|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104735200 on July 26, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 41, 37815-37820, October 12, 2001
Expression of p21Waf1/Cip1 and Cyclin D1 Is Increased
in Butyrate-resistant HeLa Cells*
Anna
Derjuga ,
Christina
Richard§,
Milena
Crosato ,
Paul S.
Wright¶,
Lorraine
Chalifour ,
Joe
Valdez ,
Anna
Barraso ,
Harry A.
Crissman ,
Walter
Nishioka**,
E. Morton
Bradbury , and
John P. H.
Th'ng§
From the Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General
Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada,
¶ Aventis Pharmaceutical Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807, Los Alamos National Laboratories, New Mexico 87545, ** Vical Inc., San Diego, California 92121, and
§ Northwestern Ontario Regional Cancer Center, Thunder Bay,
Ontario P7A 7T1, Canada
Received for publication, May 23, 2001, and in revised form, July 18, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Sodium butyrate induced cell cycle arrest in
mammalian cells through an increase in p21Waf1/Cip1,
although another study showed that this arrest is related to pRB
signaling. We isolated variants of HeLa cells adapted to growth in 5 mM butyrate. One of these variants, clone 5.1, constitutively expressed elevated levels of p21Waf1/Cip1
when incubated in regular growth medium and in the presence of butyrate. Despite this elevated level of p21Waf1/Cip1, the
cells continue to proliferate, albeit at a slower rate than parental
HeLa cells. Western blot analyses showed that other cell cycle
regulatory proteins were not up-regulated to compensate for the
elevated expression of p21Waf1/Cip1. However, cyclin D1 was
down-regulated by butyrate in HeLa cells but not in clone 5.1. We
conclude that continued expression of cyclin D1 allowed clone
5.1 to grow in the presence of butyrate and elevated levels of
p21Waf1/Cip1.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Sodium butyrate added to cultured cells lead to growth arrest,
cellular differentiation (1), or cell death (2-4). Butyrate is a
natural by-product of a high fiber diet and has been reported to offer
protection against colorectal cancer (5, 6). There is increasing
interest in its potential as a chemotherapeutic agent against other
forms of cancers (7-12). Cell cycle studies have indicated that the
cytostatic effects of butyrate could be attributable to the
up-regulation of p21Waf1/Cip1 because disruption of this
gene allowed colon cancer cells to continue dividing (13).
However, using primary fibroblasts with disrupted
p21Waf1/Cip1, Vaziri et al. (14) showed
that butyrate-induced cell cycle arrest could be independent of
p21Waf1/Cip1, instead involving cyclin D1 expression and
pRB1 signaling. They further
suggested that there were at least two mechanisms of butyrate-induced
arrest in cells involving the down-regulation of expression of cyclin
D1 and the up-regulation of p21Waf1/Cip1. Similar
observations were also reported by Davis et al. (15).
During the mid-G1 phase of the cell cycle, cyclin D1
activates cdk4 and cdk6 to phosphorylate pRB to release E2F, the
transcription factor that induces genes required for cells to enter S
phase (reviewed by Sherr (16)). P21Waf1/Cip1 inhibits cell
cycle progression by binding to and inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk)/cyclin complexes (17-19),
thereby maintaining the pRB in the dephosphorylated state.
Up-regulation of p21Waf1/Cip1 has been reported in some
quiescent cells that were stimulated to re-enter cell cycle (20-22),
and it was proposed that low levels of p21Waf1/Cip1 may
function to stabilize the cdk/cyclin complexes, whereas high levels
were inhibitory (23, 24).
Although butyrate and trichostatin A are well known to inhibit cell
division (1, 6, 25) and to induce apoptosis (2-4), variants can be
isolated that proliferate in the presence of these inhibitors. Chalkley
and Shires (34) isolated a hepatoma cell line that adapted to growth in
6 mM butyrate. These cells were established by continuous
incubation in increasing concentrations of sodium butyrate. Human
erythroleukemia cell lines resistant to the differentiation-inducing
effects of butyrate were also isolated by Ohlsson-Wilhelm
et al. (33). More recently, a mouse mammary cell line,
TR303, was isolated for resistance to trichostatin A following
mutagenesis with
N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (26, 27). Other butyrate-resistant variants were isolated from
HL60 promyelocytic leukemia cells (28, 29) and from HeLa S3 (30). In
all these cases, cell cycle studies were not done, and the mechanism of
their abilities to proliferate in butyrate-containing medium is unknown.
We have isolated a variant of HeLa cells that is resistant to high
concentrations of butyrate. Cell cycle studies showed that this
butyrate-resistant clone 5.1 constitutively expresses elevated levels
of p21Waf1/Cip1. In this study, we show that the expression
of cyclin D1 allows this cell to continue to proliferate in the
presence of 5 mM butyrate.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture and Isolation of Butyrate-resistant
Clones--
HeLa cells and their butyrate-resistant clone 5.1 were
routinely grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% calf serum, penicillin, and streptomycin. For
isolation of butyrate-resistant variants, a total of about 5 × 107 HeLa cells was plated in 100-mm tissue culture dishes.
After an overnight incubation period to allow the cells to attach, 1 M sodium butyrate (Sigma), dissolved in PBS, was added to
the cultures to final concentrations of 5, 7.5, or 10 mM,
and the cells were continuously maintained in their respective media
with regular changes. The clones that grew were isolated and
transferred to separate flasks and expanded in butyrate-free medium.
These clones were again subjected to a second round of selection in supplemented Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 5 mM butyrate, and the resulting clones were isolated and
expanded, and frozen stocks were made. One clone was put through two
additional rounds of subcloning for purification, and this purified
clone, clone 5.1, was used for cell cycle studies. Clone 5.1 was
maintained in regular growth medium in the absence of butyrate. Routine
bimonthly tests showed that the ability to grow in 5 mM
butyrate was stable.
Cell Growth--
Cells were plated in 6-well plates at a density
of 10-20 × 105 cells/well and allowed to incubate
overnight before the addition of butyrate. Cells from one set of wells
were counted, and this was used as the starting cell number. After
incubation in 1 or 5 mM butyrate for 1, 2, or 3 days, the
cells were washed with PBS, harvested by trypsinization, and counted in
a Coulter Particle Counter (Beckman Coulter). Samples were plated in
duplicate, and the average of three counts was used for each well. The
experiment was conducted three times.
Antibodies and Western Blot Analyses--
Polyclonal antibodies
for cyclins D1, D2, D3, p16INK4a,
p21Waf1/Cip1, p27Kip1, and cdk6 were purchased
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Monoclonal antibodies to
proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and cyclin B were also
purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Polyclonal antibodies to
cdk4 and p53 were purchased from Calbiochem. Monoclonal antibodies to
cyclin E and pRB were purchased from PharMingen. Secondary goat
-rabbit and goat -mouse antibodies conjugated with horseradish
peroxidase were purchased from Pierce.
For experiments, cells were plated at ~80% confluence and treated
with 0, 1, or 5 mM sodium butyrate overnight. The
cells were then collected by scraping into the medium, pelleted by
centrifugation, and washed once with cold PBS. Cell pellets were lysed
in nuclear buffer (31), the nuclei were pelleted by
centrifugation, and 1-5 µl of the supernatant was used for protein
quantity determination using the Bio-Rad microassay with bovine serum
albumin as the relative protein standard. 20 µg of total cellular
protein was fractionated in a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane (Millipore). Immunostaining with primary and secondary
antibodies was performed according to manufacturers protocols.
Immunoprecipitation and Kinase Assays--
Immunoprecipitation
of cdk2 and in vitro kinase assays were performed according
to the method described by Guo et al. (32) with some
modifications. Briefly, cells were lysed in 400 µl of NB buffer
containing Complete protease inhibitor (Roche Diagnostics) and 100 nM calyculin A as described above and centrifuged to remove insoluble material, including the nuclei. The supernatant was first
precleared with 0.5 µl of preimmune serum and 75 µl of protein A-Sepharose 6MB suspension (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Specific antibody along with fresh protein A-Sepharose 6MB was added, and the
mixture was rotated in the cold room for 2-3 h. The beads were washed
six times with NB buffer before being used for kinase assays.
The protein A-Sepharose 6MB beads with immunoprecipitate were first
equilibrated with 100 µl of H1 kinase buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.05 mM ATP)
for 10 min on ice. The buffer was removed and replaced with 50 µl of
H1 kinase reaction buffer (H1 kinase buffer containing 0.25 M Na3VO4 and 100 nM
calyculin A (Sigma), 0.1 µg/µl purified histone H1 (a gift from Dr.
X. W. Guo (Helix Diagnostics)), and 0.05 µCi/µl
[ -32P]ATP) and incubated at 30 °C for 10 min. The
reaction mixture was then centrifuged to pellet the protein A-Sepharose
beads, and the supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube. 45 µl of this supernatant was then added to nine volumes of cold acetone and
placed at 20 °C for precipitation of histone H1. The samples were
microcentrifuged for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The
histone H1 was air-dried, redissolved in SDS buffer, and
electrophoresed in a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The protein
was stained with Coomassie Blue, and the gel was dried and exposed to
x-ray film for autoradiography to determine the levels of
[32P]phosphate incorporation.
To determine the relative amounts of proteins immunoprecipitated for
kinase assays, the protein-Sepharose 6MB beads containing the
immunoprecipitated proteins were resuspended in SDS buffer, fractionated with SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and immunostained for cdk2 as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of Butyrate-resistant Cells--
When HeLa cells are
incubated with low concentrations (~1 mM) of sodium
butyrate, they become arrested in their cell cycle. Increasing the
concentration to 5 mM will induce apoptosis within 2 days.
This effect of butyrate on cells is well documented (2-4). To isolate
butyrate-resistant variants, HeLa cells were grown continuously in
medium containing 5, 7.5, or 10 mM sodium butyrate with
regular changes of medium. Most cells expired within a week of
incubation. However, after 6 weeks of continuous incubation, three
colonies appeared in plates with medium containing 5 mM butyrate, and one colony appeared in medium containing 7.5 mM butyrate. No survivors were isolated among cells
incubated in 10 mM butyrate. Following another round of
selection and further subcloning as described under "Materials and
Methods," clone 5.1 was selected for further studies.
Cell Cycle Properties of Clone 5.1--
Clone 5.1 exhibited a
reduced growth rate under normal growth conditions in regular growth
medium with a doubling time of about 24 h, as compared with
the 16-h doubling time for the parental HeLa cell. This is different
from other butyrate-resistant cells that were reported to have growth
rates similar to those of their parental cells (26, 28-30, 33, 34). In
the presence of 1 mM butyrate, parental HeLa cells stopped
dividing and remained in a state of quiescence (Fig.
1, left panel). Increasing the butyrate concentration to 5 mM resulted in complete cell
killing within 3 days. In contrast, clone 5.1 continued to grow in
butyrate, albeit at a reduced rate. In 1 mM butyrate, the
cells took 3 days to double in density, and in 5 mM
butyrate, the cell number increased by 50% in 3 days (Fig. 1,
right panel). Clone 5.1 continued to grow in butyrate and
formed visible colonies.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Butyrate effects on cell growth. HeLa
(left panel) and clone 5.1 (right panel) cells
were plated out in regular growth medium containing 0 ( ), 1 ( ),
or 5 ( ) mM butyrate. After incubating for up to 3 days,
the cells were washed with PBS and harvested by trypsinization and then
counted in a Coulter Counter.
|
|
The cell cycle arrest induced by butyrate was shown to result from the
up-regulation of p21Waf1/Cip1 (13), which then inhibited
the activities of cyclin-dependent kinases (17-19,
35-37). However, another study by Vaziri et al. (14) showed
that p21Waf1/Cip1 up-regulation was not sufficient for cell
cycle arrest and that cyclin D1 down-regulation also played a
major role in this arrest. To examine the expression level of
p21Waf1/Cip1 in the presence of butyrate, immunoblot
analyses of proteins from HeLa cells showed that
p21Waf1/Cip1 was low in cycling cells (Fig.
2, first lane) and was
up-regulated with an overnight exposure to butyrate (Fig. 2,
second and third lanes), leading to cell cycle
arrest at G1 and G2 (Fig.
3). The percent of cells in S phase
dropped from about 45% to less than 10% of total cells with
incubation in 5 mM butyrate. In contrast, the
butyrate-resistant clone 5.1 constitutively expressed elevated levels
of p21Waf1/Cip1 even when maintained in butyrate-free
medium, and the inclusion of butyrate did not alter the expression of
p21Waf1/Cip1 (Fig. 2). Northern blot analyses showed that
there was a corresponding increase in the mRNA encoding
p21Waf1/Cip1in clone 5.1 over the parental line (data not
shown). Quantitation of transcript levels using TaqMan reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction and analysis with an ABI 7700 sequence detection system (PE Applied Biosystems) showed that there was
up to an 8-fold increase in clone 5.1 as compared with the parental
line (data not shown). However, despite this elevation,
cytofluorometric analyses showed that clone 5.1 retained a normal cell
cycle profile with the percent of S phase cells remaining at around
40% (Fig. 3). In 5 mM butyrate, the cells continued to
traverse through S phase but delayed progressing through
G2, potentially accounting for the reduced cell growth
rates.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of p21Waf1/Cip1.
HeLa cells and the butyrate-resistant clone 5.1 were treated for
18 h with 0, 1, or 5 mM butyrate, and protein extracts
were prepared as described under "Materials and Methods." Following
electrophoresis in a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transfer onto a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, immunoblot of
p21Waf1/Cip1 was performed to determine the levels of
expression.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Cell cycle arrest induced by butyrate.
Cycling HeLa and clone 5.1 cells were incubated with butyrate as
described in the legend for Fig. 1 and then harvested and fixed with
70% ethanol. The cells were then stained with propidium iodide and
analyzed by flow cytometry.
|
|
In a study of human breast carcinoma by Balbín et
al. (38), a mutation in p21Waf1/Cip1 that converted an
arginine to tryptophan at residue 94 resulted in its inability to
inhibit cdks. In clone 5.1, cloning and sequencing of the cDNA
encoding p21Waf1/Cip1 did not reveal any sequence
differences from that of the parental HeLa cell line (data not
shown). The results suggest that during selection for butyrate
resistance, clone 5.1 initially responded by up-regulating the
expression of p21Waf1/Cip1, and with a prolonged period of
incubation, this variant overcame the inhibitory effects of this CKI
and was able to enter and traverse S phase.
Expression of Cell Cycle Regulatory Proteins--
One
possible way for clone 5.1 to overcome the inhibitory effects of
p21Waf1/Cip1 overexpression would be to concomitantly
increase the expression of other cell cycle regulatory proteins. To
determine whether there were compensatory increases in cell cycle
proteins in clone 5.1, cell extracts were prepared following treatments
with increasing concentrations of butyrate, and immunoblots were
performed. As shown in Fig. 4, there was
no increase in the expression of cyclin-dependent kinases.
The expression of cdk2 and cdk6 were similar between the parental HeLa
cells and clone 5.1 in the presence or absence of butyrate. A decrease
in the expression of cdk4 was seen in both cell lines treated
with butyrate. The expression levels of proliferating cell nuclear
antigen and the cdk inhibitors p16INK4a and
p27KIP were unaffected by butyrate in either cell. Western
blot analyses also showed that the expression of pRB was lower in clone
5.1 when compared with HeLa cells, and these levels in either cell line
were not affected by the presence of 5 mM butyrate.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Expression of cell cycle proteins. HeLa
and clone 5.1 were treated with increasing concentrations of butyrate
as described in the legend for Fig. 1, and whole cell extracts were
prepared. Proteins were then separated and transferred onto a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and immunostained for expression of
cell cycle regulatory proteins.
|
|
Immunoblot analyses showed a reduction in cyclin A levels in both cell
lines in the presence of butyrate (Fig.
5). A similar decline in cyclin B level
was seen in HeLa cells treated with butyrate but was unaffected by
butyrate in clone 5.1. The expression of cyclin E was not affected by
the presence of butyrate in either of the cell lines. However, cyclin
D1 in HeLa cells was down-regulated by increasing concentrations of
butyrate. In contrast, in clone 5.1, the expression of cyclin D1 was
elevated and was only partially down-regulated by 5 mM
butyrate. Measurement of transcript levels by reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction and ethidium bromide staining
and by the TaqMan reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
system showed that the mRNA encoding cyclin D1 corresponded
directly with the protein levels seen by immunoblot (data not shown).
Quantitation showed that the presence of butyrate down-regulated cyclin
D1 mRNA in HeLa cells by about 90%, whereas the cyclin D1
transcript level remained relatively constant in clone 5.1. The
expression of cyclin D2 or D3 in either cell line was unaffected by the
presence of butyrate. The results suggest that the elevated expression
of cyclin D1 allowed clone 5.1 to overcome the inhibitory effects of
butyrate.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Expression of cyclins. Protein extracts
from HeLa and clone 5.1 cells treated with butyrate were immunoblotted
for cyclins as described in the legends for Figs. 1 and 3.
|
|
Histone H1 Kinase Activity of Cdk2--
P21Waf1/Cip1
inhibits cell cycle progression by associating with and inactivating
cdk/cyclin complexes. To examine these interactions in clone 5.1, p21Waf1/Cip1 was immunoprecipitated from control cells and
cells that were incubated overnight with 5 mM butyrate and
then Western blotted for cdk2 and cyclin E. Fig.
6 shows that in HeLa cells treated with
butyrate and in control or butyrate-treated clone 5.1, p33cdk2 and cyclin E co-immunoprecipitated with
p21Waf1/Cip1. Enzymatic assays using these
immunoprecipitated complexes extracted from either the HeLa or clone
5.1 revealed that the kinases did not have enzymatic activity using
histone H1 as substrate (data not shown). This result shows that the
p21Waf1/Cip1 in clone 5.1 was functional in its ability to
inactivate cdks.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Enzyme activity assays of kinase complexes
associated with p21Waf1/Cip1. P21Waf1/Cip1
was immunoprecipitated, and the complexes were assayed for kinase
activity with histone H1 as the substrate (panel A).
Immunostaining of proteins that co-immunoprecipitated with
p21Waf1/Cip1 (panel B) revealed the presence of
cdk2 (panel C) and cyclin E (panel D).
|
|
Following depletion of p21Waf1/Cip1from the cell extracts,
we immunoprecipitated the remaining soluble p33cdk2 from
the cell extracts and assayed for kinase activities using histone H1 as
the substrate. The results showed that p33cdk2 in control
HeLa cells had high histone H1 kinase activity (Fig. 7), but the p33cdk2 kinase
immunoprecipitated from the butyrate-treated HeLa cells was
enzymatically inactive. This result corresponded with the cell cycle
arrest seen in Fig. 3. It is likely that this inactive p33cdk2 in the butyrate-treated cells was from the cells
that were in early G1, whereas the p33cdk2 from
cells that were in late G1/S was inactivated by binding to
p21Waf1/Cip1. This is further suggested by the
down-regulation of cyclin D1, which is expressed at mid-G1.
In clone 5.1, the p33cdk2 that was not bound to
p21Waf1/Cip1 was enzymatically active both in the control
and after butyrate treatment. The overexpression of cyclin D1 in these
cells allows the activation of cdk2 to traverse the cell cycle.
Furthermore, because the levels of cyclin A were reduced with butyrate
treatment in all the cells, the major cdk2 activity in clone 5.1 was
attributed to p33cdk2/cyclin E (Fig. 4).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Kinase assay of cdk2 kinase. Following
immunodepletion of p21Waf1/Cip1, cdk2 was
immunoprecipitated from the cell extracts and assayed for histone H1
kinase activity (panel A). Immunostaining of the proteins
that co-immunoprecipitated with cdk2 confirm the presence of
p33cdk2 (panel B) and cyclin E (panel
C).
|
|
During the cell cycle of normal cells, p33cdk2 regulates
entry into S phase by phosphorylating pRB, allowing release of
transcription factor E2F, which stimulates the synthesis of proteins
necessary for DNA replication (reviewed by Sherr (16)). To
determine the in vivo activity of p33cdk2, the
phosphorylation state of pRB was examined in both cell lines in the
absence or presence of butyrate. Western blot analyses showed that pRB
is hyperphosphorylated in cycling HeLa cells, as evident from the
reduced electrophoretic migration (Fig.
8). Upon up-regulation of
p21Waf1/Cip1 by butyrate, pRB was dephosphorylated. In
clone 5.1, the pRB was in a hyperphosphorylated state, and this did not
change with butyrate treatment, indicating that the cdks retained their
activities despite the overexpression of p21Waf1/Cip1. The
results further confirm that the cdk2 in clone 5.1 remained enzymatically active in the presence of butyrate, thus allowing the
cell cycle to continue.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Phosphorylation of pRB.
Immunoblot of pRB isoforms in whole cell extracts from HeLa
cells and clone 5.1 cells that were incubated overnight with and
without butyrate are shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Recently there is an increase in interest in the potential of
histone deacetylase inhibitors as chemotherapy agents; however, our
understanding of their mechanisms of action is incomplete. This
knowledge will be fundamental to the further development of such
compounds. Butyrate is one such histone deacetylase inhibitor that has
long been known to induce cell cycle arrest and differentiation in
numerous cell lines. At sufficiently high concentrations, it can induce
apoptosis. In this report, we show that HeLa cells, a prototypical
transformed cell, can spontaneously develop resistance to butyrate. We
isolated clone 5.1 from HeLa cells that do not undergo apoptosis in 5 mM butyrate but will continue to grow, although at a
reduced rate. Immunoblots show that the cdk inhibitor p21Waf1/Cip1 was constitutively expressed in this cell and
that cyclin D1 was overexpressed, allowing the cells to grow in butyrate.
Abberant expressions of p21Waf1/Cip1 and cyclin D1 were
reported in a number of cancers. In IGROV1 ovarian cancer cells with
abnormally high levels of p21Waf1/Cip1, there was also the
overexpression of other cell cycle proteins (41). In the MCF-7 cell
line, the overexpression of cyclin D1 and D3 overcame the inhibitory
effects of p21Waf1/Cip1 overexpression. The overexpression
of p21Waf1/Cip1 was also reported in a number of human
brain tumors, but the compensatory overexpression of other cell cycle
proteins was seen in only a few samples (42). Cyclin D1 overexpression
was also reported in a number of breast cancer tissues (43, 44).
In butyrate-treated HeLa cells, the p33cdk2 was found to be
enzymatically inactive even though it was not associated with
p21Waf1/Cip1 (Fig. 6, lane 2). It is most likely
that this fraction of p33cdk2 is from the subpopulation of
cells that were arrested in early G1 before they were
activated by phosphorylation and association with cyclins in
mid-G1 (45, 46). This other checkpoint is most likely
associated with the down-regulation of cyclin D1 by butyrate. This is
consistent with the findings of Vaziri et al. (14), who used
mouse 3T3 cells that were depleted of p21Waf1/Cip to
show that the butyrate was just as efficient in inducing G1 arrest. The authors suggested that there was at least one other butyrate-induced checkpoint in early G1 and that this
additional checkpoint could involve cyclin D1. The role of cyclin D1 in
regulating the G1 phase of the cell cycle was also
described by Pervin et al. (47), who showed that nitric
oxide induced cell cycle arrest by down-regulating cyclin D1 expression.
In butyrate-treated clone 5.1, cyclin D1 expression was elevated and
continued to be expressed in the presence of butyrate. The fraction of
p33cdk2 that was unbound to p21Waf1/Cip1
remained enzymatically active and is most likely responsible for the
cells traversing S phase and continuing with their cell cycle. This
suggests that the expression of cyclin D1 allowed the cells to continue
with their cell cycle. However, it is unlikely to involve the pRB
signaling pathway as suggested by Vaziri et al. (14) because
pRB in HeLa cells is inactivated by binding to the E7 protein of human
papillomavirus (39, 40). Recent reports have indicated that cyclin D1
has other functions in the cell that do not involve pRB
phosphorylation. Hirai and Sherr (48) showed that D-type cyclins could
directly bind to DMP1, a myb-like transcription factor. In breast
epithelial cells, cyclin D1 could activate the estrogen receptor to
induce transcription of steroid-responsive genes (49, 50), suppress the
initiation of skeletal muscle differentiation independent of pRB
phosphorylation (51), and bind to the STAT3 transcription factor to
down-regulate its activity (52). In Drosophila, cyclin D
regulates cell growth independent of the pRB homolog, RBF (53). What
role these factors may play in regulating G1 in clone 5.1 is currently under investigation.
Butyrate inhibits histone deacetylases (HDACs), resulting in the
hyperacetylation of histones (54, 55). Similar effects on histone
hyperacetylation and cell cycle arrest were also seen when cells were
treated with trichostatin A, a specific inhibitor of HDAC (26, 27).
Previous studies on butyrate-resistant cells focused mainly on the
activities of the histone deacetylases (27-30, 33, 34), and in each
case, the HDACs were resistant to the presence of these inhibitors.
With the HeLa cells described in this study, exposure to butyrate or
trichostatin A caused their histones to be hyperacetylated to their
tri- and tetra-acetylated states, indicating the high sensitivity of
their HDACs to these inhibitors. In contrast, incubation of clone 5.1 with butyrate or trichostatin A did not lead to the similar
hyperacetylation of histones. Although some H4 histones were tri- and
tetra-acetylated, there were about equal amounts of unacetylated and
monoacetylated histones, indicating that the HDACs remained
active in these cells.2
Preliminary characterization of another butyrate-resistant clone, Clone
7.5, which was isolated by continuous incubation in 7.5 mM
butyrate, showed that it also has up-regulated
p21Waf1/Cip1, did not overexpress other cell cycle
proteins, and has p33cdk2 kinase that remained
enzymatically active in the presence of butyrate. However, Clone
7.5 showed some distinctions from clone 5.1, including an even much
slower cell division rate (doubling time of about 36 h) and a much
lower expression of cyclin B. Further characterizations of this clone
are under way.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Alison Graver of the Paleo-DNA
Laboratory in Lakehead University for sequencing the cDNAs of
p21Waf1/Cip1 and cdk2. We also thank the Northern
Cancer Research Foundation for their support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research
Council of Canada (to J. T.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be sent: Northwestern Ontario
Regional Cancer Centre, 290 Munro St., Thunder Bay, Ontario P7A 7T1 Canada; Tel.: 807-343-1542; Fax: 807-343-1549; E-mail:
john.th'ng@cancercare.on.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 26, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104735200
2
A. Derjuga, C. Richard, M. Crosato,
P. S. Wright, and J. P. H. Th'ng, manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
pRB, retinoblastoma protein;
cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
HDAC, histone deacetylase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kruh, J.
(1982)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
42,
65-82
|
| 2.
|
Lee, E.,
Furukubo, T.,
Miyabe, T.,
Yamauchi, A.,
and Kariya, K.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
395,
183-187
|
| 3.
|
McBain, J. A.,
Eastman, A.,
Nobel, C. S.,
and Mueller, G. C.
(1997)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
53,
1357-1368
|
| 4.
|
Medina, V.,
Edmonds, B.,
Young, G. P.,
James, R.,
Appleton, S.,
and Zalewski, P. D.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
3697-3707
|
| 5.
|
Cummings, J. H.
(1981)
Gut
22,
763-779
|
| 6.
|
Hassig, C. A.,
Tong, J. K.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1997)
Chem. Biol.
4,
783-789
|
| 7.
|
Conley, B. A.,
Egorin, M. J.,
Tait, N.,
Rosen, D. M.,
Sausville, E. A.,
Dover, G.,
Fram, R. J.,
and Van Echo, D. A.
(1998)
Clin. Cancer Res.
4,
629-634
|
| 8.
|
Coradini, D.,
Biffi, A.,
Costa, A.,
Pellizzaro, C.,
Pirronello, E.,
and Di Fronzo, G.
(1997)
Cell Prolif.
30,
149-159
|
| 9.
|
Krupitza, G.,
Grill, S.,
Hariant, H.,
Hulla, W.,
Szekeres, T.,
Huber, M.,
and Dittrich, C.
(1996)
Br. J. Cancer
73,
433-438
|
| 10.
|
Saunders, N.,
Dicker, A.,
Popa, C.,
Jones, S.,
and Dahler, A.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
399-404
|
| 11.
|
Tada, S.,
Saito, H.,
Ebinuma, H.,
Atsukawa, K.,
Masuda, T.,
Tsunematsu, S.,
Morizane, T.,
and Ishii, H.
(1996)
Cancer Biochem. Biophys.
15,
177-186
|
| 12.
|
Warrell, R. P.,
He, L.-Z.,
Richon, V.,
Calleja, E.,
and Pandolfi, P. P.
(1998)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
90,
1621-1625
|
| 13.
|
Archer, S. Y.,
Meng, S.,
Shei, A.,
and Hodin, R. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6791-6796
|
| 14.
|
Vaziri, C.,
Stice, L.,
and Faller, D. V.
(1998)
Cell Growth Differ.
6,
465-474
|
| 15.
|
Davis, T.,
Kennedy, C.,
Chiew, Y. E.,
Clark, C. L.,
and deFazio, A.
(2000)
Clin. Cancer Res.
6,
4334-4342
|
| 16.
|
Sherr, C. J.
(1997)
Science
274,
1672-1677
|
| 17.
|
Hengst, L.,
and Reed, S.
(1998)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
227,
25-41
|
| 18.
|
Sherr, C. J.,
and Roberts, J. M.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1149-1163
|
| 19.
|
Xiong, Y.,
Hannon, G. H.,
Zhang, H.,
Casso, D.,
Kobayashi, R.,
and Beach, D.
(1993)
Nature
366,
701-704
|
| 20.
|
Macleod, K. F.,
Sherry, N.,
Hannon, G.,
Beach, D.,
Tokino, T.,
Kinzler, K.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Jacks, T.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
935-944
|
| 21.
|
Mantel, C.,
Luo, Z.,
Canfield, J.,
Braun, S.,
Deng, C.,
and Broxmeyer, H. E.
(1996)
Blood
88,
3710-3719
|
| 22.
|
Michieli, P.,
Chedid, M.,
Lin, D.,
Pierce, J. H.,
Mercer, W. E.,
and Givol, D.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
3391-3395
|
| 23.
|
LaBaer, J.,
Garrett, M. D.,
Stevenson, L. F.,
Slingerland, J. M.,
Sandhu, C.,
Chou, H. S.,
Fattaey, A.,
and Harlow, E.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
847-862
|
| 24.
|
Zhang, H.,
Hannon, G. J.,
and Beach, D.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1750-1758
|
| 25.
|
Yoshida, M.,
and Beppu, T.
(1988)
Exp. Cell Res.
177,
122-131
|
| 26.
|
Yoshida, M.,
Horinouchi, S.,
and Beppu, T.
(1995)
Bioessays
17,
423-430
|
| 27.
|
Yoshida, M.,
Kijima, M.,
Akita, M.,
and Beppu, T.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17174-17179
|
| 28.
|
Yen, A.,
and Varvayanis, S.
(1995)
J. Cell. Physiol.
163,
502-509
|
| 29.
|
Fischkoff, S. A.,
Hoessly, M. C.,
and Rossi, R. M.
(1990)
Leukemia (Baltimore)
4,
302-306
|
| 30.
|
Milsted, A.,
Silver, B. J.,
Cox, R. P.,
and Nilson, J. H.
(1985)
Endocrinology
117,
2033-2039
|
| 31.
|
Th'ng, J. P. H.,
Guo, X.-W.,
Swank, R. A.,
Crissman, H. A.,
and Bradbury, E. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9568-9573
|
| 32.
|
Guo, X.-W.,
Th'ng, J. P. H.,
Swank, R. A.,
Anderson, H. J.,
Tudan, C.,
Bradbury, E. M.,
and Roberge, M.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
976-985
|
| 33.
|
Ohlsson-Wilhelm, B. M.,
Farley, B. A.,
Kosciolek, B.,
La Bella, S.,
and Rowley, P. T.
(1984)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
36,
1225-1238
|
| 34.
|
Chalkley, R.,
and Shires, A.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
7698-7704
|
| 35.
|
Ball, K. L.
(1995)
in
Progress in Cell Cycle Research
(Meijer, L.
, Guidet, S.
, and Philippe, M., eds), Vol. 3
, pp. 125-134, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 36.
|
Hengst, L.,
Gopfert, U.,
Lashuel, H. A.,
and Reed, S. I.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
3882-3888
|
| 37.
|
Harper, J. W.,
Elledge, S. J.,
Keyomarsi, K.,
Dynlacht, B.,
Tsai, L. H.,
Zhang, P.,
Dobrowolski, S.,
Bai, C.,
Connell-Crowley, L.,
and Swindell, E.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
387-400
|
| 38.
|
Balbín, M.,
Hannon, G. J.,
Pendas, A. M.,
Ferrando, A. A.,
Vizoso, F.,
Fueyo, A.,
and Lopez-Otin, C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15782-15786
|
| 39.
|
Goodwin, E. C.,
and DiMaio, D.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
12513-12518
|
| 40.
|
Scheffner, M.,
Munger, K.,
Byrne, J. C.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
5523-5527
|
| 41.
|
Barboule, N.,
Baldin, V.,
Jozan, S.,
Vidal, S.,
and Valette, A.
(1998)
Int. J. Cancer
76,
891-896
|
| 42.
|
Jung, J.-M.,
Bruner, J. M.,
Ruan, S.,
Langford, L. A.,
Kyritsis, A. P.,
Kobayashi, T.,
Levin, V. A.,
and Zhang, W.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
2021-2028
|
| 43.
|
Geradts, J.,
and Ingram, C. D.
(2000)
Mod. Pathol.
13,
945-953
|
| 44.
|
Ohta, T.,
Fukuda, M.,
Arima, K.,
Kawamoto, H.,
Hashizume, R.,
Arimura, T.,
and Yamaguchi, S.
(1997)
Breast Cancer
4,
17-24
|
| 45.
|
Desai, D.,
Wessling, H. C.,
Fisher, R. P.,
and Morgan, D. O.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
345-350
|
| 46.
|
Morgan, D. O.
(1995)
Nature
374,
131-134
|
| 47.
|
Pervin, S.,
Singh, R.,
and Chaudhuri, G.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
3583-3588
|
| 48.
|
Hirai, H.,
and Sherr, C. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6457-6467
|
| 49.
|
Zwijsen, R. M.,
Wientjens, E.,
Klompmaker, R.,
van der Sman, J.,
Bernards, R.,
and Michalides, R. J.
(1997)
Cell
88,
405-415
|
| 50.
|
Zwijsen, R. M. L.,
Buckle, R. S.,
Hijmans, E. M.,
Loomans, C. J. M.,
and Bernards, R.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
3488-3498
|
| 51.
|
Skapek, S. X.,
Rhee, J.,
Kim, P. S.,
Novitch, B. G.,
and Lassar, A. B.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
7043-7053
|
| 52.
|
Bienvenu, F.,
Gascan, H.,
and Coqueret, O.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
16840-16847
|
| 53.
|
Datar, S. A.,
Jacobs, H. W.,
de la Cruz, A. F.,
Lehner, C. F.,
and Edgar, B. A.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
4543-4554
|
| 54.
|
Boffa, L. C.,
Vidali, G.,
Mann, R. S.,
and Allfrey, V. G.
(1978)
J. Biol. Chem.
253,
3364-3366
|
| 55.
|
Candido, E. P. M.,
Reeves, R.,
and Davis, J. R.
(1978)
Cell
14,
105-113
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Richard, D. Matthews, W. Duivenvoorden, J. Yau, P. S. Wright, and J. P.H. Th'ng
Flavopiridol Sensitivity of Cancer Cells Isolated from Ascites and Pleural Fluids
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 1, 2005;
11(9):
3523 - 3529.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Piekarz, R. W. Robey, Z. Zhan, G. Kayastha, A. Sayah, A. H. Abdeldaim, S. Torrico, and S. E. Bates
T-cell lymphoma as a model for the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors in cancer therapy: impact of depsipeptide on molecular markers, therapeutic targets, and mechanisms of resistance
Blood,
June 15, 2004;
103(12):
4636 - 4643.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kennedy, K. Byth, C. L. Clarke, and A. deFazio
Cell Proliferation in the Normal Mouse Mammary Gland and Inhibition by Phenylbutyrate
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
October 1, 2002;
1(12):
1025 - 1033.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|