![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 46, 42632-42638, November 16, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Institute of
Biomedical Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine,
Fukushima 960-1295 and the
Received for publication, July 25, 2001, and in revised form, September 11, 2001
MBD2, a methyl-CpG-binding protein, is a
component of the MeCP1 histone deacetylase (HDAC) complex and plays a
critical role in DNA methylation-mediated transcriptional repression.
To understand the molecular basis of the methylation-associated
repression, we attempted to identify MBD2-interacting proteins by a
yeast two-hybrid system. Using MBD2 as bait, we isolated a novel zinc finger protein, referred to as MIZF. A direct interaction between MBD2
and MIZF was confirmed by in vitro binding assays and
immunoprecipitation experiments. Four of seven zinc fingers present in
the C-terminal region of MIZF are required for binding with MBD2. The
MIZF mRNA is expressed in all human tissues and cell lines
examined. The subcellular localization of MIZF is distinct from that of
MBD2, although both proteins co-localize in some areas of the nuclei; MIZF localizes diffusely in the nucleoplasmic region, whereas MBD2
preferentially localizes in major satellites. A reporter assay
demonstrated that MIZF significantly abrogates transcriptional activities. This repression is attenuated by an HDAC inhibitor, trichostatin A, and is completely dependent on the interaction with
MBD2. These results suggest that MIZF is abundantly present in cells
and functions as a negative regulator of transcription by binding to
MBD2 and recruiting HDAC-containing complexes.
Methylation of CpG dinucleotides is the major epigenetic
modification in higher eukaryotic genomes. This reaction is mediated by
DNA methyltransferases (1, 2), and the biological importance of the CpG
methylation is directly demonstrated by the fact that mice lacking the
gene of a DNA methyltransferase exhibit a defect in
embryogenesis at midgestation (3). CpG methylation also plays important
roles in a wide range of biological steps, including tissue-specific
gene expression, X-chromosome inactivation, and genomic imprinting
(4-8). In addition, abnormalities in CpG methylation have been linked
to altered gene expression in certain genetic diseases, tumorigenesis,
and senescence; aberrant methylation of a tumor suppressor gene,
p16ink4A, is closely related to tumor growth characteristics
(9-11). The state of gene methylation is associated with
transcriptional repression (12), and the biological consequence of CpG
methylation is mediated by a family of methyl-CpG-binding proteins
(MeCPs),1 which contain a
common methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) (13-15). Although the molecular
basis for MBD-dependent repression is still unclear, so far
five MBD-containing proteins have been reported in mammals: MeCP2,
MBD1, MBD2, MBD3, and MBD4. MeCP2 is the first characterized protein
that can bind to methylated CpG pairs (16-18). MBD1 and MBD2 bind
specifically to a symmetric methyl-CpG and function as transcriptional
repressors (19, 20), whereas MBD3 is a subunit of the nucleosome
remodeling histone deacetylase (NuRD) complex that includes Mi-2,
HDAC1/2, RbAp46/48, and metastasis-associated protein 2 (21, 22). On
the other hand, MBD4 (also known as MED1) binds preferentially to
methyl-CpG·TpG mismatches and removes thymine from a mismatch
methyl-CpG site, suggesting that MBD4 may be involved in DNA mismatch
repair and the maintenance of genome stability (23).
Much evidence has accumulated to indicate a close association between
methylation-dependent repression and histone deacetylation. Among these MBD proteins, MeCP2 functions as a transcriptional repressor in concert with Sin3A, histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), and
HDAC2. MBD2 is also likely to function as a molecular link between
methyl-CpG and HDACs, because MBD2 is a component of the MeCP1 HDAC
complex that includes RbAp46/48, Sin3A, SAP30, and SAP18 (24), and MBD2
can also interact with the NuRD complex (20). To understand the precise
mechanisms for the recruitment of the two HDAC complexes by MBD2 and
for MBD2-dependent transcriptional repression, further
identification and characterization of novel proteins associated with
MBD2 is required. In the present study, we performed a yeast two-hybrid
screening using mouse MBD2 as bait to search for MBD2-interacting
molecules and found a novel zinc finger protein. This MBD2-binding zinc
finger (MIZF) protein represses transcription by associating with MBD2
and a histone deacetylase complex. The results suggest that MIZF, in
concert with MBD2, recruits HDAC complexes, which in turn results in
transcriptional repression.
Yeast Two-hybrid Screening and Isolation of the Full-length
cDNA--
The full-length mouse MBD2b cDNA was subcloned into
the pGBT9, a GAL4 DNA-binding domain (GAL4-DBD) vector
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA), and transfected into
yeast PJ69-4A strain. An expression library consisting of human fetal
brain cDNA (CLONTECH) was then introduced into
the yeast and screened by growth on plates lacking Ade, His, Leu, and
Trp, but containing 2 mM 3-aminotriazole as described (25).
The colonies were tested for Plasmid Construction--
For the expression of a green
fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to MBD2, the MBD2b cDNA was
subcloned into the appropriate sites of pEGFP-C1
(CLONTECH) to obtain pGFP-MBD2. Epitope-tagged
derivatives of MBD2 and MIZF, containing amino-terminal FLAG and
carboxyl-terminal Myc tags, respectively, were generated using a
pcDNA3 expression vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). For the
preparation of glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion
recombinant proteins, MBD2b and MIZF cDNA were subcloned into
pGEX-4T-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (GST-MBD2 and GST-MIZF).
Deletion derivatives of MBD2b were generated by inserting the cDNA
fragments into pGEX-4T-1 using EcoRI and HincII
for GST-N1-52, EcoRI and NcoI for GST-N1-154,
EcoRI and HindIII for GST-N1-212,
HincII and SalI for GST-C53-262, NcoI and SalI for GST-C154-262, and HindIII and
SalI for GST-C212-262. To transcribe and translate MBD2 and
MIZF in vitro, the MBD2b and MIZF cDNAs were subcloned
into the appropriate sites of pGBKT7 (CLONTECH).
Deletion constructs of MIZF were generated by inserting the cDNA
fragments into pGBKT7 using PstI and XbaI for
MIZF-N1-429, EcoRV and BamHI for MIZF-C125-517,
and XbaI and BamHI for MIZF-C429-517. For
MIZF-N1-201 and MIZF-C201-517, MIZF cDNA was mutagenized by polymerase chain reaction to create a SphI site at codon 201 using the primer 5'-GTGGTAGCATGCCCCACCTGTG. The polymerase chain
reaction products were digested and then subcloned into the
corresponding sites of pGBKT7. Plasmids expressing fusion proteins of
the GAL4-DBD and MBD2, MIZF, the N-terminal half of MIZF (N1-201), or
the C-terminal half of MIZF (C201-517) were constructed using the pM1
expression vector described elsewhere (26). A firefly luciferase
reporter plasmid, pGL3-G5pol In Vitro Binding Assay--
GST fusion proteins were expressed
in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) and purified using
glutathione-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
[35S]Methionine-labeled full-length MIZF, various
deletion mutants of MIZF, and MBD2 were synthesized using the indicated
pGBKT7 plasmids as templates in a TNT T7 quick coupled
transcription-translation system (Promega). The labeled, in
vitro-translated proteins were incubated with various GST fusion
proteins immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads for 4 h at
4 °C in buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 150 mM NaCl, 0.2% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 µg/ml leupeptin. After washing with the same buffer, the bound
proteins were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
Subcellular Localization--
COS-7 cells growing on glass
coverslips were transfected with pGFP-MBD2 or pMIZF-Myc using
Effectene Transfection Reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described
elsewhere (28). The cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in
phosphate-buffered saline and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in
phosphate-buffered saline for 5 min. For observation of Myc-tagged
MIZF, cells were incubated with anti-Myc antibody (9E10) and stained
with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody
(BIOSOURCE, Camalliro, CA). The cell preparation
was observed using a confocal laser-scanning microscope.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis--
Transfected
293 cells were lysed in buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 µg/ml leupeptin) and
centrifuged. The lysates were immunoprecipitated with the indicated
antibodies and protein G-Sepharose (Zymed Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA) for 4 h at 4 °C, and the
resultant immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Proteins were
transferred to a filter and incubated with either anti-Myc, anti-HDAC1
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-FLAG (Sigma), or anti-GFP antibody
(MBL, Nagoya, Japan), followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
anti-mouse (Promega) or anti-rabbit IgG polyclonal antibody (Dako,
Kyoto, Japan). The positive bands were visualized using an enhanced
chemiluminescence system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Northern Blot Analysis--
RNA was isolated from several human
cell lines by the guanidine isothiocyanate method using Isogen reagent
(Wako, Osaka, Japan). Total RNA (20 µg) was resolved in 1% agarose
gels and transferred onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). Hybridization and detection were performed using a
digoxigenin-labeled MIZF cDNA probe (nucleotides 745-1704) (Roche
Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan). The tissue expression pattern of MIZF
mRNA was also examined with a human multiple tissue Northern blot
(CLONTECH). All blots were stripped and reprobed
with a cDNA fragment encoding the constitutively expressed human
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as a control.
Luciferase Assay--
Human 293 cells plated on 24-well plates
were transfected with 50 ng of pGL3-G5pol Histone Deacetylase Assay--
Histone deacetylase activity was
measured using mouse core histones radiolabeled with
[3H]acetate in vivo as a substrate (29).
Aliquots (2 µl) of eluates from the immunoprecipitates were incubated
with 10 µg of [3H]histones in 100 µl of assay buffer
(20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 75 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol) for 30 min at 37 °C. The reaction was
stopped by the addition of 20 µl of 12 N HCl. The
released [3H]acetic acid was extracted with 1 ml of ethyl
acetate and measured by scintillation counting of the solvent layer.
Identification of MIZF--
When a total of 5 × 106 clones were tested in a yeast two-hybrid screening
system with MBD2 cDNA, ~300 cDNA clones were obtained as
first candidates exhibiting His(+) and Ade(+) properties. Most of these
were, however, eliminated by a second screening for their ability to
activate the Tissue and Subcellular Expression of MIZF--
Expression of MIZF
was examined by Northern blot analysis with RNA samples from various
human tissues and cell lines. The expression level of MIZF was
detectable as a predominant single signal in all tissues and cell lines
examined (Fig. 2, A and
B). The apparent size of the MIZF transcript is ~2.3
kilobase, consistent with the size of the cDNA clone. Among tissues
examined, the highest level of MIZF was detected in the brain, heart,
skeletal muscle, and kidney, with moderate levels of the transcript
seen in the colon, thymus, spleen, liver, small intestine, placenta,
and lung (Fig. 2A). The MIZF transcript was detected in all
cell lines examined at relatively constant levels (Fig. 2B).
We examined the subcellular localization of MIZF and compared it with
that of MBD2. When COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with
pMIZF-Myc, MIZF localized exclusively to the cell nucleus except the
nucleolus (Fig. 2C, a). The nuclear localization
of MIZF proteins was confirmed by difference interference contrast image (Fig. 2C, b). Consistent with the previous
observations on MBD2, GFP-MBD2 displays a diffuse nucleoplasmic
staining pattern with prominent nuclear dots that are known to be
highly methylated regions of the genome (Fig. 2C,
c and d) (15). These results indicate that MIZF
is a nuclear protein with subcellular localization distinct from that
of MBD2.
Association of MIZF with MBD2--
The association of the MIZF
protein with MBD2 was confirmed by in vitro binding assays.
The MIZF protein was produced by an in vitro translation
system and tested for binding to GST-MBD2, and vice versa. As shown in
Fig. 3A, MIZF bound to
GST-MBD2 but not to GST alone. Similarly, the in vitro
translated MBD2 protein bound to GST-MIZF but not to GST alone (Fig.
3B). This association was further confirmed in 293 cells
subjected to cotransfection with pMIZF-Myc and pGFP-MBD2. When GFP-MBD2
was immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibody, MIZF-Myc (68 kDa) was
present in the resultant immunoprecipitates (Fig. 3C).
Similarly, GFP-MBD2 was detected in immunoprecipitates with anti-Myc
antibody. These results demonstrate that MIZF associates specifically
with MBD2 in vitro, as well as inside the cell.
To determine the region of MIZF responsible for binding to MBD2,
several deletion mutants were examined (Fig.
4A). As shown in Fig.
4B, C125-517 and C201-517 could bind to MBD2 (lanes
10-15). The removal of an additional 228 amino acids (C429-517)
resulted in a complete loss of the binding activity to MBD2
(lanes 16-18), indicating that the N-terminal
~200 amino acids are dispensable for the interaction with MBD2. In
fact, a mutant N1-201 failed to bind to MBD2 (lanes
4-6). Deletion of the C terminus (N1-429) did not affect
the binding ability, suggesting that the C-terminal 89 amino acids are
also dispensable for the interaction with MBD2 (lanes
7-9). These results indicate that the region comprising amino acids 201-429 of the MIZF protein, containing four zinc finger
domains (ZF4-ZF7) (Fig. 1B), is required for its
association with MBD2.
A series of MBD2 deletion mutants was also examined to map the region
responsible for the interaction with MIZF (Fig.
5A). MIZF could bind to the
MBD2 mutant C53-262, which lacks the 52 amino acids at the N terminus
(Fig. 5B, lane 7), but not to mutants N1-52, C154-262, and C212-262, indicating that the N-terminal 52 amino acids are not responsible for the binding to MIZF
(lanes 4, 8, and 9). In
addition, MIZF could bind to deletion mutants N1-154 and N1-212,
indicating that the C-terminal 108 amino acids are dispensable for the
interaction with MIZF (lanes 5 and 6). Thus, the region from amino acid 53 to 154 of MBD2 is necessary for the
association with MIZF.
Involvement of MIZF in Transcriptional Repression--
The effect
of MIZF on transcription was examined using a reporter assay with a DNA
polymerase Enhancement of the MBD2-mediated Repression by MIZF--
To
confirm whether MIZF can modulate MBD2-mediated repression, a
luciferase reporter assay was performed in the presence or absence of
MIZF. MIZF enhanced the MBD2-mediated repression in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig.
7A). Basal transcription of
GAL4-DBD alone was not affected by MIZF. To investigate the involvement of HDAC in this effect of MIZF, cells expressing FLAG-MBD2 and MIZF-Myc
were analyzed by an immunoprecipitation assay. As shown in Fig. 7,
B and C, the expression of MIZF produced
significant increases in the levels of both the HDAC1 protein and HDAC
activity, an effect that was TSA-sensitive. These results suggest that
MIZF may enhance MBD2-mediated repression by recruiting HDAC activity to the complex.
A close relationship between methylation-dependent
repression and histone deacetylation has been demonstrated. The
transcriptional effects of CpG methylation are mediated by
MBD-containing proteins. Among MBD proteins, MeCP2 is known to bind to
methylated CpG pairs and functions as a transcriptional repressor by
recruiting Sin3A and HDACs (16-18). MBD2, another methyl-CpG binding
protein, has also been shown to be a component of the MeCP1-HDAC
complex that includes RbAp46/48 and Sin3A (24). In addition, MBD2
interacts with the NuRD complex (21). These findings suggest that MBD2 is likely to function as a molecular link between methyl-CpG and HDACs.
To understand the mechanisms underlying the MBD2-dependent transcriptional repression and recruitment of HDACs, we identify MBD2-interacting molecules using a yeast two-hybrid system. When a
human fetal brain cDNA library was screened using mouse MBD2 as
bait, a novel zinc finger protein, MIZF, was specifically isolated. This MIZF protein binds to MBD2 and represses the promoter-driven transcription activity. Like the MBD2 protein, the MIZF protein is
expressed in a wide variety of tissues and cells. These results suggest
that MIZF is expressed abundantly in cells and functions as a negative
regulator for transcription by binding to MBD2 and to HDAC systems.
We demonstrated that the C-terminal region of MIZF (amino acids
201-517) is required for the association with MBD2 (Fig. 4) and for
the TSA-sensitive repression (Fig. 6). The N-terminal region of MIZF
(amino acids 1-201), which lacks MBD2-binding activity, does not
repress transcription (Figs. 4 and 6). These results suggest that
MIZF-derived repression is totally dependent on binding to MBD2 and
HDACs. Indeed, MIZF was coimmunoprecipitated with endogenous HDAC1
(Fig. 6). It has become clear that several transcriptional repressors,
such as YY1, Bcl-6, and Rb family proteins, are able to associate
directly with HDAC1 or HDAC2 (31-33). The minimal structures required
for the association with HDAC are thus far identified as the
LXCXE-like motif in Rb family proteins, a
30-amino acid glycine-rich region in YY1, and the POZ domain in Bcl-6. However, MIZF does not possess regions homologous to these motifs. In
addition, we could not detect the interaction with any known HDACs in a
yeast two-hybrid assay when MIZF cDNA was used as
bait,2 indicating that MIZF
is unable to associate directly with HDACs. It has been reported that
MBD2 binds to MBD3, an integral component of the NuRD complex (34), and
also interacts with a distinct HDAC-containing complex, MeCP1
(24). Therefore, it is rather possible that MIZF binds to MBD2, which
in turn recruits HDACs to the protein complex. A series of associations
of these proteins would then result in transcriptional repression. This
is supported at least in part by the finding that the coexpression of
MIZF and MBD2 significantly enhances HDAC protein recruitment and
activity (Fig. 7).
MIZF is a unique, C2H2-type zinc finger protein involved in
methylation-dependent transcriptional repression. The C2H2
zinc finger structure was initially identified in DNA-binding molecules such as the transcription factors TFIIIA and Krüppel, and at present a number of transcription factors are known to utilize C2H2
zinc fingers as DNA-binding domains (35). Most of these proteins
contain multiple fingers, which are required for the recognition of a
specific range of DNA sequences. Concerning an analogy with these
proteins, it is possible that MIZF is a DNA-binding protein, and our
preliminary results reveal that MIZF binds to some DNA sequences (data
not shown). Thus, it is probable that MIZF functions as a repressor, in
terms of its suppressive effect on transcription and DNA binding
activity. As shown in Fig. 2C, we demonstrate here that MIZF
and MBD2 are expressed quite abundantly and ubiquitously in cells and
tissues, suggesting their important functions in cell. Although these
two proteins co-localize in some areas in nuclei, their main
localizations are quite different; MIZF localizes diffusely in the
nucleoplasmic region, whereas MBD2 preferentially localizes in the
major satellite, which is known to be a highly methylated region of the
genome. Thus, it is possible that MIZF functions as a repressor in the
regulation of the transcription of specific genes. Identification of
the DNA sequences that interact with MIZF is necessary to understand this issue.
It has become clear that zinc fingers are also involved in
protein-protein interactions. Homodimerization of the multifinger protein Ikaros is mediated by its two C-terminal fingers (36). Likewise, metastasis-associated protein 2, a subunit of the NuRD complex, which contains a C4-type zinc finger, also modulates HDAC
activity by interacting with MBD3 (20). MIZF contains seven zinc
fingers (ZF1-ZF7), and four fingers in the C-terminal region are
required for the interaction with MBD2. Our preliminary study demonstrates that MIZF also associates with MBD3 in a manner similar to
its binding with MBD2 (data not shown). MBD3 is a component of the NuRD
complex (34). Thus, it is possible that MIZF recruits the NuRD complex
through its interaction with MBD3. The analysis of MIZF-interacting
proteins may provide a clue to understanding the mechanism of
transcriptional repression induced by MIZF.
We are grateful to P. James for providing the
yeast strain PJ69-4A. We thank J. Yamaki for technical assistance.
*
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-24-548-2111;
Fax: 81-24-548-3041; E-mail: yoshihom@fmu.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 11, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107048200
2
M. Sekimata and Y. Homma, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
MeCP, methyl-CpG-binding protein;
MBD, methyl-CpG binding domain;
HDAC, histone deacetylase;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
NuRD, nucleosome remodeling histone deacetylase;
GFP, green fluorescent
protein;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
TSA, trichostatin
A.
Involvement of a Novel Zinc Finger Protein, MIZF, in
Transcriptional Repression by Interacting with a Methyl-CpG-binding
Protein, MBD2*
, and
School of Nursing, Miyagi
University, Miyagi 981-3298, Japan
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase activity, and positive
clones were analyzed for the insert sequences. To isolate the
full-length cDNA, 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends combined
with nested polymerase chain reaction was performed using a
human fetal brain cDNA library (Marathon-Ready cDNA,
CLONTECH) as a template.
, was constructed as follows. A 496-base
pair fragment of the human DNA polymerase
promoter (
422 to +73) (27) was amplified with specific primers
5'-ATCTCTAGAGAAAGTTTTGACAGTGTGACG and
5'-CAAGCTTGAAGGAGGTACCAGGACTTGGAG, digested with XbaI and HindIII, and then subcloned into the corresponding sites of
pGEM-3Z (Promega, Madison, WI) to generate pGEM-pol
. The
KpnI-NheI fragment containing five GAL4-binding
sites excised from pG5luc (Promega) was inserted into the
KpnI and XbaI sites of pGEM-pol
, and the insert was excised with SacI and HindIII and
subcloned into the corresponding sites of the pGL3-enhancer (Promega).
, 5 ng of pRL-TK (Promega),
and the indicated expression plasmids. Total amounts of expression
plasmids were normalized by pcDNA3. After incubation for 24 h,
transfected cells were split into two dishes and further incubated in
the presence or absence of 100 ng/ml trichostatin A (TSA) (Wako) for
10 h. Cell lysates were prepared, and dual luciferase assays were
carried out using the dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase gene. One clone showed strong
-galactosidase activity and was chosen for further analysis. To
obtain the full-length sequence of the clone, 5'-rapid amplification of
cDNA ends combined with polymerase chain reaction was performed using a human fetal cDNA library. Finally, we obtained a cDNA comprising 2285 base pairs including an open reading frame encoding a
polypeptide of 517 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 59.7 kDa. BLAST search revealed that the cDNA is identical to human
cDNA MGC:4317 (accession number BC001945). This cDNA encodes a
novel protein with homology to zinc finger proteins. Therefore, we name
this protein MIZF (MBD2-interacting
zinc finger protein). As shown in Fig.
1, the MIZF protein contains seven zinc
finger domains similar to the C2H2 zinc finger motif (30) and a stretch
of negatively charged amino acids residues from position 49 to 63.

View larger version (57K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Primary structure of MIZF. A,
amino acid sequence of human MIZF. The predicted zinc finger domains
are shaded, and the acidic region is underlined.
The portion of MIZF recovered in a yeast two-hybrid screen starts at
amino acid residue 197. Numbers are shown for the amino acid
sequence. B, alignment of the amino acid sequences of the
zinc finger domains. MIZF possesses seven C2H2 zinc fingers (ZF1-ZF7)
conforming to the C2H2 consensus,
CX2-4CX3(F/C)X5(F/L)X2HX3-4H,
in which X represents any amino acid.

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Expression levels of MIZF mRNA and
subcellular localization of MIZF. Northern blot analysis was
performed for the determination of the MIZF mRNA in human tissues
(A) and cell lines (B). Tissues including brain,
heart, skeletal muscle (Sk. muscle), colon, thymus, spleen,
kidney, liver, small intestine, placenta, lung, and peripheral blood
leukocyte (PBL) were analyzed by hybridization with a
digoxigenin-labeled MIZF cDNA probe (upper
panel). The same filter was rehybridized with a
digoxigenin-labeled human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
cDNA probe to quantify RNA loading (lower
panel). Similarly, human cell lines were analyzed by
hybridization with a MIZF cDNA probe (upper
panel) or a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(GAPDH) cDNA probe (lower panel).
Size markers and the corresponding mRNA are indicated on the
left and right sides, respectively.
C, subcellular localization of MIZF. COS-7 cells transiently
transfected with pMIZF-Myc (a and b) or pGFP-MBD2
(c and d) were stained for MIZF with anti-Myc
antibody. Each pair of panels shows a
fluorescence image (a and c) and the
corresponding difference interference contrast image (b and
d). The bar represents 20 µm.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Association of MIZF with MBD2.
A, binding of MIZF to GST-MBD2.
[35S]methionine-labeled MIZF produced by an in
vitro translation system was incubated with an equal amount of GST
(lane 2) or GST-MBD2 (lane
3), which was immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads.
Bound and input (lane 1) proteins were separated
on SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography. B, binding of
MBD2 to GST-MIZF. [35S]Methionine-labeled MBD2 was
incubated with GST (lane 2) or GST-MIZF
(lane 3). Bound and input (lane
1) proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and visualized by
fluorography. C, 293 cells were transfected with pMIZF-Myc
in combination with control vector alone or pGFP-MBD2 (indicated by the
plus and minus at the top of each
lane). Total lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP)
with anti-GFP antibody, and the resultant immunoprecipitates and
lysates were analyzed by Western blotting (WB) with anti-Myc
antibody to detect MIZF (upper two
panels). The same lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-Myc antibody, and the resultant immunoprecipitates and lysates
were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-GFP antibody to detect MBD2
(lower two panels). Molecular mass
markers and the corresponding proteins are indicated on the
left and right sides,
respectively.

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Mapping of the MBD2-binding region of
MIZF. A, schematic representation of MIZF and its
deletion mutants. The shaded boxes denote the
zinc finger domains of MIZF. A summary of the results of an in
vitro binding assay is shown on the right. B, binding
of MBD2 to MIZF proteins of various lengths.
[35S]Methionine-labeled MIZF (wt) and its
deletion mutants produced by an in vitro translation system
were incubated with equal amounts of GST (G) or GST-MBD2
(M). Bound and input (I) proteins were separated
on SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography. The positions of the
molecular mass markers are indicated on the left.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Mapping of the MIZF-binding region of
MBD2. A, schematic representation of GST-MBD2 and its
deletion mutants. The shaded box denotes the
methyl-CpG binding domain. A summary of the results of an in
vitro binding assay is shown on the right.
B, binding of MIZF to MBD2 proteins of various lengths. MBD2
and its deletion mutants produced as GST fusion protein were incubated
with in vitro translated,
[35S]methionine-labeled MIZF. Bound and input proteins
were separated on SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography
(upper panel). To determine the amount of GST
fusion proteins used for the assay, the gels were stained with
Coomassie Brilliant Blue (lower panel). The
position of MIZF is indicated by the arrow.
promoter and GAL4-binding sites (Fig.
6A). When the full-length MIZF
cDNA fused with GAL4-DBD was transfected into cells, transcription
of the reporter gene was significantly inhibited by MIZF in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6B). Similar results
were obtained using an MIZF mutant, C201-517, which possesses binding
activity to MBD2. These results suggest that MIZF functions as a
negative regulator for transcription and that MIZF-mediated
transcriptional repression is dependent on the binding to MBD2, and, in
turn, the association with an HDAC complex. In contrast, another MIZF
mutant, N1-201, which does not bind to MBD2, did not repress the
transcription (Fig. 6B). In addition, the results shown in
Fig. 6B demonstrate that transcriptional repression by MIZF
can be substantially relieved by TSA, an inhibitor of histone
deacetylases. To examine whether MIZF interacts with endogenous HDAC1,
an immunoprecipitation experiment followed by Western blotting analysis
was performed on lysates from 293 cells transiently expressing
MIZF-Myc. As expected, HDAC1 was detected in the immunoprecipitates
containing MIZF. MIZF-Myc was specifically coimmunoprecipitated with
HDAC1 by an anti-HDAC1 antibody but not by normal rabbit serum (Fig.
6C).

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Transcriptional repression by MIZF.
A, schematic representation of the reporter and expression
vectors used in the luciferase assay. The pGL3-G5pol
reporter vector
contains the firefly luciferase gene, human DNA polymerase
promoter, five GAL4-binding sites (5× GAL), and an SV40 enhancer. The
solid and open columns denote MBD2 and
MIZF, respectively, and the shaded boxes
represent zinc finger domains. B, effect of MIZF on
transcription. 293 cells were transfected with pGL3-G5pol
, pRL-TK,
and the expression plasmids indicated. After incubation for 24 h,
the transfected cells were divided into two dishes and incubated in the
presence (shaded columns) or absence
(solid columns) of 100 ng/ml TSA. The firefly
luciferase activity was normalized to the control sea pansy luciferase
activity. The results are expressed as the mean ± S.D. of three
independent experiments. C, interaction between MIZF and
endogenous HDAC1. Lysates from 293 cells transfected with pMIZF-Myc
were prepared 48 h after transfection and immunoprecipitated
(IP) with anti-HDAC1 antibody or normal rabbit serum
(control Ab). MIZF-Myc was detected in the immunoprecipitates by
Western blotting (WB) using anti-Myc antibody
(upper panel). Expression levels of the expected
proteins in the lysates were confirmed by Western blotting using
antibody against Myc (middle panel) or HDAC1
(lower panel). The positions of MIZF and HDAC1
are indicated by arrows.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Enhancement of MBD2-mediated transcriptional
repression by MIZF. A, effect of MIZF on MBD2-mediated
repression. The expression plasmid (100 ng) for GAL4-DBD or GAL4-MBD2
was transfected into 293 cells together with 10 ng of pGL3-G5pol
in
the absence or presence of increasing amounts of pMIZF-Myc (100, 200, and 300 ng). The relative luciferase activities were determined and
normalized to the control sea pansy luciferase activities. The results
are expressed as the mean ± S.D. of three independent
experiments. B, interaction between MBD2 and endogenous
HDAC1. Lysates from 293 cells transfected with the indicated
combinations of pFLAG-MBD2 and pMIZF-Myc were immunoprecipitated with
anti-FLAG antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were analyzed for MBD2
and HDAC1 by Western blotting (upper two
panels). The expression levels of the expected proteins in
the lysates were confirmed for MBD2, MIZF, and HDAC1 by Western
blotting (lower three panels). The
amount of a protein band was quantified from its area by use of the NIH
Image software and is indicated below each panel.
The positions of MIZF, MBD2, and HDAC1 are indicated by
arrows. C, detection of HDAC activity. Activities
of histone deacetylase recovered in the MBD2 immunoprecipitates were
measured in the presence or absence of 100 ng/ml TSA. Values represent
the mean ± S.D. of three independent assays.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Bestor, T. H.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
74,
9-12[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Okano, M.,
Xie, S.,
and Li, E.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
219-220[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Li, E.,
Bestor, T. H.,
and Jaenisch, R.
(1992)
Cell
69,
915-926[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Bartolomei, M. S.,
and Tilghman, S. M.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
31,
493-525[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Ballabio, A.,
and Willard, H. F.
(1992)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
2,
439-447[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Li, E.,
Beard, C.,
and Jaenisch, R.
(1993)
Nature
366,
362-365[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Chen, R. Z.,
Pettersson, U.,
Beard, C.,
Jackson-Grusby, L.,
and Jaenisch, R.
(1998)
Nature
395,
89-93[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Surani, M. A.
(1998)
Cell
93,
309-312[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Issa, J. P.,
Ottaviano, Y. L.,
Celano, P.,
Hamilton, S. R.,
Davidson, N. E.,
and Baylin, S. B.
(1994)
Nat. Genet.
7,
536-540[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Cameron, E. E.,
Bachman, K. E.,
Myohanen, S.,
Herman, J. G.,
and Baylin, S. B.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
21,
103-107[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Bender, C. M.,
Pao, M. M.,
and Jones, P. A.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
95-101 12.
Razin, A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4905-4908[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Meehan, R. R.,
Lewis, J. D.,
McKay, S.,
Kleiner, E. L.,
and Bird, A. P.
(1989)
Cell
58,
499-507[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Cross, S. H.,
Meehan, R. R.,
Nan, X.,
and Bird, A.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
16,
256-259[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Hendrich, B.,
and Bird, A.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6538-6547 16.
Nan, X.,
Campoy, F. J.,
and Bird, A.
(1997)
Cell
88,
471-481[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Nan, X.,
Ng, H. H.,
Johnson, C. A.,
Laherty, C. D.,
Turner, B. M.,
Eisenman, R. N.,
and Bird, A.
(1998)
Nature
393,
386-389[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Jones, P. L.,
Veenstra, G. J.,
Wade, P. A.,
Vermaak, D.,
Kass, S. U.,
Landsberger, N.,
Strouboulis, J.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
187-191[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Ng, H. H., Jeppesen, P., and Bird, A. Mol. Cell Biol.
20, 1394-1406
20.
Fujita, N.,
Shimotake, N.,
Ohki, I.,
Chiba, T.,
Saya, H.,
Shirakawa, M.,
and Nakao, M.
(2000)
Mol. Cell Biol.
20,
5107-5118 21.
Zhang, Y.,
Ng, H. H.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
Bird, A.,
and Reinberg, D.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1924-1935 22.
Wade, P. A.,
Gegonne, A.,
Jones, P. L.,
Ballestar, E.,
Aubry, F.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
23,
62-66[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Hendrich, B.,
Hardeland, U.,
Ng, H. H.,
Jiricny, J.,
and Bird, A.
(1999)
Nature
401,
301-304[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Ng, H. H.,
Zhang, Y.,
Hendrich, B.,
Johnson, C. A.,
Turner, B. M.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
Reinberg, D.,
and Bird, A.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
23,
58-61[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
James, P.,
Halladay, J.,
and Craig, E. A.
(1996)
Genetics
144,
1425-1436[Abstract]
26.
Sadowski, I.,
Bell, B.,
Broad, P.,
and Hollis, M.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
118,
137-141[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Widen, S. G.,
Kedar, P.,
and Wilson, S. H.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
16992-16998 28.
Sekimata, M.,
Kabuyama, Y.,
Emori, Y.,
and Homma, Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17757-17762 29.
Yoshida, M.,
Kijima, M.,
Akita, M.,
and Beppu, T.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17174-17179 30.
Evans, R. M.,
and Hollenberg, S. M.
(1988)
Cell
52,
1-3[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Ferreira, R.,
Magnaghi-Jaulin, L.,
Robin, P.,
Harel-Bellan, A.,
and Trouche, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10493-10498 32.
Yang, W. M.,
Inouye, C.,
Zeng, Y.,
Bearss, D.,
and Seto, E.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
12845-12850 33.
Dhordain, P.,
Lin, R. J.,
Quief, S.,
Lantoine, D.,
Kerckaert, J. P.,
Evans, R. M.,
and Albagli, O.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
4645-4651 34.
Tatematsu, K.,
Yamazaki, T.,
and Ishikawa, F.
(2000)
Genes Cells
5,
677-688[Abstract]
35.
Mackay, J. P.,
and Crossley, M.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
1-4[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Georgopoulos, K.,
Winandy, S.,
and Avitahl, N.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
155-176[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Medina, M. van der Deen, A. Miele-Chamberland, R.-L. Xie, A. J. van Wijnen, J. L. Stein, and G. S. Stein The HiNF-P/p220NPAT Cell Cycle Signaling Pathway Controls Nonhistone Target Genes Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10334 - 10342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nishida, M. Kato, Y. Kato, N. Sasai, J. Ueda, M. Tachibana, Y. Shinkai, and M. Yamaguchi Identification of ZNF200 as a novel binding partner of histone H3 methyltransferase G9a Genes Cells, July 1, 2007; 12(7): 877 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Angrisano, F. Lembo, R. Pero, F. Natale, A. Fusco, V. E. Avvedimento, C. B. Bruni, and L. Chiariotti TACC3 mediates the association of MBD2 with histone acetyltransferases and relieves transcriptional repression of methylated promoters Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2006; 34(1): 364 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gardian, S. E. Browne, D.-K. Choi, P. Klivenyi, J. Gregorio, J. K. Kubilus, H. Ryu, B. Langley, R. R. Ratan, R. J. Ferrante, et al. Neuroprotective Effects of Phenylbutyrate in the N171-82Q Transgenic Mouse Model of Huntington's Disease J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2005; 280(1): 556 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sekimata and Y. Homma Sequence-specific transcriptional repression by an MBD2-interacting zinc finger protein MIZF Nucleic Acids Res., January 29, 2004; 32(2): 590 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mitra, R.-L. Xie, R. Medina, H. Hovhannisyan, S. K. Zaidi, Y. Wei, J. W. Harper, J. L. Stein, A. J. van Wijnen, and G. S. Stein Identification of HiNF-P, a Key Activator of Cell Cycle-Controlled Histone H4 Genes at the Onset of S Phase Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2003; 23(22): 8110 - 8123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Fujita, R. Fujii, S. Aratani, T. Amano, A. Fukamizu, and T. Nakajima Antithetic Effects of MBD2a on Gene Regulation Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 2645 - 2657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Lembo, R. Pero, T. Angrisano, C. Vitiello, R. Iuliano, C. B. Bruni, and L. Chiariotti MBDin, a Novel MBD2-Interacting Protein, Relieves MBD2 Repression Potential and Reactivates Transcription from Methylated Promoters Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2003; 23(5): 1656 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brackertz, J. Boeke, R. Zhang, and R. Renkawitz Two Highly Related p66 Proteins Comprise a New Family of Potent Transcriptional Repressors Interacting with MBD2 and MBD3 J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 40958 - 40966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Detich, J. Theberge, and M. Szyf Promoter-specific Activation and Demethylation by MBD2/Demethylase J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 35791 - 35794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tachibana, K. Sugimoto, M. Nozaki, J. Ueda, T. Ohta, M. Ohki, M. Fukuda, N. Takeda, H. Niida, H. Kato, et al. G9a histone methyltransferase plays a dominant role in euchromatic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and is essential for early embryogenesis Genes & Dev., July 15, 2002; 16(14): 1779 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Daniel, C. M. Spring, H. C. Crawford, A. B. Reynolds, and A. Baig The p120ctn-binding partner Kaiso is a bi-modal DNA-binding protein that recognizes both a sequence-specific consensus and methylated CpG dinucleotides Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2002; 30(13): 2911 - 2919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ballestar and M. Esteller The impact of chromatin in human cancer: linking DNA methylation to gene silencing Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2002; 23(7): 1103 - 1109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||