|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105829200 on August 28, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 44, 41444-41454, November 2, 2001
Activation of the Ras-cAMP Signal Transduction Pathway Inhibits
the Proteasome-independent Degradation of Misfolded Protein Aggregates
in the Endoplasmic Reticulum Lumen*
Kyohei
Umebayashi §,
Ryouichi
Fukuda ,
Aiko
Hirata¶,
Hiroyuki
Horiuchi ,
Akihiko
Nakano ,
Akinori
Ohta , and
Masamichi
Takagi
From the Department of Biotechnology and
¶ Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, The University
of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657 and the Molecular
Membrane Biology Laboratory, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama
351-0198, Japan
Received for publication, June 22, 2001, and in revised form, August 7, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Many kinds of misfolded secretory proteins are
known to be degraded in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Dislocation of
misfolded proteins from the ER to the cytosol and subsequent
degradation by the proteasome have been demonstrated. Using the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we have been studying the
secretion of a heterologous protein, Rhizopus niveus
aspartic proteinase-I (RNAP-I). Previously, we found that the pro
sequence of RNAP-I is important for the folding and secretion, and that
pro, a mutated derivative of RNAP-I in which the entire region of
the pro sequence is deleted, forms gross aggregates in the yeast ER. In
this study, we show that the degradation of pro occurs independently
of the proteasome. Its degradation was not inhibited either by a potent
proteasome inhibitor or in a proteasome mutant. We also show that
neither the export from the ER nor the vacuolar proteinase is required for the degradation of pro. These results raise the possibility that
the pro aggregates are degraded in the ER lumen. We have isolated a
yeast mutant in which the degradation of pro is delayed. We show
that the mutated gene is IRA2, which encodes a
GTPase-activating protein for Ras. Because Ira2 protein is a negative
regulator of the Ras-cAMP pathway, this result suggests that
hyperactivation of the Ras-cAMP pathway inhibits the degradation of
pro. Consistently, down-regulation of the Ras-cAMP pathway in the
ira2 mutant suppressed the defect of the degradation of
pro. Thus, the Ras-cAMP signal transduction pathway seems to control
the proteasome-independent degradation of the ER misfolded protein aggregates.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In eukaryotic cells, folding of newly synthesized secretory
proteins takes place in the endoplasmic reticulum
(ER).1 Such proteins are
post-translationally modified by disulfide bond formation,
glycosylation, or, in the case of multimeric proteins, assemble with
other subunits. Properly folded or assembled proteins are transported
to the Golgi apparatus, whereas misfolded or unassembled proteins are
retained and degraded in the ER (1, 2). It has been proposed that the
ER possesses a quality control mechanism that discriminates between
normal and abnormal proteins and determines their fates,
i.e. whether they are transported or retained and degraded.
Here we focus on protein degradation in the ER. In mammalian cells,
many proteins are known to be degraded in the ER, and their
characteristics were extensively studied. It was revealed that the
characteristics of ER degradation are closely related to the unique
environment in the ER. First, the ER is known to be a major
intracellular Ca2+ storage site, and the depletion of this
Ca2+ store by calcium ionophores inhibits the ER
degradation of the truncated form of ribophorin I (3) and
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase (4) but accelerates
that of T cell antigen receptor (TCR)- and CD3- chains (5).
Second, it has been shown that the redox state in the ER lumen is
oxidative (6), allowing secretory proteins to form disulfide bonds and
fold properly. Reducing this redox state results in the rapid
degradation of otherwise stable proteins in permeabilized cells (7, 8). In contrast, diamide, the thiol-oxidizing reagent, inhibits the rapid
degradation of the chimeric protein Tac-TCR (7), HMG-CoA reductase
and TCR- (9), and the immunoglobulin light chain (10). Despite
these studies, the proteolytic machinery responsible for the ER
degradation was largely unknown. Strikingly, it has turned out that
some of the ER membrane proteins are degraded by the cytosolic
ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (11-16). Yeast studies have revealed that
the degradation of misfolded luminal proteins in the ER, such as
unglycosylated forms of pro- factor (17), a mutant form of human
-1-proteinase inhibitor A1PiZ (18), and mutant forms of proteinase A
and carboxypeptidase Y, called PrA* and CPY* (19), respectively, are
also dependent on the ubiquitin-proteasome system (reviewed in Refs. 20
and 21). That is, after being translocated into the ER lumen, these
misfolded proteins are transported in the reverse direction across the
ER membrane to the cytosol, where they are ubiquitinated and degraded. Sec61p, which is known as a constituent of the protein import channel
into the ER, has also been shown to mediate the retrograde transport of
misfolded ER proteins to the cytosol (14, 22-25). Other ER membrane
proteins, Der1p, Der3p/Hrd1p, and Hrd3p, are involved in the
dislocation process (16, 19, 26-28), although the detailed functions
of these proteins remain to be clarified. This degradation mechanism is
called ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD). Studies on ERAD have
raised two important questions. First, on the ER luminal side, how are
misfolded proteins recognized and recruited to the Sec61 channel?
Second, how is the direction of transport across the Sec61 pore regulated?
Despite the above findings, the existence of a proteasome-independent
pathway for ER protein degradation cannot be excluded. It would be of
particular interest to determine whether or not proteolytic activity
exists in the ER lumen. A recent study suggests that
proteasome-independent protein degradation occurs in the ER lumen of
yeast (29). Moreover, the existence of ER integral membrane proteases
has been demonstrated (30-32). Another report suggested that the
signal peptidase complex might play a role in the degradation of
misfolded proteins in addition to its intrinsic role of cleaving signal
peptides. This is based on the finding that a mutation in
SEC11, which encodes a component of yeast signal peptidase
complex, rendered an abnormal membrane protein stable (33).
We have previously found that certain heterologous secretory proteins
were retained and degraded in the ER of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (34). These were derivatives of Rhizopus
niveus aspartic proteinase-I (RNAP-I (35)), and we designated one
of these " pro." In pro, the entire region of the pro
sequence, which is important for the folding and secretion of RNAP-I
(36), is deleted. Upon overproduction in yeast, pro forms large
aggregates in the ER lumen, which induce ER membrane proliferation and
elevated synthesis of ER resident chaperones (37). That is,
overproduction of pro leads to biogenesis of a novel, ER-derived
compartment that accommodates the pro aggregates. We have also shown
that induction of ER chaperones, especially BiP, by the unfolded
protein response (UPR) is essential for cell growth upon overproduction
of pro (38). Overproduction of pro in the UPR-deficient
ire1 mutant led to the inhibition of protein
translocation in the ER, protein folding/transport in the ER, and cell
growth (38). From these studies, we presumed that overproduction of
pro in yeast will elicit the mechanism of ER degradation of the
misfolded protein aggregates as well as the biogenesis of a novel ER
subcompartment. In this study, we provide evidence that the degradation
of pro does not depend on the proteasome. Most likely, unidentified
proteolytic activity in the ER lumen participates in the degradation of
the pro aggregates. To investigate how the pro aggregates are
degraded, we have isolated and characterized a mutant defective in the
degradation of pro. We show that the mutated gene is
IRA2, which encodes a GTPase-activating protein for Ras. Our
results suggest that the proteolytic activity for the pro aggregates
is regulated by the Ras-cAMP signal transduction pathway.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strains and Media--
Escherichia coli strains
XL1-Blue (recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi1 hsdR17 supE44 relA1 lac
[F' proAB lacIqZ M15 Tn10
(tetr)]) and HB101 (supE44 hsdS20
(rB
mB ) recA13 ara14 proA2 lacY1
galK2 rpsL20 xyl5 mti1 leuB6 thi1) were used as hosts for plasmid
construction and propagation.
S. cerevisiae strains used in this study are listed in Table
I. Strain R27-7C-1C was transformed with
plasmid pYPR2841, which carries the pro gene downstream
of the constitutive glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)
promoter (36). The resultant transformants were mutagenized and tested
for the accumulation of pro. Eight mutants were isolated, and one of
them, mutant 22, is described in this report. In other
experiments, strains were transformed with plasmid pYPR3841, which
carries the pro gene downstream of the GAL1
promoter (37), and the production of pro was induced by galactose.
Yeast transformation was performed using a lithium acetate procedure
(39). Genetic crosses, selection of diploids, complementation tests,
spore formation, and tetrad analysis were carried out as described
previously (40).
Yeast cells were cultured aerobically at 30 °C unless otherwise
indicated. Yeast minimal medium contained 0.17% yeast nitrogen base
without amino acids and ammonium sulfate (Difco Laboratories Inc.,
Detroit, MI), 0.5% ammonium sulfate and either 2% glucose (YNBD), 2%
galactose (YNBGal), or 2% raffinose (YNBRaf) as a carbon source. In
most experiments, 2% casamino acids (Difco Laboratories Inc.) and 50 µg/ml uracil were supplemented (YNBDCU or YNBGalCU). For the culture
of strains BJ5407 and BJ5459, 5% glucose or 5% galactose plus 0.2%
sucrose was used as a carbon source.
Plasmids and Recombinant DNA Methods--
Ub-Leu-lacZ, a
URA3-marked plasmid, was used for GAL
promoter-driven expression of a fusion protein between ubiquitin and -galactosidase, whose amino-terminal residue is leucine. This plasmid was kindly provided by Andreas Bachmair.
Plasmids pYPR3841 and pYPR3841U, with which pro is expressed under
the control of the GAL1 promoter and the GAPDH terminator, were described before (37, 38). To express the pro gene
in the yeast genome, three integration plasmids, pYIL3841, pYIT3841, and pYIA3841, were constructed. The 1.8-kb
BamHI-HindIII fragment, which contained the
GAL1 promoter, the pro coding region, and the GAPDH
terminator, was prepared from pYPR3841. This fragment was inserted
between the BamHI and HindIII sites of
pBluescript II KS+, and then re-isolated by digestion with
BamHI and XhoI. The 1.8-kb
BamHI-XhoI fragment was inserted between the
BamHI and SalI sites of YIplac211 to generate
plasmid pYIP3841. To prepare pYIL3841, the 2.9-kb
BglII-BglII fragment of LEU2, which
was prepared from YEp13, was inserted into the BamHI site of
pYIP3841. pYIL3841 was digested with ApaI and then
introduced into R27-7C-1B, KUY20, WCGY4a and WCGY4 11/22a to be
integrated at the ura3 locus. To generate pYIT3841, the
1.5-kb EcoRI-EcoRI fragment of TRP1,
which was prepared from YRp7, was inserted into the SmaI
site of pYIP3841 after both EcoRI ends were filled in with
T4 DNA polymerase. pYIT3841 was digested with ApaI and then
introduced into R27-7C-1C and KUY20 to be integrated at the
ura3 locus. To generate pYIA3841, the 2.2-kb
BglII-BglII fragment of ADE2 from
plasmid pASZ11 (41) was inserted into the BamHI site of
pYIP3841. pYIA3841 was digested with HpaI and then
introduced into ANY21 and MBY10-7A to be integrated at the
ADE2 locus. Correct integration was confirmed by Southern hybridization or polymerase chain reaction. Plasmid pRS416 (42) or
YEp24 was used as a vector control.
YEpPDE2 and pKF56, a URA3-marked multicopy
plasmid carrying PDE2, and a URA3-marked
multicopy plasmid carrying IRA2, respectively, were kindly
provided by Akio Toh-e. To disrupt IRA2, the 2.8-kb SacI-SacI fragment encoding the amino-terminal
region of IRA2 (43) was inserted into the SacI
site of pUC18 to form plasmid pUCIRA2. Next, marker
fragments were inserted into the BglII site of
pUCIRA2, which was located about 200 bp downstream of the
start codon of IRA2. As the markers, the 2.9-kb
BglII-BglII fragment of LEU2 prepared
from YEp13, and the 1.2-kb HindIII-HindIII
fragment of URA3 prepared from YEp24 were used to generate
pUCira2::LEU2 and
pUCira2::URA3, respectively. The
terminal HindIII sites of the URA3 fragment were
filled in with T4 DNA polymerase before the insertion.
pUCira2::LEU2 was cut with
SacI and then introduced into R27-7C-1C to generate KUY34.
pUCira2::URA3 was also cut with SacI and introduced into R27-7C-1B to generate KUY33.
Alternatively, the 2.8-kb SacI-SacI fragment,
which was located in the middle region of the IRA2 open
reading frame (ORF (43)), was subcloned into the SacI site
of pUC18. Then, the 2.9-kb BglII-BglII fragment of LEU2 was inserted into the unique BglII site
of the plasmid. The resultant plasmid was cut with SacI and
introduced into R27-7C-1B to generate KUY25.
Isolation of Mutants That Accumulate Higher Intracellular Levels
of pro--
R27-7C-1C cells harboring pYPR2841 were grown overnight
in YNBDCU medium (~2 × 108 cells/ml). Cells from
1.25 ml of the culture were washed once with 50 mM
potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and then resuspended in 5 ml of the
same buffer. 150 µl of ethyl methanesulfonate was added, and the
cells were incubated for 30 min at 30 °C. Then, ethyl
methanesulfonate was inactivated by adding 5 ml of 10% (w/v) sodium
thiosulfate solution, and cells were washed three times with water.
After being grown in YNBDCU medium for 24 h at 25 °C, cells
were spread onto YNBD plates supplemented with histidine-HCl (20 µg/ml), leucine (30 µg/ml), and uracil (50 µg/ml) up to 1 × 103 cells/plate and incubated for 3 days at 25 °C.
For isolation of mutants, colonies on the plates were covered with the
nitrocellulose membrane, Hybond-C (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech,
Buckinghamshire, England). To lyse the cells, the membranes to which
cells were attached were exposed to chloroform vapor in a closed
container for 7 min. Then, pro in each colony was detected using an
anti-RNAP-I antibody. The ECL Western blotting system (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) was used for detection. Colonies that exhibited more
intense signals than those of wild-type were pooled and re-examined for
the phenotype twice. Only the mutants that reproducibly exhibited
intense signals were selected.
Preparation of Whole Protein Extract and
Immunoblotting--
Whole protein extracts were prepared by lysing
cells with alkali (37) or by agitation with glass beads (38).
Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (37).
Pulse-chase Experiment and Immunoprecipitation--
Pulse-chase
experiments were typically carried out as follows. Yeast cells were
grown for 3 days in YNBD medium. Appropriate supplements were included
in the media. Cells were collected, washed, and transferred to YNBGal
medium to induce the expression of pro. Cells were grown for 4 h and then the cell density was adjusted to 10 A600 units/ml. Labeling was carried out by
adding 0.06 mCi of Tran35S-label (ICN Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., Costa Mesa, CA) or redivue Pro-mix
L-35S in vitro cell-labeling mix
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to 0.6 ml of the suspension. To initiate
the chase, cells were collected and washed once, each by centrifugation
for 1 min, and then resuspended in 0.6 ml of the chase medium (YNBGal
medium supplemented with 2% of casamino acids, 75 mM
methionine, and 75 mM cysteine). At appropriate times of
the chase, 200 µl were withdrawn, mixed with 22 µl of 100 mM NaN3 solution, and placed on ice for 5 min.
Then, cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 150 µl of Tris-buffered saline supplemented with 1% SDS and proteinase inhibitors mixture (5 µg/ml of leupeptin, antipain, chymostatin, and
pepstatin A; 2.5 µg/ml aprotinin; and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Glass beads were added to the
suspension. The tube was vortexed for 30 s and chilled on ice for
30 s, repeating four times, and then heated at 100 °C for 6 min. After cooling, 600 µl of immunoprecipitation dilution buffer
(1.25% Triton X-100, 190 mM NaCl, 6 mM EDTA,
and 60 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)) supplemented with the
proteinase inhibitors mixture was added to the tube. After
centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 2 min, the supernatant was transferred
to a fresh tube for immunoprecipitation.
In the case of R2497 strain harboring Ub-Leu-lacZ or pYPR3841U,
transcriptional induction from the GAL promoter was
initiated by adding 4% galactose to YNBRaf medium. Induction of
Ub-Leu- -galactosidase and pro was kept for 4 and 6 h,
respectively. The cell density was adjusted to 20 A600 units/ml, and 0.3 ml was preincubated for
30 min with 200 µM MG132 (Peptide Institute, Inc., Osaka, Japan) or an equal volume of Me2SO, the solvent.
Then, 0.1-0.15 mCi of Tran35S-label was added and cells
were metabolically labeled for 7 min. Subsequently, chase was carried
out in the presence of 200 µM MG132 or equal volume of
Me2SO. YNBRaf medium supplemented with 50 mM
methionine, 50 mM cysteine, amino acid mixture (20 µg/ml histidine-HCl, 30 µg/ml leucine, 20 µg/ml arginine-HCl, 30 µg/ml tyrosine, 30 µg/ml isoleucine, 30 µg/ml lysine-HCl, 50 µg/ml
phenylalanine, 100 µg/ml glutamic acid, 100 µg/ml aspartic acid,
150 µg/ml valine, 200 µg/ml threonine, and 400 µg/ml serine), and
0.1 µg/ml cycloheximide was used as a chase medium.
Immunoprecipitation of pro and CPY was carried out essentially as
described previously (34). To precipitate the antibody-antigen complex,
protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) was used.
Disruption of cells and immunoprecipitation for Leu- -gal were
carried out as described by Bachmair et al. (44). The
immunoprecipitates were loaded onto the SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) gel. Gels were dried and analyzed by the Fuji
FUJIX BAS2500 Bioimaging Analyzer (Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Electron Microscopy--
Thin sections of yeast cells were
prepared and viewed as described previously (37). For immunoelectron
microscopy, thin sections were incubated with the anti-RNAP-I antibody
and subsequently with 15-nm gold particle-conjugated secondary antibody
as described previously (37).
 |
RESULTS |
Degradation of pro Occurs Independently of the Vacuolar
Proteinases--
Our previous study indicated that pro was
localized not to the vacuole but to the ER in pep4 prb1
cells, whose vacuolar proteinase activity is significantly reduced,
suggesting that pro is not degraded in the vacuole (34). However, in
that study, pro was produced by the GAPDH promoter and the dilation
of the ER accompanying the accumulation of the pro aggregates was
not remarkable, as judged from indirect immunofluorescence (34).
Because the overproduction of pro by the GAL1 promoter
resulted in extensive ER proliferation (37), we shifted cells from
galactose- to glucose-containing medium to examine whether the dilated
ER and its contents, the pro aggregates, were degraded in the
vacuole after the production of pro was shut off. In wild-type
cells, the amount of pro gradually decreased after the medium
change, and most was degraded within 8 h (Fig.
1A). In pep4
prb1 cells, like wild-type cells, the accumulated pro was
degraded after its production was shut off, and little was remaining
after 8 h (Fig. 1A), indicating that vacuolar
proteinases do not participate in the degradation of pro. We also
observed wild-type cells by electron microscopy using the
freeze-substituted fixation method (45). At 3 h after the medium
shift, the dilated ER was still observed in the cells (Fig. 1,
B and C). As we reported previously (37),
negatively stained membranes, which seemed to be derived from the
nuclear envelope (arrow in Fig. 1B), proliferated
in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1, B and C).
Electron-dense materials, which represent the pro aggregates, were
present in the lumen of the proliferating membrane structure as well as
in the nuclear envelope (arrowhead in Fig. 1B).
Unlike methylotrophic yeasts, in which autophagic degradation of
peroxisomes has been observed (46, 47), no degradative intermediates
were observed through autophagy. In S. cerevisiae, spherical
bodies called autophagic bodies, which contain intracellular structures, including rough ER, mitochondria, cytosolic ribosomes, are
induced upon nutrient starvation and become visible in the vacuole
(48). However, in this case, such spherical bodies containing the
dilated ER with the pro aggregates were not observed in the vacuole
(Fig. 1, B and C). Immunoelectron microscopy with
the anti-RNAP-I antibody detected pro on the electron-dense regions in the dilated ER but not on the vacuole (Fig. 1C). These
data exclude the possibility that the pro aggregates are degraded by
a vacuolar proteinase-dependent autophagic pathway.

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Degradation of pro
is independent of the vacuolar proteinases. A, BJ5407
(wild-type) and BJ5459 ( pep4 prb1) harboring pYPR3841
were grown in yeast minimal medium containing 5% glucose, 2% casamino
acids, and uracil for 48 h. Then, cells were shifted to yeast
minimal medium containing 5% galactose, 0.2% sucrose, 2% casamino
acids, and uracil to induce the expression of pro. After 15 h,
cells were collected and a portion was lysed to prepare whole protein
extracts. The remaining was shifted to yeast minimal medium containing
5% glucose, 2% casamino acids, and uracil to stop the expression of
pro. After 4 and 8 h, part of the culture was withdrawn and
whole protein extracts were prepared. In each lane, 10 µg of proteins
was loaded, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to the
nitrocellulose membrane. pro was detected with the anti-RNAP-I
antibody. B, wild-type strain R27-7C-1C harboring pYPR3841
was grown in YNBDCU medium for 48 h and cells were shifted to
YNBGalCU medium to induce the expression of pro. After 12 h,
cells were shifted to YNBDCU medium to stop the expression of pro
and grown for 3 h. Cells were then fixed by the freeze
substitution technique (45) for electron microscopic observation. The
arrow indicates the connection between the proliferated
membrane and the nuclear envelope. The arrowhead indicates
the electron-dense material localized in the nuclear envelope. The
scale bar indicates 1 µm. N, nucleus.
C, thin sections prepared in B were incubated
with the anti-RNAP-I antibody and then with a colloidal gold-conjugated
secondary antibody. Note that gold particles were seen on the electron
dense regions in the dilated ER but not on the vacuole. The scale
bar indicates 0.5 µm. N, nucleus; V,
vacuole.
|
|
Export from the ER Is Not Required for the Degradation of
pro--
We next examined the degradation of pro when vesicular
transport from the ER was blocked. To this end, the sec12-4
mutant defective in vesicle budding from the ER (49) was used, and a
pulse-chase experiment was carried out at the restrictive temperature (37 °C). In wild-type cells, CPY was transported to the vacuole and
processed to the mature form (m CPY, Fig.
2). In the sec12-4 mutant,
however, CPY persisted in the ER (p1) form throughout the chase (Fig.
2), indicating that the transport from the ER was completely blocked.
Under this condition, degradation of pro was not inhibited in the
sec12-4 mutant (Fig. 2). After 60 min of the chase, the
remaining pro was 63% in wild-type cells and 55% in
sec12-4. Thus, pro was degraded independently of the ER export. Together with our previous finding that pro is accumulated in the ER (34, 37), we concluded that degradation of pro occurs in
the ER.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Vesicular transport from the ER is not
required for degradation of pro. Plasmid
pYIA3841 was integrated into ANY21 (wild-type) and MBY10-7A
(sec12-4) to express the pro gene in the yeast
genome. Pulse-chase experiments were carried out using these strains as
described under "Experimental Procedures" with some modifications.
To induce the synthesis of pro, cells were grown at 23 °C for
6 h using 5% galactose and 0.2% sucrose as carbon sources. After
preincubation for 20 min at 37 °C, 12 A600
units of cells were labeled with 0.12 mCi of
[35S]methionine/cysteine and chased at 37 °C. At each
chase period, 4 A600 units of cells were
collected, and the cell extracts were divided into halves; one for
immunoprecipitation of pro and the other for CPY. Relative
percentages of the remaining pro, which were normalized to the 0-min
chase value, are indicated below the lanes.
|
|
Inhibition of the Proteasome Does Not Prevent the Degradation of
pro--
Because a variety of ER proteins are known to be
dislocated to the cytosol and subsequently degraded by the proteasome
(reviewed in Ref. 50), we addressed the question of whether pro is
degraded by the proteasome. First, the effect of a proteasome inhibitor on the degradation of pro was tested. The potent proteasome
inhibitor MG132 (reviewed in Ref. 51) has been shown to permeate the
membrane of a yeast erg6 mutant and reversibly inhibit the
degradation of short-lived proteins by 80% (52). In addition, MG132
has been shown to inhibit the ERAD of a mutant form of the plasma membrane protein Ste6p (53) and of CPY* (54). Here we performed pulse-chase experiments to test whether MG132 prevents the degradation of pro in erg6 cells. As a control, the proteolysis of
Leu- -galactosidase (44), which is known to be degraded by the
ubiquitin-proteasome pathway according to the N-end rule, was compared
with that of pro. In the presence of 200 µM MG132,
cells were preincubated for 30 min before being pulse-labeled and
chased for the indicated periods. Under this condition, the degradation
of Leu- -galactosidase was completely inhibited throughout the 60-min
chase period (Fig. 3A). The
lower band indicated by the arrowhead was observed only in
the absence of MG132, suggesting that this band represents a
degradation product of Leu- -galactosidase. In contrast, MG132 did
not inhibit the degradation of pro under the same condition (Fig.
3B). Regardless of the presence of this drug, most pro (>85%) disappeared during the 40-min chase period. Next, we monitored the degradation of pro in a proteasome mutant (pre1-1
pre2-2) defective in two subunits of the proteolytic core (55). In
immunoblotting, this mutant accumulated higher amount of CPY* than the
wild-type strain did (Fig.
4A), consistent with the
degradation defect reported before (19). In contrast, pro
accumulated in the pre1 pre2 mutant to the same degree as in
wild-type (Fig. 4A). In a pulse-chase analysis, the rate of
pro degradation in pre1 pre2 was almost identical to that
in wild-type (Fig. 4B). Quantitation from repeated experiments indicated that the degradation rate in pre1 pre2
was almost indistinguishable from that in wild-type (Fig.
4C). The finding that neither the proteasome inhibitor nor
the proteasome mutant impaired the degradation of pro indicates that
pro is not degraded by the proteasome via the
ER-to-cytosol dislocation process.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Degradation of pro
is not inhibited by the potent proteasome inhibitor MG132.
A, R2497 ( erg6) harboring Ub-Leu-lacZ was
grown, metabolically labeled and chased as described under
"Experimental Procedures." To avoid prolonged inhibition of the
proteasome that may induce pleiotropic and secondary effects, the chase
periods were shortened by stopping the synthesis of
Leu- -galactosidase and pro with 0.1 µg/ml cycloheximide in the
chase medium. Cells were disrupted, and Leu- -galactosidase was
immunoprecipitated. The arrowhead probably represents a
degradation product of Leu- -galactosidase. B, R2497
harboring pYPR3841U was grown, metabolically labeled, and chased as in
A. pro was detected after immunoprecipitation from whole
protein extracts.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Degradation of pro
is not inhibited in the proteasome mutant pre1 pre2. Plasmid
pYIL3841 was integrated into WCGY4a (wild-type) and WCGY4 11/22a
(pre1-1 pre2-2) to express the pro gene in the
yeast genome. A, to induce the synthesis of pro, these
strains were grown at 23 °C for 6 h using 5% galactose and
0.2% sucrose as carbon sources. Then, cells were shifted to 37 °C
and incubated for 1 h before lysis. 15 µg of proteins was loaded
in each lane, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to the
nitrocellulose membrane. CPY* and pro were detected with the
anti-CPY and the anti-RNAP-I antibodies, respectively. B,
pulse-chase experiments were carried out as described under
"Experimental Procedures" with some modifications. Synthesis of
pro was induced as described in A. After preincubation
for 30 min at 37 °C, 9 A600 units of cells
were labeled for 10 min with 0.09 mCi of
[35S]methionine/cysteine and chased at 37 °C. At each
chase period, 3 A600 units of cells were
collected. Relative percentages of the remaining pro, which were
normalized to the 0-min chase value, are indicated below the
lanes. C, the set of pulse-chase analysis shown in
B was independently carried out three times, and the mean
values are diagrammed.
|
|
Isolation of Mutants That Accumulate Higher Amounts of
pro--
The data presented above show that pro is degraded
independently of two known degradative pathways, the vacuolar
proteinase and the cytosolic proteasome pathways. To investigate how
pro is degraded, we attempted to isolate mutants defective in the degradation of pro.
Previously, we reported that intracellular accumulation of pro was
not obvious when pro was produced with a multicopy plasmid pYPR2841,
where the pro gene is under the control of the GAPDH promoter (34). In this expression system, we screened for mutants that
accumulate higher intracellular levels of pro. Some of these mutants
would be defective in the degradation of pro. The screening was
performed using a colony-blotting assay (see "Experimental Procedures"). To confirm the validity of this method, we investigated the accumulation of wild-type and mutated RNAP-Is that were expressed by the GAPDH promoter in wild-type cells (Fig.
5A). An intense signal was
detected from the cells producing wild-type RNAP-I. This is because
secreted RNAP-I was directly adsorbed to the nitrocellulose membrane.
In contrast, only moderate and faint signals were detected from the
cells producing mutated RNAP-Is, M1 and pro (34), respectively.
These results are consistent with our previous observation that both M1
and pro were degraded in the ER without being secreted, and that M1
was degraded more slowly than pro (34). Among 80,000 mutagenized
colonies tested, eight were found to accumulate pro reproducibly to
the same extent as M1 in wild-type cells, as judged from the intensity
of the signals (Fig. 5B). Of these, three mutants, Nos. 2, 22, and 52, exhibited relatively intense signals in the repeated
experiments. Genetic analysis revealed that these three mutants fell
into different complementation groups and that each mutant contained a
single recessive mutation. One of these mutants, mutant 22, was further
characterized.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Detection of RNAP-I and its derivatives on
nitrocellulose membranes: a method applied to the screening for mutants
that accumulate more pro than wild-type
strain. A, R27-7C-1C (wild-type) cells harboring pYE209
(vector control), pYPR2831 (wild-type RNAP-I), pYPR2841 ( pro), or
pYPR2844 (M1; these vectors are described in Ref. 36 except
pYPR2831 in Ref. 85) were grown on an agar plate to form colonies. The
colonies were adsorbed to a nitrocellulose membrane and lysed by
exposing to chloroform vapor. Intracellular and secreted RNAP-I and its
derivatives were detected with the anti-RNAP-I antibody. B,
R27-7C-1C cells harboring pYPR2841 were mutagenized. About 80,000 colonies were tested for accumulation of pro by the method shown in
A. Eight colonies, which were found to be reproducibly
positive, are shown.
|
|
Cell extracts were prepared to detect the accumulation of pro in the
mutant 22. Expression of pro was induced by the GAL1 promoter, and the time course of intracellular accumulation of pro
was analyzed. Overproduction of pro had no inhibitory effect on the
growth of the mutant 22.2 In
the mutant cells, accumulation of pro was detected from 6 h
after its induction of expression (Fig.
6A). Under the same experimental condition, accumulation of pro in wild-type cells was
detected only after 9 h of induction (Ref. 37 and Fig.
6B). The difference was obvious at 6 and 9 h, however,
the mutant 22 cells accumulated pro to the same extent as wild-type
cells after 12 h (Fig. 6B). The mRNA levels for the
pro gene in wild-type and the mutant 22 cells were
comparable,2 suggesting that the marked accumulation of
pro in the early time points by the mutant 22 cells was due to the
defect in the degradation of pro (see Figs. 10 and 11 below).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Accumulation of pro
in the mutant 22. A, the mutant 22 cells were grown in
YNBDCU medium for 48 h and shifted to YNBGalCU medium to induce
the expression of pro. Upon the indicated time points, cells were
collected and whole protein extracts were prepared. B,
R27-7C-1C (wild-type) and the mutant 22 cells were grown as described
in A, and the accumulation of pro was compared. In both
A and B, 5 µg of proteins was loaded in each
lane, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to the nitrocellulose
membrane. pro was detected with the anti-RNAP-I antibody.
|
|
Dilation of the ER and Unfolded Protein Response in the Mutant
Defective in the Degradation of pro--
Our previous study using
wild-type cells demonstrated that overproduced pro formed gross
aggregates in the ER, which resulted in enlargement of the ER (37). In
the present study, electron microscopy revealed similar morphological
changes in the mutant 22 cells. Proliferated ER membranes were observed
in the cytoplasm (Fig. 7, A
and B). They seemed to be connected with the nuclear envelope (Fig. 7B, arrow). Electron-dense
materials were observed in the luminal side of the proliferated
membranous structures as well as in the nuclear envelope (Fig.
7B, arrowhead). They were shown to contain pro
by immunoelectron microscopical analysis with the anti-RNAP-I
antibody.3 These results
indicate that, in the mutant 22 cells as in wild-type cells, pro
forms gross aggregates in the ER and ER membrane proliferation occurs
in response to the pro aggregates.

View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Electron microscopic observation of the
mutant 22 overproducing pro.
A, the mutant 22 cells were grown as described in Fig.
6A. At 5 h after the expression of pro had been
started, cells were fixed by the freeze substitution technique (45).
The scale bar indicates 1 µm. N, nucleus.
B, the boxed region in A was
magnified. The proliferated membranes containing electron-dense
materials are observed. The electron-dense materials are also seen in
the nuclear envelope (arrowhead). The proliferated membrane
seems to be continuous with the nuclear envelope (arrow).
The scale bar indicates 0.1 µm. N,
nucleus.
|
|
Overproduction of pro has been shown to trigger the UPR (56, 57) in
wild-type cells. That is, mRNA of KAR2, which encodes yeast BiP, was induced upon overproduction of pro (37, 38). In the
mutant cells, Northern analysis (Fig. 8)
indicated that overproduction of pro also increased the level of
KAR2 mRNA about 2.3-fold (compare lanes 1 and
2) and 1.5-fold (compare lanes 3 and
4) at 9 and 20 h after the expression of pro was
induced, respectively. Thus, the mutation does not impair the
ER-to-nucleus UPR pathway.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Induction of KAR2 mRNA
by overproduction of pro in the mutant
defective in the degradation of pro.
KUY20 cells were grown as described in Fig. 6A. At 9 and
20 h after the expression of pro had been started, total RNA
was extracted for Northern hybridization using a probe specific for the
KAR2 gene. In the + lanes, pro was
overproduced with pYPR3841 whereas in the lanes it was
not produced with pYPR3831X (37).
|
|
IRA2, which Negatively Regulates Yeast Ras, Is Required for the
Degradation of pro--
The mutant 22 showed the following
phenotypes: a defect in fermentation of galactose (Fig.
9A), reduced accumulation of
glycogen, and sensitivity to nutrient
starvation.4 These phenotypes
are similar to those of mutants in which the Ras-cAMP pathway is
hyperactivated (58-61). In S. cerevisiae, activation of Ras
leads to an elevated level of cAMP, which stimulates the activity of
protein kinase A (PKA) to ensure cell proliferation (reviewed in Ref.
62). During the course of genetic analysis, we found that the above
phenotypes were caused by a single and recessive mutation that was
tightly linked with the mutated locus responsible for the pro
degradation defect.4 Therefore, by complementation of the
galactose-nonfermentable phenotype, which was dependent on high
temperature (37 °C), we tried to isolate the gene that is located
very close to, or is identical to, the gene involved in the degradation
of pro. Using a plasmid-borne bank, however, identification of the
authentic genomic locus was unsuccessful. Instead, the PDE2
gene, which encodes the high affinity cAMP phosphodiesterase in yeast
(63), was identified as a high copy suppressor of the
galactose-nonfermentable phenotype (Fig. 9A). Because the
PDE2 gene product negatively regulates the Ras-cAMP pathway
by decreasing the amount of cAMP, this result strongly suggests that
the Ras-cAMP pathway is hyperactivated in the mutant 22. Hence, we
reasoned that a gene, the product of which acts upstream of Pde2p to
down-regulate the Ras-cAMP pathway, is mutated in the mutant 22. Components of the yeast Ras-cAMP pathway have been extensively
identified by genetic approaches. Therefore, the gene in question was
likely to have already been characterized. The failure in the cloning
by means of a plasmid-borne bank may indicate that the gene is very
large. Taking these possibilities into consideration, we suspected that
either IRA1 or IRA2 was mutated in the mutant 22. Both of these genes encode the yeast GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs)
for Ras, which convert a GTP-bound active form of Ras to a GDP-bound
inactive form (64-66). In addition, each has an unusually large ORF of
about 9 kb in length. Because the length of the genomic inserts in the
plasmid-borne library was 10 ~ 20 kb, these inserts have rarely
encompassed the entire region of the IRA1 or IRA2
ORF. In fact, several lines of evidence indicated that IRA2
was mutated in the mutant 22. First, IRA2 complemented the
galactose-nonfermentable phenotype of the mutant 22 (Fig.
9A). Second, when the mutant No.22 was crossed to a
ira2 strain, the resultant diploid showed a
galactose-nonfermentable phenotype (Fig. 9B). Third, when
this diploid strain was sporulated and the four-spored asci were
dissected, the haploid segregants from the 13 asci were all
galactose-nonfermentable.4

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
The mutant 22 carries an ira2
mutation, which hyperactivates the Ras-cAMP pathway.
A, the mutant 22 exhibits a galactose-nonfermentable
phenotype at a high temperature, which is suppressed by PDE2
and IRA2, both of which encode negative regulators of the
Ras-cAMP pathway. R27-7C-1C (wild-type) and the mutant 22 strains
harboring the indicated plasmids were grown on an YNBGal plate with
appropriate supplements at 37 °C. Duplicate streaks are
shown for each strain. B, the genomic locus responsible for
the galactose-nonfermentable phenotype of the mutant 22 is identified
as IRA2. The indicated strains were grown on an YNBGal plate
with appropriate supplements at 37 °C. Duplicate streaks
are shown for each strain.
|
|
Having established that the genetic locus involved in the degradation
of pro was very close to or identical to IRA2, we next attempted to determine which genomic fragment around IRA2
complemented the pro degradation defect. Our results showed that the
marked accumulation of pro in the mutant was rectified by
introduction of IRA2 (Fig.
10A). A pulse-chase analysis
(Fig. 10B) shows that the rate of pro degradation in the
mutant was significantly slower than that in the wild-type strain. This
defect was complemented by the introduction of IRA2. To
confirm that IRA2 is not an extragenic suppressor, the
mutant was mated with a ira2 strain. Accumulation of
pro in the resultant diploid (Fig. 10C, lane
5) was comparable to that in a haploid mutant strain (Fig.
10C, lane 2) and was higher than that in a
control strain that was made by mating the wild-type strain to a
ira2 strain (Fig. 10C, lane 4).
From these results, we concluded that mutation in IRA2,
which encodes a negative regulator of the Ras-cAMP pathway, caused the
degradation defect of pro.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Mutation in IRA2,
which encodes a GTPase-activating protein for Ras,
causes the degradation defect of pro.
A, introduction of IRA2 reduced the accumulation
of pro in the mutant defective in the degradation of pro. To
express the pro gene in the yeast genome, plasmid
pYIL3841 was integrated into strains R27-7C-1C (wild-type) and KUY20
(mutant). The resultant strains were transformed with the indicated
plasmids and grown as described in Fig. 6A. At 4.5 h
after the expression of pro had been started, protein extracts were
prepared. In each lane, proteins prepared from 1 A600 unit of cells were loaded. pro was
detected with the anti-RNAP-I antibody. B, pulse-chase
analysis demonstrated that the pro degradation defect was
complemented by IRA2. Using strains KUY90 (wild-type) and
KUY91 (mutant) harboring the indicated plasmids, pulse-chase analysis
was carried out (see "Experimental Procedures"). Relative
percentages of the remaining pro, which were normalized to the 0-min
chase value, are indicated below the lanes. C,
the mutated locus is identical to IRA2. R27-7C-1C
(wild-type), KUY20 (mutant), KUY34 ( ira2), KUY35
(wild-type × ira2), and KUY36 (mutant × ira2) strains harboring pYPR3841 were grown as described
in Fig. 6A. At 6 h after the expression of pro had
been started, protein extracts were prepared and 10 µg of proteins
was loaded in each lane. pro was detected with the anti-RNAP-I
antibody.
|
|
The identification of IRA2 raised the possibility that
hyperactivation of the Ras-cAMP pathway interferes with the ER
degradation of pro. However, it has previously been shown that yeast
Ras has a function distinct from the regulation of the cAMP level (67).
It is therefore possible that, in addition to the elevation of the cAMP
level, Ira2p has another biological function that is related to the ER
degradation of pro. To investigate this possibility, we tested
whether the defect of pro degradation in the ira2 mutant
could be suppressed by the overexpression of PDE2 and
thereby the decrease of the cAMP level. As shown in Fig. 11A, accumulation of pro
in ira2 cells was reduced by the overexpression of
PDE2 (compare lanes 2 and 3). In a
pulse-chase analysis, the rate of pro degradation in the
ira2 mutant was consistently accelerated by the
overexpression of PDE2 (Fig. 11, B and
C). Thus, in both immunoblotting and pulse-chase analyses,
overexpression of PDE2 significantly suppressed the
ira2 defect. These results strongly suggest that elevation
of cAMP level in the ira2 mutant leads to the impaired
degradation of pro.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Suppression of the
pro degradation defect of ira2 by
overexpression of PDE2, which encodes the
high affinity cAMP phosphodiesterase. A, strains KUY90
(wild-type) and KUY91 (ira2) harboring the indicated
plasmids were grown as described in Fig. 6A. At 6 h
after the expression of pro had been started, protein extracts were
prepared. In each lane, 20 µg of proteins was loaded. pro was
detected with the anti-RNAP-I antibody. B, using strains
KUY90 (wild-type) and KUY91 (ira2) harboring the indicated
plasmids, pulse-chase analysis was carried out (see "Experimental
Procedures"). Relative percentages of the remaining pro, which
were normalized to the 0-min chase value, are indicated
below the lanes. C, the set of pulse-chase
analysis shown in B was independently carried out three
times, and the mean values are diagrammed.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this article, we investigated whether the degradation of
pro, which forms large aggregates in the yeast ER lumen, depends on
vacuolar proteinases- and cytosolic proteasome-dependent
pathways. The results presented here demonstrate that the degradation
of pro was not affected when either pathway was blocked, indicating that the pro aggregates are mostly degraded in the ER lumen. To
elucidate the degradative pathway(s) of pro, we isolated eight mutants that accumulate more pro than wild-type cells. One of these,
the mutant 22, was shown to be defective in the degradation of pro.
We have demonstrated that the mutated gene is IRA2, which encodes a negative regulator of the yeast Ras-cAMP pathway. Therefore, we propose that the pro aggregates are degraded by an as yet unidentified proteolytic activity in the ER lumen, which is negatively regulated by the Ras-cAMP signaling pathway.
Where Are the pro Aggregates Degraded?--
Several reports
have indicated that proliferated organelles are degraded in the vacuole
via autophagy. In the methylotrophic yeasts Hansenula
polymorpha and Pichia pastoris, peroxisomes that developed during the growth on methanol are degraded in the vacuole in
the course of adaptation to nonmethylotrophic medium (46, 47). In
hepatocytes, smooth ER membranes that proliferated by phenobarbital
treatment are removed by autophagic lysosomes (68). In the electron
microscopic analysis of wild-type cells, however, we did not observe
the sequestration of the proliferated ER, which contained the pro
aggregates, into the vacuole. This result by itself does not rule out
the involvement of autophagic processes, because, in a previous study
on S. cerevisiae, accumulation of autophagic bodies was not
observed in the vacuole of wild-type cells due to rapid degradation in
a proteinase B-dependent manner (48). However, our finding
that pro was degraded in pep4 prb1 cells at a rate
similar to that in wild-type cells (Fig. 1A) argues against
the possibility that the ER containing the pro aggregates is
degraded by autophagy. We have also shown that the vesicular transport
from the ER is not required for degradation of pro. It was reported
that an ER misfolded protein is exported from the ER to the
trans-Golgi then captured by Vps10 receptor and delivered to
the vacuole for degradation (69). However, it is unlikely that pro
is degraded by following this route because pro was normally
degraded in the sec12-4 mutant, which blocks the exit from
the ER. From these results, we concluded that the site of pro
degradation is the ER. Degradation of proliferated membrane structures
is often accompanied by the appearance of morphologically distinctive
degradation intermediates. Several examples have been reported in yeast
cells. One example, as described above, is the sequestration of the
peroxisomes into the vacuole. Another is a structure called a
"whorl," which has been observed during the degradation of
karmellae, an HMG-CoA reductase-induced stacked membrane structure
surrounding the nucleus (70). Subsequent analysis has revealed the
presence of acidic compartments and lipid particles in the interior of
whorls, suggesting that acidification in whorls activates the
degradation of membranes to form lipid particles (71). Thus,
identification of the degradation intermediates is expected to provide
insights into the degradation process. As shown in Fig. 1, we examined
the proliferated ER containing the pro aggregates by electron
microscopy, but no other particular morphological changes were observed
during the degradation of the pro aggregates. Thus, from electron
microscopy, we have no clues at present to elucidate the mechanism
through which pro aggregates are degraded in the proliferated
ER.
Although proteasome-dependent degradation of ER
misfolded proteins has been reported, we have shown that the
proteolytic activities of the proteasome are not required for the ER
degradation of pro by using the proteasome inhibitor MG132 and the
proteasome mutant pre1 pre2. Two possibilities can be
considered for the degradation of pro. First, pro is dislocated
from the ER to the cytosol, and then degraded by the protease(s)
distinct from the proteasome. Second, pro is degraded in the ER
lumen without being dislocated to the cytosol. We favor the latter
possibility, because pro forms gross aggregates in the ER lumen,
which are unlikely to be completely unfolded and become competent for
retrograde transport across the Sec61 channel. We cannot rule out the
possibility that a minor population of pro, which has not yet been
incorporated into the aggregates in the ER lumen, can be dislocated to
the cytosol and degraded by the proteasome. For direct examination whether pro is retranslocated to the cytosol, we tried to use the
dislocation-deficient sec61-R4 mutant (25). We found,
however, that the translocation of pro into the ER lumen was
impaired in this mutant4 and did not pursue this experiment
further. To discriminate whether or not pro is dislocated, it will
be necessary to monitor the degradation of pro in vitro
by isolating the proliferated ER that is marked by the presence of the
pro aggregates. Characterization of this compartment will be helpful
to identify the components involved in the degradation of pro.
Although the ERAD pathway, which means dislocation to the cytosol and
subsequent degradation by the proteasome, has been extensively characterized, the possibility of other pathway(s) in ER protein degradation is still an open question. Some experimental data are
suggestive of an alternative degradation pathway(s). For example, ERAD
mutants such as ubc7 and hrd1 do not show
sensitivity to tunicamycin, which causes accumulation of misfolded
proteins in the ER (72). These ER misfolded proteins may well be
eliminated by alternative degradation machinery in these ERAD mutants.
Involvement of the Ras-cAMP Pathway in the Regulation of the
Proteasome-independent Degradation of the pro Aggregates--
We
have shown that mutation in IRA2, which encodes a negative
regulator of Ras, is responsible for the degradation defect of the
pro aggregates. We also showed that down-regulation of the Ras-cAMP
pathway by overexpression of PDE2 suppresses the defect of
the ira2 mutant in the degradation of pro. It is unlikely that Ira2p itself is responsible for the degradation of pro in the
ER lumen. Rather, the ira2 mutant seems to be defective in the signal transduction pathway upstream of the ER degradation. Recently, it has been revealed that one of the yeast MAP kinase pathways is required for correct localization of
-1,3-mannosyltransferase to early Golgi compartments (73). This
study and our present one indicate an unanticipated linkage between
signal transduction pathways and organelle functions. We propose that
the hyperactivation of the Ras-cAMP pathway inhibits the ER degradation
of the pro aggregates through the constitutive activation of PKA. In
mouse, tissue-specific localization of PKA to the ER through the
interaction with protein kinase A-anchoring protein is suggested (74).
Likewise, in yeast, PKA may be at least partially localized to the ER,
where it negatively regulates the ER degradation by phosphorylating the
components involved in this process. There are three isoforms of yeast
PKA catalytic subunit (Tpk1, Tpk2, and Tpk3), and each has recently
been shown to have a specific function (75, 76). Therefore, it is worth
investigating which isoform is engaged in the ER degradation as well as
the localization of the isoform.
The UPR is a well-known signal transduction pathway, which regulates
the ER quality control involving the degradation of misfolded proteins.
We have shown here that transcriptional induction of KAR2 in
response to the accumulation of the pro aggregates in the ER is
normal in the ira2 mutant, indicating that the
hyperactivation of the Ras-cAMP pathway does not inhibit the UPR. The
transient phenotype of pro accumulation in ira2 cells
could be related to the function of the UPR pathway as follows. Soon
after the start of pro expression from the GAL1 promoter,
marked accumulation of pro in the ER of ira2 cells is
observed because of the degradation defect. This induces the UPR
against the pro aggregates to prevent further accumulation of
pro. Because one of the functions of molecular chaperones is to
facilitate protein degradation (reviewed in Ref. 77), induction of ER
resident chaperones by the UPR pathway may promote the degradation of
pro to compensate for the defect of ira2 cells.
Therefore, marked accumulation of pro is restricted to the early
stage after the expression of pro is induced. Similar phenomena have
been reported in the ER-associated degradation of -1-protease
inhibitor and unglycosylated pro- factor (78). Also, it has been
recently shown that the UPR is required for degradation of ER misfolded
proteins (72, 79, 80).
In view of the ER degradation of pro, what is inhibited by the
hyperactivation of the Ras-cAMP pathway? It is known that yeast PKA
negatively regulates cellular responses to a variety of stress by
inhibiting STRE (stress response
element)-dependent transcription of a subset of
genes (81). It is possible that some components, which act on the ER
degradation of pro, are transcriptionally regulated through the
STRE. Recently, the yeast genome has been comprehensively searched for
genes with STREs (82). Such genes may include those involved in the ER
degradation of pro. The chaperone Hsp104, for example, may be such a
candidate. Hsp104 is not only transcriptionally regulated by STRE (83) but has recently been shown to be required for conformational repair of
heat-denatured proteins in the ER (84). In our continued study of this
subject, identification of downstream components of the Ras-cAMP
pathway and characterization of other mutants isolated in this study
should provide additional insights into the ER degradation of the
pro aggregates.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are greatly indebted to Akira Matsuura for
invaluable suggestions to the cloning of the IRA2 gene. We
thank Dieter H. Wolf for the pre1 pre2 mutant, Akio Toh-e
and Andreas Bachmair for plasmids, Do Hee Lee and Alfred L. Goldberg
for valuable information on proteasome inhibitors and the use of MG132,
and Takeshi Noda for a helpful discussion about autophagy. We are also
grateful to the members of the Nakano and the Takagi laboratories for
encouragement and helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for
scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan. This work was partly performed using the facilities of the
Biotechnology Research Center, The University of Tokyo.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipient of Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the
Promotion of Science for Young Scientists and a Special Postdoctoral Researcher at RIKEN. To whom correspondence should be addressed (present address): Molecular Membrane Biology Laboratory, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan. Tel.: 81-48-467-9548; Fax:
81-48-462-4679; E-mail: kyohei@postman.riken.go.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 28, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105829200
2
K. Umebayashi, R. Fukuda, and M. Takagi,
unpublished observation.
3
A. Hirata, K. Umebayashi, and M. Takagi,
unpublished observation.
4
K. Umebayashi and M. Takagi, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA;
TCR, T cell antigen
receptor;
PrA, proteinase A;
CPY, carboxypeptidase Y;
ERAD, ER-associated protein degradation;
RNAP-I, R. niveus
aspartic proteinase-I;
UPR, unfolded protein response;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
ORF, open reading frame;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
PKA, protein kinase A;
GAP, GTPase-activating protein;
YNB, yeast nitrogen base;
kb, kilobase(s);
STRE, stress response element.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Klausner, R. D.,
and Sitia, R.
(1990)
Cell
62,
611-614
|
| 2.
|
Bonifacino, J. S.,
and Lippincott-Schwartz, J.
(1991)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
3,
592-600
|
| 3.
|
Tsao, Y. S.,
Ivessa, N. E.,
Adesnik, M.,
Sabatini, D. D.,
and Kreibich, G.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
57-67
|
| 4.
|
Roitelman, J.,
Bar-Nun, S.,
Inoue, S.,
and Simoni, R. D.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
16085-16091
|
| 5.
|
Wileman, T.,
Kane, L. P.,
Carson, G. R.,
and Terhorst, C.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
4500-4507
|
| 6.
|
Hwang, C.,
Sinskey, A. J.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1992)
Science
257,
1496-1502
|
| 7.
|
Stafford, F. J.,
and Bonifacino, J. S.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1225-1236
|
| 8.
|
Young, J.,
Kane, L. P.,
Exley, M.,
and Wileman, T.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
19810-19818
|
| 9.
|
Inoue, S.,
and Simoni, R. D.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9080-9086
|
| 10.
|
Gardner, A. M.,
Aviel, S.,
and Argon, Y.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25940-25947
|
| 11.
|
Ward, C. L.,
Omura, S.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1995)
Cell
83,
121-127
|
| 12.
|
Jensen, T. J.,
Loo, M. A.,
Pind, S.,
Williams, D. B.,
Goldberg, A. L.,
and Riordan, J. R.
(1995)
Cell
83,
129-135
|
| 13.
|
Wiertz, E. J. H. J.,
Jones, T. R.,
Sun, L.,
Bogyo, M.,
Geuze, H. J.,
and Ploegh, H. L.
(1996)
Cell
84,
769-779
|
| 14.
|
Wiertz, E. J. H. J.,
Tortorella, D.,
Bogyo, M., Yu, J.,
Mothes, W.,
Jones, T. R.,
Rapoport, T. A.,
and Ploegh, H. L.
(1996)
Nature
384,
432-438
|
| 15.
|
Biederer, T.,
Volkwein, C.,
and Sommer, T.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2069-2076
|
| 16.
|
Hampton, R. Y.,
Gardner, R. G.,
and Rine, J.
(1996)
Mol. Biol. Cell
7,
2029-2044
|
| 17.
|
McCracken, A. A.,
and Brodsky, J. L.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
291-298
|
| 18.
|
Werner, E. D.,
Brodsky, J. L.,
and McCracken, A. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13797-13801
|
| 19.
|
Hiller, M. M.,
Finger, A.,
Schweiger, M.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1996)
Science
273,
1725-1728
|
| 20.
|
Brodsky, J. L.,
and McCracken, A. A.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
151-156
|
| 21.
|
Bonifacino, J. S.,
and Weissman, A. M.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
14,
19-57
|
| 22.
|
Pilon, M.,
Schekman, R.,
and Römisch, K.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4540-4548
|
| 23.
|
Plemper, R. K.,
Böhmler, S.,
Bordallo, J.,
Sommer, T.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1997)
Nature
388,
891-895
|
| 24.
|
Plemper, R. K.,
Egner, R.,
Kuchler, K.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32848-32856
|
| 25.
|
Zhou, M.,
and Schekman, R.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
4,
925-934
|
| 26.
|
Knop, M.,
Finger, A.,
Braun, T.,
Hellmuth, K.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
753-763
|
| 27.
|
Bordallo, J.,
Plemper, R. K.,
Finger, A.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
209-222
|
| 28.
|
Plemper, R. K.,
Bordallo, J.,
Deak, P. M.,
Taxis, C.,
Hitt, R.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
4123-4134
|
| 29.
|
Holkeri, H.,
and Makarow, M.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
429,
162-166
|
| 30.
|
Ozols, J.
(1997)
Mol. Biol. Cell
8,
2281-2290
|
| 31.
|
Heinemann, F. S.,
and Ozols, J.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
3445-3453
|
| 32.
|
Moriyama, T.,
Sather, S. K.,
McGee, T. P.,
and Simoni, R. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22037-22043
|
| 33.
|
Mullins, C.,
Lu, Y. Q.,
Campbell, A.,
Fang, H.,
and Green, N.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17139-17147
|
| 34.
|
Fukuda, R.,
Umebayashi, K.,
Horiuchi, H.,
Ohta, A.,
and Takagi, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14252-14255
|
| 35.
|
Horiuchi, H.,
Yanai, K.,
Okazaki, T.,
Takagi, M.,
and Yano, K.
(1988)
J. Bacteriol.
170,
272-278
|
| 36.
|
Fukuda, R.,
Horiuchi, H.,
Ohta, A.,
and Takagi, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9556-9561
|
| 37.
|
Umebayashi, K.,
Hirata, A.,
Fukuda, R.,
Horiuchi, H.,
Ohta, A.,
and Takagi, M.
(1997)
Yeast
13,
1009-1020
|
| 38.
|
Umebayashi, K.,
Hirata, A.,
Horiuchi, H.,
Ohta, A.,
and Takagi, M.
(1999)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
78,
726-738
|
| 39.
|
Ito, H.,
Fukuda, Y.,
Murata, K.,
and Kimura, A.
(1983)
J. Bacteriol.
153,
163-168
|
| 40.
|
Sherman, F.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
194,
3-21
|
| 41.
|
Stotz, A.,
and Linder, P.
(1990)
Gene
95,
91-98
|
| 42.
|
Sikorski, R. S.,
and Hieter, P.
(1989)
Genetics
122,
19-27
|
| 43.
|
Tanaka, K.,
Nakafuku, M.,
Tamanoi, F.,
Kaziro, Y.,
Matsumoto, K.,
and Toh-e, A.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
4303-4313
|
| 44.
|
Bachmair, A.,
Finley, D.,
and Varshavsky, A.
(1986)
Science
234,
179-186
|
| 45.
|
Sun, G.-H.,
Hirata, A.,
Ohya, Y.,
and Anraku, Y.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
1625-1639
|
| 46.
|
Veenhuis, M.,
Douma, A.,
Harder, W.,
and Osumi, M.
(1983)
Arch. Microbiol.
134,
193-203
|
| 47.
|
Tuttle, D. L.,
Lewin, A. S.,
and Dunn, W. A., Jr.
(1993)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
60,
283-290
|
| 48.
|
Takeshige, K.,
Baba, M.,
Tsuboi, S.,
Noda, T.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
301-311
|
| 49.
|
Nakano, A.,
Brada, D.,
and Schekman, R.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
851-863
|
| 50.
|
Plemper, R. K.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
266-270
|
| 51.
|
Coux, O.,
Tanaka, K.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65,
801-847
|
| 52.
|
Lee, D. H.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27280-27284
|
| 53.
|
Loayza, D.,
Tam, A.,
Schmidt, W. K.,
and Michaelis, S.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
2767-2784
|
| 54.
|
Suzuki, T.,
Park, H.,
Hollingsworth, N. M.,
Sternglanz, R.,
and Lennarz, W. J.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
1039-1051
|
| 55.
|
Heinemeyer, W.,
Kleinschmidt, J. A.,
Saidowsky, J.,
Escher, C.,
and Wolf, D.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
555-562
|
| 56.
|
Cox, J. S.,
Shamu, C. E.,
and Walter, P.
(1993)
Cell
73,
1197-1206
|
| 57.
|
Mori, K.,
Ma, W.,
Gething, M.-J.,
and Sambrook, J.
(1993)
Cell
74,
743-756
|
| 58.
|
Kataoka, T.,
Powers, S.,
McGill, C.,
Fasano, O.,
Strathern, J.,
Broach, J.,
and Wigler, M.
(1984)
Cell
37,
437-445
|
| 59.
|
Toda, T.,
Cameron, S.,
Sass, P.,
Zoller, M.,
Scott, J. D.,
McMullen, B.,
Hurwitz, M.,
Krebs, E. G.,
and Wigler, M.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
1371-1377
|
| 60.
|
Matsuura, A.,
and Anraku, Y.
(1993)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
238,
6-16
|
| 61.
|
Cannon, J. F.,
Pringle, J. R.,
Fiechter, A.,
and Khalil, M.
(1994)
Genetics
136,
485-503
|
| 62.
|
Thevelein, J. M.,
and de Winde, J. H.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
33,
904-918
|
| 63.
|
Sass, P.,
Field, J.,
Nikawa, J.,
Toda, T.,
and Wigler, M.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
9303-9307
|
| 64.
|
Tanaka, K.,
Matsumoto, K.,
and Toh-e, A.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
757-768
|
| 65.
|
Tanaka, K.,
Nakafuku, M.,
Satoh, T.,
Marshall, M. S.,
Gibbs, J. B.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Kaziro, Y.,
and Toh-e, A.
(1990)
Cell
60,
803-807
|
| 66.
|
Tanaka, K.,
Lin, B. K.,
Wood, D. R.,
and Tamanoi, F.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
468-472
|
| 67.
|
Morishita, T.,
Mitsuzawa, H.,
Nakafuku, M.,
Nakamura, S.,
Hattori, S.,
and Anraku, Y.
(1995)
Science
270,
1213-1215
|
| 68.
|
Bolender, R. P.,
and Weibel, E. R.
(1973)
J. Cell Biol.
56,
746-761
|
| 69.
|
Hong, E.,
Davidson, A. R.,
and Kaiser, C. A.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
623-633
|
| 70.
|
Wright, R.,
Basson, M.,
D'Ari, L.,
and Rine, J.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
101-114
|
| 71.
|
Lum, P. Y.,
and Wright, R.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
81-94
|
| 72.
|
Friedlander, R.,
Jarosch, E.,
Urban, J.,
Volkwein, C.,
and Sommer, T.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
379-384
|
| 73.
|
Reynolds, T. B.,
Hopkins, B. D.,
Lyons, M. R.,
and Graham, T. R.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
935-946
|
| 74.
|
Huang, L. J.-s.,
Wang, L.,
Ma, Y.,
Durick, K.,
Perkins, G.,
Deerinck, T. J.,
Ellisman, M. H.,
and Taylor, S. S.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
951-959
|
| 75.
|
Robertson, L. S.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13783-13787
|
| 76.
|
Pan, X.,
and Heitman, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
4874-4887
|
| 77.
|
Hayes, S. A.,
and Dice, J. F.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
255-258
|
| 78.
|
Brodsky, J. L.,
Werner, E. D.,
Dubas, M. E.,
Goeckeler, J. L.,
Kruse, K. B.,
and McCracken, A. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3453-3460
|
| 79.
|
Casagrande, R.,
Stern, P.,
Diehn, M.,
Shamu, C.,
Osario, M.,
Zúñiga, M.,
Brown, P. O.,
and Ploegh, H.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
5,
729-735
|
| 80.
|
Ng, D. T. W.,
Spear, E. D.,
and Walter, P.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
77-88
|
| 81.
|
Smith, A.,
Ward, M. P.,
and Garrett, S.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3556-3564
|
| 82.
|
Moskvina, E.,
Schüller, C.,
Maurer, C. T. C.,
Mager, W. H.,
and Ruis, H.
(1998)
Yeast
14,
1041-1050
|
| 83.
|
Schüller, C.,
Brewster, J. L.,
Alexander, M. R.,
Gustin, M. C.,
and Ruis, H.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4382-4389
|
| 84.
|
Hänninen, A.-L.,
Simola, M.,
Saris, N.,
and Makarow, M.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
3623-3632
|
| 85.
|
Horiuchi, H.,
Ashikari, T.,
Amachi, T.,
Yoshizumi, H.,
Takagi, M.,
and Yano, K.
(1990)
Agric. Biol. Chem.
54,
1771-1779
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Movsichoff, O. A. Castro, and A. J. Parodi
Characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe ER {alpha}-Mannosidase: A Reevaluation of the Role of the Enzyme on ER-associated Degradation
Mol. Biol. Cell,
October 1, 2005;
16(10):
4714 - 4724.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Nakatsukasa, S. Okada, K. Umebayashi, R. Fukuda, S.-i. Nishikawa, and T. Endo
Roles of O-Mannosylation of Aberrant Proteins in Reduction of the Load for Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperones in Yeast
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 26, 2004;
279(48):
49762 - 49772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Marutani, A. Yamamoto, N. Nagai, H. Kubota, and K. Nagata
Accumulation of type IV collagen in dilated ER leads to apoptosis in Hsp47-knockout mouse embryos via induction of CHOP
J. Cell Sci.,
November 15, 2004;
117(24):
5913 - 5922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Cowart, Y. Okamoto, F. R. Pinto, J. L. Gandy, J. S. Almeida, and Y. A. Hannun
Roles for Sphingolipid Biosynthesis in Mediation of Specific Programs of the Heat Stress Response Determined through Gene Expression Profiling
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 8, 2003;
278(32):
30328 - 30338.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. D. Spear and D. T.W. Ng
Stress Tolerance of Misfolded Carboxypeptidase Y Requires Maintenance of Protein Trafficking and Degradative Pathways
Mol. Biol. Cell,
July 1, 2003;
14(7):
2756 - 2767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Pagny, L.-A. Denmat-Ouisse, V. Gomord, and L. Faye
Fusion with HDEL Protects Cell Wall Invertase from Early Degradation when N-glycosylation is Inhibited
Plant Cell Physiol.,
February 15, 2003;
44(2):
173 - 182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. J. Sagt, W. H. Muller, L. van der Heide, J. Boonstra, A. J. Verkleij, and C. T. Verrips
Impaired Cutinase Secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Induces Irregular Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Membrane Proliferation, Oxidative Stress, and ER-Associated Degradation
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
May 1, 2002;
68(5):
2155 - 2160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Gelman, E. S. Kannegaard, and R. R. Kopito
A Principal Role for the Proteasome in Endoplasmic Reticulum-associated Degradation of Misfolded Intracellular Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 29, 2002;
277(14):
11709 - 11714.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|