![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 47, 43499-43502, November 23, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
¶
From the
Department of Biology, Boston College,
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467 and the § Division of
Biology, University of California, San Diego, La
Jolla, California 92093
Received for publication, September 24, 2001, and in revised form, October 1, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During nucleosome assembly in vivo,
newly synthesized histone H4 is specifically diacetylated on lysines 5 and 12 within the H4 NH2-terminal tail domain. The highly
conserved "K5/K12" deposition pattern of acetylation is thought to
be generated by the Hat1 histone acetyltransferase, which in
vivo is found in the HAT-B complex. In the following report, the
activity and substrate specificity of the human HAT-B complex and of
recombinant yeast Hat1p have been examined, using synthetic H4
NH2-terminal peptides as substrates. As expected, the
unacetylated H4 peptide was a good substrate for acetylation by yeast
Hat1p and human HAT-B, while the K5/K12-diacetylated peptide was not
significantly acetylated. Notably, an H4 peptide previously
diacetylated on lysines 8 and 16 was a very poor substrate for
acetylation by either yeast Hat1p or human HAT-B. Treating the
K8/K16-diacetylated peptide with histone deacetylase prior to the HAT-B
reaction raised acetylation at K5/K12 to 70-80% of control levels.
These results present strong support for the model of H4-Hat1p
interaction proposed by Dutnall et al. (Dutnall, R. N., Tafrov, S. T., Sternglanz, R., and Ramakrishnan, V. (1998) Cell 94, 427-438) and provide evidence for the first time
that site-specific acetylation of histones can regulate the acetylation of other substrate sites.
Chromatin replication involves both the transfer of parental
histones to new DNA and the assembly of new nucleosomes de
novo. To provide the histones required for de novo
nucleosome assembly, histone synthesis in somatic cells is for the most
part coupled to DNA replication (reviewed in Ref. 1). Newly synthesized H3 and H4 are selectively targeted to nascent DNA by the chromatin assembly factor CAF-1 (2-6), while new H2A, H2B, and H1 enter preexisting chromatin through a process of histone exchange (7, 8).
The core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) that comprise the histone
octamer are subject to reversible posttranslational acetylation on
their extended NH2-terminal "tail" domains. Acetylation
occurs on specific, highly conserved lysine residues, e.g.
lysines 5, 8, 12, and 16 of H4 and lysines 9, 14, 18, and 23 of
H3 (also K27 in some organisms) (reviewed in Ref. 9). A remarkable
feature of histone metabolism is that in species as divergent as
humans, Drosophila, and Tetrahymena, newly
synthesized H4 is specifically diacetylated on lysines 5 and 12 (or
lysines 4 and 11 in Tetrahymena, due to a deletion of the
typical arginine at position 3) (10, 11). New H4 is acetylated prior to
its deposition onto DNA and is subsequently deacetylated following
nucleosome assembly (12, 13). Although inhibiting deacetylation
prevents the complete maturation of newly replicated chromatin (14,
15), the function of the acetylation of new H4 is unknown (reviewed in
Refs. 16-18).
One histone acetyltransferase (or
HAT)1 that may possibly
catalyze the acetylation of newly synthesized H4 has been identified. This is the "type B" or HAT-B histone acetyltransferase, which is
typically recovered in the cytosol following cellular disruption. HAT-B
enzymes have been studied in a number of organisms and have been shown
to specifically diacetylate free but not nucleosomal H4 (reviewed in
Ref. 18). Moreover, native HAT-B acetyltransferases from humans (19,
20), maize (21), Xenopus (22), and Tetrahymena (23) are capable of generating the complete
Lys5/Lys12 acetylation pattern of newly
synthesized H4 in vitro (or
Lys4/Lys11 acetylation for the
Tetrahymena enzyme). HAT-B functions as a complex containing
the Hat1 catalytic subunit and, in humans, Rbap46 (a small protein that
also associates with the retinoblastoma protein, RB) (20). HAT-B
enzymes from other species contain orthologues of p46 or of p48
(another RB-binding protein). In yeast, the p46 subunit is termed Hat2p
(24, 25).
The crystal structure of the Hat1p acetyltransferase from
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (24, 26) has been determined at
2.3-Å resolution (27). Hat1p has a curved shape; acetyl-CoA binds within a depression on the concave surface of the protein, with the
acetyl group designating the active site. A model has been proposed for
the enzyme-H4 interaction, based on the assumptions that the H4 tail
has an extended conformation, that Lys12 (the lysine more
readily acetylated by yeast Hat1p) lies adjacent to the carbonyl group
of acetyl-CoA, and that Hat1p itself undergoes no major conformational
changes after binding the substrate. By applying these guidelines, it
has been proposed that the region of the H4 tail between
Lys8 and Lys16 binds along a channel that is
long enough to accommodate 6-7 amino acids (27). When
Lys12 is positioned adjacent to the acetyl group of
acetyl-CoA, Lys8 and Lys16 are found to lie
opposite two acidic patches at the ends of the channel, theoretically
engaging in electrostatic interactions that hold the tail in place.
Aligning Lys5 near the acetyl group of acetyl-CoA also
yields a reasonable, though somewhat less favorable, fit. However,
modeling Lys8 adjacent to acetyl-CoA produces a steric
clash with the channel (27, 28).
As noted above, the present model for the binding of the H4 tail to
Hat1 predicts that the lysine residues at positions 8 and 16 of H4 play
a significant role in stabilizing the Hat1-histone tail interaction. It
therefore may be postulated that abrogating the positive charge of
Lys8 and/or Lys16 by acetylation should
decrease the ability of the H4 tail to bind Hat1 and thus interfere
with enzyme activity. In the following report we have tested this
prediction directly, by performing HAT assays in vitro using
several acetylated H4 NH2-terminal peptides. We find that
the acetylation of Lys8 and/or Lys16 of H4
dramatically reduces the activity of recombinant yeast Hat1p and native
human HAT-B in vitro.
Cell Culture; Preparation of HAT-B Extract--
HeLa cells were
grown in spinner culture at 37 °C (14). Cytosolic extracts (S100
extract) from HeLa cells were prepared as described previously (19,
29). The HeLa S100 cytosolic extract contains HAT-B as the sole HAT
activity, which exclusively acetylates the H4 NH2 terminus
on lysines 5 and 12 (19).
In Vitro Acetylation Assays--
Human HAT-B activity was
measured using HeLa cytosolic extracts and an in vitro
peptide assay (30), as described previously (19). Synthetic 20-mer
peptides (typically 0.1 µg/µl final concentration) corresponding to
the first 18 amino-terminal residues (plus a C-terminal Gly-Cys
coupling linker) of either unacetylated or variously acetylated
NH2 termini of human histone H4 (19) were incubated in a
reaction volume of 80 µl in HB buffer (20 mM Hepes, 5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, adjusted to pH 7.5 with KOH) containing
40 µl of HeLa S100, an additional 60 mM Hepes (pH 8.0), 5 mM sodium butyrate, and 4-8 µCi/ml
[3H]acetyl-CoA (1-3 Ci/mmol; PerkinElmer Life
Sciences), for the times indicated in the figure legends; in
some cases the reaction volume was doubled. All peptides used in this
study were quantitated by mass spectroscopy, and all experiments
included parallel reactions using the unacetylated peptide as a
positive control. Reactions were stopped by spotting in duplicate onto
Whatman P-81 filters, washing with 50 mM NaHCO3
(pH 9.2), and then with 100% ethanol. Filters were allowed to air dry
and then were analyzed by scintillation counting. Control experiments
performed in the absence of added peptides, or using a
Lys5/Lys12-diacetylated peptide, confirmed that
incorporation was minimal in the absence of proper peptide substrates.
In vitro peptide assays using recombinant Hat1p from
S. cerevisiae were performed following a modified procedure
of Kleff et al. (26): 40 ng of Hat1p was incubated with
synthetic peptides (0.1 µg/µl) in HB buffer containing 75 mM Tris-HCl (diluted from a 1 M stock solution
(pH 8.8)), 135 mM NaCl, 5 mM sodium butyrate, and 4 µCi/ml [3H]acetyl-CoA (final reaction volume of
80 µl) for the times indicated. Reactions were stopped and spotted
onto Whatman P-81 filters as described above. Recombinant Hat1p was
prepared as described previously (27).
Preparation of Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Extract--
HeLa
histone deacetylase extract was prepared as described by Yoshida
et al. (31). HeLa cells (250 ml) were washed twice with HDAC
buffer (15 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5), 5% glycerol, and 0.2 mM EDTA). Cells were allowed to swell on ice for 15 min and were homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer. Nuclei were
collected by centrifugation (14,00 × g; 10 min;
4 °C) and resuspended (60 A260/ml;
A260 measured in SDS) in HDAC buffer plus 1 M (NH4)2SO4. After a
second homogenization, samples were sonicated for 10 s and
pelleted as described above. The supernatant, containing histone deacetylase activity, was brought to a final concentration of 3.5 M (NH4)2SO4, kept on
ice for 30 min, and centrifuged. The pellet was resuspended in 500 µl
of HDAC buffer and dialyzed overnight to 1 liter of HDAC buffer.
Samples were then stored at Treatment of Peptides with Histone Deacetylase--
Following
the procedure of Inoue and Fujimoto (32), 8 µg of peptide were added
to 37 µl of HDAC extract and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C.
Samples were boiled for 5 min and cooled. HDAC extracts treated in this
manner contained no contaminating HAT activity, as determined by HAT
assay. HDAC-treated peptides were then used in subsequent HAT-B
reactions, containing 45 µl of deacetylated peptide/HDAC extract, 40 µl of HeLa S100 cytosolic extract, 60 mM Hepes (pH 8.0),
20 mM sodium butyrate, and 0.32 µCi of
[3H]acetyl-CoA, adjusted to a final reaction volume of
100 µl with HB buffer.
Histone H4 NH2-terminal peptides were
synthesized in various isoforms, representing the following acetylation
states: unacetylated; monoacetylated at either Lys5,
Lys8, Lys12, or Lys16 (termed
Mono-5, Mono-8, Mono-12, and Mono-16, respectively); and diacetylated
at either Lys5/Lys12, or
Lys8/Lys16 (Di-5/12 and Di-8/16). The peptides
were then used to examine the activity of recombinant yeast Hat1p, as
measured by the transfer of radiolabeled acetate from
[3H]acetyl-CoA. All acetylation reactions were performed
in the presence of sodium butyrate, to inhibit possible deacetylation during incubation. The results are presented in Fig.
1.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
70 °C. HDAC activity was monitored
using [3H]acetate-labeled acetylated histones as substrates.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Acetylation of H4 NH2-terminal
tail peptides by the yeast HAT-B catalytic subunit, Hat1p.
Unacetylated (
); monoacetylated at lysine 5, 8, 12, or 16 (
,
,
, or
); or diacetylated at lysines 5 and 12 (×) or at lysines 8 and 16 (
) human H4 NH2-terminal peptides were incubated
in vitro for the times indicated with Hat1p and
[3H]acetyl-CoA.
As predicted, an H4 peptide already acetylated on lysines 5 and 12 (the
sites acetylated by Hat1 enzymes) was an extremely poor substrate (Fig.
1). The depressed acetylation of the Di-5/12 peptide also verifies that
no significant deacetylation is occurring under our experimental
conditions. In contrast, both the unacetylated peptide and the peptide
previously acetylated on Lys5 were readily acetylated by
Hat1p. Labeling of the Mono-5 peptide was reduced relative to the
unacetylated substrate (Figs. 1 and 2).
This is as expected, since only one substrate lysine is available for
radiolabeling; however, other factors may also be involved (see
"Discussion"). Notably, the Mono-12 peptide was acetylated poorly
(Figs. 1 and 2), consistent with the great preference of native and
recombinant yeast Hat1p for Lys12 over Lys5
(24, 26).
|
The effect of prior acetylation Lys8 and Lys16 (which are not substrate lysines for Hat1p) on Hat1p activity was then examined (Fig. 1). As predicted from the proposed interaction of the H4 tail with Hat1p (27), acetylation at either Lys8 or Lys16 significantly reduced the ability of Hat1p to acetylate its substrate lysines, with acetylation at Lys16 having a somewhat greater effect. Strikingly, the Lys8/Lys16-diacetylated peptide was almost refractory to acetylation by Hat1p, yielding results close to those obtained with the 5/12-diacetylated peptide, in which the substrate lysines are already acetylated. A summary of the results from several independent experiments are presented in Fig. 2, in which incorporation of radiolabeled acetate into each of the substrates is presented relative to that of the unacetylated peptide, which was always tested as a positive control. The combined data demonstrate that lysines 8 and 16 of H4 are critical to Hat1p activity (at least in vitro).
The experiments were then repeated using the human Hat1 enzyme, which in vivo resides in the HAT-B complex (19, 20). One of the hallmark features of HAT-B enzymes is their fractionation into the cytosol following cell disruption. We have previously shown that HAT-B is the sole HAT activity present in a cytosolic extract prepared from HeLa cells ("S100" extract) and that human HAT-B acetylates H4 exclusively in the Lys5/Lys12 deposition pattern (19). Moreover, HAT-B in the S100 comprises a native complex of ~100 kDA (19), which contains Hat1 and p46 (20). It is therefore possible to study HAT-B activity using the S100 extract as a native enzyme source (19).
Unacetylated, as well as Mono-8, Mono-16, Di-5/12, and Di-8/16
acetylated peptides, were tested for their ability to be acetylated by
human HAT-B; also tested was an H4 NH2-terminal peptide
with a deletion of Lys16 (Fig.
3). Control experiments verified by
immunoprecipitation of the acetylated peptides with site-specific
anti-acetylated H4 antibodies (19) that HAT-B was acetylating lysines 5 and 12 of the H4 tail (data not presented), consistent with our
previous description of human HAT-B activity (19).
|
Deleting or acetylating Lys16 reduced the ability of HAT-B to acetylate the H4 peptide by ~50%, and acetylating Lys8 had a slightly greater effect (Fig. 3). The more pronounced effect of Lys16 acetylation on the activity of recombinant Hat1p (Figs. 1 and 2), relative to human HAT-B (Fig. 3), may be due to the presence of the p46 subunit in the human enzyme; it has been demonstrated that the interaction of the H4 tail with yeast Hat1p is stabilized by Hat2p (24). Notably, as seen earlier with yeast Hat1p, the simultaneous acetylation of Lys8 and Lys16 severely reduced the acetylation of the H4 tail by the human enzyme (Fig. 3). Competition experiments further established that the Lys8/Lys16-diacetylated peptide did not inhibit HAT-B activity, even when present in 10-fold excess over the unacetylated peptide (data not presented). Thus the Lys8/Lys16 peptide is itself a poor Hat1p/HAT-B substrate.
Additional experiments were then performed to ensure that acetylation per se was regulating HAT-B activity. For these experiments, a preparation of HDAC was obtained from isolated HeLa cell nuclei (see "Experimental Procedures"). Unacetylated and Lys8/Lys16-diacetylated H4 peptides were then pretreated with HDAC prior to using the peptides in HAT-B assays. Control experiments verified that no contaminating HAT activities from the HDAC extract were present during the subsequent HAT-B reactions.
Pretreating the Lys8/Lys16-diacetylated peptide
with HDAC enabled HAT-B to acetylate the peptide at lysines 5 and 12, to 75-80% of control levels; buffer alone or BSA had no effect (Fig.
4, A and B).
Moreover, HDAC activity was essential during pretreatment; adding
sodium butyrate to the HDAC reaction to inhibit deacetylases prevented
the restoration of full HAT-B activity in the subsequent HAT-B reaction
(Fig. 4B). Thus, acetylation at
Lys8/Lys16 is responsible for the reduction in
HAT-B activity.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The acetylation of specific, nonsubstrate lysine residues (i.e. Lys8 and Lys16) of the histone H4 NH2 terminus reduces the acetylation of lysines 5 and 12 by both yeast and human Hat1 enzymes in vitro. Our results provide strong support for the model of H4-Hat1p interaction proposed by Dutnall et al. (27, 28), in which Lys8 and Lys16 are postulated to interact electrostatically with acidic domains within the Hat1p active site. In addition, this is the first demonstration that the activity of any histone acetyltransferase can potentially be regulated by the prior acetylation of nonsubstrate lysine residues within an individual histone tail.
Yeast Hat1p exhibits a strong preference for acetylating Lys12 of H4 over Lys5 (24, 26). In light of this, it might be expected that acetylation of the Mono-5 peptide (with Lys12 available for modification) would more closely approach that of the unacetylated peptide (Fig. 2). The presence of acetylation on Lys5 may therefore lower the ability of the H4 tail to interact with HAT-B. Notably, it has been shown by Loidl and colleagues (21) that maize HAT-B is incapable of using a native mixture of monoacetylated H4 isoforms as a substrate, although in this case the specific lysines inhibiting acetylation were not identified. Thus in that study a significant percentage of input H4 was very likely acetylated on Lys5 or Lys12.
It is now becoming clear that histone acetyltransferases may be controlled (either positively or negatively) by posttranslational modifications on residues that neighbor HAT-specific target lysines. For example, it has recently been shown that the Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase strongly prefers phosphorylated over unphosphorylated H3 as a substrate and that prior phosphorylation at serine 10 of H3 can potentiate subsequent acetylation of lysine 14 (33, 34). Moreover, the methylation of H3 at lysine 9 inhibits the phosphorylation of H3 at serine 10 (35), and it has been proposed that histone methylation can help to regulate acetylation (and vice versa), at least in some instances (36). While our experiments have focused on the activity of Hat1 in vitro, peptide assays have previously been shown to be excellent predictors of the interactions between histone modifications in vivo, as seen with the enhancement of H3 acetylation by phosphorylation (33, 34) and the inhibition of H3 phosphorylation by prior methylation (35). The positive or negative interaction of histone modifications thus appears to be a general regulatory mechanism of histone metabolism, as detailed in the "histone code" hypothesis proposed by Strahl and Allis (37), in which histone modifications act in concert to regulate gene activity.
Hat1 is most likely involved in the acetylation of newly synthesized H4, which is not expected to be pre-acetylated at lysines 8 and/or 16. Nevertheless, our results have relevance beyond supporting the proposed model of H4-Hat1 interaction. For example, in human cells a nuclear CAC complex (comprising the chromatin assembly factor CAF-1 and histones H3 and H4) has been described, in which a fraction of H4 is acetylated at Lys8, as well as at Lys5 and Lys12 (38). The CAC complex thus appears to represent a chromatin-bound intermediate in the deposition of new H4 onto chromatin, isolated prior to the deacetylation of nascent H4. Our results now suggest that the acetylation of new H4 at Lys8 should follow the acetylation of Lys5 and Lys12 by HAT-B, since prior acetylation of Lys8 could inhibit the activity of human HAT-B.
Although Hat1 is typically recovered from cytosolic extracts, there is
evidence that the great majority of the human Hat1 is nuclear in
vivo (20). Nuclear as well as cytoplasmic HAT-B type enzymes have
also been described in Tetrahymena cells (23) and maize
embryos (39). Interestingly, Hat1 in Xenopus oocytes has
been demonstrated to shuttle between nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments (22), and in yeast, Hat1p is found in two separate complexes, at least one of which is nuclear (25). It has been shown
that the activity of HAT enzymes can be modulated by their association
with other proteins within HAT-containing complexes (reviewed in Ref.
40), and it remains to be seen whether the Hat1 catalytic subunit can
in some circumstances associate with proteins that expand its
specificity to include nucleosomal histones in vivo. If so,
pre-existing acetylation patterns could also help to regulate nuclear
Hat1 complexes that engage chromatin-bound substrates.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM 35837 (to A. T. A.) and by a Boston College Research Incentive grant.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
This communication is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Alan Wolffe.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biology, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave., Chestnut Hill, MA 02467. Tel.: 617-552-3812; Fax: 617-552-2011; E-mail: anthony.annunziato@bc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 3, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C100549200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: HAT, histone acetyltransferase; HDAC, histone deacetylase; RB, retinoblastoma.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | van Holde, K. E. (1988) in Chromatin. Springer Series in Molecular Biology (Rich, A., ed) , Springer-Verlag, New York |
| 2. | Smith, S., and Stillman, B. (1989) Cell 58, 15-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Kamakaka, R. T.,
Kaufman, P. D.,
Stillman, B.,
Mitsis, P. G.,
and Kadonaga, J. T.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
5114-5122 |
| 4. | Kaufman, P. D., Kobayashi, R., Kessler, N., and Stillman, B. (1995) Cell 81, 1105-1114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Bulger, M.,
Ito, T.,
Kamakaka, R. T.,
and Kadonaga, J. T.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11726-11730 |
| 6. |
Kaufman, P. D.,
Kobayashi, R.,
and Stillman, B.
(1997)
Gene Dev.
11,
345-357 |
| 7. | Jackson, V., and Chalkley, R. (1981) Cell 23, 121-134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Annunziato, A. T.,
Schindler, R. K.,
Riggs, M. G.,
and Seale, R. L.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
8507-8515 |
| 9. | Wolffe, A. P. (1999) Chromatin: Structure and Function , Third Ed. , Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA |
| 10. |
Chicoine, L. G.,
Schulman, I. G.,
Richman, R.,
Cook, R. G.,
and Allis, C. D.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
1071-1076 |
| 11. |
Sobel, R. E.,
Cook, R. G.,
Perry, C. A.,
Annunziato, A. T.,
and Allis, C. D.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1237-1241 |
| 12. |
Ruiz-Carrillo, A.,
Wangh, L. J.,
and Allfrey, V. G.
(1975)
Science
190,
117-128 |
| 13. | Jackson, V., Shires, A., Tanphaichitr, N., and Chalkley, R. (1976) J. Mol. Biol. 104, 471-483[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Annunziato, A. T.,
and Seale, R. L.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
12675-12684 |
| 15. |
Perry, C. A.,
and Annunziato, A. T.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
4275-4291 |
| 16. | Kaufman, P. D. (1996) Curr. Opin. Biol. 8, 369-373 |
| 17. |
Verreault, A.
(2000)
Gene Dev.
14,
1430-1438 |
| 18. | Annunziato, A. T., and Hansen, J. C. (2000) Gene Expr. 9, 37-61[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Chang, L., Loranger, S. S., Mizzen, C., Ernst, S. G., Allis, C. D., and Annunziato, A. T. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 469-480[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Verreault, A., Kaufman, P. D., Kobayashi, R., and Stillman, B. (1997) Curr. Biol. 8, 96-108 |
| 21. | Kolle, D., Sarg, B., Lindner, H., and Loidl, P. (1998) FEBS Lett. 421, 109-114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Imhof, A., and Wolffe, A. P. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 13085-13093[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Richman, R.,
Chicoine, L. G.,
Collini, C. M. P.,
Cook, R. G.,
and Allis, C. D.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
106,
1017-1026 |
| 24. | Parthun, M. R., Widom, J., and Gottschling, D. E. (1996) Cell 87, 85-94[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Ruiz-Garcia, A. B.,
Sendra, R.,
Galiana, M.,
Pamblanco, M.,
Perezortin, J. E.,
and Tordera, V.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12599-12605 |
| 26. |
Kleff, S.,
Andrulis, E. D.,
Anderson, C. W.,
and Sternglanz, R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24674-24677 |
| 27. | Dutnall, R. N., Tafrov, S. T., Sternglanz, R., and Ramakrishnan, V. (1998) Cell 94, 427-438[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Dutnall, R. N., Tafrov, S. T., Sternglanz, R., and Ramakrishnan, V. (1998) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. 63, 501-507[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Perry, C. A., Dadd, C. A., Allis, C. D., and Annunziato, A. T. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 13605-13614[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Horiuchi, K., and Fujimoto, D. (1975) Anal. Biochem. 69, 491-496[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Yoshida, M.,
Kijima, M.,
Akita, M.,
and Beppo, T.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17174-17179 |
| 32. | Inoue, A., and Fujimoto, D. (1970) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 220, 307-316[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Cheung, P., Tanner, K. G., Cheung, W. L., Sassone-Corsi, P., Denu, J. M., and Allis, C. D. (2000) Mol. Cell 5, 905-915[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Lo, W. S., Trievel, R. C., Rojas, J. R., Duggan, L., Hsu, J. Y., Allis, C. D., Marmorstein, R., and Berger, S. L. (2000) Mol. Cell 5, 917-926[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Rea, S., Eisenhaber, F., O'Carroll, N., Strahl, B. D., Sun, Z. W., Schmid, M., Opravil, S., Mechtler, K., Ponting, C. P., Allis, C. D., and Jenuwein, T. (2000) Nature 406, 593-599[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Rice, J. C., and Allis, C. D. (2001) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 263-273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Strahl, B. D., and Allis, C. D. (2000) Nature 403, 41-45[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Verreault, A., Kaufman, P. D., Kobayashi, R., and Stillman, B. (1996) Cell 87, 95-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. |
Lusser, A.,
Eberharter, A.,
Loidl, A.,
Goralik-Schramel, M.,
Horngacher, M.,
Haas, H.,
and Loidl, P.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
4427-4435 |
| 40. |
Sterner, D. E.,
and Berger, S. L.
(2000)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
64,
435-459 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. J. Benson, J. A. Phillips, Y. Gu, M. R. Parthun, C. S. Hoffman, and A. T. Annunziato Properties of the Type B Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1: H4 TAIL INTERACTION, SITE PREFERENCE, AND INVOLVEMENT IN DNA REPAIR J. Biol. Chem., January 12, 2007; 282(2): 836 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Huang, M. Litt, and G. Felsenfeld Methylation of histone H4 by arginine methyltransferase PRMT1 is essential in vivo for many subsequent histone modifications Genes & Dev., August 15, 2005; 19(16): 1885 - 1893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Poveda, M. Pamblanco, S. Tafrov, V. Tordera, R. Sternglanz, and R. Sendra Hif1 Is a Component of Yeast Histone Acetyltransferase B, a Complex Mainly Localized in the Nucleus J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 2004; 279(16): 16033 - 16043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |