|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105275200 on August 2, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 40, 37250-37257, October 5, 2001
Role of Myosin Phosphatase Isoforms in cGMP-mediated Smooth
Muscle Relaxation*
Jaikirshan J.
Khatri §,
Katherine M.
Joyce ,
Frank V.
Brozovich ¶ , and
Steven A.
Fisher ¶**
From the Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and
¶ Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University
School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4958
Received for publication, June 7, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
In vitro experiments showing the
activation of the myosin phosphatase via heterophilic leucine zipper
interactions between its targeting subunit (MYPT1) and
cGMP-dependent protein kinase I suggested a pathway for
smooth muscle relaxation (Surks, H. K., Mochizuki, N., Kasai, Y.,
Georgescu, S. P., Tang, K. M., Ito, M., Lincoln, T. M.,
and Mendelsohn, M. E. (1999) Science 286, 1583-1587).
The relationship between MYPT1 isoform expression and smooth muscle
responses to cGMP signaling in vivo has not been explored.
MYPT1 isoforms that contain or lack a C-terminal leucine zipper are
generated in birds and mammals by cassette-type alternative splicing of
a 31-nucleotide exon. The avian and mammalian C-terminal isoforms are
highly conserved and expressed in a tissue-specific fashion. In the
mature chicken the tonic contracting aorta and phasic contracting
gizzard exclusively express the leucine zipper positive and negative
MYPT1 isoforms, respectively. Expression of the MYPT1 isoforms is also
developmentally regulated in the gizzard, which switches from leucine
zipper positive to negative isoforms around the time of hatching. This
switch coincides with the development in the gizzard of a
cGMP-resistant phenotype, i.e. inability to dephosphorylate
myosin and relax in response to 8-bromo-cGMP after calcium activation.
Furthermore, association of cGMP-dependent protein kinase I
with MYPT1 is detected by immunoprecipitation only in the tissue that
expresses the leucine zipper positive isoform of MYPT1. These results
suggest that the regulated splicing of MYPT1 is an important
determinant of smooth muscle phenotypic diversity and the variability
in the response of smooth muscles to the calcium desensitizing effect
of cGMP signaling.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Smooth muscle contraction is initiated by the phosphorylation of
the regulatory myosin light chain
(MLC20)1 by the
calcium/calmodulin-dependent activation of the myosin light
chain kinase (MLCK) (1). Relaxation is effected by the dephosphorylation of MLC20 by the smooth muscle myosin
phosphatase (SMMP). Complexity is brought to this system by accessory
proteins and signaling pathways that regulate the smooth muscle
contractile state (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 3).
The SMMP is a target of signals that are positive and negative
modulators of smooth muscle tone. SMMP is a heterotrimeric protein
composed of the 37-kDa catalytic subunit (PP1c ), the 130/133-kDa
myosin targeting subunit (MYPT1, also referred to as MBS), and the
21-kDa M21 subunit (4-6). MYPT1 targets the catalytic subunit to
MLC20 (7, 8) and in this way confers substrate specificity
to the phosphatase, whereas the function of the M21 subunit is unknown.
Activation of the Rho kinase signaling pathway leads to
phosphorylation of the MYPT1 subunit, resulting in inhibition of myosin
phosphatase activity and an increase in smooth muscle tone (9-13).
This signaling pathway is thought to determine the calcium-sensitizing
effect of -adrenergic stimulation, for example, in which greater
force is produced at a given calcium concentration than when force is
activated by calcium alone (10, 12, 14, 15).
Activation of guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide (NO) or atrial
natriuretic peptide and the increase in intracellular cGMP has
the opposite effect (16-18), desensitizing the contractile apparatus
to activating concentrations of calcium (19, 20). Calcium
desensitization is one of several proposed mechanisms by which the
cGMP-dependent protein kinase (cGKI) effects smooth muscle relaxation (reviewed in Refs. 21 and 22). SMMP was recently
suggested to be one of the final mediators of this calcium desensitization signaling pathway. SMMP activity is enhanced in vitro by dimerization of MYPT1 with the cGMP-dependent
protein kinase I (cGKI ) via leucine zipper motifs present in the
C terminus of MYPT1 and the N terminus of cGKI (23).
It has long been appreciated that smooth muscle tissues display
considerable diversity with respect to both their basic contractile properties as well as their responses to modulating signals (reviewed in Ref. 3). As the NO/cGMP-mediated relaxation pathway was elucidated,
it was also appreciated that smooth muscle tissues differ in their
sensitivity to this pathway (24-27). The molecular basis of this
smooth muscle functional diversity is not well understood. Since SMMP
is a target of signaling pathways that modulate smooth muscle tone, we
hypothesized that SMMP isoform differences may play an important role
in the variable response of smooth muscle tissues to this signal. In
mammals isoforms of the MYPT1 subunit of SMMP have been identified that
either contain or lack the C-terminal leucine zipper (8, 28).
Surprisingly, the C-terminal leucine zipper motif has not been
identified previously in chicken MYPT1, yet it is highly conserved in
mammals and the worm (reviewed in Ref. 29). In this study we
demonstrate that chicken MYPT1 isoforms that contain or lack the
C-terminal leucine zipper are generated by cassette-type alternative
splicing of a 31-nucleotide (nt) alternative exon. The MYPT1 isoforms
are expressed in a tissue-specific and developmentally regulated
fashion. Tissues that express MYPT1 isoforms that lack the C-terminal
leucine zipper fail to calcium desensitize in response to cGMP, and the
phenotypic switch of the gizzard at hatching from MYPT1 leucine zipper
positive to negative coincides with a switch from sensitivity to
resistance to cGMP-mediated calcium desensitization. These results
provide a mechanistic explanation for the differential sensitivity of smooth muscle tissues to the calcium-desensitizing (relaxing) effect of
the NO/cGMP signaling pathway.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Isolation and Analysis of RNA--
Fertile White Leghorn chicken
(Gallus gallus) eggs were obtained from Squire Valleevue
Farm (Cleveland, OH) and incubated at 38 °C in humidified air.
Organs were harvested (after decapitation) from embryonic chicks
from 8 to 21 days of incubation (hatching is 21 days) and from chicks
1-12 days after hatching. Organs from Harlan Sprague-Dawley adult rats
(Rattus norvegicus) were harvested after lethal
CO2 inhalation. After organs were stripped of adventitia, the smooth muscle tissues were dissected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and total RNA isolated as described previously (30). Quantification of
MYPT1 and M21 isoform splice variants was performed by RT-PCR using
total RNA as described previously (30) with minor modifications. Oligonucleotide primer sets were designed with the PRIMER SELECT program (DNASTAR) to bracket the alternative exons and thus amplify alternative exon included and excluded transcripts in a single reaction. The following sets of primers, listed 5'-3', were
used in these RT-PCR reactions: to chicken MYPT1 at +2888
TAGAAAAAGAAGATAGCACTG and +3203 CATTTTCATCTTTTAGCCTCTGG that generated
347- and 316-bp DNA fragments; to rat MYPT1 at +2470
GARAAAMGRMGRTCTACWGGA and +2968 GCCTCTGGTTGTCTGCYTTYA that generated
530- and 499-bp DNA fragments; and to chicken M21 at +729
GCTCGAGCTGGCAGACATCAA and +1028 GCGTGGGGCAGGAGGAAG that generated
367- and 300-nt fragments. PCR products were separated by
electrophoresis through a 2% agarose gel, visualized by ethidium
bromide staining, and images captured with a GelDoc 1000 (Bio-Rad).
Bands were quantified directly using MultiAnalyst/MacIntosh software
(Bio-Rad). Omission of RT in PCRs yielded no product (data not shown).
The accuracy of the measured isoform ratios was determined by varying
the amount of input RNA and observing a constant ratio, as described
previously (30, 31). Selected products of the RT-PCR were cloned and
sequenced by standard techniques (30) to determine their identity.
Cloning of the Chicken MYPT1 Gene--
Total DNA was isolated
from chicken liver tissue using the Puregene DNA Isolation kit (Gentra
Systems, Inc.). A PCR-amplified genomic fragment of the
MYPT1 gene was generated using the Expand Long
Template PCR System (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) with the oligonucleotide primers listed above. The ~4.6-kilobase fragment was
subcloned and sequenced by standard methods. Greater than 95% of the
genomic clone was sequenced in both directions, with the remainder
sequenced in one direction. The sequence of the exon splice sites was
confirmed by sequencing these portions from a second, independent PCR clone.
Force Measurement in Skinned Smooth Muscle Strips--
Chicken
gizzard and aorta strips (250-1000 × 80-150 × 20-150
µm) were prepared as described previously (30). The strips were
mounted between two aluminum foil T clips and permeabilized (skinned)
at room temperature for 15 (gizzard) or 30 min (aorta) in relaxing
solution (pCa 9 (in mM), 60 potassium methane
sulfonate (KMS), 5 EGTA, 0.02 CaCl2, 9.26 MgCl2, 5.2 ATP, 25 creatine phosphate, 25 BES, final
pH to 7.1 with 1 N KOH) containing 400 µM
-escin. Following skinning, the tissues were mounted onto the stage
of a computer-controlled mechanics work station. One end of the tissue strip was hooked to a length driver (Physik Instrumente, Waldbron, Germany) and the other to a force transducer (Akers AE 801 Sensor, Horten, Norway). The strips were stretched to the optimum length for
force production (1.3 times their resting length) and allowed to
equilibrate in a well of relaxing solution (pCa 9) for 30 min. Contractions were initiated by transferring the strips to a well containing activating solution (pCa 4 (in mM),
58.33 KMS, 5 EGTA, 5.19 CaCl2, 4.43 MgCl2, 5.27 ATP, 25 creatine phosphate, 25 BES, final pH to 7.1 with 1 N KOHm or pCa 6 (in mM), 61 KMS, 5 EGTA, 3.92 CaCl2, 8.94 MgCl2, 5.20 ATP, 25 creatine phosphate, 25 BES, final pH to 7.1 with 1 N KOH).
After force reached steady state, the strips were transferred to wells
containing activating solution (pCa 4/pCa 6) as
well as progressively increasing concentrations of 8-Br-cGMP (Sigma)
(10 7-10 4 M). Finally, strips
were transferred to relaxing solution (pCa 9) to demonstrate
complete relaxation. A force versus time tracing was
recorded on a digital oscilloscope (Nicolet). This tracing was used to
calculate the mean percent force reduction in response to 8-Br-cGMP
from maximal (pCa 4) and submaximal (pCa 6)
activation. Results are reported as the mean force reduction ± S.D. Additional activated strips were transferred to a well containing
activating solution (pCa 4) and
1-(5-chloronaphthalenesulfonyl)-1H-hexahydro-1,4-diazepine (ML-9, 200 µM), a selective MLCK inhibitor (32) in the
presence or absence of 8-Br-cGMP (10 4 M). A
force versus time tracing was used to determine the rate of
relaxation. Results are reported as the mean t1/2 for relaxation ± S.D.
Measurement of Myosin Light Chain Phosphorylation--
To
determine the extent of phosphorylation of MLC20, a
glycerol/urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis procedure (33) was adapted to resolve the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of
MLC20 using a mini-gel apparatus (Hoeffer). Chicken aortic and gizzard strips were prepared and mounted as described above. To
measure the effects of calcium concentration and 8-Br-cGMP on
MLC20 phosphorylation, strips were incubated in
pCa 9, 4, or 4 with 8-Br-cGMP (10 4
M) until steady state force was achieved as indicated by
force versus time tracings. Strips were then flash-frozen in
liquid nitrogen-cooled acetone containing 10% trichloroacetic acid and 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) over 5 min followed by 1 h
of incubation at room temperature. Subsequently, the samples were
washed in acetone containing 10 mM DTT three times to
remove excess trichloroacetic acid and air-dried for 30 min after the
final wash. Samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen, pulverized, placed
in 50 µl of sample buffer (8 M urea, 10 mM
DTT, glycerol (5% v/v), bromphenol blue (0.1% w/v)), and allowed to
extract for 1 h, with frequent vortexing, at room temperature. The
samples were resolved by electrophoresis through a 10% polyacrylamide
(19:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide), 40% glycerol (v/v) gel (20 mM Tris, pH 8.6; 22 mM glycine) for 3 h at
400 V. Resolved proteins were transferred to Hybond-P membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in transfer buffer (25 mM
Tris, pH 8.2; 192 mM glycine, 10% methanol (v/v)) at 220 mA for 20 min. Membranes were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin
(w/v) in wash buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4; 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (v/v)) for 1 h, incubated with
a monoclonal antibody against MLC20 (mouse IgM clone MY-21,
Sigma) for 1 h, washed for 1 h, and incubated with the
secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse IgM conjugated with alkaline
phosphatase, Sigma) for 1 h. Both primary and secondary antibodies
were diluted at 1:3000 with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (v/v) in wash
buffer. After final washing, phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms
of MLC20 were detected by developing the membrane in
alkaline phosphatase substrate buffer (100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM Tris, pH 9.5; 650 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate, 400 mM
nitro blue tetrazolium). Membranes were digitally scanned (UMAX), and
bands were subsequently quantified using Scion Image Beta 4.0.2 software (Scion Corp.). The percentage of MLC20 phosphorylated was calculated by determining the ratio of the phosphorylated MLC20 band versus the total
MLC20 (phosphorylated + unphosphorylated species)
identified by the monoclonal antibody. Results are reported as mean
phosphorylated MLC20 ± S.D.
Immunopreciptaion of MYPTI and cGKI--
Chicken aortic and
gizzard strips were harvested and permeabilized as described above and
subsequently incubated in pCa 4 activating solution treated
with 8-Br-cGMP (10 4 M) or an equal volume of
vehicle alone (PSS) for 15 min. In addition, aortas were
harvested from Harlan Sprague-Dawley adult rats (R. norvegicus) after lethal CO2 inhalation. Vessels were
quickly removed, rinsed in PSS containing 1.6 mM
CaCl2 (PSS-Ca), stripped of fat and adventitia, and
dissected into small smooth muscle strips (~5 × 2 × 2 mm). Rat strips were activated by incubation in PSS-Ca containing KCl
(80 mM) substituted isotonically for NaCl in the presence
or absence of 8-Br-cGMP (10 4 M) for 15 min.
Both rat and chicken strips were homogenized in 150 µl of lysis
buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl, Triton X (1% v/v), protease inhibitor mixture (10% v/v, Sigma)) on ice. Lysates were sonicated for 10 s on ice and clarified by
centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min. Total protein
of the clarified lysates was determined by the Bradford method
(Bio-Rad). A 100-µg aliquot of lysate was precleared with 10% v/v
protein G-agarose bead solution (Sigma, 50% v/v in phosphate-buffered
saline) for 2 h at 4 °C. Samples were centrifuged at
10,000 × g for 1 min, and supernatant was collected.
Precleared lysates were incubated overnight at 4 °C with either a
monoclonal antibody against chicken MYPT1 (mouse IgG1/
clone ASC.M130, Babco, 1:1000) or a polyclonal antibody against the
common C terminus of cGKI (rabbit IgG clone anti-PKG CT, Stressgen,
1:100). A 10% v/v protein G-agarose bead solution was added to the
lysates and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C. The samples were
centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 1 min, and the pellet
washed twice with lysis buffer. Pellets were resuspended in 20 µl of SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8; 2% w/v SDS,
10% v/v glycerol, 50 mM DTT, 0.01% w/v bromphenol blue),
heated to 95 °C for 5 min, and separated by electrophoresis through
a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel (29:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide) for 1 h
at 25 mA. Resolved proteins were transferred to Hybond-P membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in transfer buffer (25 mM
Tris, pH 8.2; 192 mM glycine, 10% methanol (v/v)) at 230 mA for 45 min. Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk (w/v) in
wash buffer for 1 h, incubated with primary antibody for 1 h,
washed for 30 min, and incubated with the secondary antibody for 1 h. Blots of lysates immunoprecipitated with ASC.MI30 were probed with
primary antibody anti-PKG CT (1:800) followed by secondary antibody
goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Cappel, 1:15,000). Blots of lysates immunoprecipitated with anti-PKG CT were
probed with primary antibody ASC.M130 (1:1000) followed by secondary
antibody goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase
(Bio-Rad, 1:1600). After the final washing, the signals were visualized
with a chemiluminescent reaction (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories).
 |
RESULTS |
Isoforms of Chicken Smooth Muscle MYPT1 Are Generated by
Cassette-type Alternative Splicing of a 3' Exon--
To characterize
the MYPT1 isoforms, we cloned a chicken MYPT1 3' genomic fragment.
Comparison with cDNA obtained by RT-PCR of transcripts from chicken
smooth muscle tissues indicated that cassette-type alternative splicing
of a 31-nt exon gave rise to MYPT1 leucine zipper positive and negative
isoforms (Fig. 1). Skipping of the 3'
alternative exon coded for the leucine zipper positive isoform of
MYPT1. The amino acid sequence of the C-terminal leucine zipper was
identical in birds and mammals and shared 75% identity (18/24
residues) with the worm homologue mel-11 (34) (Fig. 1).
Inclusion of the 31-nt alternative exon shifted the reading frame and
introduced a premature stop codon, resulting in an MYPT1 C terminus
lacking a leucine zipper. This amino acid sequence showed 85% identity
(17:20 residues) between birds and mammals and was not found in the
worm. The M21 subunit of SMMP appears to have a similar scheme for the
generation of C-terminal leucine zipper positive and negative isoforms
(35). The M21 leucine zipper amino acid sequences were identical in
birds and mammals (Fig. 1) and were highly similar to the MYPT1 leucine zipper sequence (96% identity, 23:24 residues). A gene homologous to
M21 has not been identified in the worm.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The chicken MYPT1 C-terminal leucine zipper
variable isoforms are generated by cassette-type alternative splicing
of a 31-nucleotide exon. a, the 3' region of chicken
MYPT1 genomic DNA was compared with RT-PCR products obtained using
oligonucleotide primers flanking this alternative exon. This is
represented in schematic form with amino acid sequences indicated
above and below the nucleotide sequence. Skipping
of the alternative exon (shaded box) codes for the leucine
zipper motif, whereas exon inclusion shifts the reading frame and codes
for a C terminus that lacks the leucine zipper motif. A cryptic 5'
donor splice site located within the alternative exon can generate an
additional MYPT1 splice variant indicated by gray lines.
Exons and introns are not to scale; the numbers of nucleotides are
shown below each. * = termination codon. b, the MYPT1
C-terminal leucine zipper amino acid sequence is identical in chicken,
rat, and human and is highly conserved in the worm homologue and
chicken and human M21. Identical residues are indicated in
bold and leucine residues are underlined.
C, chicken; R, rat; H, human; the
position of the first amino acid shown is indicated.
|
|
Expression of Leucine Zipper Positive and Negative SMMP Subunit
Isoforms Is Tissue-specific and Developmentally Regulated--
We
examined the expression of C-terminal variant MYPT1 and M21 isoforms in
the mature and developing chicken as a first step in determining the
relationship between SMMP isoform expression and sensitivity to
cGMP-mediated signaling. We demonstrated previously that 1) the mature
tonic aorta and phasic gizzard tissues are the most pure and distinct
with respect to the expression of contractile protein isoforms and 2)
developmental changes in gene expression in these tissues correlate
with their contractile properties (30, 31, 36), thus providing a
dynamic model for examining the functional significance of contractile
protein isoform expression.
In the adult chicken the aorta, a tonic smooth muscle tissue, expressed
exon-excluded transcripts (coding for the leucine zipper) of MYPT1 and
M21 nearly exclusively (Fig. 2). The
phasic gizzard smooth muscle expressed exon-included transcripts
(coding for absence of the leucine zipper) almost exclusively. Other
smooth muscle-containing tissues, such as intestine and lung, contained combinations of exon-included and exon-excluded transcripts. This pattern of expression was conserved in mammalian smooth muscle tissues.
The rat aorta (tonic) expressed predominantly exon-excluded MYPT1
transcripts, and other tissues such as the portal vein, uterus, and
intestine contained combinations of exon-included and exon-excluded
transcripts (Fig. 3).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of chicken MYPT1/M21 leucine
zipper variable isoforms is tissue-specific. RT-PCR products from
various smooth muscle tissues were separated by 2% agarose gel
electrophoresis and visualized with ethidium bromide. Ratios of
exon-in/exon-out MYPT1 and M21 transcripts are shown below
each lane. Quantification of isoforms in each tissue represents means
from three animals with S.D. <10% in each case. AO, aorta;
GIZ, gizzard; INT, intestine; KID,
kidney; BLAD, urinary bladder; MW, molecular
weight in bp.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Expression of rat MYPT1 leucine zipper
variable isoforms is similar to that of the chicken. RT-PCR
products from various smooth muscle tissues were separated by 2%
agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with ethidium bromide.
Ratios of exon-in/exon-out MYPT1 transcripts are shown below
each lane. Quantification of isoforms in each tissue represents mean
from three animals with S.D. <10% in each case. PV, portal
vein; UTER, uterus.
|
|
Throughout chick aorta development the expression of the exon-excluded,
leucine zipper positive MYPT1 and M21 isoforms was invariant (Fig.
4 and data not shown). In contrast the
gizzard MYPT1 and M21 transcripts switched from exon exclusion to exon inclusion (leucine zipper negative) around the time of hatching (21 days) (Fig. 4). During this transition an intermediate sized isoform
was evident in MYPT1 that arose from a cryptic splice site within the
alternative exon (Fig. 1). The isoform switch in the gizzard was
synchronous with an opposite switch in splicing of the MYPT1 central
alternative exon but much later than transitions in myosin heavy and
light chain isoforms (30). We showed previously (30) that there is a
corresponding transition in the gizzard MYPT1 protein from the larger
to the smaller isoform, whereas in the developing aorta only the larger
isoform is detected. The difference in the isoforms of 66 amino acids
when the central alternative exon is included and the 3' alternative
exon is excluded is consistent with their estimated size difference of
7 kDa by electrophoretic separation (37). This differs from the widely quoted M133/130 isoforms in the chicken due to a lack of appreciation of the presence of the C-terminal leucine zipper in the chicken MYPT1
(reviewed in Ref. 29). Furthermore, analysis of proteins derived from
MYPT1 plasmid expression vectors showed that M137 and M130 arise from
the translation of exon in/out and out/in (central/C terminus
alternative exons) transcripts (data not shown).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Expression of chicken MYPT1/M21 leucine
zipper variable isoforms is developmentally regulated. RT-PCR
products were generated and analyzed as described above. There is a
complete switch in the gizzard in MYPT1 (a) and M21
(b) from exon exclusion to inclusion around the time of
hatching (ED21). a, an additional MYPT1 isoform
is evident at the time of isoform switching that arises from a cryptic
splice site within the alternative exon (partial). The
MYPT1/M21 isoforms do not switch during aorta development, so a
representative sample is shown. Quantification of isoforms in each
tissue represents mean from three animals with S.D. <10% in each
case. ED, embryonic day; D, post-hatched day;
ns, nonspecific product.
|
|
The MYPT1 isoform switching was recapitulated by a growth stimulus
in vitro (data not shown). Gizzard smooth muscle cells (SMCs) in culture skipped the 3' alternative exon when processing the
MYPT1 transcript, resulting in the MYPT1 leucine zipper positive isoform. Aortic SMCs in culture also skipped the alternative exon, as
they do in vivo. Thus, as in the case of myosin heavy chain, myosin light chain, and the MYPT1 central alternative exon (30), the
splicing of the C-terminal alternative exon of MYPT1 reverted to the
embryonic phenotype when SMCs were placed in culture.
Expression of MYPT1 Isoforms and Sensitivity to cGMP-mediated
Smooth Muscle Relaxation--
The sensitivity of smooth muscle tissues
to cGMP was examined in mature tissues that were pure in their
expression of the SMMP subunit isoforms, as well as developing smooth
muscle tissues where the phenotype was modulating. Smooth muscle strips
were permeabilized and pre-contracted at fixed calcium concentrations in order to obviate cGMP effects on calcium fluxes, thereby isolating the effect of cGMP to calcium desensitization of the contractile apparatus (19, 20). Aortic smooth muscle strips activated at
pCa 4 relaxed completely in response to 8-Br-cGMP
(10 7-10 4 M, force reduction
from peak activation = 100%, n = 6) independent of developmental stage (Fig. 5,
c and d, and data not shown). The embryonic
gizzard, like the aorta, relaxed to 8-Br-cGMP at pCa 4 (10 7 M, mean force reduction from peak
activation 55 ± 7%, n = 6 to 10 4
M, mean force reduction from peak activation 97 ± 5%, n = 6, Fig. 5, a and d). In
contrast, the adult gizzard showed no response to 8-Br-cGMP
(10 7 M to 10 4 M) at
pCa 4 (n = 6, Fig. 5, b and
d) or pCa 6 (data not shown). Gizzard tissue from
intermediate ages when MYPT1/M21 isoforms were switching from leucine
zipper positive to negative showed an intermediate response to
8-Br-cGMP (10 4 M, mean force reduction from
peak activation 20 ± 5%, n = 4) (Fig.
3d and data not shown). The concentrations of 8-Br-cGMP required to achieve smooth muscle relaxation in these experiments were
consistent with the measured Km of 8-Br-cGMP for cGKI in vitro (2.6 × 10 8 and 2.1 × 10 7 M for I and I , respectively
(38)).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Sensitivity to the relaxant effects of
8-Br-cGMP coincides with the expression of the MYPT1 isoforms.
Tissues that express leucine zipper positive isoforms of MYPT1,
ED16 GIZ (a) and AORTA (c),
were compared with tissues that express exclusively leucine zipper
negative isoforms of MYPT1 D7 GIZ (b).
Permeabilized and calcium-activated (pCa 4) AORTA
and ED16 GIZ strips completely relax to the cGMP analogue,
whereas D7 GIZ strips show no response. d, graph
of 8-Br-cGMP concentration versus % force reduction from
peak activation in pCa 4, n = 4-6,
mean ± S.D.
|
|
Since smooth muscle tone is primarily determined by the opposing
activities of MLCK and SMMP, two sets of experiments were performed to
localize the differential sensitivity to 8-Br-cGMP to an effect on
SMMP. First, the effect of 8-Br-cGMP (10 4 M)
on the rate of relaxation of calcium-activated strips (pCa 4) in the presence of a specific inhibitor of MLCK, ML-9 (32), was
tested. Adult gizzard strips treated with ML-9 (200 µM)
completely relaxed (t1/2 = 1645 ± 120 s,
n = 3). In the presence of 8-Br-cGMP (10 4
M), there was no change in the rate of relaxation of
ML-9-treated adult gizzard strips (t1/2 = 1603 ± 85 s, n = 3, p > 0.05). In
contrast, an ~40% increase in the rate of relaxation of ML-9-treated
embryonic gizzard strips was observed in the presence of 8-Br-cGMP
(control, t1/2 = 936 ± 58 s,
n = 3; 8-Br-cGMP treated, t1/2 = 547 ± 138 s, n = 3, p < 0.01). These experiments suggested that the smooth muscle relaxant
effect of 8-Br-cGMP is not mediated by an inhibition of MLCK but rather
by activation of SMMP.
The steady state level of myosin phosphorylation in these tissues was
measured to localize further the effect of cGMP to activation of SMMP.
Phosphorylation of the regulatory myosin light chain (MLC20) was undetectable in aortic and gizzard smooth
muscle strips in pCa 9 relaxing solution and increased to
~50% upon activation at pCa 4 (Fig.
6). 8-Br-cGMP (10 4
M) caused a decrease in MLC20 phosphorylation
from 51 ± 1 to 11 ± 1% (n = 3, p < 0.001) in aortic strips independent of
developmental stage and from 47 ± 5 to 9 ± 3%
(n = 3, p < 0.001) in embryonic gizzard strips. In contrast, MLC20 phosphorylation levels
in adult gizzard strips did not change in response to 8-Br-cGMP
(control, 46 ± 1%, n = 3; 8-Br-cGMP-treated,
46 ± 2%, n = 3, p > 0.05). These results demonstrated that 8-Br-cGMP stimulated SMMP activity, as
indicated by dephosphorylation of MLC20, only in those
tissues that expressed leucine zipper positive SMMP subunit isoforms. Thus, only smooth muscle tissues that expressed leucine zipper positive
SMMP subunit isoforms desensitized to calcium via cGMP-mediated activation of the myosin phosphatase.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of 8-Br-cGMP on MLC20
phosphorylation levels. Proteins from permeabilized smooth muscle
strips in relaxing (pCa 9) or activating solution
(pCa 4) in the presence or absence of 8-Br-cGMP
(10 4 M) were separated by 10%
glycerol-urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Phosphorylated and
unphosphorylated MLC20 species were detected by Western
blot as shown. Tissues that relax to 8-Br-cGMP (AORTA, ED16
GIZ) show significant reductions in the level of MLC20
phosphorylation, whereas D7 GIZ does not.
|
|
The MYPT1 Subunit of SMMP Associates with cGKI in Vivo--
A
previous study (23) showed that the leucine zipper motif of MYPT1 is
critical for its association with cGKI and activation of the SMMP
in vitro. We performed immunoprecipitation (IP) assays to
determine if the leucine zipper positive and negative isoforms of MYPT1
associated with cGKI in vivo. Force was activated in smooth
muscle strips followed by treatment with 8-Br-cGMP or vehicle only.
MYPT1 was detected by Western blot when cGKI was immunoprecipitated from lysates of calcium-activated chicken aortic strips that had been
treated with 8-Br-cGMP (10 4 M) (Fig.
7a). MYPT1 was not detected in
the cGKI immunoprecipitates of calcium-activated aortic strips alone or
in the control assay in which the cGKI antibody was omitted. In
contrast, MYPT1 was not detected in cGKI immunoprecipitates of
calcium-activated adult chicken gizzard smooth muscle strips in the
presence or absence of 8-Br-cGMP (10 4 M),
although this tissue expressed abundant amounts of MYPT1 (30). Because
the polyclonal anti-cGKI antibody would not react with the chicken cGKI
in Western blotting, we were not able to confirm the observed
association of cGKI and MYPT1 in the chicken aorta using MYPT1 in the
immunoprecipitate followed by cGKI detection by Western blotting. We
therefore repeated the experiments with intact rat aorta strips, in
which force was activated by KCl depolarization followed by complete
relaxation with 8-Br-cGMP (10 4 M) (data not
shown). In this case, immunoprecipitation with MYPT1 followed by
immunodetection of cGKI or vice versa yielded positive results (Fig.
7b). In contrast to the chicken aorta, the MYPT1 was found
in association with cGKI in the rat aorta in the presence or absence of
exogenous 8-Br-cGMP. Of note, a second band of greater mobility was
detected with the cGKI antibody only in the samples treated with
8-Br-cGMP, consistent with a post-translational modification of the
protein (likely phosphorylation). These results support a model in
which expression of a MYPT1 isoform containing a leucine zipper motif
is required for the association of cGKI with MYPT1 (1), SMMP
activation, and desensitization of the contractile apparatus to calcium
leading to smooth muscle relaxation.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
MYPT1 is detected in association with cGKI
in vivo. a, cGKI was
immunoprecipitated from pCa 4 activated adult chicken
gizzard and aorta strips treated with 8-Br-cGMP (10 4
M) or vehicle. Proteins were separated by 7.5%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. A band of ~130-kDa corresponding
to MYPT1 was detected by Western blot only in aorta strips treated with
8-Br-cGMP. b, either cGKI or MYPT1 were immunoprecipitated
from intact rat aorta strips activated by potassium depolarization and
treated with 8-Br-cGMP (10 4 M) or vehicle.
MYPT1 association with cGKI was then detected by Western blotting with
the appropriate antibody. Bands of ~130- and 75-kDa corresponding to
MYPT1 and cGKI, respectively, were detected. * = faster migrating cGKI
band observed with 8-Br-cGMP treatment only. In both a and
b IP performed without the primary antibody served as the
negative control. Mouse stomach lysates served as the positive control.
C, control.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Reversible phosphorylation of serine/threonine (Ser/Thr) residues
of proteins by specific kinases and phosphatases is commonly used to
propagate signals and alter protein function within cells. In many
instances substrate specificity is conferred to common catalytic
subunits via unique targeting subunits (reviewed in Ref. 39). The
targeting subunits are also targets of signaling pathways that may
modulate the activity of the enzyme toward its substrate. In the case
of the myosin phosphatase, two genes encoding for the targeting subunit
have been identified, one of which is expressed ubiquitously in smooth
muscle and non-muscle cells (MYPT1) and a second that
is predominantly expressed in striated muscle and brain
(MYPT2). MYPT1 and MYPT2 are highly related, sharing 61%
amino acid identity within a species (40). The MYPT sequence has also
been conserved through evolution with nearly 90% amino acid identity
among mammalian MYPT1s and ~80% identity between mammalian and avian
MYPT1. A more distantly related MYPT1 homologue termed
mel-11 is present in the worm and shares 35% amino acid identity with the higher vertebrate form (5, 28, 34, 41).
Further diversity is generated in the MYPT isoforms by cassette-type
alternative splicing of exons. This strategy is commonly used to add
and remove specific functional modules from proteins (reviewed in Ref.
42). In the current study we have demonstrated the tissue-specific and
developmentally regulated cassette-type alternative splicing of a 31-nt
3' MYPT1 exon in the chicken. This results in MYPT1 isoforms that
either contain or lack a C-terminal leucine zipper. These isoforms have
also been identified in mammalian MYPT1, and examination of the Celera
human genome data base reveals similarity in exon-intron sizes and
conservation of the alternative splicing mechanism for generation of
the isoforms. The pattern of expression of the MYPT1 C-terminal
isoforms is also similar in birds and mammals. The MYPT2 pre-mRNA
(43) and presumptively the M21 subunit pre-mRNA are also
alternatively spliced to produce isoforms with variable presence of the
C-terminal leucine zipper. The highly conserved nature of the leucine
zipper sequences (100% identity among chicken, rat, and human
sequences and 75% identity with worm) and conserved patterns of
isoform expression are consistent with the proposed functional
significance of this motif.
We have used the developing and mature chicken as a model to understand
the relationship between contractile protein isoform expression and
smooth muscle diversity. The chicken aorta and gizzard are particularly
attractive smooth muscle tissues for this analysis because of their
distinct contractile properties and patterns of gene expression, as
well as their accessibility during development. The aorta throughout
development is always phenotypically and functionally slow (tonic) (30,
31, 36), expresses leucine zipper positive isoforms of MYPT1 and M21,
and relaxes to cGMP in the presence of activating concentrations of calcium. The evidence that the calcium desensitization is due to
cGMP-dependent activation of the SMMP includes 1) the
parallel decrease in force and MLC20 phosphorylation levels
in the presence of calcium concentrations that maximally activate MLCK,
2) an acceleration of relaxation by cGMP when MLCK was specifically inhibited with ML-9 (20), and 3) the demonstration by
immunoprecipitation that the cGKI associates with the MYPT1 subunit in
aortic tissues in vivo. This in vivo observation
supports the initial observation in vitro that SMMP/MYPT1 is
a target of cGKI via heterophilic leucine zipper interactions (23).
In our experiments MYPTI and cGKI were associated in calcium-activated
chicken aorta strips only in the presence of 8-Br-cGMP. However, in rat
smooth muscle strips that were activated by KCl depolarization, MYPT1
and cGKI were associated prior to the addition of 8-Br-cGMP. Whether
the difference between chicken and rat aorta in the requirement of cGMP
for association of MYPT1 with cGKI is due to differences in the
activation of the two tissues (Ca2+
versus KCl depolarization, respectively) or reflects species differences will require further study. The mechanism by which cGMP/cGKI enhances the activity of the SMMP has not been determined.
In contrast to the tonic aorta the gizzard undergoes a series of
phenotypic transitions during development before acquiring its mature
phasic contractile properties. From ED10 to just before hatching there
is a marked increase in the rate of force development that coincides
with a switch in the myosin heavy and light chain isoforms (31, 36).
From ED16 to shortly after hatching there is a marked change in the
relaxation response of the gizzard to cGMP, from complete calcium
desensitization to complete resistance to calcium desensitization. This
coincides with a switch in the SMMP subunit isoforms from leucine
zipper positive to negative. The transition from cGMP-sensitive to
cGMP-resistant is attributed to a failure to activate the SMMP for the
following reasons: 1) a failure to dephosphorylate MLC20 in
the presence of activating calcium concentrations, 2) a failure to
speed relaxation in the presence of the specific MLCK inhibitor ML-9,
and 3) an inability of cGKI to associate with MYPT1 as determined by immunoprecipitation.
In this study we focused on phenotypically distinct smooth muscle
tissues, the aorta and gizzard. This enabled us to show a relationship
between the expression of the myosin phosphatase isoforms and a single
component of the NO signaling pathway, cGMP mediated calcium
desensitization. However, the physiological role of NO/cGMP signaling
in all vascular (tonic) or visceral (phasic) tissues cannot be inferred
from this study for a number of reasons. First, NO may signal through
cGMP-independent mechanisms, including S-nitrosylation of
proteins (44-47). However, the signaling of NO via
cGMP-dependent activation of cGKI appears to be the
predominant pathway for physiological smooth muscle relaxation given
the minimal response in cGKI-null mice (48).
Second, this study as well as others (49-52) have shown considerable
diversity in the expression of the contractile protein isoforms
throughout both the vascular and intestinal systems. The variation in
isoform expression is observed at both the tissue and single cell level
and is also evident during smooth muscle maturation by the variation in
the timing of isoform switching (Ref. 30 and this study). Thus smooth
muscle phenotypic diversity approaches that of striated muscle, while
how it is generated is much less well understood (reviewed in Refs.
53-55). How tissues that express various mixtures of MYPT1 isoforms
respond to cGMP was not a goal of this study. However, the partial
response of the gizzard around the time of hatching to higher
concentrations of cGMP suggests that tissues with mixed isoform
expression may show intermediate responses.
Third, several targets of cGMP/cGKI signaling other than MYPT1 have
also recently been identified (reviewed in Ref. 22), but an association
between their expression and sensitivity to NO/cGMP signaling has not
been demonstrated. Telokin, an MLCK-related protein, is detected at
much higher levels in embryonic and adult visceral smooth muscle,
including gizzard, as compared with vascular smooth muscle (56-58),
i.e. in a pattern opposite to that of the cGMP sensitivity.
The vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (reviewed in Ref. 59) and
heat shock protein-20 (60) appear to be ubiquitously expressed,
although their expression in this developing chick model has not been
examined. Interestingly, a recent study of NO donor activation of cGMP
sensitive (aorta) and resistant (myometrium and vas deferens) rat
tissues reports seven phosphorylated substrates of cGK in the aorta,
none of which were found in the cGMP-resistant tissues (61). The
identity of these proteins was not determined.
Fourth, cGMP has as targets not only proteins that determine calcium
sensitivity but also proteins that regulate calcium flux (62-64). This
aspect of cGMP signaling was obviated in our experiments by clamping
calcium concentrations. Interestingly the two
cGKI-dependent components of the NO/cGMP response appear to
be mediated by different cGKI isoforms that vary only in their
N-terminal leucine zipper sequences (reviewed in Ref. 65). The cGKI
association with the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor-associated
cGKI substrate (66) is proposed as a mediator of the reduction in
calcium, whereas the cGKI association with MYPT1 is proposed as a
mediator of calcium desensitization (23). Thus it is plausible that
cGMP-dependent signaling may independently regulate the
phasic nature of smooth muscle contractions via an effect on ion flux
and regulate smooth muscle tone via an effect on calcium sensitivity of
the myofilaments.
Finally, isoform variations in the proteins that determine cGMP steady
state levels (guanylate cyclase and phosphodiesterase) and in the
cGMP-binding proteins (e.g. cGKI) may also determine the
smooth muscle response to a given signal. This upstream component of
the cGMP signaling pathway is targeted by sildenafil, a selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor that somewhat selectively regulates blood flow in the corpus cavernosum. Although some studies (67, 68)
have reported differences in the relative expression of the two cGKI
isoforms that could influence the response to cGMP, no smooth muscle
tissue has been identified that expresses one isoform exclusively. The
lack of an antibody against chicken cGKI isoforms precluded a
determination of cGKI isoform expression, but semi-quantitative RT-PCR
indicated no significant change in cGKI mRNA abundance during
gizzard development (data not shown). Relative differences in the
quantitative or qualitative expression of proteins in this pathway may
explain why the embryonic gizzard requires higher concentrations of
cGMP to completely desensitize to calcium than does the aorta, even
though they express the same SMMP subunit isoforms. It is also likely
that a unique ensemble of protein isoforms in the cGMP signaling
pathway determines the variability in the type and the magnitude of the
response to NO/cGMP signaling reported for a number of tissues,
including rat myometrium (24, 27) and vas deferens (24), guinea-pig
taenia coli (24), dog femoral vein (25), human myometrium (69), and
human umbilical artery at parturition (70).
In conclusion, there is now evidence of considerable complexity in the
signaling pathways that regulate vascular and visceral smooth muscle
function. The myosin phosphatase targeting subunit has emerged as a key
target of signals that either sensitize or desensitize the smooth
muscle cell to calcium activation. The MYPT1 may thus be considered as
a scaffold protein, analogous to the cAMP-dependent protein
kinase anchoring proteins (reviewed in Ref. 39), that binds a number of
proteins that inhibit (Zip-like kinase (13) and CPI-17 (71)) or
stimulate (cGKI (this study and Ref. 23)) the activity of the
phosphatase and thereby regulate smooth muscle tone. Additional
complexity is brought by the expression of MYPT1 isoforms that may
determine its ability to associate with the proteins that transduce
these signals. Further investigation should uncover how a unique
ensemble of gene expression within normal or diseased vascular and
visceral tissues leads to unique or dysfunctional responses to
cGMP-dependent signaling. An understanding of these
processes may provide a means to therapeutically target additional
aspects of this signal, as well as to modulate the phenotype so as to
optimize the response of smooth muscle tissues to complex signaling pathways.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Albert Rhee for technical assistance
with myosin light chain phosphorylation assays and Sarah MacFarland for
harvesting rat tissues.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was presented in part at the Biophysical
Society Meeting, 2000 (72) and 2001 (73).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by American Heart Association Ohio Valley Affiliate
Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Award 0020332B and funds from University Hospitals of Cleveland.
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 HL64137.
**
Supported by National Institute of Health Grant RO1 HL66171-01 and
KO8 HL03275-05. To whom correspondence should be addressed: 422 BRB,
2109 Adelbert Rd., Cleveland, OH 44106-4958. Tel.: 216-368-0488; Fax:
216-368-0507; E-mail: saf9@po.cwru.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 2, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105275200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MLC20, regulatory myosin light chain;
MLCK, myosin light chain kinase;
SMMP, smooth muscle myosin phosphatase;
MYPT, myosin targeting subunit;
NO, nitric oxide;
cGKI, cGMP-dependent protein kinase;
nt, nucleotide;
bp, base pair;
8- Br-cGMP, 8-bromo-cGMP;
ML-9, 1-(5-chloronaphthalenesulfonyl)-1H-hexahydro-1,4-diazepine;
IP, immunoprecipitation;
RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain
reaction;
BES, N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethanesulfonic
acid;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
SMCs, smooth muscle cells;
PSS, physiological saline solution.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Stull, J. T.,
Lin, P. J.,
Krueger, J. K.,
Trewhella, J.,
and Zhi, G.
(1998)
Acta Physiol. Scand.
164,
471-482
|
| 2.
|
Hartshorne, D. J.
(1987)
in
Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract
(Johnson, L. R., ed)
, pp. 423-482, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
|
| 3.
|
Somlyo, A. P.,
and Somlyo, A. V.
(1994)
Nature
372,
231-236
|
| 4.
|
Alessi, D.,
Macdougall, L. K.,
Sola, M. M.,
Ikebe, M.,
and Cohen, P.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
210,
1023-1035
|
| 5.
|
Shimizu, H.,
Ito, M.,
Miyahara, M.,
Ichikawa, K.,
Okubo, S.,
Konishi, T.,
Naka, M.,
Tanaka, T.,
Hirano, K.,
Hartshorne, D. J.,
and Nakano, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30407-30411
|
| 6.
|
Shirazi, A.,
Iizuka, K.,
Fadden, P.,
Mosse, C.,
Somlyo, A. P.,
Somlyo, A. V.,
and Haystead, T. A. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
31598-31606
|
| 7.
|
Hubbard, M. J.,
and Cohen, P.
(1993)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
18,
172-177
|
| 8.
|
Johnson, D.,
Cohen, P.,
Chen, Y. H.,
Chen, M. X.,
and Cohen, P. T. W.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
244,
931-939
|
| 9.
|
Trinkle-Mulcahy, L.,
Ichikawa, K.,
Hartshorne, D. J.,
Siegman, M. J.,
and Butler, T. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
18191-18194
|
| 10.
|
Kimura, K.,
Ito, M.,
Amano, M.,
Chihara, K.,
Fukata, Y.,
Nakafuku, M.,
Yamamori, B.,
Feng, J.,
Nakano, T.,
Okawa, K.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
and Kaibuchi, K.
(1996)
Science
273,
245-248
|
| 11.
|
Kawano, Y.,
Fukata, Y.,
Oshiro, N.,
Amano, M.,
Nakamura, T.,
Ito, M.,
Matsumura, F.,
Inagaki, M.,
and Kaibuchi, K.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
1023-1037
|
| 12.
|
Ichikawa, K.,
Ito, M.,
and Hartshorne, D. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4733-4740
|
| 13.
|
MacDonald, J. A.,
Borman, M. A.,
Muranyi, A.,
Somlyo, A. V.,
Hartshorne, D. J.,
and Haystead, T. A. J.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
2419-2424
|
| 14.
|
Morgan, J. P.,
and Morgan, K. G.
(1984)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
351,
155-167
|
| 15.
|
Kitazawa, T.,
Masuo, M.,
and Somlyo, A. P.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
9307-9310
|
| 16.
|
Arnold, W. P.,
Mittal, C. K.,
Katsuki, S.,
and Murad, F.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
3203-3207
|
| 17.
|
Furchgott, R. F.,
and Zawadzki, J. V.
(1980)
Nature
286,
373-376
|
| 18.
|
Ignarro, L. J.,
Buga, G. M.,
Wood, K. S.,
Byrns, R. E.,
and Chaudhuri, G.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
9265-9269
|
| 19.
|
Wu, X.,
Somlyo, A. V.,
and Somlyo, A. P.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
220,
658-663
|
| 20.
|
Lee, M. R.,
Li, L.,
and Kitazawa, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5063-5068
|
| 21.
|
Hofmann, F.,
Ammendola, A.,
and Schlossmann, J.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
1671-1676
|
| 22.
|
Lincoln, T. M.,
and Komalavilias, P.
(2000)
in
Nitric Oxide Biology and Pathobiology
(Ignarro, L. J., ed)
, pp. 401-425, Academic Press, San Diego
|
| 23.
|
Surks, H. K.,
Mochizuki, N.,
Kasai, Y.,
Georgescu, S. P.,
Tang, K. M.,
Ito, M.,
Lincoln, T. M.,
and Mendelsohn, M. E.
(1999)
Science
286,
1583-1587
|
| 24.
|
Diamond, J.
(1983)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
225,
422-426
|
| 25.
|
Miller, V. M.,
Komori, K.,
Burnett, J. C., Jr.,
and Vanhoutte, P. M.
(1989)
Am. J. Physiol.
257,
H1127-H1131
|
| 26.
|
Pfitzer, G.,
Merkel, L.,
Ruegg, J. C.,
and Hofmann, F.
(1986)
Pfluegers Arch.
407,
87-91
|
| 27.
|
Word, R. A.,
and Cornwell, T. L.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
C748-C756
|
| 28.
|
Chen, Y. H.,
Chen, M. X.,
Alessi, D.,
Campbell, D. G.,
Shanahan, C.,
Cohen, P.,
and Cohen, P. T. W.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
356,
51-55
|
| 29.
|
Hartshorne, D. J.,
Ito, M.,
and Erdodi, F.
(1998)
J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil.
19,
325-341
|
| 30.
|
Dirksen, W. P.,
Vladic, F.,
and Fisher, S. A.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
C589-C600
|
| 31.
|
Fisher, S. A.,
Ikebe, M.,
and Brozovich, F. V.
(1997)
Circ. Res.
80,
885-893
|
| 32.
|
Saitoh, M.,
Ishikawa, T.,
Matsushima, S.,
Naka, M.,
and Hidaka, H.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
7796-7801
|
| 33.
|
Hathaway, D. R.,
and Haeberle, J. R.
(1985)
Am. J. Physiol.
249,
C345-C351
|
| 34.
|
Wissmann, A.,
Ingles, J.,
McGhee, J. D.,
and Mains, P. E.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
409-422
|
| 35.
|
Mabuchi, K.,
Gong, B. J.,
Langsetmo, K.,
Ito, M.,
Nakano, T.,
and Tao, T.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1434,
296-303
|
| 36.
|
Ogut, O.,
and Brozovich, F. V.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
C1722-C1732
|
| 37.
|
Okubo, S.,
Ito, M.,
Takashiba, Y.,
Ichikawa, K.,
Miyahara, M.,
Shimizu, H.,
Konishi, T.,
Shima, H.,
Nagao, M.,
Hartshorne, D. J.,
and Nakano, T.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
200,
429-434
|
| 38.
|
Sekhar, K. R.,
Hatchett, R. J.,
Shabb, J. B.,
Wolfe, L.,
Francis, S. H.,
Wells, J. N.,
Jastorff, B.,
Butt, E.,
Chakinala, M. M.,
and Corbin, J. D.
(1992)
Mol. Pharmacol.
42,
103-108
|
| 39.
|
Schillace, R. V.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
761-765
|
| 40.
|
Fujioka, M.,
Takahashi, N.,
Odai, H.,
Araki, S.,
Ichikawa, K.,
Feng, J.,
Nakamura, M.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
Hartshorne, D. J.,
Nakano, T.,
and Ito, M.
(1998)
Genomics
49,
59-68
|
| 41.
|
Takahashi, N.,
Ito, M.,
Tanaka, J.,
Nakano, T.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
Odai, H.,
and Takemura, K.
(1997)
Genomics
44,
150-152
|
| 42.
|
Black, D. L.
(2000)
Cell
103,
367-370
|
| 43.
|
Arimura, T.,
Suematsu, N.,
Zhou, Y. B.,
Nishimura, J.,
Satoh, S.,
Takeshita, A.,
Kanaide, H.,
and Kimura, A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
6073-6082
|
| 44.
|
Bolotina, V. M.,
Najibi, S.,
Palacino, J. J.,
Pagano, P. J.,
and Cohen, R. A.
(1994)
Nature
368,
850-853
|
| 45.
|
Gaston, B.,
Drazen, J. M.,
Jansen, A.,
Sugarbaker, D. A.,
Loscalzo, J.,
Richards, W.,
and Stamler, J. S.
(1994)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
268,
978-984
|
| 46.
|
Koh, S. D.,
Campbell, J. D.,
Carl, A.,
and Sanders, K. M.
(1995)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
489,
735-743
|
| 47.
|
Takeuchi, T.,
Kishi, M.,
Ishii, T.,
Nishio, H.,
and Hata, F.
(1996)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
117,
1204-1208
|
| 48.
|
Pfeifer, A.,
Klatt, P.,
Massberg, S.,
Ny, L.,
Sausbier, M.,
Hirneiss, C.,
Wang, G. X.,
Korth, M.,
Aszodi, A.,
Andersson, K. E.,
Krombach, F.,
Mayerhofer, A.,
Ruth, P.,
Fassler, R.,
and Hofmann, F.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3045-3051
|
| 49.
|
DiSanto, M. E.,
Cox, R. H.,
Wang, Z.,
and Chacko, S.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
C1532-C1542
|
| 50.
|
Eddinger, T. J.,
and Meer, D. P.
(1997)
Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. Comp. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
117,
29-38
|
| 51.
|
Szymanski, P. T.,
Chacko, T. K.,
Rovner, A. S.,
and Goyal, R. K.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
C684-C692
|
| 52.
|
Eddinger, T. J.,
and Meer, D. P.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
280,
C309-C316
|
| 53.
|
Schiaffino, S.,
and Reggiani, C.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
77,
493-501
|
| 54.
|
Owens, G. K.
(1995)
Physiol. Rev.
75,
487-517
|
| 55.
|
Molkentin, J. D.,
Firulli, A. B.,
Black, B. L.,
Martin, J. F.,
Hustad, C. M.,
Copeland, N.,
Jenkins, N.,
Lyons, G.,
and Olson, E. N.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3814-3824
|
| 56.
|
Herring, B. P.,
and Smith, A. F.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
C1656-C1665
|
| 57.
|
Wu, X.,
Haystead, T. A.,
Nakamoto, R. K.,
Somlyo, A. V.,
and Somlyo, A. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
11362-11369
|
| 58.
|
Herring, B. P.,
Lyons, G. E.,
Hoggatt, A. M.,
and Gallagher, P. J.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
280,
C12-C21
|
| 59.
|
Eigenthaler, M.,
Lohmann, S. M.,
Walter, U.,
and Pilz, R. B.
(1999)
Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol.
135,
173-209
|
| 60.
|
Beall, A. C.,
Kato, K.,
Goldenring, J. R.,
Rasmussen, H.,
and Brophy, C. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11283-11287
|
| 61.
|
Hennan, J. K.,
and Diamond, J.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
280,
H1565-H1580
|
| 62.
|
Schmidt, H. H.,
Lohmann, S. M.,
and Walter, U.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1178,
153-175
|
| 63.
|
Alioua, A.,
Tanaka, Y.,
Wallner, M.,
Hofmann, F.,
Ruth, P.,
Meera, P.,
and Toro, L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32950-32956
|
| 64.
|
Fukao, M.,
Mason, H. S.,
Britton, F. C.,
Kenyon, J. L.,
Horowitz, B.,
and Keef, K. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10927-10935
|
| 65.
|
Butt, E.,
Geiger, J.,
Jarchau, T.,
Lohmann, S. M.,
and Walter, U.
(1993)
Neurochem. Res.
18,
27-42
|
| 66.
|
Schlossmann, J.,
Ammendola, A.,
Ashman, K.,
Zong, X.,
Huber, A.,
Neubauer, G.,
Wang, G. X.,
Allescher, H. D.,
Korth, M.,
Wilm, M.,
Hofmann, F.,
and Ruth, P.
(2000)
Nature
404,
197-201
|
| 67.
|
Keilbach, A.,
Ruth, P.,
and Hofmann, F.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
208,
467-473
|
| 68.
|
Huber, A.,
Trudrung, P.,
Storr, M.,
Franck, H.,
Schusdziarra, V.,
Ruth, P.,
and Allescher, H. D.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
G629-G637
|
| 69.
|
Word, R. A.,
Casey, M. L.,
Kamm, K. E.,
and Stull, J. T.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
91,
C861-C867
|
| 70.
|
Bergh, C. M.,
Brophy, C. M.,
Dransfield, D. T.,
Lincoln, T.,
Goldenring, J. R.,
and Rasmussen.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
268,
H202-H212
|
| 71.
|
Kitazawa, T.,
Eto, M.,
Woodsome, T. P.,
and Brautigan, D. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
9897-9900
|
| 72.
|
Khatri, J. K.,
Joyce, K.,
Brozovich, F. V.,
and Fisher, S. A.
(2000)
Biophys. J.
78,
363A
|
| 73.
|
Khatri, J. K.,
Joyce, K.,
Brozovich, F. V.,
and Fisher, S. A.
(2001)
Biophys. J.
80,
388a-389a
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Neppl, L. T. Lubomirov, K. Momotani, G. Pfitzer, M. Eto, and A. V. Somlyo
Thromboxane A2-induced Bi-directional Regulation of Cerebral Arterial Tone
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 6, 2009;
284(10):
6348 - 6360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Gao, A. D. Portugal, J. Liu, S. Negash, W. Zhou, J. Tian, R. Xiang, L. D. Longo, and J. U. Raj
Preservation of cGMP-induced relaxation of pulmonary veins of fetal lambs exposed to chronic high altitude hypoxia: role of PKG and Rho kinase
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
November 1, 2008;
295(5):
L889 - L896.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Shukla and S. A. Fisher
Tra2{beta} As a Novel Mediator of Vascular Smooth Muscle Diversification
Circ. Res.,
August 29, 2008;
103(5):
485 - 492.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Lu, H. Zhang, N. Gokina, M. Mandala, O. Sato, M. Ikebe, G. Osol, and S. A. Fisher
Uterine artery myosin phosphatase isoform switching and increased sensitivity to SNP in a rat L-NAME model of hypertension of pregnancy
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
February 1, 2008;
294(2):
C564 - C571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Somlyo
Cyclic GMP Regulation of Myosin Phosphatase: A New Piece for the Puzzle?
Circ. Res.,
September 28, 2007;
101(7):
645 - 647.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Zhang and S. A. Fisher
Conditioning Effect of Blood Flow on Resistance Artery Smooth Muscle Myosin Phosphatase
Circ. Res.,
March 16, 2007;
100(5):
730 - 737.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Lincoln
Myosin Phosphatase Regulatory Pathways: Different Functions or Redundant Functions?
Circ. Res.,
January 5, 2007;
100(1):
10 - 12.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Smith, A. Dreshaj, S. Chaudhuri, B. M. Onder, M. J. Mhanna, and R. J. Martin
Hyperoxic conditions inhibit airway smooth muscle myosin phosphatase in rat pups
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
January 1, 2007;
292(1):
L68 - L73.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Given, O. Ogut, and F. V. Brozovich
MYPT1 mutants demonstrate the importance of aa 888-928 for the interaction with PKGI{alpha}
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
January 1, 2007;
292(1):
C432 - C439.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. Khromov, H. Wang, N. Choudhury, M. McDuffie, B. P. Herring, R. Nakamoto, G. K. Owens, A. P. Somlyo, and A. V. Somlyo
Smooth muscle of telokin-deficient mice exhibits increased sensitivity to Ca2+ and decreased cGMP-induced relaxation
PNAS,
February 14, 2006;
103(7):
2440 - 2445.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. K. Surks, N. Riddick, and K.-i. Ohtani
M-RIP Targets Myosin Phosphatase to Stress Fibers to Regulate Myosin Light Chain Phosphorylation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 30, 2005;
280(52):
42543 - 42551.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. SHUKLA, F. DEL GATTO-KONCZAK, R. BREATHNACH, and S. A. FISHER
Competition of PTB with TIA proteins for binding to a U-rich cis-element determines tissue-specific splicing of the myosin phosphatase targeting subunit 1
RNA,
November 1, 2005;
11(11):
1725 - 1736.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. McAlinden, N. Havlioglu, L. Liang, S. R. Davies, and L. J. Sandell
Alternative Splicing of Type II Procollagen Exon 2 Is Regulated by the Combination of a Weak 5' Splice Site and an Adjacent Intronic Stem-loop Cis Element
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 23, 2005;
280(38):
32700 - 32711.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ekman, K. Fagher, M. Wede, K. Stakeberg, and A. Arner
Decreased Phosphatase Activity, Increased Ca2+ Sensitivity, and Myosin Light Chain Phosphorylation in Urinary Bladder Smooth Muscle of Newborn Mice
J. Gen. Physiol.,
January 31, 2005;
125(2):
187 - 196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Endo, H. K. Surks, S. Mochizuki, N. Mochizuki, and M. E. Mendelsohn
Identification and Characterization of Zipper-interacting Protein Kinase as the Unique Vascular Smooth Muscle Myosin Phosphatase-associated Kinase
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 1, 2004;
279(40):
42055 - 42061.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Karim, A. Y. Rhee, A. M. Given, M. D. Faulx, B. D. Hoit, and F. V. Brozovich
Vascular Reactivity in Heart Failure: Role of Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase
Circ. Res.,
September 17, 2004;
95(6):
612 - 618.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Hartshorne, M. Ito, and F. Erdodi
Role of Protein Phosphatase Type 1 in Contractile Functions: Myosin Phosphatase
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 3, 2004;
279(36):
37211 - 37214.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Bonnevier and A. Arner
Actions Downstream of Cyclic GMP/Protein Kinase G Can Reverse Protein Kinase C-mediated Phosphorylation of CPI-17 and Ca2+Sensitization in Smooth Muscle
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 9, 2004;
279(28):
28998 - 29003.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kitazawa, A. N. Polzin, and M. Eto
CPI-17-deficient smooth muscle of chicken
J. Physiol.,
June 1, 2004;
557(2):
515 - 528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. L. O. Buxton
Regulation of Uterine Function: a Biochemical Conundrum in the Regulation of Smooth Muscle Relaxation
Mol. Pharmacol.,
May 1, 2004;
65(5):
1051 - 1059.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Payne, H.-Y. Zhang, Y. Shirasawa, Y. Koga, M. Ikebe, J. N. Benoit, and S. A. Fisher
Dynamic changes in expression of myosin phosphatase in a model of portal hypertension
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
May 1, 2004;
286(5):
H1801 - H1810.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Shukla, W. P. Dirksen, K. M. Joyce, C. Le Guiner-Blanvillain, R. Breathnach, and S. A. Fisher
TIA Proteins Are Necessary but Not Sufficient for the Tissue-specific Splicing of the Myosin Phosphatase Targeting Subunit 1
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 2, 2004;
279(14):
13668 - 13676.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Q. Huang, S. A. Fisher, and F. V. Brozovich
Unzipping the Role of Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase in Smooth Muscle Cell Relaxation
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 2, 2004;
279(1):
597 - 603.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. CEULEMANS and M. BOLLEN
Functional Diversity of Protein Phosphatase-1, a Cellular Economizer and Reset Button
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2004;
84(1):
1 - 39.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. K. Surks, C. T. Richards, and M. E. Mendelsohn
Myosin Phosphatase-Rho Interacting Protein: A NEW MEMBER OF THE MYOSIN PHOSPHATASE COMPLEX THAT DIRECTLY BINDS RhoA
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 19, 2003;
278(51):
51484 - 51493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. SOMLYO and A. V. SOMLYO
Ca2+ Sensitivity of Smooth Muscle and Nonmuscle Myosin II: Modulated by G Proteins, Kinases, and Myosin Phosphatase
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2003;
83(4):
1325 - 1358.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. S. Murthy, H. Zhou, J. R. Grider, and G. M. Makhlouf
Inhibition of sustained smooth muscle contraction by PKA and PKG preferentially mediated by phosphorylation of RhoA
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
June 1, 2003;
284(6):
G1006 - G1016.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. P. Dirksen, S. A. Mohamed, and S. A. Fisher
Splicing of a Myosin Phosphatase Targeting Subunit 1 Alternative Exon Is Regulated by Intronic Cis-elements and a Novel Bipartite Exonic Enhancer/Silencer Element
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2003;
278(11):
9722 - 9732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Feil, N. Gappa, M. Rutz, J. Schlossmann, C. R. Rose, A. Konnerth, S. Brummer, S. Kuhbandner, and F. Hofmann
Functional Reconstitution of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells With cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase I Isoforms
Circ. Res.,
May 31, 2002;
90(10):
1080 - 1086.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. V. Brozovich
Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase: It Gets Around
Circ. Res.,
March 22, 2002;
90(5):
500 - 502.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|