This article was retracted on January 2, 2004.
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106610200 on August 16, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 42, 38877-38884, October 19, 2001
The LIS1-related Protein NUDF of Aspergillus
nidulans and Its Interaction Partner NUDE Bind Directly to
Specific Subunits of Dynein and Dynactin and to - and
-Tubulin*
Bernd
Hoffmann,
Wenqi
Zuo,
Aixiao
Liu, and
N. Ronald
Morris
From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Medicine and
Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School,
Piscataway, New Jersey 08854
Received for publication, July 13, 2001, and in revised form, August 15, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The NUDF protein of Aspergillus
nidulans, which is required for nuclear migration through the
fungal mycelium, closely resembles the LIS1 protein required for
migration of neurons to the cerebral cortex in humans. Genetic
experiments suggested that NUDF influences nuclear migration by
affecting cytoplasmic dynein. NUDF interacts with another protein,
NUDE, which also affects nuclear migration in A. nidulans.
Interactions among LIS1, NUDE, dynein, and -tubulin have been
demonstrated in animal cells. In this paper we examine the interactions
of the A. nidulans NUDF and NUDE proteins with components
of dynein, dynactin, and with - and -tubulin. We show that NUDF
binds directly to - and -tubulin and to the first P-loop of
the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain, whereas NUDE binds directly to -
and -tubulin, to NUDK (actin-related protein 1), and to the NUDG
dynein LC8 light chain. The data suggest a direct role for NUDF in
regulation of the dynein heavy chain and an effect on other
dynein/dynactin subunits via NUDE. The interactions between NUDE, NUDF,
and -tubulin suggest that this protein may also be involved in the
regulation of dynein function. Additive interactions between NUDE and
dynein and dynactin subunits suggest that NUDE acts as a scaffolding
factor between components.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
During growth of Aspergillus nidulans and other
filamentous fungi nuclei migrate into the germ tube and distribute
evenly along the cell length (1-3). Analysis of mutations that affect nuclear distribution in these fungi has shown that microtubules and the
cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin complexes are the main components of
the nuclear distribution machinery (3-8). Three additional proteins,
NUDC, NUDF, and NUDE, whose functions are still not well understood,
are also required for nuclear migration in A. nidulans. NUDC
is a 22-kDa protein required to maintain the intracellular
concentration of NUDF (9). NUDF (a homolog of yeast PacIp)
is a homodimeric 49-kDa protein with seven WD40 repeats (10) and a
short predicted N-terminal coiled-coil domain that participates in
homodimer formation (11). A. nidulans NUDF colocalizes with
the NUDA dynein heavy chain in comet-like structures at the plus ends
of cytoplasmic microtubules in vivo (12, 13). The location
of NUDA and NUDF at the ends of microtubules may have functional
significance because the deletion of either protein increases
microtubule stability (13). NUDE (RO11 in Neurospora crassa)
is a 70-kDa protein that was initially shown to be required for nuclear
migration in N. crassa (3). It was subsequently identified
in A. nidulans as a high copy suppressor of a
temperature-sensitive nudF mutation (14). NUDE has a long,
very basic N-terminal coiled-coil domain and a C-terminal domain rich
in serine and threonine. In the yeast two-hybrid assay NUDE interacts
with NUDF via the coiled-coil domains of the molecules.
GFP1-labeled NUDE, like
dynein and NUDF, also associates with the plus ends of microtubules
(14). Genetic experiments in Aspergillus indicate that NUDF
and NUDE influence nuclear motility by affecting cytoplasmic dynein
(10, 15).
NUDC, NUDF, and NUDE are evolutionarily conserved proteins with close
homologues in many higher eukaryotes, including humans, rodents,
Drosophila, and Xenopus (16-22). The homologue
of NUDF in higher eukaryotes is LIS1, which is particularly interesting because it is associated with a human genetic disease of children. Haploinsufficiency of LIS1 causes a devastating brain malformation known as Miller-Dieker lissencephaly, a disease characterized by a
smooth cerebral cortex, severe mental deficiency, epilepsy, and a short
life span (23). Lissencephaly is believed to be the result of impaired
migration of neurons from the paraventricular area of the brain, where
they replicate, to the cerebral cortex during development. LIS1 and
NUDF are 42% identical in amino acid sequence, and both appear to be
homodimers (11, 24). We have suggested that NUDF and LIS1 affect a
common motility mechanism involving cytoplasmic dynein which underlies
both nuclear migration in A. nidulans and neuronal migration
in animals (25). Considerable evidence to support this idea has been
accumulated recently. The interactions among NUDC, NUDF, and NUDE
initially characterized in Aspergillus are conserved in
higher eukaryotes. Like NUDF, LIS1 interacts with microtubules and
affects microtubule dynamics (26). It also affects nuclear migration
(27), colocalizes with dynein (20, 28, 29), and affects dynein function
in vivo (20, 30-33). Rat NUDC interacts with LIS1 in the
yeast two-hybrid system and in GST pull-down and coimmunoprecipitation
experiments (25). Mammalian homologues of NUDE similarly interact with
LIS1 and with various components of dynein and dynactin in indirect protein interaction assays (20, 28, 29). Interestingly, NUDE localizes
to the centrosome in mammalian cells. It also interacts with
-tubulin and other centrosomal proteins in the yeast two-hybrid system and in coimmunoprecipitation experiments (20, 22, 26, 28, 29,
31). The protein interaction experiments are informative; but because
they were mainly done in unpurified systems, one cannot conclude that
the observed interactions are direct, as they could be mediated by
intervening proteins. In the present paper we have examined the
interactions of the A. nidulans NUDF and NUDE proteins with
each other as well as with component proteins of dynein and dynactin
and with - and -tubulin using yeast two-hybrid assays, coimmunoprecipitations, and pull-down experiments. We have additionally studied the binding of purified proteins to each other to determine whether their interactions are direct or indirect. The data indicate that both NUDE and NUDF bind to -tubulin and -tubulin, but they bind differently to dynein and dynactin. NUDF binds directly to the
dynein heavy chain, whereas the NUDE protein is associated directly
with the NUDG dynein light chain and the NUDK actin-related protein of
dynactin. We also show that more than one dynein or dynactin subunit
can bind simultaneously to NUDE, arguing for a possible function of
NUDE as a scaffolding factor between components. The interactions
between NUDF and NUDE and -tubulin, also observed in mammalian cells
(22), raise the additional possibility that -tubulin may influence
dynein function.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
A. nidulans Media--
YG (5 g of yeast extract and 20 g of
glucose/liter supplemented with 0.1% trace elements) was used as a
complete liquid medium for A. nidulans strains (34). Minimal
medium (6 g/liter NaNO3, 0.52 g/liter KCl, 0.52 g/liter
MgSO4, 1.52 g/liter KH2PO4, 2% glucose, and 0.1% trace elements) was from Pontecorvo et
al. (35). 2% agar was added to solidify media where appropriate.
To support the growth of strains carrying pyrG mutant
alleles, media were supplemented with 10 mM uridine and uracil.
Construction of Yeast Strains Carrying Gal4p Fusion
Proteins--
The full-length, shortened and mutated constructs of
NUDE, NUDF, LIS1, and human NUDE for use in the yeast two-hybrid system were described previously (11, 14). Full-length open reading frames of
A. nidulans nudK (dynactin actin-related protein),
nudG (dynein light chain), nudI (dynein
intermediate chain), tubA ( -tubulin), tubB
( -tubulin), tubC ( -tubulin), benA
( -tubulin), mipA ( -tubulin), N. crassa ro10
(putative dynactin-associated protein) (3), ro2 (putative
dynactin subunit) (36), and ro3 (dynactin
p150Glued) (37) were made by polymerase chain
reaction. Some N. crassa dynactin subunits were used
for two-hybrid analysis because N. crassa and A. nidulans are closely related ascomycetes, and the A. nidulans genes have not yet been cloned. The primers used
contained additional restriction sites for insertion into the yeast
two-hybrid plasmids pGBKT7 and pGADT7 (Matchmaker 3 system,
CLONTECH). The open reading frame of
nudA (dynein heavy chain) was inserted into both plasmids as
three fragments of approximately equal length. The first third of NUDA
included amino acids 1-1675. The second part encoded amino acids
1676-3162, and the third contained the C-terminal coding sequence
(amino acids 3163-4344). An additional two-hybrid NUDA fragment was
constructed spanning the first P-loop of the dynein heavy chain (amino
acids 1676-2138) according to Sasaki et al. (20).
Yeast Two-hybrid Analysis--
The yeast two-hybrid strain
PJ69-4A was used containing three different reporter constructs driven
by different Gal4p-dependent promoters
(GAL1-HIS3, GAL2-ADE2, and GAL7-lacZ)
(38). After pairwise transformation of plasmids, interactions were
tested on media containing different amounts of 3-aminotriazole (3AT, 1 mM and 2 mM) or on medium lacking adenine. As a
positive control we used the previously described interaction between
NUDE and NUDF (14). Growth intensities were analyzed after a 3-day
incubation at 32 °C.
Construction of A. nidulans Strains Carrying Tagged Versions of
Dynein, Dynactin, and Tubulin Genes--
Construction of a high copy
plasmid pAAFS expressing S-tagged NUDF under the control of the
alcA promoter and its integration into the nudF
mutant strain XX20 resulting in NUDF expression strain CA1[pAAFS] was
described previously (11). Construction of strain XX21×6-17 expressing
the VSV-G-tagged version of NUDE is described (14). For construction of
a VSV-G-NUDE strain that also carries the pyrG marker,
strain XX21×6-17 was plated on uracil and uridine containing complete
medium with 100 mg/ml 5-fluorotic acid to select against the functional
pyrG gene. The resulting strain ANBH1 was unable to grow
without uracil but was able to express the VSV-G-tagged version of
NUDE. Open reading frames of nudE, nudG,
nudK, nudA1676-2138, and
mipA were polymerase chain reaction amplified with specific primers each of which also contained the sequence
GACTACAAGGACGACGACGACAAG encoding the FLAG epitope amino acids
DYKDDDDK. The protein C epitope sequence
GAGGACCAGGTCGACCCCCGTCTCATCGACGGTAAG encoding the amino acids
EDQVDPRLIDGK was added to the open reading frame of NUDG and NUDI at
both the 5'- and 3'-ends. Polymerase chain reaction products were
integrated behind the inducible alcA promoter of the high
copy plasmid pMCB17 (39) by replacing the GFP coding sequence. The
functionality of the tagged proteins was tested by introducing the
plasmids encoding these proteins into their relevant mutant strains and
assessing their ability to restore growth under restrictive conditions.
Transformation was carried out as described (40). Transformants were
selected on medium without uridine and uracil to select for the
presence of the prototrophic marker pyr4. Genes were
expressed in A. nidulans strains GR5 and the VSV-G-NUDE
containing strain ANBH1 in medium containing methyl ethyl ketone
to induce the alcA promoter to obtain increased amounts of
protein for purification. The names and genotypes of the A. nidulans strains are given in Table
I.
Expression of Tagged Proteins--
For high expression of tagged
proteins the strains were grown in a preincubation medium (0.5% yeast
extract, 1% glycerol, 0.1% trace elements) for 12 h, harvested,
washed twice with H2O, and shifted to induction medium
(0.25% yeast extract, 0.075% glycerol, 0.1% trace elements)
containing 0.5% methyl ethyl ketone to induce alcA
promoter-driven protein expression. Strains were grown for an
additional 16-20 h, harvested, and ground with a mortar and pestle in
liquid nitrogen. Proteins were extracted by vortexing 5 g of
mycelial powder in a 50-ml tube containing 20 ml of buffer that
contained a protease inhibitor mixture for fungal extracts (Sigma).
Buffers were those indicated for the isolation of the various tagged
proteins according to the manufacturer's manuals. After a 4 °C
centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 3 min to remove cell wall debris, supernatants were clarified by recentrifugation at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The resulting crude
protein extracts were adjusted to a protein concentration of 4 µg/µl using the Bradford assay.
Coimmunoprecipitation and Pull-down Experiments--
For
immunoprecipitations all steps were performed on ice or at 4 °C.
Expression of tagged proteins was induced with 2% glycerol as the sole
carbon source, which gives wild-type expression levels. 10 ml of crude
protein extract was incubated on a rocker with 30-40 µg of
monoclonal, specific antibodies against -, -, or -tubulin
(Sigma) An antibody raised against human isotype I and II -tubulin
was used as negative control (Sigma). 0.1 ml of protein G-agarose was
then added, allowed to incubate for an additional 1 h, and the
protein G-agarose-bound proteins were collected by centrifugation at
2,000 × g for 1 h. The protein G-agarose beads were washed six times with 10 volumes of buffer. Bound proteins were
resuspended directly in Laemmli sample buffer. Samples were boiled for
3 min, subjected to electrophoresis on a 4-20% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad), and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. After incubation with primary antibody and anti-mouse alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody, the blots were
developed colorimetrically. For coprecipitation experiments, 10 ml of
crude protein extract containing a single tagged protein was incubated
with 100 µl of tag-specific agarose for 1 h (anti-protein C
affinity matrix, Roche Molecular Biochemicals; anti-FLAG M2 affinity
gel, Sigma; S-protein agarose, Novagen; anti-VSV-G-agarose conjugate,
Sigma). The agarose was washed six times with 1 ml of buffer, and the
bound proteins of a small agarose sample were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
Coomassie Blue staining. Agarose-protein complexes were added to 10 ml
of crude protein extract containing a second tagged protein version.
Incubation continued for an additional 1 h. Agarose-protein
complexes were washed six times, and proteins were eluted under native
conditions according to the various manufacturers' instructions. The
eluate was used for SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis as described
above. Our criterion for purity was the appearance of a single band on
a Coomassie Blue-stained gel. Antibodies against the tags were ordered
from the same companies as the affinity matrices.
Pull-down experiments with purified tagged proteins were performed with
1-5 µg of each protein. Tagged proteins were purified from crude
protein extracts with buffer containing 0.5-2% Tween 20 as detergent.
Washing steps were performed as described above except that the last
three washing steps were performed with buffer without detergent.
Proteins were mixed in a total buffer volume of 200 µl and incubated
on a shaker for 1 h on ice. 30 µl of affinity-agarose specific
to one or the other protein was added, and incubation was continued for
an additional 1 h. Native eluted proteins were tested in Western
blot analyses. For electrophoresis under native conditions eluted
proteins were mixed in a total volume of 30 µl and after incubation
directly loaded on an 8% gel (see below).
Protein Gel Electrophoresis under Native Conditions--
Protein
shift experiments were performed under native gel electrophoresis
conditions (i.e. without SDS). The best separations of
protein complexes were obtained with an 8% acrylamide/bisacrylamide gel (pH 7.8). A 5% gel (pH 6.8) was used as stacking gel. Proteins were electrophoresed for 4-16 h depending on the anticipated sizes of
the protein complexes. Protein shifts with the dynein light chain NUDG
were analyzed by cutting protein bands out of the native gel. Gel
fragments were boiled for 10 min in SDS-buffer and transferred to a
SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were visualized either by silver
staining or by Western blot analysis.
 |
RESULTS |
NUDF and NUDE Interact with Subunits of Dynein, Dynactin, and
Tubulin in the Yeast Two-hybrid System--
We have used the yeast
two-hybrid assay system to study the interactions of NUDF and NUDE with
various components of cytoplasmic dynein, dynactin, and microtubules.
Because of its large size we were unable to test the whole NUDA dynein
heavy chain directly in the two-hybrid system. We therefore tested
constructs that encoded fragments of the dynein heavy chain, each
encoding about one-third of the molecule and an additional smaller
fragment containing the P-loop. Other interaction targets included the
NUDI dynein intermediate chain, the NUDG LC8 light chain, the NUDK ARP1
actin-related protein of dynactin, and -, -, and -tubulins. We
also tested three components of the system from the related ascomycete
N. crassa: the RO3 p150 component of dynactin (37), the
dynactin-associated protein RO2 (36), and RO10, whose function in
nuclear migration is not known (3). Different reporter constructs were
tested to determine the relative strength of the interactions (38). All
of the proteins were tested as both bait and activators (Fig. 1). As described previously, NUDF
interacted strongly with NUDE and with the coiled-coil region of NUDE
(14). It also interacted with the dynein heavy chain fragment
containing the first P-loop even though no interaction was seen with
the middle one-third fragment of the dynein heavy chain, which includes
the P-loop. This middle third fragment, however, also failed to show a
two-hybrid interaction with any of the other proteins shown in Fig. 1,
suggesting that the reason for its lack of reaction with NUDF may have
been because it was not correctly folded (data not shown). NUDF also exhibited a moderately strong interaction with the NUDI intermediate chain and with the TUBA and MIPA - and -tubulin proteins but did
not interact with the NUDG dynein LC8 light chain or with the NUDK ARP1
subunit of dynactin. To determine whether these interactions involved
the coiled-coil region of NUDF, we used a mutant NUDF construct in
which the seven leucines involved in the coiled-coil interaction were
mutated to alanines to destroy the ability of this region to undergo a
coiled-coil dimerization.2 This mutant
construct failed to interact with any of the above components of dynein
or dynactin as shown previously for the failed interaction between NUDE
and the mutant NUDF.3 This suggests either that
the coiled-coil region of NUDF was directly involved in these
interactions or that it was required to maintain the structure of NUDF.
We attempted to test LIS1, the human homologue of NUDF, for its ability
to interact with these same proteins, but the LIS1 protein by itself
induced significant Gal4p-dependent transcription. LIS1
showed an interaction above this background only with - and
-tubulin. The full-length NUDE protein interacted strongly with
itself in the two-hybrid system, as did the NUDE coiled-coil domain.
NUDE also interacted with NUDF (14), with the NUDI dynein intermediate
and NUDG LC8 light chains, with the ARP1 of dynactin, and with the -
and -tubulin proteins. The NUDE coiled-coil domain gave a somewhat
different interaction pattern. Like the full-length protein it gave a
strong signal with NUDE, NUDF, and the dynein LC8 and intermediate
chains, but it did not interact with the NUDK (ARP1) protein of
dynactin or with the tubulin proteins. A human homologue of NUDE,
hNUDE, which has a similar conserved coiled-coil domain, exhibited
interactions similar to those of the Aspergillus NUDE except
that it failed to interact with the NUDK ARP1 protein of dynactin (20).
Similarly, the coiled-coil domain of hNUDE interacted with the same
proteins as the coiled-coil domain of Aspergillus NUDE but
did so less strongly. The Neurospora RO2, RO3, and RO10
proteins did not interact with Aspergillus NUDF or NUDE, the
human homologues or the coiled-coil constructs.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
NUDE and NUDF proteins interact with
dynein/dynactin and microtubule subunits in the yeast two-hybrid
system. S. cerevisiae strain PJ69-4A was transformed
with pairwise combinations of plasmids expressing the indicated fusion
proteins with either the Gal4p DNA binding (DBD) or Gal4p
activating (AD) domains. NUDE-cc and human NUDE-cc
(hNUDE-cc) express the N-terminal domain of NUDE proteins (residues
1-195). The NUDF-m construct contains seven isoleucine and leucine to
alanine substitutions in the NUDF coiled-coil region. Protein names of
the known mammalian homologues are shown in parentheses. RO
proteins came from N. crassa. For each pair of plasmids,
yeast growth was tested on four different media (from left
to right at the bottom of the figure):
SC/-Leu/-Trp/-His; SC/-Leu/-Trp/-His with 1 mM 3AT;
SC/-Leu/-Trp/-His with 2 mM 3AT; SC/-Leu/-Trp/-adenine. The
first three media select for the expression of the HIS3
reporter gene, and the fourth medium selects for the expression of the
ADE2 reporter gene. Growth in the absence of histidine or
adenine is expected to result from interactions between the proteins
encoded by the plasmids. Growth on medium SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His is
indicated by a yellow dot and indicates a weak interaction
between the expressed proteins. Stronger interactions correspond to
growth on medium with increasing amounts of 3AT or lacking adenine and
are indicated by green, blue, and red
dots, respectively. Note that fusions with the NUDE coiled-coil
domains and LIS1 activate the HIS3 gene expression in the
absence of any interactions. 1 mM 3AT, a competitive
inhibitor of the HIS3 gene product, suppresses the resulting
background growth. Interactions were tested in both directions. Growth
results for only one direction are shown because the results in the
other direction were essentially identical. Two-hybrid interactions
confirmed by direct protein-protein interactions are labeled by a
hole within the colored dots. Direct interaction
tests were only performed with A. nidulans proteins and not
with the LIS1 and human NUDE used in the two-hybrid system. Direct
interaction experiments between A. nidulans NUDF and NUDE
have been described earlier (14).
|
|
NUDF and NUDE Coimmunoprecipitate and Pull Down Subunits of Dynein,
Dynactin, and Tubulin from Crude Protein Extracts--
We next asked
whether in vitro protein-protein interactions would
corroborate the two-hybrid interactions. We had shown previously that a
tagged version of NUDF coimmunoprecipitated NUDF from crude extracts
via the coiled-coil domain (11) and that NUDF coimmunoprecipitated with
NUDE (14), thereby confirming these two-hybrid interactions. We now
have prepared new constructs containing tagged versions of dynein,
dynactin, and the tubulin subunits. They include two different tagged
versions of dynein light chain (NUDG-FLAG and NUDG-protein C tags), the
dynein intermediate chain (NUDI-protein C-tagged), the dynein heavy
chain first P-loop (NUDA1676-2138-FLAG-tagged), the ARP of
dynactin (NUDK-FLAG-tagged), -tubulin (TUBA-FLAG-tagged),
-tubulin (MIPA-FLAG-tagged), and NUDE (NUDE-FLAG-tagged). These were
placed under the control of the alcA inducible promoter, transformed into Aspergillus, expressed, and affinity
purified under mild conditions and without detergents as described
under "Experimental Procedures." These proteins and their putative
binding partners were used in the following pull-down and
coimmunoprecipitation experiments. NUDE was pulled down from crude
protein extracts by the purified tagged NUDG LC8 dynein light chain and
by purified tagged NUDK ARP1 protein bound to agarose beads (Fig.
2A). Similarly, VSV-G-tagged
NUDE pulled down both NUDG and NUDK as well as other not yet
unidentified proteins (data not shown). Antibodies to - and
-tubulin coimmunoprecipitated both NUDE and NUDF from wild-type
crude protein extracts (Fig. 2B). Purified NUDE
(FLAG-tagged) and purified NUDF (S-tagged) also pulled out - and
-tubulins (Fig. 2A). These experiments confirmed most of
the interactions seen in our two-hybrid experiments. Only the NUDI
dynein intermediate chain, which interacted with NUDE and NUDF in the
two-hybrid system, failed to exhibit a physical interaction with these
proteins.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
NUDE and NUDF interact with
-, -, and
-tubulin in coimmuno- and coprecipitation
experiments. Panel A, coprecipitation experiments with
purified proteins. Proteins NUDF (NUDF-Prot.S), NUDE
(NUDE-Flag), NUDK (NUDK (ARP1)-Flag), and NUDG
(NUDG (CDLC)-Flag) were isolated by tag affinity
purification. No detergent was used in order to preserve protein
complexes. Proteins were eluted with S-protein and FLAG-protein,
respectively, separated by SDS-PAGE, and stained with Coomassie Blue
(lanes a). The tagged proteins are marked by a
star. The proteins were transferred to a membrane, and
Western blot analyses were performed (lanes b). NUDF and
NUDE complexes were isolated from strains CA1[pAAFS]
(NUDF-Prot.S) and XX21×6-17 (VSV-G-NUDE),
whereas NUDK and NUDG coprecipitations were performed with strains
ANBH2 and ANBH5, which carry the FLAG-tagged versions of these proteins
and the VSV-G-NUDE. Antibodies against the VSV-G tag were used to
detect a coprecipitation of NUDE. As a size control, a protein standard
is given (lane M). Panel B, coimmunoprecipitation
experiments. Crude protein extracts of strain CA1[pAAFS] and
XX21×6-17 were incubated without antibodies and with antibodies
specific against - ( -AB), - ( -AB), or
-tubulin ( -AB). As a negative control a monoclonal antibody
against the human isotype I and II -tubulins was used (unsp.
-AB), which is not functional in A. nidulans.
Antibodies and associated proteins were pulled out with protein
G-agarose. Crude extracts containing no antibody were incubated with
the same amount of protein G-agarose (Prot.G). Bound
proteins were separated sequentially by SDS-PAGE and detected with
antibodies either to the protein S tag of NUDF or to the VSV-G tag of
NUDE. Note that -, -, and -tubulins are not separated in this
electrophoresis system. As a loading control, the Coomassie-stained
protein G band is shown.
|
|
The Purified NUDF and NUDE Proteins Interact Directly with Specific
Dynein, Dynactin, and Tubulin Subunits--
The yeast two-hybrid,
coimmunoprecipitation, and pull-down experiments, although for the most
part consistent with each other, nevertheless left open the possibility
that the observed interactions could be indirect, i.e.
mediated by a third protein. We therefore retested each of the
interactions observed in the crude systems using purified proteins to
determine whether the purified proteins would interact in the same way.
Each purified protein produced a single band of appropriate molecular
mass (Fig. 3A), except for NUDE, which purified as a split band with a molecular mass of about
74 kDa in which both components stained with antibody against the FLAG
tag (Fig. 3A). Purified NUDE protein interacted directly
with purified NUDG dynein light chain in coprecipitation experiments.
NUDE also interacted directly with purified NUDK, -tubulin, and
-tubulin in pull-down experiments (Fig. 3B,
right; see also Fig. 5A). Similarly, purified
NUDF pulled down the first P-loop of the dynein heavy chain and tubulin
proteins (Fig. 4A). These
results were retested in protein shift experiments performed with
purified proteins under native electrophoresis conditions. Under these
conditions when the purified NUDF and -tubulin proteins were
coincubated and subjected to electrophoresis, a new band appeared which
contained NUDF and -tubulin. A similar result was observed for the
interaction of NUDF protein with -tubulin under native conditions
(Fig. 4B). Interestingly, in these native gel separations,
purified NUDF did not migrate into the gel except when it was bound to
another protein. A new shifted protein band also appeared when the
purified NUDE was coincubated with NUDK or NUDG proteins and subjected
to native gel electrophoresis (Fig. 3B, right).
In each of these native gel experiments we showed by Western blotting
that NUDE or NUDF and the second component were represented in the new
band. NUDE did not interact with the dynein intermediate chain or the
first P-loop of dynein heavy chain (data not shown), nor did NUDF
interact directly with the NUDI dynein intermediate chain, the NUDG
dynein light chain, or the actin-related protein NUDK. The absence of
interactions between these proteins suggests that the interactions we
have observed are likely to be specific.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Purification and interactions among dynein,
dynactin, and microtubule subunits of A. nidulans. Panel A, SDS-PAGE of
affinity-purified tagged proteins. Extraction buffers contained
0.5-2% Tween 20 to prevent binding of associated proteins. The
purified proteins were characterized by SDS-PAGE and stained with
Coomassie Blue. The identity of each purified protein is indicated
above the lanes. Lane M shows marker proteins.
Panel B, interaction of NUDE with NUDG (left). 1 µg of purified NUDE was incubated with the same amount of purified
NUDG protein. As controls, each protein was incubated by itself.
Complexes were isolated by adding affinity agarose against the FLAG tag
of NUDE (FLAG-agarose) or the protein C tag of NUDG
(ProteinC-agarose). Proteins were eluted under native
conditions according to the manufacturer's instruction manuals and
analyzed by Western blot hybridization with antibodies against both
tags in parallel. Right, native gel electrophoresis. 1 µg
of NUDE and NUDK (ARP1) or NUDE and NUDG (CDLC) were mixed and
incubated for 1 h on ice (+) or loaded directly ( ) on an 8%
acrylamide/bisacrylamide gel (pH 7.8) native separation gel. A 5% gel
(pH 6.8) was used as stacking gel. After electrophoresis proteins were
detected with silver staining. Note that the NUDE protein did not
interact with the dynein heavy chain or the dynein intermediate chain
(not shown). E, NUDE; G, NUDG; K,
NUDK; CDHC, cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain; CDIC,
cytoplasmic dynein intermediate chain; CDLC, cytoplasmic
dynein light chain.
|
|

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
NUDF interacts directly with NUDA, TUBA,
and -tubulin. Panel A,
in vitro protein binding assays. Left, 1 µg of
purified NUDF was incubated with the same amount of a purified NUDA
fragment spanning the first P-loop. As a control, each protein was
incubated by itself. Complexes were isolated by adding affinity agarose
against the FLAG tag of NUDA (NUDA (CDHC) Flag-agarose) or
the protein S tag of NUDF (NUDF ProteinS-agarose). Proteins
were eluted under native conditions and analyzed in Western blot
hybridizations with antibodies against tags of NUDA and NUDF in
parallel. Right, the identical experiment was performed with
NUDF and the -tubulin protein MIPA. The Western blot shown was
performed only with the FLAG antibody against the tag of -tubulin.
Note that -tubulin is able to bind with a low affinity to protein
S-agarose by itself. Panel B, protein shift experiments.
Proteins -tubulin and NUDF (NUDF+ -tubulin,
left) or NUDF and -tubulin (TUBA)
(NUDF+ -tub, right) were incubated in
combination and alone. Electrophoresis was performed under native gel
conditions. Proteins were either silver stained or blotted for Western
analysis. Antibodies used were specific to the FLAG tag of - and
-tubulin or the protein S-tag of NUDF. Under the gel conditions NUDF
did not migrate into the gel. Therefore Western analysis is shown only
for the right two lanes of each Coomassie-stained gel. Note
that -tubulin forms a high molecular mass complex under native
conditions. Dynein light chain, dynein intermediate chain, and the
actin-related protein NUDK did not form complexes with NUDF in native
gels (data not shown).
|
|
More Than One Dynein and/or Dynactin Component Can Bind to NUDE at
the Same Time--
The experiments described above show that several
subunits of dynein, dynactin, and tubulin can bind directly to the NUDE protein. To determine whether these interactions are additive or
competitive, we performed native electrophoresis experiments with
combinations of NUDE and pairs of proteins that interact individually
with NUDE. Incubation of NUDE with the NUDK actin-related protein plus
either - or -tubulin caused the formation of new electrophoretically supershifted bands (Fig.
5A). Similar results were
obtained when -tubulin and NUDG were tested for their ability to
interact simultaneously with NUDE. The NUDG dynein light chain and the
NUDK actin-related subunit of dynactin could also bind simultaneously
to NUDE, as shown by the presence of all three proteins within the same
supershifted complex (Fig. 5B). In contrast to this additive
binding, incubation of NUDE protein with both - and -tubulin did
not produce a supershifted band, indicating that only one tubulin
molecule at a time can bind to NUDE. Possibly the tubulin proteins
compete for the same binding site (Fig. 5A).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Simultaneous binding of subunits
of dynein, dynactin, and microtubules to NUDE. Panel A,
in vitro protein shifts. Native electrophoresis experiments
were performed with a mixture of three purified proteins. Protein
mixtures were incubated for 1 h on ice (+) or immediately loaded
on the gel ( ). Electrophoresis was performed for 16 h at 150V.
Separated proteins were detected by silver staining and analyzed by
Western blot hybridizations. - and -tubulin were detected by
Western blotting with specific monoclonal antibodies against these
proteins. Panel B, Western blot analysis of supershift
complexes containing NUDG. Purified proteins NUDE-FLAG, NUDG-protein C,
and TUBA-FLAG (left) or NUDE-FLAG, NUDG-protein C, and
NUDK-FLAG (right) were mixed and after incubation
electrophoretically separated in a native gel for 10 h. The most
shifted protein bands were cut out and boiled in 30 µl of SDS loading
dye for 10 min. Proteins were separated on a SDS-gel and blotted on a
membrane. Proteins were analyzed with antibodies to the protein C tag
and the FLAG tag. Note that the unbound NUDG protein needed ~3 h to
move across the whole gel. E, NUDE-FLAG; K,
NUDK-FLAG; G, NUDG-protein C; , MIPA-FLAG; ,
TUBA-FLAG.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have analyzed the ability of the A. nidulans NUDF
and NUDE proteins to interact with subunits of dynein, dynactin, and tubulins in a variety of systems, the yeast two-hybrid system, coimmunoprecipitation and pull-down experiments, and most importantly by assaying the ability of the purified proteins to interact directly with each other. NUDE and NUDF exhibited distinctly different interaction patterns. The NUDF protein interacted only with the part of
the dynein heavy chain which spans the first ATP P-loop binding site
and with - and - tubulins; however, it did not interact with the
middle third of the heavy chain, which contains the P-loop. The
interaction of the first third of NUDA with the NUDG dynein light chain
and of the last third with - and -tubulins (data not shown)
indicated that these fragments were folded properly (confirming known
data from mammalian systems, 41), but we have no such evidence to
demonstrate that the middle fragment folded correctly. Incorrect
folding of the middle fragment containing the P-loop could explain the
different binding affinity of NUDF to this fragment versus
the P-loop fragment. NUDE also interacted with - and - tubulin.
In contrast to NUDF it did not bind to the dynein heavy chain but
rather interacted with the NUDG dynein light chain and with the NUDK
actin-related protein of dynactin. Most of the proteins that produced
strong two-hybrid interactions also interacted in the
coimmunoprecipitation and pull-down experiments and interacted directly
as purified proteins. Proteins that did not interact in the two-hybrid
system (as NUDF with NUDG or NUDF with NUDK) failed to interact in the
purified system. The interactions and lack of interactions between the
purified proteins essentially verified the two-hybrid results. Only one
protein, NUDI, the dynein intermediate chain, exhibited discrepant
results in the two-hybrid and purified systems.
The loss of all two-hybrid interactions by a strain containing point
mutations in the coiled-coil domain of NUDF showed that NUDF interacts
with proteins other than itself via its coiled-coil region. In contrast
to NUDF, NUDE interactions appear to be shared between the coiled-coil
and the C-terminal domains. Whereas NUDF and the dynein light chain
bound to the N-terminal coiled-coil fragment of NUDE, the tubulin
proteins and the actin-related protein NUDK did not, indicating that
they bind elsewhere on the NUDE protein (Fig. 1). These data are
consistent with our results with purified proteins from native protein
shift experiments, which showed that NUDG and NUDK can bind
simultaneously to NUDE. These experiments also argue for independent
binding sites for NUDK and the tubulin proteins within the C terminus
of NUDE. In contrast - and -tubulin appear to bind to identical
or overlapping regions. Many of our results were similar to
observations made in mammalian systems. Higher eukaryotic homologues of
NUDE also interact with LIS1 as well as with various components of
dynein and dynactin and the centrosome in the yeast two-hybrid system
and in copolymerization, coimmunoprecipitation, and other indirect
protein interaction assays. These data from both mammalian and fungal
systems suggest that NUDE functions as a bridge or assembly factor
between tubulins and the dynein and dynactin complexes (20-22, 28, 29,
33, 42). The experiments with mammalian NUDE and LIS1, however, leave
open the possibility that the observed interactions could be mediated
by intervening proteins. Our results extend these previous reports by
showing that the interactions between NUDE, NUDF, and the various
components of dynein, dynactin, and tubulin occur in the absence of any
proteins other than those being tested. Thus these interactions are
direct (Fig. 1). For the most part the NUDE and NUDF interactions are
conserved between lower and higher eukaryotes. We did not, however,
observe a two-hybrid interaction between NUDE and the dynein heavy
chain, as reported in the animal system (20), suggesting that not all
interactions are conserved between Aspergillus and higher
eukaryotic dynein/dynactin-related proteins.
The interactions between NUDE, NUDF, and the various components of
dynein and dynactin coincide with the locations of these proteins in
the cell. We have shown by GFP labeling that NUDF, NUDE, and the
cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain (NUDA) appear as comet-like structures
at the plus ends of cytoplasmic microtubules in Aspergillus
(12-14). We have determined recently that much of the GFP-tagged NUDA,
NUDF, and NUDE protein is associated with membranous vesicles in
Aspergillus, suggesting that the comets represent
collections of vesicles.4 We have
also shown that a mutation in NUDK (the dynactin ARP1 protein)
prevents the association of GFP-labeled NUDA with microtubules (12).
These data suggest that dynactin is required to anchor dynein to the
vesicles. In animal cells dynein can be seen at the plus ends of
cytoplasmic microtubules under certain conditions (43). Although dynein
and dynactin have been shown to be associated with endoplasmic vesicles
(as well as other membranous structures) in animal cells (44), whether
the dynein associated with microtubule ends is in vesicles is not known.
One of the most intriguing features of NUDF and NUDE, seen in both
Aspergillus and animal systems, is their interaction with -tubulin. In animal cells NUDF and NUDE interact with -tubulin and colocalize with it at the centrosome (20, 22). Moreover, overexpression of NUDE causes -tubulin to become dissociated from
centrosomes, suggesting that there is a functional interaction between
these proteins (22). Although we have no direct functional information
to connect NUDE and NUDF with the spindle pole body, the centrosome
equivalent, or with -tubulin in Aspergillus, a recent
observation made in Schizosaccharomyces pombe suggests a
possible link to NUDE, NUDF, and dynein. An unusual cold-sensitive -tubulin mutation (SL1) identified during a search for genes synthetically lethal with Pkl1p kinesin causes a mitotic block with an
apparent impairment of chromosome attachment to kinetochore microtubules at low temperatures (45). It also causes excessive polymerization of microtubules. These phenocopy the effects of dynein
deficiency seen in other organisms. Dynein deficiency has been shown to
affect the interaction between spindle microtubules and kinetochores in
Drosophila (46, 47) and is well known to cause microtubule
hyperpolymerization in Aspergillus and other fungi (7, 12,
13, 48). Synthetic lethality between proteins often means that they
share a common essential function. The fact that mutations in the
dynein heavy chain are synthetically lethal with a number of different
mitotic kinesins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (49) suggested
an explanation for the synthetic lethality of -tubulin with Pkl1p.
If an interaction of -tubulin with NUDF and/or NUDE were required
for proper dynein function, the synthetic lethality of -tubulin with
Pkl1p could represent an overlap between an essential function of
dynein and Pkl1p kinesin similar to that seen in S. cerevisiae. In Aspergillus NUDE and NUDF interact with -tubulin, but they do not colocalize with -tubulin as in higher eukaryotic cells. NUDE, NUDF, and the dynein heavy chain are abundant at the plus ends of microtubules but are not found at the spindle pole
bodies (the fungal equivalent of the centrosome) (12, 13). Conversely,
-tubulin is concentrated at the spindle pole bodies but is not found
at the plus ends of microtubules (50). It could be argued that the lack
of colocalization of NUDF, NUDE, and dynein with -tubulin in
Aspergillus provides evidence against an interaction between
-tubulin and dynein in vivo. However, a significant
fraction of -tubulin is present in the cytoplasm in both
Aspergillus5 and in
animal cells (51). The evidence that NUDE and NUDF interact physically
with -tubulin both in Aspergillus and in mammalian cells
needs to be followed up with a functional explanation for this
interaction. Whether -tubulin affects dynein function and whether
this is mediated by NUDE and/or NUDF need to be tested by direct experimentation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Yourha Khang for helpful
discussions of the work and Xin Xiang for providing A. nidulans dynein and dynactin mutant strains and nudI
sequence information.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant 5R01GM52309 and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Pharmacology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New
Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway,
NJ 08854. Tel.: 732-235-4081; Fax: 732-235-4073; E-mail:
morrisnr@umdnj.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 16, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106610200
2
C. Ahn, unpublished.
3
V. P. Efimov, unpublished.
4
B. Hoffmann and N. R. Morris, manuscript in preparation.
5
B. R. Oakley, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GFP, green
fluorescent protein;
3-AT, 3-aminotriazole;
VSV, vesicular
stomatitis virus;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
ARP1, actin-related protein 1.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Fischer, R.
(1999)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
23,
39-68[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Xiang, X.,
and Morris, N. R.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Microbiol.
2,
636-640[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Minke, P. F.,
Lee, I. H.,
Tinsley, J. H.,
Bruno, K. S.,
and Plamann, M.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
32,
1065-1076[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Oakley, B. R.,
and Morris, N. R.
(1980)
Cell
19,
255-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Plamann, M.,
Minke, P. F.,
Tinsley, J. H.,
and Bruno, K. S.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
139-149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Xiang, X.,
Beckwith, S. M.,
and Morris, N. R.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2100-2104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Inoue, S.,
Turgeon, B. G.,
Yoder, O. C.,
and Aist, J. R.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
1555-1566[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Xiang, X.,
Zuo, W.,
Efimov, V. P.,
and Morris, N. R.
(1999)
Curr. Genet.
35,
626-630[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Chiu, Y. H.,
and Morris, N. R.
(1995)
Genetics
141,
453-464[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Xiang, X.,
Osmani, A. H.,
Osmani, S. A.,
Xin, M.,
and Morris, N. R.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
297-310[Abstract]
|
| 11.
|
Ahn, C.,
and Morris, N. R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
9903-9909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Xiang, X.,
Han, G.,
Winkelmann, D. A.,
Zuo, W.,
and Morris, N. R.
(2000)
Curr. Biol.
10,
603-606[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Han, G.,
Liu, B.,
Zhang, J.,
Zuo, W.,
Morris, N. R.,
and Xiang, X.
(2001)
Curr. Biol.
11,
719-724[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Efimov, V. P.,
and Morris, N. R.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
681-688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Willins, D. A.,
Liu, B.,
Xiang, X.,
and Morris, N. R.
(1997)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
255,
194-200[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Reiner, O.,
Bar-Am, I.,
Sapir, T.,
Shmueli, O.,
Carrozzo, R.,
Lindsay, E. A.,
Baldini, A.,
Ledbetter, D. H.,
and Cahana, A.
(1995)
Genomics
30,
251-256[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Cunniff, J.,
Ciu, Y. H.,
Morris, N. R.,
and Warrior, R.
(1997)
Mech. Dev.
66,
55-68[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Stukenberg, P. T.,
Lustig, K. D.,
McGarry, T. J.,
King, R. W.,
Kuang, J.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
338-348[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Matsumoto, N.,
and Ledbetter, D. H.
(1999)
Hum. Genet.
104,
498-504[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Sasaki, S.,
Shionoya, A.,
Ishida, M.,
Gambello, M. J.,
Yingling, J.,
Wynshaw-Boris, A.,
and Hirotsune, S.
(2000)
Neuron
28,
681-696[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Kitagawa, M.,
Umezu, M.,
Aoki, J.,
Koizumi, H.,
Arai, H.,
and Inoue, K.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
479,
57-62[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Feng, Y.,
Olson, E. C.,
Stukenberg, P. T.,
Flanagan, L. A.,
Kirschner, M. W.,
and Walsh, C. A.
(2000)
Neuron
28,
665-679[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Dobyns, W. B.,
Reiner, O.,
Carrozzo, R.,
and Ledbetter, D. H.
(1993)
JAMA
270,
2838-2842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Garcia-Higuera, I.,
Fenoglio, J.,
Li, Y.,
Lewis, C.,
Panchenko, M. P.,
Reiner, O.,
Smith, T. F.,
and Neer, E. J.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
13985-13994[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Morris, N. R.,
Efimov, V. P.,
and Xiang, X.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
467-470[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Sapir, T.,
Elbaum, M.,
and Reiner, O.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6977-6984[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Lei, Y.,
and Warrior, R.
(2000)
Dev. Biol.
226,
57-72[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Faulkner, N. E.,
Dujardin, D. L.,
Tai, C. Y.,
Vaughan, K. T.,
O'Connell, C. B.,
Wang, Y.,
and Vallee, R. B.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
784-791[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Niethammer, M.,
Smith, D. S.,
Ayala, R.,
Peng, J.,
Ko, J.,
Lee, M. S.,
Morabito, M.,
and Tsai, L. H.
(2000)
Neuron
28,
697-711[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Swan, A.,
Nguyen, T.,
and Suter, B.
(1999)
Nat. Cell Biol.
1,
444-449[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Liu, Z.,
Xie, T.,
and Steward, R.
(1999)
Development
126,
4477-4488[Abstract]
|
| 32.
|
Liu, Z.,
Steward, R.,
and Luo, L.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
776-783[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Smith, D. S.,
Niethammer, M.,
Ayala, R.,
Zhou, Y.,
Gambello, M. J.,
Wynshaw-Boris, A.,
and Tsai, L. H.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
767-775[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Cove, D. J.
(1966)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
113,
51-56[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Pontecorvo, G.,
Roper, J. A.,
Hemmons, L. M.,
MacDonald, K. D.,
and Bufton, A. W. J.
(1953)
Adv. Genet.
5,
141-238[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Vierula, P. J.,
and Mais, J. M.
(1997)
Mol. Microbiol.
24,
331-340[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Tinsley, J. H.,
Minke, P. F.,
Bruno, K. S.,
and Plamann, M.
(1996)
Mol. Biol. Cell
7,
731-742[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
James, P.,
Halladay, J.,
and Craig, E. A.
(1996)
Genetics
144,
1425-1436[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Fernandez-Abalos, J. M.,
Fox, H.,
Pitt, C.,
Wells, B.,
and Doonan, J. H.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
27,
121-130[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Punt, P. J.,
and van den Hondel, C. A.
(1992)
Methods Enzymol.
216,
447-457[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Tynan, S. H.,
Gee, M. A.,
and Vallee, R. B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32769-32774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Sweeney, K. J.,
Prokscha, A.,
and Eichele, G.
(2001)
Mech. Dev.
101,
21-33[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Valetti, C.,
Wetzel, D. M.,
Schrader, M.,
Hasbani, M. J.,
Gill, S. R.,
Kreis, T. E.,
and Schroer, T. A.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
4107-4120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Habermann, A.,
Schroer, T. A.,
Griffiths, G.,
and Burkhardt, J. K.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
229-240[Abstract]
|
| 45.
|
Paluh, J. L.,
Nogales, E.,
Oakley, B. R.,
McDonald, K.,
Pidoux, A. L.,
and Cande, W. Z.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
1225-1239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Savoian, M. S.,
Goldberg, M. L.,
and Rieder, C. L.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
948-952[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Sharp, D. J.,
Rogers, G. C.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
922-930[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Cottingham, F. R.,
Gheber, L.,
Miller, D. L.,
and Hoyt, M. A.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
335-350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Geiser, J. R.,
Schott, E. J.,
Kingsbury, T. J.,
Cole, N. B.,
Totis, L. J.,
Bhattacharyya, G.,
He, L.,
and Hoyt, M. A.
(1997)
Mol. Biol. Cell
8,
1035-1050[Abstract]
|
| 50.
|
Oakley, B. R.,
Oakley, C. E.,
Yoon, Y.,
and Jung, M. K.
(1990)
Cell
61,
1289-1301[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Vorobjev, I. A.,
Uzbekov, R. E.,
Komarova, Y. A.,
and Alieva, I. B.
(2000)
Membr. Cell Biol.
14,
219-235[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
May, G. S.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
2267-2274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Gygax, C. P. Semighini, G. H. Goldman, and S. D. Harris
SepBCTF4 Is Required for the Formation of DNA-Damage-Induced UvsCRAD51 Foci in Aspergillus nidulans
Genetics,
March 1, 2005;
169(3):
1391 - 1402.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N. Williams, C. J. Locke, A. L. Braden, K. A. Caldwell, and G. A. Caldwell
Epileptic-like convulsions associated with LIS-1 in the cytoskeletal control of neurotransmitter signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
September 15, 2004;
13(18):
2043 - 2059.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Borkovich, L. A. Alex, O. Yarden, M. Freitag, G. E. Turner, N. D. Read, S. Seiler, D. Bell-Pedersen, J. Paietta, N. Plesofsky, et al.
Lessons from the Genome Sequence of Neurospora crassa: Tracing the Path from Genomic Blueprint to Multicellular Organism
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
March 1, 2004;
68(1):
1 - 108.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Morris, G. Kandpal, L. Ma, and C. P. Austin
DISC1 (Disrupted-In-Schizophrenia 1) is a centrosome-associated protein that interacts with MAP1A, MIPT3, ATF4/5 and NUDEL: regulation and loss of interaction with mutation
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
July 1, 2003;
12(13):
1591 - 1608.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kato and W. B. Dobyns
Lissencephaly and the molecular basis of neuronal migration
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
April 2, 2003;
12(90001):
R89 - 96.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zhang, S. Li, R. Fischer, and X. Xiang
Accumulation of Cytoplasmic Dynein and Dynactin at Microtubule Plus Ends in Aspergillus nidulans Is Kinesin Dependent
Mol. Biol. Cell,
April 1, 2003;
14(4):
1479 - 1488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. P. Efimov
Roles of NUDE and NUDF Proteins of Aspergillus nidulans: Insights from Intracellular Localization and Overexpression Effects
Mol. Biol. Cell,
March 1, 2003;
14(3):
871 - 888.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-L. Lee, J. R. Oberle, and J. A. Cooper
The role of the lissencephaly protein Pac1 during nuclear migration in budding yeast
J. Cell Biol.,
February 3, 2003;
160(3):
355 - 364.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Abal, M. Piel, V. Bouckson-Castaing, M. Mogensen, J.-B. Sibarita, and M. Bornens
Microtubule release from the centrosome in migrating cells
J. Cell Biol.,
December 9, 2002;
159(5):
731 - 737.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-Y. Tai, D. L. Dujardin, N. E. Faulkner, and R. B. Vallee
Role of dynein, dynactin, and CLIP-170 interactions in LIS1 kinetochore function
J. Cell Biol.,
March 18, 2002;
156(6):
959 - 968.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|