JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107048200 on September 11, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 46, 42632-42638, November 16, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/46/42632    most recent
M107048200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sekimata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Homma, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sekimata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Homma, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Involvement of a Novel Zinc Finger Protein, MIZF, in Transcriptional Repression by Interacting with a Methyl-CpG-binding Protein, MBD2*

Masayuki Sekimata, Atsushi Takahashi, Akiko Murakami-SekimataDagger , and Yoshimi Homma§

From the Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295 and the Dagger  School of Nursing, Miyagi University, Miyagi 981-3298, Japan

Received for publication, July 25, 2001, and in revised form, September 11, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

MBD2, a methyl-CpG-binding protein, is a component of the MeCP1 histone deacetylase (HDAC) complex and plays a critical role in DNA methylation-mediated transcriptional repression. To understand the molecular basis of the methylation-associated repression, we attempted to identify MBD2-interacting proteins by a yeast two-hybrid system. Using MBD2 as bait, we isolated a novel zinc finger protein, referred to as MIZF. A direct interaction between MBD2 and MIZF was confirmed by in vitro binding assays and immunoprecipitation experiments. Four of seven zinc fingers present in the C-terminal region of MIZF are required for binding with MBD2. The MIZF mRNA is expressed in all human tissues and cell lines examined. The subcellular localization of MIZF is distinct from that of MBD2, although both proteins co-localize in some areas of the nuclei; MIZF localizes diffusely in the nucleoplasmic region, whereas MBD2 preferentially localizes in major satellites. A reporter assay demonstrated that MIZF significantly abrogates transcriptional activities. This repression is attenuated by an HDAC inhibitor, trichostatin A, and is completely dependent on the interaction with MBD2. These results suggest that MIZF is abundantly present in cells and functions as a negative regulator of transcription by binding to MBD2 and recruiting HDAC-containing complexes.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Methylation of CpG dinucleotides is the major epigenetic modification in higher eukaryotic genomes. This reaction is mediated by DNA methyltransferases (1, 2), and the biological importance of the CpG methylation is directly demonstrated by the fact that mice lacking the gene of a DNA methyltransferase exhibit a defect in embryogenesis at midgestation (3). CpG methylation also plays important roles in a wide range of biological steps, including tissue-specific gene expression, X-chromosome inactivation, and genomic imprinting (4-8). In addition, abnormalities in CpG methylation have been linked to altered gene expression in certain genetic diseases, tumorigenesis, and senescence; aberrant methylation of a tumor suppressor gene, p16ink4A, is closely related to tumor growth characteristics (9-11). The state of gene methylation is associated with transcriptional repression (12), and the biological consequence of CpG methylation is mediated by a family of methyl-CpG-binding proteins (MeCPs),1 which contain a common methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) (13-15). Although the molecular basis for MBD-dependent repression is still unclear, so far five MBD-containing proteins have been reported in mammals: MeCP2, MBD1, MBD2, MBD3, and MBD4. MeCP2 is the first characterized protein that can bind to methylated CpG pairs (16-18). MBD1 and MBD2 bind specifically to a symmetric methyl-CpG and function as transcriptional repressors (19, 20), whereas MBD3 is a subunit of the nucleosome remodeling histone deacetylase (NuRD) complex that includes Mi-2, HDAC1/2, RbAp46/48, and metastasis-associated protein 2 (21, 22). On the other hand, MBD4 (also known as MED1) binds preferentially to methyl-CpG·TpG mismatches and removes thymine from a mismatch methyl-CpG site, suggesting that MBD4 may be involved in DNA mismatch repair and the maintenance of genome stability (23).

Much evidence has accumulated to indicate a close association between methylation-dependent repression and histone deacetylation. Among these MBD proteins, MeCP2 functions as a transcriptional repressor in concert with Sin3A, histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), and HDAC2. MBD2 is also likely to function as a molecular link between methyl-CpG and HDACs, because MBD2 is a component of the MeCP1 HDAC complex that includes RbAp46/48, Sin3A, SAP30, and SAP18 (24), and MBD2 can also interact with the NuRD complex (20). To understand the precise mechanisms for the recruitment of the two HDAC complexes by MBD2 and for MBD2-dependent transcriptional repression, further identification and characterization of novel proteins associated with MBD2 is required. In the present study, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screening using mouse MBD2 as bait to search for MBD2-interacting molecules and found a novel zinc finger protein. This MBD2-binding zinc finger (MIZF) protein represses transcription by associating with MBD2 and a histone deacetylase complex. The results suggest that MIZF, in concert with MBD2, recruits HDAC complexes, which in turn results in transcriptional repression.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Yeast Two-hybrid Screening and Isolation of the Full-length cDNA-- The full-length mouse MBD2b cDNA was subcloned into the pGBT9, a GAL4 DNA-binding domain (GAL4-DBD) vector (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA), and transfected into yeast PJ69-4A strain. An expression library consisting of human fetal brain cDNA (CLONTECH) was then introduced into the yeast and screened by growth on plates lacking Ade, His, Leu, and Trp, but containing 2 mM 3-aminotriazole as described (25). The colonies were tested for beta -galactosidase activity, and positive clones were analyzed for the insert sequences. To isolate the full-length cDNA, 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends combined with nested polymerase chain reaction was performed using a human fetal brain cDNA library (Marathon-Ready cDNA, CLONTECH) as a template.

Plasmid Construction-- For the expression of a green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to MBD2, the MBD2b cDNA was subcloned into the appropriate sites of pEGFP-C1 (CLONTECH) to obtain pGFP-MBD2. Epitope-tagged derivatives of MBD2 and MIZF, containing amino-terminal FLAG and carboxyl-terminal Myc tags, respectively, were generated using a pcDNA3 expression vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). For the preparation of glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion recombinant proteins, MBD2b and MIZF cDNA were subcloned into pGEX-4T-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (GST-MBD2 and GST-MIZF). Deletion derivatives of MBD2b were generated by inserting the cDNA fragments into pGEX-4T-1 using EcoRI and HincII for GST-N1-52, EcoRI and NcoI for GST-N1-154, EcoRI and HindIII for GST-N1-212, HincII and SalI for GST-C53-262, NcoI and SalI for GST-C154-262, and HindIII and SalI for GST-C212-262. To transcribe and translate MBD2 and MIZF in vitro, the MBD2b and MIZF cDNAs were subcloned into the appropriate sites of pGBKT7 (CLONTECH). Deletion constructs of MIZF were generated by inserting the cDNA fragments into pGBKT7 using PstI and XbaI for MIZF-N1-429, EcoRV and BamHI for MIZF-C125-517, and XbaI and BamHI for MIZF-C429-517. For MIZF-N1-201 and MIZF-C201-517, MIZF cDNA was mutagenized by polymerase chain reaction to create a SphI site at codon 201 using the primer 5'-GTGGTAGCATGCCCCACCTGTG. The polymerase chain reaction products were digested and then subcloned into the corresponding sites of pGBKT7. Plasmids expressing fusion proteins of the GAL4-DBD and MBD2, MIZF, the N-terminal half of MIZF (N1-201), or the C-terminal half of MIZF (C201-517) were constructed using the pM1 expression vector described elsewhere (26). A firefly luciferase reporter plasmid, pGL3-G5polbeta , was constructed as follows. A 496-base pair fragment of the human DNA polymerase beta  promoter (-422 to +73) (27) was amplified with specific primers 5'-ATCTCTAGAGAAAGTTTTGACAGTGTGACG and 5'-CAAGCTTGAAGGAGGTACCAGGACTTGGAG, digested with XbaI and HindIII, and then subcloned into the corresponding sites of pGEM-3Z (Promega, Madison, WI) to generate pGEM-polbeta . The KpnI-NheI fragment containing five GAL4-binding sites excised from pG5luc (Promega) was inserted into the KpnI and XbaI sites of pGEM-polbeta , and the insert was excised with SacI and HindIII and subcloned into the corresponding sites of the pGL3-enhancer (Promega).

In Vitro Binding Assay-- GST fusion proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) and purified using glutathione-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). [35S]Methionine-labeled full-length MIZF, various deletion mutants of MIZF, and MBD2 were synthesized using the indicated pGBKT7 plasmids as templates in a TNT T7 quick coupled transcription-translation system (Promega). The labeled, in vitro-translated proteins were incubated with various GST fusion proteins immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads for 4 h at 4 °C in buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 150 mM NaCl, 0.2% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 µg/ml leupeptin. After washing with the same buffer, the bound proteins were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

Subcellular Localization-- COS-7 cells growing on glass coverslips were transfected with pGFP-MBD2 or pMIZF-Myc using Effectene Transfection Reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described elsewhere (28). The cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline for 5 min. For observation of Myc-tagged MIZF, cells were incubated with anti-Myc antibody (9E10) and stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (BIOSOURCE, Camalliro, CA). The cell preparation was observed using a confocal laser-scanning microscope.

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis-- Transfected 293 cells were lysed in buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 µg/ml leupeptin) and centrifuged. The lysates were immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies and protein G-Sepharose (Zymed Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA) for 4 h at 4 °C, and the resultant immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to a filter and incubated with either anti-Myc, anti-HDAC1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-FLAG (Sigma), or anti-GFP antibody (MBL, Nagoya, Japan), followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse (Promega) or anti-rabbit IgG polyclonal antibody (Dako, Kyoto, Japan). The positive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Northern Blot Analysis-- RNA was isolated from several human cell lines by the guanidine isothiocyanate method using Isogen reagent (Wako, Osaka, Japan). Total RNA (20 µg) was resolved in 1% agarose gels and transferred onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Hybridization and detection were performed using a digoxigenin-labeled MIZF cDNA probe (nucleotides 745-1704) (Roche Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan). The tissue expression pattern of MIZF mRNA was also examined with a human multiple tissue Northern blot (CLONTECH). All blots were stripped and reprobed with a cDNA fragment encoding the constitutively expressed human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as a control.

Luciferase Assay-- Human 293 cells plated on 24-well plates were transfected with 50 ng of pGL3-G5polbeta , 5 ng of pRL-TK (Promega), and the indicated expression plasmids. Total amounts of expression plasmids were normalized by pcDNA3. After incubation for 24 h, transfected cells were split into two dishes and further incubated in the presence or absence of 100 ng/ml trichostatin A (TSA) (Wako) for 10 h. Cell lysates were prepared, and dual luciferase assays were carried out using the dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega).

Histone Deacetylase Assay-- Histone deacetylase activity was measured using mouse core histones radiolabeled with [3H]acetate in vivo as a substrate (29). Aliquots (2 µl) of eluates from the immunoprecipitates were incubated with 10 µg of [3H]histones in 100 µl of assay buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 75 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol) for 30 min at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 20 µl of 12 N HCl. The released [3H]acetic acid was extracted with 1 ml of ethyl acetate and measured by scintillation counting of the solvent layer.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Identification of MIZF-- When a total of 5 × 106 clones were tested in a yeast two-hybrid screening system with MBD2 cDNA, ~300 cDNA clones were obtained as first candidates exhibiting His(+) and Ade(+) properties. Most of these were, however, eliminated by a second screening for their ability to activate the beta -galactosidase gene. One clone showed strong beta -galactosidase activity and was chosen for further analysis. To obtain the full-length sequence of the clone, 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends combined with polymerase chain reaction was performed using a human fetal cDNA library. Finally, we obtained a cDNA comprising 2285 base pairs including an open reading frame encoding a polypeptide of 517 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 59.7 kDa. BLAST search revealed that the cDNA is identical to human cDNA MGC:4317 (accession number BC001945). This cDNA encodes a novel protein with homology to zinc finger proteins. Therefore, we name this protein MIZF (MBD2-interacting zinc finger protein). As shown in Fig. 1, the MIZF protein contains seven zinc finger domains similar to the C2H2 zinc finger motif (30) and a stretch of negatively charged amino acids residues from position 49 to 63. 


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Primary structure of MIZF. A, amino acid sequence of human MIZF. The predicted zinc finger domains are shaded, and the acidic region is underlined. The portion of MIZF recovered in a yeast two-hybrid screen starts at amino acid residue 197. Numbers are shown for the amino acid sequence. B, alignment of the amino acid sequences of the zinc finger domains. MIZF possesses seven C2H2 zinc fingers (ZF1-ZF7) conforming to the C2H2 consensus, CX2-4CX3(F/C)X5(F/L)X2HX3-4H, in which X represents any amino acid.

Tissue and Subcellular Expression of MIZF-- Expression of MIZF was examined by Northern blot analysis with RNA samples from various human tissues and cell lines. The expression level of MIZF was detectable as a predominant single signal in all tissues and cell lines examined (Fig. 2, A and B). The apparent size of the MIZF transcript is ~2.3 kilobase, consistent with the size of the cDNA clone. Among tissues examined, the highest level of MIZF was detected in the brain, heart, skeletal muscle, and kidney, with moderate levels of the transcript seen in the colon, thymus, spleen, liver, small intestine, placenta, and lung (Fig. 2A). The MIZF transcript was detected in all cell lines examined at relatively constant levels (Fig. 2B).


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Expression levels of MIZF mRNA and subcellular localization of MIZF. Northern blot analysis was performed for the determination of the MIZF mRNA in human tissues (A) and cell lines (B). Tissues including brain, heart, skeletal muscle (Sk. muscle), colon, thymus, spleen, kidney, liver, small intestine, placenta, lung, and peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) were analyzed by hybridization with a digoxigenin-labeled MIZF cDNA probe (upper panel). The same filter was rehybridized with a digoxigenin-labeled human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA probe to quantify RNA loading (lower panel). Similarly, human cell lines were analyzed by hybridization with a MIZF cDNA probe (upper panel) or a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA probe (lower panel). Size markers and the corresponding mRNA are indicated on the left and right sides, respectively. C, subcellular localization of MIZF. COS-7 cells transiently transfected with pMIZF-Myc (a and b) or pGFP-MBD2 (c and d) were stained for MIZF with anti-Myc antibody. Each pair of panels shows a fluorescence image (a and c) and the corresponding difference interference contrast image (b and d). The bar represents 20 µm.

We examined the subcellular localization of MIZF and compared it with that of MBD2. When COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with pMIZF-Myc, MIZF localized exclusively to the cell nucleus except the nucleolus (Fig. 2C, a). The nuclear localization of MIZF proteins was confirmed by difference interference contrast image (Fig. 2C, b). Consistent with the previous observations on MBD2, GFP-MBD2 displays a diffuse nucleoplasmic staining pattern with prominent nuclear dots that are known to be highly methylated regions of the genome (Fig. 2C, c and d) (15). These results indicate that MIZF is a nuclear protein with subcellular localization distinct from that of MBD2.

Association of MIZF with MBD2-- The association of the MIZF protein with MBD2 was confirmed by in vitro binding assays. The MIZF protein was produced by an in vitro translation system and tested for binding to GST-MBD2, and vice versa. As shown in Fig. 3A, MIZF bound to GST-MBD2 but not to GST alone. Similarly, the in vitro translated MBD2 protein bound to GST-MIZF but not to GST alone (Fig. 3B). This association was further confirmed in 293 cells subjected to cotransfection with pMIZF-Myc and pGFP-MBD2. When GFP-MBD2 was immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibody, MIZF-Myc (68 kDa) was present in the resultant immunoprecipitates (Fig. 3C). Similarly, GFP-MBD2 was detected in immunoprecipitates with anti-Myc antibody. These results demonstrate that MIZF associates specifically with MBD2 in vitro, as well as inside the cell.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Association of MIZF with MBD2. A, binding of MIZF to GST-MBD2. [35S]methionine-labeled MIZF produced by an in vitro translation system was incubated with an equal amount of GST (lane 2) or GST-MBD2 (lane 3), which was immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads. Bound and input (lane 1) proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography. B, binding of MBD2 to GST-MIZF. [35S]Methionine-labeled MBD2 was incubated with GST (lane 2) or GST-MIZF (lane 3). Bound and input (lane 1) proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography. C, 293 cells were transfected with pMIZF-Myc in combination with control vector alone or pGFP-MBD2 (indicated by the plus and minus at the top of each lane). Total lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-GFP antibody, and the resultant immunoprecipitates and lysates were analyzed by Western blotting (WB) with anti-Myc antibody to detect MIZF (upper two panels). The same lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibody, and the resultant immunoprecipitates and lysates were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-GFP antibody to detect MBD2 (lower two panels). Molecular mass markers and the corresponding proteins are indicated on the left and right sides, respectively.

To determine the region of MIZF responsible for binding to MBD2, several deletion mutants were examined (Fig. 4A). As shown in Fig. 4B, C125-517 and C201-517 could bind to MBD2 (lanes 10-15). The removal of an additional 228 amino acids (C429-517) resulted in a complete loss of the binding activity to MBD2 (lanes 16-18), indicating that the N-terminal ~200 amino acids are dispensable for the interaction with MBD2. In fact, a mutant N1-201 failed to bind to MBD2 (lanes 4-6). Deletion of the C terminus (N1-429) did not affect the binding ability, suggesting that the C-terminal 89 amino acids are also dispensable for the interaction with MBD2 (lanes 7-9). These results indicate that the region comprising amino acids 201-429 of the MIZF protein, containing four zinc finger domains (ZF4-ZF7) (Fig. 1B), is required for its association with MBD2.


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Mapping of the MBD2-binding region of MIZF. A, schematic representation of MIZF and its deletion mutants. The shaded boxes denote the zinc finger domains of MIZF. A summary of the results of an in vitro binding assay is shown on the right. B, binding of MBD2 to MIZF proteins of various lengths. [35S]Methionine-labeled MIZF (wt) and its deletion mutants produced by an in vitro translation system were incubated with equal amounts of GST (G) or GST-MBD2 (M). Bound and input (I) proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography. The positions of the molecular mass markers are indicated on the left.

A series of MBD2 deletion mutants was also examined to map the region responsible for the interaction with MIZF (Fig. 5A). MIZF could bind to the MBD2 mutant C53-262, which lacks the 52 amino acids at the N terminus (Fig. 5B, lane 7), but not to mutants N1-52, C154-262, and C212-262, indicating that the N-terminal 52 amino acids are not responsible for the binding to MIZF (lanes 4, 8, and 9). In addition, MIZF could bind to deletion mutants N1-154 and N1-212, indicating that the C-terminal 108 amino acids are dispensable for the interaction with MIZF (lanes 5 and 6). Thus, the region from amino acid 53 to 154 of MBD2 is necessary for the association with MIZF.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mapping of the MIZF-binding region of MBD2. A, schematic representation of GST-MBD2 and its deletion mutants. The shaded box denotes the methyl-CpG binding domain. A summary of the results of an in vitro binding assay is shown on the right. B, binding of MIZF to MBD2 proteins of various lengths. MBD2 and its deletion mutants produced as GST fusion protein were incubated with in vitro translated, [35S]methionine-labeled MIZF. Bound and input proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography (upper panel). To determine the amount of GST fusion proteins used for the assay, the gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (lower panel). The position of MIZF is indicated by the arrow.

Involvement of MIZF in Transcriptional Repression-- The effect of MIZF on transcription was examined using a reporter assay with a DNA polymerase beta  promoter and GAL4-binding sites (Fig. 6A). When the full-length MIZF cDNA fused with GAL4-DBD was transfected into cells, transcription of the reporter gene was significantly inhibited by MIZF in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6B). Similar results were obtained using an MIZF mutant, C201-517, which possesses binding activity to MBD2. These results suggest that MIZF functions as a negative regulator for transcription and that MIZF-mediated transcriptional repression is dependent on the binding to MBD2, and, in turn, the association with an HDAC complex. In contrast, another MIZF mutant, N1-201, which does not bind to MBD2, did not repress the transcription (Fig. 6B). In addition, the results shown in Fig. 6B demonstrate that transcriptional repression by MIZF can be substantially relieved by TSA, an inhibitor of histone deacetylases. To examine whether MIZF interacts with endogenous HDAC1, an immunoprecipitation experiment followed by Western blotting analysis was performed on lysates from 293 cells transiently expressing MIZF-Myc. As expected, HDAC1 was detected in the immunoprecipitates containing MIZF. MIZF-Myc was specifically coimmunoprecipitated with HDAC1 by an anti-HDAC1 antibody but not by normal rabbit serum (Fig. 6C).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Transcriptional repression by MIZF. A, schematic representation of the reporter and expression vectors used in the luciferase assay. The pGL3-G5polbeta reporter vector contains the firefly luciferase gene, human DNA polymerase beta  promoter, five GAL4-binding sites (5× GAL), and an SV40 enhancer. The solid and open columns denote MBD2 and MIZF, respectively, and the shaded boxes represent zinc finger domains. B, effect of MIZF on transcription. 293 cells were transfected with pGL3-G5polbeta , pRL-TK, and the expression plasmids indicated. After incubation for 24 h, the transfected cells were divided into two dishes and incubated in the presence (shaded columns) or absence (solid columns) of 100 ng/ml TSA. The firefly luciferase activity was normalized to the control sea pansy luciferase activity. The results are expressed as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. C, interaction between MIZF and endogenous HDAC1. Lysates from 293 cells transfected with pMIZF-Myc were prepared 48 h after transfection and immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-HDAC1 antibody or normal rabbit serum (control Ab). MIZF-Myc was detected in the immunoprecipitates by Western blotting (WB) using anti-Myc antibody (upper panel). Expression levels of the expected proteins in the lysates were confirmed by Western blotting using antibody against Myc (middle panel) or HDAC1 (lower panel). The positions of MIZF and HDAC1 are indicated by arrows.

Enhancement of the MBD2-mediated Repression by MIZF-- To confirm whether MIZF can modulate MBD2-mediated repression, a luciferase reporter assay was performed in the presence or absence of MIZF. MIZF enhanced the MBD2-mediated repression in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7A). Basal transcription of GAL4-DBD alone was not affected by MIZF. To investigate the involvement of HDAC in this effect of MIZF, cells expressing FLAG-MBD2 and MIZF-Myc were analyzed by an immunoprecipitation assay. As shown in Fig. 7, B and C, the expression of MIZF produced significant increases in the levels of both the HDAC1 protein and HDAC activity, an effect that was TSA-sensitive. These results suggest that MIZF may enhance MBD2-mediated repression by recruiting HDAC activity to the complex.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Enhancement of MBD2-mediated transcriptional repression by MIZF. A, effect of MIZF on MBD2-mediated repression. The expression plasmid (100 ng) for GAL4-DBD or GAL4-MBD2 was transfected into 293 cells together with 10 ng of pGL3-G5polbeta in the absence or presence of increasing amounts of pMIZF-Myc (100, 200, and 300 ng). The relative luciferase activities were determined and normalized to the control sea pansy luciferase activities. The results are expressed as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. B, interaction between MBD2 and endogenous HDAC1. Lysates from 293 cells transfected with the indicated combinations of pFLAG-MBD2 and pMIZF-Myc were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were analyzed for MBD2 and HDAC1 by Western blotting (upper two panels). The expression levels of the expected proteins in the lysates were confirmed for MBD2, MIZF, and HDAC1 by Western blotting (lower three panels). The amount of a protein band was quantified from its area by use of the NIH Image software and is indicated below each panel. The positions of MIZF, MBD2, and HDAC1 are indicated by arrows. C, detection of HDAC activity. Activities of histone deacetylase recovered in the MBD2 immunoprecipitates were measured in the presence or absence of 100 ng/ml TSA. Values represent the mean ± S.D. of three independent assays.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A close relationship between methylation-dependent repression and histone deacetylation has been demonstrated. The transcriptional effects of CpG methylation are mediated by MBD-containing proteins. Among MBD proteins, MeCP2 is known to bind to methylated CpG pairs and functions as a transcriptional repressor by recruiting Sin3A and HDACs (16-18). MBD2, another methyl-CpG binding protein, has also been shown to be a component of the MeCP1-HDAC complex that includes RbAp46/48 and Sin3A (24). In addition, MBD2 interacts with the NuRD complex (21). These findings suggest that MBD2 is likely to function as a molecular link between methyl-CpG and HDACs. To understand the mechanisms underlying the MBD2-dependent transcriptional repression and recruitment of HDACs, we identify MBD2-interacting molecules using a yeast two-hybrid system. When a human fetal brain cDNA library was screened using mouse MBD2 as bait, a novel zinc finger protein, MIZF, was specifically isolated. This MIZF protein binds to MBD2 and represses the promoter-driven transcription activity. Like the MBD2 protein, the MIZF protein is expressed in a wide variety of tissues and cells. These results suggest that MIZF is expressed abundantly in cells and functions as a negative regulator for transcription by binding to MBD2 and to HDAC systems.

We demonstrated that the C-terminal region of MIZF (amino acids 201-517) is required for the association with MBD2 (Fig. 4) and for the TSA-sensitive repression (Fig. 6). The N-terminal region of MIZF (amino acids 1-201), which lacks MBD2-binding activity, does not repress transcription (Figs. 4 and 6). These results suggest that MIZF-derived repression is totally dependent on binding to MBD2 and HDACs. Indeed, MIZF was coimmunoprecipitated with endogenous HDAC1 (Fig. 6). It has become clear that several transcriptional repressors, such as YY1, Bcl-6, and Rb family proteins, are able to associate directly with HDAC1 or HDAC2 (31-33). The minimal structures required for the association with HDAC are thus far identified as the LXCXE-like motif in Rb family proteins, a 30-amino acid glycine-rich region in YY1, and the POZ domain in Bcl-6. However, MIZF does not possess regions homologous to these motifs. In addition, we could not detect the interaction with any known HDACs in a yeast two-hybrid assay when MIZF cDNA was used as bait,2 indicating that MIZF is unable to associate directly with HDACs. It has been reported that MBD2 binds to MBD3, an integral component of the NuRD complex (34), and also interacts with a distinct HDAC-containing complex, MeCP1 (24). Therefore, it is rather possible that MIZF binds to MBD2, which in turn recruits HDACs to the protein complex. A series of associations of these proteins would then result in transcriptional repression. This is supported at least in part by the finding that the coexpression of MIZF and MBD2 significantly enhances HDAC protein recruitment and activity (Fig. 7).

MIZF is a unique, C2H2-type zinc finger protein involved in methylation-dependent transcriptional repression. The C2H2 zinc finger structure was initially identified in DNA-binding molecules such as the transcription factors TFIIIA and Krüppel, and at present a number of transcription factors are known to utilize C2H2 zinc fingers as DNA-binding domains (35). Most of these proteins contain multiple fingers, which are required for the recognition of a specific range of DNA sequences. Concerning an analogy with these proteins, it is possible that MIZF is a DNA-binding protein, and our preliminary results reveal that MIZF binds to some DNA sequences (data not shown). Thus, it is probable that MIZF functions as a repressor, in terms of its suppressive effect on transcription and DNA binding activity. As shown in Fig. 2C, we demonstrate here that MIZF and MBD2 are expressed quite abundantly and ubiquitously in cells and tissues, suggesting their important functions in cell. Although these two proteins co-localize in some areas in nuclei, their main localizations are quite different; MIZF localizes diffusely in the nucleoplasmic region, whereas MBD2 preferentially localizes in the major satellite, which is known to be a highly methylated region of the genome. Thus, it is possible that MIZF functions as a repressor in the regulation of the transcription of specific genes. Identification of the DNA sequences that interact with MIZF is necessary to understand this issue.

It has become clear that zinc fingers are also involved in protein-protein interactions. Homodimerization of the multifinger protein Ikaros is mediated by its two C-terminal fingers (36). Likewise, metastasis-associated protein 2, a subunit of the NuRD complex, which contains a C4-type zinc finger, also modulates HDAC activity by interacting with MBD3 (20). MIZF contains seven zinc fingers (ZF1-ZF7), and four fingers in the C-terminal region are required for the interaction with MBD2. Our preliminary study demonstrates that MIZF also associates with MBD3 in a manner similar to its binding with MBD2 (data not shown). MBD3 is a component of the NuRD complex (34). Thus, it is possible that MIZF recruits the NuRD complex through its interaction with MBD3. The analysis of MIZF-interacting proteins may provide a clue to understanding the mechanism of transcriptional repression induced by MIZF.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to P. James for providing the yeast strain PJ69-4A. We thank J. Yamaki for technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-24-548-2111; Fax: 81-24-548-3041; E-mail: yoshihom@fmu.ac.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 11, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107048200

2 M. Sekimata and Y. Homma, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MeCP, methyl-CpG-binding protein; MBD, methyl-CpG binding domain; HDAC, histone deacetylase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; NuRD, nucleosome remodeling histone deacetylase; GFP, green fluorescent protein; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; TSA, trichostatin A.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Bestor, T. H. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 74, 9-12[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Okano, M., Xie, S., and Li, E. (1998) Nat. Genet. 19, 219-220[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Li, E., Bestor, T. H., and Jaenisch, R. (1992) Cell 69, 915-926[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Bartolomei, M. S., and Tilghman, S. M. (1997) Annu. Rev. Genet. 31, 493-525[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Ballabio, A., and Willard, H. F. (1992) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2, 439-447[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Li, E., Beard, C., and Jaenisch, R. (1993) Nature 366, 362-365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Chen, R. Z., Pettersson, U., Beard, C., Jackson-Grusby, L., and Jaenisch, R. (1998) Nature 395, 89-93[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Surani, M. A. (1998) Cell 93, 309-312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Issa, J. P., Ottaviano, Y. L., Celano, P., Hamilton, S. R., Davidson, N. E., and Baylin, S. B. (1994) Nat. Genet. 7, 536-540[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Cameron, E. E., Bachman, K. E., Myohanen, S., Herman, J. G., and Baylin, S. B. (1999) Nat. Genet. 21, 103-107[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Bender, C. M., Pao, M. M., and Jones, P. A. (1998) Cancer Res. 58, 95-101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Razin, A. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4905-4908[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Meehan, R. R., Lewis, J. D., McKay, S., Kleiner, E. L., and Bird, A. P. (1989) Cell 58, 499-507[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Cross, S. H., Meehan, R. R., Nan, X., and Bird, A. (1997) Nat. Genet. 16, 256-259[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Hendrich, B., and Bird, A. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6538-6547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Nan, X., Campoy, F. J., and Bird, A. (1997) Cell 88, 471-481[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Nan, X., Ng, H. H., Johnson, C. A., Laherty, C. D., Turner, B. M., Eisenman, R. N., and Bird, A. (1998) Nature 393, 386-389[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Jones, P. L., Veenstra, G. J., Wade, P. A., Vermaak, D., Kass, S. U., Landsberger, N., Strouboulis, J., and Wolffe, A. P. (1998) Nat. Genet. 19, 187-191[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Ng, H. H., Jeppesen, P., and Bird, A. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 1394-1406
20. Fujita, N., Shimotake, N., Ohki, I., Chiba, T., Saya, H., Shirakawa, M., and Nakao, M. (2000) Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 5107-5118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Zhang, Y., Ng, H. H., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Bird, A., and Reinberg, D. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 1924-1935[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Wade, P. A., Gegonne, A., Jones, P. L., Ballestar, E., Aubry, F., and Wolffe, A. P. (1999) Nat. Genet. 23, 62-66[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Hendrich, B., Hardeland, U., Ng, H. H., Jiricny, J., and Bird, A. (1999) Nature 401, 301-304[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Ng, H. H., Zhang, Y., Hendrich, B., Johnson, C. A., Turner, B. M., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Reinberg, D., and Bird, A. (1999) Nat. Genet. 23, 58-61[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. James, P., Halladay, J., and Craig, E. A. (1996) Genetics 144, 1425-1436[Abstract]
26. Sadowski, I., Bell, B., Broad, P., and Hollis, M. (1992) Gene (Amst.) 118, 137-141[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Widen, S. G., Kedar, P., and Wilson, S. H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 16992-16998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Sekimata, M., Kabuyama, Y., Emori, Y., and Homma, Y. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17757-17762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Yoshida, M., Kijima, M., Akita, M., and Beppu, T. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 17174-17179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Evans, R. M., and Hollenberg, S. M. (1988) Cell 52, 1-3[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Ferreira, R., Magnaghi-Jaulin, L., Robin, P., Harel-Bellan, A., and Trouche, D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 10493-10498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Yang, W. M., Inouye, C., Zeng, Y., Bearss, D., and Seto, E. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 12845-12850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Dhordain, P., Lin, R. J., Quief, S., Lantoine, D., Kerckaert, J. P., Evans, R. M., and Albagli, O. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 4645-4651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Tatematsu, K., Yamazaki, T., and Ishikawa, F. (2000) Genes Cells 5, 677-688[Abstract]
35. Mackay, J. P., and Crossley, M. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 1-4[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Georgopoulos, K., Winandy, S., and Avitahl, N. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 155-176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Medina, M. van der Deen, A. Miele-Chamberland, R.-L. Xie, A. J. van Wijnen, J. L. Stein, and G. S. Stein
The HiNF-P/p220NPAT Cell Cycle Signaling Pathway Controls Nonhistone Target Genes
Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10334 - 10342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
M. Nishida, M. Kato, Y. Kato, N. Sasai, J. Ueda, M. Tachibana, Y. Shinkai, and M. Yamaguchi
Identification of ZNF200 as a novel binding partner of histone H3 methyltransferase G9a
Genes Cells, July 1, 2007; 12(7): 877 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Angrisano, F. Lembo, R. Pero, F. Natale, A. Fusco, V. E. Avvedimento, C. B. Bruni, and L. Chiariotti
TACC3 mediates the association of MBD2 with histone acetyltransferases and relieves transcriptional repression of methylated promoters
Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2006; 34(1): 364 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Gardian, S. E. Browne, D.-K. Choi, P. Klivenyi, J. Gregorio, J. K. Kubilus, H. Ryu, B. Langley, R. R. Ratan, R. J. Ferrante, et al.
Neuroprotective Effects of Phenylbutyrate in the N171-82Q Transgenic Mouse Model of Huntington's Disease
J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2005; 280(1): 556 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Sekimata and Y. Homma
Sequence-specific transcriptional repression by an MBD2-interacting zinc finger protein MIZF
Nucleic Acids Res., January 29, 2004; 32(2): 590 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
P. Mitra, R.-L. Xie, R. Medina, H. Hovhannisyan, S. K. Zaidi, Y. Wei, J. W. Harper, J. L. Stein, A. J. van Wijnen, and G. S. Stein
Identification of HiNF-P, a Key Activator of Cell Cycle-Controlled Histone H4 Genes at the Onset of S Phase
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2003; 23(22): 8110 - 8123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Fujita, R. Fujii, S. Aratani, T. Amano, A. Fukamizu, and T. Nakajima
Antithetic Effects of MBD2a on Gene Regulation
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 2645 - 2657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
F. Lembo, R. Pero, T. Angrisano, C. Vitiello, R. Iuliano, C. B. Bruni, and L. Chiariotti
MBDin, a Novel MBD2-Interacting Protein, Relieves MBD2 Repression Potential and Reactivates Transcription from Methylated Promoters
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2003; 23(5): 1656 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Brackertz, J. Boeke, R. Zhang, and R. Renkawitz
Two Highly Related p66 Proteins Comprise a New Family of Potent Transcriptional Repressors Interacting with MBD2 and MBD3
J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 40958 - 40966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Detich, J. Theberge, and M. Szyf
Promoter-specific Activation and Demethylation by MBD2/Demethylase
J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 35791 - 35794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
M. Tachibana, K. Sugimoto, M. Nozaki, J. Ueda, T. Ohta, M. Ohki, M. Fukuda, N. Takeda, H. Niida, H. Kato, et al.
G9a histone methyltransferase plays a dominant role in euchromatic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and is essential for early embryogenesis
Genes & Dev., July 15, 2002; 16(14): 1779 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. M. Daniel, C. M. Spring, H. C. Crawford, A. B. Reynolds, and A. Baig
The p120ctn-binding partner Kaiso is a bi-modal DNA-binding protein that recognizes both a sequence-specific consensus and methylated CpG dinucleotides
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2002; 30(13): 2911 - 2919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
E. Ballestar and M. Esteller
The impact of chromatin in human cancer: linking DNA methylation to gene silencing
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2002; 23(7): 1103 - 1109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)