![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 40, 37451-37458, October 5, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
,
,
,
, and
From the
Department of Biochemistry, Rheinisch
Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH) Aachen,
Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany and the ¶ Imperial Cancer
Research Fund (ICRF), 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, United
Kingdom
Received for publication, July 2, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Janus kinase 1 (Jak1) is a cytoplasmic tyrosine
kinase that noncovalently associates with a variety of cytokine
receptors. Here we show that the in vitro translated
N-terminal domains of Jak1 are sufficient for binding to a biotinylated
peptide comprising the membrane-proximal 73 amino acids of gp130, the
signal-transducing receptor chain of interleukin-6-type cytokines. By
the fold recognition approach amino acid residues 36-112 of Jak1 were
predicted to adopt a Cytokines are involved in a variety of biological processes
including hematopoiesis and the regulation of the immune system. Many
cytokines signal via tyrosine kinases of the Janus family (Jaks)1 and STAT (signal
transducer and activator of transcription) transcription factors. Jaks
are large enzymes (molecular mass, 120-140 kDa) that are
cytoplasmically preassociated with signal-transducing cytokine receptor
subunits (1). Upon cytokine-induced receptor aggregation, Jaks are
activated likely by auto- and transphosphorylation. Tyrosine residues
within the cytoplasmic tail of the receptor are subsequently
phosphorylated by the kinases, providing docking sites for Src homology
2 domain-containing signaling proteins including STATs, tyrosine
phosphatases, and suppressors of cytokine signaling.
Tyrosine-phosphorylated STATs homo- or heterodimerize and translocate
to the nucleus where they bind to specific DNA sequences in the
promoter regions of their respective target genes (2, 3).
Whereas the structure/function relationship for the interaction between
cytokines and the extracellular parts of their receptors is reasonably
well understood and the structures of STATs bound to enhancer sequences
have been solved (4-7), no structural information is available on the
interaction of the cytoplasmic parts of the signal-transducing subunits
of cytokine receptors with the associated Janus kinases. Structural
information on the receptor-kinase complex, however, is crucial
to understand the binding specificity and the activation process of
Janus kinases, which is the initial event of the intracellular signal
transduction cascade after ligand binding to the extracellular part of
cytokine receptors. The Jak family of cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases
comprises four mammalian members. Three, Jak1, Jak2, and Tyk2, are
expressed in a wide variety of tissues, whereas Jak3 expression is
restricted to cells of the hematopoietic system. Based on sequence
similarities between the Jak family members it has been suggested that
seven Jak homology (JH) domains exist in Jaks (8) (see Fig.
1C). The JH1 domain, at the C terminus, is a classical
kinase domain. It is N-terminally preceded by the JH2 domain
(pseudokinase domain), which has no catalytic activity. The N-terminal
half of the Jaks, domains JH3 to JH7, is involved in binding to
cytokine receptors. The minimal binding regions of Tyk2, Jak2, and Jak3
have been further restricted to the N-terminal JH7 and the JH6 domains
(9-12). Patients with a point mutation within the JH7 domain of Jak3,
Y100C, suffer from severe combined immunodeficiency (13). Mutagenesis
of the region, comprising amino acids 98-102 of Jak3, showed that
Tyr100 and the amino acids Leu98 and
Ile102 are crucial for Jak3 binding to the common IL-2
receptor Our laboratories have been studying signal transduction in response to
interleukin-6-type cytokines and the interferons (IFNs). More
particularly, we are interested in the interaction of gp130 with Jak1,
the kinase essential for gp130 and STAT activation (16, 17). It is
known that the membrane-proximal region, including box1 and box2 of
gp130, is involved in interaction with Jak1 (18, 19), but the region of
Jak1 required for this interaction has not been defined. By a combined
approach of molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis we have
identified a region in the N-terminal domain of Jak1 crucial for its
interaction with gp130.
Model of the Cell Culture and Transfection--
Simian monkey kidney cells
(COS-7) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 mg/liter streptomycin, and
60 mg/liter penicillin. Cells were grown at 37 °C in a
water-saturated atmosphere at 5% CO2. COS-7 cells were
transiently transfected using the DEAE-chloroquine transfection method
with modifications as described previously (25) or using Fugene (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
U4C cells (14) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(BioWhittaker) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf
serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 units/ml
penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 400 µg/ml G418 (Life
Technologies, Inc.). Cells were grown at 37 °C in a water-saturated
atmosphere at 10% CO2. Transfections were carried out
using Superfect (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
IL-5 was purchased from Cell Concepts (Umkirch, Germany). IL-6
treatments were carried out with a mixture of IL-6 (0.2 µg/ml) and
soluble IL-6 receptor (0.5 µg/ml), both from R&D Systems. IFN Generation of Jak1 Mutant Constructs--
Standard cloning
procedures were performed throughout this study. The mutations
(resulting in amino acid substitutions L80A, L80A/Y81A, Y81A,
Cell Lysis, Immunoprecipitation, and Western Blot
Analysis--
Cells were lysed on the dish with 500 µl of lysis
buffer containing 1% Brij 96 (for coprecipitation studies) or Triton
X-100 (for other studies), 20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium
vanadate, 10 mM PMSF, 1 mM benzamidine, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 3 µg/ml pepstatin, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM EDTA. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at
12,000 × g. After overnight incubation at 4 °C with
antibodies, the immunoprecipitates were collected with protein
A-Sepharose (1 h, 4 °C), washed three times with lysis buffer or,
for coprecipitation studies, with washing buffer (0.1% Brij 96, 20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 10 mM
PMSF, 1 mM benzamidine, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 3 µg/ml
pepstatin, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM EDTA) and analyzed
further by SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and probed with the
respective antibodies, and signals were detected using the ECL system
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). A polyclonal serum against Jak1 (kindly
provided by Dr. A. Ziemiecki, Bern, Switzerland), anti-Jak1
(HR785, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-IL5R Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs)--
COS-7 cells
were stimulated 18 h post-transfection with 10 ng/ml IL-5 for 30 min. Protein concentrations of nuclear extracts (prepared as described
in Ref. 26) were measured with the Bio-Rad protein assay. A
double-stranded mutated SIE oligonucleotide from the
c-fos promoter (m67SIE: 5'-GAT CCG GGA GGG ATT TAC GGG AAA TGC TG-3') was labeled by filling in the 5' protruding ends with the
Klenow enzyme using [
U4C cells were stimulated 18-20 h post-transfection with IFN In Vitro Translation of Jak1 Constructs--
JH3-4, JH3-5,
JH5-7, and JH6-7 domain constructs were cloned from human Jak1 into
pET28a by polymerase chain reaction. The JH3-7 construct was cloned
into pET14b following a NdeI/BamHI digest of
human Jak1. The amino acid residues encoded by the constructs were as
follows (numbering is for human Jak1): 351-546 (JH3-4), 296-546
(JH3-5), 33-328 (JH5-7), 33-295 (JH6-7), and 1-565 (JH3-7). For
in vitro translation and [35S]methionine
labeling of polypeptides, TNT Coupled Reticulocyte Lysate Systems
(Promega) and Redivue L-[35S]methionine
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were used according to the manufacturers'
instructions. T7 RNA polymerase and T3 RNA polymerase were used for the
pET constructs (Jak1 JH domain series and full-length Jak1 control) and
the pBS constructs (Jak1 wild type and loop 4 mutants), respectively.
gp130 Box1/Box2 Receptor Peptide Pull-down Assay--
The
synthetic, biotinylated box1/box2 peptide comprised the first 73 amino
acids of the gp130 cytoplasmic domain, while the non-Jak binding mutant
was generated by replacing critical proline residues in the box1 motif
(PNVPDP) with alanines (see Fig.
4A (18); prepared by Nicola O'Reilly, Peptide
Synthesis Laboratory, ICRF). 10-20 µg of purified biotinylated
box1/box2 peptide or mutant box1/box2 peptide or 50-100 µg of an
unrelated biotinylated peptide (68-mer) were incubated with 25 µl of
in vitro translated Jak1 polypeptide in 450 µl of binding
buffer (0.25% Brij 96, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 100 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM PMSF) overnight at 4 °C. 30 µl of streptavidin-agarose (Pierce) was added, and the mixture was
incubated a further 45 min at 4 °C. "Precipitates" were washed
twice with 0.9 ml of ice-cold binding buffer and once with 0.9 ml of
ice-cold binding buffer diluted 1:1 with phosphate-buffered saline.
Complexes were solubilized in SDS loading buffer (4% SDS, 500 mM Tris/HCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, and 0.05% bromphenol
blue) and resolved by SDS-PAGE on 10% polyacrylamide gels. Gels were
dried, and the [35S]methionine-labeled Jak1 polypeptides
were visualized by autoradiography.
Identification of a Putative
Furthermore, we subjected the Jak1 sequence to a secondary structure
prediction, which exclusively relies on sequence information (27). This
prediction yields a succession of secondary structure elements in the
N-terminal region of Jak1 compatible with the sequence of structural
elements found in ubiquitin (Fig. 1A). This correlation
further supports the notion that the N-terminal region of Jak1 shares
the fold of a Mutations in Loop 4 of the Predicted
We introduced amino acid exchanges into loop 4 and other regions of the
Jak1
We deleted a stretch of four amino acids
(Tyr81-Ser84) in the loop 4 region (Fig.
1B). This mutation totally abrogated the association of Jak1
with the receptor (Fig. 2, upper right panel, third
lane). To analyze further the importance of this predicted loop
region for receptor association, point mutations were introduced. The double mutant L80A/Y81A showed a complete loss of receptor binding, while the mutant Y81A/D82A exhibited a significantly impaired receptor
association. Minimal effects were observed for the single amino acid
exchanges L80A, Y81A, E83K, and K86E. In addition, we exchanged
Tyr89 located in the fourth Mutation of the Conserved Tyr107 to Alanine Abrogates
Jak1 Binding to gp130--
Tyrosine 107 of Jak1 is conserved within
the Jak family of kinases. Interestingly, a single amino acid exchange
of the corresponding residue of Jak3 (Tyr100) to cysteine
has been identified in a patient with severe combined immunodeficiency
(13). This Jak3 mutant is unable to associate with the common The Ability of the Jak1 Mutants to Mediate Signals via gp130
Parallels Their Receptor Association Behavior--
The results of
coprecipitation studies can be greatly influenced by experimental
parameters; false positive results may arise when working with
overexpressed proteins, and harsh detergents as present in "normal"
lysis buffers may break up subtle protein interactions. Therefore, we
tested the ability of the Jak mutants to mediate
ligand-dependent signal transduction events within the
cell
COS-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with expression constructs
for IL-5R
Jak1 mutants such as The N-terminal Domains of Jak1 Mediate Binding to the Box1/Box2
Region of gp130--
In an alternative approach, the ability of a
series of polypeptides corresponding to different fragments of Jak1 to
interact with gp130 was investigated (Fig.
4Ai). In vitro
translation of appropriate constructs yielded similar amounts of
[35S]methionine-labeled Jak1 polypeptides (Fig. 4,
B-D). Polypeptides corresponding to JH5-7 and full-length
Jak1 interacted comparably (particularly allowing for the difference in
methionine content) with a synthetic, biotinylated "box1/box2"
peptide representing the first 73 amino acids of the intracellular
domain of gp130 (Fig. 4, Aii, B, and
C). Essentially identical results were obtained with a
JH3-7 polypeptide (data not shown). The interaction was specific; it
was not observed with a mutant box1/box2 or unrelated peptide (Fig. 4,
A and C) and was efficiently inhibited by the addition of an excess of nonbiotinylated box1/box2 peptide. Despite a
higher nonspecific background, clear reproducible binding to the
box1/box2 peptide was also observed with the 35S-labeled
JH6-7 domain polypeptide (Fig. 4C). Interaction over background was not observed with JH3-5 and JH3-4 polypeptides, which
lack the Loop 4 Mutants of Jak1 Are Also Defective in the IFN
Responses--
The effect of the loop 4 mutations on the ability of
Jak1 to restore IFN as well as IL-6 responses to the Jak1-deficient
cell line U4C was investigated. STAT1 activation following IFN Since Jak activation is the initial event in cytokine
receptor-dependent signal transduction, there is
considerable interest in understanding the interaction and activation
mechanism of Janus kinases. To date no structural information
exists concerning the Jak/receptor interaction. Here we present the
first structural model that helps to understand how Janus kinases
associate with cytokine receptors. In the N-terminal region of Jaks
known to mediate receptor association we identified a putative
We hypothesized that loop 4 of the Tyr107 was selected for mutagenesis on the basis of
previous data concerning Jak3. This tyrosine residue is conserved among
Janus kinases. Interestingly the corresponding residue in Jak3,
Tyr100, was found to be exchanged to cysteine in a patient
with severe combined immunodeficiency (13). It could subsequently be
demonstrated that the mutant Jak3-Y100C is severely impaired in its
ability to associate with the common Type II cytokine receptors such as IFN receptors are quite different
from class I cytokine receptors, including gp130, with respect to the
receptor requirements for Jak association. Interferon receptors have no
clear box1/box2 homology. Despite this, the loop 4 mutations
L80A/Y81A and Based on sequence similarities it has been suggested that the
N-terminal region of Janus kinases might contain a divergent band 4.1 domain. These domains have also been termed "FERM domains" due to
the fact that the "classical" proteins sharing such a domain are
band four-point-one protein, ezrin,
radixin, and moesin, or "4.1/JEF-domain"
(for Jak, ERM, Fak) (15). The
N-terminal limit of the region of Tyk2 essential for association with a
GST-IFN The three subdomains of the moesin FERM domain contact each other at
defined interaction sites. Importantly the loop 4 region of the moesin
F1 subdomain is not involved in domain/domain contacts. The same holds
true for the corresponding regions of the radixin and 4.1R FERM domains
(33, 34). Under the assumption that the subdomains of the FERM domain
show an identical topology in Jak1 to those in moesin, radixin, and
4.1R, it is unlikely that the inability of our Jak1 loop 4 mutants to
bind gp130 is due to abrogation of a necessary interaction between the
three subdomains F1, F2, and F3. In the solved FERM domain structures
the respective regions corresponding to loop 4 have not been found to
be involved in interactions with any other molecules (33, 34). Taken
together, in the solved FERM structures, loop 4 of the ubiquitin-like
F1 domains is not buried between the subdomains but rather is exposed and should therefore be accessible for binding as one might expect for
a region involved in receptor association.
Several studies with Janus kinases have underscored the importance of
the N-terminal region for receptor binding. (9-12, 14, 35-38).
Shortened fragments comprising only the JH6/JH7 domains of Tyk2, Jak2,
and Jak3 were able to associate with appropriate receptors (9-12). For
Jak1 it is known from experiments in intact cells that the N-terminal
half can mediate receptor association; Jak1/Jak2 chimeras with fusion
borders further N-terminal were unable to sustain an IFN The interaction of the Janus kinase N-terminal domain with cytokine
receptors appears complex and implicates large portions of the kinase
and the receptor, i.e. 69 amino acids of gp130 (18, 39). Our
data represent a further step in the elucidation of the structural
interface of the Jak/receptor interaction. This structural interface
seems to be at least in part conserved for Jak1 binding to different
receptors since loop 4 was found to be essential for signal
transduction in response to IL-6, IFN
-grasp fold, and a structural model was built
using ubiquitin as a template. Substitution of
Tyr107 to alanine, a residue conserved among Jaks
and involved in hydrophobic core interactions of the proposed
-grasp
domain, abrogated binding of full-length Jak1 to gp130 in COS-7
transfectants. By further mutagenesis we identified the loop 4 region
of the Jak1
-grasp domain as essential for gp130 association and
gp130-mediated signal transduction. In Jak1-deficient U4C cells
reconstituted with the loop 4 Jak1 mutants L80A/Y81A and
(Tyr81-Ser84), the interferon-
,
interferon-
, and interleukin-6 responses were similarly impaired.
Thus, loop 4 of the
-grasp domain plays a role in the association of
Jak1 with both class I and II cytokine receptors. Taken together the
structural model and the mutagenesis data provide further insight into
the interaction of Janus kinases with cytokine receptors.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-chain (12). Despite the existing information the details
of the Jak/cytokine receptor interaction are far from understood. No
structural information on the N-terminal region of Jaks is available at
present, and functional modular binding domains such as Src homology 2 or Src homology 3 domains have not been identified in Janus kinases
(14). Recently a part of the N terminus of the Jaks corresponding to the amino acids 24-415 in Jak1 has been reported to share significant sequence similarity with the so-called band 4.1 domain, indicating that
the N termini of the Janus kinases might represent divergent members of
the classical band 4.1 domain (15).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Grasp Domain of Jak1--
For fold recognition
the program package ProCeryon (a software package for fold recognition
and protein structure analysis from King's Beech Biosoftware,
1999) was used that is based on a knowledge-based force field
derived from a set of known protein conformations (20). A library of
4500 protein structures and the N-terminal sequences of the Jaks were
used to generate three-dimensional models for all these chains. All
4500 generated models were evaluated and ranked using different
ProSA-II type z-scores based on pair interactions and surface terms
(20, 21). With the sequential alignment derived from the fold
recognition approach a detailed molecular model of the N-terminal
domain of Jak-1 was built using the x-ray structure of ubiquitin (PDB
accession code 1ubi) as the template. Based on this alignment, amino
acid residues were exchanged in the template. Insertions and deletions
were modeled by using a data base approach included in the software package WHATIF (22). The data base was searched for a peptide sequence
of the appropriate length, which was fitted to the template. All loops
were selected from the data base so as to give a minimum root mean
square distance between the ends of the loops. In the final step the
three-dimensional structural models were energy-minimized using the
steepest descent algorithm implemented in the GROMOS force field (23).
For graphical representation the Ribbons program (24) was used. All
programs were run on a Silicon Graphics Indigo work station.
was
a highly purified mixture of human subspecies (Wellferon, 1.5 × 108 IU/mg of protein) provided by Wellcome Research
Laboratories (Beckenham, Kent, UK). Recombinant IFN
(4 × 107 IU/mg of protein) was a generous gift from Dr. G. Adolf, Ernst Boehringer Institut für Arzneimittelforschung
(Vienna, Austria). Each was used at 1000 IU/ml.
(Tyr81-Ser84), E83K, K86E, Y89A, R104E, and
Y107A) were introduced by a polymerase chain reaction technique into
pBS-Jak1, a pBluescript derivative containing the cDNA sequence of
mJak1. The restriction enzymes EcoRV/Bsp119I were
used for exchanging the wild type sequence of pBS-Jak1 with the
respective mutated sequences. pBS-Jak1 constructs were restricted using
EcoRV and SmaI. The resulting fragment was inserted into the SmaI-digested eukaryotic expression vector
pSVL
EcoRI. The integrity of all constructs was verified
by DNA sequencing using the ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (PerkinElmer).
(S16, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) were used for immunoprecipitation. Anti-phosphotyrosine
(PY99, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; and 4G10, Upstate
Biotechnology), anti-IL-5R
(N20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-IL-5R
(R&D Systems) antibodies and anti-Jak1 polyclonal antiserum (from Dr. A. Ziemiecki) were used for detection. The horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Dako.
-32P]dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol, 10 mCi/ml). Nuclear extracts containing 5 µg of protein were incubated
with about 10 fmol (10,000 cpm) of probe in gel shift incubation buffer
(10 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 5 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.7 mM PMSF, 0.1 mg/ml of poly(dI-dC), and
1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) for 10 min at room temperature. The
protein-DNA complexes were separated on a 4.5% nondenaturating
polyacrylamide gel containing 7.5% glycerol in 0.25-fold Tris
borate-EDTA at 20 V/cm for 4 h. Gels were fixed in a water
solution of 10% methanol and 10% acetic acid for 30 min, dried, and autoradiographed.
,
IFN
, or IL-6 for 15 min, washed twice in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and lysed in ice-cold 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM
NaF, 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 100 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM PMSF. The sequence of the
oligonucleotide probe used corresponded to the high affinity SIE of the
c-fos gene (5'-GTCGACATTTCCCGTAAATC-3'). Probes were
end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP, and aliquots equivalent to
~30,000 cpm/reaction were used. Binding reactions (20 µl) were in
10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2,
0.1 mM EGTA, 5% glycerol, 2.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.5 mg/ml tRNA, 4% (w/v) Ficoll (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Protein-matched lysates were preincubated for 5 min at room temperature with 150 µg/ml poly(dI-dC) prior to incubation with probe for an
additional 20 min at room temperature. Complexes were separated on 6%
nondenaturing acrylamide gels in 0.5% Tris-glycine-EDTA and detected
by autoradiography of dried gels.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Grasp Domain within the N-terminal
Region of Jak1--
Fold recognition first analyzes which fold in a
library of known protein structures would be energetically compatible
with a new sequence. To this end a library of 4500 model structures of
the N-terminal region of Jak1 was generated using the experimentally derived protein structures from the Protein Data Bank as templates (see
"Experimental Procedures"). These model structures were evaluated and ranked using different ProSA II type z-scores based on pair interactions and surface terms (20, 21). This analysis revealed that
the N-terminal Jak1 region could be accommodated in the
-grasp fold
of ubiquitin with high z-scores for the pair interactions as well as
the surface terms. The resultant structural alignment of ubiquitin and
the N-terminal region of Jak1 is shown in Fig. 1A.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Identification of a
-grasp domain in the N-terminal region of
Jaks. A, alignment of the ubiquitin with the N-terminal
Jak/Tyk sequences. For ubiquitin the experimentally derived secondary
structure elements are colored in red. The sequences of the
Jak/Tyk molecules were aligned according to the results obtained by the
fold recognition procedure. The secondary structure elements of the
human Jak1, as predicted by the method of Rost and Sander (27), are
colored in blue. Overall conserved residues are marked by an
asterisk, and residues that are conserved at least in one of
the Jak/Tyk sequences compared with the ubiquitin sequence are marked
by +. Overall conserved hydrophobic residues are boxed.
Amino acids exchanged in this study are shown in bold.
B, a Ribbon representation of the N-terminal
-grasp domain of Jak1. C, strip diagram of Jak1. The JH
domains, the putative FERM subdomains, and the position of the
-grasp-domain are indicated.
-grasp domain. To analyze the spatial configuration of
the amino acid residues in the N-terminal Jak1 domain we built a
detailed three-dimensional molecular model using the ubiquitin
structure as template (Fig. 1B, see "Experimental Procedures").
-Grasp Domain of Jak1
Impair Binding to the Cytoplasmic Part of gp130--
Since it can be
envisaged that Jaks associate with cytokine receptors in a conserved
manner and most often loop regions are involved in protein/protein
interactions, we examined these regions in the model for features
conserved within the Jak family but differing from the corresponding
regions of the ubiquitin
-grasp (Fig. 1A). Interestingly,
loop 4 was much longer in the Jak sequence than in ubiquitin. Moreover,
within the Jak family members, loop 4 shows considerable sequence
differences as would be expected in a region that could promote binding
specificity. Using these criteria we identified loop 4 as a promising
region for mutagenesis.
-grasp domain and tested the resulting mutants for their
ability to bind to the cytoplasmic tail of gp130. As in previous
studies, we took advantage of a chimeric receptor consisting of the
extracellular part of the IL-5R
chain and the transmembrane and
cytoplasmic regions of gp130 for which antibodies suitable for
immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis are available (25, 28).
Jak1 was coexpressed with IL-5R
/gp130 in COS-7 cells, and the
interaction was investigated by coprecipitation of the receptor with a
Jak1 antibody (Fig. 2) or vice
versa by coprecipitation of Jak1 with anti-IL-5R
(data not
shown).

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Binding of Jak1 mutants to
IL-5R
/gp130. Transiently transfected
COS-7 cells expressing IL-5R
/gp130 and Jak1 mutants as indicated
were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation using a polyclonal Jak1
antiserum (provided by A. Ziemiecki). The immunoprecipitates and
the lysates were further analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The proteins were
transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), probed with an anti-IL-5R
(N20) antibody, and reprobed
with an anti-Jak1 polyclonal antiserum. The signals were detected using
the ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). IP,
immunoprecipitation; D, detection; Lys, lysates;
WT, wild type;
Y81-S84,
(Tyr81-Ser84).
-strand to alanine and
Arg104 located in the fifth
-strand to glutamate. These
mutations outside the predicted loop 4 region did not affect receptor
association (Fig. 1B). These data are summarized in Table
I.
Summary of the data obtained with the Jak1 mutants
-chain
of the IL-2 receptor complex (12). Based on this information we
exchanged Tyr107 in Jak1 with alanine. As shown in Fig. 2
(upper left panel, sixth lane), the Jak1 mutant
does not bind to gp130. According to the
-grasp model, this tyrosine
residue is located within the fifth
-strand (Fig. 1B) and
was found to interact with Leu42, Ile70, and
Leu105. Thus, Tyr107 may stabilize the
hydrophobic core of the
-grasp domain, and the substitution to
alanine very likely destroys the structural integrity of the domain.
phosphorylation of Jaks and the receptor as well as activation of
STAT transcription factors.
/gp130, IL-5R
/gp130, and the various Jak1 mutants. After
stimulation with IL-5, lysates were prepared, and Jak1 and the
IL-5R
/gp130 chimera were immunoprecipitated. The immunoprecipitates
were separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to Western blot analysis, and
their phosphorylation was monitored using a phosphotyrosine-specific
antibody for detection. We also monitored the
stimulation-dependent activation of STAT transcription factors by an EMSA.
(Tyr81-Ser84),
L80A/Y81A, and Y107A that did not show receptor binding (Fig. 2) were
not tyrosine-phosphorylated upon stimulation with IL-5 and did not
mediate phosphorylation of the receptor (Fig.
3A). Y81A/D82A that showed a
severely impaired receptor association resulted in
phosphotyrosine-specific bands of intermediate intensity, whereas those
mutations that did not alter receptor association significantly, such
as L80A, Y81A, E83K, and K86E, led to full Jak and receptor
phosphorylation as did wild type Jak1 (Fig. 3A). The results
obtained for the various Jak1 mutants in the EMSA assay also closely
matched the receptor binding and phosphorylation data (Fig.
3B). Taken together the capacity of the various Jak1 mutants
to mediate signals via gp130 closely follows their ability to associate
with the receptor as determined by the coprecipitation studies (Table
I).

View larger version (66K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Jak1 mutants unable to associate with the
cytoplasmic tail of gp130 do not support signal transduction.
COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with chimeric receptor and
Jak1 constructs as indicated. 12 h post-transfection the cells
were starved (0% fetal calf serum) for 6 h before they were
stimulated with 10 ng/ml IL-5 for 30 min. The short expression time is
necessary to observe stimulation-dependent signals; longer
expression times result in stimulation-independent activation of the
Jaks due to higher overexpression. A, immunoprecipitates of
Jak1 and IL-5R
/gp130 as well as lysate proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and probed with a
phosphotyrosine-specific antibody (PY99). The signals were detected
using the ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The blots were
reprobed with an anti-Jak1 polyclonal antiserum or an anti-IL-5R
(N20) antibody. B, nuclear extracts were prepared and
analyzed by EMSA using the SIE probe. In COS-7 cells, STAT1 is the
major STAT activated through gp130 as observed previously (25). Here
the kinase-dead Jak1 mutant K907E was used as a negative control. Cells
transfected with the corresponding empty vector similarly showed no
ligand-dependent signaling. IP,
immunoprecipitation; D, detection; PY,
phosphotyrosine; WT, wild type;
Y81-S84,
(Tyr81-Ser84).
-grasp domain (Fig. 4D). The introduction of
selected mutations, corresponding to the inactivating mutations
described above (Fig. 2), into a JH3-7 polypeptide inhibited binding
to the box1/box2 peptide. In addition, a fragment corresponding to the
N-terminal FERM domain (encompassing JH5-7, Fig. 1C) of
Jak1 can confer gp130 binding upon
Jak3.2 Taken together these
data are consistent first, with a direct interaction of the N-terminal
domains of Jak1 with gp130 and second, with the effect of the loop 4 mutations on Jak1 function in the intact cell assays (Figs. 2 and 3)
being on this direct interaction rather than through nonspecific
mutational disruption of the overall structure of Jak1. Irrespective it
can be concluded that residues within the JH6-JH7 region, which
contains the putative
-grasp domain, are both necessary and
minimally sufficient to mediate an interaction of Jak1 with the
box1/box2 domain of gp130. The data do not, of course, exclude a
requirement for additional interactions for optimal binding of Jak1 to
a full-length native receptor.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
A Jak1 JH6-7 domain polypeptide can interact
independently with the box1/box2 region of gp130. Ai,
schematic representation of the Jak1 JH domain constructs tested.
Aii, schematic representation of the synthetic, biotinylated
gp130 box1/box2 peptide and "mutant box1/box2" peptide. The
box1/box2 peptide contains the first 73 amino acids of the gp130
cytoplasmic domain, encompassing the box1 and box2 motifs. In the
mutant box1/box2 peptide, proline residues (highlighted) in
box1 necessary for Jak recruitment to gp130 (18) have been mutated to
alanine. B-D, the 35S-labeled, in
vitro translated fragments of human Jak1 were tested for their
ability to interact with the biotinylated box1/box2 peptide,
biotinylated mutant box1/box2 peptide, or an unrelated biotinylated
peptide of similar size (see "Experimental Procedures").
Peptide-associated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by
autoradiography. Aliquots of the in vitro translated
products were analyzed in parallel; comparable amounts were obtained
for each construct. Each construct was tested in at least three
independent experiments with essentially identical results.
stimulation and STAT1/3 activation in response to IL-6 were monitored
by EMSA analysis of transiently transfected cells (Fig.
5, upper panels). The low
level activation of the STATs by IL-6 in the vector-only-transfected U4C cells (Fig. 5, vector) reflects residual signaling
through Jak2 and/or Tyk2 in the absence of Jak1 in these cells (16). Expression levels of the different constructs were assessed by anti-Jak1 Western blot (Fig. 5, lower panels). The different
mutations exerted equivalent effects on the IFN
and IL-6 responses
(Fig. 5). In addition, essentially identical results were obtained with IFN
(data not shown). The results paralleled those for the COS-7 cell experiments (Figs. 2 and 3 and Table I): Jak1 mutants that did not
bind gp130 did not complement U4Cs (L80A/Y81A and
(Tyr81-Ser84)); Jak1 mutants that retained
the ability to interact with gp130 were able to restore
Jak1-dependent signaling to U4Cs (L80A, Y81A, E83K, and
K86E). Importantly the inactivating loop 4 mutations, in contrast to a
kinase-inactivating mutation (29), were without effect on the
autokinase activity of the transiently transfected Jak1, again arguing
against any gross disruption of tertiary structure (data not
presented). Thus, despite their highly divergent Jak recruitment motifs
(30, 31), Jak1 likely interacts in a conserved manner with type I and
type II cytokine receptors, exemplified here by those for IL-6 and the
IFNs, respectively.

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Loop 4 mutants of Jak1 are defective in
IFN
as well as IL-6 responses.
Jak1-deficient U4C cells were transiently transfected with pSVL-Jak1,
pSVL-Jak1 mutants, or with empty vector and stimulated for 15 min with
IL-6 (0.2 µg/ml IL-6, 0.5 µg/ml soluble IL-6R
) or IFN
(1000 IU/ml) as indicated. Whole cell extracts were analyzed for STAT1 and
STAT3 activation by EMSA using a high affinity SIE probe (upper
panels). Expression levels of Jak1 and Jak1 mutants were
determined by anti-Jak1 Western blot on protein-matched aliquots of the
same whole cell extracts used for the EMSA (lower panels,
upper band). The apparent low positive signal observed for
L80A/Y81A in response to IL-6 was not reproducible in three further
independent experiments. WT, wild type;
Y81-S84,
(Tyr81-Ser84).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-grasp domain (amino acids 36-112) by the fold recognition
approach, which is a powerful tool to identify a potential fold of a
protein with only limited sequence homology to others. Mutational
analysis led to the conclusion that loop 4 in the
-grasp domain is
essential for association of Jak1 not only with gp130 but also with
other cytokine receptors.
-grasp domain could be a region
of general importance for Jak binding to cytokine receptors because it
proved to be much longer than loop 4 in ubiquitin and is well exposed
on the surface of the
-grasp domain. Due to sequence differences
among the Jak family members, loop 4 of the
-grasp domain might also
have the potential to determine binding specificity. Deletion of amino
acids 81-84 totally abrogated receptor association. In this mutant the
loop 4 region is shortened to the length of the corresponding loop of
ubiquitin. It is therefore unlikely that this deletion affected the
structural integrity of the domain but rather indicates that loop 4 is
involved in receptor association. Certain amino acid exchanges in loop
4 interfered with receptor binding and led to reduced Jak1 activation,
receptor phosphorylation, and STAT activation in COS-7 transfectants.
Two control mutations introduced into regions outside of loop 4, Y89A
and R104E, did not interfere with Jak1 binding to gp130. According to
the
-grasp model, the hydrophobic residue Tyr89 is not
likely to be essential for structural integrity, and Arg104
is located at the outer surface of the domain and should promote solvent contact.
-chain, which is a signal
transducing subunit of the receptor complexes for IL-2, IL-4, IL-7,
IL-9, and IL-15 (12). Since exchange of Tyr100 of Jak3 to
alanine similarly leads to an impaired binding whereas exchange to
phenylalanine was without effect, it was suggested that
Tyr100 in Jak3 is a structurally essential residue in a
domain that directly contacts the
-chain and that ablation of the
aromatic residue by an alanine or cysteine substitution disrupts the
domain fold (12). As shown in the present manuscript, exchange of
Tyr107 in Jak1 to alanine also impairs receptor
association. In our model, Tyr107 interacts with the
residues Leu42, Ile70, and Leu105
within the hydrophobic core of the
-grasp domain. Thus, it can be
envisaged that this tyrosine residue is crucial for the structural integrity of the
-grasp domain. Exchange of amino acids in the vicinity of Tyr100 of Jak3 revealed that Leu98
and Ile102 are also important for IL-2R
association,
while substitution of Leu99 to alanine did not affect
receptor association (12). According to our alignment, these residues
are part of a
-strand (see Fig. 1A), and the Jak1 residue
Leu105 corresponding to Leu98 of Jak3 is found
to be involved in hydrophobic core interactions in the model. Thus, the
published Jak3 data are also in good accordance with the
-grasp model.
(Tyr81-Ser84) affected
signal transduction in response to IFN
and IFN
similarly to
gp130-mediated signal transduction in U4C fibrosarcoma cells expressing
the different Jak mutants (Fig. 5). In addition, L80A/Y81A and
(Tyr81-Ser84) showed no binding to the
cytoplasmic parts of the leukemia inhibitory factor receptor and
the IL-5R
, two other type I cytokine receptors, and IFN
R2, a type
II cytokine receptor, as measured by coprecipitation analysis in COS-7
cells (data not shown). Thus, loop 4 seems to be crucial for binding to
cytokine receptors in general. We have no evidence for an involvement
of loop 4 in defining specificity for binding to different receptors.
R1 construct corresponds exactly to the limits of the FERM
domain (9). In Jak1, the putative FERM domain would comprise the region
between amino acid residues 24-415 (Fig. 1C). The recently
published first x-ray structure of a FERM domain, namely that of moesin
(32), showed that these domains consist of three separate subdomains.
Interestingly the most N-terminal subdomain, F1, has a ubiquitin-like,
i.e. a
-grasp, fold. The F2 subdomain is rich in
-helices and shows structural similarity to the acyl-CoA-binding
protein. The F3 subdomain is folded like a pleckstrin homology
domain. This structural information and our prediction that the extreme
N terminus of Jak1 contains a
-grasp fold support the hypothesis
that Jaks contain a FERM domain (15).
response
(14). More recently, however, similar intact cell experiments with
different Jak1/Jak3 chimeras have shown that substitution of the
putative Jak3 4.1/FERM domain with that from Jak1 can confer gp130
binding upon Jak3.2 In addition, here we show that
in a cell-free system an N-terminal fragment containing only the JH6
and JH7 subdomains of Jak1 is able to bind to a biotinylated, 73-amino
acid box1/box2 gp130 peptide. It will be interesting to see whether an
isolated
-grasp domain binds gp130. However, it might also be
possible that an intact JH7/JH6 context is crucial for Jak binding to
cytokine receptors as several studies suggest. The JH region 7 roughly corresponds to the
-grasp subdomain F1 and the JH region 6 to the
helix bundle subdomain F2 of the FERM domain. Interestingly chimeric
Jak3/Jak1 constructs, which contain the intact
-grasp domain of Jak3
(containing amino acids 1-109 of Jak3), are not able to bind to
the IL-2R
(12). The same is true for chimeric Jak3/Jak2 constructs,
which contain the intact
-grasp domain of Jak3 and part of the
linker to the helix bundle domain (containing amino acids 1-124 of
Jak3) (11). Only a Jak3/Jak1 chimera incorporating the complete Jak3
linker region between the
-grasp and the helix bundle region of the
potential FERM domain (amino acids 1-132 of Jak3) shows a
successful
-chain association (12). It is noteworthy that the Jak
kinases show differences in length and sequence of this linker region
and that binding to the
-chain can be increased by using the
complete
-grasp and helix bundle region of Jak3 (i.e. the
JH7-JH6 regions) in the Jak3/Jak1 chimera (12). These data suggest that
the JH6 and the JH7 regions may have to be present in a very defined
structural context to allow high affinity receptor binding.
, and IFN
. Our data also
support the hypothesis (15) that the N terminus of Jak1 contains a
divergent FERM domain. Models of the whole FERM domains of the Jaks
should be of considerable help in directing the further analysis of the
requirements for Jak/receptor interaction before full structural data
are available. Knowledge of the Jak/receptor binding interface could be
helpful in the design of low molecular weight inhibitors of cytokine
signaling of potential therapeutic value.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Gregor Bahrendorf for
immunodetection of the IL-5R
chimeras. We are very grateful to
Andrew Ziemiecki (Bern, Switzerland) for providing the
Jak1-specific antiserum, to Gunter Adolf for generously providing
recombinant IFN-
, and to Jan Tavernier (Ghent, Belgium) for the
IL-5R
/IFN
R2 construct. We also thank Nicola O'Reilly for the
peptides and Uta Schwidetzky for constructs. We thank Paul Bates and
Doreen Cantrell for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bonn) and by Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (Frankfurt).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Both authors contributed equally to this work.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-241-8088869; Fax: 49-241-8082428; E-mail:
behrmann@rwth-aachen.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 23, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106135200
2 Hilkens, C. M. U., Is'harc, H., Lillemeier, B., Strobl, B., Bates, P. A., Behrmann, I., and Kerr, I. M. (2001) FEBS Lett., in press.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
Jak, Janus kinase;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
FERM, 4.1, ezrin, radixin,
moesin;
IFN, interferon;
IL, interleukin;
JH, Jak homology;
IL-5R, IL-5
receptor;
STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription;
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
SIE, c-Sis-inducible element;
IFN
R, IFN
receptor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ihle, J. N., Witthuhn, B. A., Quelle, F. W., Yamamoto, K., and Silvennoinen, O. (1995) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13, 369-398 |
| 2. | Darnell, J. E., Jr., Kerr, I. M., and Stark, G. R. (1994) Science 264, 1415-1421 |
| 3. | Heinrich, P. C., Behrmann, I., Müller-Newen, G., Schaper, F., and Graeve, L. (1998) Biochem. J. 334, 297-314 |
| 4. | Chow, D., He, X., Snow, A. L., Rose-John, S., and Garcia, K. C. (2001) Science 291, 2150-2155 |
| 5. | Chen, X., Vinkemeier, U., Zhao, Y., Jeruzalmi, D., Darnell, J. E., Jr., and Kuriyan, J. (1998) Cell 93, 827-839 |
| 6. | Becker, S., Groner, B., and Müller, C. W. (1998) Nature 394, 145-151 |
| 7. | de Vos, A. M., Ultsch, M., and Kossiakoff, A. A. (1992) Science 255, 306-312 |
| 8. | Wilks, A. F., Harpur, A. G., Kurban, R. R., Ralph, S. J., Zurcher, G., and Ziemiecki, A. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 2057-2065 |
| 9. | Richter, M. F., Dumenil, G., Uze, G., Fellous, M., and Pellegrini, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24723-24729 |
| 10. | Zhao, Y., Wagner, F., Frank, S. J., and Kraft, A. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13814-13818 |
| 11. | Chen, M., Cheng, A., Chen, Y. Q., Hymel, A., Hanson, E. P., Kimmel, L., Minami, Y., Taniguchi, T., Changelian, P. S., and O'Shea, J. J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 6910-6915 |
| 12. | Cacalano, N. A., Migone, T. S., Bazan, F., Hanson, E. P., Chen, M., Candotti, F., O'Shea, J. J., and Johnston, J. A. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1549-1558 |
| 13. | Macchi, P., Villa, A., Giliani, S., Sacco, M. G., Frattini, A., Porta, F., Ugazio, A. G., Johnston, J. A., Candotti, F., O'Shea, J. J., Vezzoni, P., and Notarangelo, L. D. (1995) Nature 377, 65-68 |
| 14. | Kohlhuber, F., Rogers, N. C., Watling, D., Feng, J., Guschin, D., Briscoe, J., Witthuhn, B. A., Kotenko, S. V., Pestka, S., Stark, G. R., Ihle, J. N., and Kerr, I. M. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 695-706 |
| 15. | Girault, J. A., Labesse, G., Mornon, J. P., and Callebaut, I. (1998) Mol. Med. 4, 751-769 |
| 16. | Guschin, D., Rogers, N., Briscoe, J., Witthuhn, B., Watling, D., Horn, F., Pellegrini, S., Yasukawa, K., Heinrich, P., Stark, G. R., and Kerr, I. M. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1421-1429 |
| 17. | Rodig, S. J., Meraz, M. A., White, J. M., Lampe, P. A., Riley, J. K., Arthur, C. D., King, K. L., Sheehan, K. C., Yin, L., Pennica, D., Johnson, E. M., Jr., and Schreiber, R. D. (1998) Cell 93, 373-383 |
| 18. | Murakami, M., Narazaki, M., Hibi, M., Yawata, H., Yasukawa, K., Hamaguchi, M., Taga, T., and Kishimoto, T. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 11349-11353 |
| 19. | Haan, C., Hermanns, H. M., Heinrich, P. C., and Behrmann, I. (2000) Biochem. J. 349, 261-266 |
| 20. | Domingues, F. S., Koppensteiner, W. A., Jaritz, M., Prlic, A., Weichenberger, C., Wiederstein, M., Floeckner, H., Lackner, P., and Sippl, M. J. (1999) Proteins 37 (Suppl. 3), 112-120 |
| 21. | Sippl, M. J. (1993) Proteins 17, 355-362 |
| 22. | Vriend, G. (1990) J. Mol. Graph. 8, 52-56 |
| 23. | van Gunsteren, W. F., Billeter, S. R., Eising, A. A., Hünenberger, P. H., Krüger, P., Mark, A. E., Scott, W. R. P., and Tironi, I. G. (1996) Biomolecular Simulation: The GROMOS 96 Manual and User Guide , vdf Hochschulverlag AG, Zürich |
| 24. | Carson, M. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 958-961 |
| 25. | Hermanns, H. M., Radtke, S., Haan, C., Schmitz-Van de Leur, H., Tavernier, J., Heinrich, P. C., and Behrmann, I. (1999) J. Immunol. 163, 6651-6658 |
| 26. | Wegenka, U. M., Buschmann, J., Lütticken, C., Heinrich, P. C., and Horn, F. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 276-288 |
| 27. | Rost, B., and Sander, C. (1994) Proteins 19, 55-72 |
| 28. | Behrmann, I., Janzen, C., Gerhartz, C., Schmitz-Van de Leur, H., Hermanns, H., Heesel, B., Graeve, L., Horn, F., Tavernier, J., and Heinrich, P. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5269-5274 |
| 29. | Briscoe, J., Rogers, N. C., Witthuhn, B. A., Watling, D., Harpur, A. G., Wilks, A. F., Stark, G. R., Ihle, J. N., and Kerr, I. M. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 799-809 |
| 30. | Kaplan, D. H., Greenlund, A. C., Tanner, J. W., Shaw, A. S., and Schreiber, R. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9-12 |
| 31. | Domanski, P., Witte, M., Kellum, M., Rubinstein, M., Hackett, R., Pitha, P., and Colamonici, O. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21606-21611 |
| 32. | Pearson, M. A., Reczek, D., Bretscher, A., and Karplus, P. A. (2000) Cell 101, 259-270 |
| 33. | Hamada, K., Shimizu, T., Matsui, T., Tsukita, S., and Hakoshima, T. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 4449-4462 |
| 34. | Han, B. G., Nunomura, W., Takakuwa, Y., Mohandas, N., and Jap, B. K. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 871-875 |
| 35. | Frank, S. J., Yi, W., Zhao, Y., Goldsmith, J. F., Gilliland, G., Jiang, J., Sakai, I., and Kraft, A. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14776-14785 |
| 36. | Tanner, J. W., Chen, W., Young, R. L., Longmore, G. D., and Shaw, A. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6523-6530 |
| 37. | Gauzzi, M. C., Velazquez, L., McKendry, R., Mogensen, K. E., Fellous, M., and Pellegrini, S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20494-20500 |
| 38. | Yan, H., Piazza, F., Krishnan, K., Pine, R., and Krolewski, J. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4046-4051 |
| 39. | Narazaki, M., Witthuhn, B. A., Yoshida, K., Silvennoinen, O., Yasukawa, K., Ihle, J. N., Kishimoto, T., and Taga, T. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2285-2289 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Flex, V. Petrangeli, L. Stella, S. Chiaretti, T. Hornakova, L. Knoops, C. Ariola, V. Fodale, E. Clappier, F. Paoloni, et al. Somatically acquired JAK1 mutations in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia J. Exp. Med., April 14, 2008; 205(4): 751 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Haan, C. Margue, A. Engrand, C. Rolvering, H. Schmitz-Van de Leur, P. C. Heinrich, I. Behrmann, and C. Haan Dual Role of the Jak1 FERM and Kinase Domains in Cytokine Receptor Binding and in Stimulation-Dependent Jak Activation J. Immunol., January 15, 2008; 180(2): 998 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Radtke, A. Jorissen, H. S.-V. de Leur, P. C. Heinrich, and I. Behrmann Three Dileucine-like Motifs within the Interbox1/2 Region of the Human Oncostatin M Receptor Prevent Efficient Surface Expression in the Absence of an Associated Janus Kinase J. Biol. Chem., February 17, 2006; 281(7): 4024 - 4034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. J. Ceccarelli, H. K. Song, F. Poy, M. D. Schaller, and M. J. Eck Crystal Structure of the FERM Domain of Focal Adhesion Kinase J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 2006; 281(1): 252 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Sommer, C. Schmid, R. M. Sobota, U. Lehmann, N. J. Stevenson, J. A. Johnston, F. Schaper, P. C. Heinrich, and S. Haan Mechanisms of SOCS3 Phosphorylation upon Interleukin-6 Stimulation: CONTRIBUTIONS OF Src- AND RECEPTOR-TYROSINE KINASES J. Biol. Chem., September 9, 2005; 280(36): 31478 - 31488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Royer, J. Staerk, M. Costuleanu, P. J. Courtoy, and S. N. Constantinescu Janus Kinases Affect Thrombopoietin Receptor Cell Surface Localization and Stability J. Biol. Chem., July 22, 2005; 280(29): 27251 - 27261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|