![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 39, 36337-36343, September 28, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the International Center for Genetic Engineering and
Biotechnology (ICGEB) 34012 Trieste, Italy
Received for publication, May 10, 2001, and in revised form, July 17, 2001
Variations in a polymorphic (TG)m sequence near
exon 9 of the human CFTR gene have been associated with
variable proportions of exon skipping and occurrence of disease. We
have recently identified nuclear factor TDP-43 as a novel splicing
regulator capable of binding to this element in the CFTR pre-mRNA
and inhibiting recognition of the neighboring exon. In this study we
report the dissection of the RNA binding properties of TDP-43 and their
functional implications in relationship with the splicing process. Our
results show that this protein contains two fully functional RNA
recognition motif (RRM) domains with distinct RNA/DNA binding
characteristics. Interestingly, TDP-43 can bind a minimum number
of six UG (or TG) single-stranded dinucleotide stretches, and binding
affinity increases with the number of repeats. In particular, the
highly conserved Phe residues in the first RRM region play a key role
in nucleic acid recognition.
We have recently reported the identification of TDP-43 as a
splicing regulator that specifically binds the (UG)m-repeated polymorphic region near the 3'-splice site of CFTR
exon 9 and down-regulates its recognition by the splicing machinery
(1). This region, acting in concert with the adjacent (u)n element, is
one of the key cis-acting sequences which regulate the proportion of
exon 9 skipping in the mature CFTR mRNA transcript (1-3). Considering that exon 9 skipping produces a non-functional CFTR protein
(4, 5) the study of the RNA binding properties of TDP-43 is of
considerable importance to gain further insight concerning the
potential disease-causing consequences of its binding in
vivo. Indeed, the clinical relevance of these studies is
highlighted by the existence of a clear association between certain
(TG)m(T)n alleles with distinct forms of Cystic Fibrosis (1, 6-9).
In addition, the study of (UG)m elements can provide further insight
concerning the mRNA splicing process in general because (UG)m
sequences have been described to act as splicing regulatory sequences
in different genomic contexts. In fact, in addition to the
CFTR gene, the presence of simple (UG)m-repeated sequences has been described to influence the splicing process of at least two
other genes: the apolipoprotein AII gene (10) and the human cardiac
Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (11). In the Apo AII gene
the UG tract was shown to be functionally equivalent to a
polypyrimidine tract and required for efficient splicing of Apo AII
exon 2 (10) while in the human cardiac Na+/Ca2+
exchanger (11) it acts as a strong intronic splicing enhancer situated
in intron 2. It should be noted that in contrast with these two genes,
the CFTR (UG)m element was found to possess a strong
inhibitory effect on CFTR exon 9 splicing, a property that may probably be linked to its peculiar evolutionary history. In fact,
sequencing of the mouse CFTR exon 9 genomic region has shown that in the flanking introns, the (TG)m(T)n regulatory elements are
absent and that the intron themselves are of very different length when
compared with the human introns (2). This finding, together with the
observation that mouse CFTR exon 9 is not subject to
alternative splicing, suggests that the presence in humans of the (UG)m
sequence represents a disturbing element, which interferes with the
normal maturation process of the CFTR pre-mRNA. This conclusion is
also supported by the fact that CFTR exon 9 and its intronic
flanking sequences are found co-integrated with characteristic L1
sequences in multiple chromosome locations distinct from the CFTR locus (12, 13). These findings may indicate that the introduction of foreign elements in the CFTR IVS8 and IVS9 sequences may be a consequence of a retrotransposition event, which affected the
human CFTR gene early during the course of evolution.
In order to better elucidate the role of the CFTR (UG)m element
and obtain functional clues regarding the role of TDP-43 in the
splicing process we have characterized the RNA/DNA binding properties
of TDP-43. Our results have confirmed the existence in this protein of
two fully functional RNA recognition motifs (RRM),1 also known as RBD,
for RNA binding domains (14-18), which possess distinct binding characteristics.
Plasmid Construction and Oligonucleotides--
Plasmids pTCTT3
and pTG12 and minigenes lacking the (TG)m/T(n) elements were obtained
as previously described (1). Plasmids pTG3, pTG6, pTG9 were obtained by
annealing the following forward and reverse oligos and ligating them in
pBluescript KS (Stratagene) linearized with SmaI:
5'-gaaaattaatgtgtggaaaattaagaaa-3' (oligo TG3) and
5'-tttcttaattttccacacattaattttc-3' (oligo AC3) for pTG3, 5'-gaaaattaatgtgtgtgtgtggaaaatt-3' (oligo TG6) and
5'-aattttccacacacacacattaattttc-3' (oligo AC6) for pTG6,
5'-gaaaattaatgtgtgtgtgtgtgtgtga-3' (oligo TG9) and
5'-tcacacacacacacacacattaattttc-3' (oligo AC9) for pTG9. The plasmid
pTAR was obtained by annealing the following primers and ligating them
in pBluescript KS (Stratagene) linearized with SmaI:
5'-ctgctttttgcctgtactgggtctctctggttagaccagatctgag-3' (oligo TARS) as
the forward and 5'-ctcagatctggtctaaccagagagacccagtacaggcaaaaagcag-3' (oligo TARAS) as the reverse primer. The synthetic (UG)12
oligo was obtained from MWG Biotech (Firenze, Italy).
Expression of Recombinant TDP-43 as a GST Fusion
Protein--
The GST-TDP43 and GST-TDP43(101-261) fusion proteins
were obtained as previously described (1). Deletion of the RRM1, RRM2, and 106-111 RNP-2 regions was obtained using a two step polymerase chain reaction extension method with sense and reverse primers spanning
RRM1 (5'-aaaacatccgataaacttcctaat-3' and
5'-attaggaagtttatcggatgtttt-3'), RRM2 (5'-ttgagaagcagatccaatgccgaa-3'
and 5'-ttcggcattggatctgcttctcaa-3'), and 106-111 RNP-2
(5'-aaaacatccgatccatggaaaaca-3' and 5'-tgttttccatggatcggatgtttt-3'). It
should be noted that these regions were identified through a search
using the Pfam program at www.sanger.ac.uk. In order to introduce the
L106D, V108D, and L111D mutations we used the following primers:
5'-tccgatgatatagatttgggtgatccatgg-3' and
5'-ccatggatcacccaaatctatatcatcgga-3'. Similarly, the Phe residues (at
positions 147 and 149) in the 145-152 RNP-1 motif were mutated to Leu
using the following forward and reverse primers:
5'-aaggggttgggcttggttcgtttt-3' and 5'-aaaacgaaccaagcccaacccctt-3'. The
single Phe-194 in the 193-197 RNP-2 motif was mutated to Leu using the
following forward and reverse primers: 5'-gtgttggtggggcgctgt-3' and
5'-acagcgccccaccaacac-3'. The two Phe residues (at positions 229 and
231) in the 227-234 RNP-1 motif were mutated to Leu using the
following forward and reverse primers: 5'-agggccttggccttggttacattt-3' and 5'-aaatgtaaccaaggccaaggccct-3'. Double and triple mutants were
obtained using the same methodology on single- and double-mutated proteins. All fusion proteins were expressed in Escherichia
coli DH5 UV Cross-linking Assay--
Plasmids were linearized by
digestion with HindIII and transcription was performed with
T7 RNA polymerase (Stratagene) in the presence of labeled
[ Electromobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
Oligonucleotides (200 ng, ~25 pmols) were labeled by phosphorylation with
[ Binding Specificity of TDP-43 for Different RNA
Sequences--
In our search to identify proteins that recognize
the splicing regulatory elements of CFTR exon 9, we recently
isolated TDP-43 as a protein that binds specifically to the splicing
regulatory (UG)m element found near the 3'-splice site of this exon
(1). Up to now, the only other described cellular function of TDP-43 was the ability to bind a HIV-1 TAR DNA polypyrimidinic sequence motif
leading to the inhibition of HIV-1 transcription (19). Interestingly,
no binding to TAR RNA had been reported (19). However, our recent
observation that TDP-43 can efficiently bind to (UG)m sequences (1) is
consistent with the presence of two putative full-length RRM domains
(Fig. 1A) located between
residues 106 and 175 (RRM1) and 193 and 257 (RRM2) of its coding
sequence according to the output of the Pfam program (available at
www.sanger.ac.uk). This finding provided a functional basis that
accounted for the ability of TDP-43 to bind RNA sequences, and in this
study we provide a detailed analysis of their functionality and
importance.
Initially, using a GST fusion protein containing the TDP-43 full coding
sequence (GST-TDP43), we confirmed the binding specificities of
recombinant GST-TDP43 toward different RNAs in UV-cross-linking analysis. Fig. 1B shows that increasing amounts of unlabeled
(UG)12 RNA were very efficient competitors. Because (UG)m
sequences have been described as efficient polypyrimidinic sequences
(10) we also tested the possibility that recognition could be extended generally to this type of sequences. However, addition of a cold polypyrimidinic RNA (UCUU)3 did not have any effect on the
binding of GST-TDP43 to (UG)12 (Fig. 1B),
confirming the high specificity of TDP-43 binding to UG-repeated
motifs. This result is consistent with our previously reported
pull-down assay, which did not result in any TDP-43 being recognized by
(UCUU)3 RNA (1). The high sequence binding specificity of
TDP-43 is also highlighted by the fact that addition of cold TAR RNA
was incapable of competing with the binding of GST-TDP43 to the
(UG)12 sequence, a finding that had already been described
in the original isolation of TDP-43 (19) and which we confirm here. It
should be noted that at present no other RNA-binding protein has been
described to bind UG-repeated sequences although CUG-BP (CUG-binding
protein) has been recently described to bind UG repeats in a yeast
three-hybrid system (20).
It was then of interest to analyze the minimum length of (UG) repeats
that could be specifically bound by this protein. Therefore, cold RNAs
competitors containing different lengths of (UG) repeats (3, 6, 9, and
12) were incubated in the presence of GST-TDP43 and labeled
(UG)12 RNA. The results shown in Fig. 1C
demonstrate that efficient competition can be observed only when the
number of (UG) repeats is equal or above six and that there is a
relationship between the number of (UG) repeats and the efficiency of binding.
The DNA Binding Specificity of TDP-43 Includes Single-stranded
(TG)-repeated Sequences but Not Double-stranded (tg/ac)-repeated
Sequences--
The fact that this protein was originally described to
bind TAR DNA sequences raised the possibility that the binding
characteristics of this protein might include (TG)-repeated sequences
as well as (UG)-repeated sequences. Therefore, we performed competition analysis using GST-TDP43 bound to (UG)12 RNA in the
presence of cold single-stranded DNA oligos (see Table
I). As shown in Fig. 2A the most efficient
competitor was represented by the oligo TG12 carrying twelve (TG)
repeats followed by the TARS oligo, a result that is consistent with
what had been observed by Ou et al. (19). It should also be
noted that other oligos (in particular TCTTS) display a weak but
significant ability to compete for this protein, a characteristic not
found in the (UCUU)3 RNA (see Fig. 1). This finding also
confirms the original observations of Ou et al. (19) who,
using a polymerase chain reaction-based site selection procedure, found
that recombinant TDP-43 preferably bound DNA stretches of eight
contiguous pyrimidine residues. Nonetheless, Fig. 2B shows
that the use of oligos containing different numbers of TG repeats
yielded results very similar to those obtained in Fig. 1C
using (UG)-repeated sequences. Also in this case, the minimum number of
(TG) repeats needed to efficiently compete for GST-TDP43 binding is
six, and there is a relationship between the number of (TG) repeats and
the efficiency of competition.
Finally, oligos containing (AC) repeats can function as efficient
competitors for the binding of GST-TDP43 to (UG)12 (data not shown). However, in this case competition was caused by the (AC)
repeats annealing directly to the (UG)12-labeled sequence and inhibiting binding of the protein rather than by binding directly to GST-TDP43. In fact, EMSA analysis shows that there is little if any
direct binding of GST-TDP43 to AC6, AC9, or AC12 end-labeled oligos
(Fig. 2C, left panel) while direct binding of
GST-TDP43 efficiently occurs for single-stranded (TG)-repeated
sequences containing 6, 9, and 12 (TG) repeats (Fig. 2C,
central panel). Notably, the fact that the oligo bearing
three tg-repeats (TG3) could not efficiently bind GST-TDP43 confirms
the previous competition data by UV-cross-linking (Fig. 2B).
Thus, in order to establish whether TDP-43 could bind double-stranded
oligos we then annealed labeled (AC) oligos with equal amounts of
complementary and unlabeled (TG) oligos and then repeated the EMSA
analysis. The results confirm that double-stranded oligos containing TG
repeats do not bind TDP-43 (Fig. 2C, right
panel).
Comparing the (TG) and (UG) Binding Efficiencies of TDP-43;
Formation of Two Distinct Complexes with ssDNA as Opposed to Only One
with ssRNA in a UV Cross-linking Assay--
The DNA and RNA binding
efficiencies of TDP-43 were assumed to depend on the two RRM regions.
In order to establish whether there was no other protein domain
involved in RNA/DNA recognition and to compare the two binding
efficiencies we produced a construct coding for a truncated TDP-43
protein lacking the N- and C-terminal regions (Fig.
3A). The DNA and RNA binding
efficiencies of GST-TDP43 and GST-TDP43-(101-261) were then compared
using as substrate a 5'-labeled (TG)12 or
(UG)12 oligo (at a fixed concentration of 6 nM). The results, shown in Fig. 3B, demonstrate
that deletion of the N- and C-terminal regions of TDP-43 does not
appear to affect the RNA binding efficiency of the central
RRM-containing region and may even slightly enhance it. It should be
noted that the retarded complexes formed by each protein do not migrate
at the same level, an indication of the higher molecular weight of the
GST-TDP43/nucleic acid complex as opposed to the
GST-TDP43(101-261)/nucleic acid complex.
Interestingly, binding of TDP-43 to (UG)12 as opposed to
(TG)12 presents some differences as well. In fact, Fig.
3C shows that in UV cross-linking analysis only one
RNA-protein complex of 50-52 kDa is formed when GST-TDP43-(101-261)
is bound to (UG)12, as previously described (1). On the
other hand, at least two major DNA-protein complexes with altered
mobility can be detected when the same protein is bound to
(TG)12. The formation of multiple complexes in SDS-PAGE
following UV cross-linking analysis has already been described for
another RRM protein, Gbp1p (21), as a result of the formation of
multiple covalent cross-links between protein and nucleic acid. The
fact that the migrating complexes are different when using
(UG)12 as opposed to (TG)12 represents a
further indication that TDP-43 RNA and DNA binding characteristics may
not be identical.
Binding of TDP-43 Derivatives Lacking the RRM1 or RRM2
Motifs--
In order to test the importance of each TDP-43 RRMs we
then made a series of deletion mutants and analyzed their binding to (UG)12 RNA. Fig.
4A shows a schematic
representation of two mutants in which we selectively deleted the first
RRM motif (GST-TDP43/
It should be noted that deletion of RRM2 (leaving the RRM1 sequence
intact) does not completely abolish the RNA binding capability of
TDP-43 but leads to the appearance of a super-shifted RNA-protein complex (Fig. 4B, first panel), suggesting that
the binding characteristics of RRM2 are quite different from those of
RRM1. The specificity of this complex formation is confirmed by a
competition analysis (Fig. 4C) in which we added increasing
amounts of each mutant (GST-TDP43/ Importance of Conserved Aromatic Residues in TDP-43 RRM Domains for
RNA Binding--
In order to better characterize how TDP-43 binds to
RNA we compared the sequence of TDP-43 RRMs domains with that of other well characterized RRMs found in proteins whose structure has been
solved by crystallography: hnRNP A1 (22), Sxl (23), PABP (24) and U1A
spliceosomal protein (18, 25). Fig. 5 shows the RRM domains found
in these proteins, which are most similar to RRM1 and RRM2 of TDP-43.
It should be noted that very little homology was detected between U1A
RRMs and TDP-43 RRMs (data not shown). Overall, the highest amino acid
identity between the different RRMs can be found in correspondence with
the highly conserved RNP-1 and RNP-2 consensus motifs. In particular,
several key aromatic residues that have been reported to be responsible
for direct stacking interactions with RNA bases in these different
proteins (marked with open circles) are conserved in TDP-43
RRMs. The only exception is represented by the first putative TDP-43
RNP-2 motif (residues 106-111) in which none of the aromatic residues
reported to make direct stacking interactions with the RNA are
conserved. It should be noted that mutation of these aromatic residues
in hnRNPA1 (26) and U1A (27, 28) has long been known to severely affect
the RNA binding capability of these proteins. To further investigate
these similarities we then prepared a series of GST-TDP43-(101-261) mutants in which the conserved Phe residues in each RNP motif were
mutated to leucine residues (Fig.
6A). The rationale for this
change in residue resides in the fact that a Phe to Leu single amino
acid mutation has been previously described to abolish the functionality of the RNP motif in the case of the nucleolin protein (29). Each mutant was expressed in E. coli (Fig.
6B), and its ability to bind (UG)12 RNA and
(TG)12 DNA was assayed by EMSA (Fig. 6, C and
D). In both cases, the mutations that most reduced binding
to the nucleic acid were the F147L and F149L in the RNP-1 motif of
RRM1. The importance of these residues is best reflected in the fact
that in double mutants 5 and 7 the ability to bind (UG)12
RNA and (TG)12 DNA was lost while in the double mutation that preserved intact only Phe-147 and Phe-149 (mutant number 6)
binding could still occur. This result is in accordance with the
results obtained by Ou et al. (19), who performed
progressive deletions of TDP-43 and observed that ability to bind TAR
DNA was lost only when the first RNP-1 motif was deleted. This
observation was also confirmed by incubating labeled TAR DNA oligo with
our mutants, an experiment that yielded identical results to those obtained in Fig. 6D for the TG12 oligonucleotide (data not
shown).
Finally, it should be noted that while deletion of the entire RRM2
domain leads to a supershifted complex (Fig. 4B) the point mutations of the aromatic residues in RRM2 (Fig. 6C, mutant
6) result in a complex whose mobility is indistinguishable from
the wild type. Taken together, these results suggest the presence of
considerable interplay between the RRM1 and RRM2 domains of TDP-43.
The human genome has been recently shown to be heavily composed of
repetitive elements (>50%) that vary in complexity from whole genes
and very long stretches of DNA to much simpler and shorter nucleotide
sequences (30, 31). These shorter sequences are commonly known as short
sequence repeats (SSRs) and are often highly polymorphic (30). In
particular, SSR elements are estimated to contribute 3% of the whole
genome (with simple dinucleotide repeats accounting alone for 0.5% of
the total) (31). Usually, SSRs are composed of repeated nucleotide
motifs ranging from 1 to 20 nucleotides in length and are present in
blocks of up to thousands of tandem units (30, 32). Although their
function is still largely unknown repetitive nucleotide stretches are
known to play important roles in several pathological conditions. For example, expansion of simple trinucleotide repeats through a mechanism of dynamic mutation is known to cause distinct human genetic diseases such as myotonic dystrophy (33), the Fragile X Syndrome (34, 35),
Huntington's disease (36), or a series of neurodegenerative diseases
(37). Moreover, SSR sequences have also been described to affect the
splicing process of the CFTR gene and correlate with
severity of disease (1, 6-9).
In this study we report the characterization of the novel RNA/DNA
binding properties of TDP-43 (19), a protein that we have recently
described to play a role in CFTR exon 9 splicing and occurrence of disease following binding to the (UG)m regulatory sequence (1). Interestingly, we have found that TDP-43 can efficiently
bind a number of (UG) repeats equal to or greater than six and that
there is a relationship between the number of (UG) repeats and the
efficiency of binding. This finding provides a functional explanation
for our recent demonstration of a connection between the length of the
(UG)m regulatory region and alternative splicing of CFTR
exon 9 (1). These RNA binding characteristics of TDP-43 are also in
good agreement with those of other similar RNA-binding proteins whose
structure is known by crystallographic studies, such as hnRNP A1 (22),
Sxl (23), and PABP (24) and whose RRMs share considerable homology with
TDP-43 RRMs. In fact, the minimum length of single-stranded RNA bound
by TDP-43 (a stretch of six UG repeats) is consistent with the length
of single-stranded RNAs bound by similar proteins: (a)11 in
the case of PABP (24) and ug(u)7 for Sxl (23). In this
respect, therefore, TDP-43 acts very similarly to other well
characterized proteins that also employ a two-RRM domain strategy to
recognize RNA.
We have previously shown that an increase in TDP-43 cellular
concentrations inhibits exon 9 splicing (1). This effect may not be
necessarily mediated by simple binding competition with 3'-ss
recognition factors but could also be linked to the still unknown
cellular function of TDP-43. One alternative being that TDP-43 may bind
to other cellular proteins that disrupt the recognition of exon 9 by
the splicing machinery when positioned next to it. The search of the
putative TDP-43 partners through protein similarity searches have been
of limited use. In fact, they have shown that TDP-43 shares a high
homology with a series of nuclear factors such as hnRNP D (38) or a
mouse protein binding to CArG box motifs (39). However, the
significance of these homologies is limited because they are
predominantly localized in the central portion of TDP-43, which
contains the highly conserved RRM motifs and the glycine-rich region,
two elements that TDP-43 shares with many other RNA-binding proteins.
Nonetheless, the cloning of homologous proteins in
Drosophila (40) and Caenorhabditis (QZ0414) shows that TDP-43 is highly conserved. Interestingly, a comparison of its
amino acid sequence with yeast proteins also shows a high identity
(~30%) with two factors, HRP1 (Nuclear Polyadenylated RNA-binding
protein, involved in pre-mRNA 3'-end cleavage and polyadenylation)
(41, 42) and NSR1 (Nucleolar Protein involved in the processing of 20 S
to 18 S rRNA) (43). In this respect, the homology with the NSR1 yeast
protein is particularly interesting, because this protein has been
described to bind (TG1-3) telomeric single-stranded repeated sequences
(44). Alternatively, in the light of recent evidence, the ability of
TDP-43 to bind single-stranded (TG)m repeats may also indicate its
participation in the recombination process, and in this respect it is
worthy to note that (CA/GT)n microsatellites repeats have been reported
to affect homologous recombination in yeast meiosis (45) and GT repeats
have also been associated with recombination frequency on human
chromosome 22 (46). On the basis of these homologies it is then
possible to speculate that the cellular function of TDP-43 may concern some as yet unidentified facet of mRNA processing other than
splicing. This hypothesis is also supported by the peculiarities of
TDP-43 RNA/DNA binding properties when compared with classical
RNA-binding proteins.
The results shown in Figs. 1 and 2 indicate that the RNA and DNA
sequence binding specificities do not fully coincide. In fact, the TAR
DNA sequence does not contain any (TG) repeats, and its only
distinguishing feature are the two polypyrimidinic tracts, which at the
RNA level are not substrates for TDP-43 binding. This is rather unusual
if we consider that proteins such as hnRNP A1, which are also known to
bind both single-stranded RNA and DNA, show very similar DNA/RNA
sequence binding specificities (47, 48). Moreover, Fig. 3C
shows the formation of multiple and distinct complexes with TG repeats
as opposed to a single complex with UG repeats. Regarding the TDP-43
structure, deletion of TDP-43 RRM2 does not abolish RNA binding but
results in the formation of a complex with altered mobility (Fig.
4B). However, a selective mutagenesis of the aromatic
residues of RRM2 (Fig. 6C, mutant 6) results in the
formation of a (UG)12-TDP43 complex that has a mobility
indistinguishable from the wild type. These results suggest that RRM1
supplies most of the requirements for specific RNA binding but also
that elements present in RRM2 (aside from the aromatic residues) are
needed for correct complex formation. This situation differs from what
has been recently reported for UP1 where deletion of the second RRM
motif did not affect the RNA binding properties of the protein (49) and
suggests the presence of considerable interplay between RRM1 and RRM2
of TDP-43.
We thank Michela Zotti for skillful technical assistance.
*
This work was supported by Telethon Onlus Foundation Grant
E1038.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 24, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104236200
The abbreviations used are:
RRM, RNA recognition
motif;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PAGE, polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis;
EMSA, electromobility shift assay;
SSR, short
sequence repeats.
Characterization and Functional Implications of the RNA Binding
Properties of Nuclear Factor TDP-43, a Novel Splicing Regulator of
CFTR Exon 9*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
cells by overnight induction at room temperature in
the presence of 0.1-0.3 mM IPTG. Cells were then
resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline, 1% Triton X-100, and
sonicated. The supernatant was recovered after centrifugation at
3000 × g for 30 s in an Eppendorf 5810R centrifuge and incubated with glutathione S-Sepharose 4B
beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The absorbed proteins were then eluted according to the manufacturer's instructions. Purified proteins
were quantitated on an SDS-PAGE gel using bovine serum albumin
standards (Sigma).
-32P]UTP, DNase-treated according to standard
protocols, and purified on a Nick column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. The labeled RNAs were
then precipitated and resuspended in RNase-free water. The UV
cross-linking assay was performed by adding
[
-32P]UTP-labeled RNA probes (1 × 106 cpm per incubation) in a water bath for 15 min at
30 ° C with 200 ng of each different purified protein in a
20-µl final volume. Binding conditions were 20 mM Hepes
pH 7.9, 72 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2,
0.78 mM magnesium acetate, 0.52 mM
dithiothreitol, 3.8% glycerol, 0.75 mM ATP, and 1 mM GTP. In the competition experiments, cold RNA and DNA
were also added as competitors 5 min before addition of the labeled
RNAs (the molar excess of the unlabeled competitor used in the
different experiments is stated in each figure legend). Samples were
then transferred in the wells of an HLA plate (Nunc, InterMed) and
irradiated with UV light on ice (0.8 joules, ~5 min) using a UV
Linker (Euroclone). Unbound RNA was then digested with 30 µg of RNase
A (Sigma) and 6 units of RNase T1 (Sigma) by incubating at 37 °C for
30 min in a water bath and then adding SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Samples
were then analyzed on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel followed by autoradiography
with autoradiographic XAR film (Kodak). Films were then scanned on a
Macintosh G3 work station using Adobe Photoshop and printed using a
Phaser 400 printer.
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase (PNK,
Stratagene) for 1 h at 37 °C and then precipitated in 0.3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2 and three volumes of ethanol.
After centrifugation and a washing step with 70% ethanol the labeled
oligos were resuspended in 400 µl of water. Each binding reaction was
performed at room temperature for 15 min by mixing the purified protein
with the labeled oligo (or RNA) in a 20-µl final volume. The
reactions were performed in 1× bind shift binding buffer (20 mM Hepes pH 7.9, 2 mM MgCl2) and
electrophoresed on a 5% polyacrylamide gel at 100 V for 1 h in
0.5× Tris borate/EDTA buffer at 4 °C. The gel was then dried on 3 MM Whatman filter paper and exposed for 20 min with autoradiographic XAR film (Kodak). For quantitation gels were measured with an InstantImager (Packard).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
RNA binding specificities of TDP-43.
A, the amino acid sequence of TDP-43 (residues 1-414) with
the two predicted RRM motifs (residues 106-175 and 193-257)
highlighted in bold (RRMs were identified with a search
using the Pfam program at www.sanger.ac.uk). The boxed regions
highlight the highly conserved RNP-2 and RNP-1 regions. B,
UV cross-linking competition analysis loaded on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel of
GST-TDP43 bound to labeled (UG)12 RNA in the presence of
increasing amounts of cold (UG)12, (UCUU)3, and
TAR RNA (the excess molar ratios of cold competitor RNA used in each
data point was 3, 8, and 15). The lower panel shows a graph
with the percentage of TDP-43 labeling following incubation with the
cold competitors. C, competition analysis using short RNAs
of equal length containing different numbers of (UG) repeats:
(UG)3, (UG)6, (UG)9, and
(UG)12. The molar ratio of cold competitor RNA to labeled
RNA used for each data point was 8 and 15. The lower panel
shows a graph with the percentage of TDP-43 labeling following
incubation with the cold competitors.
ssDNA oligonucleotides used for competition analysis

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
DNA binding specificities of TDP-43.
A, competitive ability of different single-stranded DNA
oligos on the binding of GST-TDP43 to labeled (UG)12. For
each oligo, the molar ratio of cold competitor DNA to labeled
(UG)12 RNA used for the two data points was 5 and 10. The
lower panel shows a graph with the percentage of TDP-43
labeling following incubation with the cold oligos. B,
competition analysis of the effects of single-stranded oligos
containing an increasing number of (TG) repeats (3, 6, 9, and 12) on
the binding of GST-TDP43 to labeled (UG)12. For each oligo
the molar ratio of competitor cold DNA to labeled (UG)12
RNA used for the two data points was 5 and 10. The lower
panel shows a graph with the percentage of GST-TDP43 labeling
following incubation with the cold oligos. C, EMSA analysis
of GST-TDP43 binding to different 5'-labeled single-stranded (AC)-rich
oligos (AC6-AC12, left panel) as opposed to analogous
(TG)-rich oligos (TG3-TG12, middle panel). C,
right panel, EMSA analysis using the double-stranded oligos
(labeled only on the (AC)-containing strand) with GST-TDP43. Complexes
were fractionated on a 5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel.

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Comparison of ug/tg binding properties of
TDP-43. A, schematic representation of the GST-TDP43
protein and of the truncated mutant GST-TDP43-(101-261). B,
reactivity in EMSA analysis of both proteins with labeled
single-stranded (UG)12 RNA (6 nM) or labeled
(TG)12 DNA (6 nM). Protein concentrations
ranged from 0.07 µM to 0.64 µM. The
arrows on the left indicate the retarded
protein-nucleic acid complexes (upper arrow) and the free
nucleic acid (lower arrow). The percent shift for each data
point as quantified using a phosphorimager is indicated. B,
reactivity of UV cross-linking of GST-TDP43-(101-261) protein (0.14 µM) with labeled single-stranded (UG)12 RNA
or labeled (TG)12 DNA at different concentrations (6-48
nM). The arrows on the left indicate
the retarded protein-RNA complex while the arrows on the
right indicate the retarded protein-DNA complexes.
RRM1) and the second RRM motif
(GST-TDP43/
RRM2). In addition, in order to confirm the presence of
the first RNP-2 motif (residues 106-111), which had not been
previously detected in the original work by Ou et al. (19)
we prepared two mutants, the first containing a deletion of the entire
6-amino acid region (GST-TDP43/
(106-111)) and the second
introducing an Asp residue in substitution for the three amino acids
(Leu-106, Val-108, and Leu-111), which were predominantly conserved in
the corresponding RNP-2 motifs of well characterized RNA-binding
proteins (see Fig. 5). The four mutants were then analyzed by EMSA analysis using labeled (UG)12
RNA. The results show that deletion of RRM1 and deletion (or mutation) of the 106-111 RNP-2 motif completely abolished the ability of TDP-43
to bind the RNA (Fig. 4B, first and second upper
panels). This result not only confirms the presence of a
functional RNP-2 motif localized in position 106-111 but also suggests
that the RRM1 sequence spanning residues 106-175 is of fundamental
importance for the binding to RNA.

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Deletion and mutational analysis of TDP-43
RRM regions and their effects on RNA binding ability.
A, schematic panel of the deletions and mutations introduced
in the different RRM motifs of the GST-TDP43 protein. B,
first and second upper panels, EMSA analysis of
the effects of these mutations on the binding to 5'-labeled
single-stranded (UG)12 RNA and each mutant protein. The
arrow on the left indicates the anomalous
retarded protein-nucleic acid complex that is observed in the case of
GST-TDP43/
RRM2 incubated with (UG)12 RNA. B,
lower panels, two SDS-PAGE gels stained with Coomassie Blue
for each protein used in the EMSA analysis. C, competition
analysis performed by adding increasing molar quantities (1, 2, 4, and
8, respectively) of GST-TDP43/
RRM2 and GST-TDP43/
RRM1 to a
saturated GST-TDP43/(UG)12 complex. The last
lane contains (UG)12 alone as control.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Comparison of TDP-43 RRM regions with similar
RRM motifs of known tertiary structure. This figure shows a
comparison of the two TDP-43 RRM motifs with homologous RRM motifs
belonging to proteins for which their crystallographic structure is
known, hnRNP A1, Sxl, and PABP. Sequence identities with the TDP-43
sequence are marked in bold lettering while key residues
involved in direct stacking interactions with the RNA, as confirmed by
structural analysis are highlighted with open circles. The
highly conserved RNP-1 and RNP-2 consensus sequences are
underlined. The asterisk marks the position of
the conserved TDP-43 Phe residues with respect to the other RRM
sequences.
RRM1 and GST-TDP43/
RRM2) to a
reaction mix that contained GST-TDP43 and labeled (UG)12
RNA. The results show that the GST-TDP43/
RRM2 mutant is capable of
actively competing with GST-TDP43 for the formation of the supershifted
complex, but no change is observed following addition with
GST-TDP43/
RRM1.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Importance of aromatic residues in TDP-43
RNP-1 and RNP-2 motifs for RNA/DNA binding efficiency.
A, panel of the Phe to Leu mutations (numbered 1-8)
introduced in different RNP-1 and RNP-2 motifs of the
GST-TDP43-(101-261) protein, either singly or in different
combinations. B, a Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel of
each mutant after purification with glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads
according to standard protocols. C and D, EMSA of
the effects of these mutations on the binding to labeled
single-stranded (UG)12 RNA (6 nM) and labeled
(TG)12 DNA (6 nM). Protein concentration for
(UG)12 RNA was 0.28 µM while for
(TG)12 was 0.14 µM. The numbering of each
lane corresponds to the mutant used in each reaction mixture. The
arrows on the left indicate the retarded
protein-nucleic acid complexes (upper arrow) and the free
nucleic acid (lower arrow).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Padriciano 99, 34012 Trieste, Italy. Tel.: 0039-40-3757337; Fax: 0039-40-3757361; E-mail:
baralle@icgeb.trieste.it.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Buratti, E.,
Dork, T.,
Zuccato, E.,
Pagani, F.,
Romano, M.,
and Baralle, F. E.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
1774-1784
2.
Niksic, M.,
Romano, M.,
Buratti, E.,
Pagani, F.,
and Baralle, F. E.
(1999)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
8,
2339-2349
3.
Pagani, F.,
Buratti, E.,
Stuani, C.,
Romano, M.,
Zuccato, E.,
Niksic, M.,
Giglio, L.,
Faraguna, D.,
and Baralle, F. E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
21041-21047
4.
Strong, T. V.,
Wilkinson, D. J.,
Mansoura, M. K.,
Devor, D. C.,
Henze, K.,
Yang, Y.,
Wilson, J. M.,
Cohn, J. A.,
Dawson, D. C.,
Frizzell, R. A.,
and Collins, F. S.
(1993)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
2,
225-230
5.
Delaney, S. J.,
Rich, D. P.,
Thomson, S. A.,
Hargrave, M. R.,
Lovelock, P. K.,
Welsh, M. J.,
and Wainwright, B. J.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
4,
426-431
6.
Chillon, M.,
Casals, T.,
Mercier, B.,
Bassas, L.,
Lissens, W.,
Silber, S.,
Romey, M. C.,
Ruiz-Romero, J.,
Verlingue, C.,
Claustres, M.,
Nunes, V.,
Férec, C.,
and Estiril, X.
(1995)
N. Engl. J. Med.
332,
1475-1480
7.
Chu, C. S.,
Trapnell, B. C.,
Curristin, S.,
Cutting, G. R.,
and Crystal, R. G.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
3,
151-156
8.
Cuppens, H.,
Lin, W.,
Jaspers, M.,
Costes, B.,
Teng, H.,
Vankeerberghen, A.,
Jorissen, M.,
Droogmans, G.,
Reynaert, I.,
Goossens, M.,
Nilius, B.,
and Cassiman, J. J.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
101,
487-496
9.
Rave-Harel, N.,
Kerem, E.,
Nissim-Rafinia, M.,
Madjar, I.,
Goshen, R.,
Augarten, A.,
Rahat, A.,
Hurwitz, A.,
Darvasi, A.,
and Kerem, B.
(1997)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
60,
87-94
10.
Shelley, C. S.,
and Baralle, F. E.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
3787-3799
11.
Gabellini, N.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
1076-1083
12.
Kazazian, H. H., Jr.,
and Moran, J. V.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
19-24
13.
Rozmahel, R.,
Heng, H. H.,
Duncan, A. M.,
Shi, X. M.,
Rommens, J. M.,
and Tsui, L. C.
(1997)
Genomics
45,
554-561
14.
Burd, C. G.,
and Dreyfuss, G.
(1994)
Science
265,
615-621
15.
Mattaj, I. W.
(1993)
Cell
73,
837-840
16.
Biamonti, G.,
and Riva, S.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
340,
1-8
17.
Birney, E.,
Kumar, S.,
and Krainer, A. R.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
5803-5816
18.
Nagai, K.,
Oubridge, C.,
Ito, N.,
Avis, J.,
and Evans, P.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci
20,
235-240
19.
Ou, S. H.,
Wu, F.,
Harrich, D.,
Garcia-Martinez, L. F.,
and Gaynor, R. B.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
3584-3596
20.
Takahashi, N.,
Sasagawa, N.,
Suzuki, K.,
and Ishiura, S.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
277,
518-523
21.
Johnston, S. D.,
Lew, J. E.,
and Berman, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
923-933
22.
Shamoo, Y.,
Krueger, U.,
Rice, L. M.,
Williams, K. R.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
215-222
23.
Handa, N.,
Nureki, O.,
Kurimoto, K.,
Kim, I.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Shimura, Y.,
Muto, Y.,
and Yokoyama, S.
(1999)
Nature
398,
579-585
24.
Deo, R. C.,
Bonanno, J. B.,
Sonenberg, N.,
and Burley, S. K.
(1999)
Cell
98,
835-845
25.
Oubridge, C.,
Ito, N.,
Evans, P. R.,
Teo, C. H.,
and Nagai, K.
(1994)
Nature
372,
432-438
26.
Merrill, B. M.,
Stone, K. L.,
Cobianchi, F.,
Wilson, S. H.,
and Williams, K. R.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
3307-3313
27.
Jessen, T. H.,
Oubridge, C.,
Teo, C. H.,
Pritchard, C.,
and Nagai, K.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
3447-3456
28.
Hoffman, D. W.,
Query, C. C.,
Golden, B. L.,
White, S. W.,
and Keene, J. D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
2495-2499
29.
Serin, G.,
Joseph, G.,
Ghisolfi, L.,
Bauzan, M.,
Erard, M.,
Amalric, F.,
and Bouvet, P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13109-13116
30.
Sutherland, G. R.,
and Richards, R. I.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
3636-3641
31.
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium.
(2001)
Nature
409,
860-920
32.
Csink, A. K.,
and Henikoff, S.
(1998)
Trends Genet.
14,
200-204
33.
Redman, J. B.,
Fenwick, R. G., Jr.,
Fu, Y. H.,
Pizzuti, A.,
and Caskey, C. T.
(1993)
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
269,
1960-1965
34.
Yu, S.,
Pritchard, M.,
Kremer, E.,
Lynch, M.,
Nancarrow, J.,
Baker, E.,
Holman, K.,
Mulley, J. C.,
Warren, S. T.,
Schlessinger, D.,
Sutherland, G. R.,
and Richards, R. I.
(1991)
Science
252,
1179-1181
35.
Oberle, I.,
Rousseau, F.,
Heitz, D.,
Kretz, C.,
Devys, D.,
Hanauer, A.,
Boue, J.,
Bertheas, M. F.,
and Mandel, J. L.
(1991)
Science
252,
1097-1102
36.
The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group.
(1993)
Cell
72,
971-983
37.
La Spada, A. R.,
Wilson, E. M.,
Lubahn, D. B.,
Harding, A. E.,
and Fischbeck, K. H.
(1991)
Nature
352,
77-79
38.
Kajita, Y.,
Nakayama, J.,
Aizawa, M.,
and Ishikawa, F.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
22167-22175
39.
Kamada, S.,
and Miwa, T.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
119,
229-236
40.
Lukacsovich, T.,
Asztalos, Z.,
Juni, N.,
Awano, W.,
and Yamamoto, D.
(1999)
Genomics
57,
43-56
41.
Wilson, S. M.,
Datar, K. V.,
Paddy, M. R.,
Swedlow, J. R.,
and Swanson, M. S.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1173-1184
42.
Anderson, J. T.,
Wilson, S. M.,
Datar, K. V.,
and Swanson, M. S.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
2730-2741
43.
Lee, W. C.,
Xue, Z. X.,
and Melese, T.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
113,
1-12
44.
Lin, J. J.,
and Zakian, V. A.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4906-4913
45.
Gendrel, C. G.,
Boulet, A.,
and Dutreix, M.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1261-1268
46.
Majewski, J.,
and Ott, J.
(2000)
Genome Res.
10,
1108-1114
47.
Buvoli, M.,
Cobianchi, F.,
Biamonti, G.,
and Riva, S.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
6595-6600
48.
Abdul-Manan, N.,
and Williams, K. R.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
4063-4070
49.
Dallaire, F.,
Dupuis, S.,
Fiset, S.,
and Chabot, B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14509-14516
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S. Chen-Plotkin, F. Geser, J. B. Plotkin, C. M. Clark, L. K. Kwong, W. Yuan, M. Grossman, V. M. Van Deerlin, J. Q. Trojanowski, and V. M.-Y. Lee Variations in the progranulin gene affect global gene expression in frontotemporal lobar degeneration Hum. Mol. Genet., May 15, 2008; 17(10): 1349 - 1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. M. Ayala, T. Misteli, and F. E. Baralle TDP-43 regulates retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation through the repression of cyclin-dependent kinase 6 expression PNAS, March 11, 2008; 105(10): 3785 - 3789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Xiao, S. Tjostheim, T. Sanelli, J. R. McLean, P. Horne, Y. Fan, J. Ravits, M. J. Strong, and J. Robertson An Aggregate-Inducing Peripherin Isoform Generated through Intron Retention Is Upregulated in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Associated with Disease Pathology J. Neurosci., February 20, 2008; 28(8): 1833 - 1840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Abhyankar, C. Urekar, and P. P. Reddi A Novel CpG-free Vertebrate Insulator Silences the Testis-specific SP-10 Gene in Somatic Tissues: ROLE FOR TDP-43 IN INSULATOR FUNCTION J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2007; 282(50): 36143 - 36154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bareil, C. Guittard, J.-P. Altieri, C. Templin, M. Claustres, and M. des Georges Comprehensive and Rapid Genotyping of Mutations and Haplotypes in Congenital Bilateral Absence of the Vas Deferens and Other Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator-Related Disorders J. Mol. Diagn., November 1, 2007; 9(5): 582 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Zhang, Y.-f. Xu, C. A. Dickey, E. Buratti, F. Baralle, R. Bailey, S. Pickering-Brown, D. Dickson, and L. Petrucelli Progranulin Mediates Caspase-Dependent Cleavage of TAR DNA Binding Protein-43 J. Neurosci., September 26, 2007; 27(39): 10530 - 10534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Radpour, H. Gourabi, M. A. S. Gilani, and A. V. Dizaj Molecular Study of (TG)m(T)n Polymorphisms in Iranian Males With Congenital Bilateral Absence of the Vas Deferens J Androl, July 1, 2007; 28(4): 541 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Buratti, A. Brindisi, M. Giombi, S. Tisminetzky, Y. M. Ayala, and F. E. Baralle TDP-43 Binds Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein A/B through Its C-terminal Tail: AN IMPORTANT REGION FOR THE INHIBITION OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS TRANSMEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE REGULATOR EXON 9 SPLICING J. Biol. Chem., November 11, 2005; 280(45): 37572 - 37584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Mercado, Y. M. Ayala, M. Romano, E. Buratti, and F. E. Baralle Depletion of TDP 43 overrides the need for exonic and intronic splicing enhancers in the human apoA-II gene Nucleic Acids Res., October 27, 2005; 33(18): 6000 - 6010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Brasier, H. Spratt, Z. Wu, I. Boldogh, Y. Zhang, R. P. Garofalo, A. Casola, J. Pashmi, A. Haag, B. Luxon, et al. Nuclear Heat Shock Response and Novel Nuclear Domain 10 Reorganization in Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Infected A549 Cells Identified by High-Resolution Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis J. Virol., November 1, 2004; 78(21): 11461 - 11476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhao, C. Schneid, D. Iliev, E.-M. Schmidt, V. Wagner, F. Wollnik, and M. Mittag The Circadian RNA-Binding Protein CHLAMY 1 Represents a Novel Type Heteromer of RNA Recognition Motif and Lysine Homology Domain-Containing Subunits Eukaryot. Cell, June 1, 2004; 3(3): 815 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Fujiki, H Ishiguro, S B. Ko, N Mizuno, Y Suzuki, T Takemura, A Yamamoto, T Yoshikawa, M Kitagawa, T Hayakawa, et al. Genetic evidence for CFTR dysfunction in Japanese: background for chronic pancreatitis J. Med. Genet., May 1, 2004; 41(5): e55 - e55. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Hefferon, J. D. Groman, C. E. Yurk, and G. R. Cutting A variable dinucleotide repeat in the CFTR gene contributes to phenotype diversity by forming RNA secondary structures that alter splicing PNAS, March 9, 2004; 101(10): 3504 - 3509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Buratti, A. F. Muro, M. Giombi, D. Gherbassi, A. Iaconcig, and F. E. Baralle RNA Folding Affects the Recruitment of SR Proteins by Mouse and Human Polypurinic Enhancer Elements in the |