![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 39, 36268-36274, September 28, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, June 8, 2001
Molybdopterin (MPT) is a pyranopterin
with a unique dithiolene group coordinating molybdenum (Mo) or tungsten
(W) in all Mo- and W-enzymes except nitrogenase. In Escherichia
coli, MPT is formed by incorporation of two sulfur atoms into
precursor Z, which is catalyzed by MPT synthase. The recently solved
crystal structure of MPT synthase (Rudolph, M. J., Wuebbens,
M. M., Rajagopalan, K. V., and Schindelin, H. (2000)
Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 42-46) shows the heterotetrameric
nature of the enzyme that is composed of two small (MoaD) and two large
subunits (MoaE). According to sequence and structural similarities
among MoaD, ubiquitin, and ThiS, a thiocarboxylation of the C terminus
of MoaD is proposed that would serve as the source of sulfur that is
transferred to precursor Z. Here, we describe the in vitro
generation of carboxylated and thiocarboxylated MoaD. Both forms of
MoaD are monomeric and are able to form a heterotetrameric complex
after coincubation in equimolar ratios with MoaE. Only the
thiocarboxylated MPT synthase complex was found to be able to convert
precursor Z in vitro to MPT. Slight but significant
differences between the carboxylated and the thiocarboxylated MPT
synthase can be seen using size exclusion chromatography. A
two-step reaction of MPT synthesis is proposed where the dithiolene is
generated by two thiocarboxylates derived from a single tetrameric MPT synthase.
Molybdenum (Mo) plays an important role as the active
center in many Mo-enzymes that catalyze essential redox reactions in the global C-, N-, and S-cycles (1). Mo-enzymes are important for such
diverse metabolic processes like sulfur detoxification and purine
catabolism in mammals (2), nitrate assimilation in autotrophs, and
phytohormone synthesis in plants (2). With the exception of
nitrogenase, in all Mo-enzymes studied so far, Mo is activated
and chelated by the so-called molybdenum cofactor (Moco).1 In general, Moco
consists of Mo covalently bound via a dithiolene group to the unique
pterin compound molybdopterin (MPT) (3), a tetrahydropyranopterin (4)
that is highly conserved in eukaryotes, Eubacteria, and Archaebacteria.
The basic structure of Moco shows further modifications like the
attachment of nucleotide monophosphates to the terminal phosphate of
MPT and the coordination of molybdenum by two pterins in prokaryotes,
or variations in the number and nature of the substituents in the first
coordination sphere of the metal. In addition, the same pterin compound
was found to coordinate tungsten (W) in W-enzymes (5, 6). Biosynthesis of Moco requires the multistep synthesis of the MPT moiety followed by
the subsequent transfer of molybdenum (2, 7, 8). A mutational block in
Moco biosynthesis leads to the combined loss of function of all
Mo-enzymes. In humans, Moco deficiency as a rare inborn error is
characterized by the loss of activity of sulfite oxidase, xanthine
oxidase, and aldehyde oxidase. Affected patients die early postnatally
because no therapy is yet available (9).
Genes encoding for Moco biosynthesis proteins have been identified in
bacteria (10), fungi (11, 12) and recently in humans (13-15) and
plants (16, 17). In this pathway, the proposed starting compound GTP is
first converted to the sulfur-free precursor Z (18, 19). In the second
step, two sulfur atoms are incorporated into the precursor Z thereby
forming MPT as structural moiety of the cofactor. In Escherichia
coli, three gene products are essential for the synthesis of MPT
from precursor Z. MoaD (small subunit) and MoaE (large subunit) form
the MPT synthase (20) that stoichiometrically converts precursor Z to
MPT (21, 22). MPT synthase is activated (sulfurated) by MoeB (MPT
synthase sulfurase). Pitterle et al. (22) postulated that it
is the small subunit of MPT synthase that carries the sulfur because a
16-Da difference was observed in the molecular mass between MoaD
derived from active MPT synthase and MoaD derived from inactive MPT
synthase purified from E. coli moeB mutants. This difference
was interpreted to be a MoeB-catalyzed replacement of an OH group for
an SH group.
Recently the high resolution crystal structure of E. coli MPT synthase has been determined demonstrating the
heterotetrameric nature of the enzyme (23). Heterodimers are formed
between the small and large subunits that dimerize via the large
subunits to form the functional heterotetramer. Sequence homologies of the small subunit MoaD to ubiquitin and of the sulfurase MoeB to the
ubiquitin-activating enzyme UbA1 from Saccharomyces
cereviseae (24, 25) suggested a functional role of the highly
conserved C terminus of MoaD containing a double glycine motif (10).
Furthermore, MoaD shows a three-dimensional fold very similar to
ubiquitin, which interacts via its C terminus with MoaE thereby forming
two distinct hypothetical active sites in the heterotetramer. (23). In
addition, partially inactive MPT synthase shows a covalent linkage
between the C terminus of MoaD and a lysine residue of MoaE. Therefore,
it has been proposed that MoaD is thiocarboxylated, which serves as the
sulfur donor for the synthesis of the dithiolene in MPT.
For ThiS, a protein involved in thiamin biosynthesis in E. coli (26) that shows striking homologies to MoaD and ubiquitin, the formation of a thiocarboxylate at the C-terminal glycine residue was demonstrated (27). This glycine was shown to be essential for the
transfer of a single sulfur atom in thiamin biosynthesis. MPT synthases
identified in fungi (12),
plants2 and humans (15) show
the same high degree of conservation in the C terminus with the typical
double glycine motif. MOCS2A and MOCS2B are the human homologs for MoaD
and MoaE (16). The observed bicistronic expression of MOCS2A and MOCS2B
(15) indicates the functional pressure for maintaining the free C
terminus in MOCS2A.
Here we present direct functional evidence that the C-terminal glycine
residue of MPT synthase carries the sulfur that is transferred to
precursor Z. Using an intein-based expression system, we generated
preparative amounts of thiocarboxylated MoaD and show that this
thiocarboxylate is essential and sufficient for the assembly of active
MPT synthase. The two subunits of MPT synthase are monomeric when they
are expressed and purified separately. Both the thiocarboxylated and
the carboxylated form of MoaD are able to assemble a heterotetrameric
MPT synthase complex. Finally, a two-step reaction for the synthesis of
the dithiolene group in MPT is proposed.
Materials--
All chemicals used were from the highest grade
available. Restriction enzymes were purchased from Promega (Madison,
WI) and the DNA polymerase from Peqlab. The E. coli strain
ER2566, plasmid pTYB2 and the chitin matrix were obtained from New
England Biolabs. Nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid superflow matrix,
plasmids pQE30 and pQE60 as well as the E. coli M15 strain
were purchased from Qiagen.
Construction of Expression Vectors--
E. coli MPT
synthase was cloned into pQE60 (NcoI/BglII) by
amplifying moaD and moaE from pJR11 plasmid (28)
resulting in pGS100 for expression of MoaE with a C-terminal His tag
(polymerase chain reaction deletion of the stop codon) or resulting in
pGS101 for expression of unmodified MoaE. Both constructs were
bicistronic expression vectors allowing the
isopropyl- Expresssion and Purification of His-tagged
Proteins--
His-tagged proteins were recombinantly expressed and
purified according to the QIA-expressionist manual (Qiagen). Eluted
fractions were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and
pure protein fractions were subsequently rebuffered into nit-1 buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.2) using Nick columns (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). The identity of the purified proteins was verified by
N-terminal sequencing. For determination of protein concentrations the
following calculated molar extinction coefficients were used:
Expresssion and Purification of Intein Fusion Proteins--
The
expression vector pGG130 was transformed into E. coli strain
ER2566, and grown aerobically in Luria-Bertani medium at 37 °C.
Expression was induced at A600 = 0.5 with 0.5 mM isopropyl- Mass Spectrometry--
Mass spectra were generated by a
reflectron-type time-of-flight matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometer from PerSeptive (Voyager DE-RP),
equipped with a nitrogen laser (337 nm). Flight times are calibrated
against protein standards using exactly the same parameters. Matrix
samples are prepared (co-crystallized) from a saturated methanolic
solution of 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 9 × 10 Nitrate Reductase Overlay Assay--
For functional
complementation of Moco mutants, E. coli moaE mutants RK5216
and RK5204 were used (30). Reconstitution of Moco biosynthesis
was performed by transformation of pGS100 and pGG110, followed by
uninduced or induced expression of the encoded proteins, and
determination of nitrate reductase activity by colony overlay assay
(31).
Size Exclusion Chromatography--
Size exclusion chromatography
was performed at room temperature on a Sephadex 200 column (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) using an FPLC system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
The column was equilibrated in nit-1 buffer, and separation was run at
a 0.3 ml/min flow rate. Samples of 200 µl (0.5-8 µM
protein) were loaded and 0.3-ml fractions were collected. Small and
large subunits were coincubated in molar ratios ranging from 1:4 to 4:1
for a 5 min prior separation. Where indicated, standard deviations of
retention times were calculated from 5-7 independent experiments.
Nit-1 Reconstitution--
Neurospora crassa nit-1
extract was prepared as described (32) and stored in aliquots at
Purification of Precursor Z and HPLC Form A
Analysis--
Precursor Z was prepared according to Ref. 19 and 1.84
nmol (18.4 µM) of purified precursor Z were incubated for
1 h either with assembled MPT synthase (55 pmol) or with
thiocarboxylated MoaD alone (55 pmol) in a total reaction volume of 100 µl. MPT was detected and quantified by HPLC analysis of form
A-dephospho (33). Oxidation of the entire reaction mixture (100 µl),
dephosphorylation, QAE chromatography, and reversed-phased HPLC
analysis were performed as described (34).
Expression of MoaD and MoaE and Generation of Carboxylated and
Thiocarboxylated Small Subunits--
The large subunit of MPT
synthase, MoaE, as well as MPT synthase were expressed and purified as
His-tagged proteins (see "Experimental Procedures"). The activity
of the expressed proteins was proven by functional complementation of
E. coli moaD and moaE mutants (data not shown).
In E. coli MoeB has been proposed to activate MoaD by
forming a thiocarboxylate at the C-terminal glycine residue. To
simulate the predicted reaction, MoaD was expressed as an intein fusion
protein by cloning moaD in the pTYB2 vector allowing
expression of the small subunit with a C-terminal intein tag and a
chitin binding domain for affinity purification. The intein catalyzed self-cleavage reaction results in an N-S acyl shift at the target junction followed by transesterification of the resulting thioester with a cleavage reagent (Fig.
1A). For elution of MoaD we
used two different chemicals for cleavage reaction (Fig.
1A). DTT results in the cleavage of a carboxylated
unmodified protein while ammonium sulfide generates a thiocarboxylated
cleavage product that was previously demonstrated for ThiS (27).
Analysis of both cleavage products by mass spectrometry proved this
system to work correctly for MoaD (Fig. 1C). MoaD eluted
with DTT showed a mass peak of 8757.7 Da while MoaD eluted with
ammonium sulfide was 16.3 Da larger, indicating the exchange of an
oxygen atom to a sulfur atom. The 0.2-Da difference of the theoretical
and experimentally measured masses can be neglected. Hence after
cleavage the primary structures of the small subunits were identical to
native MoaD carrying the C-terminal double glycine motif. They only
differed in the modification of the C terminus. MoaD was purified from 1 liter of E. coli culture resulting in 6 mg of carboxylated
and 2 mg of thiocarboxylated protein (Fig. 1B; lanes
2 and 3), respectively.
Assembly of E. coli MPT Synthase from Single
Subunits--
E. coli MPT synthase was recombinantly
expressed and purified using a His-tagged fusion at MoaE. The expressed
protein was fully active, and after affinity purification of MoaE also
the small subunit MoaD was copurified (data not shown). Therefore, the
interaction between both subunits of MPT synthase seems to be of high
affinity. We studied the assembly of E. coli MPT synthase from its subunits using analytical size exclusion chromatography. The
large subunit MoaE, separately purified as His-tagged protein (Fig.
1B, lane 1), eluted at 16.00 ± 0.02 ml,
whereas the carboxylated and thiocarboxylated small subunits (MoaD)
showed similar chromatograms with a single peak at 17.35 ± 0.06 ml elution volume (Fig. 2, A
and B, inset). According to the elution volumes
of standard proteins, the experimentally determined molecular masses of
MoaD and MoaE are 6.9 and 16.5 kDa, respectively. Because the
theoretical molecular masses of MoaD and MoaE are 8.8 and 18.8 kDa,
respectively, we conclude that both subunits of MPT synthase are
monomers in solution (Fig. 2D). Coincubation of MoaE with
carboxylated or thiocarboxylated MoaD in equimolar amounts resulted in
the formation of protein complexes eluting between 14 and 15 ml (Fig.
2, A-C, bold lines), while the peaks of the
separated subunits simultaneously disappeared, demonstrating the
formation of a heteromultimer. Prior to size exclusion chromatography,
both subunits were coincubated for 5 min. Longer incubation times did
not increase the amount of tetramers formed (data not shown) suggesting
a rapid and high affinity interaction between MoaD and MoaE.
Furthermore, mixtures of MoaD and MoaE in submolar ratios resulted in
the fomation of a tetrameric complex and the appearance of one unbound
monomeric subunit that was provided in excess (Fig. 2, A and
B, thin and dashed lines) illustrating
the high affinity of interaction and conformational behavior of unbound
monomers.
Comparison of the elution profiles of MPT synthase complexes formed
either with a carboxylated (Fig. 2A) or a thiocarboxylated small subunit (Fig. 2B), revealed a significant shift of
0.19 ml in the elution volume between both forms (Fig. 2C).
While thiocarboxylated MPT synthase eluted at 14.45 ± 0.03 ml,
the carboxylated form eluted at 14.64 ± 0.02 ml, corresponding to
molecular masses of 52.8 and 46.1 kDa, respectively. The determined
molecular weights give rise to the conclusion that both carboxylated
and thiocarboxylated MoaD are able to form a heterotetrameric complex
(53.6 kDa) with MoaE. In addition, purified active MPT synthase (Fig.
2C, control) eluted at 14.49 ± 0.02 ml from
the column (Fig. 2C), which is identical to the elution
volume of the MPT synthase complex formed by MoaE and thiocarboxylated
MoaD. Based on these findings one can argue that the nature of the C
terminus of MoaD influences the overall shape of the heterotetramer
resulting in a different Stokes radius. Slight conformational changes
or different hydrations near the active site might result in the
observed different retention times on size exclusion chromatography
between the thiocarboxylated and carboxylated form. However, different
interaction of both MPT synthase forms with the gel filtration matrix
are rather unlikely because in the crystal structure of MPT synthase
the C terminus of MoaD is not exposed to the surface of the molecule
(23) and size exclusion chromatography was performed in the presence of 250 mM salt. Because the elution profiles of active
in vivo-assembled and -purified MPT synthase as well as
in vitro assembled MPT synthase with thiocarboxylated small
subunits were identical and close to the theoretical molecular weight,
we conclude that both enzymes have similar conformations.
In Vitro Synthesis of MPT Using Reassembled MPT Synthase--
To
analyze if the in vitro assembled MPT synthase complexes are
active, in vitro synthesis of MPT was shown in two ways: 1) by using the nit-1 reconstitution assay and 2) by using purified precursor Z and demonstrating MPT formation by HPLC form A analysis. The N. crassa mutant nit-1 is defective in the second step
of Moco biosynthesis and accumulates precursor Z that can be converted to MPT by MPT synthase, which is exogenously added to the crude nit-1
protein extract (20). In the presence of 1 mM molybdate, the resulting MPT is non-catalytically converted to Moco that reconstitutes N. crassa apo-nitrate reductase (20, 22).
Bicistronically expressed and purified E. coli MPT synthase
(data not shown) was capable of forming MPT and showed an activity of
8.4 units/pmol of purified protein (Fig.
3A, control). MPT synthase that was assembled from separately expressed and purified MoaE
and thiocarboxylated MoaD subunits exhibited an even higher activity in
MPT synthesis (Fig. 3A, 12.3 units/pmol of protein). In
contrast, MPT synthase containing carboxylated MoaD was not active
under the same conditions. Only when using 1000 times higher concentrations of carboxylated MPT synthase, a low activity was observed that might be due to an activation of the enzyme within the
nit-1 crude extract by a MoeB-like sulfurase. Interestingly, the addition of free small subunit (MoaD) in its thiocarboxylated form
in concentrations 100 times higher than the active enzyme, resulted
also in the formation of MPT, suggesting that MoaD forms a chimeric
complex with the endogenous large subunit of nit-1 MPT synthase or that
MoaD has an activity by its own, which however is rather unlikely. In
addition, like carboxylated MPT synthase also carboxylated MoaD alone
exhibited nit-1 activities when used in high concentrations, supporting
the possibility that a weak sulfuration of the small subunits takes
place within the nit-1 crude extract. MoaE alone never showed any
activity in the nit-1 assay, suggesting a lesion of the MoaD-homologous
protein in the nit-1 mutant. Finally, no activity was observed with all
MPT synthases when the protein fraction of the nit-1 extract
(gel filtrated) was used or when molybdate was depleted from the
reaction mixture (data not shown).
To further analyze the activity of reassembled thiocarboxylated MPT
synthase, the conversion of precursor Z to MPT was demonstrated using a
fully defined system containing either MPT synthase, thiocarboxylated MoaD, or no protein (control) and purified precursor Z. When 55 pmol of
reassembled MPT synthase was coincubated with an excess of purified
precursor Z (1.84 nmol) the formation of 10.4 pmol of MPT (Fig.
3B, middle chromatogram; form A) could
be shown, while in the absence of any protein (Fig. 3B,
control) no form A was detectable. However, the low but
significantly detectable MPT synthesis by the thiocarboxylated small
subunit itself in the nit-1 reconstitution assay was not found when
using this fully defined in vitro system (Fig.
3B, lower chromatogram) where 55 pmol of
thiocarboxylated MoaD (MoaD-SH) was not sufficient to generate any
detectable amounts of MPT.
MoaD and small subunits of MPT synthases from other organisms (12,
15) show homologies to ubiquitin (24) and ThiS (26), proteins with
similar small size and a highly conserved double glycine motif at the C
terminus. It was shown that ThiS in the thiamin biosynthetic pathway in
E. coli (35) contains a thiocarboxylate at the C terminus
that is the source of the incorporated sulfur (26). Comparing thiamin
biosynthesis with Moco biosynthesis, parallels in sulfur transfer and
activation can be seen. However, in contrast to ThiS, the small subunit
of MPT synthase needs to interact with the large subunit before gaining
its activity. For synthesis of the dithiolene group in MPT two sulfur
atoms must be incorporated, while in the thiamin pathway only one
sulfur per reaction is needed. Further evidence for the functional
importance of the C-terminal glycine residue of the small subunit is
the finding that in humans both subunits of MPT synthase are expressed by a single bicistronic mRNA (15), which allows the coexpression of
both subunits and maintains the free C terminus of the small subunit.
Our experiments to synthesize MPT with in vitro assembled
MPT synthases demonstrate that the C-terminal glycine residue of the
small subunit carries the sulfur that is incorporated into MPT.
Furthermore, we show that the in vitro formation of a
thiocarboxylated subunit and its subsequent assembly with the large
subunit generates active MPT synthase. Based on these data and the
conservation of MPT synthases among the phyli we propose that also the
reaction catalyzed by MPT synthase and its substrate precursor Z are
conserved in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Another line of evidence for
the functional importance of the thiocarboxylate of the small subunit comes from size exclusion chromatography experiments where different retention times were observed for active and inactive MPT synthase indicating slight but significant conformational differences between thiocarboxylated and carboxylated MPT synthase. Both kinds of subunits
induce the formation of a heterotetrameric MPT synthase whereas the
separated subunits (MoaD and MoaE) behaved clearly as monomers under
our experimental conditions. Interestingly, the crystal structure of
MPT synthase (23) shows that heterotetramer formation is exclusively
mediated by the dimerization of MoaE, while the small subunits have no
contact to each other; rather they bind to the large subunits thereby
forming two independent active sites. However, the dimerization of MoaE
seems to be MoaD-dependent because we have found MoaE
monomers only in the absence of MoaD suggesting that the large subunit
MoaE undergoes large conformational changes during the binding of MoaD
resulting in the heterotetramer formation. In the crystal structure of
MPT synthase (23) a ~50% active enzyme (50% thiocarboxylated) was
analyzed showing a region of high mobility between residues 39 and 45 that are disordered in MoaE. These residues are not in direct contact
with the C terminus of MoaD but they are in close proximity. In
addition, it is important to note that the terminal glycine
Gly-81 of MoaD is forming a strong salt bridge to Glu-126 of MoaE,
which is altered after formation of an artificial covalent complex
between MoaD and MoaE (23). Therefore it might be reasonable to argue
that thiocarboxylation of MoaD influences the conformation of the
active site within the MPT synthase complex, a phenomenon that might be
reflected by our size exclusion chromatography results.
The main advantage for the cell to possess a MPT synthase complex would
be the donation of two sulfur atoms by a single heterotetrameric complex with two independent active sites harboring two reactive sulfurs as thiocarboxylates. Assuming that both sulfur atoms in MPT
originate from the two small subunits within the heterotetrameric MPT
synthase we present the following model for the reaction mechanism of
MPT synthase (Fig. 4). A two-step
reaction with the formation of a hypothetical intermediate (precursor
G) carrying one sulfur atom as a thione is proposed. First, the
carboxyl group of the C2 atom in the side chain of precursor Z is
protonated followed by a nucleophilic attack of the sulfur from the
first thiocarboxylate of MPT synthase. After carboxylation of the small
subunit and formation of a thione, precursor G is released.
Carboxylation of the first small subunit results in a conformational
change of the MPT synthase heterodimer (Fig. 4, shaded), as
observed in this study for the fully carboxylated enzyme. The
conformational change of the first dimer would result in an induced fit
of the second heterodimer (Fig. 4, gray) generating an
active site with an increased affinity for the intermediate and a
decreased affinity for precursor Z as compared with the starting
enzyme. According to this model an equimolar ratio exists between high
affinity binding sites and the intermediate allowing a rapid processing of the intermediate without any detectable accumulation of precursor G. In the second half-reaction, the oxygen atom of the cyclic phosphate
could be protonated followed by nucleophilic attack of the
thiocarboxylate from the second small subunit. The phosphate ring is
opened, and a thioester bond is formed. For carboxylation of the second
small subunit a water molecule is needed. Finally MPT is released and a
fully carboxylated MPT synthase is formed that can be recharged by the
sulfurase.
The data presented here confirmed the postulated thiocarboxylation of
the small subunit of MPT synthase. Thiocarboxylation seems to be an
evolutionary old feature for sulfur mobilization and activation to
perform complex C-S bond chemistry. Our proposed model for the
reaction mechanism of MPT synthesis provides a first hint to explain
how the dithiolene is formed by a single MPT synthase with two active sites.
We thank H. Schindelin (SUNY Stony Brook, NY)
for providing results prior to publication, M. Kies (GBF
Braunschweig, Germany) for N-terminal protein sequencing, R. Breuckmann
(Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Ruhr-University Bochum) and A. Tiepold (Dept. of Structure Research, GBF Braunschweig, Germany) for
measuring the MALDI mass spectra, and P. Hänzelmann, J. Kuper, S. Leimkühler, and H. Schindelin for critical reading of the manuscript.
*
This work was supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (to R. R. M. and G. S.) and the Fritz Thyssen
Stiftung (to R. R. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Botanical
Institute, Technical University of Braunschweig 38023 Braunschweig, Germany. Tel.: 49-531-391-5870; Fax: 49-531-391-8128; E-mail: r.mendel@tu-bs.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 17, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105321200
2
R. R. Mendel, unpublished results.
The abbreviations used are:
Moco, molybdenum
cofactor;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
MALDI, matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization;
Mo-enzymes, molybdoenzymes;
MPT, molybdopterin;
HPLC, high
performance liquid chromatography.
Thiocarboxylation of Molybdopterin Synthase Provides Evidence for
the Mechanism of Dithiolene Formation in Metal-binding Pterins*
,
¶, and
Botanical Institute, Technical University of
Braunschweig, 38023 Braunschweig, Germany and § Lehrstuhl
für Analytische Chemie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-thiogalactoside-induced recombinant expression of MoaD
and MoaE in E. coli. A plasmid expressing exclusively MoaE
as His-tagged protein (pGG110) was generated in the same way as
described above. For recombinant expression of the small subunit as an
intein fusion protein, E. coli moaD was polymerase chain
reaction-cloned into pTYB2 (NdeI/SmaI) yielding pGG130.
MoaD = 5,690 M
1
cm
1,
MoaE = 16,620 M
1 cm
1.
-thiogalactoside and growth was continued
for 15 h at 18 °C. For protein purification, the manual of the
IMPACT expression system (New England Biolabs) was followed. Elution of
carboxylated or thiocarboxylated protein was induced by using a
cleavage buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, 500 mM NaCl,
0.1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) containing either 30 mM
dithiothreitol (DTT) or 30 mM ammonium sulfide (27),
respectively. The cleavage reaction was performed at 4 °C for at
least 24 h. Eluted proteins were checked using 14% tricine
SDS-polyacrylamide gels (29) for purity and rebuffered on Nick columns
into nit-1 buffer.
5
to 1 × 10
4 M analyte solution using 1 µl per spot of each component. Mass spectra were typically
accumulated over 20-50 consecutive laser pulses.
70 °C. All reconstitutions were performed in nit-1 buffer
(100-µl reaction volume) containing 50 µl of nit-1 crude extract in
the presence of 4 mM reduced glutathione and 10 mM sodium molybdate. Where indicated, precursor Z was
removed from the nit-1 crude extract by gel filtration on Nick columns. Complementation was carried out anaerobically for two hours at room
temperature. After addition of 20 mM NADPH for 10 min,
reconstituted NADPH-nitrate reductase activity was determined as
described (32).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Recombinant expression of E. coli
MoaE and MoaD and generation of thiocarboxylated small
subunit. A, purification and self-splicing of intein
fusion proteins by generating carboxylated and thiocarboxylated small
subunits. CDB, chitin binding domain. B,
SDS-polyacrylamide gel (14% tricine gel) of purified MoaE and MoaD.
MoaE was expressed and purified as C-terminal His-tagged protein
(lane 1). MoaD was expressed as intein fusion protein and
purified on a chitin affinity column. The intein fusion was cleaved
either by addition of DTT or ammonium sulfide resulting in carboxylated
(lane 2) or thiocarboxylated (lane 3) small
subunits, respectively. In each lane 300 pmol of protein
were loaded. C, mass spectrometry of carboxylated and
thiocarboxylated MoaD. Proteins were diluted in water to a
concentration of 10 µM and subjected to MALDI
spectroscopy. The molecular masses of the detected peaks are shown and
are compared with the calculated masses.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Size exclusion chromatography analysis of
MoaD, MoaE, and of their reassembled MPT synthase complexes.
A, size exclusion chromatography of 2.0 µM
MoaE and 10.6 µM carboxylated MoaD (inset) as
well as an equimolar mixture (4 µM; bold line)
and submolar mixtures of MoaE and carboxylated MoaD (thin
line, 4 µM MoaE + 1 µM MoaD;
dotted line, 2 µM MoaE + 8 µM
MoaD). B, size exclusion chromatography of 2.0 µM MoaE and 2.2 µM thiocarboxylated MoaD
(inset) as well as an equimolar mixture (2 µM;
bold line) and submolar mixtures of MoaE and
thiocarboxylated MoaD (dotted line, 2 µM MoaE + 0.5 µM MoaD; hair line, 1 µM
MoaE + 4 µM MoaD). C, comparison of the size
exclusion chromatography elution profiles of 2 µM active
MPT synthase (control, dotted line),
thiocarboxylated (MoaDE-SH, bold line) and carboxylated
(MoaDE-OH, thin line) reconstituted MPT synthase.
D, determination of the molecular mass of MoaD, MoaE, as
well as thiocarboxylated (E-SH) and carboxylated MPT
synthase (E-OH) by plotting their elution volume against
that of standard proteins (ovalbumin, 43 kDa; chymotrypsinogen A, 25 kDa; equine myoglobulin, 17 kDa; ribonuclease A, 14 kDa, vitamin B12,
1.35 kDa).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
In vitro synthesis of MPT using
reassembled E. coli MPT synthase. A,
nit-1 reconstitution with purified E. coli MPT synthase
(control), reassembled thiocarboxylated and carboxylated MPT
synthases (bold lines) as well as thiocarboxylated and
carboxylated MoaD (dotted lines). Different amounts of
protein were used to measure any detectable activity in the linear
range of the reconstitution assay. B, HPLC form A analysis
of 1.84 nmol precursor Z incubated with no protein
(control), with 55 pmol of assembled thiocarboxylated MPT
synthase (+MoaD-SH, +MoaE) or with 55 pmol of
thiocarboxylated small subunit alone (+MoaD-SH). After 1-h
coincubation, the mixture was oxidized, dephosphorylated, purified by
QAE chromatography and fluorimetrically (excitation: 370 nm, emission
450 nm) analyzed on a C18 reverse-phased column by HPLC
chromatography.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Hypothetical model for the conversion of
precursor Z to molybdopterin in the MPT synthase reaction. The
starting compound precursor Z, the hypothetical intermediate precursor
G and the endproduct MPT are shown. For details see "Discussion."
The fully thiocarboxylated MPT synthase is shown in white,
while the carboxylated dimer is black, and the dimer with an
intermediate conformation (induced fit) is shown in
gray.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Hille, R.
(1996)
Chem. Rev.
96,
2757-2816
2.
Mendel, R. R.,
and Schwarz, G.
(1999)
Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.
18,
33-69
3.
Kramer, S. P.,
Johnson, J. L.,
Ribeiro, A. A.,
Millington, D. S.,
and Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
16357-16363
4.
Kisker, C.,
Schindelin, H.,
Pacheco, A.,
Wehbi, W. A.,
Garrett, R. M.,
Rajagopalan, K. V.,
Enemark, J. H.,
and Rees, D. C.
(1997)
Cell
91,
973-983
5.
Kletzin, A.,
and Adams, M. W.
(1996)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
18,
5-63
6.
McMaster, J.,
and Enemark, J. H.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2,
201-207
7.
Mendel, R. R.
(1997)
Planta
203,
399-405
8.
Rajagopalan, K. V.,
and Johnson, J. L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10199-10202
9.
Johnson, J. L.,
Rajagopalan, K. V.,
and Wadman, S. K.
(1993)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
338,
373-378
10.
Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1996)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium
(Neidhardt, F. C., ed)
, pp. 674-679, ASM Press, Washington, D. C.
11.
Unkles, S. E.,
Smith, J.,
Kanan, G. J.,
Millar, L. J.,
Heck, I. S.,
Boxer, D. H.,
and Kinghorn, J. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28381-28390
12.
Unkles, S. E.,
Heck, I. S.,
Appleyard, M. V.,
and Kinghorn, J. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
19286-19293
13.
Reiss, J.,
Cohen, N.,
Dorche, C.,
Mandel, H.,
Mendel, R. R.,
Stallmeyer, B.,
Zabot, M. T.,
and Dierks, T.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
20,
51-53
14.
Stallmeyer, B.,
Schwarz, G.,
Schulze, J.,
Nerlich, A.,
Reiss, J.,
Kirsch, J.,
and Mendel, R. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
1333-1338
15.
Stallmeyer, B.,
Drugeon, G.,
Reiss, J.,
Haenni, A. L.,
and Mendel, R. R.
(1999)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
64,
698-705
16.
Stallmeyer, B.,
Nerlich, A.,
Schiemann, J.,
Brinkmann, H.,
and Mendel, R. R.
(1995)
Plant J.
8,
751-762
17.
Hoff, T.,
Schnorr, K. M.,
Meyer, C.,
and Caboche, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
6100-6107
18.
Wuebbens, M. M.,
and Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1082-1087
19.
Wuebbens, M. M.,
and Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13493-13498
20.
Johnson, M. E.,
and Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
110-116
21.
Pitterle, D. M.,
and Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13499-13505
22.
Pitterle, D. M.,
Johnson, J. L.,
and Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13506-13509
23.
Rudolph, M. J.,
Wuebbens, M. M.,
Rajagopalan, K. V.,
and Schindelin, H.
(2001)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
8,
42-46
24.
Hershko, A.,
and Ciechanover, A.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
61,
761-807
25.
McGrath, J. P.,
Jentsch, S.,
and Varshavsky, A.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
227-236
26.
Begley, T. P.,
Xi, J.,
Kinsland, C.,
Taylor, S.,
and McLafferty, F.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
3,
623-629
27.
Kinsland, C.,
Taylor, S. V.,
Kelleher, N. L.,
McLafferty, F. W.,
and Begley, T. P.
(1998)
Protein Sci.
7,
1839-1842
28.
Reiss, J.,
Kleinhofs, A.,
and Klingmuller, W.
(1987)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
206,
352-355
29.
Schagger, H.,
and von Jagow, G.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
166,
368-379
30.
Stewart, V.,
and MacGregor, C. H.
(1982)
J. Bacteriol.
151,
788-799
31.
Glaser, J. H.,
and DeMoss, J. A.
(1972)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
116,
1-10
32.
Nason, A.,
Lee, K. Y.,
Pan, S. S.,
Ketchum, P. A.,
Lamberti, A.,
and DeVries, J.
(1971)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A
68,
3242-3246
33.
Johnson, J. L.,
Hainline, B. E.,
Rajagopalan, K. V.,
and Arison, B. H.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
5414-5422
34.
Schwarz, G.,
Boxer, D. H.,
and Mendel, R. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26811-26814
35.
Begley, T. P.,
Downs, D. M.,
Ealick, S. E.,
McLafferty, F. W.,
Van Loon, A. P.,
Taylor, S.,
Campobasso, N.,
Chiu, H. J.,
Kinsland, C.,
Reddick, J. J.,
and Xi, J.
(1999)
Arch. Microbiol.
171,
293-300
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Genest, M. Neumann, F. Seduk, W. Stocklein, V. Mejean, S. Leimkuhler, and C. Iobbi-Nivol Dedicated Metallochaperone Connects Apoenzyme and Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis Components J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2008; 283(31): 21433 - 21440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Smolinsky, S. A. Eichler, S. Buchmeier, J. C. Meier, and G. Schwarz Splice-specific Functions of Gephyrin in Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2008; 283(25): 17370 - 17379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Neumann, W. Stocklein, and S. Leimkuhler Transfer of the Molybdenum Cofactor Synthesized by Rhodobacter capsulatus MoeA to XdhC and MobA J. Biol. Chem., September 28, 2007; 282(39): 28493 - 28500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Llamas, R. R. Mendel, and G. Schwarz Synthesis of Adenylated Molybdopterin: AN ESSENTIAL STEP FOR MOLYBDENUM INSERTION J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55241 - 55246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schwarz, J. A. Santamaria-Araujo, S. Wolf, H.-J. Lee, I. M. Adham, H.-J. Grone, H. Schwegler, J. O. Sass, T. Otte, P. Hanzelmann, et al. Rescue of lethal molybdenum cofactor deficiency by a biosynthetic precursor from Escherichia coli Hum. Mol. Genet., June 15, 2004; 13(12): 1249 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Santamaria-Araujo, B. Fischer, T. Otte, M. Nimtz, R. R. Mendel, V. Wray, and G. Schwarz The Tetrahydropyranopterin Structure of the Sulfur-free and Metal-free Molybdenum Cofactor Precursor J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 2004; 279(16): 15994 - 15999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Guse, C. E. M. Stevenson, J. Kuper, G. Buchanan, G. Schwarz, G. Giordano, A. Magalon, R. R. Mendel, D. M. Lawson, and T. Palmer Biochemical and Structural Analysis of the Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis Protein MobA J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 25302 - 25307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Leimkuhler, A. Freuer, J. A. S. Araujo, K. V. Rajagopalan, and R. R. Mendel Mechanistic Studies of Human Molybdopterin Synthase Reaction and Characterization of Mutants Identified in Group B Patients of Molybdenum Cofactor Deficiency J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 26127 - 26134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Wuebbens and K. V. Rajagopalan Mechanistic and Mutational Studies of Escherichia coli Molybdopterin Synthase Clarify the Final Step of Molybdopterin Biosynthesis J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 14523 - 14532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hanzelmann, G. Schwarz, and R. R. Mendel Functionality of Alternative Splice Forms of the First Enzymes Involved in Human Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis J. Biol. Chem., May 17, 2002; 277(21): 18303 - 18312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |