![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 39, 36275-36280, September 28, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Bern,
Friedbühlstrasse 49, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Received for publication, June 7, 2001, and in revised form, July 19, 2001
The GABAA receptors are
ligand-gated chloride channels. The subunit stoichiometry of the
receptors is controversial; four, five, or six subunits per receptor
molecule have been proposed for GABAA1
receptors mediate fast synaptic inhibition in the mammalian brain. They
are believed to form heterooligomers composed of subunits from six
classes with several isoforms ( GABAA receptors composed of A powerful way to gain insight into the arrangement of subunits in a
multimeric channel is to predetermine the alignment of subunits by gene
fusion and to analyze whether the linked subunits are able to form
functional channels. This approach was first successfully applied to
potassium channels (24-26). Later it was also used to study subunit
stoichiometry of other ion channels, e.g. a cyclic
nucleotide-gated channel (27), the mechanosensitive channel MscL of
Escherichia coli (28), and the cystic fibrosis conductance
regulator channel (29). All these channels have their N and C termini
on the cytoplasmic side so that the linkage occurs intracellularly. Up
to now it has only been used once with limited success in the field of
ligand-gated ion channels, which have both C and N termini on the
extracellular side. Applying it to a GABAA receptor, Im
et al. (30) prepared a tandem construct where the We constructed here tandem constructs of Construction of the Tandem cDNAs--
Several
The Expression of Tandem Constructs and Wild Type Subunits in Xenopus
Oocytes--
Capped cRNAs were synthesized (Ambion, Austin, Texas)
from the linearized pCMV vectors containing the different tandem
constructs, the single Two-electrode Voltage Clamp--
All measurements were done in
medium containing 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 90 mM
NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM KCl, and 1 mM CaCl2 at a holding potential of Western Blotting--
Oocytes were homogenized in lysis buffer
(10 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, pepstatin, leustatin, antipain,
and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, each at 5 µg/ml) using a Teflon
glass homogenizer. The homogenate was incubated on ice for 15 min and
centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant
was subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (35). Proteins
were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (HybondECL, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) according to Towbin et al. (36) and
decorated with the monoclonal antibody bd24 (31, 32), which recognizes
the N terminus of the Preparation and Analysis of Tandem Constructs--
Tandem
cDNAs were constructed that consisted of the
The function of the different tandem constructs was assessed after
expression in Xenopus oocytes, either alone (Fig.
2B, I and II), in combination with
each other (Fig. 2B, III), or in combination with
single
The first criterion for normal channel function was a GABA-evoked
maximal current amplitude comparable with that of receptors made from
single The Tandem Constructs Are Not Proteolyzed in the Linker
Sequence--
To evaluate whether the expressed tandem constructs were
intact or subjected to proteolysis we analyzed the newly formed
GABAA receptors by Western blotting. The monoclonal
antibody bd24 against the N-terminal of the The Length of the Linker Is Critical for Functional Expression of
Linked Subunits--
If the
On the right panel of Fig. 4 the results of the analogue
examination for the GABAA Receptors Made from
The tandem constructs
Fig. 6D shows that both the Coexpression of the Tandem Constructs with a Single In this study we have demonstrated the feasibility of covalent
subunit linkage Tandem linkage of subunits is a powerful strategy to extract
information about stoichiometry and arrangement of multimeric proteins.
This approach has first been applied to the study of potassium channels
(24). Later, Im et al. (30) made a tandem construct
consisting of the GABAA receptor subunit precursors In the present tandem constructs we omitted the signal sequence stretch
of the second subunit, which might have unpredictable effects on
e.g. protein folding, insertion of the protein into the
membrane, subunit assembly, or proteolysis of the connection between
the subunits. We linked the The observation that both tandem constructs form functional channels in
combination with single A further aim of this study was the design of optimal linkers between
the subunits. The linkage of two subunits should position both next to
each other in the receptor. When no functional channels can be
detected, the forced neighborhood of the two subunits either prohibits
proper channel formation, or the linker is too short. When, in
contrast, functional channels can be expressed from linked subunits,
their neighborhood may be assumed unless the linker is very long. In
this case the two linked subunits do not necessarily locate next to
each other in the receptor multimer. It is then possible for another
subunit to position itself between the two linked subunits. We
therefore determined the minimal linker length for both, the
Subunit Arrangement of
-Aminobutyric Acid Type A
Receptors*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

receptors, whereas 

receptors are assumed to be pentamers. In this study,
-
and
-
tandem cDNAs from the
1 and
2 subunits of the
GABAA receptor were constructed. We determined the minimal length of the linker that is required between the two subunits for
functional channel expression for each of the tandem constructs. 10- and 23-amino acid residues are required for
-
and
-
,
respectively. The tandem constructs either alone or in combination with
each other failed to express functional channels in Xenopus
oocytes. Therefore, we can exclude tetrameric or hexameric 
GABAA receptors. We can also exclude proteolysis of the
tandem constructs. In addition, the tandem constructs were combined
with single
,
, or
subunits to allow formation of pentameric
arrangements. In contrast to the combination with
subunits, the
combination with either
or
subunits led to expression of
functional channels. Therefore, a pentameric arrangement containing two
1 and three
2 subunits is proposed for the receptor composed of
and
subunits. Our findings also favor an arrangement




for the receptor composed of
,
, and
subunits.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1-6,
1-3,
1-3,
,
,
,
) (1-5). These subunits belong to the gene superfamily of
ligand-gated ion channels, which includes nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, GABAA receptors, glycine receptors, and the
serotonin type 3 (5HT3) receptor. The major
GABAA receptor isoform is likely to be composed of
1,
2, and
2 subunits (1, 2, 6, 7). Heterologous expression
demonstrated that the combination of
and
subunits produces
GABA-gated currents, but coexpression of a
subunit is required for
benzodiazepine sensitivity of the expressed receptors (8).
and
subunits differ
from receptors that additionally contain the
subunit in regard to
Zn2+ and benzodiazepine sensitivity and to single channel
conductance (9-13). Some populations of neuronal GABAA
receptors show high Zn2+ sensitivity coupled with low
single-channel conductance as described for 
receptors (14, 15).
Although receptors made from
,
, and
subunits are thought to
be pentameric (16-18), the subunit stoichiometry of receptors composed
of
and
is still controversial. Recombinantly expressed
receptors have been reported as possibly tetrameric (19, 20) as well as
pentameric (18, 21). Unitary dose-response curves for 
receptors,
single IC50 values for Zn2+ inhibition, and
unitary single channel properties (1) provide evidence against the
formation of two populations of receptors, e.g. 2
3
and
3
2
. A tetrameric rather than a pentameric structure has been
proposed as one of several explanations for the lower average single
channel conductance for the 
receptor as compared with the


receptor (22, 23).
6
subunit is linked to the
2 subunit via 10 glutamine residues and
studied functional expression in HEK293 cells. The connection between
the two subunits included the signal sequence of the
2 subunit of
24-amino acid residues in length. The consequences of such a signal
sequence in the middle of a protein are difficult to predict.
1 and
2 subunits for the
first time in both arrangements
1-
2 and
2-
1. We determined the minimal length of the linkers necessary for the formation of
functional channels. The constructs were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes either alone or in combination with single subunits to establish subunit stoichiometry and arrangement of GABAA
receptors. We provide novel information on the architecture of
GABAA receptors.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-
tandem
cDNAs encoding a single polypeptide 
with linkers of
differing length were established in the pCMV vector. The tandem
constructs consisted of the modified rat
1 subunit (31) including
its signal sequence at the N terminus and the mature rat
2 subunit
at the C terminus. The modified
1 subunit differs from the original
rat subunit by insertion of one amino acid residue. Insertion of this
residue confers reactivity to the monoclonal antibody bd24 (32, 31),
which was essential for Western blot analysis (shown in the
"Results" section). The
1 subunit was amplified by polymerase
chain reaction using the pCHAI vector as template and the primers
CATAGAAGACACCGGGACGA as a vector-specific primer and
XTTGATGTGGTGTGGGGGCTTT as a gene-specific primer. The latter
was complementary to the last codons before the stop codon and had the
first part of the sequence coding for the respective linker attached
(X). The
2 subunit was amplified using pCB2 as template
and the primers ACTGACACACATTCCACAGCT as vector-specific primer and
YCAGAGTGTCAATGACCCTAGT as a gene-specific primer. The latter
was complementary to the first codons of the sequence of the mature
protein and had the second part of the sequence coding for the
respective linker attached (Y). The obtained fragments
contained the open reading frame of the gene and some additional
vector-derived sequence preceding or succeeding. The fragments were cut
in the vector-derived sequence by EcoRI or XbaI,
respectively, to be ligated in a three-fragment ligation into the pCMV
vector cut with EcoRI and XbaI. The sequence of the resulting plasmids was verified. In the
-0-
tandem, the last
amino acid residue of the
1 subunit is directly attached to the
first amino acid residue of the mature
2 subunit. In the other
tandems the following amino acid sequences are present between the
N-terminal
1 subunit and the C-terminal
2 subunit:
-7-
, Q7;
-10-
, Q10.
-
tandem cDNAs were prepared similarly. The
subunit
was amplified using CATAGAAGACACCGGGACGA as vector-specific and XGTTCACATAGTAAAGCCAATAGAC as gene-specific primer. The mature
subunit was amplified using ACTGACACACATTCCACAGCT as vector-specific and YCAGCCGTCATTACAAGATGAA as gene-specific primer. The linkers introduced into the different
-
tandems are the following:
10
, Q10;
15
,
Q5A3PAQ5;
20
,
Q5(A3P)2A2Q5;
23
,
Q3(Q2A3PA)2AQ5. A long sequence of consecutive glutamine residues might exhaust the
respective tRNA pool during protein synthesis and therefore lead to an
early termination of the synthesized protein. Therefore, other amino
acid residues were introduced. Alanine and proline residues were chosen
for their properties to form no distinct secondary structure elements.
1,
2, and
2 subunits, and from the
vector pVA2580 (33) encoding a neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel
(Na+). A poly(A) tail of about 400 residues was added to
each transcript using yeast poly(A) polymerase (U. S. Biochemical
Corp.). The concentration of the cRNA was quantified on a formaldehyde
gel using Radiant Red stain (Bio-Rad) for visualization of the RNA and
known concentrations of RNA ladder (Life Technologies, Inc.) as the
standard on the same gel. cRNA combinations
1/
2/Na,
-
/Na,
-
/Na,
-
/
-
/Na,
-
/
1/Na,
-
/
1/Na,
-
/
-
/
1/Na,
-
/
2/Na and
-
/
2/Na,
-
/
2/Na, and
-
/
2/Na were precipitated in
ethanol/isoamyl alcohol (19:1) and stored at
20 °C. For injection,
the alcohol was removed, and the cRNAs were dissolved in water.
Isolation of oocytes from the frogs, culturing of the oocytes,
injection of cRNA, and defolliculation were done as described earlier
(34). Oocytes were injected with 50 nl of the cRNA solution. For cRNA combinations of
1 and
2 subunits only, the cRNA solution
contained each subunit or tandem construct at 75 nM. In the
case of coexpression of
1,
2, and
2 subunits, the cRNA
solution contained
1 and
2 subunits or the respective tandem
construct at 10 nM and the
2 subunit at 50 nM. The voltage-gated sodium channel was always added to a
concentration of 40 nM. The injected oocytes were incubated in modified Barth's solution (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 88 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 2.4 mM
NaHCO3, 0.82 mM MgSO4, 0.34 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.41 mM
CaCl2, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin)
at 18 °C for 2 days before the measurements.
80 mV. For
the determination of maximal current amplitudes 1 mM GABA
(Fluka, Switzerland) was applied for 20 s. Sodium currents were
determined by a potential jump from a holding potential of
100 to
15 mV (Fig. 1). The GABA-evoked peak
current amplitude was standardized to the co-expressed sodium current
amplitude of the same oocyte. The mean standardized current amplitude
of at least three oocytes per subunit combination was then compared
with the mean standardized wild type current amplitude. Current
stimulation by diazepam was determined at a GABA concentration evoking
5% of the maximal current amplitude in combination with 1 µM diazepam (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Current traces recorded from oocytes
expressing GABAA receptors (upper panel)
and voltage-gated sodium channels (lower panel).
Oocytes were either expressing
and
subunits of
GABAA receptors and voltage-gated sodium channels
(
/
/Na) or single
subunits (
/Na) or
subunits (
/Na) together with voltage-gated sodium
channels. The duration of the application of GABA or of the potential
jump from
100 to
15 mV is shown above the respective traces.
1 subunit of the GABAA receptor.
Bands were detected using the ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 and the
2
subunit of the GABAA receptor in both arrangements,
1-
2 and
2-
1 (Fig.
2A). The N-terminal
1
(
2) subunit was taken in its precursor form to ensure insertion into
the membrane mediated by the signal sequence. The C-terminal
2
(
1) subunit was depleted of its signal sequence because it is
difficult to predict what consequences this stretch of 24 (27) mostly
hydrophobic amino acid residues in the middle of the new fusion protein
will have. To bridge the distance between the C terminus of the
1
(
2) subunit and the N terminus of the
2 (
1) subunit, we
introduced synthetic linkers of different length to determine the
shortest possible linker resulting in a functional fusion protein after
expression in the Xenopus oocyte. Although the subunits of
the GABAA receptor share the same topology and have a high
sequence homology, they differ slightly in the number of amino acid
residues after the fourth predicted transmembrane region at the C
terminus as well as at the beginning of the N-terminal portion of the
subunit. Therefore, linkers of different length were tested for the
1-
2 and
2-
1 construct separately.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
A, schematic drawing of the
-
tandem construct. The C terminus of the
1 subunit is linked
to the N terminus of the
2 subunit by linkers of different length.
B, theoretically possible subunit arrangements of
-
and
-
tandem constructs in a tetrameric (I-III) or a
pentameric (IV-VII) receptor. Arrangements I and II are
identical and can be formed by both tandem constructs
-
(I) or
-
(II). Arrangement III can be
formed by one
-
and one
-
tandem construct. We assume the
presence of at least two
and two
subunits in a pentameric
receptor. Both tandem constructs
-
and
-
yield in this case
the same arrangement when combined with a single
subunit
(IV and V) or a single
subunit (VI
and VII), respectively.
1 (Fig. 2B, IV and V) or
2 (Fig.
1B, VI and VII) subunits. Expression
of tandem constructs alone is predicted to yield receptors composed of
an even number of subunits, whereas combination of tandem constructs
with single subunits can additionally result in receptors with an
uneven number of subunits.
1 and
2 subunits, the wild type receptor. These current
amplitudes amounted to 1.5-8 µA. Expression of either
1 or
2
subunits alone failed to produce detectable currents. To compensate for
differences in the expression level between the individual oocytes,
GABA-induced current amplitudes were standardized to the current
amplitude of the co-expressed voltage-gated sodium channel in the same
oocyte. Constructs were examined for standardized maximal current
amplitudes (Imax) and the apparent affinity for GABA (Ka). Only receptors performing very similarly
to the wild type receptor regarding Imax and
Ka were considered fully functional.
1 subunit (31, 32) was
used. Fig. 3 shows that single
1
subunits of wild type receptors migrate at 50 kDa (lane 1).
This specific band is missing in the
-10-
/
combination
(lane 2), thus indicating the absence of monomeric
1
subunit and, therefore, of significant proteolysis of the linker. A
very faint unspecific signal at the 50-kDa position is also seen for
non-injected oocytes (lane 3). As indicated by a strong signal, the
-10-
tandem construct migrates at 120-140 kDa. The absence of any additional band with bd24 reactivity also excludes proteolysis elsewhere in the construct. A peptide containing bd24 reactivity that is larger than 29 kDa would have been seen. The
-23-
tandem construct could not be detected because the epitope for the antibody seems to include the free N terminus of the
1 subunit, which is blocked by the linker in this construct. The small
quantity of channel expressed prevented detection with another antibody
due to insufficient sensitivity. As described below, we also
have functional evidence for the fact that proteolysis of both tandem
constructs can be excluded.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Resistance to proteolysis of the fusion
protein. Lane 1, the
1 subunit from the wild type
1
2 receptor migrates at 50 kDa. Lane 2, the
-10-
tandem construct migrates at 120-140 kDa. No specific signal is
detected at 50 kDa, the size of a monomeric
1 subunit, as could be
expected upon proteolysis in the linker region. The absence of specific
signals in other areas indicates that no N-terminal breakdown product
of this tandem larger than 29 kDa is formed. Lane 3,
non-injected oocytes.
1-
2 tandem construct was
co-expressed with single
2 subunits, functional channels were formed
provided the linker was long enough (Fig.
4). With no additional linker but only
the 13 amino acid residues after the fourth transmembrane region of the
1 subunit (
-0-
) connected to the N terminus of the
2
subunit, no current was detectable in injected oocytes. With a linker
of 7 residues in length (
-7-
), we found standardized maximal
current amplitudes that remained below those expressed from wild type receptors, whereas the tandem construct with a linker of 10 residues (
-10-
) resulted in similar standardized maximal current
amplitudes. The dose-response curves of the
-7-
and the
-10-
tandem constructs were close to that of the wild type
receptors (Fig. 5A). The two constructs resulted in channels with similar Ka
values of 9 ± 3 and 11 ± 2 µM, respectively,
comparable with the combination of single
and
subunits with a
Ka of 9 ± 2 µM, pointing to an
unchanged apparent affinity for GABA despite the covalent linkage.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
A minimum length of the linker is required to
obtain functional receptors from tandem constructs. The tandem
constructs were each expressed in combination with single
2 subunits
in Xenopus oocytes. Maximal current amplitudes were measured
and standardized as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." Each
column shows the mean of experiments carried out in at least
two different batches of oocytes, with 5-6 oocytes each examined. The
error bars represent S.E. WT, wild type
receptors.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Dose-response curves of tandem constructs
co-expressed with single
2 subunits.
A, the
-
tandem constructs with linkers of 7- or
10-amino acid residues in length resulted in channels with an unchanged
apparent affinity for GABA. B, channels from the
-
tandem construct with a linker of 20-amino acid residues show a
slightly reduced apparent affinity for GABA, whereas for channels from
the construct with a linker of 23 amino acid residues, the apparent
affinity is close to the one of the combination of single
and
subunits.
2-
1 constructs are shown. There was almost no
detectable current when we combined the constructs with linkers of 10- and 15-amino acid residues with single
2 subunits. A tandem construct with a linker of 20 residues produced receptors with standardized maximal current amplitudes similar to those of wild type
receptors. However, the dose-response curve (Fig. 5B) was shifted to the right, i.e. the apparent affinity for GABA
was reduced. With 64 ± 33 µM, the
Ka was about 7-fold higher than that of the wild
type receptors. A tandem construct containing a linker of 23 residues
also reached standardized maximal current amplitudes similar to wild
type receptors. The GABA dose-response curve for these channels (Fig.
5B) is characterized by a Ka of 20 ± 2 µM, which is close to the wild type receptor, with a Ka of 9 ± 2 µM.
1 and
2 Subunits Are
Pentamers Containing 2
and 3
Subunits--
The two functional
tandem constructs
-10-
and
-23-
were analyzed further. When
either the
-10-
or the
-23-
constructs were expressed
alone, we hardly detected GABA evoked currents (Fig.
6A). The co-expressed
voltage-gated sodium channel showed the same expression levels in
oocytes expressing tandem constructs or wild type receptors. Thus, the
absence of RNase activity and the capability of protein expression in
the individual oocyte was confirmed. Moreover we exclude proteolysis
for either construct because proteolysis of the linker would in each
case liberate
1 and
2 subunits, which in turn should result in
functional channels. When
-10-
and
-23-
constructs were
expressed in the same oocyte, the standardized maximal current
amplitudes remained below 10% of the wild type current (Fig.
6C). These results led to the conclusion that tetrameric
receptors of the arrangement 


, which is equal to the
arrangement 


(see Fig. 2B, I and II) or of the arrangement 


(see Fig.
2B, III) do not correspond to a functional
receptor made from single
and
subunits.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Maximal relative current amplitudes of
receptors resulting from different combinations of tandem constructs
with single subunits. The
-10-
and
-23-
tandem
constructs do not result in functional channels when each is expressed
alone (A) or each is expressed in combination with single
1 subunits (B) or when both tandem constructs are
expressed together or with additional single
1 subunits
(C). When expressed with single
2 (D) or
single
2 (E) subunits, the tandem constructs are
functionally complemented. Each column shows the mean of
experiments in at least two different batches of oocytes with 5-6
oocytes each examined. Error bars represent S.E.
WT, wild type.
-10-
and
-23-
were also coexpressed
with single
1 subunits and analyzed for maximal current amplitudes. Almost no current was detected upon application of GABA (Fig. 6B), whereas sodium currents were expressed in the same
oocytes. The addition of a single
1 subunit to the combination of
both tandem constructs
-10-
and
-23-
resulted in slightly
elevated maximal current amplitudes as compared with the combination of
-10-
with
-23-
(Fig. 6C), but they were still
far below those of the wild type receptors. This indicates an
inefficient formation of functional channels in this case.
-10-
and the
-23-
tandem constructs could be complemented with single
2
subunits to form functional channels. This result matches the
theoretical consideration that both tandem constructs yield the same
arrangement when complemented with a single
2 subunit (compare Fig.
2B, VI and VII).
2
Subunit--
When the
-10-
tandem construct is complemented with
a single
2 subunit, the standardized maximal current amplitude
amounts to about 26% compared with the wild type receptor (Fig.
6E). Submaximal current amplitudes can be stimulated by
diazepam by 134 ± 8% (mean ± S.D., n = 3)
(not shown). The
-23-
tandem construct complemented with a single
subunit results in functional channels with standardized maximal
current amplitudes similar to wild type receptors (Fig. 6E).
Submaximal current amplitudes of these receptors are also stimulated by
diazepam by 360 ± 10% (mean ± S.D., n = 3)
(not shown).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1-
2 and
2-
1 for the GABAA
receptor channel. We have also established the minimal linker lengths
required for functional expression. Our results strongly suggest a
pentameric structure of the GABAA receptor composed of
1
and
2 subunits and exclude a tetramer. The technique described here
may also be applied to the study of other ligand-gated ion channels.
6
and
2. They found that their
6-
2 tandem construct alone failed
to produce functional GABA channels, but combination with either single
6 or
2 subunits, but not
2 subunits, restored receptor
function after expression in HEK293 cells. Functional expression was,
however, very low in all these cases and did not exceed 0.2 nA even for
the wild type subunit combination
6 and
2 (30).
1 and the
2 subunits of the
GABAA receptor in both arrangements and expressed the
resulting tandem constructs
-
and
-
in
Xenopus oocytes. They were both shown to result in
functional channels when complemented with
2 subunits. When the
tandem constructs were expressed either alone or in combination with
each other, no functional receptors were formed. Therefore, our most
important conclusion here is that the GABAA receptor made
from
1 and
2 subunits is not composed of an even number of
subunits. We can exclude tetrameric receptors of the subunit
arrangements 


from the expression of each of the tandem
constructs alone and the arrangement 


from their co-expression. Only arrangements of a 1:1 stoichiometry of
and
subunits have been tested here because stoichiometries for 
receptors of 3:1 or 1:3 have been shown to be unlikely (19, 20). These
findings confirm the conclusion drawn from Western blot analysis that
proteolytic cleavage in the sequence of the linker (Fig.
7A) does not occur to a
significant extent. The participation of only one subunit of the tandem
construct in the functional receptor (Fig. 7B) can also be
excluded. If either one or both of these events had occurred, the
formation of functional pentameric receptors from the tandem constructs
alone would have been observed.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Proteolysis of tandem constructs (A) or
participation of only one subunit of the tandem construct
(B) in a functional pentamer can be excluded from the
results shown in Fig. 4 and 6A. C, proposed
rearrangement of subunits in a tandem construct. The marked areas in
the schematic subunits (stripes in
, points in
) represent amino acid residues that can contribute to the
benzodiazepine binding site. Note that a proper benzodiazepine binding
site at a 
subunit interface can only be formed in one of the two
different subunit arrangements (II) and is lost in the other
(I).
2 subunits but fail to do so in
combination with single
1 subunits supports the view that a receptor
made from
and
subunits is a pentamer composed of two
and
three
subunits. This had also been proposed based on
immunoprecipitation experiments in HEK293 cells expressing
1
3
receptors (18). A receptor stoichiometry of three
6 and two
2
subunits has also been suggested (30). This might indicate that the
subunit stoichiometry of an 
receptor depends on the specific
subunit isoforms expressed together and/or on differences in the
expression systems used.
-
and the
-
tandem constructs, necessary for the formation of
functional channels. We found this length to be 10 and 23 amino acid
residues, respectively. Shorter linkers altered the apparent affinity
for GABA or the maximal current amplitude of the channel, probably by
distorting the conformation of the resulting receptor. It should be
noted that the
-7-
and
-20-
tandem constructs, which have
linkers that are 3 amino acid residues or about 11 Å shorter,
performed nearly as well as wild type receptors. Therefore, the optimal
linker length may be somewhat shorter than 10 or 23 amino acid
residues, respectively. In our calculation of the actual linker length
we included the synthetic linker as well as the C- and N-terminal
elongations of the respective subunits (Table
I). We assumed an extended conformation
of both with 3.6-Å per amino acid residue. In this case the total
length of the subunit connection may be estimated to be maximally 83 and 97 Å in the
-
and the
-
tandem construct, respectively, which might be diminished by the existence of secondary structure elements. For the reasons mentioned above, we assume that the
actual linker length is substantially shorter. It is of interest to
estimate whether these respective linker lengths allow interspersing of
an additional subunit. We can consider the nicotinic acetylcholine
receptor an appropriate model for the structure of the
GABAA receptor, as they both belong to the same superfamily
of ligand-gated ion channels. The three-dimensional structure of the
nicotinic acetylcholine receptor has been resolved to 4.6 Å (37). All
the members of the superfamily share a high sequence homology and the
same topology, and it is assumed that they also have a very similar
overall shape. From the dimensions of the receptor we can estimate the
minimal length of a peptide passing along the perimeter of one subunit
to be about at least 54 Å if the N terminus is located at the
membrane surface. This minimal length of 54 Å is unrealistic for the
following reasons. First, the receptor surface is certainly not smooth,
but irregular. Second, the N terminus of the second subunit of the
tandem construct is not necessarily located at the membrane surface as
the beginning of the connection is predicted to be. Most
importantly, location of either the N terminus or the C terminus away
from the opposed edges of the linked subunits would both result in a
corresponding increase of the required minimal length. Comparing the
maximal length of the subunit connections and the minimal length such a
connection must have to surround an additional subunit and the restrictions made to these values, we consider it unlikely that another
subunit is interspersing, but we cannot entirely exclude this
possibility.
Calculation of the actual linker length
In initial experiments we combined the two tandem constructs
-10-
and
-23-
each with single
subunits. In the case of the
-23-
tandem construct, the resulting channel exhibited the same
maximal current amplitude as wild type receptors, whereas in the case
of the
-10-
tandem construct, maximal current amplitudes remained
below that of wild type receptors. The fact that both tandem constructs
-
and
-
resulted in channels sensitive to diazepam was very
surprising. The binding site for benzodiazepines is thought to be
located at the 
subunit interface (38). This defined interface is
lost in one of the two arrangements I and II shown in Fig.
7C. It is possible that the 
subunit interface can
take over benzodiazepine binding properties, as it has been observed
that receptors expressed from only
and
subunits are sensitive
to benzodiazepines (39). An alternative and more likely interpretation
is based on a rearrangement of one of the tandem constructs. We suggest
this rearrangement for the following reason. In the presence of
subunits, receptors containing
and
subunits alone are no more
formed (23), but the
subunit seems to induce a subunit assembly
leading to 

receptors (40, 18). The assembly of the tandem
constructs with the
subunits might, thus, start with the formation
of proper 
or 
subunit interfaces. Then the second subunit
of the tandem would be integrated. In the case of the
-23-
tandem
construct this happens very efficiently, resulting in channels with
current amplitudes similar to wild type receptors. In contrast, the
-10-
tandem constructs have to reorient to adopt a
-
arrangement (Fig. 7C, II). The linker might now
be too short and disturb the proper conformation of the subunits. It is
also conceivable that the rearrangement proceeds inefficiently.
Therefore, the maximal current amplitude is lower; nevertheless the
proper binding sites for GABA and benzodiazepines, both, seem to be
present. Thus, we propose the subunit arrangement 



for
the
1
2
2 receptor.
A rearrangement as proposed for the tandem construct
-
in the
presence of a
2 subunit would not result in additional subunit arrangements in the case of a tetrameric receptor but would add another
possible subunit sequence in pentameric receptors composed of only
and
subunits. If one of the tandem constructs in Fig. 2B, VI, reorients, an arrangement,




, which is not shown, will be formed. This additional
arrangement can not be excluded from our data.
The preparation of triple constructs containing the
subunit and its
co-expression with the
-
tandem construct will allow the study of
the effect of single point mutations exclusively in one defined
or
subunit. For topological reasons it can be safely predicted that
subunits linked in a triple construct are not able to rearrange. It
will also be possible to study the positional effect of different
subunit isoforms in the same receptor pentamer.
In summary, we have demonstrated the feasibility of covalent subunit
linkage for a ligand-gated ion channel. For the first time we have
established the minimal linker lengths required for functional
expression. Our results strongly suggest a pentameric structure of the
1
2 GABAA receptor and exclude a tetramer. This work
provides a new perspective for the study of subunit arrangement also of
other ligand-gated ion channels.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Dr. V. Niggli for carefully reading the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This study was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 3100-053599.98/1.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
Friedbühlstrasse 49, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
E-mail:erwin.sigel@pki.unibe.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 20, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105240200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
GABA,
-aminobutyric acid;
GABAA, GABA type A;
HEK, human
embryonic kidney;
Ka, apparent affinity.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Macdonald, R. L., and Olsen, R. W. (1994) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 569-602 |
| 2. | Rabow, L. E., Russek, S. J., and Farb, D. H. (1995) Synapse 21, 189-274 |
| 3. | Davies, P. A., Hanna, M. C., Hales, T. G., and Kirkness, E. F. (1997) Nature 385, 820-823 |
| 4. | Whiting, P. J., McAllister, G., Vassilatis, D., Bonnert, T. P., Heavens, R. P., Smith, D. W., Hewson, L., O'Donnell, R., Rigby, M. R., Sirinathsinghji, D. J., Marshall, G., Thompson, S. A., Wafford, K. A., and Vasilatis, D. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 5027-5037 |
| 5. | Hedblom, E., and Kirkness, E. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15346-15350 |
| 6. | Laurie, D. J., Seeburg, P. H., and Wisden, W. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 1063-1076 |
| 7. | Benke, D., Fritschy, J. M., Trzeciak, A., Bannwarth, W., and Möhler, H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27100-27107 |
| 8. | Pritchett, D. B., Sontheimer, H., Shivers, B. D., Ymer, S., Kettenmann, H., Schofield, P. R., and Seeburg, P. H. (1989) Nature 338, 582-585 |
| 9. | Draguhn, A., Verdoorn, T. A., Ewert, M., Seeburg, P. H., and Sakmann, B. (1990) Neuron 5, 781-788 |
| 10. | Verdoorn, T. A., Draguhn, A., Ymer, S., Seeburg, P. H., and Sakmann, B. (1990) Neuron 4, 919-928 |
| 11. | Moss, S. J., Ravindran, A., Mei, L., Wang, J. B., Kofuji, P., Huganir, R. L., and Burt, D. R. (1991) Neurosci. Lett. 123, 265-268 |
| 12. | Smart, T. G., Moss, S. J., Xie, X., and Huganir, R. L. (1991) Br. J. Pharmacol. 103, 1837-1839 |
| 13. | Angelotti, T. P., Uhler, M. D., and Macdonald, R. L. (1993) J. Neurosci. 13, 1418-1428 |
| 14. | Smart, T. G. (1992) J. Physiol. 447, 587-625 |
| 15. | Kaneda, M., Farrant, M., and Cull-Candy, S. G. (1995) J. Physiol. 485, 419-435 |
| 16. | Backus, K. H., Arigoni, M., Drescher, U., Scheurer, L., Malherbe, P., Möhler, H., and Benson, J. A. (1993) Neuroreport 5, 285-288 |
| 17. | Chang, Y., Wang, R., Barot, S., and Weiss, D. S. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 5415-5424 |
| 18. | Tretter, V., Ehya, N., Fuchs, K., and Sieghart, W. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 2728-2737 |
| 19. | Kellenberger, S., Eckenstein, S., Baur, R., Malherbe, P., Buhr, A., and Sigel, E. (1996) Neuropharmacology 35, 1403-1411 |
| 20. | Gorrie, G. H., Vallis, Y., Stephenson, A., Whitfield, J., Browning, B., Smart, T. G., and Moss, S. J. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 6587-6596 |
| 21. | Knight, A. R., Hartnett, C., Marks, C., Brown, M., Gallager, D., Tallman, J., and Ramabhadran, T. V. (1998) Receptor Channel 6, 1-18 |
| 22. | Angelotti, T. P., and Macdonald, R. L. (1993) J. Neurosci. 13, 1429-1440 |
| 23. | Hevers, W., and Lüddens, H. (1998) Mol. Neurobiol. 18, 35-86 |
| 24. | Isacoff, E. Y., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1990) Nature 345, 530-534 |
| 25. | Liman, E. R., Tytgat, J., and Hess, P. (1992) Neuron 9, 861-871 |
| 26. | Hurst, R. S., Kavanaugh, M. P., Yakel, J., Adelman, J. P., and North, R. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 23742-23745 |
| 27. | Varnum, M. D., and Zagotta, W. N. (1996) Biophys. J. 70, 2667-2679 |
| 28. | Sukharev, S. I., Schroeder, M. J., and McCaslin, D. R. (1999) J. Membr. Biol. 171, 183-193 |
| 29. | Zerhusen, B., Zhao, J., Xie, J., Davis, P. B., and Ma, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7627-7630 |
| 30. | Im, W. B., Pregenzer, J. F., Binder, J. A., Dillon, G. H., and Alberts, G. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26063-26066 |
| 31. | Ewert, M., Shivers, B. D., Lüddens, H., Möhler, H., and Seeburg, P. H. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 2043-2048 |
| 32. | Häring, P., Stähli, C., Schoch, P., Takacs, B., Staehelin, T., and Möhler, H. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 4837-4841 |
| 33. | Kuhn, F. J., and Greeff, N. G. (1999) J. Gen. Physiol. 114, 167-183 |
| 34. | Sigel, E. (1987) J. Physiol. 386, 73-90 |
| 35. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 |
| 36. | Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354 |
| 37. | Miyazawa, A., Fujiyoshi, Y., Stowell, M., and Unwin, N. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 288, 765-786 |
| 38. | Sigel, E., and Buhr, A. (1997) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 425-429 |
| 39. | Sigel, E., Baur, R., Trube, G., Möhler, H., and Malherbe, P. (1990) Neuron 5, 703-711 |
| 40. | Connolly, C. N., Krishek, B. J., McDonald, B. J., Smart, T. G., and Moss, S. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 89-96 |
This article has been cited by other articles: