|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106155200 on August 23, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 47, 43509-43515, November 23, 2001
Liver X Receptor (LXR) Regulation of the LXR Gene
in Human Macrophages*
Karl D.
Whitney,
Michael A.
Watson,
Bryan
Goodwin,
Cristin M.
Galardi,
Jodi M.
Maglich,
Joan G.
Wilson,
Timothy M.
Willson,
Jon
L.
Collins, and
Steven A.
Kliewer
From GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27709
Received for publication, July 2, 2001, and in revised form, August 9, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The nuclear oxysterol receptors LXR (NR1H3)
and LXR (NR1H2) coordinately regulate the expression of genes
involved in the transport and catabolism of cholesterol. In
macrophages, LXR stimulates the transcription of genes encoding
transporters involved in cholesterol efflux, which may limit the
transformation of these cells into foam cells in response to lipid
loading. Here, we report that natural and synthetic LXR ligands induce
the expression of the LXR gene in primary human
macrophages and differentiated THP-1 macrophages. This regulation was
not observed in primary human adipocytes or hepatocytes, a human
intestinal cell line, or in any mouse tissue or cell line examined. The
human LXR gene was isolated, and the transcription
initiation site delineated. Analysis of the LXR promoter
revealed a functional LXR/RXR binding site ~2.9 kb upstream of the
transcription initiation site. We conclude that LXR regulates its
own expression in human macrophages and that this response is likely to
amplify the effects of oxysterols on reverse cholesterol transport.
These findings underscore the importance of LXR as a potential
therapeutic target for the treatment of atherosclerosis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The characterization of two closely related ligand-activated
transcription factors, named liver X receptor
(LXR)1 (NR1H3) and LXR
(NR1H2) (1-4), has provided important insights into the mechanisms
underlying cellular and whole-body cholesterol homeostasis (5). The
LXRs are activated by cholesterol derivatives and metabolites,
including oxysterols such as 24(S),25-epoxycholesterol and
22(R)-hydroxycholesterol (6-10), and bind as heterodimers with the 9-cis retinoic acid receptor (RXR; NR2B1) to direct
repeat four (DR-4) type sequence motifs, termed LXR response elements (LXREs), in the regulatory regions of target genes (1-4). Whereas LXR is expressed in most tissues, LXR is abundantly expressed in
a more restricted set of tissues including the liver, kidney, spleen,
intestine, and in macrophages (1-4). Over the past several years, the
LXRs have been shown to regulate a number of genes involved in
cholesterol absorption, transport, and excretion. For example, in
the rodent liver, LXR stimulates the transcription of cholesterol
7 hydroxylase (CYP7A1) (11), the rate-limiting enzyme in the
classical pathway for the conversion of cholesterol to bile acids (12,
13). When fed a cholesterol-rich diet, mice lacking functional LXR
failed to up-regulate Cyp7a1 and accumulated copious amounts
of cholesterol in their livers (11). Thus, LXR is critical for the
elimination of excess cholesterol from the mouse liver.
More recently, the LXRs have been shown to have a central role in the
regulation of reverse cholesterol transport, a process whereby excess
cholesterol is transferred in high-density lipoprotein (HDL)
particles from peripheral tissues to the liver for elimination from the
body (14). The biology of the LXRs and their cholesterol transporter
target genes is of particular disease relevance in macrophages since
the accumulation of lipids in these cells is a critical step in their
transformation into foam cells in fatty streak lesions in
atherosclerotic vasculature subendothelium (15, 16). One of the
principal vehicles for lipid accumulation is oxidized low density
lipoprotein (oxLDL), which contains a number of oxysterol LXR ligands
(17). In macrophages, the LXRs regulate the expression of the adenosine
triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) proteins A1 and G1 (18-22), which
serve as free-cholesterol and phospholipid translocators enabling
cholesterol efflux from the macrophage onto various acceptors,
including nascent, cholesterol-poor HDL (18, 21, 23-26). Defective
ABCA1 expression in humans is the basis for Tangier disease and is
associated with cholesterol accumulation in peripheral tissues along
with a near-total lack of cellular cholesterol efflux and plasma HDL
(27-31). LXR-dependent regulation of cholesterol efflux
may prove to be an important antiatherogenic process amenable to
pharmacological intervention with LXR agonists.
In studies performed in macrophages and macrophage cell lines, we have
discovered that one of the genes regulated by the LXRs is
LXR . Notably, this positive feedback loop is specific to
human macrophages. We hypothesize that this regulatory pathway
increases the magnitude of the biological response to rising cellular
levels of cholesterol and other components of oxLDL and, thus,
represents an important component of macrophage lipid physiology.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
THP-1 cells were maintained in suspension for
passage and growth in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing
10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA), 100 units/ml penicillin/100 µg/ml streptomycin (Irvine Scientific), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Invitrogen), and 55 µM
-mercaptoethanol (Sigma). Passaging was performed every 3-4
days at a 1:4 dilution. For experiments, 1 × 106
cells/well were plated in 6-well plates in media supplemented with 100 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (Sigma) to induce differentiation. Cells were maintained in this media for 5 days prior
to treatment with LXR agonists. RAW 264.7 cells were maintained in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS (Irvine
Scientific), 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen) and
100 units/ml penicillin/100 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen).
Passaging was performed by scraping every 3-4 days at 1:3 dilutions.
Cells were plated at 5 × 105 cells/well into 6-well
plates or 5 × 106 cells into T75 flasks and dosing
was begun when the cells had grown to ~50% confluency. FHs74 cells
were grown in Hybri-Care medium (ATCC, Manassas, VA) supplemented with
10% FBS and 30 ng/ml epidermal growth factor PBS (Sigma). Cells were
passaged by trypsinization every 3-4 days at a 1:3 dilution. Cells
were plated at 3 × 105 cells/well into 6-well plates
or 3 × 106 cells into T75 flasks. Treatments began
when cells were ~50% confluent. Primary human adipocytes (Zen-Bio,
Research Triangle Park, NC) were supplied in 6-well plates in a
proprietary culture media. After cells arrived, the media was changed
and the cells allowed to recover overnight, whereupon drug treatments
commenced. Cells were ~60-80% confluent at this time. Primary human
hepatocytes pre-plated in 6-well plates were obtained from either
Stephen Strom (University of Pittsburgh) or Clonetics (Walkersville,
MD). Hepatocyte media consists of Williams' E (Invitrogen)
supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine and ITS-G
(insulin-transferrin-selenium-G, Invitrogen). Primary human macrophages
were isolated and cultured as follows. Human blood was freshly drawn
into heparin-treated tubes and diluted 1:3 with phosphate-buffered
saline containing 2 mM EDTA. Peripheral blood mononuclear
cells (PBMC) were collected by ficoll density separation by overlaying
25 ml of diluted blood on 25 ml of LymphoPrep reagent (Nycomed
Pharma AS, Asker, Norway). After centrifugation according to the
LymphoPrep protocol, the leukocyte layer was collected. Monocytes were
isolated from PBMC by an indirect magnetic cell isolation technique. In
this system, non-monocyte PBMC cell subsets are labeled with
subset-specific antibody-coated magnetic beads (Monocyte Isolation Kit,
Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) and then separated from unlabeled
monocytes with a magnet (VarioMACS separator, Miltenyi Biotec).
Unretained cells were found to be >95% monocytes by flow cytometry.
Postseparation, monocytes were washed and maintained overnight at
1 × 106 cells/well in 6-well plates in DMEM
containing 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml
penicillin/100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 0.1 ng/ml GM-CSF (BD
PharMingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ).
Drug Treatments--
Cultured cells and cell lines were
generally dosed with compounds dissolved in the same culture media in
which they were grown. Treatments included the LXR / agonists
GW3965 (32), T0901317 (19), 22(R)-hydroxycholesterol (6, 7),
or 24(S),25-epoxycholesterol (7). Each cell line was treated
according to an optimized schedule. Generally, the culture media was
replaced with media containing vehicle (Me2SO or ethanol)
or 1-10 µM drugs at 0 h. FHs74 cells were harvested
for RNA isolation 48 h after the initial dosing; human macrophages
and hepatocytes were treated a second time at 24 h and harvested
4 h later; THP-1 and RAW 264.7 cells were dosed a second time at
24 h and then harvested 24 h later; adipocytes were treated a
second time at 48 h and harvested 4 h later.
Rapid Amplification of 5'-cDNA Ends (RACE)--
The
transcriptional initiation site of the human LXR gene was determined
by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5'-RACE) using a 5'/3' RACE
kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and THP-1 total RNA prepared as
described below. The primers used were based on the 5'-end of
the published human LXR cDNA (2). The sequences are as follows:
SP1, 5'-GGCCCCCAGCCACAAGGACAT-3'; SP2, 5'-CTCTTCCTGGAGCCCT-3'; SP3,
5'-CATTACCAAGGCACTG-3'. SP1-3 are nested primers with SP1 positioned the furthest downstream.
Animal Treatments and Tissue Collection--
Male C57-Bl/6 mice
maintained on a regular chow diet were dosed twice daily by oral gavage
with 0.5% methyl cellulose or 10 mg/kg GW3965 suspended in 0.5%
methyl cellulose. After 2 days dosing, peritoneal macrophages, liver,
and intestine were collected. Peritoneal macrophages were harvested by
flushing the abdominal cavity with 10 ml ice-cold DMEM containing 10%
FBS (Irvine Scientific). The media was withdrawn and spun at 3000 × g for 10 min in a tabletop centrifuge. Cell pellets were
lysed in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and RNA extracted according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Intestine samples were removed and
flushed with ice-cold saline. Liver and intestine samples were
snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and held at 80 °C prior to RNA isolation.
Real-time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
(RTQ-PCR)--
Total RNA samples were diluted to 100 µg/ml and
treated with 40 units/ml RNA-free DNase-I (Ambion, Austin, TX) for 30 min at 37 °C followed by inactivation at 75 °C for 5 min. Samples were quantitated by spectrophotometry or with the RiboGreen assay (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and diluted to a concentration of 10 ng/µl. Samples were assayed in duplicate 25-µl reactions using 25 ng of RNA/reaction with PerkinElmer chemistry on an ABI Prism 7700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Gene-specific primers were used
at 7.5 or 22.5 pmol/reaction and optimized for each gene examined, and
the gene-specific fluorescently tagged probe was used at 5 pmol/reaction. In this system, the probe is degraded by Taq
polymerase during the amplification phase, releasing the fluorescent
tag from its quenched state; amplification data is expressed as the
number of PCR cycles required to elevate the fluorescence signal beyond
a threshold intensity level. Fold induction values were calculated by
subtracting the mean threshold cycle number for each treatment group
from the mean threshold cycle number for the vehicle group and raising
2 to the power of this difference.
Northern Blot Protocol--
Northern blot analysis was performed
exactly as described elsewhere (33). Briefly, 10 µg of total RNA was
electrophoresed in a denaturing agarose gel and transferred to a nylon
membrane (Hybond N+, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Human LXR and LXR cDNA
corresponding to the ligand-binding domain was labeled with
[ -32P]dCTP by random priming using a commercially
available system (Megaprime, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Blots were
sequentially probed with radiolabeled LXR , LXR , and -actin
(CLONTECH Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA) using
standard techniques.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays--
DNA-receptor protein
interactions were examined by electrophoretic mobility shift assays as
described elsewhere (33). Competitor oligonucleotides were added at 5-, 15-, or 75-fold molar excess (mutant oligonucleotide added only at
75-fold molar excess). The binding reactions were resolved on a
pre-electrophoresed 0.4 × TBE, 4% polyacrylamide gel at room
temperature. Human LXR , LXR , and RXR proteins were synthesized
from pSG5-hLXR , LXR , and RXR using the TNT T7-coupled
reticulocyte system (Promega, Madison, WI). The oligonucleotides used
in the experiments described here were as follows (sense strand only,
with overhang and mutated nucleotides in lowercase and
underlined, respectively: Rat CYP7A1; 5'-gatcCTTTGGTCACTCAAGTTCAAGT-3',
LXRE1; 5'-agctTGAATGACCAGCAGTAACCTCAGC-3', mutLXRE1;
5'-agctTGAATGTTCAGCAGTATTCTCAGC-3'.
Generation of Reporter Constructs--
A 3.5-kb ApaI
fragment of the human LXR 5'-flanking domain was cloned
directly upstream of a luciferase reporter gene in a modified
pGL3-Basic vector (Promega) containing an ApaI site in the
polylinker. This construct, named pGL3-hLXR -3027/463, contains bases
3027 to +463 of the human LXR gene and was obtained by
ApaI digest of bacterial artificial chromosome clone
RP1117G12 (GenBankTM AC018410). This construct was modified
to generate deletion and point mutants as follows.
pGL3-hLXR -2677/463 was generated by digestion of the parent
construct with SacI and lacks a fragment extending from the
SacI site in the polylinker upstream of the insert to
position 2677 within the insert; this construct lacks LXRE1. In
pGL3-hLXR -3027/463mut, four bases within LXRE1 from the parent
construct were mutated using the Transformer site-directed mutagenesis
system (CLONTECH Laboratories) and the
following mutation primer (mutated nucleotides underlined):
5'-CAGGGGGTGAATGTTCAGCAGTATTCTCAGCAGCTTGC-3'. The pGL3-hLXR -3027/463-Pst deletion mutant lacks LXRE2 and
LXRE3 and was generated by digestion of the parent construct with
PstI to exclude a fragment from bases 2895 to 217;
pGL3-hLXR -3027/463-Pst-mut was generated by PstI
digestion of the pGL3-hLXR -3027/463mut mutant.
Reporter Construct Transactivation Assays--
HepG2 cells were
cultured and transfected exactly as described elsewhere (33). All
luciferase values were normalized to secreted placental alkaline
phosphatase and are expressed as fold activation over the activity of
the no receptor/vehicle condition for each construct.
 |
RESULTS |
As part of a comprehensive search for LXR target genes in
macrophages, we discovered that LXR itself was
up-regulated in differentiated THP-1 cells treated with the potent,
synthetic LXR agonists GW3965 (32) and T0901317 (19) as assessed by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 1). In
multiple experiments, LXR up-regulation in THP-1 cells
averaged 4.2- and 6.2-fold with GW3965 and T0901317, respectively, as
measured by RTQ-PCR (Table I). The
natural LXR agonists 22(R)-hydroxycholesterol and
24(S),25-epoxycholesterol also robustly up-regulated
LXR (Table I), whereas the inactive enantiomer
22(S)-hydroxycholesterol (6, 7) had no effect on gene
expression in THP-1 cells or any other cells examined (data not shown).
In sharp contrast, LXR expression was not regulated in
THP-1 cells by treatment with the synthetic LXR agonists (Fig. 1).

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
LXR is up-regulated
in THP-1 cells in response to synthetic LXR agonists. Total RNA
(10 µg) was prepared from differentiated THP-1 cells treated for a
total of 48 h with vehicle or 1 µM of the indicated
drugs. Northern blot analysis was performed with radiolabeled probes
for human LXR (upper panel), LXR (middle
panel), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
RTQ-PCR analysis of LXR , ABCA1, and ABCG1 expression in various
cells and cell lines treated with various synthetic and natural LXR
agonists
Cultured cells were treated with 1-10 µM of the
indicated compounds, while peritoneal macrophages were obtained from
mice dosed orally with 10 mg/kg GW3965. Gene expression levels were
calculated from raw RTQ-PCR data as described under "Experimental
Procedures" with the vehicle group expression set to 1.0 arbitrary
unit. Data presented are averaged from multiple determinations on
samples from one to six individual experiments. First entry, THP-1 cell
data; middle entries, additional human and mouse cells and cell line
data; last entry, primary human macrophage data. ND, not determined.
|
|
Additional experiments were performed to explore the tissue and species
specificity of this effect. LXR , ABCA1, and ABCG1 mRNA levels
were assessed by RTQ-PCR in primary human hepatocytes, adipocytes, and
the human intestinal cell line FHs74 treated with various synthetic and
natural LXR agonists. Gene expression was also analyzed in drug-treated
murine macrophage-like RAW 264.7 cells and primary peritoneal
macrophages obtained from mice treated with GW3965. Whereas expression
of the known LXR target genes ABCA1 and ABCG1 was
substantially up-regulated by LXR agonists, little or no change was
observed in LXR expression levels (Table I). Similar
results were obtained in additional tissues from drug-treated mice
including liver and intestine (data not shown). In contrast, all three
LXR target genes were up-regulated in primary human
monocyte-derived macrophages (Table I), confirming the original results
obtained with THP-1 cells. Overall, these results suggest the effect is
specific to macrophages of human origin. LXR was not
regulated by LXR agonists in any of the cells, cell lines, or tissues
examined (data not shown).
The genomic structure and promoter regions of the mouse
LXR and LXR genes have recently been
examined in detail (34). To begin dissecting the human
LXR 5'-flanking region, DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank high throughput
genomic sequence data bases were queried with nucleotides corresponding
to mouse Lxr exon 1 (34). This search identified a BAC
encompassing the 5'-end of the human LXR gene (GenBankTM AC018410). The region surrounding the murine
Lxr transcription initiation site (bases 248 to +521)
was found to be highly homologous (~75%) to that in the human
LXR gene. To determine the transcriptional initiation
site for the human LXR gene, 5'-RACE was performed using total RNA
prepared from THP-1 cells and primers located at the 5'-end of the
published LXR cDNA (Fig.
2B). Despite the high degree
of sequence homology between the mouse and human LXR genes, the positions of the major transcription initiation sites were
not conserved. The vast majority (20 of 22 clones) of cDNA ends
that were obtained by 5'-RACE started ~320 bp downstream from the
mouse transcription initiation site (Fig. 2A). These clones
delineated a novel exon (designated exon 1B) of the human LXR gene that is 134 bp in length and is not present in
the previously described human LXR cDNA (2). A search of the
DBEST data base of GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ sequences from EST
Divisions demonstrated that nearly all entries containing sequence
corresponding to the human LXR translational start site
extend upstream to this same region and that none of them contains a
sequence homologous to exon 1 of the mouse Lxr gene (data
not shown). The 3'-donor site of exon 1B lies 1050 bp upstream of the
5'-acceptor site of exon 2, which contains the translational start site
(Fig. 2, A and B). Two 5'-RACE clones mapped an
additional exon (exon 1A, bases 290 to 261) in the region of the
human LXR gene corresponding to exon 1 of the murine gene
(Fig. 2A). Exon 1 of the murine Lxr gene
contains two alternative splice donor sites (1a and 1b, positions +84
and +152, respectively). The splice donor site of the human exon 1A was
identical to splice donor site 1a of the mouse Lxr gene
(34). It is notable that the transcription initiation site in the
murine Lxr gene was delineated using RNA prepared from liver (34), while the RNA used in this study was isolated from a
macrophage-derived cell line. Hence, the observed differences may be
the result of tissue-specific transcriptional events. Both the human
and mouse LXR genes contain in-frame stop codons in exon
2 (34, 35) that prevent any contribution from exons 1A or 1B to the
sequence of the LXR protein.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The human LXR 5'-flanking
region. A, alignment of the human LXR
5'-flank with the mouse gene indicating mouse exon 1 (34) (shaded
box on lower strand), human exon 1A (dashed line on upper
strand), and human exon 1B (shaded box on upper strand)
as deduced from 5'-RACE and EST data base analysis. The number
and position of cDNA ends as delineated by 5'-RACE are shown in
boxes above the sequence. Sequence numbering is expressed
relative to the transcriptional initiation site for each gene
(indicated with an arrow). Exon 2 of the human LXR gene,
which contains the translation start site, lies ~1 kb downstream of
the sequence depicted here. B, schematic of the human
LXR 5'-flanking region depicting the three potential
LXREs (black boxes), exon 1A and exons 1B and 2 (open and shaded boxes, respectively). The
indicated ApaI restriction sites were used to generate a
reporter construct containing this portion of the 5'-flanking region.
The positions of the primers used for 5'-RACE (SP1, SP2, and SP3) are
shown.
|
|
Using a computer search algorithm, we identified three potential LXREs
that conformed to the DR-4 consensus sequence in the 3 kb of sequence
upstream from the human transcription initiation site. These sites were
termed LXRE1, 2, and 3 (Fig. 2B) Interestingly, the LXRE2
and 3 sites are perfect duplicates, and moreover, the region extending
~200 bp upstream and ~100 bp downstream of the two LXREs is highly
conserved (~75% homology). The functional significance of this
observation is not clear. To explore the transcriptional activity of
these LXREs in their genomic context, an ApaI fragment of
the LXR gene containing exon 1 and upstream sequence
covering all three putative response elements was inserted into a
luciferase reporter gene vector (pGL3-Basic) directly upstream of the
luciferase gene (named pGL3-hLXR -3027/463; Figs. 2B and 3). Deletion and point mutants of this construct were generated and are
depicted in Fig. 3. Reporter construct
activity was examined in transfection assays in a hepatocellular
carcinoma cell line, HepG2. The transfections were performed in a liver
cell line because of the difficulty of transfecting human macrophage
cells. HepG2 cells were transfected with each reporter construct either
without exogenous expression of receptors or in the presence of hRXR and either hLXR or hLXR expression vectors. Ligand treatments included vehicle or the synthetic LXR agonists GW3965 and T0901317. As
shown in Fig. 3, pGL3-hLXR -3027/463 was activated in a receptor- and
ligand-dependent fashion. Only weak induction of reporter activity in response to the LXR agonists was detected in HepG2 cells
transfected with this reporter plasmid alone. Cotransfection of LXR
and RXR expression plasmids resulted in an ~2-fold increase in
reporter activity (Fig. 3). Addition of either LXR agonist to these
cells increased reporter activity an additional 2-fold, for a total of
5- to 7-fold activation compared with the no receptor/vehicle condition. Virtually identical results were obtained when an LXR expression plasmid was substituted for LXR (Fig. 3).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Activation of human LXR
reporter constructs by LXR agonists. Luciferase reporter
constructs containing a 3.5-kb ApaI fragment of the intact
LXR upstream flanking region (bases 3027 to +463) or
various mutations of this construct were transfected into HepG2 cells.
Control cultures were transfected with the backbone pGL3-Basic vector.
Cells were cotransfected either with an empty expression vector (pSG5)
or expression vectors containing human RXR and either human LXR
or LXR as indicated and then treated with vehicle (0.1%
Me2SO) or 1 µM either GW3965 or T0901317 for
48 h. Data are expressed as fold induction over the normalized
luciferase activity measured in the vehicle-treated/no receptor group.
Error bars represent the mean ± S.D. from four
separate transfection experiments.
|
|
To determine which of the three putative LXREs underlies LXR-mediated
reporter activation, mutants were constructed that deleted or mutated
LXRE1 or deleted both LXRE2 and LXRE3. The parent construct was
compared side-by-side to each mutant construct both in the absence and
presence of LXR /RXR and either vehicle, GW3965, or T0901317 (Fig.
3). Compared with the parent construct (pGL3-hLXR -3027/463), no
basal or ligand-induced activity was observed with the mutant in which
LXRE1 is deleted (pGL3-hLXR -2677/463) (Fig. 3). Very similar data
were obtained with the pGL3-hLXR -3027/463mut, in which four
nucleotides of LXRE1 are mutated Fig. 3). Deletion of LXRE1 also
resulted in a loss of induction in response to LXR (data not shown).
In contrast, deletion of nucleotides 2895 to 217 in the
LXR promoter, which includes LXRE2 and LXRE3
(pGL3-hLXR -3027/463-Pst), did not reduce the activity of the
LXR promoter. Instead, the basal and ligand-induced
activities of this reporter construct were substantially increased over
the parent construct (Fig. 3). We speculate that the deleted region
contains a repressor element that may suppress
LXR-dependent induction in cells other than macrophages.
Site-directed mutagenesis of LXRE1 in this construct (pGL3-hLXR -3027/463-Pst-mut) eliminated the increases seen in basal
and ligand-induced activities (Fig. 3). Overall, these results demonstrate that LXRE1 is the principal LXRE mediating LXR control of
LXR expression.
We next sought to determine whether LXR/RXR heterodimers bind directly
to LXRE1. Electrophoretic mobility-shift assays were performed
with in vitro synthesized LXR , LXR , and RXR . As
expected, both the LXR /RXR and LXR /RXR heterodimers bound
efficiently to a radiolabeled LXRE derived from the rat
CYP7A1 promoter (Fig. 4) (7).
An oligonucleotide corresponding to LXRE1 competed efficiently with the
rat CYP7A1 probe for binding to both the LXR /RXR and
LXR /RXR heterodimers. Under the conditions employed, the LXRE1
oligonucleotide competed better than the unlabeled rat CYP7A1
oligonucleotide (Fig. 4). An oligonucleotide harboring a mutated LXRE1
failed to compete for binding (Fig. 4). Using radiolabeled LXRE1, we
confirmed that both the LXR /RXR and LXR /RXR heterodimers
bind directly to LXRE1 (Fig. 4). Together, these data provide evidence
that the human LXR gene is regulated directly by the
LXR/RXR heterodimers.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Electrophoretic mobility-shift analysis of
LXRE1. Competition experiments were performed using a radiolabeled
oligonucleotide probe corresponding to the DR4 LXRE from the rat
CYP7A1 promoter (left panels) or LXRE1 from the
human LXR gene (right panels). In addition to probe,
binding reactions contained in vitro translated human RXR
and/or LXR (top panels) or LXR protein (bottom
panels). Some reactions also contained competitor oligonucleotides
corresponding to either the rat CYP7A1 DR4 or LXRE1 from the
human LXR promoter as indicated. Competitor rat CYP7A1 and LXRE1
oligonucleotides were added at 5-, 15-, or 75-fold molar excess, while
the mutant LXRE oligonucleotide was added at 75-fold molar excess over
the radiolabeled probe.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
LXR is known to regulate a number of genes involved in cholesterol
homeostasis (5, 36). The experiments described in this report reveal
LXR as a novel LXR target gene in human macrophages. We
hypothesize that this autoregulation increases the expression of LXR
target genes such as ABCA1, ABCG1, and
apolipoprotein (Apo) E in response to oxysterols derived from oxLDL
(18-21, 37). The coordinate increase in the expression of these genes
could then increase the efflux of excess cholesterol from macrophages onto acceptor proteins such as ApoA1 and ApoE for transport to the
liver and elimination from the body (14, 36). Thus, the LXR
autoregulatory loop provides a mechanism for efficiently amplifying the
effects of oxysterols in macrophages and promoting reverse cholesterol
transport. Interestingly, we did not observe stimulation of
LXR gene expression by LXR agonists, indicating that
autoregulation is restricted to the LXR gene. The
physiological importance of this difference remains to be determined.
The LXR gene was also recently shown to be directly
regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor , which is
activated by fatty acids and their metabolites (38). Thus,
LXR gene expression is under the control of multiple
receptors that sense dietary status. In cell-based reporter assays,
both the LXR and LXR subtypes were capable of stimulating
transcription of the LXR promoter. Since LXR and
LXR are both expressed in macrophages, these data suggest that
activation of either subtype can initiate this regulatory cascade.
Among the human cells examined, LXR was only up-regulated
in primary macrophages. This macrophage-specific effect may be due to
the restricted expression of positively acting transcription factors or
coactivators in this cell type. Alternatively, tissue-specific repressors, perhaps interacting with a region of the LXR
promoter bracketed by the PstI sites exploited in the
deletion mutation experiments described above, may prevent induction in
tissues where excessive activation of LXR target genes could be
detrimental. Notably, we failed to detect a similar autoregulation of
LXR gene expression by LXR agonists in murine macrophages
or other mouse tissues or cell lines. The basis for these species
differences is currently unknown. We speculate that the dynamic
response to oxysterols as measured by cholesterol efflux may be
greater in human macrophages than in rodent cells, perhaps reflecting
an evolutionary response to the cholesterol-rich diet of humans as compared with rodents.
One possible implication of these findings is that polymorphisms in
LXRE1 or other regulatory elements of the LXR promoter may impair the gene response to lipid loading. Thus, individuals harboring these mutations may have an increased risk of developing atherosclerosis. Interestingly, familial combined hyperlipidemia, a
polygenic lipid disorder associated with the early onset of coronary
artery disease, was recently found to have genetic linkage with a
region of chromosome 11 that contains the LXR gene (39). It remains to be determined whether mutations in either the
LXR gene or its regulatory regions contribute to this disease.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that LXR is a direct
target gene of LXR and LXR in human macrophages. Regulation is mediated by a single LXRE located 2.9 kb upstream of a previously unrecognized exon in the human LXR gene. LXR
regulation is not seen in other human cell types or any murine tissue
or cell examined. This macrophage-specific phenomenon may form an
important component of the body's response to elevated cholesterol
levels in general and may help prevent the transformation of
macrophages into foam cells by amplifying the process of reverse
cholesterol transport.
 |
Addendum |
Laffitte et al. (40) have also recently
described autoregulation of the LXR gene promoter.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: GlaxoSmithKline
Research and Development, Five Moore Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC.
Tel.: 919-483-5601; Fax: 919-315-6720; E-mail: sak15922@gsk.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 23, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106155200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LXR, liver X
receptor;
LXRE, LXR response elements;
RXR, 9-cis retinoic
acid receptor;
HDL, high-density lipoprotein;
oxLDL, oxidized
low-density lipoprotein;
ABC, adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells;
RACE, rapid amplification of
cDNA ends;
RTQ-PCR, real-time quantitative polymerase chain
reaction;
kb, kilobase(s);
bp, base pair(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Apfel, R.,
Benbrook, D.,
Lernhardt, E.,
Ortiz, M. A.,
Salbert, G.,
and Pfahl, M.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
7025-7035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Willy, P. J.,
Umesono, K.,
Ong, E. S.,
Evans, R. M.,
Heyman, R. A.,
and Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1033-1045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Teboul, M.,
Enmark, E.,
Li, Q.,
Wikstrom, A. C.,
Pelto-Huikko, M.,
and Gustafsson, J. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
2096-2100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Song, C.,
Kokontis, J. M.,
Hiipakka, R. A.,
and Liao, S.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
10809-10813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Repa, J. J.,
and Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
16,
459-481[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Janowski, B. A.,
Willy, P. J.,
Devi, T. R.,
Falck, J. R.,
and Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(1996)
Nature
383,
728-731[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Lehmann, J. M.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Moore, L. B.,
Smith-Oliver, T. A.,
Oliver, B. B.,
Su, J. L.,
Sundseth, S. S.,
Winegar, D. A.,
Blanchard, D. E.,
Spencer, T. A.,
and Willson, T. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3137-3140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Janowski, B. A.,
Grogan, M. J.,
Jones, S. A.,
Wisely, G. B.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Corey, E. J.,
and Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
266-271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Forman, B. M.,
Ruan, B.,
Chen, J.,
Schroepfer, G. J., Jr.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10588-10593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Song, C.,
Hiipakka, R. A.,
and Liao, S.
(2000)
Steroids
65,
423-427[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Peet, D. J.,
Turley, S. D.,
Ma, W.,
Janowski, B. A.,
Lobaccaro, J. M.,
Hammer, R. E.,
and Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(1998)
Cell
93,
693-704[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Russell, D. W.,
and Setchell, K. D.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
4737-4749[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Chiang, J. Y. L.
(1998)
Front. Biosci.
3,
D176-93
|
| 14.
|
Tall, A. R.,
and Wang, N.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
106,
1205-1207[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Schachter, M.
(1997)
Int. J. Cardiol.
62,
S3-7
|
| 16.
|
Ross, R.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
57,
791-804[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Schroepfer, G. J., Jr.
(2000)
Physiol. Rev.
80,
361-554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Costet, P.,
Luo, Y.,
Wang, N.,
and Tall, A. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
28240-28245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Repa, J. J.,
Turley, S. D.,
Lobaccaro, J. A.,
Medina, J.,
Li, L.,
Lustig, K.,
Shan, B.,
Heyman, R. A.,
Dietschy, J. M.,
and Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(2000)
Science
289,
1524-1529[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Schwartz, K.,
Lawn, R. M.,
and Wade, D. P.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
274,
794-802[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Venkateswaran, A.,
Repa, J. J.,
Lobaccaro, J. M.,
Bronson, A.,
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
and Edwards, P. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14700-14707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Venkateswaran, A.,
Laffitte, B. A.,
Joseph, S. B.,
Mak, P. A.,
Wilpitz, D. C.,
Edwards, P. A.,
and Tontonoz, P.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
12097-12102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Lawn, R. M.,
Wade, D. P.,
Garvin, M. R.,
Wang, X.,
Schwartz, K.,
Porter, J. G.,
Seilhamer, J. J.,
Vaughan, A. M.,
and Oram, J. F.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
R25-31
|
| 24.
|
Wang, N.,
Silver, D. L.,
Costet, P.,
and Tall, A. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33053-33058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Orso, E.,
Broccardo, C.,
Kaminski, W. E.,
Bottcher, A.,
Liebisch, G.,
Drobnik, W.,
Gotz, A.,
Chambenoit, O.,
Diederich, W.,
Langmann, T.,
Spruss, T.,
Luciani, M. F.,
Rothe, G.,
Lackner, K. J.,
Chimini, G.,
and Schmitz, G.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
24,
192-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Klucken, J.,
Buchler, C.,
Orso, E.,
Kaminski, W. E.,
Porsch-Ozcurumez, M.,
Liebisch, G.,
Kapinsky, M.,
Diederich, W.,
Drobnik, W.,
Dean, M.,
Allikmets, R.,
and Schmitz, G.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
817-822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Brooks-Wilson, A.,
Marcil, M.,
Clee, S. M.,
Zhang, L. H.,
Roomp, K.,
van Dam, M., Yu, L.,
Brewer, C.,
Collins, J. A.,
Molhuizen, H. O.,
Loubser, O.,
Ouelette, B. F.,
Fichter, K.,
Ashbourne-Excoffon, K. J.,
Sensen, C. W.,
Scherer, S.,
Mott, S.,
Denis, M.,
Martindale, D.,
Frohlich, J.,
Morgan, K.,
Koop, B.,
Pimstone, S.,
Kastelein, J. J.,
Hayden, M. R.,
et al..
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
22,
336-345[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Bodzioch, M.,
Orso, E.,
Klucken, J.,
Langmann, T.,
Bottcher, A.,
Diederich, W.,
Drobnik, W.,
Barlage, S.,
Buchler, C.,
Porsch-Ozcurumez, M.,
Kaminski, W. E.,
Hahmann, H. W.,
Oette, K.,
Rothe, G.,
Aslanidis, C.,
Lackner, K. J.,
and Schmitz, G.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
22,
347-351[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Marcil, M.,
Brooks-Wilson, A.,
Clee, S. M.,
Roomp, K.,
Zhang, L. H., Yu, L.,
Collins, J. A.,
van Dam, M.,
Molhuizen, H. O.,
Loubster, O.,
Ouellette, B. F.,
Sensen, C. W.,
Fichter, K.,
Mott, S.,
Denis, M.,
Boucher, B.,
Pimstone, S.,
Genest, J., Jr.,
Kastelein, J. J.,
and Hayden, M. R.
(1999)
Lancet
354,
1341-1346[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Rust, S.,
Rosier, M.,
Funke, H.,
Real, J.,
Amoura, Z.,
Piette, J. C.,
Deleuze, J. F.,
Brewer, H. B.,
Duverger, N.,
Denefle, P.,
and Assmann, G.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
22,
352-355[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Remaley, A. T.,
Rust, S.,
Rosier, M.,
Knapper, C.,
Naudin, L.,
Broccardo, C.,
Peterson, K. M.,
Koch, C.,
Arnould, I.,
Prades, C.,
Duverger, N.,
Funke, H.,
Assman, G.,
Dinger, M.,
Dean, M.,
Chimini, G.,
Santamarina-Fojo, S.,
Fredrickson, D. S.,
Denefle, P.,
and Brewer, H. B., Jr.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
12685-12690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Oliver, W. R., Jr.,
Shenk, J. L.,
Snaith, M. R.,
Russell, C. S.,
Plunket, K. D.,
Bodkin, N. L.,
Lewis, M. C.,
Winegar, D. A.,
Sznaidman, M. L.,
Lambert, M. H.,
Xu, H. E.,
Sternbach, D. D.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Hansen, B. C.,
and Willson, T. M.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
5306-5311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Goodwin, B.,
Jones, S. A.,
Price, R. R.,
Watson, M. A.,
McKee, D. D.,
Moore, L. B.,
Galardi, C.,
Wilson, J. G.,
Lewis, M. C.,
Roth, M. E.,
Maloney, P. R.,
Willson, T. M.,
and Kliewer, S. A.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
6,
517-526[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Alberti, S.,
Steffensen, K. R.,
and Gustafsson, J. A.
(2000)
Gene
243,
93-103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Willy, P. J.,
and Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
289-298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Fayard, E.,
Schoonjans, K.,
and Auwerx, J.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
12,
113-120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Laffitte, B. A.,
Repa, J. J.,
Joseph, S. B.,
Wilpitz, D. C.,
Kast, H. R.,
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
and Tontonoz, P.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
507-512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Chawla, A.,
Boisvert, W. A.,
Lee, C. H.,
Laffitte, B. A.,
Barak, Y.,
Joseph, S. B.,
Liao, D.,
Nagy, L.,
Edwards, P. A.,
Curtiss, L. K.,
Evans, R. M.,
and Tontonoz, P.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
7,
161-171[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Aouizerat, B. E.,
Allayee, H.,
Cantor, R. M.,
Davis, R. C.,
Lanning, C. D.,
Wen, P. Z.,
Dallinga-Thie, G. M.,
de Bruin, T. W.,
Rotter, J. I.,
and Lusis, A. J.
(1999)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
65,
397-412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Laffitte, B. A.,
Joseph, S. B.,
Walczak, R.,
Pei, L.,
Wilpitz, D. C.,
Collins, J. L.,
and Tontonoz, P.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol
21,
7558-7568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hozoji, Y. Munehira, Y. Ikeda, M. Makishima, M. Matsuo, N. Kioka, and K. Ueda
Direct Interaction of Nuclear Liver X Receptor-{beta} with ABCA1 Modulates Cholesterol Efflux
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 31, 2008;
283(44):
30057 - 30063.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. R. Stayrook, P. M. Rogers, R. S. Savkur, Y. Wang, C. Su, G. Varga, X. Bu, T. Wei, S. Nagpal, X. S. Liu, et al.
Regulation of Human 3{alpha}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase (AKR1C4) Expression by the Liver X Receptor {alpha}
Mol. Pharmacol.,
February 1, 2008;
73(2):
607 - 612.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hashimoto, S. Matsumoto, M. Yamada, T. Satoh, and M. Mori
Liver X Receptor-{alpha} Gene Expression Is Positively Regulated by Thyroid Hormone
Endocrinology,
October 1, 2007;
148(10):
4667 - 4675.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sakamoto, T. Kawasaki, T. Kazawa, R. Ohashi, S. Jiang, T. Maejima, T. Tanaka, H. Iwanari, T. Hamakubo, J. Sakai, et al.
Expression of Liver X Receptor {alpha} in Rat Fetal Tissues at Different Developmental Stages
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
June 1, 2007;
55(6):
641 - 649.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Cuchel and D. J. Rader
Macrophage Reverse Cholesterol Transport: Key to the Regression of Atherosclerosis?
Circulation,
May 30, 2006;
113(21):
2548 - 2555.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Abildayeva, P. J. Jansen, V. Hirsch-Reinshagen, V. W. Bloks, A. H. F. Bakker, F. C. S. Ramaekers, J. de Vente, A. K. Groen, C. L. Wellington,, F. Kuipers, et al.
24(S)-Hydroxycholesterol Participates in a Liver X Receptor-controlled Pathway in Astrocytes That Regulates Apolipoprotein E-mediated Cholesterol Efflux
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 5, 2006;
281(18):
12799 - 12808.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Albers, B. Blume, T. Schlueter, M. B. Wright, I. Kober, C. Kremoser, U. Deuschle, and M. Koegl
A Novel Principle for Partial Agonism of Liver X Receptor Ligands: COMPETITIVE RECRUITMENT OF ACTIVATORS AND REPRESSORS
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 24, 2006;
281(8):
4920 - 4930.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Oram and J. W. Heinecke
ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter A1: A Cell Cholesterol Exporter That Protects Against Cardiovascular Disease
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2005;
85(4):
1343 - 1372.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Soumian, C Albrecht, A. Davies, and R. Gibbs
ABCA1 and atherosclerosis
Vascular Medicine,
May 1, 2005;
10(2):
109 - 119.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Davies, K. L. H. Carpenter, I. R. Challis, N. L. Figg, R. McNair, D. Proudfoot, P. L. Weissberg, and C. M. Shanahan
Adipocytic Differentiation and Liver X Receptor Pathways Regulate the Accumulation of Triacylglycerols in Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 4, 2005;
280(5):
3911 - 3919.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Li and C. K. Glass
PPAR- and LXR-dependent pathways controlling lipid metabolism and the development of atherosclerosis
J. Lipid Res.,
December 1, 2004;
45(12):
2161 - 2173.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Ulven, K. T. Dalen, J.-A. Gustafsson, and H. I. Nebb
Tissue-specific autoregulation of the LXR{alpha} gene facilitates induction of apoE in mouse adipose tissue
J. Lipid Res.,
November 1, 2004;
45(11):
2052 - 2062.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. M. Quinet, D. A. Savio, A. R. Halpern, L. Chen, C. P. Miller, and P. Nambi
Gene-selective modulation by a synthetic oxysterol ligand of the liver X receptor
J. Lipid Res.,
October 1, 2004;
45(10):
1929 - 1942.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. R. Steffensen and J.-A. Gustafsson
Putative Metabolic Effects of the Liver X Receptor (LXR)
Diabetes,
February 1, 2004;
53(90001):
S36 - 42.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Maglich, J. A. Caravella, M. H. Lambert, T. M. Willson, J. T. Moore, and L. Ramamurthy
The first completed genome sequence from a teleost fish (Fugu rubripes) adds significant diversity to the nuclear receptor superfamily
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 15, 2003;
31(14):
4051 - 4058.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. G. Lund, J. G. Menke, and C. P. Sparrow
Liver X Receptor Agonists as Potential Therapeutic Agents for Dyslipidemia and Atherosclerosis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
July 1, 2003;
23(7):
1169 - 1177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Oram
HDL Apolipoproteins and ABCA1: Partners in the Removal of Excess Cellular Cholesterol
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
May 1, 2003;
23(5):
720 - 727.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. K. Juvet, S. M. Andresen, G. U. Schuster, K. T. Dalen, K. A. R. Tobin, K. Hollung, F. Haugen, S. Jacinto, S. M. Ulven, K. Bamberg, et al.
On the Role of Liver X Receptors in Lipid Accumulation in Adipocytes
Mol. Endocrinol.,
February 1, 2003;
17(2):
172 - 182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Mo, S. J. Fang, W. Chen, and G. C. Blobe
Regulation of ALK-1 Signaling by the Nuclear Receptor LXRbeta
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 20, 2002;
277(52):
50788 - 50794.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. O. Muscat, B. L. Wagner, J. Hou, R. K. Tangirala, E. D. Bischoff, P. Rohde, M. Petrowski, J. Li, G. Shao, G. Macondray, et al.
Regulation of Cholesterol Homeostasis and Lipid Metabolism in Skeletal Muscle by Liver X Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 18, 2002;
277(43):
40722 - 40728.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Y. L. Chiang
Bile Acid Regulation of Gene Expression: Roles of Nuclear Hormone Receptors
Endocr. Rev.,
August 1, 2002;
23(4):
443 - 463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Whitney, M. A. Watson, J. L. Collins, W. G. Benson, T. M. Stone, M. J. Numerick, T. K. Tippin, J. G. Wilson, D. A. Winegar, and S. A. Kliewer
Regulation of Cholesterol Homeostasis by the Liver X Receptors in the Central Nervous System
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2002;
16(6):
1378 - 1385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhang and D. J. Mangelsdorf
LuXuRies of Lipid Homeostasis: The Unity of Nuclear Hormone Receptors, Transcription Regulation, and Cholesterol Sensing
Mol. Interv.,
April 1, 2002;
2(2):
78 - 87.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Zaghini, J.-F. Landrier, J. Grober, S. Krief, S. A. Jones, M.-C. Monnot, I. Lefrere, M. A. Watson, J. L. Collins, H. Fujii, et al.
Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Protein-1c Is Responsible for Cholesterol Regulation of Ileal Bile Acid-binding Protein Gene in Vivo. POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF LIVER-X-RECEPTOR
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 4, 2002;
277(2):
1324 - 1331.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|