![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 46, 42857-42862, November 16, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Sister
Chromatid Cohesion Protein Ctf7*
From the Sealy Center for Molecular Science, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1061
Received for publication, July 23, 2001, and in revised form, September 6, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA polymerase In Saccharomyces cerevisiae as well as humans, DNA
polymerase Pol Although Pol Interestingly, in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces
pombe, the eso1+-encoded protein is
comprised of two domains, of which the NH2-terminal two-thirds is highly homologous to S. cerevisiae and human
Pol Expression of S. pombe Eso1 and Pol Purification of S. pombe Pol DNA Substrates--
For measuring the fidelity of
nucleotide incorporation, we used the following four 53 nucleotides.
oligodeoxynucleotides as templates, which differ only in the underlined
sequences: Template G,
5'-ATGCCTGCACGAAGAGTTCCTAGTGCCTACACTGGAGTACCGGAGCATCGTCG;
Template A,
5'-ATGCCTGCACGAAGAGTTCGCTATGCCTACACTGGAGTACCGGAGCATCGTCG;
Template T,
5'-ATGCCTGCACGAAGAGTTCAGCTTGCCTACACTGGAGTACCGGAGCATCGTCG;
Template C,
5'-ATGCCTGCACGAAGAGTTCTAGCTGCCTACACTG- GAGTACCGGAGCATCGTCG. To each template, we annealed the following 30-nucleotide
oligodeoxynucleotide primer,
5'-CGACGATGCTCCGGTACTCCAGTGTAGGCA.
For examining replication in the presence of a cyclobutane-pyrimidine
dimer (CPD), we used the following 75-nucleotide oligomer as the
template:
5'-AGCTACCTAGCCTGCACGAAGAGTTCGTATTATGCCTACACTGGAGTACCGGAGCATCGTCGTGACTGGGAAAAC. The CPD template contained a cis-syn thymine-thymine (T-T)
dimer at the underlined region, whereas the nondamaged control template contained two undamaged thymines. We used the following
oligodeoxynucleotide primer for CPD bypass analysis: 44-mer,
5'-GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGATGCTCCGGTACTCCAGTGTAGGCAT.
Primers were 5'-32P-end-labeled using polynucleotide kinase
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and [ DNA Polymerase Activity Assays--
The standard DNA polymerase
assay (5 µl) contained 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 ng/ml
bovine serum albumin, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 5 mM
MgCl2, and 10% glycerol, and was carried out for 5 min at 25 °C. For DNA synthesis, a 50 nM
5'-32P-end-labeled primer-template G substrate and 100 µM of each of the four deoxynucleotides were used, and
reactions were initiated by the addition of various concentrations (0 to 25 nM) of purified GST-Eso1 or GST-Pol
DNA polymerase fidelity assays were carried out under standard
conditions but contained 50 nM
5'-32P-end-labeled primer-template substrate (Template G,
A, T, or C), and various concentrations of a single deoxynucleotide (0 to 2000 µM). The reactions were initiated by the addition
of 5 nM purified GST-Eso1 or GST-Pol
T-T dimer bypass assays were carried out under standard conditions with
10 nM 5'-32P-end-labeled primer-CPD template
substrate, and no deoxynucleotide, one of the four deoxynucleotides at
100 µM each, or all four deoxynucleotides at 100 µM each. The reactions were initiated by the addition of 5 nM purified GST-Eso1 or GST-Pol Analysis of Fidelity--
For each concentration of nucleotide,
the relative amount of the extended product was divided by the reaction
time, resulting in the linear observed rate of nucleotide
incorporation, vobs. The
vobs was plotted as a function of
deoxynucleotide concentration, and the data were fit by nonlinear
regression using SigmaPlot 4.0 to the Michaelis-Menten equation
(Equation 1),
Processivity Assays--
Processivity was measured by
preincubating 50 nM GST-Eso1 or GST-Pol
By definition, the processivity, P, is the probability that
for each nucleotide incorporation event, the polymerase moves ahead to
incorporate at least one additional nucleotide (27). To
determine the processivity of Eso1p and Pol The Eso1 Protein of S. pombe--
The amino-terminal two-thirds of
the S. pombe eso1+-encoded protein shares 23%
identical and 34% similar amino acid residues with the S. cerevisiae Pol
To test for the influence of the COOH-terminal Ctf7-like portion on the
polymerase activity of Eso1 protein, we expressed in S. cerevisiae both the full-length Eso1 protein (872 amino acids) and
a truncated Eso1 protein that contains only the
NH2-terminal 609 amino acids, and which corresponds to the
Pol DNA Polymerase Activity of S. pombe Eso1 and Pol Fidelity of S. pombe Eso1 and Pol
S. pombe Eso1 protein (5 nM) was incubated with
the primer-template DNA and various concentrations of one of the four
deoxynucleotides in a standing-start reaction. As shown in Fig.
3A, to examine the insertion
opposite template G, the concentration of incorrect and correct
deoxynucleotide was varied from 0 to 1000 µM, and from 0 to 20 µM, respectively. The kinetics of single
deoxynucleotide incorporation by S. pombe Eso1 protein
opposite the template G are shown in Fig. 3B. These data
were fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation (Equation 1), and used to
calculate the apparent Km and
Vmax parameters. As shown in Table
I, the finc values
for the Eso1 protein range from 2.4 × 10 Processivity of S. pombe Pol
The gel band intensities of the nucleotide incorporation products at
the 15-s time point were used to calculate the processivity, P, and the average number of nucleotides incorporated per
DNA binding event (see "Materials and Methods"). Fig. 5B
is a plot of T-T Dimer Bypass by S. pombe Eso1 and Pol The fusion of Pol Pol Although Ctf7 does not activate or inactivate the DNA polymerizing
activity or T-T dimer bypass ability of Pol While the above model explains the requirement of Ctf7 in S. cerevisiae and S. pombe for the establishment of sister
chromatid cohesion during S phase, it fails to account for the fact
that deletion of Pol
(Pol
) functions in
error-free bypass of ultraviolet light-induced DNA lesions, and
mutational inactivation of Pol
in humans causes the cancer prone
syndrome, the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum (XPV). Both
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human Pol
efficiently
insert two adenines opposite the two thymines of a cyclobutane
pyrimidine dimer. Interestingly, in the fission yeast
Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the
eso1+ encoded protein is comprised of two
domains, wherein the NH2 terminus is highly homologous to
Pol
, and the COOH terminus is highly homologous to the S. cerevisiae Ctf7 protein which is essential for the establishment
of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. Here we characterize the
DNA polymerase activity of S. pombe GST-Eso1 fusion protein
and a truncated version containing only the Pol
domain. Both
proteins exhibit a similar DNA polymerase activity with a low
processivity, and steady-state kinetic analyses show that on undamaged
DNA, both proteins misincorporate nucleotides with frequencies of
~10
2 to 10
3. We also examine the two
proteins for their ability to replicate a cyclobutane pyrimidine
dimer-containing DNA template and find that both proteins replicate
through the lesion equally well. Thus, fusion with Ctf7 has no
significant effect on the DNA replication or damage bypass properties
of Pol
. The possible role of Ctf7 fusion with Pol
in the
replication of Cohesin-bound DNA sequences is discussed.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
functions in error-free replication of UV-damaged DNA.
In S. cerevisiae, inactivation of Pol
confers enhanced UV
sensitivity and leads to an increase in UV-induced mutation frequencies
(1-3). In humans, inactivation of Pol
results in the cancer prone
syndrome, the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum (4, 5). Cells from
variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum patients display a deficiency in
the replication of UV-damaged DNA (6-8), and they are hypermutable
with UV light (9, 10).
is unique among eukaryotic DNA polymerases in its proficient
ability to replicate through DNA lesions which distort the DNA helix
(5, 11-14). Both yeast and human Pol
replicate through a
cis-syn thymine-thymine (T-T) dimer with the same efficiency and accuracy as they replicate through the two undamaged Ts (12, 15).
The ability of Pol
to insert nucleotides opposite distorting DNA
lesions and to carry out extension of the nascent DNA strand has
suggested that Pol
is more tolerant of geometric distortions in DNA
than are other DNA polymerases which cannot bypass DNA lesions.
Accordingly, both S. cerevisiae and human Pol
are low fidelity enzymes, misincorporating nucleotides with a frequency of
10
2 to 10
3 (12, 16, 17).
is a low fidelity enzyme, it does not contribute to
spontaneous mutagenesis, since the rate of spontaneous mutations at
several loci examined remains the same in the presence or absence of
Pol
in S. cerevisiae
(18).1 Thus, Pol
may have
little or no effect on normal replication, and its function may be
primarily restricted to promoting replication through DNA lesions. The
Rad6-Rad18 complex, comprised of the ubiquitin conjugating and DNA
binding activities (19, 20), may be a key factor in limiting Pol
action to damage bypass. Although the mechanism of the Rad6-Rad18
enzyme complex remains unknown, it is possible that ubiquitin
conjugation by the Rad6-Rad18 complex leads to dissociation of some
protein(s) from the replication machinery stalled at a lesion site, and
that, in turn, promotes the assembly of a trans-lesion DNA synthesis
polymerase such as Pol
into the stalled replication complex.
Alternatively, Pol
could be kept in an inactive state by its binding
to other protein(s), and upon the infliction of damage to DNA, the
Rad6-Rad18 mediated protein ubiquitination may stimulate the
dissolution of the inhibitory protein(s), thereby activating
Pol
.
, and the COOH-terminal one-third is highly homologous to the
S. cerevisiae Ctf7 protein (also called Eco1) (21), an
essential protein required for the establishment of sister chromatid
cohesion during S phase (21-23). Deletion analyses have indicated that
the COOH-terminal Ctf7 portion of Eso1 is sufficient and necessary for
sister chromatid cohesion, whereas deletion of the
NH2-terminal Pol
portion increases the sensitivity to UV
irradiation but has no effect on sister chromatid cohesion (21). Thus,
although the two proteins are encoded by the same gene, they retain
their respective functions in sister chromatid cohesion and damage
bypass. The fusion of Pol
with Ctf7 in S. pombe raised
the possibility that although the two proteins are encoded by separate
genes in other species, even there these proteins may associate
in vivo, and that association may modulate the function of
one or both the proteins. For instance, it could be that association
with Ctf7 inactivates Pol
and its activation requires that the two proteins dissociate following the Rad6-Rad18-dependent
ubiquitination of one or both proteins; alternatively, association with
Ctf7 could improve the fidelity and processivity of Pol
. Here, we purify the S. pombe eso1+-encoded protein
containing both the Pol
and Ctf7 domains, and compare the DNA
synthesis properties of Pol
alone and of Pol
fused to Ctf7 in
Eso1. Unexpectedly, we find that fusion with Ctf7 has no effect on
Pol
's DNA synthesis or damage bypass ability, or on its fidelity or
processivity. We discuss these observations in relation to the possible
role of Pol
's association with Ctf7.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Proteins--
To
obtain the full-length Eso1-(1-872) protein and the truncated
Eso1-(1-609) protein which lacks the Ctf7 domain but contains the
entire Pol
domain, herein referred to as Pol
, the
eso1+ gene was amplified from the S. pombe strain JFP41 (h+ ura4-D18
ade6-M216 leu1-32) total genomic DNA by polymerase chain reaction
using oligonucleotide N7119
(5'-CAGGGGTACCGGATCCACATATGGAATTAGGCAAAAGCAAATTCTC-3') and the
oligonucleotide N7118
(5'-GGTCGTCGACGGATCCTCAACTTTCATAAACAGCATATCGAAG-3') or the
oligonucleotide N7117
(5'-CAGGGTCGACGGATCCTCATCTTTTGTTGTTTGTTTCATCGG-3'), respectively. The
amplified DNAs were then digested with Asp-718 and SalI
restriction endonucleases and cloned into YIplac211, generating
plasmids pBJ796 and pBJ800, respectively. The cloned polymerase chain
reaction fragments in pBJ796 and pBJ800 were sequenced and found not to
contain any mutations. Subsequently, the wild type and truncated
eso1 genes were cloned in-frame with the glutathione
S-transferase
(GST)2 gene under the control
of a galactose-inducible phosphoglycerate kinase promoter in plasmid
pBJ760 (24), generating the expression vectors pBJ808 and pBJ811,
respectively. The GST-tagged proteins were expressed in the S. cerevisiae strain BJ5464 harboring either the plasmid pBJ808 or
pBJ811. S. cerevisiae cells were grown overnight in
synthetic complete medium lacking leucine (SC-leu) and containing 2%
dextrose, 2.5% lactate, and 3% glycerol before diluting 30-fold in
SC-leu as above but lacking dextrose. After 16 h, 2% galactose was added and cells were grown for an additional 7 h before
harvesting by centrifugation.
and Eso1 Proteins--
To purify
GST-Eso1 and GST-Pol
proteins, cells were resuspended in 2 volumes
of ice-cold cell breakage buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl, 10% sucrose, 0.5 mM benzamidine, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, and one Complete Protease Inhibitor Mixture Tablet
per 50 ml of extract (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)), and lysed at
4 °C in a French Press at 120,000 kilopascal. Cell debris was
removed by centrifugation at 100,000 × g, and cell
extract was passed over a 100 µl of glutathione-Sepharose 4B column
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at 4 °C. The beads were washed with 10 volumes ice-cold cell breakage buffer containing 1 M NaCl,
followed by 5 volumes ice-cold low salt buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 10%
glycerol). The GST-Eso1 and the GST-Pol
proteins were each batch
eluted twice at 4 °C with 100 µl of elution buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.01%
Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol, 25 mM glutathione). Aliquots of each purified protein were stored at
80 °C.
-32P]ATP (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). Labeled primers (0.25 or 0.05 µM)
were annealed to templates (0.5 or 0.1 µM, respectively)
in the presence of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 100 mM NaCl by heating the mixture to 90 °C for 2 min and
cooling to 25 °C over several hours.
proteins.
Reactions were quenched in 10 volumes of formamide-loading buffer (80%
deionized formamide, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 1 mg/ml xylene
cyanol, 1 mg/ml bromphenol blue), heated at 90 °C for 2 min, cooled
on ice, and resolved on 10% polyacrylamide sequencing gels containing
5.2 M urea.
, and were quenched
after 2 to 20 min in 10 volumes of formamide-loading buffer. Gel band
intensities of the substrates and products were quantitated using a
PhosphorImager with ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics).
, and quenched after 5 min in 10 volumes of formamide-loading buffer.
Vmax and Km steady-state kinetic parameters
for the incorporation of the correct and incorrect deoxynucleotides were obtained from the best-fit curve. These parameters were used to
calculate the frequency of deoxynucleotide misincorporation (finc) as described (25, 26) using the following
equation (Equation 2),
(Eq. 1)
(Eq. 2)
with 50 nM 5'-32P-end-labeled primer-template DNA
substrate under standard conditions for 1 h. Reactions were
initiated by the addition of all four deoxynucleotides (100 µM of each dNTP), and 1 mg/ml sonicated herring sperm DNA
as a trap. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the trap, we performed a
control reaction in which GST-Eso1 or GST-Pol
was preincubated with
the trap DNA and the 5'-32P-end-labeled primer-template
substrate for 1 h before the addition of deoxynucleotides. After
15 or 30 s, reactions were quenched and resolved as described
above for the deoxynucleotide incorporation assays.
, we first quantitated the gel band intensities of the nucleotide incorporation products at
the 15-s reaction time point using the PhosphorImager. Next, we
calculated the fraction of polymerase molecules that incorporated at
least N nucleotides,
N, which is the ratio of the intensity
of all gel bands greater than or equal to the gel band corresponding to
N nucleotide incorporations (gel band N) to the total intensity of all
gel bands (excluding the unextended primer). Formally, this is
expressed in the following equation (Equation 3),
where Ix is the intensity of gel band x. In a
single DNA binding event, it takes N-1 consecutive steps, each
occurring with a probability P, starting at gel band 1 to
reach any gel band N. Thus, the relationship between the fraction of
polymerase molecules that incorporated at least N nucleotides,
(Eq. 3)
N, and the processivity, P, is expressed in the
following equation (Equation 4),
Consequently, we graphed
(Eq. 4)
N, the fraction of
polymerase molecules that incorporated at least N nucleotides,
versus N-1, and obtained a value for the processivity,
P, from the best fit curve to Equation 4 using nonlinear
regression (SigmaPlot 4.0). The average number of nucleotides
incorporated per DNA binding event (1/[1
P]) was
then calculated.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, and the COOH-terminal one-third of the protein
shares 24% identical and 44% similar residues with the S. cerevisiae Ctf7 protein (21), which is highly conserved among
eukaryotes and plays an essential role in the establishment of sister
chromatid cohesion during DNA replication (21-23). Fig. 1 depicts the conserved motifs shared
between Eso1 and the S. cerevisiae Pol
and Ctf7 proteins.
Two C2H2 zinc finger motifs are present in
Eso1, one of which corresponds to the motif present toward the COOH
terminus of Pol
and the other corresponds to the motif present
toward the NH2 terminus of Ctf7. The five highly conserved
motifs found in the Rad30/UmuC/DinB protein family (28), are present in
the Pol
portion of Eso1.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic alignment of S. pombe
Eso1 protein (SpEso1), S. cerevisiae Ctf7
protein (ScCtf7), and S. cerevisiae
Pol
protein
(ScPol
). Regions of homology are
indicated by large shaded boxes and nonhomologous sequences
are shown as narrow white boxes. Motifs I-V are highly
conserved in the Pol
/UmuC/DinB protein family. The arrow
in Eso1 indicates the position of the truncation for producing the
Eso1-(1-609) protein containing the entire Pol
domain.
domain, as fusions with the glutathione S-transferase
protein. The GST-Eso1 and GST-Pol
proteins were affinity purified to
near homogeneity (Fig. 2A) and
their DNA synthesis and damage bypass properties were analyzed.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Purification and DNA polymerase activity of
S. pombe Eso1 and Pol
proteins. A, purified Eso1 and Pol
proteins. Each
protein from the final purification step was separated on a 10%
denaturing polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie Blue.
Lane 1, 300 ng of purified Eso1; lane 2, 300 ng
of purified Pol
. B, varying concentrations of Eso1 or
Pol
were incubated with all four deoxynucleotides (100 µM each) and 50 nM labeled primer-template
DNA for 5 min at 25 °C.
Proteins--
To test for DNA polymerase activity of S. pombe Eso1 and Pol
proteins, various concentrations of purified
proteins were incubated with labeled primer-template DNA substrate in
the presence of all four deoxynucleotides, and reaction products were
resolved on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. As shown in Fig.
2B, both proteins exhibit nearly equivalent DNA polymerizing ability.
Proteins--
Fidelity
measures the likelihood that a polymerase will incorporate the correct
versus the incorrect deoxynucleotide opposite a template
residue. We used steady-state kinetics to measure the fidelity of
S. pombe Eso1 and Pol
proteins opposite all four undamaged template nucleotides, as described under "Materials and
Methods." The incorporation of either the correct or incorrect deoxynucleotide was quantitated and used to calculate the
Vmax and Km values.
4 to
6.5 × 10
3. The finc values
were similarly calculated for the Pol
protein. As shown in Table
II, Pol
misincorporates nucleotides
with nearly the same frequencies as the Eso1 protein. Fig.
4 compares the efficiencies
(Vmax/Km) of correct and
incorrect deoxynucleotide incorporation opposite templates G, A, T, and
C by S. pombe Eso1 and Pol
proteins. This comparison
shows that the two proteins incorporate nucleotides with nearly the
same efficiencies. Thus, the presence of the Ctf7 protein in the COOH
terminus of Eso1 has little, if any, effect on Pol
's ability to
incorporate the correct or wrong nucleotides opposite undamaged
template bases.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Kinetics of nucleotide incorporation by
S. pombe Eso1 protein. A,
deoxynucleotide incorporation opposite a template G residue. Eso1
protein (5 nM) was incubated for 2-20 min at 25 °C with
the primer-template DNA substrate (50 nM) and increasing
concentrations of nucleotide. The samples were quenched and analyzed by
denaturing PAGE. The unextended primer (n = 0) and the
extended primers (N = 1 and 2) are indicated.
B, quantitation of deoxynucleotide incorporation reactions.
For each deoxynucleotide, the observed rate of deoxynucleotide
incorporation is graphed as a function of deoxynucleotide
concentration. The data were fit using Equation 1, and the resulting
Vmax and Km parameters are
listed in Table I.
Fidelity of S. pombe Eso1 protein on undamaged DNA
Fidelity of S. pombe Pol
on undamaged DNA

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Comparison of efficiency
(Vmax/Km) of deoxynucleotide
incorporation by S. pombe Eso1 and
Pol
proteins. The efficiency
(y axis) of incorporation of each of the four nucleotides
opposite each template base G, A, T, and C (x axis) is shown
for Eso1 (
) and Pol
(
) proteins. In the base pairs shown, the
first base represents the incoming nucleotide, and the second base is
in the template.
and Eso1
Proteins--
Processivity is a measure of the number of
deoxynucleotides a polymerase incorporates in a single DNA binding
event. Processivity is expressed quantitatively as the probability,
P, that following each nucleotide incorporation, the
polymerase will move ahead to incorporate at least one additional
deoxynucleotide (27). To ensure that we were measuring the activity of
a single DNA binding event, we included excess, nonradiolabeled
sonicated herring sperm DNA to trap any polymerase molecules that
dissociated from the DNA. The Eso1 (Fig.
5A, lanes 1-3) or
Pol
(Fig. 5A, lanes 7-9) proteins were
preincubated with radiolabeled primer-template DNA substrate for 1 h before the addition of excess herring sperm DNA and all four
deoxynucleotides. To determine that the excess herring sperm DNA was
indeed sufficient to prevent the re-binding of Eso1 or Pol
proteins
to the radiolabeled DNA substrate, the Eso1 (Fig. 5A,
lanes 4-6) or Pol
(Fig. 5A, lanes
10-12) proteins were preincubated with the radiolabeled
primer-template DNA substrate and the excess DNA trap for 1 h
before the addition of all four deoxynucleotides. The lack of any DNA
synthesis in these reactions (Fig. 5A, lanes 4-6
and 10-12) confirmed the adequacy of excess herring sperm
DNA to trap all Eso1 or Pol
molecules.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Processivity of S. pombe
Eso1 and Pol
proteins. A, DNA
synthesis by Eso1 and Pol
proteins resulting from a single DNA
binding event. 50 nM Eso1 (lanes 1-3) or Pol
(lanes 7-9) was preincubated with 50 nM
primer-template DNA for 1 h at 25 °C, and the reactions were
initiated by the addition of 100 µM of each of four
dNTPs, 5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mg/ml sonicated
herring sperm DNA trap. Reactions were quenched after 15 or 30 s,
and the samples were resolved by denaturing PAGE. The positions of the
unextended primer (n = 0) and extended primers
(n = 1-11) are indicated. As a control, 1 mg/ml
sonicated herring sperm DNA trap was added to the preincubation mixture
containing Eso1 (lanes 4-6) or Pol
proteins (lanes
10-12), and the reactions were initiated by the addition of 100 µM of each of four dNTPs and 5 mM
MgCl2. B and C, graphs of
N, the fraction of polymerase molecules that incorporated at
least N nucleotides, versus N-1 for the Eso1 and Pol
proteins, respectively. The solid lines reflect the best fit
curves to Equation 4 and were used to obtain values for the
processivity, P, as described under "Materials and
Methods."
N, the fraction of polymerase molecules that
incorporated at least N nucleotides, versus N-1 for the Eso1
protein. From the best fit curve to Equation 4, we obtained a value for
P equal to 0.53 ± 0.01, which means that for each
nucleotide incorporation event, the Eso1 protein has a 53% chance of
moving ahead to incorporate at least one additional nucleotide. Thus,
the average number of nucleotides incorporated by the Eso1 protein per
DNA binding event is 2.1. Likewise, Fig. 5C is the analogous
plot for Pol
. From the best fit curve to Equation 4, we obtained a
value for P equal to 0.61 ± 0.01. Thus, the average
number of nucleotides incorporated by Pol
per DNA binding event is
2.6.
Proteins--
The
ability of Eso1 and Pol
proteins to replicate through a
cis-syn T-T dimer was assessed using a standing start assay. As shown in Fig. 6A, both
proteins are able to incorporate a deoxynucleotide opposite the 3' T of
the dimer and to extend from it, and the DNA synthesis activity on the
damaged DNA is as robust as on the nondamaged DNA. To identify the
nucleotide incorporated by Eso1 and Pol
proteins opposite the two Ts
of the dimer, we incubated each enzyme for 5 min in the presence of
dimer containing DNA substrate and containing a single deoxynucleotide
G, A, T, or C, at 100 µM concentration. As shown in Fig.
6B, both proteins primarily incorporate an A residue
opposite each of the Ts of the T-T dimer.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Bypass of a T-T dimer by S. pombe
Eso1 and Pol
proteins.
A, synthesis of DNA on a T-T dimer-containing template. 5 nM Eso1 protein was incubated at 25 °C for 5 min with
all four deoxynucleotides at 100 µM each, and either 10 nM undamaged (lane 2) or T-T dimer containing
DNA substrate (lane 4). Identical reactions were carried out
with Pol
on undamaged (lane 6) and T-T dimer containing
DNA (lane 8). dNTPs were not added in lanes 1,
3, 5, and 7. ND, nondamaged DNA; CPD,
T-T dimer containing DNA. B, specificity of deoxynucleotide
incorporation opposite a T-T dimer. Nucleotide incorporation by 5 nM Eso1 protein (lanes 1-5) or Pol
protein
(lanes 6-10) incubated at 25 °C for 5 min with 10 nM T-T dimer containing DNA substrate. Reactions contained
no deoxynucleotide (lanes 1 and 6), or 100 µM dGTP (lanes 2 and 7), dATP
(lanes 3 and 8), dTTP (lanes 4 and
9), or dCTP (lanes 5 and 10).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
to the sister chromatid cohesion protein Ctf7
in the S. pombe Eso1 protein has presented the opportunity to determine whether the fusion with Ctf7 affects Pol
function. Our
results indicate that the DNA synthesis activity of Pol
is not
affected by fusion to Ctf7, as the Eso1 and Pol
proteins synthesize
DNA with remarkably similar efficiencies and fidelities, and on
undamaged DNA, they misincorporate nucleotides with frequencies ranging
from 2 × 10
2 to 2 × 10
4. Also,
the two proteins replicate a cis-syn T-T dimer equally well
and both predominantly insert two A residues opposite the two Ts of the
dimer. In all these properties, the S. pombe Eso1 and Pol
proteins resemble S. cerevisiae and human Pol
.
is a low processivity enzyme, dissociating from DNA quite
frequently. DNA polymerases achieve processive synthesis by associating
with a multimeric ring
clamp in Escherichia coli or PCNA
in eukaryotes. T7 polymerase increases its processivity by forming a
one-to-one complex with E. coli thioredoxin (29, 30). The
processivity of Pol
, however, is not affected by its fusion to Ctf7.
Both the Eso1 and Pol
proteins exhibit low processivity, inserting
2-3 nucleotides per DNA binding event.
, fusion with Ctf7 may
enable Pol
to function in sister chromatid cohesion. Genetic studies
in S. cerevisiae have suggested that a cohesion complex
consisting of the Scc1, Scc3, Smc1, and Smc3 subunits is loaded onto
chromosomes at the end of G1. Another protein, Scc2,
although not a stoichiometric Cohesin subunit, is required for the
association of the cohesion complex with chromosomes (23). The sixth
protein, Ctf7, is neither a subunit of the Cohesin complex nor is it
required for the association of Cohesin with chromosomes (23). Ctf7,
however, is essential for the establishment of cohesion during DNA
replication, but it is not required for the maintenance of cohesion
during G2 and M phases (22, 23). One possible role for the
fusion of Ctf7 with Pol
in the Eso1 protein is that it promotes
replication through chromosomal sites where Cohesin has been deposited
onto DNA, and replication through such sites may be a prerequisite for
the formation of protein links between Cohesin-bound sister chromatids.
has no apparent effect on sister chromatid
cohesion in either yeast species. One possible explanation for this
discrepancy is the involvement of yet two other highly related
proteins, Trf4 and Trf5, in sister chromatid cohesion. A trf4 ts
trf5
double mutant is unable to complete S phase, and results
in failure of cohesion between the replicated sister chromatids (31).
The Trf proteins are members of the
-polymerase superfamily, and accordingly, a DNA polymerase activity has been identified in Trf4
(31). A role for the Trf4 and Trf5 polymerases in the replication of
Cohesin-bound DNA has been previously proposed (31). The fact that the
Trf4 and Trf5 proteins are essential for the establishment of sister
chromatid cohesion suggests that these polymerases are indispensable
for the replication of Cohesin-bound DNA sequences, whereas the
dispensability of Pol
for sister chromatid cohesion would suggest
that this protein plays a much less critical role in the replication of
Cohesin-bound DNA. Pol
may have an accessory role in the replication
of Cohesin-bound DNA, where it promotes replication through some sites
by the Trf4 or Trf5 polymerase. Pol
may act at such sites in a
manner analogous to its role in damage bypass where it salvages the
replication fork stalled at a lesion site.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Sealy Center for
Molecular Science, University of Texas Medical Branch, 6.104 Blocker
Medical Research Bldg., 11th and Mechanic Sts., Galveston, TX
77555-1061. Tel.: 409-747-8602; Fax: 409-747-8608; E-mail: sprakash@scms.utmb.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106917200
1 R. E. Johnson, L. Prakash, and S. Prakash, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: GST, glutathione S-transferase; CPD, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | McDonald, J. P., Levine, A. S., and Woodgate, R. (1997) Genetics 147, 1557-1568[Abstract] |
| 2. |
Johnson, R. E.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
15975-15977 |
| 3. |
Yu, S.-L.,
Johnson, R. E.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
185-188 |
| 4. |
Johnson, R. E.,
Kondratick, C. M.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(1999)
Science
285,
263-265 |
| 5. | Masutani, C., Kusumoto, R., Yamada, A., Dohmae, N., Yokoi, M., Yuasa, M., Araki, M., Iwai, S., Takio, K., and Hanaoka, F. (1999) Nature 399, 700-704[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Lehmann, A. R.,
Kirk-Bell, S.,
Arlett, C. F.,
Paterson, M. C.,
Lohman, P. H. M.,
de Weerd-Kastelein, E. A.,
and Bootsma, D.
(1975)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
72,
219-223 |
| 7. | Cleaver, J. E., Greene, A. E., Coriell, L. L., and Mulivor, R. A. (1981) Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 31, 188-192[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Boyer, J. C.,
Kaufmann, W. K.,
Brylawski, B. P.,
and Cordeiro-Stone, M.
(1990)
Cancer Res.
50,
2593-2598 |
| 9. |
Wang, Y.-C.,
Maher, V. M.,
Mitchell, D. L.,
and McCormick, J. J.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4276-4283 |
| 10. | Waters, H. L., Seetharam, S., Seidman, M. M., and Kraemer, K. H. (1993) J. Invest. Dermatol. 101, 744-748[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Johnson, R. E.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(1999)
Science
283,
1001-1004 |
| 12. |
Johnson, R. E.,
Washington, M. T.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7447-7450 |
| 13. | Haracska, L., Yu, S.-L., Johnson, R. E., Prakash, L., and Prakash, S. (2000) Nat. Genet. 25, 458-461[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Haracska, L.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
8001-8007 |
| 15. |
Washington, M. T.,
Johnson, R. E.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
3094-3099 |
| 16. |
Washington, M. T.,
Johnson, R. E.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36835-36838 |
| 17. | Matsuda, T., Bebenek, K., Masutani, C., Hanaoka, F., and Kunkel, T. A. (2000) Nature 404, 1011-1013[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Pavlov, Y. I., Nguyen, D., and Kunkel, T. A. (2001) Mutat. Res. 478, 129-139[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Bailly, V.,
Lamb, J.,
Sung, P.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
811-820 |
| 20. |
Bailly, V.,
Lauder, S.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23360-23365 |
| 21. |
Tanaka, K.,
Yonekawa, T.,
Kawasaki, Y.,
Kai, M.,
Furuya, K.,
Iwasaki, M.,
Murakami, H.,
Yanagida, M.,
and Okayama, H.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
3459-3469 |
| 22. |
Skibbens, R. V.,
Corson, L. B.,
Koshland, D.,
and Hieter, P.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
307-319 |
| 23. |
Toth, A.,
Ciosk, R.,
Uhlmann, F.,
Galova, M.,
Schleiffer, A.,
and Nasmyth, K.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
320-333 |
| 24. | Johnson, R. E., Washington, M. T., Haracska, L., Prakash, S., and Prakash, L. (2000) Nature 406, 1015-1019[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Goodman, M. F., Creighton, S., Bloom, L. B., and Petruska, J. (1993) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28, 83-126[Abstract] |
| 26. | Creighton, S., Bloom, L. B., and Goodman, M. F. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 262, 232-256[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | von Hippel, P. H., Fairfield, F. R., and Dolejsi, M. K. (1994) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 726, 118-131[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Johnson, R. E.,
Washington, M. T.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
12224-12226 |
| 29. |
Modrich, P.,
and Richardson, C. C.
(1975)
J. Biol. Chem.
250,
5508-5514 |
| 30. |
Huber, H. E.,
Tabor, S.,
and Richardson, C. C.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
16224-16232 |
| 31. |
Wang, Z.,
Castano, I. B.,
de las Penas, A.,
Adams, C.,
and Christman, M. F.
(2000)
Science
289,
774-779 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Shiomi, C. Masutani, F. Hanaoka, H. Kimura, and T. Tsurimoto A Second Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Loader Complex, Ctf18-Replication Factor C, Stimulates DNA Polymerase {eta} Activity J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2007; 282(29): 20906 - 20914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hou, C.-W. Chu, X. Kong, K. Yokomori, and H. Zou The acetyltransferase activity of San stabilizes the mitotic cohesin at the centromeres in a shugoshin-independent manner J. Cell Biol., May 21, 2007; 177(4): 587 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hou and H. Zou Two Human Orthologues of Eco1/Ctf7 Acetyltransferases Are Both Required for Proper Sister-Chromatid Cohesion Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2005; 16(8): 3908 - 3918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Bellows, M. A. Kenna, L. Cassimeris, and R. V. Skibbens Human EFO1p exhibits acetyltransferase activity and is a unique combination of linker histone and Ctf7p/Eco1p chromatid cohesion establishment domains Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2003; 31(21): 6334 - 6343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |