Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105079200 on July 23, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 38, 35660-35668, September 21, 2001
Cysteine Substitutions Reveal Dual Functions of the
Amino-terminal Tail in Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance
Regulator Channel Gating*
Jian
Fu and
Kevin L.
Kirk
From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, the Department of
Neurobiology, and the Gregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research
Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham,
Birmingham, Alabama 35294
Received for publication, June 3, 2001, and in revised form, July 20, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Previously, we observed that the cystic fibrosis
transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel openings are
destabilized by replacing several acidic residues in the amino-terminal
tail with alanines (Naren, A. P., Cormet-Boyaka, E., Fu,
J., Villain, M., Blalock, J. E., Quick, M. W., and
Kirk, K. L. (1999) Science 286, 544-548). Here we
determined whether this effect is due to the loss of negative
charge at these sites and whether the amino-terminal tail also
modulates other aspects of channel gating. We introduced cysteines at
two of these positions (E54C/D58C) and tested a series of
methanethiosulfonate (MTS) reagents for their effects on the gating
properties of these cysteine mutants in intact Xenopus oocytes and excised membrane patches. Covalent modification of these
sites with either neutral (MMTS) or charged
(2-carboxyethylmethanethiosulfonate (MTSCE) and
2-(trimethylammonium)ethylmethanethiosulfonate (MTSET)) reagents
markedly inhibited channel open probability primarily by reducing the
rate of channel opening. The MTS reagents had negligible effects on the
gating of the wild type channel or a corresponding double alanine
mutant (E54A/D58A) under the same conditions. The inhibition of the
opening rate of the E54C/D58C mutant channel by MMTS could be reversed
by the reducing agent dithiothreitol (200 µM) or by
elevating the bath ATP concentration above that required to activate
maximally the wild type channel (>1 mM). Interestingly,
the three MTS reagents had qualitatively different effects on the
duration of channel openings (i.e. channel closing rate),
namely the duration of openings was negligibly changed by the neutral
MMTS, decreased by the positively charged MTSET, and increased by the
negatively charged MTSCE. Our results indicate that the CFTR amino tail
modulates both the rates of channel opening and channel closing and
that the negative charges at residues 54 and 58 are important for
controlling the duration of channel openings.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator
(CFTR)1 is a cAMP-regulated
chloride channel that is expressed in a variety of epithelial tissues
(1). Altered CFTR channel function contributes to several human
diseases including cystic fibrosis (2) and secretory diarrhea (3). The
CFTR channel possesses two transmembrane domains, each of which
contains six transmembrane segments, two nucleotide binding domains
(NBDs), and a large regulatory domain (R domain) with multiple
phosphorylation sites (4). PKA phosphorylation of the R domain and ATP
binding at the nucleotide binding domains are required for CFTR channel
activation (5-8). CFTR channel gating probably involves physical and
functional interactions among the R domain and the NBDs (7, 9, 10),
although the precise roles of these domains in controlling channel
opening and closing are still unclear. In addition, there have been
reports that other regions of CFTR such as the cytoplasmic loops may
also modulate CFTR channel function (11, 12).
We observed previously (13, 14) that a cluster of negatively charged
residues in a putative helical region of the amino-terminal tail
(N-tail) participates in CFTR channel gating. Alanine substitutions at
these positions (i.e. Asp-47, Glu-51, Glu-54, and
Asp-58) resulted in accelerated deactivation kinetics in intact
oocytes and shortened open channel bursts in excised membrane patches
(13). A disease-associated mutant that maps to one of these sites (D58N
CFTR) exhibited similar alterations in macroscopic current kinetics and
open channel burst duration (14). These mutations had no apparent
effect on the ATP dependence of channel gating or on bulk
phosphorylation of the CFTR protein by PKA but did prevent the very
long channel openings that can be induced by the poorly hydrolyzable
nucleotide analog AMP-PNP (14). Thus, these mutations in the N-tail
destabilize channel openings (i.e. increase channel closing
rate) apparently by affecting a gating transition that is downstream of
channel activation by phosphorylation and ATP binding (14).
Although the results of our previous mutational analyses indicated that
the N-tail regulates CFTR channel closing, those studies provided only
limited insight into the specific role of this region in modulating
CFTR gating. For example, most of our previous data were obtained for
one kind of mutation (Glu/Asp to Ala), which limits our ability
to make conclusions about the importance of the charge or bulk of the
side groups of the relevant amino acids. In addition, the comparison
between the gating properties of wild type and mutant channels is an
unpaired comparison that could be confounded by effects of the
mutations on the biosynthesis or general structure of the channel
protein. Finally, the N-tail could play additional roles in CFTR
channel gating that are not particularly sensitive to point mutations
in this region. Although we failed to observe a dramatic effect of
mutations in this region on channel opening rate, we did observe a
modest increase in interburst duration (i.e. closed time)
for D58N CFTR (14) as if this mutation also affected the ability of the
channel to open. In addition, Chan et al. (15) have recently
reported that CFTR channels that have been epitope-tagged (FLAG-tagged)
at the extreme amino terminus exhibit fewer channel openings in excised
membrane patches (i.e. reduced opening rate) relative to the
untagged channel. These observations raise the possibility that the
N-tail could participate in multiple aspects of CFTR gating
(i.e. both channel opening and closing).
To address these issues we substituted cysteines for two negatively
charged amino acids in the N-tail (Glu-54 and Asp-58) and covalently
modified these residues in intact Xenopus oocytes and
excised membrane patches. The advantages of studying cysteine mutants
is that one can acutely and reversibly modify these residues with
thiol-specific reagents (i.e. do paired comparisons within the same oocyte or membrane patch). In addition, since cysteines can be
modified with methanethiosulfonate (MTS) derivatives with different
chemistries (16), such experiments have the potential to provide
initial insights into the structural requirements for the involvement
of the N-tail in channel gating. We were encouraged to attempt this
approach because of reports that the CFTR channel is relatively
insensitive to low concentrations of thiol-specific reagents (17-19).
Our results indicate that modification of these cysteines with either
uncharged or charged MTS reagents markedly and reversibly reduces
channel opening rate in excised membrane patches. This inhibition of
opening rate was observed at concentrations of MTS reagents that had no
effect on the gating of the wild type channel or of a corresponding
alanine mutant (E54A/D58A). Interestingly, uncharged and charged MTS
reagents had different effects on open channel burst duration
(i.e. channel closing rate); specifically, burst duration
was increased by the negatively charged MTSCE, decreased by the
positively charged MTSET, and virtually unaffected by the neutral MMTS.
Our results indicate that the amino-terminal tail can modulate both the
opening and closing of the CFTR channel and that the duration of
channel openings is dependent on the negative charges at positions
Glu-54 and Asp-58.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Mutagenesis--
The E54C and E54C/D58C CFTR mutants were
generated by PCR mutagenesis. A 1-kilobase pair fragment of wild type
CFTR in pCDNA3 (Invitrogen Corp.) was amplified by PCR in the
presence of an appropriate mutagenic oligonucleotide. The upstream
primer contained an Asp-718 restriction site, and the downstream primer
contained a Kpn21 site. After digestion the PCR product was ligated
back into pCDNA3-wild type CFTR pre-digested with Asp-718 and
Kpn21. Mutations were confirmed by sequencing the entire 1-kilobase
pair fragment. For oocyte injections wild type and mutant CFTR cRNAs were prepared using the T7 Megascript transcription kit from Ambion Inc.
Electrophysiology--
Female Xenopus
laevis were purchased from Xenopus One (Ann
Arbor, MI). Frogs were anesthetized in water containing 0.2% MS-222 (Tricaine, 3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester) for 30 min before surgery.
Oocytes were removed from a 1-cm incision in the abdomen. After
suturing the incision, the frog was allowed to recover in water. The
frogs were humanely killed after the final collection. Clumps of
oocytes were defolliculated in a 10-ml plastic tube of OR-2 solution
(82 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM KCl, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5) containing 2 mg/ml
collagenase A. Defolliculated oocytes were transferred to 50%
Leibovitz medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) plus 15 mM
HEPES, pH 7.5, 15% heat-inactivated horse serum, and 1%
penicillin/streptomycin and maintained at 18 °C before and after
injection. Wild type and mutant CFTR cRNAs were injected into oocytes
2-5 days before voltage clamp studies or patch clamp recording. For
patch clamp experiments more mutant CFTR cRNAs were injected (2-5
versus 1 ng of cRNA for wild type CFTR) to provide
sufficient channel activity for quantitative analysis of channel gating
(see below).
Two microelectrode voltage clamp experiments were performed to measure
the macroscopic currents mediated by wild type CFTR and the cysteine
mutants in intact oocytes. CFTR-mediated currents were activated in a
low calcium ND-96 bath solution (96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM CaCl2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5) by
the addition of a mixture containing 1 mM
isobutylmethylxanthine, 10 µM forskolin, and 200 µM dibutyryl-cAMP. Oocytes were clamped at
50 mV
throughout the experiments. All recordings were performed at
21-23 °C.
For patch clamp experiments the oocytes were shrunken briefly in a bath
solution containing 140 mM
N-methyl-D-glucamine, 0.5 MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES
(pH 7.4 with HCl). The vitelline membrane was then removed with fine
tip forceps. All single channel recordings were performed at
21-23 °C in an inside-out excised configuration with a holding
potential of
80 mV (pipette side ground). The pipette solution
contained 140 mM
N-methyl-D-glucamine, 0.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.2 CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES (pH
7.4 with HCl). PKA catalytic subunit and Mg-ATP were added to the bath
right after the formation of an excised inside-out patch and were
present throughout the experiment. The final concentrations of
Mg-ATP and PKA catalytic subunit were 1 mM and 80 units/ml, respectively, unless otherwise noted. Bath solutions
containing MMTS, MTSET, MTSCE, or DTT were prepared fresh in low
calcium ND-96 solution (two electrode voltage clamp experiments) or in
the bath solution used for patch clamping (see above) before each experiment.
Data Analysis--
Patch clamp records were filtered at 100 Hz.
Only records with stable activity for at least 10 min were analyzed.
Single channel analysis was performed using pClamp6 software (Axon
Instruments). Closings shorter than 20 ms were considered to be
intraburst flickerings (due presumably to block by the HEPES in the
bath (20, 21)) and were ignored in our analysis. The kinetic
differences between wild type CFTR and the cysteine mutants, and the
effects of thiol modification on the cysteine mutants, were also
obvious when longer cut-off times (50 or 80 ms) were used (data not
shown). Since most patches contained multiple channels, mean open
channel burst duration was calculated by the cycle time method
described by Mathews et al. (22) and used by us previously
(13, 14). Channel open probability (Po) was
calculated as described (13, 14, 22). Channel opening rate was
calculated as the number of openings observed per s divided by the
number of active channels detected in that patch. The calculation of
burst duration using the cycle time method is independent of the number
of channels in the patch (14, 22). Conversely, the calculations of
opening rate and Po are directly dependent on
how many active channels are in a patch. Thus, absolute values of
opening rates and Po can be overestimated for
patches containing channels with low activity for which the numbers of
channels may be underestimated. However, this potential source of error
does not affect estimates of the relative changes of these parameters
in paired experiments performed on individual excised patches.
Data are presented as means ± S.E., where n indicates
the number of oocytes or patches analyzed. Paired Student's
t tests were performed to examine differences before and
after treatment with a given reagent. Differences were considered to be
statistically significant for p values lower than 0.05 (indicated by asterisks in figures).
Chemicals--
MTSET and MTSCE were purchased from Toronto
Research Chemical Inc. PKA catalytic subunit was purchased from
Promega, and forskolin was from Calbiochem. All other chemicals were
from Sigma.
 |
RESULTS |
The Functional Properties of the Cysteine Mutants Are Similar to
Those of the Previously Studied Alanine Mutants--
The functional
properties of the cysteine mutants were first analyzed in intact
oocytes to determine how the cysteine substitutions themselves affected
CFTR activity. The cRNAs encoding wild type CFTR, a single cysteine
mutant (E54C), or a double cysteine mutant (E54C/D58C) were injected
into oocytes and assayed by two-electrode voltage clamp analysis. Both
cysteine mutants exhibited lower cAMP-activated macroscopic currents
than wild type CFTR when equivalent amounts of cRNA were injected (Fig.
1B), as we had observed
previously (13, 14) for the alanine mutants at these positions. In
addition, like the corresponding double alanine mutant (E54A/D58A)
(13), the double cysteine mutant deactivated faster than wild type CFTR following removal of the cAMP-activating mixture (Fig. 1C).
As will be shown below, E54C/D58C also exhibits reduced channel
Po and briefer channel openings in excised
membrane patches relative to the wild type channel. Thus, the cysteine
mutations in the N-tail affect CFTR channel activity much like the
corresponding alanine substitutions that we had characterized
previously (13, 14).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Functional properties of the N-tail cysteine
mutants in intact Xenopus oocytes. A,
locations of the cysteine mutations in the CFTR N-tail and the chemical
formulae of the MTS reagents used in this study. B, mean
currents mediated by WT CFTR and the indicated cysteine mutants when
their corresponding cRNAs were injected at equivalent amounts (1 ng/oocyte for each). CFTR-mediated currents were defined as those
currents activated by the addition of a cAMP-containing mixture (see
"Experimental Procedures"). Holding potential was 50 mV.
C, deactivation kinetics for the wild type (WT)
channel and the double cysteine mutant observed following washout of
the cAMP mixture. The half-time of deactivation was defined as the time
required for the current to decline to 50% of the peak level observed
in the presence of the cAMP mixture. More cRNA was injected for the
cysteine mutant than for WT CFTR (2 versus 0.5 ng) to
achieve approximately the same absolute current levels following
activation with the cAMP mixture.
|
|
The Cysteine Mutants Are Inhibited by Covalent Modification with a
Membrane-permeant MTS Reagent in Intact Oocytes--
We next tested
the responses of the cysteine mutants to MMTS, which covalently
attaches a thio-methyl group to cysteine through disulfide bonding (see
Fig. 1A for formula). MMTS is neutral, small, and
lipid-soluble and, therefore, can cross to the cytoplasmic side of the
membrane when applied extracellularly (23). The currents mediated by
the double cysteine mutant and, to a lesser extent, the single cysteine
mutant were inhibited when MMTS (10 µM) was applied to
the bath after currents had been first activated with the
cAMP-containing mixture (Fig. 2,
A and B). The representative current-voltage
relationship shown in Fig. 2C indicates that the MMTS-induced inhibition of the currents mediated by E54C/D58C was due
to lowered macroscopic conductance (i.e. reduced slope) rather than to a change in concentration driving force (i.e.
altered reversal potential).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
A cell-permeant MTS reagent (MMTS) inhibits
the N-tail cysteine mutants in intact oocytes. A,
representative traces showing the effects of adding MMTS to the bath
(10 µM) on the currents mediated by the indicated CFTR
constructs in intact oocytes. B, mean data (±S.E.)
showing effects of 10 µM MMTS on wild type and mutant
CFTR currents. More cRNA was injected for the mutants than for WT CFTR
to achieve approximately the same absolute current levels following
activation with the cAMP mixture (2 ng for E54C/D58C; 1 ng for E54C and
E54A/D58A, and 0.5 ng for WT CFTR). C, representative
I-V curves before and after MMTS (10 µM)
modification of the E54C/D58C mutant channel. D, lack of
effect of extracellular MTSET and MTSCE (100 µM each) on
E54C/D58C CFTR currents.
|
|
We also tested the effects of MMTS on the wild type channel (WT CFTR)
and the double alanine mutant (E54A/D58A) to determine if the
inhibition was specifically due to modification of the engineered
cysteines at residues 54 and 58. At this concentration MMTS had small
effects (5-10% inhibition) on the macroscopic currents mediated by WT
CFTR and E54A/D58A in intact oocytes (Fig. 2, A and
B) and had no effects on the channel activities of these
constructs in excised patches (see below). Greater inhibition of
the currents mediated by E54C/D58C was observed at higher MMTS
concentration (1-5 mM), but nonspecific effects on wild
type CFTR became significant at these considerably higher doses
(results not shown). Consequently, 10 µM MMTS was used
for the patch clamp studies described below. We also tested two
charged, hydrophilic MMTS analogs (MTSET and MTSCE; see Fig.
1A for formulae) for their effects on the currents mediated
by the double cysteine mutant in intact oocytes (Fig. 2D).
These membrane-impermeant reagents had no effect when applied extracellularly at a 10-fold greater concentration (100 µM) than that used for our MMTS experiments, which is
consistent with the presumed cytoplasmic orientation of the CFTR
amino-terminal tail (4).
Covalent Modification of E54C/D58C in Excised Membrane Patches,
Differential Responses to MMTS, MTSET, and MTSCE--
Since the
activity of the double cysteine mutant was substantially affected by
thiol modification in intact oocytes, we performed a series of patch
clamp studies of the E54C/D58C channel in excised inside-out patches.
The goals of these experiments were as follows: (i) to compare the
gating properties of this N-tail mutant to those of wild type CFTR, and
(ii) to test the effects of thiol modification of the engineered
cysteines on CFTR channel gating in excised inside-out patches. The
unmodified E54C/D58C mutant channel exhibited an ~50% lower
Po than WT CFTR (Fig.
3) under conditions that maximally
activate the wild type channel (80 units/ml PKA; 1.0 mM
Mg-ATP). This reduction in Po was due in part to
shorter open channel bursts (Fig. 3D), as we had observed
previously (13, 14) for the corresponding alanine mutants. No obvious
effect of these mutations on channel opening rate was detected (Fig. 3D). We next tested the effects of the neutral MMTS on the
gating properties of E54C/D58C in excised patches, since this compound inhibited the macroscopic currents mediated by the cysteine mutants in
intact oocytes. When added to the cytoplasmic face of excised patches,
MMTS had little effect on the channel open probability and gating
kinetics (opening rate, burst duration) of either wild type CFTR or the
double alanine mutant (E54A/D58A) (Fig. 3, A and
B). However, this reagent strongly inhibited the open
probability of the double cysteine mutant (Fig. 3, C and
D). This effect on E54C/D58C channel activity in excised
patches occurred within 1-5 min of adding MMTS to the patch (results
not shown). Interestingly, the MMTS-induced reduction in the
Po of the double cysteine mutant was due almost
entirely to a marked inhibition of opening rate (Fig. 3D).
We could detect no significant effect of MMTS on open channel burst
duration (i.e. the duration of channel openings).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
MMTS inhibits E54C/D58C channel activity in
excised inside-out membrane patches primarily by decreasing channel
opening rate. A and B, representative
channel records showing negligible effects of 10 µM MMTS
on the gating of WT CFTR and E54A/D58A CFTR. C,
representative channel records showing the marked inhibition of
E54C/D58C channel activity in excised patches by 10 µM
MMTS. The records in A-C were obtained before and 3-5 min
after MMTS addition to the bath. D, mean data (± S.E.)
showing the effects of 10 µM MMTS on
Po, burst duration, and channel opening rates
for WT CFTR and the double cysteine mutant. Asterisks
indicate values that are significantly different (p < 0.05) from pre-MMTS values.
|
|
If the effect of MMTS on the gating of the E54C/D58C channel is due to
the formation of a mixed disulfide at these positions, then this effect
should be reversed by a reducing agent such as DTT. Fig.
4 shows that the inhibitory effects of
MMTS on the gating of E54C/D58C were completely reversed by the
subsequent addition of 200 µM DTT. The
Po and channel opening rate of the double
cysteine mutant completely recovered from MMTS inhibition within 1-5
min of adding DTT to the bath. At this low concentration DTT had
negligible effects on the gating of the wild type channel (results not
shown) or on the gating of E54C/D58C in the absence of MMTS (Fig. 4, A and B). The fact that DTT alone had no effect
on the gating of E54C/D58C indicates that the lower channel activity of
this mutant is unlikely due to formation of an intramolecular disulfide bond between the two engineered cysteines in the N-tail.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
DTT reverses the inhibitory effect of MMTS on
E54C/D58C channel activity. A, representative channel
records showing negligible effects of 200 µM DTT on the
channel activity of unmodified E54C/D58C CFTR (no MMTS). B,
representative records showing recovery of the activity of the
MMTS-modified cysteine mutant channel by subsequent addition of 200 µM DTT. Records were obtained before and 3-5 min after
MMTS or DTT addition to the bath. C, mean data (± S.E.)
showing the lack of effect of DTT on the Po,
burst duration, and opening rate of the unmodified E54C/D58C channel.
D, mean data (± S.E.) showing the recovery of the
Po and opening rate of the MMTS-modified
E54C/D58C channel by the subsequent addition of 200 µM
DTT. Asterisks indicate values that are significantly
different (p < 0.05) from pre-DTT values.
|
|
We also tested the effects of the two charged MTS reagents on the
gating properties of the double cysteine mutant in excised patches,
i.e. the positively charged MTSET and the negatively charged
MTSCE. Although these charged reagents had no effect on the activity of
the double cysteine mutant when applied extracellularly to intact
oocytes (Fig. 2D), each inhibited E54C/D58C channel activity
when applied to the cytoplasmic face of an inside-out patch. Like MMTS,
the positively charged MTSET inhibited Po and channel opening rate of the double cysteine mutant (Figs.
5, B and C) but had
no effect on the channel activity of wild type CFTR (Fig.
5A) or the double alanine mutant (data not shown). However, unlike the case for the neutral MMTS, MTSET also significantly inhibited the open channel burst duration of the double cysteine mutant
(Fig. 5C). Thus, modification of the E54C/D58C channel with
the positively charged MTS reagent not only inhibited channel opening
rate but also further shortened the channel openings in excised
membrane patches.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The positively charged MTSET inhibits the
opening rate and burst duration of E54C/D58C channels in excised
patches. A, representative records showing lack of
effect of MTSET (100 µM) on WT CFTR channel activity.
B, representative records showing marked inhibition of
E54C/D58C channel activity by MTSET in excised membrane patch. Records
in A and B were obtained before and 3-5 min
after adding 100 µM MTSET to the bath. C, mean
data showing effects of MTSET on Po, burst
duration, and opening rate for WT CFTR and the double cysteine
mutant.
|
|
The negatively charged MTSCE had a qualitatively different effect on
the gating properties of the double cysteine mutant. Although
modification with MTSCE also inhibited channel opening rate (and
consequently Po), this reagent induced the
appearance of long open channel bursts (5-20 s; e.g. Fig.
6A) that were intermingled with the short bursts characteristic of the MMTS- or MTSET-modified channel. These longer bursts were never observed following modification with MMTS or MTSET and were only very rarely observed for the unmodified E54C/D58C mutant channel. In fact, the mean open channel burst duration for the double cysteine mutant increased to wild type
levels following modification with the negatively charged MTSCE (Fig.
6B; where mean burst duration was calculated for
multichannel patches using the cycle time method (see "Experimental
Procedures" and Refs. 14 and 22)). Similar results were obtained when we generated histograms of open channel bursts for patches containing only one detectable channel each (Fig.
7). Although the latter analysis is made
more difficult by the fact that MTS-modified channels have low channel
opening rates (and, hence, fewer openings to analyze), it is clear that
modification with the positively charged MTSET and the negatively
charged MTSCE caused shifts toward briefer and longer openings,
respectively. Thus, the duration of CFTR channel openings can be
increased by modification of the engineered cysteines in the N-tail
with a negatively charged MTS reagent but not with a neutral or
positively charged reagent. These results, taken together with our
initial observation that open channel burst duration was reduced by
replacing the original acidic residues at these positions (Glu-54 and
Asp-58) with alanines (13, 14) or cysteines (this study), indicate that
the negative charge in this region of the N-tail plays a significant
role in stabilizing CFTR channel openings.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The negatively charged MTSCE inhibits opening
rate but induces the appearance of long open channel bursts for
E54C/D58C CFTR. A, representative records showing the
prolonged (>10 s) open channel bursts that occur following
modification of E54C/D58C channels in excised patches by 100 µM MTSCE. B, mean data showing the effects of
MTSCE on Po, burst duration, and opening rate
for WT CFTR and the double cysteine mutant.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Histograms of burst durations recorded for
the unmodified E54C/D58C channel and following modification of this
mutant with MTSET or MTSCE. Data were collected from 5 to 7 patches that exhibited only one detectable channel each. Records were
obtained before and 3-5 min after modification with the positively
charged MTSET or negatively charged MTSCE.
|
|
Covalent Modification of the Double Cysteine Mutant Alters AMP-PNP
Activation and ATP Sensitivity--
The channel openings exhibited by
the wild type CFTR channel can by stabilized by AMP-PNP (a poorly
hydrolyzable ATP analog) when added in combination with ATP at room
temperature (14, 22). Fig. 8 shows that
the activity (Po) of the E54C/D58C mutant channel can also be stimulated by the addition of 3 mM
AMP-PNP (in the presence of 1 mM ATP) and that this effect
is due to a large increase in open channel burst duration. This is
qualitatively similar to the effect of AMP-PNP on wild type CFTR,
although the degree of activation for the cysteine mutant was somewhat
smaller than that previously observed for the wild type channel (wild type Po increases to nearly 0.9 under these
conditions (14)). Given these initial results we performed "order of
addition" experiments on excised patches containing the double
cysteine mutant channel: (i) to determine if activating this channel
with AMP-PNP protects against the inhibitory effects of MMTS
modification on E54C/D58C channel activity and (ii) to determine if
thiol modification of the N-tail cysteines influences subsequent
activation by AMP-PNP. Fig. 8 shows that prior addition of AMP-PNP
failed to protect the double cysteine mutant from MMTS inhibition. MMTS
still markedly reduced the Po of the E54C/D58C
channel, although in this case the inhibition by MMTS was due to
reductions in both channel opening rate and burst duration. No
differences in the time course of MMTS inhibition in the presence or
absence of AMP-PNP were observed (results not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Stimulation of the E54C/D58C channel with
AMP-PNP does not protect against subsequent inhibition by MMTS.
A, representative records showing the effects of AMP-PNP (3 mM) followed by the subsequent addition of 10 µM MMTS. Records were obtained 3-5 min after adding
AMP-PNP or MMTS. ATP (1 mM) was present throughout the
experiment. B, mean data showing the effects of AMP-PNP
followed by MMTS addition on the Po, burst
duration, and opening rate of E54C/D58C CFTR.
|
|
When AMP-PNP was added after MMTS treatment, this nucleotide analog did
induce small increases in Po and burst duration
(Fig. 9). However, these increases were
much smaller than those induced by treatment of the unmodified channel
with AMP-PNP (compare with Fig. 8), and AMP-PNP failed to rescue the
much reduced channel opening rate of the MMTS-modified channel.
Conversely, AMP-PNP had a dramatic effect on the gating of the
E54C/D58C channel when this cysteine mutant was first modified with the
negatively charged MTSCE (Fig. 9). In 4 out of 4 patches we observed
that AMP-PNP addition to the MTSCE-modified channel induced the
appearance of very long open channel bursts that could last for several
minutes. Such exceptionally long bursts are characteristic of the wild type channel when exposed to AMP-PNP under these conditions (14, 22)
but are never observed for the unmodified E54C/D58C channel or the
corresponding alanine mutants (14). Thus, covalent modification of the
engineered cysteines in the N-tail with the negatively charged MTS
reagent not only stabilized channel openings in the absence of AMP-PNP
(Figs. 6 and 7) but also recovered the long open channel bursts that
are normally induced by this poorly hydrolyzable nucleotide analog.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Thiol modification of the E54C/D58C channel
alters the subsequent response to AMP-PNP. A,
representative records showing sequential effects of MMTS (10 µM) and AMP-PNP (3 mM) on E54C/D58C channel
activity. B, mean data showing effects of MMTS followed by
AMP-PNP on Po, burst duration and opening rate
for the cysteine mutant. C, representative records showing
the exceptionally long bursts that are induced by AMP-PNP when the
E54C/D58C channel has been modified with the negatively charged MTSCE.
Because openings in the presence of AMP-PNP and MTSCE are so long (and,
hence, the opening rate and number of openings are so low), we did not
attempt to estimate mean Po, burst duration, and
opening rate under these conditions.
|
|
Finally, we determined if we could reverse the inhibitory effects of
MTS modification on channel opening rate by elevating the bath ATP
beyond that required to maximally activate the wild type channel
(i.e. >1 mM). The rationale for these
experiments were 2-fold: (i) CFTR channel opening is activated by ATP
binding to one or both NBDS (5-8), and (ii) each MTS reagent inhibited the channel opening rate of the double cysteine mutant. Fig.
10 shows that increasing the ATP
concentration to 10 mM following modification of the
E54C/D58C channel with MMTS nearly completely reversed the inhibitory
effects of thiol modification on Po and channel
opening rate. These data indicate that covalent modification of the
double cysteine mutant reduces its ATP sensitivity, which probably
explains the inhibitory effects of the thiol reagents on channel
opening rate.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
The opening rate of the E54C/D58C channel
can be rescued from MMTS inhibition by increasing the bath Mg-ATP
concentration. A, representative records showing the
effect of elevating the bath Mg-ATP concentration on the unmodified
E54C/D58C channel. B, representative records showing the
effects of elevating the bath Mg-ATP concentration on the activity of
the cysteine mutant channel following modification with 10 µM MMTS. C, mean data showing the effects of
increasing the bath Mg-ATP concentration on Po,
burst duration, and opening rate in the presence or absence of
MMTS.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We reported previously (13, 14) that a cluster of
negatively charged residues in the amino-terminal tail of CFTR (Asp-47, Glu-51, Glu-54, and Asp-58) participates in the gating of this chloride
channel. Mutating these negatively charged residues to alanine
destabilized CFTR channel openings in excised membrane patches (13,
14). We also observed that a disease-associated mutant (D58N) that maps
to this region exhibited unstable openings (i.e. shortened
open channel burst duration) in excised patches (14). Based on our
previous results (14) we proposed that the N-tail controls channel
gating by facilitating the transition from a brief open state to a long
open state and by stabilizing this long opening state. The biochemical
mechanism by which the N-tail participates in channel gating is
unknown, although it may involve an interdomain interaction with the R
domain and/or NBD1 (13).
To explore further the role of the amino-terminal tail of CFTR in
channel gating, we substituted cysteines for two of the acidic residues
in the N-tail that appeared to play a significant role in channel
gating (Glu-54 and Asp-58). These mutants allowed us to examine in more
detail the involvement of the N-tail in CFTR channel gating by acutely
modifying the engineered cysteines with different thiol-reactive
reagents. The cysteine substitutions per se affected
macroscopic currents in intact oocytes and single channel behavior in
excised patches much like the alanine and asparagine substitutions at
these positions. Subsequent modification of these cysteines with any of
three MTS reagents reduced channel activity in excised membrane patches
primarily by decreasing the rate of channel opening. This inhibitory
effect was not observed for the wild type channel or for a
corresponding double alanine mutant (E54A/D58A), which argues against a
nonspecific effect of these reagents on channel activity. This
inhibition could also be reversed by DTT at a concentration (200 µM) below that which affects the activity of the
unmodified E54C/D58C channel (Fig. 4) or the wild type channel. (Gating
of wild type CFTR can be affected by DTT at millimolar concentrations
of this reducing agent (19).) Thus, the simplest explanation of our
data is that the MTS reagents affected CFTR gating by forming mixed
disulfides with the engineered cysteines at positions 54 and 58 in the
CFTR amino-terminal tail.
The marked effect of thiol modification on channel opening rate differs
from what we observed to be the most obvious effect of the N-tail
mutations themselves, which was to decrease open channel burst duration
(i.e. to increase channel closing rate). A role for the
N-tail in modulating channel opening rate is also supported by the
recent findings of Chan et al. (15), who reported that CFTR
channels that had been epitope-tagged at the amino terminus exhibited
reduced opening rates in excised patches. Our prior failure to detect
an obvious effect of the alanine and cysteine substitutions on channel
opening rate may be due to the fact that absolute rates of channel
opening can be overestimated in multichannel patches that contain
mutant channels with low activity (i.e. in patches where
channel number can be underestimated). It is possible that these
mutations do indeed decrease opening rate, but this effect is difficult
to detect when performing unpaired comparisons between multichannel
patches containing wild type and N-tail mutant channels. This
uncertainty illustrates the value of acutely modifying channels in
individual patches, as performed in this study. On the other hand, it
is also possible that the regulation of channel opening rate by the
N-tail is less sensitive to point mutations at these positions than the
modulation of burst duration. This latter point is supported by our
observation that the regulation of opening rate and of burst duration
appear to have different charge dependences. In particular, the
regulation of opening rate appears to be independent of the net charge
at these positions, since opening rate was inhibited by modification
with uncharged, positively charged, or negatively charged MTS reagents.
This is unlike the case for burst duration, which is dependent on the negative charges at these residues in the N-tail (as discussed below).
The inhibition of opening rate by thiol modification of the E54C/D58C
mutant channel could be reversed by elevating the bath ATP
concentration beyond that normally required to maximally activate the
wild type channel. Channel opening is presumably driven by ATP binding
to one or both NBDs (5-8). It would appear, then, that modification of
the N-tail cysteines inhibited channel opening rate primarily by
reducing the ATP sensitivity of channel activation. One possible
mechanism by which thiol modification of the N-tail cysteines could
inhibit the ATP sensitivity of channel opening would be to inhibit
phosphorylation of the R domain (22). We observed previously that the
isolated N-tail could bind in vitro to a peptide fragment of
CFTR (residues 595-813) that included the distal portion of NBD1
followed by the R domain (13). (At the time of that study residues
595-813 were thought to constitute the R domain alone (4); however,
the more recent functional data of Chan et al. (15) indicate
that NBD1 probably extends to between residues 622 and 634.) N-tail
mutations that disrupt binding to this NBD1/R domain fragment have no
effect on channel phosphorylation (14), but it is possible that R
domain phosphorylation could be affected by chemical modification of
these sites. An alternative point of view would be that the N-tail
influences more directly the interactions of ATP with the NBDs or the
coupling of channel gating to nucleotide binding. This would be
consistent with our recent evidence that the N-tail physically
associates with the distal portion of NBD1 between residues 595 and
623.2 Thus, it is conceivable
that the amino tail interacts with a docking site(s) at or near the
NBDs (in particular, NBD1) and thereby influences the abilities of
these domains to modulate channel gating.
Although the major effect of MMTS on E54C/D58C gating was to decrease
channel opening rate, this reagent also inhibited the response of the
double cysteine mutant to the poorly hydrolyzable AMP-PNP. AMP-PNP
stimulates the activity of wild type CFTR and, to a lesser extent, the
E54C/D58C mutant by stabilizing channel openings (i.e. by
increasing burst duration). Treatment of the cysteine mutant with MMTS
either before or after AMP-PNP addition attenuated the effect of this
ATP analog on burst duration. This result is consistent with the notion
that the N-tail can modulate both channel opening rate and the
stability of channel openings (i.e. closing rate), as
discussed below.
In contrast to their similar effects on channel opening rate, the three
MTS reagents had qualitatively different effects on the duration of
channel openings exhibited by the E54C/D58C mutant. Open channel burst
duration was negligibly changed, decreased, and increased by the
neutral MMTS, the positively charged MTSET, and the negatively charged
MTSCE, respectively. Covalent modification with the negatively charged
MTSCE also recovered the very long open channel bursts (>1 min) that
are normally exhibited by the wild type channel (but not unmodified
E54C/D58C) following exposure to AMP-PNP. These data are consistent
with the shorter channel openings that were previously observed for the
disease-associated D58N mutant (14), which harbors a structurally
subtle substitution with the exception of the loss of negative charge
at this position (asparagine for aspartate). Thus, the negative charges
at these positions in the N-tail appear to play a significant role in
stabilizing CFTR channel openings.
In summary, our results indicate that the CFTR amino-terminal tail
modulates both the rate of channel opening and the rate of channel
closing (i.e. the duration of channel openings). The modulation of opening rate by the N-tail is ATP-dependent
but relatively insensitive to the net charge at positions 54 and 58 in
the N-tail. Conversely, the regulation of burst duration is highly
sensitive to mutations or modifications that affect the net negative
charge at these residues. The N-tail presumably exerts its effects on
channel gating by means of intramolecular interactions with components
of the gating machinery (e.g. the R domain and NBDs (13))
and/or with the pore itself. Perhaps the involvement of the N-tail in
regulating both the opening and closing of the channel reflects two
different sites of interaction for the N-tail (i.e. one
interaction that modulates opening rate and another that modulates
closing rate). However, other mechanisms are also possible. Further
biochemical studies will be required to map precisely the docking site
or sites within the CFTR polypeptide with which the N-tail interacts to
modulate the opening and closing of the channel. Since the N-tail can
regulate multiple aspects of CFTR channel gating, this region is a
potentially interesting target for physiologic modulators of CFTR
activity that can bind to this tail (24, 25) or for the development of
drugs to treat diseases that are caused by defective regulation of this
ion channel (2, 3).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Ge Li, Holly Gentry, and
Dr. Anjaparavanda Naren for help with the mutagenesis and
Glenda Tawbush for secretarial support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants DK56796 and DK53090.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology
and Biophysics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 982B MCLM, 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294-0005. Tel.: 205-934-3122; Fax:
205-934-5787; E-mail: Kirk@physiology.uab.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 23, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105079200
2
A. P. Naren and K. L. Kirk,
unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CFTR, cystic
fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator;
MMTS, methylmethanethiosulfonate;
MTSCE, 2-carboxyethylmethanethiosulfonate;
MTSET, 2-(trimethylammonium) ethylmethanethiosulfonate;
AMP-PNP, 5'-adenylyl
imidodiphosphate;
NBDs, nucleotide binding domains;
PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase;
MTS, methanethiosulfonate;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
N-tail, amino-terminal tail;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
WT, wild type.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Quinton, P. M.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
S3-S22
|
| 2.
|
Welsh, M. J.,
and Smith, A. E.
(1993)
Cell
73,
1251-1254
|
| 3.
|
Gabriel, S. E.,
Brigman, K. N.,
Koller, B. H.,
Boucher, R. C.,
and Stutts, M. J.
(1994)
Science
266,
107-109
|
| 4.
|
Riordan, J. R.,
Rommens, J. M.,
Kerem, B.,
Alon, N.,
Rozmahel, R.,
Grzelczak, Z.,
Zielenski, J.,
Lok, S.,
Plavsic, N.,
Chou, J.,
Drumm, M. L.,
Iannuzzi, M. C.,
Collins, F. S.,
and Tsui, L. C.
(1989)
Science
245,
1066-1072
|
| 5.
|
Cheng, S. H.,
Rich, D. P.,
Marshall, J.,
Gregory, R. J.,
Welsh, M. J.,
and Smith, A. E.
(1991)
Cell
66,
1027-1036
|
| 6.
|
Hwang, T. C.,
Nagel, G.,
Nairn, A. C.,
and Gadsby, D. C.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
4698-4702
|
| 7.
|
Ramjeesingh, M.,
Li, C.,
Garami, E.,
Huan, L.-J.,
Galley, K.,
Wang, Y.,
and Bear, C. E.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
1463-1468
|
| 8.
|
Ikuma, M.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
8675-8680
|
| 9.
|
Neville, D. C.,
Rozanas, C. R.,
Tulk, B. M.,
Townsend, R. R.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
2401-2409
|
| 10.
|
Lu, N. T.,
and Pedersen, P. L.
(2000)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
375,
7-20
|
| 11.
|
Seibert, F. S.,
Lindsell, P.,
Loo, T. W.,
Hanrahan, J. W.,
Riordan, J. R.,
and Clarke, D. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27493-27499
|
| 12.
|
Seibert, F. S.,
Lindsell, P.,
Loo, T. W.,
Hanrahan, J. W.,
Clarke, D. M.,
and Riordan, J. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15139-15145
|
| 13.
|
Naren, A. P.,
Cormet-Boyaka, E.,
Fu, J.,
Villain, M.,
Blalock, J. E.,
Quick, M. W.,
and Kirk, K. L.
(1999)
Science
286,
544-548
|
| 14.
| Fu, J., Ji, H.-L., Naren, A. P., and Kirk, K. L. (2001)
J. Physiol. (Lond.), in press
|
| 15.
|
Chan, K. W.,
Csanady, L.,
Seto-Young, D.,
Nairn, A. C.,
and Gadsby, D. C.
(2000)
J. Gen. Physiol.
116,
163-180
|
| 16.
|
Karlin, A.,
and Akabas, M. H.
(1998)
Methods Enzymol.
293,
123-145
|
| 17.
|
Cheung, M.,
and Akabas, M. H.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
70,
2688-2695
|
| 18.
|
Akabas, M. H.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
12233-12240
|
| 19.
|
Harrington, M. A.,
Gunderson, K. L.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27536-27544
|
| 20.
|
Tabcharani, J. A.,
Linsdell, P.,
and Hanrahan, J. W.
(1997)
J. Gen. Physiol.
110,
341-351
|
| 21.
|
McCarty, N. A.
(2000)
J. Exp. Biol.
203,
1947-1962
|
| 22.
|
Mathews, C. J.,
Tabcharani, J. A.,
Chang, X. B.,
Jensen, T. J.,
Riordan, J. R.,
and Hanrahan, J. W.
(1998)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
508,
365-377
|
| 23.
|
Pascual, J. M.,
Shieh, C. C.,
Kirsch, G. E.,
and Brown, A. M.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
C1849-C1858
|
| 24.
|
Naren, A. P.,
Nelson, D. J.,
Xie, W. W.,
Jovov, B.,
Pevsner, J.,
Bennett, M. K.,
Benos, D. J.,
Quick, M. W.,
and Kirk, K. L.
(1997)
Nature
390,
302-305
|
| 25.
|
Naren, A. P.,
Quick, M. W.,
Collawn, J. F.,
Nelson, D. J.,
and Kirk, K. L.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10972-10977
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Cormet-Boyaka, A. Di, S. Y. Chang, A. P. Naren, A. Tousson, D. J. Nelson, and K. L. Kirk
CFTR chloride channels are regulated by a SNAP-23/syntaxin 1A complex
PNAS,
September 17, 2002;
99(19):
12477 - 12482.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|