|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104831200 on August 8, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 42, 39067-39075, October 19, 2001
Identification and Characterization of a Family of
Rab11-interacting Proteins*
Chadwick M.
Hales ,
Richard
Griner ,
Karen C.
Hobdy-Henderson,
Matthew C.
Dorn,
David
Hardy,
Ravindra
Kumar,
Jennifer
Navarre,
Edward K. L.
Chan§,
Lynne A.
Lapierre, and
James R.
Goldenring¶
From the Departments of Medicine, Surgery, and Cellular Biology and
Anatomy, Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College
of Georgia and the Augusta Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
Augusta, Georgia 30912 and § Department of
Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute,
La Jolla, California 92037
Received for publication, May 26, 2001, and in revised form, July 31, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Rab11a is a small GTP-binding protein enriched in
the pericentriolar plasma membrane recycling systems. We hypothesized
that Rab11a-binding proteins exist as downstream effectors of its
action. Here we define a family of four Rab11-interacting proteins:
Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 1 (Rab11-FIP1), Rab11-Family Interacting
Protein 2 (Rab11-FIP2), Rab11-Family
Interacting Protein 3 (Rab11-FIP3), and
pp75/Rip11. All four interacting proteins associated with wild type
Rab11a and dominant active Rab11a (Rab11aS20V) as well as Rab11b and
Rab25. Rab11-FIP2 also interacted with dominant negative Rab11a
(Rab11aS25N) and the tail of myosin Vb. The binding of Rab11-FIP1,
Rab11-FIP2, and Rab11-FIP3 to Rab11a was dependent upon a conserved
carboxyl-terminal amphipathic -helix. Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and
pp75/Rip11 colocalized with Rab11a in plasma membrane recycling systems
in both non-polarized HeLa cells and polarized Madin-Darby canine
kidney cells. GFP-Rab11-FIP3 also colocalized with Rab11a in HeLa
cells. Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 also coenriched with
Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase on parietal cell
tubulovesicles, and Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 translocated with Rab11a
and the H+K+-ATPase upon stimulating parietal
cells with histamine. The results suggest that the function of Rab11a
in plasma membrane recycling systems is dependent upon a compendium of
protein effectors.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The Rab GTPase family contains more than 50 different members that
are believed to have a regulatory role in the formation, targeting,
and/or fusion of transport vesicles (1). Whereas the precise mechanism
of action remains poorly understood, individual Rab proteins localize
to distinct intracellular vesicular compartments suggesting that each
Rab has a well defined functional role. For example, Rab1 and Rab2 are
perinuclear in location and function in endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi
translocation (2). Rab6 is located on the Golgi and is involved in
movement of vesicles through the organelle (3). Rab8 resides in the
trans-Golgi/post-Golgi networks and regulates post-Golgi targeting to
the plasma membrane (4). Rab5 on early endosomes functions in
trafficking from the plasma membrane (5). The sub-apically localized
Rab11 family is involved in vesicle recycling, plasma membrane
recycling, and transcytosis (6-8).
Rab11a was first isolated from bovine brain membranes in 1988 (9).
Since that time, the rat (10), dog (11), mouse (12), rabbit (13), and
human (14) homologues have been identified. The Rab11 family now also
includes two other gene products, Rab11b and Rab25 (15). Rab11a is
sub-apically located in epithelial cells (16) and is involved in
vesicle recycling through the pericentriolar recycling endosome (8).
Rab11a colocalizes with transferrin receptor in recycling compartments
of K562 cells, a human hematopoietic cell line, (17) and mutants
deficient in GTP hydrolysis inhibit transferrin recycling (18).
Although ubiquitous in expression, Rab11a is enriched in epithelial
cells and gastric parietal cells (13, 16). In gastric parietal cells, Rab11a colocalized with the H+K+-ATPase and
translocated to the secretory canaliculus upon stimulation with
histamine (19). A dominant negative form of Rab11a inhibits acid
sequestration in gastric glands (20) and inhibits recycling of
polymeric IgA receptor and basolateral to apical transcytosis in
MDCK1 cells (6). Recently,
Rab11a was also implicated in recruiting membrane to the cell surface
in macrophages for phagocytosis (21) and for cell membrane extension.
Although the associations of Rab11a and the apical recycling systems is
now well established, little is known about its physiological function.
Studies have identified three Rab11-interacting proteins. The first
protein, Rab11-binding protein (Rab11BP) or rabphilin 11, was isolated
from bovine brain (22) and rat brain (23), respectively, and interacted
with the GTP-bound form of Rab11a (22). Rab11BP/rabphilin 11 localizes
to the pericentriolar recycling compartment in MDCK cells and HeLa
cells and participates in transferrin recycling and membrane turnover
events (22-23). Myosin Vb, the second Rab11a-interacting protein, was
identified from yeast two-hybrid screening of a parietal cell cDNA
library (24). Myosin Vb interacts with all members of the Rab11 family:
Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab25. In MDCK and HeLa cells, myosin Vb associates
with the Rab11a-containing plasma membrane recycling systems.
Transfection of the tail of myosin Vb lacking the motor domain retards
trafficking through the plasma membrane recycling systems (24).
Recently, a third protein, Rab11-interacting protein (Rip11), was
reported to bind with Rab11 (25). The Rip11 sequence was identified
previously as pp75, a phosphoprotein that interacts with the 60-kDa
SS-A and Ro autoantigens and may function as an autoantigen due to the
presence of pp75 antibodies in the sera of some autoimmune disease
patients (26). pp75/Rip11 was located in the apical recycling endosome
of polarized epithelial cells and appeared to be involved in apical
vesicle trafficking (26).
Since only three interacting proteins for Rab11a have been recognized
and because the function of the ubiquitously expressed Rab11a is still
unclear, we hypothesized that other interacting proteins must exist. By
utilizing a yeast two-hybrid screen and EST data base searches, we have
identified a family of four Rab11-binding proteins that have a highly
conserved Rab11 family-binding amphipathic -helical motif.
Immunofluorescence and Western blot data show a close association
between Rab11a and this family of interacting proteins. These results
suggest that the functions of Rab11a in plasma membrane recycling
systems are regulated by a complex compendium of interacting proteins.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Yeast Two-hybrid Screening and Cloning of Full-length
Rab11-FIP1--
Poly(A)+ mRNA was isolated from rabbit
gastric parietal cells and primed with oligo(dT) to construct a
parietal cell cDNA library in pAD-GAL (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA)
with an average clone length of 2.0 kilobase pairs. Rab11aS20V was
mutated as described previously (6) from wild type Rab11a via a single
base pair substitution and cloned into pBD-GAL (Stratagene, La Jolla,
CA). pBD-GAL/Rab11aS20V was transfected into the Y190 yeast strain to
produce a stable bait line that was isolated on tryptophan-deficient
media. The bait line was then transfected with 100 µg of parietal
cell cDNA library plasmid and plated on media deficient in leucine,
tryptophan, and histidine (TLH ) and supplemented with 2.5 mM 3-aminotriazole. Following 4 days of growth, colonies
were lifted onto filter paper, frozen twice for 10 s in liquid
nitrogen, and incubated with 1.67 ml of X-gal stock (50 mM
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl -D-galactoside in
N,N-dimethylformamide) in 100 ml of Z buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM
NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, and 1 mM MgSO4). Interactions were judged positive if
the blue product from the -galactosidase reaction was present within
3 h at room temperature. Positive clones were regrown on TLH
media (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA), and
-galactosidase activity was reconfirmed. Plasmids were then rescued
from yeast and transformed into XL-1 Blue bacteria and selected on
ampicillin. Isolated plasmids were sequenced by automated sequencing
(Medical College of Georgia, Molecular Biology Core Facility) using
pAD-GAL flanking vector sequences.
The larger isolated cDNA clone was used to screen a UniZAP phage
parietal cell cDNA library. Phage plaques were screened on duplicate filter lifts of 150-mm dishes plated with 50,000 plaque-forming units/dish. The filters were probed with
[32P]dCTP random-primed labeled probe prepared from our
original isolated cDNA sequence. Filters were washed to high
stringency (65 °C, 0.2× SSC), and phage plaques demonstrating
hybridization in both duplicate filter lifts were cloned to plaque
purity through serial dilutional replating and screening. Sequences
were then rescued into pBluescript using Exassist helper phage. The
plasmid cDNA inserts were sized to identify the largest clones that
were submitted for automated sequencing.
5'-Rapid amplification of cDNA ends was performed using a
linked cDNA prepared from rabbit parietal cell mRNA
(Ambion, Austin, TX). Briefly, 5 ng of parietal cell cDNA was
utilized as template in the 12 buffer Fail-Safe PCR system (Epicentre
Technologies) with the outer RNA linker primer (Ambion) and inner
antisense gene-specific primer (5' TGGGCAGGGACATGAGCACAT 3'). Advantage Taq polymerase (CLONTECH) was used in the 25-µl
reactions (5 cycles of 95 °C, 30 s, 72 °C, 180 s; 5 cycles of 95 °C, 30 s, 70 °C, 180 s; and 20 cycles of
95 °C, 30 s, 68 °C, 180 s). The 750-nucleotide band
obtained from buffer K of the Fail-Safe PCR kit was cloned into pTOPO-T
vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and sequenced (MCG Molecular Biology
Core Facility).
An oligonucleotide for the start site of Rab11-FIP1 designed with a
SacI site (5' GCGCGAGCTCAATGGAGGCTGCAAGAGAAACCCAG 3') and an
antisense oligonucleotide containing a SacI site (5'
GAGCCTTTAGATCCACGCCCGAG 3') was utilized to amplify the 542 amino-terminal nucleotides of Rab11-FIP1 from parietal cell cDNA.
Following digestion with SacI (New England Biolabs, Beverly,
MA), this fragment was ligated (New England Biolabs ligase) to the
carboxyl-terminal 1414 nucleotides of Rab11-FIP1 already cloned into
the GFP-C2 vector. Rab11-FIP1 was then recloned in pET-30c and
pAD-GAL.
Computer Gene Data Base Search, Cloning, and Yeast Two-hybrid
Binary Assays of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and
pp75/Rip11--
pAD-GAL4/Rab11-FIP1 mutant constructs were created
utilizing PCR amplification and normal cloning techniques.
Rab11-FIP2(KIAA0941), Rab11-FIP3(KIAA0665), and pp75/Rip11(KIAA0857)
were identified utilizing Rab11-FIP1 to search the human EST data base.
Rab11-FIP2(KIAA0941) and Rab11-FIP3(KIAA0665) were obtained as
cDNAs from Dr. Osamu Ohara (Kazusa DNA Research Institute). The
Rab11-FIP2 coding sequence was amplified from the KIAA0941 cDNA via
PCR using a 5' oligonucleotide with an EcoRI site
(GCCGGAATTCAAACAGGACAGGATGATGCT) and 3' oligonucleotide with
SalI site (GGCGTCGACAATTGGCTTTATTAACTGTTAGAG) and ligated into pAD-GAL4 digested with EcoRI and SalI. The
Rab11-FIP3 coding sequence was amplified from the KIAA0665 cDNA via
PCR using a 5' oligonucleotide with an EcoRI site
(GCGGAATTCCTCGGGAGCATGGCGTCG) and 3' oligonucleotide with
XbaI site (CGCGTCTAGAGCTGGACCTTCCTGCCTCTACTTG) and
ligated into pAD-GAL4 and EGFP-C2 digested with EcoRI and XbaI. pAD-GAL4/pp75/Rip11 was prepared as described
previously (26).
Yeast two-hybrid binary assays were conducted as follows. For 20 reactions, 25 ml of YPD liquid (CLONTECH) were
inoculated with a single colony from the yeast strain Y190. The culture
was grown overnight at 30 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1000 × g. Yeast cells were resuspended in 10 ml of
water and centrifuged again at 1000 × g. Yeast cells
were resuspended in a 100 mM lithium acetate/Tris EDTA
solution (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5)
and incubated for 5 min. For each reaction, 20 µl of the lithium
acetate/Tris-EDTA/yeast solution were added to a solution containing 20 µg of heat-denatured salmon sperm DNA, 120 µl of lithium
acetate/Tris-EDTA/polyethylene glycol solution (100 mM
LiAc, pH 7.5, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH
7.5, 40% polyethylene glycol), 200 ng of pBD-GAL4/construct plasmid,
and 200 ng of pAD-GAL4 construct plasmid. The solution was mixed well
and placed at 30 °C shaking for 30 min. Cells were then heat-shocked
at 42 °C for 15 min. The yeast cells were pelleted at 1000 × g for 30 s; the supernatant was removed; the cells were
resuspended in 100 µl sterile water, and then the cells were plated
onto a tryptophan- and leucine-deficient medium. The plate was
incubated at 30 °C for 3 days, and the colonies were lifted with a
70-mm filter paper disc. The discs were then processed for detection of
-galactosidase activity as detailed above. Observation of a blue
color within 3 h was considered a positive result.
Antibody and Recombinant Protein
Production--
Rab11-FIP1-(263-651) was cloned into pET-19b, and
recombinant His-tagged Rab11-FIP1-(263-651) was expressed and purified
as described previously (16). Mouse monoclonal Rab11-FIP1 antibody was
produced against recombinant Rab11-FIP1-(263-651) at the University of
Georgia Monoclonal Antibody Facility. Polyclonal Rab11-FIP2 antibody
was produced in goat by Strategic Biosolutions (Ramona, CA) against
peptide (NRQDYFDYESTN) spanning amino acids 395-406 of Rab11-FIP2
conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin. Rabbit polyclonal pp75 was
produced as described previously (26).
Full-length Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP1-(1-615), Rab11-FIP2,
Rab11-FIP2-(1-465), and Rab11-FIP3 sequences were cloned into pET-30a, and recombinant expression protein was purified as described previously (16).
Rab11a -35S-GTP Overlay Experiments--
2.5 µg
of recombinant Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP1-(1-615), Rab11-FIP2,
Rab11-FIP2-(1-465), and Rab11-FIP3 proteins were resolved on 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose (Protran,
Schleicher & Schuell). The membrane was blocked for 20 h in
block/binding buffer (5% milk and 0.1% bovine serum albumin in TBS)
at 4 °C.
For Rab3a, Rab5, or Rab11a labeling with -35S-GTP, 40 pmol of His-tagged-Rab protein were incubated for 20 min at 30 °C in 35 µl of GTP-charging buffer (18 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 8.1 mM EDTA, 0.9 mM dithiothreitol, 4.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.3% CHAPS) with 5 µCi of
-35S-GTP (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). 4 µl of 100 mM MgCl2 were then added, and reactions were
placed on ice. Labeled Rabs were transferred to 1 ml of block/binding
buffer and rocked for 2 h. If the reaction required peptide
blockade, Rab11-FIP1 peptide (KEFQVRELEDYIDNLLVRVMEETPNILRIP) or HT-31
peptide was added to final concentration of 500 µM in the
1 ml of block/binding buffer containing Rab11a -35S-GTP.
The solutions with -35S-GTP-labeled Rab3a, Rab5, and
Rab11a with or without peptide were then incubated with the membranes
and 1 ml of block/binding buffer for 2 h. Membranes were removed
and washed 5 times with block/binding buffer and 2 times with TBS.
Membranes were imaged on PhosphorImaging screens (Molecular Dynamics,
Sunnyvale, CA) for 16 h.
Parietal Cell Tubulovesicle Preparation and Western Blot
Analysis--
Enriched parietal cell tubulovesicle preparation was
conducted as described previously (28). 20 µg of protein from each fraction were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to Immobilon-P (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Membranes were
blocked for 1 h in blocking buffer (TBS with 5% nonfat milk and
0.05% Tween 20). Membranes were then probed with the appropriate primary antibody in 2 ml of antibody incubation buffer (TBS with 2.5%
nonfat milk and 0.05% Tween 20) for 2 h. Antibody dilutions were
as follows: Rab11-FIP1 was used at 1:10,000; Rab11-FIP2 was used at
1:100; Rab11a (8H10-(16)) was used at 1:50;
H+K+-ATPase was used at 1:50,000. Membranes
were washed 3 times for 10 min each with blocking buffer. Membranes
were then probed with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) in 2 ml of antibody
incubation buffer. All horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibodies were used at 1:3000. Membranes were washed 3 times for 10 min in TBS and developed with Super Signal Chemiluminescent Substrate
(Peirce) for 1 min followed by exposure to film (Kodak, Biomax-ML).
Cell Culture and Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
HeLa cells
were grown to confluence on glass coverslips. MDCK cells were grown to
confluence on Transwell filters. Primary rabbit parietal cells were
isolated and maintained in culture for 2 days following harvesting on
glass coverslips coated with Matrigel (Becton Dickinson) as described
previously (30-31). Nocodazole and taxol treatment of MDCK cells was
performed as described previously (7, 29). Prior to fixing, all cells
were washed 2 times with PBS (150 mM NaCl and 150 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4). All cells were fixed for 30 min at 4 °C in 4% paraformaldehyde and washed 3 times with PBS
prior to storage at 4 °C in PBS.
To stimulate parietal cells, media were changed 24 h after plating
cells. Cells were then pretreated for 5 min with 10 µM omeprazole prior to the addition of 100 µM histamine for
30 min. Cells were then washed 3 times for 10 min with PBS and fixed as above. Transient transfection of GFP-Rab11-FIP3 into HeLa cells was
conducted as described previously (24).
Staining of fixed cells was conducted as follows. Cells were blocked
for 20 min with donkey serum solution (0.3% Triton X-100, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 8 mM NaCl, 16.6% donkey
serum) and then incubated with appropriate primary antibodies diluted
in donkey serum solution overnight at 4 °C. Cells were washed 3 times for 5 min with PBS and then incubated with appropriate
fluorescently conjugated secondary antibodies (donkey anti-goat Cy3,
donkey anti-mouse Cy3, donkey anti-rabbit Cy3, donkey anti-mouse Cy5, or donkey anti-rat Cy5) for 2 h. Alexa488-labeled phalloidin
(Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was included with fluorescently tagged
secondary antibodies when staining parietal cells. Cells were washed 2 times for 5 min with PBS and 2 times for 5 min with 50 mM
sodium phosphate, pH 7.4. Coverslips or filters were mounted onto
slides using Prolong Antifade (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).
HeLa cells were observed utilizing a Zeiss Axiphot equipped with a SPOT
digital imaging system. MDCK cells were imaged utilizing a Molecular
Dynamics confocal microscope as described previously (6). Parietal
cells were imaged in confocal microscopy using single 0.3-µm optical sections.
 |
RESULTS |
Dominant Active Rab11a Identifies Rab11-FIP1 from a Rabbit Parietal
Cell cDNA Library--
To identify proteins that interact with
Rab11a, a yeast two-hybrid screen of a rabbit parietal cell library was
performed with dominant active Rab11a (Rab11aS20V). Two clones for an
identical cDNA sequence were found to activate histidine production
and to produce -galactosidase. The cDNAs were 1692 nucleotides
in length and 2000 nucleotides in length with open reading frames coding for 77 amino acids and 183 amino acids, respectively. Since no
initiation site was found, the larger cDNA clone was used to screen
a UniZAP phage parietal cell cDNA library. A cDNA clone of 2900 nucleotides was isolated, and it contained a 481-amino acid open
reading frame without an in-frame upstream stop codon. 5'-Rapid
amplification of cDNA ends technique was then utilized to obtain
further sequence coding for the remaining 171 amino acids. The
assembled full-length sequence (3519 nucleotides) contained an open
reading frame coding for 652 amino acids and was named Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 1 (Rab11-FIP1) (Fig. 1). The homologous
human protein is located on chromosome 2 containing 5 exons with 99%
identity. Northern blot analysis of parietal cell RNA demonstrated a
3.2-kilobase pair mRNA species (data not shown).

View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Rab11-FIP1 cDNA sequence and deduced
amino acid sequence. The putative Rab11a binding domain is in
bold and underlined.
|
|
The results of the screen suggested that only the carboxyl-terminal 77 amino acids were required for binding of Rab11a. We therefore studied
the interaction of truncations of Rab11-FIP1 with Rab11a. Truncated
forms of Rab11-FIP1 containing amino acids 263-651 or amino acids
576-651 maintained an interaction with Rab11a (Fig.
2A). However, truncations of
Rab11-FIP1 that do not contain amino acids 616-651 lost their ability
to interact with Rab11a (Fig. 2A). Hydropathy plot analysis
of amino acids 615-651 indicated the presence of an amphipathic
-helix between amino acids 615 and 632 (Fig. 2B). Based
on these results we have designated this region as the putative
"Rab11 binding domain" (Rab11BD).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Four deletional mutants of Rab11-FIP1
indicate the carboxyl-terminal -helix is
necessary for Rab11a binding in yeast two-hybrid association
assays. A, Rab11-FIP1 constructs were cloned into
pAD-GAL4 and tested for binding against Rab11a cloned into pBD-GAL4.
Amino acids 576-651 are sufficient for Rab11a binding whereas amino
acids 615-651 appear necessary. The dark box represents the
19-amino acid amphipathic -helix. B, a helical wheel
representation of the Rab11-FIP1 carboxyl-terminal -helix (amino
acids 615-633).
|
|
Rab11-FIP1 Rab11-BD Identifies Three Human Proteins with Homologous
-Helices--
A PROSITE search with the Rab11-FIP1 amino acid
sequence did not reveal any significant structural motifs. However, the
amino-terminal half of the protein did contain proline-rich domains.
Since Rab11-FIP1 binding to Rab11a was dependent on a region containing
an amphipathic -helix, and because such -helices are known to be
involved in protein-protein interactions (32), we hypothesized that
other proteins might exist that contain a similar Rab11a-binding motif. A computer BLAST search of the human GenBankTM EST data
base yielded three homologous proteins with high carboxyl-terminal identity. One protein (KIAA0941) contained the identical 18-amino acid
amphipathic -helix sequence as in Rab11-FIP1, and the other two
proteins (KIAA0665 and KIAA0857) showed high identity in the putative
Rab11 binding domain (Fig.
3A). Other than the helix, these three proteins demonstrated no significant identity with Rab11-FIP1.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Protein alignments. A,
carboxyl-terminal alignment of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2(KIAA0941),
Rab11-FIP3(KIAA0665), and pp75/Rip11(KIAA0857). Bold amino
acids indicate areas of identity. The carboxyl-terminal amphipathic
-helix is present within amino acids 615-633 of Rab11-FIP1,
475-493 of Rab11-FIP2, 732-750 of Rab11-FIP3, and 625-643 of
pp75/Rip11. B, the C2 domain from Rab11-FIP2 (amino acids
13-101) was aligned by Clustal method with the C2A domain from
synaptotagmin. There are 25 identical amino acids along with 19 other
amino acids containing similar charge.
|
|
KIAA0941 was first published as one of 100 cDNAs isolated from
human brain which code for large proteins (33). By utilizing the
PROSITE domain search engine, KIAA0941 was found to contain a putative
amino-terminal C2 domain that was similar to the C2 domain present in
synaptotagmin (Fig. 3B). The KIAA0941 sequence is located on
chromosome 10 with 5 exons and only 15.6% overall identity to
Rab11-FIP1.
KIAA0857 was initially published by Nagase and colleagues (34) and
first characterized as an autoantigen designated pp75 (26). This same
protein was subsequently identified as Rab11-interacting protein
(Rip11) because GST-Rab11a affinity assays and immunocytochemistry showed a relationship between Rab11a and Rip11 (25). The
carboxyl-terminal -helix in KIAA0857 maintains 68.4% identity to
Rab11-FIP1 and contains 2 other amino acids with like charge.
pp75/Rip11 maintains 29.6% identity with KIAA0941 due to the presence
of highly similar amino-terminal C2 domains. However, the C2 domain of
pp75/Rip11 shows more similarity with the C2 domain of protein kinase C.
KIAA0665 was also first published as a cDNA isolated from human
brain that codes for a large protein in vitro (35). By
utilizing the PROSITE domain search engine, KIAA0665 contains a
putative ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) motif from amino acids 469 to 692. The carboxyl-terminal -helix in KIAA0665 maintains 47.4% identity to Rab11-FIP1 and contains 4 other amino acids with like charge.
Rab11-FIP1, KIAA0941(Rab11-FIP2), KIAA0665(Rab11-FIP3), and
pp75/RIP11 Interact with All Three Members of the Rab11 Family of Small
GTPases--
Based on the presence of either an identical (KIAA0941)
or highly similar (KIAA0665 and pp75/Rip11) carboxyl-terminal
-helix, we sought to determine whether these proteins could interact
with Rab11a. The pAD-GAL4 constructs of Rab11-FIP1, KIAA0941, KIAA0665, and pp75/Rip11 were used in yeast two-hybrid binary association assays
to determine whether the proteins interacted with Rab11 family members
cloned into pBD-GAL4. Fig. 4 demonstrates
that Rab11-FIP1, KIAA0941, KIAA0665, and pp75/Rip11 interacted with Rab11a and the dominant active form of Rab11a (Rab11S20V). In addition,
all four interacted with Rab11b and Rab25. Therefore, Rab11-FIP1,
KIAA0941, KIAA0665, and pp75/Rip11 represent a family of interacting
proteins that bind Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab25. We therefore have
designated KIAA0941 as Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 2 (Rab11-FIP2)
and KIAA0665 as Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 3 (Rab11-FIP3).
Interestingly, Rab11-FIP2 also associated with the dominant negative
form of Rab11a (Rab11aS25N) and the myosin Vb tail, another
Rab11-interacting protein. However, Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP3, and
pp75/Rip11 showed no interaction with either dominant negative Rab11a
or myosin Vb. Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 showed
no interaction in yeast two-hybrid binary assays with Rab2, Rab3a,
Rab3b, Rab5, Rab8, or the dominant active form of Rab8
(Rab8Q67L).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Yeast two-hybrid binary assays of Rab11-FIP
proteins interacting with Rab11 family members. Rab11-FIP1,
Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 were cloned into pAD-GAL4 and
tested for binding activity against Rab proteins cloned into pBD-GAL4. + represents a positive result indicated by blue color within 3 h
after incubating yeast colonies with X-gal substrate. indicates a
negative result where no blue color was observed. These results are
representative of at least 3 separate experiments.
|
|
Rab11 -35S-GTP Overlays of Rab11-FIP
Proteins--
To confirm the results obtained from yeast two-hybrid
analysis, Rab11a overlay experiments were conducted. Recombinant
Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and Rab11-FIP3 were immobilized on
nitrocellulose membranes. These membranes were probed with
-35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a. Fig.
5 shows -35S-GTP-labeled
Rab11a binding to Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and Rab11FIP3. To show that
the Rab11a binding was specific, Rab11-FIP proteins were overlaid with
-35S-GTP-labeled Rab3a and Rab5, and no binding to
Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or Rab11-FIP3 was detected (Fig. 5).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
-35S-GTP Rab11a
overlays. Two µg of recombinant Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2,
Rab11-FIP3, Rab11-FIP1-(1-615) and Rab11-FIP2-(1-465) were
transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The lane labeled
His-tagged protein portrays the amount of His-tagged
recombinant protein in each lane. Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2,
Rab11-FIP1-(1-615), and Rab11-FIP2-(1-465) were detected by Western
blotting, whereas Rab11-FIP3 was detected by Coomassie Blue stain.
-35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a, -35S-GTP-labeled
Rab5, and -35S-GTP-labeled Rab3a were overlaid with the
blots containing the recombinant proteins. For the +BD peptide
lane 500 µg of peptide containing the Rab11-FIP1 amphipathic
-helix was incubated with -35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a for
2 h prior to overlaying the recombinant protein blot. For the
+HT-31 peptide lane 500 µg of HT-31 peptide was incubated
with -35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a for 2 h prior to
overlaying the blot. These results are representative of 3 separate
experiments.
|
|
Based on initial two-hybrid binary assays, amino acids 615-651 of
Rab11-FIP1 were necessary for Rab11a binding. To provide evidence of a
Rab11a-binding motif, mutant constructs of Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2,
each with the carboxyl-terminal -helix deleted (Rab11-FIP1-(1-615)
and Rab11-FIP2-(1-465)), were expressed.
-35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a did not bind recombinant
Rab11-FIP1-(1-615) or Rab11-FIP2-(1-465).
-35S-GTP-labeled Rab3a and Rab5 also failed to bind
Rab11-FIP proteins. In parallel experiments a 30-amino acid peptide
containing the amphipathic -helix from Rab11-FIP1 (Fig.
2B) was included in the incubations with
-35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a. The peptide markedly inhibited
the binding of the labeled Rab11a to the recombinant proteins (Fig. 5).
In comparison, a 21-amino acid peptide from the amphipathic -helical protein kinase A RII subunit binding domain of the HT-31
protein (27) did not compete with the recombinant Rab11-FIP1,
Rab11-FIP2, or Rab11-FIP3 for the labeled Rab11a (Fig. 5).
Mouse Monoclonal Rab11-FIP1 Antibody and Goat Polyclonal Rab11-FIP2
Antibody--
To assess endogenous expression of the Rab11-FIP
proteins, we developed antibodies against Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2. A
mouse monoclonal antibody was raised against recombinant Rab11-FIP1 and
a goat polyclonal antibody was raised against a Rab11-FIP2-specific peptide. The Western blot in Fig.
6A indicated that the
monoclonal Rab11-FIP1 antibody is specific. Incubation of the antibody
with recombinant Rab11-FIP1 for 1 h blocked in a
concentration-dependent manner the antibody binding to an
89-kDa band in 100,000 × g microsomes isolated from
gastric mucosa. Similar results were found with the polyclonal goat
anti-Rab11-FIP2 antibody. The Rab11-FIP2 peptide used to immunize the
goat blocked in a concentration-dependent manner antibody
binding to a 68-kDa band in the same microsomal fraction in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 6B).
Rab11-FIP1 antibodies did not recognize Rab11-FIP2 or Rab11-FIP3 and
similarly anti-Rab11-FIP2 did not recognize Rab11-FIP1 or Rab11-FIP3
(data not shown).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 antibody
characterization. Twenty µg of the 100,000 × g
microsomes from rabbit gastric mucosa were transferred to Immobilon-P
membrane in each lane. A, numbers indicate amount
(µg) of recombinant Rab11-FIP1-(263-651) incubated with the
anti-Rab11-FIP1 mouse monoclonal antibody for 1 h in 1 ml of total
volume prior to probing the immobilized 100,000 × g
membranes. B, numbers indicate amount (ng) of
Rab11-FIP2 peptide incubated with the anti-Rab11-FIP2 goat polyclonal
antibody for 1 h in 1 ml total volume prior to probing the
immobilized 100,000 × g microsomes. Protein standards
were used to determine kilodalton sizes as indicated on the left
side of each blot. The results are representative of at least
three separate experiments.
|
|
Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, GFP-Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/RIP11 Colocalized
with Rab11a in HeLa Cells--
Since Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2,
Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 interacted with Rab11a in the yeast
two-hybrid binding assays, we sought to investigate the in
situ localization of these proteins in cultured cells. HeLa cells
were double labeled with antibodies against Rab11a and antibodies
against Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11 (Fig.
7A). Immunofluorescence
microscopy showed that Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 were
distributed identically and colocalized with Rab11a. For Rab11-FIP3
localization, HeLa cells were transiently transfected with
GFP-Rab11-FIP3 and immunostained for Rab11a (Fig. 7B).
Rab11a distributed identically with GFP-Rab11-FIP3. In Fig.
7C HeLa cells were triple labeled for Rab11-FIP1,
Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11. All three colocalized in the HeLa
cells.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
HeLa cell localization of Rab11-FIP
proteins. HeLa cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and then
stained with primary antibodies (Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11)
along with anti-Rab11a. A, the left column
depicts localization of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11. The
right column shows Rab11a immunostaining. Arrowheads
indicate regions of colocalization. B, the left
column demonstrates GFP-Rab11-FIP3, and the right
column shows Rab11a immunostaining. C, HeLa cells
triple stained for Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11.
Arrowheads indicate regions of triple colocalization.
White bar equals 2 µm. These results are representative of
3 separate experiments.
|
|
Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/RIP11 Colocalized with Rab11a in
MDCK Cells and Redistributed with Rab11a upon Treatment with Nocodazole
and Taxol--
To characterize further the association of Rab11-FIP
proteins with Rab11a, we next investigated the location of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 with GFP-Rab11a in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. Polarized MDCK cells stably transfected with GFP-Rab11a were immunostained with antibodies against the tight
junction marker ZO1 and one of the Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or
pp75/Rip11 antibodies. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopic reconstructions through the apical region of the MDCK cells indicated colocalization of Rab11-FIP1 and pp75/Rip11 with GFP-Rab11a (Fig. 8A). Rab11-FIP2
immunoreactivity overlapped with GFP-Rab11a but did not colocalize
completely (Fig. 8A).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
MDCK localization of Rab11a with Rab11-FIP1,
Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11. A-C, Rab11-FIP1,
Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11 immunostaining is shown in the far left
column. GFP-Rab11a and immunostaining for the junctional marker
ZO1 are as indicated. A, cells were not treated.
B, cells were treated with nocodazole. C, cells
were treated with taxol. Arrowheads indicate points of
colocalization. White bar equals 2 µm. These results are
representative of 3 separate experiments.
|
|
The microtubule cytoskeleton has been implicated in maintaining the
integrity of the apical recycling endosome (29). Polarized MDCK cells
treated with the microtubule depolymerizing drug nocodazole showed
dispersal of the apical recycling endosome as marked by Rab11a (7). We
therefore studied the effect of nocodazole treatment on the location of
Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11. Polarized MDCK cells stably
transfected with GFP-Rab11a were treated with nocodazole and then
stained with anti-ZO1 antibodies along with antibodies against
Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11 (Fig. 8B). Confocal
immunofluorescence microscopy indicated that Rab11-FIP1 and pp75/Rip11
were dispersed but still colocalized with dispersed GFP-Rab11a.
Rab11-FIP2 was also dispersed, but its immunoreactivity only partially
overlapped with dispersed GFP-Rab11a.
We have previously noted that treatment of MDCK cells with the
microtubule-stabilizing drug taxol caused relocation of
Rab11a-contatining recycling vesicles to the apical corners of
polarized cells (7). We thus investigated the effect of taxol on the
distribution of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 in
GFP-Rab11a-expressing MDCK cells (Fig. 8C). Confocal
immunofluorescence microscopy indicated the colocalization of
Rab11-FIP1 and pp75/Rip11 with GFP-Rab11a at the perijunctional apical
corners of taxol-treated MDCK cells. Rab11-FIP2 immunoreactivity was
also relocated to the corners with GFP-Rab11a, but in addition also
demonstrated some staining in an annular perijunctional distribution.
Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 Are Located in the Same
Gastric Mucosal Tubulovesicle Fractions as Rab11a and the
H+K+-ATPase--
Since Rab11-FIP1 was isolated
from a parietal cell cDNA library, we investigated whether
Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 were distributed with Rab11a
within the parietal cell. We isolated and fractionated tubulovesicles
from rabbit gastric mucosa. As in previous studies (13), Rab11a and
H+K+-ATPase enriched in the 100,000 × g microsomes and in 20 and 27% sucrose gradient
fractions derived from the 100,000 × g
membranes (Fig. 9). Replicate
Western blots of parietal cell tubulovesicle preparations also
indicated the coenrichment of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11
with Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase in the
100,000 × g microsomes and the 20 and 27% sucrose gradient fractions (Fig. 9).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Western blot of rabbit gastric mucosa
microsome preparations. Replicate blots of a rabbit gastric
mucosal membrane fractionation were probed with antibodies to
H+K+-ATPase, Rab11a, Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2,
and pp75/Rip11. Fractions resolved are as follows:
homogenate, homogenate prior to fractionation;
PNS, perinuclear supernatant; 50G-P,
50 × g microsomes; 1K-P, 1000 × g microsomes; 10K-P, 10,000 × g
microsomes; 100K, P-100,000 × g microsomes;
100K-S, 100,000 × g supernatant;
P20, 20% fraction from sucrose gradient separation of
100,000 × g microsomes; P27, 27% fraction
from sucrose gradient separation; P33, 33% fraction from
sucrose gradient separation. These results are representative of at
least 3 separate experiments.
|
|
Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 Translocate to the Secretory Canaliculus
upon Stimulation with Histamine--
Previous work (18) has indicated
that Rab11a translocates with H+K+-ATPase onto
the secretory canaliculus following histamine stimulation. We studied
whether Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 also translocated with Rab11a to the
parietal cell secretory canaliculus upon stimulation with histamine.
Cultured rabbit gastric parietal cells were either maintained in their
resting state or stimulated with histamine. Cells were then dual
immunostained with antibodies to Rab11a or H+K+-ATPase and Rab11-FIP1 or Rab11-FIP2 along
with fluorescently conjugated phalloidin to visualize F-actin (Fig.
10). Rab11-FIP1 colocalized with Rab11a
in the resting parietal cell in a punctate vesicle pool that surrounded
the F-actin-labeled canalicular membrane. Following stimulation with
histamine, Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11a remained colocalized as they
translocated onto the F-actin-containing canalicular membrane.
Similarly, Rab11-FIP2 colocalized with
H+K+-ATPase in a punctate pericanalicular
distribution in the resting parietal cell surrounding the F-actin
labeled canaliculus (Fig. 10B). Upon stimulation with
histamine, Rab11-FIP2 was translocated with
H+K+-ATPase onto the canalicular membrane.
These results suggest that both Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 are present
on parietal cell tubulovesicles and translocate to the secretory
canaliculus as the vesicles fuse with the canalicular membrane to
deliver the H+K+-ATPase to the lumen.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 in resting
and stimulated primary cultured parietal cells. A and
B, cells were either not treated (resting) or stimulated
with histamine. A, cells were stained with anti-Rab11-FIP1,
polyclonal anti-Rab11a, and Alexa488-phalloidin. The Triple Label
column is a merge of the three images. Rab11-FIP1 is in the
red channel; Rab11a is in the blue channel, and
F-actin is in the green channel. Purple indicates
colocalization of Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11a. White indicates
colocalization of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11a, and F-actin. B, cells
were stained with anti-Rab11-FIP2, monoclonal anti-Rab11a, and
phalloidin. The Triple Label column is a merge of the three
images. Purple indicates colocalization of Rab11-FIP2 and
Rab11a. White indicates colocalization of Rab11-FIP2,
Rab11a, and actin. White bar equals 2 µm. These results
are representative of at least 3 separate experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The positioning of individual Rab proteins on discrete vesicle
populations suggests their importance in regulating unique trafficking
pathways. Previous studies have suggested that Rab proteins may
organize multiprotein complexes associated with specific vesicle
trafficking pathways. For example, early endosome fusion events
mediated by Rab5 and the Rab5 effectors Early Endosomal Antigen-1
(EEA-1) and rabaptin-5 provided a model for SNARE tethering and vesicle
fusion in early endosomes (38-41). Golgi complex organization and
intra-Golgi transport may be directed by Rab6 and its
microtubule-associating effector rabkinesin-6 (3, 42). Similarly, the
association of Rab11a with myosin Vb coupled with the effects of the
tail of myosin Vb in reducing transferrin and IgA trafficking indicated the importance of myosin Vb and possibly Rab11a in plasma membrane recycling systems (24). We sought to identify other proteins that
interact with Rab11a to characterize further protein complexes that
mediate the effects of Rab11a on vesicle trafficking through plasma
membrane recycling systems. The results presented here indicate that
interaction of Rab11a with a family of Rab11a-interacting proteins may
account for complexities observed in the trafficking of cargoes
recycling to plasma membranes.
The present studies demonstrate that Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2,
Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 are members of a family of interacting proteins that bind Rab11a through an amphipathic -helical motif not
present in either myosin Vb or Rab11BP/rabphilin-11. Amphipathic -helices are known to participate in protein/protein interactions (32). In yeast two-hybrid assays and blot overlays, deletion of the
carboxyl-terminal -helix abolished Rab11a binding. In addition, a
peptide containing the carboxyl-terminal -helix could compete for
Rab11a binding in blot overlays. The presence of a conserved Rab11a
binding domain in these four structurally diverse proteins of likely
disparate function indicates the complexity of steps involved in
membrane recycling.
As reported previously (24) for myosin Vb, Rab11-FIP family members can
interact with the GTP-bound forms of all three Rab11 family members
Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab25. The binding of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2,
Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 was specific for the Rab11 family, since
yeast two-hybrid association assays indicate no binding with Rab2,
Rab3a, Rab3b, Rab5, or Rab8a. In addition, -35S-GTP-labeled Rab3a and
-35S-GTP-labeled Rab5 overlay experiments also showed no
binding to recombinant Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or Rab11-FIP3. Although all four interacting proteins associated with the dominant active form
of Rab11a (Rab11aS20V), only Rab11-FIP2 interacted with the dominant
negative Rab11a (Rab11aS25N). These latter results may indicate the
existence of a new class of Rab11 chaperone molecules characterized by
Rab11-FIP2 which function irrespective of Rab activation status.
As with pp75/Rip11 (25), Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and GFP-Rab11-FIP3
colocalized with Rab11a in HeLa cells. In MDCK cells, Rab11-FIP1 and
pp75/Rip11 were colocalized on the apical recycling endosome system
with GFP-Rab11a. Rab11-FIP2 was also sub-apically located with Rab11a,
but colocalization was incomplete, and we observed Rab11-FIP2 staining
in regions where Rab11a was not present. Interestingly, as observed
previously with myosin Vb (24), Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11
all dispersed upon treatment with nocodazole and moved to the apical
corners upon treatment with taxol. Similarly in taxol-treated MDCK
cells, while the majority of stained Rab11-FIP2 did colocalize with
Rab11a in sub-apical corners, a significant subset of the
immunoreactivity stained an annular region adjacent to the tight
junctions where Rab11a immunoreactivity was not observed. This evidence
supports a functional association between Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and
pp75/Rip11 with Rab11a based on their dynamic codistribution with
Rab11a-containing vesicles. The somewhat different distribution of
Rab11-FIP2 may indicate the presence of different functions for
Rab11-FIP2 in polarized cells. This difference in distribution of
Rab11-FIP2 could also reflect its potential association with different
pools of nucleotide-bound Rab11 family members.
The results presented demonstrate that Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and
pp75/Rip11 are all enriched with H+K+-ATPase
and Rab11a in gastric parietal cell tubulovesicle fractions. The
gastric parietal cell represents the most highly developed example of
an apical recycling system (43). The major function of the parietal
cell, regulated acid secretion, utilizes the second messenger-dependent activation of intracellular
tubulovesicle fusion with an intracellular canalicular target membrane
to deliver H+K+-ATPase to the apical lumen of
the stomach. We have demonstrated previously that parietal cell
tubulovesicles are highly enriched in Rab11a and also contain Rab25
(13, 44). Duman et al. (20) reported that a dominant
negative form of Rab11a (Rab11aN124I) inhibited
H+K+-ATPase recruitment to the secretory
canaliculus. We have also noted that when parietal cells are
stimulated, Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase translocate
to the expanded apical canalicular membrane (19). In the present
studies, Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 also translocated to the secretory
canaliculus with Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase,
respectively. Maintenance of these Rab11a-associated proteins with the
H+K+-ATPase-containing membranes after fusion
suggests the existence of a functional recycling complex that is highly
specialized for apical recycling in the parietal cells.
How can three different Rab proteins (Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab25) within
the same cell associate with at least 5 interacting proteins
(Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, pp75/Rip11, and myosin Vb) and
establish specific pathways for each member of the Rab11 family?
Several possibilities exist. First, different pools of Rab11a, Rab11b,
or Rab25 containing vesicles may be spatially segregated within a
tubulovesicular compartment, or they may associate with other as yet
unidentified interacting proteins performing more highly specialized
functions. Second, we have observed that Rab11a has the ability to
oligomerize.2 Oligomerized
Rab11a could associate with multiple interacting partners performing
various different functions. Thus Rab11a could be the nidus for the
assembly of a multiprotein effector complex. A final explanation is
that Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 all bind
Rab11a, Rab11b, or Rab25, but their binding may be reserved for
different functions oriented in time. Such interactions could then be
regulated by either differences in in situ binding
affinities or alterations in binding due to post-translational modifications, as postulated for pp75/Rip11 (25).
In summary, we have identified a family of four proteins that can
associate with Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab25. The interaction with Rab11a
is dependent upon a carboxyl-terminal amphipathic -helix (Rab11
binding domain). Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 colocalize on
plasma membrane recycling system vesicles with Rab11a in both
non-polarized HeLa cells and polarized MDCK cells, whereas GFP-Rab11-FIP3 colocalizes with Rab11a in HeLa cells. In addition, Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 coenrich with Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase in gastric tubulovesicle fractions.
Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 translocate with Rab11a and the
H+K+-ATPase upon stimulating parietal cells
with histamine. These results suggest that association of Rab11a with a
number of protein regulators is required for the complex regulation of
plasma membrane recycling systems.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Angela Wandinger-Ness and Johan
Peranen for the Rab8a plasmids and Marianne Wessling-Resnick for the
Rab 5 plasmids.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by NIDDK Grants DK48370 and DK43405
(to J. R. G.) from the National Institutes of Health, a Veterans Affairs Merit award, and NIAID Grant AI47859 (to E. K. L. C.) from
the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute for
Molecular Medicine and Genetics, CB-2803, Medical College of Georgia, 1120 Fifteenth St., Augusta, GA 30912-3175. Tel.: 706-721-8730; Fax:
706-721-7915; E-mail: jgolden@mail.mcg.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 8, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104831200
2
J. R. Goldenring, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MDCK, Madin-Darby
canine kidney;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
-D-galactopyranoside.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Novick, P.,
and Zerial, M.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
496-504[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Chavrier, P.,
Parton, R. G.,
Hauri, H. P.,
Simons, K.,
and Zerial, M.
(1990)
Cell
62,
317-329[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Martinez, O.,
Schmidt, A.,
Salamero, J.,
Hoflack, B.,
Roa, M. A.,
and Goud, B.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1575-1588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Peranen, J.,
Auvinen, P.,
Virta, H.,
Wepf, R.,
and Simons, K.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
153-167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Bucci, C.,
Parton, R. G.,
Mather, I. H.,
Stunnenberg, H.,
Simons, K.,
Hoflack, B.,
and Zerial, M.
(1992)
Cell
70,
715-728[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Wang, X.,
Kumar, R.,
Navarre, J.,
Casanova, J. E.,
and Goldenring, J. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
29138-29146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Casanova, J. E.,
Wang, X.,
Kumar, R.,
Bhartur, S. G.,
Navarre, J.,
Woodrum, J. E.,
Ray, G. S.,
and Goldenring, J. R.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
47-61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Ullrich, O.,
Reinsch, S.,
Urbe, S.,
Zerial, M.,
and Parton, R. G.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
913-924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Kikuchi, A.,
Yamashita, T.,
Kawata, M.,
Yamamoto, K.,
Ikeda, K.,
Tanimoto, T.,
and Takai, Y.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
2897-2904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Sakurada, K.,
Uchida, K.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Aisaka, K.,
Ito, S.,
Ohmori, T.,
Takeyama, Y.,
Ueda, T.,
Hori, Y.,
Chyanagi, H.,
Saitoh, Y.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
and Takai, Y.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
177,
1224-1232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Chavrier, P.,
Vingron, M.,
Sander, C.,
Simons, K.,
and Zerial, M.
(1990)
Mol. Cell Biol.
10,
6578-6585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Chavrier, P.,
Simons, K.,
and Zerial, M.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
112,
261-264[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Goldenring, J. R.,
Soroka, C. J.,
Shen, K. R.,
Tang, L. H.,
Rodriguez, W.,
Vaughan, H. D.,
Stoch, S. A.,
and Modlin, I. M.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
267,
G187-G194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Drivas, G. T.,
Shih, A.,
Coutevas, E. E.,
D'Eustachio, P.,
and Rush, M. G.
(1991)
Oncogene
6,
3-9[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Bhartur, S. G.,
Calhoun, B. C.,
Woodrum, J.,
Kurkjian, J.,
Iyer, S.,
Lai, F.,
and Goldenring, J. R.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
269,
611-617[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Goldenring, J. R.,
Smith, J.,
Vaughan, H. D.,
Cameron, P.,
Hawkins, W.,
and Navarre, J.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
G515-G525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Green, E. G.,
Ramm, E.,
Riley, N. M.,
Spiro, D. J.,
Goldenring, J. R.,
and Wessling-Resnick, M.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
239,
612-616[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Ren, X.,
Xu, G.,
Zeng, J.,
De Lemos-Chiarandini, C.,
Adesnik, M.,
and Sabatini, D. D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6187-6192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Calhoun, B. C.,
Lapierre, L. A.,
Chew, C. S.,
and Goldenring, J. R.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
C163-C170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Duman, J. G.,
Tyagarajan, K.,
Kolsi, M. S.,
Moore, H. H.,
and Forte, J. G.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
C361-C372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Cox, D.,
Lee, D. J.,
Dale, B. M.,
Calafat, J.,
and Greenberg, S.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
680-685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Zeng, X.,
Ren, M.,
Gravotta, D.,
De Lemos-Chiarandini, C.,
Lui, M.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
Xu, G.,
Shen, T. H.,
Morimoto, T.,
Adesnick, M.,
and Sabatini, D. D.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
2840-2845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Mammoto, A.,
Ohtsuka, T.,
Hotta, I.,
Sasaki, T.,
and Takai, Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25517-25524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Lapierre, L. A.,
Kumar, R.,
Hales, C. M.,
Navarre, J.,
Bhartur, S. G.,
Burnette, J. O.,
Mercer, J. A.,
Bahler, M.,
and Goldenring, J. R.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
1843-1857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Prekeris, R.,
Klumperman, J.,
and Scheller, R. H.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
6,
1437-1448[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Wang, D.,
Buyon, J. P.,
Zhu, W.,
and Chan, E. K. L.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
1265-1275[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Carr, D. W.,
Hausken, Z. E.,
Fraser, I. D. C.,
Stofko-Hahn, R. E.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13376-13382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Basson, M. D.,
Goldenring, J. R.,
Tang, L. H.,
Lewis, J. J.,
Padfield, P.,
Jamieson, J. D.,
and Modlin, I. M.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
279,
43-48
|
| 29.
|
Apodaca, G.,
Katz, L. A.,
and Mostov, K. E.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
67-86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Chew, C. S.,
Ljungstrom, M.,
Smolka, A.,
and Brown, M. R.
(1989)
Am. J. Physiol.
256,
G254-G263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Soroka, C. J.,
Chew, C. S.,
Modlin, I. M.,
Hanzel, D.,
Smolka, A.,
and Goldenring, J. R.
(1993)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
60,
76-87[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Colledge, M.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1999)
Trends Cell Biol.
9,
216-221[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Nagase, T.,
Ishikawa, K.,
Suyama, M.,
Kikuno, R.,
Hirosawa, M.,
Miyajima, N.,
Tanaka, A.,
Kotani, H.,
Nomura, N.,
and Ohara, O.
(1999)
DNA Res.
6,
63-70[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Ishikawa, K.,
Nagase, T.,
Suyama, M.,
Miyajima, N.,
Tanaka, A.,
Kotani, H.,
Nomura, N.,
and Ohara, O.
(1998)
DNA Res.
5,
169-176[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Nagase, T.,
Ishikawa, K.,
Suyama, M.,
Kikuno, R.,
Hirosawa, M.,
Miyajima, N.,
Tanaka, A.,
Kotani, H.,
Nomura, N.,
and Ohara, O.
(1998)
DNA Res.
5,
355-364[Abstract]
|
| 36.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 37.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 38.
|
Christoforidis, S.,
McBride, H. M.,
Burgoyne, R. D.,
and Zerial, M.
(1999)
Nature
397,
621-625[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Simonsen, A.,
Gaullier, J. M.,
D'Arrigo, A.,
and Stenmark, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
28857-28860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
McBride, H. M.,
Rybin, V.,
Murphy, C.,
Giner, A.,
Teasdale, R.,
and Zerial, M.
(1999)
Cell
98,
377-386[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Stenmark, H.,
Vitale, G.,
Ullrich, O.,
and Zerial, M.
(1995)
Cell
83,
423-432[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Echard, A.,
Jollivet, F.,
Maritnez, O.,
Lacapere, J. J.,
Rousselet, A.,
Janoueix-Lerosey, I.,
and Goud, B.
(1998)
Science
279,
580-585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Forte, J. G.,
and Yao, X.
(1996)
Trends Cell Biol.
6,
45-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Goldenring, J. R.,
Shen, K. R.,
Vaughn, H. D.,
and Modlin, I. M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
18419-18422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Jovic, F. Kieken, N. Naslavsky, P. L. Sorgen, and S. Caplan
Eps15 Homology Domain 1-associated Tubules Contain Phosphatidylinositol-4-Phosphate and Phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-Bisphosphate and Are Required for Efficient Recycling
Mol. Biol. Cell,
June 1, 2009;
20(11):
2731 - 2743.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sugawara, T. Shibasaki, A. Mizoguchi, T. Saito, and S. Seino
Rab11 and its effector Rip11 participate in regulation of insulin granule exocytosis.
Genes Cells,
April 1, 2009;
14(4):
445 - 456.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Schonteich, G. M. Wilson, J. Burden, C. R. Hopkins, K. Anderson, J. R. Goldenring, and R. Prekeris
The Rip11/Rab11-FIP5 and kinesin II complex regulates endocytic protein recycling
J. Cell Sci.,
November 15, 2008;
121(22):
3824 - 3833.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. T. Caswell, M. Chan, A. J. Lindsay, M. W. McCaffrey, D. Boettiger, and J. C. Norman
Rab-coupling protein coordinates recycling of {alpha}5{beta}1 integrin and EGFR1 to promote cell migration in 3D microenvironments
J. Cell Biol.,
October 6, 2008;
183(1):
143 - 155.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Utley, N. A. Ducharme, V. Varthakavi, B. E. Shepherd, P. J. Santangelo, M. E. Lindquist, J. R. Goldenring, and J. E. Crowe Jr.
Respiratory syncytial virus uses a Vps4-independent budding mechanism controlled by Rab11-FIP2
PNAS,
July 22, 2008;
105(29):
10209 - 10214.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Fukuda, E. Kanno, K. Ishibashi, and T. Itoh
Large Scale Screening for Novel Rab Effectors Reveals Unexpected Broad Rab Binding Specificity
Mol. Cell. Proteomics,
June 1, 2008;
7(6):
1031 - 1042.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Zhang, J. M. Squirrell, and J. G. White
RAB-11 Permissively Regulates Spindle Alignment by Modulating Metaphase Microtubule Dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans Early Embryos
Mol. Biol. Cell,
June 1, 2008;
19(6):
2553 - 2565.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-M. Chow, H. Neto, C. Foucart, and I. Moore
Rab-A2 and Rab-A3 GTPases Define a trans-Golgi Endosomal Membrane Domain in Arabidopsis That Contributes Substantially to the Cell Plate
PLANT CELL,
January 1, 2008;
20(1):
101 - 123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Cortes, K. A. Rzomp, A. Tvinnereim, M. A. Scidmore, and B. Wizel
Chlamydia pneumoniae Inclusion Membrane Protein Cpn0585 Interacts with Multiple Rab GTPases
Infect. Immun.,
December 1, 2007;
75(12):
5586 - 5596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Swanson, D. D. Crane, and H. D. Caldwell
Chlamydia trachomatis Species-Specific Induction of Ezrin Tyrosine Phosphorylation Functions in Pathogen Entry
Infect. Immun.,
December 1, 2007;
75(12):
5669 - 5677.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. I. Welsh, S. E. Leney, B. Lloyd-Lewis, M. Wherlock, A. J. Lindsay, M. W. McCaffrey, and J. M. Tavare
Rip11 is a Rab11- and AS160-RabGAP-binding protein required for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes
J. Cell Sci.,
December 1, 2007;
120(23):
4197 - 4208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Ducharme, J. A. Williams, A. Oztan, G. Apodaca, L. A. Lapierre, and J. R. Goldenring
Rab11-FIP2 regulates differentiable steps in transcytosis
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
September 1, 2007;
293(3):
C1059 - C1072.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. Roland, A. K. Kenworthy, J. Peranen, S. Caplan, and J. R. Goldenring
Myosin Vb Interacts with Rab8a on a Tubular Network Containing EHD1 and EHD3
Mol. Biol. Cell,
August 1, 2007;
18(8):
2828 - 2837.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. X. Li, A. K. Satoh, and D. F. Ready
Myosin V, Rab11, and dRip11 direct apical secretion and cellular morphogenesis in developing Drosophila photoreceptors
J. Cell Biol.,
May 21, 2007;
177(4):
659 - 669.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Lapierre, K. M. Avant, C. M. Caldwell, A.-J. L. Ham, S. Hill, J. A. Williams, A. J. Smolka, and J. R. Goldenring
Characterization of immunoisolated human gastric parietal cells tubulovesicles: identification of regulators of apical recycling
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
May 1, 2007;
292(5):
G1249 - G1262.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Shiba, H. Koga, H.-W. Shin, M. Kawasaki, R. Kato, K. Nakayama, and S. Wakatsuki
Structural basis for Rab11-dependent membrane recruitment of a family of Rab11-interacting protein 3 (FIP3)/Arfophilin-1
PNAS,
October 17, 2006;
103(42):
15416 - 15421.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Wakabayashi, H. Kipp, and I. M. Arias
Transporters on Demand: Intracellular Reservoirs and Cycling of Bile Canalicular ABC Transporters
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 22, 2006;
281(38):
27669 - 27673.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. L. Prigozhina and C. M. Waterman-Storer
Decreased polarity and increased random motility in PtK1 epithelial cells correlate with inhibition of endosomal recycling.
J. Cell Sci.,
September 1, 2006;
119(Pt 17):
3571 - 3582.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Ducharme, C. M. Hales, L. A. Lapierre, A.-J. L. Ham, A. Oztan, G. Apodaca, and J. R. Goldenring
MARK2/EMK1/Par-1B{alpha} Phosphorylation of Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 2 Is Necessary for the Timely Establishment of Polarity in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell,
August 1, 2006;
17(8):
3625 - 3637.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-F. Lise, T. P. Wong, A. Trinh, R. M. Hines, L. Liu, R. Kang, D. J. Hines, J. Lu, J. R. Goldenring, Y. T. Wang, et al.
Involvement of Myosin Vb in Glutamate Receptor Trafficking
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 10, 2006;
281(6):
3669 - 3678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. F. J. van de Graaf, Q. Chang, A. R. Mensenkamp, J. G. J. Hoenderop, and R. J. M. Bindels
Direct Interaction with Rab11a Targets the Epithelial Ca2+ Channels TRPV5 and TRPV6 to the Plasma Membrane
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
January 1, 2006;
26(1):
303 - 312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Naslavsky, J. Rahajeng, M. Sharma, M. Jovic, and S. Caplan
Interactions between EHD Proteins and Rab11-FIP2: A Role for EHD3 in Early Endosomal Transport
Mol. Biol. Cell,
January 1, 2006;
17(1):
163 - 177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Swiatecka-Urban, A. Brown, S. Moreau-Marquis, J. Renuka, B. Coutermarsh, R. Barnaby, K. H. Karlson, T. R. Flotte, M. Fukuda, G. M. Langford, et al.
The Short Apical Membrane Half-life of Rescued {Delta}F508-Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Results from Accelerated Endocytosis of {Delta}F508-CFTR in Polarized Human Airway Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 4, 2005;
280(44):
36762 - 36772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Hamelin, C. Theriault, G. Laroche, and J.-L. Parent
The Intracellular Trafficking of the G Protein-coupled Receptor TP{beta} Depends on a Direct Interaction with Rab11
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 28, 2005;
280(43):
36195 - 36205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V S Patil, G Sachdeva, D N Modi, R R Katkam, D D Manjramkar, I Hinduja, and C P Puri
Rab coupling protein (RCP): a novel target of progesterone action in primate endometrium
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
October 1, 2005;
35(2):
357 - 372.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Hall, E. Smith, W. Langer, L. A. Jacobs, D. Goulding, and M. C. Field
Developmental Variation in Rab11-Dependent Trafficking in Trypanosoma brucei
Eukaryot. Cell,
May 1, 2005;
4(5):
971 - 980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Wilson, A. B. Fielding, G. C. Simon, X. Yu, P. D. Andrews, R. S. Hames, A. M. Frey, A. A. Peden, G. W. Gould, and R. Prekeris
The FIP3-Rab11 Protein Complex Regulates Recycling Endosome Targeting to the Cleavage Furrow during Late Cytokinesis
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2005;
16(2):
849 - 860.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-M. Zhang, S. Ellis, A. Sriratana, C. A. Mitchell, and T. Rowe
Sec15 Is an Effector for the Rab11 GTPase in Mammalian Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 8, 2004;
279(41):
43027 - 43034.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Lindsay and M. W. McCaffrey
The C2 domains of the class I Rab11 family of interacting proteins target recycling vesicles to the plasma membrane
J. Cell Sci.,
September 1, 2004;
117(19):
4365 - 4375.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Junutula, E. Schonteich, G. M. Wilson, A. A. Peden, R. H. Scheller, and R. Prekeris
Molecular Characterization of Rab11 Interactions with Members of the Family of Rab11-interacting Proteins
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 6, 2004;
279(32):
33430 - 33437.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Peden, E. Schonteich, J. Chun, J. R. Junutula, R. H. Scheller, and R. Prekeris
The RCP-Rab11 Complex Regulates Endocytic Protein Sorting
Mol. Biol. Cell,
August 1, 2004;
15(8):
3530 - 3541.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Hoekstra, D. Tyteca, and S. C. D. van IJzendoorn
The subapical compartment: a traffic center in membrane polarity development
J. Cell Sci.,
May 1, 2004;
117(11):
2183 - 2192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Junutula, A. M. De Maziere, A. A. Peden, K. E. Ervin, R. J. Advani, S. M. van Dijk, J. Klumperman, and R. H. Scheller
Rab14 Is Involved in Membrane Trafficking between the Golgi Complex and Endosomes
Mol. Biol. Cell,
May 1, 2004;
15(5):
2218 - 2229.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.-H. Fan, L. A. Lapierre, J. R. Goldenring, J. Sai, and A. Richmond
Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 2 and Myosin Vb Are Required for CXCR2 Recycling and Receptor-mediated Chemotaxis
Mol. Biol. Cell,
May 1, 2004;
15(5):
2456 - 2469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Naslavsky, M. Boehm, P. S. Backlund Jr., and S. Caplan
Rabenosyn-5 and EHD1 Interact and Sequentially Regulate Protein Recycling to the Plasma Membrane
Mol. Biol. Cell,
May 1, 2004;
15(5):
2410 - 2422.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. de Graaf, W. T. Zwart, R. A.J. van Dijken, M. Deneka, T. K.F. Schulz, N. Geijsen, P. J. Coffer, B. M. Gadella, A. J. Verkleij, P. van der Sluijs, et al.
Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase{beta} Is Critical for Functional Association of rab11 with the Golgi Complex
Mol. Biol. Cell,
April 1, 2004;
15(4):
2038 - 2047.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Pasqualato, F. Senic-Matuglia, L. Renault, B. Goud, J. Salamero, and J. Cherfils
The Structural GDP/GTP Cycle of Rab11 Reveals a Novel Interface Involved in the Dynamics of Recycling Endosomes
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 19, 2004;
279(12):
11480 - 11488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Brock, J. R. Goldenring, and J. E. Crowe Jr.
Apical recycling systems regulate directional budding of respiratory syncytial virus from polarized epithelial cells
PNAS,
December 9, 2003;
100(25):
15143 - 15148.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. V. Khvotchev, M. Ren, S. Takamori, R. Jahn, and T. C. Sudhof
Divergent Functions of Neuronal Rab11b in Ca2+-Regulated versus Constitutive Exocytosis
J. Neurosci.,
November 19, 2003;
23(33):
10531 - 10539.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Riggs, W. Rothwell, S. Mische, G. R.X. Hickson, J. Matheson, T. S. Hays, G. W. Gould, and W. Sullivan
Actin cytoskeleton remodeling during early Drosophila furrow formation requires recycling endosomal components Nuclear-fallout and Rab11
J. Cell Biol.,
October 13, 2003;
163(1):
143 - 154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Rzomp, L. D. Scholtes, B. J. Briggs, G. R. Whittaker, and M. A. Scidmore
Rab GTPases Are Recruited to Chlamydial Inclusions in Both a Species-Dependent and Species-Independent Manner
Infect. Immun.,
October 1, 2003;
71(10):
5855 - 5870.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Tani, M. Shibata, K. Kawase, H. Kawashima, K. Hatsuzawa, M. Nagahama, and M. Tagaya
Mapping of Functional Domains of gamma -SNAP
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 4, 2003;
278(15):
13531 - 13538.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Hales, J.-P. Vaerman, and J. R. Goldenring
Rab11 Family Interacting Protein 2 Associates with Myosin Vb and Regulates Plasma Membrane Recycling
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 20, 2002;
277(52):
50415 - 50421.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. N. Cullis, B. Philip, J. D. Baleja, and L. A. Feig
Rab11-FIP2, an Adaptor Protein Connecting Cellular Components Involved in Internalization and Recycling of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 13, 2002;
277(51):
49158 - 49166.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Meyers and R. Prekeris
Formation of Mutually Exclusive Rab11 Complexes with Members of the Family of Rab11-interacting Proteins Regulates Rab11 Endocytic Targeting and Function
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 6, 2002;
277(50):
49003 - 49010.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Volpicelli, J. J. Lah, G. Fang, J. R. Goldenring, and A. I. Levey
Rab11a and Myosin Vb Regulate Recycling of the M4 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor
J. Neurosci.,
November 15, 2002;
22(22):
9776 - 9784.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Fukuda and T. S. Kuroda
Slac2-c (Synaptotagmin-like Protein Homologue Lacking C2 Domains-c), a Novel Linker Protein that Interacts with Rab27, Myosin Va/VIIa, and Actin
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 1, 2002;
277(45):
43096 - 43103.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Lindsay and M. W. McCaffrey
Rab11-FIP2 Functions in Transferrin Recycling and Associates with Endosomal Membranes via Its COOH-terminal Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 19, 2002;
277(30):
27193 - 27199.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Wu, F. Wang, K. Rao, J. R. Sellers, and J. A. Hammer III
Rab27a Is an Essential Component of Melanosome Receptor for Myosin Va
Mol. Biol. Cell,
May 1, 2002;
13(5):
1735 - 1749.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Lindsay, A. G. Hendrick, G. Cantalupo, F. Senic-Matuglia, B. Goud, C. Bucci, and M. W. McCaffrey
Rab Coupling Protein (RCP), a Novel Rab4 and Rab11 Effector Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 29, 2002;
277(14):
12190 - 12199.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|