![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 45, 42333-42338, November 9, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
,From the Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University Hospital Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
Received for publication, August 3, 2001, and in revised form, September 5, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have recently described a novel recycling
pathway of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL)-associated
apolipoprotein (apo) E in human hepatoma cells. We now demonstrate that
not only TRL-derived apoE but also lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is
efficiently recycled in vitro and in vivo.
Similar recycling kinetics of apoE and LPL in normal and low density
lipoprotein receptor-negative human fibroblasts also indicate that the
low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein seems to be involved.
Intracellular sorting mechanisms are responsible for reduced lysosomal
degradation of both ligands after receptor-mediated internalization.
Immediately after internalization in rat liver, TRLs are disintegrated,
and apoE and LPL are found in endosomal compartments, whereas
TRL-derived phospholipids accumulate in the perinuclear region of
hepatocytes. Subsequently, substantial amounts of both proteins can be
found in purified recycling endosomes, indicating a potential
resecretion of these TRL components. Pulse-chase experiments of
perfused rat livers with radiolabeled TRLs demonstrated a serum-induced
release of internalized apoE and LPL into the perfusate. Analysis of
the secreted proteins identified ~80% of the recycled TRL-derived
proteins in the high density lipoprotein fractions. These
results provide the first evidence that recycling of TRL-derived
apoE and LPL could play an important role in the modulation of
lipoproteins in vivo.
Triglycerides are transported mainly by two distinct classes of
triglyceride-rich lipoproteins
(TRLs),1 the chylomicrons and
the very low density lipoproteins (VLDLs). After assembly in the
intestine, chylomicrons are transported via lymph into the bloodstream,
where they are converted at the endothelial surface to remnant
lipoproteins through the catalytic action of lipoprotein lipase (LPL)
(for review, see Refs. 1 and 2). After lipolysis, LPL remains
associated with the chylomicron remnants and, in concert with
apolipoprotein (apo) E (3-5), facilitates their clearance into
hepatocytes (6) via LDL receptor (LDLR) and the LDLR-related protein
(LRP) (7-10). The essential role for both receptors in TRL removal
in vivo has been demonstrated in gene knockout and gene
transfer experiments (Refs. 11 and 12; for a recent review, see Ref.
13).
Several studies have used different "model particles" to
investigate the intracellular processing of TRL constituents. In contrast to the lysosomal degradation of LDL-derived apoB (14), In this study, we addressed the question of whether recycling of
TRL-derived apoE and LPL could play a role in hepatic lipoprotein metabolism in vivo. The disintegration of TRL particles
within sorting endosomes could be demonstrated in rat liver, where the TRL lipids can be detected in lysosomal compartments, whereas TRL-derived apoE and LPL are found in a peripheral endosomal
compartment. Mobilization and subsequent resecretion of TRL-derived
apoE and LPL are induced in the presence of serum. These data suggest
that apoE and LPL recycling plays an important role in apoE enrichment of HDL precursors and reutilization of LPL in the space of Disse.
Antibodies and
Reagents--
1,1'-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine
(DiI) was purchased from Molecular Probes (Leiden, the Netherlands). 17- Cell Culture--
Human HuH7 hepatoma cells and human
fibroblasts were plated in 6-well plates (Nunc) and grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum and penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2.
Cells were used after 2 days in culture.
Ligand Preparation--
TRLs from an apoCII-deficient patient
were isolated and associated with 100 µg of labeled or unlabeled LPL
(LPL-TRL) and/or apoE (apoE/LPL-TRL, apoE-TRL) at 37 °C for 30 min
as indicated. Unbound apoE and LPL proteins were removed by
ultracentrifugation as described previously (20). Radiolabeled LDL,
TRLs, and fluorescence-labeled DiI-LPL-TRLs were prepared by the iodine
monochloride method method and incorporation of DiI as described
previously (20). The protein content of the different radiolabeled TRL
preparations was 0.21 ± 0.05 mg/ml, and the specific
radioactivity in the protein was 80-170 cpm/ng. The protein content of
125I-LDL was 1.4 mg/ml, and the specific radioactivity was
90 cpm/ng. Protein content for DiI-LPL-TRL was 0.25 mg/ml. apoE 3/3,
prepared by preparative SDS-PAGE (20), and RAP were iodinated by the IODOGEN method according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce). The specific radioactivity of different TRL preparations was 200 cpm/ng
for 125I-apoE-TRL, 450 cpm/ng for 125I-LPL-TRL,
and 320 cpm/ng for 125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL,
respectively. All radiolabeled ligands were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE
and checked by autoradiography.
Uptake, Degradation, and Recycling Assays--
Cultured cells
were incubated with the different radiolabeled ligands as described
previously (25, 26). After removal of surface-bound ligands with 770 units/ml heparin, cells were incubated at 37 °C for various time
points in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% human plasma.
The radioactivity of internalized, degraded, and recycled radiolabeled
proteins was determined as described previously (26).
Indirect Immunofluorescence--
Male Sprague-Dawley rats were
injected with 200 µl of DiI-labeled LPL-TRL (0.5 µg/µl protein).
Rats were sacrificed 20 min after injection, and cryosections (8 µm)
from liver were prepared. For immunofluorescence labeling, sections
were blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin and incubated overnight at
4 °C with an antibody against human apoE. To visualize the primary
antibody, we used immune-adsorbed
dichlorotriazinyl-fluorescein-conjugated F(ab')2 fragments
goat anti-rabbit. Finally, sections were washed with phosphate-buffered
saline containing nucleus stain Hoechst 33342 and subjected to
phase-contrast and confocal laser scanning microscopy using a Zeiss
axiovert 100 and Leica TCS (Leica Lasertechnik, Heidelberg, Germany), respectively.
Isolation of Rat Liver Endosomes--
Male Sprague-Dawley rats
(200-250 g) were treated with 17- Rat Liver Perfusion and FPLC Analysis--
Male Sprague-Dawley
rats were anesthetized with diethyl ether. After closure of the arteria
hepatica, arteria mesenterica, and vena cava inferior, the vena portae
was cannulated, and rat livers were washed with Krebs-Hanseleit buffer
for 5 min (2 ml/5 min). Radiolabeled
125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL was added, and after a
single pass of the radiolabeled ligand through rat livers, the system
was washed extensively with heparin (100 units/ml) containing
Krebs-Hanseleit buffer to remove noninternalized
125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL. After 5-10 min, 10%
human serum or 25 µg/ml HDL3 was added to the washing
buffer and passed through rat liver (2 ml/5 min); samples were
collected every 5 min after passage through the perfused liver, and the
secreted radioactivity was determined (28).
10 ml of the chase perfusate was centrifuged through a centricon filter
unit (exclusion size, 10 kDa; Amicon) to separate degraded lipoproteins
from the remaining intact lipoproteins. 200 µl of the intact
lipoproteins was separated on a Sepharose G6 column (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) in 100 mM NaCl and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
8.0. Fractions of 500 µl were collected, and the radioactivity was
determined. Cholesterol was measured in each fraction
(Monotest®; Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Pooled lipoprotein fractions were prepared and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE to visualize radiolabeled apolipoproteins by autoradiography.
Intracellular Processing of apoE and LPL Derived from
Triglyceride-rich Lipoproteins--
To study the intracellular
fate of apoE and LPL associated with TRLs, we compared the uptake and
degradation of LPL (55 kDa) and TRL-associated LPL with TRL-associated
apoE (34 kDa). Another ligand for lipoprotein receptors (12), the RAP
protein (39 kDa), served as a control for the lysosomal pathway (Fig.
1). As expected ~90% of internalized
RAP was targeted to lysosomes and degraded. In contrast, only 35-45%
of endocytosed LPL and TRL-derived apoE was degraded, respectively. The
reduced degradation was most pronounced for cells incubated with LPL
and apoE-containing TRLs (20%; see Fig. 1). These results indicate
that complementary properties of apoE and LPL are responsible for
efficient avoidance of lysosomal degradation.
To characterize the pathway of TRL-associated apoE and LPL in more
detail, pulse-chase experiments were performed. Recycling and
degradation of both proteins were determined after HuH7 cells were
incubated for 60 min with 125I-apoE-TRL (Fig.
2a) and apoE-containing TRL
associated with 125I-LPL (Fig. 2b). Consistent
with the results described above (Fig. 1), only a minor proportion
(30% at t = 240 min) of TRL-associated apoE was
degraded, whereas ~50% of intact radiolabeled apoE was secreted back
into the media within 120 min. Furthermore, we observed a reduced
(2-fold) degradation and similar recycling kinetics of
125I-LPL from apoE-containing 125I-LPL-TRL
(Fig. 2b) compared with 125I-apoE-TRL (Fig.
2a). This indicates that after receptor-mediated endocytosis
of TRLs, both proteins promote sorting mechanisms to escape lysosomal
degradation.
Recycling of TRL-associated LPL and apoE Occurs in FH
Fibroblasts--
To study the different role of the LDL receptor and
LRP for resecretion of TRL-associated apoE and LPL, normal fibroblasts and fibroblasts from patients with FH were analyzed. As shown in Fig.
3, normal fibroblasts efficiently
internalized and recycled 125I-TRL enriched with apoE or
LPL, whereas degradation played only a minor role in intracellular TRL
processing. In these experiments, FH fibroblasts demonstrated a
significant reduction of apoE-enriched TRL internalization as compared
with normal fibroblasts. However, the relative amount of recycled TRL
constituents remained unaltered (Fig. 3a). Fig.
3b demonstrates that similar amounts of LPL-enriched TRLs
were internalized in normal and FH fibroblasts. Both fibroblast cell
lines resecreted ~50% of LPL-enriched 125I-TRL
radiolabeled proteins after a 90-min chase (Fig. 3b). Thus, the efficient uptake, degradation, and recycling of TRL-derived apoE
and LPL in FH fibroblasts and the marginal expression of other LDLR
family lipoprotein receptors in these cells suggest that LRP plays an
important role for endocytosis and the intracellular processing of TRL
components.
TRL-derived apoE and LPL Are Present in Recycling Endosomes in
Vivo--
To investigate the presence of TRL-associated apoE and LPL
in recycling endosomes in vivo, male Sprague-Dawley rats
were injected with DiI-TRL associated with LPL (DiI-LPL-TRL), and rat
liver sections were analyzed 20 min after injection (Fig.
4). As shown in Fig. 4a,
DiI-containing vesicles derived from DiI-LPL-TRL were found
intracellulary, with a significant proportion located at the
perinuclear region of hepatocytes that have been demonstrated to
represent lyosomal-associated membrane protein-1-positive (pre-) lysosomes (20).
To compare this lipid staining pattern with DiI-LPL-TRL-derived apoE,
immunofluorescence analysis of rat liver sections was performed (Fig.
4, b
To confirm these observations biochemically, hepatic recycling
endosomes were isolated, and their content of TRL-derived apoE and LPL
or LDL-derived apoB100 was compared. The subcellular
fractionation developed by Belcher et al. (27) separates
endosomal fractions on the basis of their morphology: CURL represents
the early endocytic compartment involved in the sorting of ligands,
whereas MVBs correspond to late endosomes and prelysosomal structures.
The third endosomal fraction, the RRC, is characterized by tubular
structures that originate from membranous appendages emanating from
CURL and MVBs that are enriched in recycling receptors and depleted of
ligands (29, 30).
Therefore MVB, CURL, and RRC endosomes from rat liver were prepared 20 min after injection of double-labeled
125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL and
125I-LDL. As expected, radiolabeled LDL-derived
125I-apoB100 was found predominantly in the
prelysosomal MVB fraction as judged by SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig.
5a) and subsequent
quantification (55-60%; see Fig. 5b). A substantial amount
(40%) of 125I-apoB100 was still present in
sorting endosomes (CURL) that will ultimately be processed for
lysosomal degradation via the MVB fraction after prolonged incubation
periods (31). Only a minor proportion of
125I-apoB100 (1-2%) was detectable in the
recycling endosome fraction (RRC), which confirmed the purity of the
recycling endosomal fraction analyzed. Similar experiments were
performed with 125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL that
contained an approximately 5:1 apoE:LPL ratio, respectively (Fig.
5a, TRL). apoE and LPL were detectable in similar amounts in
MVBs (45-50%) and CURL (35-40%), and ~20% of apoE and LPL was
found in recycling endosomes (Fig. 5, a and b,
RRC). As described previously (29), Western blot analysis of MVB,
CURL, and RRC endosomal fractions identified the presence of LDLR and LRP (Fig. 5c). The presence of both lipoprotein receptors in
hepatic MVB endosomes demonstrates that this fraction contains
substantial amounts of recycling endosomes, which has also been
demonstrated by others (32). Taken together, the presence of apoE and
LPL and the lipoprotein receptors in the MVB and RRC endosomes indicate that both fractions contain significant amounts of recycling endosomes from which resecretion of apoE and LPL can occur.
Recycling of TRL Constituents in Vivo--
The presence of apoE
and LPL in recycling endosomes indicated significant recycling of
endocytosed TRL constituents in vivo, and therefore we
analyzed the potential resecretion of internalized TRL proteins in a
perfused rat liver system. After single-pass endocytosis of
125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL, surface-bound material
was removed with heparin. Subsequently, 10% human serum was passed
through the perfused rat liver system. The released TRL-derived
radioactivity was collected and shown to represent mainly intact
protein (see Fig. 6a, inset).
As shown in Fig. 6a, ~50% of internalized
125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL was recycled after 60 min. These findings are in agreement with the results obtained from
cell culture experiments (Figs. 2 and 3; see also Refs. 20 and 23).
Analysis of the recycled TRL-derived apoE and LPL demonstrated a more
efficient recycling of apoE compared with LPL (Fig. 6c,
compare lanes 1 and 2).
Separation of the lipoproteins by FPLC was performed to analyze the
possible association of recycled TRL proteins with lipoprotein particles. Only a minor proportion of radiolabeled material was detected in fractions 16-18 representing the TRL fraction (Fig. 6b). In contrast, HDL fractions 31-34 contained ~80%
recycled 125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL proteins.
SDS-PAGE of the radioactive material identified predominantly
125I-apoE (Fig. 6c, lane 3) in the HDL
fractions, whereas the majority of 125I-LPL was detected in
the TRL fractions (Fig. 6c, lane 4). These experiments provide the first demonstration that efficient recycling of
internalized TRL proteins might participate in the alteration of plasma
lipoprotein composition.
We have recently proposed a model of intracellular TRL processing
that comprises both recycling and degradation of TRL components (6,
20). In the current study, we demonstrated that significant amounts of
125I-apoE-TRL and even more apoE-containing
125I-LPL-TRL were not degraded but recycled back to the
cell surface. Therefore, the association of LPL with apoE-containing
TRLs not only stimulates TRL internalization but also reduces its
lysosomal degradation compared with apoE-TRL (Figs. 1 and 2). Although
internalization of apoE-containing lipoproteins is thought to be
mediated in part by cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (2),
recent experiments have demonstrated that both LRP and the LDL receptor
(11) are essential for hepatic uptake of TRL lipoproteins. However, the possible involvement of the two lipoprotein receptors in the recycling of apoE is a topic of disagreement (21, 22), which might be due
to the different "model particles" used in these studies. In
agreement with the recycling of apoE in LDLR( The main focus of our studies was to characterize TRL processing
in vivo. As observed in cell culture experiments (20), the
disintegration of TRLs leads to a peripheral, endosomal distribution of
apoE, whereas the majority of lipids seem to accumulate in the
perinuclear, prelysosomal compartment (Fig. 4). These findings correlate with the relative resistance of apoE against degradation and
the concomitant hydrolysis of cholesterol ester from internalized apoE-cholesterol ester-labeled liposomes in mouse liver (21). In
addition, Fazio et al. (22) demonstrated the reutilization of internalized apoE for VLDL assembly in Golgi-enriched fractions. In
support of these observations, we detected apoE and LPL in three
different endosomal preparations from rat liver during analysis of the
intracellular fate of internalized TRL protein components in
vivo.
First of all, CURL represents the early endosomal sorting compartment
and contains internalized radiolabeled LDL or TRL that will
subsequently be directed to either RRC or MVB vesicles (30). RRC
endosomal preparations contain substantial amounts of TRL-derived apoE
and LPL (Fig. 5). Although RRC fractions are highly enriched for
recycling proteins (e.g. transferrin or LDL receptor), it has been demonstrated that these preparations also contain
5'-nucleotidase and sialyl-transferase activity specific for Golgi
secretory vesicles (29). These findings correlate with the presence of
apoE in Golgi-enriched fractions (22) and indicate that recycling of apoE and LPL via RRC could be mediated in part by Golgi-derived secretory vesicles. In addition, significant amounts of radiolabeled apoE and LPL were found in MVBs, which represent predominantly late
endosomes. However, because LRP and LDL receptor (Fig. 5c) can be found in the MVB fraction, it can be postulated that a significant portion of recycling endosomes is present in this fraction,
as also observed by others (29). These vesicles, in addition to RRC
endosomes, are likely to be responsible for apoE and LPL recycling.
A number of studies have recently postulated the recycling of
internalized apoE in mice hepatocytes (21-23). We now provide direct
evidence that TRL-derived apoE and LPL are efficiently recycled and
resecreted in vivo (Fig. 6a). Because we have
recently described that HDL serves as an extracellular acceptor for the resecretion of apoE (20), HDL was utilized to stimulate apoE and LPL
resecretion after TRL internalization in perfused rat livers (Fig.
6b). Similar to our observations in vitro (Ref.
20; see also Fig. 2) we determined an ~60% resecretion of
internalized TRL-derived apoE and LPL. Only a minor proportion of
radioactivity, representing predominantly LPL, was detected in the VLDL
fraction after FPLC and SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 6, b and
c). In contrast, the majority of resecreted apoE-derived
radioactivity was found in HDL, indicating a reutilization of
TRL-derived apoproteins for HDL modulation. These apoE-enriched HDL
particles would provide a pool of apoE proteins in the plasma, possibly
serving as an apoE donor for intravascular transfer to chylomicrons
during lipolysis. Although endogenously synthesized apoE might be able
to fulfill this function, recycling of apoE would provide a more
readily available pool to promote apoE-mediated chylomicron remnant
uptake in the postprandial state.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that significant amounts of
internalized TRL-derived apoE and LPL escape the lysosomal pathway and
are targeted in a new recycling compartment for resecretion. The
resecreted apoE and LPL seem to participate in the modulation of VLDL
and HDL in vivo. Because apoE recycling depends on the presence of extracellular HDL, future experiments will have to clarify
a potential regulatory role of apoE recycling in HDL-induced cholesterol efflux or HDL catabolism.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-VLDL-derived apoE was identified in widely distributed vesicles and
showed a slow protein degradation in mouse macrophages (15, 16).
However, in the same cells,
-VLDL-derived lipids were delivered to
perinuclear, lysosomal compartments (17). Delayed transport and
degradation of TRL proteins were also observed in hepatoma cells (18,
19). In recent studies, we have been able to demonstrate that the
altered transport and retarded degradation of internalized TRLs is due
to intracellular disintegration and sorting of TRL components in a
peripheral cellular compartment. Whereas lipids are directed to
lysosomal compartments in human hepatoma cells and fibroblasts,
TRL-derived apoE and apoC are recycled back to the cell surface, where
resecretion can occur (20). Accumulating evidence indicates that the
complex intracellular processing of TRL constituents also exists
in vivo. An increased intracellular resistance to lysosomal
degradation of apoE compared with cholesteryl oleate was demonstrated
in C57Bl/6 mice after hepatic uptake of triglyceride-rich emulsion
particles (21). Furthermore, Fazio and co-workers (22, 23) identified
significant amounts of internalized apoE derived from
-VLDL in
Golgi-enriched fractions of mouse liver. These findings indicate that
processing of internalized apoE might occur through distinct endosomal compartments.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Ethinyl estradiol, paraformaldehyde, nucleus stain Hoechst 33342, glycine, and bovine serum albumin were purchased from Sigma. Mowiol®4-88 was purchased from Calbiochem. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, phosphate-buffered saline, fetal calf serum, trypsin, penicillin, and streptomycin were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. [125I]Iodine was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Heparin (Liquemin®) and tetrahydrolipstatin (Orlistat®) were
purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Bovine dimeric LPL and
125I-LPL were obtained from Dr. G. Olivecrona (Umea,
Sweden). Recombinant RAP was provided by Dr. S. K.
Moestrup (Aarhus, Denmark). Polyclonal antibody against LDL
receptor was obtained from J. Herz (Dallas, TX). The
affinity-purified sheep anti-LRP antibody (AB104-97) was raised against
a synthetic peptide corresponding to the final 14 amino acids of the
human LRP C terminus (CGRGPEDEIGDPLA) (24). Polyclonal antibody against
human apoE was from Dako. Horseradish peroxidase and
dichlorotriazinyl-fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and
donkey anti-sheep F(ab')2 fragments were purchased from
Jackson Immuno Research (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany).
-ethynyl estradiol, and endosomes
from rat liver homogenates were isolated as described previously (27).
Rats were anesthetized with diethyl ether, and 1-2 mg of human
125I-LDL or 0.1 mg of
125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL was injected into a
femoral vein. 20 min after injection, the portal vein was cannulated,
livers were flushed thoroughly with 150 ml of ice-cold 0.15 M NaCl and removed, and endosomes were prepared as
described previously (27). Three distinct endosomal populations (MVBs,
CURL, and RRC) were obtained and stored at
80 °C before further analysis.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Internalization and degradation of
TRL-associated proteins in hepatoma cells. Human HuH7 hepatoma
cells were incubated for 6 h at 37 °C with
125I-apoE-TRL, 125I-LPL, 125I-LPL
associated with apoE-containing TRL (125I-LPL-TRL), and
125I-RAP as indicated. To determine protein degradation,
the media were harvested, the trichloroacetic acid-precipitable
material was removed, and the content of 125I-tyrosine in
the supernatant was determined (see "Materials and Methods"). Cells
were washed and lysed in 0.1 N NaOH, and internalized
radioactivity was determined. Values of specific uptake (
) and
degradation (
) are given as a percentage of total metabolized
radioactivity and represent the mean ± S.D. of four separate
experiments with triplicate samples.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Recycling of TRL-associated proteins in
hepatoma cells. Pulse-chase experiments were performed by
preincubating HuH7 hepatoma cells with 125I-apoE-TRL
(a) and apoE-containing TRLs associated with
125I-LPL (125I-LPL-TRL; b) for 60 min at 37 °C (see "Materials and Methods"). Cells were washed at
4 °C, and cell-bound material was removed by heparin. After
incubation for an additional 0-240 min at 37 °C, the media were
collected to determine intact (
) and degraded (
)
125I-apoE and 125I-LPL proteins. The remaining
cells were lysed, and radioactivity was defined as the cell-associated
fraction (
). The data are given as a percentage of total
radioactivity and represent the mean ± S.D. of four independent
experiments with triplicate samples for each time point.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Intracellular processing of TRL-associated
proteins in normal and FH fibroblasts. Pulse-chase experiments
were performed by preincubating LPDS-treated human fibroblasts
(Normal) and human FH fibroblasts (FH) with
125I-TRL enriched with apoE (a) and
apoE-containing 125I-TRL associated with LPL (b)
for 60 min at 37 °C (see "Materials and Methods"). Cells were
washed at 4 °C, and cell-bound material was removed by heparin.
After incubation for an additional 90 min at 37 °C, the media were
collected to determine degraded and recycled 125I-TRL
proteins. The remaining cells were lysed as described in the Fig. 2
legend. The data are given in ng/mg cell protein and represent the
mean ± S.D. of three (a) and six (b)
independent experiments with duplicate samples.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Localization of apoE and phospholipids (DiI)
from LPL-TRL in rat liver cells. DiI-labeled LPL-TRLs (250 µg of
protein) were injected into the femoral vein. The liver was
removed 20 min after injection and stored at
80 °C. Frozen
sections (5 µm thick) were fixed in methanol, washed with
phosphate-buffered saline, and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy for
DiI (red) distribution and DAPI-stained nuclei
(a). Confocal microscopy of apoE (b) and DiI
(c) in the same liver sections was performed.
Arrows demonstrate colocalization of apoE and DiI in the
merged image (d; yellow). Filled
(apoE) and open (LPL) arrowheads point out
noncolocalized staining of apoE or DiI, respectively. Bar,
10 µm.
d). A specific antibody against human apoE was
utilized to exclude endogenous rat apoE detection. Whereas apoE was
widely distributed within the cytoplasm of rat hepatocytes (Fig.
4b), DiI was again localized in part at the perinuclear region (Fig. 4c). The merged image of the confocal analysis
demonstrated that the majority of apoE-containing endosomal
compartments did not colocalize with phospholipid representing DiI
(Fig. 4d). The rare appearance of yellow spots suggests that
DiI-LPL-TRL uptake via receptor-mediated endocytosis is followed by a
rapid sorting mechanism leading to a different intracellular fate of
DiI-LPL-TRL-derived apoE and DiI.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Distribution (a) and quantitative
analysis (b) of apoB-labeled LDL and TRL-derived proteins in
rat liver endosomes. Rat liver MVB, CURL, and RRC endosomal membranes
were isolated after injection of 125I-LDL or double-labeled
125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL, and 100 µg of each
fraction was analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE. Arrows indicate the
presence of radiolabeled LDL-derived
125I-apoB100 or TRL-derived
125I-apoE and 125I-LPL (a). Gels
were dried, and autoradiographs were obtained after overnight exposure
at
80 °C. Molecular masses are given in kDa. Quantitative analysis
of the radiolabeled 125I-apoB100 from LDL,
125I-apoE, and 125I-LPL from apoE-containing
TRLs in MVB (
), CURL (
), and RRC (
) was determined by
densitometric scanning of the autoradiographs and is given as a
percentage of the total protein detected (b). The data
represent one of two independent experiments with two animals analyzed.
c, immunoblot analysis of LDL receptor and LRP in
membrane preparations of rat liver endosomes. Endosomal proteins from
MVB, CURL, and RRC membranes (50 µg each) were separated by 10%
SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot for LDL receptor and the 85-kDa
LRP protein fragment as indicated. Molecular mass is given in
kDa.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
a, Recovery of recycled
125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL after rat liver
perfusion. 125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL were
passed through the perfused rat liver. After 5 min (flow rate, 2 ml/5
min), noninternalized radiolabeled TRLs were removed with heparin (100 units/ml)-containing Krebs-Hanseleit buffer until the remaining
radioactivity reached background levels in the perfusate. Recycling was
induced with 10% human serum, and samples were collected every 5 min
thereafter to determine the radioactivity resecreted from the liver.
The amount of released TRL components was calculated at each time point
(percentage of internalized) and represents the mean ± S.D. of
four animals analyzed. The amount of intact and degraded radioactivity
in the resecreted material was determined by size exclusion (<10 kDa)
and is given as a percentage (see inset). b, FPLC
analysis of recycled TRL-derived 125I-apoE and
125I-LPL. The nondegraded radioactivity from a
(inset) was separated by a Sepharose G6 column (see
"Materials and Methods"), and 500-µl fractions were collected.
Cholesterol (
) and radioactivity (
) were determined in each
fraction and show the mean of a representative experiment
(n = 4) with triplicate samples. The fractions
containing TRL (fractions 16-18), LDL (fractions 23-25), and HDL
(fractions 31-35) are indicated. c, autoradiography of
recycled TRL-derived 125I-apoE and 125I-LPL.
The 125I-apoE/125I-LPL-TRL preparation before
injection (lane 1) and the recycled TRL-derived
125I-apoE and 125I-LPL before FPLC separation
(lane 2) are shown. After FPLC, the HDL (lane 3)
and TRL (lane 4) fractions (b) were collected,
pooled, and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. The positions of radiolabeled
apoE and LPL are indicated. Molecular mass is given in kDa.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
) mice (22), our
results imply that LRP probably participates in the intracellular processing of human TRL-derived apoE and LPL, leading to the recycling of both proteins (Fig. 3). Results presented here indicate that the
composition of ligands seems to determine their specific intracellular fate. Thus, the high binding affinities of multivalent ligands on
lipoproteins to receptors seem to play an important role in their
intracellular metabolism. In support of this hypothesis, the most
likely altered ligand binding affinity of apoE3 and E4-enriched
-VLDL has recently been shown to result in different intracellular processing after internalization (33).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to J. Hoeppner and W. Tauscher for excellent technical assistance. We thank Drs. G. Olivecrona, S. K. Moestrup, J. Herz, and C. Enrich for generously providing bovine LPL, recombinant proteins, antibodies, and technical advice.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants Be 829/5-1 and Ja 421/3-1.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20249 Hamburg, Germany. Tel.: 49-40-428033917; Fax: 49-40-428034592; E-mail: heeren@uke.uni-hamburg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 6, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107461200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: TRL, triglyceride-rich lipoprotein; apo, apolipoprotein; CURL, compartment of uncoupling of receptors and ligands; FPLC, fast performance liquid chromatography; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; LDLR, low density lipoprotein receptor; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; LRP, low density lipoprotein-related protein; MVB, multivesicular body; RRC, receptor recycling compartment; VLDL, very low density lipoprotein; DiI, 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine; SDS-PAGE, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia; RAP, receptor-associated protein.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Olivecrona, G., and Olivecrona, T. (1995) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 6, 291-305[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Mahley, R. W.,
and Ji, Z. S.
(1999)
J. Lipid Res.
40,
1-16 |
| 3. | Felts, J. M., Itakura, H., and Crane, R. T. (1975) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 66, 1467-1475[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Goldberg, I. J. (1996) J. Lipid Res. 37, 693-707[Abstract] |
| 5. | Zambon, A., Schmidt, I., Beisiegel, U., and Brunzell, J. D. (1996) J. Lipid Res. 37, 2394-2404[Abstract] |
| 6. | Heeren, J., and Beisiegel, U. (2001) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 12, 255-260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Beisiegel, U., Weber, W., Ihrke, G., Herz, J., and Stanley, K. K. (1989) Nature 341, 162-164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Beisiegel, U., and Heeren, J. (1997) Proc. Nutr. Soc. 56, 731-737[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Kowal, R. C.,
Herz, J.,
Goldstein, J. L.,
Esser, V.,
and Brown, M. S.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
5810-5814 |
| 10. | Bradley, W. A., and Gianturco, S. H. (1986) J. Lipid Res. 27, 40-48[Abstract] |
| 11. | Rohlmann, A., Gotthardt, M., Hammer, R. E., and Herz, J. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 689-695[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Willnow, T. E.,
Sheng, Z.,
Ishibashi, S.,
and Herz, J.
(1994)
Science
264,
1471-1474 |
| 13. | Willnow, T. E., Nykjaer, A., and Herz, J. (1999) Nat. Cell Biol. 1, E157-E162[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Brown, M. S.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1986)
Science
232,
34-47 |
| 15. |
Tabas, I.,
Lim, S.,
Xu, X. X.,
and Maxfield, F. R.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
929-940 |
| 16. |
Tabas, I.,
Myers, J. N.,
Innerarity, T. L.,
Xu, X. X.,
Arnold, K.,
Boyles, J.,
and Maxfield, F. R.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1547-1560 |
| 17. |
Myers, J. N.,
Tabas, I.,
Jones, N. L.,
and Maxfield, F. R.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1389-1402 |
| 18. |
Lombardi, P.,
Mulder, M.,
van der Boom, H.,
Frants, R. R.,
and Havekes, L. M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26113-26119 |
| 19. | Jones, A. L., Hradek, G. T., Hornick, C., Renaud, G., Windler, E. E., and Havel, R. J. (1984) J. Lipid Res. 25, 1151-1158[Abstract] |
| 20. | Heeren, J., Weber, W., and Beisiegel, U. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 349-359[Abstract] |
| 21. |
Rensen, P. C.,
Jong, M. C.,
van Vark, L. C.,
van der Boom, H.,
Hendriks, W. L.,
van Berkel, T. J.,
Biessen, E. A.,
and Havekes, L. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
8564-8571 |
| 22. |
Fazio, S.,
Linton, M. F.,
Hasty, A. H.,
and Swift, L. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8247-8253 |
| 23. |
Swift, L. L.,
Farkas, M. H.,
Major, A. S.,
Valyi-Nagy, K.,
Linton, M. F.,
and Fazio, S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
22965-22970 |
| 24. | Herz, J., Hamann, U., Rogne, S., Myklebost, O., Gausepohl, H., and Stanley, K. K. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 4119-4127[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Lookene, A., Skottova, N., and Olivecrona, G. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 222, 395-403[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Goldstein, J. L., Basu, S. K., and Brown, M. S. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 98, 241-260[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Belcher, J. D.,
Hamilton, R. L.,
Brady, S. E.,
Hornick, C. A.,
Jaeckle, S.,
Schneider, W. J.,
and Havel, R. J.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
6785-6789 |
| 28. | Havel, R. J. (1986) Methods Enzymol. 129, 591-612[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Pol, A., Ortega, D., and Enrich, C. (1997) Biochem. J. 323, 435-443 |
| 30. | Enrich, C., Pol, A., Calvo, M., Pons, M., and Jackle, S. (1999) Hepatology 30, 1115-1120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Jackle, S., Runquist, E., Brady, S., Hamilton, R. L., and Havel, R. J. (1991) J. Lipid Res. 32, 485-498[Abstract] |
| 32. | Pol, A., and Enrich, C. (1997) Electrophoresis 18, 2548-2557[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Ji, Z. S.,
Pitas, R. E.,
and Mahley, R. W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13452-13460 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Altenburg, J. Arbones-Mainar, L. Johnson, J. Wilder, and N. Maeda Human LDL Receptor Enhances Sequestration of ApoE4 and VLDL Remnants on the Surface of Hepatocytes but Not Their Internalization in Mice Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2008; 28(6): 1104 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Heeren, U. Beisiegel, and T. Grewal Apolipoprotein E Recycling: Implications for Dyslipidemia and Atherosclerosis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 26(3): 442 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Hasty, M. R. Plummer, K. H. Weisgraber, M. F. Linton, S. Fazio, and L. L. Swift The recycling of apolipoprotein E in macrophages: influence of HDL and apolipoprotein A-I J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1433 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Heeren, T. Grewal, A. Laatsch, N. Becker, F. Rinninger, K.-A. Rye, and U. Beisiegel Impaired Recycling of Apolipoprotein E4 Is Associated with Intracellular Cholesterol Accumulation J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55483 - 55492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Farkas, K. H. Weisgraber, V. L. Shepherd, M. F. Linton, S. Fazio, and L. L. Swift The recycling of apolipoprotein E and its amino-terminal 22 kDa fragment: evidence for multiple redundant pathways J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 1546 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. M. Eckhardt, L. Cai, B. Sun, N. R. Webb, and D. R. van der Westhuyzen High Density Lipoprotein Uptake by Scavenger Receptor SR-BII J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 14372 - 14381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brundert, J. Heeren, H. Greten, and F. Rinninger Hepatic lipase mediates an increase in selective uptake of HDL-associated cholesteryl esters by cells in culture independent from SR-BI J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 1020 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Heeren, T. Grewal, A. Laatsch, D. Rottke, F. Rinninger, C. Enrich, and U. Beisiegel Recycling of Apoprotein E Is Associated with Cholesterol Efflux and High Density Lipoprotein Internalization J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 14370 - 14378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Farkas, L. L. Swift, A. H. Hasty, M. F. Linton, and S. Fazio The Recycling of Apolipoprotein E in Primary Cultures of Mouse Hepatocytes. EVIDENCE FOR A PHYSIOLOGIC CONNECTION TO HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN METABOLISM J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2003; 278(11): 9412 - 9417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||