|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106841200 on August 16, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 43, 39553-39561, October 26, 2001
Diversity in Mechanisms of Substrate Oxidation by Cytochrome P450
2D6
LACK OF AN ALLOSTERIC ROLE OF NADPH-CYTOCHROME P450 REDUCTASE IN
CATALYTIC REGIOSELECTIVITY*
Imad H.
Hanna ,
Joel A.
Krauser§,
Hongliang
Cai¶,
Mi-Sook
Kim , and
F. Peter
Guengerich**
From the Department of Biochemistry and Center in Molecular
Toxicology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine,
Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0146
Received for publication, July 19, 2001, and in revised form, August 15, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cytochrome P450 (P450) 2D6 was first
identified as the polymorphic human debrisoquine hydroxylase and
subsequently shown to catalyze the oxidation of a variety of drugs
containing a basic nitrogen. Differences in the regioselectivity of
oxidation products formed in systems containing NADPH-P450
reductase/NADPH and the model oxidant cumene hydroperoxide have been
proposed by others to be due to an allosteric influence of the
reductase on P450 2D6 (Modi, S., Gilham, D. E., Sutcliffe, M. J., Lian, L.-Y., Primrose, W. U., Wolf, C. R., and Roberts,
G. C. K. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 4461-4470). We
examined the differences in the formation of oxidation products of
N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine, metoprolol,
and bufuralol between reductase-, cumene hydroperoxide-, and
iodosylbenzene-supported systems. Catalytic regioselectivity was not
influenced by the presence of the reductase in any of the systems
supported by model oxidants, ruling out allosteric influences. The
presence of the reductase had little effect on the affinity of P450 2D6
for any of these three substrates. The addition of the reaction
remnants of the model oxidants (cumyl alcohol and iodobenzene) to the
reductase-supported system did not affect reaction patterns, arguing
against steric influences of these products on catalytic
regioselectivity. Label from H218O was
quantitatively incorporated into 1'-hydroxybufuralol in the
iodosylbenzene- but not in the reductase- or cumene
hydroperoxide-supported reactions. We conclude that the P450 systems
utilizing NADPH-P450 reductase, cumene hydroperoxide, and
iodosylbenzene use similar but distinct chemical mechanisms. These
differences are the basis for the variable product distributions, not
an allosteric influence of the reductase.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
P4501 enzymes (also
termed "heme-thiolate protein P450"; Ref. 1) are involved in the
oxidations of many organic chemicals (2-4). The P450 enzymes are found
in nearly all life forms, but there has been particular interest in the
mammalian P450 enzymes that dominate the metabolism of drugs (5). P450s
constitute an important target in pharmacogenomic efforts because
variation among individual humans can have a major influence on the
efficacy of drugs (6).
P450 2D6 was first identified as the polymorphic enzyme involved in
debrisoquine hydroxylation (7) and sparteine oxidation (8). This enzyme
is involved in the metabolism of approximately one third of the drugs
used today (5). P450 2D6 polymorphism is relatively well understood
today (9-11), and our own efforts have been directed to better
understanding the biochemical basis of P450 2D6 activity. In our early
research with purified P450 2D6 (12), the observation was made that
most of the substrates of P450 2D6 contain a basic nitrogen atom, which
is located ~5 Å away from the site of oxidation (13, 14). This
concept was developed with more detailed pharmacophore and homology
models for P450 2D6 (15-18).
A problem in modeling of P450 2D6 arose with the report of Modi
et al. (19) that differences were observed between MPTP oxidations catalyzed by P450 2D6 supported with the usual
NADPH/NADPH-P450 reductase/O2 system and with the
model oxidant ("oxygen surrogate") CuOOH. The authors
interpreted the differences in product distribution as evidence for an
allosteric role of NADPH-P450 reductase in orienting the substrate, and
some evidence for this view was obtained with NMR relaxation studies of
MPTP bound to ferric P450 2D6 (19).
We investigated the issue of possible allosterism imposed by NADPH-P450
reductase, in the context of our general interest in the cooperativity
of other P450s, particularly P450s 3A4 (20, 21) and 1A2 (22). We find
that some product profiles differ for P450 2D6 oxidations of the
substrates MPTP, metoprolol, and bufuralol supported by NADPH-P450
reductase and the oxygen surrogates CuOOH and PhIO, as in the case of
some other P450s (23-27). These differences were found not to be due
to any effect of NADPH-P450 reductase or to steric interaction of the
P450 2D6 substrates with reaction remnants of the oxygen surrogates,
but they are attributable to inherent chemical differences in the
systems as revealed with H218O studies in the
case of PhIO. Another conclusion regarding the pharmacophore models is
that they have limited ability to predict sites of oxidation for a
typical drug substrate, bufuralol, where oxidation by P450 2D6 was
shown to generate multiple products.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Caution!--
MPTP is a potent neurotoxin and should be handled
with gloves and use of other appropriate precautions. CuOOH can be
explosive (86).
Chemicals--
Bufuralol·HCl and 1'-hydroxybufuralol were
generous gifts of Hoffman-LaRoche (Nutley, NJ). Metoprolol·HCl,
Escherichia coli superoxide dismutase, and
L- -dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine were
obtained from Sigma. Quinidine·HSO4, PTP, and
iodosylbenzene diacetate were purchased from Aldrich. Metoprolol
oxidation products (O-demethylmetoprolol and
-hydroxymetoprolol) were gifts from Astra Hässle AB
(Mölndal, Sweden). MPTP was a gift of N. Catagnoli, Jr. (Virginia
Polytechnic University, Blacksburg, VA). Bovine liver catalase (Sigma)
was dialyzed prior to use to remove the preservative thymol. CuOOH was
obtained from Aldrich and purified by extraction with alkali as
described (28) prior to use. PhIO was prepared by the alkaline
hydrolysis of the diacetate (29) and stored at 20 °C.
MPTP-OH was synthesized by the condensation of phenol with
1-methyl-4-piperidone in CH3CO2H/HCl solution
as described (30): 1H NMR (dimethyl
sulfoxide-d6) 2.27 (s, 3H,
NCH3), 2.53 (t, 2H,
CH2CH2N), 2.98 (d, 2H,
CHCH2N), 3.35 (m, 2H,
CH2CH2N) 5.97 (t, 1H,
CHCH2N), 6.71 (d, 2H, Ar), 7.23 (d, 2H, Ar),
9.40 (s, 1H, OH); MS m/z 190.1 (MH+).
Enzymes--
The cDNA sequence of P450 2D6 (DB6) (31) was
modified by polymerase chain reaction to incorporate a C-terminal
(His)5 peptide (32).2 The modified protein
was expressed in E. coli (MV1304 strain) in the presence of
1.0 mg of chloramphenicol liter 1 (35). Expressed P450 2D6
was purified by Ni2+-immobilized metal affinity
chromatography as described (32, 36). Rat NADPH-P450 reductase was
expressed in E. coli (TOPP 3 strain) containing the plasmid
pOR263 (37) and purified as described elsewhere (36, 38).
Oxidation Assays--
Standard oxidation reactions with
bufuralol, MPTP, and metoprolol were conducted in 0.5-ml final volumes
of 0.10 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing
P450 2D6 (0.25 nmol), NADPH-P450 reductase (0.5 nmol), and freshly
sonicated
L- -dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (30 µg). In previous work with this recombinant P450 2D6 enzyme, these
concentrations of the reductase and phospholipid were found to be
optimal for bufuralol 1'-hydroxylation activity (32). Final substrate
concentrations were 0.10, 1.0, and 0.20 mM for bufuralol,
MPTP, and metoprolol, respectively. The mixtures were incubated for 3 min at 37 °C and the reactions were started by the addition of an
NADPH-generating system (1.0 mM NADP+, 10 mM glucose 6-phosphate, and 1 unit of yeast
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase ml 1) (39). In order to
prevent heme destruction due to the generation of reactive oxygen
species during catalysis, the reaction mixtures were supplemented with
catalase and E. coli superoxide dismutase (1000 units and 20 µg, respectively) (40). Incubations were carried out for 10 min at
37 °C and were quenched by the addition of 50 µl of 60%
HClO4. Bufuralol and metoprolol reaction mixtures were
centrifuged (3000 × g, 10 min) to sediment the
precipitated proteins and salts, and aliquots of the recovered
supernatants were directly injected onto an HPLC system for analysis.
CuOOH- and PhIO-supported P450 2D6 Oxidation of MPTP, Metoprolol,
and Bufuralol--
Incubations were carried out essentially as
described above except for the exclusion of the NADPH-generating
system, catalase, and superoxide dismutase. NADPH-P450 reductase was
included in some oxidation reactions to determine if it had any
allosteric effects on P450 2D6 during catalysis. Reactions were carried
out at 37 °C for 5-10 min and were initiated by the addition of
methanolic solutions of CuOOH or PhIO (final concentrations of 0.5 and
0.3 mM, respectively, and 1% CH3OH, v/v). (In
contrast to many other P450s (41), P450 2D6 shows considerable reaction
linearity in reactions supported by CuOOH (Ref. 42; as confirmed here).
HPLC Analysis--
Metoprolol oxidation mixtures were separated
isocratically on an octadecylsilane (C18) column (5 µm,
4.6 × 150 mm, ODS-AM, YMC, Wilmington, NC) using a 20 mM NaClO4 (pH 2.5)/CH3CN (3:2, v/v)
mixture (43). The flow rate was 2.0 ml min 1, and products
were detected fluorimetrically ( excitation 222 nm,
emission 300 nm). Products were identified by comparison of tR to those obtained with authentic
standards.3
Bufuralol oxidation mixtures were separated on a C18 column
(5 µm, 4.6 × 250 mm, ODS-AQ, YMC) using a linear gradient
beginning with 50% Buffer A (20 mM NaClO4 (pH
2.5)/CH3CN, 9:1, v/v) and 50% Buffer B (20 mM
NaClO4 (pH 2.5)/CH3CN, 3:2, v/v), changing to
100% Buffer B over 8 min. Elution was continued for an additional 5 min while holding at 100% Buffer B, followed by a 4-min recovery period to the initial conditions. The flow rate was 2.0 ml
min 1, and products were detected by UV measurements
(A254).
MPTP oxidation reactions were analyzed on a Whatman SCX column (10 µm, 4.6 × 250 mm, Whatman, Hillsboro, OR) as described elsewhere (A254 measurements) (45).
Spectroscopy and Ligand Binding Assays--
Absorbance spectra
were recorded using an Aminco DW2a/OLIS instrument (On-Line Instrument
Systems, Bogart, GA). The interaction of substrates with P450 2D6 was
examined by perturbation of the heme Soret spectra. P450 2D6 (2.0 µM) was included in a 1.0-ml cuvette containing 45 µM
L- -dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine and
0.10 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) (23 °C).
NADPH-P450 reductase was included at a concentration of 4.0 µM when indicated (a 2:1 ratio of reductase to P450 2D6
was found to be optimal in previous work (Ref. 32), and this ratio was
also used in the catalytic assays (see above)). A base line was
established from 350 to 500 nM, and sequential additions
(2-10 µl) of concentrated aqueous solutions of MPTP, metoprolol, or
bufuralol (HCl salts) were made, recording spectra each time.
Ks values were estimated by fitting plots of
A388-420 nm versus ligand
concentration (hyperbolic plots, using Graphpad Prism software,
Graphpad, San Diego, CA).
MS--
HPLC/electrospray MS studies on the determination of the
structure of 1',2'-dehydrobufuralol were performed using
a Finnigan TSQ 7000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Finnigan-MAT,
Sunnyvale, CA) operating in the positive ion mode with an electrospray
needle voltage of 4.5 kV. N2 was used as the sheath gas (70 p.s.i.) to assist nebulization and as the auxiliary gas (10 p.s.i.) to
assist with desolvation. The stainless steel capillary was heated to
200 °C, and the electrospray ionization interface and mass
spectrometer parameters were optimized to obtain maximum sensitivity.
The tube lens and the heated capillary were operated at 75 and 20 V,
respectively, and the electron multiplier was set at 1900 V. HPLC
conditions (Zorbax Rx-C8 octylsilane, 2.1 × 150 mm, Mac-Mod,
Chadds Ford, PA) were as follows: flow rate 0.2 ml min 1;
Solvent A, 20 mM
NH4CH3CO2/CH3CN (95:5,
v/v); Solvent B: 20 mM
NH4CH3CO2/CH3CN (5:95,
v/v); t = 0 min, 100% A; t = 12.5 min, 70% A; t = 20 min, 10% A; t = 22.5 min, 10% A; t = 25 min, 100% A; t = 30 min, 100% A.
MS studies for measurement of 18O incorporation into
1'-hydroxybufuralol were performed using same mass spectrometer,
source, and ion mode described above. The HPLC-isolated oxidation
products were concentrated to dryness under a stream of N2,
dissolved in 100 µl of CH3OH containing 1%
CH3CO2H (v/v), and directly infused into the
electrospray ionization source at a flow rate of 10 µl min 1. The optimized instrument parameters were as follow:
electrospray needle voltage 4 kV, sheath gas (N2) 40 p.s.i., capillary temperature 200 °C, capillary voltage 20 V, tube
lens 80 V, and electron multiplier voltage +1400 V.
 |
RESULTS |
Oxidation of MPTP by P450 2D6--
Initial experiments on the
possible allosteric effect of NADPH-P450 reductase on P450 2D6 were
done with MPTP because of previous reports of differences in the
product profiles obtained using oxidation systems supported with
NADPH-P450 reductase and CuOOH (19). Oxidation of MPTP resulted in the
formation of both the N-demethylated product PTP and the
ring-hydroxylated product MPTP-OH (Fig.
1) when supported by NADPH/NADPH-P450
reductase, CuOOH, or a mixture of the two (without NADPH). Only PTP was
obtained when the oxidation reaction was supported by PhIO (0.3 mM, results not shown). Supplementation of PhIO-supported
P450 2D6 MPTP oxidation reactions with PhI (remnant of PhIO cleavage;
Refs. 24 and 46) to concentrations as high as 0.2 mM did
not alter the regioselectivity of MPTP oxidation (results not shown).
The addition of NADPH-P450 reductase did not change the product profile
(i.e. PTP as only product) seen in the PhIO-supported
system.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Products of MPTP oxidation by P450 2D6
supported by NADPH/NADPH-P450 reductase or CuOOH. Oxidation
reactions were carried out as described under "Experimental
Procedures". A, Product profile obtained following the
CuOOH-supported reaction. B, Product profile obtained
following the CuOOH-supported reaction in the presence of the
reductase. C, Product profile obtained following the
NADPH/reductase-supported reaction (rates of formation of the
N-demethylated product (PTP) and phenol (MPTP-OH) were
3.7 and 1.8 min 1 (nmol P450) 1). The
identities of the products are indicated. Three other peaks were
present in the CuOOH reaction and were not identified
(tR 2.9, 3.3, and 6.3 min).
|
|
Oxidation of Metoprolol by P450 2D6--
Because the work with
MPTP did not show major differences in the distribution of products
from the NADPH-P450 reductase- and CuOOH-supported reactions, we
examined the distribution of the multiple products of oxidation of the
classic P450 2D6 substrate metoprolol (47). Oxidation of metoprolol
yielded two distinct products (O-demethylmetoprolol and
-hydroxymetoprolol) when the reaction was supported with the usual
NADPH/NADPH-P450 reductase system (Fig.
2A). Only one product,
O-demethylmetoprolol, was formed when the oxidation reaction
was supported by the oxygen surrogates CuOOH (Fig. 2B) or
PhIO (results not shown). In neither case did the inclusion of
NADPH-P450 reductase in CuOOH- or PhIO-supported reactions
significantly influence the composition of the oxidation products (Fig.
2C and other results not shown).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Products of metoprolol oxidation by P450 2D6
supported by NADPH-P450 reductase or CuOOH. A, Products
of reaction supported by NADPH and NADPH-P450 reductase. B,
Products of reaction supported by CuOOH. C, Products of
reaction supported by CuOOH in the presence of NADPH-P450
reductase.
|
|
Characterization of Bufuralol Oxidation Products--
Another
classic P450 2D6 substrate is bufuralol, which was utilized in the
original purifications of P450 2D6 from human liver (12, 48, 49). The
literature on P450 2D6 generally suggests that 1'-hydroxybufuralol is
the only product (12, 49, 50), which may be the result of the use of
fluorescence detection or lack of separation of the reaction products.
Bufuralol oxidation reaction mixtures were subjected to HPLC under
gradient elution conditions, and both UV (A254)
and fluorescence (F230/300) signals were
monitored. The identity of the 1'-hydroxy product was verified by
comparison of its mobility to that of an authentic standard. The
identities of 6- and 4-hydroxybufuralol were indirectly verified by
comparing their mobility and UV spectra to the P450 1A2 bufuralol oxidation products previously identified by MS and NMR (51).
Another significant product (peak 5 of Ref. 51), which
exhibited mobility similar to that of bufuralol, was yet unidentified (52). The product in question exhibited more intense fluorescence than
bufuralol, suggesting the generation of a compound with greater bond
conjugation. Relatively greater amounts of this product were obtained
when P450 2D6 oxidation reactions were supported with CuOOH as compared
with the usual NADPH/NADPH-P450 reductase system (see below). HPLC/MS
analysis of the unidentified product indicated an apparent
MH+ ion at m/z 260, 2 mass units less than the
parent compound bufuralol (m/z 262, MH+) (Fig.
3B).4
The UV spectrum of the unidentified product was different than that of
the parent compound (Fig. 3B) and identical to that of the
undefined M-5 peak described previously (51). The decrease of the
MH+ ion by 2 atomic mass units is consistent with only
either of two stable products, the 1',2'-olefin or an
oxidation of the carbinol present in the substrate, barring any unusual
rearrangement of the benzofuran ring system. The 1H NMR
spectrum (Fig. 3C) was similar to one of the unidentified components in the M-5 peak of the earlier work (51) and is a major
basis for assigning the 1',2'-olefin structure (Fig.
4). Key differences with the bufuralol spectrum (51) were the absence of the H-2' ( 1.3) and particularly the H-1' ( 2.9) signals from the ethyl group. The 1" carbinol was
not oxidized to a ketone because the H-2" protons are still present at
3.30 and 3.44. If a 1"-ketone were present, an upfield shift would
have been expected. The 1" carbinol multiplet appears at 5.50, and
subsequent experiments with another sample of this product indicated
that the carbinol OH proton was overlapped. The multiplet at 6.76 is assigned to the two olefinic protons and the 6.93 multiplet to
the H-1' olefinic proton; the apparent Jtrans
coupling constant of 12 Hz was useful in the assignment. The remaining
downfield protons are singlets (H-3, 7.10), doublets (H-4, 6, 7.11, 7.15), or multiplets (H-5, 7.37), displaced downfield because
of the increased conjugation with the aromatic system.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Identification of the
1',2'-desaturated-bufuralol
product. The product peak was collected following HPLC analysis of
bufuralol oxidation reactions (Fig. 3, tR 10.5 min). A, Electrospray MS analysis. B, UV spectra
of the desaturated product (unknown concentration), compared with that
of bufuralol (0.27 µM). C, 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz): 1.46 (9H, s, tert-butyl),
3.30 and 3.44 (2H, m, H-2" a and b), 5.50 (2H, m and bs, 1" and -OH),
6.76 (2H, m, H-2'), 6.93 (1H, m, H-1'), 7.10 (1H, s, H-3), 7.11 and
7.15 (2H, d, H-4 and -6), 7.37 (1H, m, H-5), and 9.5 (1H, bs, NH).
Other peaks are presumed to be unrelated because of lack of
connectivity.
|
|
Treatment of the product with NaBH4 under typical mild
conditions did not change the HPLC tR. If the
carbinol (1") had been oxidized to the ketone, bufuralol would have
been the product.
1'-Hydroxybufuralol did not yield the 1',2'-desaturated
product (i.e. due to dehydration) under the enzyme reaction
conditions. Thus, the olefin appears to be a direct oxidation product,
as in the case of other desaturation reactions catalyzed by P450s (4,
24, 54-56).
Oxidation Products of Bufuralol Formed in Different P450 2D6
Systems--
The demonstration of multiple products of bufuralol
oxidation by P450 2D6 (Fig. 4) provided an opportunity for further
comparisons of the NADPH-P450 reductase- and oxygen surrogate-supported
systems.5 The profiles
obtained with the NADPH-reductase-, CuOOH-, and PhIO-supported systems
were very different (Fig. 5). All of the products formed in the reductase-supported system were also formed with
CuOOH, but the ratios were different, with relatively less 4- and
6-hydroxybufuralol and more 1',2'-dehydrobufuralol (Fig.
5B). PhIO yielded mainly 1'-hydroxybufuralol and trace
6-hydroxybufuralol (Fig. 5C).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Products of bufuralol oxidation by P450.
Oxidation reactions were carried out as described in the Experimental
Procedures. A, Products of NADPH-P450 reductase-supported
reaction. The rate of 1'-hydroxybufuralol formation was 10.6 nmol
product formed min 1 (nmol P450 2D6) 1.
B, Products of reaction supported by CuOOH. C,
Products of reaction supported by PhIO. Products are indicated on the
chromatograms. Degradation products of CuOOH in Part B are
denoted "×".
|
|
The addition of NADPH-P450 reductase to the CuOOH-supported reaction
did not change the profile of bufuralol products (Fig. 6A). In a similar manner, the
addition of NADPH-P450 reductase to the PhIO-supported reaction did not
change the profile of bufuralol products (Fig. 6B).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Lack of effect of NADPH-P450 reductase on
profiles of bufuralol oxidation products generated with P450 2D6 and
oxygen surrogates. A, CuOOH; B, PhIO. In
both cases the chromatograms are offset by 0.5 min; the profile for the
reaction containing NADPH-P450 reductase is leading. Products are
identified on the chromatograms and (Part A) degradation
products of CuOOH are denoted "×" (also observed in absence of
bufuralol).
|
|
Spectral Estimation of Dissociation Constants with P450
2D6--
One approach to examination of the effect of NADPH-P450
reductase on P450 2D6/substrate interaction involves the measurement of
spectral dissociation constants. The binding of MPTP, metoprolol, or
bufuralol to P450 2D6 resulted in the formation of a typical "type
I" difference spectrum (21, 22), with a conversion of low spin to
high spin iron associated with the partial displacement of the distal
H2O ligand (Fig. 7,
A and B).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Binding of MPTP to P450 2D6 in the absence
and presence of NADPH-P450 reductase. A baseline was established
for P450 2D6 (2.0 µM) and increasing concentrations of
MPTP·HCl (in H2O) were added, in the absence (A) and
presence (B) of 4.0 µM NADPH-P450 reductase. The
alternating (solid and stippled) lines indicate the additions of MPTP
final concentrations of 5, 10, 15, 20, 29, 48, 68, 96, 125, 153, 182,
228, 284, 472, 660, 940, and 1400 µM (the final volume
increased from 1.00 to 1.074 ml, corrected for in the stated
concentrations). The A390-422 nm values from parts A
( ) and B ( ) are plotted versus the MPTP concentration
in part C: Ks = 29 ± 2 µM
(r2 = 0.986) for part A (minus NADPH-P450 reductase),
Ks = 22 ± 1 µM
(r2 = 0.991) for part B (plus NADPH-P450 reductase).
|
|
When such titrations were done with MPTP, the plots were nearly
superimposable (Ks 29 ± 2 µM
without reductase, 22 ± 1 µM with reductase) (Fig.
7C). The data obtained over a wide substrate range fit well
to a plot for a single hyperbola (r2 = 0.986 and
0.991).
Titrations with metoprolol (0-750 µM) also fit single
hyperbolas, with only a slight difference due to the presence of the reductase (Ks = 16.5 ± 0.5 µM, r2 = 0.998 without reductase;
Ks = 13.6 ± 0.2 µM,
r2 = 0.999 with reductase) (data not shown).
With bufuralol, a Ks of 8.1 ± 0.1 µM (r2 = 0.999) was estimated in
the absence of reductase and a Ks of 6.7 ± 0.1 µM (r2 = 0.999) was estimated
in the presence of the reductase. The addition of cumyl alcohol
(isopropylbenzyl alcohol, 500 µM), the major degradation
product resulting from heterolytic cleavage of CuOOH (64, 65), elicited
only a slight change in the spectrum. The subsequent titration of this
mixture yielded a Ks of 10.5 ± 0.1 µM (r2 = 0.999) for bufuralol,
only slightly different than for P450 2D6 devoid of cumyl alcohol.
Basis of Differences in Product Regioselectivity in NADPH-P450
Reductase- and Oxygen Surrogate-supported P450 2D6 Reactions--
In
the absence of any evidence for an allosteric effect of NADPH-P450
reductase as a basis for altering product distribution of P450 2D6
reactions, we considered two alternate possibilities, both of which
already have been proposed in the literature regarding other P450s (23,
24).
One explanation is that the remnant of the oxygen surrogate remains in
the active site (24, 58-60), due to inherent affinity, and as a result
steric hindrance influences the regioselectivity of oxidation of the
substrate. This view may have validity in the context of recent support
for the presence of multiple ligands in other P450s (21, 22, 61-63).
The major products of CuOOH and PhIO are cumyl alcohol (41, 64, 65) and
PhI (66), respectively. These compounds were added to NADPH-P450
reductase-supported P450 2D6 bufuralol oxidation systems at varying
concentrations up to and including those used for the oxygen surrogates
themselves; neither influenced product distribution (Fig.
8).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Lack of effect of products of oxygen
surrogates on profiles of P450 2D6-generated bufuralol oxidation
products in NADPH-P450 2D6-supported reactions. A,
Increasing concentrations of cumyl alcohol (0, 100, 200, 300, 500 µM, in order noted with arrow) were present. B,
Increasing amounts of PhI (0, 50, 100, 200, 300 µM), in
order noted with arrow) were present. Chromatograms are offset 0.5 min
and products are identified.
|
|
The major alternate possibility is that inherent differences in the
chemistry exist among these systems. Support for this view has already
been presented for hydroperoxide (and peracid)-supported systems, which
can involve either heterolytic or homolytic scission of O-O bonds (23,
24, 64, 65, 67, 68). We (46) and others (24, 69) have previously
observed the incorporation of isotopic label from
H218O into some PhIO-supported P450 reactions.
Bufuralol oxidation experiments were done in 61% atomic excess
H218O, and the 1'-hydroxybufuralol was
recovered by HPLC and analyzed by MS. The major ion pair used in
analysis was m/z 300/302 (M + Na+). In all
control experiments with H216O, only
m/z 300 was observed ( 98%). Similar results (only
m/z 300, >98%) were observed for the 1'-hydroxybufuralol
isolated from the H218O experiments done with
P450 2D6 supported by NADPH-P450 reductase or CuOOH. In the
H218O reaction supported by PhIO, the recovered
1'-hydroxybufuralol contained a calculated 61% excess 18O,
within experimental error of the estimated level in the
H218O used in the reaction (61%).
 |
DISCUSSION |
P450 2D6 has been of historical interest in that this is the first
monoxygenase involved in drug metabolism that was demonstrated to be
under monogenic control (7). Another reason for biochemical interest in
this particular P450 has been the apparent ligand selectivity relative
to many less specific microsomal P450s (13, 70). The ability to produce
P450 2D6 and site-directed mutants in heterologous expression systems
has allowed exploration of several issues, including the role of the N
terminus in catalytic selectivity (31, 32) and the effects of amino
acid substitution at Asp301 (32, 70).
The history of model building for P450 2D6 began at the time of
purification of the enzyme, when the observation was made that many of
the known substrates of P450 2D6 contained a basic nitrogen atom (12,
13). Inspection of these ligands indicated that the basic nitrogen
could be placed 5-7 Å away from the site of oxidation (13). The
pharmacophore model was further developed for substrates (15-17) and,
by our own group in collaborations, for inhibitors (14). Subsequently
Asp301 has been considered to provide the putative negative
charge bonding to the basic nitrogen, on the combined basis of work
with homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis (70-74).
The proposal that NADPH-P450 reductase plays an allosteric role in P450
2D6 specificity (74) poses a challenge to modeling efforts, in that the
prediction of the juxtaposition of ligand in a ternary complex (P450
2D6·NADPH-P450 reductase·substrate) would be difficult to predict,
if the structure is influenced by the interactions of all of the three
components. The general concept that an accessory electron transfer
protein plays an allosteric role with a P450 should be considered. The
current literature on P450 3A4 indicates that many small molecules,
including substrates, can modulate catalytic function through
interactions that are still not well understood (21, 75). Evidence has
also been presented that apo-cytochrome b5
(devoid of heme) can influence rates and selectivity of several P450s
(76-79). However, the only report of a role for NADPH-P450 reductase
binding in influencing catalytic selectivity is that of Modi et
al. (19), which relies on (i) the differences in product
distribution for the P450 2D6 oxidation of MPTP between the NADPH-P450
reductase- and CuOOH-supported systems and (ii) the differences in the
proximity of sites of MPTP atoms to the ferric iron atom of P450 2D6 as
measured by NMR relaxation methods. The interpretation of the latter
observation requires caveats about relevance to the structure of P450
2D6 in its catalytically relevant form (FeO3+ or possibly FeOOH).
In our own work we did not see a major difference between the patterns
of MPTP oxidation products formed in the NADPH-P450 reductase- and
CuOOH-supported reactions (Fig. 1), in contrast to Modi et
al. (19). A difference was observed when PhIO was used to support
the reaction, but the addition of the reductase had no influence on the
product profile. We did observe major differences in the CuOOH- and
reductase-supported reaction product profiles for oxidation of
metoprolol and bufuralol, two classic P450 2D6 substrates (Figs. 2 and
5). Neither the CuOOH nor the PhIO reaction was influenced by the
presence of NADPH-P450 reductase with either substrate (Figs. 2 and
6).
In this work we routinely added enzyme systems to scavenge
reduced oxygen species generated from uncoupled reactions and
restricted the time of enzyme incubations to 10 min. Whether these
methods led to the differences with the results of Modi et
al. (19) is not clear, because the incubation times had not been
indicated, except for 10 h in one case. However, our lack of
differences between the reductase-coupled and the
hydroperoxide-dependent MPTP oxidation systems would not be
explained. The pH was 8.0 in the work of Modi et al. (19),
instead of the 7.4 routinely used here. The conclusions derived from
the NMR measurements are not without interest but require some caveats
in interpretation. Relatively weak affinity of MPTP to P450 2D6
(Kd ~ 0.1 mM) (19) would cause its
floppy binding to the enzyme and thus this substrate would not be
tightly fixed in the active site. In general, regio- and
stereospecificities of membrane-bound microsomal P450s that are
involved in drug (often small and flexible structures) oxidation may
not be simply interpreted and rationalized just by physicochemical
methods, including paramagnetic relaxation techniques. In particular,
the latter method requires numerical structure and physical assumptions
for calculation. The situation for membrane-bound microsomal P450s may
be different from those of steroid-related P450s in that some of the
latter P450s have distinct less flexible substrates (e.g.
steroids, camphor) that would be properly fixed in the active site and
thus regio- and stereospecificities could be more clearly explained by
physicochemical methods.
Spectral titrations of the binding of MPTP to P450 2D6 were nearly
superimposable in the presence and absence of the reductase (Fig. 7),
with Ks = 22-29 µM. These results
are in contrast to those reported by Modi et al. (19), in which
Ks values of 110-149 µM were
obtained using optical and NMR methods in the absence of reductase. In
the presence of reductase, their data were fit to hyperbolic equations
with Ks = 149 µM (for a mode with
the N-methyl group near the iron atom) and
Ks = 25 µM (for a mode with the C9
hydrogen (para H of phenyl ring) closest to the iron). The relationship
of results of Modi et al. (19) to our own (Fig. 7) is
unclear. We did not find evidence for a lower affinity component in
either set of optical spectra. It is possible that the higher pH (8.0)
used by Modi et al. (19) (or the 4 °C temperature) affected their results, but we have restricted our own analysis to work
at pH 7.4. In the present work we saw only small, if any, quantitative
differences in the affinity of P450 2D6 for MPTP, metoprolol, or
bufuralol due to the presence of NADPH-P450 reductase. Further, 500 µM cumyl alcohol only increased the
Ks for bufuralol by ~ 25% (see above).
Differences in product profiles of P450 reactions supported by
NADPH-P450 reductase and oxygen surrogates are not unusual and have
been reviewed by Ortiz de Montellano (23, 24). In some of the early
literature (23, 25, 26), the differences can probably be attributed to
the presence of multiple P450 enzymes in microsomal preparations or to
secondary oxidations of initial products (24, 80). However, the
differences remain obscure in many cases. As discussed above, the
differences between these P450 2D6 reactions cannot be attributed to an
allosteric effect of the reductase (Figs. 2 and 6). One possibility is
a steric effect of the remnant of the oxygen surrogate in the active
site (24, 58-60). However, no evidence for this hypothesis was
obtained in experiments in which these compounds (cumyl alcohol, PhI)
were added to NADPH-P450 reductase-supported bufuralol oxidation
reactions in concentrations as high as the oxygen surrogates used in
the reactions (Fig. 8). Our preferred hypothesis for the differences is
one based on differences in the chemistry of the reactions supported by
the oxygen surrogates. CuOOH has long been known to undergo both
homolytic and heterolytic cleavage by P450s, yielding a variety of
oxidants with distinct properties (23, 24, 64, 65, 67, 68) (Fig.
9A). Evidence for a different
chemical mechanism in the PhIO reaction comes from the
H218O incorporation experiments with bufuralol
(see above). A scheme to explain the exchange of oxygen from
H218O with the Fe-O complex comes from Ortiz de
Montellano (23) (Fig. 9B), in which two potential oxidants
are present, FeO3+ and FeO(H)PhIOH. The possibility is
presented that the putative FeO3+ (generated by the
reductase) is involved in multiple oxidations but the complex with the
PhIO attached has a more restricted scope, e.g.
N-demethylation of MPTP or (primarily) 1'-hydroxylation of bufuralol. Other potential high valent iron intermediates
(e.g. FeOOH and FeOH ;
Refs. 81and 82) that could be generated in the reductase-supported
system are not shown but can also be considered to add to the
complexity of differences and to the versatility of the
reductase-supported system. The scheme shown in Fig. 9 may be
oversimplistic, however, in that different amino acids in the region of
the heme distal ligand would be expected to exert varying influence in
the different systems, i.e. protonation of
FeO in the reductase-supported
reaction and O-O cleavage in that and the CuOOH-supported
reactions.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Possible oxidants involved in oxygen
surrogate systems. A, Heterolytic and homolytic scissions of CuOOH
and potential oxidizing species. B, Possible oxidants
generated by PhIO (23).
|
|
We conclude that the basis of differences in the products of P450 2D6
reactions supported by NADPH-P450 reductase and the oxygen surrogates
is neither an allosteric influence of the reductase nor steric crowding
by remnants of the oxygen surrogates. The most probable explanation is
inherent differences in the chemistry of catalysis (Fig. 9). The
presence of the reductase has not been demonstrated to perturb the
regioselectivity of catalysis of P450 2D6 or any other P450 to date.
However, the reliability of pharmacophore and homology models of P450
2D6 in predicting substrates and regioselectivity is nevertheless
attenuated by the plethora of products generated from a single
substrate (Fig. 4 and Ref. 71) and recent reports of P450 2D6 binding
and oxidation of steroids (53, 83-85) and drugs devoid of a basic
nitrogen atom (e.g.
spirosulfonamide).6
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by United States Public
Health Service (USPHS) Grants R35 CA44353, R01 CA90426, and P30
ES00267.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of USPHS Postdoctoral Fellowship F32 CA79162. Present
address: Dept. of Drug Metabolism and Safety Assessment,
Schering-Plough Research Inst., Kenilworth, NJ 07033.
§
Supported in part by USPHS Training Grant T32 ES07028.
¶
Present address: Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics, and Metabolism,
Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ann Arbor, MI 48105.
Present address: Dept. of Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co.,
Rahway, NJ 07065.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Center in Molecular Toxicology, Vanderbilt University School of
Medicine, 638B Robinson Research Bldg. (Medical Research Bldg. I), 23rd
and Pierce Aves., Nashville, TN 37232-0146. Tel.: 615-322-2261; Fax:
615-322-3141; E-mail:
guengerich@toxicology.mc.vanderbilt.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 16, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106841200
2
The cDNA we expressed in previous work (31)
had been obtained with a change (to Met) at codon 374 that appears to
be the result of a cloning artifact (33, 34). The change of M374V was
made, and the resulting sequence is that generally agreed to be the
most common allele (9).
3
P450 2D6 also catalyzes the
N-deisopropylation of metoprolol (44), but we did not
analyze these products with the HPLC system we used.
4
Very recently Hiroi et al. (53)
reported a P450 2D6 bufuralol product with similar HPLC mobility and
m/z 260 (MS) but did not define the site of unsaturation by
other spectral methods. Comparison of our chromatograms and spectra
with Drs. Hiroi and Funae indicate that
1',2'-dehydrobufuralol is also the product isolated in
their work.
5
The bufuralol used here was a racemic mixture,
and the contributions of the individual enantiomers to the individual
products have not been ascertained. P450 2D6 is known to convert both
enantiomers to 1'-hydroxybufuralol (12). The situation is not as
clear with the other products. The (S)( ) enantiomer has
been suggested to be the source of the 4- and 6-hydroxy products on the
basis of studies with liver microsomes (57).
6
F. P. Guengerich, G. P. Miller,
I. H. Hanna, M. V. Martin, S. Léger, C. Black, N. Chauret,
J. M. Silva, L. A. Trimble, J. A. Yergey, and D. Nicoll-Griffith, manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
P450, microsomal
cytochrome P450;
MPTP, N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine;
PTP, 4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine;
MPTP-OH, 4-(1-methyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-phenol;
CuOOH, cumene
hydroperoxide;
PhIO, iodosylbenzene;
PhI, iodobenzene;
MS, mass
spectrometry;
HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Palmer, G.,
and Reedijk, J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
665-677[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Porter, T. D.,
and Coon, M. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
13469-13472[Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Guengerich, F. P.
(ed)
(1997)
Biotransformation: Comprehensive Toxicology
, Vol. 3
, pp. 37-68, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford
|
| 4.
|
Guengerich, F. P.
(2001)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
14,
611-650[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Guengerich, F. P.
(1995)
in
Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry
(Ortiz de Montellano, P. R., ed)
, pp. 473-535, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 6.
|
Evans, W. E.,
and Relling, M. V.
(1999)
Science
286,
487-491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Mahgoub, A.,
Idle, J. R.,
Dring, L. G.,
Lancaster, R.,
and Smith, R. L.
(1977)
Lancet
ii,
584-586
|
| 8.
|
Eichelbaum, M.,
Spannbrucker, N.,
and Dengler, H. J.
(1979)
Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
16,
189-194[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Daly, A. K.,
Brockmöller, J.,
Broly, F.,
Eichelbaum, M.,
Evans, W. E.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
Huang, J. D.,
Idle, J. R.,
Ingelman-Sundberg, M.,
Ishizaki, T.,
Jacqz-Algrain, E.,
Meyer, U. A.,
Steen, V. M.,
Wolf, C. R.,
and Zanger, U. M.
(1996)
Pharmacogenetics
6,
193-201[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Kroemer, H. K.,
and Eichelbaum, M.
(1995)
Life Sci.
56,
2285-2298[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Johansson, I.,
Lundqvist, E.,
Bertilsson, L.,
Dahl, M. L.,
Sjoqvist, F.,
and Ingelman-Sundberg, M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
11825-11829[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Distlerath, L. M.,
Reilly, P. E. B.,
Martin, M. V.,
Davis, G. G.,
Wilkinson, G. R.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
9057-9067[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Wolff, T.,
Distlerath, L. M.,
Worthington, M. T.,
Groopman, J. D.,
Hammons, G. J.,
Kadlubar, F. F.,
Prough, R. A.,
Martin, M. V.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(1985)
Cancer Res.
45,
2116-2122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Strobl, G. R.,
von Kruedener, S.,
Stöckigt, J.,
Guengerich, F. P.,
and Wolff, T.
(1993)
J. Med. Chem.
36,
1136-1145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Meyer, U. A.,
Gut, J.,
Kronbach, T.,
Skoda, C.,
Meier, U. T.,
and Catin, T.
(1986)
Xenobiotica
16,
449-464[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Islam, S. A.,
Wolf, C. R.,
Lennard, M. S.,
and Sternberg, M. J. E.
(1991)
Carcinogenesis
12,
2211-2219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Koymans, L.,
Vermeulen, N. P. E.,
van Acker, S. A. B. E.,
te Koppele, J. M.,
Heykants, J. J. P.,
Lavrijsen, K.,
Meuldermans, W.,
and Donné-Op den Kelder, G. M.
(1992)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
5,
211-219[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Ekins, S.,
de Groot, M. J.,
and Jones, J. P.
(2001)
Drug Metab. Dispos.
29,
936-944[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Modi, S.,
Gilham, D. E.,
Sutcliffe, M. J.,
Lian, L.-Y.,
Primrose, W. U.,
Wolf, C. R.,
and Roberts, G. C. K.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
4461-4470[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Ueng, Y.-F.,
Kuwabara, T.,
Chun, Y.-J.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
370-381[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Hosea, N. A.,
Miller, G. P.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
5929-5939[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Miller, G. P.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
7262-7272[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Ortiz de Montellano, P. R.
(ed)
(1986)
Cytochrome P-450
, pp. 217-271, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 24.
|
Ortiz de Montellano, P. R.
(ed)
(1995)
Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry
, pp. 245-303, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 25.
|
Fasco, M. J.,
Piper, L. J.,
and Kaminsky, L. S.
(1979)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
28,
97-103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Gustafsson, J. Å.,
Rondahl, L.,
and Bergman, J.
(1979)
Biochemistry
18,
865-870[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
McCarthy, M. B.,
and White, R. E.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
9153-9158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Hoch, H.,
and Lang, S.
(1944)
Chem. Ber.
77,
257-264
|
| 29.
|
Saltzman, H.,
and Sharefkin, J. G.
(1973)
Org. Syntheses Coll.
5,
658-659
|
| 30.
|
McElvain, S. M.,
and Berger, R. S.
(1955)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
77,
2848-2850[CrossRef]
|
| 31.
|
Gillam, E. M. J.,
Guo, Z.,
Martin, M. V.,
Jenkins, C. M.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(1995)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
319,
540-550[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Hanna, I. H.,
Kim, M.-S.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(2001)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
393,
255-261[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Ellis, S. W.,
Rowland, K.,
Ackland, M. J.,
Rekka, E.,
Simula, A. P.,
Lennard, M. S.,
Wolf, C. R.,
and Tucker, G. T.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
316,
647-654
|
| 34.
|
Crespi, C. L.,
Steimel, D. T.,
Penman, B. W.,
Korzekwa, K. R.,
Fernandez-Salguero, P.,
Buters, J. T. M.,
Gelboin, H. V.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
Idle, J. R.,
and Daly, A. K.
(1995)
Pharmacogenetics
5,
234-243[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Kusano, K.,
Waterman, M. R.,
Sakaguchi, M.,
Omura, T.,
and Kagawa, N.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
367,
129-136[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Hanna, I. H.,
Reed, J. R.,
Guengerich, F. P.,
and Hollenberg, P. F.
(2000)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
376,
206-216[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Shen, A. L.,
Porter, T. D.,
Wilson, T. E.,
and Kasper, C. B.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
7584-7589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Hanna, I. H.,
Teiber, J. F.,
Kokones, K. L.,
and Hollenberg, P. F.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
350,
324-332[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Guengerich, F. P.
(2001)
in
Principles and Methods of Toxicology
(Hayes, A. W., ed)
, pp. 1625-1687, Taylor & Francis, New York
|
| 40.
|
Guengerich, F. P.
(1978)
Biochemistry
17,
3633-3639[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Nordblom, G. D.,
White, R. E.,
and Coon, M. J.
(1976)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
175,
524-533[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Zanger, U. M.,
Hauri, H. P.,
Loeper, J.,
Homberg, J. C.,
and Meyer, U. A.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
8256-2860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Kronbach, T.,
Mathys, D.,
Gut, J.,
Catin, T.,
and Meyer, U. A.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
24-32[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Hayhurst, G. P.,
Harlow, J.,
Chowdry, J.,
Gross, E.,
Hilton, E.,
Lennard, M. S.,
Tucker, G. T.,
and Ellis, S. W.
(2001)
Biochem. J.
355,
373-379[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Shinka, T.,
Castagnoli, N., Jr.,
Wu, E. Y.,
Hoag, M. K. P.,
and Trevor, A. J.
(1987)
J. Chromatogr.
398,
279-287[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Macdonald, T. L.,
Burka, L. T.,
Wright, S. T.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(1982)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
104,
620-625[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Lennard, M. S.,
Silas, J. H.,
Freestone, S.,
Tucker, G. T.,
Ramsay, L. E.,
and Woods, H. F.
(1982)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
16,
572P-573P
|
| 48.
|
Dayer, P.,
Balant, L.,
Courvoisier, F.,
Kupfer, A.,
Kubli, A.,
Gorgia, A.,
and Fabre, J.
(1982)
Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet.
7,
73-77[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Gut, J.,
Catin, T.,
Dayer, P.,
Kronbach, T.,
Zanger, U.,
and Meyer, U. A.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
11734-11743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Gut, J.,
Gasser, R.,
Dayer, P.,
Kronbach, T.,
Catin, T.,
and Meyer, U. A.
(1984)
FEBS Lett.
173,
287-290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Yamazaki, H.,
Guo, Z.,
Persmark, M.,
Mimura, M.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
Sugahara, C.,
Guengerich, F. P.,
and Shimada, T.
(1994)
Mol. Pharmacol.
46,
568-577[Abstract]
|
| 52.
| Francis, R. J., Allen, J. G., East, P. B., and Ruane,
R. J. (1976) Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet.
113-124
|
| 53.
|
Hiroi, T.,
Chow, T.,
Imaoka, S.,
and Funae, Y.
(2000)
Abstracts of the 13th International Symposium on Microsomes and Drug Oxidations
, Stresa, ItalyJuly 10-14, 2000, 113
|
| 54.
|
Rettie, A. E.,
Rettenmeier, A. W.,
Howald, W. N.,
and Baillie, T. A.
(1987)
Science
235,
890-893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Nagata, K.,
Liberato, D. J.,
Gillette, J. R.,
and Sasame, H. A.
(1986)
Drug Metab. Dispos.
14,
559-565[Abstract]
|
| 56.
|
Guengerich, F. P.,
and Kim, D.-H.
(1991)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
4,
413-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Dayer, P.,
Leemann, T.,
Gut, J.,
Kronbach, T.,
Kupfer, A.,
Francis, R.,
and Meyer, U. A.
(1986)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
34,
399-400
|
| 58.
|
Koop, D. R.,
and Hollenberg, P. F.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
9685-9692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Blake, R. C., II,
and Coon, M. J.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
5755-5763[Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Blake, R. C., II,
and Coon, M. J.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
12127-12133[Free Full Text]
|
| 61.
|
Shou, M.,
Grogan, J.,
Mancewicz, J. A.,
Krausz, K. W.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
Gelboin, H. V.,
and Korzekwa, K. R.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
6450-6455[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Shou, M.,
Dai, R.,
Cui, D.,
Korzekwa, K. R.,
Baillie, T. A.,
and Rushmore, T. H.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2256-2262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 63.
|
Harlow, G. R.,
and Halpert, J. R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6636-6641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Thompson, J. A.,
and Wand, M. D.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
10637-10644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Thompson, J. A.,
and Yumibe, N. P.
(1989)
Drug Metab. Rev.
20,
365-378[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 66.
|
Burka, L. T.,
Thorsen, A.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(1980)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
102,
7615-7616[CrossRef]
|
| 67.
|
McCarthy, M. B.,
and White, R. E.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
11610-11616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 68.
|
Barr, D. P.,
Martin, M. V.,
Guengerich, F. P.,
and Mason, R. P.
(1996)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
9,
318-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 69.
|
Heimbrook, D. C.,
and Sligar, S. G.
(1981)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
99,
530-535[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 70.
|
Ellis, S. W.,
Hayhurst, G. P.,
Smith, G.,
Lightfoot, T.,
Wong, M. M. S.,
Simula, A. P.,
Ackland, M. J.,
Sternberg, M. J. E.,
Lennard, M. S.,
Tucker, G. T.,
and Wolf, C. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29055-29058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 71.
|
Lightfoot, T.,
Ellis, S. W.,
Mahling, J.,
Ackland, M. J.,
Blaney, F. E.,
Bijloo, G. J.,
de Groot, M. J.,
Vermeulen, N. P. E.,
Blackburn, G. M.,
Lennard, M. S.,
and Tucker, G. T.
(2000)
Xenobiotica
30,
219-233[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 72.
|
de Groot, M. J.,
Vermeulen, N. P. E.,
Kramer, J. D.,
van Acker, F. A. A.,
and Donné-Op den Kelder, G. M.
(1996)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
9,
1079-1091[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 73.
|
de Groot, M. J.,
Bijloo, G. J.,
Martens, B. J.,
van Acker, F. A. A.,
and Vermeulen, N. P. E.
(1997)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
10,
41-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 74.
|
Modi, S.,
Paine, M. J.,
Sutcliffe, M. J.,
Lian, L. Y.,
Primrose, W. U.,
Wolf, C. R.,
and Roberts, G. C. K.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
4540-4550[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 75.
|
Atkins, W. M.,
Wang, R. W.,
and Lu, A. Y. H.
(2001)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
14,
338-347[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 76.
|
Yamazaki, H.,
Johnson, W. W.,
Ueng, Y.-F.,
Shimada, T.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27438-27444[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 77.
|
Yamazaki, H.,
Shimada, T.,
Martin, M. V.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
30885-30891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 78.
|
Auchus, R. J.,
Lee, T. C.,
and Miller, W. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3158-3165
|
| 79.
|
Loughran, P. A.,
Roman, L. J.,
Miller, R. T.,
and Masters, B. S. S.
(2001)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
385,
311-321[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 80.
|
Capdevila, J.,
Estabrook, R. W.,
and Prough, R. A.
(1980)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
200,
186-195[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 81.
|
Vaz, A. D. N.,
Pernecky, S. J.,
Raner, G. M.,
and Coon, M. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
4644-4648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 82.
|
Toy, P. H.,
Newcomb, M.,
Coon, M. J.,
and Vaz, A. D. N.
(1998)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
120,
9718-9719[CrossRef]
|
| 83.
|
Hiroi, T.,
Kishimoto, W.,
Chow, T.,
Imaoka, S.,
Igarashi, T.,
and Funae, Y.
(2001)
Endocrinology
142,
3901-3908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 84.
|
Hiroi, T.,
Kishimoto, W.,
Chow, T.,
Imaoka, S.,
Igarashi, T.,
and Funae, Y.
(2000)
Front. Sci. Ser.
29,
417-418
|
| 85.
|
Niwa, T.,
Yabusaki, Y.,
Honma, K.,
Matsuo, N.,
Tatsuta, K.,
Ishibashi, F.,
and Katagiri, M.
(1998)
Xenobiotica
28,
539-547[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 86.
|
Mateles, R. J.
(1993)
Chem. Eng. News
71,
5
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. P. Guengerich, G. P. Miller, I. H. Hanna, H. Sato, and M. V. Martin
Oxidation of Methoxyphenethylamines by Cytochrome P450 2D6. ANALYSIS OF RATE-LIMITING STEPS
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 6, 2002;
277(37):
33711 - 33719.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hiroi, T. Chow, S. Imaoka, and Y. Funae
Catalytic Specificity of CYP2D Isoforms in Rat and Human
Drug Metab. Dispos.,
September 1, 2002;
30(9):
970 - 976.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. Granvil, K. W. Krausz, H. V. Gelboin, J. R. Idle, and F. J. Gonzalez
4-Hydroxylation of Debrisoquine by Human CYP1A1 and Its Inhibition by Quinidine and Quinine
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
June 1, 2002;
301(3):
1025 - 1032.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|