![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 41, 38231-38236, October 12, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
,
,
From the
Division of Immunology, Beckman Research
Institute of the City of Hope, § City of Hope Graduate
Program in Biological Sciences, Duarte, California 91010 and the
¶ Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Life Sciences
Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
94720
Received for publication, June 7, 2001, and in revised form, July 9, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The proteins Ku70 (69.8 kDa) and Ku80
(82.7 kDa) form a heterodimeric complex that is an essential component
of the nonhomologous end joining DNA double-strand break repair
pathway in mammalian cells. Interaction of Ku with DNA is central for
the functions of Ku. Ku70, which is mainly responsible for the DNA
binding activity of the Ku heterodimer, contains two DNA-binding
domains. We have solved the solution structure of the Ku80-independent
DNA-binding domain of Ku70 encompassing residues 536-609 using nuclear
magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Residues 536-560 are highly flexible
and have a random structure but form specific interactions with DNA. Residues 561-609 of Ku70 form a well defined structure with 3 The proteins Ku70 (69.8 kDa) and Ku80 (82.7 kDa) form a
heterodimeric complex that is an essential component of the
nonhomologous end joining DNA double-strand break repair pathway in
mammalian cells (for a recent review, see Ref 1). DNA double-strand
breaks are caused by ionizing radiation, V(D)J recombination,
and physiological oxygen free-radical damage. The
Ku-dependent repair process is the main DNA double-strand
break repair mechanism in mammalian cells and is essential for the
preservation of genomic stability.
Ku is an integral component of the machinery involved in repairing DNA
double-strand breaks. The Ku heterodimer binds with high affinity to
broken DNA ends (2) and can bridge two proximal DNA ends (3). Ku also
recruits a 465-kDa DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit
(DNA-PKcs) to the DNA double-strand break sites
stimulating the DNA-PKcs kinase activity (4).
DNA-PKcs interacts with and phosphorylates a nuclear
protein, XRCC4 (5-6). XRCC4 associates tightly with DNA ligase IV
through the ligase IV C-terminal extension (5, 7-8). DNA ligase IV is
thought to catalyze DNA-end joining (9).
Several studies indicate that Ku70 is mainly responsible for the DNA
binding activity of the Ku heterodimer. Ku70 contains two DNA-binding
domains; one is located at the N terminus before residue 440, and the
other one is located at the C terminus (10, 11). The DNA binding
activity of the C-terminal DNA-binding domain is independent of the
heterodimer formation with Ku80, whereas the DNA binding activity of
the N-terminal domain of Ku70 depends on heterodimer formation with
Ku80 (12). Both Ku70 DNA-binding domains are required for the high
affinity binding to DNA as demonstrated in gel shift assays (12, 13).
Elimination of either DNA-binding domain resulted in a significant
reduction of the DNA binding affinity. This may because of primarily
entropic effects.
Biochemical studies performed by Reeves and co-workers have
shown that the segment spanning residues 536-609 constitutes the C-terminal DNA-binding domain of human Ku70 (10, 12, 13). Deletion of
the first 25 residues of this domain (residues 536-560) abolished the
DNA binding activity of the C-terminal domain (10). Deletion of the
last 10 amino acid residues (residues 600-609) of Ku70 also
significantly reduced the DNA binding activity (13). In the study
described in this paper, we have expressed the segment encompassing
residues 536-609 of human Ku70 and solved the three-dimensional structure of this DNA-binding domain of Ku70. The three-dimensional structure reveals a common helix-extended loop-helix structural motif.
Sample Preparation--
Human Ku70 C-terminal fragment 536-609
was cloned into expression vector pET28a (Novagen) and transfected into
Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3). The resulting protein
product is a recombinant fusion protein starting with a 6-histidine tag
and a thrombin protease site. Uniformly 15N-labeled protein
and 15N- and 13C-labeled protein were
produced by growing the expression strain in M9 medium with
15NH4Cl as the sole nitrogen source and with
15NH4Cl and [13C]glucose as the
sole nitrogen and carbon source, respectively. The protein was purified
using Ni2+ affinity chromatography. The NMR samples
contained 1.0 mM protein in 100 mM phosphate
buffer at pH 6.0 and 5 mM dithiothreitol in 95%
H2O/5% 2H2O or 100%
2H2O.
NMR Spectroscopy and Structural Calculation--
All NMR
experiments were performed at 20 °C on a Varian Unity-plus 500 NMR
spectrometer equipped with a triple-resonance probe, pulsed-field
gradient, and pulse-shaping capabilities. Felix 98 (Molecular
Simulations Inc., San Diego, CA) was used for all NMR data processing.
1H, 15N, and 13C resonance
assignments were obtained from the following experiments: HNCACB,
C(CO)NH, CBCA(CO)NH, HCCH-TOCSY, 15N-edited TOCSY-HSQC,
H(CCO)NH, and HBHA(CO)NH (for reviews, see Refs. 14 and 15).
Stereospecific assignments of Protein-DNA Interaction--
A sample of 0.5 mM
15N-labeled Ku70 domain was titrated to a sample of 10 mM unlabeled DNA to a molar ratio of 1:1. The titration was
monitored using one-dimensional and two-dimensional HSQC NMR spectra.
The final concentration of the protein-DNA complex is ~0.35
mM. Because Ku binds to the double-strand break sites of DNA, a palindromic DNA sequence was used to ensure that the binding of
Ku70 to each end of the DNA forms the same complex. The DNA molecule is
a duplex of 16 base pairs with the upper strand sequence being
5'-GCTATGGATCCATAGC-3'.
Structure Determination--
The structure of the Ku70 C-terminal
domain was solved with 1144 structural constraints derived from NMR
measurements. An ensemble of 20 structures of Ku70 C-terminal domain
with the lowest NMR constraint violations and lowest XPLOR energies
were used for detailed analysis of the structure. The structural
statistics are given in Table I. All
experimental NMR constraints are well satisfied. There are no
NOE1 constraints violated
more than 0.5 Å, no J-coupling constraints violated more than 1 Hz,
and no dihedral constraints violated more than 5°. These structures
also display only small deviations from idealized covalent geometry
(Table I). All peptide bonds are trans. Almost all residues in
the structurally well defined regions have
The NMR structure is of high precision. The average root mean square
deviation (r.m.s.d.) from the average structure for backbone heavy
atoms (C', C Description of the Structure--
The C-terminal DNA-binding
domain of Ku70 consists of a well structured region and a highly random
and flexible N terminus. Residues 536-560, which include the nuclear
localization domain (21), are completely random and flexible and do not
form any defined structure in solution. This is evident by much
narrower resonances, absence of any medium and long range NOEs, and
chemical shifts that are similar to random coil values. Significant
information is now available to correlate primary sequences of proteins
to their secondary structures, and secondary structure prediction from
amino acid sequence is successful in most cases (22). Secondary structural prediction of Ku70 using the program PHD (22) shows that
residues 530-560 of Ku70 do not contain helices or
Residues 561-609 of Ku70 form a well defined structure. This region
contains 3
The three-dimensional structure suggests that conserved hydrophobic
residues are all located in the hydrophobic core of the protein. Fig.
2A shows the sequence
alignment of the Ku70 C-terminal domain from known species. The
following hydrophobic residues are highly conserved throughout these
species: 564, 568, 573, 576, 578, 581, 590, 599, 600, 603, and 607. All
of these residues are in the hydrophobic core of the Ku70 C-terminal
domain structure and are indicated in green in Fig. 2A and
shown with their sidechains in Fig. 2B. The extensive
hydrophobic core of the Ku70 C-terminal domain is formed with nearly
all conserved hydrophobic residues.
The structure of the C-terminal DNA-binding domain is consistent with
previous studies (10, 23), which suggested that the fragment from
residues 560-609 forms an intact structure based on reactions with
anti-Ku70 antibodies. Antibodies against full-length Ku70 and Ku80
proteins were used to react with E. coli-expressed recombinant Ku70 and Ku80 fragments. The fragment consisting of residues 560-609 of human Ku70 was the minimum length for a reaction with these antibodies (23). Fragments that contained this region (e.g. 419-609, 536-609, and 560-609) reacted
well with the antibodies. Fragments that do not entirely include this
region, such as residues 560-600, 536-600, and 589-609, did not
react with the antibodies. Because the fragment containing residues
560-609 can be recognized by antibodies generated by the full-length
Ku proteins, this would suggest that the structure of the E. coli-expressed fragment encompassing residues 560-609 has the
same structural characteristic as the fragment in the full-length protein.
Interactions of the Ku70 C-terminal Domain with
DNA--
Interaction of the Ku70 C-terminal domain with DNA has been
investigated. 15N-Labeled Ku70 C-terminal domain (0.5 mM) was titrated to the solution of 10 mM
unlabeled 16-base pair palindromic DNA with the sequence described
under "Experimental Procedures." Chemical shifts of the DNA in the
complex were monitored by one-dimensional jump return (24) and
one-dimensional 15N-filtered spectra (25). Chemical shift
changes of the protein were monitored using
1H-15N HSQC spectra. Fig.
3 shows the superposition of the
1H-15N HSQC spectra of the C-terminal domain
of Ku70 free and in complex with DNA. Overall, chemical shift
perturbation has been observed for many residues in Ku70. In addition,
the HSQC spectra were essentially identical at the protein:DNA molar
ratio of 1:2 and 1:1. This suggests that the percentages of the Ku70
domain in the complex were the same at the protein:DNA molar ratio of
1:2 and 1:1 and therefore were close to 100%. Therefore, the
dissociation constant should be in the micromolar range or smaller. The
DNA signals as monitored by one-dimensional experiments during the titration also suggest that the exchange rate between the free and
complex states is slow on the chemical shift time scale.
Chemical shift perturbation was used to identify regions of the protein
that are involved in the protein-DNA interaction, an approach used
successfully in our, as well as other, laboratories (26). Large
chemical shift changes (
The largest chemical shift changes occur in regions where most of the
conserved Arg or Lys residues are located and have the strongest
positive electrostatic potential. Several residues within the
C-terminal DNA-binding domain of Ku70 are conserved as Arg or Lys as
indicated in blue in Fig. 2A. These residues are 539, 542-544, 553, 554, 556, 565, 575, 582, 586, 591, 595, and 596. Except
residue 565, all other conserved positively charged residues are
located on the surface, which has a strong positive electrostatic potential (Fig. 4, A and B). In particular,
residues 582, 586, 591, 595, and 596 are clustered together forming the
strongest positive surface of the structured domain. Residue 582 and
586 are located in
The surface shape of the proposed DNA-binding site in the structured
region (Hb and the loop containing residues 590-596) suggests that
this surface may interact with the major groove of DNA and the
phosphate backbone. The size of an Structural Similarity with Other Proteins in the Data
Base--
The structure of the C-terminal region of Ku70 does not
resemble the helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif or other common
sequence-specific DNA-binding domains, such as zinc finger, leucine
zipper, or helix-loop-helix motif. It contains a helix-extended
loop-helix structure that has not been observed in known
sequence-specific DNA-binding domains.
We have used the program DALI (28) to search for structures in the
Protein Data Bank that share structural similarities to the C-terminal
DNA-binding domain of Ku70. The search resulted in the following three
hits: T4 endonuclease VII (29), transcription termination factor rho
(30, 31), and lysyl-tRNA synthetase (32). The superpositions of the
C-terminal domain of Ku70 with these proteins are shown in Fig.
5, A-C. T4 endonuclease VII
binds to and cleaves unusual DNA-structures such as Holiday structures, three-way junctions, single-strand overhangs, heteroduplex loops, base
mismatches, bulky adducts, and curved DNA (29). The region of T4
endonuclease VII that shares structural homology to the Ku70 C-terminal
domain is located at the C terminus, which is critical for interactions
with DNA (33, 34). rho is a transcriptional terminator in most
eubacterial species (30, 31). rho functions as a hexamer and binds
either single-stranded DNA or RNA. The
Sequence similarity among the four proteins has been observed. Fig.
5D shows the sequence alignment comparing the Ku70
C-terminal domain with T4 endonuclease VII, rho, and lysyl-tRNA
synthetase. The sequence alignment is based on the structural
superposition. Most of the conserved hydrophobic residues in Ku70,
which are located in the hydrophobic core, are also conserved in the
structurally homologous domains of the three other proteins. In
particular, the sequence similarity is higher in the helix-extended
loop-helix (the second and third helices) region. This region has a
high structural similarity among the four proteins. This would suggest that the conserved hydrophobic core is responsible for stabilizing these similar structures.
The structural motif represented by the C-terminal DNA-binding domain
of Ku70 occurs in at least four proteins including itself as discussed
here. These proteins are involved in interactions with unusual
structures of nucleic acids. The regions that share structural
similarity with the Ku70 C-terminal domain in these three proteins are
known to interact with nucleic acid or may form interactions with
nucleic acids. Thus this motif may be involved in supporting or
enhancing binding to nucleic acid by proteins that recognize unusual
nucleic acid structures.
In conclusion, this is the first study describing the atomic resolution
three-dimensional structure of the Ku proteins. Interaction of the Ku
with DNA is central for the functions of Ku. The three-dimensional structure of the C-terminal DNA-binding domain of Ku70 indicates that
all conserved hydrophobic residues are in the hydrophobic core and are
therefore likely to be important for structural integrity. Most of the
conserved positively charged residues are likely to be critical for DNA
recognition. The C-terminal domain of human Ku70 may represents a
common structural motif that is involved in the recognition
of unusual nucleic acid structures.
-helices and also interact with DNA. The three-dimensional structure indicates that all conserved hydrophobic residues are in the
hydrophobic core and therefore may be important for structural
integrity. Most of the conserved positively charged residues are likely
to be critical for DNA recognition. The C-terminal DNA-binding domain of Ku70 contains a helix-extended strand-helix motif, which occurs in
other nucleic acid-binding proteins and may represent a common nucleic
acid binding motif.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-methylene protons were obtained by
the analysis of 3JH
-H
and
3JHN-H
coupling constants extracted from the
semi-quantitative interpretation of relative peak intensities in the
three-dimensional 15N-separated TOCSY-HSQC of 30-ms
mixing time (16) and the three-dimensional HNHB (17) spectra,
respectively. The dihedral angle
restraints were obtained based on
3JHN-H
coupling constants measured in an
HNHA experiment (18). Distance restraints were obtained from
15N-separated (mixing time, 100 ms) and
13C-separated (mixing time, 100 ms) three-dimensional
NOESY spectra. The distance restraints were grouped into the
following ranges: 3.0, 4.0 (3.7 if HN, H
, or
H
is involved), and 5.0 Å. Structures were obtained
from simulated annealing calculations using Dyana (19) and CNS
(36). Quality of the NMR structures was evaluated using the
program PROCHECK (20).
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and
dihedral angles
in the most favorable regions of the Ramachandran plot. The residues in
the generally allowed regions and disallowed regions of the
Ramachandran plot are located mainly in the loop between residues
588-595, where the structure is less well defined.
Structural statistics of the Ku70 C-terminal Domain
, N) of residues in
-helices is 0.36 Å. The average
r.m.s.d. from the average structure for backbone heavy atoms of all
residues from 561 to 609 is 0.58 Å. The overall high precision of the
NMR structure is clearly correlated to the high density of experimental
constraints. In the structured region, more than 26 NMR constraints per
residue have been identified for structural calculation.
-strands but
form a loop. This is consistent with the observation that this region
is unstructured in solution. These results suggest that the nuclear
localization domain of human Ku70, like the nuclear localization
domains of many proteins, is unstructured in solution.
-helices. Superposition of the backbone C
atoms of
residues in this region is shown in Fig.
1A, and the ribbon diagram of
a representative structure is shown in Fig. 1B. On the basis
of backbone dihedral angles and characteristic NOEs, the three
-helices encompass residues 562-570, 578-587, and 596-606.
Helices Hb and Hc are nearly parallel and connected by an extended loop
region. This interhelical loop (residues 588-595) is less well defined
than the helical regions and appears to be more flexible. This region
has fewer NOE constraints per residue than average. Helices Hb and Hc
and the loop connecting them form a unique helix-extended loop-helix
motif.

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, stereo view of the
superposition of a family of 20 structures of the Ku70 C-terminal
domain. Only residues 561-609 are shown, because residues 535-560 are
unstructured. These structures are selected based on the lowest
violation of NMR structural constraints. The superposition was obtained
by minimizing the r.m.s.d. of backbone heavy atoms in helical regions.
B, stereo view of the ribbon diagram of the
average structure from residues 561-609. Helices Ha-Hc are indicated
in the figure.

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
A, sequence alignment of the
C-terminal domain of Ku70 from known mammalian species. The
GenBankTM accession numbers for these proteins are as
follows: AAB46854 (hamster), A43534 (mouse), P12956 (human),
BAA32018 (Gallus), and BAA76953 (Xenopus).
B, stereo view of the hydrophobic core of the structured
region (residues 561-609) of the C-terminal domain of Ku70. All
conserved hydrophobic residues are in the hydrophobic core and are
indicated with their sidechain in the figure.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Superposition of the HSQC spectra of the Ku70
C-terminal DNA-binding domain, free and in complex with DNA. The
cross peaks in black correspond to the spectrum
of the free protein, and the cross peaks in red
correspond to the spectrum of the protein-DNA complex. Only the
assignments of the cross peaks of the free protein are shown, although
most of the cross peaks of the complex are assigned. The residue
numbers correspond to the sequence of the expression construct,
and thus addition of 512 of the labeled residue number corresponds to
the residue number in Ku70.

1H > 0.08 ppm and/or

15N > 0.2 ppm) have been observed for residues
540-544, 554-562, 573-577, 581-588, and 590-604. The first two
segments are located in the N-terminal flexible region. The next three
segments are in the structured region. These regions are indicated in
yellow in the 3-dimensional structure of the Ku70 domain shown in Fig. 4A. The residues in the His
tag did not form any defined structures as no non-sequential NOE has
been observed involving the residues in the His tag. Furthermore, the
His tag did not form any interactions with the DNA either, because no
significant chemical shift change has been observed for resonances of
the His tag residues.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
A, the average structure of the Ku70
C-terminal domain showing the sidechains of residues that are conserved
to be Lys or Arg. The segments that have the largest chemical shift
changes ( 
15N> 0.2 ppm and/or

1H > 0.08 ppm) upon complex formation with DNA
are indicated in yellow. This surface contains most of the
conserved Arg or Lys residues. B, surface electrostatic
potential of the Ku70 DNA-binding domain. The orientation of the
molecule is identical to that in A. The proposed DNA binding
surface has the strongest positive electrostatic potential.
-helix 72 b, and residues 591, 595, and 596 are located in an adjacent flexible loop. Most of these residues are located in the segments where large chemical shift perturbation has
been observed (Fig. 4A). The positively charged amino acid residues often play key roles in the binding of nucleic acids. Conservation of these residues suggests their importance in DNA binding. Smaller chemical shift changes in other segments in the structured region may be because of additional structural perturbation as a result of the protein-DNA interaction.
-helix matches that of the major
groove of DNA, and
-helices often insert into the major groove of
DNA in many DNA-binding proteins. Thus it is possible that the helix,
where the conserved residues 582 and 586 are located, may interact with
the major groove of DNA. Then the adjacent loop, where the conserved
residues 591, 595, and 596 are located, may interact with the phosphate
backbone. This is consistent with a previous study using a
photocross-linking method that shows that Ku70 binds in the major
groove near double-helical ends (27). Further biochemical studies are
needed to define the binding site of the flexible N terminus of the
Ku70 C-terminal domain on the DNA.
-helical domain within the
RNA-binding domain shares structural similarity with the C-terminal
domain of Ku70. It is not clear whether the N-terminal domain of rho is
involved in RNA binding. Lysyl-tRNA synthetase catalyzes the covalent
conjugation of lysine to the cognate tRNA (32). The complex of an
Asp-tRNA synthetase, homologous to the lysyl-tRNA synthetase, in
complex with tRNA has been solved (35). Homology modeling shows that
the region in lysyl-tRNA synthetase that shares structural similarity
to the Ku70 C-terminal domain is located at one end of double-helical arm of tRNA and may form interactions with tRNA.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Ribbon diagram of the superposition of
the Ku70 C-terminal domain with bacteriophage T4 endonuclease VII
(A), transcription termination factor rho (B),
and lysyl-tRNA synthetase (C). The Ku70 domain is in
yellow, and T4 endonuclease VII, rho, and lysyl-tRNA
synthetase are shown in purple, cyan, and
blue, respectively. D, sequence alignment
comparing the Ku70 C-terminal domain with the structurally homologous
regions of T4 endonuclease VII, rho, and lysyl-tRNA synthetase. The
sequence alignment is based on the structural superposition. Helical
regions in the Ku70 domain are indicated at the top of the
figure. The color code used in the Ku70 sequence is the same as used in
Fig. 2A. The residues colored in green are the
conserved hydrophobic residues.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institute of Health Grants GM 54190 (to Y. C.) and CA 50519 (to D. J. C.) and by Grant DE-AC0376SF00098 from United States Department of Energy. The NMR structure was calculated on an Origin Workstation purchased using Grant 1G08LM06722-01A1 from the National Library of Medicine.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of
Immunology, Beckman Research Inst. of the City of Hope, 1450 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010. Tel.: 626-930-5408; Fax: 626-301-8186; E-mail:
ychen@coh.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 16, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105238200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: NOE, nuclear Overhauser effect; r.m.s.d., root mean square deviation.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Critchlow, S. E., and Jackson, S. P. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 394-398 |
| 2. | Blier, P. R., Griffith, A. J., Craft, J., and Hardin, J. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 7594-7601 |
| 3. | Cary, R. B., Peterson, S. R., Wang, J., Bear, D. G., Bradbury, E. M., and Chen, D. J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 4267-4272 |
| 4. | Hammarsten, O., and Chu, G. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 525-530 |
| 5. | Critchlow, S. E., Bowater, R. P., and Jackson, S. P. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 588-598 |
| 6. | Leber, R., Wise, T. W., Mizuta, R., and Meek, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1794-1801 |
| 7. | Koonin, E. V., Altschul, S. F., and Bork, P. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 266-268 |
| 8. | Grawunder, U., Wilm, M., Wu, X., Kulesza, P., Wilson, T. E., Mann, M., and Lieber, M. R. (1997) Nature 388, 492-495 |
| 9. | Ramsden, D. A., and Gellert, M. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 609-614 |
| 10. | Chou, C. H., Wang, J., Knuth, M. W., and Reeves, W. H. (1992) J. Exp. Med. 175, 1677-1684 |
| 11. | Wu, X., and Lieber, M. R. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5186-5193 |
| 12. | Wang, J., Dong, X., and Reeves, W. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31068-31074 |
| 13. | Wang, J., Dong, X., Myung, K., Hendrickson, E. A., and Reeves, W. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 842-848 |
| 14. | Bax, A., Vuister, G. W., Grzesiek, S., Delaglio, F., Wang, A. C., Tschudin, R., and Zhu, G. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 239, 79-105 |
| 15. | Clore, G. M., and Gronenborn, A. M. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 239, 349-362 |
| 16. | Clore, G. M., Bax, A., and Gronenborn, A. M. (1991) J. Biomol. NMR 1, 13-22 |
| 17. | Archer, S. J., Ikura, M., and Torchia, D. (1991) J. Magn. Reson. 95, 636-641 |
| 18. | Kuboniwa, H., Grzesiek, S., Delaglio, F., and Bax, A. (1994) J. Biomol. NMR 4, 871-878 |
| 19. | Guntert, P., Mumenthaler, C., and Wuthrich, K. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 273, 283-298 |
| 20. | Raaijmakers, H., Vix, O., Toro, I., Golz, S., Kemper, B., and Suck, D. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1447-1458 |
| 21. | Koike, M., Ikuta, T., Miyasaka, T., and Shiomi, T. (1999) Exp. Cell. Res. 250, 401-413 |
| 22. | Rost, B. (1998) Methods Enzymol. 266, 525-539 |
| 23. | Reeves, W. H., Pierani, A., Chou, C., Ng, T., Nicastri, C., Roeder, R. G., and Sthoeger, Z. M. (1991) J. Immunol. 146, 2678-2686 |
| 24. | Hore, P. J. (1983) J. Magn. Reson. 55, 283-300 |
| 25. | Ikura, M., and Bax, A. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 2433-2440 |
| 26. | Chen, Y., Reizer, J., Saier, M. H., Jr., Fairbrother, W. J., and Wright, P. E. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 32-37 |
| 27. | Yoo, S., Kimzey, A., and Dynan, W. S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20034-20039 |
| 28. | Holmes, L., and Sander, C. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 233, 123-138 |
| 29. | Laskowski, R. A., Rullmann, J. A. C., MacArthur, M. W., Kaptein, R., and Thornton, J. (1996) J. Biomol. NMR 8, 477-486 |
| 30. | Allison, T. J., Wood, T. C., Briercheck, D. M., Rastinejad, F., Richardson, J. P., and Rule, G. S. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 352-356 |
| 31. | Briercheck, D. M., Wood, T. C., Allison, T. J., Richardson, J. P., and Rule, G. S. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 393-398 |
| 32. | Onesti, S., Miller, A. D., and Brick, P. (1995) Structure 3, 163-176 |
| 33. | Golz, S., Christoph, A., Birkenkamp-Detroder, K., and Kemper, B. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 245, 573-580 |
| 34. | Birkenbihl, R. P., and Kemper, B. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4527-4534 |
| 35. | Cavarelli, J., Rees, B., Ruff, M., Thierry, J. C., and Moras, D. (1993) Nature 362, 181-184 |
| 36. | Brunger, A. T., Adams, P. O., Clore, G. M., Delano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunsleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. F., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998) D54, 905-921 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Tsuji, K. Watanabe, K. Araki, M. Shinohara, Y. Yamagata, T. Tsurimoto, F. Hanaoka, K.-i. Yamamura, M. Yamaizumi, and S. Tateishi Recognition of forked and single-stranded DNA structures by human RAD18 complexed with RAD6B protein triggers its recruitment to stalled replication forks. Genes Cells, April 1, 2008; 13(4): 343 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Devany, F. Kappes, K.-M. Chen, D. M. Markovitz, and H. Matsuo Solution NMR structure of the N-terminal domain of the human DEK protein Protein Sci., February 1, 2008; 17(2): 205 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. He, L. Li, D. Kim, B. Wen, X. Deng, P. H. Gutin, C. C. Ling, and G. C. Li Adenovirus-Mediated Expression of a Dominant Negative Ku70 Fragment Radiosensitizes Human Tumor Cells under Aerobic and Hypoxic Conditions Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 634 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Okubo, F. Hara, Y. Tsuchida, S. Shimotakahara, S. Suzuki, H. Hatanaka, S. Yokoyama, H. Tanaka, H. Yasuda, and H. Shindo NMR Structure of the N-terminal Domain of SUMO Ligase PIAS1 and Its Interaction with Tumor Suppressor p53 and A/T-rich DNA Oligomers J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31455 - 31461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Mo and W. S. Dynan Subnuclear Localization of Ku Protein: Functional Association with RNA Polymerase II Elongation Sites Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2002; 22(22): 8088 - 8099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Willis, A. P. Loewy, N. Charlton-Kachigian, J.-S. Shao, D. M. Ornitz, and D. A. Towler Regulation of Osteocalcin Gene Expression by a Novel Ku Antigen Transcription Factor Complex J. Biol. Chem., September 27, 2002; 277(40): 37280 - 37291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |