![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 43, 39819-39824, October 26, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Pharmacology, Brain Research Institute and
Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Sciences, Yonsei University
College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea
Received for publication, May 7, 2001, and in revised form, July 19, 2001
Dyrk is a dual specific protein kinase thought to
be involved in normal embryo neurogenesis and brain development.
Defects/imperfections in this kinase have been suggested to play an
important role in the mental retardation of patients with Down's
syndrome. The transcriptional factor cAMP response element-binding
protein (CREB) has been implicated in the formation of many types of
synaptic plasticity, such as learning and memory. In the present study
we show that Dyrk1 activity is markedly induced during the
differentiation of immortalized hippocampal progenitor (H19-7) cells.
The addition of a neurogenic factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, to
the H19-7 cells results in an increased specific binding of Dyrk1 to
active CREB. In addition, Dyrk1 directly phosphorylates CREB, leading
to the stimulation of subsequent CRE-mediated gene transcription during
the neuronal differentiation in H19-7 cells. Blockade of Dyrk1
activation significantly inhibits the neurite outgrowth as well as CREB
phosphorylation induced by basic fibroblast growth factor. These
findings suggest that Dyrk1 activation and subsequent CREB
phosphorylation is important in the neuronal differentiation of central
nervous system hippocampal cells.
The regulation of gene expression by specific signal transduction
pathways is tightly connected to the cell phenotype. The response
elicited by a given transduction pathway varies according to the cell
type. One major signal transduction system utilizes cAMP as a secondary
messenger and has as its ultimate target a DNA control element, the
cAMP response element (CRE)1
(1). The CRE-binding protein (CREB) is a transcription factor that
activates CRE-mediated transcription. CREB activity is regulated by
multiple kinases after various kinds of stimulation (2). Specific roles
for CREB in neuronal development and differentiation have been revealed
through in vivo and in vitro manipulations of
CREB function. For example, the expression of a dominant-interfering CREB within certain pituitary neurons causes them to develop abnormally and die perinatally (3).
"Minibrain" (Mnb) is a mutant of Drosophila whose
presence is exhibited by a specific and marked size reduction of the
optic lobes and central hemispheres in the adult brain (4). The Mnb gene encodes a Ser/Thr protein kinase that possesses a
Tyr-X-Tyr sequence in the activation loop (5). At least 7 closely related homologous mammalian kinases have since been isolated,
and a novel superfamily of protein kinases called Dyrk(s) has been
established (6). Dyrks possess Ser/Thr phosphorylation activity as well as autophosphorylation activity on Tyr residues, suggesting that Dyrk
seems to be a dual specificity kinase (5, 6). The kinase activity of
Dyrk is dependent on the Tyr-X-Tyr motif in the activation loop, suggesting the existence of a phosphorylation-dependent activation mechanism of Dyrk by certain upstream kinases (6). The most
homologous protein among the Dyrks in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome is YAK1, which has been characterized as a
negative regulator of growth (7). Interestingly, human Dyrk1A is mapped to the Down's syndrome (DS) critical region on chromosome 21 (4-megabase region containing 60~100 genes between the markers
D21S17 and ETS2) (31) and, thus, could be a candidate gene responsible for the mental retardation of DS patients (8). Thus, from
Drosophila to humans, it is suggested that Dyrk/Mnb is a key
regulator of neuronal cell growth (36). Although the exact cellular
function of the Dyrk kinases is still unknown, an understanding of the physiological role(s) of this protein kinase family will prove to be
very relevant.
Although little is known about the mechanism by which the
overexpression of Dyrks interferes with normal development in DS patients, Dyrk genes are strongly implicated in normal neuronal development by a mechanism that may involve a signal transduction pathway (36). This study examined the functional role played by Dyrk1
during the neuronal differentiation in hippocampal progenitor cells. We
found that Dyrk1 is activated and phosphorylates the transcription
factor CREB during neuronal differentiation. In addition, Dyrk1
activation induces CRE-mediated gene transcription. These findings
suggest that Dyrk1 may play an important role during neurogenic
factor-induced differentiation of central nervous system (CNS) neuronal cells.
Materials--
The following materials were purchased.
Peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit and anti-mouse immunoglobulins (IgGs)
were from Zymed Laboratories Inc. (San Francisco, CA);
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, fetal bovine serum, and cell
culture reagents were from Life Technologies, Inc.; protein A-Sepharose
was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; enhanced chemiluminescence
(ECL) reagents and [ Yeast Two-hybrid Assay--
The bait vector for yeast two-hybrid
assay was constructed by subcloning the mutant CREB cDNA, in which
RRPSY (amino acid 130-134) was replaced by RRSLY, into pHybTrp/Zeo
vector. Human fetal cDNA library subcloned into prey vector (pACT2)
was purchased from CLONTECH. The yeast strain L40,
containing the reporter genes lacZ and HIS3
downstream of the LexA promoter, was sequentially transformed with bait
vector followed by cDNA library vectors and then plated on a
synthetic medium containing 5 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole and
lacking histidine, leucine, and tryptophan residue. After incubating
the plates for 10-14 days at 30 °C, the transformants were tested
with a synthetic medium lacking histidine, leucine, and tryptophan
residue and containing 50 µg/ml
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoryl-D-galactoside. After incubation
for 2-3 days at 30 °C, the yeast colonies showing blue color were
selected as positive clones. The positive clone plasmids were extracted
from yeast in lysis buffer containing 2% Triton X-100, 1% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, and 1.0 mM EDTA and then transformed into Escherichia
coli DH5 Cell Culture and Preparation of Cell Lysates--
H19-7 cells were
generated from rat embryonic hippocampal neurons (9). They were
conditionally immortalized by stable transfection with
temperature-sensitive SV40 large T antigen. They were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum
and 100 units/ml penicillin-streptomycin under G418 selection throughout the experiments. To induce neuronal differentiation, the
cells were placed in N2 medium and shifted to 39 °C before treatment
with differentiating agents as previously described (10). To test the
effect of Dyrk1 activation on the neuronal differentiation in H19-7
cells, the cells were transfected with a plasmid encoding either wild
type or kinase-inactive Dyrk1 at 33 °C for 24 h. Then the cells
were switched to N2 medium, cultured at 39 °C for 48 h, treated
with bFGF, and analyzed for morphological changes with a optical
microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Differentiated cells were defined as
cells with a rounded and refractory cell body containing at least one
neurite whose length was greater than the cell body diameter. To
prepare cell lysates, the cells were rinsed twice with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline and solubilized in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.9, containing 1.0% Triton X-100, 1 mM Na3VO4, 137 mM NaCl,
1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM tetrasodium pyrophosphate, 5 mM
Na2EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DNA Transfection and Luciferase Reporter Assay--
The H19-7
cells were plated at a density of 2 × 106 cells per
well in 100-mm-diameter dishes. When the cell confluency was 70~90%,
the cells were transfected with suitable plasmid constructs using
LipofectAMINE Plus reagent (Life Technologies) according to the
manufacturer's instruction. Where indicated, luciferase reporter
construct, pCRE-TK-Luc, was transiently co-transfected with
kinase-inactive Dyrk1 mutant (K188R), and the luciferase activity was
measured using a luciferase assay kit (Promega) and a luminometer (EG & G Berhold, Germany). In every transfection experiment the CRE-lacking
thymidine kinase (TK) promoter construct (pTK-Luc) was used as a
negative control.
Immunoprecipitation--
One microgram of either monoclonal
anti-Dyrk1 or polyclonal anti-CREB antibodies was incubated at 4 °C
overnight with 300 µg of cell extracts prepared using lysis buffer.
Forty microliter of a 1:1 suspension of protein A-Sepharose beads was
added to the cell lysates and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with
gentle rotation. The beads were pelleted and washed extensively with
cell lysis buffer. Bound proteins were dissociated by boiling the
samples in PAGE sample buffer, and whole samples were separated on
SDS-PAGE gel.
Western Blot Analysis--
The whole cell lysates were
separated through a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Japan). The membranes
were blocked in TBST (20 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 137 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20) containing 3% nonfat dry
milk for 3 h and then incubated overnight at 4 °C in 3% nonfat
dry milk containing either anti-phospho CREB, anti-CREB, or anti-Dyrk1 (Becton Dickinson). The membrane was then washed several times in TBST and incubated with anti-mouse IgG-coupled horseradish peroxidase antibodies. After 1 h, the blot was washed several times with TBST and developed with ECL reagents.
In Vitro Dyrk Assay--
H19-7 cells were grown in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and
switched to N2 medium before differentiation for 2 days at 39 °C.
The cells were treated with 10 ng/ml of bFGF, harvested, and lysed in
lysis buffer. Then 300 µg of protein was incubated with monoclonal
Dyrk1 antibody overnight at 4 °C. The immuno-complexes were added to
40 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads. After incubation, the samples
were washed three times in lysis buffer, and the kinase reactions were
carried out at 30 °C for 1 h in 20 µl of kinase buffer
containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 5 mM
MnCl2, 200 µM sodium orthovanadate, 5 µg of
acid-treated enolase, 10 µM ATP, 5 µCi of
[ Yeast Two Hybrid Assay to Identify Novel CREB Kinase(s) Activated
during Neuronal Differentiation--
Immortalized hippocampal H19-7
cells differentiate in response to bFGF at 39 °C, the temperature at
which the simian virus 40 large T antigen is not active (11). In an
earlier work we have shown that CREB phosphorylation and subsequent
CRE-mediated gene transcription play an important role during
bFGF-induced neuronal differentiation in H19-7 cells and that the
activation of novel protein kinase-signaling pathways is required for
bFGF-responsiveness (12). During the differentiation of H19-7 cells,
Ser-133 residue in the CREB protein was phosphorylated rapidly and
sustained for 1-2 h after growth factor stimulation. In addition, the
activation of two previously unreported CREB kinases in response to
bFGF was observed by using in vitro in-gel kinase assays
(12). In the present study, in order to isolate the novel CREB
kinase(s) we undertook yeast two-hybrid assays by using mutant CREB
mutant in which the critically regulatory Pro-132-Ser-133 residues of CREB had been mutated to Ser-132-Leu-133 as bait. As a result of the
screening of human fetal brain cDNA library, we identified a number
of unknown as well as previously reported CREB-interacting genes, for
example, histone deacetylase (34), retinoblatoma-binding protein 4 (35), and zinc finger protein ZEB. A BLAST search revealed that one of
the isolated clones encodes a partial clone of mammalian homolog of
yeast minibrain kinase, Dyrk1. Because Dyrk1 was known to be important
in the cell cycle control in neuronal cells and implicated in the
pathogenesis of DS mental retardation, we chose Dyrk1 as a target for
further analysis.
Specific Binding between CREB and Dyrk1 during the Neuronal
Differentiation in H19-7 Cells--
Next we examined whether Dyrk1
specifically binds to CREB in mammalian neuronal cells and how the
neurogenic growth factor affects the expression of Dyrk1 during
neuronal differentiation. The H19-7 cell extracts obtained after the
stimulation with neurogenic bFGF were immunoprecipitated against
anti-Dyrk1 antibodies and then blotted with anti-phospho-CREB
antibodies. As shown in Fig. 1A, the expression of Dyrk1
protein with 105 kDa was not induced by bFGF, whereas significant
levels were constitutively expressed in H19-7 cells. Although there was
no complex formation without any stimulation, the addition of bFGF led
to an increase of Dyrk1 binding to phosphorylated CREB. In the
following experiment, the cells were either not transfected (Fig.
1C) or transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding
HA-tagged wild type Dyrk1 (Fig. 1B). Then the cells were
stimulated with bFGF under differentiating conditions, the cell lysates
were immunoprecipitated against either anti-CREB or anti-phospho-CREB
antibodies, and the protein mixtures were analyzed using anti-HA tag
(Fig. 1B) or anti-Dyrk1 IgG (Fig. 1C). Consistent
with the previous finding, bFGF stimulation promoted the formation of
binding complex between Dyrk1 and phospho-CREB in H19-7 cells. A
construct encoding dominant-negative Dyrk1 was used to block the
activation of Dyrk1. When the kinase-inactive K188R Dyrk1
(pSVL-HA-Dyrk1A/K188R), in which critical Lys-188 residue in the
catalytic domain of Dyrk1 was converted to Arg-188 (13), was
transiently transfected into the cells, the specific binding of Dyrk1
to active CREB markedly decreased in response to bFGF (Fig. 1,
A-C). As a control for protein loading, we measured the
amount of immunoprecipitated CREB by Western blot analysis. In all
samples, CREBs were present at the same levels (Fig. 1B). These results indicate that Dyrk1 specifically binds to active CREB in
response to neurogenic growth factor.
Dyrk1 Is Selectively Activated by bFGF, but Not by EGF, in H19-7
Cells--
Because Dyrk1 is activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in
the activation loop of the catalytic domain (14), we examined whether
Dyrk1 is also activated by bFGF. After cells were stimulated with bFGF,
the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated against anti-Dyrk1 antibodies,
and the precipitated Dyrk1-bound mixtures were analyzed using
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. As shown in Fig.
2, the tyrosine phosphorylation of Dyrk1
increased in response to bFGF. Compared with the control cells, the
overexpression of kinase-dead Dyrk1 mutants by transient transfection
extensively repressed the Dyrk1 phosphorylation, suggesting that the
addition of bFGF induces Dyrk1 activation. Differences in CREB
phosphorylation are known to be critical in the determination and
regulation of both mitogenic factor-mediated proliferation and
neurotrophin-mediated differentiation in neuronal PC12 cells (15). Like
PC12 cells, H19-7 cells also respond differentially to EGF and bFGF
(12). At the permissive temperature (33 °C) EGF treatment induces
proliferation, whereas at the nonpermissive temperature (39 °C), the
addition of either FGF or phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate, but not EGF,
induces differentiation (9, 16). Furthermore, in contrast to prolonged CREB phosphorylation by neurogenic bFGF, the addition of EGF induces transient CREB phosphorylation. These findings from previous studies imply that stable CREB activation by bFGF is important in deciding the
fate of hippocampal progenitor cell to terminally differentiate to
neuronal cell (12). To determine whether Dyrk1 activation is
selectively induced during neuronal differentiation in H19-7 cells, the
cells were stimulated with either EGF under mitogenic conditions or
bFGF under differentiation conditions. Then immunoprecipitation was
performed with the cell lysates using anti-Dyrk1 antibodies followed by
Western blot analysis against an antibody specific for phosphotyrosine
residue to detect Dyrk1 activation. Compared with a stable but slight
activation of Dyrk1 within 2 h after EGF stimulation (Fig.
3A), a transient but
significant phosphorylation of Dyrk1 was observed upon the stimulation
with bFGF reaching the maximum peak at 1 h (Fig. 3B).
In addition, the addition of either EGF at 39 °C or bFGF at 33 °C
failed to induce a significant tyrosine phosphorylation of Dyrk (Fig.
3C). These data indicate the differential activation of
Dyrk1 in response to mitogenic and neurogenic growth factor. In
particular, Dyrk1 activation may contribute to neuronal differentiation
by neurogenic bFGF in the H19-7 cells.
Dyrk1 Directly Phosphorylates CREB in Response to bFGF--
Next
we investigated whether active Dyrk1 could phosphorylate CREB. The
H19-7 cell lysates obtained after bFGF treatment were immunoprecipitated using anti-Dyrk1 antibodies, and immunocomplex kinase assays were performed using bacterially expressed GST fusion protein with either wild type CREB or S133A mutant CREB as a substrate. Phosphorylated substrates were visualized by autoradiography. As shown
in Fig. 4, CREB phosphorylation was
remarkably induced by bFGF. Furthermore, transient transfection of
kinase-deficient Dyrk1 significantly diminished the bFGF-induced CREB
phoshorylation, whereas overexpression, in a similar way, of wild type
Dyrk1 proteins caused a remarkable induction of CREB phosphorylation
compared with the control cells. When GST-CREB S133A, encoding CREB
mutant, in which Ser-133 residue was substituted to Ala-133, was used as a substrate, there was no significant phosphorylation of CREB (Fig.
4). In addition, the effect of kinase-inactive Dyrk1 on the CREB
phosphorylation was examined in H19-7 cells (Fig.
5). Consistent with the previous finding
that phospho-CREB selectively binds to active Dyrk1, the addition of
bFGF induced a marked CREB phosphorylation. Furthermore, the
overexpression of dominant-negative Dyrk1 in a transient manner
remarkably attenuated the CREB phosphorylation upon the stimulation
with bFGF compared with the control cells (Fig. 5). These data suggest
that Dyrk1 directly phosphorylates the Ser-133 residue of transcription
factor CREB during neuronal differentiation in H19-7 cells.
Effect of Dyrk1 Activation on the CRE-dependent Gene
Transcription during Neuronal Differentiation--
To assess whether
Dyrk1 exerts its stimulatory effect on CRE-mediated gene transcription
as well as on CREB activation, the gene expression of CRE-containing TK
promoter-reporter construct was assayed in response to bFGF (Fig.
6). Treatment of H19-7 cells with bFGF
resulted in the increase of CRE-mediated gene transcription in a
time-dependent manner, and it reached a plateau after
4 h (12). To test the role of Dyrk1 activation on CRE-mediated
gene transcription, the cells were transfected transiently with
pCRE-TK-Luc reporter plasmid plus an expression vector encoding
kinase-inactive Dyrk1 mutants (pSVL-HA-Dyrk1A/K188R). Whereas the
addition of bFGF led to an increase of CRE-mediated reporter luciferase
activity, the expression of kinase-deficient Dyrk1 proteins with the
mutation of critical Lys-188 residue significantly inhibited the
activation of luciferase activity triggered by bFGF (Fig. 6). Taken
together, these findings implied that neurogenic bFGF causes the
activation of CRE-mediated gene transcription, possibly through the
activation of Dyrk1 and subsequent CREB phosphorylation in embryonic
CNS hippocampal cells.
Effect of Dyrk1 Activation on Neuronal Differentiation in H19-7
Cells--
The functional role of Dyrk1 activation during neuronal
differentiation in H19-7 cells was further examined. After treatment with bFGF, most of the H19-7 cells displayed neurite extension at
39 °C at which the large T-antigen is inactive (Fig.
7A). The differentiated cells
were shown to be resistant to mitogenic stimulation by serum and to
express neuronal markers such as neurofilament and brain type II sodium
channel (9, 16). The capability of the H19-7 cells to differentiate in
response to bFGF is similar to the response of primary hippocampal
cells during late embryogenesis, since bFGFs act as a differentiating
factor in certain CNS regions, such as the hippocampus, to express bFGF
receptor (33). After a plasmid encoding either wild type or
dominant-negative Dyrk1 was transfected into the cells, the formation
of neurite outgrowth was subsequently analyzed. As shown in Fig.
7A, the vehicle-transfected control cells displayed a
similar percentage of differentiated cells (~68%) in two separate
transfection experiments. However, cells in the mutant
Dyrk1-transfected population exhibited only 26% differentiated cells
(Fig. 7B). Interestingly, transient transfection of wild
type Dyrk1 had no apparent effect on the neuronal differentiation in
H19-7 cells (Fig. 7A). These results suggest that
Dyrk activation is likely to play an important role in the
differentiation of neuronal H19-7 cells.
The participation of Dyrk1 or other Dyrk-related kinases in any
particular signal transduction pathway has not been elucidated so far.
The selective recognition of the correct substrate by protein kinase is
an important biochemical mechanism that underlies the specificity of
cellular responses to various stimuli (13). It is therefore important
to determine the nature of Dyrk substrate to understand its function in
the regulation of cellular responses. Previously, Dyrk was shown to be
required for the proliferation of distinct neuronal cell types during
postembryonic neurogenesis in Drosophila (4). Mutant flies
with a reduced Dyrk1 expression have a reduced number of neurons in
distinct areas of the adult brain and exhibit specific behavioral
defects (4). In the present study we examined the cellular Dyrk1
substrate and its functional role during neuronal differentiation in
hippocampal H19-7 cells. We have shown that Dyrk1 is activated by
neurogenic bFGF but not by mitogenic EGF and that active Dyrk1
stimulates CREB phosphorylation and subsequent CRE-mediated gene
transcription. Our data strongly suggest that Dyrk1 may play an
important role during neurogenic factor-induced differentiation in CNS
neuronal cells. Such a role was further supported by the finding that
the expression of kinase-deficient Dyrk1 in a transient manner
remarkably attenuates the formation of differentiated cells.
We have shown that the kinase-inactive Dyrk mutant could block
bFGF-induced phosphorylation of CREB (Fig. 5). Since this mutant does
not bind to CREB (Fig. 1), the effect in Fig. 5 might not be due to the
competition between endogenous and kinase-deficient Dyrk1 for CREB.
Rather, it shows that if the kinase-inactive mutant is working
specifically, then it must act by binding to the site that normally
activates Dyrk1 and competing with endogenous Dyrk1 there. Since there
could be other effectors that might also be activated at this site,
such as non-Dyrk1 proteins, then the kinase-minus Dyrk mutant might
block more than Dyrk1-mediated effects.
The Dyrk1 protein contains several striking structural features, such
as a bipartite nuclear localization signal, a PEST region, repetitively
present 17-serine/threonine residues, and an activation loop (YQY
motif) between subdomain VII and VIII (14). Dyrk1 is localized to the
cell nucleus (17), hence gaining the potential to control the
expression of other genes. A green fluorescent protein-Dyrk1A fusion
protein was found in the nucleus of transfected COS-7 or HEK293 cells
(6, 17). Furthermore, this kinase has been shown to be a dual
specificity protein kinase regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation in the
activation loop (14). This suggests that Dyrk1 might be a component of
a signaling pathway regulating nuclear events, but exactly how Dyrk1 is
involved in this mechanism has not been elucidated so far. The present
study, showing as it does that Dyrk1 is activated by bFGF and could
activate CREB and subsequent CRE-mediated gene transcription, strongly
supports the idea that Dyrk1 controls the expression of a certain
gene(s). It is possible that gene dosage for such a protein could alter the expression of downstream genes and contribute to the welter of
phenotypic effects seen in DS (17).
We also found that bFGF does not affect the expression of Dyrk1 and
that significant levels of Dyrk1 continue to be constitutively expressed in H19-7 cells. This is in good accordance with previous reports that Dyrk1 is expressed strongly in the brain from embryonic rat (18) and ubiquitously but most abundantly in CNS regions of 17-day
mouse embryo, such as in the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and the
hippocampus (19, 20).
Neuronal activity plays a critical role in many forms of synaptic
plasticity such as learning and memory (21). Studies on the formation
of long term memory indicate that the induction of immediate early
genes is often associated with memory storage (22, 23). The immediate
early gene products are thought to activate late effector genes, which
alter the structural and functional properties of nerve cells. Although
the molecular mechanism by which neuronal activity is coupled to the
alteration in gene expression is poorly understood, CREB
phosphorylation appears to be important in mediating the expression of
several immediate early genes (24, 25). Moreover, CREB has been
implicated in the formation of long term memory. CREB supports memory
in various organisms that perform different behavioral tasks, from
simple reflexes in mollusks to complex emotional behaviors in mammals.
For example, blockade of CREB activation by injection of CRE-containing
oligonucleotides has been found to impede long term facilitation, a
correlate of memory in the marine mollusk, Aplysia
californica (26). Knock-out mice with a deletion in the CREB gene
and Drosophila melanogaster expressing a repressor form of
CREB show deficits in long term memory without any effect on short term
memory (27, 28, 32).
The CNS limbic system, including the hippocampus, plays a critical role
in the processes of emotional behavior, memory, integration of
homeostatic responses, sexual behavior, and motivation. The transgenic
mice overexpressing Dyrk1 in the forebrain, including the hippocampus,
show significant defects in learning and memory as well as long term
potentiation (29, 30). In addition, functional magnetic
resonance imaging indicates a lower level of metabolic activity
in the hippocampus of these mice (29). Underlying these changes are
anatomical deficits in the expression of hippocampal synaptic and
axonal markers. Furthermore, with progressing age, transgenic mice show
a significant reduction in hippocampal volume and a concomitant
enlargement in ventricular size, suggesting that the
overexpression of Dyrk may affect postnatal hippocampal development.
Down's syndrome is a developmental disorder. Individuals with DS have
a higher incidence of complicated medical problems (31). For example,
children with DS are at increased risk for congenital heart defects and
have increased susceptibility to infection, respiratory problems,
obstructed digestive tracts, and childhood leukemia. Adults with DS are
at increased risk for Alzheimer's disease. Most people with DS have
some level of mental retardation. The secondary messenger cAMP
regulates a striking number of physiological processes, including
intermediary metabolism, cellular proliferation, and neuronal
signaling, by altering the basic pattern of gene expression via a
conserved CRE motif. In addition, CREB phosphorylation appears to be
important in mediating the expression of various kinds of genes and in
the formation of long term memory, as described previously. Based on
the findings presented here that Dyrk1 activates CREB during neuronal
differentiation in CNS hippocampal cells, further analysis of the
upstream signaling pathways activated by various neurogenic growth
factors may give deeper insights into the mechanism of neuronal
differentiation mediated by Dyrk1 activation.
We are deeply grateful to H. Suh-Kim
and K. Y. Choi for generous technical assistance, S. Ryu, M. G. Lee, and D. G. Kim for helpful discussions, and J. Roberts for
manuscript revision. We also thank W. Becker for providing the cDNA
constructs encoding wild type and dominant-negative Dyrk1A and K. Saeki
for pTK-CRE-Luc vector.
*
This work was supported by Brain Science Research Grant,
Korea Institute for Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning Grant 98-J04-02-01-A-08 (to K. C. C.) and by Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Sciences in Yonsei University (to E. J. Y.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 22, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104091200
The abbreviations used are:
CRE, cAMP response
element;
CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein;
CNS, central
nervous system;
DS, Down's syndrome;
ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
Mnb, minibrain;
TK, thymidine kinase;
bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor;
TBST, Tris-buffered saline with Tween;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Protein Kinase Dyrk1 Activates cAMP Response Element-binding
Protein during Neuronal Differentiation in Hippocampal Progenitor
Cells*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP were from
PerkinElmer Life Sciences; anti-Dyrk IgG was from Becton
Dickinson; anti-CREB IgG was from NEN Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA);
anti-phosphorylated CREB antibodies were from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY); synthetic dropout medium (SD/
T, SD/
L, SD/
HLT) and yeast extract peptone dextrose containing adenine were from Bio101
(Vista, CA); 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole was from Sigma;
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoryl-D-galactoside and luciferase
assay kit were from Promega (Madison, WI); human fetal brain cDNA
library was from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, Calif.); human basic FGF was from Bachem (Bubendorf, Switzerland). As gifts, pCRE-TK-Luc and pTK-Luc constructs were received from K. Saeki (Research Institute, International Medical Center of Japan). The plasmids encoding hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged pSVL-HA-Dyrk1A and mutant
type K188R were provided by W. Becker (Institute of Pharmacology and
Toxicology, RWTH, Aachen, Germany).
using electroporation. Sequences of the inserts in
positive library plasmids were analyzed by automatic DNA
sequencer (ALF express, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
-glycerophosphate, 0.1 g/ml p-nitrophenylphosphate, and
0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The cells were
scraped, and the supernatants were collected after centrifugation for
10 min at 14,000 × g at 4 °C. Protein
concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad detergent-compatible
protein assay kit.
-32P]ATP, and 5 µg of either bacterially expressed
glutathione S-transferase (GST)-CREB or mutant GST-CREB
(S133A) as a substrate. The reactions were stopped by adding SDS-PAGE
sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiograpy.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Dyrk1 interacts with active CREB in
hippocampal H19-7 cells. Where indicated, H19-7 cells were
transfected with 5 µg of a plasmid encoding either HA-tagged wild
type or kinase-deficient Dyrk1 for 24 h. The cells were then
stimulated with 10 ng/ml bFGF for 1 h under differentiation
conditions. Total cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with either
monoclonal anti-Dyrk 1 IgG followed by blotting with polyclonal
anti-Dyrk1 or anti-phospho-CREB antibodies (A) or anti- CREB
followed by the blotting with anti-HA or anti-Dyrk1 antibodies
(B). In panel C, the cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-phospho-CREB and blotted with anti-Dyrk1
antibodies. All expressed results are representative of three
independent experiments. IP, immunoprecipitation;
WT, wild Dyrk1 type; MT, kinase-inactive Dyrk1
mutant; No T, no treatment; Cont, control.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Basic FGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of
Dyrk1 in H19-7 cells. Where indicated, the cells were treated with
vehicle or transiently transfected with 5 µg of plasmid encoding
kinase-inactive Dyrk1 (K118R). The cells were treated with 10 ng/ml
bFGF under differentiating conditions for 1 h. Total cell lysates
were immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-Dyrk1 IgG, and bound
proteins were resolved onto SDS-PAGE and detected with an
anti-phospho-Tyr (pTyr) antibody. All expressed results are
representative of three independent experiments. IP,
immunoprecipitation; MT, Dyrk1 K118R mutant;
Cont, control; No T, no treatment.

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Selective activation of Dyrk1 in response to
neurogenic bFGF, but not mitogenic EGF, in H19-7 cells. Where
specified, H19-7 cells were stimulated with either 50 ng/ml EGF or 10 ng/ml bFGF for the indicated times. The Dyrk1 was immunoprecipitated
from cell lysates, and the Dyrk1-bound protein mixtures were blotted
with monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine (pTyr) antibodies. The
quantity of immunoprecipitated Dyrk1 kinase was determined by Western
blot analysis using anti-Dyrk1 antibodies (lower panel). All
expressed results are representative of two independent experiments.
A, EGF at 33 °C; B, bFGF at 39 °C;
C, EGF at 39 °C (top panel) and bFGF at
33 °C (bottom panel). IP,
immunoprecipitation; No T, no treatment.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Dyrk1 directly phosphorylates CREB in
response to bFGF in H19-7 cells. Where indicated, H19-7 cells were
transfected in a transient manner with 5 µg of expression plasmid
encoding either wild type or kinase-deficient Dyrk1. The cells were
then stimulated with 10 ng/ml bFGF for 1 h, and total cell lysates
were prepared. In vitro CREB kinase assays were performed
using bacterially expressed GST fusion protein with either wild type
CREB (GST-CREB) or S133A CREB mutant (GST-mCREB)
as an exogenous substrate. Kinase reaction products were resolved by
10% SDS-PAGE, and the levels of phosphorylated CREB were visualized by
autoradiography. All expressed results are representative of three
independent experiments. WT, wild type of Dyrk1;
MT, mutant type of Dyrk1; No T, no treatment;
Cont, control.

View larger version (69K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of kinase-deficient Dyrk1 on
bFGF-induced CREB phosphorylation. Where indicated, H19-7 cells
were treated with vehicle or transiently transfected with 5 µg of
plasmid encoding kinase-deficient Dyrk1. Then, the cells were either
untreated (N) or stimulated with 10 ng/ml of bFGF for 1 h under differentiating condition. Total cell lysates were resolved by
SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot analysis using the antibodies
against CREB, Dyrk1, or phosphorylated CREB. N, no
treatment; C, control; MT, kinase-inactive
Dyrk1.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect on bFGF-induced activation of Dyrk1 on
CRE-mediated gene transcription in H19-7 cells. Where indicated, 1 µg of DNA of pCRE-TK-Luciferase (CRE) reporter plasmid was
transiently transfected into H19-7 cells alone or along with 1 µg of
kinase-inactive Dyrk1 K188R vector (MT). The cells were then
untreated (C) or stimulated with 10 ng/ml of bFGF
(F) for 4 h, and the luciferase activity of reporter
plasmid was measured as described under "Experimental Procedures."
In every transfection experiment, the CRE-lacking TK promoter
construct, pTK-Luc (TK), was used as a negative control.
Data are plotted as the percent of maximum luciferase activity and
represent the mean plus range of samples from three independent
experiments in triplicate.

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effect of Dyrk1 activation on bFGF-induced
neuronal differentiation. Where indicated, H19-7 cells were
mock-transfected (Vehicle) or transiently transfected with 5 µg of either pSVL-HA-Dyrk1A vector to express wild type Dyrk1 kinase
(WT) or pSVL-HA-Dyrk1A to express K188R Dyrk1 mutant
(MT or mDyrk). The cells were then either
untreated or stimulated with 10 ng/ml bFGF (FGF) under
differentiation condition for 48 h, and the change of cell
morphology was observed by optical microscope (A). The
differentiated cell percentages were the ratios relative to the total
cell numbers (B). The results represent the mean plus the
range of data from two independent experiments in triplicates.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
Yonsei University College of Medicine, Shinchon-dong 134, Seodaemun-gu,
Seoul 120-752, Korea. Tel.: 82-2-361-5229; Fax: 82-2-313-1894; E-mail:
kchung@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Montminy, M.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66,
807-822[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Shaywitz, A. J.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68,
821-861[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Struthers, R. S.,
Vale, W. W.,
Arias, C.,
Sawchenko, P. E.,
and Montminy, M. R.
(1991)
Nature
350,
622-624[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Tejedor, F.,
Zhu, X. R.,
Kaltenbach, E.,
Ackermann, A.,
Baumann, A.,
Canal, I.,
Heisenberg, M.,
Fischbach, K. F.,
and Pongs, O.
(1995)
Neuron
14,
287-301[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Shindoh, N.,
Kudoh, J.,
Maeda, H.,
Yamaki, A.,
Minoshima, S.,
Shimizu, Y.,
and Shimizu, N.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
225,
92-99[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Becker, W.,
Weber, Y.,
Wetzel, K.,
Eirmbter, K.,
Tejedor, F. J.,
and Joost, H. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25893-25902 7.
Garrett, S.,
Menold, M. M.,
and Broach, J. R.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
4045-4052 8.
Smith, D. J.,
Stevens, M. E.,
Sudanagunta, S. P.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Makhinson, M.,
Watabe, A. M.,
O'Dell, T. J.,
Fung, J.,
Weier, H. U.,
Cheng, J. F.,
and Rubin, E. M.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
16,
28-36[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Eves, E. M.,
Tucker, M. S.,
Roback, J. D.,
Downen, M.,
Rosner, M. R.,
and Wainer, B. H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
4373-4277 10.
Chung, K. C.,
Gomes, I.,
Wang, D.,
Lau, L. F.,
and Rosner, M. R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2272-2281 11.
Kuo, W. L.,
Abe, M.,
Rhee, J.,
Eves, E. M.,
McCarthy, S. A.,
Yan, M.,
Templeton, D. J.,
McMahon, M.,
and Rosner, M. R.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1458-1470[Abstract]
12.
Sung, J. Y.,
Shin, S. W.,
Ahn, Y. S.,
and Chung, K. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
13858-13866 13.
Himpel, S.,
Tegge, W.,
Frank, R.,
Leder, S.,
Joost, H. G.,
and Becker, W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
2431-2438 14.
Kentrup, H.,
Becker, W.,
Heukelbach, J.,
Wilmes, A.,
Schurmann, A.,
Huppertz, C.,
Kainulainen, H.,
and Joost, H. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3488-3495 15.
Bonni, A.,
Ginty, D. D.,
Dudek, H.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
6,
168-183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Eves, E. M.,
Kwon, J.,
Downen, M.,
Tucker, M. S.,
Wainer, B. H.,
and Rosner, M. R.
(1994)
Brain Res.
656,
396-404[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Song, W. J.,
Chung, S. H.,
and Kurnit, D. M.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
231,
640-644[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Okui, M.,
Ide, T.,
Morita, K.,
Funakoshi, E.,
Ito, F.,
Ogita, K.,
Yoneda, Y.,
Kudoh, J.,
and Shimizu, N.
(1999)
Genomics
62,
165-171[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Rahmani, Z.,
Lopes, C.,
Rachidi, M.,
and Delabar, J. M.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
253,
514-518[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Song, W. J.,
Sternberg, L. R.,
Kasten-Sportes, C.,
Keuren, M. L.,
Chung, S. H.,
Slack, A. C.,
Miller, D. E.,
Glover, T. W.,
Chiang, P. W.,
Lou, L.,
and Kurnit, D. M.
(1996)
Genomics
38,
331-339[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Bear, M. F.,
Kleinschmidt, A.,
Gu, Q. A.,
and Singer, W.
(1990)
J. Neurosci.
10,
909-925[Abstract]
22.
Rose, S. P.
(1991)
Trends Neurosci.
14,
390-397[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Mello, C. V.,
Vicario, D. S.,
and Clayton, D. F.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6818-6822 24.
Ginty, D. D.,
Kornhauser, J. M.,
Thompson, M. A.,
Bading, H.,
Mayo, K. E.,
Takahashi, J. S.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1993)
Science
260,
238-241 25.
Konradi, C.,
Cole, R. L.,
Heckers, S.,
and Hyman, S. E.
(1994)
J. Neurosci.
14,
5623-5634[Abstract]
26.
Alberini, C. M.,
Ghirardi, M.,
Metz, R.,
and Kandel, E. R.
(1994)
Cell
76,
1099-1114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Bourtchuladze, R.,
Frenguelli, B.,
Blendy, J.,
Cioffi, D.,
Schutz, G.,
and Silva, A. J.
(1994)
Cell
79,
59-68[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Yin, J. C.,
Wallach, J. S.,
Del Vecchio, M.,
Wilder, E. L.,
Zhou, H.,
Quinn, W. G.,
and Tully, T.
(1994)
Cell
79,
49-58[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Bartsch, D.,
Bourtchuladze, R.,
Patterson, S.,
Chen, A.,
Small, S.,
Karl, K. A.,
Lacefield, C.,
and Kandel, E. R.
(2000)
Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.
26,
804
30.
Altafaj, X.,
Dierssen, M.,
Baamonde, C.,
Marti, E.,
Visa, J.,
Guimera, J.,
Oset, M.,
Gonzalez, J. R.,
Florez, J.,
Fillat, C.,
and Estivill, X.
(2001)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
10,
1915-1923 31.
Antonarakis, S. E.
(1998)
Genomics
51,
1-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Yin, J. C.,
Del Vecchio, M.,
Zhou, H.,
and Tully, T.
(1995)
Cell
81,
107-111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Kuo, W. L.,
Chung, K. C.,
and Rosner, M. R.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4633-4643[Abstract]
34.
Chariot, A.,
van Lint, C.,
Chapelier, M.,
Gielen, J.,
Merville, M. P.,
and Bours, V.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
4007-4014[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Zhang, Q.,
Vo, N.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
4970-4978 36.
Miyata, Y.,
and Nishida, E.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
266,
291-295[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Alvarez, X. Altafaj, S. Aranda, and S. de la Luna DYRK1A Autophosphorylation on Serine Residue 520 Modulates Its Kinase Activity via 14-3-3 Binding Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2007; 18(4): 1167 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Kim, J. Y. Sung, H. J. Lee, H. Rhim, M. Hasegawa, T. Iwatsubo, D. S. Min, J. Kim, S. R. Paik, and K. C. Chung Dyrk1A Phosphorylates {alpha}-Synuclein and Enhances Intracellular Inclusion Formation J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33250 - 33257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Murakami, W. Xie, R. C. Lu, M.-C. Chen-Hwang, A. Wieraszko, and Y. W. Hwang Phosphorylation of Amphiphysin I by Minibrain Kinase/Dual-specificity Tyrosine Phosphorylation-regulated Kinase, a Kinase Implicated in Down Syndrome J. Biol. Chem., August 18, 2006; 281(33): 23712 - 23724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Kelly and Z. Rahmani DYRK1A Enhances the Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Cascade in PC12 Cells by Forming a Complex with Ras, B-Raf, and MEK1 Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2005; 16(8): 3562 - 3573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Sitz, M. Tigges, K. Baumgartel, L. G. Khaspekov, and B. Lutz Dyrk1A Potentiates Steroid Hormone-Induced Transcription via the Chromatin Remodeling Factor Arip4 Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(13): 5821 - 5834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zou, D. Z. Ewton, X. Deng, S. E. Mercer, and E. Friedman Mirk/dyrk1B Kinase Destabilizes Cyclin D1 by Phosphorylation at Threonine 288 J. Biol. Chem., June 25, 2004; 279(26): 27790 - 27798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Deng, S. E. Mercer, S. Shah, D. Z. Ewton, and E. Friedman The Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27Kip1 Is Stabilized in G0 by Mirk/dyrk1B Kinase J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 2004; 279(21): 22498 - 22504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Yang, J.-H. Yoon, D. S. Min, and K. C. Chung LIM Kinase 1 Activates cAMP-responsive Element-binding Protein during the Neuronal Differentiation of Immortalized Hippocampal Progenitor Cells J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 8903 - 8910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. de Graaf, P. Hekerman, O. Spelten, A. Herrmann, L. C. Packman, K. Bussow, G. Muller-Newen, and W. Becker Characterization of Cyclin L2, a Novel Cyclin with an Arginine/Serine-rich Domain: PHOSPHORYLATION BY DYRK1A AND COLOCALIZATION WITH SPLICING FACTORS J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2004; 279(6): 4612 - 4624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Yang, J.-H. Yoon, and K. C. Chung Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Phosphorylates cAMP-responsive Element-binding Protein at Serine 133 during Neuronal Differentiation in Immortalized Hippocampal Progenitor Cells J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2004; 279(3): 1827 - 1837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zou, S. Lim, K. Lee, X. Deng, and E. Friedman Serine/Threonine Kinase Mirk/Dyrk1B Is an Inhibitor of Epithelial Cell Migration and Is Negatively Regulated by the Met Adaptor Ran-binding Protein M J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 49573 - 49581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|