|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108017200 on September 10, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 47, 43524-43533, November 23, 2001
Different Pathways Regulate Expression of the Skeletal Myosin
Heavy Chain Genes*
David L.
Allen,
Carol A.
Sartorius,
Laura K.
Sycuro , and
Leslie
A.
Leinwand§
From the Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental
Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0347
Received for publication, August 20, 2001, and in revised form, September 6, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Mammalian skeletal muscles are a mosaic of
different fiber types largely defined by differential myosin heavy
chain (MyHC) expression. Little is known about the molecular mechanisms
regulating expression of the MyHC gene family members in different
fiber types. In this work, we identified several cis- and
trans-elements that regulate expression of the three adult
fast MyHC genes. Despite multiple DNA-binding motifs for well
characterized muscle transcription factors upstream of all three fast
MyHC genes, expression of MyoD/Myf-5, calcineurin, or NFAT3 had
different effects on the three promoters. MyoD or Myf-5 overexpression
preferentially activated the IIb promoter, whereas NFAT or activated
calcineurin overexpression preferentially activated the IIa promoter.
Calcineurin had a 50-100-fold stimulatory effect on the IIa promoter,
and the known downstream effectors of calcineurin (myocyte enhancer
factor-2 and NFAT) cannot completely account for this activation.
Finally, we identified two elements critical for regulating MyHC-IId/x
expression: a 130-base pair enhancer element and a CArG-like element
that inhibited IId/x promoter activity in vitro. Thus, we
have found specific regulatory pathways that are distinct for the three
adult fast MyHC genes. These elements are logical candidates for
fiber-specific control of skeletal muscle gene expression in
vivo.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The sarcomeric myosin heavy chain
(MyHC)1 gene family consists
of eight known isoforms, each encoded by separate genes exhibiting a
complex pattern of spatial and temporal regulation (1). Of the eight
isoforms, four are expressed in adult skeletal muscle: type I or slow
MyHC and three fast isoforms, IIa, IId/x, and IIb. Greater than 90% of
the MyHC in adult skeletal muscle is composed of these latter three
gene products. The three adult fast MyHC isoforms are expressed in
different types of skeletal muscle fibers that have different
physiological characteristics, with IIA fibers being smaller,
slower, and more oxidative; IIB fibers typically being the largest,
fastest, and most glycolytic; and IID/X fibers falling between these
extremes (2). A greater understanding of the mechanisms regulating MyHC
gene transcription would provide tremendous insights into how these
individual fiber types are established and maintained.
Several axes of regulation exist for the members of the MyHC gene
family, including tissue-specific (muscle versus
non-muscle), muscle type-specific (striated versus smooth
muscle), fiber type-specific (fast versus slow), and fiber
subtype-specific (fast IIa versus IId/x versus
IIb). Many of these regulatory decisions are likely to be determined by
different transcription factor-binding motifs within the upstream
promoter regions of the different MyHC genes. For example, the adult
fast MyHC-IIa, -IId/x, and -IIb genes undoubtedly share similar
pathways for conferring muscle-specific and fast fiber-specific
expression; but because they are expressed in distinct fiber subtypes
(IIA, IID/X, and IIB), they must also have unique regulatory circuits
as well. However, because there are no data directly comparing the
sequence or physiological regulation of the three adult fast MyHC gene
regulatory regions, nothing is known about the mechanisms that regulate
the differential expression of these genes in distinct fast fiber subtypes.
Of the three adult skeletal fast MyHC genes, only the promoter region
of the mouse MyHC-IIb gene has been analyzed to date (11-16). Several
muscle-specific regulatory elements have been found within the proximal
IIb promoter, including potential binding sites for the myogenic
regulatory factors (MRFs), serum response factor (SRF), and myocyte
enhancer factor-2 (MEF-2) (11-16). Overexpression of any of the four
MRFs greatly increases IIb promoter construct activity in
differentiated C2C12 myotubes (15), whereas
gene transfer studies have demonstrated that an E-box just upstream of
the transcription start site is necessary for high-level expression of
the IIb gene in vivo (16). In addition, mutation of the
proximal AT-rich element AT-1 abolishes MEF-2 binding and greatly
reduces promoter activity (12). These studies have established that members of the MRF and MEF-2 families of myogenic transcription factors
appear to be necessary for high-level, muscle-specific expression of
the MyHC-IIb gene.
More recently, progress has been made in elucidating the
cis-regulatory sites that contribute to slow
versus fast muscle gene expression. One pathway that appears
to play a role in specifying slow fiber-specific gene expression is the
calcineurin pathway (17, 18). Calcineurin is a phosphatase that
dephosphorylates and allows nuclear transport of the NFAT
(nuclear factor of activated T-cells) transcription factors (17). NFAT can then
bind to and activate the slow fiber-specific gene promoters
(17). A recent report also implicated MEF-2 transcription factors in
calcineurin-dependent, slow fiber-specific gene expression
(19). Other elements, including the CACC box (20) and the SURE and FIRE
clusters of regulatory elements (21, 22), have also been implicated in
slow versus fast fiber gene expression. However, the role of
these elements has been largely unexplored with respect to the MyHC
gene family.
Thus, a considerable amount of research has been done on the role of
various muscle-specific transcription factors and on the factors
specifying slow versus fast fiber gene expression. To date,
however, there have been no data on the regulation of fiber-specific
gene expression within the IIA, IID, and IIB fast fiber subtypes.
Although members of the MyHC family are the only genes to date that
have distinct fast fiber isoforms, other muscle-specific genes show a
quantitative difference in expression between different fast fiber
subtypes (23, 24). Understanding the factors regulating the
differential expression of the three adult fast MyHC genes should
provide insights into the subspecialization of different fiber types.
The purpose of this work was to isolate and compare the activities of
the upstream promoter regions of the three adult fast MyHC genes and to
begin to dissect the factors responsible for their differential
expression. We have isolated the upstream regulatory regions of the
mouse MyHC-IIa, -IIb, and -IId/x genes and show that ~1 kb is
sufficient to direct high-level, muscle-specific expression in
vitro. Moreover, the promoters showed differential levels of
activity in vitro (IId > IIb > IIa), and the
relative expression levels were identical to the expression pattern of the endogenous MyHC genes. We have identified several cis-
and trans-regulatory elements with distinct effects on each
of the adult fast MyHC promoter regions that may play a role in
determining fiber-specific gene expression in vivo.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmid Construction--
Generation of mouse genomic clones
containing MyHC gene sequences was described previously (25).
Approximately 1 kb each of the mouse MyHC-IIa and MyHC-IId/x promoter
sequences were deposited in the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank
under accession numbers AF081358 (IIa) and AF081359 (IId/x). The
cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter-firefly luciferase plasmid VR1255
(Vical) was used as a backbone for all constructs. The CMV promoter was
removed by BalI and SacII digestion, and MyHC
promoters were inserted using SalI-SacII sites on
each of the three adult fast promoters. Plasmids contained MyHC-IIa
sequences from 670 to +7 bp (IIaLuc), MyHC-IIb sequences from 781
to +5 bp (IIbLuc), and MyHC-IId/x sequences from 977 to +5 bp
(IId/xLuc). Although the length of all three promoter constructs was
somewhat less than 1 kb, we observed identical results in preliminary
transfections with constructs containing 1000 bp of each promoter
linked to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase promoter (data not
shown); and for ease of communication, these constructs will be
referred to as the ~1-kb constructs. The promoter deletion constructs
were cloned by inverse polymerase chain reaction using the type IIa, IIb, and IId/x VR1255 plasmids as templates and primers with
EcoRI restriction sites. The Rous sarcoma virus-MyoD
expression vector was a gift of Harold Weintraub; the CMV-Myf-5
expression vector was a gift of Stephen Konieczny; and the CMV-GATA-4,
CMV-MEF-2C, CMV-constitutively nuclear NFAT, and CMV-constitutively
active calcineurin expression vectors were all kindly provided by
Dr. Eric Olson. All plasmid DNA used for transfections was
purified by cesium chloride gradient centrifugation.
Cell Culture Transfections--
Mouse
C2C12 myoblasts and L-cells were obtained from
American Type Culture Collection. Mouse C2C12
myoblasts were grown on gelatin-coated dishes in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 4.5 g/liter
D-glucose, 1.5 g/liter sodium bicarbonate, 1 mM
sodium pyruvate, and 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories).
Cells were transfected at 70-80% confluence with 4 µg of DNA and 15 µl of LipofectAMINE transfection reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.)
according to the manufacturer's protocol. In all experiments, 1 µg
of a thymidine kinase-Renilla luciferase construct (Promega)
was used as an internal control. After a 5-h incubation, the
transfection medium was removed and replaced with growth medium;
differentiation medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus 1%
fetal bovine serum or horse serum) was added 12-24 h after
transfection. Myoblasts were harvested 24-36 h after transfection, and
myotubes were harvested 3-4 days after transfection. For
cotransfection studies, a total of 4 µg of DNA, 1.5 µg of MyHC
reporter vectors, and either 1.5 µg of a control vector
(CMV- -galactosidase) or 1.5 µg of the expression vectors were transfected.
Luciferase Assays--
A commercially available dual luciferase
assay system was used (Promega). Briefly, cells were lysed in 1×
Passive Lysis Buffer, and 10 µl of the cell lysate was assayed for
both firefly (MyHC promoter constructs and positive controls) and
Renilla (internal control) luciferase activities using a
standard luminometer. Values are reported as firefly luciferase levels
divided by Renilla luciferase levels.
Western Blotting and Gel Electrophoresis--
For Western
blotting and gel electrophoresis, C2C12
myoblasts and myotubes were scraped into myosin extraction
buffer (27) and incubated on ice for 1 h. Following centrifugation
for 5 min to remove cell debris, the lysate was concentrated using the
Centricon-10 microconcentrator system (Amicon, Inc.). Protein
concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad) and was
adjusted to 3 mg/ml. Samples were stored at 20 °C until use.
High-resolution gel electrophoresis was used to separate the different
isoforms as described by Talmadge and Roy (28). Proteins were
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane overnight using a
miniblot transfer apparatus (Bio-Rad) and blotted for total MyHC using F-59, an antibody that recognizes all skeletal isoforms of MyHC (29).
 |
RESULTS |
Structure and Sequence of the MyHC-IIa and MyHC-IId/x
Promoters--
Fig. 1A shows
that the upstream regulatory regions of the mouse MyHC-IIa, -IIb, and
-IId/x sequences share significant homology within the proximal
200-250 bp. The identity between the proximal promoters is as follows:
IIa and IIb, 61% identity in 230-bp overlap; IId/x and IIb, 61%
identity in 190-bp overlap; and IIa and IId/x, 66% identity in 201-bp
overlap. The identity for all three genes is 45% within the proximal
250 bp; over the next ~750 bp, the homology drops to 10.2%.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, comparison of the first 250 bp of the
proximal promoter regions of the mouse MyHC-IIb, -IIa, and -IId/x
genes. Asterisks indicate the same base compared with
IIb, and spacing (dashes) was introduced to align regions of
maximum homology. The sequences were aligned using the ClustalW
alignment program in the Vector NTI Suite software package and then
adjusted manually to produce optimal alignment. Transcribed bases are
underlined. Boxes indicate four conserved
elements: a myosin-like TATA box, a CArG box, and two AT-rich motifs.
B, schematic of the various putative
cis-regulatory elements found in the promoters of the
MyHC-IIa, -IIb, and -IId/x genes. MatInspector Version 4.0 and Vector
NTI were used to identify putative binding motifs. The exact length of
each promoter is given at the end of each promoter.
|
|
The proximal 250 bp of the mouse adult fast MyHC promoters share four
highly conserved elements within the first 250 bp of upstream promoter
sequence (Fig. 1A). First, the TATA sequence (TATAAAAG) is
identical in all three fast MyHC promoters and is identical to the TATA
sequence described previously for other MyHCs (30, 31). The MyHC-IIa
gene contains a second TATA box located at 25 bp (CTTTAAAAAG) that
appears to be the functional TATA box in mouse diaphragm muscle, as
several clones were sequenced with this start site (data not shown).
Second, a motif is found at approximately 100 bp in all three
promoters that, in the IIb promoter, contains a consensus CArG box in
its core, although there are base pair substitutions in both the
MyHC-IIa and MyHC-IId/x genes that likely eliminate SRF binding
(32-36). Nonetheless, the first 7 nucleotides, TTGCCAA, and the last 8 nucleotides, TTTTGCCA, are 100% conserved among all three fast MyHC
genes (Fig. 1A). The third shared motif is a 20-bp region
designated AT-1 by Lakich et al. (12) that
is 100% conserved in all three fast MyHC genes (Fig. 1A;
see below). This proximal AT-1 element contains a consensus binding
site for MEF-2 (CT(A/T)4(G/A)), shown to be critical in expression of the MyHC-IIb promoter (available under
GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank accession number M92099) (12, 13).
Finally, a second AT-rich region at approximately 250 bp is also
highly conserved among all three fast MyHC genes, with IIb and IId/x sharing 15 of 15 nucleotides and IIa and IIb sharing 13 of 15 (Fig.
1A).
In addition to the CArG-like and AT-rich regions mentioned above, the
upstream promoter regions of the MyHC-IIa, -IIb, and -IId/x genes also
contain several potential sites for NFAT and MRF binding (Fig.
1B). There are two E-boxes in the proximal MyHC-IIa promoter, seven E-boxes in the IId/x promoter, and two E-boxes in the
IIb promoter (Fig. 1). There are three putative NFAT-binding sites in
the IIa promoter, five in the IId/x promoter, and two in the IIb
promoter (Fig. 1B). Searches for the consensus sequences (CCCCACCC) of the CACC box (20) and for the SURE and FIRE elements (21,
22) failed to produce any matches in any of the three adult fast MyHC
genes (data not shown).
Approximately 1 kb of the Upstream Promoter Regions of the Three
Adult Fast MyHC Genes Confers Muscle-specific Expression in
Vitro--
Expression of all three adult fast MyHC promoters was low
in undifferentiated C2C12 myoblasts and was
significantly increased in differentiated C2C12
myotubes (Fig. 2A).
Differentiation increased promoter activity by 35-fold for the IIb
promoter, by 10-fold for the IId/x promoter, and by 5-fold for the IIa
promoter (Fig. 2A). Expression was extremely minimal in
non-muscle L-cells (Fig. 2B), suggesting that ~1 kb of the
three adult fast MyHC promoters is sufficient to confer muscle-specific
expression and differentiation-sensitive expression in
vitro.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of the 1.0-kb
promoters for MyHC-IIa, -IIb, and -IId/x in
C2C12 myoblasts and myotubes and non-muscle
L-cells. Negative controls included a firefly luciferase
plasmid with the CMV promoter removed (empty vector) and pCATbasic, a
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter construct not expressing
luciferase to control for background. Results are expressed as
means ± S.E. from three to five experiments. A,
C2C12 myoblasts and myotubes showing the
increase in promoter activity for all three MyHC constructs upon muscle
differentiation, as well as differential expression among the IId/x,
IIb, and IIa promoters. B, non-muscle fibroblastic L-cells
that did not express any of the MyHC promoters above background levels.
*, significantly different from L-cells; , significantly different
from myoblasts (p < 0.05). C, expression of
MyHC isoforms in C2C12 myoblasts and myotubes
in vitro. The gel shows MyHC gene expression in
C2C12 myotubes and adult tibialis anterior
(TA) muscle (as a reference) as determined by
high-resolution gel electrophoretic separation of the different MyHC
isoforms, followed by Western blotting with antibody F-59 to all
sarcomeric MyHC isoforms. Emb., embryonic;
Peri., perinatal.
|
|
Moreover, activity in myotubes was significantly different among the
three adult fast promoters, with IId/x demonstrating the greatest
expression, followed by IIb and then IIa (Fig. 2A). Western
blotting revealed that, in differentiated C2C12
myotubes, the IId/x isoform was the most highly expressed adult isoform (73% of total adult fast MyHC), followed by IIb (17%) and IIa (<9%)
(Fig. 2C). These data demonstrate that the adult fast MyHC promoters show differential activity that is consistent with the expression pattern of the endogenous MyHC genes in
C2C12 myotubes.
Role of the AT-rich and CArG-like Elements in Adult Fast MyHC
Promoter Activity--
As mentioned above, the 20-bp AT-rich region at
approximately 200 bp is identical in the three mouse adult fast MyHC
genes (Fig. 1A). We therefore created internal deletion
constructs lacking this 20-bp sequence for all three fast MyHC
promoters (Fig. 3A). Expression of all three fast MyHC promoter constructs was significantly reduced to a similar extent by deletion of the AT-rich region (Fig.
3A), suggesting that this element is not involved in the differential expression of the adult fast MyHC genes, but that it plays
a role in the overall expression level of all three genes. Moreover,
deletion of the AT-rich region did not result in increased expression
in non-muscle L-cells, indicating that it is not essential for
restriction of muscle-specific expression (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Analysis of the highly conserved AT-rich
region in the adult fast MyHC promoters. A, the
activities of the AT-rich region-deleted constructs in
C2C12 myotubes showed that deletion of this
20-bp sequence in the context of the ~1-kb promoters resulted in a
50% decrease in the activities of all three adult fast MyHC promoters.
B, the activities of the AT-rich region-deleted constructs
in non-muscle L-cells showed no increase. Data are reported as
means ± S.E. from three to five experiments. *, significantly
different from full-length constructs containing the AT-rich region
(p < 0.05).
|
|
Another element found in all three adult fast promoters is the
CArG-like element at approximately 100 bp (Fig. 1A).
Deletion of this element in the context of the ~1-kb promoter
resulted in a 5-fold decrease in expression of the IIa promoter,
whereas IIb promoter activity was not significantly affected (Fig.
4). Surprisingly, deletion of the
CArG-like element from the IId/x promoter resulted in a 6-fold
increase in IId/x promoter activity (Fig. 4). Thus, the
CArG-like element has differential effects on MyHC promoter activity:
for IIa, it is an activator; for IIb, it has no effect; and for IId/x,
it is inhibitory.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effects of deletion of the CArG-like element
from the adult skeletal fast promoters. Deletion of the CArG-like
element resulted in a decrease in IIa expression, no change in IIb
expression, and a 3-fold increase in IId/x expression. *, significantly
different from full-length constructs containing the AT-rich region
(p < 0.05).
|
|
MRF Responsiveness Differs among the Three Adult Fast MyHC
Promoters--
Previous studies have revealed that the activity of the
IIb promoter is sensitive to MRF overexpression (15, 16). In
C2C12 myotubes, the ~1-kb IIb promoter region
behaved as previously described for 192 bp of the IIb promoter by
Takeda et al. (15): activity was enhanced >10-fold by
overexpression of MyoD and ~3-fold by overexpression of Myf-5 (Fig.
5A). This 10-fold increase as a result of MyoD cotransfection increased IIb promoter activity such
that it was significantly greater than either IIa or IId promoter
activity (Table I). In contrast,
cotransfection with either MyoD or Myf-5 had no significant effect on
the activity of the MyHC-IIa or MyHC-IId/x promoter (Fig. 5A
and Table I), despite the presence of multiple E-boxes in each
promoter. Infection with a myogenin adenovirus resulted in a 7.5-fold
increase in expression of the IIb promoter and no significant increase
in the activities of the IIa and IId/x promoters (Fig. 5B).
Thus, IIb is the only promoter sensitive to overexpression of all three MRFs.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Differential MRF responsiveness of the adult
skeletal fast MyHC promoters in vitro.
A, MyoD and Myf-5 overexpression. Data are reported as
means ± S.E. of the relative luciferase level. MRF overexpression
resulted in a preferential increase in IIb promoter activity compared
with IIa or IId/x promoter activity. B, myogenin
overexpression using an adenovirus system. Data are reported as
means ± S.E. of the relative luciferase level. *, significantly
different from control (pCAT or adenovirus-green fluorescent protein
(Ad-GFP)) (p < 0.05).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Relative activities of MyHC-IIa, -IIb, and -IId promoter constructs in
response to MyoD or calcineurin cotransfection
Results are mean ± S.E. from four to six different experiments.
The data from MyoD and calcineurin experiments are from different
experiments done under different experimental conditions, which is why
the -gal control values are different. -gal, -galactosidase;
ca-Cn, constitutively active calcineurin.
|
|
Differential Sensitivity of the Adult Skeletal Fast MyHC Promoters
to Calcineurin and NFAT Overexpression in Vitro--
Recent work has
supported a role for the calcineurin/NFAT signaling pathway in slow
versus fast fiber gene expression (17, 18). Among the three
adult fast MyHC genes, the progression from faster to less fast is IIb,
IId/x, and IIa, with IIa being expressed in the most oxidative fast
fibers. We tested the hypothesis that the IIa promoter would be
more responsive to calcineurin or NFAT compared with the IIb and
IId/x promoters. Cotransfection with a constitutively active
calcineurin expression plasmid resulted in a much greater augmentation
of IIa promoter activity compared with IIb or IId/x promoter activity;
calcineurin increased IIa promoter activity by 50-100-fold, but
increased IIb and IId/x promoter activities by only 5-10-fold (Fig.
6A). The increase in IIa
promoter activity resulted in IIa promoter activity that was
significantly greater than that of IIb and not significantly different
from that of IId in response to calcineurin cotransfection (Table I).
Similarly, cotransfection with a constitutively nuclear NFAT expression
plasmid resulted in a preferential augmentation of expression of IIa
compared with IIb or IId/x promoter constructs; IIa promoter activity
was increased by ~50% by NFAT, whereas constitutively nuclear NFAT
overexpression resulted in a decrease in both IIb and IId/x
promoter activities (Fig. 6B). Finally, cotransfection with
an MEF-2C expression construct resulted in a 3-fold activation of the
IIa promoter, but only minimally affected IIb or IId/x; but because the
effect on IIa was highly variable, the results were not significant
(Fig. 6A).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Differential responsiveness of the adult
skeletal fast MyHC promoters to transcription factor overexpression
in vitro. C2C12 myoblasts
were transfected with the respective adult skeletal fast MyHC promoters
(IIa, IIb, and IId/x) and cotransfected with plasmids overexpressing
MEF-2C (A), constitutively active calcineurin
(ca-Cn; B), or constitutively nuclear NFAT
(cn-NFAT; C). Data are reported as means ± S.E. of the -fold increase compared with control cotransfected with
pCATbasic. MEF-2C, constitutively active calcineurin, and
constitutively nuclear NFAT resulted in preferential stimulation of IIa
promoter activity compared with IIb or IId/x promoter activity. Results
are the means of four to six experiments. *, significantly different
from IIb (p < 0.05). B-gal,
-galactosidase.
|
|
Our results demonstrate that the MRF and calcineurin/NFAT systems have
differential effects on adult fast MyHC promoter activity when
overexpressed in muscle cells. However, the effect of a signaling molecule may be obscured by the presence of cofactors expressed in
muscle cells that potentiate or inhibit its effects. We therefore tested the effects of overexpression of MyoD and activated
calcineurin on adult fast MyHC promoter activity in non-muscle L-cells.
Alternatively, a signaling molecule may already be highly expressed in
muscle cells such that overexpression may not produce an effect on
promoter activity. Because we have observed, using an MEF-2
"sensor" construct (38), that MEF-2C activity is already extremely
high in C2C12 myotubes (data not shown), we
tested the effects of MEF-2C overexpression on adult fast MyHC promoter
activity in L-cells as well. Overexpression of activated calcineurin
showed the same differential effects in L-cells as it did in
C2C12 myotubes, with IIa > IId/x > IIb, although the overall magnitude of the response was much less than observed in C2C12 myotubes (Fig.
7, upper panel).
Overexpression of MyoD increased the activities of all three adult fast
promoters; however, overexpression of MyoD in L-cells increased
MyHC-IIb promoter activity to a greater extent than IIa or IId/x
promoter activity (Fig. 7, middle panel). Overexpression of
MEF-2C in L-cells increased the activities of all three adult fast MyHC
promoters by 2-3-fold (Fig. 7, lower panel). These data
support the hypothesis that MyoD and calcineurin have differential
effects on the adult fast MyHC promoters, whereas MEF-2 has more or
less equivalent effects on their expression.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effects of overexpression of MEF-2C,
calcineurin, or MyoD on adult fast MyHC promoter activity in
L-cells. Upper panel, overexpression of MEF-2C resulted
in an equivalent 2-3-fold increase in the activities of all three
adult fast MyHC promoters. Middle panel, overexpression of a
constitutively active form of calcineurin (ca-Cn) resulted
in increased activity of the IIa promoter only. Lower panel,
overexpression of MyoD increased the activities of all three adult fast
promoters, although the MyHC-IIb promoter was the most affected. *,
significantly different from IIb; , significantly different from IIa.
B-gal, -galactosidase.
|
|
Because calcineurin is thought to act via both the NFAT and MEF-2
families of transcription factors to achieve its effect on gene
expression (17, 18), we tested the effects of calcineurin on MyHC-IIa
promoter constructs containing deletions or mutations of the MEF-2- and
NFAT-binding sites. Deletion of the proximal AT-rich region or mutation
of the proximal NFAT site in the IIa promoter resulted in a 5-fold
decrease in the calcineurin responsiveness of the full-length IIa
promoter (Fig. 8). Mutation/deletion of both elements together resulted in a further decrease in IIa promoter responsiveness to calcineurin to a level ~10% of that of the parent IIa construct (Fig. 8). The activities of the IIa promoters with the AT
deletion, the NFAT mutation, or both were not significantly different
from the activity of the unstimulated control (Fig. 8). Mutation of the
proximal NFAT-binding site within the context of a 150-bp minimal IIa
promoter construct, which does not contain the MEF-2-binding site,
reduced calcineurin responsiveness to ~10% of that of the parent
1-kb construct (Fig. 8). However, even this 150-bp minimal construct
with a mutated NFAT site still retained a 20-fold increase in IIa
promoter activity in response to calcineurin. Finally, calcineurin
cotransfection only minimally changed expression of the
promoterless control vector (Fig. 8).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Role of MEF-2- and proximal NFAT-binding
sites in the IIa responsiveness to calcineurin. Deletion of the
proximal AT-rich element or mutation of the proximal NFAT site in the
IIa promoter resulted in an ~5-fold decrease in IIa responsiveness to
calcineurin (Cn). Elimination of both elements in the same
construct resulted in a further 2-fold decrease in IIa responsiveness
to calcineurin. Elimination of the NFAT site in the 150-bp minimal IIa
promoter also reduced calcineurin responsiveness to ~10% of that of
the parent 1-kb IIa construct. *, significantly different from
-galactosidase (B-gal)-cotransfected constructs; ,
significantly different from all other constructs (p < 0.05). mNFAT, mutated NFAT.
|
|
The Region between 600 and 300 bp Is Responsible for the
Differential MyHC Promoter Activity Observed in Myotubes in
Vitro--
We sought to determine whether shorter lengths of upstream
promoter sequence would maintain or abolish the differential pattern of
expression of the three adult fast MyHC promoters. Deletion of the IIa
promoter construct from 670 to 520 bp had only minimal effects on
IIa promoter activity, but deletion to 300 bp resulted in an
~2-fold decrease in promoter activity (Fig.
9). For the IId/x promoter construct,
deletion from ~1000 bp down to 750 bp resulted in a 10-fold decrease
in promoter expression, but deletion to 600 bp resulted in an
increase in IId/x promoter activity back to levels not significantly
different from those of the 1000-bp promoter. Deletion to 450 bp
again decreased IId/x promoter activity by ~10-fold, whereas deletion
to 300 bp did not further decrease IId/x promoter activity (Fig. 9).
Deletion of the IIb construct from 780 to 600 bp resulted in a
2-fold decrease in IIb promoter activity; further deletion to 450 bp
resulted in a 2-fold increase in promoter activity back to levels
comparable to those of the 780 bp construct (Fig. 9). Deletion to
~300 bp of upstream promoter dramatically reduced expression compared
with the 450 bp IIb promoter (Fig.
10). Further deletion to 150 bp did
not result in a further decrease in expression of any of the adult fast
constructs (Fig. 9), and the 150 bp constructs were still not
expressed above background levels in non-muscle L-cells (data not
shown), suggesting that muscle-specific expression was maintained. In summary, the region between approximately 600 and 300 bp appears to
contain elements necessary for high-level and differential muscle
expression of all three adult fast MyHC promoters, whereas the
sequence(s) conferring muscle-specific expression still reside within
the proximal 150-bp region of the three adult skeletal fast
promoters.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Deletion analysis of the adult fast MyHC
promoters. Data are reported as means ± S.E. from four to
five experiments. A schematic of putative binding sites for each
respective fast MyHC promoter is shown below the respective graph;
arrows indicate 5'-deletion sites, and the
arrowhead indicates the TATA box. Note that the
scale is different for IId/x compared with IIb and IIa.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Role of the 130-bp conserved region in the
MyHC-IId/x promoter. A, deletion of the 130-bp
promoter region results in a 4-5-fold decrease in IId/x promoter
activity. 30-bp deletions within this region demonstrated that deletion
of any region within this 130 bp resulted in a decrease in IId/x
promoter activity; however, deletion 30-4 results in a 100-fold
decrease in IId/x promoter activity. B, the 130-bp region of
the IId/x promoter acts as an enhancer element in a heterologous
context. Addition of one copy of this 130-bp region to the 300-bp
minimal promoter of the MyHC-IIb promoter resulted in a 5-fold increase
in IIb promoter activity; addition of two copies resulted in a 20-fold
increase in IIb promoter activity. DUCON, d
upstream conserved region.
|
|
Identification of an IId/x-specific Enhancer Element--
The
results demonstrate that deletion from 600 to 450 bp of the
MyHC-IId/x promoter resulted in a significant decrease in MyHC-IId/x
promoter activity (Fig. 9, upper panel). This corresponds to
a region identified by BLAST2 analysis extending from 589 to 460 bp
that has high homology between the mouse and human MyHC-IId/x promoters
(data not shown). When this 130-bp region was internally deleted in the
IId/x promoter, activity was reduced by ~5-fold compared with the
parent construct (Fig. 10A). Conversely, addition of one
copy of the 130-bp IId/x region to a 300-bp minimal MyHC-IIb promoter
resulted in a 4-fold increase in IIb promoter activity (Fig.
10B); addition of two copies of this IId/x domain resulted
in an ~20-fold increase in IIb promoter activity. Thus, the 130-bp
region of the IId/x promoter is both necessary and sufficient to confer
high-level expression on a heterologous promoter construct in
vitro. We then created four 30-bp internal deletions within this
region to identify specific sequences responsible for this effect. All
four deletions had deleterious effects on MyHC-IId/x promoter activity;
however, deletion of the final 30 bp of this 130-bp region resulted in
almost total abolition of MyHC-IId/x promoter activity, reducing it by
almost 100-fold (Fig. 10A).
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the past 10 years, many studies have examined the
cis-regulatory elements regulating expression of individual
members of the MyHC gene family. The upstream promoter regions of the
- and -cardiac MyHCs have been extensively characterized both
in vitro and in vivo (3-10), as has the promoter
region of the adult skeletal fast MyHC-IIb gene (11-16). In many
cases, cis- and trans-regulatory elements have
been identified that are necessary for muscle-specific and even fast
versus slow fiber-specific gene expression. Although these
studies have provided invaluable insights into the regulation of
individual MyHC isoform genes, there have been no data to date that
have directly compared either the promoter sequences or the activities
of the different MyHC isoform promoters in the same physiological
context. Such a comparison is necessary if the elements conferring the
sophisticated in vivo expression patterns of the adult fast
MyHC genes are to be identified.
In this study, we isolated and sequenced the upstream promoter regions
of the mouse MyHC-IIa and MyHC-IId/x genes and, along with the
previously characterized mouse MyHC-IIb gene (14), have provided the
first data directly comparing the sequences and activities of these
promoter regions in vitro. These data provide the initial
basis for determining the regulatory circuits conferring differential
expression of these three genes in distinct muscle fiber types and
conferring responsiveness to different physiological stimuli such as
altered muscle activation and loading in vivo. As a prelude
to studying these complex in vivo conditions, we have first
attempted 1) to determine the putative cis-regulatory elements both common to and distinct for each adult skeletal fast MyHC
gene; 2) to examine the expression pattern of the three adult fast MyHC
promoters in muscle and non-muscle cell types in vitro; and
3) to begin to identify specific cis- and
trans-regulatory elements that may direct differential
expression of the three adult fast MyHC genes.
Comparison of the activities of ~1 kb of each of the MyHC promoters
in myoblasts, myotubes, and non-muscle cell lines revealed that 1) this
length of promoter region was sufficient to confer muscle-specific
expression; 2) the activities of all three promoters were much greater
in differentiated C2C12 myotubes than in
myoblasts (Fig. 2A); and 3) differential expression of the
three adult skeletal muscle promoters was observed in
C2C12 myotubes (Fig. 2A) in the order IId/x > IIb > IIa, which correlates with the
endogenous MyHC isoform expression pattern in these cells (Fig.
2C). Together, these observations support the contention
that ~1 kb of upstream promoter contains the regulatory element(s)
sufficient to confer muscle-specific, differentiation-sensitive, and
differential expression of the three adult skeletal fast MyHC genes
in vitro.
Several elements are conserved in the proximal promoter regions of the
three adult fast MyHC upstream promoter sequences. One in particular is
the AT-rich motif at approximately 200 bp in all three MyHC upstream
promoter sequences that shares 20 of 20 nucleotides among all three
fast MyHC genes, but is not found in other members of the MyHC gene
family. It is attractive to speculate that it may be involved in
conferring fast fiber-specific expression of the MyHC genes. Deletion
of this 20-bp element in the context of the 1-kb promoters resulted in
a significant and equivalent decrease in expression of all three fast
MyHC promoters in vitro (Fig. 3), consistent with the
hypothesis that this element is necessary for high-level expression of
all three adult fast promoters in vitro. This element
reportedly binds to members of the MEF-2 family of transcription
factors (12). Overexpression of MEF-2C resulted in an identical 2-fold
increase in promoter activity for all three adult fast MyHC constructs
when cotransfected into L-cells (Fig. 7A). Binding of
MEF-2 to this element may therefore be critical to the specification of
fast fiber-specific expression of all three MyHC genes. However,
searches of several fast muscle promoter regions, including muscle
creatine kinase, fast troponin C, and myosin light chain-1/3f, failed
to find any sequences matching this 20-bp sequence from the MyHC genes
(data not shown); so even if this AT-rich region is responsible for
activating fast fiber-specific MyHC gene expression, other fast
fiber-specific genes do not appear to share this same pathway.
Another element that is somewhat conserved is the CArG-like element at
approximately 100 bp in all three adult fast MyHC promoters (Fig. 1).
For IIb, this sequence is a perfect consensus for binding of SRF, which
has previously been implicated in striated muscle-specific gene
expression (7). We hypothesized that deletion of this element would
have a preferential effect on IIb promoter activity compared with IIa
or IId/x promoter activity. Surprisingly, the IIb promoter was the
least affected by deletion of this element; its activity was
essentially unchanged, whereas the activity of the IIa promoter was
decreased by 5-fold, and that of the IId/x promoter was increased by
6-fold (Fig. 4). Both the IIa and IId/x promoters contain base pair
substitutions that should greatly reduce or totally eliminate SRF
binding (32-36). Together, these data suggest that SRF is probably not
involved in this process and suggest that some other transcription
factor is binding in this region and having differential effects on
MyHC gene expression. The differential effect on IIa versus
IId/x expression suggests that this element and its cognate binding
protein may be involved in suppressing MyHC-IId/x expression in IIA
fibers. The homology among the three adult fast MyHC promoters extends
both upstream and downstream of the core CArG-like element. A recent
study elegantly demonstrated that the flanking "arms" of the
CArG/serum response element are critical for conferring the
specific effects of this element (38). Since these flanking regions
were also deleted in this construct, it is possible that they play a
role in the function of this element.
Approximately 1 kb of upstream promoter was also sufficient to produce
differential responses to MRFs and calcineurin/NFAT. Cotransfection
with a MyoD or Myf-5 overexpression construct significantly increased
MyHC-IIb promoter activity, but not IIa or IId/x promoter activity
(Fig. 5). MyoD cotransfection increased IIb promoter activity such that
it was significantly greater than IIa or IId promoter activity (Table
I). This preferential effect on the IIb promoter was particularly
surprising given that sequence analysis of the IId/x promoter revealed
seven potential E-boxes, compared with two for the IIa promoter and two
for the IIb promoter. Thus, the absolute number of potential
MyoD-binding sites per se does not affect the sensitivity of
these promoters to the MRF family members. Conversely, cotransfection
with an activated form of calcineurin resulted in an increase in the
activities of all three fast MyHC promoters, but the effect was most
dramatic on the IIa promoter, with a 100-fold activation (Fig. 6).
Since type IIA fibers typically are closer to slow type I fibers in
their contractile and biochemical properties, it is possible that the
MyHC-IIa gene is regulated more similarly to a slow fiber-specific
gene. Our results also demonstrate a prominent role for the MEF-2- and
proximal NFAT-binding sites in conferring calcineurin responsiveness of the MyHC-IIa promoter, although even with both of these elements removed/mutated, the IIa promoter still retained substantial
sensitivity to calcineurin overexpression. Thus, the MEF-2- and
NFAT-binding sites cannot completely account for the activation of IIa
promoter activity by calcineurin. Regarding the differential
responsiveness of the three adult fast MyHC promoters to MRF and
calcineurin signaling, we have also observed a preferential effect of
these factors on endogenous MyHC isoform expression such that MyoD
overexpression resulted in a preferential increase in MyHC-IIb protein
expression, whereas calcineurin overexpression resulted in a
preferential increase in MyHC-IIa protein
expression.2 Together, these
data suggest that the balance between these two signaling pathways may
play a role in the fiber-specific expression of the three adult fast
MyHC genes.
Deletions to between 600 and 300 bp resulted in a significant
decrease in the differential expression pattern of the three adult
skeletal fast MyHC promoters in vitro. These data support the conclusion that elements between 600 and 300 bp are responsible for conferring high-level and differential expression in muscle cells.
Sequence analysis revealed that this deletion would eliminate two NFAT
sites and two E-boxes in the IIa promoter, two NFAT sites in the IIb
promoter, and four NFAT sites and seven E-boxes in the IId/x promoter.
Given the differential sensitivity of the three adult fast promoters to
members of these two transcription factor families, it is possible that
the loss of these sites was responsible for the loss of differential
expression, although it is possible that as yet unidentified regulatory
pathways are also important.
Moreover, 5'-deletions in the IId/x promoter suggested that the region
between 600 and 450 bp is necessary for the high-level activity of
this promoter in vitro (Fig. 9). This region corresponds almost exactly with one that is highly conserved between the mouse and
human IId/x promoters (data not shown). An internal deletion of this
130-bp region resulted in a 5-fold decrease in IId/x promoter activity
compared with the full-length construct (Fig. 10), in agreement with
the 5'-deletion data above. Moreover, addition of this 130-bp region of
the IId/x promoter to the 300-bp IIb promoter resulted in a significant
increase in promoter activity. Together, these data demonstrate that
this 130-bp region is both necessary and sufficient to confer
high-level expression in vitro. Deletion of any 30 bp within
this region resulted in a decrease in IId/x promoter activity, but to
different extents. Deletion 30-1 or 30-3 resulted in a 5-fold decrease
in IId/x promoter activity, similar to that obtained by deletion of the
entire 130-bp region, whereas deletion 30-2 decreased IId/x promoter
activity by only 50% (Fig. 10). However, deletion of the final 30 bp
of this region resulted in a massive decrease in IId/x promoter
activity, reducing activity by ~100-fold (Fig. 10). Together, these
data suggest that, whereas all parts of this 130-bp element appear to
be necessary for high-level IId/x promoter activity, this final
30-bp element, which we have termed a -box for its effect on
IId/x activity, is absolutely critical. Examination of the sequence of
this region revealed no binding sites for currently identified
muscle-specific transcription factors; however, TRANSFAC
analysis (37) identified possible binding sites for members of the SOX
and ternary complex factor family of transcription factors.
These factors are known to play roles in diverse developmental
processes (40), but have not been directly implicated in
muscle-specific gene expression. Alternatively, it is possible that
other, as yet unidentified transcription factors are involved in
this process. We are currently undertaking studies to identify the
factor(s) binding to this region.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Brooke Harrison for helpful comments
on this manuscript and Jesse Weber and Christopher Miller for help in
the cloning and analysis of the deletion constructs.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants RO1-GM29090 (to L. A. L.) and F32AR08443 (to
C. A. S.) and by a Muscular Dystrophy Association research
fellowship grant (to D. L. A.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF081358 and AF081359.
Supported by the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program of
the University of Colorado (Boulder, CO).
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular,
Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Campus Box
347, Boulder, CO 80309-0347. Tel.: 303-492-7606; Fax: 303-492-8907;
E-mail: leinwand@stripe.colorado.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108017200
2
D. L. Allen and L. A. Leinwand,
unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MyHC, myosin heavy
chain;
MRF, myogenic regulatory factor;
SRF, serum response factor;
MEF-2, myocyte enhancer factor-2;
kb, kilobase(s);
CMV, cytomegalovirus;
bp, base pair(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Weiss, A.,
and Leinwand, L. A.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
12,
417-439[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Talmadge, R. J.,
Roy, R. R.,
and Edgerton, V. R.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Rheumatol.
5,
695-705[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Gustafson, T. A.,
Markham, B. E.,
Bahl, J. J.,
and Morkin, E.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
3122-3126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Molkentin, J. D.,
and Markham, B. E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
19512-19520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Thompson, W. R.,
Nadal-Ginard, B.,
and Mahdavi, V.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22678-22688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Buttrick, P. M.,
Kass, A.,
Kitsis, R. N.,
Kaplan, M. L.,
and Leinwand, L. A.
(1992)
Circ. Res.
70,
193-198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Knotts, S.,
Rindt, H.,
Neumann, J.,
and Robbins, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
31275-31282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Rindt, H.,
Gulick, J.,
Knotts, S.,
Neumann, J.,
and Robbins, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5332-5338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Subramaniam, A.,
Jones, W. K.,
Gulick, J.,
Wert, S.,
Neumann, J.,
and Robbins, J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
24613-24620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Bouvagnet, P. F.,
Strehler, E. E.,
White, G. E.,
Strehler-Page, M.-A.,
Nadal-Ginard, B.,
and Mahdavi, V.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
4377-4389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Diagana, T. T.,
North, D. L.,
Jabet, C.,
Fiszman, M. Y.,
Takeda, S.,
and Whalen, R. G.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
265,
480-493[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Lakich, M. M.,
Diagana, T. T.,
North, D. L.,
and Whalen, R. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15217-15226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Swoap, S. J.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
C681-C687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Takeda, S.,
North, D. L.,
Lakich, M. M.,
Russell, S. D.,
and Whalen, R. G.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16957-16967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Takeda, S.,
North, D. L.,
Diagana, T.,
Miyagoe, Y.,
Lakich, M. M.,
and Whalen, R. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15664-15670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Wheeler, M. T.,
Snyder, E. C.,
Patterson, M. N.,
and Swoap, S. J.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
C1069-C1078
|
| 17.
|
Chin, E. R.,
Olson, E. N.,
Richardson, J. A.,
Yang, Q.,
Humphries, C.,
Shelton, J. M.,
Wu, H.,
Zhu, W.,
Bassel-Duby, R.,
and Williams, R. S.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2499-2509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Naya, F. J.,
Mercer, B.,
Shelton, J.,
Richardson, J. A.,
Williams, R. S.,
and Olson, E. N.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
4545-4548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
| Wu, H., Naya, F. J., McKinsey, T. A., Mercer, B., Shelton,
J. M., Chin, E. R., Simard, A. R., Michel, R. N. Bassel-Duby, R., Olson, E. N., and Williams, R. S. (2000)
EMBO J. 1963-1973
|
| 20.
|
Esser, K.,
Nelson, T.,
Lupa-Kimball, V.,
and Blough, E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12095-12102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Calvo, S.,
Venepally, P.,
Cheng, J.,
and Buonanno, A.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
515-525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Nakayama, M.,
Stauffer, J.,
Cheng, J.,
Banerjee-Basu, S.,
Wawrousek, E.,
and Buonanno, A.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
2408-2417[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Gunning, P.,
and Hardeman, E.
(1991)
FASEB J.
5,
3064-3070[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Schiaffino, S.,
and Reggiani, C.
(1996)
Physiol. Rev.
76,
371-423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Acakpo-Satchivi, L. J. R.,
Edelmann, W.,
Sartorius, C.,
Lu, B. D.,
Wahr, P. A.,
Watkins, S. C.,
Metzger, J. M.,
Leinwand, L.,
and Kucherlapati, R.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
1219-1229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 27.
|
Butler-Browne, G. S.,
and Whalen, R. G.
(1984)
Dev. Biol.
102,
324-334[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Talmadge, R. J.,
and Roy, R. R.
(1993)
J. Appl. Physiol.
75,
2337-2340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Miller, J. B.,
Teal, S. B.,
and Stockdale, F. E.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
13122-13130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Gulick, J.,
Kropp, K.,
and Robbins, J.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
1413-1420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Wassenberg, D. R. I. I.,
Kronert, W. A.,
O'Donnell, P. T.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
10741-10747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Leung, S.,
and Miyamoto, N. G.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
1177-1195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Miwa, T.,
and Kedes, L.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2803-2813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Rivera, V. M.,
Sheng, M.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
255-268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Taylor, M.,
Triesman, R.,
Garrett, N.,
and Mohun, T.
(1989)
Development
106,
67-78[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Walsh, K.,
and Schimmel, P.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
1800-1802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Quandt, K.,
Frech, K.,
Karas, H.,
Wingender, E.,
and Werner, T.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
4878-4884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Naya, F. J.,
Wu, C.,
Richardson, J. A.,
Overbeek, P.,
and Olson, E. N.
(1999)
Development
126,
2045-2052[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Chang, P. S.,
Li, L.,
McAnally, J.,
and Olson, E. N.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
17206-17212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Wegner, M.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
1409-1420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Lamon, M. A. Wallace, B. Leger, and A. P. Russell
Regulation of STARS and its downstream targets suggest a novel pathway involved in human skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy
J. Physiol.,
April 15, 2009;
587(8):
1795 - 1803.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hennebry, C. Berry, V. Siriett, P. O'Callaghan, L. Chau, T. Watson, M. Sharma, and R. Kambadur
Myostatin regulates fiber-type composition of skeletal muscle by regulating MEF2 and MyoD gene expression
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
March 1, 2009;
296(3):
C525 - C534.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Gaudel, C. Schwartz, C. Giordano, N. A. Abumrad, and P. A. Grimaldi
Pharmacological activation of PPAR{beta} promotes rapid and calcineurin-dependent fiber remodeling and angiogenesis in mouse skeletal muscle
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
August 1, 2008;
295(2):
E297 - E304.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Rinaldi, F. Haddad, P. W. Bodell, A. X. Qin, W. Jiang, and K. M. Baldwin
Intergenic bidirectional promoter and cooperative regulation of the IIx and IIb MHC genes in fast skeletal muscle
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
July 1, 2008;
295(1):
R208 - R218.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Allen
Making sense (and antisense) of myosin heavy chain gene expression. Comments on "Intergenic bidirectional promoter and cooperative regulation of the IIx and IIb MHC genes in fast skeletal muscle" by Rinaldi et al.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
July 1, 2008;
295(1):
R206 - R207.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Allen, A. S. Cleary, K. J. Speaker, S. F. Lindsay, J. Uyenishi, J. M. Reed, M. C. Madden, and R. S. Mehan
Myostatin, activin receptor IIb, and follistatin-like-3 gene expression are altered in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle of obese mice
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
May 1, 2008;
294(5):
E918 - E927.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. A. Rana, K. Gundersen, and A. Buonanno
Activity-dependent repression of muscle genes by NFAT
PNAS,
April 15, 2008;
105(15):
5921 - 5926.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ekmark, Z. A. Rana, G. Stewart, D. G. Hardie, and K. Gundersen
De-phosphorylation of MyoD is linking nerve-evoked activity to fast myosin heavy chain expression in rodent adult skeletal muscle
J. Physiol.,
October 15, 2007;
584(2):
637 - 650.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Mu, L. D. Brown, Y. Liu, and M. F. Schneider
Roles of the calcineurin and CaMK signaling pathways in fast-to-slow fiber type transformation of cultured adult mouse skeletal muscle fibers
Physiol Genomics,
August 20, 2007;
30(3):
300 - 312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Stupka, J. D. Schertzer, R. Bassel-Duby, E. N. Olson, and G. S. Lynch
Calcineurin-A{alpha} activation enhances the structure and function of regenerating muscles after myotoxic injury
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
August 1, 2007;
293(2):
R686 - R694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Eizema, D. E. van der Wal, M. M.M. van den Burg, H. W. de Jonge, and M. E. Everts
Differential Expression of Calcineurin and SR Ca2+ Handling Proteins in Equine Muscle Fibers During Early Postnatal Growth
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
March 1, 2007;
55(3):
247 - 254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Allen and T. G. Unterman
Regulation of myostatin expression and myoblast differentiation by FoxO and SMAD transcription factors
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
January 1, 2007;
292(1):
C188 - C199.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Stupka, D. R. Plant, J. D. Schertzer, T. M. Emerson, R. Bassel-Duby, E. N. Olson, and G. S. Lynch
Activated calcineurin ameliorates contraction-induced injury to skeletal muscles of mdx dystrophic mice
J. Physiol.,
September 1, 2006;
575(2):
645 - 656.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Launay, P. Noirez, G. Butler-Browne, and O. Agbulut
Expression of slow myosin heavy chain during muscle regeneration is not always dependent on muscle innervation and calcineurin phosphatase activity
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
June 1, 2006;
290(6):
R1508 - R1514.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. R. Chin
Role of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinases in skeletal muscle plasticity
J Appl Physiol,
August 1, 2005;
99(2):
414 - 423.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Allen, J. N. Weber, L. K. Sycuro, and L. A. Leinwand
Myocyte Enhancer Factor-2 and Serum Response Factor Binding Elements Regulate Fast Myosin Heavy Chain Transcription in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 29, 2005;
280(17):
17126 - 17134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. E. Spangenburg
SOCS-3 Induces Myoblast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 18, 2005;
280(11):
10749 - 10758.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Dapp, S. Schmutz, H. Hoppeler, and M. Fluck
Transcriptional reprogramming and ultrastructure during atrophy and recovery of mouse soleus muscle
Physiol Genomics,
December 15, 2004;
20(1):
97 - 107.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. A. McCullagh, E. Calabria, G. Pallafacchina, S. Ciciliot, A. L. Serrano, C. Argentini, J. M. Kalhovde, T. Lomo, and S. Schiaffino
NFAT is a nerve activity sensor in skeletal muscle and controls activity-dependent myosin switching
PNAS,
July 20, 2004;
101(29):
10590 - 10595.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Aragno, R. Mastrocola, M. G. Catalano, E. Brignardello, O. Danni, and G. Boccuzzi
Oxidative Stress Impairs Skeletal Muscle Repair in Diabetic Rats
Diabetes,
April 1, 2004;
53(4):
1082 - 1088.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. E. Spangenburg, D. K. Bowles, and F. W. Booth
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Induced Transcriptional Activity of the Skeletal {alpha}-Actin Gene Is Regulated by Signaling Mechanisms Linked to Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels during Myoblast Differentiation
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2004;
145(4):
2054 - 2063.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. V. Chakkalakal, M.-A. Harrison, S. Carbonetto, E. Chin, R. N. Michel, and B. J. Jasmin
Stimulation of calcineurin signaling attenuates the dystrophic pathology in mdx mice
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
February 15, 2004;
13(4):
379 - 388.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Endo, D. Inoue, T. Mitsui, Y. Umaki, M. Akaike, T. Yoshizawa, S. Kato, and T. Matsumoto
Deletion of Vitamin D Receptor Gene in Mice Results in Abnormal Skeletal Muscle Development with Deregulated Expression of Myoregulatory Transcription Factors
Endocrinology,
December 1, 2003;
144(12):
5138 - 5144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J S. Pattison, L. C Folk, R. W Madsen, T. E Childs, E. E Spangenburg, and F. W Booth
Expression profiling identifies dysregulation of myosin heavy chains IIb and IIx during limb immobilization in the soleus muscles of old rats
J. Physiol.,
December 1, 2003;
553(2):
357 - 368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Rice and L. A. Leinwand
Skeletal myosin heavy chain function in cultured lung myofibroblasts
J. Cell Biol.,
October 13, 2003;
163(1):
119 - 129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. McCall, D. L. Allen, F. Haddad, and K. M. Baldwin
Transcriptional regulation of IGF-I expression in skeletal muscle
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
October 1, 2003;
285(4):
C831 - C839.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z.-Z. Wang, C. H. Washabaugh, Y. Yao, J.-M. Wang, L. Zhang, M. P. Ontell, S. C. Watkins, M. A. Rudnicki, and M. Ontell
Aberrant Development of Motor Axons and Neuromuscular Synapses in MyoD-Null Mice
J. Neurosci.,
June 15, 2003;
23(12):
5161 - 5169.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Janssen, A. de Groof, M. Wijers, J. Fransen, P. P. Dzeja, A. Terzic, and B. Wieringa
Adenylate Kinase 1 Deficiency Induces Molecular and Structural Adaptations to Support Muscle Energy Metabolism
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 4, 2003;
278(15):
12937 - 12945.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Allen and L. A. Leinwand
Intracellular Calcium and Myosin Isoform Transitions. CALCINEURIN AND CALCIUM-CALMODULIN KINASE PATHWAYS REGULATE PREFERENTIAL ACTIVATION OF THE IIa MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN PROMOTER
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 15, 2002;
277(47):
45323 - 45330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Konig, J. Burkman, J. Fitzgerald, M. Mitchell, L. Su, and H. Stedman
Modular Organization of Phylogenetically Conserved Domains Controlling Developmental Regulation of the Human Skeletal Myosin Heavy Chain Gene Family
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 26, 2002;
277(31):
27593 - 27605.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Horsley and G. K. Pavlath
Nfat: ubiquitous regulator of cell differentiation and adaptation
J. Cell Biol.,
March 4, 2002;
156(5):
771 - 774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Horsley and G. K. Pavlath
Nfat: ubiquitous regulator of cell differentiation and adaptation
J. Cell Biol.,
March 4, 2002;
156(5):
771 - 774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|