|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103081200 on August 21, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 43, 39586-39591, October 26, 2001
Chemical Chaperones Regulate Molecular Chaperones in
Vitro and in Cells under Combined Salt and Heat Stresses*
Sophia
Diamant ,
Noa
Eliahu ,
David
Rosenthal , and
Pierre
Goloubinoff §¶
From the Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of
Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904 Jerusalem,
Israel and § Institute of Ecology, Lausanne University, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Received for publication, April 6, 2001, and in revised form, August 21, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Salt and heat stresses, which are often combined
in nature, induce complementing defense mechanisms. Organisms adapt to
high external salinity by accumulating small organic compounds known as
osmolytes, which equilibrate cellular osmotic pressure. Osmolytes can
also act as "chemical chaperones" by increasing the stability of
native proteins and assisting refolding of unfolded polypeptides. Adaptation to heat stress depends on the expression of heat-shock proteins, many of which are molecular chaperones, that prevent protein
aggregation, disassemble protein aggregates, and assist protein
refolding. We show here that Escherichia coli cells
preadapted to high salinity contain increased levels of glycine betaine
that prevent protein aggregation under thermal stress. After heat
shock, the aggregated proteins, which escaped protection, were
disaggregated in salt-adapted cells as efficiently as in low salt. Here
we address the effects of four common osmolytes on chaperone activity
in vitro. Systematic dose responses of glycine betaine,
glycerol, proline, and trehalose revealed a regulatory effect on the
folding activities of individual and combinations of chaperones GroEL, DnaK, and ClpB. With the exception of trehalose, low physiological concentrations of proline, glycerol, and especially glycine betaine activated the molecular chaperones, likely by assisting local folding
in chaperone-bound polypeptides and stabilizing the native end product
of the reaction. High osmolyte concentrations, especially trehalose,
strongly inhibited DnaK-dependent chaperone networks, such
as DnaK+GroEL and DnaK+ClpB, likely because high viscosity affects
dynamic interactions between chaperones and folding substrates and
stabilizes protein aggregates. Thus, during combined salt and
heat stresses, cells can specifically control protein stability and
chaperone-mediated disaggregation and refolding by modulating the
intracellular levels of different osmolytes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Salt Stress Mechanisms of acclimation to osmotic stress
involve intracellular accumulation, by synthesis or uptake, of small organic solutes known as osmolytes, which equilibrate cellular osmotic
pressure (1). In vitro, osmolytes such as glycine betaine (subsequently referred to as betaine), proline, trehalose, and glycerol
may also protect native proteins from heat denaturation and favor the
formation of native protein oligomers (2-8). Some osmolytes behave as
"chemical chaperones" by promoting the correct refolding of
unfolded proteins in vitro and in the cell (5, 6, 9-11).
The nature and cellular concentrations of osmolytes depend on the
organism, osmolyte availability in the medium, and the type, severity,
and duration of the osmotic stress. Hence, betaine is a universal
compatible solute in various prokaryotes including Escherichia
coli, animals, algae, and salt-tolerant plants (2, 12). It is a
most effective osmoprotectant in many bacteria (13), which allows
growth in hyperosmotic minimal medium (4, 14). When free betaine or
proline is available, each may accumulate in the cell up to 0.7 and 0.4 M, respectively (15-18). In the absence of other
osmolytes, salt-stressed E. coli cells may also accumulate
molar concentrations of glycerol and up to 0.4 M trehalose
(19-22).
Heat Stress The massive production of heat-shock proteins
(HSPs)1 during various types
of stresses, especially heat shock, provides various mechanisms that
protect and recover stress-damaged proteins in the cell (23). In
E. coli, proteins IbpA/B (small HSPs), GroEL (HSP60), DnaK
(HSP70), and ClpB (HSP100) (eukaryotic chaperones in
parentheses) are major components of a sophisticated network of
"holding" and "folding" chaperones that cooperate in preventing protein aggregation during heat stress and promoting protein
disaggregation and refolding after the stress (24, 25). Hence, small
HSP-bound denatured polypeptides can be sequentially refolded by the
DnaK and then by the GroEL chaperones (26). Similarly, stable
protein aggregates can be efficiently resolubilized and refolded by the sequential action of ClpB and DnaK (27-30).
Although combined heat and salt stresses are frequent in nature, little
is known about how osmolytes control protein stability and
chaperone-mediated protein refolding in the cell. Trehalose accumulation in yeast suppresses protein aggregation during heat shock
but also interferes with chaperone-assisted protein refolding in
vivo and in vitro (31). Osmolytes promote the in
vitro refolding by GroEL of a mutant enzyme, which cannot be
refolded either with the chaperone or osmolytes alone (11). This
indicates that in addition to their activity as chemical chaperones
that directly controls protein stability, osmolytes may also indirectly
regulate protein homeostasis in the cell by controlling the activity of molecular chaperones.
Here we show that adaptation of E. coli cells to a mild salt
stress inhibits protein aggregation during heat stress but does not
interfere with protein disaggregation after heat stress. In vitro, dose-response analysis shows qualitative and quantitative differences between osmolytes regulating protein folding by specific activation or inhibition of complex chaperone networks.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Proteins--
Chaperones were purified according to previously
published procedures: DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE were purified as described
in Ref. 32, ClpB was purified as described in Ref. 33, and GroEL and
GroES were purified as described in Ref. 34. Rabbit muscle pyruvate
kinase, L-proline, D(+)trehalose, and betaine
were obtained from Sigma, mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (MDH) from
pig heart was obtained from Roche Diagnostics. Chaperone concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad Bradford assay, with bovine serum
albumin as standard. Protein concentrations were expressed in protomers.
Salt Stress and Heat Shock of E. coli Cells--
E.
coli cells (DH5 ) were grown in LB medium (1% Bacto-tryptone,
0.5% Bacto-yeast extract, and 0.17 M NaCl) supplemented
with additional NaCl to the indicated concentrations. At
A600 = 1.2, cells were heat-shocked at
47 °C for up to 15 min in the presence of 50 µg/ml streptomycin to
inhibit growth and protein synthesis. Recovery was then carried out at
30 °C for 10 min. At the indicated times, aliquots were removed and
frozen in liquid N2.
Quantitative Evaluation of Protein Aggregates in E. coli
Cells--
The method for the isolation of a cellular fraction
enriched with de novo heat-aggregated proteins was based on
a modified protocol of Tomoyasu et al. (35). Frozen
bacterial pellets from 1.5-ml aliquots were lysed in 1 mg/ml lysozyme
on ice for 3 min and then sonicated (Heat Systems-Ultrasonics disrupter
W-385). Aggregated proteins were separated from the insoluble cell
membranes and debris by two washes with 200 µl of 2% (v/v) Nonidet
P-40. Nonidet P-40-insoluble pellets were resuspended in 50 µl of
guanidine-HCl (6 M). Protein content was measured by the
Bio-Rad Bradford reagent. Results in Fig. 1 are the average of four
experiments. Aggregated proteins were expressed as a fraction
(percentage) of total proteins in the cell.
NMR Spectroscopy--
1H NMR spectra were acquired
at the 1H proton frequency of 600.13 MHz on a 600 MHz
Bruker Avance DMX spectrometer (The Wolfson Center for Applied
Structural Biology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem,
Israel). The carrier frequency was set to a signal-free area of the
spectrum, and the spectrum was referenced to the residual water signal
at 4.75 ppm at 300 K. The relative concentrations of betaine and
trehalose in the samples were estimated using reference samples of pure
compound under identical acquisition conditions. The normalized
relative peak intensity of the ammonium methyl peaks of betaine and the
methine protons at position 4 on the glucopyranosyl and glucopyranoside
moieties of trehalose was compared. The comparison between the samples
was done in the same manner. Integrating and normalizing the
aforementioned peaks determined the relative amounts of betaine and trehalose.
Protection of Native MDH--
0.5 µM MDH was
denatured at 44 °C in folding buffer containing increasing
concentrations of osmolytes. The extent of protection (P)
was expressed as a percentage using the following formula: P = 100 ((Va/Vo) × 100),
where Vo and Va are the
inactivation rates without and with osmolytes, respectively.
MDH Denaturation and Refolding--
Several forms of denatured
MDH were used. 1) MDH unfolded by urea for osmolyte-mediated refolding
was used: 50 µM MDH was chemically denatured in 5 M urea and 10 mM dithiothreitol for 35 min at
37 °C. Refolding without chaperones was initiated at 37 °C on a
100-fold dilution into the refolding buffer containing 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 20 mM MgAc2,
150 mM KCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol, and
increasing concentrations of osmolytes. 2) Heat-denatured MDH prebound
to chaperones was used: 0.5 µM MDH was denatured at
47 °C for 30 min in folding buffer containing 3 mM
phosphoenol pyruvate and chaperones (3.5 µM GroEL, 6 µM GroES, or 3.5 µM DnaK, 0.7 µM DnaJ, and 0.35 µM GrpE). Osmolytes and
20 µg/ml pyruvate kinase were added at 25 °C, and refolding was
initiated with 3 mM ATP. 3) Aggregated MDH was used: 0.7 µM MDH was heat-inactivated and aggregated at 47 °C in
the absence of chaperone as described in Ref. 27. Disaggregation and
refolding were initiated at 25 °C in the presence of added
chaperones (1 µM DnaK, 0.2 µM DnaJ, 0.1 µM GrpE, and 0.5 µM ClpB), 20 µg/ml
pyruvate kinase and osmolytes, and 3 mM ATP. The MDH
activity was measured as described in Ref. 36.
Viscosity--
The viscosity of solutions containing different
concentrations of osmolytes was determined at 25 °C, 30 °C,
37 °C, and 44 °C using a capillary viscometer (Cannon-Manning
semi-micro viscometer). Results were expressed in time units (minutes)
needed for 1 ml of solution to flow-through the capillary (AU). Time
units are proportional to viscosity units.
 |
RESULTS |
Salt Stress Inhibits Heat-induced Protein Aggregation in
Vivo--
We examined the effect of increasing concentrations of salt
in rich growth medium (LB medium) on protein aggregation and
disaggregation in E. coli cells during and after heat
stress. Protein aggregates were measured using a modified protocol by
Tomoyasu et al. (35). Less than 3% of the total proteins
were found to be insoluble aggregates in cells grown at 30 °C in
standard LB medium containing 0.17 M NaCl. This aggregated
fraction was dramatically increased to 13% during a 15-min treatment
at 47 °C (Fig. 1a).
Noticeably, as the NaCl concentration increased, the heat-induced
protein aggregation in salt-adapted cells decreased (Fig. 1a,
inset). Hence, osmolyte accumulation in the salt-adapted cells
correlates with increasingly effective protection of labile proteins
against thermal denaturation and aggregation.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Salt adaptation affects heat-induced protein
aggregation in the cell. a, time-dependent
protein aggregation at 47 °C and disaggregation at 30 °C in
E. coli cells preadapted to 0.17 or 0.5 M NaCl
in LB medium. Inset, aggregated proteins formed after a
15-min incubation at 47 °C in E. coli cells preadapted to
increasing NaCl concentrations in the medium. b,
1H NMR spectra of extracts from E. coli cells
grown in LB medium with 0.17 (I) and 0.5 M (II) NaCl.
Specific peaks for betaine and trehalose are indicated.
|
|
Betaine Accumulates in the Salt-adapted E. coli
Cells--
Understanding the nature and composition of the osmolytes
that accumulate in salt-adapted E. coli cells is essential
to understanding the mechanism by which osmotic stress controls protein
stability and refolding during heat shock. NMR spectroscopy revealed
that betaine is the main osmolyte present in E. coli cells
grown in standard LB medium containing 0.17 M NaCl.
Trehalose was also present, albeit at concentrations 4-5 times lower
than that of betaine (Fig. 1b). We found that in cells grown
in LB medium with 0.5 M NaCl, the betaine concentration was
4 times higher, whereas the trehalose concentration was only 1.2 times
higher than that in cells grown in 0.17 M NaCl (Fig.
1b).
Osmolytes Protect Native Proteins in Vitro--
To address the
thermoprotective nature of various osmolytes, the activity of a model
protein, mitochondrial MDH, was examined in vitro under mild
heat-denaturing conditions in the presence of betaine and other
representative categories of osmolytes: proline (amino acids),
trehalose (sugars), and glycerol (polyols). Physiological concentrations of all osmolytes examined significantly stabilized the
native MDH at 44 °C: Without osmolytes, native MDH was irreversibly inactivated at a rate of 6.3%/min. This rate of thermal inactivation was halved in the presence of 0.2 M betaine, 0.26 M trehalose, 0.44 M proline, and 0.48 M glycerol (Fig. 2).
Noticeably, 1 M trehalose, 1.5 M betaine, 2 M proline, or 2 M glycerol fully protected native MDH over a 40-min period at 44 °C (Fig. 2).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Osmolytes protect native MDH from thermal
inactivation. MDH (0.5 µM) was incubated at 44 °C
in the presence of increasing concentrations of betaine, trehalose,
proline, or glycerol. Inactivation rates were derived from exponential
curves at each osmolyte concentration. Protection was calculated from
the inactivation rates as described in "Materials and Methods."
Inset, representative MDH inactivation curves in the
presence of increasing concentrations of proline.
|
|
Osmolytes Regulate Chaperone Activity--
The insoluble protein
aggregates that formed in the cell during heat shock became rapidly
resolubilized within 5 min of recovery at 30 °C, regardless of the
salt concentration in the growth medium (Fig. 1a). This
suggests that, unlike the case of trehalose-enriched trehalase mutants
from yeast (31), the thermoprotective betaine that accumulates in
E. coli (Fig. 1b) does not interfere with protein
disaggregation after stress. We therefore addressed the specific
effects of various osmolytes on the activity of simple and complex
chaperone networks, using in vitro refolding assays.
When heat-denatured MDH was prebound to GroEL and then supplemented
after the stress with ATP, LS, and increasing concentrations of
osmolytes, specific effects were observed. Physiological concentrations of up to 1 M proline or trehalose did not affect
chaperone-mediated refolding of MDH. Betaine and glycerol activated LS
chaperone by 30-40% (Fig. 3), but high,
nonphysiological concentrations of betaine or proline inhibited the
reaction. Interestingly, a significant refolding was also observed
without GroES in the presence of specific osmolytes. Whereas betaine
did not affect this ATP- and GroEL-dependent but
GroES-independent activity, refolding rates with 0.56 M
trehalose, 1.2 M proline, or 3.8 M glycerol were 8, 6, and 12 times faster, respectively, than the refolding rates
without osmolytes (Fig. 3). Whereas the mechanism by which osmolytes
can functionally substitute for GroES remains to be elucidated, this
clearly demonstrates that different osmolytes have different effects on
chaperonin activity. This is in contrast with the protection mechanism,
which appears similar for all the osmolytes tested.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Osmolytes affect GroEL-mediated
refolding. MDH (0.5 µM) was heat-denatured at
47 °C in the presence of GroEL (3.5 µM) as described
in Ref. 42. In the presence of supplemented betaine, trehalose,
proline, or glycerol, refolding was initiated at 25 °C by the
addition of ATP (3 mM), with (top part) or
without (bottom part) added GroES (6.0 µM).
|
|
Similar specific activatory and inhibitory effects by the different
osmolytes were also observed in the case of the DnaK+DnaJ+GrpE (KJE)
chaperone system. Low concentrations of trehalose readily inhibited the
refolding rates of KJE-bound heat-denatured MDH, whereas betaine,
proline, and glycerol activated the chaperone by 30-50% (Fig.
4a). Optimal rates were
observed with 0.6 M betaine, 1 M proline, and
1.5 M glycerol. Higher, nonphysiological concentrations of
either osmolyte inhibited this chaperone.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Osmolytes affect KJE-mediated refolding.
MDH (0.5 µM) was heat-denatured at 47 °C in the
presence of KJE chaperones (1.0, 0.2, and 0.1 µM,
respectively). Refolding at 25 °C was performed in the presence of
increasing concentrations of betaine, trehalose, proline, or glycerol,
without (a) or with (b) GroEL (3.5 µM) and GroES (6.0 µM). c, MDH
(0.7 µM) was heat-denatured in the absence of chaperones.
The refolding was performed at 25 °C in the presence of supplemented
KJE (1.0, 0.2, and 0.1 µM, respectively) and ClpB (0.5 µM) and increasing concentrations of betaine, trehalose,
proline, or glycerol.
|
|
We tested the effect of osmolytes on more complex networks of molecular
chaperones. The refolding activity of KJE-bound MDH can be activated by
supplemented GroELS, which alleviates KJE from slow and inefficient
folding of late MDH-folding intermediates (37). In the presence
of increasing osmolyte concentrations, this KJE+LS bichaperone network
was, as in the case of KJE alone, activated by low concentrations of
betaine, proline, and glycerol, but not trehalose. Noticeably, betaine
was the most effective activator of KJE+LS-mediated refolding (Fig.
4b), as in the case of LS alone (Fig. 3) High osmolyte
concentrations, in a range that was significantly lower than that for
the individual KJE or LS chaperone systems (Figs. 3 and 4a),
inhibited this complex reaction.
Another bichaperone network composed of ClpB and KJE has the ability to
disaggregate and refold stable protein aggregates (27, 28). The
disaggregation activity of ClpB+KJE was more sensitive to low trehalose
than KJE alone. Low proline and glycerol concentrations did not
activate, and inhibition occurred at concentrations 2-3-fold
lower than those in the case of KJE alone (Fig. 4, a and
c). The finding that more complex chaperone networks are
inhibited, whereas individual chaperones are not, suggests that the
shuttling of folding intermediates between chaperones is particularly
sensitive to nonphysiologically high concentrations of osmolytes.
Remarkably, contrary to the other osmolytes, physiological
concentrations of betaine strongly activated the ClpB+KJE system. Hence, disaggregation was activated 2.5-fold by 0.5 M
betaine, whereas as little as 70 mM trehalose inhibited
this reaction by 50% (Fig. 4c). This suggests that, by a
mechanism yet to be elucidated, betaine can specifically activate
protein disaggregation by ClpB and KJE chaperones, and trehalose can
specifically inhibit protein disaggregation by ClpB and KJE chaperones.
Osmolytes Promote Refolding of Extensively Unfolded
Proteins--
One possible mechanism by which osmolytes can activate
chaperone-mediated refolding is by promoting the local correct
refolding of segments within the chaperone-bound polypeptides (37).
This possibility was addressed by measuring the ability of various osmolytes to promote the correct refolding of urea-unfolded MDH. After
dilution in a chaperoneless solution, urea-unfolded MDH was not
reactivated at 37 °C. However, when urea-unfolded MDH was diluted in
the presence of betaine, glycerol, proline, or trehalose, it was
efficiently reactivated at rates and
yields that generally increased with concentration, with the exception of betaine, which inhibited refolding at concentrations above 3 M (Fig. 5). Yields were highest with glycerol (70%) > proline (40%) > trehalose (28%) > betaine (19%) (Fig.
5b, inset), implying that the nature of the osmolyte
controls the partitioning and commitment of the unfolded species to the
proper refolding or improper misfolding pathways.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Osmolytes chaperone refolding of
urea-unfolded MDH. a, MDH (50 µM) was
denatured in 5 M urea and 10 mM dithiothreitol
and then diluted 100 times into folding buffer containing increasing
concentrations of proline at 37 °C. Refolding rates (b)
and yields (b, inset) are shown, as in a, with
increasing concentrations of betaine, proline, trehalose, or
glycerol.
|
|
The Role of Viscosity in Osmolyte Protection and Protein
Folding--
Osmolytes all have high viscosity indexes. We therefore
addressed the possible contribution of viscosity to osmolyte-mediated thermal protection, promotion of refolding, and regulation of molecular
chaperone activity. The viscosity of refolding solutions containing
increasing osmolyte concentrations was measured at various
temperatures: 25 °C (Fig.
6a), 30 °C, 37 °C, and
44 °C (data not shown). Hence, at 25 °C, 0.9 M
trehalose was 5.4 times more viscous than equimolar proline, glycerol,
or betaine (Fig. 6a). When the rates of KJE-, KJE+LS-, and
ClpB+KJE-mediated refolding were expressed as a function of viscosity,
the general patterns of activation and inhibition were preserved,
although some differences among osmolytes became less pronounced (Fig.
6, b d). In addition, no direct correlation was found
between osmolyte viscosity and the ability of the osmolyte to promote
correct refolding of urea-unfolded MDH (Fig. 6e). In
contrast, when expressed as function of viscosity, differences in the
protective nature of osmolytes were strongly reduced (Fig.
6f), indicating that viscosity is a major component in the
mechanism of osmolyte-induced thermoprotection.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effects of osmolyte viscosity.
a, viscosity at 25 °C of refolding buffers containing
increasing concentrations of betaine, trehalose, proline, or glycerol.
Rates of MDH refolding by KJE (b), KJE+LS (c),
and ClpB+KJE (d), as in Fig. 4, expressed as a function of
the measured viscosity at 25 °C. e, rates of spontaneous
MDH refolding (as in Fig. 3b), expressed as a function of
the measured viscosity at 37 °C. f, protection of MDH
against heat inactivation (as in Fig. 2), expressed as a function of
the measured viscosity at 44 °C.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Cellular accumulation of osmolytes has been involved in the
adaptation of organisms to salt, desiccation, and osmotic stresses in
general (2). In parallel, accumulation of heat-shock proteins, especially molecular chaperones, has been involved in the adaptation to
thermal stress (23). Although heat and salt stresses often occur
concomitantly in nature, a possible cross-talk between the two defense
mechanisms has not been addressed in detail. Here we investigated the
effect of osmolyte accumulation on the aggregation and disaggregation
of proteins in E. coli cells and in vitro. We
found that preadaptation of E. coli cells to increasingly
high concentrations of salt in the medium decreased the tendency of soluble proteins to form insoluble aggregates during heat shock. NMR
analysis revealed that betaine was the major osmolyte that accumulated
in E. coli cells grown in rich medium (standard LB medium
containing 0.17 M NaCl), and the amounts of betaine
strongly increased in salt-adapted cells. Intracellular betaine
can originate from the medium or be synthesized from choline. Both
betaine and choline are common components of rich media (1). Although
trehalose is also present in the medium, it is mostly degraded in the
periplasm as a carbon source. Only the trehalose that is endogenously
synthesized can have an osmoprotective function (1). In addition,
betaine uptake is strongly preferred by the cell over trehalose
synthesis (18). These findings reinforce our observation that betaine is the main osmolyte that accumulates in the E. coli cells
grown in rich medium during salt stress.
The correlation between thermal protection and osmolyte accumulation in
whole cells was confirmed in vitro. Physiological concentrations (<1 M) of betaine, trehalose, proline, or
glycerol all fully protected MDH from thermal denaturation at 44 °C.
The possible mechanism by which osmolytes may protect native proteins implies the existence of a thermodynamic force, the "osmophobic effect," which makes the interaction between osmolytes and peptide backbone unfavorable (38). The exclusion of osmolytes from protein cores, hydration shells, and crevasses on the protein surface increase
protein solvation, leading to stabilization and protection of native
proteins (39, 40). Vapor pressure osmometry showed that betaine is
significantly more excluded from bovine serum albumin than proline,
which in turn is excluded more than trehalose and glycerol (41). In
contrast, we found that betaine and trehalose protect native MDH
equally well and that both are more effective protectants than glycerol
and proline. This indicates that osmolyte exclusion and osmolyte
protection do not necessarily correlate. In contrast, in the case of
all four osmolytes tested here, we found a good correlation between
protection and osmolyte viscosity. This suggests that protection
results primarily from the slowing down by the viscous solution of
heat-induced movements in labile proteins that would otherwise lead to
denaturation and aggregation.
Protection of proteins during heat shock by trehalose in yeast cells
correlates with inhibition of HSP104-mediated protein disaggregation
(31). However, this is not a general feature of osmolytes because we
observed efficient protein disaggregation, likely by the ClpB+KJE
chaperones (25, 27), despite a significant accumulation of betaine in
salt-adapted E. coli cells (Fig. 1). Consequently, we
addressed the specific effects of betaine, proline, glycerol, and
trehalose on the protein disaggregation activity of the ClpB+KJE
chaperone network in vitro, as compared with the protein
refolding activity of individual and combined chaperones KJE, LS, and
KJE+LS.
Possible Mechanisms of Chaperone Activation
With the exception of trehalose, which inhibited
KJE-dependent reactions at all concentrations,
physiological concentrations (up to 1 M) of betaine,
proline, and glycerol activated KJE and LS chaperones. Noticeably,
betaine was a potent activator of protein disaggregation by ClpB+KJE.
The mechanism for such activation may involve 1) promotion of
spontaneous local refolding within the chaperone-bound polypeptides, 2)
stabilization of the end product, 3) stabilization of chaperone
structure, and 4) specific activation of the chaperones.
Promotion of Spontaneous Refolding--
As expected from
"chemical chaperones," all the osmolytes tested but betaine
efficiently promoted the correct refolding of urea-unfolded MDH
in vitro. However, completely unfolded polypeptides are
unlikely to form in the cell, especially during thermal stress, because
partially unfolded proteins are highly unstable species that readily
seek alternative stable structures by association with chaperones (42)
or by aggregation (43). The osmolyte concentrations that optimally
refolded urea-MDH were nonphysiologically high. Moreover, the same
trehalose concentrations that strongly inhibited KJE promoted refolding
of urea-unfolded MDH, suggesting that the two effects are not
connected. Conversely, the same betaine concentrations that strongly
activated ClpB+KJE did not promote refolding. Nevertheless, a minor
contribution to local refolding by low concentrations of specific
osmolytes still remains possible.
Stabilization of the End Product and of Chaperones--
Protection
by osmolytes occurs at the same low physiological concentrations that
also activate chaperones. By preventing inactivation of the end product
of the folding reaction, osmolyte protection could produce a net
activation of the chaperone reactions. Moreover, osmolytes may
stabilize the molecular chaperones themselves. However, the fact that
low physiological concentrations of betaine strongly activate
chaperone-mediated disaggregation under conditions where glycerol,
proline, and trehalose strongly inhibit chaperone-mediated disaggregation suggests that betaine has a specific activatory interaction with ClpB and/or DnaK, whose mechanism is under investigation.
Possible Mechanisms of Chaperone Inhibition
Nonphysiologically high concentrations of glycerol, proline, and
betaine inhibited chaperone activity. Noticeably, trehalose was a very
potent inhibitor of all the reactions that depended on KJE, especially
protein disaggregation, even at physiological concentrations.
Inhibition may result from increased viscosity, which can limit dynamic
interactions between chaperones, co-chaperones, and folding substrates.
This is suggested by the observation that the sensitivity to high
concentration osmolytes increases with the complexity of the
chaperone network. The simplest system with co-chaperone GroES,
chaperone GroEL, and a prebound MDH was the least inhibited by high
osmolyte concentrations. In contrast, multichaperone networks such as
KJE+LS or ClpB+KJE were inhibited by physiological concentrations of
osmolytes. High osmolyte concentrations may also stabilize protein
aggregates, like native proteins, resulting in the inhibition of
chaperone unfolding activity. Low physiological concentrations of
trehalose strongly inhibited chaperone-mediated disaggregation under
conditions where other osmolytes activated the reaction. It is
therefore possible that trehalose can specifically interact with ClpB
or DnaK.
The mechanisms by which trehalose specifically inhibits
chaperone-mediated disaggregation and betaine specifically activates chaperone-mediated disaggregation remain to be elucidated. However, it
is significant that protein disaggregation was very efficient in
salt-adapted E. coli cells, which accumulated high levels of betaine but not of trehalose. This suggests that an organism grown in
hyperosmotic nutrient-rich media can optimally protect its native
proteins from heat damage and, at the same time, keep its network of
molecular chaperones optimally active. However, under poor and
unfavorable growth conditions and under prolonged and acute heat and
osmotic stresses, trehalose accumulation may be a better option because
it is also a powerful protecting agent of membranes (44). Thus, the
timing of heat stress in relation to osmotic stress and the
availability of osmolytes from the medium both determine the cellular
composition and concentration of osmolytes in salt-adapted cells and
hence the extent of thermal damage in proteins and the efficiency of
protein recovery after heat stress.
Molecular Crowding
In addition to osmolyte accumulation, osmotic stress increases the
confinement and crowding of the cellular macromolecules (16, 45).
Crowding enhances interactions between proteins in general and between
unstable folding intermediates in particular and thus favors protein
aggregation (45-47). However, increased protein-protein interactions
may equally favor binding of unstable folding intermediates to
molecular chaperones and their stabilization as soluble
refolding-competent species (46, 47) and may favor stabilization of
native proteins. Thus, increased molecular crowding, by low
concentration of osmolytes, may increase the overall stability of
cellular proteins and encourage proper protein refolding, whereas under
extreme stress conditions, crowding may favor protein aggregation (45).
In conclusion, complex interactions between specific chemical the
molecular chaperones can potentiate the ability of cells to control
protein stability, protein aggregation, disaggregation, and refolding
during and after combined osmotic and heat stresses.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank A. Ben-Zvi for discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by a grant from the United
States-Israel Binational Science Foundation and from the Israel Science
Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute of
Ecology, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland, Tel.: 41-21-692-4232; Fax: 41-21-692-4195; E-mail:
Pierre.Goloubinoff@ie-bpv.unil.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 21, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103081200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HSP, heat-shock
protein;
MDH, malate dehydrogenase;
LS, GroEL+GroES;
KJE, DnaK+DnaJ+GrpE.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kempf, B.,
and Bremer, E.
(1998)
Arch. Microbiol.
170,
319-330[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
da Costa, M. S.,
Santos, H.,
and Galinski, E. A.
(1998)
Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.
61,
117-153[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Arakawa, T.,
and Timasheff, S. N.
(1985)
Biophys. J.
47,
411-414[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Caldas, T.,
Demont-Caulet, N.,
Ghazi, A.,
and Richarme, G.
(1999)
Microbiology
145,
2543-2548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Samuel, D.,
Kumar, T. K.,
Ganesh, G.,
Jayaraman, G.,
Yang, P. W.,
Chang, M. M.,
Trivedi, V. D.,
Wang, S. L.,
Hwang, K. C.,
Chang, D. K.,
and Yu, C.
(2000)
Protein Sci.
9,
344-352[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Singer, M. A.,
and Lindquist, S.
(1998)
Trends Biotechnol.
16,
460-468[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Chen, B. L.,
and Arakawa, T.
(1996)
J. Pharmacol. Sci.
85,
419-426[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
De Sanctis, G.,
Maranesi, A.,
Ferri, T.,
Poscia, A.,
Ascoli, F.,
and Santucci, R.
(1996)
J. Protein Chem.
15,
599-606[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Tatzelt, J.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Welch, W. J.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6363-6373[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Yang, D. S.,
Yip, C. M.,
Huang, T. H.,
Chakrabartty, A.,
and Fraser, P. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
32970-32974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Voziyan, P. A.,
and Fisher, M. T.
(2000)
Protein Sci.
9,
2405-2412[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Yancey, P. H.,
Clark, M. E.,
Hand, S. C.,
Bowlus, R. D.,
and Somero, G. N.
(1982)
Science
217,
1214-1222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Csonka, L. N.
(1989)
Microbiol. Rev.
53,
121-147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Chambers, S.,
and Kunin, C. M.
(1985)
J. Infect. Dis.
152,
1308-1316[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Dinnbier, U.,
Limpinsel, E.,
Schmid, R.,
and Bakker, E. P.
(1988)
Arch. Microbiol.
150,
348-357[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Cayley, S.,
Lewis, B. A.,
Guttman, H. J.,
and Record, M. T., Jr.
(1991)
J. Mol. Biol.
222,
281-300[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Cayley, S.,
Lewis, B. A.,
and Record, M. T., Jr.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
1586-1595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Record, M. T., Jr.,
Courtenay, E. S.,
Cayley, D. S.,
and Guttman, H. J.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
143-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Sanno, Y.,
Wilson, T. H.,
and Lin, E. C.
(1968)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
32,
344-349[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Richey, D. P.,
and Lin, E. C.
(1972)
J. Bacteriol.
112,
784-790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Heller, K. B.,
Lin, E. C.,
and Wilson, T. H.
(1980)
J. Bacteriol.
144,
274-278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Avron, M.
(1992)
in
Dunaliella: Physiology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology
(Avron, M.
, and Ben-Amotz, A., eds)
, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
|
| 23.
|
Bukau, B.,
and Horwich, A. L.
(1998)
Cell
92,
351-366[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Buchner, J.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
10-19[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Mogk, A.,
Tomoyasu, T.,
Goloubinoff, P.,
Rudiger, S.,
Roder, D.,
Langen, H.,
and Bukau, B.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
6934-6949[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Veinger, L.,
Diamant, S.,
Buchner, J.,
and Goloubinoff, P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
11032-11037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Goloubinoff, P.,
Mogk, A.,
Ben-Zvi, A. P.,
Tomoyasu, T.,
and Bukau, B.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
13732-13737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Diamant, S.,
Ben-Zvi, A. P.,
Bukau, B.,
and Goloubinoff, P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
21107-21113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Mogk, A.,
Bukau, B.,
Lutz, R.,
and Schumann, W.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
1971-1974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Glover, J. R.,
and Lindquist, S.
(1998)
Cell
94,
73-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Singer, M. A.,
and Lindquist, S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
639-648[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Laufen, T.,
Mayer, M. P.,
Beisel, C.,
Klostermeier, D.,
Mogk, A.,
Reinstein, J.,
and Bukau, B.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
5452-5457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Woo, K. M.,
Kim, K. I.,
Goldberg, A. L.,
Ha, D. B.,
and Chung, C. H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
20429-20434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Torok, Z.,
Horvath, I.,
Goloubinoff, P.,
Kovacs, E.,
Glatz, A.,
Balogh, G.,
and Vigh, L.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2192-2197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Tomoyasu, T.,
Mogk, A.,
Langen, H.,
Goloubinoff, P.,
and Bukau, B.
(2001)
Mol. Biol.
40,
397-413
|
| 36.
|
Diamant, S.,
and Goloubinoff, P.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
9688-9694[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Ben-Zvi, A.,
and Goloubinoff, P.
(2001)
J. Struct. Biol.
135,
84-93[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Bolen, D. W.,
and Baskakov, I. V.
(2001)
J. Mol. Biol.
310,
955-963[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Parsegian, V. A.,
Rand, R. P.,
and Rau, D. C.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
259,
43-94[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Timasheff, S. N.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
9857-9864[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Courtenay, E. S.,
Capp, M. W.,
Anderson, C. F.,
and Record, M. T., Jr.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
4455-4471[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Goloubinoff, P.,
Diamant, S.,
Weiss, C.,
and Azem, A.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
407,
215-219[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Ellis, R. J.
(2000)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
25,
210-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Crowe, J. H.,
Hoekstra, F. A.,
and Crowe, L. M.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
54,
579-599[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
| Ellis, R. J. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, R531R533
|
| 46.
|
van den Berg, B.,
Ellis, R. J.,
and Dobson, C. M.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
6927-6933[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Martin, J.,
and Hartl, F. U.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
1107-1112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Bursy, A. U. Kuhlmann, M. Pittelkow, H. Hartmann, M. Jebbar, A. J. Pierik, and E. Bremer
Synthesis and Uptake of the Compatible Solutes Ectoine and 5-Hydroxyectoine by Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) in Response to Salt and Heat Stresses
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
December 1, 2008;
74(23):
7286 - 7296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. U. Kuhlmann, J. Bursy, S. Gimpel, T. Hoffmann, and E. Bremer
Synthesis of the Compatible Solute Ectoine in Virgibacillus pantothenticus Is Triggered by High Salinity and Low Growth Temperature
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
July 15, 2008;
74(14):
4560 - 4563.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-J. Shih and M.-C. Lai
Analysis of the AAA+ chaperone clpB gene and stress-response expression in the halophilic methanogenic archaeon Methanohalophilus portucalensis
Microbiology,
August 1, 2007;
153(8):
2572 - 2583.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Gagneul, A. Ainouche, C. Duhaze, R. Lugan, F. R. Larher, and A. Bouchereau
A Reassessment of the Function of the So-Called Compatible Solutes in the Halophytic Plumbaginaceae Limonium latifolium
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2007;
144(3):
1598 - 1611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. K. Conlin and H. C. M. Nelson
The Natural Osmolyte Trehalose Is a Positive Regulator of the Heat-Induced Activity of Yeast Heat Shock Transcription Factor
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
February 15, 2007;
27(4):
1505 - 1515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Fisher
Proline to the rescue
PNAS,
September 5, 2006;
103(36):
13265 - 13266.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Higo, H. Katoh, K. Ohmori, M. Ikeuchi, and M. Ohmori
The role of a gene cluster for trehalose metabolism in dehydration tolerance of the filamentous cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120.
Microbiology,
April 1, 2006;
152(Pt 4):
979 - 987.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Robben, M. Sze, N.V.A.M. Knoers, and P.M.T. Deen
Rescue of Vasopressin V2 Receptor Mutants by Chemical Chaperones: Specificity and Mechanism
Mol. Biol. Cell,
January 1, 2006;
17(1):
379 - 386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Chattopadhyay, R. Kern, M.-Y. Mistou, A. M. Dandekar, S. L. Uratsu, and G. Richarme
The Chemical Chaperone Proline Relieves the Thermosensitivity of a dnaK Deletion Mutant at 42{degrees}C
J. Bacteriol.,
December 1, 2004;
186(23):
8149 - 8152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Podrabsky and G. N. Somero
Changes in gene expression associated with acclimation to constant temperatures and fluctuating daily temperatures in an annual killifish Austrofundulus limnaeus
J. Exp. Biol.,
June 1, 2004;
207(13):
2237 - 2254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Holtmann and E. Bremer
Thermoprotection of Bacillus subtilis by Exogenously Provided Glycine Betaine and Structurally Related Compatible Solutes: Involvement of Opu Transporters
J. Bacteriol.,
March 15, 2004;
186(6):
1683 - 1693.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.-F. Zeng, M. Pypaert, and C. L. Slayman
Epitope Tagging of the Yeast K+ Carrier Trk2p Demonstrates Folding That Is Consistent with a Channel-like Structure
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 23, 2004;
279(4):
3003 - 3013.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Miseta, M. Tokes-Fuzesi, D. P. Aiello, and D. M. Bedwell
A Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mutant Unable To Convert Glucose to Glucose-6-Phosphate Accumulates Excessive Glucose in the Endoplasmic Reticulum due to Core Oligosaccharide Trimming
Eukaryot. Cell,
June 1, 2003;
2(3):
534 - 541.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|