![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 39, 36383-36390, September 28, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Pharmacology & Toxicology and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Group in Fetal and Neonatal Health and Development, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada
Received for publication, May 22, 2001, and in revised form, July 24, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) is the major
sex steroid-binding protein in human plasma and is produced by the
liver. Plasma SHBG levels vary considerably between individuals and are influenced by hormonal, metabolic, and nutritional factors. We have now
found that a (TAAAA)n pentanucleotide repeat, located within an alu sequence at the 5' boundary of the
human SHBG promoter, influences its transcriptional
activity in association with downstream elements, including an
SP1-binding site. Furthermore, SHBG alleles within the
general population contain at least 6-10 TAAAA repeats, and the
transcriptional activity of a human SHBG promoter-luciferase reporter construct containing 6 TAAAA repeats was
significantly lower than for similar reporter constructs containing 7-10 TAAAA repeats when tested in human HepG2 hepatoblastoma cells. This difference in transcriptional activity reflected the preferential binding of a 46-kDa liver-enriched nuclear factor to an oligonucleotide containing 6 rather than 7-10 TAAAA repeats. Thus, a
(TAAAA)n element within the human
SHBG promoter influences transcriptional activity in HepG2
cells and may contribute to differences in plasma SHBG levels
between individuals.
Plasma sex hormone-binding globulin
(SHBG)1 binds testosterone
and estradiol with high affinity and selectivity, and regulates the
access of these sex steroids to their target tissues (1). Hepatocytes
are the primary site of plasma SHBG biosynthesis, and changes in the
blood levels of SHBG are influenced by hormonal, as well as metabolic
and nutritional status (2). Low serum SHBG levels are commonly found in
women with polycystic ovarian syndrome and disorders characterized by
androgen excess (3), and have been reported to be a prognostic
indicator for the onset of type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease
(4, 5). Low serum levels of SHBG are also inherited within families (6, 7), and associations between abnormal serum SHBG levels and disease
processes may therefore be obscured by genetic differences that
contribute to variations in human SHBG gene expression.
We have recently characterized two binding sites for HNF-4 and COUP-TF
within the human SHBG proximal promoter, which influence its
transcriptional activity in human HepG2 hepatoblastoma cells (8). In
particular, binding of HNF-4 to a TA-rich sequence close to the
transcription start site in liver cells appears to substitute for the
TATA-binding protein in the initiation of transcription (8). The
possible function of the second HNF-4 binding site in the
SHBG proximal promoter is not as clear, but it may
contribute to phylogenetic differences in the temporal and
tissue-specific expression of SHBG because it lies within a
region that is absent in the corresponding region of SHBG
genes in other mammalian species (8). Apart from this obvious
difference in SHBG promoter sequences between species, the
human and rodent SHBG promoters show a remarkable degree of
sequence conservation, which only begins to diverge at the boundary of
several alu sequences located at about By characterizing the upstream region of the human SHBG
promoter, we have now found that a (TAAAA)6 repeat within
an alu sequence binds a 46-kDa liver enriched nuclear
protein and acts to silence transcription. More importantly, the number
of TAAAA repeats at this location is highly variable between
individuals within the general population, and the transcriptional
activity of the SHBG promoter and the binding of nuclear
protein to this element are both directly related to the number of
TAAAA repeats.
In Vitro Footprinting--
In vitro
footprinting templates of human SHBG promoter upstream
regions were produced by digesting a human SHBG fragment
(14) with XhoI and XbaI. This released a 504-base
pair region of the SHBG promoter corresponding to
Reporter Plasmids--
Human SHBG promoter deletion
constructs were generated by amplifying a region from an
SHBG fragment (14) in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
This was done using a common reverse primer containing an
XbaI site (
Site-directed mutagenesis was accomplished using a pSELECT vector
containing the Cell Culture and Transfection--
All cell culture reagents
were from Life Technologies, Inc. (Burlington, Canada). Human HepG2
hepatoblastoma cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, and were transiently
transfected with human SHBG promoter-pGL2 reporter
constructs (1.2 µg) and pCMV LacZ (0.2 µg) using
LipofectAMINE® reagent (8). Cells were harvested 48 h
following transfection, and cell extracts were prepared by three cycles
of freezing and thawing for analysis of luciferase and
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSAs)--
Mouse liver
nuclear protein extracts (4 µg) were prepared (17), and then
incubated in EMSA buffer (2.5 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 50 mM NaCl,
6.25% glycerol, and 3 µg of poly(dI-dC)) on ice for 10 min in the
presence or absence of double-stranded competitor oligonucleotides
(Table II). The corresponding end-labeled oligonucleotide probes were
then added, and the binding reaction was allowed to proceed for 15 min
at room temperature. For antibody supershift assays, radiolabeled probe
was incubated with nuclear extract on ice for 15 min prior to addition
of either normal rabbit serum, or an antiserum specific to SP1 (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). Reactions were then
incubated for 15 min at room temperature before electrophoresis.
Nuclear proteins bound to radiolabeled oligonucleotides were separated from free probe by 5% PAGE, and the gel was dried and exposed to
Biomax MR film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) against an intensifying screen at Analysis of Nuclear Factor Binding to TAAAA Repeats by UV
Cross-linking--
Binding reactions of nuclear protein extracts to
double-stranded oligonucleotides comprising various TAAAA repeats
(Table II) were carried out under the same conditions used for EMSAs. After a 15-min incubation at room temperature, samples were exposed to
UV light (302 nm) at a distance of 10 cm for 15 min at 0 °C. Equal
volumes of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer were added, and
samples were heated at 95 °C for 5 min and subjected to SDS-PAGE
with 4 and 10% acrylamide in the stacking and resolving gels,
respectively. Gels were dried and exposed to x-ray film, as described above.
Southwestern Blot Analysis--
Nuclear proteins extracted from
MSC-1 mouse Sertoli cells and human HeLa cervical cancer cells (18), as
well as mouse liver (17), were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred
by electrophoresis onto a HybondTM ECLTM nitrocellulose membrane
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The membrane was washed three times for
45 min in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 2.5% Nonidet P-40, 5% milk
powder, and 0.1 mM DTT. It was then rinsed twice in binding
buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 40 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 8% glycerol, and 0.125%
milk powder). A radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide (250,000 cpm/ml) spanning the (TAAAA)6 sequence in the
SHBG upstream promoter (Table II) was added to the binding
solution containing 5 mM MgCl2 and 5 µg/ml poly(dI-dC), and was incubated with the membrane for 16 h at room temperature. The membrane was then washed in 50 mM Tris, pH
7.5, 150 mM NaCl and exposed to Biomax MR film, as
described above.
Analysis of the (TAAAA)n Repeat in the SHBG
Promoter--
Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood
leukocytes of healthy human volunteers (19). Amplification of the TAAAA
repeat region was accomplished using PCR with a forward primer
(5'-GCTTGAACTCGAGAGGCAG) within an alu sequence in the human
SHBG promoter (14), and a reverse primer
(5'-CAGGGCCTAAACAGTCTAGCAGT) corresponding to a sequence at Identification of Nuclear Factor-binding Sites within the Upstream
Region of the Human SHBG Promoter--
Putative binding sites for
nuclear proteins in the human SHBG upstream promoter were
demonstrated by in vitro footprinting using mouse liver
nuclear extracts (Fig. 1). One of these
footprints (FP17) contains a sequence (5'-TGATAGAGCAAGAC), which
resembles a CEBP
Interaction between SP1 and a double-stranded oligonucleotide
that included FP12 (nt Sequences in the Human SHBG Upstream Promoter Silence
Transcription--
The activity associated with the nuclear factor
binding sites identified by DNase I footprinting (represented by
boxes in Fig. 4A)
was investigated by adding them sequentially to a human SHBG
proximal promoter-luciferase reporter gene construct (8). These
constructs were used for transcriptional activity measurements in a
human hepatoblastoma cell line (HepG2) that produces SHBG (22). This
revealed that upstream sequences markedly reduce transcriptional
activity when compared with the activity of the proximal promoter (Fig.
4A). In particular, addition of sequences that include FP16,
as well as a putative CEBP Nuclear Factor Binding to a (TAAAA)6 Sequence in the
Human SHBG Promoter--
When tested in an EMSA, a radiolabeled
oligonucleotide comprising the (TAAAA)6 sequence interacted
with nuclear factor extracted from mouse liver and could be competed
for by unlabeled oligonucleotides spanning this repeat region, but not
with an unrelated DNA sequence (Fig. 5).
To further characterize the nuclear factor(s) binding at this
pentanucleotide repeat, a radiolabeled (TAAAA)6 repeat oligonucleotide sequence (Table II) was used as a probe for a Southwestern blot (Fig. 6). The
radiolabeled probe recognized a nuclear protein with an apparent
molecular mass of 46 kDa, which is enriched in mouse liver nuclear
extracts when compared with nuclear extracts from mouse MSC-1 Sertoli
cells or HeLa cells (Fig. 6). By contrast, a nuclear protein with a
molecular mass of ~67 kDa was recognized in all nuclear extracts and
likely represents a ubiquitous nuclear factor, which binds to this
sequence (Fig. 6).
The Number of TAAAA Repeats in the Human SHBG Upstream Promoter
Varies and Influences Its Activity--
In view of reports that the
number of TAAAA repeats in the promoters of other human genes varies
among individuals (23), we amplified the region of the SHBG
upstream promoter containing the TAAAA repeat sequence from eight
healthy male volunteers. The sizes of the PCR products indicated that
the number of TAAAA repeats is highly variable both within and between
individuals (Fig. 7A), and we
demonstrated that the repeat number ranges from 6 to 10 by sequencing
them (Fig. 7B). The serum SHBG concentrations in
these individuals (with respect to their
(TAAAA)n allele genotypes) were as follows: 13 nmol/liter (6/10), 14 nmol/liter (6/6), 15 nmol/liter (7/7), 25 nmol/liter (7/8), 24 nmol/liter (6/8), 24 nmol/liter (6/7), 15 nmol/liter (6/8), and 23 nmol/liter (9/7). Although there was no
obvious relationship between serum SHBG concentrations and the number
of TAAAA repeats on each allele, an individual with two
(TAAAA)6 containing SHBG alleles had a relatively low serum SHBG level. However, the number of individuals we
have studied is small, and no attempt was made to control for factors
that might otherwise influence serum SHBG levels, such as body mass
index.
The influence of this polymorphism on transcription was tested in the
context of the full-length human SHBG promoter. We found that the activity of human SHBG promoter-luciferase reporter
constructs in HepG2 cells increased 5-fold as the number of TAAAA
repeats was increased from six to seven. As additional repeat sequences were added, little if any further increases in promoter activity were
observed (Fig. 8). These increases in
promoter activity associated with increasing repeats is strikingly
similar to the increase observed when the (TAAAA)6 sequence
is removed from the full-length promoter (Fig. 4B). Taken
together, these data suggest that the silencing activity is associated
specifically with the presence of only six TAAAA repeats. This was
confirmed by performing similar experiments using full-length
SHBG promoter sequences containing only four or five TAAAA
repeats, which also provided ~5-fold higher levels of transcriptional
activity when compared with the promoter sequence containing six
repeats (Fig. 8).
Nuclear Factor Binding to Various TAAAA Repeats--
To further
examine nuclear factor binding in relation to the number of TAAAA
repeats, we performed a UV cross-linking experiment with radiolabeled
oligonucleotides representing the various numbers (6-10) of TAAAA
repeats observed in the general population (Fig. 7), in the presence of
mouse liver nuclear protein extracts (Fig. 9). This clearly demonstrated that the
radiolabeled oligonucleotide containing six TAAAA repeats
preferentially binds nuclear proteins, and the major complexes formed
were 55-60 kDa in size (Fig. 9). Furthermore, the relative abundance
of these complexes declined markedly when oligonucleotides containing
more than six repeats were used, and this is consistent with the marked
increase in transcriptional activity of promoters containing more than
six TAAAA repeats (Fig. 8). The specificity of the complex formed using
the TAAAA repeat oligonucleotide sequence was demonstrated by
competition with unlabeled oligonucleotide, and the lack of complex
formation in the presence of nuclear protein without exposure to UV
light. In addition, exposure of radiolabeled oligonucleotides to UV did
not result in the formation of any high molecular weight complexes in
the absence of nuclear protein (data not shown). The size of the major
UV cross-linked complexes is consistent with a complex between the
oligonucleotide containing the six TAAAA repeats and the 46-kDa liver
enriched protein identified as the TAAAA-binding protein by
Southwestern blotting (Fig. 6).
Blood levels of SHBG in humans are highly variable even between
healthy individuals (6). To determine if this variability can be
explained by a genetic polymorphism, we sequenced the first 300 nt of
the human SHBG promoter from normal individuals and patients
with various reproductive and endocrine disorders in a separate study,
but found no significant deviations between sequences.2 By contrast, our
studies of human SHBG promoter activity in HepG2 hepatoblastoma cells alerted our attention to a (TAAAA)6
repeat located within an alu-Sx sequence close to the 5'
boundary of the transcription unit expressed in hepatocytes (9). This
particular pentanucleotide repeat has been found to vary in number
within the human cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme
CYP11A1 promoter (23), and there is a strong association
between alleles with this polymorphism and total serum testosterone
levels in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome and
hyperandrogenism (24). Since this (TAAAA)6 repeat appeared
to have a silencing effect on SHBG promoter activity, we
focused our attention on the possible factor(s) that might bind to it,
and how it might function in concert with other elements in the
upstream region of the human SHBG promoter to influence transcription.
The upstream region of the human SHBG promoter silences
transcription in HepG2 cells, and most of this activity is associated with a region between FP16 and FP17, which includes the
(TAAAA)6 repeat element. We have demonstrated that the
(TAAAA)6 repeat is responsible for this silencing activity
by removing it or by increasing the number of repeats according to the
number observed in the general population. It is also clear that this
activity is dependent on downstream promoter elements and appears to
involve an SP1 nuclear factor-binding site within FP12. Although SP1 is generally considered to be an activator of transcription, it can participate in transcriptional silencing through interactions with
other transcriptional regulators in a context-dependent
manner (25, 26). This might explain why FP12 only appears to regulate SHBG promoter activity in association with upstream elements
(FP16-FP17) within the promoter. Although our EMSA supershift data
indicate that SP1 binds to FP12, we also observed that a second protein complex forms with a FP12 oligonucleotide, and this complex does not
appear to be supershifted with an SP1-specific antiserum. It is
therefore possible that FP12 interacts with another SP1-related factor,
such as SP3 (27, 28), and this might be relevant because SP3 often acts
as a negative regulator of transcription (29, 30). Furthermore,
competition between SP3 and other SP1-related factors for a common site
within promoter sequences alters their transcriptional activity
(28).
Variations in the number of polynucleotide repeats within several other
promoters have been reported to modulate transcription (31, 32) and
have been linked to disease states (24, 31, 32). Although the number of
(TAAAA)n repeats in the CYP11A1
promoter is closely associated with serum testosterone levels and might
therefore reflect variations in the expression of the gene (24), it is
not known whether this is due to an effect at the level of
transcription. Differences in the number of an inverted
(TTTTA)n repeat in the apolipoprotein(a) gene
(APO(a)) promoter have also been associated with individual variations in plasma Lp(a) levels (33, 34). Furthermore, an APO(a) promoter containing nine TTTTA repeats is associated
with low plasma Lp(a) levels, and has a 5-fold lower transcriptional activity in HepG2 cells, when compared with a promoter sequence containing eight TTTTA repeats from an individual with relatively high
plasma levels of Lp(a) (35). The (TAAAA)n repeat found within the 5' region of the human SHBG promoter occurs
frequently within the human genome (36) and is a common feature of
repetitive elements such as alu sequences (37) and LINE
elements (36). Close inspection of the pentanucleotide repeats in the
CYP11A1 and APO(a) promoters by RepeatMasker
(www.genome.washington.edu/uwgc/analysistools/repeatmasker.htm) indicates that they also flank Sp/q and Sg
subfamilies of human alu sequences, respectively, and
differences in the number of these repeats between individuals likely
reflect an inherent instability of alu repetitive elements
(38).
Unlike the (TA)n dinucleotide repeat in
the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 (UGT1A1) promoter, where
increasing numbers of repeats are associated with decreased promoter
activity (32), the activity of the human SHBG promoter is
not linear with respect to TAAAA repeat number. Differences in the
number of TTTTA repeats in the APO(a) promoter influence its
transcriptional activity, but this has not been studied in any great
detail (35). In particular, there is no information concerning the
identity of proteins that might interact with these types of repeats,
or how they influence gene transcription. In experiments presented
here, silencing of the human SHBG promoter was only observed
in the presence of six TAAAA repeats, and this correlated with the
preferential binding of a liver-enriched 46-kDa nuclear factor to the
(TAAAA)6 repeat element. Although alleles containing less
than six TAAAA repeats were not observed in the limited group of
individuals we examined, the activities of SHBG promoters
containing four or five TAAAA repeats also lacked the silencing
properties associated with the presence of six repeats. These data
suggest that the 46-kDa factor that binds six TAAAA repeats with high
affinity acts in concert with downstream elements within the human
SHBG promoter to alter its transcriptional activity.
In summary, a (TAAAA)n repeat polymorphism
within the human SHBG promoter has a marked effect on its
transcriptional activity in vitro in HepG2 cells. This could
contribute to individual differences in plasma SHBG levels and thereby
influence the access of sex steroids to their target tissues.
Furthermore, variations in the number of TAAAA repeats within
regulatory regions of other human genes may contribute to
inter-individual differences in gene expression. The genomic DNA
samples we examined were from healthy male volunteers of various ethnic
backgrounds, and the number of TAAAA repeat elements ranged from 6 to
10 in this limited group of subjects. Although there was no obvious
relationship between the number of TAAAA repeat elements and the serum
SHBG concentrations, the number of individuals examined is too small to
draw any conclusions, especially as almost all of them were all
bi-allelic for different numbers of TAAAA repeats. It is, however,
important to appreciate that the ability of the
(TAAAA)n polymorphism to influence the
transcriptional activity of the human SHBG promoter as naked
DNA in transient transfection experiments may not necessarily reflect
its activity in the context of genomic DNA within a chromatin
structure. It will therefore be important to conduct a carefully
controlled clinical study to determine whether this polymorphism is
associated with differences in plasma SHBG levels, and to determine
whether specific alleles are associated with sex steroid
hormone-dependent diseases and/or correlate with responses
to various hormone treatments that influence plasma SHBG levels.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
700 nt from the
human SHBG transcription start site (8). This likely represents a functional boundary within the promoter sequence because
human SHBG gene sequences containing only 803 nt of promoter sequence are expressed in a spatially and temporally appropriate manner
when introduced as transgenes into the mouse genome (9, 10). Although
the significance of repetitive elements within promoter sequences is
unclear, they may contain nuclear factor binding sites that contribute
to the regulation of transcription (11-13).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
803/
299 nt relative to the transcription start site in the liver
(8). This fragment was further digested with HaeIII or
HinfI, and the products (
803/
656 nt
XhoI-HaeIII,
735/
587 nt
HinfI-HinfI,
587/
362 nt
HinfI-HinfI,
541/
298 nt
HaeIII-XbaI) were cloned into the
EcoRV site of pBluescript (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) in the
correct orientation to permit labeling of the sense strand after
digestion with HindIII. The HindIII-digested
constructs were end-labeled with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase
I in the presence of [
-32P]dCTP and purified using a
NICKTM column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Baie d'Urfé,
Québec, Canada). Radiolabeled probes were released from the
plasmids by digestion with EcoRI and purified by 6%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). The DNase I footprinting
reactions with mouse liver nuclear extracts were carried out as
described previously (8). Hydroxy-radical footprinting with the same extracts was also performed using the
803/
656 nt
XhoI-HaeIII region of the human SHBG
promoter (15, 16). Mouse liver nuclear extracts were used in these and
other experiments to characterize and study the regulation of human
SHBG promoter activity because human SHBG
transgenes are expressed efficiently in mouse hepatocytes postnatally
(9, 10).
299) and forward primers (containing an
XhoI site) corresponding to various positions in the 5'
promoter region (Table I). These PCR
products were digested with XhoI and XbaI and
then subcloned into a pSP72 vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI)
containing the
299/+60 nt region of the human SHBG proximal promoter. The entire promoter sequences were then excised with
HindIII and XhoI and inserted into a pGL2 Basic
luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega).
Sequences of oligonucleotides used for deleting (A) or mutating (B)
human SHBG promoter sequence in the context of luciferase reporter
gene constructs
6TAAAA
oligonucleotide designed to remove the TAAAA sequence. Mutations
introduced into the FP12 SP1 binding site (
536/
510) (in bold) were
designed based upon a previous mutation in an SP1 consensus sequence
(39).
803/
299 nt region of the human SHBG
promoter, according to the Altered Sites manual (Promega). Mutated
sequences in pSELECT were removed by XhoI and
XbaI digestion and subcloned into the pSP72 vector
containing the
299/+60 nt region of the human SHBG
promoter, and the entire promoter sequences were then inserted into
pGL2 Basic, as described above. All PCR-generated and mutated sequences
were confirmed by DNA sequencing using a commercially available kit
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
-galactosidase activity. Luciferase units were divided by readings
obtained from a
-galactosidase assay to correct for efficiency of transfection.
80 °C.
651/
673
nt within the upstream promoter sequence. Amplified products were
separated by 10% PAGE followed by staining with ethidium bromide. The
number of TAAAA repeats was quantified by cloning PCR products in the
pCR®-BluntII-TOPO® vector (Invitrogen Corp.,
Carlsbad, CA) for sequencing. Serum samples from the same individuals
were also taken for measurements of SHBG concentrations using a
commercially available immunoradiometric assay kit (Orion Diagnostica,
Oulunsalo, Finland).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
binding site when examined by homology searches
using MatInspector (20) release 2.1. In addition, a sequence
(5'-GGGGGAGGAGT) within FP12 (nt
527/
517) resembles a consensus SP1
binding site (5'-GGGGCGGGG(C/T)) by analysis using the TRANSFAC data
base (21). A region containing six TAAAA repeats, which is resistant to
DNase I digestion in the presence or absence of nuclear protein, lies between FP16 and FP17 (Fig. 1), and the boundary of the footprint within the TAAAA repeat region was confirmed by hydroxy-radical footprinting with a mouse liver nuclear protein extract (Fig. 2).

View larger version (91K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
DNase I in vitro
footprinting of putative transcriptional regulatory elements in
the upstream region of the human SHBG promoter.
End-labeled fragments of the upstream region of the human
SHBG promoter were incubated with 0 µg (lane
2), 3 µg (lane 3), or 10 µg
(lane 4) of adult mouse liver nuclear extract
(NE) and subjected to digestion with DNase I. Digested
fragments were purified and analyzed by denaturing polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. A Maxam-Gilbert (G/A) sequencing reaction
(lane 1) was run as a size marker to define the
boundaries of the footprinted regions (FP7-FP17, shown by
brackets). The numbering of these footprints extends from
those identified previously in the SHBG proximal promoter
(8). A bracket is also used to define the boundary of a
(TAAAA)6 repeat element, which could not be digested by
DNase I in the absence (lane 2) or presence
(lanes 3 and 4) of nuclear
protein.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Hydroxy-radical footprinting of the TAAAA
repeat within the upstream region of the human SHBG
promoter. A radiolabeled
803/
656 fragment of the human
SHBG promoter was incubated in the absence (lane
2) or presence of 1 µg (lane 3) or 5 µg (lane 4) of mouse liver nuclear protein
extract (NE) and was then subjected to hydroxy-radical DNA
cleavage. The products were purified and separated on a denaturing 8%
polyacrylamide gel, alongside the products of a Maxam-Gilbert (G/A)
sequencing reaction as size marker (lane 1). The
(TAAAA)6 region and FP17 were protected from cleavage and
are shown in brackets.
536/
510) was confirmed by EMSA (Fig. 3A). The specificity of this
interaction was demonstrated by inhibition of DNA-protein complexes
using an oligonucleotide containing a known SP-1 binding site (Table
II). In addition, the major DNA-protein complex formed in an EMSA reaction was supershifted with an
SP1-specific antibody (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (72K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
A footprinted region (FP12) in the human
SHBG promoter (
536/
510) is an SP1 nuclear factor
binding site. A, end-labeled double-stranded
oligonucleotides spanning FP12 in the human SHBG promoter
were incubated with 2 µg of adult mouse liver nuclear extract in the
absence (lane 2) or presence of excess unlabeled
competitor oligonucleotides (lanes 3-8). Free
probe was separated from DNA-protein complexes by non-denaturing
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. An unlabeled oligonucleotide, which
includes the HNF4/COUP-TF binding site in FP3 of the human
SHBG promoter (8), was used to demonstrate specificity.
B, antibody supershift assays were performed by adding
normal rabbit serum (lane 2) or antisera against
SP1 (lane 3) during incubations of
double-stranded end-labeled oligonucleotides with mouse liver nuclear
proteins. Lane 1 is without nuclear
protein.
Sequences of oligonucleotides used in South-western blotting, UV
cross-linking experiments, and electrophoretic mobility shift
assays (EMSAs)
-32P]dCTP
(17). Mutations (in bold) introduced into FP12 (
536/
510) were based
upon a previous mutation that disrupts an SP1 recognition sequence
(39). Double-stranded oligonucleotides representing SP1 (40) and
HNF-4/COUP-TF (8) binding sites were used as reported by others.
-binding site within FP17 and the
intervening (TAAAA)6 sequence resulted in progressive and
significant reductions of promoter activity (Fig. 4A). The reduction of transcription by sequences at the 5' boundary of the
upstream promoter appeared to be associated specifically with the
(TAAAA)6 sequence because a 6-fold increase in
transcription was observed when it was removed from the full-length
promoter (Fig. 4B). It was also noted that mutation of the
SP1 binding site (Table II) within FP12, which prevents its interaction
with liver nuclear extracts in an EMSA (data not shown), also resulted in a similar increase in the transcriptional activity of the
full-length promoter (Fig. 4B). However, recovery of the
transcriptional activity of the full-length promoter was not further
enhanced by removal of TAAAA pentanucleotide repeat in combination with
a mutant SP1 binding site within FP12 (Fig. 4B). It is also
important to note that the presence of FP12 appears to have a negative
effect on transcription only in the context of upstream sequences
within the full-length promoter (Fig. 4A).

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Analysis of human SHBG
promoter activity in HepG2 cells. A, a series of
human SHBG promoter deletion constructs was generated and
transiently transfected into HepG2 cells. Regions of the human
SHBG promoter protected from DNase I digestion by
mouse liver nuclear proteins (represented as boxes) were
sequentially removed, and the effect of these nuclear factor binding
sites on promoter activity was assessed. B, the
transcriptional silencing activity of the (TAAAA)6 repeat
appears to require the presence of an SP1 site within FP12. Mutation of
FP12 to prevent SP1 binding (X) relieves the transcriptional
silencing of the (TAAAA)6 repeat. Transcriptional silencing
is also relieved when the (TAAAA)6 repeat is removed
(X), irrespective of an intact SP1 site within FPIZ. The
activities of the human SHBG reporter constructs are
expressed relative to that of the promoterless pGL2 Basic luciferase
reporter plasmid (Luc). In panel A,
statistically significant differences were p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.001 (**) when compared with the activity
of the
299/+60 human SHBG promoter. In panel
B, statistically significant differences were
p < 0.001 (***) when compared with the full-length
(
803/+60) human SHBG promoter. Data are represented as
means + S.E. from at least three experiments.

View larger version (85K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
A (TAAAA)6 repeat in the human
SHBG promoter interacts with a protein from mouse
liver nuclear extract. Radiolabeled oligonucleotides spanning the
(TAAAA)6 repeat in the human SHBG promoter were
incubated with 4 µg of adult mouse liver nuclear extract in the
absence (lane 2) or presence of excess unlabeled
competitor oligonucleotides (lanes 3-6). Free
probe was separated from DNA-protein complexes by non-denaturing
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Lane 1 represents the radiolabeled probe in the absence of nuclear protein. A
double-stranded oligonucleotide spanning the SP1 site in the human
SHBG promoter (FP12,
536/
510) was used as an unrelated
competitor to demonstrate specificity.

View larger version (78K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Southwestern blotting of nuclear factors
binding to the (TAAAA)6 repeat element. Nuclear
proteins from adult mouse liver, a mouse Sertoli cell line (MSC-1), and
HeLa cells were separated on a denaturing SDS-PAGE gel, followed by
transfer to a nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was incubated with a
radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide spanning the six TAAAA
pentanucleotide repeats in the 5' region of the human SHBG
promoter. Migration of standards of known molecular mass is shown on
the left.

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Demonstration of a
(TAAAA)n polymorphism in the human
SHBG promoter. A illustrates the
degree of polymorphism in the TAAAA repeat element in the 5' region of
the human SHBG promoter within DNA samples from four
individuals. This was accomplished by PCR amplification of this
sequence using a forward primer within the alu sequence
together with a reverse primer within the human SHBG
promoter, and gives rise to an amplified product of 160 base pairs in
samples with six repeats. B, the number of TAAAA repeats in
SHBG alleles was confirmed by sequencing the resultant PCR
products (T/A reactions are shown) obtained from 4 individuals
(panel A). The sequence of the allele containing
seven repeats on the right of the figure appears to contain
an additional polymorphism in the A lane, but
repeat sequencing has indicated that this is an artifact due to
compression of the sequencing products.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Functionality of a
(TAAAA)n polymorphism in the human
SHBG promoter. HepG2 cells were transiently
transfected with human SHBG promoter-luciferase
reporter vectors containing varying numbers of TAAAA repeat elements
corresponding to that observed in the general population. Transfection
efficiency was corrected by co-transfection with pCMVLacZ control
vector and measuring the resultant
-galactosidase activity. The
activities of the human SHBG reporter constructs containing
the TAAAA repeat polymorphism are expressed relative to that of the
promoterless pGL2 Basic luciferase reporter plasmid.
Asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant
(p < 0.001) difference when compared with the activity
of a human SHBG promoter containing a (TAAAA)6 repeat. Data
are represented as means ± S.E. from at least three
experiments.

View larger version (93K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Nuclear factor binding to the TAAAA repeat
element is dependent on repeat number. UV cross-linking of adult
mouse liver nuclear proteins to radiolabeled probes spanning the TAAAA
repeat element in the 5' region of the human SHBG promoter
demonstrating differential nuclear factor binding to different numbers
of TAAAA repeat elements. The migration of standards of known molecular
size is shown on the left. No DNA-protein complexes were
observed in the absence of UV light in the presence of nuclear protein
or in the presence of UV light in the absence of nuclear protein (data
not shown).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Siu-Pok Yee, Joe Torchia, and David Rodenhiser for their suggestions and help and Denise Power for secretarial assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by an operating grant (to G. L. H) and a studentship (to K. N. H) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: London Regional Cancer
Center, 790 Commissioners Rd. E., London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada.
Tel.: 519-685-8617; Fax: 519-685-8616; E-mail: ghammond@ uwo.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 25, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104681200
2 G. L. Hammond, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin; nt, nucleotide(s); PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; DTT, dithiothreitol; Lp(a), lipoprotein (a).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Siiteri, P. K., Murai, J. T., Hammond, G. L., Nisker, J. A., Raymoure, W. J., and Kuhn, R. W. (1982) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 38, 457-510 |
| 2. | Hammond, G. L. (1990) Endocr. Rev. 11, 65-79 |
| 3. | Anderson, D. C. (1974) Clin. Endocrinol. 3, 69-96 |
| 4. | Lim, S. C., Caballero, A. E., Arora, S., Smakowski, P., Bashoff, E. M., Brown, F. M., Logerfo, F. W., Horton, E. S., and Veves, A. (1999) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 4159-4164 |
| 5. | Skafar, D. F., Xu, R., Morales, J., Ram, J., and Sowers, J. R. (1997) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 3913-3918 |
| 6. | Meikle, A. W., Stanish, W. M., Taylor, N., Edwards, C. Q., and Bishop, C. T. (1982) Metabolism 31, 6-9 |
| 7. | Jaquish, C. E., Blangero, J., Haffner, S. M., Stern, M. P., and MacCluer, J. W. (1997) Metabolism 46, 988-991 |
| 8. | Jänne, M., and Hammond, G. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 34105-34114 |
| 9. | Jänne, M., Deol, H. K., Power, S. G. A., Yee, S.-P., and Hammond, G. L. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 123-136 |
| 10. | Jänne, M., Hogeveen, K. N., Deol, H. K., and Hammond, G. L. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 4166-4174 |
| 11. | Sharan, C., Hamilton, N. M., Parl, A. K., Singh, P. K., and Chaudhuri, G. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 265, 285-290 |
| 12. | Norris, J., Fan, D., Aleman, C., Marks, J. R., Futreal, P. A., Wiseman, R. W., Iglehart, J. D., Deininger, P. L., and McDonnell, D. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22777-22782 |
| 13. | Vansant, G., and Reynolds, W. F. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 8229-8233 |
| 14. | Hammond, G. L., Underhill, D. A., Rykse, H. M., and Smith, C. L. (1989) Mol. Endocrinol. 3, 1869-1876 |
| 15. | Tullius, T. D., Dombroski, B. A., Churchill, M. E. A., and Kam, L. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 155, 537-558 |
| 16. | O'Halloran, T. V., Frantz, B., Shin, M. K., Ralston, D. M., and Wright, J. G. (1989) Cell 56, 119-129 |
| 17. | Sierra, F. (1990) BioMethods: A Laboratory Guide to In Vitro Transcription , Birkhäuser Verlag, Berlin |
| 18. | Dignam, J. D., Lebovitz, R. M., and Roeder, R. G. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 1475-1488 |
| 19. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 20. | Quandt, K., Frech, K., Karas, H., Wingender, E., and Werner, T. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4878-4884 |
| 21. | Wingender, E., Chen, X., Hehl, R., Karas, H., Liebich, I., Matys, V., Meinhardt, T., Prüß, M., Reuter, I., and Schacherer, F. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 316-319 |
| 22. | Khan, M. S., Knowles, B. B., Aden, D. P., and Rosner, W. (1981) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 53, 448-449 |
| 23. | Durocher, F., Morissette, J., and Simard, J. (1998) Pharmacogenetics 8, 49-53 |
| 24. | Gharani, N., Waterworth, D. M., Batty, S., White, D., Gilling-Smith, C., Conway, G. S., McCarthy, M., Franks, S., and Williamson, R. (1997) Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 397-402 |
| 25. | Talianidis, I., Tambakaki, A., Toursounova, J., and Zannis, V. I. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 10298-10309 |
| 26. | Shou, Y., Baron, S., and Poncz, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5716-5726 |
| 27. | Hagen, G., Müller, S., Beato, M., and Suske, G. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 5519-5525 |
| 28. | Hagen, G., Müller, S., Beato, M., and Suske, G. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3843-3851 |
| 29. | De Luca, P., Majello, B., and Lania, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8533-8536 |
| 30. | Ammanamanchi, S., and Brattain, M. G. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3348-3352 |
| 31. | Yamada, N., Yamaya, M., Okinaga, S., Nakayama, K., Sekizawa, K., Shibahara, S., and Sasaki, H. (2000) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 187-195 |
| 32. | Beutler, E., Gelbart, T., and Demina, A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 8170-8174 |
| 33. | Mooser, V., Francesco, P. M., Bopp, S., Petho-Schramm, A., Guerra, R., Boerwinkle, E., Muller, E., Joachin, H., and Hobbs, H. H. (1995) Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 173-181 |
| 34. | Valenti, K., Aveynier, E., Leaute, S., Laporte, F., and Hadjian, A. J. (1999) Atherosclerosis 147, 17-24 |
| 35. | Wade, D. P., Clarke, J. G., Lindahl, G. E., Liu, A. C., Zysow, B. R., Meer, K., Schwartz, K., and Lawn, R. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 1369-1373 |
| 36. | Kim, H.-S., and Crow, T. J. (1998) Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 83, 54-55 |
| 37. | Millar, D. S., Paul, C. L., Molloy, P. L., and Clark, S. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 24893-24899 |
| 38. | Mighell, A. J., Markham, A. F., and Robinson, P. A. (1997) FEBS Lett. 417, 1-5 |
| 39. | Xie, M., Shao, G., Buyse, I. M., and Huang, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26360-26366 |
| 40. | Prince, V. E., and Rigby, P. W. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 1803-1811 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Turk, P. Kopp, L. A. Colangelo, M. Urbanek, K. Wood, K. Liu, H. G. Skinner, and S. M. Gapstur Associations of Serum Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) Levels with SHBG Gene Polymorphisms in the CARDIA Male Hormone Study Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2008; 167(4): 412 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Yaspan, J. P. Breyer, Q. Cai, Q. Dai, J. B. Elmore, I. Amundson, K. M. Bradley, X.-O. Shu, Y.-T. Gao, W. D. Dupont, et al. Haplotype Analysis of CYP11A1 Identifies Promoter Variants Associated with Breast Cancer Risk Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 67(12): 5673 - 5682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ferk, N. Teran, and K. Gersak The (TAAAA)n microsatellite polymorphism in the SHBG gene influences serum SHBG levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1031 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Berndt, N. Chatterjee, W.-Y. Huang, S. J. Chanock, R. Welch, E. D. Crawford, and R. B. Hayes Variant in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin Gene and the Risk of Prostate Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 165 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Eriksson, M. Lorentzon, D. Mellstrom, L. Vandenput, C. Swanson, N. Andersson, G. L. Hammond, J. Jakobsson, A. Rane, E. S. Orwoll, et al. SHBG Gene Promoter Polymorphisms in Men Are Associated with Serum Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Androgen and Androgen Metabolite Levels, and Hip Bone Mineral Density J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 5029 - 5037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nader, G. Raverot, A. Emptoz-Bonneton, H. Dechaud, M. Bonnay, E. Baudin, and M. Pugeat Mitotane Has an Estrogenic Effect on Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin and Corticosteroid-Binding Globulin in Humans J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2165 - 2170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Xita and A. Tsatsoulis Fetal Programming of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome by Androgen Excess: Evidence from Experimental, Clinical, and Genetic Association Studies J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2006; 91(5): 1660 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ropponen, K. Aittomaki, V. Vihma, M. J. Tikkanen, and O. Ylikorkala Effects of Oral and Transdermal Estradiol Administration on Levels of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin in Postmenopausal Women with and without a History of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3431 - 3434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Xita, A. Tsatsoulis, I. Stavrou, and I. Georgiou Association of SHBG gene polymorphism with menarche Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 11(6): 459 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Haiman, S. E. Riley, M. L. Freedman, V. W. Setiawan, D. V. Conti, and L. Le Marchand Common Genetic Variation in the Sex Steroid Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) Gene and Circulating SHBG Levels among Postmenopausal Women: The Multiethnic Cohort J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2198 - 2204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cousin, L. Calemard-Michel, H. Lejeune, G. Raverot, N. Yessaad, A. Emptoz-Bonneton, Y. Morel, and M. Pugeat Influence of SHBG Gene Pentanucleotide TAAAA Repeat and D327N Polymorphism on Serum Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin Concentration in Hirsute Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 917 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Xita, A. Tsatsoulis, A. Chatzikyriakidou, and I. Georgiou Association of the (TAAAA)n Repeat Polymorphism in the Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) Gene with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Relation to SHBG Serum Levels J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5976 - 5980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-H. Ducluzeau, P. Cousin, E. Malvoisin, H. Bornet, H. Vidal, M. Laville, and M. Pugeat Glucose-to-Insulin Ratio Rather than Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin and Adiponectin Levels Is the Best Predictor of Insulin Resistance in Nonobese Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3626 - 3631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Selva, K. N. Hogeveen, K. Seguchi, F. Tekpetey, and G. L. Hammond A Human Sex Hormone-binding Globulin Isoform Accumulates in the Acrosome during Spermatogenesis J. Biol. Chem., November 15, 2002; 277(47): 45291 - 45298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||