![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 44, 40841-40846, November 2, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, July 12, 2001, and in revised form, August 22, 2001
The homologous proteins Oxa1, YidC, and Alb3
mediate the insertion of membrane proteins in mitochondria, bacteria,
and chloroplast thylakoids, respectively. Depletion of YidC in
Escherichia coli affects the integration of every membrane
protein studied, and Alb3 has been shown previously to be required for
the insertion of a signal recognition particle
(SRP)-dependent protein, Lhcb1, in thylakoids. In this
study we have analyzed the "global" role of Alb3 in the insertion
of thylakoid membrane proteins. We show that insertion of two
chlorophyll-binding proteins, Lhcb4.1 and Lhcb5, is almost totally
blocked by preincubation of thylakoids with anti-Alb3 antibodies,
indicating a requirement for Alb3 in the insertion pathway. Insertion
of the related PsbS protein, on the other hand, is unaffected by Alb3
antibodies, and insertion of a group of SRP-independent, signal
peptide-bearing proteins, PsbX, PsbW, and PsbY, is likewise completely
unaffected. Proteinase K is furthermore able to completely degrade
Alb3, but this treatment does not affect the insertion of these
proteins. Among the thylakoid proteins studied here, Alb3 requirement
correlates strictly with a requirement for stromal factors and
nucleoside triphosphates. However, the majority of proteins tested do
not require Alb3 or any other known form of translocation apparatus.
The post-translational insertion of proteins into their target
membranes has attracted a great deal of experimental attention in
recent years in an effort to determine how hydrophobic regions are
transferred from an aqueous environment into the membrane bilayer, and
how the correct topology is achieved during this process. In bacteria,
a complex "assisted" pathway (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2) has been
characterized in which newly synthesized membrane proteins interact
with signal recognition particle
(SRP),1 FtsY and
membrane-bound components of the secretory (Sec) apparatus (3-8). SRP
appears to be involved in membrane protein biogenesis by virtue of its
tendency to interact with particularly hydrophobic protein segments (6,
9).
A broadly similar assisted pathway operates in plant thylakoids
for the targeting of the major light-harvesting chlorophyll-binding (LHC) protein, Lhcb1, after import of this protein from the cytosol. Insertion of Lhcb1 into thylakoids requires nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs), stromal SRP, FtsY, and a thylakoid translocase minimally composed of Albino3 (Alb3) (10-13). Post-translational formation of a
SRP/Lhcb1 targeting complex requires a hydrophobic domain along with a
novel SRP-binding element in Lhcb1, termed the L18 domain, which is
found only in members of the LHC protein family (14, 15). These data
along with studies on chloroplast-synthesized D1 (16) suggest that SRP
is again used primarily to direct membrane proteins to the thylakoid membrane.
For many years it was believed that other membrane proteins, in
both bacteria and chloroplasts, were targeted by unassisted or
"spontaneous" insertion pathways, in which the protein inserted directly into the bilayer without the aid of other protein factors. The
best characterized example was M13 phage coat protein, which inserts
into the Escherichia coli plasma membrane. This protein is
synthesized with an N-terminal signal peptide, which assists insertion
into the bilayer after which it is cleaved by leader peptidase
(reviewed in Ref. 17). The precursor (procoat) does not interact with
either the Sec machinery or SRP. A second protein, Pf3 coat protein,
was also shown to insert by an SRP/Sec-independent mechanism that was
presumed to be another example of spontaneous integration (18),
although Pf3 coat, unlike M13 procoat, does not contain a cleavable
signal peptide.
More recently the critical role of a novel family of targeting factor
has come to light. The first member characterized was yeast Oxa1p that
is located in the inner mitochondrial membrane and that is important
for the insertion of a range of membrane proteins from the matrix side
(19, 20). A related protein, Alb3, is essential for the insertion of
the SRP-dependent Lhcb1 protein in thylakoids (13), and the
E. coli homologue YidC has been shown recently to be equally
important for the biogenesis of SRP substrates in this organism (21).
However, Samuelson et al. (21) made the important discovery
that YidC is also essential for the insertion of M13 procoat,
indicating a much wider role in membrane protein biogenesis. A possible
model is that one population of SecYEG-bound YidC is used in the
insertion of SRP substrates, whereas a separate pool acts as its own
translocon for the insertion of SRP/Sec-independent substrates such as procoat.
M13 procoat and Pf3 coat protein are some of the few known
SRP/Sec-independent membrane proteins in E. coli, but
studies on thylakoids have revealed a surprising number of such
proteins (reviewed in Ref. 1). Several of these proteins, such as
CFoII, PsbW, and PsbX, are single-span proteins that are
synthesized with cleavable signal peptides but are nevertheless
inserted by SRP/Sec-independent mechanisms (23-25). PsbY is
exceptional in containing two signal peptides that are cleaved several
times after insertion to yield two single-span mature proteins (26). Other multispanning proteins (that are not synthesized with signal-type peptides) have also been shown to insert SRP/Sec independently despite
being related to the strictly SRP-dependent Lhcb1 protein (27). The lack of requirement for SRP, Sec apparatus, or any energy
source raised the possibility of a spontaneous insertion mechanism for
these proteins.
Whereas SRP and the Sec apparatus are not involved in the insertion of
most thylakoid proteins studied to date, the overall role of Alb3 has
remained unclear because only Lhcb1 has been tested for Alb3
requirement (13). Because YidC is required for the efficient insertion
of every E. coli membrane protein tested (21), we have
sought to examine the global role of Alb3 in the insertion of distinct
classes of thylakoid membrane protein, with particular emphasis on the
PsbW-type proteins that so closely resemble M13 procoat. We have
identified two further substrates for Alb3, both of which are LHC
proteins, but we show that Alb3 is not required for the insertion of
any SRP-independent protein analyzed to date, including several that
are synthesized with cleavable signal peptides. These data indicate
fundamental differences in the requirements for membrane protein
insertion in E. coli and thylakoid membranes.
Preparation of Radiolabeled Precursors--
Precursor proteins
were synthesized in vitro by transcription of cDNA
clones followed by translation in a wheat germ lysate in the presence
of [35S]methionine (Lhcb1, -4.1, -5, and PsbS) or
[3H]leucine (PsbW, -X, and -Y) as detailed previously
(23-27).
Isolation of Chloroplasts, Thylakoids, and Stromal
Extract--
Isolation of intact chloroplasts, isolated pea
thylakoids, and stromal extract was as described by Kim et
al. (27). All incubations were carried out in 10 mM
Hepes-NaOH, pH 8.0, 5 mM MgCl2 (HM buffer).
Alb3 antibodies were tested for their ability to inhibit protein
insertion as described by Moore et al. (13), except that
thylakoids were incubated in the presence of the antisera for 2 h
at 4 °C instead of 1 h. Urea extractions were performed on
PsbW, -X, and -Y samples (26, 27), by using a modification of the
method described by Breyton et al. (28). Protease treatment varied on the protein being imported. Lhcb1 samples were incubated with
0.2 mg/ml trypsin on ice for 30 min and stopped by heating to 95 °C.
Lhcb4.1 and PsbS samples were incubated with 0.15 mg/ml proteinase K on
ice for 40 min and stopped by the addition of 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and subsequent heating as above. Lhcb5
samples were incubated with 0.2 mg/ml thermolysin on ice for 30 min,
which was stopped by the addition of 50 mM EDTA.
Analysis of Samples--
A portion of each thylakoid integration
assay was analyzed by either Tricine SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PsbW, -X, and -Y) or 17% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (Lhcb1, -4.1, -5, and PsbS) followed by fluorography.
Quantification was carried out using Molecular Dynamics ImageQuant
Version 3.3.
Alb3 Is Required for the Insertion of Lhcb4.1 and Lhcb5 but Not for
the Related PsbS Protein--
The aim in this study was to analyze the
global role of Alb3 in thylakoid protein insertion through an analysis
of numerous different integral thylakoid membrane proteins. These
proteins included proteins from the LHC family as well as proteins
synthesized with cleavable signal peptides. The overall structures of
the membrane proteins are summarized in Table
I.
Lhcb1 is the only protein tested for Alb3 requirement, and the initial
aim in this study was to test whether two other LHC proteins, Lhcb5 and
Lhcb4.1, require this targeting factor. These proteins contain
conserved first and third membrane-spanning domains but otherwise
differ considerably in structure (29). Lhcb5 has been shown previously
to require stromal factors and NTPs for insertion into thylakoids (27),
and in this work we found that the insertion of Lhcb4.1 displays
identical requirements. Fig. 1A shows that after import of
pLhcb4.1 into chloroplasts, the mature protein is found in the
thylakoid membrane and that proteinase K generates a 16-kDa degradation
product from the inserted Lhcb4.1. No fragments are detected when the
translation product is incubated with proteinase K (not shown), and
this fragment is thus diagnostic of correct insertion. Fig.
1B shows the insertion of pLhcb4.1 into isolated thylakoids
under control conditions or after pretreatment of the assay mixture
with apyrase, which hydrolyzes NTPs. After incubation, the 16-kDa
degradation product is evident in the control assay, indicating
insertion has occurred, but is completely absent from the
apyrase-treated assay. These data show that insertion depends
completely on NTP hydrolysis, and other tests (not shown) demonstrated
a complete dependence on stromal extract.
The role of Alb3 was tested by preincubating thylakoids with antibodies
to Alb3 essentially as carried out in the studies on Lhcb1 insertion
(13). Thylakoids were preincubated with buffer, anti-Alb3 antibodies,
or preimmune antibodies and then incubated with Lhcb1, Lhcb5, or
Lhcb4.1 (Fig. 2). In the control assays (buffer-treated) insertion of all three proteins occurred, as demonstrated by the appearance of near-mature size degradation products
with Lhcb1 (13) and Lhcb5 (27) and the 16-kDa degradation product with
Lhcb4.1 (lanes C). The preimmune serum has very little effect on insertion (lanes PI), but the anti-Alb3 antibodies
(Alb lanes) severely inhibit the insertion of all three
proteins (down to 6, 8, and 11% of the control insertion efficiencies
for Lhcb1, Lhcb4.1, and Lhcb5, respectively). These data indicate that
Alb3 is essential for the efficient insertion of all three
proteins.
The situation is very different with PsbS (Fig.
3). Kim et al. (27) have shown
that this protein inserts into thylakoids in the absence of stromal
factors or NTPs; after insertion into isolated thylakoids, proteinase K
treatment yields a close doublet of bands of 10-12 kDa. These
degradation products (denoted by arrowheads) are evident in
the protease-treated thylakoid sample (lane T+) in the
chloroplast import experiment shown in the left-hand panel,
running just above smaller labeled fragments. The indicated bands are
only generated from thylakoid-associated PsbS and are absent when the
translation product is incubated with the same concentration of
protease (lane pre+). After import into thylakoids and
protease treatment of the membranes, these degradation products are
again seen in the control lane of Fig. 3, and their intensity is
essentially unaffected by preincubation of thylakoids with either
preimmune or anti-Alb3 antibodies. The Alb3 antibodies inhibit
insertion slightly more than do the preimmune antibodies but the effect
is minor, and we conclude that Alb3 is not important for the insertion
of PsbS.
The SRP-independent, Signal Peptide-bearing Proteins Do Not Require
Alb3 for Insertion--
The primary aim in this study was to determine
whether Alb3 is required for the insertion of any of the
SRP/Sec-independent proteins characterized to date, particularly those
proteins synthesized with signal peptides which, in other systems,
invariably specify interaction with either the Sec- or Tat-type protein
translocases, with the exception of M13 procoat that requires only YidC
(21). CFoII, PsbW, and PsbX are all single-span proteins
(23, 24), whereas PsbY is translated with two signal peptides that are
both cleaved to yield two single-span proteins (26, 30, 31). The full
precursor forms of these proteins are highly competent for insertion
into isolated thylakoids.
Insertion of these precursor proteins into the thylakoid membrane
involves the formation of a loop intermediate (32), which is rapidly
followed by processing to the mature size by the thylakoidal processing
peptidase. The thylakoidal processing peptidase active site is exposed
to the lumen, and processing to the mature size is therefore clear
evidence that full insertion has taken place. A second criterion is
that the inserted mature protein should be resistant to extraction by
urea, since this extraction procedure is highly effective at removing
extrinsic proteins (28). We have found that single-span thylakoid
proteins are partially extracted by this procedure (26), but the major
portion of the mature protein is found in the urea-extracted thylakoids.
The question of Alb3 involvement was again addressed by pretreating
thylakoids with anti-Alb3 antibodies, and the upper panel of
Fig. 4 shows assays for the insertion of
the precursor form of PsbW (pPsbW). After the insertion
reaction the thylakoids were analyzed directly (Total
panel), and the data show that mature size PsbW is efficiently
generated in the control assay (lane C) as found previously
(24). Importantly, neither the preimmune nor the anti-Alb3 antibodies
have any adverse effect on insertion efficiency as judged by either the
efficiency of maturation or urea resistance of the mature protein. The
mature size PsbW is highly resistant to extraction by urea, since it is
found primarily in the membrane pellet fraction rather than the wash
supernatants, confirming that this protein is indeed inserted. An
indication of the effectiveness of the urea extraction procedure is
given in the lower panel, which shows the Coomassie-stained
Tricine gel of the insertion reaction. The urea-extracted thylakoid
pellets contain the abundant membrane-spanning Lhcb1 protein and all of the chlorophyll (Chl), but the urea quantitatively extracts
the extrinsic proteins such as the
The insertion of PsbY and PsbX is analyzed in Fig.
5. Pre-PsbY (pPsbY) inserts
with high efficiency in this type of assay (26), and the control assay
shows the presence after insertion of A1 and A2 together with two
larger intermediates. Again, the anti-Alb3 antibodies do not inhibit
insertion to any significant extent (insertion efficiency is down to
72% of control value, but the preimmune antibodies reduce insertion to
77%), indicating that Alb3 is not required for integration. In other
experiments (data not shown) we have found that the preimmune and
anti-Alb3 antibodies had essentially identical effects on
insertion.
PsbX inserts with the lowest efficiency in this type of assay, and a
typical result is shown in Fig. 5. Insertion does, however, occur with
low-moderate efficiency, as shown by the appearance of mature size PsbX
which is highly resistant to extraction by urea. Again, the presence of
the Alb3 antibodies does not inhibit insertion to any significant
extent (to 72% of the control value, whereas the preimmune antibodies
reduce insertion to 85%). We do not consider this difference to be
significant since in other experiments (not shown) the preimmune
antibodies have had a slightly greater inhibitory effect.
Proteolysis of Thylakoids Destroys Alb3 but Does Not Inhibit
the Insertion of pPsbW--
The data described above show that
antibodies to Alb3 have essentially no effect on "spontaneously"
inserting thylakoid proteins such as PsbW, but we sought to use a
second criterion for Alb3 involvement and found that a useful property
of Alb3 is its extreme sensitivity to proteolysis. Previous studies
(25, 27) have shown that trypsin treatment of isolated thylakoids leads
to a total block in import of SRP-, Tat-, or Sec-dependent
proteins, whereas the insertion of CFoII or pPsbW is
unaffected. We have also found that other proteases degrade Alb3, and
these data are shown in Fig. 6. Fig.
6A shows an immunoblot of thylakoids treated with
thermolysin, trypsin, and proteinase K, which demonstrates that
thermolysin treatment (Th) generates a 29-kDa fragment.
Since the antibody is raised against a stroma-exposed C-terminal
epitope, this indicates degradation of an N-terminal region. Treatment with trypsin or proteinase K, on the other hand (Tr and
PK) leads to a complete disappearance of the signal. To
assess the extent to which the Alb3 protein as a whole is degraded, we
imported 35S-labeled precursor to pea Alb3 (33) into intact
chloroplasts. Fig. 6B shows that the protein is imported,
processed to the mature size, and quantitatively inserted into the
thylakoid membrane. This thylakoid-inserted Alb3 is again degraded to
the 29-kDa fragment by thermolysin, whereas trypsin treatment leads to
a more substantial degradation with the appearance of several smaller
fragments (denoted by asterisks). However, proteinase K is
clearly an excellent tool for studying Alb3 involvement because
treatment of thylakoids with this protease leads to a complete
degradation of Alb3 (lane PK). Labeled methionine residues
are evenly distributed throughout the pea Alb3 sequence (33), and the
total absence of even relatively small labeled fragments means that
Alb3 is effectively destroyed by this treatment. After treatment with
proteinase K under these conditions, the destruction of the Alb3 is
predicted to lead to a block in the insertion of Lhcb1, and this is
confirmed in Fig. 6C (compare control and
+PK panels in Fig. 6C). On the other hand, Fig.
6D shows that these proteinase K-treated thylakoids are
nevertheless able to import pPsbW as efficiently as untreated
thylakoids (compare control and +PK panels), and we conclude
that Alb3 cannot be required for this insertion event. Similar data
were obtained for PsbX and PsbY (data not shown).
The depletion of YidC in E. coli is rapidly followed by
dramatic adverse effects on the insertion of every membrane protein analyzed to date, including one considered for decades to insert spontaneously (21). Disruption of the oxa1 gene in yeast
likewise leads to a severe inhibition of membrane protein insertion
from the matrix side (19, 20, 34), and the only chloroplast protein studied in terms of Alb3 dependence, Lhcb1, was found to be very reliant on this factor for insertion into thylakoids (13). These findings point to a major role for Oxa1-type proteins in these membrane
systems, but we have sought to analyze the global role of Alb3 in
thylakoids by studying its role in the biogenesis of a variety of
membrane protein types (including assisted and spontaneous substrates)
under identical circumstances.
We have first shown that Alb3 antibodies almost totally block the
insertion of Lhcb4.1 and Lhcb5, indicating a central role for Alb3 in
the integration of these LHC proteins. An involvement of Alb3 could not
be taken for granted because these proteins differ very significantly
from Lhcb1 in structural respects.
Perhaps more surprising is the finding that the majority of thylakoid
proteins tested in this study are completely unaffected by Alb3
antibodies and are able to insert in the complete absence of a
functional Alb3 protein. One of these substrates, PsbS, is related to
the above-mentioned LHC proteins yet inserts by a completely different
pathway in which SRP, GTP, and FtsY are not required (27). We have now
shown that Alb3 is not required for the insertion of PsbS, indicating a
much simpler insertion pathway. Even more significantly, Alb3 plays no
role in the insertion of a series of proteins (PsbW, PsbX, and PsbY)
that bear signal peptides which are cleaved following insertion into
thylakoids. These proteins are of particular interest because signal
peptides almost invariably specify interaction with proteinaceous
translocation apparatus, yet these proteins do not require the
thylakoidal Sec or Tat machinery, and we have now ruled out an
involvement of Alb3.
PsbW and PsbX are also of interest for a second reason in that they
closely resemble the well characterized M13 procoat in terms of overall
structure. They likewise contain a single transmembrane span in the
mature protein, are synthesized with apparently similar signal
peptides, and even contain translocated loops of similar size (20-30
residues) and overall negative charge. However, we have found that
these thylakoid proteins are completely unaffected by Alb3 antibodies
or degradation, whereas procoat is almost totally dependent on YidC for
insertion in E. coli (21). These data indicate fundamental
differences in insertion mechanisms for these simple proteins.
The four Alb3-independent thylakoid proteins described in this study
(PsbS, PsbX, PsbY, and PsbW) are the first substantial group of
membrane proteins reported to insert independently of Oxa1-type
proteins in bacteria or thylakoids. We have also found recently that a
fifth protein, PsaK, inserts as a "horseshoe" conformation in a
mechanism that does not require Alb3 (35). These data show that Alb3 is
not required for the insertion of various types of thylakoid membrane
protein, and it will be of particular interest to determine whether
YidC-independent membrane proteins are identified in bacteria. If such
proteins do not emerge, or if the bulk of bacterial membrane proteins
do transpire to be highly YidC-dependent, a possible
explanation may hinge on the very different chemical properties of the
two membrane types. The E. coli plasma membrane is composed
primarily of phospholipids, whereas galactolipids account for over 80%
of thylakoid membrane lipid (reviewed in Refs. 36 and 37). The major
species is the relatively unsaturated monogalactosyl diacylglycerol,
which has an intrinsic preference to form non-bilayer, hexagonal
HII structures when it is isolated from native biological
membranes. Thus, thylakoid lipids may provide a more fluid environment
in which spontaneous (or at least, Alb3-independent) insertion is favored.
It is notable that, among the seven membrane proteins studied here,
Alb3 requirement correlates strictly with the assisted pathway (by
which we mean that insertion requires stromal factors, NTPs, and
protease-sensitive translocation machinery). If SRP is the stromal
factor required for Lhcb4.1 and Lhcb5 insertion (but which has yet to
be tested), this would suggest a mainstream pathway in which binding to
SRP in the early stages is linked to Alb3-mediated integration at a
later stage, with FtsY performing an important but so far poorly
characterized function. A similar pathway operates in bacteria, but one
important point to note is that the Sec apparatus is also required for
some bacterial membrane proteins (7), and a portion of YidC appears to
be firmly bound to the E. coli Sec translocon (22). It is so
far unclear whether the chloroplastic SRP/Alb3 pathway involves the Sec
translocon at any stage. Antibodies to thylakoid SecY block the
translocation of SecA-requiring proteins but do not inhibit Lhcb1
integration (13, 38). However, anti-SecY antibodies may act by
inhibiting SecA binding to SecY rather than inhibiting SecY function
per se. A second point is that M13 procoat and Pf3 coat
require YidC but not SRP or the Sec machinery, and it will be of
interest to determine whether any thylakoid membrane proteins similarly
require Alb3 but not SRP and vice versa.
We thank Dr. Y. Zhu for kindly providing a pea
Alb3 plasmid.
*
This work was supported by an Engineering and Physical
Sciences Research Council studentship (to C. A. W.), by an EPSRC
Biosciences Interface Network Grant GR/M91105 (to A. R. and C. R.),
by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grants C07900
and C12908 (to C. R.), and by National Science Foundation Grant
MCB-9807826 (to R. H.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44 2476 523557;
Fax: 44 2476 523568; E-mail: Crobinson@bio.warwick.ac.uk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 27, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106523200
The abbreviations used are:
SRP, signal
recognition particle;
Sec, secretory;
NTPS, nucleoside triphosphates;
LHC, light-harvesting chlorophyll-binding;
PK, proteinase K;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine;
Alb3, Albino3.
Distinct Albino3-dependent and -independent Pathways
for Thylakoid Membrane Protein Insertion*
§,
,
,
,
**
Department of Biological Sciences and
§ Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick,
Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom and ¶ Biological Science
Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Basic structures and topologies of thylakoid membrane proteins used
in this study

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Insertion of Lhcb4.1 requires nucleoside
triphosphates. A, the precursor protein was synthesized
by transcription-translation (lane pre) and incubated with
intact chloroplasts as described under "Experimental Procedures."
After import, samples were analyzed of the chloroplasts (lane
C), chloroplasts after treatment with thermolysin (C+),
stromal fraction (S), thylakoid fraction (T), and
thylakoid fraction following treatment with 0.15 mg/ml proteinase K
(T+). B, insertion of pLhcb4.1 into pea thylakoid
membranes. pLhcb4.1 was incubated with pea thylakoids that had been
pretreated with apyrase (1 unit, 15 min on ice) or an equivalent volume
of import buffer as control, as indicated. After the insertion
reaction, samples of the thylakoids were pelleted and analyzed
(lanes T) or were treated with proteinase K as detailed
under "Experimental Procedures" (lanes T+).

View larger version (60K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Antibodies to Alb3 severely inhibit the
insertion of Lhcb1, Lhcb4.1, and Lhcb5. Pea thylakoids were
preincubated with anti-Alb3 antibodies (Alb), preimmune
(PI) antibodies, or as a control (lanes C), an
equivalent volume of the buffer used to resuspend the antibodies. The
thylakoids were then incubated with pLhcb1, pLhcb4.1, or pLhcb5. After
insertion, the thylakoids were washed with insertion buffer and
analyzed directly (membrane samples) or treated with protease as
detailed under "Experimental Procedures." DP,
degradation product; pre, translated precursor. Insertion
efficiencies are given below the lanes, expressed as a
percentage of the control insertion efficiency.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
PsbS inserts by an Alb3-independent
mechanism. Left panel, pPsbS was incubated with
chloroplasts, and the thylakoid fraction (T) was treated
with 0.15 mg/ml proteinase K (T+). Right panel,
pPsbS was incubated with pea thylakoids that had been preincubated with
buffer (control, lane C), preimmune antibodies
(PI), or anti-Alb3 antibodies as detailed in Fig. 2 and
"Experimental Procedures." After insertion, samples were analyzed
of the pelleted thylakoids (membrane samples) or thylakoids treated
with 0.15 mg/ml proteinase K as indicated. Insertion efficiencies are
given below the lanes, expressed as a percentage of the
control insertion efficiency. Arrowhead denotes fragments
generated from degradation of inserted PsbS; asterisk
denotes other degradation fragments.
and
subunits of the ATP
synthase (ATPase) and the lumenal 33-kDa component of the
oxygen-evolving complex (33K). The presence of the
antibodies does not affect the extraction procedure. These data
reinforce the proposal that resistance to urea is an effective second
criterion for insertion into the membrane, and the data thus
demonstrate that Alb3 antibodies do not affect the insertion of
pPsbW.

View larger version (93K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Insertion of pPsbW is not inhibited by
anti-Alb3 antibodies. Upper panel, the precursor of
Arabidopsis PsbW (pPsbW) was incubated with pea
thylakoids that had been preincubated with buffer, anti-Alb3
antibodies, or preimmune antibodies as carried out with the LHC
proteins described in Fig. 2. After the insertion reaction, samples of
the thylakoids were pelleted and analyzed directly (Total
panel) or extracted twice with 6.8 M urea, after which
samples of the membrane pellets or wash supernatants
(S/natant) were analyzed. Insertion efficiencies are given
below the lanes, relative to the control insertion
efficiency. Lower panel, samples of the import reaction were
run on an SDS-Tricine gel and stained with Coomassie Blue. Mobilities
of the
and
subunits of the ATP synthase (ATPase),
Lhcb1, the 33-kDa protein of the oxygen-complex (33K), and
free chlorophyll (Chl) are indicated.

View larger version (83K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Alb3 antibodies do not inhibit the insertion
of pPsbY or pPsbX. Precursors of Arabidopsis PsbY or
PsbX (pPsbY and pPsbX) were incubated with pea
thylakoids that had been preincubated with buffer, anti-Alb3
antibodies, or preimmune antibodies. After the insertion reaction,
samples were analyzed directly or after urea extraction of the
thylakoids as described for PsbW in Fig. 4. Mobilities of mature PsbX
and the two single-span mature PsbY proteins (A1 and
A2) are indicated, together with the insertion efficiencies
(expressed as a percentage of the control panel insertion
efficiency).

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Proteinase K completely degrades Alb3 but
does not affect the subsequent insertion of PsbW. A,
immunoblot, using anti-Alb3 antibodies, of thylakoid membranes
(lane Mb) and thylakoids that were treated with 200 µg/ml
thermolysin for 40 min on ice (Th), with 60 µg/ml trypsin
(Tr), or with 100 µg/ml proteinase K (PK) for
20 min on ice. Mobility of Alb3 is indicated together with the
mobilities of molecular mass markers (in kDa). Arrow
denotes degradation product generated by thermolysin. B, pea
pAlb3 (lane pre) was imported into chloroplasts, and samples
were then analyzed of the chloroplasts (C),
thermolysin-treated chloroplasts (C+), and the stromal
(S) and thylakoid (T) fractions after lysis of
thermolysin-treated chloroplasts. Further samples of the thylakoids
were treated on ice with thermolysin (Th), trypsin
(Tr),or proteinase K under the conditions used in
A above. All samples were analyzed by gel electrophoresis
and fluorography. df, dye front. C and
D, pLhcb1 or pPsbW were incubated with thylakoids that had
been incubated on ice with 100 µg/ml proteinase K and then washed
three times in HM buffer (see "Experimental Procedures") (PK
panel). The control thylakoids were treated identically except
that proteinase K was omitted. After incubation, thylakoids from the
Lhcb1 insertion reactions were pelleted and analyzed directly
(lanes T) or after trypsin treatment to generate the
degradation product (DP) as described in Fig. 2 (lanes
T+). Thylakoids from the pPsbW insertion reactions were analyzed
directly (without pelleting, lane T) or after pelleting and
two washes in HM buffer (lanes Tw).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Present address: Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Dept. of Plant
Biology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Dalbey, R. E.,
and Robinson, C.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
17-22
2.
Dalbey, R. E.,
and Kuhn, A.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
16,
51-87
3.
Gebert, J. F.,
Overhoff, B.,
Manson, M.,
and Boos, W.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
16652-16660
4.
Traxler, B.,
and Murphy, C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12394-12400
5.
MacFarlane, J.,
and Müller, M.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
233,
766-771
6.
Ulbrandt, N. D.,
Newitt, J. A.,
and Bernstein, H. D.
(1997)
Cell
88,
187-197
7.
Valent, Q. A.,
Scotti, P. A.,
High, S.,
de Gier, J.-W. L.,
von Heijne, G.,
Lentzen, G.,
Wintermayer, W.,
Oudega, B.,
and Luirink, J.
(1997)
EMBO J.
17,
2504-2512
8.
Seluanov, A.,
and Bibi, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2053-2055
9.
De Gier, J.-W. L.,
Mansournia, P.,
Valent, Q. A.,
Phillips, G. J.,
Luirink, J.,
and von Heijne, G.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
399,
307-309
10.
Li, X.,
Henry, R.,
Yuan, J.,
Cline, K.,
and Hoffman, N. E.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
3789-3793
11.
Kogata, N.,
Nishio, K.,
Hirohashi, T.,
Kikuchi, S.,
and Nakai, M.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
329,
329-333
12.
Tu, C. J.,
Schuenemann, D.,
and Hoffman, N. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27219-27224
13.
Moore, M.,
Harrison, M. S.,
Peterson, E. C.,
and Henry, R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
1529-1532
14.
DeLille, J.,
Peterson, E. C.,
Johnson, T.,
Moore, M.,
Kight, A.,
and Henry, R.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1926-1931
15.
Tu, C. J.,
Peterson, E. C.,
Henry, R.,
and Hoffman, N. E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
13187-13190
16.
Nilsson, R.,
Brunner, J.,
Hoffman, N. E.,
and van Wijk, K. J.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
733-742
17.
Kuhn, A.
(1995)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
17,
185-190
18.
Kiefer, D.,
and Kuhn, A.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
6299-6306
19.
Hell, K.,
Neupert, W.,
and Stuart, R. A.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
1281-1288
20.
Herrmann, J. M.,
Neupert, W.,
and Stuart, R. A.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
2217-2226
21.
Samuelson, J. C.,
Chen, M.,
Jiang, F.,
Moeller, I.,
Wiedmann, M.,
Phillips, G.,
and Dalbey, R. E.
(2000)
Nature
406,
637-641
22.
Scotti, P. A.,
Urbanus, M. L.,
Brunner, J.,
de Gier, J. W.,
von Heijne, G.,
van der Does, C.,
Driessen, A. J. M.,
Oudega, B.,
and Luirink, J.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
542-549
23.
Michl, D.,
Robinson, C.,
Shackleton, J. B.,
Herrmann, R. G.,
and Klösgen, R. B.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
1310-1317
24.
Kim, S. J.,
Robinson, C.,
and Mant, A.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
424,
105-108
25.
Robinson, D.,
Karnauchov, I.,
Herrmann, R. G.,
Klösgen, R. B.,
and Robinson, C.
(1996)
Plant J.
10,
149-155
26.
Thompson, S. J.,
Robinson, C.,
and Mant, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4059-4066
27.
Kim, S. J.,
Jansson, S.,
Hoffman, N. E.,
Robinson, C.,
and Mant, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4715-4721
28.
Breyton, C.,
de Vitry, C.,
and Popot, J.-L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
7597-7602
29.
Jansson, S.
(1999)
Trends Plant Sci.
4,
236-240
30.
Gau, A. E.,
Thole, H. H.,
Sokolenko, A.,
Altschmied, L.,
Herrmann, R. G.,
and Pistorius, E. K.
(1998)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
260,
56-68
31.
Mant, A.,
and Robinson, C.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
423,
183-188
32.
Thompson, S. J.,
Kim, S. J.,
and Robinson, C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18979-18983
33.
Zhu, Y.,
Zhang, Y.,
Luo, J.,
Davies, P. J.,
and Ho, D. T.
(1998)
Gene (Amst.)
208,
1-6
34.
Bonnefoy, N.,
Chalvet, F.,
Hamel, P.,
Slonimski, P. P.,
and Dujardin, G.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
239,
201-212
35.
Mant, A.,
Woolhead, C. A.,
Moore, M.,
Henry, R.,
and Robinson, C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
36200-36206
36.
Douce, R.,
and Joyard, J.
(1996)
in
Advances in Photosynthesis, Oxygenic Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions
(Ort, D. R.
, and Yocum, C. F., eds), Vol. 4
, pp. 69-101, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
37.
Bruce, B. D.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
38,
223-246
38.
Mori, H.,
Summer, E. J.,
Ma, X.,
and Cline, K.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
45-55
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Gerdes, T. Bals, E. Klostermann, M. Karl, K. Philippar, M. Hunken, J. Soll, and D. Schunemann A Second Thylakoid Membrane-localized Alb3/OxaI/YidC Homologue Is Involved in Proper Chloroplast Biogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16632 - 16642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zygadlo, C. Robinson, H. V. Scheller, A. Mant, and P. E. Jensen The Properties of the Positively Charged Loop Region in PSI-G Are Essential for Its "Spontaneous" Insertion into Thylakoids and Rapid Assembly into the Photosystem I Complex J. Biol. Chem., April 14, 2006; 281(15): 10548 - 10554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fey, R. Wagner, K. Brautigam, M. Wirtz, R. Hell, A. Dietzmann, D. Leister, R. Oelmuller, and T. Pfannschmidt Retrograde Plastid Redox Signals in the Expression of Nuclear Genes for Chloroplast Proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2005; 280(7): 5318 - 5328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Spence, S. Bailey, A. Nenninger, S. G. Moller, and C. Robinson A Homolog of Albino3/OxaI Is Essential for Thylakoid Biogenesis in the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55792 - 55800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Yi, N. Celebi, M. Chen, and R. E. Dalbey Sec/SRP Requirements and Energetics of Membrane Insertion of Subunits a, b, and c of the Escherichia coli F1F0 ATP Synthase J. Biol. Chem., September 17, 2004; 279(38): 39260 - 39267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Asakura, T. Hirohashi, S. Kikuchi, S. Belcher, E. Osborne, S. Yano, I. Terashima, A. Barkan, and M. Nakai Maize Mutants Lacking Chloroplast FtsY Exhibit Pleiotropic Defects in the Biogenesis of Thylakoid Membranes PLANT CELL, January 1, 2004; 16(1): 201 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Jiang, M. Chen, L. Yi, J.-W. de Gier, A. Kuhn, and R. E. Dalbey Defining the Regions of Escherichia coli YidC That Contribute to Activity J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 48965 - 48972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Moore, R. L. Goforth, H. Mori, and R. Henry Functional interaction of chloroplast SRP/FtsY with the ALB3 translocase in thylakoids: substrate not required J. Cell Biol., September 29, 2003; 162(7): 1245 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bellafiore, P. Ferris, H. Naver, V. Gohre, and J.-D. Rochaix Loss of Albino3 Leads to the Specific Depletion of the Light-Harvesting System PLANT CELL, September 1, 2002; 14(9): 2303 - 2314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yuan, A. Kight, R. L. Goforth, M. Moore, E. C. Peterson, J. Sakon, and R. Henry ATP Stimulates Signal Recognition Particle (SRP)/FtsY-supported Protein Integration in Chloroplasts J. Biol. Chem., August 23, 2002; 277(35): 32400 - 32404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Baumann, W. Neupert, and J. M. Herrmann Insertion of Bitopic Membrane Proteins into the Inner Membrane of Mitochondria Involves an Export Step from the Matrix J. Biol. Chem., June 7, 2002; 277(24): 21405 - 21413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Jiang, L. Yi, M. Moore, M. Chen, T. Rohl, K.-J. van Wijk, J.-W. L. de Gier, R. Henry, and R. E. Dalbey Chloroplast YidC Homolog Albino3 Can Functionally Complement the Bacterial YidC Depletion Strain and Promote Membrane Insertion of Both Bacterial and Chloroplast Thylakoid Proteins J. Biol. Chem., May 24, 2002; 277(22): 19281 - 19288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||