Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105275200 on August 2, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 40, 37250-37257, October 5, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/40/37250    most recent
M105275200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khatri, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khatri, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Role of Myosin Phosphatase Isoforms in cGMP-mediated Smooth Muscle Relaxation*

Jaikirshan J. KhatriDagger §, Katherine M. JoyceDagger , Frank V. BrozovichDagger ||, and Steven A. FisherDagger **

From the Departments of Dagger  Medicine (Cardiology) and  Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4958

Received for publication, June 7, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In vitro experiments showing the activation of the myosin phosphatase via heterophilic leucine zipper interactions between its targeting subunit (MYPT1) and cGMP-dependent protein kinase I suggested a pathway for smooth muscle relaxation (Surks, H. K., Mochizuki, N., Kasai, Y., Georgescu, S. P., Tang, K. M., Ito, M., Lincoln, T. M., and Mendelsohn, M. E. (1999) Science 286, 1583-1587). The relationship between MYPT1 isoform expression and smooth muscle responses to cGMP signaling in vivo has not been explored. MYPT1 isoforms that contain or lack a C-terminal leucine zipper are generated in birds and mammals by cassette-type alternative splicing of a 31-nucleotide exon. The avian and mammalian C-terminal isoforms are highly conserved and expressed in a tissue-specific fashion. In the mature chicken the tonic contracting aorta and phasic contracting gizzard exclusively express the leucine zipper positive and negative MYPT1 isoforms, respectively. Expression of the MYPT1 isoforms is also developmentally regulated in the gizzard, which switches from leucine zipper positive to negative isoforms around the time of hatching. This switch coincides with the development in the gizzard of a cGMP-resistant phenotype, i.e. inability to dephosphorylate myosin and relax in response to 8-bromo-cGMP after calcium activation. Furthermore, association of cGMP-dependent protein kinase I with MYPT1 is detected by immunoprecipitation only in the tissue that expresses the leucine zipper positive isoform of MYPT1. These results suggest that the regulated splicing of MYPT1 is an important determinant of smooth muscle phenotypic diversity and the variability in the response of smooth muscles to the calcium desensitizing effect of cGMP signaling.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Smooth muscle contraction is initiated by the phosphorylation of the regulatory myosin light chain (MLC20)1 by the calcium/calmodulin-dependent activation of the myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) (1). Relaxation is effected by the dephosphorylation of MLC20 by the smooth muscle myosin phosphatase (SMMP). Complexity is brought to this system by accessory proteins and signaling pathways that regulate the smooth muscle contractile state (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 3).

The SMMP is a target of signals that are positive and negative modulators of smooth muscle tone. SMMP is a heterotrimeric protein composed of the 37-kDa catalytic subunit (PP1cdelta ), the 130/133-kDa myosin targeting subunit (MYPT1, also referred to as MBS), and the 21-kDa M21 subunit (4-6). MYPT1 targets the catalytic subunit to MLC20 (7, 8) and in this way confers substrate specificity to the phosphatase, whereas the function of the M21 subunit is unknown. Activation of the Rho kinase signaling pathway leads to phosphorylation of the MYPT1 subunit, resulting in inhibition of myosin phosphatase activity and an increase in smooth muscle tone (9-13). This signaling pathway is thought to determine the calcium-sensitizing effect of alpha -adrenergic stimulation, for example, in which greater force is produced at a given calcium concentration than when force is activated by calcium alone (10, 12, 14, 15).

Activation of guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide (NO) or atrial natriuretic peptide and the increase in intracellular cGMP has the opposite effect (16-18), desensitizing the contractile apparatus to activating concentrations of calcium (19, 20). Calcium desensitization is one of several proposed mechanisms by which the cGMP-dependent protein kinase (cGKI) effects smooth muscle relaxation (reviewed in Refs. 21 and 22). SMMP was recently suggested to be one of the final mediators of this calcium desensitization signaling pathway. SMMP activity is enhanced in vitro by dimerization of MYPT1 with the cGMP-dependent protein kinase Ialpha (cGKIalpha ) via leucine zipper motifs present in the C terminus of MYPT1 and the N terminus of cGKIalpha (23).

It has long been appreciated that smooth muscle tissues display considerable diversity with respect to both their basic contractile properties as well as their responses to modulating signals (reviewed in Ref. 3). As the NO/cGMP-mediated relaxation pathway was elucidated, it was also appreciated that smooth muscle tissues differ in their sensitivity to this pathway (24-27). The molecular basis of this smooth muscle functional diversity is not well understood. Since SMMP is a target of signaling pathways that modulate smooth muscle tone, we hypothesized that SMMP isoform differences may play an important role in the variable response of smooth muscle tissues to this signal. In mammals isoforms of the MYPT1 subunit of SMMP have been identified that either contain or lack the C-terminal leucine zipper (8, 28). Surprisingly, the C-terminal leucine zipper motif has not been identified previously in chicken MYPT1, yet it is highly conserved in mammals and the worm (reviewed in Ref. 29). In this study we demonstrate that chicken MYPT1 isoforms that contain or lack the C-terminal leucine zipper are generated by cassette-type alternative splicing of a 31-nucleotide (nt) alternative exon. The MYPT1 isoforms are expressed in a tissue-specific and developmentally regulated fashion. Tissues that express MYPT1 isoforms that lack the C-terminal leucine zipper fail to calcium desensitize in response to cGMP, and the phenotypic switch of the gizzard at hatching from MYPT1 leucine zipper positive to negative coincides with a switch from sensitivity to resistance to cGMP-mediated calcium desensitization. These results provide a mechanistic explanation for the differential sensitivity of smooth muscle tissues to the calcium-desensitizing (relaxing) effect of the NO/cGMP signaling pathway.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolation and Analysis of RNA-- Fertile White Leghorn chicken (Gallus gallus) eggs were obtained from Squire Valleevue Farm (Cleveland, OH) and incubated at 38 °C in humidified air. Organs were harvested (after decapitation) from embryonic chicks from 8 to 21 days of incubation (hatching is 21 days) and from chicks 1-12 days after hatching. Organs from Harlan Sprague-Dawley adult rats (Rattus norvegicus) were harvested after lethal CO2 inhalation. After organs were stripped of adventitia, the smooth muscle tissues were dissected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and total RNA isolated as described previously (30). Quantification of MYPT1 and M21 isoform splice variants was performed by RT-PCR using total RNA as described previously (30) with minor modifications. Oligonucleotide primer sets were designed with the PRIMER SELECT program (DNASTAR) to bracket the alternative exons and thus amplify alternative exon included and excluded transcripts in a single reaction. The following sets of primers, listed 5'-3', were used in these RT-PCR reactions: to chicken MYPT1 at +2888 TAGAAAAAGAAGATAGCACTG and +3203 CATTTTCATCTTTTAGCCTCTGG that generated 347- and 316-bp DNA fragments; to rat MYPT1 at +2470 GARAAAMGRMGRTCTACWGGA and +2968 GCCTCTGGTTGTCTGCYTTYA that generated 530- and 499-bp DNA fragments; and to chicken M21 at +729 GCTCGAGCTGGCAGACATCAA and +1028 GCGTGGGGCAGGAGGAAG that generated 367- and 300-nt fragments. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis through a 2% agarose gel, visualized by ethidium bromide staining, and images captured with a GelDoc 1000 (Bio-Rad). Bands were quantified directly using MultiAnalyst/MacIntosh software (Bio-Rad). Omission of RT in PCRs yielded no product (data not shown). The accuracy of the measured isoform ratios was determined by varying the amount of input RNA and observing a constant ratio, as described previously (30, 31). Selected products of the RT-PCR were cloned and sequenced by standard techniques (30) to determine their identity.

Cloning of the Chicken MYPT1 Gene-- Total DNA was isolated from chicken liver tissue using the Puregene DNA Isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Inc.). A PCR-amplified genomic fragment of the MYPT1 gene was generated using the Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) with the oligonucleotide primers listed above. The ~4.6-kilobase fragment was subcloned and sequenced by standard methods. Greater than 95% of the genomic clone was sequenced in both directions, with the remainder sequenced in one direction. The sequence of the exon splice sites was confirmed by sequencing these portions from a second, independent PCR clone.

Force Measurement in Skinned Smooth Muscle Strips-- Chicken gizzard and aorta strips (250-1000 × 80-150 × 20-150 µm) were prepared as described previously (30). The strips were mounted between two aluminum foil T clips and permeabilized (skinned) at room temperature for 15 (gizzard) or 30 min (aorta) in relaxing solution (pCa 9 (in mM), 60 potassium methane sulfonate (KMS), 5 EGTA, 0.02 CaCl2, 9.26 MgCl2, 5.2 ATP, 25 creatine phosphate, 25 BES, final pH to 7.1 with 1 N KOH) containing 400 µM beta -escin. Following skinning, the tissues were mounted onto the stage of a computer-controlled mechanics work station. One end of the tissue strip was hooked to a length driver (Physik Instrumente, Waldbron, Germany) and the other to a force transducer (Akers AE 801 Sensor, Horten, Norway). The strips were stretched to the optimum length for force production (1.3 times their resting length) and allowed to equilibrate in a well of relaxing solution (pCa 9) for 30 min. Contractions were initiated by transferring the strips to a well containing activating solution (pCa 4 (in mM), 58.33 KMS, 5 EGTA, 5.19 CaCl2, 4.43 MgCl2, 5.27 ATP, 25 creatine phosphate, 25 BES, final pH to 7.1 with 1 N KOHm or pCa 6 (in mM), 61 KMS, 5 EGTA, 3.92 CaCl2, 8.94 MgCl2, 5.20 ATP, 25 creatine phosphate, 25 BES, final pH to 7.1 with 1 N KOH). After force reached steady state, the strips were transferred to wells containing activating solution (pCa 4/pCa 6) as well as progressively increasing concentrations of 8-Br-cGMP (Sigma) (10-7-10-4 M). Finally, strips were transferred to relaxing solution (pCa 9) to demonstrate complete relaxation. A force versus time tracing was recorded on a digital oscilloscope (Nicolet). This tracing was used to calculate the mean percent force reduction in response to 8-Br-cGMP from maximal (pCa 4) and submaximal (pCa 6) activation. Results are reported as the mean force reduction ± S.D. Additional activated strips were transferred to a well containing activating solution (pCa 4) and 1-(5-chloronaphthalenesulfonyl)-1H-hexahydro-1,4-diazepine (ML-9, 200 µM), a selective MLCK inhibitor (32) in the presence or absence of 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M). A force versus time tracing was used to determine the rate of relaxation. Results are reported as the mean t1/2 for relaxation ± S.D.

Measurement of Myosin Light Chain Phosphorylation-- To determine the extent of phosphorylation of MLC20, a glycerol/urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis procedure (33) was adapted to resolve the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of MLC20 using a mini-gel apparatus (Hoeffer). Chicken aortic and gizzard strips were prepared and mounted as described above. To measure the effects of calcium concentration and 8-Br-cGMP on MLC20 phosphorylation, strips were incubated in pCa 9, 4, or 4 with 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M) until steady state force was achieved as indicated by force versus time tracings. Strips were then flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled acetone containing 10% trichloroacetic acid and 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) over 5 min followed by 1 h of incubation at room temperature. Subsequently, the samples were washed in acetone containing 10 mM DTT three times to remove excess trichloroacetic acid and air-dried for 30 min after the final wash. Samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen, pulverized, placed in 50 µl of sample buffer (8 M urea, 10 mM DTT, glycerol (5% v/v), bromphenol blue (0.1% w/v)), and allowed to extract for 1 h, with frequent vortexing, at room temperature. The samples were resolved by electrophoresis through a 10% polyacrylamide (19:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide), 40% glycerol (v/v) gel (20 mM Tris, pH 8.6; 22 mM glycine) for 3 h at 400 V. Resolved proteins were transferred to Hybond-P membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 8.2; 192 mM glycine, 10% methanol (v/v)) at 220 mA for 20 min. Membranes were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (w/v) in wash buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4; 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (v/v)) for 1 h, incubated with a monoclonal antibody against MLC20 (mouse IgM clone MY-21, Sigma) for 1 h, washed for 1 h, and incubated with the secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse IgM conjugated with alkaline phosphatase, Sigma) for 1 h. Both primary and secondary antibodies were diluted at 1:3000 with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (v/v) in wash buffer. After final washing, phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of MLC20 were detected by developing the membrane in alkaline phosphatase substrate buffer (100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM Tris, pH 9.5; 650 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate, 400 mM nitro blue tetrazolium). Membranes were digitally scanned (UMAX), and bands were subsequently quantified using Scion Image Beta 4.0.2 software (Scion Corp.). The percentage of MLC20 phosphorylated was calculated by determining the ratio of the phosphorylated MLC20 band versus the total MLC20 (phosphorylated + unphosphorylated species) identified by the monoclonal antibody. Results are reported as mean phosphorylated MLC20 ± S.D.

Immunopreciptaion of MYPTI and cGKI-- Chicken aortic and gizzard strips were harvested and permeabilized as described above and subsequently incubated in pCa 4 activating solution treated with 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M) or an equal volume of vehicle alone (PSS) for 15 min. In addition, aortas were harvested from Harlan Sprague-Dawley adult rats (R. norvegicus) after lethal CO2 inhalation. Vessels were quickly removed, rinsed in PSS containing 1.6 mM CaCl2 (PSS-Ca), stripped of fat and adventitia, and dissected into small smooth muscle strips (~5 × 2 × 2 mm). Rat strips were activated by incubation in PSS-Ca containing KCl (80 mM) substituted isotonically for NaCl in the presence or absence of 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M) for 15 min. Both rat and chicken strips were homogenized in 150 µl of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl, Triton X (1% v/v), protease inhibitor mixture (10% v/v, Sigma)) on ice. Lysates were sonicated for 10 s on ice and clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min. Total protein of the clarified lysates was determined by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad). A 100-µg aliquot of lysate was precleared with 10% v/v protein G-agarose bead solution (Sigma, 50% v/v in phosphate-buffered saline) for 2 h at 4 °C. Samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 1 min, and supernatant was collected. Precleared lysates were incubated overnight at 4 °C with either a monoclonal antibody against chicken MYPT1 (mouse IgG1/kappa clone ASC.M130, Babco, 1:1000) or a polyclonal antibody against the common C terminus of cGKI (rabbit IgG clone anti-PKG CT, Stressgen, 1:100). A 10% v/v protein G-agarose bead solution was added to the lysates and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C. The samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 1 min, and the pellet washed twice with lysis buffer. Pellets were resuspended in 20 µl of SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8; 2% w/v SDS, 10% v/v glycerol, 50 mM DTT, 0.01% w/v bromphenol blue), heated to 95 °C for 5 min, and separated by electrophoresis through a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel (29:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide) for 1 h at 25 mA. Resolved proteins were transferred to Hybond-P membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 8.2; 192 mM glycine, 10% methanol (v/v)) at 230 mA for 45 min. Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk (w/v) in wash buffer for 1 h, incubated with primary antibody for 1 h, washed for 30 min, and incubated with the secondary antibody for 1 h. Blots of lysates immunoprecipitated with ASC.MI30 were probed with primary antibody anti-PKG CT (1:800) followed by secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Cappel, 1:15,000). Blots of lysates immunoprecipitated with anti-PKG CT were probed with primary antibody ASC.M130 (1:1000) followed by secondary antibody goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Bio-Rad, 1:1600). After the final washing, the signals were visualized with a chemiluminescent reaction (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isoforms of Chicken Smooth Muscle MYPT1 Are Generated by Cassette-type Alternative Splicing of a 3' Exon-- To characterize the MYPT1 isoforms, we cloned a chicken MYPT1 3' genomic fragment. Comparison with cDNA obtained by RT-PCR of transcripts from chicken smooth muscle tissues indicated that cassette-type alternative splicing of a 31-nt exon gave rise to MYPT1 leucine zipper positive and negative isoforms (Fig. 1). Skipping of the 3' alternative exon coded for the leucine zipper positive isoform of MYPT1. The amino acid sequence of the C-terminal leucine zipper was identical in birds and mammals and shared 75% identity (18/24 residues) with the worm homologue mel-11 (34) (Fig. 1). Inclusion of the 31-nt alternative exon shifted the reading frame and introduced a premature stop codon, resulting in an MYPT1 C terminus lacking a leucine zipper. This amino acid sequence showed 85% identity (17:20 residues) between birds and mammals and was not found in the worm. The M21 subunit of SMMP appears to have a similar scheme for the generation of C-terminal leucine zipper positive and negative isoforms (35). The M21 leucine zipper amino acid sequences were identical in birds and mammals (Fig. 1) and were highly similar to the MYPT1 leucine zipper sequence (96% identity, 23:24 residues). A gene homologous to M21 has not been identified in the worm.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The chicken MYPT1 C-terminal leucine zipper variable isoforms are generated by cassette-type alternative splicing of a 31-nucleotide exon. a, the 3' region of chicken MYPT1 genomic DNA was compared with RT-PCR products obtained using oligonucleotide primers flanking this alternative exon. This is represented in schematic form with amino acid sequences indicated above and below the nucleotide sequence. Skipping of the alternative exon (shaded box) codes for the leucine zipper motif, whereas exon inclusion shifts the reading frame and codes for a C terminus that lacks the leucine zipper motif. A cryptic 5' donor splice site located within the alternative exon can generate an additional MYPT1 splice variant indicated by gray lines. Exons and introns are not to scale; the numbers of nucleotides are shown below each. * = termination codon. b, the MYPT1 C-terminal leucine zipper amino acid sequence is identical in chicken, rat, and human and is highly conserved in the worm homologue and chicken and human M21. Identical residues are indicated in bold and leucine residues are underlined. C, chicken; R, rat; H, human; the position of the first amino acid shown is indicated.

Expression of Leucine Zipper Positive and Negative SMMP Subunit Isoforms Is Tissue-specific and Developmentally Regulated-- We examined the expression of C-terminal variant MYPT1 and M21 isoforms in the mature and developing chicken as a first step in determining the relationship between SMMP isoform expression and sensitivity to cGMP-mediated signaling. We demonstrated previously that 1) the mature tonic aorta and phasic gizzard tissues are the most pure and distinct with respect to the expression of contractile protein isoforms and 2) developmental changes in gene expression in these tissues correlate with their contractile properties (30, 31, 36), thus providing a dynamic model for examining the functional significance of contractile protein isoform expression.

In the adult chicken the aorta, a tonic smooth muscle tissue, expressed exon-excluded transcripts (coding for the leucine zipper) of MYPT1 and M21 nearly exclusively (Fig. 2). The phasic gizzard smooth muscle expressed exon-included transcripts (coding for absence of the leucine zipper) almost exclusively. Other smooth muscle-containing tissues, such as intestine and lung, contained combinations of exon-included and exon-excluded transcripts. This pattern of expression was conserved in mammalian smooth muscle tissues. The rat aorta (tonic) expressed predominantly exon-excluded MYPT1 transcripts, and other tissues such as the portal vein, uterus, and intestine contained combinations of exon-included and exon-excluded transcripts (Fig. 3).


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Expression of chicken MYPT1/M21 leucine zipper variable isoforms is tissue-specific. RT-PCR products from various smooth muscle tissues were separated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with ethidium bromide. Ratios of exon-in/exon-out MYPT1 and M21 transcripts are shown below each lane. Quantification of isoforms in each tissue represents means from three animals with S.D. <10% in each case. AO, aorta; GIZ, gizzard; INT, intestine; KID, kidney; BLAD, urinary bladder; MW, molecular weight in bp.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression of rat MYPT1 leucine zipper variable isoforms is similar to that of the chicken. RT-PCR products from various smooth muscle tissues were separated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with ethidium bromide. Ratios of exon-in/exon-out MYPT1 transcripts are shown below each lane. Quantification of isoforms in each tissue represents mean from three animals with S.D. <10% in each case. PV, portal vein; UTER, uterus.

Throughout chick aorta development the expression of the exon-excluded, leucine zipper positive MYPT1 and M21 isoforms was invariant (Fig. 4 and data not shown). In contrast the gizzard MYPT1 and M21 transcripts switched from exon exclusion to exon inclusion (leucine zipper negative) around the time of hatching (21 days) (Fig. 4). During this transition an intermediate sized isoform was evident in MYPT1 that arose from a cryptic splice site within the alternative exon (Fig. 1). The isoform switch in the gizzard was synchronous with an opposite switch in splicing of the MYPT1 central alternative exon but much later than transitions in myosin heavy and light chain isoforms (30). We showed previously (30) that there is a corresponding transition in the gizzard MYPT1 protein from the larger to the smaller isoform, whereas in the developing aorta only the larger isoform is detected. The difference in the isoforms of 66 amino acids when the central alternative exon is included and the 3' alternative exon is excluded is consistent with their estimated size difference of 7 kDa by electrophoretic separation (37). This differs from the widely quoted M133/130 isoforms in the chicken due to a lack of appreciation of the presence of the C-terminal leucine zipper in the chicken MYPT1 (reviewed in Ref. 29). Furthermore, analysis of proteins derived from MYPT1 plasmid expression vectors showed that M137 and M130 arise from the translation of exon in/out and out/in (central/C terminus alternative exons) transcripts (data not shown).


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Expression of chicken MYPT1/M21 leucine zipper variable isoforms is developmentally regulated. RT-PCR products were generated and analyzed as described above. There is a complete switch in the gizzard in MYPT1 (a) and M21 (b) from exon exclusion to inclusion around the time of hatching (ED21). a, an additional MYPT1 isoform is evident at the time of isoform switching that arises from a cryptic splice site within the alternative exon (partial). The MYPT1/M21 isoforms do not switch during aorta development, so a representative sample is shown. Quantification of isoforms in each tissue represents mean from three animals with S.D. <10% in each case. ED, embryonic day; D, post-hatched day; ns, nonspecific product.

The MYPT1 isoform switching was recapitulated by a growth stimulus in vitro (data not shown). Gizzard smooth muscle cells (SMCs) in culture skipped the 3' alternative exon when processing the MYPT1 transcript, resulting in the MYPT1 leucine zipper positive isoform. Aortic SMCs in culture also skipped the alternative exon, as they do in vivo. Thus, as in the case of myosin heavy chain, myosin light chain, and the MYPT1 central alternative exon (30), the splicing of the C-terminal alternative exon of MYPT1 reverted to the embryonic phenotype when SMCs were placed in culture.

Expression of MYPT1 Isoforms and Sensitivity to cGMP-mediated Smooth Muscle Relaxation-- The sensitivity of smooth muscle tissues to cGMP was examined in mature tissues that were pure in their expression of the SMMP subunit isoforms, as well as developing smooth muscle tissues where the phenotype was modulating. Smooth muscle strips were permeabilized and pre-contracted at fixed calcium concentrations in order to obviate cGMP effects on calcium fluxes, thereby isolating the effect of cGMP to calcium desensitization of the contractile apparatus (19, 20). Aortic smooth muscle strips activated at pCa 4 relaxed completely in response to 8-Br-cGMP (10-7-10-4 M, force reduction from peak activation = 100%, n = 6) independent of developmental stage (Fig. 5, c and d, and data not shown). The embryonic gizzard, like the aorta, relaxed to 8-Br-cGMP at pCa 4 (10-7 M, mean force reduction from peak activation 55 ± 7%, n = 6 to 10-4 M, mean force reduction from peak activation 97 ± 5%, n = 6, Fig. 5, a and d). In contrast, the adult gizzard showed no response to 8-Br-cGMP (10-7 M to 10-4 M) at pCa 4 (n = 6, Fig. 5, b and d) or pCa 6 (data not shown). Gizzard tissue from intermediate ages when MYPT1/M21 isoforms were switching from leucine zipper positive to negative showed an intermediate response to 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M, mean force reduction from peak activation 20 ± 5%, n = 4) (Fig. 3d and data not shown). The concentrations of 8-Br-cGMP required to achieve smooth muscle relaxation in these experiments were consistent with the measured Km of 8-Br-cGMP for cGKI in vitro (2.6 × 10-8 and 2.1 × 10-7 M for Ialpha and Ibeta , respectively (38)).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Sensitivity to the relaxant effects of 8-Br-cGMP coincides with the expression of the MYPT1 isoforms. Tissues that express leucine zipper positive isoforms of MYPT1, ED16 GIZ (a) and AORTA (c), were compared with tissues that express exclusively leucine zipper negative isoforms of MYPT1 D7 GIZ (b). Permeabilized and calcium-activated (pCa 4) AORTA and ED16 GIZ strips completely relax to the cGMP analogue, whereas D7 GIZ strips show no response. d, graph of 8-Br-cGMP concentration versus % force reduction from peak activation in pCa 4, n = 4-6, mean ± S.D.

Since smooth muscle tone is primarily determined by the opposing activities of MLCK and SMMP, two sets of experiments were performed to localize the differential sensitivity to 8-Br-cGMP to an effect on SMMP. First, the effect of 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M) on the rate of relaxation of calcium-activated strips (pCa 4) in the presence of a specific inhibitor of MLCK, ML-9 (32), was tested. Adult gizzard strips treated with ML-9 (200 µM) completely relaxed (t1/2 = 1645 ± 120 s, n = 3). In the presence of 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M), there was no change in the rate of relaxation of ML-9-treated adult gizzard strips (t1/2 = 1603 ± 85 s, n = 3, p > 0.05). In contrast, an ~40% increase in the rate of relaxation of ML-9-treated embryonic gizzard strips was observed in the presence of 8-Br-cGMP (control, t1/2 = 936 ± 58 s, n = 3; 8-Br-cGMP treated, t1/2 = 547 ± 138 s, n = 3, p < 0.01). These experiments suggested that the smooth muscle relaxant effect of 8-Br-cGMP is not mediated by an inhibition of MLCK but rather by activation of SMMP.

The steady state level of myosin phosphorylation in these tissues was measured to localize further the effect of cGMP to activation of SMMP. Phosphorylation of the regulatory myosin light chain (MLC20) was undetectable in aortic and gizzard smooth muscle strips in pCa 9 relaxing solution and increased to ~50% upon activation at pCa 4 (Fig. 6). 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M) caused a decrease in MLC20 phosphorylation from 51 ± 1 to 11 ± 1% (n = 3, p < 0.001) in aortic strips independent of developmental stage and from 47 ± 5 to 9 ± 3% (n = 3, p < 0.001) in embryonic gizzard strips. In contrast, MLC20 phosphorylation levels in adult gizzard strips did not change in response to 8-Br-cGMP (control, 46 ± 1%, n = 3; 8-Br-cGMP-treated, 46 ± 2%, n = 3, p > 0.05). These results demonstrated that 8-Br-cGMP stimulated SMMP activity, as indicated by dephosphorylation of MLC20, only in those tissues that expressed leucine zipper positive SMMP subunit isoforms. Thus, only smooth muscle tissues that expressed leucine zipper positive SMMP subunit isoforms desensitized to calcium via cGMP-mediated activation of the myosin phosphatase.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of 8-Br-cGMP on MLC20 phosphorylation levels. Proteins from permeabilized smooth muscle strips in relaxing (pCa 9) or activating solution (pCa 4) in the presence or absence of 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M) were separated by 10% glycerol-urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Phosphorylated and unphosphorylated MLC20 species were detected by Western blot as shown. Tissues that relax to 8-Br-cGMP (AORTA, ED16 GIZ) show significant reductions in the level of MLC20 phosphorylation, whereas D7 GIZ does not.

The MYPT1 Subunit of SMMP Associates with cGKI in Vivo-- A previous study (23) showed that the leucine zipper motif of MYPT1 is critical for its association with cGKIalpha and activation of the SMMP in vitro. We performed immunoprecipitation (IP) assays to determine if the leucine zipper positive and negative isoforms of MYPT1 associated with cGKI in vivo. Force was activated in smooth muscle strips followed by treatment with 8-Br-cGMP or vehicle only. MYPT1 was detected by Western blot when cGKI was immunoprecipitated from lysates of calcium-activated chicken aortic strips that had been treated with 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M) (Fig. 7a). MYPT1 was not detected in the cGKI immunoprecipitates of calcium-activated aortic strips alone or in the control assay in which the cGKI antibody was omitted. In contrast, MYPT1 was not detected in cGKI immunoprecipitates of calcium-activated adult chicken gizzard smooth muscle strips in the presence or absence of 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M), although this tissue expressed abundant amounts of MYPT1 (30). Because the polyclonal anti-cGKI antibody would not react with the chicken cGKI in Western blotting, we were not able to confirm the observed association of cGKI and MYPT1 in the chicken aorta using MYPT1 in the immunoprecipitate followed by cGKI detection by Western blotting. We therefore repeated the experiments with intact rat aorta strips, in which force was activated by KCl depolarization followed by complete relaxation with 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M) (data not shown). In this case, immunoprecipitation with MYPT1 followed by immunodetection of cGKI or vice versa yielded positive results (Fig. 7b). In contrast to the chicken aorta, the MYPT1 was found in association with cGKI in the rat aorta in the presence or absence of exogenous 8-Br-cGMP. Of note, a second band of greater mobility was detected with the cGKI antibody only in the samples treated with 8-Br-cGMP, consistent with a post-translational modification of the protein (likely phosphorylation). These results support a model in which expression of a MYPT1 isoform containing a leucine zipper motif is required for the association of cGKIalpha with MYPT1 (1), SMMP activation, and desensitization of the contractile apparatus to calcium leading to smooth muscle relaxation.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   MYPT1 is detected in association with cGKI in vivo. a, cGKI was immunoprecipitated from pCa 4 activated adult chicken gizzard and aorta strips treated with 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M) or vehicle. Proteins were separated by 7.5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. A band of ~130-kDa corresponding to MYPT1 was detected by Western blot only in aorta strips treated with 8-Br-cGMP. b, either cGKI or MYPT1 were immunoprecipitated from intact rat aorta strips activated by potassium depolarization and treated with 8-Br-cGMP (10-4 M) or vehicle. MYPT1 association with cGKI was then detected by Western blotting with the appropriate antibody. Bands of ~130- and 75-kDa corresponding to MYPT1 and cGKI, respectively, were detected. * = faster migrating cGKI band observed with 8-Br-cGMP treatment only. In both a and b IP performed without the primary antibody served as the negative control. Mouse stomach lysates served as the positive control. C, control.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reversible phosphorylation of serine/threonine (Ser/Thr) residues of proteins by specific kinases and phosphatases is commonly used to propagate signals and alter protein function within cells. In many instances substrate specificity is conferred to common catalytic subunits via unique targeting subunits (reviewed in Ref. 39). The targeting subunits are also targets of signaling pathways that may modulate the activity of the enzyme toward its substrate. In the case of the myosin phosphatase, two genes encoding for the targeting subunit have been identified, one of which is expressed ubiquitously in smooth muscle and non-muscle cells (MYPT1) and a second that is predominantly expressed in striated muscle and brain (MYPT2). MYPT1 and MYPT2 are highly related, sharing 61% amino acid identity within a species (40). The MYPT sequence has also been conserved through evolution with nearly 90% amino acid identity among mammalian MYPT1s and ~80% identity between mammalian and avian MYPT1. A more distantly related MYPT1 homologue termed mel-11 is present in the worm and shares 35% amino acid identity with the higher vertebrate form (5, 28, 34, 41).

Further diversity is generated in the MYPT isoforms by cassette-type alternative splicing of exons. This strategy is commonly used to add and remove specific functional modules from proteins (reviewed in Ref. 42). In the current study we have demonstrated the tissue-specific and developmentally regulated cassette-type alternative splicing of a 31-nt 3' MYPT1 exon in the chicken. This results in MYPT1 isoforms that either contain or lack a C-terminal leucine zipper. These isoforms have also been identified in mammalian MYPT1, and examination of the Celera human genome data base reveals similarity in exon-intron sizes and conservation of the alternative splicing mechanism for generation of the isoforms. The pattern of expression of the MYPT1 C-terminal isoforms is also similar in birds and mammals. The MYPT2 pre-mRNA (43) and presumptively the M21 subunit pre-mRNA are also alternatively spliced to produce isoforms with variable presence of the C-terminal leucine zipper. The highly conserved nature of the leucine zipper sequences (100% identity among chicken, rat, and human sequences and 75% identity with worm) and conserved patterns of isoform expression are consistent with the proposed functional significance of this motif.

We have used the developing and mature chicken as a model to understand the relationship between contractile protein isoform expression and smooth muscle diversity. The chicken aorta and gizzard are particularly attractive smooth muscle tissues for this analysis because of their distinct contractile properties and patterns of gene expression, as well as their accessibility during development. The aorta throughout development is always phenotypically and functionally slow (tonic) (30, 31, 36), expresses leucine zipper positive isoforms of MYPT1 and M21, and relaxes to cGMP in the presence of activating concentrations of calcium. The evidence that the calcium desensitization is due to cGMP-dependent activation of the SMMP includes 1) the parallel decrease in force and MLC20 phosphorylation levels in the presence of calcium concentrations that maximally activate MLCK, 2) an acceleration of relaxation by cGMP when MLCK was specifically inhibited with ML-9 (20), and 3) the demonstration by immunoprecipitation that the cGKI associates with the MYPT1 subunit in aortic tissues in vivo. This in vivo observation supports the initial observation in vitro that SMMP/MYPT1 is a target of cGKIalpha via heterophilic leucine zipper interactions (23). In our experiments MYPTI and cGKI were associated in calcium-activated chicken aorta strips only in the presence of 8-Br-cGMP. However, in rat smooth muscle strips that were activated by KCl depolarization, MYPT1 and cGKI were associated prior to the addition of 8-Br-cGMP. Whether the difference between chicken and rat aorta in the requirement of cGMP for association of MYPT1 with cGKI is due to differences in the activation of the two tissues (Ca2+ versus KCl depolarization, respectively) or reflects species differences will require further study. The mechanism by which cGMP/cGKI enhances the activity of the SMMP has not been determined.

In contrast to the tonic aorta the gizzard undergoes a series of phenotypic transitions during development before acquiring its mature phasic contractile properties. From ED10 to just before hatching there is a marked increase in the rate of force development that coincides with a switch in the myosin heavy and light chain isoforms (31, 36). From ED16 to shortly after hatching there is a marked change in the relaxation response of the gizzard to cGMP, from complete calcium desensitization to complete resistance to calcium desensitization. This coincides with a switch in the SMMP subunit isoforms from leucine zipper positive to negative. The transition from cGMP-sensitive to cGMP-resistant is attributed to a failure to activate the SMMP for the following reasons: 1) a failure to dephosphorylate MLC20 in the presence of activating calcium concentrations, 2) a failure to speed relaxation in the presence of the specific MLCK inhibitor ML-9, and 3) an inability of cGKI to associate with MYPT1 as determined by immunoprecipitation.

In this study we focused on phenotypically distinct smooth muscle tissues, the aorta and gizzard. This enabled us to show a relationship between the expression of the myosin phosphatase isoforms and a single component of the NO signaling pathway, cGMP mediated calcium desensitization. However, the physiological role of NO/cGMP signaling in all vascular (tonic) or visceral (phasic) tissues cannot be inferred from this study for a number of reasons. First, NO may signal through cGMP-independent mechanisms, including S-nitrosylation of proteins (44-47). However, the signaling of NO via cGMP-dependent activation of cGKI appears to be the predominant pathway for physiological smooth muscle relaxation given the minimal response in cGKI-null mice (48).

Second, this study as well as others (49-52) have shown considerable diversity in the expression of the contractile protein isoforms throughout both the vascular and intestinal systems. The variation in isoform expression is observed at both the tissue and single cell level and is also evident during smooth muscle maturation by the variation in the timing of isoform switching (Ref. 30 and this study). Thus smooth muscle phenotypic diversity approaches that of striated muscle, while how it is generated is much less well understood (reviewed in Refs. 53-55). How tissues that express various mixtures of MYPT1 isoforms respond to cGMP was not a goal of this study. However, the partial response of the gizzard around the time of hatching to higher concentrations of cGMP suggests that tissues with mixed isoform expression may show intermediate responses.

Third, several targets of cGMP/cGKI signaling other than MYPT1 have also recently been identified (reviewed in Ref. 22), but an association between their expression and sensitivity to NO/cGMP signaling has not been demonstrated. Telokin, an MLCK-related protein, is detected at much higher levels in embryonic and adult visceral smooth muscle, including gizzard, as compared with vascular smooth muscle (56-58), i.e. in a pattern opposite to that of the cGMP sensitivity. The vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (reviewed in Ref. 59) and heat shock protein-20 (60) appear to be ubiquitously expressed, although their expression in this developing chick model has not been examined. Interestingly, a recent study of NO donor activation of cGMP sensitive (aorta) and resistant (myometrium and vas deferens) rat tissues reports seven phosphorylated substrates of cGK in the aorta, none of which were found in the cGMP-resistant tissues (61). The identity of these proteins was not determined.

Fourth, cGMP has as targets not only proteins that determine calcium sensitivity but also proteins that regulate calcium flux (62-64). This aspect of cGMP signaling was obviated in our experiments by clamping calcium concentrations. Interestingly the two cGKI-dependent components of the NO/cGMP response appear to be mediated by different cGKI isoforms that vary only in their N-terminal leucine zipper sequences (reviewed in Ref. 65). The cGKIbeta association with the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor-associated cGKI substrate (66) is proposed as a mediator of the reduction in calcium, whereas the cGKIalpha association with MYPT1 is proposed as a mediator of calcium desensitization (23). Thus it is plausible that cGMP-dependent signaling may independently regulate the phasic nature of smooth muscle contractions via an effect on ion flux and regulate smooth muscle tone via an effect on calcium sensitivity of the myofilaments.

Finally, isoform variations in the proteins that determine cGMP steady state levels (guanylate cyclase and phosphodiesterase) and in the cGMP-binding proteins (e.g. cGKI) may also determine the smooth muscle response to a given signal. This upstream component of the cGMP signaling pathway is targeted by sildenafil, a selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor that somewhat selectively regulates blood flow in the corpus cavernosum. Although some studies (67, 68) have reported differences in the relative expression of the two cGKI isoforms that could influence the response to cGMP, no smooth muscle tissue has been identified that expresses one isoform exclusively. The lack of an antibody against chicken cGKI isoforms precluded a determination of cGKI isoform expression, but semi-quantitative RT-PCR indicated no significant change in cGKIalpha mRNA abundance during gizzard development (data not shown). Relative differences in the quantitative or qualitative expression of proteins in this pathway may explain why the embryonic gizzard requires higher concentrations of cGMP to completely desensitize to calcium than does the aorta, even though they express the same SMMP subunit isoforms. It is also likely that a unique ensemble of protein isoforms in the cGMP signaling pathway determines the variability in the type and the magnitude of the response to NO/cGMP signaling reported for a number of tissues, including rat myometrium (24, 27) and vas deferens (24), guinea-pig taenia coli (24), dog femoral vein (25), human myometrium (69), and human umbilical artery at parturition (70).

In conclusion, there is now evidence of considerable complexity in the signaling pathways that regulate vascular and visceral smooth muscle function. The myosin phosphatase targeting subunit has emerged as a key target of signals that either sensitize or desensitize the smooth muscle cell to calcium activation. The MYPT1 may thus be considered as a scaffold protein, analogous to the cAMP-dependent protein kinase anchoring proteins (reviewed in Ref. 39), that binds a number of proteins that inhibit (Zip-like kinase (13) and CPI-17 (71)) or stimulate (cGKI (this study and Ref. 23)) the activity of the phosphatase and thereby regulate smooth muscle tone. Additional complexity is brought by the expression of MYPT1 isoforms that may determine its ability to associate with the proteins that transduce these signals. Further investigation should uncover how a unique ensemble of gene expression within normal or diseased vascular and visceral tissues leads to unique or dysfunctional responses to cGMP-dependent signaling. An understanding of these processes may provide a means to therapeutically target additional aspects of this signal, as well as to modulate the phenotype so as to optimize the response of smooth muscle tissues to complex signaling pathways.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Albert Rhee for technical assistance with myosin light chain phosphorylation assays and Sarah MacFarland for harvesting rat tissues.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was presented in part at the Biophysical Society Meeting, 2000 (72) and 2001 (73).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Supported by American Heart Association Ohio Valley Affiliate Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Award 0020332B and funds from University Hospitals of Cleveland.

|| Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 HL64137.

** Supported by National Institute of Health Grant RO1 HL66171-01 and KO8 HL03275-05. To whom correspondence should be addressed: 422 BRB, 2109 Adelbert Rd., Cleveland, OH 44106-4958. Tel.: 216-368-0488; Fax: 216-368-0507; E-mail: saf9@po.cwru.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 2, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105275200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MLC20, regulatory myosin light chain; MLCK, myosin light chain kinase; SMMP, smooth muscle myosin phosphatase; MYPT, myosin targeting subunit; NO, nitric oxide; cGKI, cGMP-dependent protein kinase; nt, nucleotide; bp, base pair; 8- Br-cGMP, 8-bromo-cGMP; ML-9, 1-(5-chloronaphthalenesulfonyl)-1H-hexahydro-1,4-diazepine; IP, immunoprecipitation; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; BES, N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid; DTT, dithiothreitol; SMCs, smooth muscle cells; PSS, physiological saline solution.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Stull, J. T., Lin, P. J., Krueger, J. K., Trewhella, J., and Zhi, G. (1998) Acta Physiol. Scand. 164, 471-482
2. Hartshorne, D. J. (1987) in Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract (Johnson, L. R., ed) , pp. 423-482, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
3. Somlyo, A. P., and Somlyo, A. V. (1994) Nature 372, 231-236
4. Alessi, D., Macdougall, L. K., Sola, M. M., Ikebe, M., and Cohen, P. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 210, 1023-1035
5. Shimizu, H., Ito, M., Miyahara, M., Ichikawa, K., Okubo, S., Konishi, T., Naka, M., Tanaka, T., Hirano, K., Hartshorne, D. J., and Nakano, T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30407-30411
6. Shirazi, A., Iizuka, K., Fadden, P., Mosse, C., Somlyo, A. P., Somlyo, A. V., and Haystead, T. A. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 31598-31606
7. Hubbard, M. J., and Cohen, P. (1993) Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 172-177
8. Johnson, D., Cohen, P., Chen, Y. H., Chen, M. X., and Cohen, P. T. W. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 244, 931-939
9. Trinkle-Mulcahy, L., Ichikawa, K., Hartshorne, D. J., Siegman, M. J., and Butler, T. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18191-18194
10. Kimura, K., Ito, M., Amano, M., Chihara, K., Fukata, Y., Nakafuku, M., Yamamori, B., Feng, J., Nakano, T., Okawa, K., Iwamatsu, A., and Kaibuchi, K. (1996) Science 273, 245-248
11. Kawano, Y., Fukata, Y., Oshiro, N., Amano, M., Nakamura, T., Ito, M., Matsumura, F., Inagaki, M., and Kaibuchi, K. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 147, 1023-1037
12. Ichikawa, K., Ito, M., and Hartshorne, D. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4733-4740
13. MacDonald, J. A., Borman, M. A., Muranyi, A., Somlyo, A. V., Hartshorne, D. J., and Haystead, T. A. J. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 2419-2424
14. Morgan, J. P., and Morgan, K. G. (1984) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 351, 155-167
15. Kitazawa, T., Masuo, M., and Somlyo, A. P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 9307-9310
16. Arnold, W. P., Mittal, C. K., Katsuki, S., and Murad, F. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 3203-3207
17. Furchgott, R. F., and Zawadzki, J. V. (1980) Nature 286, 373-376
18. Ignarro, L. J., Buga, G. M., Wood, K. S., Byrns, R. E., and Chaudhuri, G. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 9265-9269
19. Wu, X., Somlyo, A. V., and Somlyo, A. P. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 220, 658-663
20. Lee, M. R., Li, L., and Kitazawa, T. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5063-5068
21. Hofmann, F., Ammendola, A., and Schlossmann, J. (2000) J. Cell Sci. 113, 1671-1676
22. Lincoln, T. M., and Komalavilias, P. (2000) in Nitric Oxide Biology and Pathobiology (Ignarro, L. J., ed) , pp. 401-425, Academic Press, San Diego
23. Surks, H. K., Mochizuki, N., Kasai, Y., Georgescu, S. P., Tang, K. M., Ito, M., Lincoln, T. M., and Mendelsohn, M. E. (1999) Science 286, 1583-1587
24. Diamond, J. (1983) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 225, 422-426
25. Miller, V. M., Komori, K., Burnett, J. C., Jr., and Vanhoutte, P. M. (1989) Am. J. Physiol. 257, H1127-H1131
26. Pfitzer, G., Merkel, L., Ruegg, J. C., and Hofmann, F. (1986) Pfluegers Arch. 407, 87-91
27. Word, R. A., and Cornwell, T. L. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, C748-C756
28. Chen, Y. H., Chen, M. X., Alessi, D., Campbell, D. G., Shanahan, C., Cohen, P., and Cohen, P. T. W. (1994) FEBS Lett. 356, 51-55
29. Hartshorne, D. J., Ito, M., and Erdodi, F. (1998) J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 19, 325-341
30. Dirksen, W. P., Vladic, F., and Fisher, S. A. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 278, C589-C600
31. Fisher, S. A., Ikebe, M., and Brozovich, F. V. (1997) Circ. Res. 80, 885-893
32. Saitoh, M., Ishikawa, T., Matsushima, S., Naka, M., and Hidaka, H. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 7796-7801
33. Hathaway, D. R., and Haeberle, J. R. (1985) Am. J. Physiol. 249, C345-C351
34. Wissmann, A., Ingles, J., McGhee, J. D., and Mains, P. E. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 409-422
35. Mabuchi, K., Gong, B. J., Langsetmo, K., Ito, M., Nakano, T., and Tao, T. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1434, 296-303
36. Ogut, O., and Brozovich, F. V. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, C1722-C1732
37. Okubo, S., Ito, M., Takashiba, Y., Ichikawa, K., Miyahara, M., Shimizu, H., Konishi, T., Shima, H., Nagao, M., Hartshorne, D. J., and Nakano, T. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 200, 429-434
38. Sekhar, K. R., Hatchett, R. J., Shabb, J. B., Wolfe, L., Francis, S. H., Wells, J. N., Jastorff, B., Butt, E., Chakinala, M. M., and Corbin, J. D. (1992) Mol. Pharmacol. 42, 103-108
39. Schillace, R. V., and Scott, J. D. (1999) J. Clin. Invest. 103, 761-765
40. Fujioka, M., Takahashi, N., Odai, H., Araki, S., Ichikawa, K., Feng, J., Nakamura, M., Kaibuchi, K., Hartshorne, D. J., Nakano, T., and Ito, M. (1998) Genomics 49, 59-68
41. Takahashi, N., Ito, M., Tanaka, J., Nakano, T., Kaibuchi, K., Odai, H., and Takemura, K. (1997) Genomics 44, 150-152
42. Black, D. L. (2000) Cell 103, 367-370
43. Arimura, T., Suematsu, N., Zhou, Y. B., Nishimura, J., Satoh, S., Takeshita, A., Kanaide, H., and Kimura, A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 6073-6082
44. Bolotina, V. M., Najibi, S., Palacino, J. J., Pagano, P. J., and Cohen, R. A. (1994) Nature 368, 850-853
45. Gaston, B., Drazen, J. M., Jansen, A., Sugarbaker, D. A., Loscalzo, J., Richards, W., and Stamler, J. S. (1994) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 268, 978-984
46. Koh, S. D., Campbell, J. D., Carl, A., and Sanders, K. M. (1995) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 489, 735-743
47. Takeuchi, T., Kishi, M., Ishii, T., Nishio, H., and Hata, F. (1996) Br. J. Pharmacol. 117, 1204-1208
48. Pfeifer, A., Klatt, P., Massberg, S., Ny, L., Sausbier, M., Hirneiss, C., Wang, G. X., Korth, M., Aszodi, A., Andersson, K. E., Krombach, F., Mayerhofer, A., Ruth, P., Fassler, R., and Hofmann, F. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3045-3051
49. DiSanto, M. E., Cox, R. H., Wang, Z., and Chacko, S. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, C1532-C1542
50. Eddinger, T. J., and Meer, D. P. (1997) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. Comp. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 117, 29-38
51. Szymanski, P. T., Chacko, T. K., Rovner, A. S., and Goyal, R. K. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, C684-C692
52. Eddinger, T. J., and Meer, D. P. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. 280, C309-C316
53. Schiaffino, S., and Reggiani, C. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 77, 493-501
54. Owens, G. K. (1995) Physiol. Rev. 75, 487-517
55. Molkentin, J. D., Firulli, A. B., Black, B. L., Martin, J. F., Hustad, C. M., Copeland, N., Jenkins, N., Lyons, G., and Olson, E. N. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3814-3824
56. Herring, B. P., and Smith, A. F. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, C1656-C1665
57. Wu, X., Haystead, T. A., Nakamoto, R. K., Somlyo, A. V., and Somlyo, A. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11362-11369
58. Herring, B. P., Lyons, G. E., Hoggatt, A. M., and Gallagher, P. J. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. 280, C12-C21
59. Eigenthaler, M., Lohmann, S. M., Walter, U., and Pilz, R. B. (1999) Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 135, 173-209
60. Beall, A. C., Kato, K., Goldenring, J. R., Rasmussen, H., and Brophy, C. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11283-11287
61. Hennan, J. K., and Diamond, J. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. 280, H1565-H1580
62. Schmidt, H. H., Lohmann, S. M., and Walter, U. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1178, 153-175
63. Alioua, A., Tanaka, Y., Wallner, M., Hofmann, F., Ruth, P., Meera, P., and Toro, L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32950-32956
64. Fukao, M., Mason, H. S., Britton, F. C., Kenyon, J. L., Horowitz, B., and Keef, K. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 10927-10935
65. Butt, E., Geiger, J., Jarchau, T., Lohmann, S. M., and Walter, U. (1993) Neurochem. Res. 18, 27-42
66. Schlossmann, J., Ammendola, A., Ashman, K., Zong, X., Huber, A., Neubauer, G., Wang, G. X., Allescher, H. D., Korth, M., Wilm, M., Hofmann, F., and Ruth, P. (2000) Nature 404, 197-201
67. Keilbach, A., Ruth, P., and Hofmann, F. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 208, 467-473
68. Huber, A., Trudrung, P., Storr, M., Franck, H., Schusdziarra, V., Ruth, P., and Allescher, H. D. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, G629-G637
69. Word, R. A., Casey, M. L., Kamm, K. E., and Stull, J. T. (1991) Am. J. Physiol. 91, C861-C867
70. Bergh, C. M., Brophy, C. M., Dransfield, D. T., Lincoln, T., Goldenring, J. R., and Rasmussen. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 268, H202-H212
71. Kitazawa, T., Eto, M., Woodsome, T. P., and Brautigan, D. L. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9897-9900
72. Khatri, J. K., Joyce, K., Brozovich, F. V., and Fisher, S. A. (2000) Biophys. J. 78, 363A
73. Khatri, J. K., Joyce, K., Brozovich, F. V., and Fisher, S. A. (2001) Biophys. J. 80, 388a-389a


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. L. Neppl, L. T. Lubomirov, K. Momotani, G. Pfitzer, M. Eto, and A. V. Somlyo
Thromboxane A2-induced Bi-directional Regulation of Cerebral Arterial Tone
J. Biol. Chem., March 6, 2009; 284(10): 6348 - 6360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
Y. Gao, A. D. Portugal, J. Liu, S. Negash, W. Zhou, J. Tian, R. Xiang, L. D. Longo, and J. U. Raj
Preservation of cGMP-induced relaxation of pulmonary veins of fetal lambs exposed to chronic high altitude hypoxia: role of PKG and Rho kinase
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): L889 - L896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. Shukla and S. A. Fisher
Tra2{beta} As a Novel Mediator of Vascular Smooth Muscle Diversification
Circ. Res., August 29, 2008; 103(5): 485 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
Y. Lu, H. Zhang, N. Gokina, M. Mandala, O. Sato, M. Ikebe, G. Osol, and S. A. Fisher
Uterine artery myosin phosphatase isoform switching and increased sensitivity to SNP in a rat L-NAME model of hypertension of pregnancy
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): C564 - C571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. V. Somlyo
Cyclic GMP Regulation of Myosin Phosphatase: A New Piece for the Puzzle?
Circ. Res., September 28, 2007; 101(7): 645 - 647.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
H. Zhang and S. A. Fisher
Conditioning Effect of Blood Flow on Resistance Artery Smooth Muscle Myosin Phosphatase
Circ. Res., March 16, 2007; 100(5): 730 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. M. Lincoln
Myosin Phosphatase Regulatory Pathways: Different Functions or Redundant Functions?
Circ. Res., January 5, 2007; 100(1): 10 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
P. G. Smith, A. Dreshaj, S. Chaudhuri, B. M. Onder, M. J. Mhanna, and R. J. Martin
Hyperoxic conditions inhibit airway smooth muscle myosin phosphatase in rat pups
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): L68 - L73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
A. M. Given, O. Ogut, and F. V. Brozovich
MYPT1 mutants demonstrate the importance of aa 888-928 for the interaction with PKGI{alpha}
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): C432 - C439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. S. Khromov, H. Wang, N. Choudhury, M. McDuffie, B. P. Herring, R. Nakamoto, G. K. Owens, A. P. Somlyo, and A. V. Somlyo
Smooth muscle of telokin-deficient mice exhibits increased sensitivity to Ca2+ and decreased cGMP-induced relaxation
PNAS, February 14, 2006; 103(7): 2440 - 2445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. K. Surks, N. Riddick, and K.-i. Ohtani
M-RIP Targets Myosin Phosphatase to Stress Fibers to Regulate Myosin Light Chain Phosphorylation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
J. Biol. Chem., December 30, 2005; 280(52): 42543 - 42551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
S. SHUKLA, F. DEL GATTO-KONCZAK, R. BREATHNACH, and S. A. FISHER
Competition of PTB with TIA proteins for binding to a U-rich cis-element determines tissue-specific splicing of the myosin phosphatase targeting subunit 1
RNA, November 1, 2005; 11(11): 1725 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. McAlinden, N. Havlioglu, L. Liang, S. R. Davies, and L. J. Sandell
Alternative Splicing of Type II Procollagen Exon 2 Is Regulated by the Combination of a Weak 5' Splice Site and an Adjacent Intronic Stem-loop Cis Element
J. Biol. Chem., September 23, 2005; 280(38): 32700 - 32711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
M. Ekman, K. Fagher, M. Wede, K. Stakeberg, and A. Arner
Decreased Phosphatase Activity, Increased Ca2+ Sensitivity, and Myosin Light Chain Phosphorylation in Urinary Bladder Smooth Muscle of Newborn Mice
J. Gen. Physiol., January 31, 2005; 125(2): 187 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Endo, H. K. Surks, S. Mochizuki, N. Mochizuki, and M. E. Mendelsohn
Identification and Characterization of Zipper-interacting Protein Kinase as the Unique Vascular Smooth Muscle Myosin Phosphatase-associated Kinase
J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 42055 - 42061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. M. Karim, A. Y. Rhee, A. M. Given, M. D. Faulx, B. D. Hoit, and F. V. Brozovich
Vascular Reactivity in Heart Failure: Role of Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase
Circ. Res., September 17, 2004; 95(6): 612 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. J. Hartshorne, M. Ito, and F. Erdodi
Role of Protein Phosphatase Type 1 in Contractile Functions: Myosin Phosphatase
J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 2004; 279(36): 37211 - 37214.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Bonnevier and A. Arner
Actions Downstream of Cyclic GMP/Protein Kinase G Can Reverse Protein Kinase C-mediated Phosphorylation of CPI-17 and Ca2+Sensitization in Smooth Muscle
J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 2004; 279(28): 28998 - 29003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
T. Kitazawa, A. N. Polzin, and M. Eto
CPI-17-deficient smooth muscle of chicken
J. Physiol., June 1, 2004; 557(2): 515 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
I. L. O. Buxton
Regulation of Uterine Function: a Biochemical Conundrum in the Regulation of Smooth Muscle Relaxation
Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2004; 65(5): 1051 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. C. Payne, H.-Y. Zhang, Y. Shirasawa, Y. Koga, M. Ikebe, J. N. Benoit, and S. A. Fisher
Dynamic changes in expression of myosin phosphatase in a model of portal hypertension
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): H1801 - H1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Shukla, W. P. Dirksen, K. M. Joyce, C. Le Guiner-Blanvillain, R. Breathnach, and S. A. Fisher
TIA Proteins Are Necessary but Not Sufficient for the Tissue-specific Splicing of the Myosin Phosphatase Targeting Subunit 1
J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 13668 - 13676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Q. Q. Huang, S. A. Fisher, and F. V. Brozovich
Unzipping the Role of Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase in Smooth Muscle Cell Relaxation
J. Biol. Chem., January 2, 2004; 279(1): 597 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
H. CEULEMANS and M. BOLLEN
Functional Diversity of Protein Phosphatase-1, a Cellular Economizer and Reset Button
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2004; 84(1): 1 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. K. Surks, C. T. Richards, and M. E. Mendelsohn
Myosin Phosphatase-Rho Interacting Protein: A NEW MEMBER OF THE MYOSIN PHOSPHATASE COMPLEX THAT DIRECTLY BINDS RhoA
J. Biol. Chem., December 19, 2003; 278(51): 51484 - 51493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. P. SOMLYO and A. V. SOMLYO
Ca2+ Sensitivity of Smooth Muscle and Nonmuscle Myosin II: Modulated by G Proteins, Kinases, and Myosin Phosphatase
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2003; 83(4): 1325 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. S. Murthy, H. Zhou, J. R. Grider, and G. M. Makhlouf
Inhibition of sustained smooth muscle contraction by PKA and PKG preferentially mediated by phosphorylation of RhoA
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): G1006 - G1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. P. Dirksen, S. A. Mohamed, and S. A. Fisher
Splicing of a Myosin Phosphatase Targeting Subunit 1 Alternative Exon Is Regulated by Intronic Cis-elements and a Novel Bipartite Exonic Enhancer/Silencer Element
J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2003; 278(11): 9722 - 9732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. Feil, N. Gappa, M. Rutz, J. Schlossmann, C. R. Rose, A. Konnerth, S. Brummer, S. Kuhbandner, and F. Hofmann
Functional Reconstitution of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells With cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase I Isoforms
Circ. Res., May 31, 2002; 90(10): 1080 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
F. V. Brozovich
Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase: It Gets Around
Circ. Res., March 22, 2002; 90(5): 500 - 502.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/40/37250    most recent
M105275200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khatri, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khatri, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement