Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103843200 on July 17, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 37, 35078-35086, September 14, 2001
Differential Vicia villosa Agglutinin
Reactivity Identifies Three Distinct Dystroglycan Complexes in Skeletal
Muscle*
Erin L.
McDearmon
,
Ariana C.
Combs§, and
James M.
Ervasti
§¶
From the
Graduate Program in Molecular and Cellular
Pharmacology and the § Department of Physiology, University
of Wisconsin-Madison Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Received for publication, April 30, 2001, and in revised form, July 5, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
We present evidence for the
expression of three
-dystroglycan glycoforms in skeletal muscle
cells, including two minor glycoforms marked by either patent or latent
reactivity with the N-acetylgalactosamine-specific lectin
Vicia villosa agglutinin. Both minor glycoforms co-isolated with
-dystroglycan, but not with other
dystrophin/utrophin-glycoprotein complex components, suggesting that
they may perform distinct or modified cellular functions. We also
confirmed that both patent and latent V. villosa
agglutinin-reactive
-dystroglycan glycoforms are expressed in C2C12
myotubes. However, we found that the combined effect of saturating
concentrations of V. villosa agglutinin and laminin-1 were
strictly additive with respect to acetylcholine receptor cluster
formation in C2C12 myotubes, which suggests that laminin-1 and V. villosa agglutinin do not compete for the same binding site on
the cell surface. Finally, although
-N-acetylhexosaminidase digestion dramatically inhibited
agrin-, V. villosa agglutinin-, and laminin-1-induced
acetylcholine receptor clustering in C2C12 myotubes, treatment with
this enzyme had no effect on the amount of
-dystroglycan that was
bound to V. villosa agglutinin-agarose. We conclude that
-dystroglycan is not the V. villosa agglutinin receptor implicated in acetylcholine receptor cluster formation. However, our data provide new support for the hypothesis that different
glycoforms of
-dystroglycan may perform distinct functions even
within the same cell.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The dystroglycan complex was originally identified as a component
of the skeletal muscle dystrophin-glycoprotein complex, which spans the
sarcolemma of muscle cells and physically couples the actin
cytoskeleton with the extracellular matrix (1). The dystroglycan
complex consists of
-dystroglycan, a highly glycosylated extracellular protein that binds to several extracellular ligands, and
-dystroglycan, a single-pass transmembrane protein that links cytoplasmic dystrophin with
-dystroglycan (2). Both dystroglycan subunits are encoded by a single highly conserved pro-peptide that is
proteolytically processed into
- and
-dystroglycan, which remain
stably associated through noncovalent interactions (2). Like muscle
deficient in dystrophin or other core components in the
dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (1), deficiency of the dystroglycan
complex in skeletal muscle results in compromised sarcolemmal integrity
(3). Thus, it is generally thought that the dystroglycan complex in
skeletal muscle mainly functions to mechanically protect the sarcolemma
against shear stresses imposed during muscle contraction. However, the
dystroglycan complex has also been linked with more dynamic
developmental or pathological processes (2). In skeletal muscle,
several studies (3-5) have implicated the dystroglycan complex in
either the formation or maintenance of acetylcholine receptor
(AChR)1-rich folds within the
motor end plate of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). However, it is
presently unclear how the single, invariant dystroglycan protein may
subserve different functions within a single cell type.
Because
-dystroglycan displays tissue-specific differences in
glycosylation (6), it is possible that distinct
-dystroglycan glycoforms may perform different functions. With regard to a role in
AChR cluster formation at the NMJ, we previously confirmed (6) that
neural
-dystroglycans express exposed (patent) terminal
-linked
N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) residues, which bound to the
GalNAc-specific lectin Vicia villosa agglutinin (VVA). Skeletal muscle
-dystroglycan displayed no patent binding to VVA but
revealed latent VVA reactivity after digestion with neuraminidase (6).
Interestingly, the VVA binding properties of neural and skeletal muscle
-dystroglycans were consistent with the characteristics of an
unidentified VVA receptor previously implicated in AChR clustering (7,
8). Therefore, we hypothesized the expression of two
-dystroglycan
glycoforms in skeletal muscle cells: 1) an extrasynaptic form with
latent VVA reactivity caused by further modification with terminal
sialic acid residues and 2) a motor end plate-specific glycoform marked
with exposed
-linked GalNAc residues that may specifically
participate in AChR cluster formation (6).
Here we show that three
-dystroglycan glycoforms are expressed in
skeletal muscle, including two minor glycoforms marked by either patent
or latent VVA reactivity. Both minor glycoforms co-isolated with
-dystroglycan but not other dystrophin/utrophin-glycoprotein complex
components, suggesting they may perform distinct cellular functions.
Although we confirmed that both patent and latent VVA reactive
glycoforms are also expressed in C2C12 myotubes, other experiments
indicate that neither glycoform is the receptor that mediates
VVA-induced AChR clustering. We conclude that the VVA receptor
important in AChR cluster formation remains to be identified.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture--
C2C12 and L6 cell lines were obtained from
American Type Culture Collection and used for three to seven passages.
Proliferating cells were grown in 10-cm dishes or on
poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips with Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (Cellgrow; Fisher) containing 10% fetal
bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT) plus 1% antibiotic/antimycotic (Sigma) at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere of 5-10% CO2.
After reaching confluency, the medium was switched to Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium containing 2% equine serum (Hyclone) plus 1%
antibiotic/antimycotic. The cells were incubated until full
differentiation to multi-nucleate myotubes was observed morphologically
(with C2C12, 4 days; with L6, 9-11 days) with fresh medium exchanged
every 2 days.
Cell and Tissue Solubilization--
Crude surface membranes
(CSM) were isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle as described previously
(9). For small scale lectin chromatography, 1 mg/ml CSM was solubilized
in 1% Triton buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2,
100 µg/ml benzamidine, 40 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.5 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM
iodoacetamide, 0.5 µg/ml pepstatin A, 1% Triton X-100) plus 150 mM NaCl, with end-over-end mixing for 1 h at 4 °C.
Solubilized proteins were recovered in the supernatant fraction after
centrifugation for 30 min at 100,000 × g. For large scale chromatography, 500-600 mg of CSM were solubilized in 1% Triton
buffer plus 250 mM NaCl and 0.5 M sucrose and
centrifuged as described above.
Fully differentiated C2C12 or L6 myotubes were rinsed twice with
37 °C phosphate-buffered saline and scraped off the dish in 5 ml/dish ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline containing the following
protease inhibitors: 100 µg/ml benzamidine, 40 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.5 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM iodoacetamide, and 0.5 µg/ml pepstatin A. The cells were pelleted by brief centrifugation at 50-200 × g and solubilized in 0.5 ml/dish 1% Triton buffer
containing 150 mM NaCl. The resuspended cell pellet was
incubated at 4 °C for 1 h with end-over-end mixing followed by
centrifugation as described above.
Lectin Chromatography--
For small scale lectin
chromatography, 0.5 ml of Triton solubilate from CSM was incubated
overnight at 4 °C with 100 µl of either wheat germ agglutinin
(WGA)-agarose or VVA-agarose beads (from Sigma and EY Labs, San Mateo,
CA, respectively) that were pre-equilibrated in wash buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 250 mM NaCl, 100 µg/ml
benzamidine, 40 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1% Triton
X-100). The beads were pelleted, and the void volumes were removed.
Lectin-bound proteins were then washed extensively and eluted with the
appropriate eluting buffer (for WGA, wash buffer containing 0.3 M N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc); for VVA, wash
buffer containing 50 mM GalNAc). Small scale chromatography
was performed in essentially the same way for Triton-solubilized C2C12
or L6 myotubes except that the wash buffer contained 150 mM
NaCl and an extra 100 mM NaCl was added to the VVA eluting
buffer. For large scale chromatography, ~100 ml of CSM solubilate was
loaded onto a 3-ml VVA-agarose column that was pre-equilibrated with
wash buffer containing 250 mM NaCl. The column was washed
and eluted with wash buffer containing 50 mM GalNAc. The
eluates were concentrated by methanol precipitation.
Enzyme Treatments--
CSM solubilates were incubated with or
without 0.1 unit/ml of Clostridium perfringens neuraminidase
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 2 h at 37 °C and used in
small scale VVA chromatography as described above. Fully differentiated
C2C12 or L6 myotubes were incubated with or without 0.1 unit/ml
neuraminidase diluted in medium for 2 h at 37 °C. C2C12
myotubes were also treated for 6 h at 37 °C with 1 unit/ml
-N-acetylhexosaminidase from beef kidney (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals), 1 unit/ml
-N-acetylgalactosaminidase from
chicken liver (Sigma), or 0.05 unit/ml
-N-acetylgalactosaminidase from Acremonium sp.
(Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), each diluted in medium. Following
incubation, the cells were analyzed for AChR clustering as described
below or rinsed and solubilized for lectin chromatography as described above.
SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting--
The samples were separated by
SDS-PAGE under reducing or nonreducing conditions and transferred to
nitrocellulose as described previously (10). Western blotting was
performed with the following antibodies: monoclonal antibody IIH6 to
-dystroglycan (10), affinity purified chicken polyclonal antibody
against
-dystroglycan (6), monoclonal antibody XIXC2 to dystrophin
(11), monoclonal antibody SYN1351 to syntrophin (12), anti-dystrobrevin
monoclonal antibody 13H1 (13), monoclonal antibody NCL-
-DG to
-dystroglycan, monoclonal antibody NCL-
-SG to
-sarcoglycan
(both from Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), Rb 1715 antiserum to
-sarcoglycan (14), Rb 56 antiserum to utrophin (15),
7CDB2
antiserum to
7B integrin cytoplasmic domain (16),
anti-
1 integrin monoclonal antibody MAB1997 (Chemicon,
Temecula, CA), anti-AChR
subunit monoclonal antibody (BD
Transduction Laboratories, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and monoclonal antibody
HNK-1 (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA).
Analysis of AChR Clustering--
To assay for AChR clustering,
C2C12 and L6 myotubes were grown on poly-L-lysine-coated
glass coverslips. After treatment with laminin-1 (the gift of Dr. Hynda
Kleinman, NIDR), VVA lectin (Sigma or EY Labs), C-Ag4,8 conditioned
medium (17) (the gift of Drs. Mark Bowe and Justin Fallon, Brown
University), and/or glycosidases, the myotubes were washed with
37 °C phosphate-buffered saline and incubated for 1 h at
37 °C with 500 ng/ml Alexa 488-conjugated bungarotoxin (Molecular
Probes, Eugene, OR) diluted in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium.
The cells were washed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at
room temperature. Fixed cells were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline
and mounted on slides for immunofluorescence analysis. Images were
collected with a Bio-Rad MRC 1000 confocal microscope (Keck Center for
Biological Imaging) using a 40× oil immersion objective. AChR clusters
were counted from five randomly chosen fields for each experiment.
Immunocytochemistry--
7-µm cross-sections of control and
mdx mouse hind limb muscle were adhered to Plus slides
(Fisher), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature,
rinsed, and blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin for 2 h at room
temperature. Blocked sections were rinsed and incubated either with Rab
56 antiserum to utrophin for 2 h at 37 °C followed by 20 µg/ml Alexa 568-conjugated rabbit secondary antibody (Molecular
Probes) for 1 h at 37 °C or with 500 ng/ml rhodamine-conjugated
bungarotoxin (Molecular Probes) for 1 h at 37 °C. All sections
were double-labeled with 50 µg/ml VVA-fluorescein isothiocyanate
lectin (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA), which was included during the incubation
with secondary antibodies or bungarotoxin. The images were collected as
described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of a VVA-reactive Dystroglycan Complex in Skeletal
Muscle--
To determine whether a VVA-reactive glycoform of
-dystroglycan is expressed in adult skeletal muscle, we attempted to
isolate
-dystroglycan from detergent-solubilized rabbit skeletal
muscle CSM by small scale VVA-agarose chromatography. The
chromatography protocol was first tested with WGA-agarose, a lectin
that has previously been shown to bind
-dystroglycan isolated from a
wide variety of tissues and species, including rabbit skeletal muscle (11). We observed that all
-dystroglycan in 1 mg of solubilized CSM
protein quantitatively bound to WGA-agarose and was eluted with buffer
containing 0.3 M GlcNAc (Fig.
1a). In addition, several other dystrophin-glycoprotein complex constituents were observed to
co-purify with
-dystroglycan in the WGA eluate (Fig. 1a). However, no
-dystroglycan was detected in the GalNAc eluate from VVA-agarose using the small scale chromatography protocol (Fig. 1b). Because the motor end plate makes up less than 0.1% of
the entire muscle cell plasma membrane (18), it seemed probable that a
VVA-reactive species of
-dystroglycan might be present in such low
abundance that we could not detect it by small scale chromatography.
Therefore, we performed a large scale VVA chromatography protocol in
which 500-600 mg of CSM solubilate was loaded onto a 3-ml VVA-agarose
column. The GalNAc eluate from the 3-ml VVA-agarose column was then
concentrated 300-400-fold, relative to the CSM solubilate. On this
scale of amplification, we readily detected two distinct species of
-dystroglycan in the concentrated VVA eluate with molecular weights
of ~156,000 and 110,000 (Fig. 2). Both proteins were reactive with the
-dystroglycan-specific
monoclonal antibody IIH6 and an affinity-purified polyclonal antibody
to
-dystroglycan (Fig. 2).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Small scale WGA and VVA chromatography of
skeletal muscle membranes. In a, 1 mg of
Triton-solubilized rabbit skeletal muscle CSM was incubated overnight
with 0.1 ml of WGA-agarose beads. The beads were washed and eluted with
an equivalent volume of wash buffer containing 300 mM
GlcNAc. The samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to
nitrocellulose, and stained with antibodies that recognize the
following proteins: -dystroglycan (IIH6),
-dystroglycan ( -DG), dystrophin (DYS),
-sarcoglycan ( -SG), syntrophin (Syn), and
dystrobrevins 1,2 (Db). In b, 1 mg of
Triton-solubilized rabbit skeletal muscle CSM was incubated overnight
with 0.1 ml of VVA-agarose beads. The beads were washed and eluted with
buffer containing 50 mM GalNAc. The samples were separated
by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and stained with monoclonal
antibody IIH6 against -dystroglycan.
|
|

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Amplification of distinct
-dystroglycan glycoforms from skeletal muscle
membranes by large scale VVA chromatography. 600 mg of
Triton-solubilized rabbit skeletal muscle CSM were circulated overnight
on a 3-ml VVA-agarose column. After washing, the column was eluted with
buffer containing 50 mM GalNAc, and the eluates were
concentrated by methanol precipitation. The samples were separated by
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and stained with antibodies
that recognize the following proteins: -dystroglycan
( -DG polyclonal antibody (pAb) and
IIH6), -dystrobrevins-1 and -2 (Db),
-dystroglycan ( -DG), dystrophin (DYS),
utrophin (UTR), -sarcoglycan ( -SG),
-sarcoglycan ( -SG), and syntrophin (Syn).
Note that the eluates were concentrated ~300-fold relative to the CSM
solubilate (SUP).
|
|
One or both of the VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan species could have
originated from small amounts of blood vessel or peripheral nerve
tissues that may contaminate the muscle membrane preparations used.
Indeed, we observed that the 110-kDa species, but not the 156-kDa
species, reacted with a monoclonal antibody to the HNK-1 epitope (data
not shown). Because HNK-1 antibodies have been observed to react with
peripheral nerve but not skeletal muscle
-dystroglycan (19)2 and because peripheral
nerve
-dystroglycan has a molecular weight of ~120,000 (19), we
concluded that the 110-kDa
-dystroglycan species in the large scale
VVA eluate likely originated from peripheral nerve tissue. However,
-dystroglycan from visceral and lung smooth muscle is not reactive
with monoclonal antibody IIH6 (20, 21). In addition,
-sarcoglycan, a
component of the smooth muscle dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (20),
did not co-purify with
-dystroglycan in the large scale VVA eluates
(Fig. 2). These results suggested that the 156-kDa VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan species likely originated from skeletal muscle cells.
Based on the densitometric intensities of IIH6 staining in the
solubilate and VVA eluate and taking into account the difference in
sample load, we estimated that the 156-kDa VVA-reactive species comprised ~0.1% of total skeletal muscle
-dystroglycan (Table I).
We next examined the large scale VVA eluates for co-purification of
other components in the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex. As expected,
-dystroglycan was observed to co-purify with VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan (Fig. 2). However, other components of the
dystrophin-glycoprotein complex were not detected in the large scale
VVA eluates (Fig. 2). Of particular relevance, we did not detect the
co-purification of utrophin with VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan, as
might be expected if VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan was expressed at the
neuromuscular junction (15). Although it is possible that Triton X-100
may have dissociated VVA-reactive dystroglycan complex from other dystrophin-associated proteins (22), we observed the same results when
large scale VVA chromatography was performed with CSM solubilized in
1% digitonin (data not shown). We also observed the same results when
large scale VVA chromatography was performed using Triton-solubilized rat skeletal muscle (data not shown). The presence of AChRs in both
solubilized CSM and rat skeletal muscle was verified by Western blotting with an antibody against AChR
-subunit (data not shown). These results indicate that a small amount of VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan is expressed in skeletal muscle cells in association
with
-dystroglycan but is not stably associated with other proteins
in the dystrophin-utrophin glycoprotein complexes.
VVA Receptors at the NMJ Are Not Associated with Utrophin--
The
dystrophin homologue utrophin is normally restricted to the adult NMJ
(15). Immunofluorescence analysis of skeletal muscle from the
dystrophin-deficient mdx mouse previously revealed an
up-regulation in utrophin expression and its redistribution to the
extrasynaptic sarcolemma normally occupied by dystrophin (23, 24). More
recently, proteins stably associated with utrophin in biochemical
assays were also shown to redistribute with utrophin to the
extrasynaptic sarcolemma of mdx muscle (25, 26). To determine whether VVA receptors in skeletal muscle associate with utrophin in vivo, we double-labeled control and
mdx mouse skeletal muscle cross-sections with VVA lectin and
utrophin antibody (Fig. 3). From analysis
of several fields with identifiable neuromuscular junctions
(n = 7), we observed that VVA receptors do not
redistribute with utrophin in mdx mouse skeletal muscle. In
addition, bungarotoxin-labeled AChRs remained strictly localized at the
neuromuscular junctions in mdx mouse skeletal muscle (data
not shown and Refs. 27 and 28). The results of Figs. 2 and 3 suggested
that neither VVA receptors at the neuromuscular junction nor
VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan are specifically associated with
utrophin. Because AChRs and residual dystroglycan are both retained at
the NMJ of dystrophin/utrophin double knock-out mice (29, 30), it
remained possible that the small amount of VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan present in skeletal muscle may participate in AChR
clustering independent of an interaction with dystrophin or
utrophin.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
VVA-reactive glycoconjugates localize to the
neuromuscular junction but do not redistribute with utrophin in
mdx mouse skeletal muscle. 7-µm cross-sections
of control or mdx mouse skeletal muscle were fixed and
double-labeled with VVA-fluorescein isothiocyanate and Rab 56 antiserum
against utrophin, followed by Alexa 568-conjugated rabbit secondary
antibody. The images were collected with a Bio-Rad MRC 1000 confocal microscope using a 40× oil immersion objective. Scale
bar, 50 µm.
|
|
Distinct
-Dystroglycan Glycoforms in Cultured
Myotubes--
-Dystroglycan in C2C12 myotubes was recently shown to
bind to VVA-agarose (31). However, it remained to be determined what fraction of total C2C12
-dystroglycan was patently reactive with VVA
and whether VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan may also be expressed in
other clonal myotube cell lines. Therefore, we analyzed both C2C12 and
rat L6 myotubes for expression of distinct
-dystroglycan glycoforms.
Both C2C12 and L6 myotubes were shown to express
-dystroglycan with
similar average molecular weights of 134,000 and 136,000, respectively.
Because the polypeptide core of
-dystroglycan is 67,000, the high
molecular weights of C2C12 and L6
-dystroglycan suggested that these
cell lines express glycosylated
-dystroglycan. In addition,
-dystroglycan expressed in both cell lines reacted with IIH6 (Fig.
4a), which has been shown to
recognize carbohydrate residues on
-dystroglycan (32). Finally, both
C2C12 and L6 myotubes expressed
-dystroglycan that bound WGA-agarose
(Fig. 4a). These results suggested that
-dystroglycan in
C2C12 and L6 myotubes is glycosylated in a manner similar to that
observed for skeletal muscle CSM
-dystroglycan (Fig. 1). Small scale
VVA chromatography indicated that ~80% of C2C12 myotube
-dystroglycan could bind to VVA-agarose (Fig. 4a).
-Dystroglycan also co-purified with VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan
from C2C12 myotubes, whereas other components of the
dystrophin-glycoprotein complex were only detected in the VVA void
(Fig. 4b). To determine whether the small fraction of
-dystroglycan left in the VVA void (Fig. 4a) was due
to saturation of the lectin beads, we incubated the VVA void with a
fresh aliquot of VVA-agarose overnight but did not detect any
additional binding of
-dystroglycan to VVA (data not shown). In
contrast to C2C12 myotube
-dystroglycan, L6 myotube
-dystroglycan showed no detectable binding to VVA-agarose (Fig. 4a). These
data confirm that C2C12 myotubes express two distinct
-dystroglycan glycoforms, one of which predominates and is marked by its patent reactivity with VVA-agarose. In addition, these results indicate that
skeletal muscle cells are capable of expressing three distinct glycoforms of
-dystroglycan.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan is expressed in C2C12 but not in L6
skeletal muscle myotubes. In a, Triton-solubilized
extracts from C2C12 or L6 myotubes were incubated with WGA- or
VVA-agarose beads. The beads were washed and eluted with three aliquots
of buffer containing 0.3 M GlcNAc or 50 mM
GalNAc, respectively. The samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and
transferred to nitrocellulose. -Dystroglycan was detected with
monoclonal antibody IIH6. In b, equal volumes of
Triton-solubilized C2C12 myotubes (TOT), VVA flow-through
(VOID), and GalNAc eluate (ELUTE) were assessed
for co-purification of dystrophin-associated proteins by Western blot
analysis. The molecular weight standards (× 10 3) are
indicated on the left.
|
|
Additive AChR Clustering by Laminin-1 and VVA--
Laminin-1 and
VVA can each induce AChR clustering in C2C12 myotubes in a manner that
is independent of and additive to the well established agrin/MuSK
pathway (31, 33, 34) but still linked to agrin/MuSk through dependence
on rapsyn to effect clustering (35). Because laminin-1 appears to
induce AChR clustering mainly through binding to
-dystroglycan (4,
5) and the majority of C2C12
-dystroglycan could also bind
VVA-agarose (Fig. 4a), we considered that
-dystroglycan
may be the cell surface receptor through which laminin-1 and VVA both
induce AChR clustering. To test this hypothesis, we compared AChR
cluster formation in C2C12 myotubes treated with 120 nM
laminin-1, 50 µg/ml VVA, or both laminin-1 and VVA (Fig.
5). Consistent with previous studies (8, 33), these concentrations of laminin-1 and VVA were found to maximally
stimulate AChR clustering when each ligand was tested individually over
a wide range of concentrations (not shown). We observed that laminin-1
and VVA each significantly increased the number of AChR clusters per
field compared with untreated control myotubes (Fig. 5). However, the
combined effects of laminin-1 and VVA on AChR cluster frequency were
strictly additive (Fig. 5), which suggests that laminin-1 and VVA do
not compete for the same cell surface receptor.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Additive AChR clustering by laminin-1 and
VVA. a, C2C12 myotubes were incubated with 50 µg/ml
VVA, 120 nM laminin-1 (+Lam), or both VVA and
laminin-1 for 18 h, and AChR clusters were detected with Alexa
488-labeled bungarotoxin as described under "Materials and
Methods." In b, the data represent the average number of
AChR clusters (± S.E.) measured in five random fields from each of
three independent experiments. AChR clustering induced by VVA
(p < 0.05), laminin-1 (p < 0.001), or VVA
plus laminin-1 (p < 0.001) were all significantly
greater than control as assessed by one-way analysis of variance with
Tukey's multiple comparison test. However, the sum of AChR clustering
induced by VVA or laminin-1 alone (14 ± 0.4) was not
significantly different from clustering induced by simultaneous
treatment with VVA and laminin-1 (19 ± 4.0) as determined by
Student's t test (p > 0.24).
|
|
Neuraminidase Stimulates AChR Clustering and
-Dystroglycan VVA
Reactivity in C2C12 but Not L6 Myotubes--
Treatment of C2C12
myotubes with neuraminidase has been shown to dramatically increase
cell surface labeling by VVA (8), stimulate AChR clustering in the
absence of agrin (8, 36), and increase the binding of C2C12
-dystroglycan to VVA-agarose (31). Furthermore, we previously
demonstrated that purified skeletal muscle
-dystroglycan becomes
VVA-reactive after treatment with neuraminidase (6). Therefore, we
examined the effect of neuraminidase treatment on C2C12 and L6 myotube
-dystroglycan binding to VVA-agarose. We first confirmed that
neuraminidase treatment could stimulate AChR clustering in C2C12
myotubes. A 2-h incubation of C2C12 myotubes with 0.1 unit/ml
neuraminidase resulted in a 5.9-fold increase in AChR clusters/field
(Fig. 6a), similar to previous
results (8, 36). In small scale chromatography experiments, we observed
that 100% of
-dystroglycan in neuraminidase-treated C2C12 myotubes
bound to VVA-agarose as compared with the 80% of
-dystroglycan
bound to VVA from untreated C2C12 myotubes (Fig. 6b). These
data demonstrate that a small fraction (20%) of C2C12
-dystroglycan
expresses latent VVA epitopes that can be exposed by digestion with
neuraminidase.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Neuraminidase treatment stimulates AChR
clustering in C2C12 myotubes and identifies a subpopulation of
-dystroglycan with latent VVA reactivity.
C2C12 myotubes were incubated in the presence (+C.N.) or
absence (Control) of 0.1 unit/ml C. perfringens
neuraminidase for 2 h at 37 °C, and AChR clusters were detected
with Alexa 488-conjugated bungarotoxin as described under "Materials
and Methods." The graph in a indicates the
average number of AChR clusters (± S.E.) measured in five random
fields from each of three independent experiments. AChR clustering was
significantly greater in neuraminidase-treated cultures
(p < 0.0001) as assessed by Student's t
test. In b, C2C12 or L6 myotubes were incubated with
(+CN) or without (CON) 0.1 unit/ml C. perfringens neuraminidase at 37 (0)C for 2 h and then
solubilized. Rabbit skeletal CSM were first solubilized and then
incubated with or without 0.1 unit/ml neuraminidase at 37 °C for
2 h. Small scale VVA-agarose chromatography was then performed as
described under "Materials and Methods." Equivalent volumes of
solubilates (SUP), VVA flow-through (VOID), and
GalNAc eluates (ELUTE) were separated by SDS-PAGE,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and stained with monoclonal antibody
IIH6 against -dystroglycan.
|
|
Although L6 myotubes express AChRs (37), they exhibit greatly reduced
spontaneous AChR clustering activity compared with C2C12 myotubes (38).
We hypothesized that the low spontaneous AChR clustering activity of L6
might in part be due to sialic acid capping of VVA-reactive epitopes on
L6 myotube
-dystroglycan. However, we observed no AChR clustering in
L6 myotubes treated with 0.1 unit/ml neuraminidase (not shown).
Furthermore, we performed small scale VVA chromatography using
solubilates from control or neuraminidase-treated L6 myotubes and again
observed no L6
-dystroglycan binding to VVA-agarose (Fig.
6b). Neuraminidase treatment did cause an ~10-kDa decrease
in the apparent molecular mass of L6
-dystroglycan,
indicating that
-dystroglycan was predominantly exposed on the
surface of L6 myotubes and was modified with sialic acid residues (Fig.
6b). These results indicate that L6 myotube
-dystroglycan
lacks both patent and latent reactivity with VVA.
Evidence for Three
-Dystroglycan Glycoforms in
Skeletal Muscle Cells--
Our lectin chromatography analysis of
detergent-solubilized C2C12 and L6 myotubes suggested that skeletal
muscle cells can express three distinct glycoforms of
-dystroglycan.
L6 myotubes appeared to express a single
-dystroglycan glycoform
that was not reactive with VVA (Figs. 4 and 6 and Table I). C2C12
myotubes appeared to express two distinct glycoforms: a patent form
that is endogenously reactive with VVA (Figs. 4 and 6 and Table I) and
a latent form that became VVA-reactive following digestion with
neuraminidase (Fig. 6 and Table I). Because these data were obtained
from two different clonal cell lines, we sought to confirm the possible
co-expression of these three
-dystroglycan glycoforms and determine
their relative abundance in adult skeletal muscle. Therefore, we
performed small scale VVA-agarose chromatography using
detergent-solubilized rabbit CSM that was either untreated or digested
with neuraminidase (Fig. 6b). Consistent with the results
presented in Fig. 1b, no
- or
-dystroglycan was
recovered in the GalNAc eluates of untreated CSM solubilates. In
contrast, we readily detected a small fraction of
- and
-dystroglycan binding to VVA-agarose following neuraminidase
treatment (Fig. 6b). Based on densitometric intensities of
IIH6 immune signal in the CSM solubilate and VVA eluate (Fig.
6b), we estimated that the latent VVA-reactive species
comprised 1.7% of total CSM
-dystroglycan (Table I). Western blot
analysis indicated that both dystrophin and utrophin were absent from
the GalNAc eluate containing
-dystroglycan after neuraminidase
digestion (data not shown). We conclude that at least three distinct
glycoforms of
-dystroglycan are expressed in cultured myotubes and
adult skeletal muscle. In adult skeletal muscle, the predominant
glycoform was not reactive with VVA and was stably associated with the
canonical dystrophin-glycoprotein complex of skeletal muscle (Fig. 1).
The two additional glycoforms were present in substantially lower
amounts (Figs. 2 and 6b), exhibited no stable interaction
with other dystrophin-associated proteins besides
-dystroglycan
(Fig. 2), and were distinguishable by either patent (Fig. 2) or latent
(Fig. 6) VVA reactivity.
-N-Acetylhexosaminidase Treatment Inhibits Agrin-, Laminin-, and
VVA-induced Clustering but Has No Effect on the VVA Reactivity of C2C12
-Dystroglycan--
The exoglycosidase
-N-acetylhexosaminidase was previously shown to cause a
dramatic decrease in cell surface labeling by VVA and also to
completely inhibit agrin-induced AChR clustering in C2C12 myotubes (8).
Therefore, we made use of
-N-acetylhexosaminidase as a
tool to further assess the putative role of
-dystroglycan in
VVA-induced AChR clustering. First, we confirmed that treatment of
C2C12 myotubes with
-N-acetylhexosaminidase completely
blocked agrin-induced AChR clustering (Fig.
7a). Second, we found that
-N-acetylhexosaminidase treatment also completely
inhibited laminin-induced AChR clustering (Fig. 7b), whereas
treatment of C2C12 myotubes with two different sources of
-N-acetylgalactosaminidase did not inhibit
laminin-1-induced AChR clustering (not shown). Third, VVA-induced AChR
clustering was completely inhibited in C2C12 myotubes treated with
-N-acetylhexosaminidase (Fig. 7c). Taken together, these data indicate that agrin-, laminin-1-, and VVA-mediated AChR clustering pathways are mutually dependent on one or more
-GalNAc-modified glycoconjugates that are sensitive to digestion with
-N-acetylhexosaminidase. However,
-N-acetylhexosaminidase treatment of C2C12 myotubes
had no discernable effect on the amount of
-dystroglycan that was
bound to VVA-agarose or eluted with GalNAc (Fig. 7d). Thus,
although
-N-acetylhexosaminidase digestion clearly
inhibited agrin-, laminin-1-, and VVA-induced AChR clustering in C2C12
myotubes, the enzyme did not appear to inhibit clustering through a
direct effect on
-dystroglycan glycosylation.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
-N-Acetylhexosaminidase
treatment blocks agrin-, laminin-1-, and VVA-induced AChR
clustering in C2C12 myotubes but does not inhibit
-dystroglycan binding to VVA-agarose. In
a, C2C12 myotubes were either left untreated
(Control) or treated with a maximally stimulating dilution
of C-Ag4,8-conditioned medium (Agrin), 1 unit/ml
-N-acetylhexosaminidase (HEXase), or both
(HEXase + Agrin) for 6 h at 37 °C. In b,
C2C12 myotubes were either left untreated (Control) or
treated with 120 nM laminin (Lam), 1 unit/ml
hexosaminidase (HEXase), or both (HEXase + Lam)
for 6 h at 37 °C. In c, C2C12 myotubes were either
left untreated (Control) or treated with 50 µg/ml VVA
(VVA), 1 unit/ml hexosaminidase (HEXase), or both
(HEXase + VVA) for 6 h at 37 °C. The graphs in
a-c represent the average number of AChR clusters measured
in five random fields from each of two independent experiments. In
d, control (CON) or hexosaminidase-treated
(+HEXase) C2C12 myotubes were solubilized and subjected to
VVA small scale chromatography as described under "Materials and
Methods." Western blot analysis was performed on equivalent volumes
of solubilates (SUP), VVA flow-through (VOID), or
GalNAc eluates (ELUTE) using IIH6 monoclonal antibody
( DG), antiserum specific for the 7B integrin isoform
( 7B), or a monoclonal antibody specific for
1 integrin ( 1).
|
|
7
1 Integrin Is Not a VVA
Receptor--
7
1 integrin has also been
implicated as a receptor that may also mediate laminin-induced AChR
clustering (39, 40). Therefore, we examined whether
7
1 integrin in C2C12 myotubes could bind to VVA-agarose and, if so, whether the binding of this integrin to
VVA-agarose was sensitive to pretreatment of myotubes with
-N-acetylhexosaminidase. However, Western blot analysis
of GalNAc eluates from VVA-agarose with antibodies specific for
7 or
1 integrin subunits demonstrated
that neither protein bound to VVA-agarose (Fig. 7d). In
addition, neither
7 nor
1 integrin
subunits from C2C12 myotubes became VVA-reactive when C2C12 myotubes
were pretreated with neuraminidase (data not shown). Thus, we conclude
that neither
-dystroglycan nor
7
1
integrin are solely responsible for mediating VVA-induced AChR clustering.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have presented evidence indicating that three distinct
glycoforms of
-dystroglycan are expressed in adult skeletal muscle, including two minor species that display either patent or latent reactivity with the GalNAc-specific plant lectin VVA. These
VVA-reactive
-dystroglycan glycoforms differ from the predominant
-dystroglycan of skeletal muscle in two respects. Besides displaying
no reactivity with VVA (Figs. 1 and 6b), the predominant
-dystroglycan glycoform also exhibited a biochemically stable
association with several other components in the
dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (Fig. 1). As noted in the introduction,
evidence from a variety of studies indicates that the
dystrophin-glycoprotein complex performs a structural role in
stabilizing the sarcolemma against mechanical stress. In contrast,
neither the patent nor the latent VVA-reactive glycoforms of
-dystroglycan exhibited a stable association with any other
component in the dystrophin- or utrophin-glycoprotein complexes (Fig. 2
and 6b). Thus, VVA reactivity identifies "free agent"
glycoforms of
-dystroglycan that may function in ways that are
modified or distinct from that of the predominant glycoform in
maintaining membrane stability. Other studies have reported evidence
for expression of distinct molecular weight species of
-dystroglycan
within skeletal muscle (41), smooth muscle (20), or nonmuscle tissues
(6, 21). Because the
-dystroglycan core protein has a predicted
molecular weight of 67,000 (42), and chemical deglycosylation reduced
skeletal muscle
-dystroglycan from an apparent molecular weight of
156,000 to 67,000 (32), the observed differences in
-dystroglycan
electrophoretic mobility likely arose from differential glycosylation.
In one study (41), the expression of distinct
-dystroglycan
glycoforms in skeletal muscle was shown to vary with developmental
state and under neural control. In two studies (20, 21),
-dystroglycans of distinct molecular weight were shown either to
display differential protein associations or to exist in free agent
forms as we have shown for VVA-reactive glycoforms in skeletal muscle.
Although past studies have relied on dramatic differences in
-dystroglycan electrophoretic mobility as evidence for differential
glycosylation, our current results demonstrate that
-dystroglycan
molecules of identical molecular weight can vary with respect to their
expression of distinct glyco-epitopes as well as in their
protein-protein interactions.
The evidence for expression of distinct
-dystroglycan
glycoforms combined with the growing list of extracellular molecules that bind
-dystroglycan (2, 43) has tempted speculation that
differential glycosylation may specify or modulate the ligand binding
properties of
-dystroglycan. However, no clear support for this
hypothesis has been reported. In the current study, we examined whether
the presence of distinct glyco-epitopes may instead serve as useful
markers to identify
-dystroglycan glycoforms that perform unique
functions. We focused our effort on testing a hypothesized role for
-linked, terminal GalNAc residues in marking a unique
-dystroglycan glycoform that specifically participates in the
formation of dense AChR clusters at the NMJ. Several previous results
made this hypothesis particularly attractive. First, VVA was shown to
specifically label the NMJ in skeletal muscle from a wide variety of
species (7).
-Dystroglycan purified from nervous tissue was
distinguished from the predominant
-dystroglycan in skeletal muscle
by its patent reactivity with VVA (6). Interestingly, purified skeletal
muscle
-dystroglycan displayed latent VVA reactivity after digestion
with C. perfringens neuraminidase (6), a treatment that also
induced agrin-independent AChR clustering in C2C12 myotubes (8, 36).
VVA was shown to modestly induce AChR clustering by itself and to
potentiate agrin-induced AChR clustering, whereas
-N-acetylhexosaminidase digestion dramatically inhibited
agrin-induced AChR clustering in C2C12 myotubes (8). Like
laminin-1-induced AChR clustering (33, 34), VVA-induced clustering was
shown to occur in MuSK
/
myotubes (35) and in the absence of MuSK or AChR
-subunit phosphorylation (31). Furthermore,
-dystroglycan in C2C12 myotubes displayed both patent VVA reactivity and also latent
reactivity after neuraminidase treatment (31). Finally, VVA-induced
AChR clustering was nearly abolished in myotubes from mice in which the
dystrophin/utrophin-glycoprotein complex protein
-dystrobrevin was
ablated (4). The sum of these results provided an attractive but
circumstantial argument that the unidentified VVA receptor involved in
AChR clustering and
-dystroglycan may be one and the same.
In the present study, we confirmed several of the previous
results linking VVA with
-dystroglycan, and we further demonstrated the expression of two minor
-dystroglycan glycoforms in adult skeletal muscle that displayed either patent or latent reactivity with
VVA. However, we also performed two additional experiments that lead us
to conclude that
-dystroglycan is not the receptor mediating the
effect of VVA on AChR cluster formation in C2C12 myotubes. First, we
found that saturating concentrations of VVA and laminin-1 were strictly
additive with respect to AChR cluster formation (Fig. 5), which
suggests that laminin-1 and VVA do not compete for the same cell
surface receptor on C2C12 myotubes. Second, we found that
-N-acetylhexosaminidase digestion dramatically inhibited
agrin-, VVA-, and laminin-1-induced AChR clustering in C2C12 myotubes;
however, this treatment had no effect on the amount of
-dystroglycan
that was bound to VVA-agarose (Fig. 7). Rather, our results argue for
the existence of a "secret agent" VVA receptor that participates in
AChR cluster formation (Fig. 8). Our
finding that both agrin- and laminin-1-induced AChR clustering are
inhibited by treatment of C2C12 myotubes with
-N-acetylhexosaminidase suggests that this
unidentified VVA receptor is an important downstream component of both
clustering pathways. Future effort will focus on the identification of
NMJ constituents that are both reactive with VVA and sensitive to
digestion by
-N-acetylhexosaminidase.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
V. villosa agglutinin and
-N-acetylhexosaminidase appear to
act on a novel component of the AChR clustering pathway. Based on
our data and other studies (8, 35), we propose the existence of a novel
VVA receptor that lies downstream and is common to both the agrin- and
laminin-mediated AChR clustering pathways.
-N-Acetylhexosaminidase presumably inhibits agrin-,
laminin-, and VVA-induced AChR clustering by cleaving GalNAc residues
from the novel receptor.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Kevin Campbell and Steven
Kaufman for providing antibodies to utrophin and
7
integrin, respectively and also for insightful discussions of the
current study. We are also grateful to Drs. Mark Bowe and Justin Fallon
for the C-Ag4,8-conditioned medium, Dr. Hynda Kleinman for purified
laminin-1, and Drs. Jonathan Cohen, Stanley Froehner, and Joshua Sanes
for providing antibodies used in this study.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a grant from the Muscular
Dystrophy Association, National Institutes of Health Grant ARO1985 to (J. M. E.), and an American Heart Association-Northland
Affiliate Predoctoral Fellowship (to E. L. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Physiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 127 Service Memorial
Inst., 1300 University Ave., Madison, WI 53706. Tel.:
608-265-3419; Fax: 608-265-5512; E-mail:
ervasti@physiology.wisc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 17, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103843200
2
A. Combs and J. Ervasti, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AChR, acetylcholine
receptor;
NMJ, neuromuscular junction;
GalNac, N-acetylgalactosamine;
VVA, V. villosa
agglutinin;
CSM, crude surface membrane(s);
WGA, wheat germ agglutinin;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Straub, V.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
10,
168-175
|
| 2.
|
Henry, M. D.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
602-607
|
| 3.
|
Cote, P. D.,
Moukhles, H.,
Lindenbaum, M.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
23,
338-342
|
| 4.
|
Grady, R. M.,
Zhou, H.,
Cunningham, J. M.,
Henry, M. D.,
Campbell, K. P.,
and Sanes, J. R
(2000)
Neuron
25,
279-293
|
| 5.
|
Jacobson, C.,
Cote, P. D.,
Rossi, S. G.,
Rotundo, R. L.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
435-450
|
| 6.
|
Ervasti, J. M.,
Burwell, A. L.,
and Geissler, A. L
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22315-22321
|
| 7.
|
Scott, L. J. C.,
Bacou, F.,
and Sanes, J. R
(1988)
J. Neurosci.
8,
932-944
|
| 8.
|
Martin, P. T.,
and Sanes, J. R
(1995)
Neuron
14,
743-754
|
| 9.
|
Ohlendieck, K.,
Ervasti, J. M.,
Snook, J. B.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
112,
135-148
|
| 10.
|
Ervasti, J. M.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1991)
Cell
66,
1121-1131
|
| 11.
|
Ervasti, J. M.,
Ohlendieck, K.,
Kahl, S. D.,
Gaver, M. G.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1990)
Nature
345,
315-319
|
| 12.
|
Froehner, S. C.,
Murnane, A. A.,
Tobler, M.,
Peng, H. B.,
and Sealock, R.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
104,
1633-1646
|
| 13.
|
Carr, C.,
Fischbach, G. D.,
and Cohen, J. B
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
1753-1764
|
| 14.
|
Ettinger, A. J.,
Feng, G.,
and Sanes, J. R
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
32534-32538
|
| 15.
|
Ohlendieck, K.,
Ervasti, J. M.,
Matsumura, K.,
Kahl, S. D.,
Leveille, C. J.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1991)
Neuron
7,
499-508
|
| 16.
|
Song, W. K.,
Wang, W.,
Sato, H.,
Biesler, D. A.,
and Kaufman, S. J
(1993)
J. Cell Sci.
106,
1139-1152
|
| 17.
|
O'Toole, J. J.,
Deyst, K. A.,
Bowe, M. A.,
Nastuk, M. A.,
McKechnie, B. A.,
and Fallon, J. R
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
7369-7374
|
| 18.
|
Burden, S. J
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
133-148
|
| 19.
|
Yamada, H.,
Chiba, A.,
Endo, T.,
Kobata, A.,
Anderson, V. B.,
Hori, H.,
Fukuta-Ohi, H.,
Kanazawa, I.,
Campbell, K. P.,
Shimizu, T.,
and Matsumura, K.
(1996)
J. Neurochem.
66,
1518-1524
|
| 20.
|
Straub, V.,
Ettinger, A. J.,
Durbeej, M.,
Venzke, D. P.,
Cutshall, S.,
Sanes, J. R.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27989-27996
|
| 21.
|
Durbeej, M.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26609-26616
|
| 22.
|
Fuhrer, C.,
Gautam, M.,
Sugiyama, J. E.,
and Hall, Z. W
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
6405-6416
|
| 23.
|
Matsumura, K.,
Ervasti, J. M.,
Ohlendieck, K.,
Kahl, S. D.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1992)
Nature
360,
588-591
|
| 24.
|
Khurana, T. S.,
Watkins, S. C.,
Chafey, P.,
Chelly, J.,
Tome, F. M. S.,
Fardeau, M.,
Kaplan, J. C.,
and Kunkel, L. M
(1991)
Neuromuscular Disorders
1,
185-194
|
| 25.
|
Lumeng, C.,
Phelps, S.,
Crawford, G. E.,
Walden, P. D.,
Barald, K.,
and Chamberlain, J. S
(1999)
Nat. Neurosci.
2,
611-617
|
| 26.
|
Peters, M. F.,
Adams, M. E.,
and Froehner, S. C
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
81-93
|
| 27.
|
Man, N.,
Ellis, J. M.,
Love, D. R.,
Davies, K. E.,
Gatter, K. C.,
Dickson, G.,
and Morris, G. E
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1695-1700
|
| 28.
|
Peters, M. F.,
Sadoulet-Puccio, H. M.,
Grady, R. M.,
Kramarcy, N. R.,
Kunkel, L. M.,
Sanes, J. R.,
Sealock, R.,
and Froehner, S. C
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
1269-1278
|
| 29.
|
Deconinck, A. E.,
Rafael, J. A.,
Skinner, J. A.,
Brown, S. C.,
Potter, A. C.,
Metzinger, L.,
Watt, D. J.,
Dickson, J. G.,
Tinsley, J. M.,
and Davies, K. E.
(1997)
Cell
90,
717-727
|
| 30.
|
Grady, R. M.,
Teng, H. B.,
Nichol, M. C.,
Cunningham, J. C.,
Wilkinson, R. S.,
and Sanes, J. R
(1997)
Cell
90,
729-738
|
| 31.
|
Grow, W. A.,
Ferns, M.,
and Gordon, H.
(1999)
Dev. Neurosci.
21,
436-443
|
| 32.
|
Ervasti, J. M.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
809-823
|
| 33.
|
Sugiyama, J. E.,
Glass, D. J.,
Yancopoulos, G. D.,
and Hall, Z. W
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
181-191
|
| 34.
|
Montanaro, F.,
Gee, S. H.,
Jacobson, C.,
Lindenbaum, M. H.,
Froehner, S. C.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
1250-1260
|
| 35.
|
Gautam, M.,
DeChiara, T. M.,
Glass, D. J.,
Yancopoulos, G. D.,
and Sanes, J. R
(1999)
Dev. Brain Res.
114,
171-178
|
| 36.
|
Grow, W. A.,
Ferns, M.,
and Gordon, H.
(1999)
J. Neurobiol.
40,
356-365
|
| 37.
|
Land, B. R.,
Podleski, T. R.,
Salpeter, E. E.,
and Salpeter, M. M
(1977)
J. Physiol.
269,
155-176
|
| 38.
|
Portier, G. L.,
Benders, A. G. M.,
Oosterhof, A.,
Veerkamp, J. H.,
and VanKuppevelt, T. H
(1999)
In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.
35,
219-227
|
| 39.
|
Burkin, D. J.,
Gu, M.,
Hodges, B. L.,
Campanelli, J. T.,
and Kaufman, S. J
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1067-1075
|
| 40.
|
Burkin, D. J.,
Kim, J. E.,
Gu, M.,
and Kaufman, S. J
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
2877-2886
|
| 41.
|
Leschziner, A.,
Moukhles, H.,
Lindenbaum, M.,
Gee, S. H.,
Butterworth, J.,
Campbell, K. P.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(2000)
J. Neurochem.
74,
70-80
|
| 42.
|
Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya, O.,
Ervasti, J. M.,
Leveille, C. J.,
Slaughter, C. A.,
Sernett, S. W.,
and Campbell, K. P
(1992)
Nature
355,
696-702
|
| 43.
|
Bowe, M. A.,
Mendis, D. B.,
and Fallon, J. R
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
801-810
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles: