JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105240200 on July 20, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 39, 36275-36280, September 28, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/39/36275    most recent
M105240200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumann, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sigel, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baumann, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sigel, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Subunit Arrangement of gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors*

Sabine W. Baumann, Roland Baur, and Erwin SigelDagger

From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Friedbühlstrasse 49, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland

Received for publication, June 7, 2001, and in revised form, July 19, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The GABAA receptors are ligand-gated chloride channels. The subunit stoichiometry of the receptors is controversial; four, five, or six subunits per receptor molecule have been proposed for alpha beta receptors, whereas alpha beta gamma receptors are assumed to be pentamers. In this study, alpha -beta and beta -alpha tandem cDNAs from the alpha 1 and beta 2 subunits of the GABAA receptor were constructed. We determined the minimal length of the linker that is required between the two subunits for functional channel expression for each of the tandem constructs. 10- and 23-amino acid residues are required for alpha -beta and beta -alpha , respectively. The tandem constructs either alone or in combination with each other failed to express functional channels in Xenopus oocytes. Therefore, we can exclude tetrameric or hexameric alpha beta GABAA receptors. We can also exclude proteolysis of the tandem constructs. In addition, the tandem constructs were combined with single alpha , beta , or gamma  subunits to allow formation of pentameric arrangements. In contrast to the combination with alpha  subunits, the combination with either beta  or gamma  subunits led to expression of functional channels. Therefore, a pentameric arrangement containing two alpha 1 and three beta 2 subunits is proposed for the receptor composed of alpha  and beta  subunits. Our findings also favor an arrangement beta alpha gamma beta alpha for the receptor composed of alpha , beta , and gamma  subunits.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

GABAA1 receptors mediate fast synaptic inhibition in the mammalian brain. They are believed to form heterooligomers composed of subunits from six classes with several isoforms (alpha 1-6, beta 1-3, gamma 1-3, epsilon , delta , theta , pi ) (1-5). These subunits belong to the gene superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels, which includes nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, GABAA receptors, glycine receptors, and the serotonin type 3 (5HT3) receptor. The major GABAA receptor isoform is likely to be composed of alpha 1, beta 2, and gamma 2 subunits (1, 2, 6, 7). Heterologous expression demonstrated that the combination of alpha  and beta  subunits produces GABA-gated currents, but coexpression of a gamma  subunit is required for benzodiazepine sensitivity of the expressed receptors (8).

GABAA receptors composed of alpha  and beta  subunits differ from receptors that additionally contain the gamma  subunit in regard to Zn2+ and benzodiazepine sensitivity and to single channel conductance (9-13). Some populations of neuronal GABAA receptors show high Zn2+ sensitivity coupled with low single-channel conductance as described for alpha beta receptors (14, 15). Although receptors made from alpha , beta , and gamma  subunits are thought to be pentameric (16-18), the subunit stoichiometry of receptors composed of alpha  and beta  is still controversial. Recombinantly expressed receptors have been reported as possibly tetrameric (19, 20) as well as pentameric (18, 21). Unitary dose-response curves for alpha beta receptors, single IC50 values for Zn2+ inhibition, and unitary single channel properties (1) provide evidence against the formation of two populations of receptors, e.g. 2alpha 3beta and 3alpha 2beta . A tetrameric rather than a pentameric structure has been proposed as one of several explanations for the lower average single channel conductance for the alpha beta receptor as compared with the alpha beta gamma receptor (22, 23).

A powerful way to gain insight into the arrangement of subunits in a multimeric channel is to predetermine the alignment of subunits by gene fusion and to analyze whether the linked subunits are able to form functional channels. This approach was first successfully applied to potassium channels (24-26). Later it was also used to study subunit stoichiometry of other ion channels, e.g. a cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (27), the mechanosensitive channel MscL of Escherichia coli (28), and the cystic fibrosis conductance regulator channel (29). All these channels have their N and C termini on the cytoplasmic side so that the linkage occurs intracellularly. Up to now it has only been used once with limited success in the field of ligand-gated ion channels, which have both C and N termini on the extracellular side. Applying it to a GABAA receptor, Im et al. (30) prepared a tandem construct where the alpha 6 subunit is linked to the beta 2 subunit via 10 glutamine residues and studied functional expression in HEK293 cells. The connection between the two subunits included the signal sequence of the beta 2 subunit of 24-amino acid residues in length. The consequences of such a signal sequence in the middle of a protein are difficult to predict.

We constructed here tandem constructs of alpha 1 and beta 2 subunits for the first time in both arrangements alpha 1-beta 2 and beta 2-alpha 1. We determined the minimal length of the linkers necessary for the formation of functional channels. The constructs were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes either alone or in combination with single subunits to establish subunit stoichiometry and arrangement of GABAA receptors. We provide novel information on the architecture of GABAA receptors.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Construction of the Tandem cDNAs-- Several alpha -beta tandem cDNAs encoding a single polypeptide alpha beta with linkers of differing length were established in the pCMV vector. The tandem constructs consisted of the modified rat alpha 1 subunit (31) including its signal sequence at the N terminus and the mature rat beta 2 subunit at the C terminus. The modified alpha 1 subunit differs from the original rat subunit by insertion of one amino acid residue. Insertion of this residue confers reactivity to the monoclonal antibody bd24 (32, 31), which was essential for Western blot analysis (shown in the "Results" section). The alpha 1 subunit was amplified by polymerase chain reaction using the pCHAI vector as template and the primers CATAGAAGACACCGGGACGA as a vector-specific primer and XTTGATGTGGTGTGGGGGCTTT as a gene-specific primer. The latter was complementary to the last codons before the stop codon and had the first part of the sequence coding for the respective linker attached (X). The beta 2 subunit was amplified using pCB2 as template and the primers ACTGACACACATTCCACAGCT as vector-specific primer and YCAGAGTGTCAATGACCCTAGT as a gene-specific primer. The latter was complementary to the first codons of the sequence of the mature protein and had the second part of the sequence coding for the respective linker attached (Y). The obtained fragments contained the open reading frame of the gene and some additional vector-derived sequence preceding or succeeding. The fragments were cut in the vector-derived sequence by EcoRI or XbaI, respectively, to be ligated in a three-fragment ligation into the pCMV vector cut with EcoRI and XbaI. The sequence of the resulting plasmids was verified. In the alpha -0-beta tandem, the last amino acid residue of the alpha 1 subunit is directly attached to the first amino acid residue of the mature beta 2 subunit. In the other tandems the following amino acid sequences are present between the N-terminal alpha 1 subunit and the C-terminal beta 2 subunit: alpha -7-beta , Q7; alpha -10-beta , Q10.

The beta -alpha tandem cDNAs were prepared similarly. The beta  subunit was amplified using CATAGAAGACACCGGGACGA as vector-specific and XGTTCACATAGTAAAGCCAATAGAC as gene-specific primer. The mature alpha  subunit was amplified using ACTGACACACATTCCACAGCT as vector-specific and YCAGCCGTCATTACAAGATGAA as gene-specific primer. The linkers introduced into the different beta -alpha tandems are the following: beta 10alpha , Q10; beta 15alpha , Q5A3PAQ5; beta 20alpha , Q5(A3P)2A2Q5; beta 23alpha , Q3(Q2A3PA)2AQ5. A long sequence of consecutive glutamine residues might exhaust the respective tRNA pool during protein synthesis and therefore lead to an early termination of the synthesized protein. Therefore, other amino acid residues were introduced. Alanine and proline residues were chosen for their properties to form no distinct secondary structure elements.

Expression of Tandem Constructs and Wild Type Subunits in Xenopus Oocytes-- Capped cRNAs were synthesized (Ambion, Austin, Texas) from the linearized pCMV vectors containing the different tandem constructs, the single alpha 1, beta 2, and gamma 2 subunits, and from the vector pVA2580 (33) encoding a neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel (Na+). A poly(A) tail of about 400 residues was added to each transcript using yeast poly(A) polymerase (U. S. Biochemical Corp.). The concentration of the cRNA was quantified on a formaldehyde gel using Radiant Red stain (Bio-Rad) for visualization of the RNA and known concentrations of RNA ladder (Life Technologies, Inc.) as the standard on the same gel. cRNA combinations alpha 1/beta 2/Na, alpha -beta /Na, beta -alpha /Na, alpha -beta /beta -alpha /Na, alpha -beta /alpha 1/Na, beta -alpha /alpha 1/Na, alpha -beta /beta -alpha /alpha 1/Na, alpha -beta /beta 2/Na and beta -alpha /beta 2/Na, alpha -beta /gamma 2/Na, and beta -alpha /gamma 2/Na were precipitated in ethanol/isoamyl alcohol (19:1) and stored at -20 °C. For injection, the alcohol was removed, and the cRNAs were dissolved in water. Isolation of oocytes from the frogs, culturing of the oocytes, injection of cRNA, and defolliculation were done as described earlier (34). Oocytes were injected with 50 nl of the cRNA solution. For cRNA combinations of alpha 1 and beta 2 subunits only, the cRNA solution contained each subunit or tandem construct at 75 nM. In the case of coexpression of alpha 1, beta 2, and gamma 2 subunits, the cRNA solution contained alpha 1 and beta 2 subunits or the respective tandem construct at 10 nM and the gamma 2 subunit at 50 nM. The voltage-gated sodium channel was always added to a concentration of 40 nM. The injected oocytes were incubated in modified Barth's solution (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 88 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 2.4 mM NaHCO3, 0.82 mM MgSO4, 0.34 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.41 mM CaCl2, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin) at 18 °C for 2 days before the measurements.

Two-electrode Voltage Clamp-- All measurements were done in medium containing 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 90 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM KCl, and 1 mM CaCl2 at a holding potential of -80 mV. For the determination of maximal current amplitudes 1 mM GABA (Fluka, Switzerland) was applied for 20 s. Sodium currents were determined by a potential jump from a holding potential of -100 to -15 mV (Fig. 1). The GABA-evoked peak current amplitude was standardized to the co-expressed sodium current amplitude of the same oocyte. The mean standardized current amplitude of at least three oocytes per subunit combination was then compared with the mean standardized wild type current amplitude. Current stimulation by diazepam was determined at a GABA concentration evoking 5% of the maximal current amplitude in combination with 1 µM diazepam (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Current traces recorded from oocytes expressing GABAA receptors (upper panel) and voltage-gated sodium channels (lower panel). Oocytes were either expressing alpha  and beta  subunits of GABAA receptors and voltage-gated sodium channels (alpha /beta /Na) or single alpha  subunits (alpha /Na) or beta  subunits (beta /Na) together with voltage-gated sodium channels. The duration of the application of GABA or of the potential jump from -100 to -15 mV is shown above the respective traces.

Western Blotting-- Oocytes were homogenized in lysis buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, pepstatin, leustatin, antipain, and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, each at 5 µg/ml) using a Teflon glass homogenizer. The homogenate was incubated on ice for 15 min and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (35). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (HybondECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to Towbin et al. (36) and decorated with the monoclonal antibody bd24 (31, 32), which recognizes the N terminus of the alpha 1 subunit of the GABAA receptor. Bands were detected using the ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preparation and Analysis of Tandem Constructs-- Tandem cDNAs were constructed that consisted of the alpha 1 and the beta 2 subunit of the GABAA receptor in both arrangements, alpha 1-beta 2 and beta 2-alpha 1 (Fig. 2A). The N-terminal alpha 1 (beta 2) subunit was taken in its precursor form to ensure insertion into the membrane mediated by the signal sequence. The C-terminal beta 2 (alpha 1) subunit was depleted of its signal sequence because it is difficult to predict what consequences this stretch of 24 (27) mostly hydrophobic amino acid residues in the middle of the new fusion protein will have. To bridge the distance between the C terminus of the alpha 1 (beta 2) subunit and the N terminus of the beta 2 (alpha 1) subunit, we introduced synthetic linkers of different length to determine the shortest possible linker resulting in a functional fusion protein after expression in the Xenopus oocyte. Although the subunits of the GABAA receptor share the same topology and have a high sequence homology, they differ slightly in the number of amino acid residues after the fourth predicted transmembrane region at the C terminus as well as at the beginning of the N-terminal portion of the subunit. Therefore, linkers of different length were tested for the alpha 1-beta 2 and beta 2-alpha 1 construct separately.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A, schematic drawing of the alpha -beta tandem construct. The C terminus of the alpha 1 subunit is linked to the N terminus of the beta 2 subunit by linkers of different length. B, theoretically possible subunit arrangements of alpha -beta and beta -alpha tandem constructs in a tetrameric (I-III) or a pentameric (IV-VII) receptor. Arrangements I and II are identical and can be formed by both tandem constructs alpha -beta (I) or beta -alpha (II). Arrangement III can be formed by one alpha -beta and one beta -alpha tandem construct. We assume the presence of at least two alpha  and two beta  subunits in a pentameric receptor. Both tandem constructs alpha -beta and beta -alpha yield in this case the same arrangement when combined with a single alpha  subunit (IV and V) or a single beta  subunit (VI and VII), respectively.

The function of the different tandem constructs was assessed after expression in Xenopus oocytes, either alone (Fig. 2B, I and II), in combination with each other (Fig. 2B, III), or in combination with single alpha 1 (Fig. 2B, IV and V) or beta 2 (Fig. 1B, VI and VII) subunits. Expression of tandem constructs alone is predicted to yield receptors composed of an even number of subunits, whereas combination of tandem constructs with single subunits can additionally result in receptors with an uneven number of subunits.

The first criterion for normal channel function was a GABA-evoked maximal current amplitude comparable with that of receptors made from single alpha 1 and beta 2 subunits, the wild type receptor. These current amplitudes amounted to 1.5-8 µA. Expression of either alpha 1 or beta 2 subunits alone failed to produce detectable currents. To compensate for differences in the expression level between the individual oocytes, GABA-induced current amplitudes were standardized to the current amplitude of the co-expressed voltage-gated sodium channel in the same oocyte. Constructs were examined for standardized maximal current amplitudes (Imax) and the apparent affinity for GABA (Ka). Only receptors performing very similarly to the wild type receptor regarding Imax and Ka were considered fully functional.

The Tandem Constructs Are Not Proteolyzed in the Linker Sequence-- To evaluate whether the expressed tandem constructs were intact or subjected to proteolysis we analyzed the newly formed GABAA receptors by Western blotting. The monoclonal antibody bd24 against the N-terminal of the alpha 1 subunit (31, 32) was used. Fig. 3 shows that single alpha 1 subunits of wild type receptors migrate at 50 kDa (lane 1). This specific band is missing in the alpha -10-beta /beta combination (lane 2), thus indicating the absence of monomeric alpha 1 subunit and, therefore, of significant proteolysis of the linker. A very faint unspecific signal at the 50-kDa position is also seen for non-injected oocytes (lane 3). As indicated by a strong signal, the alpha -10-beta tandem construct migrates at 120-140 kDa. The absence of any additional band with bd24 reactivity also excludes proteolysis elsewhere in the construct. A peptide containing bd24 reactivity that is larger than 29 kDa would have been seen. The beta -23-alpha tandem construct could not be detected because the epitope for the antibody seems to include the free N terminus of the alpha 1 subunit, which is blocked by the linker in this construct. The small quantity of channel expressed prevented detection with another antibody due to insufficient sensitivity. As described below, we also have functional evidence for the fact that proteolysis of both tandem constructs can be excluded.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Resistance to proteolysis of the fusion protein. Lane 1, the alpha 1 subunit from the wild type alpha 1beta 2 receptor migrates at 50 kDa. Lane 2, the alpha -10-beta tandem construct migrates at 120-140 kDa. No specific signal is detected at 50 kDa, the size of a monomeric alpha 1 subunit, as could be expected upon proteolysis in the linker region. The absence of specific signals in other areas indicates that no N-terminal breakdown product of this tandem larger than 29 kDa is formed. Lane 3, non-injected oocytes.

The Length of the Linker Is Critical for Functional Expression of Linked Subunits-- If the alpha 1-beta 2 tandem construct was co-expressed with single beta 2 subunits, functional channels were formed provided the linker was long enough (Fig. 4). With no additional linker but only the 13 amino acid residues after the fourth transmembrane region of the alpha 1 subunit (alpha -0-beta ) connected to the N terminus of the beta 2 subunit, no current was detectable in injected oocytes. With a linker of 7 residues in length (alpha -7-beta ), we found standardized maximal current amplitudes that remained below those expressed from wild type receptors, whereas the tandem construct with a linker of 10 residues (alpha -10-beta ) resulted in similar standardized maximal current amplitudes. The dose-response curves of the alpha -7-beta and the alpha -10-beta tandem constructs were close to that of the wild type receptors (Fig. 5A). The two constructs resulted in channels with similar Ka values of 9 ± 3 and 11 ± 2 µM, respectively, comparable with the combination of single alpha  and beta  subunits with a Ka of 9 ± 2 µM, pointing to an unchanged apparent affinity for GABA despite the covalent linkage.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   A minimum length of the linker is required to obtain functional receptors from tandem constructs. The tandem constructs were each expressed in combination with single beta 2 subunits in Xenopus oocytes. Maximal current amplitudes were measured and standardized as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." Each column shows the mean of experiments carried out in at least two different batches of oocytes, with 5-6 oocytes each examined. The error bars represent S.E. WT, wild type receptors.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Dose-response curves of tandem constructs co-expressed with single beta 2 subunits. A, the alpha -beta tandem constructs with linkers of 7- or 10-amino acid residues in length resulted in channels with an unchanged apparent affinity for GABA. B, channels from the beta -alpha tandem construct with a linker of 20-amino acid residues show a slightly reduced apparent affinity for GABA, whereas for channels from the construct with a linker of 23 amino acid residues, the apparent affinity is close to the one of the combination of single alpha  and beta  subunits.

On the right panel of Fig. 4 the results of the analogue examination for the beta 2-alpha 1 constructs are shown. There was almost no detectable current when we combined the constructs with linkers of 10- and 15-amino acid residues with single beta 2 subunits. A tandem construct with a linker of 20 residues produced receptors with standardized maximal current amplitudes similar to those of wild type receptors. However, the dose-response curve (Fig. 5B) was shifted to the right, i.e. the apparent affinity for GABA was reduced. With 64 ± 33 µM, the Ka was about 7-fold higher than that of the wild type receptors. A tandem construct containing a linker of 23 residues also reached standardized maximal current amplitudes similar to wild type receptors. The GABA dose-response curve for these channels (Fig. 5B) is characterized by a Ka of 20 ± 2 µM, which is close to the wild type receptor, with a Ka of 9 ± 2 µM.

GABAA Receptors Made from alpha 1 and beta 2 Subunits Are Pentamers Containing 2 alpha  and 3 beta  Subunits-- The two functional tandem constructs alpha -10-beta and beta -23-alpha were analyzed further. When either the alpha -10-beta or the beta -23-alpha constructs were expressed alone, we hardly detected GABA evoked currents (Fig. 6A). The co-expressed voltage-gated sodium channel showed the same expression levels in oocytes expressing tandem constructs or wild type receptors. Thus, the absence of RNase activity and the capability of protein expression in the individual oocyte was confirmed. Moreover we exclude proteolysis for either construct because proteolysis of the linker would in each case liberate alpha 1 and beta 2 subunits, which in turn should result in functional channels. When alpha -10-beta and beta -23-alpha constructs were expressed in the same oocyte, the standardized maximal current amplitudes remained below 10% of the wild type current (Fig. 6C). These results led to the conclusion that tetrameric receptors of the arrangement alpha beta alpha beta , which is equal to the arrangement beta alpha beta alpha (see Fig. 2B, I and II) or of the arrangement alpha beta beta alpha (see Fig. 2B, III) do not correspond to a functional receptor made from single alpha  and beta  subunits.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Maximal relative current amplitudes of receptors resulting from different combinations of tandem constructs with single subunits. The alpha -10-beta and beta -23-alpha tandem constructs do not result in functional channels when each is expressed alone (A) or each is expressed in combination with single alpha 1 subunits (B) or when both tandem constructs are expressed together or with additional single alpha 1 subunits (C). When expressed with single beta 2 (D) or single gamma 2 (E) subunits, the tandem constructs are functionally complemented. Each column shows the mean of experiments in at least two different batches of oocytes with 5-6 oocytes each examined. Error bars represent S.E. WT, wild type.

The tandem constructs alpha -10-beta and beta -23-alpha were also coexpressed with single alpha 1 subunits and analyzed for maximal current amplitudes. Almost no current was detected upon application of GABA (Fig. 6B), whereas sodium currents were expressed in the same oocytes. The addition of a single alpha 1 subunit to the combination of both tandem constructs alpha -10-beta and beta -23-alpha resulted in slightly elevated maximal current amplitudes as compared with the combination of alpha -10-beta with beta -23-alpha (Fig. 6C), but they were still far below those of the wild type receptors. This indicates an inefficient formation of functional channels in this case.

Fig. 6D shows that both the alpha -10-beta and the beta -23-alpha tandem constructs could be complemented with single beta 2 subunits to form functional channels. This result matches the theoretical consideration that both tandem constructs yield the same arrangement when complemented with a single beta 2 subunit (compare Fig. 2B, VI and VII).

Coexpression of the Tandem Constructs with a Single gamma 2 Subunit-- When the alpha -10-beta tandem construct is complemented with a single gamma 2 subunit, the standardized maximal current amplitude amounts to about 26% compared with the wild type receptor (Fig. 6E). Submaximal current amplitudes can be stimulated by diazepam by 134 ± 8% (mean ± S.D., n = 3) (not shown). The beta -23-alpha tandem construct complemented with a single gamma  subunit results in functional channels with standardized maximal current amplitudes similar to wild type receptors (Fig. 6E). Submaximal current amplitudes of these receptors are also stimulated by diazepam by 360 ± 10% (mean ± S.D., n = 3) (not shown).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study we have demonstrated the feasibility of covalent subunit linkage alpha 1-beta 2 and beta 2-alpha 1 for the GABAA receptor channel. We have also established the minimal linker lengths required for functional expression. Our results strongly suggest a pentameric structure of the GABAA receptor composed of alpha 1 and beta 2 subunits and exclude a tetramer. The technique described here may also be applied to the study of other ligand-gated ion channels.

Tandem linkage of subunits is a powerful strategy to extract information about stoichiometry and arrangement of multimeric proteins. This approach has first been applied to the study of potassium channels (24). Later, Im et al. (30) made a tandem construct consisting of the GABAA receptor subunit precursors alpha 6 and beta 2. They found that their alpha 6-beta 2 tandem construct alone failed to produce functional GABA channels, but combination with either single alpha 6 or gamma 2 subunits, but not beta 2 subunits, restored receptor function after expression in HEK293 cells. Functional expression was, however, very low in all these cases and did not exceed 0.2 nA even for the wild type subunit combination alpha 6 and beta 2 (30).

In the present tandem constructs we omitted the signal sequence stretch of the second subunit, which might have unpredictable effects on e.g. protein folding, insertion of the protein into the membrane, subunit assembly, or proteolysis of the connection between the subunits. We linked the alpha 1 and the beta 2 subunits of the GABAA receptor in both arrangements and expressed the resulting tandem constructs alpha -beta and beta -alpha in Xenopus oocytes. They were both shown to result in functional channels when complemented with beta 2 subunits. When the tandem constructs were expressed either alone or in combination with each other, no functional receptors were formed. Therefore, our most important conclusion here is that the GABAA receptor made from alpha 1 and beta 2 subunits is not composed of an even number of subunits. We can exclude tetrameric receptors of the subunit arrangements alpha beta alpha beta from the expression of each of the tandem constructs alone and the arrangement alpha beta beta alpha from their co-expression. Only arrangements of a 1:1 stoichiometry of alpha  and beta  subunits have been tested here because stoichiometries for alpha beta receptors of 3:1 or 1:3 have been shown to be unlikely (19, 20). These findings confirm the conclusion drawn from Western blot analysis that proteolytic cleavage in the sequence of the linker (Fig. 7A) does not occur to a significant extent. The participation of only one subunit of the tandem construct in the functional receptor (Fig. 7B) can also be excluded. If either one or both of these events had occurred, the formation of functional pentameric receptors from the tandem constructs alone would have been observed.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Proteolysis of tandem constructs (A) or participation of only one subunit of the tandem construct (B) in a functional pentamer can be excluded from the results shown in Fig. 4 and 6A. C, proposed rearrangement of subunits in a tandem construct. The marked areas in the schematic subunits (stripes in gamma , points in alpha ) represent amino acid residues that can contribute to the benzodiazepine binding site. Note that a proper benzodiazepine binding site at a alpha gamma subunit interface can only be formed in one of the two different subunit arrangements (II) and is lost in the other (I).

The observation that both tandem constructs form functional channels in combination with single beta 2 subunits but fail to do so in combination with single alpha 1 subunits supports the view that a receptor made from alpha  and beta  subunits is a pentamer composed of two alpha  and three beta  subunits. This had also been proposed based on immunoprecipitation experiments in HEK293 cells expressing alpha 1beta 3 receptors (18). A receptor stoichiometry of three alpha 6 and two beta 2 subunits has also been suggested (30). This might indicate that the subunit stoichiometry of an alpha beta receptor depends on the specific subunit isoforms expressed together and/or on differences in the expression systems used.

A further aim of this study was the design of optimal linkers between the subunits. The linkage of two subunits should position both next to each other in the receptor. When no functional channels can be detected, the forced neighborhood of the two subunits either prohibits proper channel formation, or the linker is too short. When, in contrast, functional channels can be expressed from linked subunits, their neighborhood may be assumed unless the linker is very long. In this case the two linked subunits do not necessarily locate next to each other in the receptor multimer. It is then possible for another subunit to position itself between the two linked subunits. We therefore determined the minimal linker length for both, the alpha -beta and the beta -alpha tandem constructs, necessary for the formation of functional channels. We found this length to be 10 and 23 amino acid residues, respectively. Shorter linkers altered the apparent affinity for GABA or the maximal current amplitude of the channel, probably by distorting the conformation of the resulting receptor. It should be noted that the alpha -7-beta and beta -20-alpha tandem constructs, which have linkers that are 3 amino acid residues or about 11 Å shorter, performed nearly as well as wild type receptors. Therefore, the optimal linker length may be somewhat shorter than 10 or 23 amino acid residues, respectively. In our calculation of the actual linker length we included the synthetic linker as well as the C- and N-terminal elongations of the respective subunits (Table I). We assumed an extended conformation of both with 3.6-Å per amino acid residue. In this case the total length of the subunit connection may be estimated to be maximally 83 and 97 Å in the alpha -beta and the beta -alpha tandem construct, respectively, which might be diminished by the existence of secondary structure elements. For the reasons mentioned above, we assume that the actual linker length is substantially shorter. It is of interest to estimate whether these respective linker lengths allow interspersing of an additional subunit. We can consider the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor an appropriate model for the structure of the GABAA receptor, as they both belong to the same superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels. The three-dimensional structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor has been resolved to 4.6 Å (37). All the members of the superfamily share a high sequence homology and the same topology, and it is assumed that they also have a very similar overall shape. From the dimensions of the receptor we can estimate the minimal length of a peptide passing along the perimeter of one subunit to be about at least 54 Å if the N terminus is located at the membrane surface. This minimal length of 54 Å is unrealistic for the following reasons. First, the receptor surface is certainly not smooth, but irregular. Second, the N terminus of the second subunit of the tandem construct is not necessarily located at the membrane surface as the beginning of the connection is predicted to be. Most importantly, location of either the N terminus or the C terminus away from the opposed edges of the linked subunits would both result in a corresponding increase of the required minimal length. Comparing the maximal length of the subunit connections and the minimal length such a connection must have to surround an additional subunit and the restrictions made to these values, we consider it unlikely that another subunit is interspersing, but we cannot entirely exclude this possibility.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Calculation of the actual linker length

In initial experiments we combined the two tandem constructs alpha -10-beta and beta -23-alpha each with single gamma  subunits. In the case of the beta -23-alpha tandem construct, the resulting channel exhibited the same maximal current amplitude as wild type receptors, whereas in the case of the alpha -10-beta tandem construct, maximal current amplitudes remained below that of wild type receptors. The fact that both tandem constructs alpha -beta and beta -alpha resulted in channels sensitive to diazepam was very surprising. The binding site for benzodiazepines is thought to be located at the alpha gamma subunit interface (38). This defined interface is lost in one of the two arrangements I and II shown in Fig. 7C. It is possible that the beta gamma subunit interface can take over benzodiazepine binding properties, as it has been observed that receptors expressed from only beta  and gamma  subunits are sensitive to benzodiazepines (39). An alternative and more likely interpretation is based on a rearrangement of one of the tandem constructs. We suggest this rearrangement for the following reason. In the presence of gamma  subunits, receptors containing alpha  and beta  subunits alone are no more formed (23), but the gamma  subunit seems to induce a subunit assembly leading to alpha beta gamma receptors (40, 18). The assembly of the tandem constructs with the gamma  subunits might, thus, start with the formation of proper alpha gamma or gamma beta subunit interfaces. Then the second subunit of the tandem would be integrated. In the case of the beta -23-alpha tandem construct this happens very efficiently, resulting in channels with current amplitudes similar to wild type receptors. In contrast, the alpha -10-beta tandem constructs have to reorient to adopt a beta -alpha arrangement (Fig. 7C, II). The linker might now be too short and disturb the proper conformation of the subunits. It is also conceivable that the rearrangement proceeds inefficiently. Therefore, the maximal current amplitude is lower; nevertheless the proper binding sites for GABA and benzodiazepines, both, seem to be present. Thus, we propose the subunit arrangement beta alpha gamma beta alpha for the alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 receptor.

A rearrangement as proposed for the tandem construct alpha -beta in the presence of a gamma 2 subunit would not result in additional subunit arrangements in the case of a tetrameric receptor but would add another possible subunit sequence in pentameric receptors composed of only alpha  and beta  subunits. If one of the tandem constructs in Fig. 2B, VI, reorients, an arrangement, alpha alpha beta beta beta , which is not shown, will be formed. This additional arrangement can not be excluded from our data.

The preparation of triple constructs containing the gamma  subunit and its co-expression with the beta -alpha tandem construct will allow the study of the effect of single point mutations exclusively in one defined alpha  or beta  subunit. For topological reasons it can be safely predicted that subunits linked in a triple construct are not able to rearrange. It will also be possible to study the positional effect of different subunit isoforms in the same receptor pentamer.

In summary, we have demonstrated the feasibility of covalent subunit linkage for a ligand-gated ion channel. For the first time we have established the minimal linker lengths required for functional expression. Our results strongly suggest a pentameric structure of the alpha 1beta 2 GABAA receptor and exclude a tetramer. This work provides a new perspective for the study of subunit arrangement also of other ligand-gated ion channels.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. V. Niggli for carefully reading the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This study was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 3100-053599.98/1.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, Friedbühlstrasse 49, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail:erwin.sigel@pki.unibe.ch.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 20, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105240200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GABA, gamma -aminobutyric acid; GABAA, GABA type A; HEK, human embryonic kidney; Ka, apparent affinity.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Macdonald, R. L., and Olsen, R. W. (1994) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 569-602
2. Rabow, L. E., Russek, S. J., and Farb, D. H. (1995) Synapse 21, 189-274
3. Davies, P. A., Hanna, M. C., Hales, T. G., and Kirkness, E. F. (1997) Nature 385, 820-823
4. Whiting, P. J., McAllister, G., Vassilatis, D., Bonnert, T. P., Heavens, R. P., Smith, D. W., Hewson, L., O'Donnell, R., Rigby, M. R., Sirinathsinghji, D. J., Marshall, G., Thompson, S. A., Wafford, K. A., and Vasilatis, D. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 5027-5037
5. Hedblom, E., and Kirkness, E. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15346-15350
6. Laurie, D. J., Seeburg, P. H., and Wisden, W. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 1063-1076
7. Benke, D., Fritschy, J. M., Trzeciak, A., Bannwarth, W., and Möhler, H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27100-27107
8. Pritchett, D. B., Sontheimer, H., Shivers, B. D., Ymer, S., Kettenmann, H., Schofield, P. R., and Seeburg, P. H. (1989) Nature 338, 582-585
9. Draguhn, A., Verdoorn, T. A., Ewert, M., Seeburg, P. H., and Sakmann, B. (1990) Neuron 5, 781-788
10. Verdoorn, T. A., Draguhn, A., Ymer, S., Seeburg, P. H., and Sakmann, B. (1990) Neuron 4, 919-928
11. Moss, S. J., Ravindran, A., Mei, L., Wang, J. B., Kofuji, P., Huganir, R. L., and Burt, D. R. (1991) Neurosci. Lett. 123, 265-268
12. Smart, T. G., Moss, S. J., Xie, X., and Huganir, R. L. (1991) Br. J. Pharmacol. 103, 1837-1839
13. Angelotti, T. P., Uhler, M. D., and Macdonald, R. L. (1993) J. Neurosci. 13, 1418-1428
14. Smart, T. G. (1992) J. Physiol. 447, 587-625
15. Kaneda, M., Farrant, M., and Cull-Candy, S. G. (1995) J. Physiol. 485, 419-435
16. Backus, K. H., Arigoni, M., Drescher, U., Scheurer, L., Malherbe, P., Möhler, H., and Benson, J. A. (1993) Neuroreport 5, 285-288
17. Chang, Y., Wang, R., Barot, S., and Weiss, D. S. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 5415-5424
18. Tretter, V., Ehya, N., Fuchs, K., and Sieghart, W. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 2728-2737
19. Kellenberger, S., Eckenstein, S., Baur, R., Malherbe, P., Buhr, A., and Sigel, E. (1996) Neuropharmacology 35, 1403-1411
20. Gorrie, G. H., Vallis, Y., Stephenson, A., Whitfield, J., Browning, B., Smart, T. G., and Moss, S. J. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 6587-6596
21. Knight, A. R., Hartnett, C., Marks, C., Brown, M., Gallager, D., Tallman, J., and Ramabhadran, T. V. (1998) Receptor Channel 6, 1-18
22. Angelotti, T. P., and Macdonald, R. L. (1993) J. Neurosci. 13, 1429-1440
23. Hevers, W., and Lüddens, H. (1998) Mol. Neurobiol. 18, 35-86
24. Isacoff, E. Y., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1990) Nature 345, 530-534
25. Liman, E. R., Tytgat, J., and Hess, P. (1992) Neuron 9, 861-871
26. Hurst, R. S., Kavanaugh, M. P., Yakel, J., Adelman, J. P., and North, R. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 23742-23745
27. Varnum, M. D., and Zagotta, W. N. (1996) Biophys. J. 70, 2667-2679
28. Sukharev, S. I., Schroeder, M. J., and McCaslin, D. R. (1999) J. Membr. Biol. 171, 183-193
29. Zerhusen, B., Zhao, J., Xie, J., Davis, P. B., and Ma, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7627-7630
30. Im, W. B., Pregenzer, J. F., Binder, J. A., Dillon, G. H., and Alberts, G. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26063-26066
31. Ewert, M., Shivers, B. D., Lüddens, H., Möhler, H., and Seeburg, P. H. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 2043-2048
32. Häring, P., Stähli, C., Schoch, P., Takacs, B., Staehelin, T., and Möhler, H. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 4837-4841
33. Kuhn, F. J., and Greeff, N. G. (1999) J. Gen. Physiol. 114, 167-183
34. Sigel, E. (1987) J. Physiol. 386, 73-90
35. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685
36. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354
37. Miyazawa, A., Fujiyoshi, Y., Stowell, M., and Unwin, N. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 288, 765-786
38. Sigel, E., and Buhr, A. (1997) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 425-429
39. Sigel, E., Baur, R., Trube, G., Möhler, H., and Malherbe, P. (1990) Neuron 5, 703-711
40. Connolly, C. N., Krishek, B. J., McDonald, B. J., Smart, T. G., and Moss, S. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 89-96


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles: