![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 39, 36075-36078, September 28, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
From the ICRF Laboratories, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
Received for publication, June 21, 2001, and in revised form, July 23, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The human multidrug resistance
P-glycoprotein (P-gp), a member of the ATP-binding cassette
(ABC) superfamily of transporters, is frequently responsible for the
failure of chemotherapy by virtue of its ability to export hydrophobic
cytotoxic drugs from cells. Elucidating the inter- and intramolecular
interactions of this protein is critical to understanding its cellular
function and mechanism of action. Toward this end, we have used both
biochemical and genetic techniques to probe potential oligomerization
interactions of P-gp. Differentially epitope-tagged P-gp molecules did
not co-immunoprecipitate when co-expressed in HEK293 cells or when co-translated in vitro, demonstrating that P-gp is
monomeric in both the presence and absence of detergents. The two
cytoplasmic domains of P-gp did not interact with each other in
vivo when co-expressed as gene fusions in yeast. In contrast, the
homologous domains of the transporter associated with antigen
processing (TAP), which reside on separate polypeptides and must form a
heterodimeric transporter (TAP1/TAP2), did interact in this system,
suggesting a role for these domains in TAP dimerization. Implications
for understanding the subunit organization of ABC transporters are discussed.
The product of the human MDR1 gene, P-glycoprotein
(P-gp),1 is an integral
membrane protein that can confer multidrug resistance on cells and
tumors (reviewed in Ref. 1). P-gp is an ATP-dependent efflux pump that transports an extraordinary range of hydrophobic substrates out of the cell and has also been implicated in the regulation of a heterologous cell swelling-activated chloride channel
(reviewed in Ref. 2). P-gp is a member of the ATP-binding cassette
(ABC) superfamily of transporters and has the characteristic architecture of this protein family: two large cytoplasmic
nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) and two hydrophobic transmembrane
domains. The first cytoplasmic domain includes a linker region that can
be phosphorylated by protein kinase C. Phosphorylation of the linker has little or no effect on drug transport (3, 4) but plays a role in
modulation of heterologous ion channel activity by P-gp (2, 5).
Biochemical and biophysical techniques have previously been employed to
investigate the oligomeric structure of P-gp, with ambiguous results.
Freeze-fracture electron micrographs of membranes containing
overexpressed P-gp showed aggregates in the plasma membrane
corresponding to an oligomeric state (6). Radiation inactivation (7)
yielded an apparent molecular mass of 250 kDa for P-gp,
corresponding to approximately a dimer, and chemical cross-linking
indicated a small proportion of a 340-kDa form (8). Sedimentation
velocity centrifugation through sucrose gradients also indicated an
oligomeric state (9), although this depended upon the detergent used
and could not distinguish whether P-gp might be interacting with
heterologous proteins rather than sedimenting as an oligomer. In brain
capillaries and renal brush border membranes, radiation inactivation
and mobility of Triton X-solubilized protein on native gels also
suggested a possible dimer (10). In contrast, a molecular
complementation approach suggested that the functional unit of P-gp is
a monomer (11). Single-particle electron microscopy of purified
reconstituted P-gp also showed a size for the functional protein
particle most consistent with a monomeric form (12), and labeling with
lectin-gold particles indicated a single site of glycosylation on each
P-gp particle, consistent with a monomer (12).
As the strategies used to date are subject to a number of caveats or
may reflect the fortuitous interaction of the target with other
proteins and aggregation due to overexpression, we have used a
combination of in vitro and in vivo techniques to assess the oligomeric state of P-glycoprotein, as well as potential intramolecular interactions between the cytoplasmic nucleotide-binding domains of the protein.
DNA Manipulations and Bacterial Culture--
Restriction
digests, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and other manipulations of
DNA were performed according to standard protocols. DNA was introduced
into Escherichia coli SureTM cells (Stratagene)
by electroporation. Transformed cells were grown in Luria-Bertani broth
supplemented with 100 µg/ml ampicillin. Plasmid DNA was prepared by
alkaline lysis (Qiagen). Double-stranded plasmid DNA was sequenced by
the automated dye-terminator method (ABI PRISMTM 377 DNA
Sequencer, PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Mammalian Cell Culture--
HEK293 cells (Imperial Cancer
Research Fund Cell Culture Facility, Clare Hall, UK) were maintained in
monolayers in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal calf serum.
Construction of Epitope-tagged
P-glycoproteins--
Myc (EEQKLISEEDL) and FLAG (DYKDDDDK)
epitope tags were added to the C terminus of P-gp by
oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis of the human MDR1 gene.
A PstI-SalI fragment of MDR1 encoding the C terminus of the protein was cloned into the pAlter vector and
mutagenesis performed according to the Altered Sites procedure (Promega). The mutagenic oligonucleotide was designed to replace the
stop codon of MDR1 with the epitope tag followed by an
in-frame stop codon and a novel AatII restriction site to facilitate
identification of the tagged MDR1 genes. Sequencing of the
mutant plasmids confirmed the presence of the tags and demonstrated
that no other mutations had been introduced. The mutated 480-base
pair PstI-SalI fragment was then used to
replace the corresponding fragment of the wild type MDR1
sequence in plasmid pMDR7 (13) to regenerate the full-length P-gp
coding sequence with the appropriate epitope tags (pMDR7.M and pMDR7.F,
respectively). The pMDR7 plasmid has a T7 promoter for in
vitro expression. For in vivo studies, the tagged
MDR1 fragments were cloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen),
which contains a cytomegalovirus promoter, generating pcMDR.M
(myc tagged) and pcMDR.F (FLAG-tagged). Plasmids were
verified by restriction analysis and DNA sequencing.
In Vitro Expression--
For in vitro studies,
proteins encoded by the pMDR7.M and pMDR7.F plasmids were expressed
using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate-coupled transcription/translation
system (Promega). Reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 1.5 h
in the presence of [35S]methionine. Labeled proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE (14) and detected by autoradiography.
Immunoprecipitation--
Dynabeads cross-linked with
the anti-myc or anti-FLAG antibodies were used for
immunoprecipitations. The beads were first coated with either the
myc or FLAG antibodies (1.5 µg/107 beads) by
cross-linking using 20 mM dimethylpimelimidate in 0.2 M triethanolamine at pH 9 for 45 min at room temperature.
The beads were then washed in triethanolamine for 2 h, washed
three times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and stored at 4 °C. For in vitro immunoprecipitation, Myc and FLAG-tagged P-gps
were co-expressed and 35S-labeled in the complete
transcription-translation system. Dynabeads cross-linked with the
myc antibody were added to the labeled protein and incubated
for 2 h at 4 °C with continuous slow rotation. The Dynabeads
were then harvested magnetically and washed extensively with PBS before
eluting bound proteins in 50 µl of 1% SDS. The eluate was diluted to
500 µl with PBS. For the second immunoprecipitation, Dynabeads
cross-linked with the FLAG antibody were added to the eluate and
immunoprecipitation performed as described above. After harvesting and
washing, bound proteins were eluted with 50 µl of Laemmli sample
buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
For in vivo immunoprecipitations, epitope-tagged proteins
encoded by plasmids pcMDR.M and pcMDR.F were expressed in HEK293 cells.
Plasmid DNA (5 µg) was complexed with 20 µl of Lipofectin (Life
Technologies, Inc.) in 2 ml of Opti-MEM (Life Technologies, Inc.) for
10 min at room temperature. The mixture was added to cells grown to
~80% confluence in 35-mm wells and incubated for 5 h. Cells
were returned to Dulbecco's modified Eagles' medium for a further
48-h incubation and then lysed in solubilization buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) containing, as
appropriate, between 0.5 and 4% detergent (either Nonidet P-40,
dodecyl maltoside, or Triton X-100). Lysates were incubated on ice for
1 h and then centrifuged at 100,000 × g for
1 h to sediment insoluble material. The supernatants were incubated overnight at 4 °C with continuous slow rotation with 150 µl of Dynabeads cross-linked with the anti-myc antibody.
Dynabeads were harvested magnetically and washed in solubilization
buffer. Bound proteins were eluted in 50 µl of Laemmli sample buffer. Immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and detected by
immunoblotting with the anti-FLAG or anti-myc antibody.
Protein Separation and Autoradiography--
Proteins were
separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Gels of
radiolabeled proteins were fixed in 25% isopropanol, 10% acetic acid
for 30 min, incubated in AmplifyTM (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) for 30 min, dried, and exposed for 1-24 h.
Unlabeled proteins were detected by immunoblotting, performed as
described previously (15) using enhanced chemiluminescence detection
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Primary antibodies were M2 anti-FLAG (IBI Kodak)
and 9E10 anti-myc (Imperial Cancer Research Fund Hybridoma Unit).
Construction of Gene Fusions for Two-hybrid Analysis--
The
PCR was used to amplify, from plasmid DNA, sequences encoding the
cytoplasmic domains of wild type P-gp and the P-gp-8E mutant in which
phosphorylatable serine and threonine residues are replaced by
glutamates (5). As controls, the cytoplasmic domains of related ABC
transporter proteins, TAP1, TAP2, and CFTR (Table I), were also
amplified. PCR primers were designed to add restriction endonuclease
recognition sequences for EcoRI and XhoI to
facilitate directional cloning. The PCR products were cloned into the
yeast two-hybrid vectors pEG202 and pJG4-5 to generate in-frame gene
fusions with the LexA DNA binding domain and the "acid blob"
transcriptional activation domain, respectively (16). Gene fusions were
verified by restriction analysis and DNA sequencing.
Yeast Two-hybrid Analysis--
Protein-protein interactions were
studied using the LexA two-hybrid system as described previously (17).
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain EGY48
(LEU2::pLexAop1-LEU2) containing pSH18-34, a 20-µm
plasmid carrying a galactose-inducible lacZ gene
(LexAop-Gal1-lacZ), was used as a reporter strain (17).
Plasmids were transformed into this strain using the lithium acetate
method (18). Transcriptional activation was assessed by plate assay
(19). Fusion proteins were tested for nuclear localization and DNA
binding by repression assay (17).
Generation of Epitope-tagged P-gps--
Oligonucleotide-directed
mutagenesis was used to introduce short epitope tags (myc
and FLAG) to the C terminus of P-gp. Cytotoxicity tests for ability to
confer drug resistance demonstrated that addition of these tags did not
affect the function of P-gp (data not shown).
Co-immunoprecipitation of Epitope-tagged P-gps Expressed in
Vitro--
[35S]Methionine-radiolabeled myc-
and FLAG-tagged P-gps were co-expressed in vitro in a rabbit
reticulocyte system and sequentially immunoprecipitated with antibody
cross-linked Dynabeads. Sequential immunoprecipitation with
anti-myc and anti-FLAG antibodies (myc/FLAG) gave
no recovery of P-gp-FLAG in the final immunoprecipitate (Fig. 1). In contrast, P-gp was recovered in
the second precipitation of positive control reactions in which
anti-myc antibody was used in both precipitation steps
(myc/myc). This suggests that the two
differentially tagged populations of P-gp do not associate with each
other and that P-gp is monomeric in the absence of detergent.
Co-immunoprecipitation of Epitope-tagged P-gps Co-expressed in
Vivo--
To ascertain whether P-gp is also a monomer in
vivo, Myc- and FLAG-tagged P-gps were co-expressed in HEK293 cells
by transient transfection. Epitope-tagged P-gps were recovered in
immunoprecipitates from cell lysates prepared in the presence of varied
concentrations of several different detergents: dodecyl- Intramolecular Interactions between the Nucleotide-binding Domains
of P-gp--
To determine whether P-gp oligomerizes in the absence of
detergents and to assess the possibility of very weak or transient interactions, we tested the soluble domains of P-gp in the yeast two-hybrid system. The large cytoplasmic domains of P-gp were expressed
as fusion proteins (Table I) as were the
cytoplasmic domains of two other ABC transporters, CFTR and TAP, which
served as controls. Fusion proteins were expressed singly in yeast and tested for expression, nuclear localization, and DNA binding activity (for binding domain fusions) to exclude autoactivation of reporter genes, as described previously (17). Fusion proteins were then co-expressed in pairwise combinations and tested for interaction by
assaying
No combination of wild-type P-glycoprotein cytoplasmic domains produced
a detectable interaction with either reporter gene (Table
II). Interestingly, the P-gp-8E
mutant, derived from a form of P-gp generated by site-directed
mutagenesis to study the effects of phosphorylation of the linker
region, interacted weakly with the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of
P-gp in the more sensitive leucine assay. These results suggest that
direct interaction between the cytoplasmic domains does not normally
occur, but may be induced upon phosphorylation of the linker.
Control experiments with the cytoplasmic domains of CFTR were likewise
negative (data not shown). In contrast, the cytoplasmic domains of the
transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) did interact in
this system (Table III). This
observation is also consistent with a recent study showing interaction
of TAP1 and TAP2 cytoplasmic domains by co-immunoprecipitation (20). It
is important to note that, unlike the homologous domains in P-gp and
CFTR, the TAP cytoplasmic domains reside on separate polypeptides that
must dimerize to form a complete ABC transporter. Furthermore, the TAP
transporter does not include a regulatory domain homologous to either
the P-gp linker or the CFTR R domain.
Efforts to examine the oligomerization of P-gp have been hampered
by the technical difficulties of studying protein-protein interactions
of integral membrane proteins. The detergents used to solubilize
membrane proteins may give rise to protein aggregates or disrupt normal
associations. For these reasons, we chose to conduct oligomerization
experiments both in the presence and absence of a variety of
detergents. Expression of tagged P-gps in vitro in the
absence of microsomal membranes obviates the need for detergent solubilization. To complement this approach, we investigated P-gp oligomerization in vivo, using a number of detergents in an
attempt to control for detergent-specific effects. Detergents with
differing properties in terms of head groups, hydrocarbon chain length, and critical micellar concentration were used for solubilization. Concentrations of 0.5-4% were used for each detergent, enabling efficient solubilization of P-gp and a wide enough range of
concentrations to examine possible artifactual aggregation of the
protein. We consistently isolated P-gp as a monomer in vitro
and in vivo under all conditions tested.
In vivo two-hybrid analysis allowed us to test for possible
weak dimerization interactions between cytoplasmic domains on individual molecules as well as intramolecular interactions between the
two cytoplasmic domains of a single molecule. The latter type of
interaction could have both structural and mechanistic implications. Although the yeast two-hybrid system provides an extremely sensitive assay for interaction, allowing detection of weak and/or transient protein-protein interactions, we were unable to detect interaction between the cytoplasmic domains of P-gp or of CFTR. These results suggest that dimerization does not occur via direct interaction of the
cytoplasmic domains of these ABC transporters.
In contrast, interaction was observed between TAP1 and TAP2, which
represent discrete subunits that upon heterodimerization constitute the
four-domain structure present in a single monomer of P-gp or CFTR.
While a monomer is apparently sufficient for P-gp activity (21), TAP
activity requires both the TAP1 and TAP2 subunits, each consisting of
one membrane domain and one cytoplasmic domain (NBD). The interaction
of TAP cytoplasmic domains suggests that these regions may be directly
involved in TAP1/TAP2 dimerization.
The absence of cytoplasmic domain interaction for P-gp is consistent
with the low resolution structure of P-gp (12) in which two distinct
lobes, predicted to be the two cytoplasmic domains, are observed.
However, intramolecular interactions between cytoplasmic domains of
P-gp may occur under certain conditions, as implied by the weak
interaction that we observe when a pseudo-phosphorylated form of
cytoplasmic domain 1 is used in interaction assays. A recent study (22)
suggests that, at least during part of the reaction cycle, the two
nucleotide-binding domains of P-gp are in close proximity to one
another, as they could be chemically cross-linked. Interestingly, the
cross-linking only occurred at 37 °C and was inhibited by ATP,
suggesting a role for structural flexibility and substrate-induced
conformational change.
Our data suggest a model in which four-domain ABC transporters, such as
P-gp and CFTR, are normally monomeric, whereas two-domain ABC
transporters, such as TAP, may dimerize through direct protein-protein interaction to form a paradigmatic, four-domain ABC protein. However, the data do not rule out the possibility that four-domain transporters may oligomerize through indirect interaction. A recent paper by Wang
and colleagues (23) identifies a protein, CAP70, which interacts with
CFTR, facilitating oligomerization and modulating CFTR channel
activity. This interaction requires both ATP and phosphorylation of the
R domain and yields a more active channel configuration. Likewise, P-gp
may be regulated by oligomerization in response to effectors or via
specific binding proteins. Such interactions may account for at least
some of the cases in which apparent P-gp oligomers have been observed.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (74K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Co-immunoprecipitation of myc
and FLAG-tagged P-gps in vitro. Autoradiogram of
sequential immunoprecipitations of 35S-labeled,
epitope-tagged P-gps transcribed and translated in vitro.
S1, supernatant from first (myc)
immunoprecipitation; P1, pellet from first
immunoprecipitation; S2, supernatant from second
(myc or FLAG) immunoprecipitation; P2, pellet
from second immunoprecipitation. Arrow indicates approximate
mobility of P-gp.
-maltoside,
Nonidet P-40, or Triton X-100 (Fig. 2).
In controls, when the anti-myc antibody was used for both
immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting (myc/myc),
P-gp was recovered with each detergent at all the concentrations used,
demonstrating the efficacy of the procedure. No P-gp was detected on
immunoblots with the anti-FLAG antibody following immunoprecipitation
with the anti-myc antibody under any conditions (myc/FLAG). Experiments carried out in reverse using the
anti-FLAG antibody for immunoprecipitation and anti-myc
antibody for immunoblotting yielded similar results (data not shown).
The inability to co-immunoprecipitate FLAG-tagged P-gp with the
myc-tagged P-gp in these experiments indicated that the two
forms of P-gp did not associate, suggesting that P-gp in the membranes
is a monomer.

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Immunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged P-gps
from detergent-solubilized cells. Immunoblots of
anti-myc precipitated epitope-tagged P-gps expressed in
HEK293 cells solubilized with dodecyl-
-maltoside, Nonidet P-40
(NP40), or Triton X-100 (A, B, and
C, respectively) at the detergent concentrations indicated.
Blots were probed with either anti-myc (myc/myc) or
anti-FLAG (myc/FLAG) antibodies. Arrow indicates
the approximate mobility of P-gp.
-galactosidase and leucine reporters. All fusions were
shown to be capable of positive interaction with other fusion proteins
in related studies (data not shown).
Protein domains used in the yeast two-hybrid studies
Yeast two-hybrid analysis of interaction of P-gp cytoplasmic domains
-D-galactopyranoside; LEU2,
growth on minimal medium plates lacking leucine). Positive interactions
were dependent on galactose induction of expression of the activation
domain fusion. Relative activities were scored qualitatively from no
detectable activity (
), to high activity (+++).
Yeast two-hybrid analysis of interaction of TAP1 and TAP2
-D-galactopyranoside; LEU2,
growth on minimal medium plates lacking leucine). Relative activities
were scored qualitatively from no detectable activity (
) to high
activity (+++).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The two-hybrid interaction reagents were the generous gift of Lauren Ha and Roger Brent.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Cancer Research Campaign and the Imperial Cancer Research Fund.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Oxagen Limited, 91 Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon
OX14 4RY, UK.
§ Present address: Dept. of Clinical Chemistry, Albert Szent-Gyorgyi Medical University, Somogyi Bela Ter 1., Szeged, H-6722, Hungary.
¶ Howard Hughes International Research Scholar.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Present address:
The Marine Biological Laboratory, 7 MBL St., Woods Hole, MA 02543. E-mail: gbegley@mbl.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 8, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C100345200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: P-gp, P-glycoprotein; CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator; MDR, multidrug resistance; NBD, nucleotide-binding domain; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; TAP, transporter associated with antigen presentation; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; ABC, ATP-binding cassette.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Gottesman, M. M. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62, 385-427 |
| 2. | Bond, T. D., Valverde, M. A., and Higgins, C. F. (1998) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 508, 333-340 |
| 3. | Goodfellow, H. R., Sardini, A., Ruetz, S., Callaghan, R., Gros, P., McNaughton, P. A., and Higgins, C. F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13668-13674 |
| 4. | Germann, U. A., Chambers, T. C., Ambudkar, S. V., Licht, T., Cardarelli, C., Pastan, I., and Gottesman, M. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1708-1716 |
| 5. | Hardy, S. P., Goodfellow, H. R., Valverde, M. A., Gill, D. R., Sepulveda, V., and Higgins, C. F. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 68-75 |
| 6. | Arsenault, A. L., Ling, V., and Kartner, N. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 938, 315-321 |
| 7. | Boscoboinik, D., Debanne, M. T., Stafford, A. R., Jung, C. Y., Gupta, R. S., and Epand, R. M. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1027, 225-228 |
| 8. | Naito, M., and Tsuruo, T. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 185, 284-290 |
| 9. | Poruchynsky, M. S., and Ling, V. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 4163-4174 |
| 10. | Jette, L., Potier, M., and Beliveau, R. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 13929-13937 |
| 11. | Loo, T. W., and Clarke, D. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20986-20989 |
| 12. | Rosenberg, M. F., Callaghan, R., Ford, R. C., and Higgins, C. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10685-10694 |
| 13. | Valverde, M. A., Diaz, M., Sepulveda, F. V., Gill, D. R., Hyde, S. C., and Higgins, C. F. (1992) Nature 355, 830-833 |
| 14. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 |
| 15. | Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354 |
| 16. | Gyuris, J., Golemis, E., Chertkov, H., and Brent, R. (1993) Cell 75, 791-803 |
| 17. | Golemis, E., Gyuris, J., and Brent, R. (1994) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smithe, J. A. , and Struhl, K., eds), Vol. 2 , pp. 13.14.1-13.14.17, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York |
| 18. | Schiestl, R. H., and Gietz, R. D. (1989) Curr. Genet. 16, 339-346 |
| 19. | Sato, T., Hanada, M., Bodrug, S., Irie, S., Iwama, N., Boise, L. H., Thompson, C. B., Golemis, E., Fong, L., Wang, H. G., and Reed, J. C. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 9238-9242 |
| 20. | Lapinski, P. E., Miller, G. G., Tampe, R., and Raghavan, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6831-6840 |
| 21. | Loo, T. W., and Clarke, D. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27488-27492 |
| 22. | Loo, T. W., and Clarke, D. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 39272-39278 |
| 23. | Wang, S., Yue, H., Derin, R. B., Guggino, W. B., and Li, M. (2000) Cell 103, 169-179 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Yang, Y. Liu, Z. Dong, J. Xu, H. Peng, Z. Liu, and J.-T. Zhang Regulation of Function by Dimerization through the Amino-terminal Membrane-spanning Domain of Human ABCC1/MRP1 J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2007; 282(12): 8821 - 8830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xu, Y. Liu, Y. Yang, S. Bates, and J.-T. Zhang Characterization of Oligomeric Human Half-ABC Transporter ATP-binding Cassette G2 J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 19781 - 19789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |