JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104681200 on July 25, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 39, 36383-36390, September 28, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/39/36383    most recent
M104681200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogeveen, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hogeveen, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, G. L.

Human Sex Hormone-binding Globulin Promoter Activity Is Influenced by a (TAAAA)n Repeat Element within an Alu Sequence*

Kevin N. Hogeveen, Marja Talikka, and Geoffrey L. HammondDagger

From the Departments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Pharmacology & Toxicology and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Group in Fetal and Neonatal Health and Development, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada

Received for publication, May 22, 2001, and in revised form, July 24, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) is the major sex steroid-binding protein in human plasma and is produced by the liver. Plasma SHBG levels vary considerably between individuals and are influenced by hormonal, metabolic, and nutritional factors. We have now found that a (TAAAA)n pentanucleotide repeat, located within an alu sequence at the 5' boundary of the human SHBG promoter, influences its transcriptional activity in association with downstream elements, including an SP1-binding site. Furthermore, SHBG alleles within the general population contain at least 6-10 TAAAA repeats, and the transcriptional activity of a human SHBG promoter-luciferase reporter construct containing 6 TAAAA repeats was significantly lower than for similar reporter constructs containing 7-10 TAAAA repeats when tested in human HepG2 hepatoblastoma cells. This difference in transcriptional activity reflected the preferential binding of a 46-kDa liver-enriched nuclear factor to an oligonucleotide containing 6 rather than 7-10 TAAAA repeats. Thus, a (TAAAA)n element within the human SHBG promoter influences transcriptional activity in HepG2 cells and may contribute to differences in plasma SHBG levels between individuals.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasma sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG)1 binds testosterone and estradiol with high affinity and selectivity, and regulates the access of these sex steroids to their target tissues (1). Hepatocytes are the primary site of plasma SHBG biosynthesis, and changes in the blood levels of SHBG are influenced by hormonal, as well as metabolic and nutritional status (2). Low serum SHBG levels are commonly found in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome and disorders characterized by androgen excess (3), and have been reported to be a prognostic indicator for the onset of type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease (4, 5). Low serum levels of SHBG are also inherited within families (6, 7), and associations between abnormal serum SHBG levels and disease processes may therefore be obscured by genetic differences that contribute to variations in human SHBG gene expression.

We have recently characterized two binding sites for HNF-4 and COUP-TF within the human SHBG proximal promoter, which influence its transcriptional activity in human HepG2 hepatoblastoma cells (8). In particular, binding of HNF-4 to a TA-rich sequence close to the transcription start site in liver cells appears to substitute for the TATA-binding protein in the initiation of transcription (8). The possible function of the second HNF-4 binding site in the SHBG proximal promoter is not as clear, but it may contribute to phylogenetic differences in the temporal and tissue-specific expression of SHBG because it lies within a region that is absent in the corresponding region of SHBG genes in other mammalian species (8). Apart from this obvious difference in SHBG promoter sequences between species, the human and rodent SHBG promoters show a remarkable degree of sequence conservation, which only begins to diverge at the boundary of several alu sequences located at about -700 nt from the human SHBG transcription start site (8). This likely represents a functional boundary within the promoter sequence because human SHBG gene sequences containing only 803 nt of promoter sequence are expressed in a spatially and temporally appropriate manner when introduced as transgenes into the mouse genome (9, 10). Although the significance of repetitive elements within promoter sequences is unclear, they may contain nuclear factor binding sites that contribute to the regulation of transcription (11-13).

By characterizing the upstream region of the human SHBG promoter, we have now found that a (TAAAA)6 repeat within an alu sequence binds a 46-kDa liver enriched nuclear protein and acts to silence transcription. More importantly, the number of TAAAA repeats at this location is highly variable between individuals within the general population, and the transcriptional activity of the SHBG promoter and the binding of nuclear protein to this element are both directly related to the number of TAAAA repeats.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In Vitro Footprinting-- In vitro footprinting templates of human SHBG promoter upstream regions were produced by digesting a human SHBG fragment (14) with XhoI and XbaI. This released a 504-base pair region of the SHBG promoter corresponding to -803/-299 nt relative to the transcription start site in the liver (8). This fragment was further digested with HaeIII or HinfI, and the products (-803/-656 nt XhoI-HaeIII, -735/-587 nt HinfI-HinfI, -587/-362 nt HinfI-HinfI, -541/-298 nt HaeIII-XbaI) were cloned into the EcoRV site of pBluescript (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) in the correct orientation to permit labeling of the sense strand after digestion with HindIII. The HindIII-digested constructs were end-labeled with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I in the presence of [alpha -32P]dCTP and purified using a NICKTM column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Baie d'Urfé, Québec, Canada). Radiolabeled probes were released from the plasmids by digestion with EcoRI and purified by 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). The DNase I footprinting reactions with mouse liver nuclear extracts were carried out as described previously (8). Hydroxy-radical footprinting with the same extracts was also performed using the -803/-656 nt XhoI-HaeIII region of the human SHBG promoter (15, 16). Mouse liver nuclear extracts were used in these and other experiments to characterize and study the regulation of human SHBG promoter activity because human SHBG transgenes are expressed efficiently in mouse hepatocytes postnatally (9, 10).

Reporter Plasmids-- Human SHBG promoter deletion constructs were generated by amplifying a region from an SHBG fragment (14) in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This was done using a common reverse primer containing an XbaI site (-299) and forward primers (containing an XhoI site) corresponding to various positions in the 5' promoter region (Table I). These PCR products were digested with XhoI and XbaI and then subcloned into a pSP72 vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) containing the -299/+60 nt region of the human SHBG proximal promoter. The entire promoter sequences were then excised with HindIII and XhoI and inserted into a pGL2 Basic luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Sequences of oligonucleotides used for deleting (A) or mutating (B) human SHBG promoter sequence in the context of luciferase reporter gene constructs
Underlined sequences denote restriction enzyme recognition sites used for creation of human SHBG promoter constructs. Delta 6TAAAA oligonucleotide designed to remove the TAAAA sequence. Mutations introduced into the FP12 SP1 binding site (-536/-510) (in bold) were designed based upon a previous mutation in an SP1 consensus sequence (39).

Site-directed mutagenesis was accomplished using a pSELECT vector containing the -803/-299 nt region of the human SHBG promoter, according to the Altered Sites manual (Promega). Mutated sequences in pSELECT were removed by XhoI and XbaI digestion and subcloned into the pSP72 vector containing the -299/+60 nt region of the human SHBG promoter, and the entire promoter sequences were then inserted into pGL2 Basic, as described above. All PCR-generated and mutated sequences were confirmed by DNA sequencing using a commercially available kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Cell Culture and Transfection-- All cell culture reagents were from Life Technologies, Inc. (Burlington, Canada). Human HepG2 hepatoblastoma cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, and were transiently transfected with human SHBG promoter-pGL2 reporter constructs (1.2 µg) and pCMV LacZ (0.2 µg) using LipofectAMINE® reagent (8). Cells were harvested 48 h following transfection, and cell extracts were prepared by three cycles of freezing and thawing for analysis of luciferase and beta -galactosidase activity. Luciferase units were divided by readings obtained from a beta -galactosidase assay to correct for efficiency of transfection.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSAs)-- Mouse liver nuclear protein extracts (4 µg) were prepared (17), and then incubated in EMSA buffer (2.5 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 50 mM NaCl, 6.25% glycerol, and 3 µg of poly(dI-dC)) on ice for 10 min in the presence or absence of double-stranded competitor oligonucleotides (Table II). The corresponding end-labeled oligonucleotide probes were then added, and the binding reaction was allowed to proceed for 15 min at room temperature. For antibody supershift assays, radiolabeled probe was incubated with nuclear extract on ice for 15 min prior to addition of either normal rabbit serum, or an antiserum specific to SP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). Reactions were then incubated for 15 min at room temperature before electrophoresis. Nuclear proteins bound to radiolabeled oligonucleotides were separated from free probe by 5% PAGE, and the gel was dried and exposed to Biomax MR film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) against an intensifying screen at -80 °C.

Analysis of Nuclear Factor Binding to TAAAA Repeats by UV Cross-linking-- Binding reactions of nuclear protein extracts to double-stranded oligonucleotides comprising various TAAAA repeats (Table II) were carried out under the same conditions used for EMSAs. After a 15-min incubation at room temperature, samples were exposed to UV light (302 nm) at a distance of 10 cm for 15 min at 0 °C. Equal volumes of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer were added, and samples were heated at 95 °C for 5 min and subjected to SDS-PAGE with 4 and 10% acrylamide in the stacking and resolving gels, respectively. Gels were dried and exposed to x-ray film, as described above.

Southwestern Blot Analysis-- Nuclear proteins extracted from MSC-1 mouse Sertoli cells and human HeLa cervical cancer cells (18), as well as mouse liver (17), were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred by electrophoresis onto a HybondTM ECLTM nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The membrane was washed three times for 45 min in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 2.5% Nonidet P-40, 5% milk powder, and 0.1 mM DTT. It was then rinsed twice in binding buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 40 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 8% glycerol, and 0.125% milk powder). A radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide (250,000 cpm/ml) spanning the (TAAAA)6 sequence in the SHBG upstream promoter (Table II) was added to the binding solution containing 5 mM MgCl2 and 5 µg/ml poly(dI-dC), and was incubated with the membrane for 16 h at room temperature. The membrane was then washed in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl and exposed to Biomax MR film, as described above.

Analysis of the (TAAAA)n Repeat in the SHBG Promoter-- Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes of healthy human volunteers (19). Amplification of the TAAAA repeat region was accomplished using PCR with a forward primer (5'-GCTTGAACTCGAGAGGCAG) within an alu sequence in the human SHBG promoter (14), and a reverse primer (5'-CAGGGCCTAAACAGTCTAGCAGT) corresponding to a sequence at -651/-673 nt within the upstream promoter sequence. Amplified products were separated by 10% PAGE followed by staining with ethidium bromide. The number of TAAAA repeats was quantified by cloning PCR products in the pCR®-BluntII-TOPO® vector (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA) for sequencing. Serum samples from the same individuals were also taken for measurements of SHBG concentrations using a commercially available immunoradiometric assay kit (Orion Diagnostica, Oulunsalo, Finland).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Identification of Nuclear Factor-binding Sites within the Upstream Region of the Human SHBG Promoter-- Putative binding sites for nuclear proteins in the human SHBG upstream promoter were demonstrated by in vitro footprinting using mouse liver nuclear extracts (Fig. 1). One of these footprints (FP17) contains a sequence (5'-TGATAGAGCAAGAC), which resembles a CEBPbeta binding site when examined by homology searches using MatInspector (20) release 2.1. In addition, a sequence (5'-GGGGGAGGAGT) within FP12 (nt -527/-517) resembles a consensus SP1 binding site (5'-GGGGCGGGG(C/T)) by analysis using the TRANSFAC data base (21). A region containing six TAAAA repeats, which is resistant to DNase I digestion in the presence or absence of nuclear protein, lies between FP16 and FP17 (Fig. 1), and the boundary of the footprint within the TAAAA repeat region was confirmed by hydroxy-radical footprinting with a mouse liver nuclear protein extract (Fig. 2).


View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   DNase I in vitro footprinting of putative transcriptional regulatory elements in the upstream region of the human SHBG promoter. End-labeled fragments of the upstream region of the human SHBG promoter were incubated with 0 µg (lane 2), 3 µg (lane 3), or 10 µg (lane 4) of adult mouse liver nuclear extract (NE) and subjected to digestion with DNase I. Digested fragments were purified and analyzed by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. A Maxam-Gilbert (G/A) sequencing reaction (lane 1) was run as a size marker to define the boundaries of the footprinted regions (FP7-FP17, shown by brackets). The numbering of these footprints extends from those identified previously in the SHBG proximal promoter (8). A bracket is also used to define the boundary of a (TAAAA)6 repeat element, which could not be digested by DNase I in the absence (lane 2) or presence (lanes 3 and 4) of nuclear protein.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Hydroxy-radical footprinting of the TAAAA repeat within the upstream region of the human SHBG promoter. A radiolabeled -803/-656 fragment of the human SHBG promoter was incubated in the absence (lane 2) or presence of 1 µg (lane 3) or 5 µg (lane 4) of mouse liver nuclear protein extract (NE) and was then subjected to hydroxy-radical DNA cleavage. The products were purified and separated on a denaturing 8% polyacrylamide gel, alongside the products of a Maxam-Gilbert (G/A) sequencing reaction as size marker (lane 1). The (TAAAA)6 region and FP17 were protected from cleavage and are shown in brackets.

Interaction between SP1 and a double-stranded oligonucleotide that included FP12 (nt -536/-510) was confirmed by EMSA (Fig. 3A). The specificity of this interaction was demonstrated by inhibition of DNA-protein complexes using an oligonucleotide containing a known SP-1 binding site (Table II). In addition, the major DNA-protein complex formed in an EMSA reaction was supershifted with an SP1-specific antibody (Fig. 3B).


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A footprinted region (FP12) in the human SHBG promoter (-536/-510) is an SP1 nuclear factor binding site. A, end-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides spanning FP12 in the human SHBG promoter were incubated with 2 µg of adult mouse liver nuclear extract in the absence (lane 2) or presence of excess unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides (lanes 3-8). Free probe was separated from DNA-protein complexes by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. An unlabeled oligonucleotide, which includes the HNF4/COUP-TF binding site in FP3 of the human SHBG promoter (8), was used to demonstrate specificity. B, antibody supershift assays were performed by adding normal rabbit serum (lane 2) or antisera against SP1 (lane 3) during incubations of double-stranded end-labeled oligonucleotides with mouse liver nuclear proteins. Lane 1 is without nuclear protein.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Sequences of oligonucleotides used in South-western blotting, UV cross-linking experiments, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs)
Lowercase letters indicate additional sequences that were filled using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I and [alpha -32P]dCTP (17). Mutations (in bold) introduced into FP12 (-536/-510) were based upon a previous mutation that disrupts an SP1 recognition sequence (39). Double-stranded oligonucleotides representing SP1 (40) and HNF-4/COUP-TF (8) binding sites were used as reported by others.

Sequences in the Human SHBG Upstream Promoter Silence Transcription-- The activity associated with the nuclear factor binding sites identified by DNase I footprinting (represented by boxes in Fig. 4A) was investigated by adding them sequentially to a human SHBG proximal promoter-luciferase reporter gene construct (8). These constructs were used for transcriptional activity measurements in a human hepatoblastoma cell line (HepG2) that produces SHBG (22). This revealed that upstream sequences markedly reduce transcriptional activity when compared with the activity of the proximal promoter (Fig. 4A). In particular, addition of sequences that include FP16, as well as a putative CEBPbeta -binding site within FP17 and the intervening (TAAAA)6 sequence resulted in progressive and significant reductions of promoter activity (Fig. 4A). The reduction of transcription by sequences at the 5' boundary of the upstream promoter appeared to be associated specifically with the (TAAAA)6 sequence because a 6-fold increase in transcription was observed when it was removed from the full-length promoter (Fig. 4B). It was also noted that mutation of the SP1 binding site (Table II) within FP12, which prevents its interaction with liver nuclear extracts in an EMSA (data not shown), also resulted in a similar increase in the transcriptional activity of the full-length promoter (Fig. 4B). However, recovery of the transcriptional activity of the full-length promoter was not further enhanced by removal of TAAAA pentanucleotide repeat in combination with a mutant SP1 binding site within FP12 (Fig. 4B). It is also important to note that the presence of FP12 appears to have a negative effect on transcription only in the context of upstream sequences within the full-length promoter (Fig. 4A).


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Analysis of human SHBG promoter activity in HepG2 cells. A, a series of human SHBG promoter deletion constructs was generated and transiently transfected into HepG2 cells. Regions of the human SHBG promoter protected from DNase I digestion by mouse liver nuclear proteins (represented as boxes) were sequentially removed, and the effect of these nuclear factor binding sites on promoter activity was assessed. B, the transcriptional silencing activity of the (TAAAA)6 repeat appears to require the presence of an SP1 site within FP12. Mutation of FP12 to prevent SP1 binding (X) relieves the transcriptional silencing of the (TAAAA)6 repeat. Transcriptional silencing is also relieved when the (TAAAA)6 repeat is removed (X), irrespective of an intact SP1 site within FPIZ. The activities of the human SHBG reporter constructs are expressed relative to that of the promoterless pGL2 Basic luciferase reporter plasmid (Luc). In panel A, statistically significant differences were p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.001 (**) when compared with the activity of the -299/+60 human SHBG promoter. In panel B, statistically significant differences were p < 0.001 (***) when compared with the full-length (-803/+60) human SHBG promoter. Data are represented as means + S.E. from at least three experiments.

Nuclear Factor Binding to a (TAAAA)6 Sequence in the Human SHBG Promoter-- When tested in an EMSA, a radiolabeled oligonucleotide comprising the (TAAAA)6 sequence interacted with nuclear factor extracted from mouse liver and could be competed for by unlabeled oligonucleotides spanning this repeat region, but not with an unrelated DNA sequence (Fig. 5). To further characterize the nuclear factor(s) binding at this pentanucleotide repeat, a radiolabeled (TAAAA)6 repeat oligonucleotide sequence (Table II) was used as a probe for a Southwestern blot (Fig. 6). The radiolabeled probe recognized a nuclear protein with an apparent molecular mass of 46 kDa, which is enriched in mouse liver nuclear extracts when compared with nuclear extracts from mouse MSC-1 Sertoli cells or HeLa cells (Fig. 6). By contrast, a nuclear protein with a molecular mass of ~67 kDa was recognized in all nuclear extracts and likely represents a ubiquitous nuclear factor, which binds to this sequence (Fig. 6).


View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A (TAAAA)6 repeat in the human SHBG promoter interacts with a protein from mouse liver nuclear extract. Radiolabeled oligonucleotides spanning the (TAAAA)6 repeat in the human SHBG promoter were incubated with 4 µg of adult mouse liver nuclear extract in the absence (lane 2) or presence of excess unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides (lanes 3-6). Free probe was separated from DNA-protein complexes by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Lane 1 represents the radiolabeled probe in the absence of nuclear protein. A double-stranded oligonucleotide spanning the SP1 site in the human SHBG promoter (FP12, -536/-510) was used as an unrelated competitor to demonstrate specificity.


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Southwestern blotting of nuclear factors binding to the (TAAAA)6 repeat element. Nuclear proteins from adult mouse liver, a mouse Sertoli cell line (MSC-1), and HeLa cells were separated on a denaturing SDS-PAGE gel, followed by transfer to a nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was incubated with a radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide spanning the six TAAAA pentanucleotide repeats in the 5' region of the human SHBG promoter. Migration of standards of known molecular mass is shown on the left.

The Number of TAAAA Repeats in the Human SHBG Upstream Promoter Varies and Influences Its Activity-- In view of reports that the number of TAAAA repeats in the promoters of other human genes varies among individuals (23), we amplified the region of the SHBG upstream promoter containing the TAAAA repeat sequence from eight healthy male volunteers. The sizes of the PCR products indicated that the number of TAAAA repeats is highly variable both within and between individuals (Fig. 7A), and we demonstrated that the repeat number ranges from 6 to 10 by sequencing them (Fig. 7B). The serum SHBG concentrations in these individuals (with respect to their (TAAAA)n allele genotypes) were as follows: 13 nmol/liter (6/10), 14 nmol/liter (6/6), 15 nmol/liter (7/7), 25 nmol/liter (7/8), 24 nmol/liter (6/8), 24 nmol/liter (6/7), 15 nmol/liter (6/8), and 23 nmol/liter (9/7). Although there was no obvious relationship between serum SHBG concentrations and the number of TAAAA repeats on each allele, an individual with two (TAAAA)6 containing SHBG alleles had a relatively low serum SHBG level. However, the number of individuals we have studied is small, and no attempt was made to control for factors that might otherwise influence serum SHBG levels, such as body mass index.


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Demonstration of a (TAAAA)n polymorphism in the human SHBG promoter. A illustrates the degree of polymorphism in the TAAAA repeat element in the 5' region of the human SHBG promoter within DNA samples from four individuals. This was accomplished by PCR amplification of this sequence using a forward primer within the alu sequence together with a reverse primer within the human SHBG promoter, and gives rise to an amplified product of 160 base pairs in samples with six repeats. B, the number of TAAAA repeats in SHBG alleles was confirmed by sequencing the resultant PCR products (T/A reactions are shown) obtained from 4 individuals (panel A). The sequence of the allele containing seven repeats on the right of the figure appears to contain an additional polymorphism in the A lane, but repeat sequencing has indicated that this is an artifact due to compression of the sequencing products.

The influence of this polymorphism on transcription was tested in the context of the full-length human SHBG promoter. We found that the activity of human SHBG promoter-luciferase reporter constructs in HepG2 cells increased 5-fold as the number of TAAAA repeats was increased from six to seven. As additional repeat sequences were added, little if any further increases in promoter activity were observed (Fig. 8). These increases in promoter activity associated with increasing repeats is strikingly similar to the increase observed when the (TAAAA)6 sequence is removed from the full-length promoter (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these data suggest that the silencing activity is associated specifically with the presence of only six TAAAA repeats. This was confirmed by performing similar experiments using full-length SHBG promoter sequences containing only four or five TAAAA repeats, which also provided ~5-fold higher levels of transcriptional activity when compared with the promoter sequence containing six repeats (Fig. 8).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Functionality of a (TAAAA)n polymorphism in the human SHBG promoter. HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with human SHBG promoter-luciferase reporter vectors containing varying numbers of TAAAA repeat elements corresponding to that observed in the general population. Transfection efficiency was corrected by co-transfection with pCMVLacZ control vector and measuring the resultant beta -galactosidase activity. The activities of the human SHBG reporter constructs containing the TAAAA repeat polymorphism are expressed relative to that of the promoterless pGL2 Basic luciferase reporter plasmid. Asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference when compared with the activity of a human SHBG promoter containing a (TAAAA)6 repeat. Data are represented as means ± S.E. from at least three experiments.

Nuclear Factor Binding to Various TAAAA Repeats-- To further examine nuclear factor binding in relation to the number of TAAAA repeats, we performed a UV cross-linking experiment with radiolabeled oligonucleotides representing the various numbers (6-10) of TAAAA repeats observed in the general population (Fig. 7), in the presence of mouse liver nuclear protein extracts (Fig. 9). This clearly demonstrated that the radiolabeled oligonucleotide containing six TAAAA repeats preferentially binds nuclear proteins, and the major complexes formed were 55-60 kDa in size (Fig. 9). Furthermore, the relative abundance of these complexes declined markedly when oligonucleotides containing more than six repeats were used, and this is consistent with the marked increase in transcriptional activity of promoters containing more than six TAAAA repeats (Fig. 8). The specificity of the complex formed using the TAAAA repeat oligonucleotide sequence was demonstrated by competition with unlabeled oligonucleotide, and the lack of complex formation in the presence of nuclear protein without exposure to UV light. In addition, exposure of radiolabeled oligonucleotides to UV did not result in the formation of any high molecular weight complexes in the absence of nuclear protein (data not shown). The size of the major UV cross-linked complexes is consistent with a complex between the oligonucleotide containing the six TAAAA repeats and the 46-kDa liver enriched protein identified as the TAAAA-binding protein by Southwestern blotting (Fig. 6).


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Nuclear factor binding to the TAAAA repeat element is dependent on repeat number. UV cross-linking of adult mouse liver nuclear proteins to radiolabeled probes spanning the TAAAA repeat element in the 5' region of the human SHBG promoter demonstrating differential nuclear factor binding to different numbers of TAAAA repeat elements. The migration of standards of known molecular size is shown on the left. No DNA-protein complexes were observed in the absence of UV light in the presence of nuclear protein or in the presence of UV light in the absence of nuclear protein (data not shown).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Blood levels of SHBG in humans are highly variable even between healthy individuals (6). To determine if this variability can be explained by a genetic polymorphism, we sequenced the first 300 nt of the human SHBG promoter from normal individuals and patients with various reproductive and endocrine disorders in a separate study, but found no significant deviations between sequences.2 By contrast, our studies of human SHBG promoter activity in HepG2 hepatoblastoma cells alerted our attention to a (TAAAA)6 repeat located within an alu-Sx sequence close to the 5' boundary of the transcription unit expressed in hepatocytes (9). This particular pentanucleotide repeat has been found to vary in number within the human cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme CYP11A1 promoter (23), and there is a strong association between alleles with this polymorphism and total serum testosterone levels in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome and hyperandrogenism (24). Since this (TAAAA)6 repeat appeared to have a silencing effect on SHBG promoter activity, we focused our attention on the possible factor(s) that might bind to it, and how it might function in concert with other elements in the upstream region of the human SHBG promoter to influence transcription.

The upstream region of the human SHBG promoter silences transcription in HepG2 cells, and most of this activity is associated with a region between FP16 and FP17, which includes the (TAAAA)6 repeat element. We have demonstrated that the (TAAAA)6 repeat is responsible for this silencing activity by removing it or by increasing the number of repeats according to the number observed in the general population. It is also clear that this activity is dependent on downstream promoter elements and appears to involve an SP1 nuclear factor-binding site within FP12. Although SP1 is generally considered to be an activator of transcription, it can participate in transcriptional silencing through interactions with other transcriptional regulators in a context-dependent manner (25, 26). This might explain why FP12 only appears to regulate SHBG promoter activity in association with upstream elements (FP16-FP17) within the promoter. Although our EMSA supershift data indicate that SP1 binds to FP12, we also observed that a second protein complex forms with a FP12 oligonucleotide, and this complex does not appear to be supershifted with an SP1-specific antiserum. It is therefore possible that FP12 interacts with another SP1-related factor, such as SP3 (27, 28), and this might be relevant because SP3 often acts as a negative regulator of transcription (29, 30). Furthermore, competition between SP3 and other SP1-related factors for a common site within promoter sequences alters their transcriptional activity (28).

Variations in the number of polynucleotide repeats within several other promoters have been reported to modulate transcription (31, 32) and have been linked to disease states (24, 31, 32). Although the number of (TAAAA)n repeats in the CYP11A1 promoter is closely associated with serum testosterone levels and might therefore reflect variations in the expression of the gene (24), it is not known whether this is due to an effect at the level of transcription. Differences in the number of an inverted (TTTTA)n repeat in the apolipoprotein(a) gene (APO(a)) promoter have also been associated with individual variations in plasma Lp(a) levels (33, 34). Furthermore, an APO(a) promoter containing nine TTTTA repeats is associated with low plasma Lp(a) levels, and has a 5-fold lower transcriptional activity in HepG2 cells, when compared with a promoter sequence containing eight TTTTA repeats from an individual with relatively high plasma levels of Lp(a) (35). The (TAAAA)n repeat found within the 5' region of the human SHBG promoter occurs frequently within the human genome (36) and is a common feature of repetitive elements such as alu sequences (37) and LINE elements (36). Close inspection of the pentanucleotide repeats in the CYP11A1 and APO(a) promoters by RepeatMasker (www.genome.washington.edu/uwgc/analysistools/repeatmasker.htm) indicates that they also flank Sp/q and Sg subfamilies of human alu sequences, respectively, and differences in the number of these repeats between individuals likely reflect an inherent instability of alu repetitive elements (38).

Unlike the (TA)n dinucleotide repeat in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 (UGT1A1) promoter, where increasing numbers of repeats are associated with decreased promoter activity (32), the activity of the human SHBG promoter is not linear with respect to TAAAA repeat number. Differences in the number of TTTTA repeats in the APO(a) promoter influence its transcriptional activity, but this has not been studied in any great detail (35). In particular, there is no information concerning the identity of proteins that might interact with these types of repeats, or how they influence gene transcription. In experiments presented here, silencing of the human SHBG promoter was only observed in the presence of six TAAAA repeats, and this correlated with the preferential binding of a liver-enriched 46-kDa nuclear factor to the (TAAAA)6 repeat element. Although alleles containing less than six TAAAA repeats were not observed in the limited group of individuals we examined, the activities of SHBG promoters containing four or five TAAAA repeats also lacked the silencing properties associated with the presence of six repeats. These data suggest that the 46-kDa factor that binds six TAAAA repeats with high affinity acts in concert with downstream elements within the human SHBG promoter to alter its transcriptional activity.

In summary, a (TAAAA)n repeat polymorphism within the human SHBG promoter has a marked effect on its transcriptional activity in vitro in HepG2 cells. This could contribute to individual differences in plasma SHBG levels and thereby influence the access of sex steroids to their target tissues. Furthermore, variations in the number of TAAAA repeats within regulatory regions of other human genes may contribute to inter-individual differences in gene expression. The genomic DNA samples we examined were from healthy male volunteers of various ethnic backgrounds, and the number of TAAAA repeat elements ranged from 6 to 10 in this limited group of subjects. Although there was no obvious relationship between the number of TAAAA repeat elements and the serum SHBG concentrations, the number of individuals examined is too small to draw any conclusions, especially as almost all of them were all bi-allelic for different numbers of TAAAA repeats. It is, however, important to appreciate that the ability of the (TAAAA)n polymorphism to influence the transcriptional activity of the human SHBG promoter as naked DNA in transient transfection experiments may not necessarily reflect its activity in the context of genomic DNA within a chromatin structure. It will therefore be important to conduct a carefully controlled clinical study to determine whether this polymorphism is associated with differences in plasma SHBG levels, and to determine whether specific alleles are associated with sex steroid hormone-dependent diseases and/or correlate with responses to various hormone treatments that influence plasma SHBG levels.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Siu-Pok Yee, Joe Torchia, and David Rodenhiser for their suggestions and help and Denise Power for secretarial assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by an operating grant (to G. L. H) and a studentship (to K. N. H) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: London Regional Cancer Center, 790 Commissioners Rd. E., London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada. Tel.: 519-685-8617; Fax: 519-685-8616; E-mail: ghammond@ uwo.ca.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 25, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104681200

2 G. L. Hammond, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin; nt, nucleotide(s); PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; DTT, dithiothreitol; Lp(a), lipoprotein (a).

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Siiteri, P. K., Murai, J. T., Hammond, G. L., Nisker, J. A., Raymoure, W. J., and Kuhn, R. W. (1982) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 38, 457-510
2. Hammond, G. L. (1990) Endocr. Rev. 11, 65-79
3. Anderson, D. C. (1974) Clin. Endocrinol. 3, 69-96
4. Lim, S. C., Caballero, A. E., Arora, S., Smakowski, P., Bashoff, E. M., Brown, F. M., Logerfo, F. W., Horton, E. S., and Veves, A. (1999) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 4159-4164
5. Skafar, D. F., Xu, R., Morales, J., Ram, J., and Sowers, J. R. (1997) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 3913-3918
6. Meikle, A. W., Stanish, W. M., Taylor, N., Edwards, C. Q., and Bishop, C. T. (1982) Metabolism 31, 6-9
7. Jaquish, C. E., Blangero, J., Haffner, S. M., Stern, M. P., and MacCluer, J. W. (1997) Metabolism 46, 988-991
8. Jänne, M., and Hammond, G. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 34105-34114
9. Jänne, M., Deol, H. K., Power, S. G. A., Yee, S.-P., and Hammond, G. L. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 123-136
10. Jänne, M., Hogeveen, K. N., Deol, H. K., and Hammond, G. L. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 4166-4174
11. Sharan, C., Hamilton, N. M., Parl, A. K., Singh, P. K., and Chaudhuri, G. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 265, 285-290
12. Norris, J., Fan, D., Aleman, C., Marks, J. R., Futreal, P. A., Wiseman, R. W., Iglehart, J. D., Deininger, P. L., and McDonnell, D. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22777-22782
13. Vansant, G., and Reynolds, W. F. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 8229-8233
14. Hammond, G. L., Underhill, D. A., Rykse, H. M., and Smith, C. L. (1989) Mol. Endocrinol. 3, 1869-1876
15. Tullius, T. D., Dombroski, B. A., Churchill, M. E. A., and Kam, L. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 155, 537-558
16. O'Halloran, T. V., Frantz, B., Shin, M. K., Ralston, D. M., and Wright, J. G. (1989) Cell 56, 119-129
17. Sierra, F. (1990) BioMethods: A Laboratory Guide to In Vitro Transcription , Birkhäuser Verlag, Berlin
18. Dignam, J. D., Lebovitz, R. M., and Roeder, R. G. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 1475-1488
19. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
20. Quandt, K., Frech, K., Karas, H., Wingender, E., and Werner, T. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4878-4884
21. Wingender, E., Chen, X., Hehl, R., Karas, H., Liebich, I., Matys, V., Meinhardt, T., Prüß, M., Reuter, I., and Schacherer, F. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 316-319
22. Khan, M. S., Knowles, B. B., Aden, D. P., and Rosner, W. (1981) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 53, 448-449
23. Durocher, F., Morissette, J., and Simard, J. (1998) Pharmacogenetics 8, 49-53
24. Gharani, N., Waterworth, D. M., Batty, S., White, D., Gilling-Smith, C., Conway, G. S., McCarthy, M., Franks, S., and Williamson, R. (1997) Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 397-402
25. Talianidis, I., Tambakaki, A., Toursounova, J., and Zannis, V. I. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 10298-10309
26. Shou, Y., Baron, S., and Poncz, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5716-5726
27. Hagen, G., Müller, S., Beato, M., and Suske, G. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 5519-5525
28. Hagen, G., Müller, S., Beato, M., and Suske, G. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3843-3851
29. De Luca, P., Majello, B., and Lania, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8533-8536
30. Ammanamanchi, S., and Brattain, M. G. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3348-3352
31. Yamada, N., Yamaya, M., Okinaga, S., Nakayama, K., Sekizawa, K., Shibahara, S., and Sasaki, H. (2000) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 187-195
32. Beutler, E., Gelbart, T., and Demina, A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 8170-8174
33. Mooser, V., Francesco, P. M., Bopp, S., Petho-Schramm, A., Guerra, R., Boerwinkle, E., Muller, E., Joachin, H., and Hobbs, H. H. (1995) Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 173-181
34. Valenti, K., Aveynier, E., Leaute, S., Laporte, F., and Hadjian, A. J. (1999) Atherosclerosis 147, 17-24
35. Wade, D. P., Clarke, J. G., Lindahl, G. E., Liu, A. C., Zysow, B. R., Meer, K., Schwartz, K., and Lawn, R. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 1369-1373
36. Kim, H.-S., and Crow, T. J. (1998) Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 83, 54-55
37. Millar, D. S., Paul, C. L., Molloy, P. L., and Clark, S. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 24893-24899
38. Mighell, A. J., Markham, A. F., and Robinson, P. A. (1997) FEBS Lett. 417, 1-5
39. Xie, M., Shao, G., Buyse, I. M., and Huang, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26360-26366
40. Prince, V. E., and Rigby, P. W. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 1803-1811


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Turk, P. Kopp, L. A. Colangelo, M. Urbanek, K. Wood, K. Liu, H. G. Skinner, and S. M. Gapstur
Associations of Serum Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) Levels with SHBG Gene Polymorphisms in the CARDIA Male Hormone Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2008; 167(4): 412 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. L. Yaspan, J. P. Breyer, Q. Cai, Q. Dai, J. B. Elmore, I. Amundson, K. M. Bradley, X.-O. Shu, Y.-T. Gao, W. D. Dupont, et al.
Haplotype Analysis of CYP11A1 Identifies Promoter Variants Associated with Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 67(12): 5673 - 5682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Ferk, N. Teran, and K. Gersak
The (TAAAA)n microsatellite polymorphism in the SHBG gene influences serum SHBG levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1031 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. I. Berndt, N. Chatterjee, W.-Y. Huang, S. J. Chanock, R. Welch, E. D. Crawford, and R. B. Hayes
Variant in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin Gene and the Risk of Prostate Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 165 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. L. Eriksson, M. Lorentzon, D. Mellstrom, L. Vandenput, C. Swanson, N. Andersson, G. L. Hammond, J. Jakobsson, A. Rane, E. S. Orwoll, et al.
SHBG Gene Promoter Polymorphisms in Men Are Associated with Serum Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Androgen and Androgen Metabolite Levels, and Hip Bone Mineral Density
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 5029 - 5037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. Nader, G. Raverot, A. Emptoz-Bonneton, H. Dechaud, M. Bonnay, E. Baudin, and M. Pugeat
Mitotane Has an Estrogenic Effect on Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin and Corticosteroid-Binding Globulin in Humans
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2165 - 2170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. Xita and A. Tsatsoulis
Fetal Programming of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome by Androgen Excess: Evidence from Experimental, Clinical, and Genetic Association Studies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2006; 91(5): 1660 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Ropponen, K. Aittomaki, V. Vihma, M. J. Tikkanen, and O. Ylikorkala
Effects of Oral and Transdermal Estradiol Administration on Levels of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin in Postmenopausal Women with and without a History of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3431 - 3434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
N. Xita, A. Tsatsoulis, I. Stavrou, and I. Georgiou
Association of SHBG gene polymorphism with menarche
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 11(6): 459 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Haiman, S. E. Riley, M. L. Freedman, V. W. Setiawan, D. V. Conti, and L. Le Marchand
Common Genetic Variation in the Sex Steroid Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) Gene and Circulating SHBG Levels among Postmenopausal Women: The Multiethnic Cohort
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2198 - 2204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Cousin, L. Calemard-Michel, H. Lejeune, G. Raverot, N. Yessaad, A. Emptoz-Bonneton, Y. Morel, and M. Pugeat
Influence of SHBG Gene Pentanucleotide TAAAA Repeat and D327N Polymorphism on Serum Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin Concentration in Hirsute Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 917 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. Xita, A. Tsatsoulis, A. Chatzikyriakidou, and I. Georgiou
Association of the (TAAAA)n Repeat Polymorphism in the Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) Gene with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Relation to SHBG Serum Levels
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5976 - 5980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P.-H. Ducluzeau, P. Cousin, E. Malvoisin, H. Bornet, H. Vidal, M. Laville, and M. Pugeat
Glucose-to-Insulin Ratio Rather than Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin and Adiponectin Levels Is the Best Predictor of Insulin Resistance in Nonobese Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3626 - 3631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. M. Selva, K. N. Hogeveen, K. Seguchi, F. Tekpetey, and G. L. Hammond
A Human Sex Hormone-binding Globulin Isoform Accumulates in the Acrosome during Spermatogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., November 15, 2002; 277(47): 45291 - 45298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/39/36383    most recent
M104681200v1
Right arrow