plasma membrane, as shown in Fig. 3B
(b), where another sample of H1045 cells was stained with
antiserum against Lhs1p, an ER-resident protein (24). As control we
used the E166A mutant lacking a signal peptide, expressed in a
erg6 background (strain H1376) in the presence of PenG.
This variant was not membrane-associated, as it stained the entire
cytosol (Fig. 3A, c). Thus, PenG-bound E166A was
mostly attached to the ER membrane in a signal
peptide-dependent fashion.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Localization of PenG-bound E166A.
A, the strains (H1045 in lanes 1 and
2, H482 in lanes 3 and 4,
H393 in lanes 5 and 6) were incubated
for 1 h at 37 °C. The cytosolic (c) and microsomal
(m) fractions were separated and subjected to SDS-PAGE and
Western analysis using -lactamase ( la) antiserum.
Molecular mass markers (M) are indicated on the
left and fusion protein variants on the right
(c, cytosolic fraction; m, microsomal fraction).
B, strains H1045 (a and b) and H1376
(c; signal peptide-less E166A in erg6
background) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in the presence of
PenG, followed by immunofluorescent staining with -lactamase
(a and c) or Lhs1p (b)
antiserum.
|
|
PenG-bound E166A Is Associated with Translocons--
Next we
showed that PenG-bound E166A molecules blocked translocation of other
precursor proteins. First we used as markers BiP and CPY, mostly
translocated during and after translation, respectively (1). Unlabeled
PenG-bound E166A was allowed to accumulate for different times in H1045
cells (E166A/ erg6), whereafter the cell
samples were 35S-labeled, lysed, and immunoprecipitated
with BiP antiserum. Before PenG treatment, only mature BiP was detected
(Fig. 4A, lane
1). With PenG preincubation, pre-BiP started to accumulate
(lane 2), until after 60 min less than half of
the newly synthesized molecules were mature, and thus translocated
(lane 3). The sec18-1 mutant, where
mature BiP accumulates (lane 4), and the
kar2-159 mutant, where translocation of pre-BiP is
partially blocked (lane 5) (2), served as
controls. In the H1045 cells, the ER form of vacuolar carboxypeptidase
Y (pro-CPY or p1) could be immunoprecipitated after a 5 min
pulse (Fig. 4B, lane 1), and mature
CPY (m) after a 30-min chase (lane 3).
After preincubation with PenG of the same cells, mostly untranslocated
pre-CPY, and some pro-CPY form were detected (lane
2). In control cells (H1) in the absence of PenG,
a 2-min pulse revealed pre-CPY and pro-CPY (lane 4), which were converted to the golgi form p2 and mature CPY upon a 15-min chase (lane 5). In the sec63-1
mutant, CPY fails to be translocated, revealing pre-CPY
(lane 6), and pro-CPY (p1) accumulates
in the sec18-1 mutant (lane 7).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Arrest of translocation of BiP and CPY.
A, the indicated strains (H1045 in lanes
1-3, H393 in lane 4, H495 in
lane 5) were 35S-labeled for 5 min in
the absence of PenG, or pre-incubated with PenG for the indicated times
and 35S-labeled for 5 min in the presence of the drug.
B, similarly, strains H1045 (lanes
1-3), H1 (lanes 4 and 5),
H482 (lane 6), and H4 (lane
7) were 35S-labeled in the absence of PenG, or
in the presence of the drug after a 30-min preincubation
(lane 2). Labeling was for 5 min in
lanes 1-3, 6, and 7, and
for 2 min in lanes 4 and 5. After
labeling, the cells were chased with CHX for 30 or 15 min in the case
of lanes 3 and 5, respectively.
p2, golgi form; p1, pro-CPY; m, mature CPY; pre-CPY,
untranslocated CPY. A and B, all incubations were
at 37 °C, and cells treated in the absence of PenG were incubated
for 30 min at 37 °C before labeling. The cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with antiserum against BiP (A) or CPY
(B), and the precipitates resolved by SDS-PAGE, followed by
autoradiography.
|
|
Next, H1045 cells (E166A/ erg6) were preincubated with
PenG for different times, followed by labeling with
[35S]methionine/cysteine for 1 h in continuous
presence of the drug (Fig.
5A). The culture supernatants
were trichloroacetic acid-precipitated and resolved in SDS-PAGE. In the
absence of the drug, E166A together with several other proteins were
detected (lane 1). The identity of E166A was
confirmed by immunoprecipitation of a parallel sample -lactamase
antiserum prior to SDS-PAGE analysis (lane 4).
After 30 min with PenG, very little if any E166A was detected, whereas other proteins still appeared in the medium (lane
2). After 1 h of PenG preincubation, no
35S-labeled proteins could be detected in the medium
(lane 3). This must have been due to inhibition
of their translocation, as PenG did not decrease protein synthesis.
Incorporation of [35S]methionine/cysteine into
trichloroacetic acid-precipitable material was after 3 h as
efficient as in the absence of the drug (Fig. 5B). Since
pre-accumulated PenG-bound E166A inhibited translocation of an
ER-resident protein (BiP), a vacuolar enzyme (CPY), and a number of
secretory proteins, it must have been engaged with ER components
required for both co-translational and post-translational translocation.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of secretion of proteins by
PenG. A, H1045 cells (E166A/ erg6) were
preincubated with PenG as indicated and then labeled with
[35S]methionine/cysteine for 1 h at 24 °C. The
culture supernatants were trichloroacetic acid-precipitated and
subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis directly (lanes
1-3), or after immunoprecipitation with -lactamase
antiserum (lane 4). B, H1045 cells
were incubated at 24 °C in the absence or presence of PenG. Parallel
duplicate samples were 35S-labeled for successive 1 h
periods as indicated, and the cell-associated trichloroacetic
acid-precipitable radioactivity was counted.
|
|
Cytosolic Exposure of Ligand-bound E166A--
We then asked
how far the Hsp150 portion of PenG-bound E166A had advanced into
the ER lumen, by examining signal peptide cleavage. The signal peptide
appeared not to be cleaved, since PenG-bound E166A migrated in SDS-PAGE
(Fig. 6, lane 1)
like native pre-Hsp150 - -lactamase blocked in the cytosol before
pore penetration in the sec63-1 mutant (lane 3).
The cytosolic signal peptide-less Hsp150 - -lactamase variant
served as a control; it migrated slightly faster (lane
2) than PenG-bound E166A. These data were confirmed by
direct amino acid sequencing. An E166A fusion protein variant with a
C-terminal histidine tag, E166A-His6, was expressed in a
erg6 mutant (H1248). The cells were incubated with PenG
at 37 °C for 2 h and lysed by glass beads in the presence of
Triton X-100. The lysate was subjected to affinity chromatography over a nickel column as described under "Experimental Procedures." Fractions that, according to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using His5 antibody, contained the E166A-His6 protein
of 66 kDa were subjected to SDS-PAGE, blotting onto a polyvinylidene
difluoride filter, and N-terminal amino acid sequencing. The sequence
was that of the signal peptide of Hsp150 (18). We conclude that the
ER-attached PenG-bound E166A fusion protein was not translocated far
enough to reach the signal peptidase, though the Hsp150 fragment should have no structural constraints for pore penetration, and authentic Hsp150 is translocated extremely rapidly (12). This suggests
that, in normal conditions, unfolding of the C-terminal -lactamase
portion has to occur before pore penetration can be initiated.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Electrophoretic analysis of PenG-bound
E166A. Strains H1045 (lane 1; E166A variant
in erg6 background), H977 (lane 2;
signal peptide-less Hsp150 - -lactamase in normal cells), and H482
(lane 3; Hsp150 - -lactamase in
sec63-1 background) were 35S-labeled at
37 °C for 30 min, in the presence or absence of PenG as indicated.
la, -lactamase. The cell samples were
immunoprecipitated with -lactamase antiserum followed by SDS-PAGE
analysis in a 7.5-15% gradient gel. Molecular size markers are on the
left, and the migration of biosynthetic intermediates of the
reporter protein is indicated on the right (kDa).
|
|
Reversible Binding of Ligand to the -Lactamase Portion Allows
Translocation--
Finally we examined the
Hsp150 - -lactamaseE166D mutant (E166D), which also binds PenG, but
reversibly (21). We anticipated that E166D molecules should be
translocated immediately when PenG dissociates from the active site. As
the crystal structure of PenG-bound molecules is almost identical to
that of the native unmodified -lactamase molecules (25), E166D
molecules binding PenG in the ER lumen after translocation should be
competent for ER exit and secretion. The erg6 mutation
allows penetration of drugs also across the ER membrane. Pulse-chase
experiments showed that E166D was translocated and secreted similarly
in the presence (Fig. 7A) and
absence (Fig. 7B) of PenG. As no more ER form could be
detected after chase in the presence of PenG (Fig. 7A,
lane 4) than in its absence (Fig. 7B,
lane 4), E166D apparently exited the ER as
rapidly in free and PenG-bound form. Since the E166D mutation
inactivated the enzyme similarly as shown in Fig. 2C for the
E166A mutation, and PenG had no effect on the fate of the E166D fusion
protein, we needed to confirm that the drug bound to the reporter
protein. To this end, parallel E166D/ erg6 cell samples (H1046) were incubated with [14C]PenG and
[35S]methionine/cysteine for 30 min at 37 °C.
Immunoprecipitation of the medium with -lactamase antiserum and
SDS-PAGE analysis revealed a 14C-labeled protein
comigrating with 35S-labeled E166D (data not shown).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Translocation of E166D mutant and native
Hsp150 - -lactamase in
the presence of penicillin derivatives. A and
B, strain H1046 (E166D variant in erg6
background) was preincubated for 20 min in the presence (A)
or absence (B) of PenG, pulse-labeled with
[35S]methionine/cysteine for 5 min (lanes
1 and 2), and chased in the presence of CHX for
20 min (lanes 3 and 4). The media
(odd lane numbers; m) and
lysed cell samples (even numbers; c)
were immunoprecipitated with -lactamase antiserum, followed by
SDS-PAGE analysis. Numbers on the right indicate
migration of the cytosolic (66 kDa), ER (110 kDa), and mature (145 kDa)
forms of Hsp150 - -lactamase ( la). C and
D, the same experiment as in A and B
for strain H987 (native Hsp150 - -lactamase in erg6
background), except that CLX was used instead of PenG and chase was for
30 min. E, strain H987 (Hsp150 - -lactamase in
erg6 background) was incubated at 37 °C in the
presence of CLX. Intracellular (IN, open
squares) and extracellular (EX, filled
squares) -lactamase activity was determined and plotted
against incubation time. All incubations were at 37 °C.
|
|
The results on the E166D mutant were complemented using native,
enzymatically active Hsp150 - -lactamase and the penicillinase inhibitor CLX, which is bound to authentic -lactamase, hydrolyzed, and released (26). CLX inactivated Hsp150 - -lactamase, confirming binding (Fig. 7E). The control experiment demonstrating
secretion of active molecules in the absence of CLX is shown in Fig.
2B (circles). Pulse-chase experiments showed that
CLX had no effect on translocation and secretion of
Hsp150 - -lactamase (Fig. 7, C and D). These
data suggest that release of the ligand allowed unfolding, which in
turn allowed translocation of native Hsp150 - -lactamase as well as
the E166D variant.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Here we show that prefolded -lactamase with a covalently bound
ligand could not be translocated into the yeast ER. Our reporter protein was E. coli RTEM-1 -lactamase, which in authentic
form is a tight globule (13). It was fused to the C terminus of a 321-amino acid fragment (Hsp150 ) of the yeast secretory glycoprotein Hsp150. Hsp150 - -lactamase is translocated post-translationally, but before that, the -lactamase portion folds in the cytosol to a
native-like catalytically active conformation (12). Here we introduced
to the -lactamase portion a point mutation (E166A), which causes
covalent and irreversible binding of PenG to the active site residue
Ser70 (21). In addition, Glu166,
Lys73, Ser130, Asn132,
Lys243, and Ala237 are involved in substrate
binding, and the crystal structure of the PenG-bound mutant protein is
nearly identical to that of the native unmodified protein (25). In the
presence of PenG, the Hsp150 - -lactamaseE166A protein (designated
E166A) was unable to translocate and remained cytosolic with a
trypsin-resistant -lactamase portion. PenG and another penicillin
derivative, cloxacillin, which bind reversibly to variant E166D and
native -lactamase, respectively, did not prevent translocation of
the respective fusion proteins. We suggest that irreversibly PenG-bound
E166A molecules could not penetrate the translocon because the ligand prevented unfolding, whereas release of the reversibly bound ligands allowed unfolding and translocation.
PenG-stabilized E166A was attached in a signal
peptide-dependent fashion to the ER membrane, where it
inhibited translocation of BiP, CPY, and a number of secretory
proteins. This shows that the PenG-bound molecules were on a productive
translocation pathway, normally shared by co- and post-translationally
translocated polypeptides. Whether the binding site was Sec63p or
Sec61p (7), or perhaps an as yet unknown receptor upstream of these
components, remains to be studied. Anyhow, PenG-bound E166A did not
penetrate deep enough into the translocon pore to be processed by the
signal peptidase. The failure of the 321-amino acid-long Hsp150
fragment to penetrate into the ER lumen is surprising, since most of it adopts no regular secondary structure as determined by NMR spectrometry and CD spectroscopy (14), and should thus have no structural constraints for translocation. Moreover, authentic Hsp150 translocates so rapidly that no cytosolic form can be detected even after a 1-min
35S pulse (12). The cytosolically exposed, signal
peptide-containing, ER-attached PenG-bound E166A fusion protein must
have represented a proper translocation intermediate, because the E166D
variant binding PenG reversibly was readily translocated. It appears
that unfolding of the C-terminal -lactamase portion had to occur
before translocation of the Hsp150 portion could be initiated or
advanced significantly. Pore opening is carefully controlled, and
completion of the unfolding process may somehow trigger pore opening.
The scenario is different from what has been suggested for
mitochondrial import. Stably folded precursor proteins cannot
traverse mitochondrial import sites (27, 28). However, the N-terminal
F0-ATPase subunit of 86 amino acids was fully translocated,
and only the fusion partner dihydrofolate reductase, when stabilized by
methotrexate, remained stalled against the mitochondrial outer membrane
(29).
As PenG-bound molecules were exposed to the cytosol, the machinery
unfolding the remote -lactamase portion must be cytosolic. BiP has
been shown not to actively pull precursor proteins, but to trap them
passively by binding and preventing backwards sliding (30). This does
not exclude the possibility that BiP exerted a pulling function on our
reporter protein, but pulling as well as trapping could occur only
after destabilization of the -lactamase portion by cytosolic
factors, and sufficient advancement of the polypeptide into the ER
lumen for BiP to be able to grab it. It has been suggested that pore
penetration becomes BiP-dependent after the signal peptide
has intercalated into transmembrane domains 2 and 7 of Sec61p (9).
Unfolding of cytosolic prefolded proteins for mitochondrial import has
been proposed to occur as matrix Hsp70 actively pulls the polypeptide
through import sites. In this scenario mtHsp70 is viewed as a motor,
which interacts with the inner membrane protein Tim44 to generate
pulling force acting on the translocation substrate (29, 31). Other
data suggest that mtHsp70, anchored to Tim44, acts like BiP as a
ratchet minimizing retrograde movements, that unfolding occurs
spontaneously, and that forward movement is driven by Brownian motion
(32, 33). Import of polypeptides into mitochondria requires a high
degree of unfolding. Only 50 amino acids were sufficient to span both outer and inner membrane, demonstrating that the passenger polypeptide is imported into the matrix in an extended state (34). According to
equilibrium measurements with 8 M urea, pre- -lactamase
folds in vitro via a molten globule state, which retains
native-like secondary structure but lacks catalytic activity, and whose
compactness is between those of native and completely unfolded forms
(35). Whether the translocation-competent -lactamase portion retains secondary structure in yeast cells remains to be determined.
Pre-pro- -factor was post-translationally translocated, in the
absence of cytosolic components, into reconstituted proteoliposomes, which contained the heptameric translocon complex in the membrane and
BiP in the lumen (30). However, pre-pro- -factor was urea-denatured before dilution and the translocation assay. Moreover, it is not known
whether it folds prior to translocation in vivo. Loosely folded molecules may not require unfolding, and evolution may have
selected such proteins for post-translational translocation, and
directed tightly folded proteins to the co-translational pathway, which
allows folding only on the luminal side of the ER membrane. Nevertheless, our data unravel new activities in the yeast cytosol, unfolding of tightly folded protein for post-translational ER translocation, and a connection between unfolding of the translocation substrate and pore opening. Such events were not anticipated, as it was
thought that polypeptides do not fold to native-like conformation prior
to translocation. Our experiments were performed on living cells,
confirming the physiological relevance of the findings.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Nisse Kalkkinen for N-terminal
amino acid sequencing. Ms. Anna Liisa Nyfors provided excellent
technical help. We thank Drs. R. Schekman, C. Jackson, E. Craig, and M. Rose for yeast strains and antisera.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Academy of Finland Grant 38017 and by grants from the Technology Development Center (Tekes) and the
Juselius Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Biocentrum Helsinki fellow. To whom correspondence should be
addressed: Inst. of Biotechnology, P.O. Box 56, 00014 University of
Helsinki, Finland. Tel.: 358-9-19159419; Fax: 358-9-19159570; E-mail: marja.makarow@helsinki.fi.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102056200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
CPY, carboxypeptidase Y;
CAPS, 3-(cyclohexylamino)propanesulfonic acid;
PenG, penicillin G;
CLX, cloxacillin;
CHX, cycloheximide;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ng, D. T. W.,
Brown, J. D.,
and Walter, P.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
269-278
|
| 2.
|
Vogel, J. P.,
Misra, M. D.,
and Rose, M. D.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
1885-1895
|
| 3.
|
Deshaies, R. J.,
and Schekman, R.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
6024-6035
|
| 4.
|
Brodsky, J. L.,
and Schekman, R.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1355-1363
|
| 5.
|
Feldheim, D.,
and Schekman, R.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
935-943
|
| 6.
|
Panzner, S.,
Dreier, L.,
Hartmann, E.,
Kostka, S.,
and Rapoport, T. A.
(1995)
Cell
81,
561-570
|
| 7.
|
Pilon, M.,
Schekman, R.,
and Römisch, K.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4540-4548
|
| 8.
|
Lyman, S. K.,
and Schekman, R.
(1997)
Cell
88,
85-96
|
| 9.
|
Plath, K.,
Mothes, W.,
Wilkinson, B. M.,
Stirling, C.,
and Rapoport, T. A.
(1998)
Cell
94,
795-807
|
| 10.
|
Deshaies, R. J.,
Koch, B. D.,
Werner-Washburne, M.,
Craig, E. A.,
and Schekman, R.
(1988)
Nature
332,
800-805
|
| 11.
|
Chirico, W. J.,
Waters, M. G.,
and Blobel, G.
(1988)
Nature
332,
805-810
|
| 12.
|
Paunola, E.,
Suntio, T.,
Jämsä, E.,
and Makarow, M.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
817-827
|
| 13.
|
Jelsch, C.,
Lenfant, F.,
Masson, J. M.,
and Samama, J. P.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
299,
135-142
|
| 14.
|
Jämsä, E.,
Holkeri, H.,
Vihinen, H.,
Wikström, M.,
Simonen, M.,
Walse, B.,
Kalkkinen, N.,
Paakkola, J.,
and Makarow, M.
(1995)
Yeast
11,
1381-1391
|
| 15.
|
Hamman, B. D.,
Cheng, J.-C.,
Johnson, E. E.,
and Johnson, A. E.
(1997)
Cell
89,
535-544
|
| 16.
|
Simonen, M.,
Jämsä, E.,
and Makarow, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13889-13892
|
| 17.
|
Jackson, C.,
and Képès, F.
(1994)
Genetics
137,
423-437
|
| 18.
|
Russo, P.,
Kalkkinen, N.,
Sareneva, H.,
Paakkola, J.,
and Makarow, M.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
3671-3675
|
| 19.
|
Suntio, T.,
Shmelev, A.,
Lund, M.,
and Makarow, M.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
3889-3898
|
| 20.
|
Hänninen, A.-L.,
Simola, M.,
Saris, N.,
and Makarow, M.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
3623-3632
|
| 21.
|
Adachi, H.,
Ohto, T.,
and Matsuzawa, H.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3186-3191
|
| 22.
|
Lyman, S. K.,
and Schekman, R.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
1163-1171
|
| 23.
|
Pilon, M.,
Römisch, K.,
Quach, D.,
and Schekman, R.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
3455-3473
|
| 24.
|
Craven, R.,
Egerton, M.,
and Striling, C.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2640-1650
|
| 25.
|
Strynadka, N. C. J.,
Adachi, H.,
Jensen, S. E.,
Johns, K.,
Sielicki, A.,
Betzel, C.,
Sutoh, K.,
and James, M. N. G.
(1992)
Nature
359,
700-705
|
| 26.
|
Citri, N.,
and Zyk, N.
(1982)
Biochem. J.
201,
425-427
|
| 27.
|
Eilers, M.,
and Schatz, G.
(1986)
Nature
322,
800-805
|
| 28.
|
Wienhues, U.,
Becker, K.,
Schleyer, M.,
Guiard, B.,
Tropschug, M.,
Horwich, A. L.,
Pfanner, N.,
and Neupert, W.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1601-1609
|
| 29.
|
Voisine, C.,
Craig, E. A.,
Zufall, N.,
von Ahsen, O.,
Pfanner, N.,
and Voos, W.
(1999)
Cell
97,
565-574
|
| 30.
|
Matlack, K. E. S.,
Misselwitz, B.,
Plath, K.,
and Rapoport, T. A.
(1999)
Cell
97,
553-564
|
| 31.
|
Merlin, A.,
Voos, W.,
Maatse, A. C.,
Meijer, M.,
Pfanner, N.,
and Rassow, J.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
961-972
|
| 32.
|
Gaume, B.,
Klaus, C.,
Ungermann, C.,
Guiard, B.,
Neupert, W.,
and Brunner, M.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
6497-6507
|
| 33.
|
Neupert, W.,
Brunner, M.,
Hofman, S.,
and Bauer, M. F.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
25-31
|
| 34.
|
Rassow, J.,
Hartl, F.-U.,
Guiard, B.,
Pfanner, N.,
and Neupert, W.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
275,
190-194
|
| 35.
|
Zahn, R.,
Axmann, S. E.,
Ruecknagel, K.-P.,
Jaeger, E.,
Lamineth, A. A.,
and Plueckthun, A.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
242,
150-164
|
| 36.
|
Holkeri, H.,
Paunola, E.,
Jämsä, E.,
and Makarow, M.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
749-757
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Karhinen and M. Makarow
Activity of recycling Golgi mannosyltransferases in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum
J. Cell Sci.,
January 15, 2004;
117(2):
351 - 358.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Yabal, S. Brambillasca, P. Soffientini, E. Pedrazzini, N. Borgese, and M. Makarow
Translocation of the C Terminus of a Tail-anchored Protein across the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane in Yeast Mutants Defective in Signal Peptide-driven Translocation
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 24, 2003;
278(5):
3489 - 3496.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|