![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 46, 42761-42766, November 16, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
§¶,
From the Institut für Pflanzenphysiologie,
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Weinbergweg 10, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany and ¶ Botanisches Institut der
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Menzinger Stra
e 67, D-80638
München, Germany
Received for publication, July 16, 2001, and in revised form, August 27, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Rieske Fe/S protein, a
nuclear-encoded subunit of the cytochrome
b6/f complex in chloroplasts, is
retarded in the stromal space after import into the chloroplast and
only slowly translocated further into the thylakoid membrane system. As
shown by the sensitivity to nigericin and to specific competitor
proteins, thylakoid transport takes place by the
The Rieske Fe/S protein of the cytochrome
b6/f complex is an indispensable
component of the photosynthetic electron transport chain in
chloroplasts. It is a bitopic polypeptide that faces the stroma
with only a few NH2-terminal residues and is anchored in the membrane with a single transmembrane helix (1). The
large COOH-terminal hydrophilic domain is exposed in the lumenal space
of the thylakoid membrane system and provides the ligands for the
[2 Fe-2 S]cluster (2, 3). In higher plants, the Rieske
protein is encoded in the nucleus and synthesized in the cytosol as a
precursor molecule with a transit peptide mediating solely the import
of the protein into the chloroplast stroma (4-7). The signal for the
subsequent thylakoid translocation step is provided by the
NH2-terminal region of the mature polypeptide chain that
comprises the membrane anchor (8).
To date, four independent pathways have been identified that are each
specific for the transport of a subset of thylakoid proteins
into or across the thylakoid membrane (summarized in Refs. 9 and 10).
According to their transport mechanism, they are described as
Sec-dependent,
In bacteria, a phylogenetically related protein transport pathway
exists that shows a strikingly similar substrate specificity (17-19).
This pathway is responsible for the export of a group of periplasmic
proteins carrying complex redox cofactors (20, 21). Assembly of these
cofactors takes place in the cytoplasm, i.e. the proteins
must fold at least partially prior to membrane translocation (22, 23).
Since the thylakoidal Rieske protein also carries a redox cofactor in
its native conformation, it is appealing to speculate that it likewise
might be targeted in a folded conformation by the
Here we show that the Rieske protein of higher plant chloroplasts is
transported with a mechanism that is unique among all thylakoid
proteins characterized so far. Although specifically translocated by
the Materials--
Spinach (Spinacia oleracea var.
Lina) was grown in hydroponic culture under constant
temperature (18-22 °C) and light regime (8/16-h light/dark
cycles) and harvested 2-3 months after sowing. Pea seedlings
(Pisum sativum var. Feltham First) were grown for 8-10 days under a 16-h photoperiod.
Protein Import into Isolated Chloroplasts--
Precursor
proteins were synthesized by in vitro transcription of the
corresponding cDNA clones and subsequent in vitro
translation in cell-free rabbit reticulocyte lysates in the presence of
[35S]methionine. Intact chloroplasts were isolated from
pea or spinach leaves by Percoll gradient centrifugation essentially as
described (25, 26). They were used in protein transport experiments following the protocol in Ref. 27. Competition experiments were performed with precursor proteins that were obtained by overexpression in Escherichia coli (28) and recovered from inclusion bodies by solubilization in a buffer containing 7 M urea, 30 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, and 2 mM EDTA. The
solubilized proteins were included in the import assays at
concentrations up to 4 µM, taking care that the
concentration of urea in the assays never exceeded 300 mM.
Control assays contained the same amount of buffer lacking any such
solubilized protein.
Miscellaneous--
Gel electrophoresis of proteins under
denaturing conditions was carried out according to Ref. 29. Blue native
gel electrophoresis (30, 31) was performed according to the protocol in
Ref. 32. The gels were exposed to PhosphorImager screens
(Molecular Dynamics) and analyzed using the software package ImageQuant
(version 1.2). Western blot analysis was performed according to Ref. 33
except that the blue native gels were soaked for 5 min at 40 °C in
transfer buffer containing 1% SDS and 14 mM
Thylakoid Targeting of the Rieske Protein Is Retarded in the
Chloroplast Stroma--
A striking feature in the targeting process of
the Rieske protein is the remarkably slow sorting of the protein within
the chloroplast to its final destination, the thylakoid membrane
system. In experiments with intact chloroplasts isolated from spinach, only about 30% of the Rieske protein that is imported into the organelle reaches the thylakoids during the incubation period of 20 min
(Fig. 1). The majority of the protein
accumulates in the stroma where it is processed to the mature
polypeptide of ~20 kDa. This behavior is even more pronounced if pea
chloroplasts are used in the experiment. In this instance, usually more
than 90% of the imported Rieske protein remains in the stroma during the incubation process (Fig. 1). Such retardation in the
intraorganellar sorting and targeting process is unique among all
thylakoid proteins analyzed so far. Usually, these proteins arrive at
their target membrane almost quantitatively under these conditions
(e.g. Ref. 27).
After the Rieske protein has reached the thylakoids, it is to a large
extent protected against the activity of proteases that are added
externally to reisolated thylakoid vesicles, which indicates that the
COOH-terminal hydrophilic domain has been completely translocated into
the lumenal space (Fig. 1). This fraction of the Rieske protein is
furthermore correctly assembled into the cytochrome
b6/f complex after import, as
demonstrated by its co-migration with the native cytochrome complex
during blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig.
2). Thus, whereas the protein is only
slowly targeted to the thylakoid system after import into the
organelle, its subsequent assembly into the cytochrome
b6/f complex apparently is an efficient process.
The Rieske Protein Is Targeted by the
Transport of the Rieske protein is furthermore impaired by saturating
amounts of TAT-specific competitor proteins such as the precursor of
the 23-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system. Raising the
concentration of competitor in the assays decreases the thylakoid
transport of the Rieske protein until at a competitor concentration of
0.5 µM, the protein accumulates almost quantitatively in
the stromal space after import (Fig. 4).
This demonstrates that the Rieske and the 23-kDa protein depend on the
same translocation machinery for their transport across the thylakoid
membrane. Sec-dependent protein transport (which was
analyzed in parallel) is not affected under these conditions (Ref. 39
and data not shown), confirming that competition was
pathway-specific.
Transport of the Rieske Protein Involves Components of the Sec
Pathway in Chloroplasts--
While the results so far clearly
demonstrate transport of the Rieske protein by the
We therefore performed competition experiments as a complementary
approach to examine the possible involvement of the Sec machinery in
Rieske transport. In these experiments, the thylakoidal Sec pathway was
saturated by excess amounts of the precursor of the 33-kDa subunit of
the oxygen-evolving system, a well characterized substrate of this
transport route (38, 45-47). Indeed, this treatment led to a
significant reduction of thylakoid transport of the Rieske protein
(Fig. 6A). However, as
compared with saturating the
These results strongly suggest that the Rieske protein, although
translocated across the thylakoid membrane by the Both the Rieske Protein and the 33-kDa Polypeptide Interact with
Several Protein Complexes during Their Passage through the Stromal
Space--
As an initial step to identify the components involved in
the intraorganellar targeting of the Rieske protein, we recovered the
stromal fraction after the import experiment and analyzed it in
nondenaturing gel systems. Unexpectedly, the Rieske protein was found
in several distinct complexes in the chloroplast stroma ranging in size
from ~130 to more than 700 kDa (Fig.
7). The size of the latter corresponds
well with that of the stromal cpn60 complex (48, 49). Indeed,
co-immunoprecipitation experiments could demonstrate that a substantial
amount of the newly imported Rieske protein is associated with this
chaperonine (Fig. 8), which corroborates
earlier observations of Madueno et al. (50). It is
particularly remarkable that not only the processed, mature size Rieske
protein but also its unprocessed precursor is found associated with
this chaperonine. Actually, the Rieske precursor shows even a much
higher affinity to cpn60 than the mature protein, which is
co-immunoprecipitated by the antisera only to a minor extent (<10%;
Fig. 8). These results suggest that the Rieske protein interacts with
the cpn60 complex very early in the translocation process, even before
the removal of the transit peptide by the stromal processing peptidase.
This interaction might even be mediated by the protein transport
machinery of the inner envelope membrane in chloroplasts because some
cpn60 was found in close contact with the translocase (51).
Cpn60 is probably not a binding partner for all the proteins imported
into the chloroplast, however, because no interaction with the 33-kDa
protein could be observed in import experiments, neither in native gel
systems nor by co-immunoprecipitation experiments (Fig. 7 and data not
shown). Instead, the stromal intermediate of the 33-kDa polypeptide,
which was obtained by supplementing the import assays with nigericin
(38), accumulates in at least four distinct complexes of ~150, 180, 200, and 220 kDa (Fig. 7). This multitude of stromal interactions was
totally unexpected because so far, only an interaction with SecA was
assumed (42). It is interesting to note that the Rieske protein also
accumulates, in addition to the cpn60 complex, in several complexes of
a similar size range (~120-250 kDa, Fig. 7). These complexes are not
well resolved, however, suggesting a limited stability and/or variable composition. Although the overall pattern of stromal complexes formed
by the Rieske protein and the 33-kDa protein is rather different, it
appears possible that at least one of the components required for
complex formation interacts with both thylakoid proteins during passage
through the chloroplast stroma. This could then cause the competition
observed between the Rieske protein and the 33-kDa protein, despite the
fact that the two proteins finally utilize different transport
machineries in the thylakoid system for their membrane translocation.
The Rieske protein of the cytochrome
b6/f complex in chloroplasts is
transported to and across the thylakoid membrane with a mechanism that
is unique among those of all chloroplast proteins analyzed so far.
While the actual membrane transport is mediated by the
The participation of both the There are numerous candidates for such targeting factors in the
chloroplast stroma. As shown by native gel electrophoresis, both the
Rieske protein and the 33-kDa polypeptide interact after import into
the organelle with several stromal complexes of high molecular
mass. It remains elusive, however, which of these complexes represents
true transport intermediates and could thus be responsible for the
observed competition. Because of the size difference of the two
proteins analyzed, co-migration even of corresponding protein complexes
cannot be expected, so this point remains unsolved at the
moment. However, it is already remarkable that there is such a
multitude of interactions for proteins passing through the chloroplast
stroma on their way to the thylakoids. This suggests a much higher
degree of complexity in the recruitment of targeting factors than
anticipated so far. Apparently, stromal factors in addition to SecA are
involved in Sec-dependent protein targeting of the 33-kDa
protein. Even more striking, the Rieske protein is the first
example of a protein transported by the It will be interesting to examine whether the demand for stromal
factors in the intraorganellar targeting of the Rieske protein is
created by the transport signal or by its "passenger,"
i.e. the hydrophilic domain that is translocated across the
thylakoid membrane. Interaction of the hydrophilic domain with stromal
components might, for example, be required for the assembly of the
iron-sulfur cluster into the apoprotein if this process takes place in
the chloroplast stroma. A precedent for such a scenario is found in yeast mitochondria, which house an essential part of the machinery for
the biogenesis of Fe/S proteins in their matrix (52). Stromal assembly
of the Fe/S cluster and, consequently, at least partial folding of the
Rieske protein prior to membrane transfer would also be in line with
transport by the Stromal retardation of the Rieske protein to allow for cofactor
assembly and folding might also be the cause for the exceptional structure of its thylakoid transport signal. Not only is it the first
membrane anchor signal known for thylakoid proteins, but it furthermore
lacks the twin-R motif, which is indicative for Taken together, the exceptional transport mechanism of the Rieske
protein, which is the only chloroplast protein with cyanobacterial homologs known so far that is targeted by the thylakoidal
pH-dependent TAT pathway. The Rieske protein is an
untypical TAT substrate, however. It is only the second integral
membrane protein shown to utilize this pathway, and it is the first
authentic substrate without a cleavable signal peptide. Transport is
instead mediated by the NH2-terminal membrane
anchor, which lacks, however, the twin-arginine motif indicative of
pH/TAT-dependent transport signals. Furthermore, transport is affected by sodium azide as well as by competitor proteins
for the Sec pathway in chloroplasts, demonstrating for the first time
some cross-talk of the two pathways. This might take place in the
stroma where the Rieske protein accumulates after import in several
complexes of high molecular mass, among which the cpn60 complex is the
most prominent. These untypical features suggest that the Rieske
protein represents an intermediate or early state in the
evolution of the thylakoidal protein transport pathways.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
pH/TAT1 (twin
arginine translocation)-dependent,
SRP-dependent, and spontaneous pathway, respectively. Among
these, the
pH/TAT pathway has received particular attention
in the past few years because of its unique mechanism; it does
not require soluble factors nor nucleoside triphosphates but depends
solely on the transthylakoidal proton gradient (11-13). In contrast to
the other pathways, it is furthermore capable of translocating not only
unfolded polypeptide chains but also folded protein domains across the
membrane (14-16).
pH/TAT-dependent pathway across the thylakoid membrane.
However, the thylakoid transport signal of the Rieske protein does not
resemble
pH/TAT-specific targeting signals. It is not a cleavable
signal peptide but operates as a signal anchor domain (8), and
furthermore, it lacks the indicative twin-R motif (24), which
even accounts for the denomination of the entire pathway.
pH/TAT-dependent pathway across the thylakoid membrane, the targeting process is characterized by a number of unusual
features including the involvement of components from the
Sec-dependent protein transport route. This suggests that the Rieske protein might represent an ancient or intermediate state in
the evolution of transport pathways at the thylakoid membrane in chloroplasts.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-mercaptoethanol prior to transfer onto polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes. Stromal protein complexes were separated under
nondenaturing conditions (34) using a running buffer of 45 mM Tris and 45 mM boric acid. All other methods
followed the protocols of Sambrook et al. (35).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (87K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Import of the Rieske Fe/S protein into
chloroplasts from spinach and pea. The Rieske precursor protein
was obtained by in vitro transcription/translation of
the corresponding cDNA from spinach and then incubated with
isolated chloroplasts for 20 min at 25 °C in the light. After the
import reaction, the chloroplasts were treated with thermolysin,
reisolated by Percoll gradient centrifugation, and fractionated into
stroma (lanes s) and thylakoids, which were subsequently
treated with either thermolysin (lanes +) or mock-treated
(lanes
). Stoichiometric amounts of each chloroplast
fraction, corresponding to 12.5 µg of chlorophyll, were separated on
10-17.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels and visualized by
phosphorimaging. In lanes t, 0.25 µl of the in
vitro translation assay was loaded. The positions of the precursor
(p, ~26 kDa) and mature polypeptide (m, ~20
kDa) are indicated by open and closed arrowheads,
respectively. Note that because of an in-frame AUG at codon number 18, an additional translation product ~2 kDa smaller than the full size
precursor is found after in vitro translation, which does
not affect the import reaction. Rieske protein accumulating in the
different chloroplast fractions was quantified, and the relative
amounts (in terms of percentage of protein imported into the organelle)
are given below the lanes. The mobilities of the
molecular size markers are indicated at the right.

View larger version (96K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Assembly of the newly imported Rieske protein
into the cytochrome b6/f
complex of spinach chloroplasts. Thylakoids were recovered
after import of the radiolabeled Rieske precursor protein and
separated, after mild solubilization, in a 5-13.5% blue native
polyacrylamide gel. A, the untreated gel showing the stained
protein complexes. B, an autoradiograph of this gel.
C, the results of Western analyses from such gels using
antisera raised against constituent subunits of the photosynthetic
protein complexes within the thylakoid membrane.
PsaF, photosystem I (PS I), ~700 kDa;
CFoII, ATP synthase (ATPase), ~640 kDa;
CP24, photosystem II (PS II), ~480 kDa;
Cyt b6, cytochrome b6/f
complex (Cyt b/f) ~430 kDa; light-harvesting complex
(LHC), ~280 kDa.
pH-dependent
TAT Pathway to the Thylakoids--
Similar to a few other proteins,
e.g. PSI-F (36, 37), the Rieske protein depends on intact
chloroplasts for its thylakoid transport and is not able to translocate
into isolated thylakoid vesicles obtained after osmotic lysis of the
organelles (data not shown). However, it is possible in experiments
with intact organelles to demonstrate that the Rieske protein is
targeted across the thylakoid membrane by the
pH-dependent TAT pathway. In the presence of nigericin,
an ionophore that dissipates the transthylakoidal proton gradient,
thylakoid translocation of the Rieske protein is almost abolished, and
only minute amounts are found associated with the thylakoid membrane
(Fig. 3). Transport inhibition cannot be
cured by supplementing the assays with increased amounts of ATP, in
contrast to the findings for Sec-dependent transport (38),
proving that it is the proton gradient itself (rather than its
influence on ATP synthesis) that is required for the translocation
process.

View larger version (57K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Thylakoid transport of the Rieske protein in
spinach chloroplasts depends on the transthylakoidal proton
gradient. Import experiments were performed in the presence
or absence of the protonophor nigericin (nig) (2 µM). In the experiments shown in A, the assays
were additionally supplemented with ATP to a final concentration of 8 mM. B, standard conditions. For further details,
see the legend for Fig. 1. p, precursor; m,
mature polypeptide; t, translation assay; s,
stroma.

View larger version (59K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Saturation of the
pH/TAT-dependent pathway totally
inhibits transport of the Rieske protein across the thylakoid
membrane. Import experiments were performed in the presence of
increasing amounts of precursor (p) of the 23-kDa subunit of
the oxygen-evolving system that were obtained by overexpression in
E. coli. The concentration of competitor protein (in
µM) present in each assay is indicated above
the lanes. The portion of the Rieske protein that is
translocated across the thylakoid membrane under these conditions (in
terms of percentage of protein imported into the organelle) is given
below each panel. For further details, see the
legend for Fig. 1. m, mature polypeptide; t,
translation assay; s, stroma.
pH/TAT pathway,
other features of the transport process suggest some deviation from
this route. In the presence of sodium azide, a potent inhibitor of
Sec-dependent protein transport in prokaryotes and
chloroplasts (40-42), thylakoid transport of the Rieske protein is
affected (Fig. 5A). The
inhibitory effect is moderate but still specific because transport of
typical
pH/TAT substrates such as the 23-kDa subunit of the
oxygen-evolving system is not disturbed by the antimetabolite (Fig.
5B). At first glance, this suggests the involvement of SecA
in the transport process, the azide-sensitive translocation ATPase of
the Sec pathway (40). However, it should be considered that sodium
azide is not only an inhibitor of SecA function but is able to impair
the activity of numerous other nucleotide-binding proteins
(e.g. Ref. 43). This is particularly relevant here because
spinach chloroplasts, which were used in our experiments, are known to
harbor a SecA protein that is largely azide-resistant (44).

View larger version (72K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The SecA inhibitor sodium azide affects the
thylakoid transfer of the Rieske protein. Import experiments were
performed in the presence or absence of 10 mM sodium azide
with the precursors (p) of either the Rieske protein
(A) or the 23-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system
(B). For further details, see the legends for Figs. 1 and 4.
m, mature polypeptide; t, translation assay;
s, stroma.
pH-dependent TAT pathway by
the 23-kDa precursor protein, the degree of inhibition is far less
pronounced. Even at a concentration of 4 µM Sec
competitor in the assays, thylakoid transport of the Rieske protein
takes place with a rate close to 50% of the control level, although as
little as 0.5 µM TAT competitor is sufficient to block
thylakoid transport of the protein completely (Fig. 4). Still,
saturation of the Sec machinery causes a true competitive effect
because the degree of inhibition varies with the concentration of the competitor in the assays (Fig. 6A). The specificity of the
reaction was confirmed in control experiments in which the 23- and
33-kDa subunits of the oxygen-evolving system were imported in the
presence of the Sec competitor. As expected, only the Sec pathway is
saturated under these conditions, as demonstrated by the appearance of
the stromal intermediate of the 33-kDa protein (Fig. 6B). In
contrast, the
pH-dependent thylakoid transport route is
not affected by the Sec competitor. Only transport of the
23-kDa protein across the chloroplast envelope is impaired by the
competitor to a certain extent, which confirms that both proteins are
imported by the same translocase into the organelle.

View larger version (95K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Saturation of the Sec-dependent
pathway affects transport of the Rieske protein across the thylakoid
membrane. Import experiments were performed in the presence of
increasing amounts of precursor (p) of the 33-kDa subunit of
the oxygen-evolving system that were obtained by overexpression in
E. coli. The concentration of competitor protein (in
µM) present in each assay is indicated above
the lanes. A, import of the Rieske precusor
protein. B, analysis of control proteins for the
pH/TAT-dependent (23) and the
Sec-dependent pathway (33). The shaded
arrowhead indicates the position of the stromal intermediate
(i) for the 33-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system.
For further details, see the legends for Figs. 1 and 4. m,
mature polypeptide; t, translation assay; s,
stroma.
pH/TAT translocase, depends for its correct targeting on the availability of
components also involved in Sec-dependent protein
targeting. However, it appears unlikely that the whole process of
thylakoid targeting and translocation can be mediated solely by the Sec machinery because in this case, the complete block of Rieske transport in the presence of the 23-kDa TAT competitor protein could not be explained.

View larger version (79K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Association of newly imported proteins with
complexes in the chloroplast stroma. Radiolabeled precursors of
the Rieske protein (Ri) and the 33-kDa subunit of the
oxygen-evolving system (33) were imported into spinach
chloroplasts. After the import reaction (which in the case of the
33-kDa protein was performed in the presence of 2 µM
nigericin), the stromal fractions were recovered and separated
overnight on a 4-18% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gradient gel. The
gel was stained with Coomassie R-250 (A) and subsequently
exposed to a PhosphorImager screen (B). The arrow
marks the position of the stromal cpn60 chaperonine complex. The
mobilities of the molecular size markers are indicated at the
left. For further details, see the legend for Fig. 1.

View larger version (103K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
The Rieske protein binds to the stromal cpn60
chaperonine complex immediately after import into the chloroplast.
Stromal fraction recovered from spinach chloroplasts after the import
of radiolabeled Rieske precursor (p) protein was subjected
to immunoprecipitation for 1 h at 4 °C using antisera raised
against Hsp60 from yeast mitochondria (B). Lane 1 contains 10% of the stromal proteins that remained in the supernatant
after immunoprecipitation. In lane 2, the whole pellet
containing all proteins that were co-immunoprecipitated by the
antibodies was loaded. For comparison, the autoradiograph of the import
experiment used for immunoprecipitation is presented in A.
For further details, see the legend for Fig. 1. m, mature
polypeptide; t, translation assay; s,
stroma.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
pH-dependent TAT translocase, the delivery of the
protein to this translocase depends on components that are also
involved in Sec-dependent protein transport. Thus, the Rieske protein represents the first link between the Sec- and the
pH-dependent transport routes in chloroplasts that so
far were considered to operate completely independently from each other.
pH/TAT-dependent and part
of the Sec-dependent transport machineries in Rieske
transport becomes evident in competition experiments. Saturating the
two pathways independently from each other by specific competitor
proteins in each case affects the thylakoid transport of the Rieske
protein, although to a different extent. In the presence of TAT
competitor (23-kDa protein), transport of the Rieske protein is
completely abolished (Fig. 4), demonstrating that a functional
pH/TAT pathway is essential for its membrane transport. Because the
23-kDa protein that was used as the competitor traverses the stromal
space as a tightly folded monomer, probably without interacting with
the stromal targeting and folding machinery (14), it is likely that its
competition with the Rieske protein occurs at the thylakoid membrane,
presumably at the receptor or at the translocase itself. The inhibitory
effect observed with the Sec competitor (33-kDa protein), on the other
hand, requires a significantly higher concentration of competitor
protein and still does not lead to a complete block of the thylakoid
transport process (Fig. 6A). This suggests that competition
in this case is caused by saturating a relatively abundant targeting
factor rather than the translocase at the membrane.
pH-dependent pathway in chloroplasts that shows interaction with, and probably requirement for, stromal components in the targeting process. Thus,
protein transport by the
pH/TAT pathway can no longer be strictly
distinguished by its independence of stromal factors.
pH/TAT translocase, which is capable of
translocating folded protein domains across the membrane (15, 16). It
would furthermore explain why the Rieske protein but not the 33-kDa
polypeptide interacts in the stroma with the cpn60 chaperonine (Fig.
7), the chloroplast homolog of the hsp60 folding machinery of
mitochondria and prokaryotes (48, 53, 54). Sec-dependent
targeting of the 33-kDa protein requires the unfolded polypeptide (55),
and any folding of the protein in the stroma would probably impair its
membrane translocation.
pH/TAT-targeting
signals. Instead, a KR-sequence is found at the corresponding position
in all Rieske proteins from higher plant chloroplasts characterized to
date, which should essentially prevent transport of the protein across
the membrane (19, 24, 56). Interestingly, cyanobacteria, which are the
closest relatives to the endosymbiotic ancestors of chloroplasts known
today, possess Rieske proteins with perfect twin-R motifs in their
presumed targeting signals. It is therefore appealing to speculate that
the thylakoid transport signal of the Rieske protein was modified after
the phylogenetic transfer of the gene into the nucleus in order to slow
down the passage of the protein through the stromal space to the
thylakoid membrane, thereby providing sufficient time for the assembly
of the Fe/S cluster.
pH/TAT pathway, suggests that it is an ancient substrate of this
pathway and thus can be considered as a missing link in the evolution of the protein transport pathways operating at the thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Thomas Langer for providing the antisera raised against Hsp60 from yeast mitochondria.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants SFB 184, SFB 363, and KL862/1-1.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
§ Present address: Laboratory of Cell Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021.
To whom correspondence should be sent. Tel.: 49-345-55-26-200;
Fax: 49-345-55-27-285; E-mail:
klosgen@pflanzenphys.uni-halle.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 28, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106690200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviation used is: TAT, twin arginine translocation.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Karnauchov, I., Herrmann, R. G., and Klösgen, R. B. (1997) FEBS Lett. 408, 206-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Zhang, H.,
Carrell, C. J.,
Huang, D.,
Sled, V.,
Ohnishi, T.,
Smith, J. L.,
and Cramer, W. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31360-31366 |
| 3. | Carrell, C. J., Zhang, H., Craner, W. A., and Smith, J. L. (1997) Structure 5, 1613-1625[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Steppuhn, J., Rother, C., Hermans, J., Jansen, T., Salnikow, J., Hauska, G., and Herrmann, R. G. (1987) Mol. Gen. Genet. 210, 171-177[CrossRef] |
| 5. | Bartling, D., Clausmeyer, S., Oelmüller, R., and Herrmann, R. G. (1990) Bot. Mag. Tokyo 2, 119-144 |
| 6. | Madueno, F., Napier, J. A., Cejudo, F. J., and Gray, J. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 289-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Salter, A. H., Newman, B. J., Napier, J. A., and Gray, J. C. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 569-574[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Madueno, F.,
Bradshaw, S. A.,
and Gray, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
17458-17463 |
| 9. | Klösgen, R. B. (1997) J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biology 38, 1-9[CrossRef] |
| 10. | Dalbey, R. E., and Robinson, C. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 17-22[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Mould, R. M.,
and Robinson, C.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
12189-12193 |
| 12. |
Cline, K.,
Ettinger, W. F.,
and Theg, S. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
2688-2696 |
| 13. | Klösgen, R. B., Brock, I. A., Herrmann, R. G., and Robinson, C. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 18, 1031-1034[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Creighton, A. M.,
Hulford, A.,
Mant, A.,
Robinson, D.,
and Robinson, C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1663-1669 |
| 15. | Clark, S. A., and Theg, S. M. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 923-934[Abstract] |
| 16. |
Hynds, P. J.,
Robinson, D.,
and Robinson, C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
34868-34874 |
| 17. |
Mori, H.,
and Cline, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
11405-11408 |
| 18. | Wexler, M., Bogsch, E. G., Klösgen, R. B., Palmer, T., Robinson, C., and Berks, B. C. (1998) FEBS Lett. 431, 339-342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Halbig, D., Hou, B., Freudl, R., Sprenger, G. A., and Klösgen, R. B. (1999) FEBS Lett. 447, 95-98[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Berks, B. C. (1996) Mol. Microbiol. 22, 393-404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Weiner, J. H., Bilous, P. T., Shaw, G. M., Lubitz, S. P., Frost, L., Thomas, G. H., Cole, J. A., and Turner, R. J. (1998) Cell 93, 93-101[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Santini, C-L., Ize, B., Chanal, A., Müller, M., Giordano, G., and Wu, L.-F. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 101-112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Blaudeck, N.,
Sprenger, G. A.,
Freudl, R.,
and Wiegert, T.
(2001)
J. Bacteriol.
183,
604-610 |
| 24. | Chaddock, A. M., Mant, A., Karnauchov, I., Brink, S., Herrmann, R. G., Klösgen, R. B., and Robinson, C. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2715-2722[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Bartlett, S. G, Grossman, A. R., and Chua, N.-H. (1982) in Methods in Chloroplast Molecular Biology (Edelmann, M. , Hallick, R. B. , and Chua, N.-H., eds) , pp. 1081-1091, Elsevier Biomedical Press, New York |
| 26. | Brock, I. W., Hazell, L., Michl, D., Skovgaard Nielsen, V., Lindberg Møller, B., Herrmann, R. G., Klösgen, R. B., and Robinson, C. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 23, 717-725[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Clausmeyer, S.,
Klösgen, R. B.,
and Herrmann, R. G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13869-13876 |
| 28. | Michl, D., Robinson, C., Shackleton, J. B., Herrmann, R. G., and Klösgen, R. B. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1310-1317[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Schägger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 199, 223-231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Schägger, H., Cramer, W. A., and von Jagow, G. (1994) Anal. Biochem. 217, 220-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Berghöfer, J., and Klösgen, R. B. (1999) FEBS Lett. 460, 328-332[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Vachereau, A. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 179, 206-208[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Reuter, W., Nickel, C., and Wehrmeyer, W. (1990) FEBS Lett. 273, 155-158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 36. |
Karnauchov, I.,
Cai, D.,
Schmidt, I.,
Herrmann, R. G.,
and Klösgen, R. B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32871-32878 |
| 37. |
Mant, A.,
Nielsen, S. V.,
Knott, T. G.,
Møller, B. L.,
and Robinson, C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27303-27309 |
| 38. |
Mant, A.,
Schmidt, I.,
Herrmann, R. G.,
Robinson, C.,
and Klösgen, R. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23275-23281 |
| 39. | Karnauchov, I., Herrmann, R. G., Pakrasi, H., and Klösgen, R. B. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 249, 497-504[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Oliver, D. B.,
Cabelli, R. J.,
Dolan, K. M.,
and Jarosik, G. P.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
8227-8231 |
| 41. |
Knott, T.,
and Robinson, C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
7843-7846 |
| 42. |
Yuan, J.,
Henry, R.,
McCaffery, M.,
and Cline, K.
(1994)
Science
266,
796-798 |
| 43. | Muneyuki, E., Makino, M., Kamata, H., Kagawa, Y., Yoshida, M., and Hirata, H. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1144, 62-68[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Berghöfer, J.,
Karnauchov, I.,
Herrmann, R. G.,
and Klösgen, R. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
18341-18346 |
| 45. | Cline, K., Henry, R., Li, C., and Yuan, J. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4105-4114[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. |
Hulford, A.,
Hazell, L.,
Mould, R. M.,
and Robinson, C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3251-3256 |
| 47. |
Yuan, J.,
and Cline, K.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18463-18467 |
| 48. | Hemmingsen, S. M., Woolford, C., van der Vies, S. M., Tilly, K., Dennis, D. T., Georgopoulos, C. P., Hendrix, R. W., and Ellis, R. J. (1988) Nature 333, 330-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. |
Lubben, T. H.,
Donaldson, G. K.,
Viitanen, P. V.,
and Gatenby, A. A.
(1989)
Plant Cell
1,
1223-1230 |
| 50. | Madueno, F., Napier, J. A., and Gray, J. C. (1993) Plant Cell 5, 1865-1876[Abstract] |
| 51. |
Kessler, F.,
and Blobel, G.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
7684-7689 |
| 52. | Lill, R., Diekert, K., Kaut, A., Lange, H., Pelzer, W., Prohl, C., and Kispal, G. (1999) Biol. Chem. 380, 1157-1166 |
| 53. | Goloubinoff, P., Christeller, J. T., Gatenby, A. A., and Lorimer, G. H. (1989) Nature 342, 884-889[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 54. | Ostermann, J., Horwich, A. L., Neupert, W., and Hartl, F. U. (1989) Nature 341, 125-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 55. |
Pugsley, A. P.
(1993)
Microbiol. Rev.
57,
50-108 |
| 56. |
Henry, R.,
Carrigan, M.,
McCaffrey, M.,
Ma, X.,
and Cline, K.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
823-832 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. B. Gould, E. Fan, F. Hempel, U.-G. Maier, and R. B. Klosgen Translocation of a Phycoerythrin {alpha} Subunit across Five Biological Membranes J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2007; 282(41): 30295 - 30302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Frielingsdorf and R. B. Klosgen Prerequisites for Terminal Processing of Thylakoidal Tat Substrates J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 24455 - 24462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Lindenstrauss and T. Bruser Conservation and Variation between Rhodobacter capsulatus and Escherichia coli Tat Systems J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2006; 188(22): 7807 - 7814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. J. B. Sibbald, A. K. Ziebandt, S. Engelmann, M. Hecker, A. de Jong, H. J. M. Harmsen, G. C. Raangs, I. Stokroos, J. P. Arends, J. Y. F. Dubois, et al. Mapping the Pathways to Staphylococcal Pathogenesis by Comparative Secretomics Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 70(3): 755 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Fisher and M. P. DeLisa A Little Help from My Friends: Quality Control of Presecretory Proteins in Bacteria J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2004; 186(22): 7467 - 7473. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Santini and R. N. vanden Hoven Molybdenum-Containing Arsenite Oxidase of the Chemolithoautotrophic Arsenite Oxidizer NT-26 J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2004; 186(6): 1614 - 1619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Jeong, A. Rose, and I. Meier MFP1 is a thylakoid-associated, nucleoid-binding protein with a coiled-coil structure Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2003; 31(17): 5175 - 5185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. H. Jongbloed, H. Antelmann, M. Hecker, R. Nijland, S. Bron, U. Airaksinen, F. Pries, W. J. Quax, J. M. van Dijl, and P. G. Braun Selective Contribution of the Twin-Arginine Translocation Pathway to Protein Secretion in Bacillus subtilis J. Biol. Chem., November 8, 2002; 277(46): 44068 - 44078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||