Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106795200 on August 28, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 44, 41502-41509, November 2, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/44/41502    most recent
M106795200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hickox, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hickox, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Heterogeneous Processing and Zona Pellucida Binding Activity of Pig Zonadhesin*

John R. Hickox, Ming Bi, and Daniel M. HardyDagger

From the Department of Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas 79430

Received for publication, July 19, 2001, and in revised form, August 17, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Zonadhesin is a mosaic protein in sperm membrane fractions that binds directly and in a species-specific manner to the extracellular matrix (zona pellucida) of the oocyte. The active form of pig zonadhesin from capacitated, epididymal spermatozoa comprises two covalently associated polypeptide chains of Mr 105,000 (p105) and Mr 45,000 (p45). Here we report detection and characterization of multiple zonadhesin isoforms in freshly ejaculated cells. Antibodies to the predicted von Willebrand D0-D1, D1, and D3 domains of pig zonadhesin recognized p105, p45, and additional Mr 60,000-90,000 polypeptides in particulate fractions of uncapacitated cells. Although the p105/45 form constituted a minority of all zonadhesin forms in sperm membrane fractions, it was the predominant form capable of binding to the pig zona pellucida. Zonadhesin-binding sites were distributed over the entire zona pellucida. Anion exchange chromatography resolved active, p105/45 zonadhesin from the p60-90 inactive forms. Without disulfide bond reduction some zonadhesin was Mr >= 300,000, including Mr 300,000 and 900,000 proteins comprising in part multimers of p105/45. The multimeric forms did not bind the zona pellucida as avidly as did the p105/45 monomer. Expressed D1 and D3 domain fragments containing the CG(L/V)CG sequence motif spontaneously formed multimers at -246 mV Eh in vitro. Double Cys right-arrow Ser mutants of the D1 fragment formed multimers with the same apparent kinetics as the wild type protein. Zonadhesin localized to the apical head of pig spermatozoa. We conclude that a heterogeneous combination of specific proteolysis and intermolecular disulfide bond formation in the sperm head generates multiple forms of zonadhesin with differing avidities for the zona pellucida.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Adhesion of mammalian spermatozoa to the zona pellucida (ZP)1 is a complex process mediated by binding of sperm proteins to complementary ligands in the ZP (1, 2). The complexity of this process derives partly from cellular changes that occur during gamete interactions. Spermatozoa undergo physiological changes in the female reproductive tract that are required for fertilization and are collectively called capacitation (1, 3). Although the molecular basis of capacitation is only partly understood, in some if not all species avidity of sperm-ZP adhesion increases as capacitation progresses. After capacitation is completed, the membranes involved in initial adhesion events are lost from the sperm surface during the acrosome reaction, but adhesion is sustained by interaction of newly exposed structures with the ZP (1, 2). Unique adhesion molecule pairs likely function at different times during fertilization, and the activities of these molecules may change as fertilization progresses (2). It is therefore important to assess the biochemical and functional properties of sperm adhesion molecules at each stage in the fertilization process.

Several sperm proteins that may mediate adhesion to the ZP have been identified and characterized (2). Among these molecules zonadhesin is unique in its ability to bind directly and in a species-specific manner to native, particulate ZP (4, 5). Zonadhesin from pig (5), mouse (6), rabbit,2 and human (7)3 spermatozoa is a mosaic protein with a predicted Type I integral membrane topology. In each of these species, the large extracellular region of the protein comprises primarily three domain types (meprin/A5 antigen/mu receptor tyrosine phosphatase, mucin, and von Willebrand D (VWD)) that are present in other adhesion molecules (8-10). Although the domain structures of zonadhesin from these four mammals have been predicted from cDNA sequences, relatively little is known about the biochemical and functional properties of the proteins.

The active form of pig zonadhesin in membrane fractions of capacitated, epididymal spermatozoa is a two-chain molecule with disulfide-bonded Mr 105,000 and 45,000 polypeptides, both of which are derived from a predicted 2467-amino acid nascent precursor (4, 5). High Mr forms of zonadhesin have also been observed, suggesting the possible formation of covalent oligomers (4). This possibility was further implied by the presence in the pig zonadhesin D1, D2, and D3 domains of a conserved CG(L/V)CG sequence motif (5) that is important for the oligomerization and proper function of von Willebrand factor (11) and for the oligomerization of porcine submaxillary mucin (12-14). These observations suggested that the protein at a minimum undergoes limited proteolysis and possibly also oligomerization as occurs in the functional maturation of vWF and other D-domain proteins (10). However, it is unclear when during sperm maturation such post-translational processing occurs or whether it is important for the ZP binding activity of zonadhesin.

Here we report that heterogeneous post-translational processing gives rise to multiple isoforms of pig zonadhesin in freshly ejaculated spermatozoa. Among these, only forms comprising the p105 and p45 polypeptides possess ZP binding activity, and the monomeric p105/45 form binds more avidly than do higher order covalent oligomers. Furthermore, we find that zonadhesin binds uniformly to homologous ZP and localizes to the apical head of pig spermatozoa. These properties further support a function for zonadhesin in sperm adhesion to the extracellular matrix of the egg.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolation of Sperm Membrane Fraction-- Boar spermatozoa in extended, freshly ejaculated semen were washed and immediately disrupted by N2 cavitation at 650 p.s.i. (15). Particulate fractions enriched in sperm plasma membranes were isolated from suspensions of disrupted cells by differential centrifugation (15) as for previous studies with cauda epididymal spermatozoa (4, 5). Solutions for sperm fractionations were buffered at pH 7.5 and contained EDTA (1 mM) and diisopropyl fluorophosphate (1 mM) to prevent proteolysis by acidic proteases, Ca2+-dependent metalloproteinases, or serine proteases, respectively. In some experiments, solutions also contained 1 mM iodoacetamide to inhibit thiol proteases and to prevent thiol oxidation. Isolated membrane fractions in 20 mM NaHEPES, 130 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5 (HNE), were stored at -70 °C.

Isolation of Zona Pellucida-- Porcine ZP were isolated from sliced ovaries by stepwise sieving through screens (16) and then further purified by ultracentrifugation through Percoll (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) gradients (4). Isolated ZP in HNE were stored at -70 °C.

ZP Binding Assays-- Detergent-solubilized proteins from sperm membrane fractions were mixed with isolated ZP, and zonadhesin that bound directly to the particulate, native ZP was detected either by Western blotting (4, 5) or by epifluorescence. For localization of binding sites, sperm proteins were biotinylated (4) prior to solubilization and incubation with ZP. The ZP with bound sperm proteins were washed extensively with 20 mM NaHEPES, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.5% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, pH 7.5 (mRIPA) (4), and then bound, biotinylated proteins were detected by incubating for 15 min at 22 °C with Texas Red-labeled streptavidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) diluted 10,000-fold in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20, pH 7.5 (TBST). After washing three times for 5 min with TBST, ZP were dropped on coverslips, air dried, mounted with Fluoromount G (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA), and viewed by epifluorescence. ZP-bound forms of zonadhesin were characterized by Western blotting. Biotinylated zonadhesin polypeptides that remained bound to ZP after washing with mRIPA were detected by probing blots with horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin (4). Alternatively, zonadhesin polypeptides that remained bound after washing with 1% CHAPS/HNE were detected by probing blots with specific antisera as described below.

Expression and Purification of D0-D1 Fusion Protein-- The 1.7-kilobase EcoRI fragment of pig zonadhesin cDNA clone M2 (in pBluescript) was subcloned into the EcoRI site of pET-23d. The 5' sticky end of this fragment came from the EcoRI site in the adapter used to construct the cDNA library (5), and its 3' sticky end came from the EcoRI site at nucleotides 4063-4068 of the zonadhesin composite cDNA (GenBankTM accession number U40024). This construct specified an Mr 64,000 fusion protein comprising 20 amino acids of N-terminal vector-encoded protein, 19 amino acids of C-terminal vector-encoded protein (including a hexahistidine tag), and zonadhesin amino acids Pro683-Ser1224. The fusion protein was expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21/DE3 by induction with 0.5 mM isopropylthiogalactoside for 2 h at 37 °C and isolated from inclusion bodies by preparative SDS-PAGE and electroelution.

Preparation of D0-D1 Antisera-- Asp-Pro bonds of the purified D0-D1 fusion protein were hydrolyzed for 36 h with 70% formic acid at 37 °C. The final hydrolysates contained a mixture of proteins with Mr values corresponding to partial hydrolysis products predicted from the deduced amino acid sequence, including an Mr 33,000 core polypeptide. Hydrolysates were lyophilized to remove formic acid prior to injection. Two female New Zealand White rabbits were immunized (intramuscular) with 0.2-0.5 mg of protein each in 1 ml of Freund's complete adjuvant (day 0). Booster injections (intramuscular) on day 45 consisted of 0.2-0.5 mg of protein each in 1 ml of Freund's incomplete adjuvant. Antisera were recovered from blood obtained by terminal exsanguinations on day 58.

Expression and Purification of D1 and D3 Fusion Proteins-- Glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins comprising in part amino acids Ser923-Met993 of the D1 domain or amino acids Ile1684-Pro1788 of the D3 domain were expressed in E. coli strain BL21. Polymerase chain reaction products (D1 sense primer, 5'-AGTGGATCCAGCACCTTCTCTGG-3'; D1 antisense primer, 5'-ATAGAATTCTGCTAGGCCGTGTTG-3'; D3 sense primer, 5'-CATCGGATCCCAGGTCAAGTTTGACGG-3'; and D3 antisense primer, 5'-GGGGAATTCTAGGCCGCCTG-3'; underlined bases denote mismatches introduced to create restriction sites and stop codons) encoding the D1 and D3 domain segments were directionally cloned into the BamHI and EcoRI sites of pGEX-2T, and fusion protein expression was induced with 0.1 mM isopropylthiogalactoside at 37 °C for 2 h. After washing the bacteria with 10 mM NaPO4, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 (PBS), soluble fusion proteins were extracted by sonicating cell pellets in PBS containing 0.5 mM diisopropyl fluorophosphate, 1.0 mM EDTA, 10 mM E64, and 0.2% Triton X-100. Cell lysates were applied to a glutathione (GSH)-Sepharose column (15 ml of bed volume) equilibrated at 22 °C in PBS. Nonbinding proteins were washed through with PBS, and fusion proteins were eluted with 5 mM GSH in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Eluted fusion proteins were present at concentrations of 5-8 mg/ml in the pooled, peak fractions, and with prior disulfide bond reduction migrated as single bands in SDS-PAGE (10% gels). Total yields of purified fusion protein were 40-45 mg/500 ml of culture.

Preparation of Domain-specific Antisera-- Four female New Zealand White rabbits were immunized (intramuscular) with 1 mg of purified fusion protein/animal (two with GST-D1 and two with GST-D3) emulsified in 0.5 ml of Freund's complete adjuvant (day 0). Booster injections consisted of 1 mg of purified fusion protein/animal emulsified in 0.5 ml of Freund's incomplete adjuvant (intramuscular) on day 42, and 1 mg of soluble protein/animal in PBS (subcutaneous) on days 49 and 70. Antisera were recovered from blood obtained by terminal exsanguinations on day 81.

Preparation of GST, GST-D1, and GST-D3 Affinity Columns-- Purified GST (100 mg), GST-D1 (70 mg), and GST-D3 (70 mg) were dialyzed at 4 °C for >16 h in 0.1 M NaHCO3, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 8.3, to remove GSH and exchange into conjugation buffer. Dialyzed proteins were each coupled at 10 mg/ml swelled gel to CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). After washing by suction on a glass filter to remove uncoupled proteins, the remaining activated groups were blocked with 1 M ethanolamine, and the conjugated resins were washed with three cycles of alternating pH (0.1 M acetate, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 4.0, and 0.1 M NaHCO3, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 8.3). The affinity matrices were poured into 1-cm-diameter glass columns, equilibrated in PBS containing 0.02% NaN3, and then stored at 4 °C.

Affinity Purification of D1 and D3 Antibodies-- Antibodies to GST were removed by passing 20 ml of antisera through a 10-ml bed volume GST-Sepharose column equilibrated at 22 °C in PBS. Antibodies to zonadhesin D1 or D3 domains were then affinity purified from their anti-GST-depleted sera by chromatography on GST-D1 or GST-D3 columns, respectively (7 ml of bed volume each, equilibrated in PBS at 22 °C). Elution of bound antibodies with 0.2 M sodium citrate, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 3.0, was monitored continuously by A280. Peak fractions were pooled and immediately adjusted to pH 7 by addition of 1 M Tris (unbuffered). Antibodies to GST that were removed in the initial depletion steps were similarly eluted from GST-Sepharose and recovered for use as affinity-purified control antibodies. All purified antibodies were stored at -70 °C.

Preparation of D3 Immunoaffinity Column-- 20 mg of affinity-purified antibody to the D3 domain (11.4 mg from rabbit R128 and 8.6 mg from rabbit R129) were desalted into 0.1 M NaHCO3, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 8.3 (coupling buffer) in two runs on four tandem 5-ml HiTrap desalting columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Desalted protein (15 mg in 8.8 ml) was coupled to 0.43 g (dry weight) of freshly swollen CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B. A protein assay of uncoupled protein confirmed that more than 95% of the antibody (>14.5 mg) was coupled to the affinity matrix (1.5 ml of packed volume), which after blocking and washing as for the fusion protein affinity matrices was equilibrated in PBS containing 0.02% NaN3 and stored at 4 °C.

Immunoaffinity Purification of Zonadhesin from Spermatozoa-- Sperm membrane fractions (100 mg protein) were Dounce homogenized in 10 ml of 1% SDS/HNE and incubated for 30 min at 22 °C. The homogenate was diluted to 100 ml with HNE containing 0.5 mM diisopropyl fluorophosphate, 0.56% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, and 1.1% (v/v) hydrogenated Triton X-100 to produce the composition of mRIPA, a detergent solution in which zonadhesin retains its ZP binding activity (4). After ultracentrifugation for 1 h at 100,000 × g at 2 °C, up to 50 ml of the supernatant solution (mRIPA extract) was applied to a 1.5-ml anti-D3 column, and nonbound proteins were washed through with mRIPA until A280 (monitored continuously) returned to base line. The column was further washed with 10 ml of HNE containing 1% (v/v) hydrogenated Triton X-100, and then the protein was eluted with 10 ml of 0.2 M sodium citrate, 0.15 M NaCl, 1% (v/v) hydrogenated Triton X-100, pH 3.0. Eluted protein fractions containing purified zonadhesin were pooled, adjusted to pH 7 with 1 M Tris (unbuffered), and stored at -70 °C.

Preparation of Antisera to Zonadhesin Holoprotein-- Two female New Zealand White rabbits were immunized (intradermal) with 100 µg of purified zonadhesin holoprotein/animal emulsified in 1 ml of Freund's complete adjuvant (day 0). After boosting with 100 µg of purified protein/animal emulsified in 1.2 ml of Freund's incomplete adjuvant (intramuscular) on day 45, antisera were recovered from blood obtained by terminal exsanguinations on day 60.

Site-directed Mutagenesis-- Mutations in the pGEX-2T construct encoding GST-D3 were introduced with T4 polymerase-based GeneEditor (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), and those in the construct encoding GST-D1 were introduced with polymerase chain reaction-based QuickChange (Stratagene Inc., La Jolla, CA) without modification of the vendor's instructions. The primer for generating the double Cys right-arrow Ser mutant of the 1709CGVCG1713 motif in GST-D3 (C1709S,C1712S) was 5'-ACGGAAGGACCTCCGGCGTGAGCGGGAACTTCA-3' (altered bases in mutagenesis primer sequences are underlined). Primers for generating mutants of the 933CGLCG937 motif in GST-D1 were: 5'-CTCTGGCAAACTCTCTGGTCTCTGTGGCG-3' (C933S sense); 5'-CGCCACAGAGACCAGAGAGTTTGCCAGAG-3' (C933S antisense); 5'-CTCTGTGGTCTCAGTGGCGACTATGACGG-3' (C936S sense); 5'-CCGTCATAGTCGCCACTGAGACCACAGAG-3' (C936S antisense); 5'-CTCTGGCAAACTCTCTGGTCTCAGTGGCGACTATG-3' (C933S,C936S sense); and 5'-CATAGTCGCCACTGAGACCAGAGAGTTTGCCAGAG-3' (C933S,C936S antisense). Mutated constructs were verified by double-stranded DNA sequencing using insert-flanking pGEX primers (sense: 5'-AATCGGATCTGGTTCCG-3'; antisense: 5'-CGTCAGTCAGTCACGAT-3'). Mutant fusion proteins were expressed in BL21 cells and purified by GSH affinity chromatography as for the wild type proteins.

Electrophoresis and Western Blotting-- SDS-PAGE and Western blotting were done as described previously (17-20). Two-dimensional SDS-PAGE was also done as described previously (4), except that gradient gels (4-12% linear) were used for each dimension to resolve both high Mr zonadhesin isoforms and their constituent polypeptides. Dilutions used to detect zonadhesin on Western blots of pig sperm membranes were: D0-D1 antisera, 1:50,000; D1 antibody, 1:5,000; D3 antibody, 1:50,000; holoprotein antisera, 1:50,000, each in TBST. Bound antibody was detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (BIOSOURCE International, Camarillo, CA) diluted 1:50,000 in TBST and development by chemiluminescence (SuperSignal; Pierce).

In Vitro Multimerization-- Wild type and mutant fusion proteins were purified by GSH affinity chromatography in the presence of 1 mM DTT to stabilize the expressed proteins in their monomeric forms. The purified fusion proteins were then desalted on Sephadex G50 spin columns equilibrated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing 1 mM DTT. For time course studies, oxidized glutathione (GSSG) was added to desalted fusion protein (1 µg in Tris-DTT) to a final concentration of 25 mM, which upon reaction with DTT produced a 24 mM GSSG/2 mM GSH redox buffer with an effective potential in solution (Eh) at pH 7.4 of -246 mV. The reactions were incubated at 37 °C, and disulfide bond formation was terminated at various times by adding iodoacetamide to 60 mM. To determine dependence of multimer formation on Eh, 5-25 mM GSSG was added to reactions to produce redox buffers ranging from -269 to -246 mV Eh. After incubating for 2 h at 37 °C, the reactions were terminated with iodoacetamide as for time course studies. Multimers in the terminated reactions were separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by staining with Coomassie Blue.

Immunofluorescence-- All steps for immunolocalization experiments were done at 22 °C. Spermatozoa were recovered from pig epididymides and washed with HEPES-buffered medium as described previously (4). For immunofluorescence, the cells were smeared on coverslips, air dried, and then fixed in methanol for 30 min. After blocking 30 min with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated goat serum in PBS, the coverslips were floated 1 h on D0-D1 antisera diluted 1:400 in PBS/heat-inactivated goat serum. After washing coverslips with PBS, bound antibody was detected by incubating for 1 h with Texas Red-conjugated antibody to rabbit immunoglobulin (BIOSOURCE International) diluted 1:400 in PBS/heat-inactivated goat serum. After a final wash with PBS, coverslips were mounted with Fluoromount G and viewed by epifluorescence and phase contrast microscopy.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Zonadhesin from membrane fractions of capacitated, epididymal spermatozoa bound directly and with high affinity to intact ZP (Fig. 1). The bound zonadhesin comprised p105 and p45 polypeptides (Fig. 1a) as previously observed (4). Although earlier work established the species specificity of this interaction, the distribution of zonadhesin-binding sites in the pig ZP has not been characterized. We therefore visualized ZP-bound zonadhesin in situ by affinity fluorescence (Fig. 1, b and c). Zonadhesin protein was detected on the entire ZP, indicating that its binding sites were not regionalized in the ZP structure. In addition, the relative evenness of the labeling suggested that the binding sites are intrinsic to the ZP and not associated with adherent materials from the cumulus cell matrix or other potential contaminants of the ZP preparation.


View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Direct binding of zonadhesin to intact ZP. a, biotinylated polypeptides in a membrane fraction of capacitated, epididymal spermatozoa that bound to the pig ZP. CHAPS-solubilized sperm proteins were incubated with particulate ZP. The pig ZP with bound proteins were washed sequentially with CHAPS/HNE and mRIPA, and bound, biotinylated proteins were detected on Western blots (10% SDS-PAGE, disulfides reduced) by probing with horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin as described previously (4, 5). Note that the p105 and p45 major polypeptides of zonadhesin remained bound under these conditions. Peptides comprising a minor portion of the bound zonadhesin (4) migrated at the dye front (df). b, epifluorescence image of zonadhesin bound to the pig ZP. Bound, biotinylated zonadhesin on intact ZP from the experiment shown in a was detected in situ by probing with Texas Red-streptavidin. The labeled ZP were then viewed by fluorescence microscopy. Note that the zonadhesin-derived fluorescence is uniform, and associated with all regions of the ZP fragments. c, differential interference contrast image of the ZP shown in b.

The locations of p105 and p45 tryptic peptides in the sequence of the pig zonadhesin precursor indicated that p45 comprises in part the D1 domain and that p105 comprises in part the D2 and D3 domains (ref. (5) and Fig. 2). To detect zonadhesin isoforms in spermatozoa and to characterize their polypeptide compositions, we prepared various domain-directed antisera and affinity-purified antibodies. The deduced sequence of the precursor specified numerous potentially antigenic regions, including segments located in approximately the same positions within the D1 and D3 domains that exhibited high predicted hydrophilicity, surface probability, and flexibility (Fig. 2). Accordingly, we raised antisera to a Gene 10 fusion protein spanning the D0 and D1 domains (Pro683-Ser1224), as well as to two GST fusion proteins comprising in part the short, antigenic segments identified in the D1 and D3 domains (Ser923-Met993 and Ile1684-Pro1788, respectively; Figs. 2 and 3). We also raised antisera to whole zonadhesin isolated from membrane fractions of pig spermatozoa (Fig. 3).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Domain structure, polypeptide composition, and predicted characteristics of the pig zonadhesin precursor. The N-terminal domain (designated N) is composed of one partial and one full meprin/A5 antigen/mu receptor tyrosine phosphatase domain, whereas this region of mouse and human zonadhesins comprises three tandem meprin/A5 antigen/mu receptor tyrosine phosphatase domains. Vertical bars mark the locations in the precursor of tryptic peptides that were previously isolated from p45 and p105 and sequenced (5). Note that p45 must include much of the D1 domain and that p105 includes most or all of the D2 and D3 domains. Horizontal bars denote segments in the tandem VWD domains that were expressed as fusion proteins for production of antisera. Two potentially antigenic segments in the D1 and D3 domains (short horizontal bars) exhibited high predicted hydrophilicity, flexibility, and surface probability.


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Production and characterization of zonadhesin antisera and antibodies. a, preparation and specificity of antisera and antibodies to recombinant fusion proteins. Shown are protein stains and Western blots of SDS-PAGE (10% gels, protein disulfides reduced) as indicated. Purified, recombinant zonadhesin fusion proteins (lanes labeled G10-D0D1-H6 (where "H6" indicates a His6 tag), GST-D1, and GST-D3) each migrated primarily as single, Coomassie Blue-stained bands in overloaded gels. To generate the immunogen for production of antisera to the D0-D1 domains, the purified Gene 10 fusion protein spanning Pro683-Ser1224 of pig zonadhesin (lane labeled G10-D0D1-H6) was partially hydrolyzed at Asp-Pro bonds (lane labeled DP-hydrolyzed). The three predominant bands visible in the hydrolyzed preparation (asterisks) corresponded to Pro724-Asp1191 (51,500 Da; top band), a mixture of Pro724-Asp1107 and Pro807-Asp1191 (42,500 and 42,300 Da, respectively; middle band), and Pro807-Asp1107 (33,200 Da; bottom band). GST fusion proteins (lanes labeled GST-D1 and GST-D3) were used to prepare affinity-purified antibodies to segments spanning Ser923-Met993 of the pig zonadhesin D1 domain and Ile1684-Pro1788 of the D3 domain. Specificity of the antisera and antibodies was determined by Western blotting mixtures of the fusion proteins. Arrowheads mark the locations of the three fusion proteins in a mixture of 50 ng of each partially pure protein (lane labeled Silver stain). Note that the anti-D0-D1 antisera and the anti-D1 antibody readily recognized the G10-D0D1-H6 and GST-D1 proteins but not GST-D3 in mixtures of 10 ng of each protein (lanes overlined with Western blots). Similarly, the anti-D3 antibody recognized GST-D3 but not the other fusion protein. Note also that antisera to the purified, disulfide-bonded zonadhesin holoprotein did not recognize the disulfide-reduced fusion proteins under these conditions. All developed blots for a were exposed to film for 40 s. b, composition and immunoreactivity of processed zonadhesin holoprotein purified from membrane fractions of pig ejaculated spermatozoa. Shown are protein stains and Western blots of SDS-PAGE (4-12% linear gradient gels, protein disulfides either reduced (lanes labeled R) or not reduced (lanes labeled NR) as indicated). Note the different mobilities of the constituent polypeptides of the purified protein when separated without and with prior reduction of disulfide bonds (lanes overlined with Silver stains). Note also that the different antisera and antibodies each recognized a unique subset of the disulfide reduced and nonreduced polypeptides (lanes overlined with Western blots, containing 220 ng zonadhesin/lane). The developed anti-D0-D1, anti-D1, and anti-D3 blots of b were exposed to film for 40 s, whereas the anti-holoprotein blot was exposed for 5 s.

The D0-D1 fusion protein was recovered from inclusion bodies and purified by preparative SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3a). Rabbit antisera to this recombinant protein recognized the vector-encoded amino acids at the N and C termini of the fusion protein but did not cross-react with zonadhesin (not shown). We therefore hydrolyzed the purified fusion protein at Asp-Pro bonds to remove the short, vector-encoded peptides. The Asp-Pro hydrolysis products corresponded to those predicted by the precursor sequence, thereby confirming that the hydrolysate contained the desired zonadhesin fragments (Fig. 3a). This hydrolysate was used to prepare antisera to the D0-D1 domains.

In contrast to the D0-D1 fusion protein, the GST-D1 and GST-D3 proteins were expressed in soluble form and purified by chromatography on GSH-Sepharose (Fig. 3a). Antisera to these expressed, recombinant proteins were fractionated by chromatography on D1 and D3 affinity columns to produce reagents for specific detection of these domains. The D0-D1 antisera and the D1 antibody each recognized both the D0-D1 and GST-D1 fusion proteins but not the GST-D3 protein (Fig. 3a). Similarly, the D3 antibody recognized the GST-D3 protein but not the other two fusion proteins. The absence of cross-reactivity with other D-domains indicated that these reagents were suitable for domain-specific detection of zonadhesin polypeptides.

We used the D3 antibody to prepare an immunoaffinity column for purification of zonadhesin from membrane fractions of freshly ejaculated spermatozoa (Fig. 3b). Without prior reduction of disulfide bonds, the purified zonadhesin migrated in SDS-PAGE primarily as an Mr 150,000 protein (p150) and a less prominent Mr >300,000 protein. When protein disulfides were reduced, the same zonadhesin preparation migrated primarily as p45, p105, and an Mr 300,000 polypeptide (p300). This purified zonadhesin preparation was used to raise antisera to the fully processed and disulfide-bonded holoprotein and to confirm the reactivity and specificity of antisera and affinity-purified antibodies (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 4 shows the reactivity of the four immunoreagents with zonadhesin isoforms on Western blots of membrane fractions from pig ejaculated spermatozoa. Antisera to the hydrolyzed D0-D1 protein recognized primarily p150 on blots of nonreduced proteins (Fig. 4a). In contrast to this relatively weak interaction with a single, disulfide-bonded form of zonadhesin, the D0-D1 antisera detected several polypeptides of disulfide-reduced zonadhesin, including the p105 and p45 components described previously, as well as an Mr 300,000 protein (p300) and at least two other polypeptides of intermediate size (designated p60-90). The reaction of the D0-D1 antisera with p45 was consistent with the presence of p45 tryptic peptides in the D1 domain (Fig. 2). The reaction of these sera also with p105 indicated that the N terminus of p105 is likely upstream of Ser1224 (the C terminus of the expressed D0-D1 fragment). The absence of the p60-90 polypeptides from the holoprotein purified by D3 immunoaffinity chromatography (compare with Fig. 3) indicates that these D0-D1-reactive polypeptides neither contain nor are covalently associated with a D3 polypeptide.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Identification of multiple zonadhesin forms in membrane fractions of freshly ejaculated spermatozoa. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and Western blotted, and zonadhesin forms were detected with antisera or affinity-purified antibodies. a, reaction of D0-D1 antisera, D1 antibody, D3 antibody, and zonadhesin holoprotein antisera with zonadhesin separated on 4-12% linear gradient gels. Note the differences in polypeptides recognized depending on whether protein disulfides were reduced (lanes labeled R) or not reduced (lanes labeled NR), and the Mr >= 300,000 disulfide nonreduced protein (asterisks) detected by the D3 antibody and the holoprotein antisera. b, reaction of D0-D1 antisera with zonadhesin polypeptides separated by two-dimensional SDS-PAGE. Note the presence of p60-90 on the diagonal and the migration in the first dimension of p105 and p45 as Mr 150,000, 300,000, and 900,000 complexes.

Like the D0-D1 antisera, the D1- and D3-specific antibodies also detected p150 zonadhesin in nonreduced sperm proteins (Fig. 4a). However, in contrast to the complex pattern of disulfide-reduced proteins the D0-D1 antisera recognized, the D1 antibody recognized only p45. Similarly, the D3 antibody bound primarily to p105 and more weakly to an Mr 60,000 polypeptide. Affinity-purified control antibodies to GST did not bind significantly to sperm proteins (not shown). The antiserum to the zonadhesin holoprotein detected p150 in nonreduced sperm proteins but primarily recognized proteins with Mr 300,000. Overall, the D0-D1 antisera reacted much more weakly with nonreduced forms of zonadhesin than it did with the reduced, constituent polypeptides. In contrast, the D1 and D3 antibodies bound similarly to both nonreduced and reduced zonadhesin, and the antiserum to the zonadhesin holoprotein reacted strongly with nonreduced zonadhesin (Figs. 3b and 4a) but did not recognize the protein's separated, disulfide-reduced polypeptides. The differential binding of our antibodies to reduced and nonreduced zonadhesin likely reflects structural properties determined in part by the many intramolecular disulfide bonds present in von Willebrand D-domains (21). The cross-reaction of the antibodies to the GST-D1 and GST-D3 proteins with nonreduced zonadhesin extracted from spermatozoa, both on blots and in the isolation of the holoprotein by immunoaffinity chromatography, further suggested that the tertiary structures of these soluble fusion proteins are similar to that of the native protein.

Two-dimensional SDS-PAGE (first dimension, disulfides not reduced; second dimension, disulfides reduced) revealed that the p60-90 zonadhesin polypeptides migrated with the same mobility in each dimension (i.e. on the gel diagonal) and are therefore not covalently bound to other polypeptides. In contrast, p105 and p45 were components of Mr 150,000, 300,000, and >= 900,000 complexes stabilized by intermolecular disulfide bonds (Fig. 4b). The presence of both p105 and p45 in the Mr 150,000 nonreduced protein (p150) indicated that this zonadhesin form comprised primarily one each of the two polypeptides, consistent with both polypeptides being derived by proteolysis from a single precursor molecule. Similar compositions of the Mr 300,000 and >= 900,000 nonreduced proteins, in particular the presence of mostly p105 and p45 in a ratio similar to that of p150, suggested that these large complexes are covalent dimer and hexamer respectively of p150 (Fig. 4b). The relative amounts of the Mr 150,000, 300,000, and >= 900,000 zonadhesins did not change substantially when 1 mM iodoacetamide was included in membrane isolation buffers to inhibit potentially artifactual thiol-disulfide exchange (data not shown). Thus the Mr 300,000 and 900,000 zonadhesins likely exist as true multimers in the sperm cell. Other VWD domain proteins form oligomers that are functionally important. For example, the absence of the largest vWF multimers causes a mild clotting deficiency distinct from other forms of von Willebrand disease (22), presumably because the higher inherent avidity of multivalent interactions is necessary for proper clot formation. Although vWF multimerizes extensively (23, 24), porcine submaxillary mucin preferentially forms trimers in transfected cells (12, 25). The apparent absence in spermatozoa of zonadhesin multimers other than dimer and hexamer indicates that its oligomerization, like that of porcine submaxillary mucin, is more limited and specific than the multimerization of vWF.

To test the ZP binding activity of the zonadhesin isoforms present in ejaculated cells, we solubilized membrane fractions of spermatozoa in 1% CHAPS/HNE, incubated the extract with particulate ZP, and then removed nonbinding proteins by sequential washing with CHAPS/HNE and mRIPA. Under these conditions, zonadhesin was the only protein from membrane fractions of capacitated, epididymal spermatozoa that remained bound to the ZP (Fig. 1 and Ref. 4). In contrast to previous ZP binding studies that used biotinylated sperm proteins, however, in this experiment ZP-bound zonadhesin was detected on Western blots with the D0-D1 antisera. Only zonadhesin forms comprising the p105 and p45 polypeptides bound to the ZP (Fig. 5a), and these p105/45 zonadhesin molecules were separable by anion exchange chromatography from other forms that lacked ZP binding activity (Fig. 5b). In two-dimensional SDS-PAGE (Fig. 6), the predominant ZP-bound form of p105/45 zonadhesin migrated with Mr 150,000 in the first dimension (disulfides not reduced). The Mr 300,000 (dimer) and >= 900,000 (hexamer) proteins also bound to the ZP, but a significant proportion of these zonadhesin forms remained in the nonbinding fraction (Fig. 6). Thus the p105/45 monomeric form of zonadhesin bound preferentially to the ZP in vitro, although p105/45 multimers also possessed ZP binding activity.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Differential binding of zonadhesin forms to the ZP. a, binding of zonadhesin from membrane fractions of uncapacitated cells to the ZP. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (10% gel) and Western blotted, and zonadhesin was detected with the D0-D1 antisera. Note that of the several zonadhesin polypeptides present in the detergent-solubilized membrane preparation (lane labeled Extract), only p105 and p45 were components of the protein that bound to the ZP (lane labeled ZP+bound). The apparent immunoreactivity present between p105 and p45 in the ZP+bound lane was nonspecific signal that was also evident in a mock binding reaction that contained ZP but no sperm proteins (lane labeled ZP only). b, separation of zonadhesin forms by ion exchange chromatography. Zonadhesin comprising the p105 and p45 polypeptides eluted at 0.2 M NaCl (lane labeled DEAE pool I), whereas other forms that lacked ZP binding activity eluted at >= 0.5 M NaCl (lane labeled DEAE pool II).


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Differential binding of zonadhesin multimers to the ZP. Binding experiments were performed as for Fig. 5a. Proteins in the nonbinding and ZP-bound fractions were separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis, and zonadhesin forms were detected on Western blots with the D0-D1 antisera. a, nonbinding fraction. b, binding fraction. Note that only zonadhesin forms comprising the p105 and p45 polypeptides exhibited ZP binding activity. Note also that the proportion of p105/45 monomer (Mr 150,000 when disulfides were not reduced) that bound to the ZP was higher than those of the other p105/45 forms (dimer and hexamer).

At high concentrations in storage, the purified D1 and D3 fusion proteins formed viscous gels that liquefied upon the addition of 10 mM DTT. This observation suggested that the fusion proteins, which each contained the CG(L/V)CG sequence motif, had spontaneously formed intermolecular disulfide bonds even though a mild reductant was present (the 5 mM GSH used to elute them from GSH-Sepharose). SDS-PAGE without prior reduction of disulfides revealed that covalent multimers were indeed present in stored preparations of both fusion proteins but not in identically stored GST (Fig. 7a). Including DTT in isolation buffers preserved the proteins in their monomeric forms (Fig. 7b). The addition of oxidized DTT at concentrations up to 100 mM, which raised the effective potentials in solution (Eh) at pH 7.4 as high as -292 mV, did not induce formation of covalent multimers in vitro (not shown). However, the addition of 25 mM GSSG to produce a -246 mV redox buffer induced rapid formation of disulfide-bonded multimers of both proteins (D1 shown in Fig. 7b; D3 not shown). Most of the D1 fusion protein was converted to multimers within 30 min, and multimer formation continued until very little monomeric protein remained (Fig. 7b). To determine whether the vicinal cysteines in the CG(L/V)CG sequence motif were important for multimer formation, we compared the multimerization kinetics of the Cys right-arrow Ser mutants with those of the wild type proteins. Single mutants of the D1 protein (C933S and C936S) formed multimers at the same apparent rates as the wild type proteins (not shown). The double mutant of the D1 protein (C933S,C936S) also formed multimers at -246 mV with the same kinetics as the wild type protein (Fig. 7b). Furthermore, the multimerization of the wild type and double mutant D1 fusion proteins were indistinguishable at various Eh values ranging from -269 to -246 mV (Fig. 7c). Neither the wild type nor the mutant protein multimerized significantly at -269 mV, but multimer formation was clearly evident when Eh was raised to -259 mV. Double mutation of the 1709CGVCG1713 motif in the D3 fusion protein to SGVSG also did not perturb multimer formation (not shown). Collectively, these results demonstrate that the expressed D1 and D3 fragments of pig zonadhesin spontaneously form intermolecular disulfide bonds and that the reaction is dependent on Eh but not on the vicinal cysteines in the CG(L/V)CG sequence motif known to be important for vWF multimer formation. Our D1 and D3 fragments contained two and three additional cysteines, respectively, downstream of the two in the CG(L/V)CG motif, one or more of which must form cystine in the multimerization of these proteins. Studies on porcine submaxillary mucin have identified half-cystines that are not in the CG(L/V)CG motif but are nonetheless important for the dimerization of fragments (13) or multimerization of full D-domains (12). Nevertheless, when they are expressed in eukaryotic cells, Cys right-arrow Xaa mutants of the CG(L/V)CG motif in vWF (11) or in submaxillary mucin (12) generally exhibit defects in multimer formation. Our results show that cysteines other than those in the CG(L/V)CG can mediate spontaneous multimerization of purified zonadhesin fragments in vitro. Further studies, including testing whether mutants of downstream cysteines (Cys975 and Cys985) in GST-D1 form multimers, will be necessary to determine whether our results reflect differences in methods or true differences in multimer formation between zonadhesin and other D-domain proteins.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Multimerization of D1 and D3 fusion proteins in vitro. a, spontaneous multimerization of purified GST-D1 and GST-D3 in storage. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (10% gel, silver stained) with (left gel) or without (right gel) prior reduction of disulfide bonds. Note the high Mr multimers present in the stored D1 and D3 preparations but not in identically stored preparations of GST. b, time course of D1 wild type and double mutant (C933S,C936S) multimerization at -246 mV Eh. The fusion proteins were purified in the presence of 1 mM DTT to inhibit premature multimer formation. GSSG (25 mM) was then added to the purified proteins (upper gel, wild type; lower gel, double mutant) to initiate multimer formation. Reactions were terminated with iodoacetamide at intervals ranging from 15 min to 18 h as shown, and multimers were detected by SDS-PAGE (10% gels). Note that GSSG induced significant multimer formation within 30 min, whereas in the absence of GSSG neither protein formed multimers even after prolonged incubation (compare GSSG at time 0 with GSSG at 18 h). c, dependence of multimer formation on Eh. Purified GST-D1 wild type and double mutant proteins were incubated with various concentrations of GSSG as indicated to promote multimer formation. Eh ranged from -269 mV (at 5 mM added GSSG) to -246 mV (at 25 mM added GSSG). The reactions were terminated as for panel b, and multimers were detected by SDS-PAGE on a 4-12% linear gradient gel. Note the presence of multimers in all reactions containing >= 10 mM added GSSG (Eh to >= -259 mV).

The D0-D1 antisera detected pig zonadhesin on the apical heads of methanol-fixed, epididymal spermatozoa (Fig. 8). All of the cells were strongly labeled when they were prepared by methanol fixation, which both denatures proteins and disrupts membranes. Thus pig zonadhesin is present in the anterior head of pig spermatozoa, which is a part of the cell that interacts with the ZP. However, because methanol fixation disrupts cell membranes, we cannot discern from this experiment whether the pig protein is present on the sperm cell surface. These results are consistent with those reported by Gao and Garbers (6), who used antisera to the unique, partial D domain repeats of mouse zonadhesin to detect the protein on the apical heads of paraformaldehyde-fixed spermatozoa.


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Light microscopic localization of zonadhesin in pig epididymal spermatozoa with the D0-D1 antisera. Shown is a phase contrast/epifluorescence (Texas Red) double exposure image of localization by immunofluorescence on methanol-fixed cells. Note the strong labeling on the apical heads of all cells.

These studies are relevant both to the potential function of zonadhesin in mammalian fertilization and to the functions of VWD domains in diverse proteins. To our knowledge no other sperm protein exhibits the physicochemical heterogeneity of zonadhesin. In ovine spermatozoa, hyaluronidase is present as a remarkably heterogeneous mixture of disulfide-bonded multimers (26-28). Nevertheless, even this protein does not undergo the combined proteolytic removal of protein domains, generation of specific constituent polypeptides, and multimerization that occur in the processing of zonadhesin. In addition, hyaluronidase does not exhibit such marked variation in all species (29), whereas we find that zonadhesin is heterogeneous in spermatozoa from all mammals examined (eight species).4 Our detection of differences in ZP binding activity among the various zonadhesin forms suggests that the heterogeneous processing of this protein is functionally important, just as proteolytic activation and heterogeneous multimerization are important for the proper function of vWF (10). Unlike vWF multimers, however, zonadhesin multimers appear to bind less avidly than the monomer. This observation, together with our detection of potential differences in the way zonadhesin and vWF form multimers, indicates that VWD domains are versatile structures that share certain properties but nonetheless have unique functions in different proteins. Multimerization of zonadhesin could represent a mechanism for storing the protein in a latent form that can be activated when it is required for interaction with the ZP, or it could reflect an additional function of the protein as a scaffold or other structural element of the sperm head. Further studies will be required to determine whether the ZP binding activity of zonadhesin is dynamically regulated during fertilization, for example, as a component of sperm capacitation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Prof. David B. Knaff (Texas Tech University Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry) for advice on multimerization experiments.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant HD-35166 from the National Institutes of Health and Grant 96G-324 from the Texas Affiliate of the American Heart Association (to D. M. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601 Fourth St., Lubbock, TX 79430. Tel.: 806-743-2053; Fax: 806-743-2990; E-mail: Daniel.Hardy@ttmc.ttuhsc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 28, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106795200

2 I. A. Lea, P. Sivashanmugam, R. T. Richardson, and M. G. O'Rand, unpublished; GenBankTM accession number AF244982.

3 T. L. Cheung, M. J. Wassler, G. A. Cornwall, and D. M. Hardy, manuscript in preparation.

4 M. Bi, V. P. Winfrey, G. E. Olson, and D. M. Hardy, manuscript in preparation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ZP, zona pellucida; VWD, von Willebrand D; vWF, von Willebrand factor; mRIPA, modified radioimmune precipitation assay solution; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; DTT, dithiothreitol; Eh, effective potential in solution.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Yanagimachi, R. (1994) in The Physiology of Reproduction (Knobil, E. , and Neill, J. D., eds) , pp. 189-317, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
2. Bi, M., Wassler, M. J., and Hardy, D. M. (2002) in Fertilization (Hardy, D. M., ed) in press, Academic Press, San Diego
3. Jaiswal, B. S., and Eisenbach, M. (2002) in Fertilization (Hardy, D. M., ed) in press, Academic Press, San Diego
4. Hardy, D. M., and Garbers, D. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19000-19004
5. Hardy, D. M., and Garbers, D. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26025-26028
6. Gao, Z., and Garbers, D. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3415-3421
7. Wilson, M. D., Riemer, C., Martindale, D. W., Schnupf, P., Boright, A. P., Cheung, T. L., Hardy, D. M., Schwartz, S., Scherer, S. W., Tsui, L. C., Miller, W., and Koop, B. F. (2001) Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 1352-1365
8. Beckmann, G., and Bork, P. (1993) Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 40-41
9. Varki, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7390-7397
10. Wagner, D. D. (1990) Ann. Rev. Cell Biol. 6, 217-246
11. Mayadas, T. N., and Wagner, D. D. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3531-3535
12. Perez-Vilar, J., and Hill, R. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 34527-34534
13. Perez-Vilar, J., and Hill, R. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6982-6988
14. Perez-Vilar, J., and Hill, R. L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31751-31754
15. Haden, N. P., Hickox, J. R., Scott, W. C., and Hardy, D. M. (2000) Biol. Reprod. 63, 1839-1847
16. Dunbar, B. S., Wardrip, N. J., and Hedrick, J. L. (1980) Biochemistry 2, 356-365
17. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685
18. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354
19. Hardy, D. M., Wild, G. C., and Tung, K. S. (1987) Biol. Reprod. 37, 189-199
20. Morrissey, J. H. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 117, 307-310
21. Marti, T., Rosselet, S. J., Titani, K., and Walsh, K. A. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 8099-8109
22. Ruggeri, Z. M., and Zimmerman, T. S. (1980) J. Clin. Invest. 65, 1318-1325
23. Sporn, L. A., Marder, V. J., and Wagner, D. D. (1986) Cell 46, 185-190
24. Mayadas, T. N., and Wagner, D. D. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 13497-13503
25. Perez-Vilar, J., Eckhardt, A. E., DeLuca, A., and Hill, R. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14442-14449
26. Harrison, R. A. (1988) Biochem. J. 252, 865-874
27. Harrison, R. A. (1988) Biochem. J. 252, 875-882
28. Harrison, R. A., and Gaunt, S. J. (1988) J. Reprod. Fertil. 82, 777-785
29. Hunnicutt, G. R., Mahan, K., Lathrop, W. F., Ramarao, C. S., Myles, D. G., and Primakoff, P. (1996) Biol. Reprod. 54, 1343-1349


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. E. Olson, V. P. Winfrey, M. Bi, D. M. Hardy, and S. K. NagDas
Zonadhesin Assembly into the Hamster Sperm Acrosomal Matrix Occurs by Distinct Targeting Strategies During Spermiogenesis and Maturation in the Epididymis
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1128 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
P. Primakoff and D. G. Myles
Penetration, Adhesion, and Fusion in Mammalian Sperm-Egg Interaction
Science, June 21, 2002; 296(5576): 2183 - 2185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Crider-Pirkle, P. Billingsley, C. Faust, D. M. Hardy, V. Lee, and H. Weitlauf
Cubilin, a Binding Partner for Galectin-3 in the Murine Utero-Placental Complex
J. Biol. Chem., May 3, 2002; 277(18): 15904 - 15912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Recent Prog Horm ResHome page
D. J. Miller, X. Shi, and H. Burkin
Molecular Basis of Mammalian Gamete Binding
Recent Prog. Horm. Res., January 1, 2002; 57(1): 37 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/44/41502    most recent
M106795200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hickox, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hickox, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement