JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106690200 on August 28, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 46, 42761-42766, November 16, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/46/42761    most recent
M106690200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molik, S.
Right arrow Articles by Klösgen, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molik, S.
Right arrow Articles by Klösgen, R. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Rieske Fe/S Protein of the Cytochrome b6/f Complex in Chloroplasts

MISSING LINK IN THE EVOLUTION OF PROTEIN TRANSPORT PATHWAYS IN CHLOROPLASTS?*

Sabine MolikDagger, Ivan KarnauchovDagger§, Constanze Weidlich, Reinhold G. Herrmann, and Ralf Bernd Klösgen||

From the Institut für Pflanzenphysiologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Weinbergweg 10, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany and  Botanisches Institut der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Menzinger Strabeta e 67, D-80638 München, Germany

Received for publication, July 16, 2001, and in revised form, August 27, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Rieske Fe/S protein, a nuclear-encoded subunit of the cytochrome b6/f complex in chloroplasts, is retarded in the stromal space after import into the chloroplast and only slowly translocated further into the thylakoid membrane system. As shown by the sensitivity to nigericin and to specific competitor proteins, thylakoid transport takes place by the Delta pH-dependent TAT pathway. The Rieske protein is an untypical TAT substrate, however. It is only the second integral membrane protein shown to utilize this pathway, and it is the first authentic substrate without a cleavable signal peptide. Transport is instead mediated by the NH2-terminal membrane anchor, which lacks, however, the twin-arginine motif indicative of Delta pH/TAT-dependent transport signals. Furthermore, transport is affected by sodium azide as well as by competitor proteins for the Sec pathway in chloroplasts, demonstrating for the first time some cross-talk of the two pathways. This might take place in the stroma where the Rieske protein accumulates after import in several complexes of high molecular mass, among which the cpn60 complex is the most prominent. These untypical features suggest that the Rieske protein represents an intermediate or early state in the evolution of the thylakoidal protein transport pathways.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Rieske Fe/S protein of the cytochrome b6/f complex is an indispensable component of the photosynthetic electron transport chain in chloroplasts. It is a bitopic polypeptide that faces the stroma with only a few NH2-terminal residues and is anchored in the membrane with a single transmembrane helix (1). The large COOH-terminal hydrophilic domain is exposed in the lumenal space of the thylakoid membrane system and provides the ligands for the [2 Fe-2 S]cluster (2, 3). In higher plants, the Rieske protein is encoded in the nucleus and synthesized in the cytosol as a precursor molecule with a transit peptide mediating solely the import of the protein into the chloroplast stroma (4-7). The signal for the subsequent thylakoid translocation step is provided by the NH2-terminal region of the mature polypeptide chain that comprises the membrane anchor (8).

To date, four independent pathways have been identified that are each specific for the transport of a subset of thylakoid proteins into or across the thylakoid membrane (summarized in Refs. 9 and 10). According to their transport mechanism, they are described as Sec-dependent, Delta pH/TAT1 (twin arginine translocation)-dependent, SRP-dependent, and spontaneous pathway, respectively. Among these, the Delta pH/TAT pathway has received particular attention in the past few years because of its unique mechanism; it does not require soluble factors nor nucleoside triphosphates but depends solely on the transthylakoidal proton gradient (11-13). In contrast to the other pathways, it is furthermore capable of translocating not only unfolded polypeptide chains but also folded protein domains across the membrane (14-16).

In bacteria, a phylogenetically related protein transport pathway exists that shows a strikingly similar substrate specificity (17-19). This pathway is responsible for the export of a group of periplasmic proteins carrying complex redox cofactors (20, 21). Assembly of these cofactors takes place in the cytoplasm, i.e. the proteins must fold at least partially prior to membrane translocation (22, 23). Since the thylakoidal Rieske protein also carries a redox cofactor in its native conformation, it is appealing to speculate that it likewise might be targeted in a folded conformation by the Delta pH/TAT-dependent pathway across the thylakoid membrane. However, the thylakoid transport signal of the Rieske protein does not resemble Delta pH/TAT-specific targeting signals. It is not a cleavable signal peptide but operates as a signal anchor domain (8), and furthermore, it lacks the indicative twin-R motif (24), which even accounts for the denomination of the entire pathway.

Here we show that the Rieske protein of higher plant chloroplasts is transported with a mechanism that is unique among all thylakoid proteins characterized so far. Although specifically translocated by the Delta pH/TAT-dependent pathway across the thylakoid membrane, the targeting process is characterized by a number of unusual features including the involvement of components from the Sec-dependent protein transport route. This suggests that the Rieske protein might represent an ancient or intermediate state in the evolution of transport pathways at the thylakoid membrane in chloroplasts.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Spinach (Spinacia oleracea var. Lina) was grown in hydroponic culture under constant temperature (18-22 °C) and light regime (8/16-h light/dark cycles) and harvested 2-3 months after sowing. Pea seedlings (Pisum sativum var. Feltham First) were grown for 8-10 days under a 16-h photoperiod.

Protein Import into Isolated Chloroplasts-- Precursor proteins were synthesized by in vitro transcription of the corresponding cDNA clones and subsequent in vitro translation in cell-free rabbit reticulocyte lysates in the presence of [35S]methionine. Intact chloroplasts were isolated from pea or spinach leaves by Percoll gradient centrifugation essentially as described (25, 26). They were used in protein transport experiments following the protocol in Ref. 27. Competition experiments were performed with precursor proteins that were obtained by overexpression in Escherichia coli (28) and recovered from inclusion bodies by solubilization in a buffer containing 7 M urea, 30 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, and 2 mM EDTA. The solubilized proteins were included in the import assays at concentrations up to 4 µM, taking care that the concentration of urea in the assays never exceeded 300 mM. Control assays contained the same amount of buffer lacking any such solubilized protein.

Miscellaneous-- Gel electrophoresis of proteins under denaturing conditions was carried out according to Ref. 29. Blue native gel electrophoresis (30, 31) was performed according to the protocol in Ref. 32. The gels were exposed to PhosphorImager screens (Molecular Dynamics) and analyzed using the software package ImageQuant (version 1.2). Western blot analysis was performed according to Ref. 33 except that the blue native gels were soaked for 5 min at 40 °C in transfer buffer containing 1% SDS and 14 mM beta -mercaptoethanol prior to transfer onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Stromal protein complexes were separated under nondenaturing conditions (34) using a running buffer of 45 mM Tris and 45 mM boric acid. All other methods followed the protocols of Sambrook et al. (35).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Thylakoid Targeting of the Rieske Protein Is Retarded in the Chloroplast Stroma-- A striking feature in the targeting process of the Rieske protein is the remarkably slow sorting of the protein within the chloroplast to its final destination, the thylakoid membrane system. In experiments with intact chloroplasts isolated from spinach, only about 30% of the Rieske protein that is imported into the organelle reaches the thylakoids during the incubation period of 20 min (Fig. 1). The majority of the protein accumulates in the stroma where it is processed to the mature polypeptide of ~20 kDa. This behavior is even more pronounced if pea chloroplasts are used in the experiment. In this instance, usually more than 90% of the imported Rieske protein remains in the stroma during the incubation process (Fig. 1). Such retardation in the intraorganellar sorting and targeting process is unique among all thylakoid proteins analyzed so far. Usually, these proteins arrive at their target membrane almost quantitatively under these conditions (e.g. Ref. 27).


View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Import of the Rieske Fe/S protein into chloroplasts from spinach and pea. The Rieske precursor protein was obtained by in vitro transcription/translation of the corresponding cDNA from spinach and then incubated with isolated chloroplasts for 20 min at 25 °C in the light. After the import reaction, the chloroplasts were treated with thermolysin, reisolated by Percoll gradient centrifugation, and fractionated into stroma (lanes s) and thylakoids, which were subsequently treated with either thermolysin (lanes +) or mock-treated (lanes -). Stoichiometric amounts of each chloroplast fraction, corresponding to 12.5 µg of chlorophyll, were separated on 10-17.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels and visualized by phosphorimaging. In lanes t, 0.25 µl of the in vitro translation assay was loaded. The positions of the precursor (p, ~26 kDa) and mature polypeptide (m, ~20 kDa) are indicated by open and closed arrowheads, respectively. Note that because of an in-frame AUG at codon number 18, an additional translation product ~2 kDa smaller than the full size precursor is found after in vitro translation, which does not affect the import reaction. Rieske protein accumulating in the different chloroplast fractions was quantified, and the relative amounts (in terms of percentage of protein imported into the organelle) are given below the lanes. The mobilities of the molecular size markers are indicated at the right.

After the Rieske protein has reached the thylakoids, it is to a large extent protected against the activity of proteases that are added externally to reisolated thylakoid vesicles, which indicates that the COOH-terminal hydrophilic domain has been completely translocated into the lumenal space (Fig. 1). This fraction of the Rieske protein is furthermore correctly assembled into the cytochrome b6/f complex after import, as demonstrated by its co-migration with the native cytochrome complex during blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2). Thus, whereas the protein is only slowly targeted to the thylakoid system after import into the organelle, its subsequent assembly into the cytochrome b6/f complex apparently is an efficient process.


View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Assembly of the newly imported Rieske protein into the cytochrome b6/f complex of spinach chloroplasts. Thylakoids were recovered after import of the radiolabeled Rieske precursor protein and separated, after mild solubilization, in a 5-13.5% blue native polyacrylamide gel. A, the untreated gel showing the stained protein complexes. B, an autoradiograph of this gel. C, the results of Western analyses from such gels using antisera raised against constituent subunits of the photosynthetic protein complexes within the thylakoid membrane. PsaF, photosystem I (PS I), ~700 kDa; CFoII, ATP synthase (ATPase), ~640 kDa; CP24, photosystem II (PS II), ~480 kDa; Cyt b6, cytochrome b6/f complex (Cyt b/f) ~430 kDa; light-harvesting complex (LHC), ~280 kDa.

The Rieske Protein Is Targeted by the Delta pH-dependent TAT Pathway to the Thylakoids-- Similar to a few other proteins, e.g. PSI-F (36, 37), the Rieske protein depends on intact chloroplasts for its thylakoid transport and is not able to translocate into isolated thylakoid vesicles obtained after osmotic lysis of the organelles (data not shown). However, it is possible in experiments with intact organelles to demonstrate that the Rieske protein is targeted across the thylakoid membrane by the Delta pH-dependent TAT pathway. In the presence of nigericin, an ionophore that dissipates the transthylakoidal proton gradient, thylakoid translocation of the Rieske protein is almost abolished, and only minute amounts are found associated with the thylakoid membrane (Fig. 3). Transport inhibition cannot be cured by supplementing the assays with increased amounts of ATP, in contrast to the findings for Sec-dependent transport (38), proving that it is the proton gradient itself (rather than its influence on ATP synthesis) that is required for the translocation process.


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Thylakoid transport of the Rieske protein in spinach chloroplasts depends on the transthylakoidal proton gradient. Import experiments were performed in the presence or absence of the protonophor nigericin (nig) (2 µM). In the experiments shown in A, the assays were additionally supplemented with ATP to a final concentration of 8 mM. B, standard conditions. For further details, see the legend for Fig. 1. p, precursor; m, mature polypeptide; t, translation assay; s, stroma.

Transport of the Rieske protein is furthermore impaired by saturating amounts of TAT-specific competitor proteins such as the precursor of the 23-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system. Raising the concentration of competitor in the assays decreases the thylakoid transport of the Rieske protein until at a competitor concentration of 0.5 µM, the protein accumulates almost quantitatively in the stromal space after import (Fig. 4). This demonstrates that the Rieske and the 23-kDa protein depend on the same translocation machinery for their transport across the thylakoid membrane. Sec-dependent protein transport (which was analyzed in parallel) is not affected under these conditions (Ref. 39 and data not shown), confirming that competition was pathway-specific.


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Saturation of the Delta pH/TAT-dependent pathway totally inhibits transport of the Rieske protein across the thylakoid membrane. Import experiments were performed in the presence of increasing amounts of precursor (p) of the 23-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system that were obtained by overexpression in E. coli. The concentration of competitor protein (in µM) present in each assay is indicated above the lanes. The portion of the Rieske protein that is translocated across the thylakoid membrane under these conditions (in terms of percentage of protein imported into the organelle) is given below each panel. For further details, see the legend for Fig. 1. m, mature polypeptide; t, translation assay; s, stroma.

Transport of the Rieske Protein Involves Components of the Sec Pathway in Chloroplasts-- While the results so far clearly demonstrate transport of the Rieske protein by the Delta pH/TAT pathway, other features of the transport process suggest some deviation from this route. In the presence of sodium azide, a potent inhibitor of Sec-dependent protein transport in prokaryotes and chloroplasts (40-42), thylakoid transport of the Rieske protein is affected (Fig. 5A). The inhibitory effect is moderate but still specific because transport of typical Delta pH/TAT substrates such as the 23-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system is not disturbed by the antimetabolite (Fig. 5B). At first glance, this suggests the involvement of SecA in the transport process, the azide-sensitive translocation ATPase of the Sec pathway (40). However, it should be considered that sodium azide is not only an inhibitor of SecA function but is able to impair the activity of numerous other nucleotide-binding proteins (e.g. Ref. 43). This is particularly relevant here because spinach chloroplasts, which were used in our experiments, are known to harbor a SecA protein that is largely azide-resistant (44).


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The SecA inhibitor sodium azide affects the thylakoid transfer of the Rieske protein. Import experiments were performed in the presence or absence of 10 mM sodium azide with the precursors (p) of either the Rieske protein (A) or the 23-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system (B). For further details, see the legends for Figs. 1 and 4. m, mature polypeptide; t, translation assay; s, stroma.

We therefore performed competition experiments as a complementary approach to examine the possible involvement of the Sec machinery in Rieske transport. In these experiments, the thylakoidal Sec pathway was saturated by excess amounts of the precursor of the 33-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system, a well characterized substrate of this transport route (38, 45-47). Indeed, this treatment led to a significant reduction of thylakoid transport of the Rieske protein (Fig. 6A). However, as compared with saturating the Delta pH-dependent TAT pathway by the 23-kDa precursor protein, the degree of inhibition is far less pronounced. Even at a concentration of 4 µM Sec competitor in the assays, thylakoid transport of the Rieske protein takes place with a rate close to 50% of the control level, although as little as 0.5 µM TAT competitor is sufficient to block thylakoid transport of the protein completely (Fig. 4). Still, saturation of the Sec machinery causes a true competitive effect because the degree of inhibition varies with the concentration of the competitor in the assays (Fig. 6A). The specificity of the reaction was confirmed in control experiments in which the 23- and 33-kDa subunits of the oxygen-evolving system were imported in the presence of the Sec competitor. As expected, only the Sec pathway is saturated under these conditions, as demonstrated by the appearance of the stromal intermediate of the 33-kDa protein (Fig. 6B). In contrast, the Delta pH-dependent thylakoid transport route is not affected by the Sec competitor. Only transport of the 23-kDa protein across the chloroplast envelope is impaired by the competitor to a certain extent, which confirms that both proteins are imported by the same translocase into the organelle.


View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Saturation of the Sec-dependent pathway affects transport of the Rieske protein across the thylakoid membrane. Import experiments were performed in the presence of increasing amounts of precursor (p) of the 33-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system that were obtained by overexpression in E. coli. The concentration of competitor protein (in µM) present in each assay is indicated above the lanes. A, import of the Rieske precusor protein. B, analysis of control proteins for the Delta pH/TAT-dependent (23) and the Sec-dependent pathway (33). The shaded arrowhead indicates the position of the stromal intermediate (i) for the 33-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system. For further details, see the legends for Figs. 1 and 4. m, mature polypeptide; t, translation assay; s, stroma.

These results strongly suggest that the Rieske protein, although translocated across the thylakoid membrane by the Delta pH/TAT translocase, depends for its correct targeting on the availability of components also involved in Sec-dependent protein targeting. However, it appears unlikely that the whole process of thylakoid targeting and translocation can be mediated solely by the Sec machinery because in this case, the complete block of Rieske transport in the presence of the 23-kDa TAT competitor protein could not be explained.

Both the Rieske Protein and the 33-kDa Polypeptide Interact with Several Protein Complexes during Their Passage through the Stromal Space-- As an initial step to identify the components involved in the intraorganellar targeting of the Rieske protein, we recovered the stromal fraction after the import experiment and analyzed it in nondenaturing gel systems. Unexpectedly, the Rieske protein was found in several distinct complexes in the chloroplast stroma ranging in size from ~130 to more than 700 kDa (Fig. 7). The size of the latter corresponds well with that of the stromal cpn60 complex (48, 49). Indeed, co-immunoprecipitation experiments could demonstrate that a substantial amount of the newly imported Rieske protein is associated with this chaperonine (Fig. 8), which corroborates earlier observations of Madueno et al. (50). It is particularly remarkable that not only the processed, mature size Rieske protein but also its unprocessed precursor is found associated with this chaperonine. Actually, the Rieske precursor shows even a much higher affinity to cpn60 than the mature protein, which is co-immunoprecipitated by the antisera only to a minor extent (<10%; Fig. 8). These results suggest that the Rieske protein interacts with the cpn60 complex very early in the translocation process, even before the removal of the transit peptide by the stromal processing peptidase. This interaction might even be mediated by the protein transport machinery of the inner envelope membrane in chloroplasts because some cpn60 was found in close contact with the translocase (51).


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Association of newly imported proteins with complexes in the chloroplast stroma. Radiolabeled precursors of the Rieske protein (Ri) and the 33-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving system (33) were imported into spinach chloroplasts. After the import reaction (which in the case of the 33-kDa protein was performed in the presence of 2 µM nigericin), the stromal fractions were recovered and separated overnight on a 4-18% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gradient gel. The gel was stained with Coomassie R-250 (A) and subsequently exposed to a PhosphorImager screen (B). The arrow marks the position of the stromal cpn60 chaperonine complex. The mobilities of the molecular size markers are indicated at the left. For further details, see the legend for Fig. 1.


View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   The Rieske protein binds to the stromal cpn60 chaperonine complex immediately after import into the chloroplast. Stromal fraction recovered from spinach chloroplasts after the import of radiolabeled Rieske precursor (p) protein was subjected to immunoprecipitation for 1 h at 4 °C using antisera raised against Hsp60 from yeast mitochondria (B). Lane 1 contains 10% of the stromal proteins that remained in the supernatant after immunoprecipitation. In lane 2, the whole pellet containing all proteins that were co-immunoprecipitated by the antibodies was loaded. For comparison, the autoradiograph of the import experiment used for immunoprecipitation is presented in A. For further details, see the legend for Fig. 1. m, mature polypeptide; t, translation assay; s, stroma.

Cpn60 is probably not a binding partner for all the proteins imported into the chloroplast, however, because no interaction with the 33-kDa protein could be observed in import experiments, neither in native gel systems nor by co-immunoprecipitation experiments (Fig. 7 and data not shown). Instead, the stromal intermediate of the 33-kDa polypeptide, which was obtained by supplementing the import assays with nigericin (38), accumulates in at least four distinct complexes of ~150, 180, 200, and 220 kDa (Fig. 7). This multitude of stromal interactions was totally unexpected because so far, only an interaction with SecA was assumed (42). It is interesting to note that the Rieske protein also accumulates, in addition to the cpn60 complex, in several complexes of a similar size range (~120-250 kDa, Fig. 7). These complexes are not well resolved, however, suggesting a limited stability and/or variable composition. Although the overall pattern of stromal complexes formed by the Rieske protein and the 33-kDa protein is rather different, it appears possible that at least one of the components required for complex formation interacts with both thylakoid proteins during passage through the chloroplast stroma. This could then cause the competition observed between the Rieske protein and the 33-kDa protein, despite the fact that the two proteins finally utilize different transport machineries in the thylakoid system for their membrane translocation.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Rieske protein of the cytochrome b6/f complex in chloroplasts is transported to and across the thylakoid membrane with a mechanism that is unique among those of all chloroplast proteins analyzed so far. While the actual membrane transport is mediated by the Delta pH-dependent TAT translocase, the delivery of the protein to this translocase depends on components that are also involved in Sec-dependent protein transport. Thus, the Rieske protein represents the first link between the Sec- and the Delta pH-dependent transport routes in chloroplasts that so far were considered to operate completely independently from each other.

The participation of both the Delta pH/TAT-dependent and part of the Sec-dependent transport machineries in Rieske transport becomes evident in competition experiments. Saturating the two pathways independently from each other by specific competitor proteins in each case affects the thylakoid transport of the Rieske protein, although to a different extent. In the presence of TAT competitor (23-kDa protein), transport of the Rieske protein is completely abolished (Fig. 4), demonstrating that a functional Delta pH/TAT pathway is essential for its membrane transport. Because the 23-kDa protein that was used as the competitor traverses the stromal space as a tightly folded monomer, probably without interacting with the stromal targeting and folding machinery (14), it is likely that its competition with the Rieske protein occurs at the thylakoid membrane, presumably at the receptor or at the translocase itself. The inhibitory effect observed with the Sec competitor (33-kDa protein), on the other hand, requires a significantly higher concentration of competitor protein and still does not lead to a complete block of the thylakoid transport process (Fig. 6A). This suggests that competition in this case is caused by saturating a relatively abundant targeting factor rather than the translocase at the membrane.

There are numerous candidates for such targeting factors in the chloroplast stroma. As shown by native gel electrophoresis, both the Rieske protein and the 33-kDa polypeptide interact after import into the organelle with several stromal complexes of high molecular mass. It remains elusive, however, which of these complexes represents true transport intermediates and could thus be responsible for the observed competition. Because of the size difference of the two proteins analyzed, co-migration even of corresponding protein complexes cannot be expected, so this point remains unsolved at the moment. However, it is already remarkable that there is such a multitude of interactions for proteins passing through the chloroplast stroma on their way to the thylakoids. This suggests a much higher degree of complexity in the recruitment of targeting factors than anticipated so far. Apparently, stromal factors in addition to SecA are involved in Sec-dependent protein targeting of the 33-kDa protein. Even more striking, the Rieske protein is the first example of a protein transported by the Delta pH-dependent pathway in chloroplasts that shows interaction with, and probably requirement for, stromal components in the targeting process. Thus, protein transport by the Delta pH/TAT pathway can no longer be strictly distinguished by its independence of stromal factors.

It will be interesting to examine whether the demand for stromal factors in the intraorganellar targeting of the Rieske protein is created by the transport signal or by its "passenger," i.e. the hydrophilic domain that is translocated across the thylakoid membrane. Interaction of the hydrophilic domain with stromal components might, for example, be required for the assembly of the iron-sulfur cluster into the apoprotein if this process takes place in the chloroplast stroma. A precedent for such a scenario is found in yeast mitochondria, which house an essential part of the machinery for the biogenesis of Fe/S proteins in their matrix (52). Stromal assembly of the Fe/S cluster and, consequently, at least partial folding of the Rieske protein prior to membrane transfer would also be in line with transport by the Delta pH/TAT translocase, which is capable of translocating folded protein domains across the membrane (15, 16). It would furthermore explain why the Rieske protein but not the 33-kDa polypeptide interacts in the stroma with the cpn60 chaperonine (Fig. 7), the chloroplast homolog of the hsp60 folding machinery of mitochondria and prokaryotes (48, 53, 54). Sec-dependent targeting of the 33-kDa protein requires the unfolded polypeptide (55), and any folding of the protein in the stroma would probably impair its membrane translocation.

Stromal retardation of the Rieske protein to allow for cofactor assembly and folding might also be the cause for the exceptional structure of its thylakoid transport signal. Not only is it the first membrane anchor signal known for thylakoid proteins, but it furthermore lacks the twin-R motif, which is indicative for Delta pH/TAT-targeting signals. Instead, a KR-sequence is found at the corresponding position in all Rieske proteins from higher plant chloroplasts characterized to date, which should essentially prevent transport of the protein across the membrane (19, 24, 56). Interestingly, cyanobacteria, which are the closest relatives to the endosymbiotic ancestors of chloroplasts known today, possess Rieske proteins with perfect twin-R motifs in their presumed targeting signals. It is therefore appealing to speculate that the thylakoid transport signal of the Rieske protein was modified after the phylogenetic transfer of the gene into the nucleus in order to slow down the passage of the protein through the stromal space to the thylakoid membrane, thereby providing sufficient time for the assembly of the Fe/S cluster.

Taken together, the exceptional transport mechanism of the Rieske protein, which is the only chloroplast protein with cyanobacterial homologs known so far that is targeted by the thylakoidal Delta pH/TAT pathway, suggests that it is an ancient substrate of this pathway and thus can be considered as a missing link in the evolution of the protein transport pathways operating at the thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Thomas Langer for providing the antisera raised against Hsp60 from yeast mitochondria.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants SFB 184, SFB 363, and KL862/1-1.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Both authors contributed equally to this work.

§ Present address: Laboratory of Cell Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021.

|| To whom correspondence should be sent. Tel.: 49-345-55-26-200; Fax: 49-345-55-27-285; E-mail: klosgen@pflanzenphys.uni-halle.de.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 28, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106690200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviation used is: TAT, twin arginine translocation.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Karnauchov, I., Herrmann, R. G., and Klösgen, R. B. (1997) FEBS Lett. 408, 206-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Zhang, H., Carrell, C. J., Huang, D., Sled, V., Ohnishi, T., Smith, J. L., and Cramer, W. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31360-31366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Carrell, C. J., Zhang, H., Craner, W. A., and Smith, J. L. (1997) Structure 5, 1613-1625[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Steppuhn, J., Rother, C., Hermans, J., Jansen, T., Salnikow, J., Hauska, G., and Herrmann, R. G. (1987) Mol. Gen. Genet. 210, 171-177[CrossRef]
5. Bartling, D., Clausmeyer, S., Oelmüller, R., and Herrmann, R. G. (1990) Bot. Mag. Tokyo 2, 119-144
6. Madueno, F., Napier, J. A., Cejudo, F. J., and Gray, J. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 289-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Salter, A. H., Newman, B. J., Napier, J. A., and Gray, J. C. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 569-574[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Madueno, F., Bradshaw, S. A., and Gray, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17458-17463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Klösgen, R. B. (1997) J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biology 38, 1-9[CrossRef]
10. Dalbey, R. E., and Robinson, C. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 17-22[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Mould, R. M., and Robinson, C. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 12189-12193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Cline, K., Ettinger, W. F., and Theg, S. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 2688-2696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Klösgen, R. B., Brock, I. A., Herrmann, R. G., and Robinson, C. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 18, 1031-1034[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Creighton, A. M., Hulford, A., Mant, A., Robinson, D., and Robinson, C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1663-1669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Clark, S. A., and Theg, S. M. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 923-934[Abstract]
16. Hynds, P. J., Robinson, D., and Robinson, C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 34868-34874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Mori, H., and Cline, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11405-11408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Wexler, M., Bogsch, E. G., Klösgen, R. B., Palmer, T., Robinson, C., and Berks, B. C. (1998) FEBS Lett. 431, 339-342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Halbig, D., Hou, B., Freudl, R., Sprenger, G. A., and Klösgen, R. B. (1999) FEBS Lett. 447, 95-98[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Berks, B. C. (1996) Mol. Microbiol. 22, 393-404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Weiner, J. H., Bilous, P. T., Shaw, G. M., Lubitz, S. P., Frost, L., Thomas, G. H., Cole, J. A., and Turner, R. J. (1998) Cell 93, 93-101[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Santini, C-L., Ize, B., Chanal, A., Müller, M., Giordano, G., and Wu, L.-F. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 101-112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Blaudeck, N., Sprenger, G. A., Freudl, R., and Wiegert, T. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183, 604-610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Chaddock, A. M., Mant, A., Karnauchov, I., Brink, S., Herrmann, R. G., Klösgen, R. B., and Robinson, C. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2715-2722[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Bartlett, S. G, Grossman, A. R., and Chua, N.-H. (1982) in Methods in Chloroplast Molecular Biology (Edelmann, M. , Hallick, R. B. , and Chua, N.-H., eds) , pp. 1081-1091, Elsevier Biomedical Press, New York
26. Brock, I. W., Hazell, L., Michl, D., Skovgaard Nielsen, V., Lindberg Møller, B., Herrmann, R. G., Klösgen, R. B., and Robinson, C. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 23, 717-725[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Clausmeyer, S., Klösgen, R. B., and Herrmann, R. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13869-13876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Michl, D., Robinson, C., Shackleton, J. B., Herrmann, R. G., and Klösgen, R. B. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1310-1317[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Schägger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 199, 223-231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Schägger, H., Cramer, W. A., and von Jagow, G. (1994) Anal. Biochem. 217, 220-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Berghöfer, J., and Klösgen, R. B. (1999) FEBS Lett. 460, 328-332[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Vachereau, A. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 179, 206-208[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Reuter, W., Nickel, C., and Wehrmeyer, W. (1990) FEBS Lett. 273, 155-158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
36. Karnauchov, I., Cai, D., Schmidt, I., Herrmann, R. G., and Klösgen, R. B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32871-32878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Mant, A., Nielsen, S. V., Knott, T. G., Møller, B. L., and Robinson, C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27303-27309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Mant, A., Schmidt, I., Herrmann, R. G., Robinson, C., and Klösgen, R. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23275-23281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Karnauchov, I., Herrmann, R. G., Pakrasi, H., and Klösgen, R. B. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 249, 497-504[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Oliver, D. B., Cabelli, R. J., Dolan, K. M., and Jarosik, G. P. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 8227-8231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Knott, T., and Robinson, C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7843-7846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Yuan, J., Henry, R., McCaffery, M., and Cline, K. (1994) Science 266, 796-798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Muneyuki, E., Makino, M., Kamata, H., Kagawa, Y., Yoshida, M., and Hirata, H. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1144, 62-68[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Berghöfer, J., Karnauchov, I., Herrmann, R. G., and Klösgen, R. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18341-18346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Cline, K., Henry, R., Li, C., and Yuan, J. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4105-4114[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Hulford, A., Hazell, L., Mould, R. M., and Robinson, C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3251-3256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Yuan, J., and Cline, K. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18463-18467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Hemmingsen, S. M., Woolford, C., van der Vies, S. M., Tilly, K., Dennis, D. T., Georgopoulos, C. P., Hendrix, R. W., and Ellis, R. J. (1988) Nature 333, 330-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Lubben, T. H., Donaldson, G. K., Viitanen, P. V., and Gatenby, A. A. (1989) Plant Cell 1, 1223-1230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Madueno, F., Napier, J. A., and Gray, J. C. (1993) Plant Cell 5, 1865-1876[Abstract]
51. Kessler, F., and Blobel, G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 7684-7689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Lill, R., Diekert, K., Kaut, A., Lange, H., Pelzer, W., Prohl, C., and Kispal, G. (1999) Biol. Chem. 380, 1157-1166
53. Goloubinoff, P., Christeller, J. T., Gatenby, A. A., and Lorimer, G. H. (1989) Nature 342, 884-889[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Ostermann, J., Horwich, A. L., Neupert, W., and Hartl, F. U. (1989) Nature 341, 125-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Pugsley, A. P. (1993) Microbiol. Rev. 57, 50-108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Henry, R., Carrigan, M., McCaffrey, M., Ma, X., and Cline, K. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 823-832[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. B. Gould, E. Fan, F. Hempel, U.-G. Maier, and R. B. Klosgen
Translocation of a Phycoerythrin {alpha} Subunit across Five Biological Membranes
J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2007; 282(41): 30295 - 30302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Frielingsdorf and R. B. Klosgen
Prerequisites for Terminal Processing of Thylakoidal Tat Substrates
J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 24455 - 24462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
U. Lindenstrauss and T. Bruser
Conservation and Variation between Rhodobacter capsulatus and Escherichia coli Tat Systems
J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2006; 188(22): 7807 - 7814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
M. J. J. B. Sibbald, A. K. Ziebandt, S. Engelmann, M. Hecker, A. de Jong, H. J. M. Harmsen, G. C. Raangs, I. Stokroos, J. P. Arends, J. Y. F. Dubois, et al.
Mapping the Pathways to Staphylococcal Pathogenesis by Comparative Secretomics
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 70(3): 755 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. C. Fisher and M. P. DeLisa
A Little Help from My Friends: Quality Control of Presecretory Proteins in Bacteria
J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2004; 186(22): 7467 - 7473.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
J. M. Santini and R. N. vanden Hoven
Molybdenum-Containing Arsenite Oxidase of the Chemolithoautotrophic Arsenite Oxidizer NT-26
J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2004; 186(6): 1614 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Y. Jeong, A. Rose, and I. Meier
MFP1 is a thylakoid-associated, nucleoid-binding protein with a coiled-coil structure
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2003; 31(17): 5175 - 5185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. D. H. Jongbloed, H. Antelmann, M. Hecker, R. Nijland, S. Bron, U. Airaksinen, F. Pries, W. J. Quax, J. M. van Dijl, and P. G. Braun
Selective Contribution of the Twin-Arginine Translocation Pathway to Protein Secretion in Bacillus subtilis
J. Biol. Chem., November 8, 2002; 277(46): 44068 - 44078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/46/42761    most recent
M106690200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow