![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 37, 34784-34791, September 14, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Received for publication, December 22, 2000, and in revised form, May 3, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The conserved lysine in the Walker A
motif of the ATP-binding domain encoded by the yeast RFC1,
RFC2, RFC3, and RFC4 genes was
mutated to glutamic acid. Complexes of replication factor C with
a N-terminal truncation ( Replication factor C
(RFC)12
uses the energy of ATP hydrolysis to load PCNA onto a primer-template
junction. Sequence comparison studies indicate that each of the five
Rfc subunits has an ATP-binding domain (reviewed in Ref. 1). The
ATP-binding motif present in each of these five subunits represents a
structural domain that may also function in ATP binding and/or
hydrolysis. The prototypic structure for this domain is the
Escherichia coli The studies in the previous paper (4) indicate that RFC can bind up to
four molecules of ATP depending on the presence of PCNA and
primer-template DNA. In agreement with these experimental results are
sequence comparison studies indicating that the Rfc1-Rfc4 subunits
contain consensus ATP-binding motifs (see Fig. 1). The Walker A
consensus sequence is GXXXXGKT, in which the lysine is invariant (5). This lysine coordinates oxygens on the The observation that four molecules of ATP bind to a loading-competent
complex of RFC with PCNA and DNA does not necessarily imply that
binding and/or hydrolysis of all four ATPs is required for clamp
loading. Because the four-subunit Rfc2-5 core complex can form
alternative complexes, e.g. with Rad24p, it may well be the
case that ATP binding to some subunit(s) is related to these
alternative functions rather than loading of PCNA (8). A mutational
analysis of the ATP-binding domains of these subunits may address this
issue. Recently, mutational studies of the ATP-binding sites of the
subunits of human RFC have been carried out. In one study, mutation to
alanine of the conserved lysine in the Walker A motif in each of the
human Rfc subunits, except for human Rfc5, greatly diminished or almost
completely abolished clamp loading (9). In another study, the same
lysine was mutagenized to glutamic acid in all subunits, again showing
severe defects both in complex stability and activity in all mutants,
except for that in Rfc5 (10).
In this paper we present mutational studies of yeast RFC, in which we
have mutated the conserved lysine in the Walker A motif of the
RFC1, RFC2, RFC3, and RFC4
genes to glutamic acid and also, for the RFC2 and
RFC3 genes, to arginine. Whereas the Lys Strains and Plasmids--
For protein overproduction E. coli strains BL21(DE3)pLysS and BL21-CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL
(Stratagene) were used. PY90-R (MAT
A series of plasmids was created for overproduction of Rfc subunits in
E. coli expression vector pPY55. The genes were under the
control of the T7 RNA polymerase promoter and the T7 phage gene 10 ribosome binding site and leader sequence. pBL482
(T7prom-rfc1-
pBL481 is an E. coli expression plasmid that contains
rfc1-
pBL424 (RFC1, RFC3, RFC4, and RFC5), pBL425 (RFC1, RFC2, RFC4, and
RFC5), pBL412 (RFC2), and pBL413 (RFC3) are multicopy
Saccharomyces cerevisiae expression plasmids that contain
the indicated RFC genes, each under control of the galactose-inducible
GAL1-10 promoter (14). pBL412-R and pBL413-R have the wild
type genes swapped for rfc2-K71R and rfc3K59R, respectively.
Purification of Individual RFC Subunits--
BL21(DE3)-pLysS
cells containing pBL456, pBL456-E, pBL555, pBL555-E, pBL565, or
pBL565-E were grown in 1 liter of Terrific Broth (1.2% tryptone, 2.4%
yeast extract, 0.4% glycerol, 17 mM KH2PO4, 72 mM
K2HPO4) at 37 °C. At an
A595 of 0.7-1.0, the cells were induced
for 3 h with 0.4 mM isopropyl- Overproduction and Purification of Mutant RFC Complexes from E. coli--
Three liters of cells were grown in Terrific Broth at
25-26 °C. The CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL cells contained either pBL481 or
pBL481-1E, pBL481-2E, pBL481-3E, or pBL481-4E. When cells reached an
A595 of 1.8-2.5, they were induced with 0.4 mM isopropyl- Overproduction and Purification of Mutant RFC Complexes from
Yeast--
To obtain mutant complexes from yeast, strain PY90-R
(containing chromosomal rfc2-K71R) was transformed with
plasmids pBL424 and pBL412-R, and strain PY92-R (containing chromosomal
rfc3-K59R) was transformed with plasmids pBL425 and
pBL413-R. The strains will be described elsewhere (31). Yeast growth,
induction by galactose, and purification of mutant RFC-2R and RFC-3R
complexes, respectively, were exactly as described for wild type
(14).
ATPase Activity Assays--
ATPase activity assays were carried
out as described (4). Initial rates of hydrolysis of
[ Pol
The standard 50-µl poly(dA)-oligo(dT) assay contained 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 8 mM MgAc2,
0.2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 75 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.1% ampholytes 3.5-9.5, 30 µM
[3H]dTTP, 250 ng of poly(dA)-(dT)22 (40:1
nucleotide ratio), 1.6 µg of E. coli single-stranded
binding protein, 2 pmol of PCNA, 100 fmol Pol Bi-molecular Interaction Analysis--
Surface plasmon resonance
(SPR) was performed on a BIAcore X apparatus. The running buffer used
in the analysis was 30 mM Hepes-NaOH, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 125 mM sodium chloride, 0.1% ampholytes 3.5-9.8,
and 0.01% Nonidet P-40, 0.2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. The DNA chips and PCNA chips were as described (15). The interaction of (mutant) RFC
with PCNA and with DNA was monitored by injecting 90 µl of the
indicated concentrations of (mutant) RFC over a PCNA chip or a DNA chip
at a flow rate of 30 µl/min. Linear initial rates of binding were
determined from the response curves between 4 and 15 s to avoid
variations because of injection spikes at t = 0 s.
Overproduction of Mutant RFC Complexes--
To determine which
subunits of RFC were required for the ATPase and clamp loading
activities of this complex, we mutated the conserved lysine in the
Walker A motif of the RFC1, RFC2,
RFC3, and RFC4 genes to glutamic acid (Fig.
1). To examine the biochemical properties
of RFC containing these mutations, five-subunit complexes were
overproduced in E. coli using a plasmid system described previously (11). In this overproduction system we also used a
truncation derivative of the Rfc1 subunit that deletes the ligase homology domain (Rfc1- Purification of Mutant RFC Complexes by
PCNA-agarose--
Purification involved the use of a PCNA affinity
column. Because salt-stable ATP-dependent binding to
PCNA-beads requires the five-subunit enzyme (14, 15), binding of a
mutant RFC in the presence of Mg2+-ATP and subsequent
elution by EDTA indicates that the mutant RFC assembled properly into a
complex without major structural problems. Of course this rationale
would not apply to a mutant complex that failed to bind PCNA because of
failure to bind ATP to a subunit critical for this interaction. After
an initial S-Sepharose batch purification step of the E. coli lysate, the mutant complexes were subjected to PCNA-agarose
chromatography (see "Experimental Procedures"). The RFC-2E and
RFC-3E mutant complexes bound as efficiently as wild type RFC to the
PCNA-agarose beads in the presence of 1 mM ATP, 8 mM MgAc2, and 300 mM NaCl. A
considerable fraction (30-70% in several preparations) of the RFC-4E
complex and an even larger fraction (50-80% in two preparations; see
below) of the RFC-1E complex failed to bind to the affinity matrix,
indicative that not all five-subunit complexes are fully active.
However, when the RFC-1E complex that had bound to PCNA-agarose was
subjected to a second PCNA-agarose step, all RFC-1E complex bound.
These data indicate that some fraction of the five-subunit complexes obtained from E. coli was inactive. Therefore, the
PCNA-agarose step is a crucial purification step in our methodology,
because it not only removes the excess of Rfc2-5 complex present in
the lysates but also (mutant) five-subunit RFC complexes that were inactive because of misfolding or misassociation.
Purification of the RFC-1E complex posed a major difficulty because of
rampant proteolysis of the Rfc1-E subunit. Four of the six independent
RFC-1E overproduction and purification preparations we carried out
resulted in complete proteolysis of the Rfc1-E subunit after the first
column step. A 62-kDa species was a major intermediate of proteolytic
breakdown, suggesting that the Lys
Following purification, the complexes were examined by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Fig.
2A shows the purified mutant
RFCs, whereas a larger view of the small subunit region of the gel is
shown in Fig. 2B. Except for RFC-1E (see above), all five
subunits in the purified complexes were present in approximately equimolar amounts. The glutamic acid-containing subunits migrated slightly faster through the gel than the corresponding wild type subunits. This is seen most dramatically in the case of the Rfc2-E subunit, which co-migrated with Rfc3p, giving the appearance of the
presence of only four subunits in the RFC-2E complex. The anomalous
migration of Rfc2-Ep was confirmed by separate purification of the Rfc2
and Rfc2-E subunits and analysis by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (Fig. 2C).
RFC Mutants Are Proficient for Binding PCNA--
The observation
that all mutant RFCs could be purified over a PCNA-agarose column in
the presence of Mg-ATP indicates that the ability to form a stable
RFC-PCNA complex remains intact in the mutants (see above). To assess
the quantitative requirement for ATP in the formation of a stable
RFC-PCNA complex, we used SPR. Binding of RFC to a PCNA chip is greatly
enhanced in the presence of ATP (4). The linear initial rate of binding
to the chip is dependent on the concentration of active complexes, i.e. those RFC molecules that have the required number of
ATP molecules bound to form a high affinity complex with PCNA on the chip. Therefore, by varying the ATP concentration at a constant concentration of RFC, the KD for binding of ATP can
be determined from the initial binding rates (4). The half-maximal response for wild type RFC was obtained at 0.5 µM
ATP. Surprisingly, RFC-2E, RFC-3E, and RFC-4E all yielded very similar
KD values of 0.5-2.2 µM ATP (Fig.
3). The lower rate of binding for RFC-3E
at saturating ATP probably reflects the presence of inactive complex in
the preparation because the extent of RFC-3E binding at equilibrium was
also 20-30% lower than that of wild type (data not shown).
RFC-2E and RFC-3E Are Defective for DNA Binding--
SPR was also
used to assess binding of the RFC mutants to DNA. As in all of these
mutant RFCs the ligase homology domain of Rfc1 is deleted by an
N-terminal truncation, binding of RFC to DNA is absolutely dependent on
the presence of a primer-template junction and ATP
Injection of RFC together with PCNA and ATP
The signals obtained with RFC-2E and RFC-3E were too low to permit more
detailed studies. For the RFC-4E mutant we determined the
KD value for ATP ATPase Activity of the Rfc3 Subunit--
Rfc3 is the only subunit
of RFC that has been shown to possess an intrinsic ATPase activity
(12). This ATPase is stimulated about 10-fold by DNA, but
primer-template junctions are not required for this stimulation. With a
turnover number of ~0.02 s ATPase Activity of RFC Mutants--
Comparative ATPase
studies were performed at 50 µM ATP, a
concentration close to saturation for wild type RFC (Fig.
5A) (4). As described before,
the basal ATPase activity of wild type RFC is stimulated 2-3-fold by
PCNA. Mutant RFC-2E and RFC-3E showed a very low basal ATPase, which
was not stimulated by PCNA, even though both mutants bound PCNA
efficiently (Fig. 3). In contrast, in the absence of DNA, the ATPase
activity of RFC-4E with or without PCNA was indistinguishable from that
of wild type (Table I).
Upon addition of primer-template DNA, the ATPase of RFC was stimulated
7-8-fold, and addition of PCNA gave a further 3-fold stimulation. A
2-3-fold stimulation by DNA of the RFC-2E ATPase was observed, but
further addition of PCNA showed an inhibition rather than a stimulation
of the ATPase, reflecting the DNA binding properties of this mutant
complex (Fig. 4, A and B). The ATPase activity of
the RFC-3E complex was marginally stimulated by DNA. However, unlike
observed with RFC-2E, the addition of PCNA resulted in a weak but
significant stimulation of the ATPase activity, suggesting that RFC-3E
may possess a weak clamp loading activity (Fig. 5A).
Considering the observed ATP defect in DNA binding for RFC-4E (Fig.
4C), we carried out a full kinetic analysis of this mutant complex (Fig. 5, B and C). The
kcat value of the DNA-stimulated RFC-4E ATPase
was one third of that of wild type. However, the Km
value of the DNA-stimulated ATPase was only 4 µM, which
is much lower than the KD value of 140 µM for ATP ATP Defects in Clamp Loading--
Two series of replication assays
were carried out to indirectly determine the efficiency of clamp
loading by the mutant RFCs. Replication of poly(dA)-oligo(dT) by Pol
At 1 mM ATP, RFC-1E and RFC-4E efficiently loaded PCNA onto
poly(dA)-oligo(dT), resulting in efficient replication by Pol
Replication of primed circular viral DNA templates, e.g.
M13-mp18 DNA, follows a single loading event by RFC. To assess ATP concentration-dependent defects, the assay was carried out
at either 10 µM or 1 mM ATP. Full activity
was observed for RFC-1E at both ATP concentrations, whereas RFC-4E
showed reduced activity at 10 µM ATP (Fig.
7A) but was fully active at 1 mM ATP (Fig. 7B). Again, the activity of RFC-3E
was negligible at low ATP, but inefficient clamp loading could be
detected at the high ATP concentration. Finally, RFC-2E was completely
defective.
Finally, we have coupled PCNA loading to another read-out system.
Activity of the FEN1 FLAP endonuclease at 100 mM NaCl is strictly dependent on PCNA encircling the DNA and therefore also on
loading of the clamp by RFC (22). In this assay the results with the
mutant RFCs were completely analogous to those obtained with the
replication-coupled loading assays (data not shown).
Clamp Loading Defects with Lysine The ATP-binding Domains of Rfc2, Rfc3, and Rfc4 Are Required for
PCNA Loading--
Our previous analysis of RFC showed that four
molecules of ATP can bind to RFC under clamp loading conditions,
i.e. with PCNA and primer-template DNA present. However, it
did not address whether ATP binding to all four sites and their
subsequent hydrolysis is actually required for loading of PCNA (4). The
results of this study suggest that the ATP-binding sites of the Rfc2,
Rfc3, and Rfc4 subunits, but not of the Rfc1 subunit, are required for clamp loading. However, these results need to be reconciled with very
different results from mutational studies with human RFC (Table
II).
The conserved lysine residue in the Walker A motif of ATP-binding
proteins has been a favorite target for mutational studies. Mutation of
this lysine to other residues, including glutamic acid, results in only
slight alterations in the P loop structure as determined by x-ray
crystallography and other methods (23-25). Therefore, defects
associated with mutations in this residue have in general been ascribed
to defects in ATP binding and/or hydrolysis rather than defects in
protein folding or stability. The Rfc proteins are members of the AAA+
superfamily of ATP-binding proteins, which include many
DNA-dependent ATPases such as the E. coli DnaA
and RuvB proteins, the
Against this experimental background, the inactivity of the RFC-2E and
RFC-3E complexes is easily understood; their ATP-binding domains are
essential for one or more steps in clamp loading. Although the
phenotype of RFC-4E is more unusual, the observation that full activity
of this mutant complex could only be obtained at very high ATP
concentrations still indicates that ATP binding to the Rfc4 subunit is
essential for clamp loading.
Mutations in Yeast and Human Rfc1 Have Opposite Phenotypes--
In
contrast, our results with the mutant RFC-1E complex were very
surprising because they appear to directly contradict analogous studies
with human RFC (Table II) (9, 10). The only defect we detected in the
mutant RFC complex containing Rfc1-K359E was its extreme sensitivity to
proteolysis during isolation from E. coli extracts. However,
we were able to obtain sufficient quantities to ascertain that the
mutation did not affect clamp loading in coupled assays measuring DNA
replication by Pol
With any mutational analysis there is the real possibility that loss of
activity is obtained not because ATP binding to the mutant protein is
disrupted but rather because an essential domain of the mutant protein
is misfolded or because of improper interactions of the mutant protein
with other subunits in the complex. We think that it is unlikely that
gross misfolding or misassociation occurred in any of the mutant yeast
complexes because all complexes efficiently interacted with PCNA in the
presence of ATP or ATP
The diametrically different results obtained with the yeast and human
mutant Rfc1 complexes may reflect distinct mechanistic differences
between human and yeast RFC, i.e. that ATP binding to human
Rfc1, but not to yeast Rfc1, is essential for clamp loading. Another
explanation is based on the assumption that yeast and human RFC are
mechanistically similar but that serious problems occurred with the
folding, stability, and/or subunit-subunit interactions in the human
RFC complex containing mutant Rfc1. PCNA affinity chromatography was
not included as a purification step of the human RFC preparations, and
therefore it may well be possible that the preparations contained large
amounts of misfolded or misassociated inactive complexes (9, 10).
Indeed, in their study, Podust et al. (10) commented on the
very low yield of RFC containing a Rfc1-K657E mutation from a
baculovirus expression system.
Binding of ATP to Rfc4 Is Required for Clamp Loading--
Without
PCNA present, the kinetic parameters of the RFC-4E ATPase were
independent of DNA, reflecting the inability of the mutant complex to
bind DNA at low ATP concentrations (Fig. 4C and Table I). However, in
the presence of PCNA, the stimulation of the RFC-4E ATPase by DNA is
indicative of clamp loading, even though the kinetic parameters were
negatively affected in comparison with wild type. The data were fitted
to a Michaelis-Menten binding curve with a single Km
value of 40 µM ATP (Table I), but an equally good fit was
obtained with two different Km values,
i.e. Km1 = 2 µM, reflecting the PCNA-dependent ATPase at
low ATP values where no DNA binding occurred, and
Km2 = 70 µM, reflecting
the PCNA and DNA-dependent ATPase. The latter value is
similar to that obtained in the loading assays with ATP Subunit Redundancy in Binding of RFC to PCNA but Not to
DNA--
One of the most surprising results of this study was that
none of the mutations severely affected PCNA binding (Fig. 3). Of the
three mutant complexes examined by SPR, none showed a substantial KD effect for binding PCNA. Although similar studies were not carried out with RFC-1E, the ability of RFC-1E to bind PCNA-agarose at high salt concentrations in the presence of ATP as well
as the wild type clamp loading properties of this mutant suggest that
it should also bind PCNA similarly to wild type (Fig. 6) (14). These
data suggest that at least two Rfc subunits with two ATPs bound are
involved in binding PCNA and opening it in preparation for loading
around the DNA. ATP occupancy of either one of these two subunits would
suffice for the formation of a strong salt-resistant RFC-PCNA complex.
In contrast, stable DNA binding by RFC requires ATP occupancy to Rfc2,
Rfc3, and to Rfc4. Curiously, residual DNA binding was observed by
RFC-2E and RFC-3E, but this binding was suppressed in the presence of
PCNA. Previously, we have established an ordered mechanism for clamp
loading in which binding of PCNA to RFC precedes binding of DNA (4).
When the binding pathway proceeds via PCNA to DNA, the mutations in
Rfc2E and Rfc3E cause a virtually complete block, and the mutation in
Rfc4E causes an ATP concentration-dependent block in DNA
binding. Possibly, this block is at a step related to PCNA opening,
prohibiting the PCNA-RFC complex to go through the conformational
change necessary for DNA binding.
In conclusion, this mutational study has shown that ATP binding to
Rfc2, Rfc3, and Rfc4 is essential for clamp loading. Unexpectedly, we
found that the ATP-binding domains of the Rfc subunits tolerate mutations remarkably well. As a result our analysis shows a gradient of
phenotypes, indicating that mutations in each subunit differentially affect the ability to bind and hydrolyze ATP by the mutant subunit. Most severely affected is the complex with the Lys
2-273) of the Rfc1 subunit (RFC) containing a single mutant subunit were overproduced in
Escherichia coli for biochemical analysis. All of the
mutant RFC complexes were capable of interacting with PCNA. Complexes
containing a rfc1-K359E mutation were similar to wild type
in replication activity and ATPase activity; however, the mutant
complex showed increased susceptibility to proteolysis. In contrast,
complexes containing either a rfc2-K71E mutation or a
rfc3-K59E mutation were severely impaired in ATPase and
clamp loading activity. In addition to their defects in ATP hydrolysis,
these complexes were defective for DNA binding. A mutant complex
containing the rfc4-K55E mutation performed as well as a
wild type complex in clamp loading, but only at very high ATP
concentrations. Mutant RFC complexes containing rfc2-K71R
or rfc3-K59R, carrying a conservative lysine
arginine mutation, had much milder clamp loading defects that could be partially
(rfc2-K71R) or completely (rfc3-K59R)
suppressed at high ATP concentrations.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
subunit of the
-complex (2, 3). The
structure of
is C-shaped with the Walker A and B motifs situated at
the base near the hinge of the C. Although it has imperfect ATP-binding
motifs and does not bind ATP, the
protein has high sequence
similarity to the
subunit, the active ATPase of the
-complex,
and therefore the structures of these two proteins are expected to be
similar. Sequence comparisons between the five RFC subunits and
suggest that they may have a similar structure, at least in the base
and hinge of the C. From this structure one can easily visualize how
ATP binding could cause a conformational change in the entire protein.
The top and base of the C clamp are only connected by a small hinge region, giving the overall structure some flexibility. ATP binding could result in an opening or closing of the C, which could be transmitted to the other subunits within the complex, resulting in an
overall conformational change in RFC or the
-complex (2).
and
phosphates of ATP (6, 7). The B motif (


DE), in which
is
M, L, I, or V, is essential for chelation of the divalent metal ion
(7). The Rfc1-Rfc4 subunits contain both consensus motifs, whereas the
Rfc5 subunit lacks critical residues in both the A and B motifs (see
Fig. 1). As with the
' subunit of the E. coli
-complex, the ATP-binding domain in Rfc5p likely is of structural
importance rather than to bind ATP (2).
Glu mutations
in Rfc2p and Rfc3p have strong adverse effects on DNA binding, ATPase
activity, and clamp loading activity defects in RFC containing a
mutant (Lys
Glu) Rfc4 subunit were only apparent at a low ATP
concentration. Surprisingly, no significant catalytic defect could be
ascribed to the Rfc1 (Lys
Glu) mutation, but the stability of the
mutant RFC complex was compromised.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
rfc2
::kanMX6 ade2-1 his3-11,
15 ura3-1 trp1-1 leu2-3, 112 can 1-100 + pBL621
(rfc2-K71R)) and PY92-R (MAT
rfc3
::kanMX6 ade2-1 his3-11,
15 ura3-1 trp1-1 leu2-3, 112 can 1-100 + pBL623
(rfc3-K59R)) were used for overexpression in yeast.
(3) pACYCori KanR) is an
E. coli expression plasmid containing an N-terminal
truncated version of RFC1 (11). pBL482-E
(T7prom-rfc1-K359E,
(3-272)) was
created by cloning a 524-base pair NcoI/PvuII
fragment from pBL642-E (31) into the
NcoI/PvuII sites of pBL482. pBL565 has been
described (11). pBL565-E (T7prom-rfc2-K71E AmpR)
was created by replacing the PflMI/NheI fragment
of pBL565 (T7prom-RFC2 AmpR) with the same
fragment from pBL622 (31). pBL456 (T7prom-RFC3 AmpR) has been described previously (12). pBL456-E
(T7prom-rfc3-K59E AmpR) was created by replacing
the 793-base pair NcoI/EcoNI fragment of pBL456
with the same fragment from pBL624 (31). pBL555 (T7prom-RFC4 AmpR) has been described previously (13). pBL555-E
(T7prom-rfc4-K55E AmpR) was made by swapping in
a 361-base pair NcoI fragment from pBL626 (31).
(3-272), RFC2,
RFC3, RFC4, and RFC5, each under
control of the T7 promoter and leader sequence (11). A series of mutant
pBL481 plasmids, each containing a single mutant and four wild type
RFC genes, was created by appropriate exchange of
restriction fragments. These plasmids are named pBL481-1E
(T7prom-rfc1-K359E,
(3-272) T7prom-RFC2 T7prom-RFC3 T7prom-RFC4
T7prom-RFC5 AmpR), and pBL481-2E, pBL481-3E, and
pBL481-4E, defined analogously.
-thiogalactoside. The
cells were harvested and resuspended in an equal volume of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, 10% sucrose and frozen. An equal
volume of 2× lysis buffer (1× lysis buffer = 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, 2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM EGTA, 2 µM leupeptin, 0.2 µM pepstatin A, 5 mM NaHSO3, 3 mM DTT, 0.6 mg/ml
lysozyme) was added upon thawing. Nonidet P-40 and phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride were added to 0.05% and 1 mM final
concentrations, respectively. After 10 min of incubation on ice, the
lysate was briefly sonicated to reduce the viscosity. The lysate was
spun for 20 min at 16,000 rpm in an SS-34 rotor. The insoluble pellet
was washed twice with buffer B (buffer A, but with Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 2 M NaCl) and resuspended in buffer C (buffer B, but
with 400 mM NaCl and 6 M urea). The samples
were gently agitated at 4 °C for an hour and then spun at 16,000 rpm in an SS-34 rotor. The supernatant was retained and protein-renatured. The samples were diluted to 0.1-0.2 mg/ml in buffer D containing 5 M urea (buffer D contains 25 mM potassium
phosphate, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 2 µM pepstatin A, 2 µM leupeptin, 5 mM NaHSO3, 3 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 0.05% Brij 35) and then dialyzed twice for 3 h each time against 3 volumes of buffer D lacking urea. This usually
resulted in 50-95% of the protein remaining soluble. After a clearing
step in the centrifuge, the soluble Rfc subunits were concentrated by
batch adsorption to Affi-Gel-Blue and step elution with 1 M
NaCl in buffer D (lacking urea). The samples were dialyzed against
buffer D containing 100 mM NaCl and filtered to remove
aggregates using Whatman Anotop 10 inorganic membrane filters with a
0.1-µm pore size.
-thiogalactoside and grown with shaking for
another 6-8 h at 25-26 °C. The cells were harvested, resuspended
in about 40 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, 10% sucrose and
frozen in liquid nitrogen. Lysis and sonication were as described
above. After centrifugation at 16,000 rpm for 30 min, 5 M
NaCl and 10% Polymin P were added to the supernatant to 250 mM and 0.04%, respectively, to precipitate the nucleic acids. After 15 min on ice, with periodic agitation, the mixture was
spun for 20 min at 16,000 rpm. Ammonium sulfate was added to the
supernatant to 0.28 gm/ml, which was stirred at 4 °C for 1 h
followed by a spin at 16,000 rpm for 30 min. The pellet was resuspended
in buffer A (25 mM KPO4, pH 7.2, 10%
glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 2 µM pepstatin A,
2 µM leupeptin, 3 mM DTT, 5 mM NaHSO3, 0.01% Nonidet P-40, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) until the conductivity
was equal to that of buffer A150 (buffer A with 150 mM NaCl; Salt concentrations of the buffers (in
mM NaCl) are indicated with a subscript). This is fraction
I (usually about 90 ml). Fraction I was then loaded onto a 25-ml
S-Sepharose column. After a 50-ml wash with buffer A150,
the RFC was eluted with buffer A850. The RFC-containing
fractions were combined (fraction II, about 30 ml) and dialyzed against
buffer MA (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 0.5 mM EDTA,
10% glycerol, 8 mM magnesium acetate, 0.5 mM ATP, 5 µM pepstatin A, 5 µM leupeptin, 3 mM DTT, and 5 mM NaHSO3) until the
conductivity had reached that of buffer B200. ATP was added
to the dialyzed fraction to a final concentration of 1 mM. The sample was gently agitated for 1 h with 3-4 ml of
PCNA-agarose beads equilibrated in B-200. The beads were packed into a
column and washed with 6 ml of buffer MA200 followed by 5 ml of buffer MA300. The protein was eluted with buffer E
(30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 2 mM EDTA, 10%
glycerol, 5 µM pepstatin A, 5 µM leupeptin, 3 mM DTT, 5 mM NaHSO3, 0.05%
ampholytes 3.5-9) plus 300 mM NaCl. The RFC containing
fractions were pooled (fraction III, 10-12 ml) and dialyzed against
buffer H (30 mM Hepes, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 2 µM pepstatin A, 2 µM
leupeptin, 3 mM DTT, 5 mM
NaHSO3, 0.01% Nonidet P-40, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) plus 150 mM NaCl. The
samples were then run on a 1-ml MonoS column with a linear gradient of
100-600 mM NaCl in buffer H.
-32P]ATP were determined from time courses at
increasing ATP concentrations. Km and
Vmax values were obtained by fitting the data to
a one-site Michaelis-Menten model.
Holoenzyme DNA Replication Assays--
The standard
30-µl mp18 DNA replication assay contained 40 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 8 mM MgAc2, 0.2 mg/ml bovine
serum albumin, 75 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.1%
ampholytes 3.5-9.5, 100 µM each dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP,
12.5 µM [
-32P]dATP, 1 mM
ATP, 40 fmol (100 ng) of singly primed single-stranded mp18 DNA, 850 ng
of E. coli single-stranded binding protein, 50 fmol (25 ng)
of Pol
, 1 pmol (90 ng) of PCNA as trimers, and the indicated
amounts of RFC. The aliquots were quenched in half the volume of 50 mM EDTA, 1% SDS, 50% glycerol, 0.05% bromphenol blue,
and the products were separated on 0.8% alkaline agarose gels and
subjected to autoradiography.
, and ATP and RFC as
indicated. After incubation at 30 °C for 8 min, acid-precipitable
radioactivity was determined. The chain length of poly(dA) was
~300.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(3-272)). The
truncation-containing complex eliminates ATP-independent DNA binding
attributed to the ligase homology domain. The truncation derivative has
the same clamp loading activity as the full-length complex and, because
of the elimination of a competing DNA binding domain, may show
increased activity in some assay systems (11, 16, 17). Each mutant five-subunit complex contained four wild type subunits and one mutant
subunit. The mutant RFCs were designated RFC-1E (i.e. RFC containing Rfc1-
(3-272), K359E, Rfc2, Rfc3, Rfc4, and
Rfc5), RFC-2E (RFC with Rfc2-K71E), RFC-3E (RFC with Rfc3-K59E), and RFC-4E (RFC with Rfc4-K55E). Limited biochemical studies were also
carried out with mutant complexes in which conservative lysine
arginine mutations were made in the RFC2 and RFC3
genes to yield RFC-2R (RFC with Rfc2-K71R) and RFC-3R (RFC with
Rfc3-K59R), respectively, and which were overproduced and purified from
yeast (14).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The ATP-binding domains of the five RFC
subunits. Consensus Walker A and Walker B domains are shown.
indicates I, L, V, or M. The arrow indicates the conserved
lysine mutated in this study to arginine or glutamic acid.
Glu mutation at amino acid 93 of
Rfc1 (the truncated version lacking the ligase homology
domain)2 resulted in a destabilization of the N-terminal
domain of this subunit, which led to an initial proteolytic removal of
~40 amino acids. Such an N-terminal proteolytic truncation would
reach into motif II of Rfc1, which is essential for RFC activity
(16).3 Of the two remaining
preparations of RFC-1E, more than 90% of the Rfc1-E subunit was
proteolyzed. However, a small fraction of Rfc1-E remained intact. When
these preparations were subjected to PCNA-agarose, only a minor
fraction (20-50%) bound and was eluted with EDTA. However, a large
excess of Rfc2-5 still remained in the preparations, and the bound
fraction was passed again over a PCNA-agarose column. In this second
column all Rfc1-E containing material bound in the presence of
Mg2+-ATP and was eluted with EDTA. Even then, the subunit
composition of this complex was not stoichiometric with a ~50%
excess of small subunits remaining in the final preparation after MonoS
column chromatography. Because of these problems with obtaining
sufficient quantities of pure RFC-1E with proper subunit stoichiometry,
studies with this complex were limited in scope.

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of
mutant RFC complexes. A, wild type and mutant RFC
complexes following purification. The gel was stained with colloidal
Coomassie. B, enlarged view of the small subunit region.
C, migration of the individually purified Rfc2p subunit and
the mutant Rfc2Ep subunit.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Mutant RFCs bind PCNA. SPR was used to
determine linear initial rates of binding of 30 nM (mutant)
RFC to a PCNA chip as a function of the ATP concentration. The data
were fitted to a one-site saturation binding model. The
inset shows a diagram of the experiment.
S (15). Injection
of either wild type RFC or RFC-4E across a DNA chip in the presence of
1 mM ATP
S yielded a very similar sensorgram, indicating
that DNA binding by RFC-4E was not impaired under these conditions.
However, binding of RFC-3E and particularly RFC-2E was severely
impaired (Fig. 4A).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
RFC-2E and RFC-3E are defective in DNA
binding and PCNA loading. A, SPR sensorgrams of binding
of (mutant) RFC (30 nM) to a primed DNA chip (see
"Experimental Procedures") in the presence of 1 mM
ATP
S. B, PCNA (120 nM) and (mutant) RFC (30 nM) were injected onto the DNA chip in the presence of 1 mM ATP
S. C, 30 nM RFC or RFC-4E
with or without 120 nM PCNA were injected onto a DNA chip
at increasing concentrations of ATP
S. Relative linear initial rates
of binding (kon/kon max)
were plotted against the ATP
S concentration, and the data were
fitted to a one-site saturation binding model. The ATP
S
KD values were 6 ± 2 µM for RFC,
1.1 ± 0.5 µM for RFC+PCNA, 140 ± 40 µM for RFC-4E, and 74 ± 20 µM for
RFC-4E with PCNA.
S over the DNA chip
allows the detection of complexes in which PCNA has been loaded by RFC,
but the termination step, release of RFC, is blocked because hydrolysis
of bound ATP
S does not occur (15). A robust signal was observed when
either wild type RFC or RFC-4E together with PCNA and 1 mM
ATP
S were flowed across the chip (Fig. 4B). The signal
obtained with RFC-3E was barely above background (the no nucleotide
control). It was also much weaker than that obtained in the absence of
PCNA (Fig. 4A). Even more striking was the result with
RFC-2E, which had shown very weak binding in the absence of PCNA but
showed absolutely no binding to DNA in the presence of PCNA.
S required to establish a stable complex with DNA either in the absence or presence of PCNA. These values were 10-100-fold higher than for wild type RFC, suggesting that
ATP binding to Rfc4p is required for stable DNA binding (Fig. 4C).
1, this activity is much
lower than that of the RFC complex (Table I). Mutant Rfc3 with either a K59R or
K59E mutation were overexpressed and purified from E. coli.
The DNA-dependent ATPase activity was determined at 50 µM ATP. The turnover number of Rfc3 was 0.019 s
1, that of Rfc3-K59R was 0.005 s
1, and
Rfc3-K59E was completely inactive (<0.001 s
1) (data not
shown). The ATPase activity of Rfc3-K59R in the absence of DNA was
close to background levels (~0.001 s
1).
ATPase activity of RFC and RFC-4E

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
ATPase activities of mutant RFC.
A, 25 ng of wild type RFC and up to 500 ng of mutant RFC was
used in each assay which was performed at a fixed ATP concentration of
50 µM. The data are expressed as mol of ATP hydrolyzed
per mol of RFC/s. Standard errors of this analysis are 10% within a
given set, i.e. for a particular mutant. B,
DNA-stimulated ATPase activity of RFC and RFC-4E as a function of the
ATP concentration. C, DNA- and PCNA-stimulated ATPase
activity of RFC and RFC-4E as a function of the ATP concentration. PCNA
and DNA when added were each in 2-fold molar excess. The ATP
Km and kcat values are given
in Table I. See "Experimental Procedures" for details.
S necessary to form a stable complex with
the DNA (compare Fig. 4C with Fig. 5B). However,
because both the Km and kcat values of the RFC-4E ATPase are the same with or without DNA
present (Table I), the data obtained in the presence of primer-template DNA likely reflect the activity of the complex without DNA. One might
expect to see a further increase in ATPase activity at high ATP levels
at which DNA binding by RFC-4E occurs, but no such increase was
observed, even at 300 µM ATP, the practical upper limit
for carrying out these assays (Fig. 5B). On the other hand, the observed Km for the DNA-stimulated ATPase of
RFC-4E in the presence of PCNA is more in agreement with the binding data (compare Fig. 4C with Fig. 5C; Table I).
is stimulated by PCNA because PCNA can load by diffusion onto the
ends of the linear DNA molecule (18, 19). However, when the NaCl
concentration in the assay is raised to 75 mM, PCNA can no
longer load by diffusion onto the DNA ends, and processive DNA
replication by Pol
and PCNA is absolutely dependent on the presence
of RFC and ATP. Therefore, this replication assay indirectly measures
the efficiency of PCNA loading. However, because PCNA when loaded by
RFC onto short polynucleotides such as poly(dA)-oligo(dT) can easily
dissociate from the linear DNA by sliding off the end, efficient
replication of these DNA templates by Pol
requires multiple loading
events of PCNA by RFC (11, 20, 21). On the other hand, one single event
stably loads PCNA on primed single-stranded circular phage DNA.
,
whereas inefficient but measurable DNA synthesis was observed at high
RFC-3E levels. RFC-2E was completely inactive in this assay (Fig.
6A). For each RFC that showed
activity, the quantitative requirement for ATP was measured at those
levels of RFC at which the response was linear with RFC concentration
(Fig. 6B). Consistent with all previous observations of wild
type RFC, half-maximal activation was obtained at 5 µM
ATP. The apparent Km value of 85 µM
for RFC-4E is also consistent with the other studies of this mutant
(Figs. 4C and 5C). Surprisingly, RFC-1E was like wild type with an apparent Km value of 6 µM for PCNA loading. Finally, the low but measurable
clamp loading activity of RFC-3E did allow us to determine an apparent
Km of 320 µM ATP.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
ATP dependence of clamp loading.
DNA replication on poly(dA)-oligo(dT) was carried out as described
under "Experimental Procedures." A, increasing levels of
(mutant) RFC were used in a replication assay containing 2 pmol of PCNA
and 0.1 pmol of Pol
for 8 min at 30 °C. Quantitation of RFC-1E
was based on that of the large subunit. B, replication
assays for 8 min at 30 °C as under A contained 0.1 pmol
of RFC, 0.1 pmol of RFC-1E, 1.2 pmol of RFC-3E, or 0.2 pmol of RFC-4E,
and increasing ATP. For each series of ATP titration curves, the
Vmax was calculated using Michaelis-Menten
kinetics and set to 100% for illustrative purposes. ATP
Km values were 5 ± 2 µM for RFC,
6 ± 2 µM for RFC-1E, 320 ± 100 µM for RFC-3E, and 85 ± 20 µM for
RFC-4E.

View larger version (98K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Activity of RFC Lys
Glu mutants in primed
mp18 DNA replication. DNA replication reactions at 30 °C
containing 0.2 pmol of wild type or mutant RFC at 10 µM
ATP (A) or 1 mM ATP (B)
Arginine Mutations in Rfc2p
and Rfc3p--
Mutant complexes were also made with the conservative
Lys
Arg mutations in the Rfc2 and Rfc3 subunits. These mutant
complexes were overproduced in yeast and contained the full-length Rfc1 subunit (see "Experimental Procedures"). As before, the mutant RFCs
were tested for their ability to load PCNA indirectly using the primed
M13-mp18 DNA replication assay (Fig. 8).
These assays showed that RFC-3R4
was fully functional at 1 mM ATP but showed defects at low
ATP concentrations, much like the RFC-4E mutant discussed above. On the
other hand, RFC-2R4 was completely defective at low ATP and
showed severe defects in loading even at 1 mM ATP.
Considering our observation that substantial DNA-dependent
ATPase activity remained in the isolated Rfc3-K59R subunit in
comparison with wild type Rfc3, the observation of efficient clamp
loading activity by the RFC-3R complex, especially at high ATP
concentrations, was not that surprising.

View larger version (107K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Activity of RFC Lys
Arg mutants in primed
mp18 DNA replication. DNA replication reactions at 30 °C
containing 0.2 pmol of wild type or mutant RFC at the indicated levels
of ATP. Total DNA synthesis (pmol of dNTP) is indicated
below each lane.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Comparison between human and yeast RFC mutants
A mutants are from Ref. 9, and those for K
E are from Ref. 10. Minor, >30% activity; moderate, 5-30%
activity; severe, 1-5% activity; inactive, <1% activity;
Km, no activity at 10 µM ATP.
subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, and the eukaryotic Cdc6 and Mcm proteins (3). Mutation of the lysine
residue to isoleucine (dnaA), arginine (ruvB), alanine (
-subunit),
and glutamic acid (Cdc6) in all cases yielded a protein with
1%
activity and, where measured, a more than 100-fold reduction in ATP
binding affinity (26-29). Only in the human Mcm4,6,7 helicase, in
which all three subunits have ATP-binding domains, was a partially active helicase recovered upon a Lys
Ala mutation in Mcm6 (30).
(Figs. 6 and 7). Within the margin of error the
apparent Km value for ATP in PCNA loading by RFC-1E
is identical to that of wild type RFC, and the
Vmax value is only slightly lower than that of
wild type (Fig. 6).
S, which represents a very specific step in
the loading pathway (Fig. 3). In fact, the PCNA affinity column step
that we applied to the purification of all mutant complexes not only
served to remove excess Rfc2-5 core complex but also to remove
misfolded, misassociated, and partially proteolyzed inactive
five-subunit complexes. For this reason, the yield of the RFC1-E
complex after PCNA-agarose was extremely low.
S monitored
by SPR (Fig. 4) and to the functional clamp loading assay on
poly(dA)-oligo(dT) (Fig. 6).
Glu mutation in
Rfc2, whereas a Lys
Glu mutation in Rfc4 shows only a quantitative defect in ATP binding but not in the ability to hydrolyze the bound
ATP. The Lys
Arg mutation in Rfc3 has only marginal defects. Our
in vivo studies of these mutants, presented in the fourth paper of this series, broadly confirm the results drawn from this biochemical study (31).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Kim Gerik with help in plasmid construction, John Majors and Tim Lohman for critical discussions during the course of this work, and Rao Ayyagari for purified replication protein A.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Grant GM32431 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail:
burgers@biochem.wustl.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M011633200
2
The truncation derivative of replication factor
C containing Rfc1-
(aa3-272) has been used in this biochemical
study. For ease of reading, this complex has been simply designated as
RFC, and the Lys
Glu mutant complexes have been designated as
RFC-1E, RFC-2E, RFC-3E, and RFC-4E.
3 X. V. Gomes and P. M. J. Burgers, unpublished results.
4
The Lys
Arg mutant complexes contained the
full-length Rfc1 subunit and are designated RFC-2R and RFC-3R.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
RFC, replication
factor C;
Rfcx, xth subunit of RFC;
RFC-xE, RFC complex with Lys
Glu mutation in
xth subunit;
Rfc2-5, complex of Rfc2p, Rfc3p,
Rfc4p, and Rfc5p;
PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen;
ATP
S, adenosine (3-thiotriphosphate);
SPR, surface plasmon resonance;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
Pol, polymerase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Cullmann, G., Fien, K., Kobayashi, R., and Stillman, B. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4661-4671 |
| 2. | Guenther, B., Onrust, R., Sali, A., O'Donnell, M., and Kuriyan, J. (1997) Cell 91, 335-345 |
| 3. | Neuwald, A. F., Aravind, L., Spouge, J. L., and Koonin, E. V. (1999) Genome Res. 9, 27-43 |
| 4. | Gomes, X. V., Gary Schmidt, S. L., and Burgers, P. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34776-34783 |
| 5. | Walker, J. E., Saraste, M., Runswick, M. J., and Gay, N. J. (1982) EMBO J. 1, 945-951 |
| 6. | Parsonage, D., Al-Shawi, M. K., and Senior, A. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 4740-4744 |
| 7. | Fry, D. C., Kuby, S. A., and Mildvan, A. S. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 907-911 |
| 8. | Green, C. M., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., and Lowndes, N. F. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 39-42 |
| 9. | Cai, J., Yao, N., Gibbs, E., Finkelstein, J., Phillips, B., O'Donnell, M., and Hurwitz, J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11607-11612 |
| 10. | Podust, V. N., Tiwari, N., Ott, R., and Fanning, E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12935-12942 |
| 11. | Gomes, X. V., Gary, S. L., and Burgers, P. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 14541-14549 |
| 12. | Li, X., and Burgers, P. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 868-872 |
| 13. | Li, X., and Burgers, P. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21880-21884 |
| 14. | Gerik, K. J., Gary, S. L., and Burgers, P. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1256-1262 |
| 15. | Gomes, X. V., and Burgers, P. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34768-34775 |
| 16. | Uhlmann, F., Cai, J., Gibbs, E., O'Donnell, M., and Hurwitz, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10058-10064 |
| 17. | Podust, V. N., Tiwari, N., Stephan, S., and Fanning, E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31992-31999 |
| 18. | Tan, C. K., Castillo, C., So, A. G., and Downey, K. M. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 12310-12316 |
| 19. | Bauer, G. A., and Burgers, P. M. J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 7506-7510 |
| 20. | Burgers, P. M. J., and Yoder, B. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19923-19936 |
| 21. | Podust, L. M., Podust, V. N., Floth, C., and Hubscher, U. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 2970-2975 |
| 22. | Li, X., Li, J., Harrington, J., Lieber, M. R., and Burgers, P. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22109-22112 |
| 23. | O'Brien, M. C., Flaherty, K. M., and McKay, D. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15874-15878 |
| 24. | Yang, g., Sandalova, T., Lohman, K., Lindqvist, Y., and Rendina, A. R. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 4751-4760 |
| 25. | Smith, C. V., and Maxwell, A. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 9658-9667 |
| 26. | Hishida, T., Iwasaki, H., Yagi, T., and Shinagawa, H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 25335-25342 |
| 27. | Mizushima, T., Takaki, T., Kubota, T., Tsuchiya, T., Miki, T., Katayama, T., and Sekimizu, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20847-20851 |
| 28. | Xiao, H., Naktinis, V., and O'Donnell, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13378-13383 |
| 29. | Mizushima, T., Takahashi, N., and Stillman, B. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 1631-1641 |
| 30. | You, Z. Y., Komamura, Y., and Ishimi, Y. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8003-8015 |
| 31. | Gary Schmidt, S. L., Pautz, A. L., and Burgers, P. M. J. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34792-34800 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Johnson, N. Y. Yao, G. D. Bowman, J. Kuriyan, and M. O'Donnell The Replication Factor C Clamp Loader Requires Arginine Finger Sensors to Drive DNA Binding and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Loading J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2006; 281(46): 35531 - 35543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Majka, S. K. Binz, M. S. Wold, and P. M. J. Burgers Replication Protein A Directs Loading of the DNA Damage Checkpoint Clamp to 5'-DNA Junctions J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 27855 - 27861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. O. Bylund and P. M. J. Burgers Replication Protein A-Directed Unloading of PCNA by the Ctf18 Cohesion Establishment Complex Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2005; 25(13): 5445 - 5455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Majka, B. Y. Chung, and P. M. J. Burgers Requirement for ATP by the DNA Damage Checkpoint Clamp Loader J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 2004; 279(20): 20921 - 20926. [Abstract] [Full Text] |