![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 45, 42509-42513, November 9, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Departments of
Medicine and Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham,
North Carolina 27710, § Centre de Neurochimie, CNRS
UPR-2356, Strasbourg 67084, France, and ¶ Pulmonary-Critical Care
Medicine Branch, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
Maryland 20892
Received for publication, July 31, 2001
Agonist-triggered G protein-coupled receptor
(GPCR)1 endocytosis is a
highly regulated process involved in signaling and resensitization of
numerous receptors. Agonist-dependent GPCR phosphorylation by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) promotes binding of
The ARF proteins constitute a group of six ubiquitously expressed small
GTP-binding proteins. These GTPases are essential components of the
molecular machinery that regulates membrane trafficking along endocytic
and biosynthetic pathways (7, 8). ARF1, the best characterized subtype,
is localized to the Golgi complex and is a regulator of vesicle coat
recruitment for both COP1- and clathrin-coated vesicles (9-11). ARF6
is uniquely associated with the plasma membrane (12, 13). Activation of
ARF proteins is facilitated by guanine nucleotide exchange
factors that promote dissociation of bound GDP from the inactive
ARF protein followed by binding of GTP to the nucleotide-free ARF.
Inactivation of ARF proteins is regulated by GTPase-activating proteins
(GAPs). ARF proteins have been shown to regulate various plasma
membrane trafficking events such as the constitutive recycling of the
transferrin receptor (12), calcium-stimulated exocytosis in chromaffin
cells (14), Fc Plasmids--
pBK( Preparation of Recombinant Proteins--
Recombinant hARF6 or
myr-hARF6 were prepared as described previously (26, 27). DNA
constructs for Flag- Cell Culture and Transfection--
HEK 293 cells were maintained
and transiently transfected as described previously (5).
Sequestration and Recycling Assays--
Receptor sequestration
was determined by flow cytometry as described previously (6, 28) and
defined as the percent of cell surface receptor no longer accessible to
extracellular antibodies. Recycling experiments were done similarly
except that the agonist was removed after 30 min of stimulation by
washing the cells three times with warm media. The cells were placed
back at 37 °C, and the percent of initial receptors present at the
cell surface was assessed 15, 30, and 60 min after agonist removal.
Immunoprecipitation--
Immunoprecipitations were done as
described previously (5). Briefly, serum-starved HEK 293 cells
were stimulated with isoproterenol for indicated times.
Dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) (DSP; Pierce) (25 mM) in
phosphate-buffered saline was added to each dish for 20 min, and the
cells were lysed in 1 ml of FLAG-radioimmune precipitation assay buffer
containing protease inhibitors. The samples were incubated at 4 °C
for 1 h and spun at 15,000 rpm for 20 min to pellet the
particulate fraction. Twenty µl was removed for direct immunoblotting
of the lysates. Affinity gel FLAG beads (15 µl) (Sigma) were added to
each tube, and the samples were rotated for 6 h at 4 °C. The
proteins were eluted into 40 µl of SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis sample buffer containing 5% GST Fusion Proteins and Pull-down Experiments--
pGEX2T
plasmids bearing ARNO or Co-Immunoprecipitation of Endogenous Proteins from Whole Brain
Extract--
Co-immunoprecipitations from whole brain extract were
performed as described previously (29). GTP Data Analysis--
The mean and standard error of the mean are
expressed for values obtained from the number of separate experiments
indicated performed in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed by a two-way analysis-of-variance followed by an unpaired Student's t test or Tukey's statistical test.
To directly investigate the role of ARF proteins in endocytosis of
GPCRs, we first expressed wild type and mutant ARF proteins together
with the Interestingly, expression of ARF6 mutants prevents constitutive
recycling of the transferrin receptor, another process involving cell
surface vesicle trafficking (12). Although expression of wild type ARF6
had no effect on the kinetics of recycling of the Like other small GTP-binding proteins, activation of ARF by GTP loading
is regulated by nucleotide exchange factors, whereas inactivation by
GTP hydrolysis is facilitated by GAPs. We have previously shown that
expression of the ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT1 markedly inhibits
internalization of the To elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which ARF6 regulates receptor
internalization, we set out to identify proteins interacting with ARF6
and its regulatory proteins. The
-Arrestin-mediated ADP-ribosylation Factor 6 Activation
and
2-Adrenergic Receptor Endocytosis*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Arrestins are multifunctional adaptor
proteins known to regulate internalization of agonist-stimulated G
protein-coupled receptors by linking them to endocytic proteins such as
clathrin and AP-2. Here we describe a previously unappreciated
mechanism by which
-arrestin orchestrates the process of receptor
endocytosis through the activation of ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6),
a small GTP-binding protein. Involvement of ARF6 in the endocytic process is demonstrated by the ability of GTP-binding defective and GTP
hydrolysis-deficient mutants to inhibit internalization of the
2-adrenergic receptor. The importance of
regulation of ARF6 function is shown by the ability of the ARF
GTPase-activating protein GIT1 to inhibit and of the ARF nucleotide
exchange factor, ARNO, to enhance receptor endocytosis. Endogenous
-arrestin is found in complex with ARNO. Upon agonist stimulation of
the receptor,
-arrestin also interacts with the GDP-liganded form of
ARF6, thereby facilitating ARNO-promoted GTP loading and activation of
the G protein. Thus, the agonist-driven formation of a complex including
-arrestin, ARNO, and ARF6 provides a molecular mechanism that explains how the agonist-stimulated receptor recruits a small G
protein necessary for the endocytic process and controls its activation.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-arrestins to the receptor, which in turn induces desensitization by
preventing further receptor-mediated G protein activation (1).
-Arrestins have been shown to regulate GPCR internalization via their direct interaction with clathrin and the
subunit of the clathrin adaptor protein complex AP-2 (2-4). However, the exact molecular mechanisms regulating the protein-protein interactions involved in clathrin-coated pit formation remain unknown. We have shown
recently that a novel GTPase-activating protein for the ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) family of small GTP-binding proteins, GIT1, can regulate internalization of the
2-adrenergic
receptor (
2AR), as well as other signaling receptors,
suggesting a critical role for ARF function in this process (5, 6).
receptor-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages (15), endocytosis at the apical surface of epithelial Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (16), membrane recycling (17, 18), and the endothelin-mediated translocation of the GLUT4 glucose transporter (19,
20). In addition, ARF6 activation is involved in the remodeling of the
actin cytoskeleton (15, 21, 22). In this study, we examine the
involvement of ARF proteins in the internalization process of the
2AR and begin to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by
which the function of these small GTP-binding proteins is regulated following agonist-stimulation.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
)-
2AR, pBK(
)-GIT1,
pGEX4T2-
-arrestin 1-(319-418), pCDNA3-His-
-arrestin 1, pCDNA3-Flag-
-arrestin 1, and pCDNA3-Flag-
-arrestin 2, were previously described (3, 5, 23, 24). pToto3'2J-hARF6 and
pToto3'2J-ARF6Q67L clones were obtained from Dr. P. Stahl (Washington
University, St. Louis, MO). pBK(
)-ARF6 and pBK(
)ARF6Q67L were
generated by cloning the full-length ARF6 or ARF6Q67L from pToto3'2J-hARF6 into the XbaI site of a modified
pBK-CMV vector (Stratagene). pBK(
)-ARF6T27N was generated by cloning
the full-length ARF6T27N from pEGFP-N1-ARF6T27N into XhoI
and SalI sites of pBK(
). Human ARNO (3G variant)
(25) was amplified from a human brain library using specific primers
and subcloned into pBK(
) and pGEX4T2. All sequences were confirmed
using an automated ABI DNA sequencer (Howard Hughes Medical
Institute Nucleic Acid Facility, Duke University Medical Center).
-arrestin 1 and 2 were prepared in pVL1393, and
recombinant baculoviruses were obtained using the BD BaculoGold
transfection kit (BD PharMingen). FLAG-tagged
-arrestins were
purified from SF9 cells 96 h post-infection. Briefly, SF9 cells
were harvested in lysis buffer (1 M HEPES, 10% Nonidet
P-40, 4 M NaCl, 50% glycerol, 0.4 M EDTA,
protease inhibitors), cell debris were pelleted, and the supernatant
was incubated with M2 affinity beads for 3-4 h at 4 °C. The beads were subsequently spun and washed three times with the lysis buffer. Purified proteins were eluted with 100 mM glycine (pH 3.5)
into vials containing 1 M Tris (pH 8).
-mercaptoethanol
by heating to 95 °C for 10 min. Proteins were resolved on 14% gels
and detected by immunoblot analysis.
-arrestin 1 carboxyl-terminal (319)
DNAs were prepared, and fusion proteins were purified as described
previously (4). GST fusion proteins on glutathione-Sepharose 4B were
incubated in 200 µl of binding buffer B (20 mM Tris, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 25 mM NaCl, 2 mM
EDTA, 0.2% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, pH 7.4) containing protease inhibitors for 4 h
at 4 °C with purified 6xHis-
-arrestin 1 or recombinant
myristoylated ARF6 protein in the absence or presence of either GDP
S
or GTP
S. The beads were spun and washed three times with binding
buffer followed by two washes with binding buffer without any
detergent. Beads were resuspended in 2× SDS sample buffer, incubated
at 95 °C for 10 min, resolved by electrophoresis on a 14% gel,
transferred onto nitrocellulose, and analyzed by Western blot or
stained with Coomassie Blue for GST-protein detection.
-Arrestins were
immunoprecipitated from the supernatant using an antibody specific for
-arrestins (A1CT) covalently cross-linked to Reactigel beads
(Pierce). Immunoprecipitated proteins were detected by immunoblot
analysis using a goat anti-ARNO amino-terminal antibody (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology) and the
-arrestin polyclonal antibody.
S-binding Assay--
[35S]GTP
S loading
assays were done as described previously (30). Briefly,
[35S]GTP
S binding to purified recombinant ARF6
(myristoylated and nonmyristoylated forms) was assayed in a total
volume of 50 µl using a rapid filtration procedure. ARF6 (0.36 µg),
[35S]GTP
S (4 µM: 1 × 106 cpm) without or with GST-ARNO (1 µg) and
-arrestin
1 (5 µg) were incubated for the indicated times at 37 °C. After
the reaction was stopped by the addition of 2 ml of wash buffer and
rapid filtration onto nitrocellulose, the amount of protein-bound
[35S]GTP
S was quantified. Data are reported as
mean ± S.E. of values from duplicate assays and expressed as the
amount of GTP
S specifically bound to ARF6.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2AR and examined receptor internalization
following isoproterenol stimulation. Expression of wild type ARF6 did
not significantly affect
2AR sequestration from the cell
surface at any time point, whereas overexpression of a mutant defective in GTP hydrolysis (ARF6Q67L) or in GTP binding (ARF6T27N) showed marked
inhibitory effects (Fig. 1a).
In contrast, expression of ARF1 or ARF1 mutants, ARF1T31N or ARF1Q71L,
had no effect on
2AR endocytosis (data not shown).
Presumably, this is because activated ARF1 is mainly found on
intracellular membranes, whereas activated ARF6 is mainly localized at
the plasma membrane.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effect of ARF6, ARF6Q67L, ARF6T27N, ARNO, and
GIT1 on internalization of the
2AR. a, HEK 293 cells
were transiently co-transfected with Flag-
2AR together
with empty vector, ARF6, ARF6Q67L, or ARF6T27N. Agonist-induced
internalization of epitope-tagged
2AR was measured
before and after treatment with isoproterenol (10 µM) for the indicated times. b, cells were
transiently co-transfected with Flag-
2AR together with
empty vector, ARF6, or ARF6Q67L. Agonist-induced internalization of
epitope-tagged
2AR was measured before and after 30 min
of isoproterenol treatment (10 µM). Agonist was removed
by washes and cell surface receptor number was quantified after 15, 30, and 60 min. Results were expressed as the percent of cell surface
immunofluorescence compared with nonstimulated cells. The data
represent the mean of 4-6 independent experiments done in duplicate
(**, p < 0.001). c, cells transiently
expressing Flag-
2AR together with either ARNO or GIT1
were stimulated with isoproterenol (10 µM) for the
indicated times. Results were expressed as the percent loss of cell
surface immunofluorescence compared with nonstimulated cells. The data
represent the mean of 4-8 independent experiments done in duplicate
(*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.001).
2AR,
expression of the ARF6Q67L mutant totally prevented reappearance of
internalized receptors at the cell surface, even after 60 min of
recovery when 95% of internalized receptors are normally recycled (Fig. 1b). These data suggest that ARF proteins, namely
ARF6, regulate internalization as well as recycling of the
2AR, two processes requiring plasma membrane vesicle trafficking.
2AR (6). Therefore, we
hypothesized that expression of an appropriate ARF guanine nucleotide
exchange factor would facilitate ARF6 activation, thereby leading to
increased receptor internalization. In HEK 293 cells, we transiently
expressed ARNO, an exchange factor for both ARF1 and ARF6 that is
localized to the plasma membrane (26, 31), and examined the
internalization profile of the
2AR. Increased cellular
levels of ARNO led to increased agonist-stimulated internalization of
receptors, whereas expression of GIT1 was inhibitory (Fig. 1c). These results suggest that expression of ARNO
facilitates receptor internalization by promoting ARF6 activation. In
contrast, GIT1 expression may reduce receptor internalization by
triggering immediate inactivation of ARF6. Our data on the contribution
of ARF regulatory proteins support the role of ARF6 in regulating agonist-promoted receptor endocytosis.
-arrestins have been shown to play
an important role in receptor internalization through their direct
interaction with clathrin and its adaptor protein, AP-2 (2, 3). We
hypothesized that
-arrestin, a protein recruited to
GRK-phosphorylated receptors, might also play a role in the regulation
of ARF6 function. Therefore, we examined whether ARF6 could interact
with
-arrestin 1 and
-arrestin 2. Cells expressing
HA-
2AR, Flag-
-arrestin 1, or Flag-
-arrestin 2 and ARF6 were left untreated or were stimulated with isoproterenol for 2, 5, and 10 min. Subsequently, Flag-
-arrestin proteins were immunoprecipitated, and associated ARF6 was detected by immunoblotting. Interestingly, the binding of ARF6 to
-arrestin 1 or
-arrestin 2 increased following receptor stimulation and could be detected readily
after 2 min of agonist stimulation (Fig.
2a). The interaction was found
to be maximal after 5 and 10 min of receptor activation. von Zastrow
and Kobilka (32) have reported that
2AR targeting to
clathrin-coated pits occurs after 2 min of agonist activation. Similarly,
-arrestin 2 can be found in complex with the
subunit of AP-2 following 2 min of
2AR stimulation (3).
Therefore, our data suggest that ARF6 activation following receptor
stimulation might regulate early events of the endocytic process. Using
similar experimental conditions, we were unable to co-immunoprecipitate ARF6 with the
2AR (data not shown) suggesting that
-arrestin is required to bridge this receptor to
ARF-dependent signaling pathways. Mitchell et
al. (33) have reported that in 1321N1 cells, ARF proteins can be
found in complex with several but not all Ca2+-mobilizing G
protein-coupled receptors, activation of which lead to phospholipase D
stimulation. Whether these interactions are direct or mediated via an
adaptor protein has not yet been examined.

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
-Arrestins interact with
ARF6. a, Flag-
-arrestin 1 and 2 were co-expressed in
HEK 293 cells together with HA-
2AR and ARF6. Using
Flag-affinity beads,
-arrestins were immunoprecipitated
(IP) after the indicated time of isoproterenol-stimulation
(10 µM). The presence of ARF6 in the immunoprecipitate
was detected (IB) using specific antibodies (J. Donaldson,
National Institutes of Health). Mock cells co-expressed the
HA-
2AR and ARF6. Amounts of immunoprecipitated
-arrestins were detected using a Flag-probe antibody (Santa Cruz).
b, purified recombinant Flag-
-arrestin 1 and 2 (2 µg)
were incubated with purified ARF6 (0.3 µg).
-Arrestin 1 and 2 were
immunoprecipitated with Flag-affinity beads and the associated ARF6
detected by immunoblotting. c, GST-
-arrestin
1-(319-418) was incubated with ARF6 in the absence and presence
of GDP
S or GTP
S (0.1 mM). GST-ARNO was captured using
glutathione-Sepharose 4B and pelleted, and associated ARF6 was detected
by immunoblotting. Data shown are representative of at least four
independent experiments. Similar results were obtained with
myristoylated ARF6.
To confirm that the interactions between
-arrestin and ARF6 were
direct, we used purified recombinant Flag-
-arrestin 1 and 2 together
with ARF6 and analyzed their ability to interact in vitro.
As illustrated in Fig. 2b, ARF6 can be co-immunoprecipitated with both
-arrestin 1 and
-arrestin 2. Mutagenesis studies of
-arrestin proteins have revealed that the binding sites for both clathrin and AP-2 are present in the carboxyl-terminal portion of the
protein (2-4). To determine whether the interaction between
-arrestin and ARF6 is also mediated via the carboxyl-terminal part
of
-arrestin , we used a GST fusion protein of the last 100 amino
acids of
-arrestin 1 (GST-
-arrestin 1-(319-418)) and examined
the interaction with ARF6. Pull-down assays revealed that a binding
site for ARF6 is present within this region of
-arrestin 1 (Fig.
2c). Interestingly, the interaction between GST-
-arrestin
1-(318-419) and ARF6 was found to be regulated by the nature of the
nucleotide bound to the small G protein, which is purified mainly in
its GDP-bound state. The addition of GDP
S did not alter the
interaction, whereas addition of GTP
S completely abolished the
binding of ARF6 to
-arrestin 1 (Fig. 2c). Taken together,
these results suggest that
-arrestin might act as a scaffold protein
bringing together the ARF protein in complex with receptors.
Furthermore, this interaction is regulated by both agonist activation
of the receptor and the nature of the nucleotide bound to ARF6. Once
bound to GTP, activated ARF6 dissociates from
-arrestin proteins and
is available to promote the endocytic process.
Next, we examined whether ARNO could also interact with
-arrestin
proteins. Cells overexpressing HA-
2AR, Flag-ARNO, and His-
-arrestin 1 or His-
-arrestin 2 were left untreated or
stimulated with isoproterenol for 5 min. Subsequently, ARNO was
immunoprecipitated, and associated
-arrestin 1 or
-arrestin 2 were detected by Western blotting. Fig.
3a shows that ARNO can be
co-immunoprecipitated with both
-arrestins. In this regard, it is
interesting that a recent study reported that ARNO can promote release
of a pool of membrane-associated
-arrestin involved in the
desensitization process of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin
receptor (34). In addition, ARNO and ARF6 could also be found in a
complex in cells expressing HA-
2AR, Flag-ARNO, and ARF6
(data not shown). Under these experimental conditions, the interactions
between ARNO and
-arrestin, as well as ARNO and ARF6, did not appear to be regulated by agonist stimulation of the receptor. Furthermore, using a GST fusion protein of ARNO and purified recombinant
Flag-
-arrestin 1 and 2, ARNO and
-arrestin proteins were found to
interact directly (Fig. 3b). These results demonstrate that
-arrestin can be found in complex with ARF6 as well as with its
nucleotide exchange factor, ARNO. However, the interaction between
-arrestin and ARNO does not require agonist activation of the
2AR. Furthermore, ARNO was found to interact
simultaneously with
-arrestin 1 and ARF6, suggesting that the
binding of
-arrestin 1 and ARF6 to ARNO is not mutually exclusive.
Indeed, increasing amounts of
-arrestin 1 did not prevent ARF6
binding to ARNO (data not shown).
|
To verify that these molecular interactions occur with endogenous
proteins,
-arrestins were immunoprecipitated from bovine brain
extracts with a
-arrestin-specific antibody covalently cross-linked
to beads, and associated proteins were detected by immunoblotting. ARNO
was found to be present in the
-arrestin immunoprecipitates but not
in the pre-immune serum immunoprecipitates (Fig. 3c).
However, under several experimental conditions, we were unable to
detect ARF6 in the endogenous
-arrestin immunoprecipitates (data not
shown). This is likely due to the agonist dependence of this
interaction, as illustrated above. These findings demonstrate a
specific interaction between ARNO and
-arrestin at endogenous levels
of proteins and confirm the results obtained from cellular co-immunoprecipitations and in vitro experiments.
It is well established that the binding of ARNO to ARF6 serves to
catalyze the exchange of GDP for GTP to activate the ARF protein. We
next wanted to determine whether
-arrestin simply acts as an adaptor
protein between activated receptors and the ARF6 complex or, rather,
plays a more direct role in the regulation of the ARF6 activation
process. To investigate the effect of
-arrestin on ARNO-mediated
GTP
S-binding to ARF6, we used recombinant
-arrestin 1, ARF6, and
ARNO in an in vitro GTP
S loading assay. The rate of
GTP
S binding to ARF6 was enhanced by increasing concentrations of
ARNO (data not shown). Further, the amount of GTP
S bound to ARF6 in
the presence of ARNO was significantly increased in a time-dependent fashion, consistent with its role as an ARF
nucleotide exchange factor (Fig. 4).
Using an amount of ARNO that leads to submaximal GTP loading, further
addition of
-arrestin 1 led to a marked potentiation of the rate of
activation of ARF6 stimulated by ARNO without affecting maximal loading
of GTP
S. Therefore, the effect of
-arrestin 1 was most
significant at early time points (5 and 10 min). In the absence of
ARNO,
-arrestin 1 did not have any effect on the amount of GTP
S
bound to ARF6. These data suggest that by interacting with both ARF6
and ARNO,
-arrestin 1 facilitates GTP loading of the ARF protein,
thereby leading to a potentiation of the activation of this small
GTP-binding protein.
|
Recent reports have demonstrated that ARF proteins are involved in
several intracellular trafficking processes. Here, we show that ARF6
regulates internalization of the
2AR, a prototypical G
protein-coupled receptor. Expression of the GTP hydrolysis-deficient mutant (ARF6Q67L) or the GTP binding-defective mutant (ARF6T27N) results in the inhibition of the internalization process.
Interestingly, expression of ARF6Q67L or ARF6T27N inhibits Fc
receptor-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages while stimulating
endocytosis at the apical surface of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells
(15, 16). Several reports have demonstrated that ARF6Q67L accumulates
at the plasma membrane where it induces invaginations, whereas ARF6T27N is distributed to an internal tubulovesicular compartment (17, 18, 35).
Although both ARF6 mutants affect internalization, they probably do so
by different mechanisms (15, 16). Similarly, we have shown that
expression of GIT1, an ARF GAP, also inhibits internalization of the
2AR. However, expression of ARNO, an ARF guanine
nucleotide exchange factor, is stimulatory. By overexpressing GIT1, we
might promote rapid and unregulated inactivation of ARF6, thereby
leading to inhibition of vesicle formation. In contrast, expression of
ARNO would result in further ARF6 activation and therefore promote
vesicle formation. At endogenous levels of proteins, both ARNO and GIT
probably contribute to the formation of endocytic vesicles by
regulating, in a coordinated fashion, the turnover of nucleotide on ARF proteins.
According to our findings,
-arrestin appears to serve as an
agonist-controlled scaffold bringing together the exchange factor, ARNO, and the GDP-bound form of ARF6, thereby promoting ARF6 activation in proximity to the receptor. The agonist dependence of the ARF6 interaction with
-arrestin brings this entire process under the control of the receptor. Once bound to GTP, active ARF6 proteins dissociate from
-arrestin and are now available to promote the endocytic process. The biochemical details involved in this process remain to be determined. However, the closely related ARF1 protein is
known to drive vesicle budding from donor membranes by promoting coat
protein assembly through the recruitment of AP-1 and coatomers (COPI,
COPII, and clathrin) (36, 37). Furthermore, ARF6 has been shown to
activate phospholipase D, thereby increasing the levels of phosphatidic
acid, and to activate phosphatidylinositol 4- and 5-kinase activity to
increase phosphatidylinositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate levels (8,
38). Interestingly,
-arrestin, GRK, ARNO, and GIT proteins all bind
to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and/or phosphatidylinositol
1,4,5-trisphosphate (39-42). Therefore, activation of ARF6 following
GPCR stimulation would presumably lead to the recruitment of vesicle
coat proteins (clathrin and AP-2), reorganization of the actin
cytoskeleton, and modification of the lipid content of the plasma
membrane, all of which promote receptor endocytosis. Subsequently,
inactivation of ARF6 by GTP hydrolysis, which is necessary for proper
trafficking, is achieved by ARF GAPs such as GIT1, which as previously
illustrated are recruited to the receptor through their interaction
with GRKs (5).
The results reported here add to the growing list of
-arrestin-regulated functions that link these molecules to
endocytosis. These include interaction with clathrin, AP-2,
N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein, and
Src (2, 3, 24, 43). Moreover, the ability of
-arrestin to spatially
localize ARF6, while facilitating its activation, is quite analogous to
the recently discovered functions of
-arrestin to localize and
facilitate the activation of several MAP kinases (29, 44).
Interestingly, other small GTP-binding proteins have also been shown to
regulate receptor internalization and recycling. Understanding how
these various protein-protein interactions are dynamically and
temporally integrated to regulate G protein-coupled receptor
endocytosis and recycling is an important goal for future studies.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. S. Laporte and K. Pierce for
helpful discussion and critical reading of this manuscript. We also
thank Drs. S. Laporte and M. Caron (Duke University Medical
Center) for pCDNA3-Flag-
-arrestin 2; Dr. J. Donaldson
(National Institutes of Health) for the polyclonal anti-ARF6 antibody.
We thank D. Addison, M. Holben, and J. Turnbough for excellent
secretarial assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Grant HL16037 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of a fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
An Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. To
whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 919-684-2974; Fax: 919-684-8875; E-mail: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 30, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108399200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
GPCR, G
protein-coupled receptor;
ARF, ADP-ribosylation factor;
hARF6, human
ADP-ribosylation factor 6;
2AR,
2-adrenergic receptor;
GAP, GTPase-activating protein;
ARNO, ARF nucleotide binding site opener;
GRK, G protein-coupled
receptor kinase;
AP-2, adaptor protein-2;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
COP, coat protein;
, GRK-interacting GTPase-activating
protein.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Lohse, M. J.,
Benovic, J. L.,
Codina, J.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1990)
Science
248,
1547-1550 |
| 2. | Goodman, O. B., Jr., Krupnick, J. G., Santini, F., Gurevich, V. V., Penn, R. B., Gagnon, A. W., Keen, J. H., and Benovic, J. L. (1996) Nature 383, 447-450[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Laporte, S. A.,
Oakley, R. H.,
Zhang, J.,
Holt, J. A.,
Ferguson, S. S.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Barak, L. S.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3712-3717 |
| 4. |
Laporte, S. A.,
Oakley, R. H.,
Holt, J. A.,
Barak, L. S.,
and Caron, M. G.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
23120-23126 |
| 5. |
Premont, R. T.,
Claing, A.,
Vitale, N.,
Freeman, J. L. R.,
Pitcher, J. A.,
Patton, W. A.,
Moss, J.,
Vaughan, M.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14082-14087 |
| 6. |
Claing, A.,
Perry, S. J.,
Achiriloaie, M.,
Walker, J. K.,
Albanesi, J. P.,
Lefkowitz, R. J.,
and Premont, R. T.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1119-1124 |
| 7. | Donaldson, J. G., and Klausner, R. D. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 527-532[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Chavrier, P., and Goud, B. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 466-475[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Schekman, R., and Orci, L. (1996) Science 271, 1526-1533[Abstract] |
| 10. | Rothman, J. E. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 185-194[Abstract] |
| 11. |
Ooi, C. E.,
Dell'Angelica, E. C.,
and Bonifacino, J. S.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
391-402 |
| 12. |
D'Souza-Schorey, C.,
Li, G.,
Colombo, M. I.,
and Stahl, P. D.
(1995)
Science
267,
1175-1178 |
| 13. |
Cavenagh, M. M.,
Whitney, J. A.,
Carroll, K.,
Zhang, C.,
Boman, A. L.,
Rosenwald, A. G.,
Mellman, I.,
and Kahn, R. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21767-21774 |
| 14. |
Galas, M. C.,
Helms, J. B.,
Vitale, N.,
Thierse, D.,
Aunis, D.,
and Bader, M. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2788-2793 |
| 15. |
Zhang, Q.,
Cox, D.,
Tseng, C. C.,
Donaldson, J. G.,
and Greenberg, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19977-19981 |
| 16. |
Altschuler, Y.,
Liu, S.,
Katz, L.,
Tang, K.,
Hardy, S.,
Brodsky, F.,
Apodaca, G.,
and Mostov, K.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
7-12 |
| 17. |
Radhakrishna, H.,
and Donaldson, J. G.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
49-61 |
| 18. |
D'Souza-Schorey, C.,
van Donselaar, E.,
Hsu, V. W.,
Yang, C.,
Stahl, P. D.,
and Peters, P. J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
603-616 |
| 19. |
Bose, A.,
Cherniack, A. D.,
Langille, S. E.,
Nicoloro, S. M.,
Buxton, J. M.,
Park, J. G.,
Chawla, A.,
and Czech, M. P.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
5262-5275 |
| 20. |
Lawrence, J. T.,
and Birnbaum, M. J.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
5276-5285 |
| 21. |
Radhakrishna, H.,
Klausner, R. D.,
and Donaldson, J. G.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
935-947 |
| 22. | Song, J., Khachikian, Z., Radhakrishna, H., and Donaldson, J. G. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 2257-2267[Abstract] |
| 23. |
Attramadal, H.,
Arriza, J. L.,
Aoki, C.,
Dawson, T. M.,
Codina, J.,
Kwatra, M. M.,
Snyder, S. H.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17882-17890 |
| 24. |
Miller, W. E.,
Maudsley, S.,
Ahn, S.,
Khan, K. D.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
11312-11319 |
| 25. | Chardin, P., Paris, S., Antonny, B., Robineau, S., Beraud-Dufour, S., Jackson, C. L., and Chabre, M. (1996) Nature 384, 481-484[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Hong, J. X.,
Haun, R. S.,
Tsai, S. C.,
Moss, J.,
and Vaughan, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9743-9745 |
| 27. |
Haun, R. S.,
Tsai, S. C.,
Adamik, R.,
Moss, J.,
and Vaughan, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
7064-7068 |
| 28. |
Barak, L. S.,
Tiberi, M.,
Freedman, N. J.,
Kwatra, M. M.,
Lefkowitz, R. J.,
and Caron, M. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2790-2795 |
| 29. |
McDonald, P. H.,
Chow, C. W.,
Miller, W. E.,
Laporte, S. A.,
Field, M. E.,
Lin, F. T.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(2000)
Science
290,
1574-1577 |
| 30. |
Someya, A.,
Sata, M.,
Takeda, K.,
Pacheco-Rodriguez, G.,
Ferrans, V. J.,
Moss, J.,
and Vaughan, M.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
2413-2418 |
| 31. |
Frank, S.,
Upender, S.,
Hansen, S. H.,
and Casanova, J. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23-27 |
| 32. |
von Zastrow, M.,
and Kobilka, B. K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
3530-3538 |
| 33. | Mitchell, R., McCulloch, D., Lutz, E., Johnson, M., MacKenzie, C., Fennell, M., Fink, G., Zhou, W., and Sealfon, S. C. (1998) Nature 392, 411-414[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Mukherjee, S.,
Gurevich, V. V.,
Jones, J. C.,
Casanova, J. E.,
Frank, S. R.,
Maizels, E. T.,
Bader, M. F.,
Kahn, R. A.,
Palczewski, K.,
Aktories, K.,
and Hunzicker-Dunn, M.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
5901-5906 |
| 35. |
Peters, P. J.,
Hsu, V. W.,
Ooi, C. E.,
Finazzi, D.,
Teal, S. B.,
Oorschot, V.,
Donaldson, J. G.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
1003-1017 |
| 36. |
Liang, J. O.,
Sung, T. C.,
Morris, A. J.,
Frohman, M. A.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
33001-33008 |
| 37. | Donaldson, J. G., and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (2000) Cell 101, 693-696[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Cukierman, E.,
Huber, I.,
Rotman, M.,
and Cassel, D.
(1995)
Science
270,
1999-2002 |
| 39. |
Vitale, N.,
Patton, W. A.,
Moss, J.,
Vaughan, M.,
Lefkowitz, R. J.,
and Premont, R. T.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
13901-13906 |
| 40. |
DebBurman, S. K.,
Ptasienski, J.,
Benovic, J. L.,
and Hosey, M. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22552-22562 |
| 41. | Gaidarov, I., Krupnick, J. G., Falck, J. R., Benovic, J. L., and Keen, J. H. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 871-881[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Macia, E., Paris, S., and Chabre, M. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 5893-5901[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. |
Luttrell, L. M.,
Ferguson, S. S.,
Daaka, Y.,
Miller, W. E.,
Maudsley, S.,
Della Rocca, G. J.,
Lin, F.,
Kawakatsu, H.,
Owada, K.,
Luttrell, D. K.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1999)
Science
283,
655-661 |
| 44. |
Luttrell, L. M.,
Roudabush, F. L.,
Choy, E. W.,
Miller, W. E.,
Field, M. E.,
Pierce, K. L.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
2449-2454 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. D. Nelson, J. J. Kovacs, K. N. Nobles, E. J. Whalen, and R. J. Lefkowitz {beta}-Arrestin Scaffolding of Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate 5-Kinase I{alpha} Promotes Agonist-stimulated Sequestration of the {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor J. Biol. Chem., July 25, 2008; 283(30): 21093 - 21101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Macia, M. Partisani, C. Favard, E. Mortier, P. Zimmermann, M.-F. Carlier, P. Gounon, F. Luton, and M. Franco The Pleckstrin Homology Domain of the Arf6-specific Exchange Factor EFA6 Localizes to the Plasma Membrane by Interacting with Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate and F-actin J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2008; 283(28): 19836 - 19844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pang, C. Yan, K. Natarajan, M. E. Cavet, M. P. Massett, G. Yin, and B. C. Berk GIT1 Mediates HDAC5 Activation by Angiotensin II in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2008; 28(5): 892 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Totaro, S. Paris, C. Asperti, and I. de Curtis Identification of an Intramolecular Interaction Important for the Regulation of GIT1 Functions Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2007; 18(12): 5124 - 5138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bouschet, S. Martin, V. Kanamarlapudi, S. Mundell, and J. M. Henley The calcium-sensing receptor changes cell shape via a beta-arrestin-1 ARNO ARF6 ELMO protein network J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2007; 120(15): 2489 - 2497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Grodnitzky, N. Syed, M. J. Kimber, T. A. Day, J. G. Donaldson, and W. H. Hsu Somatostatin Receptors Signal through EFA6A-ARF6 to Activate Phospholipase D in Clonal beta-Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2007; 282(18): 13410 - 13418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cotton, P.-L. Boulay, T. Houndolo, N. Vitale, J. A. Pitcher, and A. Claing Endogenous ARF6 Interacts with Rac1 upon Angiotensin II Stimulation to Regulate Membrane Ruffling and Cell Migration Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2007; 18(2): 501 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Drake, S. K. Shenoy, and R. J. Lefkowitz Trafficking of G Protein-Coupled Receptors Circ. Res., September 15, 2006; 99(6): 570 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hiroi, A. Someya, W. Thompson, J. Moss, and M. Vaughan GEP100/BRAG2: Activator of ADP-ribosylation factor 6 for regulation of cell adhesion and actin cytoskeleton via E-cadherin and {alpha}-catenin PNAS, July 11, 2006; 103(28): 10672 - 10677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shmuel, L. C. Santy, S. Frank, D. Avrahami, J. E. Casanova, and Y. Altschuler ARNO through Its Coiled-coil Domain Regulates Endocytosis at the Apical Surface of Polarized Epithelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 12, 2006; 281(19): 13300 - 13308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Klein, M. Franco, P. Chardin, and F. Luton Role of the Arf6 GDP/GTP Cycle and Arf6 GTPase-activating Proteins in Actin Remodeling and Intracellular Transport J. Biol. Chem., May 5, 2006; 281(18): 12352 - 12361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||