![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 46, 43004-43009, November 16, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, July 23, 2001, and in revised form, September 14, 2001
Oxidative injuries including apoptosis can be
induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species
(RNS) in aerobic metabolism. We determined impacts of a
selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase-1 (GPX1) on
apoptosis induced by diquat (DQ), a ROS (superoxide) generator, and
peroxynitrite (PN), a potent RNS. Hepatocytes were isolated from GPX1
knockout (GPX1 Reactive oxygen species
(ROS)1 and reactive nitrogen
species (RNS) are constantly generated in aerobic metabolism and
involved in pathogenesis of many diseases (1, 2). Pro-oxidants such as
diquat (DQ) also induce cellular production of ROS including superoxide
anion (O Earlier, Sies et al. (20) showed that adding GPX1 in human
fibroblast lysates was able to reduce PN to nitrite and thus attenuated
the PN-mediated protein nitration in the presence of adequate
glutathione (GSH). Because nitration of protein tyrosine residues may
impair the tyrosine phosphorylation-related signaling and function
(21), their finding has physiological relevance. However, the metabolic
role of GPX1 in intact cells in coping with PN might be different from
that in cell lysates, because of a strong reactivity between PN and
CO2 to form more active intermediates such as
·NO2 or CO Because apoptosis is induced by moderate levels of ROS in many types of
cells (25), and by PN in HL-60 (26), PC12 (27), and human endothelial
cells (28), it can be used to assess oxidative injury. Two key events
in the induced apoptosis include cytochrome c release from
mitochondria and activation of caspase-3 (29). During the early stage
of apoptosis, the activated caspase-3 cleaves p21WAF1/CIP1, a
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that protects cells from apoptosis (30), at a specific aspartate residue (Asp-112) and causes
the loss of its localization and function in nuclei (31). c-Jun
NH2-terminal protein kinase (JNK) and p38 kinase, two
mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), are also activated in
apoptosis induced by diverse stimuli (32). It is unknown how GPX1
affects the DQ- and PN-induced apoptosis and related signaling.
Intracellular GSH may play three roles in metabolism: as an independent
antioxidant, as a presumed physiological substrate of GPX1 to be
oxidized to GSSG and regenerated by NADPH-dependent glutathione reductase (EC 1.6.4.2) reaction (33, 34), and as a
regulator of apoptosis (35). It is fascinating to find out how GPX1
knockout affects the responses of cellular GSH/GSSG to ROS and RNS.
Therefore, our objective was to dissect the metabolic role of GPX1 in
cell death, apoptotic signaling, protein nitration, and GSH/GSSG
responses induced by the ROS generator DQ and RNS donor PN in primary
hepatocytes isolated from the GPX1 Chemicals and Antibodies--
All chemicals were purchased from
Sigma unless indicated otherwise. We obtained antibodies against
phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr-180/Tyr-182), p38 MAPK, and phosphorylated
stress-activated protein kinase/JNK (Thr-183/Tyr-185) from New England
Biolabs (Beverly, MA); against JNK2 (D-2) and p21 (C-19) from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); against cytochrome c
from PharMingen (San Diego, CA); against caspase-3 from Transduction
Laboratories (Lexington, KY); and against nitrotyrosine from Upstate
Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY).
Culture of Primary Hepatocytes and ROS/RNS
Generation--
Hepatocytes were prepared from 8-week old GPX1 Cell Viability, DNA Fragmentation, and Apoptosis--
Cell
viability was assessed by the reduction of
3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide to
formazan. Actual values were read at 570 nm in a Microplate Reader
(Elx15, Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT) and expressed as percentage of the
untreated controls. DNA fragmentation was detected by ethidium bromide
staining after the cellular DNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform
and separated in 1.8% agarose gel. Apoptosis was quantified by
terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling
(TUNEL) assay kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the
manufacturer's instruction. Positive stained nuclei were counted in
~80 cells from each of four random fields using a fluorescent
microscope (Olympus, Seattle, WA).
Western Blot Analyses of Whole Cell, Cytosolic, and Nucleic
Extracts--
Cells were washed twice with saline and harvested in
lysis buffer (50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.8, 0.1% Triton
X-100, 1.34 mM diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml each of
leupeptin, aprotinin, and pepstatin A). After the lysate was sonicated
and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C,
supernatant was used for nitrotyrosine and GPX activity analyses. For
the detection of p38 MAPK and JNK activations, whole cell lysates were
prepared in modified radioimmune precipitation buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol,
1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM NaF, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1%
SDS, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg of
leupeptin/ml, and 10 µg of aprotinin/ml). For the detection of
cytochrome c, caspase-3, and
p21WAF1/CIP1, cytosolic and nucleic extracts
were prepared as described by Bossy-Wetzel et al. (37).
Protein concentrations were measured by Bradford protein assay
(Bio-Rad). Western blot analyses were conducted as described previously
(17), and immunoreactive proteins were visualized with SuperSignal West
Pico chemiluminescent substrate system (Pierce).
Glutathione and GPX Activity--
Total (GSH + GSSG) and
oxidized (GSSG) glutathione were measured as described by Anderson (38)
and expressed as nanomoles/mg of protein. Total GPX activity was
measured by the coupled assay of reduced NADPH oxidation using
H2O2 as substrate (39). The enzyme unit was
defined as 1 nmol of GSH oxidized/min.
Statistics--
Data were analyzed using the GLM procedure of
SAS (release 6.11, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The Bonferroni
t test was used for mean comparisons.
GPX1 Knockout Renders Mouse Hepatocytes Susceptible to DQ-induced,
but Resistant to PN-induced, Apoptotic Death--
Compared with the
untreated controls, viability of GPX1 Similar Apoptotic Signaling Occurs in the DQ-treated GPX1 Intracellular GSH and GSSG in GPX1 PN Induces More Protein Nitration in the WT than in GPX1 It is remarkable that GPX1 knockout exerted completely opposite
impacts on susceptibility of mouse hepatocyte to DQ and PN-induced apoptotic death. Because high levels of H2O2
could be produced by DQ (3), the substantial loss of cellular defense
against DQ-induced apoptosis in GPX1 A fundamental question is how GPX1 affects the PN-mediated apoptosis
and protein nitration. In cell lysate, extrinsic GPX1 was able to
reduce PN to nitrite using GSH in a two-electron catalysis (20).
However, we did not see a difference in PN reduction or medium nitrite
level between GPX1 The DQ-treated GPX1 Distinct differences in the DQ-induced cellular GSH/GSSG changes
between the GPX1 Elucidating the opposite role of GPX1 in DQ- and PN-induced oxidative
injury has broad implications. It teaches us that antioxidant protection for a given enzyme or protein such as GPX1 may not be a
general property, but depends on the specific nature of oxidants. Although pro-oxidant properties of high levels of vitamin E or C (51,
52) and overexpression of Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase (53) have been
reported previously, our study provides the first evidence to show the
"double-edged sword" function of an "antioxidant" enzyme at its
physiological expression level in metabolically normal primary cells.
The potent role of GPX1 in turning off the DQ-induced and in switching
on the PN-induced apoptosis will help us in elucidating mechanisms of
ROS/RNS in regulating cell death and related signaling (54), and in
developing novel therapeutic strategies for the ROS and RNS involved
diseases (55). Our findings also caution the public that blind
antioxidant supplementation in clinic or nutrition may not always be
desirable. In line of our view, knockout of GPX1 enhanced mouse brain
resistance to the kainic acid-induced epileptic seizure (56), whereas
overexpressing GPX1 promoted acetaminophen toxicity to mice (57) and
tumorigenesis (58). Likewise, vitamin C was able to induce
decomposition of lipid hydroperoxides to endogenous geneotoxins
(59).
We thank Dr. Hiroki Ueda for technical help
in TUNEL assay and Professor Leon Heppel for critical review of the manuscript.
*
This work was supported in part by a National Institutes of
Health Grant DK53018 (to X. G. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Fellow of the National Foundation for Cancer Research.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 18, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106946200
The abbreviations used are:
ROS, reactive oxygen
species;
RNS, reactive nitrogen species;
DQ, diquat;
PN, peroxynitrite;
GPX, glutathione peroxidase;
GPX1, cellular glutathione peroxidase;
GPX1
Opposite Roles of Selenium-dependent Glutathione
Peroxidase-1 in Superoxide Generator Diquat- and Peroxynitrite-induced
Apoptosis and Signaling*
,
Department of Animal Science, Cornell
University, Ithaca, New York 14853 and the § Institute of
Physiological Chemistry I, Heinrich Heine University, Postfach 101007, 40001 Dusseldorf, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
) or wild-type (WT) mice, and treated with 0.5 mM DQ or 0.1-0.8 mM PN for up to 12 h. Loss of cell viability, high levels of apoptotic cells, and severe
DNA fragmentation were produced by DQ in only GPX1
/
cells and by PN
in only WT cells. These two groups of cells shared similar cytochrome
c release, caspase-3 activation, and
p21WAF1/CIP1 cleavage. Higher levels of protein
nitration were induced by PN in WT than GPX1
/
cells. Much less
and/or slower cellular GSH depletion was caused by DQ or PN in
GPX1
/
than in WT cells, and corresponding GSSG accumulation
occurred only in the latter. In conclusion, it is most striking that,
although GPX1 protects against apoptosis induced by
superoxide-generator DQ, the enzyme actually promotes apoptosis induced
by PN in murine hepatocytes. Indeed, GSH is a physiological
substrate for GPX1 in coping with ROS in these cells.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


/
) (16), we have demonstrated that GPX1 is
the metabolic mediator of body selenium to protect mice against
pro-oxidant-induced death and oxidative injuries (17, 18). In contrast
to such strong evidence for the long-assumed role of GPX1 in coping
with ROS in vivo (19), the impact of GPX1 on RNS-mediated
oxidative stress in various organisms is virtually unknown.

/
and the WT mice. Most
strikingly, we found that GPX1 knockout did not attenuate, but enhanced
hepatocyte resistance to the PN-mediated apoptosis, which was
completely opposite to its impact on the DQ-mediated apoptosis or
our expectation.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
and WT mice (16) by collagenase D perfusion (36), and plated in 6- or 12-well collagen-coated plates (at the density of 6 or 3 ×105). In all experiments, viability of the isolated
cells, as determined by trypan blue exclusion, was >85%. Cells were
grown at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in William's medium E
supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg of gentamycin/ml, 5 µg of insulin/ml, 1 µg of glucagon/ml, 0.5 µg of
hydrocortisone/ml, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.0. After 20 h
of culture, cells were incubated with superoxide generator DQ (diquat
dibromide monohydrate, Chem Service, West Chester, PA; 0.5 mM dissolved in saline) or PN (0.1-0.8 mM in
4.7% NaOH, Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) for different lengths of time.
Both DQ and PN were added as a bolus into the media and mixed
thoroughly for 30 s.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
hepatocytes was decreased by
0.5 mM DQ from 82% at 3 h to 4.9% at 12 h,
whereas that of WT remained >84% throughout (Fig.
1A). In contrast, over 85% of
GPX1
/
cells were viable after being treated with 0.2-0.8
mM PN for 12 h, whereas viability of WT cells was
reduced to 30 and 10% by 0.4 and 0.8 mM PN, respectively
(Fig. 1B). Similarly, 0.4 mM PN caused only
<16% reduction in viability of GPX1
/
cells at various time
points, but it decreased viability of WT cells to 50% at 3 h and
further to 12% at 12 h (Fig. 1C). The PN vehicle
alone, 4.7% NaOH, did not affect viability of either type of cells
(data not shown). DNA fragmentation was produced by 0.5 mM
DQ in only GPX1
/
cells and by 0.4 mM PN in only WT cells at 9 h, and the DNA ladder became pronounced at 12 h in these two groups (Fig. 2A).
TUNEL assay showed 53.8 and 43.6% apoptotic cells at 9 h in
the DQ-treated GPX1
/
and the PN-treated WT hepatocytes,
respectively (Fig. 2B). However, there was no detectable DNA
fragmentation and only <3.5% apoptotic cells in the untreated,
the DQ-treated WT, or the PN-treated GPX1
/
hepatocytes.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effects of DQ and PN on cell viability.
A, viability (n = 3) of the GPX1
/
and WT
hepatocytes treated with 0.5 mM DQ for 0, 3, 6, 9, or
12 h; *, p < 0.01 versus the untreated
GPX1
/
and the respective WT cells. B, viability
(n = 3) of the GPX1
/
and WT hepatocytes treated
with 0, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 mM PN for 12 h; *,
p < 0.01 versus the untreated WT and the
respective GPX1
/
cells. C, viability (n = 3) of the GPX1
/
and WT hepatocytes treated with 0.4 mM PN for 0, 3, 6, 9, or 12 h; *, p < 0.01 versus the untreated WT and the respective GPX1
/
cells.

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Apoptosis in hepatocytes induced by 0.5 mM DQ and 0.4 mM PN. A, DNA
fragmentation at 12 h. Total cellular DNA was separated in 1.8%
agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The gel is a
representative of >10 independent experiments. B, TUNEL
assay at 9 h. Positive stained nuclei were counted in ~80 cells
from each of four random fields using a fluorescent microscope
(Olympus, Seattle, WA). Values are means ± S.E. from three
independent experiments. *, p < 0.01 versus
untreated GPX1
/
and respective WT cells; #, p < 0.01 versus untreated WT and respective GPX1
/
cells.
/
and
the PN-treated WT Cells--
Cytochrome c release (Fig.
3A) and cleavage of caspase-3
(Fig. 3B) was initially detected in the DQ-treated GPX1
/
at 6 h and in the PN-treated WT hepatocytes at 3 h. At the
following time points, cytochrome c was accumulated in the
cytosolic fraction and cleavage of caspase-3 progressed further in
these cells. There was no cytochrome c release or caspase-3
cleavage in the DQ-treated WT or the PN-treated GPX1
/
hepatocytes
at any time point. After an initial increase at 3 h over the base
line, p21WAF1/CIP1 protein in the nucleic
fraction of the DQ-treated WT and the PN-treated GPX1
/
cells
continued to rise or was maintained at a fairly constant high level at
9 and 12 h (Fig. 4A). In
contrast, it was decreased to approximately the base line at 6 h
and remained at a low level at 9 and 12 h in the DQ-treated
GPX1
/
and the PN-treated WT cells. The up-regulation of
p21WAF1/CIP1 protein expression was also
observed in the whole cell extracts of the DQ-treated WT and the
PN-treated GPX1
/
hepatocytes (Fig. 4B). However, there
was no such initial increase in p21WAF1/CIP1 in
the DQ-treated GPX1
/
or the PN-treated WT hepatocytes. Instead, the
protein showed significant decreases in these two groups at 6 and
3 h, respectively, and remained low thereafter. Although total p38
MAPK or JNK protein was unaffected by GPX1 knockout, DQ, or PN, both
kinases were activated at 30 min in both types of cell by DQ and PN
(Fig. 5). However, PN seemed to be a
stronger stimulus than DQ and produced a greater level of p38 MAPK
phosphorylation in WT than in GPX1
/
cells.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Cytochrome c release and
caspase-3 activation in hepatocytes induced by 0.5 mM DQ
and 0.4 mM PN. A, cytochrome c
release in the DQ-treated GPX1
/
and the PN-treated WT cells at 3, 6, 9, and 12 h. Cytochrome c release was detected in
cytosolic fraction by Western blot using anti-cytochrome c
antibody. B, caspase-3 activation in the DQ-treated
GPX1
/
and the PN-treated WT cells at 3, 6, and 9 h. After
treatment, whole cell lysate was prepared and caspase-3 was detected by
Western blot using anti-casapse-3 antibody.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Changes of
p21WAF1/CIP1 in hepatocytes induced by 0.5 mM DQ and 0.4 mM PN. A, initial
up-regulation followed by significant cleavage of
p21WAF1/CIP1 in the nucleic fraction of the
DQ-treated GPX1
/
and the PN-treated WT cells. After cells were
treated with DQ or PN for 0, 3, 6, 9, or 12 h, nuclei fraction was
prepared to detect p21WAF1/CIP1 protein by
Western blot using anti-p21WAF1/CIP1 antibody.
B, changes of p21WAF1/CIP1 in the
whole cell lysate of the DQ-treated GPX1
/
and the PN-treated WT
hepatocytes. After treatment, whole cell lysate was prepared to detect
p21WAF1/CIP1 protein as described in
A.

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Activation of p38 MAPK and JNK in hepatocytes
by 0.5 mM DQ and 0.4 mM PN. After cells
were treated with DQ or PN for 30 min, whole cell lysate was prepared
to detect phospho-p38 MAPK, p38 MAPK, phospho-JNK, and JNK proteins by
Western blot using respective antibodies. The blot is a representative
of three independent experiments.
/
Hepatocytes Respond to DQ
and PN Differently from That in WT Cells--
A much more abrupt
time-dependent decline in intracellular GSH was produced by
0.5 mM DQ in WT than in GPX1
/
hepatocytes (Fig.
6A). Compared with the
untreated controls, the decrease was 31 and 88% in WT cells, but only
7.5 and 46% in GPX1
/
cells at 30 min and 3 h, respectively.
Thus, intracellular GSH was higher (p < 0.05) in
GPX1
/
than in WT cells at these time points. Although DQ produced
no change in intracellular GSSG in GPX1
/
hepatocytes at all, it
resulted in a 15.5-fold increase over the untreated controls at 30 min
in WT cells (Fig. 6B). That increase peaked at 1 h
(18.2-fold), and declined to 9.3-fold at 6 h. In the PN-treated WT
hepatocytes, intracellular GSH was decreased by 40.2% at only 5 min of
the treatment (Fig. 6C). The decrease progressed linearly to
66.7% at 30 min and reached 82.3% at 6 h with a slight rise at
1 h. In contrast, the only significant decrease of GSH (46.2%, p < 0.05) caused by PN in GPX1
/
cells was seen at
3 h, along with a nearly complete restoration to the untreated
cell level at 6 h. Likewise, PN did not affect intracellular GSSG
in GPX1
/
cells, but caused a 5.4-fold increase over the untreated
controls at 5 min in WT hepatocytes (Fig. 6D). That increase
was progressively attenuated to 4.8-, 4.4-, and 1.9-fold at 10, 20, and
30 min, respectively, with a total disappearance at 1 h. In both
DQ- and PN-treated GPX1
/
cells, ratios of intracellular GSH/GSSG
were much higher than those in WT cells throughout or at most of the time points.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Changes in intracellular GSH and GSSG
concentration in hepatocytes induced by 0.5 mM DQ and 0.4 mM PN. A, intracellular GSH concentrations
in the GPX1
/
and WT cells treated with DQ; p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**) versus the
respective untreated controls; p < 0.05 (#)
versus the respective WT cells. B, Intracellular
GSSG concentration in the GPX1
/
and WT cells treated with DQ;
p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**)
versus the untreated controls and GPX1
/
cells.
C, intracellular GSH concentrations in the GPX1
/
and WT
cells treated with PN; p < 0.05 (*) and
p < 0.01 (**) versus the respective
untreated controls; p < 0.01 (#) versus the
respective GPX1
/
cells. D, intracellular GSSG
concentrations in the GPX1
/
and WT cells treated with PN;
p < 0.01 (*) versus the untreated controls
and GPX1
/
cells. Values are the means of five independent
experiments.
/
Hepatocytes--
Despite a PN-dose dependent protein nitrotyrosine
formation in both types of cells at 12 h, the total band intensity
was 64 and 76% greater in WT than GPX1
/
cells treated with 0.2 and 0.4 mM PN, respectively (Fig.
7). Treating WT hepatocytes with 0.4 mM PN for 12 h decreased total GPX activity by 34%
compared with the untreated controls (207 versus 316 units/mg of protein, p < 0.05). However, DQ alone did
not induce protein nitration in either type of cells or significant
reduction of GPX activity in WT cells (data not shown).

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Protein nitration in hepatocytes induced by 0 to 0.4 mM PN. Cells were treated with 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mM PN for 12 h. Whole cell lysate (10 µg) was
separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and
probed with anti-nitrotyrosine antibody. The relative intensity of the
total bands was measured using the NIH Image Program (version 1.61).
The blot is a representative of three independent experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
over WT cells is consistent
with the whole body responses of the GPX1
/
mice challenged with ROS generators (18, 40, 41). However, the positive impact of GPX1 knockout
on hepatocyte resistance to PN cytotoxicity is rather striking and does
not agree with the notion that selenoproteins such as GPX1 (20) and
selenoprotein P (42) may protect against PN-induced oxidative stress
in vivo. Although PN is highly reactive with a short
half-life, our results are reproducible and physiologically relevant.
This is because we demonstrated a PN-dose dependent response of cell
viability and nitrotyrosine formation, a reliable indicator of PN
activity in the cell (6). Our selected PN dose (0.4 mM),
similar to that used by others (20, 43), was the minimal level that
distinguished GPX1
/
from WT cells. Comparable results were obtained
by using different sources or manipulations of PN treatment (data not
shown). The enhanced nitrotyrosine formation in WT cells over that in
GPX1
/
cells treated with 0.2 or 0.4 mM PN reflects a
promoting role of GPX1, similar to that of other peroxidases (44), in
the PN-mediated protein nitration.
/
and WT cells treated with 0-0.8 mM
PN for 12 h (data not shown). Because of the strong reactivity between PN and CO2 (22), GPX1 in the cultured cells, unlike in the cell lysates (20), might be encountered with not only authentic
PN, but also more reactive PN intermediates such as ·NO2 or CO
/
hepatocytes
(207-316 versus 4.2 milliunits/mg of protein). More likely,
GPX1 exerted its role by affecting H2O2 removal
and thus cellular balances of ROS and RNS that could modulate PN
toxicity (24, 45, 46).
/
and the PN-treated WT cells clearly underwent
apoptosis and exhibited similar apoptotic signaling, because cytochrome
c release and pro-caspase-3 cleavages preceded the
appearance of apoptotic cells and severe DNA fragmentation in these
cells. As a critical step in stress-induced apoptosis, cytochrome
c release from mitochondria enables it to bind to Apaf-1 and
caspase-9, leading to the activation of caspase-9 that in turn
activates caspase-3 (29). Caspase-3 is an executioner of apoptosis with
many target proteins, including p21WAF1/CIP1
(31) that protects against apoptosis (30). Cleavage of
p21WAF1/CIP1 mediated by caspase-3 and the
consequent activation of cyclin A/Cdk2 have been shown as prerequisite
for the execution of apoptosis in human hepatoma cells SK-HEP-1 induced
by ginsenoside Rh2 (47). In the present study, the initial
up-regulation of p21WAF1/CIP1 protein expression
at 3 h over the base line was maintained later only in the
DQ-treated WT cells and the PN-treated GPX1
/
cells that showed no
induced apoptosis. In contrast, the DQ-treated GPX1
/
and the
PN-treated WT cells exhibited significant decreases of
p21WAF1/CIP1 at 6 and 9 h over the levels
at 0 or 3 h. Both p38 MAPK and JNK, two kinases involved in
stress-induced apoptosis (32, 48), were activated by DQ or PN at 30 min, but their responses were not consistent with the changes of the
three assayed apoptotic signal molecules. Seemingly, GPX1 exerted its
role in the PN- or DQ-induced apoptotic events downstream or
independent of activation of these two kinases. Inhibition of the
PN-induced activation of p38 MAPK and JNK by selenite in the cultured
rat liver epithelial cells has been suggested to be through
selenium-containing proteins, including GPX (49). In our study,
activation of p38 MAPK was slightly stronger by DQ and much so by PN in
WT than GPX1
/
cells. Thus, GPX1 promoted its activation mediated by
ROS or RNS in mouse hepatocytes, indicating a possible cell-specific or
GPX1-independent effect of selenite on these kinases.
/
and WT cells in the present study support the
idea that GSH is a physiological substrate of GPX1 in metabolism (33,
34). In the presence of GPX1, WT cells displayed a sharp decrease in
GSH, along with an abrupt rise of GSSG, within 60 min after the DQ
treatment. Although this GSH depletion attenuated after 60 min,
probably because of the decrease in ROS production and(or) an
accelerated regeneration of GSH from GSSG by glutathione reductase, GSH
was indeed oxidized to GSSG by GPX1 to reduce the DQ-generated
H2O2 and other hydroperoxides at a very high
rate initially. In contrast, GPX1
/
cells responded to DQ or PN with much less and slower depletion of GSH than WT cells, without any GSSG
accumulation at all. Clearly, lack of GPX1 spared the oxidation of GSH
to GSSG and left it for direct and/or GPX1-independent protections (33,
34, 50). In the PN-treated WT cells, GSH seemed to act as a substrate
of GPX1 initially and then became more like a GPX1-indpendent protector
because a sharp rise in GSSG along with the GSH depletion was not seen
after 60 min. In comparison with these distinct roles of GSH in
functioning as a GPX1 substrate and a major antioxidant, the suggested
necessity of certain amount of cellular GSH for cells to undergo
apoptosis instead of necrosis (35) was not fully shown in our study.
Although apoptotic events occurred in the DQ-treated GPX1
/
cells in
which cellular GSH was indeed greater than in WT cells, these events were also exhibited in the PN-treated WT cells in which cellular GSH
was depleted to a very low level initially. Thus, cellular GSH
alteration alone may not be sufficient to regulate apoptosis.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
607-254-4703; Fax: 607-255-9829; E-mail:
xl20@cornell.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
/
, GPX1 knockout;
WT, wild-type;
MAPK, mitogen-activated
protein kinase;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase;
TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick-end
labeling.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Evans, M. D.,
Griffiths, H. R.,
and Lunec, J.
(1997)
Adv. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
25-73
2.
Sies, H.
(1986)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
25,
1058-1071[CrossRef]
3.
Farrington, J. A.,
Ebert, M.,
Land, E. J.,
and Fletcher, K.
(1973)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
314,
372-381[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Koppenol, W. H.
(1998)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
25,
385-391[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Beckman, J. S.,
and Koppenol, W. H.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C1424-C1437 6.
Haddad, I. Y.,
Pataki, G.,
Hu, P.,
Galliani, C.,
Beckman, J. S.,
and Matalon, S.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94,
2407-2413
7.
Stadtman, T. C.
(2000)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
899,
399-402 8.
Clark, L. C.,
Combs, G. F., Jr.,
Turnbull, B. W.,
Slate, E. H.,
Chalker, D. K.,
Chow, J.,
Davis, L. S.,
Glover, R. A.,
Graham, G. F.,
Gross, E. G.,
Krongrad, A.,
Lesher, J. L., Jr.,
Park, H. K.,
Sanders, B. B., Jr.,
Smith, C. L.,
and Taylor, J. R.
(1996)
JAMA
276,
1957-1963[Abstract]
9.
Beck, M. A.,
Shi, Q.,
Morris, V. C.,
and Levander, O. A.
(1995)
Nat. Med.
1,
433-436[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Gu, B. Q.
(1983)
Chin. Med. J. (Engl. Ed.)
96,
251-261[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Flohé, L.,
Andreesen, J. R.,
Brigelius-Flohé, R.,
Maiorino, M.,
and Ursini, F.
(2000)
IUBMB Life
49,
411-420[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Gladyshev, V. N.,
and Hatfield, D. L.
(1999)
J. Biomed. Sci.
6,
151-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Rotruck, J. T.,
Pope, A. L.,
Ganther, H. E.,
Swanson, A. B.,
Hafeman, D. G.,
and Hoekstra, W. G.
(1973)
Science
179,
588-590 14.
Flohé, L.,
Gunzler, W. A.,
and Schock, H. H.
(1973)
FEBS Lett.
32,
132-134[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Cheng, W. H.,
Ho, Y.-S.,
Ross, D. A.,
Valentine, B. A.,
Combs, G. F., Jr.,
and Lei, X. G.
(1997)
J. Nutr.
127,
1445-1450 16.
Ho, Y. S.,
Magnenat, J. L.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Cao, J.,
Gargano, M.,
Sugawara, M.,
and Funk, C. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
16644-16651 17.
Cheng, W. H.,
Fu, Y. X.,
Porres, J. M.,
Ross, D. A.,
and Lei, X. G.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
1467-1475 18.
Fu, Y. X.,
Cheng, W. H.,
Porres, J. M.,
Ross, D. A.,
and Lei, X. G.
(1999)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
27,
605-611[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Hoekstra, W. G.
(1975)
Fed. Proc.
34,
2083-2089[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Sies, H.,
Sharov, V. S.,
Klotz, L.-O.,
and Briviba, K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27812-27817 21.
Brito, C.,
Naviliat, M.,
Tiscornia, A. C.,
Vuillier, F.,
Gualco, G.,
Dighiero, G.,
Radi, R.,
and Cayota, A. M.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
3356-3366 22.
Squadrito, G. L.,
and Pryor, W. A.
(1998)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
25,
392-403[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Padmaja, S.,
Squadrito, G. L.,
and Pryor, W. A.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
349,
1-6[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Day, B. J.,
Patel, M.,
Calavetta, L.,
Chang, L. Y.,
and Stamler, J. S.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
12760-12765 25.
Gardner, A. M.,
Xu, F. H.,
Fady, C.,
Jacoby, F. J.,
Duffey, D. C.,
Tu, Y.,
and Lichtenstein, A.
(1997)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
22,
73-83[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Lin, K. T.,
Xue, J. Y.,
Nomen, M.,
Spur, B.,
and Wong, P. Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16487-16490 27.
Estevez, A. G.,
Radi, R.,
Barbeito, L.,
Shih, J. T.,
Thompson, J. A.,
and Beckman, J. S.
(1995)
J. Neurochem.
65,
1543-1550[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Szabo, C.,
Zingarelli, B.,
O'Connor, M.,
and Salzman, A. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
1753-1758 29.
Green, D. R.,
and Reed, J. C.
(1998)
Science
281,
1309-1312 30.
Gorospe, M.,
Wang, X.,
Guyton, K. Z.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6654-6660[Abstract]
31.
Levkau, B.,
Koyama, H.,
Raines, E. W.,
Clurman, B. E.,
Herren, B.,
Orth, K.,
Roberts, J. M.,
and Ross, R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell.
1,
553-563[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Tibbles, L. A.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1999)
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
55,
1230-1254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Sies, H.,
Gerstenecker, C.,
Menzel, H.,
and Flohé, L.
(1972)
FEBS Lett.
27,
171-175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Meister, A.,
and Anderson, M. E.
(1983)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
52,
711-760[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Coppola, S.,
and Ghibelli, L.
(2000)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
28,
56-61[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Liu, R. H.,
Jacob, J. R.,
Tennant, B. C.,
and Hotchkiss, J. H.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
4139-4143 37.
Bossy-Wetzel, E.,
and Green, D. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17484-17490 38.
Anderson, A. E.
(1985)
in
CRC Handbook of Method for Oxygen Radical Research
(Greenwald, R. A., ed)
, pp. 317-320, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
39.
Lawrence, R. A.,
Sunde, R. A.,
Schwartz, G. L.,
and Hoekstra, W. G.
(1974)
Exp. Eye Res.
18,
563-569[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Cheng, W. H.,
Ho, Y.-S.,
Valentine, B. A.,
Ross, D. A.,
Combs, G. F., Jr.,
and Lei, X. G.
(1998)
J. Nutr.
128,
1070-1076 41.
de Haan, J. B.,
Bladier, C.,
Griffiths, P.,
Kelner, M.,
O'Shea, R. D.,
Cheung, N. S.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Silvestro, M. J.,
Wild, S.,
Zheng, S. S.,
Beart, P. M.,
Hertzog, P. J.,
and Kola, I.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22528-22536 42.
Arteel, G. E.,
Briviba, K.,
and Sies, H.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
445,
226-230[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Go, Y. M.,
Patel, R. P.,
Maland, M. C.,
Park, H.,
Beckman, J. S.,
Darley-Usmar, V. M.,
and Jo, H.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
H1647-H1653
44.
Sampson, J. B.,
Ye, Y.,
Rosen, H.,
and Beckman, J. S.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
356,
207-213[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Brune, B.,
Gotz, C.,
Messmer, U. K.,
Sandau, K.,
Hirvonen, M. R.,
and Lapetina, E. G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7253-7258 46.
Eu, J. P.,
Liu, L.,
Zeng, M.,
and Stamler, J. S.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
1040-1047[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Jin, Y. H.,
Yoo, K. J.,
Lee, Y. H.,
and Lee, S. K.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
30256-30263 48.
Park, H.-S.,
Park, E.,
Kim, M.-S.,
Ahn, K.,
Kim, I. Y.,
and Choi, E.-J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
2527-2531 49.
Schieke, S. M.,
Briviba, K.,
Klotz, L.-O.,
and Sies, H.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
448,
301-303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
50.
Koppenol, W. H.,
Moreno, J. J.,
Pryor, W. A.,
Ischiropoulos, H.,
and Beckman, J. S.
(1992)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
5,
834-842[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Maiorino, M.,
Zamburlini, A.,
Roveri, A.,
and Ursini, F.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
330,
174-176[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
52.
Podmore, I. D.,
Griffiths, H. R.,
Herbert, K. E.,
Mistry, N.,
Mistry, P.,
and Lunec, J.
(1998)
Nature
392,
559[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
53.
Midorikawa, K.,
and Kawanishi, S.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
495,
187-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
54.
Hensley, K.,
Robinson, K. A.,
Gabbita, S. P.,
Salsman, S.,
and Floyd, R. A.
(2000)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
28,
1456-1462[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
55.
Stadtman, E. R.,
and Levine, R. L.
(2000)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
899,
191-208 56.
Jiang, D.,
Akopian, G.,
Ho, Y.-S.,
Walsh, J. P.,
and Andersen, J. K.
(2000)
Exp. Neurol.
164,
257-268[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
57.
Mirochnitchenko, O. I.,
Weisbrot-Lefkowitz, M.,
Reuhl, K.,
Chen, L.,
Yang, C.,
and Inouye, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10349-10355 58.
Lu, Y. P.,
Lou, Y. R.,
Yen, P.,
Newmark, H. L.,
Mirochnitchenko, O. I.,
Inouye, M.,
and Huang, M. T.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
1468-1474 59.
Lee, S. H.,
Oe, T.,
and Blair, I. A.
(2001)
Science
292,
2083-2086
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Martin-Gronert, J. L. Tarry-Adkins, R. L. Cripps, J.-H. Chen, and S. E. Ozanne Maternal protein restriction leads to early life alterations in the expression of key molecules involved in the aging process in rat offspring Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R494 - R500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pacher, J. S. Beckman, and L. Liaudet Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease Physiol Rev, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 315 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Zhu, X. Zhang, J. P. McClung, and X. G. Lei Impact of Cu,Zn-Superoxide Dismutase and Se-Dependent Glutathione Peroxidase-1 Knockouts on Acetaminophen-Induced Cell Death and Related Signaling in Murine Liver Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2006; 231(11): 1726 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Zhu and X. G. Lei Double Null of Selenium-Glutathione Peroxidase-1 and Copper, Zinc-Superoxide Dismutase Enhances Resistance of Mouse Primary Hepatocytes to Acetaminophen Toxicity. Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2006; 231(5): 545 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Tassabehji, J. W. VanLandingham, and C. W. Levenson Copper Alters the Conformation and Transcriptional Activity of the Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 in Human Hep G2 Cells Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 1, 2005; 230(10): 699 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, D. E. Handy, and J. Loscalzo Adenosine-Dependent Induction of Glutathione Peroxidase 1 in Human Primary Endothelial Cells and Protection Against Oxidative Stress Circ. Res., April 29, 2005; 96(8): 831 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||