Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104819200 on September 4, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 47, 43987-43993, November 23, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/47/43987    most recent
M104819200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cerione, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cerione, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Nonreceptor Tyrosine Kinase ACK2, a Specific Target for Cdc42 and a Negative Regulator of Cell Growth and Focal Adhesion Complexes*

Wannian Yang, Qiong Lin, JiHe Zhao, Jun-Lin Guan, and Richard A. CerioneDagger

From the Department of Molecular Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Received for publication, May 25, 2001, and in revised form, August 22, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ACK2 (activated Cdc42-associated tyrosine kinase-2) is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase that is a specific target/effector for the GTP-binding protein Cdc42. Thus far the biological function of this tyrosine kinase has not been determined. Using an inducible eukaryotic expression system in fibroblasts, we demonstrate that ACK2 can strongly influence cell shape and growth as well as focal complex formation. ACK2 was found to associate with the focal adhesion complex components talin and vinculin, but not with the focal adhesion kinase (FAK), in a kinase-independent manner. The tyrosine kinase activity of FAK was also inhibited in cells overexpressing both wild-type and kinase-defective ACK2. This may be due to a competition between ACK2 and FAK for Src, which is an essential cofactor for FAK activation, as we have found that ACK2 specifically binds Src in cells. The ACK2-Src interaction appears to be mediated by the SH3 domain of Src, and the phosphorylation of ACK2 is enhanced in cells overexpressing the hyperactivated Src(Y527F) mutant. Overexpression of both wild-type and kinase-defective ACK2 also results in a severe inhibition of cell growth. In addition, ACK2 dissolves actin stress fibers and disassembles focal complexes but in a kinase-dependent manner. These results, taken together with previous studies demonstrating an association of ACK2 with integrin beta 1 (Yang, W., Lin, Q., Guan, J.-L., Cerione, R. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8524-8530) and clathrin (Yang, W., Lo, C. G., Dispenza, T., and Cerione, R. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 17468-17473), suggest that the binding and protein tyrosine kinase activities of ACK2 coordinate changes in cell morphology and growth with the disassembly of focal adhesion sites, perhaps to organize new integrin complexes that are required for endocytosis and/or for cellular differentiation.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ACKs1 (activated Cdc42-associated tyrosine kinases) are a family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases that specifically interact with the GTP-bound, active form of Cdc42, a Rho family GTPase (1, 2). We have cloned and characterized one member of this tyrosine kinase family, ACK2 (1, 3). While Cdc42 has been shown to play important roles in a variety of cellular activities including actin cytoskeletal organization, cell adhesion, intracellular trafficking, DNA biosynthesis, and cell growth regulation (4-10), little is known about the function of the ACKs in cells.

Our initial studies indicated that ACK2 was involved in cell adhesion signaling (3). Cell attachment strongly enhanced the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK2. Unlike the focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which has a tyrosine kinase activity that is specifically increased by cell adhesion on fibronectin-coated plates, the tyrosine kinase activity of ACK2 is stimulated when attaching cells to either fibronectin- or polylysine-coated plates. Interestingly the stimulation of the tyrosine kinase activity of ACK2 by adhesion is, at least partially, mediated by integrin beta 1. Data from immunoprecipitation studies indicated that ACK2 associated with an integrin beta 1 complex (3), thus suggesting that this tyrosine kinase may have a regulatory role in the assembly or disassembly of focal adhesion complexes.

To further address the cellular function of the Cdc42-specific target ACK2, we used a Tet-off inducible eukaryotic cell expression system. Here we show that the overexpression of ACK2 in NIH3T3 cells strikingly affected cell morphology as well as inhibited the tyrosine kinase activity of FAK, perhaps as an outcome of the binding of ACK2 to c-Src. These ACK2-mediated effects were all largely independent of ACK2 tyrosine kinase activity as was a marked inhibition of cell growth that accompanied the inducible expression of ACK2. The expression of ACK2 also resulted in the disruption of actin stress fibers and focal complexes, although these effects were dependent on ACK2 tyrosine kinase activity. Overall the data indicate that the Cdc42 target ACK2 participates in the down-regulation of focal adhesion complex organization and acts as a negative regulator of mitogenic signaling activity.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Puromycin was purchased from Calbiochem, tetracycline and anti-vinculin antibody were obtained from Sigma, and Texas red-conjugated phalloidin was from Molecular Probes. The Tet-off inducible expression system was described previously (11).

Selection of Tet-off Inducible Cell Lines-- The HindIII/EcoRV-digested Myc-tagged ACK2 cDNA from pcDNA3 Myc-ACK2 and the corresponding Myc-tagged ACK2(K158R) cDNA were cloned into the pTet-splice vector to obtain pTet Myc-ACK2 or pTet Myc-ACK2(K158R). We then co-transfected ptTAK (3 µg/60-mm dish) with either the pTet-splice (control) vector, the pTet Myc-ACK2, or the pTet Myc-ACK2(K158R) (3 µg/60-mm dish) together with the puromycin-resistant gene plasmid (0.3 µg/60-mm dish) into NIH3T3 cells (3 × 105 cells/60-mm dish) in the presence of tetracycline (1 µg/ml). After 48 h, the cells were transferred to 100-mm dishes and cultured overnight in DMEM plus 10% calf serum (CS) and 1 µg/ml tetracycline. The colony selection was performed by adding puromycin (5 µg/ml) into the culture medium. The positive colonies were identified following removal of tetracycline for 24 h by immunoblotting the protein with an anti-Myc antibody.

The NIH3T3 cell lines stably transfected with pTet, pTet-Myc-ACK2, or pTet-Myc-ACK2(K158R) were sustained in DMEM containing 10% CS, 5 µg/ml puromycin, and 1 µg/ml tetracycline. To determine the expression of the recombinant proteins, the cells in each cell line were seeded in four dishes (60 mm) (two dishes for pTet cells) at a density of 3 × 105 cells/dish and cultured overnight in DMEM plus 10% CS and 1 µg/ml tetracycline. The induction was initiated by replacement of tetracycline-containing medium with regular medium (DMEM plus 10% CS) for various periods of time (ranging from 0 to 72 h) prior to harvesting the cells. The cells in each dish were lysed in 300 µl of lysis buffer (40 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 25 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml aprotinin), and 20 µg of lysate proteins were loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and blotted with an anti-Myc antibody.

Apoptosis Assay-- Apoptosis assays were performed using an apoptosis detection kit with annexin V-FITC staining purchased from Calbiochem (Oncogene). Cells that were stably transfected with Tet (vector) or pTet-Myc-ACK2 were cultured on coverslips in DMEM plus 10% calf serum and 1 µg/ml tetracycline overnight. Tetracycline then was removed from the culture medium for 28 h to overexpress ACK2. As a positive control, cells containing the pTet vector were treated at the same time with 200 ng/ml Fas ligand for 12 h to induce apoptosis. Untreated cells containing the pTet vector served as negative controls. The annexin V-FITC staining procedures were modified based on the instructions of the manufacturer (Calbiochem). Briefly, the cells were washed with DMEM serum-free medium twice and incubated with annexin V-FITC (0.5 µg/ml) in the binding buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 4% bovine serum albumin) at 22 °C for 15 min. The cells were then washed with DMEM plus 5 mM CaCl2 three times and incubated in propidium iodide (30 µg/ml in PBS) in the binding buffer at 22 °C for 5 min to stain dead cells. After washing (three times) with DMEM plus 5 mM CaCl2, the cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde plus 5 mM CaCl2 at 22 °C for 10 min and followed subsequently by three washes with DMEM plus 5 mM CaCl2. The staining was observed under a fluorescent microscope.

Immunofluorescence-- Cells that were preplated on glass slips with or without induction were rinsed with PBS twice, fixed in 3.5% formaldehyde for 10 min, and then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min. The cells were blocked with 0.2% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 5-10 min and then incubated with primary antibodies for 30 min at 37 °C. After washing (three times) with PBS, the cells were incubated with secondary antibodies and phalloidin (conjugated to fluorescent dyes) for 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were then washed with PBS (three times), mounted on a glass slide, and observed under a fluorescence microscope.

Immunoprecipitations-- The cells in 60-mm dishes were lysed in 500 µl of lysis buffer (40 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 25 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml aprotinin) by rocking for 15-30 min at 4 °C. The lysate was cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 2 min, and an aliquot of the lysate (200-500 µl) was used for immunoprecipitation. After the primary antibody (1 µg/400 µg of lysate) was incubated with the lysate on ice for 30 min, protein A beads (Sigma) (1:1) were added, and the mixture was rocked at 4 °C for 1 h. The beads were washed twice with 700 µl of the lysis buffer and finally resuspended in 20 µl of 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer. The immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE.

BrdUrd Incorporation-- The BrdUrd incorporation experiments were performed as described previously (11). Briefly, the cells were synchronized at G0 phase by serum starvation, and the expression of ACK2 and the kinase-dead mutant was induced for 24 h before labeling the cells with 100 µM BrdUrd in regular medium for 18 h. The cells were then fixed and stained with anti-BrdUrd and Hoechst as described in the preceding section. The percentage of incorporation of BrdUrd was determined by the ratio of the number of cells showing anti-BrdUrd staining to cells showing Hoechst staining from five to eight microscopic fields (about 110-200 cells).

In Vitro Assays of FAK Autophosphorylation and Exogenous Substrate Phosphorylation-- The FAK was immunoprecipitated as follows. The lysate (1.2 mg of total protein) from uninduced or induced wild-type or kinase-defective ACK-expressing cells was incubated with 2 µl of anti-FAK antibody for 1.5 h at 4 °C followed by the addition of 5 µl of protein A-agarose beads (Sigma) overnight at 4 °C. The beads containing FAK immunocomplexes were washed three times with ice-cold lysis buffer and divided into three equal aliquots, which were used for assaying FAK activity (autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of exogenous substrates) and immunoblotting.

When assaying FAK activity, the immunocomplexes were further washed twice with ice-cold kinase buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MnCl2) and then incubated in 40 µl of kinase buffer including 10 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP with (for assaying the phosphorylation of exogenous substrates) or without (for autophosphorylation assays) 5 µg of the exogenous substrate poly(Glu,Tyr) (E4Y1) for 20 min at 25 °C. The reactions were stopped by adding 10 µl of 5× SDS-PAGE sample buffer. The samples were boiled for 5 min, and the proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The radioactivity of the phosphorylation bands was visualized and quantitated by autoradiography and phosphorimage analysis.

For immunoblotting, the complexes were further washed twice with ice-cold lysis buffer, suspended in 20 µl of 1× SDS-PAGE sample buffer, boiled for 5 min, and resolved on 9% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. After protein transfer onto nitrocellulose membranes, FAK was blotted with the anti-FAK antibody (1:5000).

Precipitation of ACK2 by GST-SH3 Domains-- The immobilized GST-Src-SH3, Grb2-SH3, and Crk-SH3 domains (20 µg each) on glutathione beads were incubated with COS7 cell lysates (200 µg) that contained Myc-tagged ACK2 at 4 °C for 2-3 h with rotation. The beads were washed three times with cell lysis buffer and subjected to analysis by SDS-PAGE. The SH3 domain-associated ACK2 was detected by Western blotting with an anti-Myc antibody.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ACK2 Causes Cell Shape Changes-- To begin to examine the cellular effects of ACK2, we cloned a Myc-tagged cDNA of ACK2 and its kinase-defective mutant ACK2(K158R) into pTet-splice, a eukaryotic expression vector that contains a tetracycline transactivator regulatory sequence upstream from a minimal human cytomegalovirus promoter. After co-transfection of pTet-ACK2 or pTet-ACK2(K158R) with pTet-tTAK, the tetracycline transactivator plasmid, and pMet-puro (a plasmid that contains a puromycin-resistant gene), positive (NIH3T3 cell) clones were selected for overexpression of wild-type ACK2 or ACK2(K158R). The expression of wild-type ACK2 or ACK2(K158R) was induced by removing tetracycline from the medium at various times (Fig. 1A). While we have observed some variability for the time required for the maximal expression of ACK2 following its induction, for the experiments presented here, ACK2 expression peaked at ~24 h (postinduction).


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Overexpression of ACK2 causes morphology changes in NIH3T3 cells. A, expression of Myc-ACK2 and Myc-ACK2(K158R) in tetracycline-inducible (Tet-off) cell lines. The induction of protein expression was performed as described previously (9). The proteins were blotted with an anti-Myc antibody (9E10). The numbers at the top of the panel represent the time of induction. B, ACK2 induces cell branching. The cells were seeded in a 12-well plate at a density of 103 cells/well and cultured overnight in DMEM plus 10% CS and 1 µg/ml tetracycline. For induction, the cells were rinsed once with DMEM plus 10% CS and replenished with DMEM plus 10% CS. After the indicated times of induction (to the left), the cells were photographed under a microscope. Upper three panels (a, g, and m) represent no induction. Panels a-f, pTet (vector control) cell line; panels g-l, pTet-ACK2 cell line; panels m-r, pTet-ACK2(K158R) cell line.

Cells overexpressing wild-type ACK2 showed dramatic changes in morphology with a time course mirroring that for ACK2 expression (Fig. 1B). The cells that overexpressed wild-type ACK2 showed a significant degree of branching (Fig. 1B, see panels j-l) with some of the branches extending to a length of 200 µm (compared with the average diameter of ~50 µm for the control cells). Generally, similar changes in cell morphology were observed upon overexpression of the kinase-defective mutant ACK2(K158R). However, whereas after 24 h of induction of wild-type ACK2 we often observed significant extensions or long spikes (as many as four to five per cell), under similar conditions of induction the kinase-defective ACK2 counterpart showed less branching with typically one or two very long spikes extending from the ends of the cell body. We noted that the branching structure of those cells expressing wild-type ACK2 was dramatically inhibited by cell-cell contact, whereas the spikes exhibited by cells expressing ACK2(K158R) were not affected by cell-cell contact (data not shown). Cells that contained the vector alone did not show any changes in morphology after removal of tetracycline (Fig. 1B, panels a-f).

The Interaction of ACK2 with Known Components of Focal Complexes Occurs in a Kinase-independent Manner-- Previously we showed that ACK2 could be co-immunoprecipitated in a complex with the integrin beta 1 subunit (3). Here we show that both wild-type and kinase-defective ACK2 can be co-immunoprecipitated with anti-vinculin as well as anti-talin antibodies (Fig. 2, see lanes 8, 9, 14, and 15). We have estimated that ~10% of the total (overexpressed) ACK2 is co-immunoprecipitated with vinculin or talin, and both of these interactions occur independently of ACK2 tyrosine kinase activity. We did not find evidence for a stable complex between ACK2 and FAK based on co-immunoprecipitation experiments. However, we consistently observed that the tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK was inhibited in cells that overexpressed ACK2 (see Fig. 2, compare lanes 2 and 3 with lane 1 or versus lanes 4-6). This is further examined in Fig. 3. Overexpression of either wild-type ACK2 or the kinase-defective ACK2 mutant caused a clear inhibition of the ability of FAK to phosphorylate exogenous substrates, as assayed with the tyrosine-containing polymer E4Y1, with a corresponding inhibition of the autophosphorylation of FAK. In different experiments, we have found that the extent of inhibition ranged from 50-75%. Previous studies have shown that cytochalasin D, an F-actin depolymerization reagent, also inhibits the tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK (12), suggesting that ACK2-mediated effects on the integrity of the actin cytoskeleton may at least in part account for the inhibition of FAK autophosphorylation.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Co-immunoprecipitation of ACK2 with vinculin and talin. The Tet-off inducible cells that were stably transfected with pTet-Myc-ACK2 or pTet-Myc-ACK2(K158R) were cultured in 100-mm dishes with DMEM plus 10% CS plus 1 µg/ml tetracycline overnight, and the expression of ACK2 proteins was induced by removing tetracycline from the medium for 24 h. The cells were then lysed in 1 ml of the radioimmune precipitation lysis buffer for each 100-mm dish. 300 µg of lysate proteins were used in each sample for immunoprecipitation. The anti-vinculin (2 µg), anti-talin (2 µg), or anti-FAK (2 µg) antibody was incubated with the lysates, and the immunoprecipitation was carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures." The immunoprecipitation complexes were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and immunoblotted by either anti-phosphotyrosine antibody or anti-Myc antibody. +Tet, uninduced samples; -Tet, induced samples; IP, immunoprecipitation; PY, phosphotyrosine; MW, molecular weight marker.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   ACK2 inhibited tyrosine phosphorylation and kinase activity of FAK. U, uninduced (+tetracycline); I, induced (-tetracycline). The upper right panel shows the quantitation of FAK activity by phosphorimage analysis of the autoradiograph shown in the upper left panel. The lower right panel shows inhibition of FAK autophosphorylation by ACK2. The lower left panel compares the relative amounts of FAK that were assayed for the different conditions. WT, wild type; IP, immunoprecipitation.

However, the inhibition of FAK activity by ACK2 may also involve c-Src. While screening for potential binding partners for ACK2, we found that the SH3 domain of Src was highly effective in its ability to bind to the proline-rich carboxyl-terminal domain of ACK2. The upper panel in Fig. 4A compares the abilities of different GST-SH3 domains to co-precipitate Myc-tagged ACK2, while the middle panel compares the binding of the GST-SH3 domain constructs to dynamin, and the lower panel compares the relative amounts of the GST-SH3 domains that were assayed. We have found that the carboxyl-terminal SH3 domain of Grb2 is capable of a weak interaction with ACK2, although in some experiments we have detected no interaction, and in all cases it was at least 50% less effective than the SH3 domain of c-Src. Note that under the same conditions the SH3 domains of both Grb2 and Src bind equally well to dynamin. Thus far we have not found any other SH3 domain-containing protein to be capable of associating with ACK2. When Src(Y527F), a constitutively active Src mutant, was co-transfected with Myc-tagged ACK2Delta NT, an amino-terminal truncation mutant of ACK2, in COS7 cells, the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK2Delta NT was dramatically increased (Fig. 4B, lane 3), demonstrating that Src either directly, or through another tyrosine kinase, phosphorylates ACK2 in vivo. Stable complex formation between Src and ACK2Delta NT in vivo was also detected following the immunoprecipitation of either Myc-tagged ACK2Delta NT with an anti-Myc antibody (Fig. 4B, lane 1) or endogenous c-Src with an anti-Src antibody (Fig. 4C, lane 2). In these experiments, we estimated that ~5% of the total ACK2 was co-immunoprecipitated with Src. Although the tyrosine phosphorylation of wild-type ACK2 was also dramatically enhanced by co-transfection with Src(Y527F), we have not been able to consistently detect a stable association between wild-type ACK2 and c-Src in cells (data not shown). These results are reminiscent of the binding interaction between ACK2 and clathrin, which is significantly stronger when assaying the ACK2Delta NT mutant (13). This may mean that the amino-terminal end of ACK2 plays some sort of regulatory role that weakens the affinity of ACK2 for Src, perhaps in a manner similar to its effects on the interaction of ACK2 with clathrin.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   ACK2 interacts with Src and is phosphorylated by Src(Y527F). A, ACK2 specifically interacts with the Src-SH3 domain. Immobilized GST-Src-SH3, Grb2 carboxyl-terminal SH3, and Crk amino-terminal SH3 domains (20 µg each) on glutathione beads were incubated with Myc-tagged ACK2-transfected COS7 cell lysates (200 µg) at 4 °C for 2-3 h. The SH3 domain-associated ACK2 protein was detected by immunoblotting with anti-Myc antibody (upper panel). The middle panel shows the results of immunoblotting with anti-dynamin antibody. The lower panel shows the relative amounts of the different GST fusion proteins used in the experiments. B, ACK2Delta NT is co-immunoprecipitated with and phosphorylated by Src(Y527F). pcDNA3-Myc-ACK2Delta NT (2 µg/60-mm dish) was co-transfected with pcDNA3-Src(Y527F) (2 µg/60-mm dish) into COS7 cells. The cells were lysed with a Triton X-100-based lysis buffer. The immunoprecipitations were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" with an anti-Myc antibody (9E10). The immunoprecipitated proteins were immunoblotted with either an anti-phosphotyrosine, an anti-Src, or an anti-Myc antibody as indicated in the figure. Lanes 1 and 3, co-transfection of pcDNA3-Myc-ACK2Delta NT with pcDNA3-Src(Y527F); lanes 2 and 4, pcDNA3-Myc-ACK2Delta NT alone. C, ACK2Delta NT is associated with endogenous c-Src. pcDNA3-Myc-ACK2Delta NT (2 µg/60-mm dish) was transfected into COS7 cells. The cells were lysed with a Triton X-100-based lysis buffer. The immunoprecipitation was performed with an anti-Src antibody. The immunoprecipitated proteins were immunoblotted with either an anti-Myc antibody or anti-Src antibody as indicated in the figure. Lane 1, control cells (no transfection); lane 2, pcDNA3-Myc-ACK2Delta NT-transfected cells. PY, phosphotyrosine; IP, immunoprecipitation.

ACK2 Inhibits Cell Growth-- Another striking effect that accompanied the overexpression of ACK2 was a significant inhibition of cell growth. We determined the growth rates of the different cell lines by either (i) inducing ACK2 expression for different periods of time and then counting cell numbers (where in each case cells were counted for a total of 3 days) (Fig. 5A) or (ii) by inducing the cells for various times and then counting the cells at the different time periods of induction (Fig. 5B). In both cases, the growth rates for cells overexpressing wild-type ACK2 were dramatically reduced. The induced expression of ACK2(K158R) also resulted in a reduction in cell growth, although the growth inhibition was less severe than that caused by wild-type ACK2. Similar results were obtained when assaying DNA synthesis by deoxybromouridine incorporation (Fig. 5C). Expression of wild-type ACK2, and to a slightly lesser extent ACK2(K158R), resulted in an inhibition of serum-stimulated DNA synthesis.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   ACK2 inhibits cell growth. The cells were seeded in a 12-well plate and cultured in DMEM plus 10% CS and 1 µg/ml tetracycline overnight. The initial cell density was 5 × 103 in A and 6 × 104 in B. Induction of the expression of ACK2 or ACK2(K158R) was performed in two ways: either induction at the different indicated time points and then counting the cell numbers (in all cases, cells were grown for 3 days) (A) or cells were induced for different time periods and then counted (B). The cell growth rate was determined by counting the cell numbers under a microscope with a manual cell counter. The numbers in the figures are the averages from two independent sets of culture. C, ACK2 inhibits DNA synthesis. The pTet, pTet-Myc-ACK2, or pTet Myc-ACK2(K158R) stably transfected NIH3T3 cells were seeded at 104/35-mm dish and cultured in DMEM plus 10% CS plus 1 mg/ml tetracycline overnight. The cells were synchronized at G0 phase by serum starvation for 24 h, and the expression of ACK2 was induced at the same time by removing tetracycline in the culture medium. The cells were subsequently cultured in regular culture medium plus BrdUrd (BrdU) (100 µM) for 18 h, and then fixed and stained with anti-BrdUrd antibody and Hoechst. The percentage of BrdUrd incorporation was determined by the ratio of the number of cells showing BrdUrd staining to cells showing Hoechst staining from five to eight microscopic fields (110-200 cells). The variation was calculated from the differences between microscopic fields.

The inhibition of cell growth by ACK2 was not the outcome of programmed cell death (apoptosis). Fig. 6 shows that unlike the Fas ligand, which gives rise to a strong apoptotic response as assayed by staining dead cells with annexin V-FITC, the overexpression of ACK2 does not induce programmed cell death. At the present time, we also do not believe that the inhibitory effects of ACK2 on cell growth can be entirely attributed to the ACK2-mediated inhibition of FAK and/or binding of Src. We have generated a number of ACK2 mutations, and thus far we have only found that perturbing the SH3 domain of ACK2 alters its ability to inhibit cell growth (data not shown). This perturbation should not affect the ability of ACK2 to bind Src or inhibit FAK. However, it does strongly inhibit the binding of ACK2 to clathrin, presumably by preventing an intramolecular interaction that allows ACK2 to adapt the appropriate conformation for binding to clathrin (13). This may mean that the participation of ACK2 in the endocytosis of cell surface receptors (e.g. integrins and/or growth factor receptors) has a strong role in the ACK2-mediated inhibition of cell growth.


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Overexpression of ACK2 did not induce apoptosis. The cells were cultured, treated, and stained as described under "Experimental Procedures." The expression of Myc-tagged ACK2 was induced by removing tetracycline from the culture medium for 28 h before annexin V-FITC staining. The positive control was the pTet (vector)-transfected cells that were treated with 200 ng/ml Fas ligand (FasL) for 12 h, and the negative control was the pTet (vector)-transfected cells without any treatment. The green fluorescence is annexin V-FITC staining. The phase contrast image of the cells was captured from the same field for the annexin V staining. Notice that Fas ligand induced apoptosis in about 30% of total cells, while overexpression of ACK2 did not result in any apoptosis.

ACK2 Influences the Actin Cytoskeleton and Focal Adhesion Complexes in a Kinase-dependent Manner-- To further examine the cellular effects caused by overexpression of ACK2, actin cytoskeletal staining was performed. As shown in Fig. 7A, in the absence of induction (i.e. plus tetracycline), the cytoskeletal structures for all three cell lines were similar such that each cell line showed intact actin stress fibers (Fig. 7A, see panels a-c). After 48 h of induction (i.e. minus tetracycline), cells expressing wild-type ACK2 were either completely lacking or had markedly reduced amounts of actin stress fibers (Fig. 7B, panel b). Both control cells and cells that express kinase-defective ACK2(K158R) showed intact actin stress fibers (Fig. 7B, panels a and c).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   ACK2 disassembles actin stress fibers and focal adhesion complexes. Cells were cultured in 100-mm dishes with DMEM plus 10% CS and 1 µg/ml tetracycline overnight, and then for induction of ACK2, cells were cultured without tetracycline for 24 h. The cells were added to glass coverslips in a six-well plate and cultured under the same conditions (as described above) to continue the induction for another 24 h. The cells were then fixed and stained as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, without induction (+Tet). B, with induction for 48 h (-Tet). In both A and B, the panels on the left (a, b, and c) were stained with phalloidin for F-actin (red) and the panels on the right (d, e, and f) were stained with anti-vinculin (green) for focal adhesion complexes. Panels a and d represent the pTet (vector control) cell line, panels b and e represent the pTet-Myc-ACK2 cell line, and panels c and f represent the pTet-Myc-ACK2(K158R) cell line.

Focal adhesion complexes are the docking sites for stress fibers (14). We have shown that ACK2 is activated by cell attachment (1, 3). The disassembly of stress fibers by ACK2 may be the result of interactions between ACK2 and focal adhesion complexes. When we stained control cells with an antibody against vinculin, a known component of focal adhesion complexes, we observed that the focal adhesion complexes were located at the ends of stress fibers (Fig. 7A, panels d-f). In contrast, vinculin staining was diminished in the cells that overexpressed wild-type ACK2 and had a branching structure (Fig. 7B, panel e). Control cells containing vector alone or cells expressing the kinase-defective ACK2 mutant had normal focal adhesion complexes (Fig. 7B, panels d and f). These results suggest that the disruption of focal adhesion complex formation may be the direct cause for the disassembly of actin stress fibers by ACK2.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The GTP-binding protein Cdc42 has been implicated in a diversity of cellular activities that ultimately mediate changes in cell shape, motility, cell cycle progression, differentiation, and cell survival (15, 16). Among the major questions concerning the underlying mechanisms for these different functions are the cellular roles played by the individual targets of Cdc42. Here we have examined the cellular effects of the highly specific Cdc42 target ACK2 and found that it has a significant influence on cell shape, cell cycle progression, and the actin cytoskeleton. Specifically both wild-type and kinase-dead ACK2 induce cell extensions and inhibit cell growth. The effects are somewhat enhanced when expressing a kinase-competent ACK2 compared with the kinase-defective version. Nonetheless, the latter causes clear changes in cell shape and retards cell growth, arguing that it is the binding ability (rather than the tyrosine kinase activity) of ACK2 that is mainly responsible for these effects. However, there is a significant requirement for the kinase activity of ACK2 in its ability to dissolve actin stress fibers and disassemble focal complexes. Thus, one can envisage a model where the binding of ACK2 to integrin beta 1 and/or vinculin, talin, and c-Src initially results in a modulation of FAK activity and cytoskeletal alterations that lead to cellular extensions. The activation of ACK2 tyrosine kinase activity apparently then gives rise to the phosphorylation of a focal contact or cytoskeletal-associated component(s) that directs focal adhesion disassembly and the dissolution of actin stress fibers.

All of this makes it attractive to think of ACK2 as playing a key regulatory role both through its binding partners and tyrosine phosphosubstrate(s) in coordinating changes in cell shape with a slowing of cell cycle progression. The coordination of these activities becomes important during cellular differentiation. This is especially the case when considering the shape changes and effects on actin stress fibers that accompany neuronal differentiation. Previous studies have shown that the inhibition of actin stress fiber formation results in cell membrane protrusion or neurite outgrowth (17). Microinjection of the constitutively active Rho mutant Rho(G14V) or the catalytic domain of the p160 RhoA-binding kinase ROKalpha into rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells rapidly induced neurite retraction (18), while introduction of the C3 exoenzyme, which is a specific inhibitor for Rho activation, promoted neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells (17). However, the microinjection of a dominant-negative mutant of Cdc42 (Cdc42(T17N)) inhibited neurite outgrowth completely, indicating that active Cdc42 is required for this neuronal activity. Microinjection of activated Cdc42 into PC12 cells leads to a loss of actin stress fibers and focal complexes. Thus, ACK2, which is capable of inducing cellular extensions and disrupting actin stress fibers, may be responsible for mediating these Cdc42-stimulated events during a differentiation response.

It has been well established that a FAK·Src complex plays a pivotal role in integrin-mediated cell growth (19-21). Thus, it seems likely that some of the effects of ACK2 on cell growth are through its interactions with Src, perhaps by blocking the proper activation of FAK and preventing its transmission of mitogenic signals through the Grb2/Ras/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway (21, 22). However, thus far we have not been able to draw a direct correlation between the ACK2-Src interaction and ACK2-mediated growth inhibition. We have found that an ACK2 SH3 domain mutant that is incapable of binding clathrin is also unable to inhibit cell growth (data not shown). This provides us with a clue that the ACK2-clathrin interaction is somehow linked to the ACK2-mediated effects on cell cycle progression. Such a possibility is interesting as proteins that participate in the endocytosis of growth factor or other mitogenic receptors are often growth inhibitory. The potential regulatory effects of ACK2 on growth factor receptor and/or integrin endocytosis giving rise to a down-regulation of these receptors could strongly contribute to the effects of ACK2 on cell shape and the actin cytoskeleton as well as cell cycle progression and thereby serve a multipurpose function toward the generation of a differentiation signal. It will be interesting to see how general a role ACK2 plays in cellular differentiation processes and whether such roles are connected to the regulation of ACK2 by integrins and other cell adhesion molecules. Such a connection may be manifested by the involvement of ACK2 in the disruption of focal adhesion complexes and the organization of new integrin complexes necessary for clathrin-coated vesicle endocytosis. Future studies will be directed toward testing these ideas.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We appreciate the help of Cindy Westmiller in the preparation of this manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM40654 and GM47458.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 607-253-3888; Fax: 607-253-3659; E-mail: rac1@cornell.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 4, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104819200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ACK, activated Cdc42-associated tyrosine kinase; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; BrdUrd, deoxybromouridine; SH3, Src homology 3; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; CS, calf serum; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; GST, glutathione S-transferase; Tet, tetracycline.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Yang, W., and Cerione, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24819-24824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Manser, E., Leung, T., Salihuddin, H., Zhao, Z. S., and Lim, L. (1994) Nature 367, 40-46[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Yang, W., Lin, Q., Guan, J.-L., and Cerione, R. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8524-8530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Hall, A. (1998) Science 279, 509-514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Nobes, C. D., and Hall, A. (1995) Cell 81, 53-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Kozma, R., Ahmed, S., Best, A., and Lim, L. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1942-1952[Abstract]
7. Qiu, R.-G., Abo, A., McCormick, F., and Symons, M. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 3449-3458
8. Lin, R., Bagrodia, S., Cerione, R. A., and Manor, D. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 794-797[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Erickson, J. W., Zhang, C., Kahn, R. A., Evans, T., and Cerione, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26850-26854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Olson, M. F., Ashworth, A., and Hall, A. (1995) Science 269, 1270-1272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Zhao, J. H., Reiske, H., and Guan, J.-L. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 1997-2008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Seufferlein, T., and Rozengurt, E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27610-27617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Yang, W., Lo, C. G., Dispenza, T., and Cerione, R. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 17468-17473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Gilmore, A. P., and Burridge, K. (1996) Nature 381, 531-535[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Johnson, D. I. (1999) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 54-105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Erickson, J. W., and Cerione, R. A. (2001) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 153-157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Kozma, R., Sarner, S., Ahmed, S., and Lim, L. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1201-1211[Abstract]
18. Katoh, H., Aoki, J., Ichikawa, A., and Negishi, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2489-2492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Jones, R. J., Brunton, V. G., and Frame, M. C. (2000) Eur. J. Cancer 36, 1595-1606
20. Cary, L. A., Han, D. C., and Guan, J.-L. (1999) Histol. Histopathol. 14, 1001-1009[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Schlaepfer, D. D., Hauch, C. R., and Sieg, D. J. (1999) Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 71, 435-478[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Schlaepfer, D. D., Jones, K. C., and Hunter, T. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 2571-2585[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Chan, R. Tian, Y.-F. Lee, S. T. Sit, L. Lim, and E. Manser
Down-regulation of Active ACK1 Is Mediated by Association with the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Nedd4-2
J. Biol. Chem., March 20, 2009; 284(12): 8185 - 8194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
F. Shen, Q. Lin, Y. Gu, C. Childress, and W. Yang
Activated Cdc42-associated Kinase 1 Is a Component of EGF Receptor Signaling Complex and Regulates EGF Receptor Degradation
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2007; 18(3): 732 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Yokoyama, J. Lougheed, and W. T. Miller
Phosphorylation of WASP by the Cdc42-associated Kinase ACK1: DUAL HYDROXYAMINO ACID SPECIFICITY IN A TYROSINE KINASE
J. Biol. Chem., December 23, 2005; 280(51): 42219 - 42226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. De Calisto, C. Araya, L. Marchant, C. F. Riaz, and R. Mayor
Essential role of non-canonical Wnt signalling in neural crest migration
Development, June 1, 2005; 132(11): 2587 - 2597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
A. Nur-E-Kamal, A. Zhang, S. M. Keenan, X. I. Wang, J. Seraj, T. Satoh, S. Meiners, and W. J. Welsh
Requirement of Activated Cdc42-Associated Kinase for Survival of v-Ras-Transformed Mammalian Cells
Mol. Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 3(5): 297 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
S. Jenna, M.-E. Caruso, A. Emadali, D. T. Nguyen, M. Dominguez, S. Li, R. Roy, J. Reboul, M. Vidal, G. N. Tzimas, et al.
Regulation of Membrane Trafficking by a Novel Cdc42-related Protein in Caenorhabditis elegans Epithelial Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2005; 16(4): 1629 - 1639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. C. Lougheed, R.-H. Chen, P. Mak, and T. J. Stout
Crystal Structures of the Phosphorylated and Unphosphorylated Kinase Domains of the Cdc42-associated Tyrosine Kinase ACK1
J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 44039 - 44045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Tu, W. J. Wu, J. Wang, and R. A. Cerione
Epidermal Growth Factor-dependent Regulation of Cdc42 Is Mediated by the Src Tyrosine Kinase
J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 49293 - 49300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Yokoyama and W. T. Miller
Biochemical Properties of the Cdc42-associated Tyrosine Kinase ACK1: SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY, AUTOPHOSPHORYLATION, AND INTERACTION WITH Hck
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2003; 278(48): 47713 - 47723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. A. Worby, N. Simonson-Leff, J. C. Clemens, D. Huddler Jr., M. Muda, and J. E. Dixon
Drosophila Ack Targets Its Substrate, the Sorting Nexin DSH3PX1, to a Protein Complex Involved in Axonal Guidance
J. Biol. Chem., March 8, 2002; 277(11): 9422 - 9428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/47/43987    most recent
M104819200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cerione, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cerione, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement