Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104831200 on August 8, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 42, 39067-39075, October 19, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/42/39067    most recent
M104831200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hales, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldenring, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hales, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldenring, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Identification and Characterization of a Family of Rab11-interacting Proteins*

Chadwick M. HalesDagger, Richard GrinerDagger, Karen C. Hobdy-Henderson, Matthew C. Dorn, David Hardy, Ravindra Kumar, Jennifer Navarre, Edward K. L. Chan§, Lynne A. Lapierre, and James R. Goldenring

From the Departments of Medicine, Surgery, and Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College of Georgia and the Augusta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia 30912 and § Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037

Received for publication, May 26, 2001, and in revised form, July 31, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Rab11a is a small GTP-binding protein enriched in the pericentriolar plasma membrane recycling systems. We hypothesized that Rab11a-binding proteins exist as downstream effectors of its action. Here we define a family of four Rab11-interacting proteins: Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 1 (Rab11-FIP1), Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 2 (Rab11-FIP2), Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 3 (Rab11-FIP3), and pp75/Rip11. All four interacting proteins associated with wild type Rab11a and dominant active Rab11a (Rab11aS20V) as well as Rab11b and Rab25. Rab11-FIP2 also interacted with dominant negative Rab11a (Rab11aS25N) and the tail of myosin Vb. The binding of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and Rab11-FIP3 to Rab11a was dependent upon a conserved carboxyl-terminal amphipathic alpha -helix. Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 colocalized with Rab11a in plasma membrane recycling systems in both non-polarized HeLa cells and polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. GFP-Rab11-FIP3 also colocalized with Rab11a in HeLa cells. Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 also coenriched with Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase on parietal cell tubulovesicles, and Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 translocated with Rab11a and the H+K+-ATPase upon stimulating parietal cells with histamine. The results suggest that the function of Rab11a in plasma membrane recycling systems is dependent upon a compendium of protein effectors.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Rab GTPase family contains more than 50 different members that are believed to have a regulatory role in the formation, targeting, and/or fusion of transport vesicles (1). Whereas the precise mechanism of action remains poorly understood, individual Rab proteins localize to distinct intracellular vesicular compartments suggesting that each Rab has a well defined functional role. For example, Rab1 and Rab2 are perinuclear in location and function in endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi translocation (2). Rab6 is located on the Golgi and is involved in movement of vesicles through the organelle (3). Rab8 resides in the trans-Golgi/post-Golgi networks and regulates post-Golgi targeting to the plasma membrane (4). Rab5 on early endosomes functions in trafficking from the plasma membrane (5). The sub-apically localized Rab11 family is involved in vesicle recycling, plasma membrane recycling, and transcytosis (6-8).

Rab11a was first isolated from bovine brain membranes in 1988 (9). Since that time, the rat (10), dog (11), mouse (12), rabbit (13), and human (14) homologues have been identified. The Rab11 family now also includes two other gene products, Rab11b and Rab25 (15). Rab11a is sub-apically located in epithelial cells (16) and is involved in vesicle recycling through the pericentriolar recycling endosome (8). Rab11a colocalizes with transferrin receptor in recycling compartments of K562 cells, a human hematopoietic cell line, (17) and mutants deficient in GTP hydrolysis inhibit transferrin recycling (18). Although ubiquitous in expression, Rab11a is enriched in epithelial cells and gastric parietal cells (13, 16). In gastric parietal cells, Rab11a colocalized with the H+K+-ATPase and translocated to the secretory canaliculus upon stimulation with histamine (19). A dominant negative form of Rab11a inhibits acid sequestration in gastric glands (20) and inhibits recycling of polymeric IgA receptor and basolateral to apical transcytosis in MDCK1 cells (6). Recently, Rab11a was also implicated in recruiting membrane to the cell surface in macrophages for phagocytosis (21) and for cell membrane extension.

Although the associations of Rab11a and the apical recycling systems is now well established, little is known about its physiological function. Studies have identified three Rab11-interacting proteins. The first protein, Rab11-binding protein (Rab11BP) or rabphilin 11, was isolated from bovine brain (22) and rat brain (23), respectively, and interacted with the GTP-bound form of Rab11a (22). Rab11BP/rabphilin 11 localizes to the pericentriolar recycling compartment in MDCK cells and HeLa cells and participates in transferrin recycling and membrane turnover events (22-23). Myosin Vb, the second Rab11a-interacting protein, was identified from yeast two-hybrid screening of a parietal cell cDNA library (24). Myosin Vb interacts with all members of the Rab11 family: Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab25. In MDCK and HeLa cells, myosin Vb associates with the Rab11a-containing plasma membrane recycling systems. Transfection of the tail of myosin Vb lacking the motor domain retards trafficking through the plasma membrane recycling systems (24).

Recently, a third protein, Rab11-interacting protein (Rip11), was reported to bind with Rab11 (25). The Rip11 sequence was identified previously as pp75, a phosphoprotein that interacts with the 60-kDa SS-A and Ro autoantigens and may function as an autoantigen due to the presence of pp75 antibodies in the sera of some autoimmune disease patients (26). pp75/Rip11 was located in the apical recycling endosome of polarized epithelial cells and appeared to be involved in apical vesicle trafficking (26).

Since only three interacting proteins for Rab11a have been recognized and because the function of the ubiquitously expressed Rab11a is still unclear, we hypothesized that other interacting proteins must exist. By utilizing a yeast two-hybrid screen and EST data base searches, we have identified a family of four Rab11-binding proteins that have a highly conserved Rab11 family-binding amphipathic alpha -helical motif. Immunofluorescence and Western blot data show a close association between Rab11a and this family of interacting proteins. These results suggest that the functions of Rab11a in plasma membrane recycling systems are regulated by a complex compendium of interacting proteins.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Yeast Two-hybrid Screening and Cloning of Full-length Rab11-FIP1-- Poly(A)+ mRNA was isolated from rabbit gastric parietal cells and primed with oligo(dT) to construct a parietal cell cDNA library in pAD-GAL (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with an average clone length of 2.0 kilobase pairs. Rab11aS20V was mutated as described previously (6) from wild type Rab11a via a single base pair substitution and cloned into pBD-GAL (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). pBD-GAL/Rab11aS20V was transfected into the Y190 yeast strain to produce a stable bait line that was isolated on tryptophan-deficient media. The bait line was then transfected with 100 µg of parietal cell cDNA library plasmid and plated on media deficient in leucine, tryptophan, and histidine (TLH-) and supplemented with 2.5 mM 3-aminotriazole. Following 4 days of growth, colonies were lifted onto filter paper, frozen twice for 10 s in liquid nitrogen, and incubated with 1.67 ml of X-gal stock (50 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta -D-galactoside in N,N-dimethylformamide) in 100 ml of Z buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, and 1 mM MgSO4). Interactions were judged positive if the blue product from the beta -galactosidase reaction was present within 3 h at room temperature. Positive clones were regrown on TLH- media (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA), and beta -galactosidase activity was reconfirmed. Plasmids were then rescued from yeast and transformed into XL-1 Blue bacteria and selected on ampicillin. Isolated plasmids were sequenced by automated sequencing (Medical College of Georgia, Molecular Biology Core Facility) using pAD-GAL flanking vector sequences.

The larger isolated cDNA clone was used to screen a UniZAP phage parietal cell cDNA library. Phage plaques were screened on duplicate filter lifts of 150-mm dishes plated with 50,000 plaque-forming units/dish. The filters were probed with [32P]dCTP random-primed labeled probe prepared from our original isolated cDNA sequence. Filters were washed to high stringency (65 °C, 0.2× SSC), and phage plaques demonstrating hybridization in both duplicate filter lifts were cloned to plaque purity through serial dilutional replating and screening. Sequences were then rescued into pBluescript using Exassist helper phage. The plasmid cDNA inserts were sized to identify the largest clones that were submitted for automated sequencing.

5'-Rapid amplification of cDNA ends was performed using a linked cDNA prepared from rabbit parietal cell mRNA (Ambion, Austin, TX). Briefly, 5 ng of parietal cell cDNA was utilized as template in the 12 buffer Fail-Safe PCR system (Epicentre Technologies) with the outer RNA linker primer (Ambion) and inner antisense gene-specific primer (5' TGGGCAGGGACATGAGCACAT 3'). Advantage Taq polymerase (CLONTECH) was used in the 25-µl reactions (5 cycles of 95 °C, 30 s, 72 °C, 180 s; 5 cycles of 95 °C, 30 s, 70 °C, 180 s; and 20 cycles of 95 °C, 30 s, 68 °C, 180 s). The 750-nucleotide band obtained from buffer K of the Fail-Safe PCR kit was cloned into pTOPO-T vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and sequenced (MCG Molecular Biology Core Facility).

An oligonucleotide for the start site of Rab11-FIP1 designed with a SacI site (5' GCGCGAGCTCAATGGAGGCTGCAAGAGAAACCCAG 3') and an antisense oligonucleotide containing a SacI site (5' GAGCCTTTAGATCCACGCCCGAG 3') was utilized to amplify the 542 amino-terminal nucleotides of Rab11-FIP1 from parietal cell cDNA. Following digestion with SacI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), this fragment was ligated (New England Biolabs ligase) to the carboxyl-terminal 1414 nucleotides of Rab11-FIP1 already cloned into the GFP-C2 vector. Rab11-FIP1 was then recloned in pET-30c and pAD-GAL.

Computer Gene Data Base Search, Cloning, and Yeast Two-hybrid Binary Assays of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11-- pAD-GAL4/Rab11-FIP1 mutant constructs were created utilizing PCR amplification and normal cloning techniques. Rab11-FIP2(KIAA0941), Rab11-FIP3(KIAA0665), and pp75/Rip11(KIAA0857) were identified utilizing Rab11-FIP1 to search the human EST data base. Rab11-FIP2(KIAA0941) and Rab11-FIP3(KIAA0665) were obtained as cDNAs from Dr. Osamu Ohara (Kazusa DNA Research Institute). The Rab11-FIP2 coding sequence was amplified from the KIAA0941 cDNA via PCR using a 5' oligonucleotide with an EcoRI site (GCCGGAATTCAAACAGGACAGGATGATGCT) and 3' oligonucleotide with SalI site (GGCGTCGACAATTGGCTTTATTAACTGTTAGAG) and ligated into pAD-GAL4 digested with EcoRI and SalI. The Rab11-FIP3 coding sequence was amplified from the KIAA0665 cDNA via PCR using a 5' oligonucleotide with an EcoRI site (GCGGAATTCCTCGGGAGCATGGCGTCG) and 3' oligonucleotide with XbaI site (CGCGTCTAGAGCTGGACCTTCCTGCCTCTACTTG) and ligated into pAD-GAL4 and EGFP-C2 digested with EcoRI and XbaI. pAD-GAL4/pp75/Rip11 was prepared as described previously (26).

Yeast two-hybrid binary assays were conducted as follows. For 20 reactions, 25 ml of YPD liquid (CLONTECH) were inoculated with a single colony from the yeast strain Y190. The culture was grown overnight at 30 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1000 × g. Yeast cells were resuspended in 10 ml of water and centrifuged again at 1000 × g. Yeast cells were resuspended in a 100 mM lithium acetate/Tris EDTA solution (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) and incubated for 5 min. For each reaction, 20 µl of the lithium acetate/Tris-EDTA/yeast solution were added to a solution containing 20 µg of heat-denatured salmon sperm DNA, 120 µl of lithium acetate/Tris-EDTA/polyethylene glycol solution (100 mM LiAc, pH 7.5, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, 40% polyethylene glycol), 200 ng of pBD-GAL4/construct plasmid, and 200 ng of pAD-GAL4 construct plasmid. The solution was mixed well and placed at 30 °C shaking for 30 min. Cells were then heat-shocked at 42 °C for 15 min. The yeast cells were pelleted at 1000 × g for 30 s; the supernatant was removed; the cells were resuspended in 100 µl sterile water, and then the cells were plated onto a tryptophan- and leucine-deficient medium. The plate was incubated at 30 °C for 3 days, and the colonies were lifted with a 70-mm filter paper disc. The discs were then processed for detection of beta -galactosidase activity as detailed above. Observation of a blue color within 3 h was considered a positive result.

Antibody and Recombinant Protein Production-- Rab11-FIP1-(263-651) was cloned into pET-19b, and recombinant His-tagged Rab11-FIP1-(263-651) was expressed and purified as described previously (16). Mouse monoclonal Rab11-FIP1 antibody was produced against recombinant Rab11-FIP1-(263-651) at the University of Georgia Monoclonal Antibody Facility. Polyclonal Rab11-FIP2 antibody was produced in goat by Strategic Biosolutions (Ramona, CA) against peptide (NRQDYFDYESTN) spanning amino acids 395-406 of Rab11-FIP2 conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin. Rabbit polyclonal pp75 was produced as described previously (26).

Full-length Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP1-(1-615), Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP2-(1-465), and Rab11-FIP3 sequences were cloned into pET-30a, and recombinant expression protein was purified as described previously (16).

Rab11a gamma -35S-GTP Overlay Experiments-- 2.5 µg of recombinant Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP1-(1-615), Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP2-(1-465), and Rab11-FIP3 proteins were resolved on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose (Protran, Schleicher & Schuell). The membrane was blocked for 20 h in block/binding buffer (5% milk and 0.1% bovine serum albumin in TBS) at 4 °C.

For Rab3a, Rab5, or Rab11a labeling with gamma -35S-GTP, 40 pmol of His-tagged-Rab protein were incubated for 20 min at 30 °C in 35 µl of GTP-charging buffer (18 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 8.1 mM EDTA, 0.9 mM dithiothreitol, 4.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.3% CHAPS) with 5 µCi of gamma -35S-GTP (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). 4 µl of 100 mM MgCl2 were then added, and reactions were placed on ice. Labeled Rabs were transferred to 1 ml of block/binding buffer and rocked for 2 h. If the reaction required peptide blockade, Rab11-FIP1 peptide (KEFQVRELEDYIDNLLVRVMEETPNILRIP) or HT-31 peptide was added to final concentration of 500 µM in the 1 ml of block/binding buffer containing Rab11a gamma -35S-GTP. The solutions with gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab3a, Rab5, and Rab11a with or without peptide were then incubated with the membranes and 1 ml of block/binding buffer for 2 h. Membranes were removed and washed 5 times with block/binding buffer and 2 times with TBS. Membranes were imaged on PhosphorImaging screens (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) for 16 h.

Parietal Cell Tubulovesicle Preparation and Western Blot Analysis-- Enriched parietal cell tubulovesicle preparation was conducted as described previously (28). 20 µg of protein from each fraction were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to Immobilon-P (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Membranes were blocked for 1 h in blocking buffer (TBS with 5% nonfat milk and 0.05% Tween 20). Membranes were then probed with the appropriate primary antibody in 2 ml of antibody incubation buffer (TBS with 2.5% nonfat milk and 0.05% Tween 20) for 2 h. Antibody dilutions were as follows: Rab11-FIP1 was used at 1:10,000; Rab11-FIP2 was used at 1:100; Rab11a (8H10-(16)) was used at 1:50; H+K+-ATPase was used at 1:50,000. Membranes were washed 3 times for 10 min each with blocking buffer. Membranes were then probed with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) in 2 ml of antibody incubation buffer. All horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used at 1:3000. Membranes were washed 3 times for 10 min in TBS and developed with Super Signal Chemiluminescent Substrate (Peirce) for 1 min followed by exposure to film (Kodak, Biomax-ML).

Cell Culture and Immunofluorescence Microscopy-- HeLa cells were grown to confluence on glass coverslips. MDCK cells were grown to confluence on Transwell filters. Primary rabbit parietal cells were isolated and maintained in culture for 2 days following harvesting on glass coverslips coated with Matrigel (Becton Dickinson) as described previously (30-31). Nocodazole and taxol treatment of MDCK cells was performed as described previously (7, 29). Prior to fixing, all cells were washed 2 times with PBS (150 mM NaCl and 150 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4). All cells were fixed for 30 min at 4 °C in 4% paraformaldehyde and washed 3 times with PBS prior to storage at 4 °C in PBS.

To stimulate parietal cells, media were changed 24 h after plating cells. Cells were then pretreated for 5 min with 10 µM omeprazole prior to the addition of 100 µM histamine for 30 min. Cells were then washed 3 times for 10 min with PBS and fixed as above. Transient transfection of GFP-Rab11-FIP3 into HeLa cells was conducted as described previously (24).

Staining of fixed cells was conducted as follows. Cells were blocked for 20 min with donkey serum solution (0.3% Triton X-100, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 8 mM NaCl, 16.6% donkey serum) and then incubated with appropriate primary antibodies diluted in donkey serum solution overnight at 4 °C. Cells were washed 3 times for 5 min with PBS and then incubated with appropriate fluorescently conjugated secondary antibodies (donkey anti-goat Cy3, donkey anti-mouse Cy3, donkey anti-rabbit Cy3, donkey anti-mouse Cy5, or donkey anti-rat Cy5) for 2 h. Alexa488-labeled phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was included with fluorescently tagged secondary antibodies when staining parietal cells. Cells were washed 2 times for 5 min with PBS and 2 times for 5 min with 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4. Coverslips or filters were mounted onto slides using Prolong Antifade (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).

HeLa cells were observed utilizing a Zeiss Axiphot equipped with a SPOT digital imaging system. MDCK cells were imaged utilizing a Molecular Dynamics confocal microscope as described previously (6). Parietal cells were imaged in confocal microscopy using single 0.3-µm optical sections.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Dominant Active Rab11a Identifies Rab11-FIP1 from a Rabbit Parietal Cell cDNA Library-- To identify proteins that interact with Rab11a, a yeast two-hybrid screen of a rabbit parietal cell library was performed with dominant active Rab11a (Rab11aS20V). Two clones for an identical cDNA sequence were found to activate histidine production and to produce beta -galactosidase. The cDNAs were 1692 nucleotides in length and 2000 nucleotides in length with open reading frames coding for 77 amino acids and 183 amino acids, respectively. Since no initiation site was found, the larger cDNA clone was used to screen a UniZAP phage parietal cell cDNA library. A cDNA clone of 2900 nucleotides was isolated, and it contained a 481-amino acid open reading frame without an in-frame upstream stop codon. 5'-Rapid amplification of cDNA ends technique was then utilized to obtain further sequence coding for the remaining 171 amino acids. The assembled full-length sequence (3519 nucleotides) contained an open reading frame coding for 652 amino acids and was named Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 1 (Rab11-FIP1) (Fig. 1). The homologous human protein is located on chromosome 2 containing 5 exons with 99% identity. Northern blot analysis of parietal cell RNA demonstrated a 3.2-kilobase pair mRNA species (data not shown).


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Rab11-FIP1 cDNA sequence and deduced amino acid sequence. The putative Rab11a binding domain is in bold and underlined.

The results of the screen suggested that only the carboxyl-terminal 77 amino acids were required for binding of Rab11a. We therefore studied the interaction of truncations of Rab11-FIP1 with Rab11a. Truncated forms of Rab11-FIP1 containing amino acids 263-651 or amino acids 576-651 maintained an interaction with Rab11a (Fig. 2A). However, truncations of Rab11-FIP1 that do not contain amino acids 616-651 lost their ability to interact with Rab11a (Fig. 2A). Hydropathy plot analysis of amino acids 615-651 indicated the presence of an amphipathic alpha -helix between amino acids 615 and 632 (Fig. 2B). Based on these results we have designated this region as the putative "Rab11 binding domain" (Rab11BD).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Four deletional mutants of Rab11-FIP1 indicate the carboxyl-terminal alpha -helix is necessary for Rab11a binding in yeast two-hybrid association assays. A, Rab11-FIP1 constructs were cloned into pAD-GAL4 and tested for binding against Rab11a cloned into pBD-GAL4. Amino acids 576-651 are sufficient for Rab11a binding whereas amino acids 615-651 appear necessary. The dark box represents the 19-amino acid amphipathic alpha -helix. B, a helical wheel representation of the Rab11-FIP1 carboxyl-terminal alpha -helix (amino acids 615-633).

Rab11-FIP1 Rab11-BD Identifies Three Human Proteins with Homologous alpha -Helices-- A PROSITE search with the Rab11-FIP1 amino acid sequence did not reveal any significant structural motifs. However, the amino-terminal half of the protein did contain proline-rich domains. Since Rab11-FIP1 binding to Rab11a was dependent on a region containing an amphipathic alpha -helix, and because such alpha -helices are known to be involved in protein-protein interactions (32), we hypothesized that other proteins might exist that contain a similar Rab11a-binding motif. A computer BLAST search of the human GenBankTM EST data base yielded three homologous proteins with high carboxyl-terminal identity. One protein (KIAA0941) contained the identical 18-amino acid amphipathic alpha -helix sequence as in Rab11-FIP1, and the other two proteins (KIAA0665 and KIAA0857) showed high identity in the putative Rab11 binding domain (Fig. 3A). Other than the helix, these three proteins demonstrated no significant identity with Rab11-FIP1.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Protein alignments. A, carboxyl-terminal alignment of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2(KIAA0941), Rab11-FIP3(KIAA0665), and pp75/Rip11(KIAA0857). Bold amino acids indicate areas of identity. The carboxyl-terminal amphipathic alpha -helix is present within amino acids 615-633 of Rab11-FIP1, 475-493 of Rab11-FIP2, 732-750 of Rab11-FIP3, and 625-643 of pp75/Rip11. B, the C2 domain from Rab11-FIP2 (amino acids 13-101) was aligned by Clustal method with the C2A domain from synaptotagmin. There are 25 identical amino acids along with 19 other amino acids containing similar charge.

KIAA0941 was first published as one of 100 cDNAs isolated from human brain which code for large proteins (33). By utilizing the PROSITE domain search engine, KIAA0941 was found to contain a putative amino-terminal C2 domain that was similar to the C2 domain present in synaptotagmin (Fig. 3B). The KIAA0941 sequence is located on chromosome 10 with 5 exons and only 15.6% overall identity to Rab11-FIP1.

KIAA0857 was initially published by Nagase and colleagues (34) and first characterized as an autoantigen designated pp75 (26). This same protein was subsequently identified as Rab11-interacting protein (Rip11) because GST-Rab11a affinity assays and immunocytochemistry showed a relationship between Rab11a and Rip11 (25). The carboxyl-terminal alpha -helix in KIAA0857 maintains 68.4% identity to Rab11-FIP1 and contains 2 other amino acids with like charge. pp75/Rip11 maintains 29.6% identity with KIAA0941 due to the presence of highly similar amino-terminal C2 domains. However, the C2 domain of pp75/Rip11 shows more similarity with the C2 domain of protein kinase C.

KIAA0665 was also first published as a cDNA isolated from human brain that codes for a large protein in vitro (35). By utilizing the PROSITE domain search engine, KIAA0665 contains a putative ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) motif from amino acids 469 to 692. The carboxyl-terminal alpha -helix in KIAA0665 maintains 47.4% identity to Rab11-FIP1 and contains 4 other amino acids with like charge.

Rab11-FIP1, KIAA0941(Rab11-FIP2), KIAA0665(Rab11-FIP3), and pp75/RIP11 Interact with All Three Members of the Rab11 Family of Small GTPases-- Based on the presence of either an identical (KIAA0941) or highly similar (KIAA0665 and pp75/Rip11) carboxyl-terminal alpha -helix, we sought to determine whether these proteins could interact with Rab11a. The pAD-GAL4 constructs of Rab11-FIP1, KIAA0941, KIAA0665, and pp75/Rip11 were used in yeast two-hybrid binary association assays to determine whether the proteins interacted with Rab11 family members cloned into pBD-GAL4. Fig. 4 demonstrates that Rab11-FIP1, KIAA0941, KIAA0665, and pp75/Rip11 interacted with Rab11a and the dominant active form of Rab11a (Rab11S20V). In addition, all four interacted with Rab11b and Rab25. Therefore, Rab11-FIP1, KIAA0941, KIAA0665, and pp75/Rip11 represent a family of interacting proteins that bind Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab25. We therefore have designated KIAA0941 as Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 2 (Rab11-FIP2) and KIAA0665 as Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 3 (Rab11-FIP3). Interestingly, Rab11-FIP2 also associated with the dominant negative form of Rab11a (Rab11aS25N) and the myosin Vb tail, another Rab11-interacting protein. However, Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 showed no interaction with either dominant negative Rab11a or myosin Vb. Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 showed no interaction in yeast two-hybrid binary assays with Rab2, Rab3a, Rab3b, Rab5, Rab8, or the dominant active form of Rab8 (Rab8Q67L).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Yeast two-hybrid binary assays of Rab11-FIP proteins interacting with Rab11 family members. Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 were cloned into pAD-GAL4 and tested for binding activity against Rab proteins cloned into pBD-GAL4. + represents a positive result indicated by blue color within 3 h after incubating yeast colonies with X-gal substrate. - indicates a negative result where no blue color was observed. These results are representative of at least 3 separate experiments.

Rab11 gamma -35S-GTP Overlays of Rab11-FIP Proteins-- To confirm the results obtained from yeast two-hybrid analysis, Rab11a overlay experiments were conducted. Recombinant Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and Rab11-FIP3 were immobilized on nitrocellulose membranes. These membranes were probed with gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a. Fig. 5 shows gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a binding to Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and Rab11FIP3. To show that the Rab11a binding was specific, Rab11-FIP proteins were overlaid with gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab3a and Rab5, and no binding to Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or Rab11-FIP3 was detected (Fig. 5).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   gamma -35S-GTP Rab11a overlays. Two µg of recombinant Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, Rab11-FIP1-(1-615) and Rab11-FIP2-(1-465) were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The lane labeled His-tagged protein portrays the amount of His-tagged recombinant protein in each lane. Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP1-(1-615), and Rab11-FIP2-(1-465) were detected by Western blotting, whereas Rab11-FIP3 was detected by Coomassie Blue stain. gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a, gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab5, and gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab3a were overlaid with the blots containing the recombinant proteins. For the +BD peptide lane 500 µg of peptide containing the Rab11-FIP1 amphipathic alpha -helix was incubated with gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a for 2 h prior to overlaying the recombinant protein blot. For the +HT-31 peptide lane 500 µg of HT-31 peptide was incubated with gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a for 2 h prior to overlaying the blot. These results are representative of 3 separate experiments.

Based on initial two-hybrid binary assays, amino acids 615-651 of Rab11-FIP1 were necessary for Rab11a binding. To provide evidence of a Rab11a-binding motif, mutant constructs of Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2, each with the carboxyl-terminal alpha -helix deleted (Rab11-FIP1-(1-615) and Rab11-FIP2-(1-465)), were expressed. gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a did not bind recombinant Rab11-FIP1-(1-615) or Rab11-FIP2-(1-465). gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab3a and Rab5 also failed to bind Rab11-FIP proteins. In parallel experiments a 30-amino acid peptide containing the amphipathic alpha -helix from Rab11-FIP1 (Fig. 2B) was included in the incubations with gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab11a. The peptide markedly inhibited the binding of the labeled Rab11a to the recombinant proteins (Fig. 5). In comparison, a 21-amino acid peptide from the amphipathic alpha -helical protein kinase A RII subunit binding domain of the HT-31 protein (27) did not compete with the recombinant Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or Rab11-FIP3 for the labeled Rab11a (Fig. 5).

Mouse Monoclonal Rab11-FIP1 Antibody and Goat Polyclonal Rab11-FIP2 Antibody-- To assess endogenous expression of the Rab11-FIP proteins, we developed antibodies against Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2. A mouse monoclonal antibody was raised against recombinant Rab11-FIP1 and a goat polyclonal antibody was raised against a Rab11-FIP2-specific peptide. The Western blot in Fig. 6A indicated that the monoclonal Rab11-FIP1 antibody is specific. Incubation of the antibody with recombinant Rab11-FIP1 for 1 h blocked in a concentration-dependent manner the antibody binding to an 89-kDa band in 100,000 × g microsomes isolated from gastric mucosa. Similar results were found with the polyclonal goat anti-Rab11-FIP2 antibody. The Rab11-FIP2 peptide used to immunize the goat blocked in a concentration-dependent manner antibody binding to a 68-kDa band in the same microsomal fraction in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 6B). Rab11-FIP1 antibodies did not recognize Rab11-FIP2 or Rab11-FIP3 and similarly anti-Rab11-FIP2 did not recognize Rab11-FIP1 or Rab11-FIP3 (data not shown).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 antibody characterization. Twenty µg of the 100,000 × g microsomes from rabbit gastric mucosa were transferred to Immobilon-P membrane in each lane. A, numbers indicate amount (µg) of recombinant Rab11-FIP1-(263-651) incubated with the anti-Rab11-FIP1 mouse monoclonal antibody for 1 h in 1 ml of total volume prior to probing the immobilized 100,000 × g membranes. B, numbers indicate amount (ng) of Rab11-FIP2 peptide incubated with the anti-Rab11-FIP2 goat polyclonal antibody for 1 h in 1 ml total volume prior to probing the immobilized 100,000 × g microsomes. Protein standards were used to determine kilodalton sizes as indicated on the left side of each blot. The results are representative of at least three separate experiments.

Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, GFP-Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/RIP11 Colocalized with Rab11a in HeLa Cells-- Since Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 interacted with Rab11a in the yeast two-hybrid binding assays, we sought to investigate the in situ localization of these proteins in cultured cells. HeLa cells were double labeled with antibodies against Rab11a and antibodies against Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11 (Fig. 7A). Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 were distributed identically and colocalized with Rab11a. For Rab11-FIP3 localization, HeLa cells were transiently transfected with GFP-Rab11-FIP3 and immunostained for Rab11a (Fig. 7B). Rab11a distributed identically with GFP-Rab11-FIP3. In Fig. 7C HeLa cells were triple labeled for Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11. All three colocalized in the HeLa cells.


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   HeLa cell localization of Rab11-FIP proteins. HeLa cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and then stained with primary antibodies (Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11) along with anti-Rab11a. A, the left column depicts localization of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11. The right column shows Rab11a immunostaining. Arrowheads indicate regions of colocalization. B, the left column demonstrates GFP-Rab11-FIP3, and the right column shows Rab11a immunostaining. C, HeLa cells triple stained for Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11. Arrowheads indicate regions of triple colocalization. White bar equals 2 µm. These results are representative of 3 separate experiments.

Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/RIP11 Colocalized with Rab11a in MDCK Cells and Redistributed with Rab11a upon Treatment with Nocodazole and Taxol-- To characterize further the association of Rab11-FIP proteins with Rab11a, we next investigated the location of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 with GFP-Rab11a in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. Polarized MDCK cells stably transfected with GFP-Rab11a were immunostained with antibodies against the tight junction marker ZO1 and one of the Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11 antibodies. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopic reconstructions through the apical region of the MDCK cells indicated colocalization of Rab11-FIP1 and pp75/Rip11 with GFP-Rab11a (Fig. 8A). Rab11-FIP2 immunoreactivity overlapped with GFP-Rab11a but did not colocalize completely (Fig. 8A).


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   MDCK localization of Rab11a with Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11. A-C, Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11 immunostaining is shown in the far left column. GFP-Rab11a and immunostaining for the junctional marker ZO1 are as indicated. A, cells were not treated. B, cells were treated with nocodazole. C, cells were treated with taxol. Arrowheads indicate points of colocalization. White bar equals 2 µm. These results are representative of 3 separate experiments.

The microtubule cytoskeleton has been implicated in maintaining the integrity of the apical recycling endosome (29). Polarized MDCK cells treated with the microtubule depolymerizing drug nocodazole showed dispersal of the apical recycling endosome as marked by Rab11a (7). We therefore studied the effect of nocodazole treatment on the location of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11. Polarized MDCK cells stably transfected with GFP-Rab11a were treated with nocodazole and then stained with anti-ZO1 antibodies along with antibodies against Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or pp75/Rip11 (Fig. 8B). Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy indicated that Rab11-FIP1 and pp75/Rip11 were dispersed but still colocalized with dispersed GFP-Rab11a. Rab11-FIP2 was also dispersed, but its immunoreactivity only partially overlapped with dispersed GFP-Rab11a.

We have previously noted that treatment of MDCK cells with the microtubule-stabilizing drug taxol caused relocation of Rab11a-contatining recycling vesicles to the apical corners of polarized cells (7). We thus investigated the effect of taxol on the distribution of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 in GFP-Rab11a-expressing MDCK cells (Fig. 8C). Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy indicated the colocalization of Rab11-FIP1 and pp75/Rip11 with GFP-Rab11a at the perijunctional apical corners of taxol-treated MDCK cells. Rab11-FIP2 immunoreactivity was also relocated to the corners with GFP-Rab11a, but in addition also demonstrated some staining in an annular perijunctional distribution.

Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 Are Located in the Same Gastric Mucosal Tubulovesicle Fractions as Rab11a and the H+K+-ATPase-- Since Rab11-FIP1 was isolated from a parietal cell cDNA library, we investigated whether Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 were distributed with Rab11a within the parietal cell. We isolated and fractionated tubulovesicles from rabbit gastric mucosa. As in previous studies (13), Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase enriched in the 100,000 × g microsomes and in 20 and 27% sucrose gradient fractions derived from the 100,000 × g membranes (Fig. 9). Replicate Western blots of parietal cell tubulovesicle preparations also indicated the coenrichment of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 with Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase in the 100,000 × g microsomes and the 20 and 27% sucrose gradient fractions (Fig. 9).


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Western blot of rabbit gastric mucosa microsome preparations. Replicate blots of a rabbit gastric mucosal membrane fractionation were probed with antibodies to H+K+-ATPase, Rab11a, Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11. Fractions resolved are as follows: homogenate, homogenate prior to fractionation; PNS, perinuclear supernatant; 50G-P, 50 × g microsomes; 1K-P, 1000 × g microsomes; 10K-P, 10,000 × g microsomes; 100K, P-100,000 × g microsomes; 100K-S, 100,000 × g supernatant; P20, 20% fraction from sucrose gradient separation of 100,000 × g microsomes; P27, 27% fraction from sucrose gradient separation; P33, 33% fraction from sucrose gradient separation. These results are representative of at least 3 separate experiments.

Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 Translocate to the Secretory Canaliculus upon Stimulation with Histamine-- Previous work (18) has indicated that Rab11a translocates with H+K+-ATPase onto the secretory canaliculus following histamine stimulation. We studied whether Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 also translocated with Rab11a to the parietal cell secretory canaliculus upon stimulation with histamine. Cultured rabbit gastric parietal cells were either maintained in their resting state or stimulated with histamine. Cells were then dual immunostained with antibodies to Rab11a or H+K+-ATPase and Rab11-FIP1 or Rab11-FIP2 along with fluorescently conjugated phalloidin to visualize F-actin (Fig. 10). Rab11-FIP1 colocalized with Rab11a in the resting parietal cell in a punctate vesicle pool that surrounded the F-actin-labeled canalicular membrane. Following stimulation with histamine, Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11a remained colocalized as they translocated onto the F-actin-containing canalicular membrane. Similarly, Rab11-FIP2 colocalized with H+K+-ATPase in a punctate pericanalicular distribution in the resting parietal cell surrounding the F-actin labeled canaliculus (Fig. 10B). Upon stimulation with histamine, Rab11-FIP2 was translocated with H+K+-ATPase onto the canalicular membrane. These results suggest that both Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 are present on parietal cell tubulovesicles and translocate to the secretory canaliculus as the vesicles fuse with the canalicular membrane to deliver the H+K+-ATPase to the lumen.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 in resting and stimulated primary cultured parietal cells. A and B, cells were either not treated (resting) or stimulated with histamine. A, cells were stained with anti-Rab11-FIP1, polyclonal anti-Rab11a, and Alexa488-phalloidin. The Triple Label column is a merge of the three images. Rab11-FIP1 is in the red channel; Rab11a is in the blue channel, and F-actin is in the green channel. Purple indicates colocalization of Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11a. White indicates colocalization of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11a, and F-actin. B, cells were stained with anti-Rab11-FIP2, monoclonal anti-Rab11a, and phalloidin. The Triple Label column is a merge of the three images. Purple indicates colocalization of Rab11-FIP2 and Rab11a. White indicates colocalization of Rab11-FIP2, Rab11a, and actin. White bar equals 2 µm. These results are representative of at least 3 separate experiments.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The positioning of individual Rab proteins on discrete vesicle populations suggests their importance in regulating unique trafficking pathways. Previous studies have suggested that Rab proteins may organize multiprotein complexes associated with specific vesicle trafficking pathways. For example, early endosome fusion events mediated by Rab5 and the Rab5 effectors Early Endosomal Antigen-1 (EEA-1) and rabaptin-5 provided a model for SNARE tethering and vesicle fusion in early endosomes (38-41). Golgi complex organization and intra-Golgi transport may be directed by Rab6 and its microtubule-associating effector rabkinesin-6 (3, 42). Similarly, the association of Rab11a with myosin Vb coupled with the effects of the tail of myosin Vb in reducing transferrin and IgA trafficking indicated the importance of myosin Vb and possibly Rab11a in plasma membrane recycling systems (24). We sought to identify other proteins that interact with Rab11a to characterize further protein complexes that mediate the effects of Rab11a on vesicle trafficking through plasma membrane recycling systems. The results presented here indicate that interaction of Rab11a with a family of Rab11a-interacting proteins may account for complexities observed in the trafficking of cargoes recycling to plasma membranes.

The present studies demonstrate that Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 are members of a family of interacting proteins that bind Rab11a through an amphipathic alpha -helical motif not present in either myosin Vb or Rab11BP/rabphilin-11. Amphipathic alpha -helices are known to participate in protein/protein interactions (32). In yeast two-hybrid assays and blot overlays, deletion of the carboxyl-terminal alpha -helix abolished Rab11a binding. In addition, a peptide containing the carboxyl-terminal alpha -helix could compete for Rab11a binding in blot overlays. The presence of a conserved Rab11a binding domain in these four structurally diverse proteins of likely disparate function indicates the complexity of steps involved in membrane recycling.

As reported previously (24) for myosin Vb, Rab11-FIP family members can interact with the GTP-bound forms of all three Rab11 family members Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab25. The binding of Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 was specific for the Rab11 family, since yeast two-hybrid association assays indicate no binding with Rab2, Rab3a, Rab3b, Rab5, or Rab8a. In addition, gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab3a and gamma -35S-GTP-labeled Rab5 overlay experiments also showed no binding to recombinant Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, or Rab11-FIP3. Although all four interacting proteins associated with the dominant active form of Rab11a (Rab11aS20V), only Rab11-FIP2 interacted with the dominant negative Rab11a (Rab11aS25N). These latter results may indicate the existence of a new class of Rab11 chaperone molecules characterized by Rab11-FIP2 which function irrespective of Rab activation status.

As with pp75/Rip11 (25), Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and GFP-Rab11-FIP3 colocalized with Rab11a in HeLa cells. In MDCK cells, Rab11-FIP1 and pp75/Rip11 were colocalized on the apical recycling endosome system with GFP-Rab11a. Rab11-FIP2 was also sub-apically located with Rab11a, but colocalization was incomplete, and we observed Rab11-FIP2 staining in regions where Rab11a was not present. Interestingly, as observed previously with myosin Vb (24), Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 all dispersed upon treatment with nocodazole and moved to the apical corners upon treatment with taxol. Similarly in taxol-treated MDCK cells, while the majority of stained Rab11-FIP2 did colocalize with Rab11a in sub-apical corners, a significant subset of the immunoreactivity stained an annular region adjacent to the tight junctions where Rab11a immunoreactivity was not observed. This evidence supports a functional association between Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 with Rab11a based on their dynamic codistribution with Rab11a-containing vesicles. The somewhat different distribution of Rab11-FIP2 may indicate the presence of different functions for Rab11-FIP2 in polarized cells. This difference in distribution of Rab11-FIP2 could also reflect its potential association with different pools of nucleotide-bound Rab11 family members.

The results presented demonstrate that Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 are all enriched with H+K+-ATPase and Rab11a in gastric parietal cell tubulovesicle fractions. The gastric parietal cell represents the most highly developed example of an apical recycling system (43). The major function of the parietal cell, regulated acid secretion, utilizes the second messenger-dependent activation of intracellular tubulovesicle fusion with an intracellular canalicular target membrane to deliver H+K+-ATPase to the apical lumen of the stomach. We have demonstrated previously that parietal cell tubulovesicles are highly enriched in Rab11a and also contain Rab25 (13, 44). Duman et al. (20) reported that a dominant negative form of Rab11a (Rab11aN124I) inhibited H+K+-ATPase recruitment to the secretory canaliculus. We have also noted that when parietal cells are stimulated, Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase translocate to the expanded apical canalicular membrane (19). In the present studies, Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 also translocated to the secretory canaliculus with Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase, respectively. Maintenance of these Rab11a-associated proteins with the H+K+-ATPase-containing membranes after fusion suggests the existence of a functional recycling complex that is highly specialized for apical recycling in the parietal cells.

How can three different Rab proteins (Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab25) within the same cell associate with at least 5 interacting proteins (Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, pp75/Rip11, and myosin Vb) and establish specific pathways for each member of the Rab11 family? Several possibilities exist. First, different pools of Rab11a, Rab11b, or Rab25 containing vesicles may be spatially segregated within a tubulovesicular compartment, or they may associate with other as yet unidentified interacting proteins performing more highly specialized functions. Second, we have observed that Rab11a has the ability to oligomerize.2 Oligomerized Rab11a could associate with multiple interacting partners performing various different functions. Thus Rab11a could be the nidus for the assembly of a multiprotein effector complex. A final explanation is that Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, Rab11-FIP3, and pp75/Rip11 all bind Rab11a, Rab11b, or Rab25, but their binding may be reserved for different functions oriented in time. Such interactions could then be regulated by either differences in in situ binding affinities or alterations in binding due to post-translational modifications, as postulated for pp75/Rip11 (25).

In summary, we have identified a family of four proteins that can associate with Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab25. The interaction with Rab11a is dependent upon a carboxyl-terminal amphipathic alpha -helix (Rab11 binding domain). Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 colocalize on plasma membrane recycling system vesicles with Rab11a in both non-polarized HeLa cells and polarized MDCK cells, whereas GFP-Rab11-FIP3 colocalizes with Rab11a in HeLa cells. In addition, Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2, and pp75/Rip11 coenrich with Rab11a and H+K+-ATPase in gastric tubulovesicle fractions. Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2 translocate with Rab11a and the H+K+-ATPase upon stimulating parietal cells with histamine. These results suggest that association of Rab11a with a number of protein regulators is required for the complex regulation of plasma membrane recycling systems.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Angela Wandinger-Ness and Johan Peranen for the Rab8a plasmids and Marianne Wessling-Resnick for the Rab 5 plasmids.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by NIDDK Grants DK48370 and DK43405 (to J. R. G.) from the National Institutes of Health, a Veterans Affairs Merit award, and NIAID Grant AI47859 (to E. K. L. C.) from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Both authors contributed equally to this work.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, CB-2803, Medical College of Georgia, 1120 Fifteenth St., Augusta, GA 30912-3175. Tel.: 706-721-8730; Fax: 706-721-7915; E-mail: jgolden@mail.mcg.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 8, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104831200

2 J. R. Goldenring, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney; GFP, green fluorescent protein; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta -D-galactopyranoside.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Novick, P., and Zerial, M. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 496-504[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Chavrier, P., Parton, R. G., Hauri, H. P., Simons, K., and Zerial, M. (1990) Cell 62, 317-329[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Martinez, O., Schmidt, A., Salamero, J., Hoflack, B., Roa, M. A., and Goud, B. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 1575-1588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Peranen, J., Auvinen, P., Virta, H., Wepf, R., and Simons, K. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 153-167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Bucci, C., Parton, R. G., Mather, I. H., Stunnenberg, H., Simons, K., Hoflack, B., and Zerial, M. (1992) Cell 70, 715-728[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Wang, X., Kumar, R., Navarre, J., Casanova, J. E., and Goldenring, J. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 29138-29146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Casanova, J. E., Wang, X., Kumar, R., Bhartur, S. G., Navarre, J., Woodrum, J. E., Ray, G. S., and Goldenring, J. R. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 47-61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Ullrich, O., Reinsch, S., Urbe, S., Zerial, M., and Parton, R. G. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 913-924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Kikuchi, A., Yamashita, T., Kawata, M., Yamamoto, K., Ikeda, K., Tanimoto, T., and Takai, Y. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 2897-2904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Sakurada, K., Uchida, K., Yamaguchi, K., Aisaka, K., Ito, S., Ohmori, T., Takeyama, Y., Ueda, T., Hori, Y., Chyanagi, H., Saitoh, Y., Kaibuchi, K., and Takai, Y. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 177, 1224-1232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Chavrier, P., Vingron, M., Sander, C., Simons, K., and Zerial, M. (1990) Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 6578-6585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Chavrier, P., Simons, K., and Zerial, M. (1992) Gene (Amst.) 112, 261-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Goldenring, J. R., Soroka, C. J., Shen, K. R., Tang, L. H., Rodriguez, W., Vaughan, H. D., Stoch, S. A., and Modlin, I. M. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 267, G187-G194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Drivas, G. T., Shih, A., Coutevas, E. E., D'Eustachio, P., and Rush, M. G. (1991) Oncogene 6, 3-9[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Bhartur, S. G., Calhoun, B. C., Woodrum, J., Kurkjian, J., Iyer, S., Lai, F., and Goldenring, J. R. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269, 611-617[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Goldenring, J. R., Smith, J., Vaughan, H. D., Cameron, P., Hawkins, W., and Navarre, J. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, G515-G525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Green, E. G., Ramm, E., Riley, N. M., Spiro, D. J., Goldenring, J. R., and Wessling-Resnick, M. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 239, 612-616[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Ren, X., Xu, G., Zeng, J., De Lemos-Chiarandini, C., Adesnik, M., and Sabatini, D. D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 6187-6192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Calhoun, B. C., Lapierre, L. A., Chew, C. S., and Goldenring, J. R. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, C163-C170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Duman, J. G., Tyagarajan, K., Kolsi, M. S., Moore, H. H., and Forte, J. G. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, C361-C372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Cox, D., Lee, D. J., Dale, B. M., Calafat, J., and Greenberg, S. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 680-685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Zeng, X., Ren, M., Gravotta, D., De Lemos-Chiarandini, C., Lui, M., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Xu, G., Shen, T. H., Morimoto, T., Adesnick, M., and Sabatini, D. D. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 2840-2845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Mammoto, A., Ohtsuka, T., Hotta, I., Sasaki, T., and Takai, Y. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 25517-25524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Lapierre, L. A., Kumar, R., Hales, C. M., Navarre, J., Bhartur, S. G., Burnette, J. O., Mercer, J. A., Bahler, M., and Goldenring, J. R. (2001) Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1843-1857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Prekeris, R., Klumperman, J., and Scheller, R. H. (2000) Mol. Cell 6, 1437-1448[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Wang, D., Buyon, J. P., Zhu, W., and Chan, E. K. L. (1999) J. Clin. Invest. 104, 1265-1275[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Carr, D. W., Hausken, Z. E., Fraser, I. D. C., Stofko-Hahn, R. E., and Scott, J. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13376-13382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Basson, M. D., Goldenring, J. R., Tang, L. H., Lewis, J. J., Padfield, P., Jamieson, J. D., and Modlin, I. M. (1991) Biochem. J. 279, 43-48
29. Apodaca, G., Katz, L. A., and Mostov, K. E. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 125, 67-86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Chew, C. S., Ljungstrom, M., Smolka, A., and Brown, M. R. (1989) Am. J. Physiol. 256, G254-G263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Soroka, C. J., Chew, C. S., Modlin, I. M., Hanzel, D., Smolka, A., and Goldenring, J. R. (1993) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 60, 76-87[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Colledge, M., and Scott, J. D. (1999) Trends Cell Biol. 9, 216-221[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Nagase, T., Ishikawa, K., Suyama, M., Kikuno, R., Hirosawa, M., Miyajima, N., Tanaka, A., Kotani, H., Nomura, N., and Ohara, O. (1999) DNA Res. 6, 63-70[Abstract]
34. Ishikawa, K., Nagase, T., Suyama, M., Miyajima, N., Tanaka, A., Kotani, H., Nomura, N., and Ohara, O. (1998) DNA Res. 5, 169-176[Abstract]
35. Nagase, T., Ishikawa, K., Suyama, M., Kikuno, R., Hirosawa, M., Miyajima, N., Tanaka, A., Kotani, H., Nomura, N., and Ohara, O. (1998) DNA Res. 5, 355-364[Abstract]
36. Deleted in proof
37. Deleted in proof
38. Christoforidis, S., McBride, H. M., Burgoyne, R. D., and Zerial, M. (1999) Nature 397, 621-625[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Simonsen, A., Gaullier, J. M., D'Arrigo, A., and Stenmark, H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28857-28860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. McBride, H. M., Rybin, V., Murphy, C., Giner, A., Teasdale, R., and Zerial, M. (1999) Cell 98, 377-386[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Stenmark, H., Vitale, G., Ullrich, O., and Zerial, M. (1995) Cell 83, 423-432[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Echard, A., Jollivet, F., Maritnez, O., Lacapere, J. J., Rousselet, A., Janoueix-Lerosey, I., and Goud, B. (1998) Science 279, 580-585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Forte, J. G., and Yao, X. (1996) Trends Cell Biol. 6, 45-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Goldenring, J. R., Shen, K. R., Vaughn, H. D., and Modlin, I. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18419-18422[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Jovic, F. Kieken, N. Naslavsky, P. L. Sorgen, and S. Caplan
Eps15 Homology Domain 1-associated Tubules Contain Phosphatidylinositol-4-Phosphate and Phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-Bisphosphate and Are Required for Efficient Recycling
Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2009; 20(11): 2731 - 2743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
K. Sugawara, T. Shibasaki, A. Mizoguchi, T. Saito, and S. Seino
Rab11 and its effector Rip11 participate in regulation of insulin granule exocytosis.
Genes Cells, April 1, 2009; 14(4): 445 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
E. Schonteich, G. M. Wilson, J. Burden, C. R. Hopkins, K. Anderson, J. R. Goldenring, and R. Prekeris
The Rip11/Rab11-FIP5 and kinesin II complex regulates endocytic protein recycling
J. Cell Sci., November 15, 2008; 121(22): 3824 - 3833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
P. T. Caswell, M. Chan, A. J. Lindsay, M. W. McCaffrey, D. Boettiger, and J. C. Norman
Rab-coupling protein coordinates recycling of {alpha}5{beta}1 integrin and EGFR1 to promote cell migration in 3D microenvironments
J. Cell Biol., October 6, 2008; 183(1): 143 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. J. Utley, N. A. Ducharme, V. Varthakavi, B. E. Shepherd, P. J. Santangelo, M. E. Lindquist, J. R. Goldenring, and J. E. Crowe Jr.
Respiratory syncytial virus uses a Vps4-independent budding mechanism controlled by Rab11-FIP2
PNAS, July 22, 2008; 105(29): 10209 - 10214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
M. Fukuda, E. Kanno, K. Ishibashi, and T. Itoh
Large Scale Screening for Novel Rab Effectors Reveals Unexpected Broad Rab Binding Specificity
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, June 1, 2008; 7(6): 1031 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
H. Zhang, J. M. Squirrell, and J. G. White
RAB-11 Permissively Regulates Spindle Alignment by Modulating Metaphase Microtubule Dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans Early Embryos
Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2008; 19(6): 2553 - 2565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
C.-M. Chow, H. Neto, C. Foucart, and I. Moore
Rab-A2 and Rab-A3 GTPases Define a trans-Golgi Endosomal Membrane Domain in Arabidopsis That Contributes Substantially to the Cell Plate
PLANT CELL, January 1, 2008; 20(1): 101 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
C. Cortes, K. A. Rzomp, A. Tvinnereim, M. A. Scidmore, and B. Wizel
Chlamydia pneumoniae Inclusion Membrane Protein Cpn0585 Interacts with Multiple Rab GTPases
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2007; 75(12): 5586 - 5596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
K. A. Swanson, D. D. Crane, and H. D. Caldwell
Chlamydia trachomatis Species-Specific Induction of Ezrin Tyrosine Phosphorylation Functions in Pathogen Entry
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2007; 75(12): 5669 - 5677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
G. I. Welsh, S. E. Leney, B. Lloyd-Lewis, M. Wherlock, A. J. Lindsay, M. W. McCaffrey, and J. M. Tavare
Rip11 is a Rab11- and AS160-RabGAP-binding protein required for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes
J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2007; 120(23): 4197 - 4208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
N. A. Ducharme, J. A. Williams, A. Oztan, G. Apodaca, L. A. Lapierre, and J. R. Goldenring
Rab11-FIP2 regulates differentiable steps in transcytosis
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): C1059 - C1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. T. Roland, A. K. Kenworthy, J. Peranen, S. Caplan, and J. R. Goldenring
Myosin Vb Interacts with Rab8a on a Tubular Network Containing EHD1 and EHD3
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2007; 18(8): 2828 - 2837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
B. X. Li, A. K. Satoh, and D. F. Ready
Myosin V, Rab11, and dRip11 direct apical secretion and cellular morphogenesis in developing Drosophila photoreceptors
J. Cell Biol., May 21, 2007; 177(4): 659 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
L. A. Lapierre, K. M. Avant, C. M. Caldwell, A.-J. L. Ham, S. Hill, J. A. Williams, A. J. Smolka, and J. R. Goldenring
Characterization of immunoisolated human gastric parietal cells tubulovesicles: identification of regulators of apical recycling
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): G1249 - G1262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Shiba, H. Koga, H.-W. Shin, M. Kawasaki, R. Kato, K. Nakayama, and S. Wakatsuki
Structural basis for Rab11-dependent membrane recruitment of a family of Rab11-interacting protein 3 (FIP3)/Arfophilin-1
PNAS, October 17, 2006; 103(42): 15416 - 15421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Wakabayashi, H. Kipp, and I. M. Arias
Transporters on Demand: Intracellular Reservoirs and Cycling of Bile Canalicular ABC Transporters
J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 27669 - 27673.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
N. L. Prigozhina and C. M. Waterman-Storer
Decreased polarity and increased random motility in PtK1 epithelial cells correlate with inhibition of endosomal recycling.
J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2006; 119(Pt 17): 3571 - 3582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
N. A. Ducharme, C. M. Hales, L. A. Lapierre, A.-J. L. Ham, A. Oztan, G. Apodaca, and J. R. Goldenring
MARK2/EMK1/Par-1B{alpha} Phosphorylation of Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 2 Is Necessary for the Timely Establishment of Polarity in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2006; 17(8): 3625 - 3637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M.-F. Lise, T. P. Wong, A. Trinh, R. M. Hines, L. Liu, R. Kang, D. J. Hines, J. Lu, J. R. Goldenring, Y. T. Wang, et al.
Involvement of Myosin Vb in Glutamate Receptor Trafficking
J. Biol. Chem., February 10, 2006; 281(6): 3669 - 3678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. F. J. van de Graaf, Q. Chang, A. R. Mensenkamp, J. G. J. Hoenderop, and R. J. M. Bindels
Direct Interaction with Rab11a Targets the Epithelial Ca2+ Channels TRPV5 and TRPV6 to the Plasma Membrane
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2006; 26(1): 303 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
N. Naslavsky, J. Rahajeng, M. Sharma, M. Jovic, and S. Caplan
Interactions between EHD Proteins and Rab11-FIP2: A Role for EHD3 in Early Endosomal Transport
Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2006; 17(1): 163 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Swiatecka-Urban, A. Brown, S. Moreau-Marquis, J. Renuka, B. Coutermarsh, R. Barnaby, K. H. Karlson, T. R. Flotte, M. Fukuda, G. M. Langford, et al.
The Short Apical Membrane Half-life of Rescued {Delta}F508-Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Results from Accelerated Endocytosis of {Delta}F508-CFTR in Polarized Human Airway Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 4, 2005; 280(44): 36762 - 36772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Hamelin, C. Theriault, G. Laroche, and J.-L. Parent
The Intracellular Trafficking of the G Protein-coupled Receptor TP{beta} Depends on a Direct Interaction with Rab11
J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 36195 - 36205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
V S Patil, G Sachdeva, D N Modi, R R Katkam, D D Manjramkar, I Hinduja, and C P Puri
Rab coupling protein (RCP): a novel target of progesterone action in primate endometrium
J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 35(2): 357 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
B. S. Hall, E. Smith, W. Langer, L. A. Jacobs, D. Goulding, and M. C. Field
Developmental Variation in Rab11-Dependent Trafficking in Trypanosoma brucei
Eukaryot. Cell, May 1, 2005; 4(5): 971 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
G. M. Wilson, A. B. Fielding, G. C. Simon, X. Yu, P. D. Andrews, R. S. Hames, A. M. Frey, A. A. Peden, G. W. Gould, and R. Prekeris
The FIP3-Rab11 Protein Complex Regulates Recycling Endosome Targeting to the Cleavage Furrow during Late Cytokinesis
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 849 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X.-M. Zhang, S. Ellis, A. Sriratana, C. A. Mitchell, and T. Rowe
Sec15 Is an Effector for the Rab11 GTPase in Mammalian Cells
J. Biol. Chem., October 8, 2004; 279(41): 43027 - 43034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
A. J. Lindsay and M. W. McCaffrey
The C2 domains of the class I Rab11 family of interacting proteins target recycling vesicles to the plasma membrane
J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2004; 117(19): 4365 - 4375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. R. Junutula, E. Schonteich, G. M. Wilson, A. A. Peden, R. H. Scheller, and R. Prekeris
Molecular Characterization of Rab11 Interactions with Members of the Family of Rab11-interacting Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33430 - 33437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. A. Peden, E. Schonteich, J. Chun, J. R. Junutula, R. H. Scheller, and R. Prekeris
The RCP-Rab11 Complex Regulates Endocytic Protein Sorting
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2004; 15(8): 3530 - 3541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
D. Hoekstra, D. Tyteca, and S. C. D. van IJzendoorn
The subapical compartment: a traffic center in membrane polarity development
J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2004; 117(11): 2183 - 2192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. R. Junutula, A. M. De Maziere, A. A. Peden, K. E. Ervin, R. J. Advani, S. M. van Dijk, J. Klumperman, and R. H. Scheller
Rab14 Is Involved in Membrane Trafficking between the Golgi Complex and Endosomes
Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2004; 15(5): 2218 - 2229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
G.-H. Fan, L. A. Lapierre, J. R. Goldenring, J. Sai, and A. Richmond
Rab11-Family Interacting Protein 2 and Myosin Vb Are Required for CXCR2 Recycling and Receptor-mediated Chemotaxis
Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2004; 15(5): 2456 - 2469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
N. Naslavsky, M. Boehm, P. S. Backlund Jr., and S. Caplan
Rabenosyn-5 and EHD1 Interact and Sequentially Regulate Protein Recycling to the Plasma Membrane
Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2004; 15(5): 2410 - 2422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
P. de Graaf, W. T. Zwart, R. A.J. van Dijken, M. Deneka, T. K.F. Schulz, N. Geijsen, P. J. Coffer, B. M. Gadella, A. J. Verkleij, P. van der Sluijs, et al.
Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase{beta} Is Critical for Functional Association of rab11 with the Golgi Complex
Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2004; 15(4): 2038 - 2047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Pasqualato, F. Senic-Matuglia, L. Renault, B. Goud, J. Salamero, and J. Cherfils
The Structural GDP/GTP Cycle of Rab11 Reveals a Novel Interface Involved in the Dynamics of Recycling Endosomes
J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 2004; 279(12): 11480 - 11488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. C. Brock, J. R. Goldenring, and J. E. Crowe Jr.
Apical recycling systems regulate directional budding of respiratory syncytial virus from polarized epithelial cells
PNAS, December 9, 2003; 100(25): 15143 - 15148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. V. Khvotchev, M. Ren, S. Takamori, R. Jahn, and T. C. Sudhof
Divergent Functions of Neuronal Rab11b in Ca2+-Regulated versus Constitutive Exocytosis
J. Neurosci., November 19, 2003; 23(33): 10531 - 10539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
B. Riggs, W. Rothwell, S. Mische, G. R.X. Hickson, J. Matheson, T. S. Hays, G. W. Gould, and W. Sullivan
Actin cytoskeleton remodeling during early Drosophila furrow formation requires recycling endosomal components Nuclear-fallout and Rab11
J. Cell Biol., October 13, 2003; 163(1): 143 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
K. A. Rzomp, L. D. Scholtes, B. J. Briggs, G. R. Whittaker, and M. A. Scidmore
Rab GTPases Are Recruited to Chlamydial Inclusions in Both a Species-Dependent and Species-Independent Manner
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2003; 71(10): 5855 - 5870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Tani, M. Shibata, K. Kawase, H. Kawashima, K. Hatsuzawa, M. Nagahama, and M. Tagaya
Mapping of Functional Domains of gamma -SNAP
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 13531 - 13538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. M. Hales, J.-P. Vaerman, and J. R. Goldenring
Rab11 Family Interacting Protein 2 Associates with Myosin Vb and Regulates Plasma Membrane Recycling
J. Biol. Chem., December 20, 2002; 277(52): 50415 - 50421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. N. Cullis, B. Philip, J. D. Baleja, and L. A. Feig
Rab11-FIP2, an Adaptor Protein Connecting Cellular Components Involved in Internalization and Recycling of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 49158 - 49166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. M. Meyers and R. Prekeris
Formation of Mutually Exclusive Rab11 Complexes with Members of the Family of Rab11-interacting Proteins Regulates Rab11 Endocytic Targeting and Function
J. Biol. Chem., December 6, 2002; 277(50): 49003 - 49010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. A. Volpicelli, J. J. Lah, G. Fang, J. R. Goldenring, and A. I. Levey
Rab11a and Myosin Vb Regulate Recycling of the M4 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor
J. Neurosci., November 15, 2002; 22(22): 9776 - 9784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Fukuda and T. S. Kuroda
Slac2-c (Synaptotagmin-like Protein Homologue Lacking C2 Domains-c), a Novel Linker Protein that Interacts with Rab27, Myosin Va/VIIa, and Actin
J. Biol. Chem., November 1, 2002; 277(45): 43096 - 43103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. J. Lindsay and M. W. McCaffrey
Rab11-FIP2 Functions in Transferrin Recycling and Associates with Endosomal Membranes via Its COOH-terminal Domain
J. Biol. Chem., July 19, 2002; 277(30): 27193 - 27199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
X. Wu, F. Wang, K. Rao, J. R. Sellers, and J. A. Hammer III
Rab27a Is an Essential Component of Melanosome Receptor for Myosin Va
Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2002; 13(5): 1735 - 1749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. J. Lindsay, A. G. Hendrick, G. Cantalupo, F. Senic-Matuglia, B. Goud, C. Bucci, and M. W. McCaffrey
Rab Coupling Protein (RCP), a Novel Rab4 and Rab11 Effector Protein
J. Biol. Chem., March 29, 2002; 277(14): 12190 - 12199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/42/39067    most recent
M104831200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hales, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldenring, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hales, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldenring, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement