Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106044200 on September 11, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 45, 42534-42542, November 9, 2001
MSK1 and JNKs Mediate Phosphorylation of STAT3 in
UVA-irradiated Mouse Epidermal JB6 Cells*
Yiguo
Zhang,
Guangming
Liu, and
Zigang
Dong
From the Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota,
Austin, Minnesota 55912
Received for publication, June 28, 2001, and in revised form, September 6, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Phosphorylation of Tyr705 and
Ser727 of signal transducer and activator of transcription
3 (STAT3) are known to be required for maximal activation by diverse
stimuli. Tyr705 phosphorylation is generally accepted to be
mediated by the Janus kinase family. But the mechanism for STAT3
(Ser727) phosphorylation is not well understood. Here, we
provide evidence that UVA-induced phosphorylation of STAT3 at
Ser727 is inhibited by pretreatment of JB6 cells with
PD98059 or SB202190. Phosphorylation of STAT3 (Ser727) is
also markedly prevented by a dominant negative mutant of ERK2, c-Jun
N-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1), or p38 kinase and in knockout Jnk1
/
or Jnk2
/
cells. Furthermore, STAT3 (Ser727) phosphorylation is
suppressed by C- or N-terminal "kinase-dead" mutants of mitogen-
and stress-activated protein kinase 1 (MSK1), a downstream kinase of
ERKs and p38 kinase, and H89, a potential MSK1 inhibitor. In
vitro experiments showed that active MSK1 and JNKs, but not ERKs
or p38 kinase, phosphorylate STAT3 (Ser727). Additionally,
the role of MAPKs in mediating UVA-stimulated DNA binding activity of
STAT3 was investigated. Overall, these results suggest that UVA-induced
Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 may occur through MSK1 and JNKs.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)1 was identified as a
latent transcription factor that transduces signals to the nucleus and
activates expression of many genes in response to cytokines and growth
factors (1-4). STAT3 activation is generally accepted to occur by
cytokine-stimulated Tyr705 phosphorylation (3, 5, 6).
Tyr705 phosphorylation of STAT3 by Janus kinases, receptors
with an intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity (e.g. epidermal
growth factor receptor (EGFR)), or nonreceptor tyrosine kinases
(e.g. Src or Abl) (5-8) appeared to be all that was
required for its activation. However, other earlier studies showed that
cytokine-stimulated STAT3 signaling activation required a secondary
phosphorylation modification at the serine/threonine residues, possibly
by H7-sensitive kinase (9) or the extracellular signal-regulated
kinases (ERKs) (10). Later, a serine phosphorylation of STAT3, as well
as STAT1, 4 and 5, was found to be induced in a stimulus-related manner (4). Further, phosphorylation of STAT3 at Ser727, like
Tyr705, was shown to be essential for its full activation
(11-14). Additionally, STAT3 signaling activation by environmental
stresses, such as heat and osmotic shock, short wave UV light, free
radicals, or hypoxia, was also shown to involve induction of multiple
signaling pathways (15-17). These findings, therefore, indicate that
STAT3 may be a convergent point for integrating signals from multiple pathways (18). More interestingly, only Ser727
phosphorylation of STAT3 was observed to be stimulated by insulin, anisomycin, tumor necrosis factor-
, or arsenite and, to a weaker extent, by NaCl, okadaic acid, or lipopolysaccharide (16, 19, 20). In
contrast, Tyr705 phosphorylation was not detected in cells
with these treatments (16, 19, 20). These observations indicate that
Ser727 phosphorylation may play an important role in
mediating the activation of STAT3 independently of Tyr705
phosphorylation. Moreover, Ser727 lies within a potential
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) consensus motif of the
C-terminal domain (11, 12, 21). Ser727 phosphorylation is,
thereby, postulated to occur through activation of MAPKs, including
ERKs, c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs), and p38 kinase (4, 22). However,
identification of the kinases responsible for Ser727
phosphorylation has not been fully resolved (4, 23). Therefore, identifying the STAT3 (Ser727) kinases will provide a
clearer understanding of the mechanisms of STAT3 activation.
Activation of STAT3 signaling was shown to be involved in regulation of
diverse cell processes, including growth, differentiation, proliferation, transformation, as well as apoptosis (24-26).
Furthermore, STAT3 was confirmed to be an oncogene (27), and its
mediated signaling pathways were initiated by carcinogens (28-30).
Solar UV irradiation is believed to be one of the most important skin carcinogens (31, 32). The UV components of sunlight reaching the
surface of the earth are UVB (290-320 nm) and UVA (320-400 nm). UVC
(200-290 nm) is completely absorbed by the ozone layer of the
atmosphere of the earth (31) and, therefore, is unlikely to have major
pathophysiological effects. UVB is also partially absorbed by the ozone
layer, and efficient protection can be provided by using sunscreen (31,
32). UVA thus constitutes more than 90% of solar UV and is a major
contributor to carcinogenesis (31-33). To date, an array of signaling
pathways are known to be activated in UV-induced carcinogenesis (34,
35). Recently, STAT1 was reported to be activated through tyrosine
phosphorylation in response to UVA (36). However, whether STAT3
signaling in oncogenesis is stimulated by UVA is not clear. In the
UVB/UVC response, activation of STAT3 signaling was triggered by
phosphorylation at Ser727 but not at Tyr705
(16, 17, 23). Moreover, Ser727 phosphorylation was also
shown to be critical for constitutive or aberrant activation of STAT3
signaling in tumorigenesis (4, 28, 30, 37). To facilitate an
understanding of the role for the STAT3 signaling pathway in
UVA-induced skin carcinogenesis, the serine/threonine kinase pathways
through which Ser727 in STAT3 is phosphorylated in
UVA-irradiated epidermal JB6 cells were investigated. We provide
evidence that UVA-induced Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3
may occur through JNKs and mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase
1 (MSK1), a downstream kinase of both ERKs and p38 kinase.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and Stable Transfectants--
Mouse epidermal tumor
promotion sensitive JB6 Cl 41 cells were cultured in Eagle's minimum
essential medium (BioWhittaker, Inc., Walkersville, MD) containing 5%
fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, and
25 µg/ml gentamicin at 37 °C in humidified air with 5%
CO2. JB6 Cl 41 cell lines stably transfected with empty
CMV-neo vector (CMV-neo) or a dominant negative mutant (DNM) of ERK2,
JNK1, or p38 kinase were prepared and identified as described previously (38-43). Transfected JB6 Cl 41 cell lines stably expressing empty pCMV5-FLAG vector (CMVS), pCMV5-FLAG-wild-type MSK1 (MSK1-WT), pCMV5-FLAG-MSK1-A195/N-terminal kinase dead (MSK1-Nd), or
pCMV-FLAG-MSK1-A565/C-terminal kinase dead (MSK1-Cd) from Dr. D. R. Alessi (Medical Research Council Protein Phosphorylation
Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK)
(44) were established and identified according to the recommended
protocol of Life Technologies, Inc.
(www.lifetech.com/transfection/celltypes/).2
The above-mentioned stable transfectants were also grown in 5% FBS
with Eagle's minimum essential medium. Embryonic fibroblasts from
wild-type (Egfr+/+ or
Jnk+/+) and knockout
(Egfr
/
, Jnk1
/
, or
Jnk2
/
)3
mice were prepared and identified as previously reported (42, 43, 45).
The fibroblasts were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM
L-glutamine, 100 units/ml of penicillin, and 100 µg/ml of
streptomycin. To reduce a basal level of protein phosphorylation or
activity, the nontransfected and transfected JB6 Cl 41 cells were
starved for 24-48 h in 0.1% FBS with minimum essential medium, whereas the embryonic fibroblasts were in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium prior to treatments.
Analysis of Phosphorylated Proteins by Western
Blotting--
After starvation, experimental cells were or were not
pretreated for 1 h with AG1478, PD135035 (Calbiochem, Inc., San
Diego, CA), PD98059, SB202190, rapamycin (Sigma), or H89 (Alexis
Biochemicals, Inc., San Diego, CA) at the doses indicated in the
figures and then irradiated with UVA, UVB, or UVC as described
previously (42, 43, 46). Here, the nonirradiated cells in the UV box were used as negative controls. The treated cell lysates were harvested
in SDS sample buffer and resolved by 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
followed by Western blotting analysis with specific antibodies against
phospho-STAT3 (Ser727), phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705),
phospho-MSK1 (Ser376), STAT3 (Cell Signaling, Inc.,
Beverly, MA), or MSK1 (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY).
For a detailed description of the assay see Zhang et al.
(42, 43). Additionally, the intensity of the bands in some Western
blots was calculated using the Image-Quant Microsoft system or the
recommended system (www.totallab.com).
In Vitro Assay for STAT3 Phosphorylation by Protein
Kinases--
After starvation for 48 h in 0.1% FBS with minimum
essential medium, JB6 Cl 41 cells were disrupted in 300 µl of lysis
buffer A containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% (v/v) Triton
X-100, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM
-glycerol phosphate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
1 mM Na3VO4, 1 µg/ml leupeptin,
and 10 µg/ml aprotinin. The cell lysates were clarified by
centrifuging at 17,000 × g at 4 °C for 5 min, and
then equal amounts of protein were subjected to immunoprecipitation with a STAT3 antibody (42). The immune complex containing STAT3 proteins was incubated at 30 °C for 60 min with active ERK1, ERK2, JNK1, JNK2, p38 kinase, or MSK1 (Upstate Biotechnology) in kinase buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 5 mM ATP, and 0.01% Brij 35) (Cell
Signaling) after washing twice with lysis buffer A and twice with
kinase buffer. Subsequently, Ser727 phosphorylation of
STAT3 was detected by Western blot analysis as described previously
(42). Nonphosphorylated STAT3 was used as an internal control to verify
equal protein loading. To further evaluate STAT3 phosphorylation
catalyzed by MSK1, the immunoprecipitated STAT3 from nonirradiated JB6
cell lysates was incubated with active MSK1 or JNK1 at the indicated
doses in the above kinase buffer containing 1 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP. After quantifying by scintillation
counting, radioactive phosphate incorporated into immunoprecipitated
STAT3 was calculated (www.upstatebiotech.com). In
addition, to assess the specificity of the phospho-STAT3
(Ser727) antibody, UVA-irradiated cell lysates were
subjected to immunoprecipitation with a phospho-STAT3
(Ser727) antibody preincubated with a 5-fold concentration
of bovine serum albumin (BSA) or STAT3 blocking peptides containing
phospho-specific Ser727 (sc-8001P) or Tyr705
(sc-7993P), a C terminus with no Ser727 or
Tyr705 sites (sc-482P), or an internal domain (sc-483P) of
STAT3 p92 of mouse origin (Santa Cruz) for 1 h at room
temperature. Then phosphorylated STAT3 p92 was visualized using Western
blots with the phospho-STAT3 (Ser727) antibody.
MSK1 Activity Assay--
The immune complex MSK1 activity assay
with the Akt/SGK peptide as a substrate was employed according to the
recommended procedure of Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.
(www.upstatebiotech.com) (44). In brief, treated or
untreated cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with a
MSK1 antibody as reported (42). Then the immune complex containing MSK1
proteins was incubated with agitation for 15 min at 30 °C in a
mixture of the following: 20 µl of assay dilution buffer (20 mM MOPS, pH 7.2, 25 mM
-glycerol phosphate,
5 mM EGTA, 1 mM Na3VO4,
and 1 mM dithiothreitol), 10 µl of the Akt/SGK substrate
peptide in assay dilution buffer, and 10 µl of
[
-32P] ATP solution (1 µCi/µl, diluted in 75 mM MgCl2 and 500 µM unlabeled ATP). To stop the reaction, the samples were spotted onto a numbered P81 paper square and washed three times (5 min each) with 0.75% phosphoric acid and once (3 min) with acetone. Each sample paper was
transferred into a scintillation vial containing 5 ml of scintillation fluid and counted in a
-scintillation counter.
STAT3 DNA Binding Mobility Shift Assay--
Electrophoretic
mobility shift assays were used to detect STAT3 DNA binding activity
after exposure of the cells to UVA irradiation (16, 36). Briefly,
1 h after UVA irradiation, the cells were disrupted in 500 µl of
lysis buffer B (50 mM KCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 25 mM HEPES, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
10 µg/ml leupeptin, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, and 100 µM
dithiothreitol). After centrifugation at 17,000 × g
for 1 min, the nuclear pellets were washed with the same buffer without
Nonidet P-40 and then resuspended in 300 µl of extraction buffer (500 mM KCl and 10% glycerol with the same concentrations of
HEPES, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, leupeptin, aprotinin, and
dithiothreitol as the buffer B). After an additional centrifugation for
5 min, the supernatant fractions were harvested as nuclear protein
extracts and stored at
70 °C. The STAT3-binding oligonucleotide
(5'-GATCCTTCTGGGAATTCCTAGATC-3') probe from Santa Cruz Biotechnology
(Santa Cruz, CA) (66) was labeled with [
-32P]ATP using
the Klenow fragment (Life Science Co., Gaithersburg, MD). The nuclear
extract (3 µg) was added into the DNA binding buffer containing
5 × 104 cpm 32P-labeled probe, 1.5 µg
of poly(dI·dC), and 3 µg of BSA. The reaction mixture was incubated
on ice for 10 min followed by an additional incubation at room
temperature for 20 min. Then the DNA-protein complexes were resolved on
a 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel. For specific competition, the
nuclear extracts were preincubated for 20 min with 2 µg of unlabeled
cold probe or for 4 h with 0.2 µg of STAT3 antibody before
addition of the labeled STAT3-binding probe. After autoradiography, the
radioactivity was quantified using the Image Quant software (Molecular
Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
 |
RESULTS |
Induction of Ser727 Phosphorylation of STAT3 by UVA
Irradiation--
Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 was shown
to be required for its maximal activation by cytokine stimulation (11,
12, 14, 47). A recent report indicated that STAT1, which is highly
homologous to STAT3, was activated by UVA irradiation (36). But whether UVA stimulates STAT3 signaling through Ser727
phosphorylation is as yet unknown. This question was investigated here
by using Western blot analysis with a specific antibody to detect
phosphorylation of STAT3 at Ser727. After epidermal JB6 Cl
41 cells were exposed to UVA irradiation, Ser727
phosphorylation was induced in a dose-dependent (Fig.
1A) and time-dependent (Fig. 1B) manner. Induction of
Ser727 phosphorylation occurred 15 min after irradiation
with UVA at 160 kJ/m2 (Fig. 1B), increased to
maximal induction at 30 min (Fig. 1), and then gradually decreased to
basal level by 120 min, and a second peak of induction recurred at 360 min following irradiation (Fig. 1C). In contrast, a weaker
Tyr705 phosphorylation induced by UVA was also observed in
the same experiments (Fig. 1, A and B).
Tyr705 phosphorylation was induced at 5 min following UVA
irradiation and then decreased to basal level at 30 min after
irradiation (Fig. 1B). In addition, the phosphorylation at
Ser727 (Fig. 1A), but not at Tyr705
(Fig. 1A), was detected in JB6 cells irradiated with UVB or
UVC, consistent with previous reports (16, 17, 23, 48). These findings,
therefore, suggest that changes in Ser727 phosphorylation
of STAT3 may indirectly reflect regulation of STAT3 signaling.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Dose- and time-dependent
phosphorylation of STAT3 by UVA irradiation. JB6 Cl 41 cells were
harvested at 30 min (A) or the indicated times (B
and C) after irradiation with UVA, UVB, or UVC at the
indicated doses. UVB or UVC-irradiated samples were used as positive
controls, whereas nonirradiated samples were used as negative controls.
The cell lysates were resolved by 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and phosphorylation of STAT3 at Ser727 or
Tyr705, or nonphosphorylated levels of STAT3 were
determined by Western blot analysis with phospho-specific
Ser727, Tyr705, or nonphospho-STAT3 antibodies.
The data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
p, phosphorylated; np, nonphosphorylated;
Ctrl, control.
|
|
Requirement of EGFR for UVA-induced Ser727
Phosphorylation of STAT3--
EGFR-mediated activation of STAT3, but
not STAT1, has been shown to be an early event in carcinogenesis (30,
49-51). Furthermore, UVA, like UVB or UVC, was reported to initiate
several potential EGFR signaling pathways including
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Ras/MAPKs (30, 52, 53). However,
although Janus kinase-independent Tyr705 phosphorylation is
known to be mediated by EGFR, which has an intrinsic tyrosine kinase
activity (7), whether Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 by
serine/threonine kinases is EGFR-dependent is unclear. To
determine this, we used EGFR-deficient
(Egfr
/
) cells that were characterized and
identified in our laboratory3 and two EGFR-specific
tyrosine kinase inhibitors, AG1478 and PD153035 (52, 54, 55). Our data
demonstrated that a dose-dependent Ser727
phosphorylation stimulated by UVA irradiation was markedly prevented in
Egfr
/
cells compared with wild-type
Egfr+/+ control cells (Fig.
2A). Furthermore, UVA-induced
Ser727 phosphorylation was inhibited by pretreatment of JB6
cells with either AG1478 or PD153035 (Fig. 2B), but total
levels of STAT3 were unchanged in Egfr
/
cells or after pretreatment with EGFR inhibitors (Fig. 2). On the other
hand, the phosphorylation of STAT3 at Ser727 was not
totally blocked by deficiency of EGFR or inhibition of EGFR kinase
(Fig. 2). Therefore, these results indicate that
EGFR-dependent and -independent signaling may be involved
in Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 in response to UVA. In
addition, AG1478 and PD153035 had no marked effect on
Tyr705 phosphorylation levels (Fig. 1B), based
on the observation that the UVA-stimulated increase of
Tyr705 phosphorylation did not occur 30 min after
irradiation of JB6 cells (Fig. 1, A and B).
However, a weaker Tyr705 phosphorylation was induced in
UVA-irradiated Egfr+/+ cells, but no induction was observed
in corresponding control Egfr
/
cells (Fig.
2A), suggesting that EGFR may be required for
UVA-induced Tyr705 phosphorylation.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Prevention of UVA-induced STAT3
(Ser727) phosphorylation by EGFR deficiency and
EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibition. A,
Egfr+/+ and Egfr / cells were harvested at
30 min after irradiation with UVA at the indicated doses. B,
JB6 Cl 41 cells were pretreated for 1-1.5 h with AG1478 or PD153035 at
the indicated doses before UVA irradiation (160 kJ/m2), and
then the cells were harvested at 30 min after irradiation. Total and
phosphorylated STAT3 proteins were detected by Western blotting with
specific STAT3 or phospho-STAT3 (Ser727 or
Tyr705) antibodies. The data are representative of at least
three similar independent experiments. p, phosphorylated;
np, nonphosphorylated.
|
|
Involvement of MAPKs in UVA-induced Ser727
Phosphorylation of STAT3--
In the UVA response, activation of
Ras/ERKs cascades is triggered by EGFR-dependent signaling,
but JNKs and p38 kinase activation is
not.4 EGFR signaling to STAT3
and subsequent phosphorylation of STAT3 at Ser727 is
proposed to be mediated by MAPKs, based on the fact that
Ser727 is located in a conserved Pro-Met-Ser-Pro
motif of the transcriptional activation domain (11, 12). However, a
role of MAPKs in mediating STAT3 is not well elucidated. To assess the
role, we first treated JB6 cells with PD98059, an inhibitor of MEK1,
which is a kinase that leads to ERKs activation (56), or with SB202190,
a specific inhibitor of p38 kinase (57, 58). The results from these
experiments showed that UVA-induced Ser727 phosphorylation
of STAT3 was markedly suppressed by pretreatment with either PD98059
(Fig. 3A) or SB202190 (Fig.
3B), compared with treatment with UVA only. In addition,
induction of STAT3 (Ser727) phosphorylation after exposure
of JB6 cells to UVA irradiation was also partially impaired by
pretreatment with rapamycin, an inhibitor of mTOR (Fig. 3C),
which was used as an internal control. These observations suggest that
besides mTOR (59), Ser727 phosphorylation and maximal
activation of STAT3 may be mediated in vivo by ERKs or p38
kinase. However, LY294002 pretreatment had no effect on
Ser727 phosphorylation (Fig. 3D), indicating
that Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 occurred through
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-independent pathways.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Impairment of UVA-induced STAT3
(Ser727) phosphorylation by inhibitors of MEK1, p38 kinase
or mTOR kinase. JB6 Cl 41 cells were pretreated for 1 h with
PD98059 (A), SB202190 (B), rapamycin
(C), or LY294002 (D) at the indicated doses prior
to UVA irradiation (160 kJ/m2). 30 min after irradiation,
the cells were harvested, and then the cell lysates were subjected to
Western blot analysis for total and phosphorylated STAT3
(Ser727). The results are representative of at least three
independent experiments. p, phosphorylated; np,
nonphosphorylated.
|
|
To further determine the effect of MAPKs on Ser727
phosphorylation of STAT3, we prepared and identified JB6 cell lines
stably expressing a DNM of ERK2, JNK1, or p38 kinase as previously
reported (38-41). UVA-induced phosphorylation of ERKs, JNKs, and p38
kinase was shown to be blocked specifically by DNM-ERK2, DNM-JNK1, and DNM-p38 kinase, respectively (42, 43). Here, the experiments showed
that stimulation of Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 with
UVA was, to different degrees, prevented by expression of DNM-ERK2
(Fig. 4A), DNM-p38 kinase (Fig. 4B), or DNM-JNK1 (Fig. 4C), compared with
control JB6 cells expressing the empty CMV-neo vector (CMV-neo).
Moreover, further experiments using JNK1-deficient
(Jnk1
/
) or JNK2-deficient
(Jnk2
/
) cells (42, 43) revealed that loss of
JNK1 significantly attenuated UVA-induced Ser727
phosphorylation and the phosphorylation was also partially blocked by
JNK2 deficiency (Fig. 4D). In addition, total protein and
Tyr705 phosphorylation levels of STAT3 were unaffected in
the same experiments (Fig. 4). These data suggest that ERKs, JNKs, and
p38 kinase may be involved in the regulation of Ser727
phosphorylation of STAT3 in UVA-irradiated JB6 cells.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Prevention of UVA-stimulated STAT3
(Ser727) phosphorylation by genetic disruption of
MAPKs. JB6 Cl 41 cell lines stably expressing DNM-ERK2
(A), DNM-p38 kinase (B), DNM-JNK1 (C),
or CMV-neo (as an internal control) were harvested at 30 min following
irradiation with UVA at the indicated doses. Wild-type
(Jnk+/+) and knockout
(Jnk1 / or Jnk2 / )
cells (D) were treated with UVA (80 kJ/m2) and
then harvested at 15 or 30 min after irradiation. Total and
phosphorylated STAT3 proteins were determined by Western blotting with
specific phospho-STAT3 (Ser727 or Tyr705) or
nonphospho-STAT3 antibodies. The data represent one of three
independent similar experiments. p, phosphorylated;
np, nonphosphorylated.
|
|
STAT3 protein was immunoprecipitated from 24-h starved JB6 cells and
used as a substrate of kinases for in vitro experiments. The
kinase reactions showed that JNK1 and JNK2 (Fig.
5B), but not ERK1, ERK2, or
p38 kinase (Fig. 5A), phosphorylated Ser727 of
the STAT3 protein. Additionally, the purified JNK1, JNK2, ERK1, ERK2,
and p38 kinase were confirmed to be active as previously reported (Ref.
43 and data not shown). Overall, these in vivo and in
vitro results indicate that after exposure of JB6 cells to UVA
irradiation, JNKs may directly mediate Ser727
phosphorylation of STAT3, whereas ERKs and p38 kinase appear to
regulate the process indirectly through a serine/threonine kinase.
Additionally, a phospho-STAT3 (Ser727) antibody was
preincubated with BSA or STAT3 blocking peptides and subjected to
immunoprecipitation to examine specificity of the antibody. The results
in Fig. 5C showed that Ser727 phosphorylation of
STAT3 immunoprecipitated from UVA-irradiated JB6 cell lysates was
suppressed by preincubation with a Ser727 phospho-specific
blocking peptide (sc-8001P) but not by a Tyr705
phospho-specific peptide (sc-7993P), a C terminus with no
Ser727 or Tyr705 residues (sc-482P), an
internal domain (SC-483P) of STAT3 p92 of mouse origin or by BSA. These
data suggest that the phospho-STAT3 (Ser727) antibody
specifically recognizes phosphorylated STAT3 (Ser727).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Induction of STAT3 phosphorylation at
Ser727 by protein kinases in vitro.
The immunoprecipitated STAT3 proteins from 24-h starved JB6 Cl 41 cell
lysates were incubated for 60 min at 30 °C in kinase buffer with
active purified ERK1, ERK2, or p38 kinase (A) or JNK1, JNK2,
or MSK1 (B) at the described doses. Total and phosphorylated
(Ser727) STAT3 proteins were detected by Western blot
analysis as described for Fig. 4. C, JB6 cells were or were
not irradiated with UVA (160 kJ/m2), and the cell lysates
were subjected to immunoprecipitation with a phospho-STAT3
(Ser727) antibody preincubated with a 5-fold concentration
of BSA or STAT3 blocking peptides, and subsequent determination of
STAT3 phosphorylation was performed as described under "Materials and
Methods." D, immunoprecipitated (IP) STAT3 from
nonirradiated JB6 cells was incubated with active MSK1 or JNK1 at the
indicated doses in kinase buffer containing [ -32P]ATP.
Then radioactive phosphate incorporated into immunoprecipitated STAT3
was calculated after counting in a -scintillation counter.
The results are representative of at least three independent
experiments. p, phosphorylated; np,
nonphosphorylated; IP, immunoprecipitated; mU,
milliunits; Ctrl, control.
|
|
MSK1 Phosphorylation of STAT3 at Ser727 Both in Vivo
and in Vitro--
To determine an ERK- or p38
kinase-dependent serine/threonine kinase for
Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3, we employed additional
in vitro kinase experiments using active MSK1 (44). The
results demonstrated that immunoprecipitated STAT3 proteins were
phosphorylated at Ser727 by active MSK1 in vitro
(Fig. 5B). To further evaluate STAT3 phosphorylation by MSK1
in vitro, we determined catalytic kinetics of MSK1 and JNK1
in kinase assays by using [
-32P]ATP and
immunoprecipitated STAT3 protein. The results in Fig. 5D
showed that MSK1 was more effective than JNK1 for catalysis of STAT3
phosphorylation. To examine the role of MSK1 in UVA-induced Ser727 phosphorylation, we prepared JB6 cell lines stably
expressing an N-terminal or C-terminal "kinase-dead" mutant (Nd or
Cd) of MSK1, as well as wild-type MSK1 (MSK1-WT) (44). As expected, the
UVA-stimulated increase in MSK1 activity was significantly inhibited by
overexpression of MSK1-Cd or -Nd (p < 0.01, Fig. 6A) compared with MSK1-WT or
empty vector CMVS. Furthermore, MSK1-Cd or -Nd markedly prevented
UVA-induced Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 (Fig.
6B). Additionally, a dose-dependent inhibition
of UVA-stimulated Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 (Fig.
6C) was observed following pretreatment of JB6 cells with
H89, a potential MSK1 inhibitor (60, 61).2 These data
suggest that the Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 may be
mediated by MSK1 in UVA-irradiated JB6 cells.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Reduction of UVA-induced STAT3
(Ser727) phosphorylation by inhibition of MSK1. After
stable introduction of CMVS, MSK1-WT, MSK1-Cd, or MSK1-Nd (A
and B), these transfected JB6 Cl 41 cells were harvested at
30 min following irradiation with UVA (160 kJ/m2).
Nontransfected JB6 Cl 41 cells (C) were irradiated after
pretreatment with H89 at the indicated doses. A, MSK1
activity in immunoprecipitated complexes was assayed as previously
reported (44, 60). After subtraction of background, UVA-induced MSK1
activity was normalized to nonirradiated negative control values and is
represented as a fold change. Each column or bar
indicates the mean and standard deviation from three independent
experiments performed in duplicate. UVA-induced MSK1 activity was
significantly inhibited (*, p < 0.01) in MSK1-Cd or
-Nd cells when compared with CMVS or MSK1-WT control cells using
Student's t test. B and C, total and
phosphorylated STAT3 (Ser727) proteins were detected by
Western blot analysis as described for Fig. 4. The data are
representative of at least three independent experiments. p,
phosphorylated; np, nonphosphorylated.
|
|
MSK1 phosphorylation was shown to reflect its activity indirectly (44,
60). A recent report showed that Ser376 located in the
hydrophobic motif of the MSK1 linker region is a critical site for MSK1
activity (62). Here, Ser376 phosphorylation of MSK1 was
analyzed by Western blot analysis with a phospho-specific antibody to
MSK1 (Ser376). The data demonstrated that UVA-stimulated
enhancement of Ser376 phosphorylation of MSK1 was
completely blocked by pretreament with PD98059 (Fig.
7A) and partially inhibited by
SB202190 (Fig. 7B) compared with treatment with UVA only.
Furthermore, similar inhibitory effects on Ser376
phosphorylation of MSK1 were observed in DNM-ERK2 (Fig. 7C)
and DNM-p38 (Fig. 7D) cells. These data indicate that
Ser376 phosphorylation of MSK1 occurs through ERKs and p38
kinase in the UVA response. Together, our results suggest that ERKs and p38 kinase may mediate Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3
indirectly through MSK1. In addition, DNM-JNK1 and
Jnk1
/
and Jnk2
/
cells also had inhibitory effects on MSK1 (Ser376)
phosphorylation compared with corresponding control cells (data not
shown). These data suggest that JNKs may be a potent upstream kinase of
MSK1, but the suggestion remains to be investigated further.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Inhibition of MSK1 activation and
phosphorylation by blocking ERKs or p38 kinase. Before UVA
irradiation (160 kJ/m2), JB6 Cl 41 cells were or were not
pretreated with PD98059 (A) or SB202190 (B) at
the indicated doses. Stable transfectants, DNM-ERK2 (C),
DNM-p38 kinase (D), and CMV-neo (as an internal control)
were irradiated with 80 or 160 kJ/m2 of UVA. 30 min after
irradiation the cells were harvested, and then total and phosphorylated
MSK1 proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with nonphospho- or
phospho-MSK1 (Ser376) antibodies. The results are
representative of at least three independent experiments. p,
phosphorylated; np, nonphosphorylated.
|
|
Involvement of MAPK Cascades in Mediating UVA-stimulated DNA
Binding Activity of STAT3--
Induction of STAT1 DNA binding activity
by UVA was reported by Maziere et al. (36). Here, to
characterize UVA-induced STAT3 DNA binding activity, nuclear extracts
from UVA-irradiated JB6 cells expressing MSK1-WT or CMVS were subjected
to electrophoretic mobility shift assay with a STAT3-specific high
affinity consensus-binding site oligonucleotide probe (66). A marked
stimulation of STAT3 DNA binding activity was observed 1 h after
UVA irradiation (Fig. 8A),
compared with that in sham-irradiated controls. Competition analysis
showed that STAT3 binding to the labeled oligonucleotide was completely
blocked by preincubation with an excess of unlabeled probe (Fig.
8A). Furthermore, prior incubation of UVA-treated nuclear
extracts with a STAT3 antibody induced a weaker supershift but markedly
inhibited the binding complex (Fig. 8A) compared with
internal controls using normal serum. These data indicate that DNA
binding activity of STAT3 is stimulated after irradiation of JB6 cells
with UVA.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Reduction of UVA-stimulated STAT3 DNA binding
activity by mutants of MAPKs or MSK1. The experimental cells were
harvested 1 h after UVA irradiation. A, the nuclear
protein extracts from UVA-irradiated or nonirradiated JB6 Cl 41 CMVS or
MSK1-WT cells were or were not preincubated with unlabeled STAT3 probe,
STAT3 antibody, or normal serum followed by incubation with labeled
probe for STAT3. Furthermore, JB6 Cl 41 cells expressing CMVS, MSK1-WT,
MSK1-Cd, or MSK1-Nd (B) or CMV-neo, DNM-ERK2, DNM-JNK1, or
DNM-p38 kinase (C) were or were not irradiated with UVA.
Then the nuclear proteins were extracted and subjected to
electrophoretic mobility shift assay as described under "Materials
and Methods." The data are representative of at least three
independent experiments.
|
|
The effect of Ser727 phosphorylation on DNA binding
activity of STAT3 is controversial (4). A study showed that blocking
Ser727 phosphorylation by mutation of STAT3
Ser727 with Ala727 abolished its
transcriptional activity but had no effect on DNA binding activity of
STAT3 (79). However, the possibility exists that regulation of the
Ser727 phosphorylation is involved in this process. For
example, Chung et al. (69) showed that the
Ser727 phosphorylation negatively regulated DNA binding
activity of STAT3. Conversely, the phosphorylation of
Ser727, besides Tyr705, was confirmed to
contribute to maximal activation of STAT3 (11, 63). Additional studies
also showed that Ser727 phosphorylation corresponded to an
increased DNA binding activity of STAT3 (12, 64, 65, 78). To determine
the role of MAPK cascades for Ser727 phosphorylation in
regulating STAT3 DNA binding activity, we analyzed the UVA-induced
binding complex in JB6 cell lines expressing MSK1-Cd or -Nd, DNM-ERK2,
DNM-JNK1, or DNM-p38 kinase. The results demonstrated that
UVA-stimulated enhancement of STAT3 DNA binding activity was
significantly abrogated by MSK1 kinase-dead mutants (Fig.
8B). Furthermore, the enhancement was also markedly
suppressed in DNM-ERK2, DNM-JNK1, or DNM-p38 kinase cells (Fig.
8C) compared with that observed in control cells. Together
with previous reports (12, 64, 65, 78), our data suggest that
UVA-induced Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 may be mediated
by ERK- and p38 kinase-dependent MSK1, as well as JNKs, and
may be involved in functional regulation of the DNA binding activity of
STAT3, but whether serine/threonine sites other than Ser727
are involved in this process is not known.
 |
DISCUSSION |
STAT3 is confirmed to be an oncogene that plays a key signaling
role in neoplastic transformation (27). Activation of STAT3 signaling
has been increasingly associated with malignant progression (28).
Furthermore, STAT3 activation requires phosphorylation of both
Tyr705 and Ser727 in response to stimulation by
cytokines and growth factors (4, 11, 63). But, in the UVC or UVB
response, only Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 was detected
(16; 23). Induction of a strong Ser727 phosphorylation
during UVA irradiation was observed here, but Tyr705
phosphorylation was weaker. These findings suggest that
Ser727 phosphorylation may result in STAT3 signaling
activation independently of Tyr705 phosphorylation in
response to some environmental stimuli such as UV stress and thus
contribute to UV-induced oncogenesis. This assertion is supported
directly from the observation that a dominant negative STAT3 mutant
with a change of Ser727 to Ala727 blocks
phosphorylation and inhibits STAT3 signaling activation and Src
transformation (27, 28, 67). Therefore, elucidating the signal
transduction pathways leading to Ser727 phosphorylation of
STAT3 will help in understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in
activation of STAT3 during UVA-induced carcinogenesis. In addition,
this knowledge may lead to the development of novel preventive and
therapeutic approaches to intervene in the process. However, the
identity of the kinases that are responsible for catalyzing
Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 has been elusive (23, 68).
In contrast, Tyr705 phosphorylation of STAT3 is a well
characterized event known to be mediated by Janus kinase family kinases
and receptor or nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (3, 5-7). In this report,
evidence is provided showing that UVA-stimulated Ser727
phosphorylation of STAT3 and its DNA binding activity may be mediated
by ERK- and p38 kinase-dependent MSK1, as well as JNKs. The
UVA-induced Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 was initiated
by EGFR-dependent and -independent signaling pathways.
Additionally, a model of the possible signal transduction pathways
involved in Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 is presented in
Fig. 9.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
A hypothetical model for induction of STAT3
(Ser727) phosphorylation by UVA irradiation. The
arrows indicate activation. The question marks
indicate the unknown. In addition, phosphorylation at other
serine/threonine sites possibly by activation of MAPKs cascades or
other signaling pathways remains to be determined.
|
|
Because the site of Ser727 phosphorylation,
-Pro-Met-Ser-Pro-, present in both STAT1 and STAT3 agrees with the MAPK
action consensus sequence, -Pro-Xaa-(Ser/Thr)-Pro- (22), MAPK family
members, including ERKs, JNKs, and p38 kinase, are hypothesized to
mediate Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 and regulate its
activity in vivo. As expected, in 3T3 cell lysates
stimulated with fetal calf serum or epidermal growth factor, a
C-terminal peptide of STAT3 was reported to be phosphorylated at
Ser727 by immune complexes of ERK1 but not p38 kinase or
JNK1 (69). Unexpectedly, the homologous C-terminal peptide of STAT1 was
a relatively poor substrate for all MAPKs tested both in
vitro and in vivo (69). However, our in
vitro kinase experiments showed that the Ser727
phosphorylation in intact STAT3 immunoprecipitated from quiescent JB6
cell lysates was induced by purified active JNKs but not by ERKs or p38
kinase. This finding agrees with the assumption of Lim and Cao (16)
that was drawn from experiments using glutathione S-transferase-STAT3 fusion protein, containing an almost
full-length STAT3. The discrepancies of these reactions may be related
to their docking interactions contributing to regulation of the
specificity and efficiency of the enzymatic reactions with substrates
(70, 71). In fact, the specificity of STAT signaling dependent on the
SH2 and C-terminal domains was recently confirmed by the experimental evidence of Kovarik et al. (23). Additionally, the
occurrences of these reactions may also vary with the molecular
conformations in different cell contexts. For example, STAT3 has
recently been shown to form stable homodimers independently of
Tyr705 phosphorylation (72), although STAT3 was thought to
exist as monomers in the cytoplasm prior to its activation. Therefore, JNKs may play a direct role in regulation of Ser727
phosphorylation of STAT3, whereas the regulation by ERKs and p38 kinase
may be mediated indirectly through a serine/threonine kinase
(e.g. MSK1).
In fact, studies of STAT1 showed that activation of the p38 kinase
pathway was essential for Ser727 phosphorylation and
subsequent activation of STAT1 and indicated an indirect role for p38
kinase in this process (17, 23, 68, 73). Although most studies on STAT3
Ser727 phosphorylation revealed that regulation occurred
through activation of ERK-dependent and -independent
pathways (65, 69, 74), evidence was not provided as to whether ERKs is
a direct Ser727 kinase of STAT3. Here, however, we provide
evidence that prevention of JNKs activation by DNM-JNK1 and Jnk1 or
Jnk2 deficiency resulted in inhibition of Ser727
phosphorylation of STAT3 and its DNA binding activity and that Ser727 phosphorylation was induced by active JNKs in
vitro, consistent with previous results (16, 75). Thus, JNKs may
be a candidate for the direct STAT3 Ser727 kinase.
More interestingly, evidence was provided in this report that blocking
MSK1 activation by H89, a potential MSK1 inhibitor (60),2
or a N-terminal or C-terminal kinase-dead mutant of MSK1
(44)2 resulted in inhibition of UVA-stimulated STAT3
Ser727 phosphorylation and its DNA binding activity,
indicating that MSK1 may play a role in the process. Furthermore,
activation of ERKs and p38 kinase pathways were required for induction
of Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 during stimulation with
UVA. This was supported by the findings that inhibition of
UVA-activated ERKs by PD98059 and DNM-ERK2 and of p38 kinase by
SB202190 and DNM-p38 blocked MSK1 phosphorylation and subsequently
suppressed STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation and its DNA binding
activity. Moreover, purified active MSK1 can induce phosphorylation at
Ser727 in vitro. At the same time, however, the
in vitro induction of the Ser727 phosphorylation
by active ERK1, ERK2, or p38 kinase was undetectable. Taken together,
these findings suggest that the regulation by ERKs and p38 kinase of
UVA-induced STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation and its DNA
binding activity may be mediated through MSK1, a direct downstream
serine/threonine kinase dependent on both ERKs and p38 kinase.
Therefore, MSK1 is likely to be considered as a potential STAT3
Ser727 kinase.
However, the possibility of phosphorylation at other serine/threonine
sites cannot be ruled out, because mutation of STAT3 Ser727
with Ala727 blocked phosphorylation and transcriptional
activity of STAT3 but did not produce any effect on its DNA binding
activity (4, 11). In addition, a relative weaker induction of serine
phosphorylation of STAT3 by p38 kinase was shown with radioactive
labeled phosphate (75) but was not detected with specific phospho-STAT3
Ser727 antibody in our experiments or in those of Lim and
Cao (16). Therefore, the action of MSK1 on STAT3 phosphorylation was
postulated to require a prior phosphorylation at other serine/threonine
sites that induce a change in its conformation. In fact, a recent study suggests that phosphorylation at other serine/threonine sites may occur
by activation of the p38 kinase pathway and play a role in p38 kinase
regulation of STAT3 signaling activation (76), because the p38 kinase
pathway is required for interferon
-dependent activation
of STATs but not for their Ser727 phosphorylation.
In summary, following integrating signals from multiple signaling
pathways (including MAPKs and others) induced concurrently by UV
stimulation, STAT3 was phosphorylated at Ser727 and/or
other serine/threonine sites, and subsequently STAT3-mediated signaling
pathways were activated to regulate expression of target genes. In the
UVA response, Ser727 phosphorylation of STAT3 is mediated
by JNKs and MSK1, which is dependent upon ERKs and p38 kinase both
in vivo and in vitro. The phosphorylation of
STAT3 at Ser727 and possibly other serine/threonine sites
by MAPKs cascades may play a role in regulating STAT3 DNA binding
activity and transcriptional activity as a consequence of integrating
multiple signals. In addition, the Ser727 and
non-Ser727 phosphorylation events may also require
H7-sensitive kinase (9, 65), protein kinase C
d (77), mTOR kinase
(59), or other kinase pathways (37, 78), and thus a goal of our future
studies will be to provide a mechanistic explanation for our findings.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Dario R. Alessi for providing
the pCMV5-FLAG vector (CMVS), pCMV5-FLAG-wild-type MSK1 (MSK1-WT),
pCMV5-FLAG-MSK1-A195/N-terminal kinase dead (MSK1-Nd), and
pCMV-FLAG-MSK1-A565/C-terminal kinase dead (MSK1-Cd). Help by Drs.
Shuping Zhong, Wei-Ya Ma, Nanyue Chen, Qing-Bai She, and Masaaki Nomura
on some details of the experimental methods is gratefully acknowledged.
We thank Dr. Ann M. Bode for scientific discussion and editorial
advice. Andria Hansen is thanked for secretarial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Hormel Foundation, by
National Institutes of Health Grants CA77646, CA81064, and CA74916, and by the Eagle's Telethon Cancer Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Hormel Inst.,
University of Minnesota, 801 16th Avenue NE, Austin, MN
55912. Fax: 507-437-9606; E-mail: zgdong@smig.net.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106044200
2
S. Zhong and Z. Dong, unpublished data.
3
N. Chen and Z. Dong, manuscript in preparation.
4
Y. Zhang and Z. Dong, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
STAT3, signal
transducer and activator of transcription 3;
MSK1, mitogen- and
stress-activated protein kinase 1;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein
kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
JNK, c-Jun
N-terminal kinase;
UVA, UVB, or UVC, UV light A, B, or C;
EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
DNM, dominant negative mutant;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1997)
Science
277,
1630-1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Hirano, T.,
Ishihara, K.,
and Hibi, M.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2548-2556[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Schindler, C.,
and Strehlow, I.
(2000)
Adv. Pharmacol.
47,
113-117
|
| 4.
|
Decker, T.,
and Kovarik, P.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2628-2637[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Reddy, E. P.,
Korapati, A.,
Chaturvedi, P.,
and Rane, S.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2532-2547[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Danial, N. N.,
and Rothman, P.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2523-2531[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Ihle, J. N.
(1996)
Cell
84,
331-334[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Zhang, T.,
Kee, W. H.,
Seow, K. T.,
Fung, W.,
and Cao, X.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
7132-7139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Boulton, T. G.,
Zhong, Z.,
Wen, Z.,
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
Stahl, N.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
6915-6919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
David, M.,
Petricoin, E., III,
Benjamin, C.,
Pine, R.,
Weber, M. J.,
and Larner, A. C.
(1995)
Science
269,
1721-1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Wen, Z.,
Zhong, Z.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1995)
Cell
82,
241-250[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Zhang, X.,
Blenis, J.,
Li, H. C.,
Schindler, C.,
and Chen-Kiang, S.
(1995)
Science
267,
1990-1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Zhu, X.,
Wen, Z.,
Xu, L. Z.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6618-6623[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Zhang, J. J.,
Zhao, Y.,
Chait, B. T.,
Lathem, W. W.,
Ritzi, M.,
Knippers, R.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
6963-6971[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Gatsios, P.,
Terstegen, L.,
Schliess, F.,
Häussinger, D.,
Kerr, I. M.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Graeve, L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22962-22968[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Lim, C. P.,
and Cao, X.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31055-31061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Kovarik, P.,
Stoiber, D.,
Eyers, P. A.,
Menghini, R.,
Neininger, A.,
Gaestel, M.,
Cohen, P.,
and Decker, T.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
13956-13961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Janknecht, R.,
and Hunter, T.
(1999)
Science
284,
443-444[Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Ceresa, B. P.,
and Pessin, J. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12121-12124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Ceresa, B. P.,
Horvath, C. M.,
and Pessin, J. E.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
4131-4137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Marshall, C. J.
(1995)
Cell
80,
179-185[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Schaeffer, H. J.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2435-2444[Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Kovarik, P.,
Mangold, M.,
Ramsauer, K.,
Heidari, H.,
Steinborn, R.,
Zotter, A.,
Levy, D. E.,
Müller, M.,
and Decker, T.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
91-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Nosaka, T.,
Kawashima, T.,
Misawa, K.,
Ikuta, K.,
Mui, A. L.,
and Kitamura, T.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
4754-4765[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Williams, J. G.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev.
10,
503-507[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Bromberg, J.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2468-2473[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Bromberg, J. F.,
Wrzeszczynska, M. H.,
Devgan, G.,
Zhao, Y.,
Pestell, R. G.,
Albanese, C.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1999)
Cell
98,
295-203[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Bowman, T.,
Garcia, R.,
Turkson, J.,
and Jove, R.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2474-2488[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Frank, D. A.
(1999)
Mol. Med.
5,
432-456[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Song, J. I.,
and Grandis, J. R.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2489-2495[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Griffiths, H. R.,
Mistry, P.,
Herbert, K. E.,
and Lunec, J.
(1998)
Crit. Rev. Clinic. Lab. Sci.
35,
189-237
|
| 32.
|
Woodhead, A. D.,
Setlow, R. B.,
and Tanaka, M.
(1999)
J. Epidemiol.
9,
S102-114[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Moan, J.,
Dahlback, A.,
and Setlow, R. B.
(1999)
Photochem. Photobiol.
70,
243-147[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Bender, K.,
Blattner, C.,
Knebel, A.,
Iordanov, M.,
Herrlich, P.,
and Rahmsdorf, H. J.
(1997)
J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol.
37,
1-17[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Bender, K.,
Gottlicher, M.,
Whiteside, S.,
Rahmsdorf, H. J.,
and Herrlich, P.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5170-5181[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Maziere, C.,
Dantin, F.,
Dubois, F.,
Santus, R.,
and Maziere, J.
(2000)
Free Rad. Biol. Med.
28,
1430-1437[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Schuringa, J. J.,
Jonk, L. J.,
Dokter, W. H.,
Vellenga, E.,
and Kruijer, W.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
347,
89-96
|
| 38.
|
Huang, C.,
Ma, W.-Y.,
and Dong, Z.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6427-6435[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Huang, C.,
Ma, W.-Y.,
Li, J.,
Goranson, A.,
and Dong, Z.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14595-14601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Huang, C.,
Ma, W.-Y.,
Maxiner, A.,
Sun, Y.,
and Dong, Z.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12229-12235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Watts, R. G.,
Huang, C.,
Young, M. R.,
Li, J. J.,
Dong, Z.,
Pennie, W. D.,
and Colburn, N. H.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
3493-3498[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Zhang, Y.,
Dong, Z. M.,
Nomura, M.,
Zhong, S.,
Chen, N.,
Bode, A. M.,
and Dong, Z.
(2001)
J.
Biol. Chem.
276,
20913-20923[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Zhang, Y.,
Zhong, S.,
Dong, Z. M.,
Chen, N.,
Bode, A. M.,
Ma, W.-Y.,
and Dong, Z.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
14572-14580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Deak, M.,
Clifton, A. D.,
Lucocq, L. M.,
and Alessi, D. R.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4426-4441[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Chen, N.,
Nomura, M.,
She, Q.-B.,
Ma, W.-Y.,
Bode, A. M.,
Wang, L.,
Flavell, R. A.,
and Dong, Z.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
3908-3912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Zhang, Y.,
Mattjus, P.,
Schmid, P. C.,
Dong, Z. M.,
Zhong, S.,
Ma, W.-Y.,
Brown, R. E.,
Bode, A. M.,
Schmid, H. H. O.,
and Dong, Z.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
11775-11782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Beadling, C.,
Ng, J.,
Babbage, J. W.,
and Cantrell, D. A.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1902-1913[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Aragane, Y.,
Kulms, D.,
Luger, T. A.,
and Schwarz, T.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11490-11495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Sartor, C. I.,
Dziubinski, M. L., Yu, C. L.,
Jove, R.,
and Ethier, S. P.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
978-987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Karni, R.,
Jove, R.,
and Levitzki, A.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
4654-4662[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Grandis, J. R.,
Drenning, S. D.,
Chakraborty, A.,
Zhou, M. Y.,
Zeng, Q.,
Pitt, A. S.,
and Tweardy, D. J.
(1998)
J. Clinic. Invest.
102,
1385-1392[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Knebel, A.,
Rahmsdorf, H. J.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Herrlich, P.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
5314-5325[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Kim, H.,
and Muller, W. J.
(1999)
Exp. Cell Res.
253,
78-87[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Moro, L.,
Venturino, M.,
Bozzo, C.,
Silengo, L.,
Altruda, F.,
Beguinot, L.,
Tarone, G.,
and Defilippi, P.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
6622-6632 |