|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104407200 on September 12, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 46, 42901-42907, November 16, 2001
The Bacillus subtilis Competence Transcription
Factor, ComK, Overrides LexA-imposed Transcriptional Inhibition without
Physically Displacing LexA*
Leendert W.
Hamoen §,
Bertjan
Haijema¶,
Jetta J.
Bijlsma ,
Gerard
Venema , and
Charles M.
Lovett**
From the Department of Genetics, University of
Groningen, NL-9751 NN Haren, The Netherlands, the ¶ Institute of
Virology, University of Utrecht, NL-3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands,
the Department of Medical Microbiology, Vrije Universiteit,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and the ** Department of
Chemistry, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267
Received for publication, May 15, 2001, and in revised form, September 5, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
During the development of competence in
Bacillus subtilis the recA gene is activated by
the competence transcription factor, ComK, which is presumably required
to alleviate the transcriptional repression of recA by
LexA. To investigate the mechanism by which ComK activates
recA transcription we examined the binding of ComK and LexA
to the recA promoter in vitro. Using hydroxyl
radical protection analyses to establish the location of ComK
dimer-binding sites within the recA promoter, we identified
four AT-boxes in a configuration unique for ComK-regulated promoters.
Gel mobility shift experiments showed that all four ComK dimer-binding
sites were occupied at ComK concentrations in the physiological range. In addition, occupation of all ComK-binding sites did not prevent LexA
from binding to the recA promoter, despite the fact that the ComK and LexA recognition motifs partially overlap. Although ComK
did not replace LexA from the recA promoter, in
vitro transcription analyses indicated that the presence of ComK
is sufficient to alleviate LexA repression of
recA.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bacillus subtilis differentiates into cells competent
for genetic transformation by synthesizing a complex DNA binding and uptake system and by activating recombination genes. Paramount among
the recombination gene products that enable cells to incorporate newly
acquired genetic material is the RecA protein, which plays a crucial
role in recombination by promoting homologous pairing and DNA strand
exchange (1, 2). RecA is also essential for the regulation of the SOS
DNA repair system, which is activated when DNA is damaged or when
B. subtilis cells differentiate to a competent state
(3).
The SOS system operates in many bacteria and has been the subject of
extensive studies in Escherichia coli (for review, see Ref.
4). Following exposure to DNA damaging treatments, a set of damage
inducible (din) genes becomes transcriptionally activated. Expression of B. subtilis din genes is regulated by the
products of the lexA (formerly called dinR) and
recA genes (5, 6). LexA acts as the repressor of all
B. subtilis din genes, including recA and
lexA, by binding specifically to DNA sequences located within the putative promoter regions (5, 7-10). Comparison of the DNA
sequences of more than 20 din promoter regions that bind
LexA revealed a consensus sequence for binding of a LexA dimer,
CGAACATATGTTC.1 Analogous to
the situation in E. coli, RecA is required for SOS induction
in B. subtilis (6, 11, 12). B. subtilis RecA is
activated to promote the autocleavage of LexA repressor in vitro when it binds single-stranded DNA and nucleoside
triphosphate (10). Correspondingly, B. subtilis RecA is
activated in vivo by binding single-stranded DNA exposed by
discontinuous replication past UV-induced lesions and to a lesser
extent by the processing of gaps formed during excision repair
(13).
Although the SOS system is induced during competence development by a
similar RecA/LexA-dependent mechanism, B. subtilis
recA expression is additionally stimulated by a
competence-specific mechanism (8, 14). Competence is a
starvation-induced differentiation process that develops optimally at
sufficiently high cell densities and in minimal growth medium with
glucose as the main carbon source (for review, see Ref. 15). The
various environmental signals are interpreted by a complex signal
transduction cascade and ultimately lead to the activation of
comK, which encodes the competence transcription factor (16,
17). ComK is essential for: (i) the expression of all late competence
gene products that assemble the DNA-binding and -uptake system; (ii)
the competence-related expression of the recombination genes
recA and addAB (the homologue of E. coli recBCD); and (iii) its own expression (8, 16, 18). Purified ComK
has been shown to bind to the promoter regions of all these genes, and
its transcription stimulating activity has been demonstrated in
vitro with the late competence gene, comG (19). ComK
footprinting analyses with a number of ComK-regulated genes established
a conserved AT-rich palindromic sequence (called the AT-box) as the
ComK-recognition sequence (19).
Since competence-dependent recA induction occurs
in RecA-minus cells, deficient in LexA cleavage, and before LexA is
cleaved in wild-type cells,2
the LexA-imposed transcriptional repression of recA is
presumably alleviated by the activity of ComK (14). To examine whether ComK is able to prevent the association of LexA with the
recA promoter region, we analyzed the binding of purified
ComK in the absence and presence of LexA. Hydroxyl radical footprinting
analysis revealed four possible ComK dimer-binding sites, which was
substantiated by the results of gel mobility shift experiments.
Surprisingly, the occupation of all ComK-binding sites did not
interfere with LexA binding, yet our in vitro transcription
analysis showed that ComK is sufficient to overcome LexA repression.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
General Methods and Materials--
All molecular cloning and
PCR3 procedures were carried
out using standard techniques (20, 21). Labeled nucleotides were from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Media for growth of B. subtilis and E. coli have been described by Sambrook et
al. (21) and Venema et al. (22). B. subtilis
strain 8G5 chromosomal DNA used as template for PCR, was purified as
described by Venema et al. (22).
Purification of ComK--
ComK was purified as an MBP-ComK
fusion protein on an amylose resin (New England Biolabs) column and
separated from MBP by cleavage with protease Factor Xa, as previously
described (16). After cleavage was complete, Factor Xa was inactivated
by the addition of 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. To
separate ComK from MBP and DNA, the protein mixture was loaded onto a
DEAE column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM dithiotreitol. MBP and ComK were sequentially eluted
with a 0 to 50 mM Na2SO4 gradient
and a 0 to 1 M KCl gradient (containing 50 mM
Na2SO4). Fractions were collected and the
Na2SO4 concentration increased to 100 mM to prevent precipitation of ComK. The ComK containing
fractions were checked for the absence of contaminating DNA by ethidium
bromide-stained agarose gel electrophoresis, aliquoted, and stored at
70 °C. Purification and cleavage of MBP-ComK were followed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Purification of LexA--
B. subtilis LexA was
purified as described previously (10). E. coli strain
BL21(DE3) containing pET21a-dinR was grown in 1 liter of LB
broth containing carbenicillin (50 µg/ml) with shaking until an
A600 of 0.6. The culture was induced with 10 ml
of 100 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside and grown for an
additional 3 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4 °C,
5000 × g for 20 min, and resuspended in 5 ml of 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10% (w/v) sucrose, 1 mM EDTA.
Cells were lysed with lysozyme (0.2 mg/ml) by incubation on ice for 30 min followed by a 15-min incubation at 37 °C. After 3 times
freeze-thawing and sonication, debris was removed by centrifugation at
18,000 × g for 15 min, and the supernatant was used
for further purification. The supernatant (0.5-2 ml) was filtered and
applied to a 5-ml heparin-agarose column, equilibrated in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, and subjected to
fast protein liquid chromatography. Following elution with a 40-ml
linear NaCl gradient (10 mM to 1 M), fractions
containing LexA protein were pooled, concentrated 10-fold by
centrifugation in a Centricon 10 unit (Amicon), and diluted to the
original volume in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM
NaCl; concentration and dilution was then repeated twice. Sample was
applied to a Mono-S column and chromatographed as described for the
heparin-agarose column, and fractions containing LexA were pooled and
dialyzed against 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, and concentrated by centrifugation in a Centricon
10 unit.
Hydroxyl Radical Protection Analyses--
Hydroxyl radical
protection analyses were performed as described by Tullius and
Dombroski (23) with the modifications described by O'Halloran et
al. (24). The DNA probes were obtained by PCR amplification using
primers R1 (5'-TACGGCTGCCATTTAATG-3') and R2 (5'-CTGCCTGACGATCACTC-3'),
complementary to the sequence at nucleotide position 184 and +32,
relative to the transcriptional start of recA. Primers were
end-labeled with T4-polynucleotide kinase using
[ -32P]ATP. Binding reaction conditions were as for the
gel mobility shift experiments described below, except that glycerol
was omitted. DNA fragments, containing ~30,000 cpm, were added to
each 50-µl reaction mixture. After 20 min at room temperature, 1 µl
of 5.6 mM
(NH4)2Fe(SO2)2·6H2O
was mixed with 1 µl of 11.2 mM EDTA, and added to the
incubation mixture, followed by the addition of 2 µl of 3.36%
H2O2 and 2 µl of 112 mM
Na-ascorbate. Reactions were incubated for 1 min at room temperature
and terminated with 44 µl of stop solution (10 µl of 3 M Na-acetate, 6 µg of yeast tRNA, and 10 µl of 320 mM thiourea) and the subsequent addition of 300 µl of
ethanol. Samples were extracted with phenol-chloroform, and ethanol
precipitated. The precipitates were resuspended in 3 µl of loading
buffer. Analysis of DNA products was carried out by electrophoresis on
a 6% polyacrylamide urea gel. Maxam-Gilbert G + A reactions were run
with each experiment to locate sequence positions and protected regions
(21).
Gel Mobility Shift Analyses--
Gel mobility shift experiments
were carried out essentially as described (16). The recA
promoter fragment was isolated by PCR, using the primer set as
described for the hydroxyl radical protection analyses, and end-labeled
with T4-polynucleotide kinase using [ -32P]ATP. The
purified proteins and probes were premixed on ice in binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiotreitol, 10% (v/v)
glycerol, 0.05 mg/ml poly(dI-dC), and 0.05 mg/ml bovine serum albumin).
After 15 min incubation at 37 °C, the samples were loaded on a
nondenaturing 4% polyacrylamide gel. The following modifications were
applied to increase the resolution of retardation. Electrophoresis was
performed with the Bio-Rad Mini-protein cell system, using a spacer
thickness of 0.75 mm. A voltage gradient stacking was established by
using 1 × TAE buffer (40 mM Tris acetate, pH 8, 2 mM EDTA) for the nondenaturing 4% polyacrylamide gel,
0.5 × TAE buffer for the cathode compartment, and 2 × TAE
buffer for the anode compartment. Gels were run at 50 V, dried, and
autoradiographed in the absence of intensifying screens.
Autoradiograms of the dried gels were digitized and analyzed by
densitometry using an Alpha Innotech IS-1000 imaging system. To
determine the fraction of DNA molecules with exactly i
dimers bound, Øi (i = 0, 2, 3, or 4), the
total OD of all bands in each lane was quantified. Øi was
calculated for each band from Øi = ODtot,i/ ODtot,i, summed over
all of the bands in a given lane. The equations for the fractions of
DNA molecules with i ligands bound in a three-site system
have been derived previously using a general statistical mechanical approach (25). In our analyses we assumed that the three sites correspond to the binding of a tetramer first and then subsequently by
two dimers such that the equations representing the number of dimers
bound are given by,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
|
(Eq. 2)
|
|
(Eq. 3)
|
|
(Eq. 4)
|
where Z = 1 + K1[ComK] + K2[ComK]2 + K3[ComK]3.
Experimental data shown in Fig. 7 were analyzed according to Equations
1-4 with Mathematica and KaleidaGraph using nonlinear least squares
methods to determine and apply the best curve fits.
In Vitro Transcription Assays--
In vitro
transcription experiments were performed essentially as described by
Hamoen et al. (19). The DNA template, pAN-recA, was
constructed by cloning a PCR fragment containing the recA promoter, between the SmaI and XbaI sites of the
pAN583 vector (26). The recA promoter fragment was isolated
by PCR using the primers R1 and R3
(5'-TGTTCTAGAGCCATATCTAAGG-3'), and subsequent digestion
with HindIII (position +49 relative to the transcriptional start of recA) and XbaI (underlined in R3). The
HindIII site was converted to a blunt-end by using a Klenow
fill-in reaction, prior to XbaI digestion. The transcription
reactions were performed in the binding buffer described for the gel
mobility shift experiments (poly(dI-dC) included). DNA templates,
purified B. subtilis RNA polymerase, and purified ComK were
incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in a final volume of 20 µl, before
the addition of 3 µl of a nucleotide mixture (1 mM ATP, 1 mM UTP, 1 mM GTP, 0.5 µl of [ -32P]CTP). After 1 min incubation at room
temperature, 2 µl of 0.3% heparin was added to the mixture and
incubation resumed for another 10 min at 37 °C. After the addition
of 2 µl of 1 mM CTP, incubation was continued for 10 min
before terminating the reaction by the addition of 18 µl of formamide
containing 0.05% bromphenol blue and 0.05% xylene blue. After heating
for 3 min at 90 °C, the samples were loaded on a 8%
polyacrylamide-urea gel and run at 300 V. Gels were subjected to
autoradiography immediately after electrophoresis without prior drying.
 |
RESULTS |
The recA Promoter Contains Four ComK Dimer-binding Sites--
In a
previous study Haijema et al. (8) determined the
ComK-binding site at the recA promoter using DNase I
footprinting analysis (8). They obtained a clear footprint extending
from approximately positions 150 to 50, which is the longest
ComK-protected region identified thus far. By analyzing ComK footprints
of several ComK-dependent promoters, Hamoen et
al. (19) concluded that ComK binds as a tetramer composed of two
dimers, where each dimer recognizes the dyad symmetrical sequence
AAAAN5TTTT, the so called AT-box (19). The two putative
AT-boxes in the recA promoter appeared to be located at the
center of the DNase I protections, yet the region confined by these
AT-boxes covers only half the sequence protected by ComK (19).
To examine which nucleotide sequences could be responsible for this
peculiarly extended ComK-binding region, we improved the resolution of
the ComK footprint analyses by using a hydroxyl radical protection
assay (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig.
2, the hydroxyl radical footprint fits
well within the borders of the DNase I footprint. The central hydroxyl
radical protections mark the two previously assigned AT-boxes in a
pattern comparable with that found in a hydroxyl radical ComK footprint
of the addAB promoter (19). A closer inspection of the
hydroxyl radical protections at the extremities of the ComK-binding
region revealed two additional AT-boxes: a perfect AT-box around
position 140, and one AT-box, with two replacements in the thymine
tract, around position 55.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Hydroxyl radical footprinting analysis of the
recA promoter region in the absence ( ) and presence
of ComK (+). The left and right panels
represents the footprint of the upper and lower strands,
respectively. Footprints are flanked by G + A sequence ladders.
Strongly protected regions are marked by solid lines and
weaker protected regions by dots. The position of the 35
promoter sequences are marked.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Summary of the ComK DNase I and ComK hydroxyl
radical footprints of the recA promoter.
Sequences protected from DNase I nuclease and hydroxyl radical activity
are marked by bars and dots, respectively.
Thin bars and small dots represent weak
protection. Hypersensitive sites are indicated by
arrowheads. AT-boxes are boxed, the SOS-box is
marked with open bars, and the 35 promoter sequence is
underlined. Base pair positions are indicated relative to
the transcriptional start site.
|
|
The presence of four ComK-protected AT-boxes in the recA
promoter suggests that this promoter is able to accommodate a total of
four ComK dimers. Since it has been shown that ComK binds as a single
tetramer to the promoter regions of the ComK-regulated genes studied so
far (19), we were interested in determining the oligomerization state
of ComK on the recA promoter with its two additional
dimer-binding sites. Specifically, we wondered if the detection of
partial saturation of the recA promoter at low ComK
concentrations might provide clues regarding the nature of ComK
binding. Although previous gel mobility shift assays with the
recA promoter and purified ComK yielded a single retarded band, the retarded band displayed in the autoradiograms was diffuse and
may have obscured the presence of multiple bands (8).
To increase the resolution of the gel mobility shifts we omitted the
use of intensifying screens, reduced the thickness of the nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gels, and applied a voltage gradient using buffers with
various ionic strengths (for details, see "Experimental Procedures"). These alterations resolved the single diffuse band into
three separate bands (Fig. 3). Repeating
these high resolution gel mobility shift assays with other
ComK-regulated promoters, such as addAB and comK,
yielded only a single retarded band (data not shown) consistent with
the binding of a single ComK tetramer (19). Gel mobility shift
experiments at low ComK concentrations with these ComK-regulated
promoter fragments never revealed intermediate retarded bands that
would correspond to the binding of discrete ComK dimers. Based on its
relative mobility, we assume that the least retarded recA
fragment is bound by a single ComK tetramer, and that the two further
retarded bands are due to successive binding of two additional ComK
dimers.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Gel mobility shift titration of a
32P-labeled recA promoter fragment
incubated with increasing concentrations of ComK. ComK was
increased in 2-fold increments from 4 to 900 nM. Left
lane (0) contains no protein.
|
|
ComK Binding Does Not Interfere with LexA Binding--
The
LexA-binding site of the recA promoter partially overlaps
with the downstream AT-box (AT-box 4) suggesting that ComK binding to
this AT-box could reduce the affinity of LexA for the recA SOS-box. Thus, a plausible mechanism for
competence-dependent recA induction could be
that ComK precludes stable binding of LexA to its site. Arguing against
this simple mechanism, Haijema et al. (8) showed that both
proteins can bind simultaneously to the recA promoter.
However, it is possible that in the presence of LexA the downstream
AT-box was not occupied (i.e. only three ComK dimers bound)
since the unresolved mobility shift experiment could not distinguish
between partial and complete occupancy of al ComK-binding sites.
To examine whether ComK is capable of displacing LexA from the
recA promoter, we repeated the high-resolution gel mobility shift assays with ComK in the presence of purified LexA. Prior to
testing retardation with both proteins, we tested the binding of LexA
alone to determine the saturating LexA concentration. The
recA promoter contains a single SOS-box, and only a single shifted band was observed in a gel mobility shift assay (Fig. 4). Graphical analysis of these data gave
a Kd of 5 nM for LexA binding to the
recA SOS-box (data not shown). Using a LexA concentration
(13 nM) sufficient to ensure binding to all recA
promoter molecules, we incubated the recA promoter with
increasing concentrations of ComK in the absence and presence of LexA.
As indicated in Fig. 5, the presence of
LexA added to the electrophoretic mobility shift of all three ComK
retarded bands. Apparently, despite partially overlapping recognition
sites, ComK does not exclude LexA from binding to the recA
promoter. The alternative possibility, that LexA-induced supershift
resulted from a specific interaction between ComK and LexA, could be
refuted. In a gel mobility shift assay with a
ComK-dependent promoter which does not contain a SOS-box,
the presence of LexA did not result in an additional retardation in
electrophoretic mobility of ComK-bound promoter fragments (data not
shown).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Gel mobility shift titration of a
32P-labeled recA promoter fragment
incubated with increasing concentrations of LexA. LexA was
increased in 2-fold increments from 0.1 to 25 nM.
Left lane (0) contains no protein.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Gel mobility shift titration using
32P-labeled recA promoter fragment
incubated with increasing concentrations of ComK, in the presence (+)
and absence of LexA (13 nM). ComK was increased in
2-fold increments from 7 to 900 nM. The left
lane (0) contains no protein.
|
|
LexA Does Not Affect the Affinity of ComK for the recA
Promoter--
We quantified our mobility shift data by densitometry
and analyzed the data graphically to determine equilibrium binding
constants. Our objective was to assess the extent to which LexA alters
the ability of ComK to bind the recA promoter. Any changes
in ComK binding constants at saturating LexA concentration would
suggest that saturating concentrations of ComK could alter the binding of LexA to the recA SOS-box.
Fig. 6 shows graphical analyses of our
ComK titration data in the absence and presence of LexA at a saturating
concentration of 13 nM. Assuming the stoichiometry
indicated by our footprinting data (i.e. a maximum occupancy
of four ComK dimers per recA promoter), we analyzed the
average number of ComK dimers bound per recA promoter as a
function of free ComK concentration. The data for the binding of ComK
in the presence and absence of LexA fit a binding isotherm with a
dissociation constant, Kd, of 84 nM. The
value of 84 nM was determined from a Scatchard plot of the
same data (Fig. 6, middle graph). It is noteworthy that the
Scatchard plot is linear suggesting that the thermodynamics of binding
is not cooperative despite the existence of multiple contiguous binding sites. Consistent with the linear Scatchard plots, Hill plots of the
data (Fig. 6, lower graph) had slopes of exactly 1.0. These results do not rule out the possibility that the kinetics of ComK binding is cooperative, which we suspect is the case for binding of the
ComK tetramer since we never detect binding of a single dimer. It is
also possible that the kinetics of dimer binding is cooperative. In any
case, the significant result is that the presence of LexA does not
appear to affect the affinity of ComK for the recA
promoter.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Graphical analyses of the gel mobility shift
titration of recA promoter fragment with ComK.
Upper graph, average number of ComK dimers bound per
recA promoter (r) plotted versus concentration of
unbound ComK; middle graph, Scatchard plot; lower
graph, Hill plot. Data are from titrations in the presence
(open squares) or absence of LexA (closed
circles).
|
|
Our ability to resolve different ligation states for ComK binding makes
it possible to analyze individual binding constants to better assess
cooperative interactions that might occur between sites. Senear and
Brenowitz (25) demonstrated the validity of this approach for the Lac,
Gal, and cI repressors (25). As described above, our gel mobility
shift results can best be explained by a three-site system where one
site is bound by a ComK tetramer and the other two sites are bound by
ComK dimers. The fraction of DNA molecules with exactly i
dimers bound, Øi (where i = 0, 2, 3, or 4),
was calculated from digitized autoradiogram images and the data were
curve fitted as described under "Experimental Procedures." Fig.
7 shows a plot of the fraction of DNA
with ComK bound to 0, 1, 2, or 3 sites, the first site bound
(i.e. the site bound at low ComK concentration) by a
tetramer, and the other sites by dimers. The curves in Fig. 7 result
from fitting the data from gel mobility shift assays, in the presence
and absence of LexA, according to Equations 1-4 to give
K1 = 1.21 × 107,
K2 = 8.94 × 1013, and
K3 = 7.25 × 1020 for the
respective equilibrium association constants. It is noteworthy that the
dissociation constant corresponding to K1 = 1.21 × 107 (i.e. the reciprocal of this
value) is 83 nM, is in very good agreement with the
dissociation constant determined from the Scatchard plot in Fig. 6.
Although the curve fit is not perfect for our 1- and 2-site data, there
is no significant difference between the data in the presence or
absence of LexA.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Graphical analyses of the gel mobility shift
titration of recA promoter fragment with ComK.
Fraction of DNA molecules with i dimers bound was calculated
from bands as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Circles, unbound promoters; squares, promoters
with 2 dimers bound; triangles, promoters with 3 dimers
bound; inverted triangles, promoters with 4 dimers bound.
Open symbols are from titrations with LexA and closed
symbols are from titrations without LexA. The solid
lines are from fitting the data according to Equations 1-4 under
"Experimental Procedures."
|
|
As described for the binding of the cI repressor to its operator,
cooperative binding of the second ligand in a 3-site system can be
inferred if K2 > K12/3 and cooperative binding of the
third ligand can be inferred if K3 > K1K2/3 (25). For ComK binding to the
recA promoter the ratio of
K2:K12/3 is 1.8 and the ratio of
K3:K1K2/3 is 2.0 suggesting
moderate cooperativity in each case. Although the ComK-binding sites
are not identical, Senear and Brenowitz (25) showed that the ratios are
greater than one when cooperativity equals or exceeds site heterogeneity. A possible explanation for the apparent discrepancy between these results and our Hill analysis is that the cooperativity is about equal to the site heterogeneity. That is, the free energy corresponding to cooperative interactions between the tetramer and the
adjacent dimers is about equal to the respective differences in the
free energy of binding.
Figs. 6 and 7 provide strong evidence that the binding constants for
ComK are unaffected by the presence of LexA. According to equilibrium
laws, it follows that if the binding constants for ComK are unaffected
by the presence of LexA, the binding constant for LexA is unaffected by
the presence of ComK. Thus, binding of ComK alone does not contribute
to the displacement of LexA from the recA promoter.
ComK Is Sufficient to Activate recA Transcription--
Since ComK
does not prevent LexA from binding to the recA promoter, is
ComK alone capable of counteracting the LexA-imposed repression or are
additional factors required? We performed in vitro
transcription experiments with purified RNA polymerase to address this
question. The recA promoter region was cloned into the
multiple cloning site of pAN583, followed by the strong T7 terminator
for use in an in vitro transcription assay (26). The
resulting pAN-recA construct was incubated in a
transcription buffer containing purified RNA polymerase and
combinations of purified LexA and ComK. Fig.
8 shows that the inhibition of
recA transcription by LexA is overridden by the addition of
ComK, although the level of transcription is not as high as with ComK
alone. We therefore conclude that the presence of ComK is sufficient for competence induced recA expression.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
In vitro transcription assays,
with the recA promoter as template, in the presence of
LexA (0.1 µM) and/or ComK (1 µM). Both proteins were absent in
the first lane ( ).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Using hydroxyl radical protection analysis we identified a total
of four ComK dimer-binding sites, two more than are present in other
ComK-regulated promoters. Our mobility shift results further suggest
that the recA promoter is bound by a ComK tetramer at low
ComK concentration, and then successively by two additional ComK dimers
as ComK concentration increases. Complete retardation of most
recA promoter molecules does not occur until the ComK concentration reaches about 1 µM. Assuming a cell volume
of 1 × 10 9 µl (calculated from the size of a
typical cell), and about 90,000 ComK molecules per cell (27), the
physiological concentration of ComK would be well over 100 µM, high enough to ensure that all four ComK-binding
sites are occupied in vivo.
On the basis of the separation of the ComK dimer-binding sites
(AT-boxes), three classes of ComK-regulated promoters are distinguished (19). In the first class (addAB, dinA, and
nucA) the interval between dimer-binding sites is 21 nucleotides, placing both AT-boxes at the same side of the DNA helix,
assuming 10.5 nucleotides per helical turn (28). The second class
comprises the late competence genes (comC, -G,
-E, and -F). These promoters contain AT-boxes separated by an interval of 31 nucleotides, corresponding to 3 complete
helical turns. The third class contains a single representative, the
comK promoter. In this case the repetition of the two
AT-boxes occurs at an interval of 44 nucleotides, ~4 helical turns.
Although the distances between the ComK dimer-binding sites show a
remarkable variability, in all classes the two AT-boxes are located at
the same face of the DNA helix. This enables the ComK dimers to
interact to form a tetramer, which has been shown to be essential for
efficient binding of ComK (19). In the recA promoter the two
centrally located AT-boxes (AT-boxes 2 and 3) are separated by an
interval of 21 nucleotides, corresponding to the first class of
ComK-regulated promoters. The interval between AT-box 1 and AT-box 2 is
33 nucleotides, equivalent to the second class of promoters. The same
interval separates AT-box 3 and AT-box 4. Thus, all of the AT-boxes
face the same side of the DNA helix suggesting that the ComK dimers could interact with the ComK tetramer. In support of such interactions, our analysis of the individual binding constants for the three distinct
ligation states revealed cooperativity for binding of the dimers. In
order for class 2 and class 3 promoters to form tetramers, the two ComK
dimers must span a considerable distance suggesting significant
distortion of the DNA. In fact, ComK has been shown to induce bending,
estimated at about 75 degrees, in the promoters of comG and
comF (19). It is therefore likely that binding of the 4 ComK
dimers would induce a substantial bending of the recA promoter.
We have provided strong evidence that ComK alone cannot displace the
LexA repressor from the recA operator. The SOS-box partially overlaps with the downstream located AT-box, yet when all ComK-binding sites are sequestered, our results indicate that LexA still binds to
the recA promoter with equal affinity. Thus, it is
reasonable to assume that ComK and LexA neither interact nor interfere
sterically with each other and that ComK-induced bending does not
affect the LexA-binding site. According to the hydroxyl radical
protection pattern, the protected bases in the upper and lower strand
nearest to the centers of the AT-box dyad symmetries are offset toward the 3' direction, relative to the AT-box centers, which is indicative of two ComK monomers contacting each other across the major groove of
DNA (23). This implies that ComK recognizes the AT-box consensus sequence in the minor groove as previously documented for the addAB promoter (19). In contrast, hydroxyl radical
protection studies showed that the B. subtilis LexA protein
recognizes the SOS consensus sequence in the major groove (10, 29).
Comparison of the protection patterns of LexA (29) and ComK on the
recA promoter suggests that the center of LexA binding at
the operator is rotationally separated from ComK, bound at AT-box 4, by
about 120 degrees relative to the helical axis. Thus, it is plausible that ComK does not interfere with LexA binding.
Miller et al. (10) have shown that binding of B. subtilis LexA to the recA promoter inhibits both
binding of RNA polymerase and transcription in vitro. The
location of the recA SOS-box suggests that the nature of
LexA repression is unusual among the known din genes. Unlike
many of the B. subtilis SOS-boxes, which are centered
between position 10 and position 35, the SOS-box of recA
is centered at position 52. This region corresponds to the distal
subsite of E. coli UP elements thought to interact with the
C-terminal domain of an -subunit ( CTD) of RNA polymerase (30).
Although not as extensively characterized as those in E. coli, B. subtilis UP elements are required for high
level expression of certain genes and interact with the B. subtilis CTD (31-33). Indeed, the sequence of the
recA promoter between position 46 and position 59 is
AT-rich and resembles the E. coli UP element consensus
sequence. We suppose that high-level transcription of the
recA gene requires the interaction of the CTD with the
SOS-box region, and that LexA binding blocks this interaction.
Our results suggest that ComK overrides LexA repression without
directly displacing LexA. Thus, ComK either enables RNA polymerase to
displace LexA and/or provides an alternative binding interaction such
that RNA polymerase can bind the recA promoter in the
presence of LexA. In either case, we propose that the bending of DNA by ComK is an essential feature. DNA bending is commonly observed with
transcriptional activators and is thought to facilitate wrapping of DNA
around RNA polymerase (34). For the recA promoter, binding of ComK to all four AT-boxes may provide the appropriate bending for
such wrapping. In support of a requirement for ComK binding at the most
upstream site, which would contribute to such bending, Cheo et
al. (35) have shown that deleting the region upstream of position
120, containing AT-box 1, causes a 70% reduction in
competence-related recA expression. In addition to DNA
wrapping, binding of RNA polymerase to the recA promoter
could also be facilitated by direct interactions between ComK and
CTD. Considering evidence for the interactions of E. coli
CTDs with the proximal UP element subsite, centered at 42, and the
distal UP element subsite, centered at 52 (30), it seems significant
that the downstream AT-boxes of the comC, comE,
comF, and comG promoters are all centered at about position 48, whereas the downstream AT-boxes of the
recA and addAB promoters are centered at about
position 58 (19). The precise location of all these downstream
AT-boxes relative to the CTD-binding sites suggests a mechanism in
which ComK affects the binding of CTD. In the case of the
recA promoter, ComK may provide an alternative binding site
for the CTD of RNA polymerase when the UP element is masked by LexA.
On the other hand, ComK may affect CTD binding indirectly by
inducing a conformation change in the DNA. Indeed, recent biochemical
evidence suggests that some class I transcription factors, thought to
interact with CTD, may stimulate the DNA binding activity of CTD
by inducing a conformation change in the DNA (36). Further research
will be necessary to distinguish between these possibilities.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are indebted to Issar Smith and the late
Gopalan Nair for purified B. subtilis RNA polymerase and for
valuable comments. We thank David Dubnau and Aske van Werkhoven for
helpful discussions, and Henk Mulder for preparing the figures.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization of
Scientific Research (NWO) under the auspices of the Netherlands Foundation for Chemical Research (SON) and by National Science Foundation Grant MCB-9601398 (to C. M. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 31-50-3632194; Fax:
31-50-3632348; E-mail: l.w.hamoen@biol.rug.nl.

To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 413-597-2124;
Fax: 314-597-4116; E-mail: clovett@williams.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 12, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104407200
1
L. Bothwell, S. Canny, S. Colavito, S. Fuller,
E. Groban, L. Hensley Jr., T. O'Brien, T. M. O'Gara, L. Tomm,
and C. M. Lovett, unpublished results.
2
B. Chaudhuri and C. M. Lovett, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
MBP, maltose-binding protein;
CTD,
COOH-terminal domain.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kowalczykowski, S. C.,
Dixon, D. A.,
Eggleston, A. K.,
Lauder, S. D.,
and Rehrauer, W. M.
(1994)
Microbiol. Rev.
58,
401-465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Lovett, C. M.,
and Roberts, J. W.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
3305-3313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Yasbin, R. E.,
Cheo, D. L.,
and Bayles, K. W.
(1992)
Mol. Microbiol.
6,
1263-1270[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Walker, G. C.
(1996)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella
(Neidhardt, F. C., ed)
, pp. 1400-1416, American Society for Microbiology, Wahington, D. C.
|
| 5.
|
Raymond-Denise, A.,
and Guillen, N.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
7084-7091[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
de Vos, W. M.,
and Venema, G.
(1982)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
187,
439-445[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Raymond-Denise, A.,
and Guillen, N.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
3171-3176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Haijema, B. J.,
van-Sinderen, D.,
Winterling, K.,
Kooistra, J.,
Venema, G.,
and Hamoen, L. W.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
22,
75-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Lovett, C. M.,
Cho, K. C.,
and O'Gara, T. M.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
6842-6849[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Miller, M. C.,
Resnick, J. B.,
Smith, B. T.,
and Lovett, C. M. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
33502-33508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Love, P. E.,
Lyle, M. J.,
and Yasbin, R. E.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
6201-6205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Lovett, C. M.,
Love, P. E.,
Yasbin, R. E.,
and Roberts, J. W.
(1988)
J. Bacteriol.
170,
1467-1474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Lovett, C. M.,
O'Gara, T. M.,
and Woodruff, J. N.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
4914-4923[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Lovett, C. M.,
Love, P. E.,
and Yasbin, R. E.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
2318-2322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Dubnau, D.
(1993)
in
Bacillus subtilis and Other Gram-positive Bacteria
(Sonenshein, A. L.
, Hoch, J. A.
, and Losick, R., eds)
, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 16.
|
van-Sinderen, D.,
Luttinger, A.,
Kong, L.,
Dubnau, D.,
Venema, G.,
and Hamoen, L.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
15,
455-462[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Hahn, J.,
Luttinger, A.,
and Dubnau, D.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
21,
763-775[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Haijema, B. J.,
Hamoen, L. W.,
Kooistra, J.,
Venema, G.,
and van-Sinderen, D.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
15,
203-211[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Hamoen, L. W.,
Van-Werkhoven, A. F.,
Bijlsma, J. J.,
Dubnau, D.,
and Venema, G.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1539-1550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidham, J. G.,
Smith, J. A.,
and Struhl, K.
(1998)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, John Wiley & Sons, New York
|
| 21.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 22.
|
Venema, G.,
Pritchard, R. H.,
and Venema-Schroder, T.
(1965)
J. Bacteriol.
89,
1250-1255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Tullius, T. D.,
and Dombroski, B. A.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
5469-5473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
O'Halloran, T. V.,
Frantz, B.,
Shin, M. K.,
Ralston, D. M.,
and Wright, J. G.
(1989)
Cell
56,
119-129[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Senear, D. F.,
and Brenowitz, M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
13661-13671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Predich, M.,
Nair, G.,
and Smith, I.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
2771-2778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Turgay, K.,
Hahn, J.,
Burghoorn, J.,
and Dubnau, D.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
6730-6738[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Lane, D.,
Prentki, P.,
and Chandler, M.
(1992)
Microbiol. Rev.
56,
509-528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Winterling, K. W.,
Chafin, D.,
Hayes, J. J.,
Sun, J.,
Levine, A. S.,
Yasbin, R. E.,
and Woodgate, R.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
2201-2211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Estrem, S. T.,
Ross, W.,
Gaal, T.,
Chen, Z. W.,
Niu, W.,
Ebright, R. H.,
and Gourse, R. L.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
2134-2147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Banner, C. D.,
Moran, C. P.,
and Losick, R.
(1983)
J. Mol. Biol.
168,
351-365[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Frisby, D.,
and Zuber, P.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
7557-7564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Fredrick, K.,
and Helmann, J. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4982-4987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Coulombe, B.,
and Burton, Z. F.
(1999)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63,
457-478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Cheo, D. L.,
Bayles, K. W.,
and Yasbin, R. E.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
5907-5915[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Ozoline, O. N.,
Fujita, N.,
and Ishihama, A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
1119-1127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Nahrstedt, C. Schroder, and F. Meinhardt
Evidence for two recA genes mediating DNA repair in Bacillus megaterium
Microbiology,
March 1, 2005;
151(3):
775 - 787.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. B.L. Alkema, B. Lenhard, and W. W. Wasserman
Regulog Analysis: Detection of Conserved Regulatory Networks Across Bacteria: Application to Staphylococcus aureus
Genome Res.,
July 1, 2004;
14(7):
1362 - 1373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. W. Hamoen, W. K. Smits, A. d. Jong, S. Holsappel, and O. P. Kuipers
Improving the predictive value of the competence transcription factor (ComK) binding site in Bacillus subtilis using a genomic approach
Nucleic Acids Res.,
December 15, 2002;
30(24):
5517 - 5528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Tapias, S. Fernandez, J. C. Alonso, and J. Barbe
Rhodobacter sphaeroides LexA has dual activity: optimising and repressing recA gene transcription
Nucleic Acids Res.,
April 1, 2002;
30(7):
1539 - 1546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|