|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105212200 on August 23, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 44, 40441-40448, November 2, 2001
Bullfrog Ghrelin Is Modified by n-Octanoic Acid at
Its Third Threonine Residue*
Hiroyuki
Kaiya §,
Masayasu
Kojima ,
Hiroshi
Hosoda ,
Aya
Koda¶,
Kazutoshi
Yamamoto¶,
Yasuo
Kitajima ,
Masaru
Matsumoto ,
Yoshiharu
Minamitake ,
Sakae
Kikuyama¶, and
Kenji
Kangawa
From the Department of Biochemistry, National
Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, 5-7-1 Fujishirodai, Suita,
Osaka 565-8565, Japan, the ¶ Department of Biology, School of
Education, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishiwaseda, Shinjuku-ku Tokyo
169-8050, Japan, and the Suntory Institute for Medicinal
Research and Development, 2716-1 Kurakake, Akaiwa, Chiyoda-machi,
Ora-gun, Gunma 370-0503, Japan
Received for publication, June 6, 2001, and in revised form, August 20, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have identified the amphibian ghrelin
from the stomach of the bullfrog. We also examined growth hormone
(GH)-releasing activity of this novel peptide in both the rat and
bullfrog. The three forms of ghrelin identified, each comprised of 27 or 28 amino acids, possessed 29% sequence identity to the mammalian ghrelins. A unique threonine at amino acid position 3 (Thr3) in bullfrog ghrelin differs from the serine
present in the mammalian ghrelins; this Thr3 is acylated by
either n-octanoic or n-decanoic acid. The
frog ghrelin-28 has a complete structure of GLT
(O-n-octanoyl)FLSPADMQKIAERQSQNKLRHGNM; the
structure of frog ghrelin-27 was determined to be
GLT(O-n-octanoyl)FLSPADMQKIAERQSQNKLRHGN; frog
ghelin-27-C10 possessed a structure of
GLT(O-n-decanoyl)FLSPADMQKIAERQSQNKLRHGN. Northern blot analysis demonstrated that ghrelin mRNA is
predominantly expressed in the stomach. Low levels of gene expression
were observed in the heart, lung, small intestine, gall bladder,
pancreas, and testes, as revealed by reverse transcription polymerase
chain reaction analysis. Bullfrog ghrelin stimulated the
secretion of both GH and prolactin in dispersed bullfrog pituitary
cells with potency 2-3 orders of magnitude greater than that of rat
ghrelin. Bullfrog ghrelin, however, was only minimally effective in
elevating plasma GH levels following intravenous injection into rats.
These results indicate that although the regulatory mechanism of
ghrelin to induce GH secretion is evolutionary conserved, the
structural changes in the different ghrelins result in species-specific
receptor binding.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Growth hormone (GH)1
secretion from the pituitary gland is regulated by hypothalamic
hormones; growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulates GH
secretion, whereas somatostatin is inhibitory (1). Derivatives of
Met-enkephalin stimulate GH release (2), the first demonstration that
small synthetic peptides and nonpeptide molecules, dubbed growth
hormone secretagogues (GHSs), can mediate GH release through a receptor
distinct from that of GHRH (3-5). The G-protein-coupled GHS receptor
(GHS-R) was subsequently identified in swine, rat, and human (6, 7),
suggesting that one or more unknown ligands for this receptor are
endogenously present.
We recently discovered an endogenous ligand for GHS-R from the rat
stomach, using an intracellular calcium influx assay in stable cell
lines expressing rat GHS-R (8). This novel molecule, a 28-amino acid
peptide named ghrelin (from "ghre," the Proto-Indo-European root of
"grow"), possesses a unique serine residue at the third N-terminal
position (Ser3) that is n-octanoylated (8, 9).
Acylation of Ser3 is essential for ghrelin bioactivity.
cDNA analysis revealed that the rat ghrelin sequence follows
the 23-residue signal sequence within the 117-residue prepro-ghrelin.
Ghrelin stimulates GH secretion both in vivo and in
vitro. Accumulating evidence in mammals suggests that, in addition
to regulating GH release, ghrelin also influences feeding behavior (10,
11), gastrointestinal function (12, 13), and energy metabolism
(14).
Little is known about the activity of GHS in non-mammalian vertebrates.
Limited studies in these organisms, however, suggest the involvement of
GHS homologues in GH regulation. In the chicken, a growth
hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP)-6 induces GH secretion in
vivo (15). A nonpeptidyl GHS, L-692,429, also stimulated GH
secretion in the chicken in vivo and in vitro
(16). Palyha et al. (17) isolated three GHS-R homologues
from the pufferfish; one of these GHS-R homologues (78B7), sharing 58%
identity with human GHS-R, is activated by three kinds of GHS.
Intraperitoneally injected GHRP, KP-102, also stimulates GH secretion
in a teleost, the tilapia (18). These findings suggest that GHS-Rs and
their natural ligands are necessary for the function to regulate
GH secretion in non-mammalian vertebrates.
In this study, we have identified ghrelin and the precursor cDNA in
an amphibian, the bullfrog. The structure of bullfrog ghrelin contains
an n-octanoylated threonine at amino acid position 3, differing from the serine present in the mammalian forms. Bullfrog ghrelin stimulates GH and prolactin (PRL) secretion in bullfrog but is
unable to mediate this effect in the rat.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Fluorometric Imaging Plate Reader (FLIPR) Assay--
Through the
purification process, ghrelin activity was measured by changes in
intracellular calcium concentrations
([Ca2+]i) using a FLIPR system (Molecular
Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) in CHO-GHSR62. These cells, stably expressing
rat GHS-R as previously described (8, 9), were plated onto black wall
96-well microplates at 5 × 104 cells/well. Cells were
cultured in a humidified environment of 95% air:5% CO2
for 20 h prior to the assay. Cells were incubated for 1 h
with 4 mM Fluo-4 AM (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR), dissolved in assay buffer (Hanks' balanced salt solution, 20 mM HEPES, 2.5 mM probenecid) containing
1% fetal calf serum. The cells were then washed four times by an
automatic cell washer in assay buffer without fetal calf serum.
Lyophilized test samples were dissolved in 120 µl of assay buffer
containing 0.01% bovine serum albumin and 0.001% Triton X-100. One
hundred microliters of each sample were added to the CHO-GHSR62 cells.
The maximum [Ca2+]i change was then
determined as a response. We utilized this assay to study the
dose-response relationships for synthetic rat ghrelin, frog ghrelin-27,
and frog ghrelin-28, all of which were modified by
n-octanoic acid.
Purification of Bullfrog Ghrelin from Stomach
Tissue--
Bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana, were purchased
from a commercial supplier (Ohuchi, Saitama, Japan). A frozen bullfrog
stomach (10.75 g) was pulverized and boiled for 10 min in 5 volumes of water to inactivate intrinsic proteases (19, 20). The sample was then
chilled on ice and adjusted to 1 M acetic acid (AcOH) by
the addition of glacial AcOH. The boiled stomach tissue was homogenized
using a Polytron mixer. The homogenate was then centrifuged for 30 min
at 10,000 × g. The supernatant, diluted in an equal volume of distilled water, was loaded onto a Sep-Pak Plus C18 environmental cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA) pre-equilibrated with 0.5 M AcOH. The cartridge was washed with a 10% acetonitrile (CH3CN)/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) solution. The
peptide was sequentially eluted with 10 ml of 25, 40, and 60%
CH3CN/0.1% TFA. A 50-mg tissue equivalent of each fraction
was subjected to the FLIPR assay. The active fractions (40 and 60%
CH3CN/0.1% TFA fractions) were combined and lyophilized.
The lyophilized material was then dissolved in 10 mM
ammonium formate (pH 4.8), containing 10% CH3CN (solvent
A). We subjected the samples to carboxymethyl (CM)-ion exchange
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min; this procedure utilized a TSK-gel CM-2SW column (4.6 × 250 mm, Tosoh, Japan) with a two-step gradient profile, first from
solvent A to 25% solvent B (1 M ammonium formate containing 10% CH3CN, pH 4.8) for 10 min and then to 55%
solvent B for 90 min. The eluate was collected in 1-ml fractions. The activity of each fraction was determined by subjecting a 50-mg tissue
equivalent to FLIPR analysis. Active peak, P1 (fraction 25-29),
was diluted in an equal volume of 0.1% TFA. The lyophilized sample was
subsequently dissolved in 500 µl of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). This active solution was purified by anti-rat ghrelin
(1-11) immunoglobulin G (IgG) immunoaffinity chromatography. Absorbed
substances were eluted in 1 ml of 60% CH3CN/0.1% TFA. The
eluate was concentrated by evaporation and then subjected to
reversed-phase (RP-) HPLC using a µBondasphare C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm, Waters) at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min under a linear gradient from 10 to 60% CH3CN/0.1% TFA for 40 min. The
eluate corresponding to each absorption peak was collected. A part of each fraction (~100-mg tissue equivalent) was assayed for activity by
FLIPR. The active fractions (numbers 9-11) were combined and further
purified by RP-HPLC using a diphenyl column (2.1 × 150 mm,
219TP5215, Vydac, Hesperia, CA) at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min with a
linear gradient from 10 to 60% CH3CN/0.1% TFA for 80 min. Each absorption peak was collected; a part of each fraction (~100-mg tissue equivalent) was assayed for activity by FLIPR. The active fraction was purified using a CHEMCOSRORB 3-ODS-H column (Chemco, Osaka, Japan) at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min with a linear gradient from
10 to 60% CH3CN/0.1% TFA for 40 min. Approximately 10 pmol of the purified peptide was analyzed by a protein sequencer (model 494, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Five pmol of the purified peptide was redissolved in 5 µl of 50% (v/v) methanol containing 1%
AcOH. We determined the molecular weight using electrospray ionization
mass spectrometry (ESI/MA) (SSQ 7000; Finnigan, San Jose, CA) as
previously described (9).
3'-Rapid Amplification of the cDNA Ends (RACE)--
Total
RNA was extracted from 2.5 g of bullfrog stomach using TRIzol
reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). Poly(A)+ RNA was
isolated using a mRNA purification kit (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan).
First strand cDNAs were synthesized from 500 ng of
poly(A)+ RNA using an adaptor primer supplied by the
3'-RACE system (Life Technologies, Inc.). The reaction mixture was
purified utilizing a Wizard PCR preps DNA purification system (Promega,
Madison, WI) and eluted in 50 µl of sterilized water. One tenth of
this purified cDNA served as a template for polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) using four degenerate sense-primers based on the
N-terminal 7-mino acid sequence of mammalian ghrelin (GSSFLSP). The
sense-primer sequences of ghrelin (GRL)-s7:
5'-GGGTCGAG(C/T)TTCTT- (A/G)TC(A/G/T/C)CC-3'; GRL-s8:
5'-GGGTCGAG(C/T)TTCTT- (A/G)AG(C/T)CC-3'; GRL-s9:
5'-GGGTCGAG(C/T)TTCCT(A/G/T/C)TC(A/G/T/C)CC-3'; and GRL-s10:
5'-GGGTCGAG(C/T)TTCCT(A/G/T/C)AG(C/T)CC-3' were used to amplify the
desired sequences. Primary PCR was performed using these degenerate
sense-primers, a 3'-universal amplification primer supplied by the
3'-RACE kit, and Ex Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa). Sequences
were amplified at 94 °C for 1 min with 35 subsequent cycles of
94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. We then performed nested PCR with one tenth of the purified PCR product. We designed two degenerate nested sense-primers based on the
amino acid sequence of purified bullfrog ghrelin (8-14) (ADMQKIA). The
nested sense-primer sequences contained sequences of
5'-GC(A/G)GA(C/T)ATGCA(A/G)AA(A/G)AT(A/C/T)GC-3' for the frog (f)
GRL-nest 1 primer and 5'-GC(C/T)GA(C/T)ATGCA(A/G)AA(A/G)
AT(A/C/T)GC-3' for the fGRL-nest 2 primer. The nested PCR was performed
using conditions of 94 °C for 1 min and 30 subsequent cycles of
94 °C for 30 s, 52 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min.
The candidate PCR product was subcloned using a TOPO TA cloning kit
(pCR II-TOPO vector, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The nucleotide sequence
was determined by DNA sequencer (model 373, Applied Biosystems)
according to the Thermosequence II dye terminator cycle sequencing kit
protocol (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) using the M13 forward and
reverse primers. The obtained bullfrog ghrelin cDNA
EcoRI fragment (395 base pairs (bp)) was used as a probe to
screen a bullfrog cDNA library.
Construction of Bullfrog Stomach cDNA Library--
A
double-stranded cDNA was synthesized from 3 µg of
poly(A)+ RNA using a cDNA synthesis kit (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) with SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life
Technologies, Inc.). cDNA ligated to EcoRI/NotI
adapters. Following size-fractionation on a Sephacryl S-500 HR column
(Life Technologies, Inc.), the cDNA was ligated into the
EcoRI site of ZAP II vector arms. Phages were packaged
in vitro using Gigapack III gold (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA),
according to the manufacturer's protocol. The titer of the cDNA
library was 1 × 106 plaque-forming unit/ml.
Cloning of Bullfrog Prepro-ghrelin cDNA--
The phage DNA
was transferred onto BIODYNE B nylon membranes (PALL, East Hills, NY),
prehybridized with a hybridization buffer (5 × SSPE (750 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaH2PO4,
and 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4), 5 × Denhardt's
solution, 50% formamide, 0.5% SDS, and 100 ng/ml calf thymus DNA) at
37 °C for 2 h. A 395-bp bullfrog ghrelin cDNA fragment was
labeled by [ -32P]dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech
Inc.) using a multiprime DNA labeling kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech
Inc.) at 37 °C for 24 h. This labeled probe was then hybridized
to the phage sequences. Following two washes with 2× SSC/0.1% SDS at
55 °C for 30 min, hybridized membranes were subjected to
autoradiography with x-ray films (Kodak, Tokyo, Japan) at 80 °C
for 24 h. Ten positive plaques were isolated and subjected to a
secondary screening. Eight positive plaques, re-isolated in the second
screening, infected XL 1-Blue MRF' in the presence of a helper
phage. Following in vivo excision, we sequenced the
resultant plasmid containing the bullfrog ghrelin cDNA.
Northern Blot Analysis--
Poly(A)+ RNA was
isolated from the total RNA of 13 bullfrog tissues using a mRNA
purification kit (TaKaRa). Poly(A)+ RNA (2 µg) was
electrophoresed on a denaturing 1% agarose-formamide gel for 2 h
under 50 volts. RNA was then transferred onto a nylon membrane
(Zeta-Probe, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and fixed by a UV-cross-linker. A
32P-labeled, full-length bullfrog ghrelin cDNA was
hybridized to the membrane. Conditions of hybridization and wash
followed the procedure described above. The intensity of hybridization
was analyzed using a BAS-5000 bioimaging analyzer (Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan).
Gene Expression Analysis by RT-PCR--
Template cDNAs were
made from 100 ng of poly(A)+ RNA derived from 13 bullfrog
tissues using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase. RT-PCR reaction
mixtures consisted of 10 ng of purified cDNA, a sense-primer
(fGRL-full (FL)-s; 5'-CTTGTTCTGCCTGCTGTGGACG-3', nucleotides 82-103),
an antisense-primer (fGRL-FL-as; 5'-GGATTTTCATTCTTGTCTTCT-3', nucleotides 358-378), and Ex Taq polymerase. The reactions
were performed at 94 °C for 1 min with 40 subsequent cycles of
94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min.
The PCR product (297-bp) was electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel.
Intravenous Injection of Ghrelin into Rats and Plasma GH
Measurement--
Under pentobarbital sodium anesthesia, male
Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) were cannulated in the femoral artery
and vein. After sampling untreated blood from the femoral artery, a
bolus of 20 ng/g of either synthetic rat ghrelin, bullfrog ghrelin-27, or bullfrog ghrelin-28 was injected into the femoral vein. Blood (150 µl) was collected in a syringe containing EDTA (1 mg/ml blood) 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 60 min after injection; isolated blood was then
centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5 min. Plasma was stored at 30 °C
until use. Plasma GH levels were measured using a rat GH enzyme
immunoassay system (BIOTRAK, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc.).
Effect of Ghrelin on Adenohypophyseal Hormone Secretion in
Bullfrog Pituitary Cells--
We examined the effect of ghrelin on the
secretion of adenohypophyseal hormones, such as GH, PRL,
follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH), in
dispersed bullfrog anterior pituitary cells (21). Bullfrogs purchased
from a commercial supplier (Ohuchi, Saitama, Japan) in July and October
were sacrificed by decapitation. The anterior pituitary glands were
rapidly dissected out under sterile conditions. The pituitaries were
diced in Ca2+-/Mg2+-free frog Ringer solution
(50.4 mM NaCl, 0.7 mM KCl, 9.2 mM
Na2HPO4, 0.9 mM
KH2PO4, 2.4 mM NaHCO3
and 2.4 mM EDTA) and transferred to 70% Medium 199 (M199,
Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) containing 0.2% collagenase (Wako
Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) and 0.001% DNase (Sigma). After
mechanical and enzymatic disruption, the suspension was centrifuged at
100 × g for 5 min. Following removal of the
supernatant, the dispersed cells were resuspended in M199 containing
0.1% bovine serum albumin (Fraction V; Sigma) and plated in
96-multiwell plates (Corning Costar Japan, Tokyo, Japan) at 60,000 cells/well. Plates were precultured for 24 h at 23 °C in a
humidified incubator with 95% air:5% CO2. Test substances (200 µl/well) dissolved in cultured medium were added to the
precultured cells for a 24-h incubation. The resulting media (150 µl)
were collected in V-bottom 96-well microplates (Iwaki, Tokyo, Japan) following centrifugation at 100 × g for 5 min to
remove cell debris. The collected medium (100 µl) was stored at
20 °C until use in a homologous radioimmunoassay for GH (22), PRL
(23), FSH (24), and LH (25).
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation and Sequence Determination of the Bullfrog
Ghrelin--
Crude stomach extracts were eluted using a Sep-Pak C18
cartridge; the fraction eluted by 40-60% CH3CN/0.1% TFA
contained ghrelin activity. The lyophilized sample was then subjected
to CM-ion exchange HPLC (Fig.
1A). Ghrelin activity was
observed in 16 sequential fractions (numbers 18-32). A portion of the
active peak, P1 (fraction 25-29), contained the highest activity.
These pooled fractions were subjected to immunoaffinity chromatography
using an IgG antiserum raised against rat ghrelin (1-11). The
peptides, absorbed on the immunoaffinity column, were separated by
RP-HPLC on a µBondasphare C18 column (Fig. 1B). Although
many peaks were observed after the immunoaffinity chromatography,
ghrelin activity was observed in peak numbers 9-11. These active peaks
were combined and further purified by RP-HPLC on a diphenyl column
(Fig. 1C). The three resultant active peaks (peaks I, II,
and III) were purified by RP-HPLC on an ODS column (data not shown).
Based on the peak height, the isolated peptide yield was estimated to
be 20 pmol for peak I, 53 pmol for peak II, and 33 pmol for peak III.
Ten pmol of each purified peptide was sequenced using a protein
sequencer. Peak I contained a 28-amino acid residue peptide with a
sequence of GLXFLSPADMQKIAERQSQNKLRHGNMN
(X, unidentified) (Fig. 1D). Peaks II and III
consisted of 27 amino acid residues with a sequence identical to that
of peak I except for the deletion of the asparagine (N) residue
at the C terminus: GLXFLSPADMQKIAERQSQNKLRHGNM
(X, unidentified) (Fig. 1D). As the N-terminal
amino acid sequence of the purified peptides, GLXFLSP,
demonstrated a high similarity to the mammalian ghrelins (GSSFLSP),
these purified peptides have been designated the bullfrog ghrelins. The
unidentified X residue at position 3 was predicted to
contain an acyl modification, as seen in rat ghrelin.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Successive purification of bullfrog
ghrelin. Black bars indicate the fluorescence change of
[Ca2+]i in CHO-GHSR62 cells. A,
CM-ion exchange HPLC (pH 4.8) of Sep-Pak fraction eluted with 40 and
60% CH3CN/0.1% TFA. Column: TSK-gel CM-2SW (4.6 × 250 mm). Solvent: (a) 10 mM ammonium formate (pH
4.8):CH3CN (90:10 (v/v)), (b) 1 M ammonium
formate (pH 4.8):CH3CN (90:10 (v/v)). Elution: linear
gradient from a:b = 100:0 to a:b = 75:25 for 10 min, followed
by a second gradient from a:b = 75:25 to a:b = 45:55 for 90 min. Flow rate: 1 ml/min. Fraction size: 1 ml/tube. The active peak, P1
(fraction 25-29), indicated by a solid bar, was purified by
anti-rat ghrelin (1-11) IgG immunoaffinity chromatography.
B, PR-HPLC of immunoaffinity chromatography adsorbed
fraction. Column: µBondasphare C18 (2.1 × 150 mm). Elution:
linear gradient from 10% CH3CN/0.1% TFA to 60%
CH3CN/0.1% TFA for 40 min. Flow rate: 0.2 ml/min. Fraction
size: each peak. The active fraction (numbers 9-11), indicated by
solid bar, was further purified by an additional RP-HPLC.
C, final purification of bullfrog ghrelin by RP-HPLC.
Column: 219TP5215 diphenyl (2.1 × 150 mm). Elution: linear
gradient from 10% CH3CN/0.1% TFA to 60%
CH3CN/0.1% TFA for 80 min. Flow rate: 0.2 ml/min. Fraction
size: full width of each peak. D, structures of bullfrog
ghrelin, determined from peaks I, II, and III. The identity of the
third residue as a threonine was determined by cDNA analysis. The
modification of Thr3 by n-octanoic acid in peaks
I and II and that with n-decanoic acid for peak III were
analyzed by ESI/MS and confirmed by co-chromatography with synthetic
and native peptides.
|
|
To determine the complete sequence of the purified peptides, we
isolated a cDNA encoding the precursor protein from a bullfrog stomach cDNA library. As the peptide sequence of bullfrog ghrelin was quite different from the mammalian ghrelins, a mammalian ghrelin cDNA was unlikely to hybridize to the bullfrog ghrelin cDNA.
Therefore, we used a partial bullfrog ghrelin cDNA fragment
obtained by 3'-RACE-PCR as a screening probe. The cDNA fragment was
~400 bp long containing a known sequence as determined by peptide
sequence analysis. This cDNA (395 bp, s8-n1-1) was used to screen
a bullfrog stomach cDNA library. The isolated full-length bullfrog
ghrelin cDNA was 485 bp long, containing 46 bp in the
5'-untranslated region, 345 bp of coding region, and 94 bp in the
3'-untranslated region. An AATAAA polyadenylation signal was identified
in the 3'-non-coding region (Fig. 2). The
predicted initiation methionine was located at nucleotide 47-49. The
deduced amino acid sequence of the coding region indicated that the
bullfrog ghrelin precursor is composed of 114 amino acid residues, two
to four amino acids shorter than the mammalian ghrelin precursors (Fig.
3). The bullfrog prepro- and
mature-ghrelins were only 18 and 29% identical, respectively, as
compared with the mammalian counterparts. Computer analysis using the
SignalP server (26) predicted the presence of a signal sequence
comprised of the N-terminal 24 residues of the precursor in agreement
with the determined sequence of the purified peptide. The
mature-ghrelin peptide, therefore, directly follows the signal peptide.
Furthermore, a typical dibasic processing sequence, Arg-Arg, flanks the
mature-ghrelin peptide at nucleotides 203-208 at the C terminus (Fig.
2). The unidentified third residue of the purified peptide was
determined from the nucleotide sequence to be threonine. This is a
difference from those of the highly conserved serine present in the
mammalian ghrelins.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Nucleotide sequences and deduced amino acid
sequence of the bullfrog ghrelin. The bullfrog ghrelin cDNA
contains a 485-base pair sequence. Prepro-ghrelin is composed of 114 amino acids. The frog ghrelin-28 mature sequence is
underlined. A typical dibasic processing sequence, Arg-Arg,
is boxed. Doubled underline indicates the
polyadenylation signal (AATAAA).
|
|

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Comparison of amino acid sequence of the
bullfrog ghrelin precursor to those of mammalian ghrelin
precursors. Asterisks indicate the amino acids that are
identical in all species. Amino acid sequences are available from the
DDBJ/EMBL/GenBankTM data bases (accession number AB058510 for frog;
AB029434 for human; AB092433 for rat; AB03571 for mouse; AF350329 for
bovine; AF308930 for pig; AJ298295 for dog).
|
|
To determine the structure of the purified frog ghrelins,
we determined the molecular weights of the purified peptides. Analysis by ESI/MS demonstrated that the molecular weights of the peak I
(3308.5 ± 0.9) and peak II (3196.1 ± 0.9) ghrelins were
~126 mass units greater than the theoretical mass calculated from the 28-residue peptide sequence (3183.6) and the 27-residue of peak II
(3069.6), respectively. These results indicate that the
The3 hydroxyl groups for the peak I and peak II ghrelins
are n-octanoylated, as seen for mammalian ghrelins. We
designated these octanoylated 28- and 27-residue peptides as frog
ghrelin-28 and frog ghrelin-27, respectively. The molecular weight of
peak III (3225.3 ± 1.7) was 154 mass units greater than the
theoretical mass (3069.6). This result suggests that the
The3 residue is modified by n-decanoic acid. We
designated this decanoylated 27-residue peptide as frog ghrelin-27-C10.
These structures were confirmed by co-chromatography of the purified
peptide with synthetic peptides by RP-HPLC (data not shown).
Gene Expression of the Bullfrog Ghrelin--
To examine the frog
ghrelin gene expression pattern, we performed Northern blot analysis
using poly(A)+ RNA isolated from 13 bullfrog tissues. A
strong signal derived from ghrelin mRNA (~0.5 kilobase) was
observed in the stomach; no signal could be detected in other tissues
(Fig. 4A). To detect lower
levels of gene expression, we performed RT-PCR analysis for the same
tissues. We observed the expected PCR product (297 bp) at high levels
in stomach, with moderate levels in small intestine, pancreas, and
testes and low levels in the heart, lung, and gall bladder (Fig.
4B).

View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Gene expression of the bullfrog ghrelin in
various tissues. A, Northern blot analysis. Each lane
contains 2 µg of poly(A)+ RNA. B, RT-PCR
analysis. Poly(A)+ RNA (100 ng) was subjected to reverse
transcription; one tenth of the resultant cDNA was used as a
template for specific amplification. Each lane contains one fourth of
the reacted solution. Lane 1, brain; lane
2, heart; lane 3, lung; lane 4, liver;
lane 5, stomach; lane 6, small intestine;
lane 7, large intestine; lane 8, gall bladder;
lane 9, spleen; lane 10, pancreas; lane
11, kidney; lane 12, adrenal gland; lane 13,
testes.
|
|
Biological Activity of Bullfrog Ghrelin--
Frog ghrelin-27 and
frog ghrelin-28 increased [Ca2+]i in
CHO-GHSR62 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
5) with a potency ~1/20 that of rat
ghrelin. A similar stimulatory response was observed, altering plasma
GH concentrations when either frog or rat ghrelin were injected
intravenously into rats (Fig. 6). Rat ghrelin potently stimulated GH secretion, whereas the frog ghrelins had
weak effects only.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Dose-response relationships of change in
intracellular calcium concentrations by bullfrog and rat ghrelins in
CHO-GHSR62 cells. CHO-GHSR62 cells (5 × 104
cells/well) were cultured in black 96-well plates for 20 h. After
the addition of reagents, fluorescence changes were automatically
measured by a FLIPR system. The maximum value of the response was used
for data calculation. Values represent the mean ± S.E.
(n = 3).
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Time-course of changes in plasma GH
concentration after intravenous injection of bullfrog and rat ghrelins
into rats. Either synthetic bullfrog or rat ghrelin (20 ng/g body
weight) was injected into the femoral vein of male Sprague-Dawley rats
(250-300 g) anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium. Blood (150 µl)
was collected from the femoral artery at time points up to 60 min after
injection. Values (mean ± S.E., n = 5) are
expressed in terms of the ratio of each time point to the initial level
due to variations in the initial levels (mean ± S.E., frog
ghrelin-27, 144.1 ± 11.1 ng/ml; frog ghrelin-28, 184.2 ± 28.0 ng/ml; rat ghrelin, 130.4 ± 15.5 ng/ml; saline, 273.3 ± 26.9 ng/ml).
|
|
The assessment of frog ghrelin activity throughout the purification was
performed using CHO-GHSR62 cells expressing rat GHS-R. To examine the
effect of frog ghrelin on cells expressing bullfrog GHS-R, we examined
GH-releasing activity in dispersed bullfrog adenohypophyseal cells. The
effects on other adenohypophyseal hormones such as PRL, LH, and FSH
were examined simultaneously. Frog ghrelin-27 stimulated GH and PRL
secretion in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7,
A and B). Similar
results were observed for frog ghrelin-28 (data not shown). The minimum
effective concentration of frog ghrelin enhancing GH release was 0.1 nM; the value needed to enhance PRL release was 0.01 nM. Rat ghrelin stimulated GH and PRL secretion in this
system, but the potency was reduced more than 3 orders of magnitude
from frog ghrelin. We also examined the effect of GHRP-6 on GH and PRL
secretion. Compared with the control value, 10 nM GHRP-6
stimulated GH secretion (32.82 ± 2.56 versus
26.39 ± 0.71 ng/10,000 cells/24 h, mean ± S.E.
(n = 6); p < 0.05) and PRL secretion
(61.95 ± 2.86 versus 46.24 ± 3.53 ng/10,000
cells/24 h, mean ± S.E. (n = 6);
p < 0.001). The GH-releasing potency of GHRP-6 was
reduced 2 orders of magnitude from frog ghrelin. No effects were
observed on FSH and LH secretion (data not shown).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of bullfrog and rat ghrelins on
the secretion of GH and PRL from dispersed bullfrog adenohypophyseal
cells. Left and right panels show the
secretion of GH (A) and PRL (B), respectively. Dispersed
bullfrog adenohypophyseal cells were plated in 96-multiwell plates at
60,000 cells/well and precultured for 24 h at 23 °C in a
humidified incubator with 95% air:5% CO2. Either frog
ghrelin-27 or rat ghrelin (200 µl/well) was added to the precultured
cells and incubated for 24 h. We measured the GH and PRL
concentrations in the incubated media by a homologous radioimmunoassay
designed to detect bullfrog GH or PRL. Values represent mean ± S.E. (n = 5-6). *p < 0.05 as compared
with controls (concentration 0) by Student's t test.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We isolated an amphibian ghrelin using a stable cell line
expressing rat GHS-R (CHO-GHSR62) binding ghrelin. Bullfrog ghrelin was
a potent ligand for the rat GHS-R, clearly demonstrating the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in this system and in bullfrog adenohypophyseal cells.
The Ser3 hydroxyl group of the mammalian ghrelins is
acylated by n-octanoic acid. Des-n-octanoyl form
of ghrelin, designated as des-acyl ghrelin, has no effect on
[Ca2+]i in CHO-GHSR62 cells (8). This
acylation, therefore, is essential for the biological activity of
ghrelin (8, 9). The present study revealed that bullfrog ghrelin
changes the acylated amino acid from Ser to Thr, the first report of an
amino acid residue other than Ser of the ghrelin molecule that is
n-octanoylated. This amino acid alteration at position 3 occurs by a point mutation of codon from AGC to ACC. Both Ser and Thr
contain a hydroxyl group, creating the acylation site. These results
suggest that the n-octanoyl modification of the position 3 amino acid hydroxyl group is the general structure of ghrelin across
multiple species. As bullfrog ghrelin increases
[Ca2+]i in CHO-GHSR62 cells and stimulates GH
secretion from the dispersed bullfrog adenohypophyseal cells, this
acylation may mediate the biological activity of ghrelin.
We also identified a bullfrog ghrelin acylated by n-decanoic
acid, the first report of acylation of ghrelin by a modifier other than
n-octanoic acid. We have also observed n-decanoic
acid acylation of a ghrelin present in human stomach, comprising 23% of the isolated
ghrelin.2
Approximately 35 pmol of decanoyl-modified ghrelin was isolated from
bullfrog stomach, 33% of the isolated bullfrog ghrelin (105 pmol). A
decanoyl-modified ghrelin has not been identified in the
rat.2 These differences may be species-specific. The
mechanisms governing peptide acylation in the posttranslational
processing of ghrelin, however, are still unknown.
Two lengths of bullfrog ghrelin were isolated in this study, one of 28 residues and the other of 27 residues. The later has a residue deleted
from the C terminus of the 28-residue ghrelin. Analysis of the bullfrog
ghrelin cDNA revealed that a typical dibasic processing sequence,
Arg-Arg, follows the C terminus of the 28-residue ghrelin. The yield of
28-residue ghrelin (20 pmol) was less than that of the 27-residue
ghrelin (86 pmol) in this purification. The mechanism governing the
greater abundance of the 27-residue bullfrog ghrelin is unclear; it is
likely, however, that an unusual endoproteolytic processing mechanism
controls the maturation of bullfrog ghrelin.
The sequence of bullfrog ghrelin differs substantially from the
mammalian counterparts (30% identity). The N-terminal amino acid
residues (1-7), however, are highly conserved. The amino acids at
positions 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7 are identical in all the species examined.
Bullfrog ghrelin elicited increases in
[Ca2+]i in CHO-GHSR62 cells expressing rat
GHS-R with a reduced potency from rat ghrelin. The Gly-Ser-Ser
(n-octanoyl)-Phe-Leu segment at the N terminus constitutes
the "active core" required for agonist potency at GHS-R (29);
des-acyl ghrelin has no effect on [Ca2+]i
(8). Des-acyl ghrelin does not bind to GHS-R (28). In addition to the
N-terminal amino acid sequence, the acylated amino acid at position 3 is involved in receptor binding and subsequent signal transduction.
Bullfrog ghrelin demonstrates a potent GH-releasing activity in
bullfrog adenohypophyseal cells, with only a weak GH-releasing activity
in in vivo experiment of rat. This result indicates the species specificity of the ligand binding to the receptor, suggesting that the structure of GHS-R ligand recognition is different between the
bullfrog and rat. Although the bullfrog GHS-R has not been defined, key
amino acid residues essential for ligand binding and activation have
been defined in transmembrane regions 3 and 4 in human GHS-R (30). The
N-terminal sequence of ghrelin is believed to contain the key amino
acids for binding to the receptor. Amino acids at positions 2 and 3 in
bullfrog ghrelin, however, are altered to
Leu2-Thr3, instead of
Ser2-Ser3 present in the mammalian ghrelins.
Amino acids at positions 2 and 3 of the bullfrog ghrelin are likely to
be important in the recognition of the ligand by bullfrog GHS-R.
Bullfrog ghrelin potently stimulated GH secretion in bullfrog
adenohypophyseal cells. Hypothalamic GHRH primarily stimulates GH
secretion in mammals (1). Although a bullfrog GHRH has not been
identified, GH-releasing activity by human GHRH has been observed in
the bullfrog in vitro (31). A GHRH-like peptide in the frog
(Rana ridibunda) stimulates GH secretion from the bullfrog pituitary cell (32-34). These results indicate that the regulatory mechanism governing GH secretion by GHRH exists in the frog.
In addition, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (27),
proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides (27), pituitary adenylate
cyclase-activating polypeptide (34), and endothelin (35) are involved
in GH release in the frog. These facts indicate that the stimulation of
GH secretion in frog is governed by a complicated hypothalamic hormonal regulation.
Ghrelin is also synthesized in the brain of rat (8). The few
ghrelin-producing cells are located in a specific hypothalamic region,
the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (8), participating in the regulation
of GH secretion from the pituitary (36). The presence of hypothalamic
ghrelin in the bullfrog has not been confirmed. The gene expression of
ghrelin in the bullfrog brain was not detectable by either Northern
blot or RT-PCR analyses. In bullfrog, the expression of the ghrelin
gene or the number of ghrelin-producing cells may be too low for
detection, even by RT-PCR. As hypothalamic ghrelin may still play a
role in the stimulation of GH secretion (36), it will be important to
identify the expression of ghrelin in the bullfrog brain.
Bullfrog ghrelin is predominantly synthesized in the stomach, as seen
in the rat. In both the bullfrog and the rat, ghrelin produced and
secreted from the stomach is likely to act on the pituitary gland
through the systemic circulation. This novel regulatory mechanism
controlling GH secretion by a mechanism independent from hypothalamic
hormonal control is present in mammals and in amphibians.
Bullfrog ghrelin also stimulated PRL secretion in bullfrog
adenohypophyseal cells. The effect is more potent than that observed for GH secretion. In the rat, PRL secretion is not stimulated by rat
ghrelin either in vivo or in vitro (8). In the
bullfrog, GH and PRL are produced and secreted by different cells (22), suggesting that the coordinate GHS-R may be expressed on both GH- and
PRL-producing cells.
In addition to the stomach, bullfrog ghrelin is synthesized in the
heart, lung, pancreas, gall bladder, small intestine, and testes at low
levels. In mammals, the GHS-R is also expressed peripherally at low
levels in various tissues, such as the heart, lung, pancreas,
intestine, adrenal, ovary, testes, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue
(4, 37, 38). In accordance with the receptor distribution, a
cardiovascular function of GHRP has been observed (39). The
distribution of GHS-R in the bullfrog has not yet been examined, but
ghrelin may also act on peripheral tissues as an endocrine, paracrine,
and/or autocrine factor through the GHS-R.
The discovery of amphibian ghrelin demonstrates the relevance of
ghrelin in non-mammalian systems. In previous functional studies of the
GHS-R in non-mammalian species, artificial ligands such as GHRPs and
nonpeptidyl GHSs have been utilized. A GHS-R homologue identified in
the pufferfish shares 58% identity to human GHS-R and is activated by
GHRP-6 and nonpeptidyl GHSs (17), suggesting that GHS binding to the
GHS-R is not species-specific. These GHS species, however, bind
relatively weakly to pufferfish, compared with human GHS-R, possibly
due to structural differences between the two receptors. GHS is a more
potent agonist of human and/or rat GHS-R. GHSs can stimulate GH
secretion in chicken (15, 16) and teleost fish such as tilapia (18),
suggesting that GHSs bind to functional GHS-Rs in non-mammals. The
present study demonstrates that GHRP-6 can stimulate GH release from
the bullfrog pituitary. However, its potency is weak compared with frog
ghrelin even though they both bind to the coordinate GHS-R. This may be due to different affinities of the natural and artificial ligands, an
issue that should be resolved upon identification of the cognate bullfrog GHS-R. GHRP-6 stimulated PRL secretion from the bullfrog pituitary with a comparable potency to frog ghrelin. Little is known
about the PRL-releasing activity of GHS in non-mammalian species. In
tilapia, GHS tends to increase the plasma PRL level on a different time
scale than GH levels are affected (18). Ghrelin does not stimulate PRL
secretion in rats either in vitro or in vitro
(8). These results suggest that ghrelin and GHS function as PRL
secretagogues in non-mammals. This effect may be species-specific, seen
especially in lower vertebrates. The evolutionary distribution of the
GHS-R on cells producing GH (somatotrophs), PRL (lactotrophs) or both
GH and PRL (mammosomatotrophs) may have influenced the GH- and
PRL-releasing activities of ghrelin. It would be worthwhile, then, to
examine the PRL-releasing activity of ghrelin in fish or chicken.
Our research suggests that an endogenous ligand for the GHS receptor,
ghrelin, is widely present in vertebrates. The ligand has similar
physiological functions across species, governing the release of
GH.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We would like to thank Dr. Yuta Arai (Waseda
University, Tokyo, Japan) for collecting the bullfrog stomachs and
Dr. Christopher A. Loretz (State University of New York at Buffalo) for
careful reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for
Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan, a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Science and
Technology Agency of Japan, and a grant-in-aid for the Promotion of
Fundamental Studies in Health Science from the Organization for
Pharmaceutical Safety and Research (OPSR) of Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the DDBJ/GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AB058510.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-6-6833-5012 ext. 2479; Fax: 81-6-6835-5402; E-mail:
kaiya@ri.ncvc.go.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 23, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105212200
2
H. Hosoda, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GH, growth hormone;
GHRH, growth hormone-releasing hormone;
GHS(s), growth hormone secretagogue(s);
GHS-R(s) or GHSR, GHS receptor(s);
GHRP, growth
hormone-releasing peptide;
PRL, prolactin;
FLIPR, fluorometric imaging
plate reader;
[Ca2+]i, intracellular calcium
concentration;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
AcOH, acetic acid;
CH3CN, acetonitrile;
TFA, trifluoroacetic acid;
CM, carboxymethyl;
HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography;
RP, reverse-phase;
ESI/MA, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry;
ODS, octadecyl silica;
RACE, rapid amplification of the cDNA ends;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
RT, reverse transcription;
bp, base pair(s);
FSH, follicle-stimulating hormones LH, luteinizing hormone.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bertherat, J.,
Bluet-Pajot, M. T.,
and Epelbaum, J.
(1995)
Eur. J. Endocrinol.
132,
12-24
|
| 2.
|
Bowers, C. Y.,
Chang, J.,
Momany, F. A.,
and Folkers, K.
(1977)
in
Molecular Endocrinology
(MacIntyre, G.
, and Szelke, H., eds)
, pp. 287-292, Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam
|
| 3.
|
Cheng, K.,
Chan, W. W.,
Barreto, A.,
Convey, E. M.,
and Smith, R. G.
(1989)
Endocrinology
124,
2791-2798
|
| 4.
|
Blake, A. D.,
and Smith, R. G.
(1991)
J. Endocrinol.
129,
11-19
|
| 5.
|
Cheng, K.,
Chan, W. W.,
Butler, B.,
Barreto, A.,
and Smith, R. G.
(1991)
Endocrinology
129,
3337-3342
|
| 6.
|
Howard, A. D.,
Feighner, S. D.,
Cully, D. F.,
Arena, J. P.,
Liberator, P. A.,
Rosenblum, C. I.,
Hamelin, M.,
Hreniuk, D. L.,
Palyha, O. C,
Anderson, J,
Paress, P. S.,
Diaz, C.,
Chou, M.,
Liu, K. K.,
McKee, K. K.,
Pong, S. S.,
Chaung, L. Y.,
Elbrecht, A.,
Dashkevicz, M.,
Heavens, R.,
Rigby, M.,
Sirinathsinghji, D. J. S.,
Dean, D. C.,
Melillo, D. G.,
Patchett, A. A.,
Nargund, R.,
Griffin, P. R.,
DeMartino, J. A.,
Gupta, S. K.,
Schaeffer, J. M.,
Smith, R. G.,
and Van der Ploeg, L. H. T.
(1996)
Science
273,
974-977
|
| 7.
|
McKee, K. K.,
Palyha, O. C.,
Feighner, S. D.,
Hreniuk, D. L.,
Tan, C. P.,
Phillips, M. S.,
Smith, R. G.,
Van der Ploeg, L. H.,
and Howard, A. D.
(1997)
Mol. Endocrinol.
11,
415-423
|
| 8.
|
Kojima, M.,
Hosoda, H.,
Date, Y.,
Nakazato, M.,
Matsuo, H.,
and Kangawa, K.
(1999)
Nature
402,
656-660
|
| 9.
|
Hosoda, H.,
Kojima, M.,
Matsuo, H.,
and Kangawa, K.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
21995-22000
|
| 10.
|
Wren, A. M.,
Small, C. J.,
Ward, H. L.,
Murphy, K. G.,
Dakin, C. L.,
Taheri, S.,
Kennedy, A. R.,
Roberts, G. H.,
Morgan, D. G.,
Ghatei, M. A.,
and Bloom, S. R.
(2000)
Endocrinology
141,
4325-4328
|
| 11.
|
Nakazato, M.,
Murakami, N.,
Date, Y.,
Kojima, M.,
Matsuo, H.,
Kangawa, K.,
and Matsukura, S.
(2001)
Nature
409,
194-198
|
| 12.
|
Date, Y.,
Kojima, M.,
Hosoda, H.,
Sawaguchi, A.,
Mondal, M. S.,
Suganuma, T.,
Matsukura, S.,
Kangawa, K.,
and Nakazato, M.
(2000)
Endocrinology
141,
4255-4261
|
| 13.
|
Date, Y.,
Nakazato, M.,
Murakami, N.,
Kojima, M.,
Kangawa, K.,
and Matsukura, S.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
280,
904-907
|
| 14.
|
Tschop, M.,
Smiley, D. L.,
and Heiman, M. L.
(2000)
Nature
407,
908-913
|
| 15.
|
Bowers, C. Y.,
Momany, F. A.,
Reynolds, G. A.,
and Hong, A.
(1984)
Endocrinology
114,
1537-1545
|
| 16.
|
Geris, K. L.,
Hickey, G. J.,
Berghman, L. R.,
Visser, T. J.,
Kühn, E. R.,
and Darras, V. M.
(1998)
Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.
111,
186-196
|
| 17.
|
Palyha, O. C.,
Feighner, S. D.,
Tan, C. P.,
McKee, K. K,
Hreniuk, D. L,
Gao, Y. D.,
Schleim, K. D.,
Yang, L.,
Morriello, G. J.,
Nargund, R.,
Patchett, A. A.,
Howard, A. D.,
and Smith, R. G.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
160-169
|
| 18.
|
Shepherd, B. S.,
Eckert, S. M.,
Parhar, I. S.,
Vijayan, M. M.,
Wakabayashi, I.,
Hirano, T.,
Grau, E. G.,
and Chen, T. T.
(2000)
J. Endocrinol.
167,
R7-R10
|
| 19.
|
Sudoh, T.,
Kangawa, K.,
Minamino, N.,
and Matsuo, H.
(1988)
Nature
332,
78-81
|
| 20.
|
Kitamura, K.,
Kangawa, K.,
Kawamoto, M.,
Ichiki, Y.,
Nakamura, S.,
Matsuo, H.,
and Eto, T.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
192,
553-560
|
| 21.
|
Oguchi, A.,
Tanaka, S.,
Yamamoto, K.,
and Kikuyama, S.
(1996)
Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.
102,
141-146
|
| 22.
|
Kobayashi, T.,
and Kikuyama, S.
(1991)
Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.
82,
14-22
|
| 23.
|
Yamamoto, K.,
and Kikuyama, S.
(1982)
Endocrinol. Japon
29,
159-167
|
| 24.
|
Tanaka, S.,
Sakai, M.,
Park, M. K.,
and Kurosumi, K.
(1991)
Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.
84,
318-327
|
| 25.
|
Oguchi, A.,
Tanaka, S.,
Aida, T.,
Yamamoto, K.,
and Kikuyama, S.
(1997)
Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.
107,
128-135
|
| 26.
|
Nielsen, H.,
Engelbrecht, J.,
Brunak, S.,
and Von Heijne, G.
(1997)
Protein Eng.
10,
1-6
|
| 27.
|
Aida, T.,
Yamamoto, K.,
and Kikuyama, S.
(1999)
Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.
115,
101-109
|
| 28.
|
Muccioli, G.,
Papotti, M.,
Locatelli, V.,
Ghigo, E.,
and Deghenghi, R.
(2001)
J. Endocrinol. Invest.
24,
RC7-RC9
|
| 29.
|
Bednarek, M. A.,
Feighner, S. D.,
Pong, S. S.,
McKee, K. K.,
Hreniuk, D. L.,
Silva, M. V.,
Warren, V. A.,
Howard, A. D.,
Van der Ploeg, L. H.,
and Heck, J. V.
(2000)
J. Med. Chem.
43,
4370-4376
|
| 30.
|
Feighner, S. D.,
Howard, A. D.,
Prendergast, K.,
Palyha, O. C.,
Hreniuk, D. L.,
Nargund, R.,
Underwood, D.,
Tata, J. R.,
Dean, D. C.,
Tan, C. P.,
McKee, K. K.,
Woods, J. W.,
Patchett, A. A.,
Smith, R. G.,
and Van der Ploeg, L. H.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
137-145
|
| 31.
|
Jeandel, L.,
Okuno, A.,
Kobayashi, T.,
Kikuyama, S.,
Tostivint, H.,
Lihrmann, I.,
Chartrel, N.,
Conlon, J. M.,
Fournier, A.,
Tonon, M. C.,
and Vaudry, H.
(1998)
J. Neuroendocrinol.
10,
187-192
|
| 32.
|
Alexandre, D.,
Vaudry, H.,
Jegou, S.,
and Anouar, Y.
(2000)
J. Comp. Neurol.
421,
234-246
|
| 33.
|
Hu, Z.,
Lelievre, V.,
Tam, J.,
Cheng, J. W.,
Fuenzalida, G.,
Zhou, X.,
and Waschek, J. A.
(2000)
Endocrinology
141,
3366-3376
|
| 34.
|
Montero, M.,
Yon, L.,
Kikuyama, S.,
Dufour, S.,
and Vaudry, H.
(2000)
J. Mol. Endocrinol.
25,
157-168
|
| 35.
|
Suzuki, H.,
Yamamoto, T.,
Kikuyama, S.,
Oguchi, A.,
and Uemura, H.
(1997)
in
Advances in Comparative Endocrinology
(Kawashima, S.
, and Kikuyama, S., eds), Vol. 2
, pp. 1033-1037, Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, Italy.
|
| 36.
|
Date, Y.,
Murakami, N.,
Kojima, M.,
Kuroiwa, T.,
Matsukura, S.,
Kangawa, K.,
and Nakazato, M.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
275,
477-480
|
| 37.
|
Bodart, V.,
Bouchard, J. F.,
McNicoll, N.,
Escher, E.,
Carriere, P.,
Ghigo, E.,
Sejlitz, T.,
Sirois, M. G.,
Lamontagne, D.,
and Ong, H.
(1999)
Circ. Res.
85,
796-802
|
| 38.
|
Guan, X. M., Yu, H.,
Palyha, O. C.,
McKee, K. K.,
Feighner, S. D.,
Sirinathsinghji, D. J.,
Smith, R. G.,
Van der Ploeg, L. H.,
and Howard, A. D.
(1997)
Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.
48,
23-29
|
| 39.
|
Muccioli, G.,
Broglio, F.,
Valetto, M. R.,
Ghe, C.,
Catapano, F.,
Graziani, A.,
Papotti, M.,
Bisi, G.,
Deghenghi, R.,
and Ghigo, E.
(2000)
Ann. Endocrinol. (Paris)
61,
27-31
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Wang, L. Wang, Y. Zhao, Y. Shi, L. Wang, and Z.-J. Chen
No association of the Arg51Gln and Leu72Met polymorphisms of the ghrelin gene and polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod.,
February 1, 2009;
24(2):
485 - 490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. S. Chowdhury, K. Yamamoto, I. Saeki, I. Hasunuma, T. Shimura, and K. Tsutsui
Melatonin Stimulates the Release of Growth Hormone and Prolactin by a Possible Induction of the Expression of Frog Growth Hormone-Releasing Peptide and Its Related Peptide-2 in the Amphibian Hypothalamus
Endocrinology,
March 1, 2008;
149(3):
962 - 970.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J Manning, H. M Murray, J. W Gallant, M. P Matsuoka, E. Radford, and S. E Douglas
Ontogenetic and tissue-specific expression of preproghrelin in the Atlantic halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.
J. Endocrinol.,
January 1, 2008;
196(1):
181 - 192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-M. Yeung, C.-B. Chan, N. Y S Woo, and C. H K Cheng
Seabream ghrelin: cDNA cloning, genomic organization and promoter studies.
J. Endocrinol.,
May 1, 2006;
189(2):
365 - 379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T Yada, H Kaiya, K Mutoh, T Azuma, S Hyodo, and K Kangawa
Ghrelin stimulates phagocytosis and superoxide production in fish leukocytes.
J. Endocrinol.,
April 1, 2006;
189(1):
57 - 65.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. F. Canosa, S. Unniappan, and R. E. Peter
Periprandial changes in growth hormone release in goldfish: role of somatostatin, ghrelin, and gastrin-releasing peptide
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
July 1, 2005;
289(1):
R125 - R133.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Nishi, H. Hiejima, H. Mifune, T. Sato, K. Kangawa, and M. Kojima
Developmental Changes in the Pattern of Ghrelin's Acyl Modification and the Levels of Acyl-Modified Ghrelins in Murine Stomach
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2005;
146(6):
2709 - 2715.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Nishi, H. Hiejima, H. Hosoda, H. Kaiya, K. Mori, Y. Fukue, T. Yanase, H. Nawata, K. Kangawa, and M. Kojima
Ingested Medium-Chain Fatty Acids Are Directly Utilized for the Acyl Modification of Ghrelin
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2005;
146(5):
2255 - 2264.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kojima and K. Kangawa
Ghrelin: Structure and Function
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2005;
85(2):
495 - 522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Luque, R. D. Kineman, S. Park, X.-D. Peng, F. Gracia-Navarro, J. P. Castano, and M. M. Malagon
Homologous and Heterologous Regulation of Pituitary Receptors for Ghrelin and Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone
Endocrinology,
July 1, 2004;
145(7):
3182 - 3189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. van der Lely, M. Tschop, M. L. Heiman, and E. Ghigo
Biological, Physiological, Pathophysiological, and Pharmacological Aspects of Ghrelin
Endocr. Rev.,
June 1, 2004;
25(3):
426 - 457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Unniappan and R. E. Peter
In vitro and in vivo effects of ghrelin on luteinizing hormone and growth hormone release in goldfish
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
June 1, 2004;
286(6):
R1093 - R1101.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Malagon, R. M. Luque, E. Ruiz-Guerrero, F. Rodriguez-Pacheco, S. Garcia-Navarro, F. F. Casanueva, F. Gracia-Navarro, and J. P. Castano
Intracellular Signaling Mechanisms Mediating Ghrelin-Stimulated Growth Hormone Release in Somatotropes
Endocrinology,
December 1, 2003;
144(12):
5372 - 5380.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kaiya, M. Kojima, H. Hosoda, S. Moriyama, A. Takahashi, H. Kawauchi, and K. Kangawa
Peptide Purification, Complementary Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) and Genomic DNA Cloning, and Functional Characterization of Ghrelin in Rainbow Trout
Endocrinology,
December 1, 2003;
144(12):
5215 - 5226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ukena, A. Koda, K. Yamamoto, T. Kobayashi, E. Iwakoshi-Ukena, H. Minakata, S. Kikuyama, and K. Tsutsui
Novel Neuropeptides Related to Frog Growth Hormone-Releasing Peptide: Isolation, Sequence, and Functional Analysis
Endocrinology,
September 1, 2003;
144(9):
3879 - 3884.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Cummings and M. H. Shannon
Roles for Ghrelin in the Regulation of Appetite and Body Weight
Arch Surg,
April 1, 2003;
138(4):
389 - 396.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Hosoda, M. Kojima, T. Mizushima, S. Shimizu, and K. Kangawa
Structural Divergence of Human Ghrelin. IDENTIFICATION OF MULTIPLE GHRELIN-DERIVED MOLECULES PRODUCED BY POST-TRANSLATIONAL PROCESSING
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 3, 2003;
278(1):
64 - 70.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Hosoda, M. Kojima, and K. Kangawa
Ghrelin and the Regulation of Food Intake and Energy Balance
Mol. Interv.,
December 1, 2002;
2(8):
494 - 503.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kaiya, S. van der Geyten, M. Kojima, H. Hosoda, Y. Kitajima, M. Matsumoto, S. Geelissen, V. M. Darras, and K. Kangawa
Chicken Ghrelin: Purification, cDNA Cloning, and Biological Activity
Endocrinology,
September 1, 2002;
143(9):
3454 - 3463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Koda, K. Ukena, H. Teranishi, S. Ohta, K. Yamamoto, S. Kikuyama, and K. Tsutsui
A Novel Amphibian Hypothalamic Neuropeptide: Isolation, Localization, and Biological Activity
Endocrinology,
February 1, 2002;
143(2):
411 - 419.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|