HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 45, 41945-41949, November 9, 2001

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 276/45/41945    most recent M108217200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Abbott, D. W. Articles by Ausió, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Abbott, D. W. Articles by Ausió, J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Characterization of the Stability and Folding of H2A.Z Chromatin Particles

IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION^*

D. Wade Abbott, Vessela S. Ivanova^§, Xiaoying Wang, William M. Bonner^§, and Juan Ausió^¶

From the  Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3P6, Canada and the ^§ Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Received for publication, August 24, 2001

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

H2A.Z and H2A.1 nucleosome core particles and oligonucleosome arrays were obtained using recombinant versions of these histones and a native histone H2B/H3/H4 complement reconstituted onto appropriate DNA templates. Analysis of the reconstituted nucleosome core particles using native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and DNase I footprinting showed that H2A.Z nucleosome core particles were almost structurally indistinguishable from its H2A.1 or native chicken erythrocyte counterparts. While this result is in good agreement with the recently published crystallographic structure of the H2A.Z nucleosome core particle (Suto, R. K., Clarkson, M J., Tremethick, D. J., and Luger, K. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 1121-1124), the ionic strength dependence of the sedimentation coefficient of these particles exhibits a substantial destabilization, which is most likely the result of the histone H2A.Z-H2B dimer binding less tightly to the nucleosome. Analytical ultracentrifuge analysis of the H2A.Z 208-12, a DNA template consisting of 12 tandem repeats of a 208-base pair sequence derived from the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus 5 S rRNA gene, reconstituted oligonucleosome complexes in the absence of histone H1 shows that their NaCl-dependent folding ability is significantly reduced. These results support the notion that the histone H2A.Z variant may play a chromatin-destabilizing role, which may be important for transcriptional activation.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

The packaging of DNA around histone octamers creates a thermodynamic obstacle to processive enzyme complexes such as RNA polymerase. To lower the energy of activation and display a template more amenable for expression, the nucleus uses several mechanisms to biochemically alter the nature of histone-DNA and histone-histone interactions. These mechanisms include post-translational modifications, nucleosome remodeling complexes, and the introduction of histone variants into the octameric core (for current reviews, see Refs. 1-3). Histone variants are nonallelic isoforms of the major H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 proteins that interact through inherent histone fold domains in nucleosomes throughout the genome (for current reviews, see Refs. 4 and 5). By inserting variant histones into the octamer noncovalent interactions between the players are altered, possibly creating particles with modified stability or functional novelty. This epigenetic feature may be utilized to silence nonessential genes in differentiated tissues or to lower the binding constants of replication, transcription, and repair machinery in active chromatin.

H2A.Z is an H2A subtype that has been identified in organisms as diverse as Saccharomyces cerevisiae (6), Tetrahymena (7), Drosophila (8), and Homo sapiens (9). The protein displays 60% homology with H2A and 90% homology between species. Mutagenic assays have demonstrated that H2A.Z is essential for development in yeast (10) and for viability in Tetrahymena (11) and Drosophila (12, 13). Initial immunochemical characterization of this protein uncovered that H2A.Z is exclusive to transcriptionally active domains in Tetrahymena (14-16). Recently H2A.Z has been observed to be located at yeast promoters and to display a redundant role with ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes (17) and interact directly with transcriptional machinery during gene expression (18). However, the functional dynamics of H2A.Z enrichment in active chromatin remains enigmatic as other studies describe H2A.Z deposition to have a nonspecific (19) and repressive effect on expression (20).

The characterization of the H2A.Z nucleosome crystal structure by Suto and colleagues (21) provides a snapshot of histone-DNA and histone-histone interactions within the nucleosome core particle containing this histone variant. Divergent amino acid residues in H2A.Z octamers conform to similar nucleic acid-binding sites as native octamers (22) and do not distort the superhelical path of DNA around the nucleosome perimeter (21). Despite this lack of effect on the DNA trajectory, it appears that internal protein-protein interactions are affected. Substitution of H2A Gln¹⁰⁴ by Gly¹⁰⁴ in H2A.Z destabilizes the 2(H2A.Z-H2B)-(H3-H4)₂ association and presents an opportune particle for DNA activation (13, 17). Also the molecular surface of the variant nucleosome displays a novel acidic patch and a divalent cation-binding site, which may facilitate the rearrangement of higher order structure through internucleosomal electrostatic interactions or the recruitment of remodeling factors (21). However, these observations are only speculative as it is difficult to determine the direct implications of H2A.Z for chromatin from static crystallographic images.

To address this problem we have reconstituted nucleosome core particles and oligonucleosome arrays containing major histone H2A.1 variant and variant histone H2A.Z and have characterized the ionic strength dependence of these complexes by analytical ultracentrifugation. These experiments provide the first clues into the folding dynamics of H2A.Z mononucleosome and chromatin complexes.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Native Histones and Native Nucleosome Core Particles-- Native histone H2A-H2B dimers and H3-H4 tetramers were purified by salt gradient hydroxyapatite fractionation of chicken erythrocyte nucleosome core particles (23). H2A-H2B histones were further fractionated by gel filtration on a Bio-Gel P-60 (Bio-Rad) column according to the protocol described previously (24). Native chicken mononucleosomes were purified as described previously (25).

Recombinant Histones-- Polymerase chain reaction was performed on plasmids containing the coding sequences for human H2A.1 and H2A.Z (26) maintaining the ATG codon at the 5'-end of the coding sequence and adding a HindIII site just upstream of the ATG codon and a convenient restriction site at the 3'-end so that the polymerase chain reaction fragments could be cloned in phase into the HindIII site of the pET17xb vector (Novagen, Inc., Madison, WI). This procedure permitted the histone species to be expressed as part of fusion proteins. After constructs were checked by sequencing, duplex oligonucleotides coding for the formic acid-sensitive sequence (Asp-Pro)₆ followed by the nickel-binding sequence His₆ were inserted in phase at the HindIII site. The constructs were expressed in bacterial strain BL21(DE3)pLysS (Novagen, Inc.). When expression was maximal, the bacteria were harvested. The pellets were dissolved in 3 volumes of 98% formic acid and incubated at 37 °C overnight, leading to cleavage of the fusion protein species in the (Asp-Pro)₆ region. The formic acid was neutralized with ammonia, and the solutions were dialyzed against 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) overnight and passed over a nickel column in the appropriate buffer (Novagen, Inc.). The histone species with their His₆ tags were eluted with an imidazole gradient. The eluted material was treated with cyanogen bromide to cleave the tagged histone species at the methionine residue of the initiation codon, lyophilized, dissolved in the appropriate buffer, and passed through a nickel column to remove the His₆-containing oligopeptides. The histone species were collected in the flow-through and stored at 70 °C (27).

Reconstitution of Nucleosome and Oligonucleosome Arrays-- Recombinant human H2A.1 and H2A.Z proteins were mixed with chicken native H2B, H3, and H4 histones in stoichiometric amounts, and histone octamers were reconstituted onto random 146-bp¹ and positioning 208-12-mer templates (28) by a 2 to 0 M stepwise salt gradient dialysis (29) in 10 mM Tris-HCl (7.5), 0.1 mM EDTA (8.0) as described elsewhere (28). The 208-12 DNA template consisting of 12 tandem repeats of a 208-bp sequence derived from the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus 5 S rRNA gene was amplified and purified from plasmid p5S-208-12 kindly provided to us by Dr. R. T. Simpson (30). The stoichiometry of the histone octamer to the DNA in the reconstituted 208-12 oligonucleosome complexes was determined as described previously (28). The reconstituted chromatin particles thus obtained (at a concentration of ~40-50 µg/ml) were dialyzed against the appropriate buffers (25, 31) and used for subsequent analytical ultracentrifuge analysis (32, 33). In some instances, the reconstituted nucleosome particles were concentrated 5-fold at 4 °C using Centricon YM-10 or YM-50 (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA).

Gel Electrophoresis-- SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed as described by Laemmli (34). Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was carried out according to Yager and van Holde (35). 4.8% acetic acid, 5 M urea, 4.6 mM Triton X-100 (AUT) gels were modified from Bonner et al. (36) by using thiourea as a cross-linking agent and hydrogen peroxide as a catalyzing agent (37). Briefly, the gel solution (3 g of urea; 5 ml of 20% acrylamide, 0.5% N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide; 7 mg of thiourea; 480 µl of 100% glacial acetic acid; 24 µl of 45 mM fresh NH₃OH; and 118 µl of 25% Triton X-100) was combined and brought to 10 ml with dH₂O. After mixing, 45 µl of 30% H₂O₂ was added, and the resulting solution was immediately poured to prepare 9.7- × 7.0- × 0.075-cm minigels. Preparing AUT gels in this fashion eliminates the need for preelectrophoresis buffer equilibration and shortens the polymerization time required with riboflavin gels.

DNase I Footprinting-- DNase I digestion of ³²P-labeled mononucleosomes and autoradiography were performed according to Ausió and Moore (28).

Analytical Ultracentrifugation-- Reconstituted and native chromatin complexes were analyzed in a Beckman XL-A ultracentrifuge with an An-55 Al aluminum rotor and double sector cells with aluminum-filled Epon centerpieces as described elsewhere (31). The UV scans (260 nm) were analyzed according to the method of van Holde and Weischet (38) using XL-A Ultra Scan version 4.1 sedimentation data analysis software (Borries Demeler, Missoula, MT).

	RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

We have used recombinant human H2A.Z and H2A.1 histone variants to reconstitute nucleosome core particles and 208-12 nucleosome arrays. Fig. 1, A and B, display the electrophoretic nature of the histone component of these particles.

View larger version (60K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   Electrophoretic analysis of the histones from reconstituted nucleosome core particles. A, AUT-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of H2A.Z-containing particles (lane 2), H2A.1-containing particles (lane 3), and chicken erythrocytes (lane 1) and calf thymus (lane 4) used as histone markers. B, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the same histones shown in A. CK, chicken; CT, calf thymus.

H2A.Z octamers were reconstituted onto random sequence 146-bp DNA fragments obtained from chicken erythrocyte nucleosomes. The generated particles are shown in Fig. 2A. As it can be seen in this figure, histone octamers consisting of H2A.1 or H2A.Z are equally able to produce mononucleosome particles with identical electrophoretic mobility. The slightly lower electrophoretic mobility of these complexes when compared with native (purified) chicken erythrocyte mononucleosomes (Fig. 2A, lane 4) can be ascribed to differences in the ionic strength of the sample buffer. Indeed the fraction of free DNA that is present in lane 2 of the Fig. 2A (see white arrow) also exhibits a similar extent of mobility retardation when compared with the same DNA template used for the reconstitution of these particles (see Fig. 2A, lane 5). The structural similarity between reconstituted H2A.1 and H2A.Z nucleosome core particles and to native chicken erythrocyte particles can be further depicted from the DNase I footprints which are shown in Fig. 2B.

View larger version (53K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.   A, native (4%) polyacrylamide gel of H2A.Z-containing (lane 2) and H2A.1-containing (lane 3) reconstituted nucleosome core particles. Lane 4 is native chicken erythrocyte nucleosome core particles, and lane 5 corresponds to the 146-bp DNA obtained from these native particles and which was used in the reconstitution of the complexes shown in lanes 2 and 3. Lane 1 is a DNA marker obtained by digesting pBr 322 with HhaI. The white arrow points to the presence of a small fraction of free DNA. B, DNase I footprinting analysis of H2A.1-containing (lane 2) and H2A.Z-containing (lane 3) reconstituted nucleosome core particles in comparison to native chicken erythrocyte nucleosome core particles (lane 1).

These results clearly demonstrate that recombinant histone H2A.Z variants can be equally reconstituted into nucleosome core particles that are otherwise structurally very similar to native nucleosome core particles. This result is not surprising, and it was to be anticipated from the recently determined crystal structure of H2A.Z nucleosomes (21), which showed that the overall structure of this particle was similar to that of a nucleosome core particle that did not contain this unique histone H2A variant (22).

The apparent lack of a significant structural difference between H2A.Z and native nucleosome core particles consisting of the two major histone H2A isoforms (H2A.1 and H2A.2) is intriguing. Indeed, in contrast to H2A.1/H2A.2 variants, histone H2A.Z has been shown to be essential for survival in organisms phylogenetically as diverse as Tetrahymena (11) and Drosophila (12, 13). It has been determined by substitution experiments with H2A.1 homologous regions that the indispensable portion of histone H2A.Z maps to the carboxyl-terminal of the molecule (13). Interestingly enough, of all core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4), H2A is the only histone with a prominent carboxyl-terminal "tail" extending beyond the histone fold (39). The COOH domain also introduces inherent functional novelty in the case of three other histone H2A variants. H2A-Bbd is a recently identified protein that displays a truncated carboxyl-terminal tail and is enriched in active chromatin (40), H2AX contains a carboxyl-terminal DNA-dependent protein kinase/ataxia telangiectasia mutated consensus recognition sequence (SQE) and is a phosphorylation substrate during double strand break DNA repair (41) and meiosis (42), and macroH2A has a large COOH nonhistone region, which specializes the protein for transcriptionally silenced chromatin (43).

In the case of the major H2A.1 and -2 subtypes, the carboxyl terminus has been shown to play an important role in the stability of the nucleosome core particle. Cleavage of the last 15 COOH-terminal amino acids of this region by an endogenous chromatin-bound protease (44) has been shown to substantially lower the affinity of the histone H2A-H2B dimer for the H3-H4 tetramer (45). Based upon these observations, it is reasonable to assume that H2A isoform substitution within the nucleosome may have functional and/or structural implications for chromatin nucleoprotein folding dynamics in vivo.

Alterations of nucleosome core particle stability in solution can be monitored by changes in their conformation resulting from variations of the ionic strength within the range of salt concentrations where histones still remain bound to DNA (0.6 M NaCl) (32, 46). Changes in the ionic environment of the nucleosome under these conditions are physiologically relevant as they can mimic, to a large extent, the changes in the ionic environment resulting from interactions with other protein complexes such as RNA polymerase or chromatin-remodeling complexes (3) among others.

We (25, 32, 33, 47, 48) and others (35, 49-51) have shown that nucleosomes in solution are not static entities but rather they are highly transient structures. A dynamic equilibrium exists between the constitutive histone octamer and the nucleosomal DNA (32), which besides the ionic strength is also dependent on many other physical parameters such as temperature and sample concentration.

With this in mind, we decided to characterize the ionic strength dependence of the sedimentation coefficient of reconstituted H2A.1 and H2A.Z nucleosomes. The results of such analysis are shown in Fig. 3A. They indicate that H2A.1 nucleosomes behave in a way that is almost indistinguishable from native nucleosome core particles. In contrast, although H2A.Z reconstituted nucleosome core particles exhibit a very similar sedimentation coefficient at low salt (0.1 M NaCl), this parameter displays a characteristic declining trend to a sedimentation coefficient value of 8.3 S at 600 mM NaCl. This drop in the S value is clearly indicative of a conformational change of the nucleosome core particle. Integral distribution analysis (38) shows that at 0.6 M NaCl, about 30-40% of the H2A.Z nucleosome core particles sediment at 8.3 S, 30% sediment at 5.4 S, and the remaining 30% sediment with intermediate values (see Fig. 3B). This is in contrast to reconstituted H2A.1 nucleosomes, which under the same conditions exhibit a 9.4 S (70%), 5.4 S (15%), and 15% component of intermediate sedimenting particles (see Fig. 3B) in what is almost indistinguishable from native nucleosome core particles (32, 33). The 5.4 S value corresponds to free nucleosomal DNA, which is reversibly dissociating from the nucleosome core particle (32). While the conformational change in the native and H2A.1 nucleosome core particles corresponding to 9.4 S at 0.6 M NaCl is not yet clearly understood (52), the value of 8.3 S observed with H2A.Z nucleosome core particles under the same conditions could be accounted for by partial H2A-H2B depletion. We have experimentally determined the sedimentation velocity coefficient of a nucleosome core particle deficient in one H2A-H2B dimer to be 8.6 S and that of the nucleosome core particle lacking both dimers to be 6.9 S, whereas the sedimentation coefficient of free 146-bp DNA was determined to be 5.2 S.² These values are in good agreement with similar experimental values reported by other groups (53). Thus it is possible that the decrease in sedimentation observed in the case of the H2A.Z nucleosome core particle corresponds to the progressive loss of particle integrity (H2A.Z-H2B dissociation).

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.   A, ionic strength-dependent variation of the sedimentation coefficient s20,w of H2A.Z-containing () and H2A.1-containing () reconstituted nucleosome core particles in comparison to native chicken erythrocyte nucleosome core particles (). The dashed line corresponds to previously published data (25, 47). B, integral distribution of the sedimentation coefficient (in Svedberg units (S)) of H2A.Z-containing () and H2A.1-containing () reconstituted nucleosome core particles in comparison to native chicken erythrocyte nucleosome core particles () in 0.6 M NaCl. These integral distributions were obtained after analysis of the sedimentation boundaries using the method of van Holde and Weischet (38). In these plots the ordinate represents the fraction of nucleosome arrays sedimenting with an s20,w given in the abscissa. All experiments were carried out at 20 °C and 40,000 rpm. The buffer used was 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM EDTA.

H2A.Z particle lability shown in Fig. 3 was also observed elsewhere during sample manipulation. H2A.Z particles displayed an increased electrophoretic mobility compared with the unmodified patterns of its major H2A and native nucleosome counterparts following concentration (see Fig. 4). This observation corroborates the ultracentrifuge analysis and indicates that the H2A.Z nucleosome core particles have a reduced stability. The results are in very good agreement and support the crystallographic data that pointed to the existence of a "subtle destabilization of the interaction between the (H2A.Z-H2B) dimer and the (H3-H4)₂ tetramer" in the crystal structure (21).

View larger version (51K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4.   Native (4%) polyacrylamide gel of nucleosomes that have been concentrated 5-fold with Centricon YM-10 (Amicon, Millipore) before being loaded on the gel. Lane 2, native chicken erythrocyte nucleosome core particles; lane 3, H2A.1-containing reconstituted nucleosome core particles; lane 4, H2A.Z-containing reconstituted nucleosome core particles; lane 5, 146-bp random sequence DNA. Lane 1 consists of a DNA marker obtained by cutting pBr 322 with HhaI.

We decided next to look at the effects of the H2A.Z histone variant in the modulation of internucleosomal interactions by analyzing reconstituted oligonucleosome complexes (28). The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 5.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5.   A, integral distribution of the sedimentation coefficient (in Svedberg units (S)) of H2A.Z reconstituted 208-12 nucleosome arrays at different NaCl concentrations (0, 75, and 150 mM as indicated) in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM EDTA buffer. B, ionic strength (NaCl concentration) dependence of the average sedimentation coefficient s20,w of 208-12 oligonucleosome complexes containing histone H2A.1 () and 208-12 oligonucleosome arrays containing H2A.Z (). The dotted line represents the ionic strength dependence of 208-12 oligonucleosome complexes reconstituted with native chicken erythrocyte histones (28). C, integral distribution of the sedimentation coefficient (in Svedberg units (S)) at 150 mM NaCl of H2A.Z-containing () and H2A.1-containing () reconstituted 208-12 nucleosome arrays and 208-12 oligonucleosome complexes reconstituted with native chicken erythrocyte histones. The analytical ultracentrifuge runs were carried out at 20 °C and 20,000 rpm.

Saturated H2A.Z 208-12 oligonucleosome complexes (30) sedimented in low salt (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM EDTA (TE buffer)) as a very homogeneous population with a sedimentation coefficient of 29.5 S (see Fig. 5A), similar to its H2A.1 208-12 counterpart (results not shown). However, as the salt was titrated to 150 mM, the increase in the sedimentation coefficient of the 208-12 H2A.Z reconstituted complexes was consistently lower than that of the 208-12 complexes reconstituted with either H2A.1 octamers or native histone octamers (28, 31). As in H2A.1 or in native histone 208-12 complexes, a plateau was reached at 100-150 mM NaCl but at a (10%) lower average sedimentation coefficient value (34 S) (see Fig. 5B). The increase in sedimentation coefficient of the 208-12 reconstituted complexes under these conditions reflects an increase in the folding of the complexes (31, 33, 54). The very similar values of the sedimentation coefficients of H2A.1 and H2A.Z reconstituted 208-12 complexes at low salt was to be expected from the similarity of the sedimentation coefficient values of the nucleosome core particles under the same conditions (see Fig. 3A), which suggest that both species of nucleosome core particles have a very similar conformation at this low salt. The reason for the inability of the 208-12 H2A.Z nucleosome arrays to fold to the same extent as the H2A.1 counterpart (as indicated by the lower sedimentation coefficient values observed in this later instance) is not clear. However, it could possibly be attributed to novel internucleosomal electrostatic interactions resulting from the H2A.Z-H2B dimer acidic patch, which was observed in the crystal structure of the H2A.Z nucleosome core particles (21). It is important to note, however, that this does not preclude the formation of the 40-50 S higher folding structures (see Fig. 5C), which are observed for 208-12-mers reconstituted with native core histones under physiological ionic strength conditions of 100-150 mM NaCl and which have also been well characterized in the presence of divalent ions such as magnesium (55).

When the results described above are considered together, the data suggest that histone variant H2A.Z has a destabilizing effect on both intranucleosomal histone-histone interactions and at the internucleosomal level. Such destabilization is consistent with the physiological roles attributed to this variant, especially its participation in the regulation of transcription through its enrichment at promoter sites and redundancy with nucleosome remodeling complexes (17) and in recruitment of RNA polymerase II (20). Such instability of the nucleosome core particle complexes possibly resulting from the loss of H2A.Z-H2B dimers could facilitate the movement of the RNA polymerase complex through the nucleosomal DNA during transcriptional elongation (56).

In the future, it will be interesting to determine the structural effects that covalent modification have on the folding of H2A.Z fibers. In this regard, it has recently been shown that H2A.Z particles retain a nonspecific charge neutralization requirement for viability (57), which may facilitate cooperative regulation of DNA activation.

	ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are very grateful to Melissa Hills for assistance in the preparation of chicken erythrocyte histones and native chicken erythrocyte nucleosome core particles. We are also grateful to John Lewis for skillful computer assistance in the preparation of the figures.

	FOOTNOTES

^* This work was supported by MRC (Medical Research Council of Canada) Grant MT 13104 (to J. A.) and by a University of Victoria graduate fellowship (to D. W. A.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

^¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Petch Bldg., 220, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 3P6. Tel.: 250-721-8863; Fax: 250-721-8855; E-mail: jausio@uvic.ca.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108217200

² J. Ausió, unpublished results.

	ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviation used is: bp, base pair.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Ishibashi, K. So, C. G. Cupples, and J. Ausio MBD4-Mediated Glycosylase Activity on a Chromatin Template Is Enhanced by Acetylation Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2008; 28(15): 4734 - 4744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Sarcinella, P. C. Zuzarte, P. N. I. Lau, R. Draker, and P. Cheung Monoubiquitylation of H2A.Z Distinguishes Its Association with Euchromatin or Facultative Heterochromatin Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2007; 27(18): 6457 - 6468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Montel, E. Fontaine, P. St-Jean, M. Castelnovo, and C. Faivre-Moskalenko Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging of SWI/SNF Action: Mapping the Nucleosome Remodeling and Sliding Biophys. J., July 15, 2007; 93(2): 566 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Jin and G. Felsenfeld Nucleosome stability mediated by histone variants H3.3 and H2A.Z Genes & Dev., June 15, 2007; 21(12): 1519 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. B. Deal, C. N. Topp, E. C. McKinney, and R. B. Meagher Repression of Flowering in Arabidopsis Requires Activation of FLOWERING LOCUS C Expression by the Histone Variant H2A.Z PLANT CELL, January 1, 2007; 19(1): 74 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ausio Histone variants--the structure behind the function Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 228 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chakravarthy and K. Luger The Histone Variant Macro-H2A Preferentially Forms "Hybrid Nucleosomes" J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2006; 281(35): 25522 - 25531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Thambirajah, D. Dryhurst, T. Ishibashi, A. Li, A. H. Maffey, and J. Ausio H2A.Z Stabilizes Chromatin in a Way That Is Dependent on Core Histone Acetylation J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2006; 281(29): 20036 - 20044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I.-Y. Chen, J. Lypowy, J. Pain, D. Sayed, S. Grinberg, R. R. Alcendor, J. Sadoshima, and M. Abdellatif Histone H2A.z Is Essential for Cardiac Myocyte Hypertrophy but Opposed by Silent Information Regulator 2{alpha} J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2006; 281(28): 19369 - 19377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Mazurkiewicz, J. F. Kepert, and K. Rippe On the Mechanism of Nucleosome Assembly by Histone Chaperone NAP1 J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16462 - 16472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Lowell, F. Kaiser, C. J. Janzen, and G. A. M. Cross Histone H2AZ dimerizes with a novel variant H2B and is enriched at repetitive DNA in Trypanosoma brucei J. Cell Sci., December 15, 2005; 118(24): 5721 - 5730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chakravarthy, S. K. Y. Gundimella, C. Caron, P.-Y. Perche, J. R. Pehrson, S. Khochbin, and K. Luger Structural Characterization of the Histone Variant macroH2A Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(17): 7616 - 7624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Abbott, B. P. Chadwick, A. A. Thambirajah, and J. Ausio Beyond the Xi: MacroH2A CHROMATIN DISTRIBUTION AND POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATION IN AN AVIAN SYSTEM J. Biol. Chem., April 22, 2005; 280(16): 16437 - 16445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. T. Kamakaka and S. Biggins Histone variants: deviants? Genes & Dev., February 1, 2005; 19(3): 295 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Swaminathan, E. M. Baxter, and V. G. Corces The role of histone H2Av variant replacement and histone H4 acetylation in the establishment of Drosophila heterochromatin Genes & Dev., January 1, 2005; 19(1): 65 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]