Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107005200 on August 23, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 43, 39938-39944, October 26, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/43/39938    most recent
M107005200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jodo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ju, S.-T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jodo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ju, S.-T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Apoptosis-inducing Membrane Vesicles

A NOVEL AGENT WITH UNIQUE PROPERTIES*

Satoshi JodoDagger §, Sheng XiaoDagger , Andreas Hohlbaum, David StrehlowDagger , Ann Marshak-Rothstein, and Shyr-Te JuDagger ||

From the Departments of Dagger  Medicine and  Microbiology, the Arthritis Center, School of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118

Received for publication, July 24, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The CD95 ligand (FasL) transmembrane protein is found on activated T cells and cells outside the immune system. A well-known turnover process of membrane FasL is mediated by matrix metalloproteinase, which generates soluble FasL (sFasL). Here, we demonstrate that membrane FasL turnover occurs effectively through the release of membrane vesicles. Quantitative analysis indicates that this process is as effective as sFasL release for FasL-3T3 cells but somewhat less effective for FasL-expressing T cells. The apoptosis-inducing membrane vesicles display unique properties not found in FasL-expressing cells and sFasL. Unlike sFasL, vesicle-associated FasL remained bioactive, killing the same panel of targets that are susceptible to FasL-expressing cells. In contrast to FasL-expressing T cells, FasL-mediated killing by vesicles do not involve LFA-1/ICAM interaction and do not depend on de novo protein synthesis. These observations indicate that the release of FasL-bearing vesicles contributes to the turnover of cell-associated FasL, but the impact of the bioactive FasL-expressing vesicles on the function of cell-associated FasL is different from that of sFasL.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

CD95 (Fas)1 is a type I transmembrane protein expressed by a variety of nucleated cells (1). The physiological ligand for Fas (FasL) is a type II transmembrane protein expressed by activated T cells and non-T cells under a variety of conditions (2-11). Cross-linking of Fas induces cells to undergo apoptosis (12-14). This apoptosis pathway has been implicated in immune response regulation, self-tolerance, graft rejection, tumor escape of immune surveillance, and maintenance of the immune privileged sites (2-6, 15-28).

Regulation of FasL expression has been demonstrated at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels (4-6, 29-32). Recent studies have suggested that the level of cell surface FasL is regulated by a mechanism involving matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) cleavage that releases from cells soluble FasL (sFasL) lacking the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains (29-32). Compared with cell-associated FasL, sFasL is a relatively poor mediator of cytotoxicity. Indeed, under certain conditions, sFasL can actually inhibit the cytotoxicity of FasL-expressing cells (30, 31). Thus, sFasL release effectively down-regulates the function of cell-associated FasL. Here, we demonstrate that there is a second mechanism responsible for FasL turnover. This mechanism involves the release of cell surface FasL in the form of vesicles, which contain full-length FasL and are bioactive. Although the presence of FasL-bearing vesicles was implicated in previous studies (33, 34), the FasL expression level was so low that a quantitative study to determine its contribution to cell membrane FasL turnover was difficult. We have generated retroviral packaging cell lines that produce large amounts of FasL-expressing vesicles; however, it is not clear whether the retroviral packaging process has influenced the production of FasL membrane vesicles (35-37).

To determine whether normal FasL-expressing cells produce apoptosis-inducing vesicles, we generated FasL-expressing 3T3 cells that do not produce virus. We generated T cells that produce high levels of membrane FasL upon activation. In addition, we studied normal T cells for cell membrane FasL turnover upon activation. We demonstrated that these cells release of FasL-bearing vesicles capable of inducing apoptosis in target cells. Our quantitative analysis indicated that release of vesicles contributes to the turnover of cell-associated FasL, but the extent of contribution varies in different cell lines examined. Interestingly, the apoptosis-inducing vesicles display unique properties. In contrast to sFasL, FasL-bearing vesicles fully retained the target range of the FasL-expressing cells. However, there is a reduction of specific activity in comparison with cell-associated FasL. These observations suggest that release of vesicles is a physiologically significant process regarding both the turnover of cell-associated FasL and the impact on FasL function of the FasL-expressing cells.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Production of FasL-expressing Cell Lines-- We obtained an hfasl cDNA construct from Dr. S. Nagata (Osaka University Medical School, Japan). A retroviral packaging cell line (hFasL-PA317) carrying the hfasl gene and control packaging cell line Krox-PA317 carrying the human ckrox were prepared according to the method of A. D. Miller (38) and have been described previously (36, 39). A vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein pseudotyped, vector-packaging cell line carrying the hfasl gene was prepared according to the method described by Burns et al. (40). Various amounts of vector prepared from packaging cells were cultured with NIH-3T3 cells (2 × 103 cells/well in a 24-well plate) in the presence of 6 µg/ml Polybrene (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Medium was replaced 24 h later with fresh medium containing 0.75 mg/ml G418 (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Cell populations that survived the G418 selection were expanded and examined for FasL-mediated cytotoxicity. One cell line (hFasL-3T3) that expresses strong cytotoxicity is used in this study. We also generated an expression construct, pIL-2-hfasl, by putting the hfasl gene under the control of a 1.9-kb IL-2 promoter (41). The promoter construct, pIL-2, and EL-4 T lymphoma cells were obtained from Dr. E. V. Rothenberg (California Technical Inst., Pasadena, CA). We transfected the EL-4 cells with the pIL-2-hfasl construct by electroporation. Cells were selected with G418 (0.8 mg/ml)-containing culture medium and cloned by limiting dilution.

Activation of T Cells for FasL Expression-- Peripheral blood T (PBT) cells (5 × 106/ml) were obtained from healthy individuals and were activated by phytohemagglutinin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) at 5 µg/ml. Three days later, activated T cells were expanded by 100 units/ml recombinant IL-2 (Hoffman-La Roche Inc., Nutley, NJ) for 3-4 days with daily splits of culture. The IL-2-maintained T cells (2 × 106/ml) were purified by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation and then activated by 20 ng/ml PMA (Sigma) and 0.5 µM ionomycin (Sigma) for 24 h. Culture supernatants were collected for vesicle preparation. Activated T cells were purified by centrifugation through a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient, washed, and then examined for FasL-mediated cytotoxicity in the presence of 6 mM EGTA and 3 mM MgCl2 (42). The PMA plus ionomycin (P/I)-activation protocol was also used to prepare activated Jurkat T cells and pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 T cells.

Preparation of Vesicles and sFasL-- Adherent cells (80% confluence) were maintained in 150- × 25-mm Petri dishes in 25 ml of culture medium. Non-adherent cells were cultured at 106/ml. Cells were cultured for 24 h. The cell number harvested was ~25 × 106/25 ml/dish. Supernatants were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm in a Sorvall RC-5B centrifuge (Newton, CT) at 5 °C for 30 min to remove cell debris. The cell-free supernatants were then centrifuged for 3 h at 5 °C at 25,000 rpm in a Beckman ultracentrifuge (Model L8 m-55, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) using an SW25 rotor. For P/I-treated cells, the vesicles were washed once with 25 ml of medium by ultracentrifugation. The vesicle-containing pellet (VP) was suspended with 1.5 ml of culture medium and passed through a 0.45-µm sterile filter before use. To prepare sFasL, cell-free supernatants were centrifuged at 25,000 rpm for 16 h and the top 10% volume (to avoid potential contamination of vesicles) was collected for analysis.

Quantification of FasL-- Human FasL concentrations were determined using a capture ELISA kit (Oncogene, Boston, MA). This assay measures both sFasL and intact FasL, because the mAb used are specific to epitopes present on both sFasL and intact FasL. To measure cell-associated FasL, cells (10 × 106) were washed, resuspended, and then treated with antigen-extraction buffer that was provided with the kit. To standardize the effect of this treatment, antigen-extraction buffer was also added to the vesicle and sFasL preparations. All samples were diluted with sample dilution buffer (provided with the kit) and immediately assayed. Standard curves were generated with various molar concentrations of recombinant soluble FasL (rsFasL) provided with the kit. The molecular mass of the rsFasL is 35,000 Da. A different source of rsFasL was obtained from Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Lake Placid, NY. This rsFasL is made of the extracellular region of FasL (from position 103 to 281) with a FLAG-tagged peptide, and it has a molecular mass of 35,000 Da as determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Essentially identical standard curves were established with both standards. To determine the concentrations (nanomolar) or amounts (nanograms) of the physiologically derived sFasL or the full-length FasL, the molecular masses used for calculation were 27,000 and 40,000 Da, respectively (29).

Cytotoxicity Assays-- Target cells were labeled with Na251CrO4 (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) as previously described (43). The effector samples included FasL-expressing cells, vesicle preparations, and sFasL preparations. Various targets were used to test the target range of these preparations. Target populations included LB27.4, A20, IIA1.6 (a FcR- variant of A20) (44), Jurkat, and WEHI-279 (kindly provided by Dr. D. Scott, American Red Cross, Rockville, MD). Various amounts of each sample were cultured with 2 × 104 target cells in a total of 0.2 ml in each well of a 96-well plate. In some experiments, inhibitors were added to the mixtures to determine their effect on cytotoxicity. Supernatants were removed at 5 h after culture, and cpm were determined with a gamma -scintillation counter (LKB, Turku, Finland). Background release was determined by culturing target cells in the absence of test samples. Target cells, treated with 0.5% Nonidet P-40, were used to determine total release, which represented 100% cell death. Background release was routinely 6-15% of total release. Cytotoxicity is expressed as percent specific 51Cr release, which is determined by the formula, 100% × (experimental release - background release)/(total release - background release). Specific experimental conditions were described in detail under "Results." All experiments were carried out in duplicate and conducted two times or more. The Fas-dependent nature of the cytotoxicity of cells, vesicle preparations, and sFasL has been rigorously demonstrated in previous studies (35-37).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Comparison of Cytotoxicity Mediated by Vesicles Prepared from Various FasL-expressing Cell Lines-- To study the bioactivity of FasL-bearing vesicles and sFasL, we transfected several tumor cell lines with a human fasl gene. One FasL-expressing cell line is the hFasL-PA317 packaging cell line, which we have recently characterized (35-37). The second cell line is hFasL-3T3, which was derived by transfection with the vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein pseudotyped vector. We also generated a hFasL-expressing EL-4 T cell line (pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4) by transfection with an expression vector in which the hfasl gene is under the control of a 1.9-kb mouse IL-2 promoter. This cell line was generated to determine the release of FasL-bearing vesicles during T cell activation, because activated T cells are the major source of FasL under physiological conditions of antigen stimulation. The fourth cell line was Jurkat T lymphoma, which has been reported to produce FasL vesicles (34). Finally, we prepared activated peripheral blood T cells, because they are the physiologically relevant cells that express FasL.

Both FasL-PA317 cells and hFasL-3T3 cells constitutively expressed potent cytotoxicity in a short-term 5-h cytotoxicity assay (Fig. 1a). In contrast, pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells were not constitutively cytotoxic. However, when stimulated by PMA plus ionomycin and then washed with medium, the activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells expressed strong FasL-mediated cytotoxicity (Fig. 1a). Optimal expression of cytotoxicity was observed when cells were treated for 2-24 h (data not shown). We used cells treated for 24 h so that their cell FasL turnover could be determined under the optimal and steady condition of FasL expression. For comparison, activated human peripheral blood T cells (PBT) expressed only moderate cytotoxicity (Fig. 1a). The cytotoxicity of activated Jurkat T cells could only be detected in a 16-h assay (data not shown) but not in the 5-h assay.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Cytotoxicity of hFasL-expressing cells and vesicle preparations (VP). Cell-mediated cytotoxicity assays were carried out against 51Cr-labeled LB27.4 target at various E/T ratios (a). hFasL-PA317, hFasL-3T3, pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4, Jurkat, and PBT cells were tested. Various preparations of T cells were activated with PMA and ionomycin (P/I) for 24 h and used. Vesicle preparations were made as described under "Experimental Procedures." Various amounts of the vesicle preparations were mixed with target cells, and cytotoxicity was determined 5 h after culture (b).

The cytotoxicity of vesicles isolated from 24-h culture supernatants of each of the above cell lines was compared. Vesicles prepared from hFasL-PA317 and hFasL-3T3 cell lines displayed strong cytotoxicity (Fig. 1b). Vesicles prepared from PBT or Jurkat cells displayed undetectable cytotoxicity (Fig. 1b). Interestingly, vesicles prepared from the P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells, which expressed strong cytotoxicity, were only weakly cytotoxic. This is largely due to the absence of LFA-1/ICAM interactions between FasL-expressing vesicles and target cells (see below).

FasL Protein Expression Levels Correlate with Cytotoxicity of FasL-expressing Vesicles-- A highly sensitive hFasL-specific ELISA was used to determine the protein levels among various vesicle preparations (Table I, column III). The specificity of the assay was demonstrated by the lack of detectable hFasL in vesicles prepared from 3T3 cells, Krox-PA317 cells, and pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells. Remarkably, vesicles preparations from both the hFasL-PA317 and hFasL-3T3 cell lines contained a very high level of hFasL. Among various T cell lines tested, the P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells produced the highest level of hFasL. In contrast, little FasL protein was detected in the vesicles prepared from activated PBT cells. Activated Jurkat cells produced the lowest level of vesicle FasL, barely above the detectable level of the ELISA. The data demonstrate a strong correlation between hFasL protein content and cytotoxicity of the vesicle preparations.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
FasL protein levels of various cell lines, VP, and sFasL fractions
The levels of hFasL in various samples were determined in duplicate assays by ELISA as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data expressed are based on 25 × 106 cells and VP or sFasL prepared from 25 ml of culture supernatants obtained after 24 h of culture of 25 × 106 cells. The data presented are averages of two to three experiments of similar results. The different lower limits of detection for cell FasL (<0.02 ng), vesicle FasL (<0.05 ng), and sFasL (<0.4 ng) are due to the dilution factors used to prepare samples for the ELISA and the variations of sample size.

Rapid Turnover of Cell-associated FasL-- It is important to note that factors such as copies of transfected gene and cell size contributed to the variable expression of cell-associated FasL, which affects the levels of FasL associated with vesicles. Therefore, the level of cell-associated FasL was also determined (Table I, column II). Both hFasL-PA317 and hFasL-3T3 cell lines contained a large amount of hFasL. Comparatively, only a moderate amount was present in the P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells. The moderate FasL level expressed by the P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells may account for its modest production of vesicle-associated FasL. It is interesting that the P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells displayed a higher level of cell-mediated cytotoxicity than hFasL-3T3 cells (Fig. 1a). Thus, in contrast to the results obtained from FasL-bearing vesicles, FasL protein expression levels of cells do not necessarily correlate with the cytotoxicity of FasL-expressing cells. This is due to the fact that the P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells but not the hFasL-PA317 and hFasL-3T3 effectively utilized LFA-1/ICAM to facilitate cell-mediated killing (45, 46; see Fig. 4 below). The total FasL accumulated in the vesicles over the 24-h culture period was 1.7 and 2.9 times that of FasL constitutively expressed by hFasL-PA317 and hFasL-3T3 cells, respectively. In contrast, the total vesicle-associated FasL accumulated for activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4, PBT, and Jurkat was 23%, 24%, and 71%, respectively, that of the respective cell source. The data suggest that activated T cells may not release FasL-containing vesicles as efficiently as hFasL-PA317 and hFasL-3T3 cells.

Previous studies have shown that the MMP-mediated release of sFasL is an effective turnover mechanism of cell membrane FasL (29-32). To determine its contribution to FasL turnover relative to the release of FasL-containing vesicles, the sFasL accumulated in 24-h culture supernatants was determined (Table I, column IV). The data showed that the sFasL levels accumulated were high, but higher amounts of FasL were observed with vesicles in the culture supernatants of hFasL-PA317 cells and hFasL-3T3 cells, indicating that both mechanisms strongly contributed to FasL turnover. In contrast, a higher level of sFasL than vesicle-associated FasL was observed for the P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells, PBT cells, and Jurkat cells, indicating that the release of sFasL contributed to FasL turnover in T cells more than FasL released as vesicles. Interestingly, IL-2 maintained PBT contained a modest amount of hFasL but did not produce detectable levels of vesicle-associated FasL and sFasL, suggesting that further activation, as demonstrated with P/I treatment, is required.

Target Range of Vesicle-associated FasL-- Once released from cells, sFasL lost its activity against many targets that are sensitive to cell-associated FasL (30-32). The target range of vesicle-associated FasL was compared with sFasL using four targets that are sensitive to hFasL-PA317, hFasL-3T3, and P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 T cells (data not shown). The comparison is based on the molar concentrations, which were calculated from the FasL levels determined by ELISA using 27,000 Da for sFasL and 40,000 Da for the full-length FasL. As shown in Fig. 2, vesicles prepared from hFasL-3T3 cells effectively killed A20, IIA1.6, Jurkat, and WEHI-279 targets. In contrast, sFasL killed only A20 but not the other three targets. It has been reported that few targets are sensitive to sFasL and many targets are resistant (30-32). The selective killing of A20 but not other targets by sFasL suggests that this killing is controlled by factors uniquely associate with A20 cells. Indeed, Jurkat and WEHI-279 that are more sensitive to vesicle-associated FasL than A20 are resistant to sFasL. The data indicated that vesicle-associated FasL but not sFasL retained the target range of FasL-expressing cells.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Quantitative comparison of cytotoxicity expressed by vesicle-associated FasL and sFasL prepared from hFasL-3T3 cells. Various concentrations of samples (nM) were examined for cytotoxicity against various targets in a 5-h assay. The targets tested are: (a) A20, (b) IIA1.6, (c) Jurkat, and (d) WEHI-279. Background release was less than 15% in all cases.

Vesicle Preparations from Different FasL-expressing Cell Lines Display Identical Target Range and Specific Activity-- We prepared vesicles from three different cell lines (hFasL-PA317, hFasL-3T3, and P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 T cells), measured their FasL protein levels, and tested them against three different targets to determine whether these FasL VP display identical target range and specific activity (Fig. 3). FasL VP prepared from these cell lines showed comparable cytotoxicity against A20, Jurkat, and WEHI-279 targets when the same level of FasL was assayed, i.e. they have the same target range and specific activity. The data indicate that vesicle-associated FasL with identical target range and specific activity can be produced from different FasL-expressing cell lines.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Vesicles prepared from different FasL-expressing cell lines display similar properties and specific activity. Vesicles were prepared from hFasL-PA317, hFasL-3T3, and P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 T cells. A more concentrated form of vesicles was prepared for the P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 T cells so that sufficient FasL could be tested. The targets tested are A20 mouse B lymphoma target (a), human Jurkat target (b), and mouse WEHI-279 target (c).

The Power of Cell-associated FasL-- We used various concentrations of FasL to compare the cytotoxicity of cell-associated FasL with vesicle-associated FasL (Fig. 4). We found that the cytotoxicity expressed by former was significantly stronger than the latter. The observation is valid because vesicle preparations from three different cell lines showed comparable cytotoxicity. The dramatic difference between vesicle-associated FasL and cell-associated FasL was observed not only for P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells (Fig. 4, c and d) but also for hFasL-PA317 and hFasL-3T3 cell lines (Fig. 4, a and b). Three possible factors were considered. First, FasL-mediated cytotoxicity by cells involves cell interaction molecules, and the extent of this interaction varies among cell types. Second, cells may contain stored FasL, which are rapidly released to cell membrane upon activation (47). Third, the de novo synthesized FasL (during the 5-h cytotoxicity assay) may have provided an additional resource for cell-associated FasL that was not considered by the ELISA, which determines FasL expression on a fixed time point.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The power of cell-associated FasL. Various concentrations (nM) of vesicle-associated FasL and cell-associated FasL prepared from hFasL-3T3 (a, b) and P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells (c, d) were examined for cytotoxicity against Jurkat target (a, c) and IIA1.6 target (b, d) in a 5-h assay. Background release was less than 12% in all cases.

To address the role of cell interaction molecules in FasL-mediated cytotoxicity, we determined the ability of anti-LFA-1 mAb to block FasL-mediated cytotoxicity (Fig. 5). In contrast to control rat IgG, anti-LFA-1 mAb effectively inhibited the killing of P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells. Under the same condition, killing by hFasL-3T3 cells was not inhibited. The data indicate the former but not the latter FasL-expressing cells effectively used LFA-1/ICAM interaction to facilitate the cytotoxicity. Indeed, P/I activation has been shown to effectively enhance LFA-1 and ICAM interaction between effector T cells and target cells (48). Interestingly, cytotoxicity of FasL VP, including those prepared from P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells was not inhibited by anti-LFA-1 mAb under the same condition. The data suggest that FasL-bearing vesicles do not co-express LFA-1 and therefore display weaker specific cytotoxicity than cell-associated FasL. Thus, for cell-mediated cytotoxicity that depends on LFA-1/ICAM interaction, release of FasL as vesicles is an effective way to down-regulate the activity of cell-associated FasL.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Anti-LFA-1 mAb inhibited the cytotoxicity of P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 T cells, but not hFasL-3T3 cells and vesicles prepared from these cells. Cytotoxicity against IIA1.6 target was assessed in a 5-h assay in the absence or presence of various concentrations of anti-LFA-1 mAb. Cell-associated FasL and vesicle-associated FasL, prepared from activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells and hFasL-3T3 cells, were used at amounts capable of inducing 30-40% killing. Rat IgG was used as controls and did not affect the cytotoxicity of P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells.

To determine whether the de novo synthesis of FasL contributes to the 5-h cell-mediated cytotoxicity, we compared the cytotoxicity mediated by hFasL-3T3 cells and FasL VP in the presence of 20 µg/ml cycloheximide (Chx), which inhibited more than 98% de novo protein synthesis (49). The result demonstrated that Chx significantly inhibited the killing mediated by hFasL-3T3 cells (Fig. 6a). However, complete inhibition was not obtained even when the effector/target ratios were low, consistent with the pre-existing FasL on hFasL-3T3 cells. In contrast, Chx did not inhibit the killing by FasL-expressing vesicles, which only have pre-existing FasL and do not have the machinery for de novo protein synthesis (Fig. 6b). There was a slight enhancement of killing, which could be due to inhibition of anti-apoptotic molecules in the target cells. Significantly, Chx completely inhibited cell-mediated killing when added to pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells 30 min prior to activation by P/I, indicating that the dose of Chx is enough to completely inhibit the de novo synthesis of FasL (Fig. 6c). The inhibition of FasL expression was confirmed by ELISA assay (data not shown). However, when Chx was added to P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells, only partial inhibition was observed (Fig. 6d). Taken together, the data indicate that, with respect to FasL-expressing cells, a significant portion of cell-mediated killing depends on de novo protein synthesis, which is consistent with a rapid turnover of cell-associated FasL through the release of sFasL and FasL-containing vesicles. A significant fraction is also independent of de novo protein synthesis, reflecting the activity of pre-existing cell-associated FasL in the FasL-expressing cells.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   In the absence of de novo protein synthesis, the specific activity of FasL-expressing T cells, but not vesicles, was inhibited significantly. Various concentrations (nM) of cell-associated FasL (a) and vesicle-associated FasL (b) prepared from hFasL-3T3 cells, were examined for cytotoxicity against IIA1.6 cells in a 5-h assay in the absence (solid symbols) or presence (open symbols) of Chx (20 µg/ml). The pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 T cells (106/ml) were activated for 5 h in the presence or absence of Chx (20 µg/ml) and then washed extensively before used as effector cells against the IIA1.6 target (c). E/T ratios were used in the axis, because unactivated cells and the Chx-treated cells expressed little FasL. The pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 T cells were activated with P/I for 5 h, extensively washed, and then used as effector cells against IIA1.6 target in the presence or absence of 20 µg/ml Chx (d). Chx alone did not affect the viability of IIA1.6 target. Background release was less than 12% in all cases.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Previous studies have demonstrated that a major pathway of FasL turnover is the release of sFasL resulting from MMP digestion. Here, we showed that FasL-expressing cells also release cell membrane FasL as vesicles capable of inducing apoptosis of target cells. The biological significance of releasing cell membrane FasL as vesicles is unclear. This process could down-regulate membrane expression of FasL. On the other hand, FasL presented by vesicles could be functional and could have an important biological function (33-37). Using gene-transferred hFasL-PA317 and hFasL-3T3 cell lines and conducting quantitative analyses of FasL protein expression levels, we have shown that FasL is released from cells in the form of vesicles, and this process is as effective as the MMP-mediated release of sFasL. In contrast, FasL-expressing T cells release lower levels of FasL-containing vesicles and thus contribute modestly for T cell FasL turnover. Unlike sFasL, which is unable to kill many of the targets sensitive to FasL-expressing cells, vesicle-associated FasL retained the ability to kill these targets. These observations suggest that the rapid release of FasL-bearing vesicles may serve a more complex role than just simply down regulating the cell-associated FasL as is the case of sFasL release.

Our analyses based on quantitative hFasL-specific ELISA demonstrated that release of FasL-bearing vesicles is as effective a turnover mechanism as sFasL release, because large amounts of FasL accumulated as vesicles in the supernatants of hFasL-PA317 and hFasL-3T3 cells. The FasL accumulated in vesicles was comparable to or slightly more than the amounts of sFasL released. In contrast to hFasL-PA317 and hFasL-3T3 cell lines, the P/I-activated Jurkat, PBT, and pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 T cells expressed variable levels of FasL from very low to moderate. Taking this factor into consideration, the FasL levels of vesicles generated by these activated T cells ranged from 23% to 71% of the cell-associated FasL (Table I), whereas the sFasL levels were significantly higher. This indicates that the release of FasL-bearing vesicles contributes modestly to the FasL turnover in activated T cells. The modest accumulation of FasL-bearing vesicles is not likely due to an overactive MMP that degrades the full-length FasL of vesicles, because the same high level of vesicle-associated FasL was obtained when hFasL-3T3 cells were cultured with activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 T cells (data not shown). In an earlier study, sFasL was shown to be the major species detected in culture supernatants of T lymphoma cells that overexpress hFasL (29). Our results obtained from three additional and different FasL-expressing T cell populations not only support the previous observation but also indicate that the release of vesicles contributes modestly to T cell FasL turnover. Whether different types of cells utilize different mechanisms, i.e. membrane shedding or secretion of exosomes (50), for the release of FasL-containing vesicles remains to be established.

T cell-mediated cytotoxicity depends on cell interaction forces. Antibodies against LFA-1 and ICAM are effective inhibitors of FasL-mediated cytotoxicity of T cells (45, 46). In the present study we showed that the FasL-mediated cytotoxicity of the P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells but not hFasL-3T3 cells depended on LFA-1/ICAM interaction. Because of this cell interaction, the former cells are more potent than the latter cells even though their FasL is only one-sixth of the latter cells. In contrast to the P/I-activated pIL-2-hFasL-EL-4 cells, the cytotoxicity of vesicles prepared from the same cells was not inhibited by anti-LFA-1 mAb. Thus, release of FasL-containing vesicles could effectively down-regulate FasL function of T cells. Although we have clearly shown that vesicles contain FasL, whether or not LFA-1 could be released in the form of vesicles and whether a vesicle co-expresses both FasL and LFA-1 have not been firmly established.

One reason that sFasL release has been considered a down-regulatory mechanism for cell-associated FasL is that sFasL is unable to kill many targets that are sensitive to the FasL-expressing cells. In addition, affinity-purified and concentrated sFasL was shown to inhibit killing mediated by cell-associated FasL (30, 31). The sFasL prepared from hFasL-3T3 cells also inhibited killing mediated by FasL-bearing vesicles or FasL-expressing cells. This loss and gain of function was not observed for FasL-bearing vesicles, which do not inhibit the killing mediated by FasL-expressing cells (data not shown). Moreover, vesicle-associated FasL retained the ability to kill a panel of targets that are sensitive to the FasL-expressing cells from which the vesicles were derived. This suggests that release of FasL-bearing vesicles may have a different biological function than the MMP-mediated release of sFasL. For example, certain tumor cells (25-27), cells in the immune privileged sites (24, 28), and cells outside the immune system (51-53) constitutively express FasL under specific conditions. Their FasL is likely maintained at a steady level despite continuous release of vesicles that bear FasL. The accumulated FasL-bearing vesicles could provide additional killing power and could function beyond the local area controlled by FasL-expressing cells. Active release of FasL-bearing vesicles may help FasL-expressing cells mediate its functions rather than the inhibition as observed with sFasL. FasL-bearing vesicles may have long-lasting apoptosis-inducing power, because their expression is no longer dependent on de novo protein synthesis. A recent study suggests sFasL bind to extracellular matrix and display an enhanced cytotoxicity against Jurkat target (54). However, the loss of cytotoxicity against various targets associated with sFasL release would significantly reduce the role of sFasL as a general cytotoxic mediator in vivo. Given that multiple roles of FasL in the immune system have been demonstrated, the present study indicates that release of FasL-bearing vesicles, like sFasL release, is an important factor to consider because of its distinct influence on the expression and function of cell-associated FasL. In this respect, our ongoing study has shown that FasL-bearing vesicles display two bioactivities in vivo, i.e. they act as a chemotactic factor for neutrophils when injected intraperitoneally, and they induce lethal fulminant hepatitis when injected intravenously.2

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. A. D. Miller and S. Nagata for providing the valuable cellular and molecular reagents, Dr. W. Cruikshank (Pulmonary Center, Boston University Medical Campus) for providing the phytohemagglutinin-activated human T cells, and Dr. D. H. Sherr for critical comments.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institute of Health Grants AI36938 and ES10244 (to S. T. J.) and GM58724 and CA90691 (to A. M. R.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Supported by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Japan.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: K508. Arthritis Center, 715 Albany Street, Boston University Medical Campus, Boston, MA 02118. Tel.: 617-638-4303; Fax: 617-638-5226; E-mail: jushyrte@acs.bu.edu

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 32, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107005200

2 S. Jodo, and S.-T. Ju, unpublished observations.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Fas, CD95; FasL, Fas ligand; sFasL, soluble FasL; rsFasL, recombinant soluble FasL; I, ionomycin; Chx, cycloheximide; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; PBT, peripheral blood T cells; VP, vesicle preparation; kb, kilobase(s); IL-2, interleukin-2; P/I, PMA plus ionomycin; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; mAb, monoclonal antibody; LFA-1, lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecules.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Watanabe-Fukunaga, R., Brannan, C. I., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., and Nagata, S. (1992) Nature 356, 314-317[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Takahashi, T., Tanaka, M., Brannan, C. I., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G., Suda, T., and Nagata, S. (1994) Cell 76, 969-976[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Lynch, D. H., Watson, M. L., Alderson, M. L., Baum, P. R., Miller, R. E., Tough, T., Gibson, M., Davis-Smith, T., Smith, C. A., Hunter, K., Bhat, D., Din, W., Goodwin, R. G., and Seldin, M. F. (1994) Immunity 1, 131-136[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Dhein, J., Walxzak, H., Baumler, C., Debatin, K.-M., and Krammer, P. H. (1995) Nature 373, 438-441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Brunner, T., Mogil, R. J., LaFace, D., Yoo, N. J., Mahoubi, A., Wcheverri, F., Martin, S. J., Force, W. R., Lynch, D. H., Ware, C. F., and Green, D. R. (1995) Nature 373, 441-444[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Ju, S.-T., Panka, D. J., Cui, H., Ettinger, R., El-Khatib, M., Sherr, D. H., Stanger, B. Z., and Marshak-Rothstein, A. (1995) Nature 373, 444-448[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Hahne, M., Renno, T., Schroter, M., Irmler, M., French, L. E., Bornand, T., MacDonald, H. R., and Tchopp, J. (1996) Eur. J. Immunol. 26, 721-724[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. French, L. E., Hahne, M., Viard, I., Radlgruber, G., Zanone, R., Becker, K., Muller, C., and Tchopp, J. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 335-343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. French, L. E., Hahne, M., Viard, I., Radlgruber, G., Zanone, R., Becker, K., Muller, C., and Tchopp, J. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 2196-2202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Lu, L., Quiang, S., Hershberg, P. A., Rudert, W. A., Lynch, D. H., and Thomson, A. W. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 5676-5684[Abstract]
11. Bonfoco, E., Stuart, P. M., Brunner, T., Lin, T., Griffith, T. S., Gao, Y., Nakajima, H., Henkart, P. A., Ferguson, T. A., and Green, D. R. (1998) Immunity 9, 711-720[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Trauth, B. C., Klas, C., Peters, A. M., Matzku, S., Moller, P., Falk, W., Debatin, K.-M., and Krammer, P. H. (1989) Science 245, 301-305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Yonehara, S., Ishii, A., and Yonehara, M. (1989) J. Exp. Med. 169, 1747-1756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Ogasawara, J., Watanabe-Fukunaga, R., Adachi, M., Matsuzawa, A., Kasugai, T., Kitamura, Y., Itoh, N., Suda, T., and Nagata, S. (1993) Nature 364, 806-809[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ettinger, R., Panka, D. J., Wang, J. L. K., Stanger, B. Z., Ju, S.-T., and Marshak-Rothstein, A. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 4302-4308[Abstract]
16. Rothstein, T. L., Wang, J. K. L., Panka, D. J., Foote, L. C., Wang, Z., Stanger, B. Z., Cui, H., Ju, S.-T., and Marshak-Rothstein, A. (1995) Nature 374, 163-165[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Stalder, T., Hahn, S., and Erb, P. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 1127-1133[Abstract]
18. Ju, S.-T., Cui, H., Panka, D. J., Ettinger, R., and Marshak-Rothstein, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4185-4189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Alderson, M. R., Tough, T. W., Davis-Smith, T., Braddy, S., Falk, B., Schooley, K. A., Goodwin, R. G., Smith, C. A., Ramsdell, F., and Lynch, D. H. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 181, 71-77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Yang, Y., Mercep, M., Ware, C. F., and Ashwell, J. D. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 181, 1673-1682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Andrews, B. S., Eisenberg, R. A., Theofilopoulos, A. N., Izui, S., Wilson, C. B., McConahey, P. J., Murphy, E. D., Roths, J. B., and Dixon, F. J. (1978) J. Exp. Med. 148, 1198-1215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Roths, J. B., Murphy, E. D., and Eicher, E. M. (1984) J. Exp. Med. 159, 1-20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Davidson, W. F., Dumont, F. J., Bedigian, H. G., Fowlkes, B. J., and Morse, H. C., 3rd (1986) J. Immunol. 136, 4075-4084[Abstract]
24. Bellgrau, D., Gold, D., Selawry, H., Moore, J., Franzusoff, A., and Duke, R. C. (1995) Nature 377, 630-632[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Hahne, M., Rimoldi, D., Schroter, M., Romero, P., Schreiter, M., French, L. E., Schneider, P., Bornand, T., Fontana, A., Lienard, D., Cerottini, J.-C., and Tschopp, J. (1996) Science 274, 1363-1366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. O'Connell, J., O'Sullivan, G. C., Collin, J. K., and Shanahan, F. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 1075-1082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Bennett, M. W., O'Connell, J., O'Sullivan, G. C., Chrady, C., Roche, D., Collins, J. K., and Shanahan, F. (1998) J. Immunol. 160, 5669-5675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Griffith, T. S., Brunner, T., Fletcher, S. M., Green, D. R., and Ferguson, T. A. (1995) Science 270, 1189-1192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Kayagaki, N., Kawasaki, A., Ebata, H., Ohmoto, S., Ikeda, S., Inoue, S., Yoshino, K., Okumura, K., and Yagita, H. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 182, 1777-1783[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Tanaka, M., Itai, T., Adachi, M., and Nagata, S. (1998) Nat. Med. 4, 31-36[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Suda, T., Hashimoto, H., Tanaka, M., Ochi, T., and Nagata, S. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 186, 2045-2050[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Schneider, P., Holler, N., Bodmer, J.-L., Hahne, M., Frei, K., Fontana, A., and Tschopp, J. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 187, 1205-1213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Albanese, J., Meterissian, S., Kontogiannea, M., Dubreuil, C., Hand, A., Sorba, S., and Dainiak, N. (1998) Blood 91, 3862-3874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Martinez-Lorenzo, M. J., Anel, A., Gamen, S., Monleon, I., Lasierra, P., Larrad, L., Pineiro, A., Alava, M. A., and Naval, J. (1999) J. Immunol. 163, 1274-1281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Jodo, S., Hohlbaum, H., Xiao, S., Chan, D., Strehlow, D., Sherr, D. H., Marshak-Rothstein, A., and Ju, S.-T. (2000) J. Immunol. 165, 5487-5494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Strehlow, D., Jodo, S., and Ju, S.-T. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 4209-4214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Jodo, S., Strehlow, D., and Ju, S.-T. (2000) J. Immunol. 164, 5062-5069[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Miller, A. D., Miller, D. G., Garcia, J. V., and Lynch, C. M. (1993) Methods Enzymol. 217, 581-599[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Widom, R. L., Culic, I., Lee, J., and Korn, J. H. (1997) Gene 198, 407-420[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Burns, J. C., Friedmann, T., Driever, W., Burrascano, M., and Yee, J.-K. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 8033-8037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Rothenberg, E. V., and Ward, S. B. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9358-9365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Rouvier, E., Luciani, M. F., and Golstein, P. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 177, 195-200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Ju, S.-T., Ruddle, N. H., Strack, P., Dorf, M. E., and DeKruyff, R. H. (1990) J. Immunol. 144, 23-31[Abstract]
44. Jones, B., Tite, J. P., and Janeway, C. A. (1986) J. Immunol. 136, 348-356[Abstract]
45. Wang, J., and Lenardo, M. J. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 186, 1171-1176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Kojima, H., Eshima, K., Takayama, H., and Sitkovsky, M. V. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 2728-2734[Abstract]
47. Griffiths, G. M., and Bossi, G. (1999) Nat. Med. 5, 90-96[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Dustin, M. L., and Springer, T. A. (1989) Nature 341, 619-624[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Ozdemirli, M., El-Khatib, M., Bastiani, L., Akdeniz, H., Kuchroo, V., and Ju, S.-T. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 1889-1895[Abstract]
50. Raposo, G., Nijman, H. W., Stoorvogel, W., Leijendekker, R., Harding, C. V., Melief, C. J. M., and Geuze, H. J. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 183, 1161-1172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Galle, P. R., Hofmann, W. J., Walczak, H., Schaller, H., Otto, G., Stremmel, W., Krammer, P. H., and Runkel, L. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 182, 1223-1230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Strand, S., Hofmann, W. J., Grambihler, A., Hug, H., Volkmann, M., Otto, G., Wesch, H., Mariani, S. M., Hack, V., Stremmel, W., Krammer, P. H., and Galle, P. E. (1998) Nat. Med. 4, 588-593[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Moller, P., Walczak, H., Reidl, S., Strater, J., and Krammer, P. H. (1996) Am. J. Pathol. 149, 9-13[Abstract]
54. Aoki, K., Kurooka, M., Chen, J.-J., Petryniak, J., Nabel, E. G., and Nabel, G. I. (2001) Nat. Immunol. 2, 333-337[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
N. Gasper-Smith, D. M. Crossman, J. F. Whitesides, N. Mensali, J. S. Ottinger, S. G. Plonk, M. A. Moody, G. Ferrari, K. J. Weinhold, S. E. Miller, et al.
Induction of Plasma (TRAIL), TNFR-2, Fas Ligand, and Plasma Microparticles after Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Transmission: Implications for HIV-1 Vaccine Design
J. Virol., August 1, 2008; 82(15): 7700 - 7710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Das, G. Sa, E. Paszkiewicz-Kozik, C. Hilston, L. Molto, P. Rayman, D. Kudo, K. Biswas, R. M. Bukowski, J. H. Finke, et al.
Renal Cell Carcinoma Tumors Induce T Cell Apoptosis through Receptor-Dependent and Receptor-Independent Pathways
J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4687 - 4696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
X. Li, Y.-H. Liu, Y.-P. Zhang, S. Zhang, X. Pu, T. A. Gardner, M.-H. Jeng, and C. Kao
Fas Ligand Delivery by a Prostate-Restricted Replicative Adenovirus Enhances Safety and Antitumor Efficacy
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5463 - 5473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
L. Eidsmo, C. Fluur, B. Rethi, S. Eriksson Ygberg, N. Ruffin, A. De Milito, H. Akuffo, and F. Chiodi
FasL and TRAIL Induce Epidermal Apoptosis and Skin Ulceration Upon Exposure to Leishmania major
Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2007; 170(1): 227 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Baum, V. Kirkin, S. B. M. Fernandez, R. Pick, M. Lettau, O. Janssen, and M. Zornig
Binding of the Intracellular Fas Ligand (FasL) Domain to the Adaptor Protein PSTPIP Results in a Cytoplasmic Localization of FasL
J. Biol. Chem., December 2, 2005; 280(48): 40012 - 40024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Tesse, M. C. Martinez, B. Hugel, K. Chalupsky, C. D. Muller, F. Meziani, D. Mitolo-Chieppa, J.-M. Freyssinet, and R. Andriantsitohaina
Upregulation of Proinflammatory Proteins Through NF-{kappa}B Pathway by Shed Membrane Microparticles Results in Vascular Hyporeactivity
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2005; 25(12): 2522 - 2527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Alonso, M. C. Rodriguez, J. Pindado, E. Merino, I. Merida, and M. Izquierdo
Diacylglycerol Kinase {alpha} Regulates the Secretion of Lethal Exosomes Bearing Fas Ligand during Activation-induced Cell Death of T Lymphocytes
J. Biol. Chem., August 5, 2005; 280(31): 28439 - 28450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Jodo, V. J. Pidiyar, S. Xiao, A. Furusaki, R. Sharma, T. Koike, and S.-T. Ju
Cutting Edge: Fas Ligand (CD178) Cytoplasmic Tail Is a Positive Regulator of Fas Ligand-Mediated Cytotoxicity
J. Immunol., April 15, 2005; 174(8): 4470 - 4474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
L. Frangsmyr, V. Baranov, O. Nagaeva, U. Stendahl, L. Kjellberg, and L. Mincheva-Nilsson
Cytoplasmic microvesicular form of Fas ligand in human early placenta: switching the tissue immune privilege hypothesis from cellular to vesicular level
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 11(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Xiao, U. S. Deshmukh, S. Jodo, T. Koike, R. Sharma, A. Furusaki, S.-s. J. Sung, and S.-T. Ju
Novel Negative Regulator of Expression in Fas Ligand (CD178) Cytoplasmic Tail: Evidence for Translational Regulation and against Fas Ligand Retention in Secretory Lysosomes
J. Immunol., October 15, 2004; 173(8): 5095 - 5102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
S. Xiao, X. Zhang, K. K. Mann, S. Jodo, L. Li, W. N. Jarjour, A. Marshak-Rothstein, D. H. Sherr, and S.-T. Ju
Changes in sensitivity of peripheral lymphocytes of autoimmune gld mice to FasL-mediated apoptosis reveal a mechanism for the preferential deletion of CD4-CD8-B220+ T cells
Int. Immunol., May 1, 2004; 16(5): 759 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Jodo, J. T. Kung, S. Xiao, D. V. Chan, S. Kobayashi, M. Tateno, R. Lafyatis, and S.-T. Ju
Anti-CD95-induced Lethality Requires Radioresistant Fcgamma RII+ Cells. A NOVEL MECHANISM FOR FULMINANT HEPATIC FAILURE
J. Biol. Chem., February 21, 2003; 278(9): 7553 - 7557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Xiao, S. Jodo, S.-s. J. Sung, A. Marshak-Rothstein, and S.-T. Ju
A Novel Signaling Mechanism for Soluble CD95 Ligand. SYNERGY WITH ANTI-CD95 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES FOR APOPTOSIS AND NF-kappa B NUCLEAR TRANSLOCATION
J. Biol. Chem., December 20, 2002; 277(52): 50907 - 50913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
G. Andreola, L. Rivoltini, C. Castelli, V. Huber, P. Perego, P. Deho, P. Squarcina, P. Accornero, F. Lozupone, L. Lugini, et al.
Induction of Lymphocyte Apoptosis by Tumor Cell Secretion of FasL-bearing Microvesicles
J. Exp. Med., May 20, 2002; 195(10): 1303 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/43/39938    most recent
M107005200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jodo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ju, S.-T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jodo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ju, S.-T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement