|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104882200 on August 31, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 44, 40497-40501, November 2, 2001
Anti-atherogenic Antioxidants Regulate the Expression and
Function of Proteasome -Type Subunits in Human Endothelial
Cells*
Wakako
Takabe ,
Tatsuhiko
Kodama ,
Takao
Hamakubo ,
Keiji
Tanaka§,
Toshiaki
Suzuki§,
Hiroyuki
Aburatani¶,
Naeko
Matsukawa¶, and
Noriko
Noguchi¶
From the Department of Molecular Biology and
Medicine, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology,
University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan, the
§ Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science and CREST,
Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 3-18-22 Komagome, Bunkyo,
Tokyo 113-8613, Japan, and ¶ Genome Sciences, Research Center for
Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba,
Meguro, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan
Received for publication, May 29, 2001, and in revised form, August 23, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
It has been proposed that phenolic antioxidants
such as probucol exert their anti-atherogenic effects through
scavenging lipid-derived radicals. In this study the potential for
genomics to reveal unanticipated pharmacological properties of phenolic
antioxidants is explored. It was found that two anti-atherogenic
compounds, BO-653 and probucol, inhibited the expression of three
-type proteasome subunits, PMSA2, PMSA3, and PMSA4 in human
umbilical vein endothelial cells. Here we report that both BO-653 and
probucol caused not only inhibition of the mRNA levels of these
three subunits but also inhibition of both the gene expression and
protein synthesis of the -type subunit, PMSA1. Other subunit
components of the proteasome such as the -type subunits (PMSB1,
PMSB7), the ATPase subunit of 19 S (PMSC6), the non-ATPase subunit of
19 S (PMSD1), and PA28 (PMSE2) were not significantly affected by
treatment with these compounds. The specific inhibition of -type
subunit expression in response to these antioxidants resulted in
functional alterations of the proteasome with suppression of
degradation of multiubiquitinated proteins and I B .
These results suggest that certain compounds previously
classified solely as antioxidants are able to exert potentially
important modulatory effects on proteasome function.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Genomics and proteomics offer powerful tools for discovering
molecular mechanisms underlying complex biological responses. For
example, these methods enable comparison of the levels of gene and
protein expression between diseased and normal cells or cells treated
with pharmacological agents. Atherosclerosis is an interesting example
in this respect because it is a complex chronic inflammatory condition
resulting from the interaction between modified lipoproteins,
monocyte-derived macrophages, and other cellular elements of artery
wall in which numerous pharmacological agents have been tested for
efficacy (1, 2). Indeed, one important class of molecules assessed in
these models are generically classified as antioxidants, and the
anti-atherogenic effects of these compounds have contributed to the
evolution of the LDL1
oxidation hypothesis of atherosclerosis. However, the detailed mechanisms of antioxidant compounds, such as probucol, remain complex
and elusive with a number of biological responses identified, which are
not easily reconciled with a unique mechanism depending solely on free
radical scavenging. Recently, we have applied the oligonucleotide
microarrays analysis (HuGene human FL array, Affimetrix, Inc., Santa
Clara, California) to determine the effects of two anti-atherogenic
phenolic compounds,
2,3-dihydro-5-hydroxy-2,2-dipentyl-4,6-di-tert-butylbenzofuran (BO- 653)and
4,4'-isopropylidenedithio-bis-(2,6-di-tert-butylphenol) (probucol) on gene expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC).
Probucol has been used clinically as an anti-atherogenic compound due
to its lipid-lowering properties, while its antioxidant properties
subsequently emerged from a combination of in vitro (3, 4)
and in vivo models of the atherosclerotic processes (5, 6).
With the advent of effective lipid-lowering therapies probucol use as
an anti-atherogenic agent has become limited. However, the mechanisms
underlying probucol action remain important. For example, recent
studies have shown that probucol is effective in reducing the incidence
of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
(PTCA) (7, 8). It has been also reported that probucol inhibits
expression of adhesion molecules such as vascular cell adhesion
molecule-1 (VCAM-1) both in animal models (9, 10) and in HUVEC (11,
12). Not withstanding the continuing interest in probucol molecular
mechanisms remain obscure with several controversial results with
probucol observed in different animal models. For example, probucol
effectively inhibited development of atherosclerosis in Watanabe
heritable hyperlipidemia (WHHL) rabbits (5, 6) while it exacerbated the
development of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E (apoE) knockout mice
(13) and LDL receptor knockout mice (14). The responses in apoE
knockout mice were particularly interesting with a recent report
showing that lesion development was increased by probucol in the aortic
root yet decreased in the aortic arch (15). These studies implicate
mechanisms that are more complex than simple scavenging of lipid
peroxyl radicals and encompass processes that involve site-specific
modulation of gene transcription in the endothelium. It remains
uncertain whether the antioxidant properties of probucol and its
lipid-lowering effects are related or critical for the anti-atherogenic
effects in humans.
The LDL oxidation hypothesis of atherosclerosis also prompted a series
of initiatives to elaborate and improve on the antioxidant component of
probucol. The compound, BO-653, is such an example and shares the
structural motif for scavenging peroxyl radicals, the phenol group,
while the rest of the molecule is structurally distinct from probucol
(Fig. 1). It was found that BO-653
exerted a potent antioxidant activity against lipid peroxidation (16) and oxidative modification of LDL (17) and also exhibited
anti-atherogenic effects in three different animal models (14).
Surprisingly, it is about 10 times more effective than probucol
as an antioxidant yet still requires similar concentrations to exert
anti-atherogenic properties. We hypothesized that properties other than
the antioxidant activity of these compounds could contribute to
inhibition of atherosclerosis.
The use of genomic analysis to elucidate the mechanisms of
pharmacological agents is an important application of this emerging technology. Indeed, a novel and unexpected finding derived from gene
chip analysis (18) indicated that regulation of proteasome function
could occur on exposure of HUVEC to phenolic antioxidants.
The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway has been shown to be involved in
various biologically important processes, such as the cell cycle,
cellular metabolism, apoptosis, signal transduction, immune response,
and protein quality control (19-23). Consequently, this proteolytic
machinery is capable of catalyzing the turnover of proteins in a
regulated fashion. The potential of a pharmacological agent to modulate
proteasome function through transcriptional regulation has not been
reported previously. The complete catalytic complex, the 20 S
proteasome, is a barrel-like particle appearing as a stack of four
rings made up of two outer -rings and two inner -rings. The -
and -rings are each made up of seven structurally similar - and
-subunits, respectively (23). The regulatory complex termed PA700
(also called the 19 S complex) associates with 20 S proteasome to form
the 26 S proteasome with a molecular mass of ~2500 kDa (24).
Moreover, another proteasome activator PA28 (11 S REG), consisting of
and subunits, is known to bind to the -ring of the 20 S
proteasome (19). In this report we show that the selective inhibition
of the -type subunits of the 20 S proteasome in HUVEC treated with
either probucol or BO-653 results in suppression of proteasome activity.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Chemicals--
2,3-Dihydro-5-hydroxy-2,2-dipentyl-4,6-di-tert-butylbenzofuran
(BO-653) was a kind gift from the Chugai Pharmaceutical Co (Shizuoka,
Japan).
4,4'-Isopropylidenedithio-bis-(2,6-di-tert-butylphenol) (Probucol) was kindly supplied by the Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co (Tokyo,
Japan). Fetal bovine serum was obtained from JRH Biosciences (Lenexa,
KA). Monoclonal antibody against multiubiquitinated chains and
polyclonal antibody against I B were obtained from MBL (Nagoya, Japan) and ROCKLAND (Gilbertsville, PA), respectively.
Cell Culture--
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC
s) were obtained from a commercial source (Clonetics Corp,
Walkersville, MD) and grown in endothelial cell growth factor
containing medium-2 (EGM-2, Clonetics Corp) with 2% fetal bovine serum
at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. All experiments were
completed within four passages. After reaching confluency, the medium
was replaced by endothelial basement medium (EBM) 2 h before the
addition of the antioxidants. The final concentration of BO-653 and
probucol was 50 µM, except for the
concentration-dependent experiments and selected on the
basis of the plasma levels in animals and humans (25). Antioxidants
were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO, SIGMA),
which was diluted with EBM resulting in a final Me2SO concentration of 0.01%. The control cells were cultured in EBM containing 0.01% Me2SO in the absence of antioxidant.
Gene ChipTM Analysis--
Oligonucleotide microarray
analysis was performed by using gene chip, the HuGene human FL array
(Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA) as described (18).
Northern Blot Analysis (RNA Blot Hybridization)--
Total RNA
was extracted by the method of Chomczynski et al. (26).
Samples of 5 µg of total RNA were denatured and separated by
electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel containing 2.2 M
formaldehyde. Total RNA was then transferred to Hybond-XL nylon
membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and hybridized with
32P-labeled probes as described previously (27). For the
Northern blot analysis of proteasomes, the cDNAs for the subunits
PMSA1 (HC2), PMSA2 (HC3), PMSA3 (HC8), and PMSA4 (HC9) of human
proteasomes were constructed according to the literature (28) and the
cDNA of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used
as a standard. These probes were labeled with a random primer labeling kit, the BCA BESTTM Labeling kit (Takara, Shizuoka, Japan),
using [ -32P]dCTP. The membranes were washed as
described previously (29) and autoradiographed with a BAS-1800 (Fuji
Photo Film Co., Tokyo, Japan). To measure the stability of the
proteasome subunit mRNA, cells were treated with actinomycin D (5 µg/ml), an inhibitor of transcription of mRNA as well as an
antioxidant treatment as described (30).
Western Blot Analysis--
Cells were harvested and pelleted at
200 × g for 3 min. Cells were washed with
phosphate-buffered saline and disrupted by sonication in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.25 M sucrose, and 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The homogenates were centrifuged at
20,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, and the resulting
supernatants were used for analysis. Samples (5 µg) separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in 10% gel were transferred
electrophoretically to HybondTM ECLTM nylon
membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 2 h at 80 V. The
membranes were pretreated with Block Ace (Yukijirushi Co., Sapporo,
Japan) and then treated with monoclonal antibodies, which were raised
against human PMSA1 (HC2), PMSB7 (Z), PMSC6 (p42), PMSD1 (p112), and
PMSE2 (PA28 ) (28). After treatment with peroxidase-conjugated goat
anti-mouse IgG monoclonal antibody (SIGMA) or anti-rabbit IgG
monoclonal antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), labeled bands from
washed blots were detected by Super Signal West Dura Extended Duration
Substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Membranes were exposed to FUJI
MEDICAL X-RAY FILM (Fuji Photo Film Co., Tokyo, Japan) at room
temperature. To detect the multiubiquitinated proteins and I B ,
after treatment of cells with 100 µg/ml cycloheximide dissolved in
phosphate-buffered saline for 2 h the cells were treated with
either 50 µM BO-653 or probucol for 12 h. Control cells were treated with vehicle (Me2SO, 0.01%). After
electrophoresis under the same conditions to detect the proteasome
subunits, the membrane was treated with monoclonal antibody against the
multiubiquitinated proteins or polyclonal antibody against I B .
Protein concentrations were measured with a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce).
 |
RESULTS |
Phenolic Antioxidant-dependent Modulation of the Level
of mRNAs Encoding Proteasomal -Type Subunits--
Gene chip
analysis revealed a decrease in the levels of mRNA encoding
proteasome -type subunits, PMSA2(HC3), PMSA3(HC8), and PMSA4(HC9) in
HUVEC exposed to the phenolic antioxidants, probucol (50 µM) and BO-653 (50 µM) for 6 h (Table
I). These concentrations are equivalent
to those achieved in both human and animal studies (14, 25). The gene
chip analysis can result in false positives, and thus the responses
were carefully validated and extended in the first series of
experiments using Northern blot analysis. It is clear that treatment of
HUVEC with either BO-653 or probucol results in a decreased expression
of these three genes at 6 h (Fig. 2,
A, B, and C). The gene chip used in the present study contains only a subset of the proteasome subunits (Table I). To test for changes in the mRNA for other -type
subunits not included on this analysis the message for PMSA1 (HC2) was determined. In this case, the mRNA level decreased to its minimum over 3-6 h on exposure to BO-653 or probucol and recovered by 12 h (Fig. 2, D and E). To test for the possibility
that the antioxidants may enhance degradation of mRNA, we
investigated the effect of BO-653 and probucol on mRNA levels
observed in cells treated with actinomycin D, an inhibitor of
transcription. Neither BO-653 nor probucol affected the rate of
mRNA degradation as shown for PMSA2 (Fig. 2F). The
decreased mRNA for PMSA1 on exposure to the antioxidants was also
found to result in decreased protein levels of PMSA1 after a 12-h
exposure, with levels making a partial recovery to control values at
24 h (Fig. 3). To determine the
concentration dependence of the antioxidants, mRNA levels and
protein levels of PMSA1 in cells treated with different concentrations
(1, 10, 50 µM) of either BO-653 or probucol were
measured. These antioxidants inhibited both levels of message and
protein of PMSA1 in a dose-dependent manner with maximal
effects achieved with the 1 µM BO-653 and 50 µM probucol (Table II).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Decreased expression of mRNA encoding
proteasome -type subunits by phenolic
antioxidants. Northern blot analysis was performed using the
mRNA of PMSA2 (HC3) (A), PMSA3 (HC8) (B), and
PMSA4 (HC9) (C), prepared from HUVEC treated with
Me2SO (D), 50 µM BO-653
(B) and 50 µM probucol (P) for
6 h. The changes in mRNA levels of PMSA1 (HC2) in HUVEC
treated with either 50 µM BO-653 (D) or 50 µM probucol (E) were followed for up to
12 h. F, after HUVECs were treated with actinomycin D
(5 µg/ml) in the absence (open mark) or presence of either
BO-653 (filled circle) or probucol (filled
triangle), mRNA of PMSA2 was analyzed by Northern blotting.
All data obtained were normalized for GAPDH values and shown as the
mean ± S.D. (n = 4) of the ratio against
Me2SO-treated control obtained from densitometric
quantitation of the subunit band.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Changes in protein levels of proteasome
-type subunit, PMSA1 (HC2). Western blot
analysis of PMSA1 (HC2) was performed for the protein obtained from
HUVEC treated with 50 µM BO-653 (A) or 50 µM probucol (B) for up to 24 h.
Bottom, plot shows the mean ± S.D. (n = 4) of the ratio against time 0 obtained from densitometric
quantitation of the subunit band.
|
|
Specificity of Regulation of Proteasome Subunits by BO-653 and
Probucol--
From the data obtained from the gene analysis (Table I)
it was evident that only the -type proteasome subunits were
down-regulated significantly in HUVEC treated with BO-653 or probucol.
To further assess the specificity of this response, we investigated
changes in the -type subunits (PMSB1 (HC5) and PMSB7 (Z)) in
response to BO-653 and probucol by means of Northern and Western
blotting. Neither subunit exhibited significant changes. The data of
mRNA and protein levels for PMSB7 are shown after exposure to
either BO-653 or probucol for 6 and 12 h, respectively (Fig.
4, A and B). In
addition, the effects of BO-653 and probucol on protein levels of PMSC6
(ATPase subunit of 19 S), PMSD1 (non-ATPase subunit of 19 S), and PMSE2
(PA28) were determined and found to be unchanged by treatment of cells
with these antioxidants over a period of 12 h (Fig. 4,
C, D, and E). These results are
consistent with those of the gene chip experiment (Table I). These data
support the hypothesis that both BO-653 and probucol show selectivity in modulating the expression of the -type subunits.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of antioxidants on the proteasome
-type subunit, ATPase subunit of 19 S, non-ATPase
subunit of 19 S, and PA28. Northern blot analysis for PMSB7 (Z,
-type subunit) was performed for total RNA extracted from HUVEC
treated with Me2SO (D), 50 µM
BO-653 (B), or 50 µM probucol (P)
for 6 h (A). Western blot analysis for PMSB7 (Z), PMSC6
(p42, ATPase subunit of 19 S), PMSD1 (p112, non-ATPase subunit of 19 S), and PMSE2 (PA28 , PA28) was performed. Proteins (5 µg) were
obtained from HUVECs treated with the same concentration of
antioxidants for 12 h (B-E). The experiments were
repeated four times and showed the same results.
|
|
Accumulation of the Proteasome Target Multiubiquitinated
Proteins and I B in HUVEC Treated with
Antioxidants--
These data suggest that BO-653 and probucol have a
functional impact on proteasome activity. We investigated this further by determining the accumulation of multiubiquitinated proteins and
I B , well known target proteins of the proteasome. HUVECs were
preincubated with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide for
2 h, followed by additional incubation with or without either BO-653 or probucol to determine whether the stability of ubiquitinated proteins and I B was increased. Incubation of HUVEC with
cycloheximide alone significantly decreased levels of both
multiubiquitinated proteins and I B compared with non-treated
cells (Fig. 5, lane 2 versus lane 1). This decrease is thought to be due to
degradation of these proteins in the absence of new protein synthesis.
In contrast, co-incubation of the cells with either BO-653 or probucol in the presence of cycloheximide maintained the levels of
multiubiquitinated proteins and I B at control levels. (Fig. 5,
lanes 3 and 4 versus lane 1). This
increase is consistent with inhibition of degradation of these proteins
by these antioxidants, but cannot be due to increased protein
synthesis.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Accumulation of multiubiquitinated proteins
and I B induced by
antioxidants in cycloheximide-pretreated HUVEC. HUVECs were
preincubated without (lane 1) and with 100 µg/ml
cycloheximide for 2 h, followed by co-incubation with
Me2SO (lane 2), 50 µM BO-653
(lane 3) or 50 µM probucol (lane 4)
for 12 h. Samples (5 µg of proteins) of the crude extract were
used for Western blot analysis with a corresponding monoclonal antibody
against multiubiquitinated proteins (A) and I B
(B). The bars show the mean ± S.D.
(n = 4) of the ratio against non-treated (lane
1) obtained from densitometric quantitation of the band.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Taken together these data provide a novel and interesting
perspective on the biological properties of phenolic lipid peroxyl radical scavengers. The two compounds selected for study have both been
shown to be anti-atherogenic in animal models, yet differ markedly in
radical scavenging ability, with probucol being about 10 times less
effective than BO-653 (4, 14, 16). The unforeseen property revealed by
genomic analysis was an apparent modulatory effect on the
transcriptional regulation of subunits of the proteasome. Such an
effect would be particularly significant in atherosclerosis, because
nuclear factor B (NF B) expression is increased in human atherosclerotic lesions (31) and is thought to make a significant contribution to the development of the inflammatory process. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway degrades the inhibitory binding protein, I B , which ordinarily keeps NF B sequestered in the cytoplasm. The degradation of I B by proteasomes allows nuclear translocation of NF B in cells treated with various external stimuli including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- . Inhibition of I B degradation by
a proteasome inhibitor blocks NF B activation. Accordingly, the
expression of the endothelial cell adhesion molecules (ECAMs) such as
vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), intercellular adhesion
molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and E-selectin induced by TNF- (32, 33) or
interleukin 1- (IL-1 ) (34) was suppressed. It is generally
accepted that these adhesion molecules play important roles in the
development of atherosclerotic lesions (1, 2). The induction of VCAM-1
and ICAM-1 by oxidized LDL has been reported (11). Probucol is known to
inhibit the expression of VCAM-1 in the aortic wall of rabbits (9, 10)
and in HUVEC (11, 12). Our findings provide the key elements for a
molecular mechanism that contributes to the inhibition of VCAM-1
expression and contributes to the anti-atherosclerotic properties of
phenolic antioxidants such as probucol and BO-653.
With respect to the implications for the role of the proteasome in
endothelial cell responses to atherosclerosis, these data are
intriguing. Thus far most reports have focused on the biological importance of the 26 S proteasome that selectively degrades a multitude
of ubiquitinated cellular proteins. In contrast, little is known of the
direct role of the 20 S proteasome in regulating cellular processes.
However, it was recently reported that interactions with the 20 S
proteasome was a critical determinant in p21WAF1/CIP1
turnover (35). The inhibitory effect of probucol and BO-653 on 20 S
proteasome activity demonstrated herein is the first example of a
pharmacological agent mediating its effects through this mechanism.
The mechanisms by which these phenolic compounds regulate gene
expression of proteasome subunits are not clear. Several possibilities exist with perhaps the most likely involving the effects on the cell
signaling mediated by low level reactive oxygen and nitrogen species
that are now known to control transcriptional events through activation
of proteins such as the MAP kinases. If so then the effects of phenolic
compounds may have some interesting implications for the role of low
levels of lipid mediators acting as intermediaries in these cell
signaling cascades. Interesting examples include 4-hydroxynonenal (36)
or acrolein as we have recently demonstrated in mouse embryo fibroblast
cells (37). Other possibilities include antioxidant independent
mechanism in which these compounds may act as direct modulators of
transcription factors or ligands for nuclear receptors. Current
investigations are directed at analysis for the promoter for the
proteasome subunits, which should reveal deeper insights into these
interesting responses.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Genome
Sciences, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The
University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan. Tel.:
81-3-5452-5356; Fax: 81-3-5452-5359; E-mail:
nonoriko@oxygen.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 31, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104882200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LDL, low density
lipoporotein;
BO-653, 2,3-dihydro-5-hydroxy-2,2-dipentyl-4,6-di-tert-butylbenzofuran;
Me2SO, dimethylsulfoxide;
EBM, endothelial basement
medium;
ECAMs, endothelial cell adhesion molecules;
EGM-2, endothelial
cell growth factor containing medium-2;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
HUVECs, human umbilical vein
endothelial cells;
ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1;
I B , inhibitory binding protein B ;
IL-1 , interleukin-1 ;
NF B, nuclear factor B;
probucol, 4,4'-isopropylidenedithio-bis-(2,6-di-tert-butylphenol);
VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lusis, A. J.
(2000)
Nature
407,
233-241
|
| 2.
|
Glass, C. K.,
and Witztum, J. L.
(2001)
Cell
104,
503-516
|
| 3.
|
Kuzuya, M,
and Kuzuya, F.
(1993)
Free Rad. Biol. Med.
14,
67-77
|
| 4.
|
Gotoh, N.,
Shimizu, K.,
Komuro, E.,
Tsuchiya, J.,
Noguchi, N.,
and Niki, E.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1128,
147-154
|
| 5.
|
Carew, T. E.,
Schwenke, D. C.,
and Steinberg, D.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
7725-7729
|
| 6.
|
Kita, T.,
Nagano, Y.,
Yokode, M.,
Ishii, K.,
Kume, N.,
Ooshima, A.,
Yoshida, H.,
and Kawai, C.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
5928-5931
|
| 7.
|
Tardif, J. C.,
Cote, G.,
Lesperance, J.,
Bourassa, M.,
Lambert, J.,
Doucet, S.,
Bilodeau, L.,
Nattel, S.,
and de Guise, P.
(1997)
N. Engl. J. Med.
337,
365-372
|
| 8.
|
Daida, H.,
Kuwabara, Y.,
Yokoi, H.,
Nishikawa, H.,
Takatsu, F.,
Nakata, Y.,
Kutsumi, Y.,
Oshima, S.,
Nishiyama, S.,
Ishiwata, S.,
Kato, K.,
Nishimura, S.,
Miyauchi, K.,
Kanoh, T.,
and Yamaguchi, H.
(2000)
Am. J. Cardiol.
86,
550-552
|
| 9.
|
Fruebis, J.,
Gonzalez, V.,
Silvestre, M.,
and Palinski, W.
(1997)
Arterioscl. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
17,
1289-1302
|
| 10.
|
Fruebis, J.,
Silvestre, M.,
Shelton, D.,
Napoli, C.,
and Palinski, W.
(1999)
J. Lipid Res.
40,
1958-1966
|
| 11.
|
Cominacini, L.,
Garbin, U.,
Pasini, A. F.,
Davoli, A.,
Campagnola, M.,
Contessi, G. B.,
Pastorino, A. M.,
and Lo Cascio, V.
(1997)
Free Rad. Biol. Med.
22,
117-127
|
| 12.
|
Zapolska-Dawnar, D.,
Zapolski-Downar, A.,
Markiewski, M.,
Ciechanowicz, A.,
Kaczmarczyk, M.,
and Naruszewicz, M.
(2001)
Atherosclerosis
155,
123-130
|
| 13.
|
Zhang, S. H.,
Reddick, R. L.,
Avdievich, E.,
Surles, L. K.,
Jones, R. G.,
Reynolds, J. B.,
Quarfordt, S. H.,
and Maeda, N.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
2858-2866
|
| 14.
|
Cynshi, O.,
Kawabe, Y.,
Suzuki, T.,
Takashima, Y.,
Kaise, H.,
Nakamura, M.,
Ohba, Y.,
Kato, Y.,
Tamura, K.,
Hayasaka, A.,
Higashida, A.,
Sakaguchi, H.,
Takeya, M.,
Takahashi, K.,
Inoue, K.,
Noguchi, N.,
Niki, E.,
and Kodama, T.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10123-10128
|
| 15.
|
Witting, P. K.,
Pettersson, K.,
Letters, J.,
and Stocker, R.
(2000)
Arterioscler. Thronb. Vasc. Biol.
20,
e26-e33
|
| 16.
|
Noguchi, N.,
Iwaki, Y.,
Takahashi, M.,
Komuro, E.,
Kato, Y.,
Tamura, K.,
Cynshi, O.,
Kodama, T.,
and Niki, E.
(1997)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
342,
236-243
|
| 17.
|
Noguchi, N.,
Okimoto, Y.,
Tsuchiya, J.,
Cynshi, O.,
Kodama, T.,
and Niki, E.
(1997)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
347,
141-147
|
| 18.
|
Takabe, W.,
Mataki, C.,
Wada, Y.,
Ishii, M.,
Izumi, A.,
Aburatani, H.,
Hamakubo, T.,
Niki, E.,
and Kodama, T.
(2001)
J. Atheroscl. Thromb.
7,
223-230
|
| 19.
|
Coux, O.,
Tanaka, K.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65,
801-847
|
| 20.
|
Rechsteiner, M.
(1998)
Ubiquitin and the Biology of the Cell
, pp. 147-189, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 21.
|
Hochstrasser, M.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
30,
415-439
|
| 22.
|
Hershko, A.,
and Ciechanover, A.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
425-479
|
| 23.
|
Bochtler, M.,
Ditzel, L.,
Groll, M.,
Hartmann, C.,
and Huber, R.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.
28,
295-317
|
| 24.
|
Baumeister, W.,
Walz, J.,
Zuhl, F.,
and Seemuller, E.
(1998)
Cell
92,
367-380
|
| 25.
|
Touitou, R.,
Richardson, J.,
Bose, S.,
Nakanishi, M.,
Rivett, J.,
and Allday, M. J.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
2367-2375
|
| 26.
|
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159
|
| 27.
|
Fujiwara, T.,
Tanaka, K.,
Kumatori, A.,
Shin, S.,
Yoshimura, T.,
Ichihara, A.,
Tokunaga, F.,
Aruga, R.,
Iwanaga, S.,
and Kakizuka, A.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
7332-7340
|
| 28.
|
Feinberg, A. P.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1984)
Anal. Biochem.
137,
266-267
|
| 29.
|
Kumatori, A.,
Tanaka, K.,
Inamura, N.,
Sone, S.,
and Ogura, T.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
7071-7075
|
| 30.
|
Umetani, M.,
Nakao, H.,
Doi, T.,
Iwasaki, A.,
Ohtaka, M.,
Nagoya, T.,
Mataki, C.,
Hamakubo, T.,
and Kodama, T.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
272,
370-374
|
| 31.
|
Mao, S. J. T.,
Yates, M. T.,
and Jackson, R. L.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
234,
505-513
|
| 32.
|
Thurberg, B. L.,
and Collins, T.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
9,
387-396
|
| 33.
|
Kalogeris, T. J.,
Kevil, C. G.,
Laroux, F. S.,
Coe, L. L.,
Phifer, T. J.,
and Alexander, J. S.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
L9-L19
|
| 34.
|
Kalogeris, T. J.,
Laroux, F. S.,
Cockrell, A.,
Ichikawa, H.,
Okayama, N.,
Phifer, T. J.,
Alexander, J. S.,
and Grisham, M. B.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
C856-C864
|
| 35.
|
Morigi, M.,
Angioletti, S.,
Imberti, B.,
Donadelli, R.,
Micheletti, G.,
Figliuzzi, M.,
Remuzzi, A.,
Zoja, C.,
and Remuzzi, G.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
101,
1905-1915
|
| 36.
|
Parola, M.,
Bellomo, G.,
Robino, G.,
Barrera, G.,
and Dianzani, M, U.
(1999)
Antioxid. Redox Signal.
1,
255-284
|
| 37.
|
Takabe, W.,
Niki, E.,
Uchida, K.,
Yamada, S.,
Satoh, K.,
and Noguchi, N.
(2001)
Carcinogenesis
22,
935-941
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B.-Y. Kang, S. Tsoi, Shan Zhu, Shenghui Su, and H. H. Kay
Differential Gene Expression Profiling in HELLP Syndrome Placentas
Reproductive Sciences,
March 1, 2008;
15(3):
285 - 294.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Herrmann, L. O. Lerman, and A. Lerman
Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-Like Proteins in Protein Regulation
Circ. Res.,
May 11, 2007;
100(9):
1276 - 1291.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Watanabe, J. W. Zmijewski, W. Takabe, M. Umezu-Goto, C. L. Goffe, A. Sekine, A. Landar, A. Watanabe, J. Aoki, H. Arai, et al.
Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases by Lysophosphatidylcholine-Induced Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in Endothelial Cells
Am. J. Pathol.,
May 1, 2006;
168(5):
1737 - 1748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-i. Hirano, C. Ikegami, K.-i. Tsujii, Z. Zhang, F. Matsuura, Y. Nakagawa-Toyama, M. Koseki, D. Masuda, T. Maruyama, I. Shimomura, et al.
Probucol Enhances the Expression of Human Hepatic Scavenger Receptor Class B Type I, Possibly Through a Species-Specific Mechanism
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
November 1, 2005;
25(11):
2422 - 2427.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-K. Kwak, N. Wakabayashi, J. L. Greenlaw, M. Yamamoto, and T. W. Kensler
Antioxidants Enhance Mammalian Proteasome Expression through the Keap1-Nrf2 Signaling Pathway
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 1, 2003;
23(23):
8786 - 8794.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Braun, S. Zhang, H. E. Miettinen, S. Ebrahim, T. M. Holm, E. Vasile, M. J. Post, D. M. Yoerger, M. H. Picard, J. L. Krieger, et al.
Probucol prevents early coronary heart disease and death in the high-density lipoprotein receptor SR-BI/apolipoprotein E double knockout mouse
PNAS,
June 10, 2003;
100(12):
7283 - 7288.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Goldberg, C. I. Whiteside, and I. G. Fantus
The Hexosamine Pathway Regulates the Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Gene Promoter and Sp1 Transcriptional Activation through Protein Kinase C-beta I and -delta
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 6, 2002;
277(37):
33833 - 33841.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|