|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104326200 on August 2, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 40, 37230-37236, October 5, 2001
Deletion of Specific Glycan Chains Affects Differentially the
Stability, Local Structures, and Activity of Lecithin-cholesterol
Acyltransferase*
Jeffrey
Kosman and
Ana
Jonas
From the Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine at
Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Received for publication, May 14, 2001, and in revised form, July 18, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The enzymatic and interfacial binding activity of
lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) is affected differentially
by the location and extent of its glycosylation. Two LCAT
glycosylation-deficient mutants, N84Q and N384Q, were constructed,
permanently expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, and
purified to determine the effects of deleting individual glycan chains
on its stability, structure, and function. These purified mutants were
studied by spectroscopic structural methods and enzymatic and binding
assays to develop a molecular rationale for the relationship between LCAT glycosylation and activity. The N84Q LCAT mutant did not possess
measurable enzymatic activity or interfacial binding affinity for
reconstituted high-density lipoproteins. In addition, in thermal and
chemical denaturation studies, N84Q LCAT was found to be significantly less stable than wild-type LCAT. The N384Q variant was initially more
enzymatically active than wild-type LCAT, but gradually lost activity
within months; however, it retained full interfacial binding activity.
Significant changes were detected over time by circular dichroism in
the -helical content of N384Q LCAT and in the -sheet content of
N84Q LCAT, compared with wild-type LCAT. Fluorescence measurements with
the probe 1-anilinonapthalene-8-sulfonate suggested an alteration of
the active site cavity in both mutants. In conclusion, both mutants
lost catalytic activity, N84Q shortly after purification and N384Q more
gradually, and were destabilized, probably because the deletion of the
glycan chains altered local structural elements near the active site
cavity and/or the interfacial binding regions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase
(LCAT)1 is the enzyme
responsible for the generation of the majority of the cholesterol esters present in human plasma. The conversion of cholesterol to
cholesterol esters is necessary to facilitate reverse cholesterol transport, the process which removes excess cholesterol and
phospholipids from peripheral cells and delivers them to the liver for
disposal (1). The LCAT reaction occurs primarily on the surface of
high-density lipoproteins (HDL), which contains phospholipids,
cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I). Although no crystal
structure exists for LCAT, the study of its structure-function
relationships has been facilitated by the construction of a computer
model of the catalytic core of LCAT (2-6). Based on its amino acid
composition alone, LCAT has an intermediate hydrophobicity between
integral membrane proteins and apolipoproteins (7). One modification commonly found in plasma proteins, including LCAT, that increases their
solubility and hydrophilicity is glycosylation.
Four N-linked complex type glycans and two
O-linked glycans are found in LCAT (8, 9) and constitute
around 20% of the total enzyme mass of human plasma LCAT (10).
Different cell types transfected with the human LCAT gene express the
glycan structure of LCAT differently (11, 12), which leads to
disparities between recombinant preparations of LCAT. Chinese hamster
ovary (CHO) cells express LCAT bearing a similar glycosylation pattern to plasma LCAT (12), making this cell type a preferred recombinant host. The polar glycan chains help solubilize LCAT and prevent it from
aggregating; however, glycosylation is known to have a variety of
additional effects on other proteins, including regulation of
intracellular processing, induction and stabilization of protein folding, determination of binding affinity, and modulation of enzymatic
activity. While the removal of certain glycan chains has no detectable
effect on some glycoproteins, the removal of others may modify any or
all of the functions listed above. Because the effects of removing one
or more glycan chains from glycoproteins cannot be predicted or
generalized from the available examples, each glycoprotein represents a
unique system for the investigation of structure-function interactions.
The individual glycans of LCAT have been investigated by other
laboratories to determine their role in LCAT function. Two of the
glycosylation-deficient mutants, N20Q and N272Q, were similar to WT
LCAT in enzymatic activity. However, the N84Q mutant retained little
activity compared with WT LCAT, whereas the N384Q mutant was twice as
active as WT (13-16). These studies involved recombinant LCAT present
in cell media; purified mutants of LCAT are required to study
structure-function relationships and to clarify some of the ambiguity
regarding the effects of glycosylation on LCAT activity. In particular,
determination of the reasons for the decrease of activity in the N84Q
mutant and the increase of activity in the N384Q mutant may uncover
significant facts regarding the catalytic mechanism of LCAT. Therefore,
the goals of this study were to elucidate the effects of the deletion
of glycan chains at positions Asn84 and
Asn384 in purified LCAT, using several experimental
approaches to determine differences between the glycosylation-deficient
mutants and WT LCAT in enzymatic activity, interfacial binding, and
structure and stability.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Construction of LCAT Glycosylation Mutants--
Asparagine
residues 84 and 384 were altered to glutamine to prevent glycosylation
at those sites. Mutagenic primers were constructed by the Genetic
Engineering Facility at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
The sequence of the N84Q mutagenic primer was: 5'-GGTTGTCTACCAGCGGAGCTCCGGACTCGTGTCCAAC-3',
which also introduced a BspEI restriction site. The N384Q
mutagenic primer was:
5'-GGTCTTCAGCCAGCTGACGCTGGAG-3', which
introduced a PvuII restriction site. Underlined bases are those changed from the human LCAT sequence. The QuikChange
Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) was employed to generate the
LCAT mutants (17), which were subcloned into the pSVDNA expression vector, described by Lee et al. (18). Constructs were
sequenced by the Genetic Engineering Facility.
Expression and Purification of LCAT Glycosylation
Mutants--
Overexpression of the LCAT glycosylation mutants was
carried out in dhfr CHO cells as described by Jin et
al. (19). Cells were stably transfected by the calcium phosphate
method. The selective pressure of increasing methotrexate
concentrations in cell medium produced concomitant amplification of
both dhfr and LCAT genes in the cells. Colonies
overexpressing LCAT were isolated and the level of expression was
analyzed by Western blotting (17). Eventually, cell lines expressing
2.5 mg/liter of cell medium of N84Q LCAT and 5.0 mg/liter of cell
medium of N384Q LCAT were produced. WT LCAT (10 mg/liter) was expressed
by a CHO cell line generated by an identical procedure by Jin et
al. (19).
Purification of WT LCAT and the glycosylation mutants was carried out
(19) over phenyl-Sepharose and Affi-Gel Blue columns. Protein
concentration was determined by A280 and purity
was evaluated on Coomassie or silver-stained SDS-PAGE Phast gels
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Pure protein fractions were concentrated
and dialyzed into storage buffer of 10 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.6, and were stored on ice, in capped plastic
tubes under nitrogen. Irreversible aggregation of LCAT was monitored by
nondenaturing Phast gels and by Western blots.
Enzymatic Assays--
Acyltransferase assays for LCAT were
performed as described previously (18) with a minor modification.
Because of the relative inactivity of the LCAT mutants, up to 10 times
more mutant LCAT was used than WT LCAT in order to obtain kinetic data
of sufficient accuracy.
LCAT esterase assays were performed based on the procedures of Bonelli
and Jonas (20). For the same reason as in the acyltransferase assays,
samples required higher mutant LCAT concentrations to obtain measurable
activity. However, in neither enzymatic assay did the mutant LCAT
concentration exceed that which would induce aggregation. Irreversible
aggregation is observed at concentrations greater than 0.5 mg/ml of
pure WT LCAT (19).
Interfacial Binding to rHDL--
The surface plasmon
resonance method was used to measure the interfacial binding kinetics
of LCAT with reconstituted HDL particles (rHDL). These particles were
prepared as described in previous work (21) except that cholesterol was
not included and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl phosphatidylcholine (POPC) was
substituted for egg phosphatidylcholine. Thus, the molar ratio of the
components of rHDL was 99:0.7:1 of POPC (Sigma)/Cap-Biotinylated
dipalmitoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (Avanti Polar
Lipids)/apolipoprotein A-I (purified from human plasma). Control
dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) rHDL were made in the same
proportions, substituting DPPC for POPC. The small proportions of
biotinylated lipid used did not interfere with any properties of the
rHDL (21). The incorporation of biotinylated lipid was later determined
by the Pierce Biotinylation Kit to be 1.1 mol of biotin/mol of rHDL.
The lack of cholesterol and the ambient temperature used in these
experiments (25 °C) ensured that little or no enzymatic activity
took place on the rHDL during the short exposure time to LCAT.
Association and dissociation rates of LCAT on the immobilized rHDL were
measured on a Biacore 3000 instrument (Biacore, Inc.) maintained by the
Immunological Resources Center (University of Illinois, Urbana, IL).
The SA (streptavidin) chip (Biacore) was used to immobilize the
biotin-labeled rHDL. Biotinylated POPC and DPPC rHDL were injected
through separate flow cells until around 900 response units of mass had
bound to each cell. LCAT does not bind appreciably to DPPC rHDL under
the present reaction conditions, so a flow cell coated with this
particle provides a negative control for POPC rHDL binding. LCAT was
diluted to 2 µM to 62 nM and passed though
the cells using KINJECT mode at 30 µl/min, for 1 min contact time,
and 5 min dissociation time (21). LCAT dissociated from rHDL completely
during the dissociation period, making regeneration of the surface
unnecessary. Corrected sensorgrams were analyzed by Biacore evaluation
software, using the algorithm for a 1:1 Langmuir binding isotherm with
global fitting kinetics, compensated for drifting baseline. Finally, a
mass transfer control experiment was performed, verifying that binding
constants were independent of flow rate.
Thermal Denaturation--
Thermal denaturation experiments were
performed by determining enzymatic activity as a function of
temperature. Purified LCAT is not stable at temperatures above 4 °C,
and does not retain activity for long at temperatures above 37 °C.
However, LCAT in plasma or cell media is much more stable and can be
used to judge the relative stability of WT compared with mutant enzymes
as a function of temperature. Aliquots of cell media were incubated in
water baths from 37 to 55 °C for 1 h prior to use in the assay. The decrease in percent conversion of substrate was assumed to correspond to enzyme denaturation. Denaturation curves and the TM, or midpoint of denaturation, were calculated by
Origin software.
Circular Dichroism and Fluorescence Measurements--
All
circular dichroism (CD) measurements were performed on a Jasco J-720
spectropolarimeter using parameters given previously (19). Pure LCAT
samples (0.05 mg/ml) contained progressively increasing concentrations
of the chemical denaturant guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl).
Spectra were analyzed by the SELCON 3 algorithm. The intrinsic
fluorescence of LCAT due mostly to tryptophan residues was also
measured as described previously (19). All LCAT samples were identical
to those used in CD measurements.
ANS Fluorescence--
The fluorescent probe
1-anilinonapthalene-8-sulfonate (ANS) (Molecular Probes) increases in
quantum yield and blue shifts upon binding to a hydrophobic protein
site. Thus, ANS is a useful indicator of hydrophobic regions in a
protein accessible to the probe. A common application of ANS is the
detection of folding intermediates or unfolded states of a protein
(22). In this case, it is used to assess qualitatively the differences
in structure between WT LCAT and the glycosylation mutants.
Experimental conditions were modeled after studies on apoA-I (22). LCAT
was added to a 1-cm path length fluorescent cuvette at a concentration
of 0.05 mg/ml. ANS was dissolved in methanol as a 5 mg/ml solution. To ensure complete saturation of available binding sites, ANS was added in
a 100-fold molar excess over LCAT. The fluorometer was a PerkinElmer
Life Sciences LS-50B set to the following parameters: emission slit, 5 nm; excitation slit, 5 nm; excitation wavelength 395 nm; emission scan
range, 405-560 nm; scan speed 200 nm/min; and 8 accumulations. In
addition, carbonic anhydrase (Sigma) was tested at the same
concentration and conditions as LCAT as an example of a globular
protein that has very little affinity for ANS.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of LCAT Glycosylation Mutants--
The
glycosylation mutants of LCAT were examined in terms of their purity,
molecular mass, and tendency toward aggregation. The peak of spectral
mass (Protein Sciences Facility, University of Illinois) for WT LCAT
was 58.0 kDa, N84Q LCAT was 56.2 kDa, and N384Q LCAT was 57.0 kDa as
determined by mass spectrometry analysis. This decrease in mass
observed in the two mutants corresponds closely to the theoretical
decrease for loss of a triantennary and biantennary complex-type
N-linked glycan chain, respectively. Thus, the predominant
glycan chain structure is similar at these two sites between
CHO-expressed LCAT and human LCAT (8). Similar relative masses were
observed using SDS-PAGE gels and high molecular weight markers (Fig.
1A). This gel also shows the
high degree of purity (>95%) of the WT and mutant LCAT preparations.
Gels, after eight months of storage of the LCAT variants, gave
identical results.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Characterization of purified LCAT
variants. A, SDS-PAGE, Coomassie stained, showing the
purified recombinant LCAT species. Lane 1, molecular weight
protein standards; lane 2, WT LCAT; lane 3, N84Q
mutant; lane 4, N384Q mutant. Note the slight differences in
migration due to the distinct glycosylation states. B,
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of purified LCAT variants. Different
amounts of each LCAT species were used to attain comparable band
intensities. Lanes 1 and 4, WT LCAT (16 ng);
lane 2, N84Q mutant (80 µg); lane 3, N384Q
mutant (80 ng). C, native, Coomassie-stained 12.5%
polyacrylamide gel showing the LCAT bands near the 67-kDa molecular
marker. No aggregated, high molecular bands are present. Lane
1, WT LCAT; lane 2, N84Q mutant; lane 3,
N384Q mutant; lane 4, molecular weight (Stokes radius)
protein standards.
|
|
Fig. 1B shows Western blots of the purified LCAT variants
adjusted in the mass applied to the gel to give comparable staining intensity. Evidently the N84Q mutant is about 500-fold less
immunoreactive than WT LCAT, and the N384Q mutant is about 5-fold less
reactive. This illustrates the importance and specificity of
glycosylation in the expression of glycoprotein epitopes.
The aggregation tendencies of the two LCAT mutants did not differ
significantly from that of WT LCAT, as tested by native, nondenaturing
PAGE (Fig. 1C). At the concentrations used for storage and
for these experiments (<0.35 mg/ml), no aggregation was detected for
any of the LCAT species. Concentrations in excess of 0.5 mg/ml WT LCAT
have been shown in the past to result in irreversible aggregation
(19).
Enzymatic Activity--
The acyltransferase assay is an important
tool for the characterization of the LCAT reaction, for it encompasses
all steps of LCATs enzymatic reaction with a physiologically relevant
substrate, the rHDL, and reflects the interfacial binding affinity for
rHDL in the apparent Km value. Analysis of the
results of the acyltransferase assay using a Lineweaver-Burk plot
allowed calculation of the apparent kcat and
Km of LCAT (Table I).
The deletion of glycan chains Asn84 or Asn384
resulted in a relatively rapid loss of activity for both
glycosylation-deficient mutants. Interestingly, N84Q LCAT was inactive
immediately following its purification from cell media, whereas freshly
purified N384Q LCAT initially possessed higher activity than WT LCAT,
but lost activity steadily over the course of months. The decrease in
N384Q activity with time is shown as a percentage of WT LCAT activity in Fig. 2. Shortly after purification,
N384Q was about 50% more active than WT LCAT, in agreement with
previous studies performed on the mutant in cell media (13-16). Seven
months later, N384Q had almost no measurable activity while WT LCATs
activity was unchanged. Yet, during that same period, the apparent
Km of N384Q remained constant relative to WT LCAT
apparent Km (Fig. 2 and Table I). Thus, these
results indicate that the removal of the glycan chain has drastically
affected N84Q LCAT, rendering it enzymatically inactive. In the case of
the N384Q mutant, removal of the glycan chain has destabilized N384Q
such that its enzymatic activity decreases far more rapidly than WT
LCAT, while its interfacial binding affinity remains unchanged.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Changes in enzymatic activity of N384Q LCAT
with time. Enzymatic parameters of N384Q LCAT
(kcat-acyltransferase assay ( ),
Km-acyltransferase assay ( ),
kcat-esterase assay ( ),
Km-esterase assay ( )) were measured at each time
point in parallel with wild-type LCAT and expressed as a percent of the
corresponding wild-type LCAT parameter.
|
|
The LCAT esterase assay measures the catalytic rate of ester bond
hydrolysis for a water-soluble substrate,
para-nitrophenylbutyrate. Because the reaction is
independent of interfacial binding and activation steps, this assay is
used mainly to detect changes in the catalytic core of LCAT. The same
trends were observed in the esterase assay results as in the
acyltransferase assay (Fig. 2 and Table I). The N84Q mutant was
catalytically inactive less than a month after purification. The N384Q
mutant initially had a greater activity than WT LCAT, but lost all
measurable activity in a matter of months. WT LCAT, as usual, retained
a constant activity over the same number of months. The
Km values of WT LCAT and N384Q LCAT remained
relatively constant. Evidently, the Asn84 glycan chain is
essential for LCAT activity after purification, but the N84Q mutant
possesses some activity while still in cell media (see thermal
denaturation studies). The Asn384 glycan seems to be
important in stabilizing LCAT activity for a period of longer than a
few days.
Interfacial Binding Kinetics--
Surface plasmon resonance is a
powerful method to study LCAT interfacial binding to rHDL.
Interestingly, the N84Q mutant displayed no binding affinity at all for
the rHDL. Coupled with the negative enzymatic results, this result
confirms that the purified mutant is not functional. In contrast, the
N384Q mutant binds to rHDL with similar affinity to WT LCAT. In fact,
the binding of N384Q LCAT to rHDL held constant regardless of the age
of the enzyme preparation, in agreement with the enzymatic assay
results that the apparent Km value did not change
over time. These results applied equally to association and
dissociation rate binding constants, and the resultant equilibrium
dissociation constant, as seen in Table
II.
Structural Studies--
Thermal denaturation studies were used to
estimate the stability of the LCAT glycosylation mutants compared with
WT LCAT. A decrease in enzymatic activity at progressively higher
temperatures generally corresponds to the denaturation of the protein
structure. The denaturation curves are shown in Fig.
3A. The Tm for WT LCAT was 48.1 °C, for N384Q LCAT was 47.5 °C, and for N84Q LCAT was 44.5 °C. The N384Q mutant denatured similarly to the WT
LCAT, but the N84Q mutant demonstrated a decreased thermal stability
compared with either the N384Q mutant or WT LCAT. The Tm of N84Q LCAT has shifted down by about 3.5 °C.
This difference in Tm corresponds to a difference of
around 0.5 kcal/mol of free energy change in calorimetry studies of
other proteins (23). It is important to note that the N84Q mutant does
have some activity at this point, although the same mutant has no
activity after the protein purification procedure, as shown by the
enzymatic activity assays. The complete lack of activity in the
purified form of N84Q is likely related to the decreased stability of
the enzyme, since the purification procedure is the same as that used
for WT LCAT and N384Q LCAT.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Denaturation of WT LCAT and glycosylation
mutants. Wild-type LCAT, solid line ( ); N84Q
LCAT, dashed line ( ); N384Q LCAT, dotted line
( ). Panel A, thermal denaturation, monitored by
acyltransferase activity measurements on cell culture media. Activity
at 37 °C was assumed to correspond to native enzyme structure.
Panel B, chemical denaturation of purified proteins by
GdnHCl, monitored by fluorescence. The denaturation curves of N384Q
LCAT at 1 week and 6 months were nearly superimposable, and so were
combined for clarity. Panel C, chemical denaturation of
purified proteins by GdnHCl, monitored by CD. The denaturation curves
of N384Q LCAT at 1 week and 6 months old were combined. All data points
are the average of at least two measurements. Plots and calculations
were performed by Origin software.
|
|
The denaturation of LCAT was also followed by isothermal spectroscopic
means. By adding progressively higher concentrations of GdnHCl, CD can
be used to observe the disappearance of secondary structure and to
determine the stability (or GD°) of LCAT. In a
complementary study, fluorescence spectroscopy was used to estimate the
average environment of the tryptophan residues of LCAT, which reflect
the tertiary structure of the protein, and to follow LCAT denaturation.
As high concentrations of GdnHCl denature LCAT, the tryptophans become
increasingly exposed to solvent, altering their fluorescence emission
spectra and thus allowing observation of the progress of the denaturation.
According to the CD spectra of LCAT in buffer, the N84Q mutant
possesses less -sheet structure but slightly more -helical structure compared with WT LCAT (Table
III). The possible location of these
altered structural motifs is considered in the discussion section. A
fresh sample of the N384Q mutant also possesses more -helical
structure than does WT LCAT. However, an older sample of N384Q LCAT
undergoes a marked decrease in -helix content with a concurrent
increase in the amount of unordered structure. From this data, it
appears that N384Q LCAT, over a period of months, loses much of its
helical structure, which unravels to become more disordered.
From the GdnHCl denaturation experiments, WT LCAT was found to have a
GD° of 2.0 kcal/mol. This value is low for globular proteins, which typically have GD°
values of 5-15 kcal/mol, but is consistent with previous measurements
(24) and underscores LCATs flexibility and ability to undergo
conformational changes. Both LCAT glycosylation mutants were found to
have even lower stabilities, as shown in Fig. 3B and Table
IV.
Little difference is seen in the wavelength of maximum fluorescence
(WMF) and peak intensity between the fluorescence spectra of WT LCAT
and N384Q LCAT, regardless of the age of the preparation (Table III).
Evidently, the localized effects that alter the -helical structure
of this mutant do not extend to regions containing tryptophan. The N84Q
mutant, however, did display a significant blue shift in its WMF,
indicating a more sheltered and hydrophobic environment for its
tryptophan residues. In general, a blue shift suggests that a region of
the protein containing tryptophan residues has become more compact or
more sequestered from solvent exposure. The denaturation studies, as
monitored by fluorescence, confirm much of what has been discovered by
the other techniques. The N384Q mutant does not change in stability
with age, but is consistently slightly less stable than WT LCAT (Fig.
3C and Table IV). The N84Q mutant, as expected, is
significantly less stable than WT LCAT.
Interaction with ANS permitted a qualitative evaluation of the
probe-accessible hydrophobic sites on LCAT. This experiment was
intended to examine further the structural changes observed in the
glycosylation mutants and especially the blue shift observed in the
N84Q fluorescence results. ANS is a hydrophobic, fluorescent probe
whose quantum yield increases and WMF decreases (blue shifts) upon
noncovalently binding to a hydrophobic region in a protein. In buffer,
ANS has little fluorescent intensity. The intensity and WMF do not
change when incubated with tightly folded globular proteins such as
carbonic anhydrase, which lacks specific binding sites for ANS (22).
However, the emission maximum of ANS incubated with WT LCAT shifts to
470 nm; this value is typical of other lipid-binding proteins such as
apolipoprotein A-I (22) and bovine serum albumin (25). As shown in Fig.
4, a relatively fresh preparation of
N384Q is similar to WT LCAT in its interaction with ANS. However, as
the N384Q preparation ages, the ANS spectrum shifts toward that of
carbonic anhydrase. Interestingly, the N84Q ANS spectrum is also more
similar to the spectrum of carbonic anhydrase than to the WT LCAT
spectrum. These observations indicate that a hydrophobic region of WT
LCAT accessible to ANS has become inaccessible or altered in the
glycosylation mutants.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
ANS fluorescence spectra. ANS was added
in an excess over protein of 100:1 mol/mol and incubated with the
indicated proteins for 1 h. The "ANS" curve indicates the
probe in buffer in the absence of any proteins. Fluorescence intensity
(y axis) is uncorrected and is given in arbitrary
units.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
One of the conclusions from the current studies is that the N84Q
LCAT mutant is a less stable protein than WT LCAT. This conclusion is
confirmed by the thermal denaturation study and both chemical denaturation studies. The decrease in stability
( GD°) is under 1 kcal/mol, which is not large
in absolute value, but is a significant proportion of the measured
stability of WT LCAT (1.6-2.0 kcal/mol). Probably this instability is
the main cause of the absence of activity after purification of the
N84Q mutant. In several previously published reports (13-16) and in
the thermal denaturation studies, the N84Q mutant possessed weak but
detectable enzymatic activity in cell media. However, after undergoing
the same purification procedures as WT LCAT and the N384Q mutant, the
purified form of N84Q was no longer active.
A change in structure may be responsible for the destabilization and
loss of activity in the N84Q mutant. One possible explanation for the
differences in N84Q LCAT structure compared with WT LCAT is that the
mutant protein is misfolded. Glycosylation plays a role in the quality
control processes in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi, so the lack
of a glycan at position Asn84 may allow a bypass of the
usual folding inspection mechanism. However, the secreted protein is
capable of normal, albeit reduced, enzymatic functions in cell media,
which would not be likely if the protein were extensively misfolded.
Instead, the changes in structure may be a localized effect due to the
absence of the Asn84 glycan. One distinct possibility is
that the proposed 2-sheet of LCAT has become
destabilized. In the LCAT computer model published by Rosseneu and
colleagues (2), the 2-strand, a structurally conserved
element of the / hydrolase fold superfamily, spans residues
Thr79-Asn84 (Fig.
5). The most striking difference in N84Q
structure from WT LCAT, as reported by CD spectra, is the loss of
-sheet content. While the 2-strand has not been shown
to play any significant role in LCAT activity, the region N-terminal to
it has. The residues within the disulfide bridge of
Cys50-Cys74 constitute LCATs lid region, a
structural element conserved among lipases. This feature covers the
entrance to the active site of lipases and facilitates interaction
between substrate and enzyme by participating in interfacial binding
and active site interactions with lipid substrates (26). Alteration of
this region in LCAT, whether through deletion (27) or mutation (3),
completely abolishes binding affinity for rHDL particles (21). Clearly, the lid region of LCAT is essential for both binding and activity with
rHDL. Significantly, even as the N384Q mutant activity faded to zero
over a period of months, it retained full binding affinity for rHDL,
whereas the N84Q mutant was unable to bind rHDL at all, according to
the surface plasmon resonance results. Therefore, the lack of a glycan
chain at position Asn84 may destabilize the
2-sheet of LCAT, repositioning or altering the
neighboring lid region and blocking interfacial binding. The explanation for the absence of N84Q activity in the esterase assay is
less apparent, but the deletion of the lid region has also been shown
to partially decrease esterase activity (27). Therefore, the lid region
may also have some role in binding lipid substrates and analogs such as
para-nitrophenylbutyrate and/or orienting them in the active
site.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Sequences of LCAT in the N-terminal and
C-terminal regions. The Asn84 and Asn384
glycosylation sites are boxed. In the N-terminal sequence,
tryptophan residues are in bold, the lid region has a
dashed underline, and the proposed 2-sheet is
underlined and in bold. In the C-terminal
sequence, the catalytic histidine is marked with an asterisk
and in bold, the proposed -His helix is
underlined and in italics, and
O-glycosylation sites are marked with an "o" and are in
bold.
|
|
An alternative explanation for the lack of activity in the N84Q mutant
involves the positioning of the active site residues. According to the
computer model, the catalytic Asp345 residue is located
only 3.4 Å from Arg80 in the 2-strand (4).
Thus, even a slight rearrangement of the 2-structure
might lock Asp345 into a salt bridge with
Arg80, making it unavailable for catalysis.
Three observations about N84Q LCAT indicate that it may have a more
compact structure than WT LCAT. Fluorescence results show that N84Q has
a blue-shifted spectrum compared with WT LCAT, meaning that, on
average, tryptophan residues are buried deeper in the hydrophobic
interior of the protein and are less accessible to solvent.
Unfortunately, LCAT contains 12 tryptophans, and it is not possible to
distinguish which have been affected by the N84Q mutation. However, it
is worth noting that the sequence close to the lid region of LCAT
contains three tryptophans, making it a possible candidate for the
proposed structural changes. A second observation relates to the shape
of the denaturation curves of the N84Q mutant. As monitored by both CD
and fluorescence, the N84Q denaturation curves are not only shifted in
terms of [GdnHCl]1/2, but also slightly steeper in slope
(m). A study by Byrne and Stites (23) proposes that a change
in the slope of a denaturation curve may be related to the amount
of hydrophobic area exposed during the course of denaturation of a
protein. A steeper slope indicates that a protein exposed more
hydrophobic area during denaturation, implying that it started with
less of that hydrophobic area exposed. Finally, N84Q LCAT bound ANS
less effectively than WT LCAT did. A consideration of the principles of
ANS binding would be helpful before elaborating on this topic.
ANS will bind to a protein only under certain conditions. First, the
protein may contain a hydrophobic cavity of sufficient size to
accommodate ANS. The fatty acid-binding sites of bovine serum albumin
(25) and the heme-binding site of apomyoglobin (28) are both examples
of cavities which bind ANS. Second, the protein may be in the molten
globule state. ANS is often used to detect folding intermediates or
follow the denaturation of a protein. It will also bind apoA-I, which,
due to its flexibility and clustering of hydrophobic residues (29),
bears some resemblance to a molten globule (30). Third, the protein may
possess an extremely hydrophobic surface. Although this mode of binding
has been demonstrated with erythropoietin (31), it has not been commonly observed, even among other hydrophobic proteins.
The fact that N84Q LCAT was unable to interact with ANS suggests that a
hydrophobic environment found in WT LCAT has been made unavailable for
ANS binding. In principle, the removal of a glycan chain might expose
the hydrophobic surface area of a protein to solvent (31) or decrease
the stability of that region (32). In both of these cases, however, ANS
would tend to bind N84Q LCAT to a greater degree than WT LCAT, if its
binding changed at all. Instead, the lesser degree of binding observed
indicates that a hydrophobic cavity in WT LCAT is no longer accessible
to ANS in the N84Q mutant. The Asn84 glycosylation site has
already been shown to be proximal to the lid region, which is located
at the entrance to the active site. Therefore, the removal of the
Asn84 glycan chain may have altered the active site cavity
such that it either has become inaccessible to ANS or has collapsed.
This hypothesis would explain both the lack of enzymatic activity and the more compact structure observed in N84Q LCAT compared with WT
LCAT.
The denaturation curves of all species of LCAT are unusually shallow
for a globular protein, indicating a noncooperative unfolding mechanism. In other words, many regions of the protein may unfold independently, in contrast to the abrupt collapse of structure typical
of many other globular proteins. Because of this independence, one
region of LCAT may be destabilized or unfolded, but may not be detected
by a technique which focuses on secondary structure or tryptophan
environment changes. This phenomenon may help explain the differences
in the structural results obtained for the aging N384Q mutant. Both the
WMF of N384Q LCAT and the denaturation profile of N384Q LCAT, monitored
by fluorescence, remain constant, regardless of the age of the
preparation. However, if structural changes were occurring near
Asn384, they would not be detected by fluorescence methods,
for this region is devoid of tryptophan residues.
The CD results show first a slightly increased -helix content in a
fresh sample of N384Q protein, and then a dramatic decline in helical
content months later. This trend mimics the trend in the enzymatic
activity for N384Q, which is initially higher than for WT LCAT in cell
media and in fresh preparations of enzyme, and then falls steadily to
near zero within months. A modification of the -His helix of LCAT
may be sufficient to rationalize these results. The -His helix,
which has been modeled to be proximal to the Asn384
glycosylation site of LCAT (Fig. 5), is a conserved element of /
hydrolases and is located near the catalytic core. This helix has
already been shown to be essential for LCAT activity, because C-terminal truncations which progress further than residue 398 bring
about a total loss of enzymatic activity (18, 33). Therefore, a
progressive disruption of this helix seems likely to have an effect on
LCAT activity.
According to ANS spectra, a 2-month-old preparation of N384Q LCAT
resembles WT LCAT, but a 6-month-old preparation resembles more closely
the compact structure of the N84Q mutant, which has little binding
affinity for ANS. As argued for the N84Q mutant, the decrease in ANS
binding may indicate that the active site cavity of N384Q LCAT is
becoming inaccessible to ANS or is collapsing. If the catalytic
residues in the active site were inaccessible to ANS, the same may also
be true for lipid substrates, and the enzymatic activity of N384Q would
correspondingly decrease. Therefore, the removal of the
Asn384 glycan may modify the -His helix and surrounding
structure, restricting access of substrates to the active site.
In addition, one of the regions affected by the deletion of the
Asn384 glycan may include the catalytic histidine
(His377). The decline in esterase activity mirrors
the decline in acyltransferase activity, suggesting that the catalytic
mechanism of LCAT is affected. The involvement of His377 is
plausible, for this catalytic residue is only seven amino acids away
from the glycosylation site (Fig. 5). If the structure of LCAT were
altered upon removal of the glycan at Asn384 such that this
key residue was repositioned, the catalytic activity of LCAT would drop accordingly.
Elucidating the greater activity of N384Q over WT LCAT in cell media
was one of the motivations in performing these studies. This increased
activity may be attributed to the consistently lower apparent
Km values in the acyltransferase assay of the N384Q
mutant over WT LCAT (Table I), suggesting a more effective binding of
the mutant to rHDL. A more effective binding could be due to a decrease
in the steric hindrance of binding, once the bulky glycan chain is
removed. However, the fact that this difference in apparent
Km was observed in the acyltransferase assay, but
not in the equilibrium dissociation constant measured by the surface
plasmon resonance studies raises doubts about the interfacial binding
hypothesis. Instead, it suggests that the Asn384 glycan may
have some inhibitory effect on the access or binding of the lipid
substrates to the active site of LCAT. This possibility has some merit,
for in an analogous enzyme, cholesterol esterase, the -His helix
forms part of the cholesterol binding pocket (34). However, it should
be stressed that apparent Km values are not a direct
measure of the binding of LCAT to the rHDL surface and should be
interpreted with great caution.
One important property of the N384Q mutant which does not change with
time is its binding to rHDL. As measured by the acyltransferase assay
and surface plasmon resonance, the binding of N384Q LCAT to rHDL
particles is the same whether it has maximal or minimal enzymatic
activity. The independence of these two results indicates that the
protein regions responsible for these two activities are well separated.
The general conclusion from this work is that the deletion of
individual glycan chains destabilizes LCAT. However, the effects of
this destabilization take different forms depending on the region of
the protein. The N84Q mutant is destabilized in the sense that it is
unable to withstand the procedures of purification, becoming inactive,
and is more susceptible to thermal and chemical denaturation than WT
LCAT. The destabilization of its structure affects both interfacial
binding affinity and enzymatic activity, probably by altering key
catalytic and binding elements near the glycosylation site. The result
is a protein which has apparently collapsed upon itself to alter or
eliminate the hydrophobic active site cavity, rendering the enzyme
inactive. The N384Q mutant is destabilized only slightly relative to WT
LCAT as observed by chemical and thermal denaturation. However,
starting from a higher activity, it loses its activity much more
rapidly than does WT LCAT, probably due to loss of key -helical
elements involved in the active site cavity or due to rearrangement of
catalytic residues. After months of storage, this mutant also loses its ability to bind ANS. After performing a literature search, no other
comparable study could be found tracking the effects of destabilization
over time. Although examples are plentiful of studies describing the
effects of glycosylation on enzyme activity, structure, or
stability, none follow up these observations after extended periods.
Therefore, the N384Q LCAT mutant is a unique example of localized,
gradual destabilization due to deglycosylation. Without utilizing more
sophisticated techniques such as NMR or x-ray spectroscopy, it is not
possible to describe the effects of glycosylation on LCAT at the atomic
resolution level. However, the current studies have provided evidence
that glycosylation affects the stability of localized protein
structures which in turn affects enzyme functions such as catalysis or
interfacial binding. They have also provided a rare example of how
deglycosylation affects a protein's stability over time, independent
of additional chemical, thermal, or pressure denaturation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Shanthi Adimoolam for
constructing the WT LCAT-expressing CHO cells and for assistance with
cell culture techniques. We also thank Dr. Henry Pownall, Baylor
College of Medicine, for the gift of anti-LCAT antibodies, Dr. Lihua
Jin for the instruction in surface plasmon resonance measurements, and
Adam Kennedy and Jeanne Danes for excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant HL-29939 (to A. J.) and by a predoctoral fellowship from the American Heart Association, Illinois Affiliate (to J. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry,
College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois, 506 South Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Tel.: 217-333-0452; Fax:
217-333-8868; E-mail: a-jonas@uiuc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 2, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104326200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LCAT, lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase;
rHDL, reconstituted high density
lipoproteins;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
GdnHCl, guanidine
hydrochloride;
ANS, 1-anilinonapthalene-8-sulfonate;
WMF, wavelength of
maximum fluorescence;
GD°, free energy of
denaturation;
POPC, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl phosphatidylcholine;
DPPC, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Fielding, C.,
and Fielding, P.
(1995)
J. Lipid Res.
36,
211-228
|
| 2.
|
Peelman, F.,
Vinaimont, N.,
Verhee, A.,
Vanloo, B.,
Verschelde, J.-L.,
Labeur, C.,
Seguret-Mace, S.,
Duverger, N.,
Hutchinson, G.,
Vandekerckhove, J.,
Tavernier, J.,
and Rosseneu, M.
(1998)
Protein Sci.
7,
587-599
|
| 3.
|
Peelman, F.,
Vanloo, B.,
Perez-Mendez, O.,
Decount, A.,
Verschelde, J.-L.,
Labeur, C.,
Vinaimont, N.,
Verhee, A.,
Duverger, N.,
Brasseur, R.,
Vandekerckhove, J.,
Tavernier, J.,
and Rosseneu, M.
(1999)
Protein Eng.
12,
71-78
|
| 4.
|
Peelman, F.,
Verschelde, J.-L.,
Vanloo, B.,
Ampe, C.,
Labeur, C.,
Tavernier, J.,
Vandekerckhove, J.,
and Rosseneu, M.
(1999)
J. Lipid Res.
40,
59-69
|
| 5.
|
Peelman, F.,
Vandekerckhove, J.,
and Rosseneu, M.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
11,
155-160
|
| 6.
|
Vanloo, B.,
Peelman, F.,
Deschuymere, K.,
Taveirne, J.,
Verhee, A.,
Gouyette, C.,
Labeur, C.,
Vandekerckhove, J.,
Tavernier, J.,
and Rosseneu, M.
(2000)
J. Lipid Res.
41,
752-761
|
| 7.
|
Yang, C.,
Manoogian, D.,
Pao, Q.,
Lee, F.-S.,
Knapp, R.,
Gotto, A.,
and Pownall, H.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
644-651
|
| 8.
|
Schindler, P.,
Settineri, C.,
Collet, X.,
Fielding, C.,
and Burlingame, A.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
791-803
|
| 9.
|
Lacko, A.,
Reason, A.,
Nuckolls, C.,
Kudchodkar, B.,
Nair, M.,
Sundarrajan, G.,
Pritchard, P.,
Morris, H.,
and Dell, A.
(1998)
J. Lipid Res.
39,
807-820
|
| 10.
|
Jonas, A.
(1998)
Prog. Lipid Res.
37,
209-234
|
| 11.
|
Ayyobi, A.,
Lacko, A.,
Murray, K.,
Nair, M.,
Li, M.,
Molhuizen, H.,
and Pritchard, P.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1484,
1-13
|
| 12.
|
Miller, K.,
Wang, J.,
Sorci-Thomas, M.,
Anderson, R.,
and Parks, J.
(1996)
J. Lipid Res.
37,
551-561
|
| 13.
|
Francone, O.,
Evangelista, L.,
and Fielding, C.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1166,
301-304
|
| 14.
|
O, K.,
Hill, J.,
Wang, X.,
McLeod, R.,
and Pritchard, P.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
294,
879-884
|
| 15.
|
Qu, S.,
Fan, H.,
Blanco-Vaca, F.,
and Pownall, H.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
8732-8736
|
| 16.
|
O, K.,
Hill, J.,
and Pritchard, P.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1254,
193-197
|
| 17.
|
Adimoolam, S.,
Lee, Y-P.,
and Jonas, A.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
243,
337-341
|
| 18.
|
Lee, Y.-P.,
Adimoolam, S.,
Liu, M.,
Subbaiah, P.,
Glenn, K.,
and Jonas, A.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1344,
250-261
|
| 19.
|
Jin, L.,
Lee, Y.-P.,
and Jonas, A.
(1997)
J. Lipid Res.
38,
1085-1093
|
| 20.
|
Bonelli, F.,
and Jonas, A.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
14723-14728
|
| 21.
|
Jin, L.,
Shieh, J.-J.,
Grabbe, E.,
Adimoolam, S.,
Durbin, D.,
and Jonas, A.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
15659-15665
|
| 22.
|
Rogers, D.,
Brouilette, C.,
Engler, J.,
Tendian, S.,
Roberts, L.,
Mishra, V.,
Anantharamaiah, G.,
Lund-Katz, S.,
Phillips, M.,
and Ray, M.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
288-300
|
| 23.
|
Byrne, M.,
and Stites, W.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
2545-2558
|
| 24.
|
Adimoolam, S.,
Jin, L.,
Grabbe, E.,
Shieh, J-J.,
and Jonas, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32561-32567
|
| 25.
|
Daniel, E.,
and Weber, G.
(1966)
Biochemistry
5,
1893-1900
|
| 26.
|
van Tilbeurgh, H.,
Egloff, M.-P.,
Martinez, C.,
Rugani, N.,
Verger, R.,
and Cambillau, C.
(1993)
Nature
362,
814-820
|
| 27.
|
Adimoolam, S.,
and Jonas, A.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
232,
783-787
|
| 28.
|
Stryer, L.
(1965)
J. Mol. Biol.
13,
482-495
|
| 29.
|
Davidson, W.,
Arnvig-McGuire, K.,
Kennedy, A.,
Kosman, J.,
Hazlett, T.,
and Jonas, A.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
14387-14395
|
| 30.
|
Gursky, O.,
and Atkinson, D.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
2991-2995
|
| 31.
|
Toyada, T.,
Itai, T.,
Arakawa, T.,
Aoki, K.,
and Yamaguchi, H.
(2000)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
128,
731-737
|
| 32.
|
Wang, C.,
Eufemi, M.,
Turano, C.,
and Giartosio, A.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
7299-7307
|
| 33.
|
Francone, O.,
Evangelista, L.,
and Fielding, C.
(1996)
J. Lipid Res.
37,
1609-1615
|
| 34.
|
Ghosh, D.,
Wawrzak, Z.,
Pletnev, V.,
Li, N.,
Kaiser, R.,
Pangborn, W.,
Jornvall, H.,
Erman, M.,
and Duax, W.
(1995)
Structure
3,
279-288
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|