Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M102056200 on July 10, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 37, 34553-34559, September 14, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/37/34553    most recent
M102056200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paunola, E.
Right arrow Articles by Makarow, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paunola, E.
Right arrow Articles by Makarow, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Inhibition of Translocation of beta -Lactamase into the Yeast Endoplasmic Reticulum by Covalently Bound Benzylpenicillin*

Eija Paunola, Mingqiang Qiao, Anton Shmelev, and Marja MakarowDagger

From the Program in Cellular Biotechnology, Institute of Biotechnology, P.O. Box 56, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland

Received for publication, March 7, 2001, and in revised form, June 29, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We found recently that beta -lactamase folds in the yeast cytosol to a native-like, catalytically active, and trypsin-resistant conformation, and is thereafter translocated into the ER and secreted to the medium. Previously, it was thought that pre-folded proteins cannot be translocated. Here we have studied in living yeast cells whether beta -lactamase, a tight globule in authentic form, must be unfolded for ER translocation. A beta -lactamase mutant (E166A) binds irreversibly benzylpenicillin via Ser70 in the active site. We fused E166A to the C terminus of a yeast-derived polypeptide having a post-translational signal peptide. In the presence of benzylpenicillin, the E166A fusion protein was not translocated into the endoplasmic reticulum, whereas translocation of the unmutated variant was not affected. The benzylpenicillin-bound protein adhered to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, where it prevented translocation of BiP, carboxypeptidase Y, and secretory proteins. Although the 321-amino acid-long N-terminal fusion partner adopts no regular secondary structure and should have no constraints for pore penetration, the benzylpenicillin-bound protein remained fully exposed to the cytosol, maintaining its signal peptide. Our data suggest that the beta -lactamase portion must unfold for translocation, that the unfolding machinery is cytosolic, and that unfolding of the remote C-terminal beta -lactamase is required for initiation of pore penetration.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Depending on the hydrophobicity of the signal peptide, newly synthesized polypeptides are translocated into the yeast endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1 either during translation or after completion of translation and release from the ribosomes (1). Post-translational and co-translational translocation occur through heterotrimeric Sec61p complexes, which are composed of subunits Sec61p, Sbh1p, and Sss1p. Sec61p spans the ER membrane 10 times and forms an aqueous pore. In addition to the heterotrimeric translocon complex, post-translational translocation requires also the Sec62-63 complex (Sec62p, Sec63p, Sec71p, and Sec72p) embedded in the ER membrane, plus the soluble ER chaperone BiP, also named Kar2p in yeast (2-6). By chemical cross-linking of prepro-alpha -factor to isolated microsomal membranes, it was possible to dissect two steps that precede post-translational pore penetration, docking of the precursor onto a receptor site where it interacts with the translocon subcomplex composed of Sec62p, Sec71p, and Sec72p, and its subsequent release for pore insertion (7). The release of the translocation substrate from the subcomplex is mediated by BiP and its co-chaperone Sec63p, and requires ATP (8). Thereafter, the signal peptide intercalates into transmembrane domains 2 and 7 of Sec61p, perhaps opening the pore, whereafter passage of pre-pro-alpha -factor proceeds in an ATP- and BiP-dependent manner (9).

Events preceding these steps have been much less studied. It has been thought that cytosolic Hsp70s bind to completed precursor proteins to prevent them from folding and to keep them in a translocation-competent form (10, 11). However, we showed recently that newly synthesized Escherichia coli RTEM-1 beta -lactamase folded to a native-like, catalytically active, and trypsin-resistant conformation in the cytosol of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Thereafter, it was translocated into the ER lumen and secreted in active form to the medium (12). beta -Lactamase was expressed as a chimeric protein, fused to a yeast-derived polypeptide (Hsp150Delta ) having a signal peptide conferring post-translational translocation. The crystal structure of authentic RTEM-1 beta -lactamase is a tight two-domain globule measuring 32 × 37 × 53 Å (13), whereas the 321-amino acid-long N-terminal Hsp150Delta fragment occurs as a random coil (14). As the translocon pore has been estimated to be able to enlarge to a maximal width of 60 Å (15), folded beta -lactamase could traverse the pore without unfolding. Here we show that benzylpenicillin, which was irreversibly bound to a mutated beta -lactamase portion, prevented ER translocation of the fusion protein at a stage preceding signal peptide cleavage, suggesting that unfolding by a cytosolic machinery was required for initiation and completion of pore penetration.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Strain Construction-- The DNA fragment coding for the beta -lactamase mutants E166A or E166D was PCR-amplified with Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) using wild type beta -lactamase gene in plasmid pKTH4539 (16) as template, and oligonucleotides MS2 (5'-TTCTGCAGCCGCTACCTC), 92395 (5'-ATCGTTGGGCACCGGAGCT), 92396 (5'-AGCTCCGGTGCCCAACGAT), and 82629 (5'-GCAACCAAGCTTGAGTAAACTTGGTCTGACAG) for the E166A mutant, and oligonucleotides MS2, 92397 (5'-CAGCTCCGGGTCCCAACGA), 92398 (5'-TCGTTGGGACCCGGAGCTG), and 82629 for the E166D mutant. The mutated fragments were digested with KpnI-HindIII and cloned into plasmid pKTH4539 to replace the wild type gene. The plasmids were named pKTH4825 (E166D) and pKTH4826 (E166A) and the mutations verified by sequencing. The BamHI fragments containing the mutated HSP150Delta -beta -lactamase-ADC1 terminator cassettes were cloned into plasmid pFL34, designated pKTH4828 (E166D) and pKTH4830 (E166A), and into plasmid pFL26, designated pKTH4829 (E166A). The mutant beta -lactamase gene (E166A) with a His6 tag was created by PCR using plasmid pKTH4829 as a template, and MS2 and C2500 (5'-TTAAGCTTAGTGATGGTGATGGTGATGCCAATGCTTAATCAGT) as primers. The PCR fragments were digested with KpnI and HindIII and ligated to pKTH4539. The resulting plasmid pKTH4956 was verified by sequencing. The BamHI fragment containing the HSP150Delta -beta -lactamaseE166A-His6-ADC1 terminator cassette was cloned into pFL26, resulting in plasmid pKTH4960, which was transformed to yield strain H1248. The DNA fragment of HSP150Delta -beta -lactamase lacking the signal peptide codons was PCR-amplified using pKTH4539 as template, and oligonucleotides 82629 and 82239 (5'-ATAAATGCATATGGCCTATGCTCCATCTGAGCC) as primers. The product was digested with NsiI and HindIII (Promega) and ligated to plasmid pKTH4700 containing the HSP150 promotor and the ADH1 terminator to produce plasmid pKTH4716. The XbaI-NheI fragment of pKTH4716 with the truncated Delta 1-18HSP150Delta -beta -lactamase fragment with promotor and terminator sequences was cloned into pFL26 to produce plasmid pKTH4757, which was transformed to Sey2101a (R. Schekman) to produce strain H977. The NheI-KpnI fragment derived from pKTH4716 containing the truncated version of the HSP150 gene lacking the signal sequence and flanked by the HSP150 promoter, and the KpnI-SacI fragment of pKTH4828 containing the beta -lactamaseE166A mutant gene flanked by the ADC1 terminator, were successively cloned into pFL34, to create pKTH4995 containing the signal sequence-less Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase E166A mutant (Delta 1-18E166A). pKTH4544 (16), pKTH4830, pKTH4828, and pKTH4995 were transformed into CJY004 (17) to produce strains H987, H1045, H1046, and H1376, respectively (Table I). Yeast cells were grown overnight, in synthetic complete medium lacking appropriate amino acids or nucleotides or in YPD medium, in shake flasks at 24 °C.

N-terminal Sequencing of E166A-His6-- Cells (2 liters, optical density of 1) treated with benzylpenicillin (5 mg/ml) were lysed with a GlassBeater (Biospec) in 30 ml of Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 300 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 100 µl of Yeast Protease Inhibitor Mixture (Sigma). The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 50 min at 4 °C, and urea powder was added to M concentration and the pH adjusted to 8.0. The lysate (80 ml) was mixed with 1 ml of Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose (Qiagen) overnight at 4 °C. Further procedures were at room temperature. The resin was loaded into a 2-ml column and washed successively with 5-ml batches of buffers B, C, D, and E, which consisted of 8 M urea, 100 mM NaH2PO4, and 20 mM Tris, the pH of which was 8.0, 6.3, 5.9, and 4.5, respectively. The final wash was with 2 ml of discharging buffer (100 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). Samples of the flow-through and the 1-ml fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (7.5%) and Western blotting using His5 antibody (Qiagen). The second fraction eluted with buffer D, which contained the E166A-His6 protein of 66 kDa, was resolved in SDS-PAGE (7.5%) and blotted onto PDVF membrane (ProBlottTM) in 10 mM CAPS buffer, pH 11, containing 10% methanol at 50 V for 2.5 h at 4 °C. The filter was rinsed with MilliQ water, stained with Coomassie Blue, and washed several times with 50% methanol, air-dried, and used for N-terminal amino acid sequencing of the 66-kDa protein (18).

Other Methods and Materials-- Metabolic labeling with [35S]methionine/cysteine (5 × 107 cells/ml), immunoprecipitation with beta -lactamase (1:100), Kar2p/BiP (1:400), and carboxypeptidase Y (CPY; 1:100) antisera, and trypsin and proteinase K digestions were as described previously (12). Isolation of microsomes and Western analysis have been described (12), as well as beta -lactamase activity assays (16). Immunofluorescent staining with beta -lactamase (1:500) and Lhs1p (1:500) antisera was as described previously (19). Determination of 35S-labeled bulk protein synthesis has been described previously (20). SDS-PAGE was in 8% gels if not otherwise stated. Penicillin G (PenG), cloxacillin (CLX), and cycloheximide (CHX) (Sigma) were used at final concentrations of 2, 2, and 0.1 mg/ml, respectively, unless otherwise stated. Labeling with benzyl[14C]penicillin (57 mCi/mmol; Amersham Biotech) was with 2 µCi/0.5 ml of cell suspension.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Covalently Bound Penicillin G Prevents Translocation of Hsp150Delta -- beta -lactamaseE166A---E. coli RTEM-1 beta -lactamase was fused to the C terminus of Hsp150Delta , an N-terminal portion of 321 amino acids of the secretory yeast glycoprotein Hsp150 (18). The Hsp150 signal peptide of 18 amino acids confers post-translational translocation (12). The fusion protein is designated Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase (or beta la for short). The Hsp150Delta fragment has 106 serine and threonine residues, most of which acquire in the ER single mannose residues that are elongated in the Golgi (14, 19), allowing distinction of the cytoplasmic (66 kDa), ER (110 kDa), and mature (145 kDa) forms (12). Hsp150Delta consists mostly of 11 repeats of a 19-amino acid peptide, which do not adopt any regular secondary structure, as determined for the glycosylated protein by CD spectroscopy and for the synthetic unglycosylated consensus peptide by NMR spectrometry (14). Thus, conformational restrictions that would require unfolding before ER translocation should be due to the beta -lactamase portion only.

When glutamate 166 of RTEM-1 beta -lactamase is exchanged into alanine, the enzyme becomes deacylation-defective, and PenG is covalently and irreversibly bound to Ser70 of the active site (21). We fused the E166A beta -lactamase variant to Hsp150Delta , creating Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamaseE166A (designated E166A), and expressed it in S. cerevisiae, from which the ERG6 gene was deleted (resulting in strain H1045, see Table I). In Delta erg6 cells synthesis of the main yeast membrane sterol, ergosterol, is blocked, resulting in efficient penetration of drugs across membranes (17). The H1045 cells were preincubated with PenG and pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine. Immunoprecipitation with beta -lactamase antiserum followed by SDS-PAGE analysis showed that E166A was cell-associated and migrated mostly like the cytosolic 66-kDa protein (Fig. 1A, lane 2). A small fraction migrated like the ER form (110 kDa) and the mature protein (145 kDa), and very little was in the medium (lane 1). After a chase of 20 min, the cytosolic form persisted and the ER form migrated more slowly (lane 4). Some protein was found in the medium (lane 3). The beta -lactamase portion of the cytosolic PenG-bound E166A molecules was trypsin-resistant (data not shown), as shown previously for native cytosolic Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase molecules (12).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Designation, genotype, and source of yeast strains


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Translocation of E166A in the presence of PenG. A and B, strain H1045 (E166A variant in Delta erg6 background) was preincubated for 20 min in the presence (A) or absence (B) of PenG and pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 5 min (lanes 1 and 2). CHX was added and a chase of 20 min was performed (lanes 3 and 4). The media (odd lane numbers; m) were separated from the cells that were lysed (even numbers; c), and all samples were immunoprecipitated with beta -lactamase antiserum, followed by SDS-PAGE analysis. Numbers on the right indicate migration the cytosolic (66 kDa), ER (110 kDa), and mature (145 kDa) forms of Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase. The incubations were at 37 °C.

The mutation per se did not effect translocation or secretion of E166A. In the absence of PenG after the pulse, cytosolic, ER, and mature forms could be immunoprecipitated from the lysate (Fig. 1B, lane 2) and some from the medium (lane 1), whereas after chase most of the mutant protein was in the medium (lane 3), and some persisted in mature form with the cells (lane 4). The mutation inactivated beta -lactamase completely (Fig. 2C, asterisks). In WT (Fig. 2A) or Delta erg6 (Fig. 2B) cells expressing native Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase, catalytic activity increased in the medium (EX) and some remained intracellular (IN) similarly in the absence (circles) and presence (squares) of PenG. Thus, PenG did not effect translocation, folding, or secretion of native Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase. We conclude that, when bound to PenG, the E166A fusion protein was unable to translocate into the ER lumen.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   beta -Lactamase activity. Strains H335 (A, Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase in WT background), H987 (B and D; Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase in Delta erg6 background), and H1045 (C; E166A variant in Delta erg6 background) were incubated at 37 °C in the absence (circles) or presence (squares) of PenG as indicated. Intracellular (IN, open symbols) and extracellular (EX, filled symbols) beta -lactamase activity was determined and plotted against incubation time. In C, no activity was detected in any of the samples, indicated collectively by asterisks. beta la, beta -lactamase.

ER Association of PenG-bound E166A-- Next we studied whether cytosolic PenG-bound E166A was attached to the ER membrane. PenG-bound E166A was accumulated for 30 min in H1045 cells (E166A/Delta erg6), the cells were lysed under mild detergent conditions, and the microsomal membranes were isolated. The cytosolic and membrane fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western analysis using beta -lactamase antiserum. Most of the 66-kDa form was detected in the microsomal fraction (Fig. 3A, lane 2) and some in the soluble fraction (lane 1). The sec63-1 and sec18-1 mutants expressing native Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase served as controls. At 37 °C in sec63-1 an early step of translocation is blocked, leading to cytosolic accumulation of pre-proteins and in the latter mutant membrane traffic is halted before arrival in the Golgi (22, 23). In both mutants most of the 66-kDa form was pelleted with the microsomes (lanes 4 and 6). In sec18-1 part of the Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase pool had been translocated and could be visualized as the glycosylated 110-kDa form (lane 6). The 62-kDa form probably was an artifactual degradation product rather than a biosynthetic intermediate, because the signal peptide-less form runs like a 64-kDa protein and no 62-kDa form was found after metabolic labeling (see below). Moreover, the 62-kDa form was found in lysates of the sec63-1 mutant, where no signal peptide cleavage should occur, and even in the cytosolic fraction (lane 1). H1045 cells (E166A/Delta erg6) were then incubated with PenG and subjected to immunofluorescent staining using beta -lactamase antiserum. Mostly the plasma membrane was stained (Fig. 3B, a). In yeast cells the ER is mostly located beneath the plasma membrane, as shown in Fig. 3B (b), where another sample of H1045 cells was stained with antiserum against Lhs1p, an ER-resident protein (24). As control we used the E166A mutant lacking a signal peptide, expressed in a Delta erg6 background (strain H1376) in the presence of PenG. This variant was not membrane-associated, as it stained the entire cytosol (Fig. 3A, c). Thus, PenG-bound E166A was mostly attached to the ER membrane in a signal peptide-dependent fashion.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Localization of PenG-bound E166A. A, the strains (H1045 in lanes 1 and 2, H482 in lanes 3 and 4, H393 in lanes 5 and 6) were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The cytosolic (c) and microsomal (m) fractions were separated and subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western analysis using beta -lactamase (beta la) antiserum. Molecular mass markers (M) are indicated on the left and fusion protein variants on the right (c, cytosolic fraction; m, microsomal fraction). B, strains H1045 (a and b) and H1376 (c; signal peptide-less E166A in Delta erg6 background) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in the presence of PenG, followed by immunofluorescent staining with beta -lactamase (a and c) or Lhs1p (b) antiserum.

PenG-bound E166A Is Associated with Translocons-- Next we showed that PenG-bound E166A molecules blocked translocation of other precursor proteins. First we used as markers BiP and CPY, mostly translocated during and after translation, respectively (1). Unlabeled PenG-bound E166A was allowed to accumulate for different times in H1045 cells (E166A/Delta erg6), whereafter the cell samples were 35S-labeled, lysed, and immunoprecipitated with BiP antiserum. Before PenG treatment, only mature BiP was detected (Fig. 4A, lane 1). With PenG preincubation, pre-BiP started to accumulate (lane 2), until after 60 min less than half of the newly synthesized molecules were mature, and thus translocated (lane 3). The sec18-1 mutant, where mature BiP accumulates (lane 4), and the kar2-159 mutant, where translocation of pre-BiP is partially blocked (lane 5) (2), served as controls. In the H1045 cells, the ER form of vacuolar carboxypeptidase Y (pro-CPY or p1) could be immunoprecipitated after a 5 min pulse (Fig. 4B, lane 1), and mature CPY (m) after a 30-min chase (lane 3). After preincubation with PenG of the same cells, mostly untranslocated pre-CPY, and some pro-CPY form were detected (lane 2). In control cells (H1) in the absence of PenG, a 2-min pulse revealed pre-CPY and pro-CPY (lane 4), which were converted to the golgi form p2 and mature CPY upon a 15-min chase (lane 5). In the sec63-1 mutant, CPY fails to be translocated, revealing pre-CPY (lane 6), and pro-CPY (p1) accumulates in the sec18-1 mutant (lane 7).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Arrest of translocation of BiP and CPY. A, the indicated strains (H1045 in lanes 1-3, H393 in lane 4, H495 in lane 5) were 35S-labeled for 5 min in the absence of PenG, or pre-incubated with PenG for the indicated times and 35S-labeled for 5 min in the presence of the drug. B, similarly, strains H1045 (lanes 1-3), H1 (lanes 4 and 5), H482 (lane 6), and H4 (lane 7) were 35S-labeled in the absence of PenG, or in the presence of the drug after a 30-min preincubation (lane 2). Labeling was for 5 min in lanes 1-3, 6, and 7, and for 2 min in lanes 4 and 5. After labeling, the cells were chased with CHX for 30 or 15 min in the case of lanes 3 and 5, respectively. p2, golgi form; p1, pro-CPY; m, mature CPY; pre-CPY, untranslocated CPY. A and B, all incubations were at 37 °C, and cells treated in the absence of PenG were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C before labeling. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antiserum against BiP (A) or CPY (B), and the precipitates resolved by SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography.

Next, H1045 cells (E166A/Delta erg6) were preincubated with PenG for different times, followed by labeling with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 1 h in continuous presence of the drug (Fig. 5A). The culture supernatants were trichloroacetic acid-precipitated and resolved in SDS-PAGE. In the absence of the drug, E166A together with several other proteins were detected (lane 1). The identity of E166A was confirmed by immunoprecipitation of a parallel sample beta -lactamase antiserum prior to SDS-PAGE analysis (lane 4). After 30 min with PenG, very little if any E166A was detected, whereas other proteins still appeared in the medium (lane 2). After 1 h of PenG preincubation, no 35S-labeled proteins could be detected in the medium (lane 3). This must have been due to inhibition of their translocation, as PenG did not decrease protein synthesis. Incorporation of [35S]methionine/cysteine into trichloroacetic acid-precipitable material was after 3 h as efficient as in the absence of the drug (Fig. 5B). Since pre-accumulated PenG-bound E166A inhibited translocation of an ER-resident protein (BiP), a vacuolar enzyme (CPY), and a number of secretory proteins, it must have been engaged with ER components required for both co-translational and post-translational translocation.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Inhibition of secretion of proteins by PenG. A, H1045 cells (E166A/Delta erg6) were preincubated with PenG as indicated and then labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 1 h at 24 °C. The culture supernatants were trichloroacetic acid-precipitated and subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis directly (lanes 1-3), or after immunoprecipitation with beta -lactamase antiserum (lane 4). B, H1045 cells were incubated at 24 °C in the absence or presence of PenG. Parallel duplicate samples were 35S-labeled for successive 1 h periods as indicated, and the cell-associated trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity was counted.

Cytosolic Exposure of Ligand-bound E166A-- We then asked how far the Hsp150Delta portion of PenG-bound E166A had advanced into the ER lumen, by examining signal peptide cleavage. The signal peptide appeared not to be cleaved, since PenG-bound E166A migrated in SDS-PAGE (Fig. 6, lane 1) like native pre-Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase blocked in the cytosol before pore penetration in the sec63-1 mutant (lane 3). The cytosolic signal peptide-less Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase variant served as a control; it migrated slightly faster (lane 2) than PenG-bound E166A. These data were confirmed by direct amino acid sequencing. An E166A fusion protein variant with a C-terminal histidine tag, E166A-His6, was expressed in a Delta erg6 mutant (H1248). The cells were incubated with PenG at 37 °C for 2 h and lysed by glass beads in the presence of Triton X-100. The lysate was subjected to affinity chromatography over a nickel column as described under "Experimental Procedures." Fractions that, according to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using His5 antibody, contained the E166A-His6 protein of 66 kDa were subjected to SDS-PAGE, blotting onto a polyvinylidene difluoride filter, and N-terminal amino acid sequencing. The sequence was that of the signal peptide of Hsp150 (18). We conclude that the ER-attached PenG-bound E166A fusion protein was not translocated far enough to reach the signal peptidase, though the Hsp150Delta fragment should have no structural constraints for pore penetration, and authentic Hsp150 is translocated extremely rapidly (12). This suggests that, in normal conditions, unfolding of the C-terminal beta -lactamase portion has to occur before pore penetration can be initiated.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Electrophoretic analysis of PenG-bound E166A. Strains H1045 (lane 1; E166A variant in Delta erg6 background), H977 (lane 2; signal peptide-less Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase in normal cells), and H482 (lane 3; Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase in sec63-1 background) were 35S-labeled at 37 °C for 30 min, in the presence or absence of PenG as indicated. beta la, beta -lactamase. The cell samples were immunoprecipitated with beta -lactamase antiserum followed by SDS-PAGE analysis in a 7.5-15% gradient gel. Molecular size markers are on the left, and the migration of biosynthetic intermediates of the reporter protein is indicated on the right (kDa).

Reversible Binding of Ligand to the beta -Lactamase Portion Allows Translocation-- Finally we examined the Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamaseE166D mutant (E166D), which also binds PenG, but reversibly (21). We anticipated that E166D molecules should be translocated immediately when PenG dissociates from the active site. As the crystal structure of PenG-bound molecules is almost identical to that of the native unmodified beta -lactamase molecules (25), E166D molecules binding PenG in the ER lumen after translocation should be competent for ER exit and secretion. The Delta erg6 mutation allows penetration of drugs also across the ER membrane. Pulse-chase experiments showed that E166D was translocated and secreted similarly in the presence (Fig. 7A) and absence (Fig. 7B) of PenG. As no more ER form could be detected after chase in the presence of PenG (Fig. 7A, lane 4) than in its absence (Fig. 7B, lane 4), E166D apparently exited the ER as rapidly in free and PenG-bound form. Since the E166D mutation inactivated the enzyme similarly as shown in Fig. 2C for the E166A mutation, and PenG had no effect on the fate of the E166D fusion protein, we needed to confirm that the drug bound to the reporter protein. To this end, parallel E166D/Delta erg6 cell samples (H1046) were incubated with [14C]PenG and [35S]methionine/cysteine for 30 min at 37 °C. Immunoprecipitation of the medium with beta -lactamase antiserum and SDS-PAGE analysis revealed a 14C-labeled protein comigrating with 35S-labeled E166D (data not shown).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Translocation of E166D mutant and native Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase in the presence of penicillin derivatives. A and B, strain H1046 (E166D variant in Delta erg6 background) was preincubated for 20 min in the presence (A) or absence (B) of PenG, pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 5 min (lanes 1 and 2), and chased in the presence of CHX for 20 min (lanes 3 and 4). The media (odd lane numbers; m) and lysed cell samples (even numbers; c) were immunoprecipitated with beta -lactamase antiserum, followed by SDS-PAGE analysis. Numbers on the right indicate migration of the cytosolic (66 kDa), ER (110 kDa), and mature (145 kDa) forms of Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase (beta la). C and D, the same experiment as in A and B for strain H987 (native Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase in Delta erg6 background), except that CLX was used instead of PenG and chase was for 30 min. E, strain H987 (Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase in Delta erg6 background) was incubated at 37 °C in the presence of CLX. Intracellular (IN, open squares) and extracellular (EX, filled squares) beta -lactamase activity was determined and plotted against incubation time. All incubations were at 37 °C.

The results on the E166D mutant were complemented using native, enzymatically active Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase and the penicillinase inhibitor CLX, which is bound to authentic beta -lactamase, hydrolyzed, and released (26). CLX inactivated Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase, confirming binding (Fig. 7E). The control experiment demonstrating secretion of active molecules in the absence of CLX is shown in Fig. 2B (circles). Pulse-chase experiments showed that CLX had no effect on translocation and secretion of Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase (Fig. 7, C and D). These data suggest that release of the ligand allowed unfolding, which in turn allowed translocation of native Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase as well as the E166D variant.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Here we show that prefolded beta -lactamase with a covalently bound ligand could not be translocated into the yeast ER. Our reporter protein was E. coli RTEM-1 beta -lactamase, which in authentic form is a tight globule (13). It was fused to the C terminus of a 321-amino acid fragment (Hsp150Delta ) of the yeast secretory glycoprotein Hsp150. Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamase is translocated post-translationally, but before that, the beta -lactamase portion folds in the cytosol to a native-like catalytically active conformation (12). Here we introduced to the beta -lactamase portion a point mutation (E166A), which causes covalent and irreversible binding of PenG to the active site residue Ser70 (21). In addition, Glu166, Lys73, Ser130, Asn132, Lys243, and Ala237 are involved in substrate binding, and the crystal structure of the PenG-bound mutant protein is nearly identical to that of the native unmodified protein (25). In the presence of PenG, the Hsp150Delta -beta -lactamaseE166A protein (designated E166A) was unable to translocate and remained cytosolic with a trypsin-resistant beta -lactamase portion. PenG and another penicillin derivative, cloxacillin, which bind reversibly to variant E166D and native beta -lactamase, respectively, did not prevent translocation of the respective fusion proteins. We suggest that irreversibly PenG-bound E166A molecules could not penetrate the translocon because the ligand prevented unfolding, whereas release of the reversibly bound ligands allowed unfolding and translocation.

PenG-stabilized E166A was attached in a signal peptide-dependent fashion to the ER membrane, where it inhibited translocation of BiP, CPY, and a number of secretory proteins. This shows that the PenG-bound molecules were on a productive translocation pathway, normally shared by co- and post-translationally translocated polypeptides. Whether the binding site was Sec63p or Sec61p (7), or perhaps an as yet unknown receptor upstream of these components, remains to be studied. Anyhow, PenG-bound E166A did not penetrate deep enough into the translocon pore to be processed by the signal peptidase. The failure of the 321-amino acid-long Hsp150Delta fragment to penetrate into the ER lumen is surprising, since most of it adopts no regular secondary structure as determined by NMR spectrometry and CD spectroscopy (14), and should thus have no structural constraints for translocation. Moreover, authentic Hsp150 translocates so rapidly that no cytosolic form can be detected even after a 1-min 35S pulse (12). The cytosolically exposed, signal peptide-containing, ER-attached PenG-bound E166A fusion protein must have represented a proper translocation intermediate, because the E166D variant binding PenG reversibly was readily translocated. It appears that unfolding of the C-terminal beta -lactamase portion had to occur before translocation of the Hsp150Delta portion could be initiated or advanced significantly. Pore opening is carefully controlled, and completion of the unfolding process may somehow trigger pore opening. The scenario is different from what has been suggested for mitochondrial import. Stably folded precursor proteins cannot traverse mitochondrial import sites (27, 28). However, the N-terminal F0-ATPase subunit of 86 amino acids was fully translocated, and only the fusion partner dihydrofolate reductase, when stabilized by methotrexate, remained stalled against the mitochondrial outer membrane (29).

As PenG-bound molecules were exposed to the cytosol, the machinery unfolding the remote beta -lactamase portion must be cytosolic. BiP has been shown not to actively pull precursor proteins, but to trap them passively by binding and preventing backwards sliding (30). This does not exclude the possibility that BiP exerted a pulling function on our reporter protein, but pulling as well as trapping could occur only after destabilization of the beta -lactamase portion by cytosolic factors, and sufficient advancement of the polypeptide into the ER lumen for BiP to be able to grab it. It has been suggested that pore penetration becomes BiP-dependent after the signal peptide has intercalated into transmembrane domains 2 and 7 of Sec61p (9). Unfolding of cytosolic prefolded proteins for mitochondrial import has been proposed to occur as matrix Hsp70 actively pulls the polypeptide through import sites. In this scenario mtHsp70 is viewed as a motor, which interacts with the inner membrane protein Tim44 to generate pulling force acting on the translocation substrate (29, 31). Other data suggest that mtHsp70, anchored to Tim44, acts like BiP as a ratchet minimizing retrograde movements, that unfolding occurs spontaneously, and that forward movement is driven by Brownian motion (32, 33). Import of polypeptides into mitochondria requires a high degree of unfolding. Only 50 amino acids were sufficient to span both outer and inner membrane, demonstrating that the passenger polypeptide is imported into the matrix in an extended state (34). According to equilibrium measurements with 8 M urea, pre-beta -lactamase folds in vitro via a molten globule state, which retains native-like secondary structure but lacks catalytic activity, and whose compactness is between those of native and completely unfolded forms (35). Whether the translocation-competent beta -lactamase portion retains secondary structure in yeast cells remains to be determined.

Pre-pro-alpha -factor was post-translationally translocated, in the absence of cytosolic components, into reconstituted proteoliposomes, which contained the heptameric translocon complex in the membrane and BiP in the lumen (30). However, pre-pro-alpha -factor was urea-denatured before dilution and the translocation assay. Moreover, it is not known whether it folds prior to translocation in vivo. Loosely folded molecules may not require unfolding, and evolution may have selected such proteins for post-translational translocation, and directed tightly folded proteins to the co-translational pathway, which allows folding only on the luminal side of the ER membrane. Nevertheless, our data unravel new activities in the yeast cytosol, unfolding of tightly folded protein for post-translational ER translocation, and a connection between unfolding of the translocation substrate and pore opening. Such events were not anticipated, as it was thought that polypeptides do not fold to native-like conformation prior to translocation. Our experiments were performed on living cells, confirming the physiological relevance of the findings.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Nisse Kalkkinen for N-terminal amino acid sequencing. Ms. Anna Liisa Nyfors provided excellent technical help. We thank Drs. R. Schekman, C. Jackson, E. Craig, and M. Rose for yeast strains and antisera.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Academy of Finland Grant 38017 and by grants from the Technology Development Center (Tekes) and the Juselius Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Biocentrum Helsinki fellow. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. of Biotechnology, P.O. Box 56, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. Tel.: 358-9-19159419; Fax: 358-9-19159570; E-mail: marja.makarow@helsinki.fi.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102056200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CPY, carboxypeptidase Y; CAPS, 3-(cyclohexylamino)propanesulfonic acid; PenG, penicillin G; CLX, cloxacillin; CHX, cycloheximide; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Ng, D. T. W., Brown, J. D., and Walter, P. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 134, 269-278
2. Vogel, J. P., Misra, M. D., and Rose, M. D. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 1885-1895
3. Deshaies, R. J., and Schekman, R. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 6024-6035
4. Brodsky, J. L., and Schekman, R. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 123, 1355-1363
5. Feldheim, D., and Schekman, R. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 935-943
6. Panzner, S., Dreier, L., Hartmann, E., Kostka, S., and Rapoport, T. A. (1995) Cell 81, 561-570
7. Pilon, M., Schekman, R., and Römisch, K. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 4540-4548
8. Lyman, S. K., and Schekman, R. (1997) Cell 88, 85-96
9. Plath, K., Mothes, W., Wilkinson, B. M., Stirling, C., and Rapoport, T. A. (1998) Cell 94, 795-807
10. Deshaies, R. J., Koch, B. D., Werner-Washburne, M., Craig, E. A., and Schekman, R. (1988) Nature 332, 800-805
11. Chirico, W. J., Waters, M. G., and Blobel, G. (1988) Nature 332, 805-810
12. Paunola, E., Suntio, T., Jämsä, E., and Makarow, M. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 817-827
13. Jelsch, C., Lenfant, F., Masson, J. M., and Samama, J. P. (1992) FEBS Lett. 299, 135-142
14. Jämsä, E., Holkeri, H., Vihinen, H., Wikström, M., Simonen, M., Walse, B., Kalkkinen, N., Paakkola, J., and Makarow, M. (1995) Yeast 11, 1381-1391
15. Hamman, B. D., Cheng, J.-C., Johnson, E. E., and Johnson, A. E. (1997) Cell 89, 535-544
16. Simonen, M., Jämsä, E., and Makarow, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13889-13892
17. Jackson, C., and Képès, F. (1994) Genetics 137, 423-437
18. Russo, P., Kalkkinen, N., Sareneva, H., Paakkola, J., and Makarow, M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3671-3675
19. Suntio, T., Shmelev, A., Lund, M., and Makarow, M. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 3889-3898
20. Hänninen, A.-L., Simola, M., Saris, N., and Makarow, M. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 3623-3632
21. Adachi, H., Ohto, T., and Matsuzawa, H. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 3186-3191
22. Lyman, S. K., and Schekman, R. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 131, 1163-1171
23. Pilon, M., Römisch, K., Quach, D., and Schekman, R. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3455-3473
24. Craven, R., Egerton, M., and Striling, C. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 2640-1650
25. Strynadka, N. C. J., Adachi, H., Jensen, S. E., Johns, K., Sielicki, A., Betzel, C., Sutoh, K., and James, M. N. G. (1992) Nature 359, 700-705
26. Citri, N., and Zyk, N. (1982) Biochem. J. 201, 425-427
27. Eilers, M., and Schatz, G. (1986) Nature 322, 800-805
28. Wienhues, U., Becker, K., Schleyer, M., Guiard, B., Tropschug, M., Horwich, A. L., Pfanner, N., and Neupert, W. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 115, 1601-1609
29. Voisine, C., Craig, E. A., Zufall, N., von Ahsen, O., Pfanner, N., and Voos, W. (1999) Cell 97, 565-574
30. Matlack, K. E. S., Misselwitz, B., Plath, K., and Rapoport, T. A. (1999) Cell 97, 553-564
31. Merlin, A., Voos, W., Maatse, A. C., Meijer, M., Pfanner, N., and Rassow, J. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 145, 961-972
32. Gaume, B., Klaus, C., Ungermann, C., Guiard, B., Neupert, W., and Brunner, M. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 6497-6507
33. Neupert, W., Brunner, M., Hofman, S., and Bauer, M. F. (2000) Trends Cell Biol. 10, 25-31
34. Rassow, J., Hartl, F.-U., Guiard, B., Pfanner, N., and Neupert, W. (1990) FEBS Lett. 275, 190-194
35. Zahn, R., Axmann, S. E., Ruecknagel, K.-P., Jaeger, E., Lamineth, A. A., and Plueckthun, A. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 242, 150-164
36. Holkeri, H., Paunola, E., Jämsä, E., and Makarow, M. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 749-757


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
L. Karhinen and M. Makarow
Activity of recycling Golgi mannosyltransferases in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum
J. Cell Sci., January 15, 2004; 117(2): 351 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Yabal, S. Brambillasca, P. Soffientini, E. Pedrazzini, N. Borgese, and M. Makarow
Translocation of the C Terminus of a Tail-anchored Protein across the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane in Yeast Mutants Defective in Signal Peptide-driven Translocation
J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3489 - 3496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/37/34553    most recent
M102056200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paunola, E.
Right arrow Articles by Makarow, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paunola, E.
Right arrow Articles by Makarow, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement