Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105919200 on July 23, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 38, 35629-35635, September 21, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/38/35629    most recent
M105919200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Imanaka, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Imanaka, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Different Cleavage Specificities of the Dual Catalytic Domains in Chitinase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1*

Takeshi Tanaka, Toshiaki Fukui, and Tadayuki ImanakaDagger

From the Department of Synthetic Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan, and Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology Program of Japan Science and Technology Corporation (CREST-JST), Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan

Received for publication, June 26, 2001, and in revised form, July 20, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The chitinase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1, Tk-ChiA, has an interesting multidomain structure containing dual catalytic domains and triple chitin-binding domains. To determine the biochemical properties of each domain, we constructed deletion mutant genes corresponding to the individual catalytic domains and purified the recombinant proteins. A synergistic effect was observed when chitin was degraded in the presence of both catalytic domains, suggesting different cleavage specificity of these domains. Analyses of degradation products from N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides and their chromogenic derivatives with thin layer chromatography indicated that the N-terminal catalytic domain mainly hydrolyzed the second glycosidic bond from the nonreducing end of the oligomers, whereas the C-terminal domain randomly hydrolyzed glycosidic bonds other than the first bond from the nonreducing end. Both catalytic domains formed diacetyl-chitobiose as a major end product and possessed transglycosylation activity. Further analysis of degradation products from colloidal chitin with high performance liquid chromatography showed that the N-terminal catalytic domain exclusively liberated diacetyl-chitobiose, whereas reactions with the C-terminal domain led to N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides of various lengths. These results demonstrated that the N-terminal and C-terminal catalytic domains functioned as exo- and endochitinases, respectively. The biochemical results provide a physiological explanation for the presence of two catalytic domains with different specificity and suggest a cooperative function between the two on a single polypeptide in the degradation of chitin.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chitin is a beta -1,4-linked, insoluble linear polymer of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and is the second most abundant organic compound on our planet following cellulose. Hence, the biological degradation of chitinous materials is an important process for the recycling of nutrients in most environments. Chitin-hydrolyzing enzymes are classified into three categories (endochitinases, exochitinases, and N-acetyl-beta -glucosaminidases) according to the manner in which they cleave chitin chains (1). Endochitinases randomly cleave beta -1,4-glycosidic bonds of chitin, whereas exochitinases cleave the chain from the nonreducing end to form diacetyl-chitobiose (GlcNAc2). N-Acetyl-beta -glucosaminidases hydrolyze GlcNAc2 into GlcNAc or produce GlcNAc from the nonreducing end of N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides. Many chitinases are composed of a catalytic domain joined to one or more chitin-binding domains (ChBDs),1 as in the case of various insoluble polysaccharide hydrolases including cellulases. This kind of substrate-binding domain is functional not only for accumulating catalytic sites on the surface of substrates but also for disrupting hydrogen bonds in the crystalline region of substrates and thereby facilitating subsequent hydrolysis by the catalytic domains (2).

Many chitinolytic bacteria, such as Bacillus circulans (3), Serratia marcescens (4), Streptomyces thermoviolaceus (5), Clostridium paraputrificum (6), Aeromonas sp. (7), and Pseudoalteromonas sp. (8), have been found to produce more than one kind of chitinase. The efficient chitin degradation is assumed to be performed by the combination of these multiple chitinases. Synergistic effects on degradation of chitin or cellulose have been observed in the simultaneous action of different types of hydrolases (9-11).

In contrast to bacterial, fungal, and plant chitinases, information concerning chitinase from the third kingdom, archaea, has been quite limited. A chitin-degrading hyperthermophilic archaeon, Thermococcus chitonophagus, was isolated from a deep sea hydrothermal vent environment (12). Putative chitinase genes were recently found in archaeal genomes of a hyperthermophile, Pyrococcus furiosus (13), and an extreme halophile, Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 (14). However, these archaeal chitinases have not yet been characterized. We have previously reported the first characterization of an archaeal chitinase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 (previously reported as Pyrococcus kodakaraensis KOD1) (15). The chitinase (Tk-ChiA) had a striking multidomain structure composed of two catalytic domains and three ChBDs (Fig. 1), in which both the catalytic domains were classified into family 18 of glycosyl hydrolases (16). Two internal ChBDs (ChBD2 and ChBD3) possessing almost identical sequences were classified into family 2 of carbohydrate-binding modules, and an N-terminal ChBD1 was classified into family 12 of carbohydrate-binding modules.2 Recombinant Tk-ChiA displayed thermostable chitinase activity with an optimum temperature at 85 °C, and both catalytic domains were independently functional as chitinases. The presence of a chitinase with two catalytic domains has been observed from Chlorella virus CVK2 (17) and PBCV-1 (18); however, catalytic properties of the individual domains have not been well characterized in both cases. In this study, we focused on the enzymatic properties of the individual catalytic domains of Tk-ChiA and found that the chitinase from T. kodakaraensis KOD1 possesses dual catalytic domains with different cleavage specificity on a single polypeptide.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Media-- Escherichia coli TG-1 and BL21(DE3) were used as hosts for expression plasmids derived from pET-25b(+) (Novagen, Madison, WI). E. coli TG-1 was cultivated in LB medium at 37 °C. NZCYM medium (10 g of NZ amine, 5 g of yeast extract, 1 g of casamino acids, 5 g of NaCl, and 2 g of MgSO4·7H2O in 1 liter of deionized water, pH 7.0) was used for cultivation of E. coli BL21(DE3). Ampicillin, when needed, was added at a final concentration of 50 µg/ml.

DNA Manipulations and Sequencing-- DNA manipulations were performed by standard methods, as described by Sambrook and Russell (19). Restriction enzymes and other modifying enzymes were purchased from Takara Shuzo (Kyoto, Japan) or Toyobo (Osaka, Japan). Small scale preparation of plasmid DNA from E. coli cells was performed with the Qiagen Plasmid Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA sequencing was performed with the ABI PRISM kit and Model 310 capillary DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Nucleotide and amino acid sequence analyses were performed with GENETYX software (Software Development, Tokyo, Japan).

Preparation of ChiADelta 5 and Other Mutants-- The expression plasmid for ChiADelta 5 was constructed by polymerase chain reaction as described below. Two oligonucleotides (sense, 5'-ACAACCCATATGTACGGGGTCGTCCCGGTTCTCGCC-3'; antisense, 5'-GCAGATCTCAGCCGAGGTGCTGGAGAACAGTATC-3' (underlining indicates an NdeI site and a BglII site in sense and antisense primers, respectively)) and lambda  phage DNA containing the Tk-chiA gene (20) were used as primers and template for DNA amplification, respectively. The amplified DNA (1,222 base pairs) was digested with NdeI and BglII and then ligated with the NdeI and BamHI sites of plasmid pET-25b(+). No mutation occurring in the sequence of the insert was confirmed by DNA sequencing. The resulting plasmid was designated pET-ChiADelta 5. Expression and purification of ChiADelta 5 were performed with the same procedures as those described for Tk-ChiA (15). Preparations of Tk-ChiA, ChiADelta 2, ChiADelta 3, and ChiADelta 4 have been described previously (15). The protein concentration was determined by the Bio-Rad protein assay system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with bovine serum albumin as a standard. The N-terminal amino acid sequences of purified proteins were determined by protein sequencer Model 491 cLC (Applied Biosystems).

Enzyme Assays-- Chitinase was assayed by a modification of the Schales procedure (21) with colloidal chitin as the substrate (final concentration, 0.17%). The preparation of colloidal chitin has been described previously (15). The standard assay was performed at 80 °C in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by cooling the samples in an ice-cold bath, and the amount of reducing sugar generated was measured. To measure chitinase activity toward other substrates, colloidal chitin was replaced by chitin (chitin Ex), chitosan 7B, chitosan 8B, chitosan 9B, and chitosan 10B (Funakoshi, Tokyo, Japan). Ethylene glycol chitin (Seikagaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used at a concentration of 0.15%. The optimal temperature and pH for chitinase activity were determined as described previously (15). The thermostability of the enzymes was measured by monitoring the remaining activity after heat treatment (90 °C or 100 °C) of 93 µg/ml enzyme in 47 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) with or without 200 mM NaCl.

Analyses of Degradation Products-- The analyses of degradation products from colloidal chitin, N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides (GlcNAc2-6), p-nitrophenyl N-acetyl-beta -chitooligosaccharides (GlcNAc1-5-PNP), and chitosan pentamer (Seikagaku Corp.) by silica gel thin layer chromatography (TLC) were performed as described previously (15). Degradation products from colloidal chitin at the early stage of the reaction were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with a TSKgel Amide-80 column (4.6 × 25 mm; Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan). The produced N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides were eluted with 65% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1 ml/min at 80 °C and then detected by absorbance at 205 nm. A chitooligosaccharide mixture (Seikagaku Corp.) that contains equal weights of GlcNAc1-6 was used as a standard.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Comparison of Primary Structures and Synergism of Two Catalytic Domains of Tk-ChiA-- The chitinase from T. kodakaraensis KOD1 (Tk-ChiA) is composed of two catalytic domains and three ChBDs (Fig. 1) (15). Although both the N-terminal and C-terminal catalytic domains (catalytic domains A and B, respectively) are classified into family 18 of glycosyl hydrolases, the similarity between the catalytic domains is very low (17% identity within 420 amino acids). According to the classification of family 18 bacterial chitinases (22), catalytic domains A and B belong to different subfamilies, subfamilies A and C, respectively. These facts suggested that the two catalytic domains might possess some different features. We have already characterized two deletion mutants of Tk-ChiA, ChiADelta 3 and ChiADelta 2, which contain catalytic domain A with ChBD1 and catalytic domain B with the repeated ChBDs (ChBD2 and ChBD3), respectively (Fig. 1) (15). In the study, when colloidal chitin was used as a substrate, the sum of the specific activities of ChiADelta 3 and ChiADelta 2 was nearly equivalent to that of Tk-ChiA, indicating no synergistic effect. Here, we performed experiments using chitin as a substrate (Fig. 2). Activities of ChiADelta 3, ChiADelta 2, their combination, and Tk-ChiA were measured as µmol of reducing sugar released/nmol of catalytic domain. The results clearly indicated a synergistic effect between ChiADelta 3 and ChiADelta 2 because the activity of the combination of ChiADelta 3 and ChiADelta 2 was significantly higher than the specific activity calculated from individual activities during the reaction. The synergism coefficient, i.e. activity (ChiADelta 3 + ChiADelta 2)/(activity ChiADelta 3 + activity ChiADelta 2), at 60 min was 1.49. The activity of Tk-ChiA, just joining ChiADelta 3 to ChiADelta 2, was also higher than the calculated activity of the deletion mutants. Such synergism raised the possibility that catalytic domains A and B of Tk-ChiA harbored distinct modes of cleavage on chitin.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structural features of the chitinase from T. kodakaraensis (Tk-ChiA) and schematic drawings of the deletion mutants. A putative signal sequence, catalytic domains A and B, three ChBDs, and three linker-like regions are indicated.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Synergistic effect on chitin degradation by deletion mutants of Tk-ChiA. The reaction mixture (1 ml) containing 1.7 mg of chitin in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was incubated with enzyme at 80 °C. The amount of reducing sugar generated was measured by using the Schales procedure (21). black-diamond , Tk-ChiA (29 pmol); , ChiADelta 3 (58 pmol); black-square, ChiADelta 2 (58 pmol); black-triangle, combination of ChiADelta 3 and ChiADelta 2 (29 pmol each); + (broken line), calculated activity for ChiADelta 3 and ChiADelta 2; open circle , ChiADelta 5 (200 pmol); , ChiADelta 4 (200 pmol); triangle , combination of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 (100 pmol each); × (broken line), calculated activity for ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4.

Overexpression and Purification of Deletion Mutants-- To examine the properties of each catalytic domain without the influence of ChBDs, a new deletion mutant (ChiADelta 5) consisting of only catalytic domain A was constructed (Fig. 1). In ChiADelta 5, the initial Met residue was flanked to Tyr-148 located between ChBD1 and catalytic domain A because the longer mutant protein was partially degraded during purification procedures, leading to a protein with Tyr-148 at the N terminus. E. coli cells harboring expression plasmid pET-ChiADelta 5 were induced by isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside, and the protein was purified to apparent homogeneity by heat treatment and column chromatography, as described under "Experimental Procedures" (Fig. 3A, lane 2). The N-terminal amino acid sequence of purified ChiADelta 5 was MYGVVPVLAD, which was identical to the predicted amino acid sequence. The other deletion mutant (ChiADelta 4) consisting of catalytic domain B was constructed and purified as described previously (Fig. 3A, lane 3) (15).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 purified from recombinant E. coli strains. Lane 1, molecular mass marker; lane 2, purified ChiADelta 5 (45,512 Da); lane 3, purified ChiADelta 4 (33,832 Da). B, thermostabilities of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 at 90 °C and 100 °C. , ChiADelta 5 at 90 °C; black-square, ChiADelta 4 at 90 °C; open circle , ChiADelta 5 at 100 °C; , ChiADelta 4 at 100 °C.

Characterizations of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4-- We first investigated whether the catalytic domains ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4, which lacked ChBD(s), showed synergism toward the degradation of chitin. When the activities of ChiADelta 5, ChiADelta 4, and their combination were measured with chitin as a substrate, we could still observe a significant synergistic effect by ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 (Fig. 2). The synergism coefficient was determined to be 1.51 at 60 min, which was equivalent to that of ChiADelta 3 and ChiADelta 2. The synergistic effect was also observed toward ethylene glycol chitin but was not observed toward colloidal chitin (data not shown).

The optimal temperature of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 for colloidal chitin was determined to be 85 °C and 90 °C, respectively. The optimal pH of ChiADelta 4 was 4.5, whereas ChiADelta 5 exhibited high levels of activity over a wide pH range from 4.5 to 8.0. ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 were stable at 80 °C for 60 min in the pH range from 5 to 9 and from 4 to 9, respectively, and the activities were increased up to 110% by additional salt (0.2-1.0 M NaCl or KCl). The half-life of ChiADelta 5 at 90 °C was 5 min, and the enzyme was completely inactivated within 1 min at 100 °C (Fig. 3B). On the other hand, ChiADelta 4 was extremely thermostable even at 100 °C, with a half-life of >7 h. Additions of 0.2 M NaCl did not affect the thermostabilities of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 (data not shown).

Cleavage Specificities of ChiADelta 5 and ChiDelta 4-- To determine the modes of cleavage by ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4, we analyzed the reaction products formed from colloidal chitin and various N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides (GlcNAc2-6) with TLC (Fig. 4). When colloidal chitin was used as a substrate, only GlcNAc2 was detected in both cases. Hydrolysis of GlcNAc2 by ChiADelta 5 or ChiADelta 4 was not observed within 180 min; however, spots corresponding to GlcNAc could be detected after prolonged incubation (24 h), indicating that ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 possessed small degrees of activity toward GlcNAc2 (data not shown). GlcNAc3 was hydrolyzed to GlcNAc and GlcNAc2 by ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4. Although both enzymes formed GlcNAc2 as a major end product from GlcNAc4-6, obvious differences between ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 were observed in their intermediate products. ChiADelta 4 produced oligosaccharides that were 1 unit shorter than the starting substrate, such as GlcNAc5 from GlcNAc6 (Fig. 4B). This result indicated that ChiADelta 4 could liberate a GlcNAc unit from the reducing and/or nonreducing ends. In contrast, reactions with ChiADelta 5 did not lead to intermediates 1 unit shorter than the starting material (Fig. 4A), indicating a distinct mode of cleavage. It had been confirmed that there was no thermal decomposition for these substrates.


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   TLC of hydrolysis products by ChiADelta 5 (A) and ChiADelta 4 (B) from colloidal chitin and various N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides. The reaction mixture (100 µl) containing 0.8 mg of substrate in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was incubated with enzyme (ChiADelta 5, 50 pmol; ChiADelta 4, 10 pmol) at 70 °C. The reaction products were analyzed at the indicated times. Lanes Std., standard N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides ranging from GlcNAc (G1) to GlcNAc6 (G6).

In an additional experiment, N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharide derivatives labeled at their reducing ends with p-nitrophenol (GlcNAc1-5-PNP) were used as substrates to distinguish the directions of oligosaccharides (Fig. 5). GlcNAc-PNP was not hydrolyzed by both the enzymes. When GlcNAcn-PNP (n = 2-5) were used as substrates, the spots corresponding to GlcNAcn-1-PNP could not be detected in most cases, indicating that ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 did not cleave the first glycosidic bond from the nonreducing end. ChiADelta 5 produced mainly GlcNAc2 with a small amount of GlcNAc3 from GlcNAc4,5-PNP. In contrast, the spots corresponding to GlcNAc2-5 were detected from GlcNAc5-PNP by ChiADelta 4 at 1 and 3 min, demonstrating the cleavage at multiple sites in the substrate by ChiADelta 4. When GlcNAc2-PNP was hydrolyzed by ChiADelta 5, the formation of GlcNAc-PNP and GlcNAc3 was observed, suggesting a transglycosylation activity of ChiADelta 5. Therefore, reactions with each enzyme and high concentrations of GlcNAc3 (51.7 mg/ml) were carried out. TLC analysis of the reaction mixtures displayed the generation of GlcNAc4 and GlcNAc5 in each the reaction (Fig. 6), indicating that ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 both harbored transglycosylation activity.


View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   TLC of hydrolysis products by ChiADelta 5 (A) and ChiADelta 4 (B) from various p-nitrophenyl N-acetyl-beta -chitooligosaccharides. The reaction mixture (100 µl) containing 0.16 mg of substrate in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was incubated with enzyme (ChiADelta 5, 5 pmol; ChiADelta 4, 1 pmol) at 70 °C. The reaction mixtures (10 µl each) were concentrated under reduced pressure without heating and then analyzed. Lanes Std., standard N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides ranging from GlcNAc (G1) to GlcNAc6 (G6); lanes PNP Std., standard p-nitrophenyl N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides ranging from GlcNAc-PNP (G1PNP) to GlcNAc5-PNP (G5PNP). Schematic models of hydrolysis sites in GlcNAc6 or GlcNAc5-PNP by ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 are represented at the bottoms of A and B, respectively. Arrow size indicates the relative degradation rate. White hexagons indicate GlcNAc residues, and black hexagons indicate GlcNAc residues of reducing ends or p-nitrophenyl groups.


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   TLC of transglycosylation products by ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 from GlcNAc3. The reaction mixture (50 µl) containing 2.59 mg of GlcNAc3 in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was incubated with enzyme (ChiADelta 5, 3 pmol; ChiADelta 4, 3 pmol) at 70 °C. The reaction mixtures were diluted and then analyzed. Lanes Std., standard N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides ranging from GlcNAc (G1) to GlcNAc6 (G6).

Although the cleavage specificity for oligosaccharides was different between ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 as described above, no difference in the cleavage properties of these enzymes against colloidal chitin was observed. Both enzymes formed GlcNAc2 as an end product from colloidal chitin (Fig. 4); however, it was not clear whether these GlcNAc2 products were produced directly from colloidal chitin or produced indirectly via longer oligosaccharide intermediates during hydrolysis. To clarify this, we analyzed the products from colloidal chitin at the early stage of the reaction (2, 4, 8, and 12 min) by HPLC. The weight of products was kept within 3% of that of the initial substrate in this experiment to avoid secondary hydrolysis. ChiADelta 5 produced mainly GlcNAc2, together with a small amount of GlcNAc3 (Fig. 7A). In contrast, ChiADelta 4 produced GlcNAc1-6, and we also detected faint signals that were probably derived from GlcNAc7 and GlcNAc8 at the retention times of 10.7 and 12.6 min, respectively (Fig. 7B). The result of HPLC analysis supported the direct formation of GlcNAc2 from colloidal chitin by ChiADelta 5, whereas ChiADelta 4 liberated GlcNAc1-6 from the high polymer substrate. It should be noted that GlcNAcn production rates from colloidal chitin with ChiADelta 5 were much higher than those seen with ChiADelta 4, as shown in insets of Fig. 7.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Identification of hydrolysis products from colloidal chitin by ChiADelta 5 (A) and ChiADelta 4 (B) at the early stage of the reaction (4 min). The reaction mixture (1 ml) containing 6 mg of colloidal chitin in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was incubated with enzyme (ChiADelta 5, 100 pmol; ChiADelta 4, 100 pmol) for 2, 4, 8, and 12 min at 70 °C. The reaction products (250 µl each) were centrifuged, and the supernatants were analyzed by HPLC. In the case of reactions with ChiADelta 4, the supernatants were concentrated 5-fold under reduced pressure without heating. Insets, time course of GlcNAcn production. open circle , GlcNAc; , GlcNAc2; , GlcNAc3; black-square, GlcNAc4; triangle , GlcNAc5; black-down-triangle , GlcNAc6.

Specific Activities of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 toward Various Substrates-- The specificities of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 toward insoluble substrates (chitin and colloidal chitin) and soluble derivatives (ethylene glycol chitin and various degrees of deacetylated chitosans) were also determined as shown in Table I. The specific activities toward chitin were lowest among all substrates for both ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4. ChiADelta 4 showed lower activity toward colloidal chitin than ChiADelta 5, as was demonstrated by the HPLC analysis (Fig. 7, insets). Whereas the activities of ChiADelta 5 were similar toward colloidal chitin and chitosans with various degrees of deacetylation, ChiADelta 4 showed remarkably high levels of activity toward soluble ethylene glycol chitin, chitosan 7B, chitosan 8B, and chitosan 9B. Both ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 showed hydrolytic activities against the highly deacetylated chitin (>98%) chitosan 10B. These activities are most likely to be dependent on residual GlcNAc units in the substrate because hydrolyses of chitosan pentamer by ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 could not be observed (data not shown).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Specific activities of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 toward various substrates


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The chitinase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon T. kodakaraensis KOD1, Tk-ChiA, possesses two catalytic domains on a single polypeptide (15). In this study, we examined the biochemical properties of the individual catalytic domains in detail. The results clearly indicated differences between the cleavage specificities of the two catalytic domains.

From the analyses of hydrolysates of N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides with TLC (Figs. 4 and 5), we determined the cleavage sites in GlcNAc6 or GlcNAc5-PNP by ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4, respectively (see illustrations in Fig. 5). ChiADelta 5 showed exochitinolytic activity that mainly hydrolyzed the second glycosidic bond and slightly hydrolyzed the third one from the nonreducing end of chitin chains. On the other hand, ChiADelta 4 showed endochitinolytic activity that randomly hydrolyzed glycosidic bonds other than the terminal bond at the nonreducing end. Furthermore, we carried out HPLC analysis and successfully detected N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides liberated from chitin at the early stage of hydrolysis, without the use of radiolabeled substrate. The results shown in Fig. 7 clearly indicate that ChiADelta 5 is an exochitinase, whereas ChiADelta 4 is an endochitinase, consistent with the conclusions from experiments using N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides as substrates. The absence of hydrolytic activities of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 against chitosan pentamer indicated that both catalytic domains did not possess chitosanase activity. This result agrees with previous findings that family 18 chitinases catalyzed the hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond via substrate-assisted catalysis that required the N-acetyl group of the substrate (23, 24). Hence, although ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 showed activity even toward chitosan 10B (>98% deacetylated) as shown in Table I, the activities must be dependent on the residual GlcNAc units in the substrate.

Chitinase A1 from B. circulans WL-12 has been well studied and is one of the chitinases (besides the archaeal ones) most similar to catalytic domain A of Tk-ChiA (36% identity within 403 amino acids). Although it had been reported that chitinase A1 mainly hydrolyzed the second glycosidic bond from the nonreducing end of PNP-GlcNAc2-5, like ChiADelta 5 (25), recent three-dimensional structural analysis of chitinase A1 suggested that GlcNAc2 units were continuously split off from the reducing end of the chitin chain in this enzyme (26). Seven aromatic residues were proposed to guide a chitin chain into the catalytic site in chitinase A1, and six of them were also conserved in the catalytic domain A of Tk-ChiA (Trp-372, Trp-251, Trp-523, Trp-184, Tyr-187, and Tyr-223). From these facts, catalytic domain A may also hydrolyze mainly the second glycosidic bond from the reducing end when high polymer chitin is a substrate.

As described above, ChiADelta 4 (endochitinase type) could hydrolyze the bonds regardless of their positions in the high polymer chains, whereas the cleavage sites for ChiADelta 5 (exochitinase type) were limited at the ends of the chitin chains. The higher number of accessible cleavage sites for the endochitinase could explain the higher activities of ChiADelta 4 toward soluble ethylene glycol chitin, chitosan 7B, chitosan 8B, and chitosan 9B in comparison with those of ChiADelta 5 (Table I). The drastic decrease in activity toward chitosan 10B is likely to be due to the concentration of GlcNAc residues falling below the value needed for maximum velocity of the reaction. On the other hand, the activities of ChiADelta 5 were higher than those of ChiADelta 4 when colloidal chitin or chitosan 10B was used as a substrate. It is well known that the acid and alkaline treatments for preparations of the colloidal chitin and chitosan 10B are accompanied by low molecularization and a consequent increase of chitin ends (27, 28). Indeed, the viscosity of chitosan 10B was approximately one-third of that of the other chitosans used in our experiments. The larger number of chain ends in these substrates for recognition and cleavage by ChiADelta 5 probably contributes to the similar levels of activity toward colloidal chitin and chitosan 10B with less GlcNAc residues when compared with those toward other chitosans.

Due to its highly crystalline structure, chitin itself is hardly degradable. Indeed, the activities of ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 toward higher crystalline chitin were much lower when compared with other chitin derivatives. As shown in Fig. 2, ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 with different cleavage specificities exhibited a synergistic effect toward chitin. It can be assumed that the endochitinase (catalytic domain B) randomly produced ends of chitin chains accessible to the exochitinase (catalytic domain A), which then effectively released GlcNAc2 from the ends (Fig. 7, insets). Although many organisms produce more than one chitinase for efficient hydrolysis of chitin polymer (3-8), the single polypeptide Tk-ChiA alone could achieve synergistic hydrolysis of chitin. We have observed no synergistic effect between ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 toward colloidal chitin as a substrate. The reason for this phenomenon is probably the existence of a sufficient number of the ends in colloidal chitin formed by the low molecularization described above, which allowed ChiADelta 5 to efficiently hydrolyze the chains without the assistance of an endochitinase.

The deletion mutants, ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4, are thermostable chitinases, and ChiADelta 4 in particular exhibited extreme thermostability (Fig. 3B). In addition, such thermostable enzymes generally possess stabilities not only toward heat but also toward detergents and organic solvents (29). These thermostable chitinases would be applicable as useful catalysts in the chitin industry. Moreover, ChiADelta 5 and ChiADelta 4 both possess transglycosylation activity (Fig. 6). These catalytic properties may be advantages in the efficient production of N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharides with biological activity (30, 31) using organic solvents as reaction media.

In the archaeal genomes of P. furiosus (the unfinished genome sequence is available at the Utah Genome Center website3) (13) and Halobacterium NRC-1 (14), two chitinase orthologue genes are present as a cluster (gene names: Pf_1168804 and Pf_1166613, and chi and VNG0818C, respectively). The deduced amino acid sequences of Pf_1168804 and Pf_1166613 are similar to the N-terminal region of Tk-ChiA divided at the middle of catalytic domain A and the C-terminal polypeptide without one of the two internal ChBDs, respectively. The two putative enzymes from Halobacterium NRC-1, both composed of N-terminal ChBD and C-terminal catalytic domain, are similar to the N-terminal half of Tk-ChiA. Among all chitinases for which primary structures have been determined, catalytic domains A and B of Tk-ChiA are the most closely related to the putative chitinases from P. furiosus (72-83% identities). The deduced amino acid sequences translated from chi and VNG0818C show comparatively higher similarities to catalytic domain A (43% and 33% identities, respectively) than to other chitinases from eucarya and bacteria. Further identification of archaeal chitinases would clarify whether archaeal chitinases comprise independent groups from eucaryal and bacterial enzymes in terms of primary structure.

The structure of Tk-ChiA, which is composed of dual catalytic domains and triple ChBDs on a single polypeptide, is very interesting. The two catalytic domains possess different cleavage specificities, and their simultaneous action showed a synergistic effect on the hydrolysis of high molecular chitin. The ChBDs enhanced the hydrolytic efficiency of these catalytic domains against the insoluble substrate (Fig. 2). Moreover, the multidomain structure of Tk-ChiA is expected to be effective to concentrate the different kinds of catalytic domains (endochitinase- and exochitinase-type enzymes) side by side on the surface of chitin crystals. The advantages are similar to those obtained by the "more evolved" cellulosome in cellulose degradation. The biochemical evidence in this study provides a feasible physiological explanation for the unique structure of Tk-ChiA. This structure should contribute to efficient degradation of chitin, especially at the low enzyme and substrate concentrations found under natural conditions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Japan Science and Technology Corporation for Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (T. I.) and by a grant-in-aid for the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows (to T. T.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Synthetic Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. Tel.: 81-75-753-5568; Fax: 81-75-753-4703; E-mail: imanaka@sbchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 23, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105919200

2 P. M. Coutinho and B. Henrissat; afmb.cnrs-mrs.fr/~pedro/CAZY/cbm.html.

3 www.genome.utah.edu/.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ChBD, chitin-binding domain; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Gooday, G. W. (1994) in Biochemistry of Microbial Degradation (Ratledge, C., ed) , pp. 279-312, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
2. Tomme, P., Warren, R. A., and Gilkes, N. R. (1995) Adv. Microb. Physiol. 37, 1-81
3. Alam, M. M., Mizutani, T., Isono, M., Nikaidou, N., and Watanabe, T. (1996) J. Ferment. Bioeng. 82, 28-36
4. Brurberg, M. B., Nes, I. F., and Eijsink, V. G. (1996) Microbiology 142, 1581-1589
5. Tsujibo, H., Hatano, N., Okamoto, T., Endo, H., Miyamoto, K., and Inamori, Y. (1999) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 181, 83-90
6. Morimoto, K., Karita, S., Kimura, T., Sakka, K., and Ohmiya, K. (1999) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 51, 340-347
7. Shiro, M., Ueda, M., Kawaguchi, T., and Arai, M. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1305, 44-48
8. Techkarnjanaruk, S., and Goodman, A. E. (1999) Microbiology 145, 925-934
9. Boisset, C., Fraschini, C., Schülein, M., Henrissat, B., and Chanzy, H. (2000) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1444-1452
10. Fukamizo, T., and Kramer, K. J. (1985) Insect Biochem. 15, 141-145
11. Gaudin, C., Belaich, A., Champ, S., and Belaich, J. P. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 1910-1915
12. Huber, R., Stöhr, J., Hohenhaus, S., Rachel, R., Burggraf, S., Jannasch, H. W., and Stetter, K. O. (1995) Arch. Microbiol. 164, 255-264
13. Driskill, L. E., Kusy, K., Bauer, M. W., and Kelly, R. M. (1999) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 893-897
14. Ng, W. V., Kennedy, S. P., Mahairas, G. G., Berquist, B., Pan, M., Shukla, H. D., Lasky, S. R., Baliga, N. S., Thorsson, V., Sbrogna, J., Swartzell, S., Weir, D., Hall, J., Dahl, T. A., Welti, R., Goo, Y. A., Leithauser, B., Keller, K., Cruz, R., Danson, M. J., Hough, D. W., Maddocks, D. G., Jablonski, P. E., Krebs, M. P., Angevine, C. M., Dale, H., Isenbarger, T. A., Peck, R. F., Pohlschroder, M., Spudich, J. L., Jung, K. H., Alam, M., Freitas, T., Hou, S., Daniels, C. J., Dennis, P. P., Omer, A. D., Ebhardt, H., Lowe, T. M., Liang, P., Riley, M., Hood, L., and DasSarma, S. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 12176-12181
15. Tanaka, T., Fujiwara, S., Nishikori, S., Fukui, T., Takagi, M., and Imanaka, T. (1999) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 5338-5344
16. Henrissat, B. (1991) Biochem. J. 280, 309-316
17. Hiramatsu, S., Ishihara, M., Fujie, M., Usami, S., and Yamada, T. (1999) Virology 260, 308-315
18. Sun, L., Adams, B., Gurnon, J. R., Ye, Y., and Van Etten, J. L. (1999) Virology 263, 376-387
19. Sambrook, J., and Russell, D. W. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 3rd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
20. Ezaki, S., Miyaoku, K., Nishi, K., Tanaka, T., Fujiwara, S., Takagi, M., Atomi, H., and Imanaka, T. (1999) J. Biosci. Bioeng. 88, 130-135
21. Imoto, T., and Yagishita, K. (1971) Agric. Biol. Chem. 35, 1154-1156
22. Suzuki, K., Taiyoji, M., Sugawara, N., Nikaidou, N., Henrissat, B., and Watanabe, T. (1999) Biochem. J. 343, 587-596
23. Honda, Y., Tanimori, S., Kirihata, M., Kaneko, S., Tokuyasu, K., Hashimoto, M., Watanabe, T., and Fukamizo, T. (2000) FEBS Lett. 476, 194-197
24. Terwisscha van Scheltinga, A. C., Armand, S., Kalk, K. H., Isogai, A., Henrissat, B., and Dijkstra, B. W. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 15619-15623
25. Sugiyama, J., Boisset, C., Hashimoto, M., and Watanabe, T. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 286, 247-255
26. Watanabe, T., Ishibashi, A., Ariga, Y., Hashimoto, M., Nikaidou, N., Sugiyama, J., Matsumoto, T., and Nonaka, T. (2001) FEBS Lett. 494, 74-78
27. Austin, P. R. (1988) Methods Enzymol. 161, 403-407
28. Wang, W., Bo, S. Q., Li, S. Q., and Qin, W. (1991) Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 13, 281-285
29. Owusu, R. K., and Cowan, D. A. (1989) Enzyme Microb. Technol. 11, 568-574
30. Suzuki, K., Mikami, T., Okawa, Y., Tokoro, A., Suzuki, S., and Suzuki, M. (1986) Carbohydr. Res. 151, 403-408
31. Tokoro, A., Tatewaki, N., Suzuki, K., Mikami, T., Suzuki, S., and Suzuki, M. (1988) Chem. Pharm. Bull. 36, 784-790


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
T. Tanaka, F. Takahashi, T. Fukui, S. Fujiwara, H. Atomi, and T. Imanaka
Characterization of a Novel Glucosamine-6-Phosphate Deaminase from a Hyperthermophilic Archaeon
J. Bacteriol., October 15, 2005; 187(20): 7038 - 7044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Adams, A. Musiyenko, R. Kumar, and S. Barik
A Novel Class of Dual-family Immunophilins
J. Biol. Chem., July 1, 2005; 280(26): 24308 - 24314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
T. Fukui, H. Atomi, T. Kanai, R. Matsumi, S. Fujiwara, and T. Imanaka
Complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 and comparison with Pyrococcus genomes
Genome Res., March 1, 2005; 15(3): 352 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Tanaka, T. Fukui, S. Fujiwara, H. Atomi, and T. Imanaka
Concerted Action of Diacetylchitobiose Deacetylase and Exo-{beta}-D-glucosaminidase in a Novel Chitinolytic Pathway in the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1
J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30021 - 30027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
M. B. Howard, N. A. Ekborg, L. E. Taylor II, R. M. Weiner, and S. W. Hutcheson
Chitinase B of "Microbulbifer degradans" 2-40 Contains Two Catalytic Domains with Different Chitinolytic Activities
J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2004; 186(5): 1297 - 1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
T. Tanaka, T. Fukui, H. Atomi, and T. Imanaka
Characterization of an Exo-{beta}-D-Glucosaminidase Involved in a Novel Chitinolytic Pathway from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1
J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2003; 185(17): 5175 - 5181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J. Gao, M. W. Bauer, K. R. Shockley, M. A. Pysz, and R. M. Kelly
Growth of Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus on Chitin Involves Two Family 18 Chitinases
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2003; 69(6): 3119 - 3128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/38/35629    most recent
M105919200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Imanaka, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Imanaka, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement