|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M010821200 on September 14, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 47, 43723-43733, November 23, 2001
NF B-dependent Transcriptional Activation
during Heat Shock Recovery
THERMOLABILITY OF THE NF- B·I B COMPLEX*
Carole
Kretz-Remy,
Béatrice
Munsch, and
André-Patrick
Arrigo
From the Laboratoire Stress Oxydant, Chaperons, et Apoptose, Centre
de Génétique Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS-UMR
5534, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I,
F-69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
Received for publication, November 30, 2000, and in revised form, September 10, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Heat shock induces the accumulation of misfolded
proteins and results in the preferential expression of heat shock
proteins, which help the cell to recover from thermal damage. Heat
shock is a well known transcriptional activator of the human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat (LTR). We report
here that mutations or deletions of the LTR B sites impaired the LTR
transcriptional activation by heat shock. Further analysis revealed
that, during heat shock recovery, the NF- B p65 and p50 subunits
migrated into the nucleus of HeLa cells, bound to DNA, and induced
B-dependent reporter gene expression. This NF- B
activation did not depend on new transcriptional and/or translational
events and on the pro-oxidant state generated by heat shock. It was not
concomitant with I B phosphorylation and was not abolished by the
expression of I B kinase or I B dominant-negative mutants.
Moreover, NF- B activation and migration into the nucleus were not
concomitant with I B / or p105 degradation. However, during heat
shock recovery, NF- B was dissociated from its complexing partners,
allowing its migration into the nucleus. Hence, we describe here a
novel mechanism for activation of NF- B based on the thermolability
of the NF- B·I B complex.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)1 long terminal repeat
(LTR) contains a complex eukaryotic promoter that regulates the
transcription of the provirus (9). The progression of the disease
induced by HIV-1 infection is directly correlated with the level of
expression of HIV-1 RNA (10-12). Hence, modulation of HIV-1 LTR
activity is a key element in the development of the disease. The HIV-1
promoter contains binding sites for many transcription factors such as
NF- B, SP1, upstream stimulatory factor, and AP1 and therefore
confers on the virus the possibility of being activated or reactivated
by many stimuli (13, 14). Among these stimuli are cytokines, phorbol
esters, tumor promoters, and protein kinase inhibitors (15),
co-infection by other viruses (1), and oxidative (16) or thermal
(17-19) stress. If, for oxidative stress mediated by
H2O2 or tumor necrosis factor- (TNF- ),
the intervention of the transcription factor NF- B in the
transcriptional activation of the LTR was clearly demonstrated (16),
the mechanism regulating the thermal activation of this promoter is
still unknown.
Heat shock generates abnormally folded proteins. As a consequence, the
expression of most genes is inhibited, whereas a small set of genes
(the heat shock genes) are preferentially transcribed. Heat shock genes
encode heat shock or stress proteins that can protect cells from
thermally induced injuries. Indeed, heat shock proteins act as
molecular chaperones that help the cells to cope with aberrant protein
folding and, as a consequence, help the cell to recover from thermal
damage (20). Several studies suggested that a modification of
the redox state homeostasis and particularly of the non-protein thiols
such as glutathione could be involved in the heat stress signal
transduction pathway that activates heat shock protein synthesis
(21-24). Indeed, hydrogen peroxide treatment can induce, in
vitro and in vivo, heat shock gene transcription (25, 26) by
activating heat shock transcription factor-1 (27, 28). Of interest,
amino acid analogs, which are powerful agents that disrupt protein
folding, are able to induce NF- B activation (2). This observation,
together with the fact that NF- B activation is under the control of
the intracellular redox state (29, 30), prompted us to investigate the
mechanism of NF- B activation by heat shock.
NF- B belongs to the Rel/NF- B family of transcription factors that
includes many proteins conserved from Drosophila to humans. It controls a variety of physiological aspects of immune, inflammatory, viral, and stress responses (31). NF- B is a heterodimeric (p65/p50) inducible factor whose regulation is centered around
nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling. Indeed, the transcription factor is
retained in a latent form in the cytoplasm of unstimulated cells by
inhibitory molecules called I B subunits (I B , I B ,
and I B or p50 and p52 precursors called p105 and p100,
respectively) (32-35). I B subunits inhibit NF- B by masking its
nuclear localization signal, thereby causing its cytoplasmic retention
and blocking both its DNA binding and transactivation ability
(36-39). Migration of NF- B into the nucleus requires cytoplasmic
NF- B·I B complex disruption. Most NF- B inducers such as
inflammatory cytokines (e.g. TNF- ), phorbol esters
(e.g. phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate), pathogenic agents, and oxidative stress (31) act via a common pathway based on the
phosphorylation-induced degradation of I B proteins, which was first
described with the best studied and major I B protein, I B .
Stimuli induce I B phosphorylation at Ser32 and
Ser36 by the I B kinase (consisting of IKK , IKK ,
and IKK ) (4, 6, 40-44). This step triggers multi-ubiquitination at
Lys21 and Lys22 of I B , which then signals
I B for degradation by the 26 S proteasome (45-48). Following
I B degradation, NF- B migrates into the nucleus as an active
factor and induces transcription of B-containing genes such as the
I B gene. Newly synthesized I B enters the nucleus, removes
NF- B dimers from DNA, and causes their exportin-mediated transport
to the cytoplasm (49, 50). To date, three exceptions to this universal
pathway of NF- B activation have been reported. Activation of NF- B
in response to UV radiation or amino acid analog treatment depends on
I B degradation, but without its prior phosphorylation (2, 51,
52). In contrast, anoxia stimulates I B Tyr42
phosphorylation, a phenomenon that leads to p65/p50 release from the
NF- B·I B complex (53).
We report here that heat shock induces the transcriptional activation
of the HIV-1 LTR through a mechanism that is
NF- B-dependent. NF- B activation that occurs during
the heat shock recovery period differs from the universal pathway of
NF- B activation since it does not involve any prior phosphorylation
or degradation step of I B subunits. Moreover, this phenomenon does
not require new transcriptional and/or translational events and is a
redox-independent process. During heat shock recovery, we observed a
dissociation of NF- B from its complexing partners, allowing NF- B
to migrate into the nucleus. This new mechanism of NF- B activation
is characterized by the thermolability of the NF- B·I B complex.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Cultures--
HeLa cells were grown at 37 °C in the
presence of 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. For heat shock treatments, the
cells were incubated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and 10%
fetal calf serum supplemented with 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4.
Reagents and Plasmids--
Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC),
N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), hydrogen peroxide,
and type B gelatin were from Sigma (Saint Quentin Fallavier, France).
Recombinant human TNF- was purchased from Pepro Tech EC Ltd.
(London, United Kingdom). Anti-p50 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Santa Cruz, CA) is a goat polyclonal antibody (C-19) reactive with p50
and p105 proteins of human origin. Anti-p52 antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) is a rabbit polyclonal antibody (K-27) specific for p52
and p100 proteins of human origins. Anti-I B /MAD-3 antibody (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology) is a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against a
full-length recombinant protein of human I B . Rabbit anti-p65
polyclonal antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) is
directed against the 13 C-terminal amino acids of the p65 subunit of
human NF- B. The wild-type HIV LTR-Cat plasmid was a kind gift from
Dr. F. Arenzana-Seisdedos (Pasteur Institute, Paris, France). It
is composed of a 719-base pair XhoI-HindIII fragment containing the HIV-1 LTR (from the pBenn-Cat plasmid (1)) in
front of the cat gene of pIBI20 (International
Biotechnologies Inc.). The ( B)HIV LTR-Cat plasmid was obtained by
deleting a 26-base pair fragment containing the two B sites of the
wild-type plasmid. The pLTR-Cat-wt and pLTR-PstI plasmids were
described elsewhere (2). pLTR-Cat-EcoRI is identical to pLTR-Cat-wt, except that the two B consensus sequences were mutated into two perfect palindromic B sites. These mutants were produced by
megaprimer polymerase chain reaction mutagenesis (3). The pLTR-Cat-NcoI plasmid is a mutation of the pLTR-Cat-wt plasmid in which the B
sites and the three SP1 sites of the LTR were spaced out by the
insertion of a 4-nucleotide sequence (CCAT). The p2x B-37TKcat vector, which is composed of two B sites in front of a
cat reporter gene, has already been described (2).
pN-FLAG-CHUK(K44A) is a pRK7-S/N vector containing the full-length open
reading frame of human IKK cDNA with an alanine substitution of
the conserved lysine residue at position 44. The expression of
pN-FLAG-CHUK(K44A) leads to a dominant-negative mutant of IKK kinase
(4). The pRK5-IKK (K44A)-C-FLAG plasmid is the pRK5-C-FLAG vector
containing the IKK cDNA encoding amino acids 1-755 with an
alanine substitution of the conserved lysine residue at position 44. pRK5-IKK (K44A)-C-FLAG encodes a dominant-negative mutant of IKK
kinase (4-6). pLXSN and pLXSN-I B M were described elsewhere
(7). The expression of pLXSN-I B M leads to a
dominant-negative mutant of I B in which the N-terminal
(Ser32 and Ser36) and C-terminal
(Ser283, Ser288, Ser291,
Ser293, and Ser296) serine phosphorylation
sites are mutated to alanines (7).
Transfection and CAT Assays--
HeLa cells were seeded the day
before transfection at a density of 2 × 106
cells/100-mm dishes. The cells were then transfected with 11 µg of
the desired plasmids according to the LipofectAMINETM
reagent procedure (Life Technologies, Inc., Cergy Pontoise, France). The lipid·DNA complex was applied to the cultured cells over 4 h. Two h later, cells were trypsinized and replated onto five or six
60-mm dishes. After 12 h, the cells were submitted to various heat, hydrogen peroxide, or TNF- treatments and harvested after a
24-h recovery period. The transfected cells were then lysed, and 50 µg of total cellular proteins were analyzed using the
CAT/enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals, Meylan, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Indirect Immunofluorescence Analysis--
HeLa cells were grown
on glass coverslips coated with 0.1% type B gelatin. Twenty h later,
the cells were submitted to various heat treatments at 43 °C,
followed or not by a recovery period at 37 °C. Thereafter, the cells
were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline and fixed for 90 s with
cold methanol. Anti-p65 antibody was diluted 1:100 in
phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin.
Isothiocyanate-coupled goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (Organon
Teknica-Cappel, Fresnes, France) was used as a second antibody. The
stained cells were observed and photographed with a Zeiss Axioskop
photomicroscope. Fluorescent images were recorded on Tri-X Pan film
(Eastman Kodak Co.).
NF- B p65 Transcription Factor Assay--
NF- B binding to
B sites was assessed using the Trans-AMTM NF- B p65
transcription factor assay kit (Active Motif Europe, Rixensart, Belgium). In this assay, an oligonucleotide containing the NF- B consensus site is attached to a 96-well plate. The active form of
NF- B contained in cell extracts specifically binds to this oligonucleotide and can be revealed by incubation with antibodies using
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technology with absorbance reading.
In our study, HeLa cells were submitted to various heat treatments.
Thereafter, whole cell extracts were prepared, and 10 µg of total
cellular proteins were analyzed for p65 binding to B oligonucleotide
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Note that for whole cell
extract preparation, a sonication step of 20 s was added after the
10-min incubation time in lysis buffer. Specificity of the assay was
monitored by competition with free wild-type B consensus
oligonucleotide or mutated B consensus oligonucleotide according to
the manufacturer's instructions.
Gel Electrophoresis, Immunoblotting, and
Co-immunoprecipitation--
Acrylamide (10%) gel electrophoresis and
immunoblotting were performed as described (2). For
co-immunoprecipitation, 5 × 106 cells were
resuspended in 500 µl of IPP 150 buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Nonidet P-40) and 20 µl
of cØmpleteTM protease inhibitor mixture (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). The cells were lysed by repeated
freezing-thawing (three times). After centrifugation for 10 min at
4000 × g, the supernatant was incubated for 3 h
on ice with 1 µg of nonimmune or anti-I B serum (for p65/I B co-immunoprecipitation) or with 3 µg of nonimmune or anti-p65 serum (for p65/p100 co-immunoprecipitation). The
immunocomplexes were precipitated with protein A-Sepharose with
constant agitation at 4 °C for 1 h. Thereafter, the protein A
immunocomplexes were centrifuged at 4000 × g for 5 min, washed several times with cold IPP 150 buffer, and boiled in SDS
sample buffer. After removal of protein A-Sepharose by centrifugation,
samples were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
immunoblotted with either anti-p65 or anti-p100 antibody.
Gel Filtration Analysis--
Cells (2 × 107)
were resuspended in 1 ml of IPP 150 buffer and lysed by repeated
freezing-thawing (three times). After a 10-min centrifugation at
4000 × g, the supernatant was applied to a Sepharose 6B gel filtration column (1 × 100 cm; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Ullis, France) equilibrated and developed in 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 20 mM NaCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, and 0.1 mM EDTA. The fractions eluted from the column were analyzed by immunoblotting. Molecular mass markers
(Sigma) that were used to calibrate the gel filtration column included
dextran blue (2000 kDa), thyroglobulin (669 kDa), apoferritin (443 kDa), -amylase (200 kDa), alcohol dehydrogenase (150 kDa), bovine
serum albumin (66 kDa), and carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa).
In Vivo Fluorescent Measurement of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen
Species--
ROS detection was performed by ethidium bromide
fluorescence as already described (8). Briefly, 1.5 × 106 cells pretreated or not with PDTC or NAC were submitted
to various heat treatments. Cells were trypsinized and resuspended in
phosphate-buffered saline containing 40 µg/ml hydroethydine, the
sodium borohydride-reduced form of ethidium bromide. Flow cytometric
analysis was performed with a FACSCalibur cytometer (Becton Dickinson,
Le Pont de Claix, France) using a 488-nm excitation wavelength.
The emission filter was 610 nm for oxidized hydroethydine fluorescence.
 |
RESULTS |
Heat Shock Induces B-site-dependent Transcriptional
Activation of the HIV-1 LTR--
We previously reported that the HIV-1
LTR was transcriptionally activated in response to heat shock (19), but
the mechanism regulating this thermal activation remained obscure. To
unravel the molecular mechanism of this activation, we tested the
heat-induced transcriptional activity of the wild-type or B-deleted
HIV-1 LTR. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with the wild-type HIV LTR-Cat or ( B)HIV LTR-Cat plasmid and thereafter submitted to
90-min heat shock treatments performed at temperatures ranging from 41 to 44 °C. In these experiments, the transfection efficiency (determined in a parallel transfection using the -galactosidase gene-bearing plasmid pCMV ) was ~90%. By quantifying the level of
CAT polypeptide produced, we observed that up to 43 °C, the different heat shock treatments stimulated the transcriptional activity
of the wild-type HIV-1 LTR (Fig. 1,
A-D). At 44 °C, a drastic decrease in CAT polypeptide
production was observed. In contrast, deletion of the two B sites of
the HIV-1 LTR completely abolished HIV-1 LTR activation by heat shock
(Fig. 1A). These results indicate that the HIV-1 LTR
transcriptional response to a heat stress is B
site-dependent.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
B sites are indispensable for
HIV-1 LTR transcriptional activation by heat shock. HeLa cells
were transiently transfected with the wild-type (wild-type HIV LTR-Cat;
black bars) or B-deleted (( B)HIV LTR-Cat;
gray bars) HIV-1 LTR-cat reporter construct
(A) or with vectors containing the wild-type LTR
(pLTR-Cat-wt; B-D, black bars), pLTR-Cat-PstI
(B, gray bars), pLTR-Cat-EcoRI (C,
gray bars), or pLTR-Cat-NcoI (D, gray
bars). Cells were subsequently heat-shocked for 90 min at
temperatures ranging from 41 to 44 °C. After a 24-h recovery period
at 37 °C, the level of cytoplasmic CAT enzyme was quantified by the
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The results are presented as -fold stimulation, which
was calculated as the ratio of the CAT concentration of the different
samples to that of the control unstressed cells. The histograms shown
are representative of four independent and identical experiments. The
DNA sequences of the wild-type and mutated HIV-1 LTRs are shown in
E. Mutations are shown in underlined boldface
letters.
|
|
We therefore investigated the effect of different nucleotide variations
in the sequence of the two B sites present in the HIV-1 LTR. The
B consensus sequence (5'-GGGA(N/N)YYCC-3') is highly conserved.
However, small nucleotide variations have been described to occur
preferentially at the level of the 4 central nucleotides (54). The
pLTR-Cat-PstI mutant (Fig. 1E) was constructed by modifying
the most conserved 5'-nucleotides (GG) of the B sites with CA
nucleotides. These mutations have been described to impair the
transcriptional activity of the HIV-1 LTR after UV irradiation or
mitogen treatment (55, 56). In the pLTR-Cat-EcoRI mutant, the two B
sites were transformed into palindromic B sites (Fig.
1E), a situation that is suspected to improve the activity
of NF- B (54, 57). These constructions were transfected into HeLa
cells, which were submitted thereafter to heat shock treatments. A
complete impairment of the HIV-1 LTR response to heat shock was
obtained in the case of pLTR-Cat-PstI (Fig. 1B), as was
obtained with the B-deleted vector (Fig. 1A), suggesting that B sites are indispensable for HIV-1 LTR activation by heat shock. The pattern of pLTR-Cat-EcoRI activation by heat shock was
similar to that obtained with the wild-type LTR (Fig. 1C), except that the maximal degree of activation was increased by 2-fold in
comparison with the maximal degree of activation of the wild-type LTR.
Therefore, palindromic B sites seem to enhance NF- B
transactivation ability. We then assessed whether cooperation between
SP1 and NF- B was involved in the HIV-1 LTR response to heat shock.
To this end, the pLTR-Cat-NcoI mutant was constructed, in which the
B and SP1 sites were spaced out by the insertion of a 4-nucleotide
sequence so that NF- B and SP1 are located on opposite sides of the
DNA helix (Fig. 1E). We observed that the pLTR-Cat-NcoI
response to heat shock was similar to that of the wild-type LTR (Fig.
1D). Therefore, cooperation between the B and SP1 sites
is not necessary for HIV-1 LTR activation by heat shock. Taken
together, these results indicate an intervention of B sites in HIV-1
LTR activation by heat shock since the different modifications of B
sites we have tested modulate the HIV-1 LTR response to heat shock.
Heat Shock Activates the NF- B Transcription Factor Independently
of Transcriptional and/or Translational Events during the Recovery
Period after Heat Stress--
Based on the results presented above, we
analyzed whether heat shock was able to activate the NF- B
transcription factor itself. To this end, we looked for indices of
NF- B activation such as NF- B migration into the nucleus or
binding to DNA, transactivation of B-dependent reporter
genes, and I B degradation. The nuclear redistribution of NF- B
subunits was analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence. We observed that,
during heat shock, HeLa cells became rounded and that the cytoplasmic
distribution of the p65/RelA subunit was not modified. In contrast,
after 1-5 h of heat shock recovery at 37 °C, the p65 subunit of
NF- B redistributed into the nucleus of the cells (Fig.
2A). The same results were
obtained with an antibody raised against the p50 subunit of NF- B
(data not shown). This experiment showed that heat shock induces the
migration of NF- B into the nucleus, but this event seems to solely
occur during the recovery period after a heat stress.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Heat shock treatment induces p65 migration
into the nucleus and binding to B sites.
A, HeLa cells were either left untreated or submitted to
heat shock treatments at 43 °C for 45 min, for 1.5 h, or for
1.5 h followed by a 1-5-h recovery period at 37 °C. The cells
were then fixed and processed for indirect immunofluorescence analysis
using an antibody raised against the p65 subunit of NF- B.
B, HeLa cells were either left untreated (control
(C)) or submitted to heat shock treatments at 43 °C for
90 min (90) or for 90 min followed by a recovery period at
37 °C of 1 h (R1), 3 h (R3), or
5 h (R5). These various treatments were performed in
the absence of any drug (black bars) or in the presence of
0.5 µg/ml actinomycin D (dark-gray bars) or 20 µg/ml
cycloheximide (light-gray bars) added 5 min before the heat
shock treatment. Whole cell extracts were prepared, and NF- B binding
to B oligonucleotide was quantified with the Trans-AMTM
p65 transcription factor assay kit as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The results are presented as -fold stimulation, which
was calculated as the ratio of the absorbance of the different samples
to that of the control unstressed cells. Specificity of binding was
assessed by competition with free oligonucleotide. Twenty pmol of
wild-type oligonucleotide prevented the binding of NF- B from the
R5 extract to the probe immobilized on the plate (R5 + B). Conversely, 20 pmol of mutated consensus oligonucleotide
had no effect on the binding of NF- B from the R5 extract
(R5 + mut B). The histogram shown is representative of
two identical and independent experiments.
|
|
We then quantified NF- B binding to DNA in HeLa cells submitted to
heat shock treatments. We observed that p65 binding to B sites was
detectable during the first hour of heat shock recovery and increased
up to 5 h of recovery at 37 °C (Fig. 2B).
Specificity of p65 binding was tested by competition with free B
oligonucleotide. Wild-type oligonucleotide competed efficiently for p65
binding after 5 h of heat shock recovery (R5 + B),
whereas mutated B oligonucleotide had no effect (R5 + mut
B). Monitoring of NF- B binding to DNA was also performed in
the presence of 0.5 µg/ml actinomycin D or 20 µg/ml cycloheximide
added 5 min before heat shock treatment. These drug concentrations
efficiently blocked transcription and translation, respectively (data
not shown). We observed that actinomycin D and cycloheximide did not
modify the kinetics of NF- B binding to DNA during heat shock
recovery. This suggests that no new transcriptional and/or
translational events are required during heat shock and heat shock
recovery for NF- B activation.
To verify whether NF- B, once in the nucleus, was able to activate
B-dependent transcription, we transfected HeLa cells
with a plasmid bearing the cat reporter gene under the
control of two B elements (p2x B-37TKcat). Cells were then
submitted to heat shock treatments, followed by a 24-h recovery period
at 37 °C. A small increase in the level of CAT polypeptide driven by
p2x B-37TKcat was observed in cells exposed to 41 °C (Fig.
3). This increase was far more pronounced
at 42 and 43 °C. Indeed, at 43 °C, stimulation was 3.9-fold; it
was more intense than that observed in cells exposed for 1.5 h
to 200 µM hydrogen peroxide and represented 65% of that
obtained with TNF- treatment. Moreover, the overall kinetics of
activation of p2x B-37TKcat was similar to that obtained for the
wild-type HIV-1 LTR.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Heat shock treatment activates
B-dependent gene expression. HeLa
cells transiently transfected with the pLTR-Cat-wt (black
bars) or p2x B-37TKcat (gray bars) plasmid were
either left untreated or submitted to 90-min heat shock treatments
performed at 41, 42, 43, and 44 °C. After a 24-h recovery period at
37 °C, the level of CAT enzyme synthesized was analyzed as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Presentation of the results is as
described in the legend to Fig. 1. A positive control experiment was
performed using HeLa cells transfected with the p2x B-37TKcat plasmid
and treated for 90 min with 200 µM hydrogen peroxide or
with 2000 units/ml TNF- .
|
|
NF- B Activation during Heat Shock Recovery Occurs without Any
Prior Phosphorylation and Degradation of I B Subunits--
We next
determined whether NF- B translocation into the nucleus after heat
shock treatment was induced by I B degradation. To this end, the
level of several inhibitory subunits (I B , I B , and p105) was
analyzed by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig.
4A, no degradation or
phosphorylation of I B , I B , or p105 could be observed during
heat shock treatment performed at 43 °C or during the following
recovery period at 37 °C. In contrast, control experiments showed
that TNF- treatment induced the phosphorylation and/or degradation
of these inhibitory subunits (Fig. 4B). Hence, NF- B
migration into the nucleus after a heat stress appears to occur
independently of degradation and phosphorylation of its inhibitory
subunits.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
NF- B
inhibitory subunits are not degraded during heat shock or during heat
shock recovery. A, HeLa cells were either left
untreated or submitted to heat shock treatments of different duration
(from 10 to 90 min) at 43 °C. Cells were also exposed to 43 °C
for 90 min and allowed to recover at 37 °C for 1-5 h. B,
HeLa cells were treated with 2000 units/ml TNF- for 3-120 min.
Equal amounts of total cellular proteins were separated by 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the cellular contents of
I B , I B , and p105 were investigated by immunoblot analysis
using antibodies specific to these proteins as described under
"Experimental Procedures."
|
|
To confirm that NF- B activation during heat shock recovery is not
dependent on the classical signal transduction pathway including I B
phosphorylation by IKK kinase and subsequent degradation, we used
dominant-negative mutants of the two kinases that constitute IKK
(IKK and IKK ). Double transient transfection of the
dominant-negative mutant of IKK (pN-FLAG-CHUK(K44A)) or of IKK
(pRK5-IKK (K44A)) with p2x B-37TKcat was performed with HeLa cells.
The cells were then submitted to heat shock treatments, and the level
of CAT polypeptide synthesized was analyzed. We observed that neither the IKK nor IKK dominant-negative mutant modified the
p2x B-37TKcat activation by heat shock (Fig.
5A). In contrast, the IKK
dominant-negative mutant and, to a lesser extent, the IKK mutant (as
was expected since IKK is not absolutely required for IKK activation
(44)) inhibited the stimulated expression of the
B-dependent reporter gene after TNF- treatment (Fig.
5A). The same observations were made when a
dominant-negative mutant of I B in which serines 32, 36, 283, 288, 291, 293, and 296 were mutated to alanines (I B M) was transfected
with the p2x B-37TKcat vector (Fig. 5B). Indeed, expression of I B M did not modify expression of p2x B-37TKcat after a heat stress, whereas it completely abolished its response to
TNF- treatment. Therefore, these results show that NF- B
activation during heat shock recovery follows a novel signal
transduction pathway that does not require phosphorylation and
degradation of I B subunits to release the NF- B transcription
factor.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Dominant-negative mutants of IKKs or of
I B do not impair
NF- B activation by heat shock.
A, HeLa cells were transiently transfected with the
p2x B-37TKcat plasmid together with either a control plasmid (pUC19;
black bars) or an expression vector of a dominant-negative
mutant of IKK (pN-FLAG-CHUK(K44A); dark-gray bars) or a
dominant-negative mutant of IKK (pRK5-IKK (K44A); light-gray
bars). The transfected cells were submitted to 90-min heat shock
treatments performed at 41, 42, 43, and 44 °C. A 2-h TNF- (2000 units/ml) treatment was also used as a control. After a 24-h recovery
period at 37 °C, cells were analyzed for the level of CAT enzyme
synthesized. Presentation of the results is as described in the legend
to Fig. 1. B, the same experiment was carried out, but HeLa
cells were transiently transfected with the p2x B-37TKcat vector and
the pLXSN control plasmid (black bars) or the expression
vector of a dominant-negative mutant of I B (pLXSN-I B M;
gray bars). C, control.
|
|
The Pro-oxidant State Generated by Heat Shock Is Dispensable for
NF- B Activation--
Most NF- B inducers have been reported to be
inhibited by antioxidants such as PDTC and NAC and detoxifying enzymes
such as glutathione peroxidase and catalase (29, 30), implying that ROS
modulate the signal transduction pathway leading to NF- B activation.
Several studies have suggested the involvement of an oxidative stress
during heat shock. We therefore tested whether a heat stress could
increase the level of ROS and, by using antioxidant drugs such as PDTC
and NAC, whether ROS are involved in NF- B activation during heat
shock recovery. We performed a kinetic analysis of the in
vivo level of ROS during and after heat shock treatment performed
at 43 °C. As shown in Fig. 6, an
increase in the level of intracellular ROS was detectable already after exposing cells for 1 h at 43 °C. ROS levels continued to
increase up to 2 h of heat shock recovery and then decreased to
reach the basal level observed in control cells. In contrast, when
cells were pretreated with the antioxidant drug PDTC (Fig. 6) or NAC (data not shown), the level of ROS remained unchanged. PDTC and NAC
were then used to evaluate the involvement of ROS in NF- B activation
during heat shock recovery.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Heat shock treatment increases the level of
reactive oxygen species. Shown are the results from the in
vivo estimation of intracellular ROS levels by
fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis using a hydroethydine
fluorescent probe. HeLa cells were either left untreated (gray
plots) or submitted to 43 °C heat shock treatments (white
plots) for 60 and 90 min. The 90-min heat shock treatment was
followed or not by a recovery period of 1, 2, 3, or 4 h at
37 °C. A 4-h treatment with 40 µM menadione was also
performed as a positive control for ROS production. The same experiment
was performed in the absence of any antioxidant drug or in the presence
of 100 µM PDTC. Ethidium bromide (EB)
fluorescence was measured as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Results are presented as fluorescence histograms.
|
|
We first investigated whether these drugs could modulate HIV-1 LTR
transcriptional activation or B-dependent gene
transcription induced by heat shock. To this end, HeLa cells
transiently transfected with the wild-type HIV LTR-Cat (Fig.
7A) or p2x B-37TKcat (Fig. 7B) plasmid were first incubated for 1 h with 100 µM PDTC or 10 mM NAC before being exposed or
not to heat shock. The level of CAT polypeptide produced was
quantified, and we could observe that PDTC drastically inhibited HIV-1
LTR activation by heat shock (Fig. 7A). Moreover, this
compound also completely impaired the heat-induced expression of the
p2x B-37TKcat plasmid (Fig. 7B). In contrast, pretreatment
with the antioxidant drug NAC did not modify the wild-type HIV LTR-Cat
or p2x B-37TKcat plasmid response to heat shock. Hence, these
contradictory results prevented us from making a conclusion regarding
the involvement or not of a pro-oxidant state in NF- B activation
during heat shock recovery.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The pro-oxidant state generated by heat shock
is dispensable for NF- B activation.
A and B, HeLa cells, transiently transfected with
either wild-type HIV LTR-Cat or p2x B-37TKcat, respectively, were
preincubated for 1 h with either 100 µM PDTC
(dark-gray bars) or 10 mM NAC (light-gray
bars) or were left untreated (black bars). Cells were
then submitted to 90-min heat shock treatments performed at 41, 42, 43, and 44 °C. After a 24-h recovery period at 37 °C, the level of
CAT enzyme synthesized was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay. Presentation of the results is as described in the legend to
Fig. 1. C, shown are the results for the analysis of p65
cellular localization. HeLa cells pretreated or not for 1 h with
100 µM PDTC were either left at 37 °C or submitted to
heat shock treatments at 43 °C for 1.5 h or for 1.5 h
followed by a 3-h recovery period at 37 °C. Thereafter, the cells
were fixed and processed for indirect immunofluorescence analysis using
an antibody raised against the p65 subunit of NF- B.
|
|
To determine whether the PDTC effect was due to its antioxidant
property in the NF- B transduction pathway or to a possible unspecific role in transcription, we analyzed the level of action of
this drug and whether PDTC could alter the migration of NF- B into
the nucleus during heat shock recovery. Indirect immunofluorescence analyses were performed with HeLa cells pretreated or not for 1 h
with 100 µM PDTC and thereafter submitted to heat shock
treatments. We observed the same kinetics of NF- B nuclear migration
in the presence and absence of the antioxidant drug (Fig.
7C). These results therefore suggest that PDTC can affect
the overall transcription step in an unspecific way and that ROS
produced during heat shock are not involved in NF- B activation after
a heat stress, as was suggested by the results obtained using cells
treated with NAC (Fig. 7, A and B).
Heat Shock Induces p65 and p50 Dissociation from Their Complexing
Partners--
To unravel the molecular mechanism responsible for
NF- B migration into the nucleus, we analyzed the interactions
between NF- B and several of its inhibitors during and after heat
shock. To this end, cell extracts from HeLa cells submitted to various heat shock treatments followed or not by a recovery period at 37 °C
were used for co-immunoprecipitation studies of p65 and I B or
p100 subunits. As shown in Fig.
8A, p65 was efficiently immunoprecipitated by anti-I B antibody in control cells. After 90 min of heat shock, decreased co-immunoprecipitation of p65 was
observed. This effect was even more pronounced when the experiment was
performed with extracts of cells that were allowed to recover for 1 or
3 h at 37 °C after heat shock. In contrast, after a 5-h recovery period at 37 °C, p65 was again slightly
co-immunoprecipitated by anti-I B antibody. These results suggest
that the interaction between p65 and I B begins to be altered
after 90 min of heat shock treatment. The dissociation of the complex
increased after 1-3 h of heat shock recovery at 37 °C, but was
reversible since co-immunoprecipitation of p65 and I B was again
detectable after 5 h of heat shock recovery. The same observations
were obtained with p65 and p100 (Fig. 8B) and p65 and p105
(data not shown) co-immunoprecipitations. Hence, heat shock triggers
NF- B activation by inducing the dissociation of NF- B from its
inhibitory complexing partners during the recovery period that follows
a heat stress.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
I B or p100
inhibitory subunits dissociate from p65 in HeLa cells recovering from
heat shock. HeLa cells were either left untreated (control
(C)) or submitted to heat shock treatments at 43 °C for
45 min (45), for 90 min (90), or for 90 min with
a recovery period at 37 °C of 1 h (R1), 3 h
(R3), or 5 h (R5). Cells were then processed
for immunoprecipitation using nonimmune (A and
B), anti-I B (A), or anti-p65 (B)
antiserum as described under "Experimental Procedures." Samples
were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the
association of p65 with I B or with p100 was investigated in
immunoblots probed with antibodies raised against either the p65
subunit of NF- B (A) or the p100 inhibitory subunit
(B). A positive control sample for the presence of p65
(A) or p100 (B), containing total cellular
proteins (Tot), was loaded on the gel. C, the gel
filtration analysis of p65 and I B association during heat shock
recovery. HeLa cells were either left untreated (Control) or
submitted to a 43 °C treatment for 90 min followed by a 3-h recovery
period at 37 °C (43 °C 1h30 + 37 °C 3h). Cell extracts were prepared and applied
to gel filtration columns as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The fractions eluted from the column were applied to a
10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and the fraction content of p65 and
I B was investigated by immunoblot analysis.
|
|
To better document the NF- B·I B complex thermolability observed
by co-immunoprecipitation assays, we monitored this complex by gel
filtration analysis (Fig. 8C). We observed that, in whole cell extracts of control HeLa cells, the p65 protein was eluted in
fractions of ~100-250 kDa and that I B was recovered in
fractions of 40-150 kDa. Hence, p65 and I B were both recovered
in the 100-150-kDa fractions that could represent the NF- B·I B
complex. In contrast, when the same experiment was performed with
extracts from HeLa cells submitted to a 90-min heat shock treatment at 43 °C followed by a 3-h recovery period at 37 °C, the p65 subunit was detected in 66-200-kDa fractions, whereas the I B subunit was
recovered solely in 40-kDa fractions. Therefore, p65 and I B were
no longer recovered in the same fractions, suggesting that the
p65·I B complex was disrupted. The same results were obtained when HeLa cells were transiently transfected with the I B
dominant-negative mutant. In this case, we observed a dissociation of
the NF- B·I B M complex (data not shown). Taken together, these
results demonstrate that the NF- B·I B complex is thermolabile,
leading NF- B to migrate into the nucleus.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The HIV-1 LTR is transcriptionally activated by various cellular
stresses, including heat hock. However, the mechanisms underlying this
thermal activation are still obscure. Indeed, a previous study based on
deletion analysis of HIV-1 LTR B sites reported a reduced activation
of this promoter in heat-shocked U937 promonocytic cells (18). Another
report observed an inhibition of heat shock-induced virus activation by
pentoxifylline (an NF- B inhibitor) (58). On the other hand, in other
studies, we (19) and others (16) did not observe any specific binding
of a protein to B motifs in HeLa or Jurkat cells submitted to heat
shock treatments. To answer these contradictory results, we performed
studies on mutated HIV-1 LTR activation by heat shock. We constructed
mutations in B sites of the LTR or modulated the distance between
B and SP1 sites because cooperation between B and SP1 sites has
been demonstrated in the case of HIV-1 LTR activation by mitogens (59).
We observed that spacing SP1 and B sites does not modify the HIV-1
LTR response to heat shock. In contrast, B sites are indispensable
for HIV-1 LTR activation by heat stress. Hence, as heat shock induces
the accumulation of misfolded proteins, these results suggest that a
prolonged fever or pathologies interfering with protein folding are
probably inducers of the HIV-1 LTR by way of NF- B transcription factor activation.
We then analyzed NF- B activation by heat shock and observed by
immunofluorescence analysis that heat shock treatment induced the
migration of p65 and p50 into the nucleus. However, this effect occurred only during the recovery period after the heat stress. The
same conclusions were obtained by analysis of NF- B binding to DNA.
Moreover, we observed stimulation of B-dependent
reporter gene transcription after heat shock (maximal activation at
43 °C for 1.5 h). This stimulation was of similar intensity
to that obtained after hydrogen peroxide or TNF- treatment (3.9-fold with heat shock versus 3.1-fold with hydrogen peroxide and
5.8-fold with TNF- ). Hence, heat shock is a very powerful inducer of
B-dependent transcription. These results suggest that,
during inflammation processes, a persistent fever could be an important
event involved in NF- B recruitment. NF- B activation by heat shock
is quite intriguing since several studies have reported that heat shock or hsp70 overexpression decreases subsequent NF- B activation by
various stressors (60-64). In contrast, Jaattela and co-workers (65, 66) observed that overexpression of hsp70 in mouse fibrosarcoma cells did not influence NF- B activation by TNF- or UV light. However, these reports studied the influence of heat shock on NF- B
activation by others stressors and not the direct influence of heat
shock on the NF- B transcription factor. In this regard, we observed
that NF- B was activated during the recovery period after and not
during the heat stress. These results are consistent with two
observations: (i) the fact that heat shock transcription factor-1
activation has been associated with NF- B inhibition as if the
concomitant activation of both transcription factors was incompatible
(67-69); and (ii) the fact that heat shock pretreatment delays (up to
4-6 h) NF- B activation by cytokines (62, 63). Indeed, this delay
could be explained by the fact that, as we show in this study,
pretreatment by heat shock induced NF- B activation and migration
into the nucleus after 1-5 h of recovery at 37 °C. Hence, the
transcription factor would not be available for a new induction by
other stressors until it is dissociated from DNA and released from the
nucleus, thus creating this delay in the NF- B response to a new induction.
Finally, our previous study (19) as well as those of others (16, 64)
reported the absence of NF- B binding to DNA in cells submitted to
heat shock. This discrepancy can be explained by our present results.
The previous studies were performed after mild or short heat treatment
and, more importantly, without any recovery period after the heat
stress. By quantifying NF- B binding during heat shock or during the
recovery period, we demonstrated that the previous conditions are not
adequate for NF- B activation. Indeed, we showed that NF- B can
bind to DNA solely during the recovery period after a heat stress.
We then analyzed NF- B activation in the presence of transcription
(actinomycin D) or translation (cycloheximide) inhibitors. The drug
concentrations used have been tested beforehand for their ability to
efficiently inhibit transcription or translation. We observed the same
kinetics of NF- B binding to DNA in cells submitted to heat shock
treatments in the presence or absence of these drugs. Hence, de
novo transcription and/or translation events during heat shock or
during heat recovery are dispensable for NF- B activation. This
suggests that NF- B activation during heat shock recovery results
from modification of pre-existing factors. In this respect, further
studies of NF- B activation in thermotolerant cells submitted to heat
stress will probably provide some clues to the sensor responsible for
NF- B mobilization. Indeed, one can ask whether accumulation of
misfolded protein could be a stimulus that triggers NF- B activation.
In a previous study, we found that NF- B was also activated by amino
acid analogs (2); these compounds are structural analogs of
natural amino acids rapidly incorporated into newly synthesized
polypeptides and therefore induce irreversible aberrant protein
conformation. Another drug creating abnormal polypeptides in the cell
(puromycin, which induces a premature release of polypeptide chains
from ribosomes) can induce transcription of B-dependent
genes and NF- B
activation.2 But in the case
of amino acid analog treatment, the mechanism of NF- B activation is
different from the one obtained with heat shock, as it involves
I B degradation by the 26 S proteasome. Hence, a still unknown
sensor would be responsible for NF- B activation during heat shock recovery.
As most NF- B inducers seem to involve ROS in their signal
transduction pathway, we measured the in vivo level of
intracellular ROS during and after a heat stress. We observed a
transient increase in the level of ROS produced during heat shock and
during the first hours of recovery at 37 °C. These results confirm
earlier studies that observed that heat shock pretreatment can
sensitize cells or NF- B activation to hydrogen peroxide treatments
(22-24). Moreover, it was shown that hydrogen peroxide is able to
activate heat shock transcription factor-1 (27, 28). Other studies revealed that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, oxidative stress
is involved in heat shock-induced death (70) and that ROS are
intracellular mediators of hyperthermia-induced apoptosis in human
HL-60 cells (71). By using the antioxidant drugs PDTC and NAC, we were
able to abolish the heat-induced increased level of ROS. Nevertheless, we obtained contradictory results concerning the impairment or not of
NF- B activation by heat shock according to whether PDTC or NAC was
used, as PDTC, in contrast to NAC, abolished B-dependent gene expression after heat shock. However, PDTC could not impair NF- B migration into the nucleus during the heat recovery period. Therefore, these results suggest that ROS are not involved in NF- B
activation during heat shock recovery and that PDTC and NAC could
differently affect transactivation of transcription after heat shock.
In this respect, recent studies reported that PDTC can have biphasic
effects: one conferred by its antioxidant property and the other by its
metal (copper/zinc) chelator property (72). Hence, PDTC could also
affect, independently of its potential antioxidant role, transcription
factor activity by regulating the intracellular zinc and copper ion
levels. Therefore, NF- B activation during heat shock recovery does
not appear to be dependent on the pro-oxidant state generated by
heat-shock.
The finding of NF- B binding to DNA and B-dependent
gene transcription prompted us to determine the events responsible for NF- B activation during heat shock recovery. By using
dominant-negative mutants of IKK and IKK kinases, we observed
that NF- B activation by heat shock was not dependent on prior
phosphorylation of its I B inhibitory subunits. Moreover, immunoblot
assays revealed that, at the time point when NF- B migrated into the
nucleus after heat shock, its I B inhibitory subunit was not
degraded; this remained true for even longer recovery periods. We
obtained the same results when other NF- B inhibitory subunits
(i.e. I B and p105) were analyzed, demonstrating that
NF- B activation by heat shock is independent of I B degradation.
These results were confirmed by the use of the I B M
dominant-negative mutant. I B M is a super-repressor that cannot be
phosphorylated or degraded, but can still interact with NF- B dimers,
being a very potent inhibitor of NF- B by keeping it permanently in
the cytoplasm. We observed that overexpression of I B M did not
abolish the stimulated expression of p2x B-37TKcat after a heat
stress, demonstrating that I B phosphorylation and degradation are
not indispensable for NF- B activation by heat shock. To explain
NF- B migration into the nucleus, we thus co-immunoprecipitated p65
and I B during heat shock and during recovery after heat shock. We
observed that p65 and I B dissociated early during heat shock
recovery and re-associated 5 h later. The same held true for the
major complexing partners of p65 (and p50), which are p100 and p105.
Hence, heat shock induces p50 and p65 dissociation from their
inhibitors, allowing possible new matching of NF- B subunits, which
then can migrate into the nucleus. These results were strengthened by
gel filtration analysis showing that, during heat shock recovery,
I B and p65 were no longer eluted in the same fractions. Hence,
heat treatment dissociates I B from p65/p50 dimers. Moreover, the
same dissociation was observed with the dominant-negative mutant of
I B (I B M). Therefore, these results demonstrate that heat
shock activates NF- B by a new mechanism that relies on
p65/p50·I B complex thermolability. One might suggest that heat
shock, known to induce unfolded or denatured proteins, could modify the
conformation of NF- B inhibitory subunits and their interactions with
p65 and p50 since interactions between p65/p50 and its inhibitors are
weak (73). The ankyrin domains shared by I B proteins, p100, and p105
could also be responsible for any destabilization of the
NF- B·I B complex or precursors associated with p65 or p50 after
heat shock. But since this mechanism of I B heat denaturation can
hardly explain why the NF- B·I B complex is dissociated during
the heat recovery period and resists elevated temperatures during heat
shock, the involvement of a chaperone-mediated dissociation is one
hypothesis that will merit further investigations. In this respect,
additional studies on the thermolability of the precursor proteins
could be informative. p100 and p105 dissociate from p65 and p50.
Whether this dissociation occurs in precursors associated with each
other, in precursors involved in heterodimers (precursor and p50 or
p65), or in heterotrimers (precursor and p50 and p65) (74, 75) merits
further investigations and suggests a mechanism involving specific
chaperone recognition of the ankyrin domains of I B proteins and
precursors and the specific dissociation of these inhibitors from
NF- B.
Hence, we report here a new mechanism of activation of NF- B during
heat shock recovery, independent of any de novo
transcriptional and/or translational events, with no I B
phosphorylation and degradation. This mechanism relies on the
thermolability of I B subunits that dissociate from NF- B dimers.
Therefore, in addition to physiological stressors
(ischemia/reperfusion, liver regeneration, hemorrhagic shock), physical
stress, or oxidative stress, heat shock must be considered as a stress
inducer of NF- B, making this transcription factor a novel regulator
of the cellular stress response. However, it is still not known whether
the transcription of B-dependent genes during heat shock
recovery is beneficial or not for the recovery of cellular functions
injured during heat shock.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dominique Guillet for excellent
technical assistance, Patrick-A. Baeuerle (Tularik, San Francisco, CA)
for the kind gift of the pRK5-IKK (K44A) and pN-FLAG-CHUK(K44A)
plasmids, and E. Bates for the pLTR-Cat-PstI plasmid constructions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Association pour la Recherche sur
le Cancer Grant 5204 and by the Région Rhône-Alpes (to
A.-P. A.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Lab. Stress Oxydant,
Chaperons, et Apoptose, Centre de Génétique
Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS-UMR5534, Bâtiment Gregor
Mendel, 16 rue Dubois, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, F-69622
Villeurbanne Cedex, France. Tel.: 33-4-72-44-85-95; Fax:
33-4-72-44-05-55; E-mail: Arrigo@univ-lyon1.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 14, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M010821200
2
C. Kretz-Remy and A.-P. Arrigo, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HIV-1, human
immunodeficiency virus type 1;
LTR, long terminal repeat;
TNF- , tumor necrosis factor- ;
IKK, I B kinase;
PDTC, pyrrolidine
dithiocarbamate;
NAC, N-acetyl-L-cysteine;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
ROS, reactive oxygen species.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Gendelman, H. E.,
Phelps, W.,
Feigenbaum, L.,
Ostrove, J. M.,
Adachi, A.,
Howley, P. M.,
Khoury, G.,
Ginsberg, H. S.,
and Martin, M. A.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
9759-9763[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Kretz-Remy, C.,
Bates, E. E. M.,
and Arrigo, A.-P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3180-3191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Sarkar, G.,
and Sommer, S. S.
(1990)
BioTechniques
8,
404-407[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Regnier, C. H.,
Song, H. Y.,
Gao, X.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
Cao, Z.,
and Rothe, M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
373-383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Woronicz, J. D.,
Gao, X.,
Cao, Z.,
Rothe, M.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1997)
Science
278,
866-869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Zandi, E.,
Rothwarf, D. M.,
Delhase, M.,
Hayakawa, M.,
and Karin, M.
(1997)
Cell
91,
243-252[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Van Antwerp, D. J.,
Martin, S. J.,
Kafri, T.,
Green, D. R.,
and Verma, I. M.
(1996)
Science
274,
787-789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Mehlen, P.,
Kretz-Remy, C.,
Preville, X.,
and Arrigo, A.-P.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2695-2706[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Gaynor, G.
(1992)
AIDS
6,
347-363[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Bagnarelli, P.,
Menzo, S.,
Valenza, A.,
Manzin, A.,
Giacca, M.,
Ancarani, F.,
Scalise, G.,
Varaldo, P. E.,
and Clementi, M.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
7328-7335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Michael, N. L.,
Vahey, L.,
Burke, D. S.,
and Redfield, R. R.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
310-316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Embretson, J.,
Zupancic, M.,
Ribas, J. L.,
Burke, A.,
Racz, P.,
Tenner-Racz, K.,
and Haase, A. T.
(1993)
Nature
362,
359-362[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Steffy, K.,
and Wong-Staal, F.
(1991)
Microbiol. Rev.
55,
193-205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Garcia, J. A.,
and Gaynor, R. B.
(1994)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol.
49,
157-196[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Brown, F. L.,
Tahaoglu, E.,
Graham, G. J.,
and Maio, J. J.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
5245-5254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Schreck, R.,
Rieber, P.,
and Baeuerle, P.-A.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
2247-2258[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Re, M. C.,
Furlini, G.,
and La Placa, M.
(1989)
J. Virol. Methods
26,
313-317[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Stanley, S. K.,
Bressler, P. B.,
Poli, G.,
and Fauci, A. S.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
145,
1120-1126[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Kretz-Remy, C.,
and Arrigo, A.-P.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
351,
191-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Burel, C.,
Mezger, V.,
Pinto, M.,
Rallu, M.,
Trigon, S.,
and Morange, M.
(1992)
Experientia (Basel)
48,
629-634
|
| 21.
|
Zou, J.,
Salminen, W. F.,
Roberts, S. M.,
and Voellmy, R.
(1998)
Cell Stress Chaperones
3,
130-141[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Love, J. D.,
Vivino, A. A.,
and Minton, K. W.
(1986)
J. Cell. Physiol.
126,
60-68[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Issels, R. D.,
Bourier, S.,
Boning, B.,
Li, G. C.,
Mak, J. J.,
and Wilmanns, W.
(1987)
Cancer Res.
47,
2268-2274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Sappey, C.,
Legrandpoels, S.,
Bestbelpomme, M.,
Favier, A.,
Rentier, B.,
and Piette, J.
(1994)
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
10,
1451-1461[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Becker, J.,
Mezger, V.,
Courgeon, A. M.,
and Best-Belpomme, M.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
189,
553-558[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Courgeon, A. M.,
Becker, J.,
Maingourd, M.,
Maisonhaute, C.,
and Best-belpomme, M.
(1990)
Free Radic. Res. Commun.
9,
147-155[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Jacquier-Sarlin, M.,
and Polla, B.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
318,
187-193
|
| 28.
|
Jornot, L.,
Petersen, H.,
and Junod, A. F.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
416,
381-386[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Kretz-Remy, C.,
Mehlen, P.,
Mirault, M. E.,
and Arrigo, A.-P.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
1083-1093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Arrigo, A.-P.,
and Kretz-Remy, C.
(1997)
in
Free Radicals and the Molecular Biology of Human Diseases
(Halliwell, B.
, and Aruoma, O., eds)
, pp. 183-216, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
| 31.
|
Pahl, H. L.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6853-6866[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Baeuerle, P.-A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1996)
Cell
87,
13-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Whiteside, S. T.,
and Israel, A.
(1997)
Semin. Cancer Biol.
8,
75-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Rice, N. R.,
MacKichan, M. L.,
and Israel, A.
(1992)
Cell
71,
243-253[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Mercurio, F.,
DiDonato, J. A.,
Rosette, C.,
and Karin, M.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
705-718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Naumann, M.,
and Scheidereit, C.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4597-4607[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Arenzana-Seisdedos, F.,
Thompson, J.,
Rodriguez, M. S.,
Bachelerie, F.,
Thomas, D.,
and Hay, R. T.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2689-2696[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14,
649-683[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Zhong, H.,
SuYang, H.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
and Ghosh, S.
(1997)
Cell
89,
413-424[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
DiDonato, J. A.,
Hayakawa, M.,
Rothwarf, D. M.,
Zandi, E.,
and Karin, M.
(1997)
Nature
388,
548-554[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Mercurio, F.,
Zhu, H.,
Murray, B. W.,
Shevchenko, A.,
Bennett, B. L.,
Li, J.,
Young, D. B.,
Barbosa, M.,
Mann, M.,
Manning, A.,
and Rao, A.
(1997)
Science
278,
860-866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Rothwarf, D. M.,
Zandi, E.,
Natoli, G.,
and Karin, M.
(1998)
Nature
395,
297-300[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Scheidereit, C.
(1998)
Nature
395,
225-226[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Karin, M.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6867-6874[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
DiDonato, J. A.,
Mercurio, F.,
and Karin, M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
1302-1311[Abstract]
|
| 46.
|
Chen, Z. J.,
Hagler, J.,
Palombella, V. J.,
Melandri, F.,
Scherer, D.,
Ballard, D.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1586-1597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Yaron, A.,
Gonen, H.,
Alkalay, I.,
Hatzubai, A.,
Jung, S.,
Beyth, S.,
Mercurio, F.,
Manning, A. M.,
Ciechanover, A.,
and Ben-Neriah, Y.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6486-6494[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Yaron, A.,
Hatzubai, A.,
Davis, M.,
Lavon, I.,
Amit, S.,
Manning, A. M.,
Andersen, J. S.,
Mann, M.,
Mercurio, F.,
and Ben-Neriah, Y.
(1998)
Nature
396,
590-594[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Arenzana-Seisdedos, F.,
Turpin, P.,
Rodriguez, M.,
Thomas, D.,
Hay, R. T.,
Virelizier, J. L.,
and Dargemont, C.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
369-378[Abstract]
|
| 50.
|
Sachdev, S.,
Hoffmann, A.,
and Hannink, M.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2524-2534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Bender, K.,
Gottlicher, M.,
Whiteside, S.,
Rahmsdorf, H. J.,
and Herrlich, P.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5170-5181[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Li, N.,
and Karin, M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13012-13017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Imbert, V.,
Rupec, R. A.,
Livolsi, A.,
Pahl, H. L.,
Traenckner, E. B.-M.,
Mueller-Dieckmann, C.,
Farahifar, D.,
Rossi, B.,
Auberger, P.,
Baeuerle, P.-A.,
and Peyron, J.-F.
(1996)
Cell
86,
787-798[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Ghosh, G.,
van Duyne, G.,
Ghosh, S.,
and Sigler, P. B.
(1995)
Nature
373,
303-310[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Nabel, G.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1987)
Nature
326,
711-713[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Stein, B.,
Kramer, M.,
Rahmsdorf, H. J.,
Ponta, H.,
and Herlich, P.
(1989)
J. Virol.
63,
4540-4543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Zabel, U.,
Schreck, R.,
and Baeuerle, P.-A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
252-260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Hashimoto, K.,
Baba, M.,
Gohnai, K.,
Sato, M.,
and Shigeta, S.
(1996)
Arch. Virol.
141,
439-447[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
Edwards, N. L.,
Duckett, C. S.,
Agranoff, A. B.,
Schmid, R. M.,
and Nabel, G. J.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
3551-3558[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Wong, H. R.,
Ryan, M.,
and Wispe, J. R.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
231,
257-263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Wong, H. R.,
Ryan, M. A.,
Menendez, I. Y.,
and Wispe, J. R.
(1999)
Cell Stress Chaperones
4,
1-7[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Guzhova, I. V.,
Darieva, Z. A.,
Melo, A. R.,
and Margulis, B. A.
(1997)
Cell Stress Chaperones
2,
132-139[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Feinstein, D. L.,
Galea, E.,
Aquino, D. A.,
Li, G. C.,
Xu, H.,
and Reis, D. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17724-17732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Curry, H. A.,
Clemens, R. A.,
Shah, S.,
Bradbury, C. M.,
Botero, A.,
Goswami, P.,
and Gius, D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
23061-23067[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Jaattela, M.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
4286-4294[Abstract]
|
| 66.
|
Simon, M. M.,
Reikerstorfer, A.,
Schwarz, A.,
Krone, C.,
Luger, T. A.,
Jaattela, M.,
and Schwarz, T.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
95,
926-933
|
| 67.
|
Rossi, A.,
Elia, G.,
and Santoro, M. G.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
746-750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 68.
|
Rossi, A.,
Elia, G.,
and Santoro, M. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16446-16452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 69.
|
Vayssier, M.,
Favatier, F.,
Pinot, F.,
Bachelet, M.,
and Polla, B. S.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
252,
249-256[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 70.
|
Davidson, J. F.,
Whyte, B.,
Bissinger, P.,
and Schiestl, R. H.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5116-5121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 71.
|
Katschinski, D. M.,
Boos, K.,
Schindler, S. G.,
and Fandrey, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
21094-21098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 72.
|
Chung, K. C.,
Park, J. H.,
Kim, C. H.,
Lee, H. W.,
Sato, N.,
Uchiyama, Y.,
and Ahn, Y. S.
(2000)
J. Neurosci. Res.
59,
117-125[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 73.
|
Baeuerle, P.-A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1988)
Science
242,
540-546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 74.
|
Dejardin, E.,
Bonizzi, G.,
Bellahcene, A.,
Castronovo, V.,
Merville, M. P.,
and Bours, V.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
1835-1841[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 75.
|
Kanno, T.,
Franzoso, G.,
and Siebenlist, U.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12634-12638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Cuccurullo, A. Iezzi, M. L. Fazia, D. De Cesare, A. Di Francesco, R. Muraro, R. Bei, S. Ucchino, F. Spigonardo, F. Chiarelli, et al.
Suppression of Rage as a Basis of Simvastatin-Dependent Plaque Stabilization in Type 2 Diabetes
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
December 1, 2006;
26(12):
2716 - 2723.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-Y. Fan, L. H. Ly, R. Barhoumi, D. N. McMurray, and R. S. Chapkin
Dietary Docosahexaenoic Acid Suppresses T Cell Protein Kinase C{theta} Lipid Raft Recruitment and IL-2 Production
J. Immunol.,
November 15, 2004;
173(10):
6151 - 6160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cipollone, M. Fazia, A. Iezzi, G. Ciabattoni, B. Pini, C. Cuccurullo, S. Ucchino, F. Spigonardo, M. De Luca, C. Prontera, et al.
Balance Between PGD Synthase and PGE Synthase Is a Major Determinant of Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability in Humans
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
July 1, 2004;
24(7):
1259 - 1265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cipollone, A. Iezzi, M. Fazia, M. Zucchelli, B. Pini, C. Cuccurullo, D. De Cesare, G. De Blasis, R. Muraro, R. Bei, et al.
The Receptor RAGE as a Progression Factor Amplifying Arachidonate-Dependent Inflammatory and Proteolytic Response in Human Atherosclerotic Plaques: Role of Glycemic Control
Circulation,
September 2, 2003;
108(9):
1070 - 1077.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Parcellier, E. Schmitt, S. Gurbuxani, D. Seigneurin-Berny, A. Pance, A. Chantome, S. Plenchette, S. Khochbin, E. Solary, and C. Garrido
HSP27 Is a Ubiquitin-Binding Protein Involved in I-{kappa}B{alpha} Proteasomal Degradation
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 15, 2003;
23(16):
5790 - 5802.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|