|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103358200 on September 13, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 47, 44052-44063, November 23, 2001
Determinants for Membrane Association of the
Hepatitis C Virus RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase*
Juliane
Schmidt-Mende ,
Elke
Bieck ,
Thomas
Hügle ,
François
Penin§,
Charles M.
Rice¶,
Hubert E.
Blum , and
Darius
Moradpour
From the Department of Medicine II, University of
Freiburg, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany, the § Institut de
Biologie et Chimie des Protéines, CNRS-UMR 5086, F-69367,
Lyon Cedex 07, France, and the ¶ Center for the Study of
Hepatitis C, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021
Received for publication, April 16, 2001, and in revised form, August 20, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The hepatitis C virus (HCV)
RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), represented by
nonstructural protein 5B (NS5B), is believed to form a
membrane-associated RNA replication complex together with other
nonstructural proteins and as yet unidentified host components.
However, the determinants for membrane association of this essential
viral enzyme have not been defined. By double label immunofluorescence
analyses, NS5B was found in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or an
ER-like modified compartment both when expressed alone or in the
context of the entire HCV polyprotein. The carboxyl-terminal 21 amino
acid residues were necessary and sufficient to target NS5B or a
heterologous protein to the cytosolic side of the ER membrane. This
hydrophobic domain is highly conserved among 269 HCV isolates analyzed
and predicted to form a transmembrane -helix. Association of NS5B
with the ER membrane occurred by a posttranslational mechanism that was
ATP-independent. These features define the HCV RdRp as a new member of
the tail-anchored protein family, a class of integral membrane proteins
that are membrane-targeted posttranslationally via a carboxyl-terminal
insertion sequence. Formation of the HCV replication complex,
therefore, involves specific determinants for membrane association that
represent potential targets for antiviral intervention.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
With an estimated 170 million chronically infected individuals the
hepatitis C virus (HCV)1 is a
major cause of chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide (1). A protective vaccine does not exist to date,
and therapeutic options are still limited (2). HCV has been classified
in the Hepacivirus genus within the Flaviviridae family that
includes the classical flaviviruses, such as yellow fever virus, and
the animal pestiviruses (3). HCV contains a single-stranded RNA genome
of positive polarity and ~9600 nucleotides (nt) in length that
encodes a polyprotein precursor of about 3000 amino acids (aa) (see
Refs. 4 and 5 for recent reviews) (Fig. 1A). The polyprotein
precursor is co- and posttranslationally processed by cellular and
viral proteases to yield the mature structural and nonstructural
proteins. HCV replication proceeds via synthesis of a complementary
minus strand RNA using the genome as a template and the subsequent
synthesis of genomic plus strand RNA from this minus strand RNA
template. The key enzyme responsible for both of these steps is the
RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), represented by
nonstructural protein 5B (NS5B).
The HCV RdRp has been shown to be essential for viral replication
in vitro (6) and in vivo (7). It has recently
been characterized both biochemically (8-12) and with respect to its three-dimensional structure (13-15). The HCV NS5B protein contains motifs shared by all RdRps and possesses the classical fingers, palm,
and thumb subdomains. As a unique feature of the HCV RdRp extensive
interactions between the fingers and thumb subdomains result in a
completely encircled active site. Interestingly, deletion of the highly
hydrophobic carboxyl-terminal domain of NS5B has been found to increase
solubility of the protein in Escherichia coli (10, 11) and
to alter the subcellular localization in mammalian cells (10).
Three-dimensional structures of NS5B reported thus far lack this
carboxyl-terminal domain.
Compared with the detailed knowledge of its biochemical and structural
features, much less is known about the characteristics of NS5B in a
cellular context. This is due in part to the lack of an efficient cell
culture system permissive for HCV infection and replication and the
difficulty to reliably detect viral proteins in naturally infected
liver tissue. In a preliminary study, NS5B was found to be present as
fine speckles in the cytoplasm of transiently transfected COS 7 cells,
with accumulation in the perinuclear region. The subcellular
localization of this protein was not further defined, however (16).
Membrane flotation analyses from recombinant baculovirus-infected
insect cells revealed NS5B in both membrane and cytosolic fractions,
and several NS5B species with slightly different electrophoretic
mobility were detected by immunoblot using sera from patients with
chronic hepatitis C as a source of primary antibody (16). In a more
recent study, a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-NS5B fusion protein was
found to be distributed throughout the cytoplasm in a "mesh-like
pattern" (17).
Here, we used monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and continuous human cell
lines inducibly expressing NS5B either alone or in the context of the
entire HCV polyprotein to define the subcellular localization of the
HCV RdRp. In addition, a comprehensive set of deletion mutants and GFP
fusion constructs as well as an in vitro
transcription-translation (IVTT) system were employed to examine the
mechanism of NS5B membrane association.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Expression Constructs--
A fragment comprising nt 7602-9377
(aa 2421-3011) of a functional HCV H strain consensus cDNA
(genotype 1a) was amplified by PCR from pBRTM/HCV1-3011con (18) using
primers NS5Bfwd and NS5Brev (Table I). The amplification product was
digested with BamHI and XbaI and cloned into the
BamHI-XbaI sites of pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen, San
Diego, CA) and pGEM-11Zf(+) (Promega, Madison, WI) to yield plasmids
pCMVNS5Bcon and pGEM-11-BXNS5Bcon, respectively. pCMVNS5Bcon allows
both eukaryotic expression from a cytomegalovirus promoter and in
vitro transcription from a T7 RNA polymerase promoter. The
EcoRI-EcoRI fragment of pGEM-11-BXNS5Bcon
comprising HCV nt 7602-8205 and the EcoRI-XbaI
fragment comprising nt 8206-9377 were ligated together into the
EcoRI-XbaI sites of pUHD10-3 (19) to yield
plasmid pUHDNS5Bcon. This construct allows expression of NS5B under the
transcriptional control of a tetracycline-controlled transactivator
(tTA)-dependent promoter.
To construct the expression vector pUHDHCV(H)con, plasmid
pBRTM/HCV1-3011con was linearized with AflII downstream of
the HCV stop codon. The recessed 3' terminus was filled in with Klenow polymerase, followed by digestion of the plasmid with EcoRI
which cuts immediately upstream of the HCV start codon and at nt
position 8205 of the HCV cDNA. The 7803-base pair
EcoRI-EcoRI fragment and the 1200-base pair
EcoRI-AflII fragment were ligated into the
EcoRI-XbaI sites (XbaI site blunted
with Klenow polymerase) of pUHD10-3 to yield plasmid pUHDHCV(H)con.
This construct allows expression of the entire open reading frame
derived from a functional HCV consensus cDNA with authentic
translation initiation and stop codons under the transcriptional
control of a tTA-dependent promoter.
Plasmid pUHDEGFP was constructed by ligation of the
EcoRI-XbaI fragment of pEGFP-N1
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA), coding for an enhanced
GFP, into the EcoRI-XbaI sites of pUHD10-3.
NS5B fragments with carboxyl-terminal deletions were
PCR-amplified from pBRTM/HCV1-3011con using forward primer NS5Bfwd and reverse primers NS5B C12rev, NS5B C16rev, NS5B C21rev,
NS5B C26rev, and NS5B C63rev (Table I), yielding plasmids
pCMVNS5Bcon C12, pCMVNS5Bcon C16, pCMVNS5Bcon C21,
pCMVNS5Bcon C26, and pCMVNS5Bcon C63, respectively (Fig.
2A).
The NheI-EcoRI fragment of pEGFP-C1
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA), comprising the coding
region for an enhanced GFP and convenient restriction sites for
carboxyl-terminal fusions, was subcloned into the
NheI-EcoRI sites of pcDNA3.1 to yield plasmid
pCMVGFP. Plasmids pCMVGFPNS5BconC12, pCMVGFPNS5BconC16,
pCMVGFPNS5BconC21, and pCMVGFPNS5BconC26 (Fig. 3A) were
constructed by ligation of the preannealed primer pairs
NS5B580-591fwd-NS5B580-591rev, NS5B576-591fwd-NS5B576-591rev, NS5B571-591fwd-NS5B571-591rev, and NS5B566-591fwd-NS5B566-591rev, respectively (Table I), into the
BspEI-EcoRI sites of pCMVGFP. These constructs
allow the expression of the last 12, 16, 21, or 26 aa of NS5B fused in
frame to the carboxyl terminus of GFP. pCMVGFPNS5Bcon63, which allows
expression of GFP with the last 63 aa of NS5B fused to its carboxyl
terminus, was constructed by PCR amplification of the corresponding
NS5B fragment from pBRTM/HCV1-3011con using primers NS5B529fwd and
NS5B591rev, followed by digestion of the amplification product with
BspEI and EcoRI, and ligation into the
BspEI-EcoRI sites of pCMVGFP. All expression
constructs were verified by sequencing.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
PCR primers and oligonucleotides
Restriction enzyme recognition sites are underlined, and start and stop
codons are bold.
|
|
Plasmid pTM1-ppl, which allows in vitro transcription of
bovine preprolactin (ppl) from a T7 RNA polymerase promoter, was kindly
provided by Frauke Fehrmann and Hans-Georg Kräusslich, Heinrich
Pette Institute, Hamburg, Germany.
Plasmids pSPUTKVampI (20) and pSPCytb5 (20), which allow expression of
vesicle-associated membrane protein 1 (Vamp1) and cytochrome
b5 (Cb5), respectively, under the control of an
SP6 RNA polymerase promoter, were kindly provided by David W. Andrews, Department of Biochemistry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Tetracycline-regulated Cell Lines--
Tetracycline-regulated
cell lines were generated as described previously (21-24). In brief,
the constitutively tTA-expressing, U-2 OS human osteosarcoma (ATCC
HTB-96)-derived founder cell line UTA-6 (25) was co-transfected with
pUHDNS5Bcon, pUHDHCV(H)con, or pUHDEGFP, respectively, and pBabepuro
(26). G418 and puromycin double-resistant clones were isolated and
screened for tightly regulated HCV protein or GFP expression,
respectively, by immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoblot analyses.
Stable transfections were performed by a modified calcium phosphate
precipitation protocol (27). Transient transfections were performed
with a 22-kDa linear polyethyleneimine derivative (ExGen 500, MBI
Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania).
Antibodies--
The NS5B-specific mAbs 5B-3B1 and 5B-12B7 will
be described elsewhere.2
Briefly, mAb 5B-3B1 recognizes a linear epitope at the palm-thumb subdomain boundary of the HCV RdRp and functions well in immunoblot applications, whereas mAb 5B-12B7 recognizes a conformational epitope
and functions well in immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation analyses. A polyclonal rabbit antiserum against protein disulfide isomerase was obtained from StressGen (Victoria, British Columbia, Canada). The mAb G1/93 against human ERGIC-53 (28) was kindly provided
by Hans-Peter Hauri, University of Basel, Switzerland. A polyclonal
rabbit antiserum to mannosidase II (29) was kindly provided by Kelley
Moremen, University of Georgia, Athens, GA. The mAbs JL-8 against GFP
and C23 (MS-3) against nucleolin were obtained from
CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA) and Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), respectively.
Indirect Immunofluorescence and Confocal Laser Scanning
Microscopy--
Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy was performed
as described previously (21, 22). In brief, cells grown as monolayers on glass coverslips were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.05% saponin, and incubated with primary antibodies in
phosphate-buffered saline containing 3% bovine serum albumin and
0.05% saponin. Bound primary antibody was revealed with fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat F(ab')2 fragment to
mouse IgG F(ab')2 (Cappel, Durham, NC) or sheep
F(ab')2 fragment to rabbit IgG (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). For co-localization experiments, Texas Red
(TXR)-conjugated sheep F(ab')2 to mouse IgG or goat
antibody to rabbit IgG (ICN/Cappel, Aurora, OH) was used as secondary
antibody. For co-localization experiments involving two mAbs of murine
origin, the mAb 5B-12B7 was biotinylated using the FluoReporter
Biotin-XX labeling kit and revealed with TXR-conjugated streptavidin
(both from Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Coverslips were mounted in
SlowFade (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and examined with a Zeiss
Axiovert photomicroscope equipped with an epifluorescence attachment.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy was performed using a Zeiss LSM 410 microscope, and images were processed with the Adobe Photoshop 3.0.5 program.
Western Blot Analysis--
Western blot analysis was performed
as described previously (21, 22).
Subcellular Fractionation--
Subcellular fractionation was
performed essentially as described previously (21). In brief, 5 × 107 cells were homogenized in a hypotonic buffer containing
10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, and 2 mM
MgCl2, followed by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 5 min to yield a nuclear pellet. The supernatant fraction was adjusted to 0.25 M sucrose, and a
mitochondrial pellet was obtained by centrifugation at 9,000 × g for 10 min. Finally, a microsomal pellet was separated
from the cytosolic supernatant by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 40 min.
In Vitro Transcription-Translation (IVTT)--
The TNT T7- and
SP6-coupled reticulocyte lysate systems (Promega, Madison, WI) were
used essentially following the manufacturer's recommendations. IVTT
was routinely performed for 90 min at 30 °C in the presence of 0.8 mCi/ml [35S]methionine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in a
volume of 25 µl. Where indicated, 1.5 µl of canine pancreatic
microsomes (kindly provided by Martin Spiess, Biozentrum, University of
Basel, Switzerland, and Matthias Müller, Department of
Biochemistry, University of Freiburg, Germany) were added.
For membrane sedimentation analyses, 15 µl of NTE buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA) were added after completion of the IVTT reaction,
followed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min.
Supernatants were collected, and pellets were resuspended in 40 µl of
NTE buffer. Subsequently, pellet and supernatant fractions were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography. Gels were scanned on
a Fuji BAS1000 PhosphorImager and analyzed using the Fuji MacBAS
version 2.4 software.
For analyses of co- and posttranslational membrane association,
microsomal membranes were added to the reaction either during or for 45 min at 30 °C after completion of IVTT. In the latter setting
translation was stopped by 1.25 mM puromycin prior to the
addition of microsomal membranes.
For membrane extraction experiments, microsomal membranes were
posttranslationally added to IVTT reactions, followed by sedimentation of membrane-associated material as described above. Subsequently, membrane pellets were resuspended in NTE buffer, 1 M NaCl,
100 mM sodium carbonate, pH 11.5, 2, 4, or 6 M
urea, or 1% Triton X-100 and incubated for 20 min at 4 °C. Finally,
membrane sedimentation analyses were performed and fractions analyzed
by SDS-PAGE.
For protease protection assays, nuclease-free Pronase from
Streptomyces griseus (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was
added to a final concentration of 0.7 mg/ml to IVTT reactions performed in the presence of microsomal membranes. Triton X-100 at a final concentration of 0.5% was added to some of the reactions to disrupt microsomal membranes. After 15 min of incubation at 35 °C,
proteolysis was terminated by the addition of protease inhibitors
(Complete® Protease Inhibitor Mixture, Roche Molecular Biochemicals),
followed by SDS-PAGE of the samples.
ATP was depleted from IVTT reactions after the addition of puromycin by
incubation with 10 units/ml apyrase (Sigma) for 15 min at 30 °C.
Sequence Analyses and Structure Predictions--
The NS5B aa
561-591 sequence of the HCV H strain consensus cDNA (18)
(GenBankTM accession number AF009606) was used to retrieve
all reported isolates from the EMBL data base using the FASTA homology
search program (30). Incomplete sequences were removed from the list of
matching sequences. A final set of 269 sequences of all genotypes was
analyzed to construct Fig. 8, A and B. Multiple
sequence alignments and the consensus sequence determination were
carried out with the ClustalW program (31). All analyses were made
using the IBCP HCV data base website facilities (hepatitis.ibcp.fr).
Visualization of sequence alignments and plotting of the most
frequently represented aa residues at each position were done with the
MPSA program (32). At each aa sequence position, the residue types and
their respective frequencies were computed using a program developed at
the IBCP.3 Various methods
were combined for the prediction of transmembrane sequences as follows:
PHDhtm (33) (www.embl-heidelberg.de/predictprotein/), TMHMM (34)
(www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-1.0/), DAS (35) (www.sbc.su.se/~miklos/DAS/), and TopPred2 (36)
(bioweb.pasteur.fr/seqanal/interfaces/toppred.html). Sequences
homologous to the NS5B aa 561-591 segment were searched in the Protein
Data Bank of three-dimensional structures with SSEARCH program (37)
using IBCP website facilities (npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/).
 |
RESULTS |
Tetracycline-regulated Cell Lines--
A tetracycline-regulated
gene expression system was used to establish U-2 OS human
osteosarcoma-derived cell lines inducibly expressing NS5B either alone
(UNS5Bcon) or in the context of the entire HCV polyprotein (UHCVcon).
In addition, cell lines inducibly expressing GFP (UGFP) were generated
as a control for the subcellular fractionation experiments. Screening
of 50 antibiotic double-resistant clones each resulting from
transfections of the tTA-expressing founder cell line UTA-6 with the
constructs pUHDNS5Bcon, pUHDHCV(H)con, and pUHDEGFP allowed the
isolation of several tightly regulated UNS5Bcon, UHCVcon, and UGFP cell
lines, respectively. Detailed characteristics of the cell lines are
available from the authors upon request. In the following, data
obtained with the cell lines UNS5Bcon-5, UHCVcon-57.3, and UGFP-9.22
will be presented. In addition, all results were confirmed in at least
one independent cell clone. These cell lines were maintained in
continuous culture for more than 12 months and over 50 passages with
stable characteristics and without loss of tightly regulated protein expression.
NS5B Is Localized in the ER--
The subcellular localization of
NS5B was determined by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. A
representative analysis of UNS5Bcon-5 cells is shown in Fig.
1B. Virtually no
immunoreactivity was detected when the cells were cultured in the
presence of tetracycline. NS5B expression became clearly detectable
6 h following tetracycline withdrawal (data not shown) and
increased to reach a steady-state level after 24 h. At this time
point, the mAb 5B-12B7 revealed a reticular staining pattern, which
surrounded the nucleus, extended through the cytoplasm, and appeared to
include the nuclear membrane. No nuclear or plasma membrane staining
was observed. In UHCVcon-57.3 cells, which inducibly express NS5B in
the context of the entire HCV polyprotein, the cytoplasmic reticular
staining pattern was very similar to that observed in UNS5Bcon-5 cells
(Fig. 1B). Taken together, the NS5B staining pattern
observed in these cell lines was typical of a membrane-associated
protein and highly suggestive of a localization of the protein in the
ER. Co-expression of other HCV structural and nonstructural proteins in
the context of the entire polyprotein did not appreciably alter the
subcellular localization of NS5B. Finally, control UGFP-9.22 cells
showed the typical diffuse cytoplasmic and nuclear GFP fluorescence
upon tetracycline withdrawal (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
NS5B is localized in the ER.
A, expression cassettes present in UNS5Bcon and UHCVcon
cells. Included HCV aa positions are indicated below. The
genetic organization and polyprotein processing of HCV are
schematically illustrated on top. Diamonds denote cleavages
of the HCV polyprotein precursor by the ER signal peptidase, and
arrows indicate cleavages by the NS2-3 and NS3 proteases.
Asterisks indicate glycosylation of the envelope proteins.
B, subcellular localization of NS5B. UNS5Bcon-5,
UHCVcon-57.3, and UGFP-9.22 cells were cultured in the presence
(+tet) or for 24 h in the absence of tetracycline
( tet) and subsequently processed for indirect
immunofluorescence microscopy using the mAb 5B-12B7 or, in the case of
UGFP-9.22 cells, viewed directly by fluorescence microscopy.
C, subcellular fractionation. UNS5Bcon-5 (right
panel) and UGFP-9.22 cells (left panel) were cultured
for 24 h in the absence of tetracycline and subsequently subjected
to subcellular fractionation as described under "Experimental
Procedures." About 60 µg of protein per lane was separated by 12%
SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblot using the mAb 5B-3B1 against NS5B
or the mAb JL-8 against GFP, respectively. nuc, nuclear;
mit, mitochondrial; mic, microsomal;
cyt, cytosolic fraction. D, UNS5Bcon-5 cells were
cultured for 24 h in the absence of tetracycline and subsequently
processed for double immunolabeling with polyclonal rabbit antisera
against protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), mannosidase II
(ManII), and mAb 5B-12B7 against NS5B. Bound primary
antibodies were revealed with FITC- and TXR-conjugated secondary
antibodies, respectively. Slides were analyzed by confocal laser
scanning microscopy as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Horizontal sections taken through the center of the nuclei
are shown. Images recorded in red (TXR) and
green (FITC) channels are presented separately on
the left and on the right, respectively, and
composite images are shown in the middle.
|
|
Subcellular fractionation experiments were performed to confirm the
membrane association of NS5B suggested by the immunofluorescence data.
For this purpose, cells were lysed in a hypotonic buffer and separated
roughly into nuclear, mitochondrial, microsomal, and cytosolic
fractions by differential centrifugation (Fig. 1C). When
equal amounts of protein from each fraction were analyzed by
immunoblot, NS5B was detected only in the membrane-containing fractions, i.e. the nuclear pellet (which contains the outer
nuclear membrane (contiguous with the ER) and membranes adsorbed to the nucleus), the mitochondrial pellet (containing ER membranes, which in
U-2 OS cells are often wrapped around mitochondria (21)), and the
microsomal pellet, whereas it was not detected in the cytosolic
fraction. By contrast, GFP was found in all cell fractions (Fig.
1C). Taken together, these results clearly demonstrate the membrane association of NS5B.
The staining pattern and the subcellular fractionation data were highly
suggestive of an association of NS5B with the ER. To explore further
the subcellular localization of NS5B, double label immunofluorescence
experiments with antibodies to cellular marker proteins were performed.
As shown in Fig. 1D, NS5B co-localized perfectly with
protein disulfide isomerase, a marker for the ER. The NS5B staining
pattern observed in these cells was different, however, from that
revealed by antibodies directed against ERGIC-53, a marker of the
ER-to-Golgi intermediate compartment (data not illustrated), and
mannosidase II, a marker of the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 1D). A
minor association of NS5B with these related compartments cannot be
completely excluded by this technique. Taken together, however, these
results clearly demonstrate that the major localization of NS5B is the
ER or an ER-like modified compartment.
As previously shown by us (21-24) and others (38) using the
tetracycline-regulated gene expression system, there was some heterogeneity in expression levels among individual cells of a given
monoclonal cell line. This feature inherent to the expression system
explains the observation that not all cells stained with antibodies
against marker proteins also stained for NS5B in the double
immunolabeling experiments.
The Carboxyl-terminal 21 aa of NS5B Serve as a Membrane
Anchor--
Evidence obtained in E. coli (10, 11) and
mammalian cells (10) suggests that the highly hydrophobic
carboxyl-terminal domain of NS5B serves as a membrane anchor. To
explore systematically the role of this domain in determining the
subcellular localization of NS5B, we generated a panel of
carboxyl-terminal deletion constructs shown in Fig.
2A. The NS5B C12 construct
encodes at its 3' end the four leucine residues that are conserved in
all HCV genotypes and were found in E. coli to be an
important determinant of protein solubility (11). NS5B C16 lacks
these four leucine residues, NS5B C21 the entire highly hydrophobic
carboxyl-terminal domain, and NS5B C26 the absolutely conserved
positively charged aa residues flanking the hydrophobic domain.
Finally, the NS5B C63 construct represents the minimal domain
required for polymerase activity of NS5B (11). These constructs were
transiently transfected into U-2 OS human osteosarcoma and HuH-7 human
hepatocellular carcinoma cells (39), followed by immunofluorescence
analyses using the NS5B-specific mAb 5B-12B7. Representative data
obtained in U-2 OS cells are shown in Fig. 2B. Identical
results were found in HuH-7 cells (data not illustrated).
Interestingly, deletion of the carboxyl-terminal 12 aa of NS5B
(NS5B C12) abolished the typical ER staining pattern, resulting in a
diffuse cytoplasmic and nuclear staining. Deletion of 16 aa
(NS5B C16) led in addition to a concentration in nuclear globular
structures, corresponding to the nucleoli (Fig. 2C), as well
as occasional large cytoplasmic dots (particularly in cells expressing
high levels of the truncated protein). The staining pattern of
NS5B C21 and NS5B C26 was very similar to NS5B C16. NS5B C63,
however, did not accumulate in the nucleoli but rather appeared to
spare these. A shared structural feature of nucleolar proteins is the
presence of an RNA recognition motif that binds either ribosomal RNAs
synthesized in the nucleolus or small nucleolar RNAs (40). Our
observation, therefore, suggests the presence of an RNA binding domain
located between aa positions 529 and 566 of NS5B. Indeed, based on
modeling of the HCV RdRp with the template and primer RNA (15), aa
residues 558-563 are probably involved in RNA contact. Alternatively,
Arg-531, Lys-533, and Lys-535 (see Fig. 2A) are basic
residues with intrinsic nucleic acid-binding properties and thus could
also play a role in nucleolar localization of NS5B C16, NS5B C21,
and NS5B C26.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The carboxyl-terminal 21 aa of NS5B
serve as a membrane anchor. A, schematic representation
of the carboxyl-terminal NS5B deletion constructs. Amino acid sequences
of representative HCV isolates with the HCV H consensus clone shown in
the 1st line are given below. Positively charged aa residues
are indicated. B, subcellular localization of
carboxyl-terminal NS5B deletion constructs. U-2 OS cells were
transiently transfected with pCMVNS5Bcon (NS5B),
pCMVNS5Bcon C12 (NS5B C12), pCMVNS5Bcon C16 (NS5B C16),
pCMVNS5Bcon C21 (NS5B C21), pCMVNS5Bcon C26 (NS5B C26), or
pCMVNS5Bcon C63 (NS5B C63), as indicated by the captions. Cells
were subsequently processed for indirect immunofluorescence microscopy
using the mAb 5B-12B7 as described under "Experimental Procedures."
C, confocal laser scanning microscopy. U-2 OS cells were
transiently transfected with pCMVNS5Bcon or pCMVNS5Bcon C21 and
processed 36 h later for confocal laser scanning microscopy using
the mAb 5B-12B7 as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells
were counterstained with propidium iodide (PI) to visualize
nuclei. Horizontal sections taken through the center of the nuclei are
shown. Images recorded in green (FITC) and red
(PI) channels are presented separately on the
left and on the right, respectively, and
composite images are shown in the middle. The
inset in the lower left panel shows a double
label immunofluorescence analysis with the mAb C23 (MS-3) against
nucleolin and biotinylated mAb 5B-12B7 against NS5B. In this case,
reactivity of the anti-nucleolin mAb was revealed with a FITC-labeled
secondary antibody and reactivity of the biotinylated anti-NS5B mAb
with TXR-conjugated streptavidin.
|
|
Confocal laser scanning microscopy was performed to confirm the
findings obtained by conventional immunofluorescence analyses. As
representatively shown for the full-length NS5B and the NS5B C21 constructs (Fig. 2C), deletion of the carboxyl-terminal 21 aa led to nuclear redistribution of the protein with accumulation in
the nucleoli. A double label immunofluorescence analysis demonstrating co-localization of NS5B C21 with the nucleolar marker protein nucleolin is shown in the inset.
The Carboxyl-terminal 21 aa of NS5B Are Necessary and Sufficient to
Target a Heterologous Protein to the ER Membrane--
To assess
whether the membrane anchor of NS5B can target a heterologous protein
to the ER, we generated a panel of fusion constructs. As shown in Fig.
3A, the last 12, 16, 21, 26, or 63 aa residues of NS5B were fused in frame to the carboxyl terminus of GFP. These constructs were transiently transfected into U-2 OS cells
and examined by fluorescence microscopy. GFP as well as the GFPC12 and
GFPC16 fusion constructs were diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm
and nucleus. Interestingly, fusion of the 21 carboxyl-terminal aa of
NS5B to the carboxyl terminus of GFP led to a dramatic change in the
subcellular distribution. In this case, the GFPC21 fusion construct
showed the same staining pattern as NS5B with a fine reticular network
involving the nuclear membrane and extending into the cytoplasm. GFPC26
and GFPC63 were very similar to GFPC21. Identical results were obtained
in transiently transfected HuH-7 cells (data not shown).

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The carboxyl-terminal 21 aa of NS5B are
necessary and sufficient to target a heterologous protein to the ER
membrane. A, schematic representation of
carboxyl-terminal GFP fusion constructs. The aa sequence of the HCV H
consensus clone is shown at the top. B, U-2 OS cells were
transiently transfected with pCMVGFP (GFP), pCMVGFPNS5BconC12 (GFPC12),
pCMVGFPNS5BconC16 (GFPC16), pCMVGFPNS5BconC21 (GFPC21),
pCMVGFPNS5BconC26 (GFPC26), or pCMVGFPNS5BconC63 (GFPC63), as indicated
by the captions. Cells were subsequently viewed by fluorescence
microscopy. C, subcellular fractionation. U-2 OS cells were
transiently transfected with pCMVGFP (GFP), pCMVGFPNS5BconC16 (GFPC16),
pCMVGFPNS5BconC21 (GFPC21), or pCMVGFPNS5BconC26 (GFPC26) and
subsequently subjected to subcellular fractionation as described under
"Experimental Procedures." In this case, the 9000 × g centrifugation step was omitted, and the combined
mitochondrial and microsomal pellet resulted from a 100,000 × g centrifugation. Per lane 15 µg of protein was separated
by 12% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblot using the mAb JL-8 against
GFP. nuc, nuclear; cyt, cytosolic;
mit/mic, mitochondrial and microsomal fraction.
|
|
These fluorescence microscopy results were confirmed by subcellular
fractionation of transiently transfected U-2 OS cells. As shown in Fig.
3C, the amount of cytosolic GFP dramatically decreased with
addition of 21 or 26 carboxyl-terminal aa of NS5B, whereas addition of
16 aa had no significant effect.
Since a lysine residue located at position 24 of the GFPC21 fusion
construct (. . . . .
.ELYKSG WFWFCLLLLAAGVGIYLLPNR) could functionally
substitute the conserved arginine residues flanking the hydrophobic
carboxyl-terminal domain of NS5B (. . . . .
.SHARPR WFWFCLLLLAAGVGIYLLPNR), we
mutated this lysine to a serine. However, the subcellular localization of the resulting GFPC21-K24S construct (. . . . .
.ELYSSG WFWFCLLLLAAGVGIYLLPNR) was identical to that of the
original GFPC21 construct (data not illustrated), confirming that
the carboxyl-terminal 21 aa of NS5B are sufficient to target a
heterologous protein to the ER membrane. Nevertheless, in the
subcellular fractionation experiments shown in Fig. 3C, the
amount of cytosolic GFP was lower for GFPC26 as compared with GFPC21,
suggesting that membrane association may be stabilized by the
positively charged aa residues amino-terminal to the hydrophobic
core sequence.
Taken together, these experiments unequivocally demonstrate that the
carboxyl-terminal 21 aa of NS5B are necessary and sufficient to target
a heterologous protein to the ER membrane.
Membrane Association of NS5B Occurs Post-translationally--
IVTT
and membrane sedimentation analyses were performed to characterize
further the membrane association of NS5B. NS5B was translated in a
coupled rabbit reticulocyte lysate system in the presence or absence of
microsomal membranes. Subsequently, membrane-associated material was
separated by centrifugation, and NS5B was quantified in both fractions.
To elucidate the mechanism of membrane association, we first examined
whether membrane targeting of NS5B occurs co- or posttranslationally.
In eukaryotic cells, ER transport of membrane proteins is generally
mediated by a signal sequence that is recognized by the signal
recognition particle (SRP). The SRP interacts with the signal sequence
of nascent polypeptide chains during translation and directs the
translation complex to the ER membrane. SRP-mediated ER transport,
therefore, occurs only co-translationally. NS5B, however, would be
expected to be inserted into membranes posttranslationally because the
membrane anchor will be buried within the translating ribosome when the
termination codon is reached. To distinguish between these two
possibilities, microsomal membranes were added to the reaction either
during or after completion of IVTT. Puromycin was added to the reaction
mixture in the posttranslational setting to stop translation and to
ensure that polypeptides were released from ribosomes. As represented
in Fig. 4, when NS5B was translated in
the absence of microsomal membranes only 7% was subsequently found in
the pellet fraction. By contrast, 88% of the protein pelleted when
translation was performed in the presence of microsomal membranes.
These results demonstrate that membrane association of NS5B occurs very
efficiently also in vitro. Interestingly, 89% of NS5B was
found in the pellet when the membranes were added posttranslationally.
This demonstrates that membrane association of NS5B can occur by a
posttranslational mechanism.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Membrane association of NS5B occurs
posttranslationally. IVTT reactions of pCMVNS5Bcon were performed
in the presence (co) or absence of microsomal membranes
(post and ). After 1 h translation was
stopped by the addition of puromycin to 1.25 mM, and
microsomal membranes were added to a set of the reactions without
membranes (post) and incubated for 1 additional h.
Subsequently, membrane sedimentation analyses were performed as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Supernatant
(S) and pellet fractions (P) were applied in
equivalent amounts and separated by 12% SDS-PAGE.
[35S]Methionine-labeled translation products were
detected by autoradiography. Quantitation was performed as described
under "Experimental Procedures," and values expressed in percent
are given at the bottom. Molecular mass standards in kDa are
indicated on the left.
|
|
NS5B Is a Cytoplasmically Oriented Integral ER Membrane
Protein--
The presence of a carboxyl-terminal membrane anchor
mediating posttranslational membrane association defines the HCV RdRp as a member of the so-called tail-anchored protein family. As such,
NS5B would be expected to behave as a cytoplasmically oriented integral
membrane protein. This possibility was explored by membrane extraction
and protease protection experiments. NS5B was translated in
vitro and posttranslationally incubated with microsomal membranes, followed by differential extraction of the pellet. High salt extraction (1 M NaCl) shields charges and weakens ionic interactions
that bind peripheral proteins to membranes either directly or
indirectly through other membrane proteins (41). Treatment with 100 mM sodium carbonate, pH 11.5, releases peripheral proteins
by transforming microsomes into membrane sheets (42). As shown in Fig.
5, NS5B remained predominantly associated
with microsomal membranes under both conditions. In addition, membrane
pellets were extracted with 2, 4, or 6 M urea. As shown in
Fig. 5, about 80% of the in vitro translated protein
remained in the pellet fraction following extraction with 4 M urea. Finally, membranes were disrupted with 1% Triton
X-100, resulting in the release of NS5B into the supernatant fraction.
Taken together, these results demonstrate that NS5B behaves as an
integral membrane protein and thus fulfills the criteria of a typical
tail-anchored protein. In this respect, the extraction profile
paralleled that of Cb5 and Vamp1 (data not illustrated).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
NS5B is an integral membrane protein.
Microsomal membranes were posttranslationally added to IVTT reactions
of pCMVNS5Bcon. Subsequently, reaction mixtures were centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000 × g to sediment microsomal membranes
containing associated NS5B protein. The supernatants were removed, and
the pellets were resuspended in NTE buffer, 1 M NaCl, 100 mM sodium carbonate, pH 11.5, 2, 4, or 6 M
urea, or 1% Triton X-100, and incubated for 20 min at 4 °C.
Subsequently, membrane sedimentation analyses were performed as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Supernatant
(S) and pellet (P) fractions were applied in
equivalent amounts and separated by 12% SDS-PAGE.
[35S]Methionine-labeled translation products were
detected by autoradiography. Quantitation was performed as described
under "Experimental Procedures," and values expressed in % are
given at the bottom and depicted as bars.
Light gray bars represent supernatant and dark gray
bars pellet fractions.
|
|
Protease protection experiments were performed to determine the
orientation of NS5B in the ER membrane. As shown in Fig.
6, Pronase treatment of IVTT reactions
performed in the presence of microsomal membranes resulted in the
complete disappearance of the NS5B signal. This protease sensitivity of
NS5B indicates that the majority of the protein is localized on the
cytoplasmic side of the ER membrane. In these experiments, ppl was used
as control for the integrity of microsomal membranes. Ppl is directed to the ER membrane by interaction of its signal sequence with the SRP.
Signal sequence cleavage is performed by the signal peptidase located
at the luminal side of the ER membrane, followed by release of
prolactin into the ER lumen (43). As expected, prolactin was protected
from Pronase digestion in the presence of microsomal membranes. It
became accessible to proteolysis only after disruption of the membranes
by detergent. Most importantly, addition of the NS5B insertion sequence
to the carboxyl terminus of GFP targeted the fusion protein to the
cytosolic side of microsomal membranes, as shown for GFPC26 in Fig.
6.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
NS5B is cytoplasmically oriented on the ER
membrane. IVTT reactions of pCMVNS5Bcon, pCMVGFPNS5BconC26, and
pTM1-ppl were performed in the absence or presence of microsomal
membranes (MM), followed by digestion with 0.7 mg/ml Pronase
(P) for 15 min at 35 °C in the absence or presence of
0.5% Triton X-100 (TX-100) as indicated at the
top. Aliquots of each reaction were analyzed by 12%
SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. Molecular mass standards in
kDa are indicated on the right.
|
|
Posttranslational Membrane Association of NS5B Occurs by an
ATP-independent Mechanism--
Tail-anchored proteins fall into two
major categories, proteins whose membrane targeting depends on ATP
(exemplified by the VAMPs) and those whose membrane targeting occurs by
an ATP-independent mechanism (exemplified by Cb5). Therefore, we next
examined the ATP dependence using these proteins as controls. ATP was
depleted from IVTT reactions by the adenosine 5'-tri- and -phosphatase activity of apyrase. As shown in Fig. 7,
posttranslational targeting of NS5B to microsomal membranes in
vitro was not affected by ATP depletion, indicating that it occurs
by an ATP-independent mechanism.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Posttranslational membrane association of
NS5B occurs by an ATP-independent mechanism. IVTT reactions of
pCMVNS5Bcon, pSPCytb5, and pSPUTKVampI were performed in the absence of
microsomal membranes, followed by the addition of puromycin to 1.25 mM. ATP was depleted from one set of reactions by the
addition of apyrase as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Subsequently, microsomal membranes (MM) were added for
1 h as indicated at the top. Finally, membrane
sedimentation analyses were performed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Supernatant (S) and pellet
fractions (P) were applied in equivalent amounts and
separated by 12% SDS-PAGE in the case of NS5B and 15% SDS-PAGE in the
case of Cb5 and Vamp1. [35S]Methionine-labeled
translation products were detected by autoradiography. Quantitation was
performed as described under "Experimental Procedures," and values
expressed in % are given at the bottom. Molecular mass
standards in kDa are indicated on the left.
|
|
Sequence Comparisons and Structure Predictions--
The data shown
above define the carboxyl-terminal domain of NS5B as a new membrane
insertion sequence. Sequence comparisons were performed to assess the
degree of conservation of this sequence among different HCV isolates
and to identify motifs potentially involved in membrane targeting and
insertion. Analysis of the conservation of this sequence among 269 HCV
isolates of various genotypes revealed a high degree of aa sequence
similarity (Fig. 8A). Fifty
percent of residues are fully conserved, and most of the positions
showing apparent variability are in fact occupied by aa residues with
similar hydropathic character (Fig. 8B). Overall, despite
the presence of conserved neutral residues at positions 580, 582, and
584, the carboxyl-terminal sequence appears as a highly hydrophobic
core (segment 572-589) that is predicted to be a transmembrane segment
by all analyses performed (PHDhtm, TMHMM, DAS, and TopPred2, see under
"Experimental Procedures"). The length of this transmembrane
segment (18 aa) is consistent with the typical length of transmembrane
-helices. The transmembrane segment is flanked by two (or three)
positively charged residues on the amino-terminal side (aa positions
566, 568 and 570) and a positively charged arginine residue at the very
carboxyl terminus (aa position 591). Arg-568 and Arg-570 were found to
be absolutely conserved, indicating that they are essential. Position
569 is always occupied by a small residue (Pro, Thr or Ser), as well as
position 567 (Ala or Val). Hence, the 566-570 segment appears flexible, positively charged, and is probably involved in membrane surface binding via electrostatic interactions with the polar head of
phospholipids. Position 571 is clearly variable but either occupied by
a hydrophobic residue or histidine, i.e. residues that are
likely to be located at the membrane interface. Positions 572-579
(except 575) as well as positions 585-588 are occupied by large
hydrophobic residues that indicate an -helical folding of this
region. By contrast, the connecting segment 580-584 (SVGVG) between
these two hydrophobic stretches exhibits flexible properties, in
particular at the level of the fully conserved Gly-582 and Gly-584.
Because glycine residues are known to act as helix breakers, one can
wonder whether this connecting segment can adopt an -helical fold.
To address this issue, we searched for sequence homologies between the
NS5B aa 561-591 segment and proteins of known three-dimensional structure. Interestingly, 40.9% aa identity was found between the NS5B
aa 571-588 segment and the first transmembrane -helix of
bacteriorhodopsin (Fig. 8C). In addition, 41.2% identity
was found between the NS5B aa 571-587 segment and the photosynthetic reaction center, chain M, whose structure has been identified as a
transmembrane -helix as well (Protein Data Bank entry code 6PRM;
data not shown). The presence of similar GLG and SASVG segments in
these known -helices confirms that GVG in NS5B can adopt an
-helical fold in a membrane environment. Finally, residues at
positions 589 and 590 are characteristic of the carboxyl-terminal end
of an -helix (proline is a helix breaker and asparagine is often
involved in carboxyl-terminal helix capping). In conclusion, the
carboxyl-terminal domain of NS5B can be reliably predicted to form a
transmembrane -helix starting at residue 570 and ending at residue
589. An -helix projection of the NS5B aa 571-588 segment is shown
in Fig. 8D.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Sequence comparisons and structure
predictions. A, repertoire of aa per position in 269 HCV isolates. Amino acids are listed in decreasing order of observed
frequency, from top to bottom. Amino acids within
the box correspond to residues observed in more than 10% of the 269 sequences. Amino acids observed at a given position in fewer than three
distinct sequences (<1%) were not taken into consideration. Fully
conserved, conserved, and similar residues at each position are
symbolized by an asterisk, a colon, and a
dot, respectively. #, prediction of minimal transmembrane
segment deduced from various prediction methods (see "Experimental
Procedures"). B, histogram showing the hydropathic
character of residues at each NS5B position. The height of each
box in each bar indicates the number of sequences observed with a
given residue at a given position. The boxes are presented
in order of decreasing hydrophobicity, from bottom to top,
according to the hydrophobicity scale of Black and Mold (F, I,
W, Y, L, V, M, P, C, A, G, T, S, K, Q, N, H, E, D, R). Each box is
colored according to the hydrophobic character of the residue:
dark gray for hydrophobic (F, I, W, Y, L, V, M, P, C, A),
light gray for neutral (G, T, S), and white for hydrophilic
(K, Q, N, H, E, D, R). C, similarity of the NS5B insertion
sequence with the first transmembrane -helix of bacteriorhodopsin
(Protein Data Bank code 1F50) (77). Struc., secondary
structure of the transmembrane segment deduced from the
bacteriorhodopsin three-dimensional structure: h, helix;
s, bend; t, hydrogen-bonded turn. D,
ideal -helix projection of the NS5B[571-588] segment. The
variability of residues at each position is included, according to
A. The larger characters indicate the most frequently
observed residues. Outline, italic, and bold
letters correspond to neutral (G, S, and T), hydrophilic, and
hydrophobic residues, respectively.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Formation of a membrane-associated replication complex is a
characteristic feature of positive-strand RNA viruses (44-49). In this
context, physical interactions between NS4A and a NS4B-5A cleavage
substrate on the one hand (50) and between NS5B and NS3 as well as NS4A
on the other hand have been described (51). The mechanisms of membrane
association and the protein-protein interactions involved in formation
of the HCV replication complex, however, are poorly understood. A
highly complex and subtly regulated scenario is likely, not the least
in view of recent data on membrane targeting of the HCV NS3-4A complex
by the NS4A polypeptide (23) and the conformational changes of this
complex predicted for cis- and trans-processing
events (52).
The best characterized mechanism of membrane insertion in mammalian
cells is the SRP-mediated pathway (53). Here, membrane targeting is
initiated co-translationally by a signal sequence encoded near the
amino terminus of the nascent peptide. The signal sequence in the
ribosome-bound nascent chain interacts with the SRP that then docks at
the ER. For these proteins integration occurs via a complex multistep
process ending with release of the polypeptide into the lipid membrane
coincident with the completion of protein synthesis. Another small but
rapidly growing class of membrane proteins lacks an amino-terminal
signal sequence and instead is targeted via a carboxyl-terminal
hydrophobic domain termed insertion sequence (reviewed in Ref. 54). The
prototype of this class of integral membrane proteins, termed
tail-anchored proteins, is Cb5. Other examples include members of the
soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein
receptor proteins, such as the VAMPs (20, 55, 56), Bcl-2 (57), polyoma
virus middle T antigen (58, 59), vaccinia virus H3L envelope protein
(60), and pseudorabies virus Us9 protein (61). The carboxyl-terminal
location of insertion sequences implies that these proteins are
targeted to and integrated into the bilayer of membranes
posttranslationally. Therefore, neither SRP nor SRP receptor is
involved in the membrane association of these proteins.
The features described here, namely posttranslational membrane
association via a carboxyl-terminal insertion sequence, behavior as an
integral membrane protein, and cytosolic orientation, define the HCV
RdRp as a new member of the tail-anchored protein family. NS5B
represents the first polymerase within this family. The NS5B insertion
sequence was mapped to the highly hydrophobic carboxyl-terminal 21 aa
of the protein. This domain was necessary and sufficient to target NS5B
or a heterologous protein to the cytosolic side of the ER membrane.
Sequence analyses reliably predicted that this segment can form a
single -helix despite the presence of flexible glycine residues
within the center of the transmembrane domain. It is well documented
that glycine residues can be involved in specific dimerization of
transmembrane segments in membrane proteins such as glycophorin A (62)
and phage M13 coat proteins (63). In these cases, however, the glycine
residues are located on the same side of the -helix, as observed
with the typical GXXXG motif (64, 65). In the case of NS5B,
however, Gly-582 and Gly-584 occupy opposite sides in the putative
transmembrane helix (Fig. 8D). Although it could not be
ruled out that these glycines might be involved in transmembrane
helix-helix interactions, it is tempting to speculate that these
residues are essential to allow some flexibility to the polypeptide
chain during the membrane insertion process.
The mechanism of membrane association of NS5B is by current knowledge
unique among HCV proteins. In this context, membrane targeting of the
structural proteins appears to be mediated by the classical
SRP-dependent pathway (66, 67), whereas NS3 has been shown
to be targeted to the ER or an ER-like modified compartment via
interaction with its cofactor NS4A (23), and NS4B is co-translationally
targeted to the ER where it behaves as an integral membrane protein
(24).
Very little is known about the mechanisms involved in insertion
sequence-mediated membrane integration and the mechanisms that regulate
membrane selectivity (56, 68). Membrane integration of Cb5 in
vitro is promiscuous, spontaneous, and independent of membrane
proteins (20). Nevertheless, when expressed in cells, both Cb5 and
fusion proteins containing the Cb5 insertion sequence associate
specifically with the ER membrane (69). Therefore, Cb5 insertion
sequence-mediated subcellular localization appears to be regulated by
targeting of the molecule to the ER membrane. After correct targeting,
membrane integration probably occurs spontaneously (20). Membrane
binding of VAMPs, on the other hand, requires ATP and a
trypsin-sensitive component of the ER membrane (20, 55). Thus, there
are at least two different mechanisms for correct membrane integration
of proteins with insertion sequences, one mediated primarily by
targeting and one relying on putative receptors in the target membrane
to mediate selective integration (20). Here, we showed that
posttranslational membrane association of NS5B occurs by an
ATP-independent mechanism. Further studies will be aimed at identifying
the determinants for membrane selectivity and the mechanism of membrane
insertion. In this context, it will be interesting to systematically
mutate conserved aa residues within the NS5B insertion sequence and to
analyze the phenotype of these mutants in vitro and in
transfected cells. The most complete three-dimensional structure of
NS5B composes the structure up to aa residue 563 (15). Ultimately,
therefore, resolution of the three-dimensional structure of the very
hydrophobic carboxyl-terminal domain of the HCV RdRp will provide a
framework for a molecular understanding of the insertion mechanism.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme
UBC6 is a tail-anchored protein found in the ER. Interestingly, lengthening of the insertion sequence from 17 to 21 aa resulted in
retargeting to the Golgi complex and a further increase in length to 26 aa allowed the modified protein to traverse the secretory pathway and
gain expression at the plasma membrane (70). Similar observations were
made with the yeast ER t-soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor Ufe1p, where lengthening of the
transmembrane domain allows transport along the secretory pathway (71)
or, in mammalian cells, in the case of Cb5, where targeting to the ER
membrane was found to be defined by the length of the insertion
sequence (72, 73). In the case of NS5B, however, extension of the
insertion sequence by 4 or 8 hydrophobic residues did not alter the
subcellular localization of the
protein.4
Membrane association of NS5B was independent of the expression of other
HCV proteins. In this context, co-transfection experiments with the
NS5B C21 construct and the NS3-4A complex, NS4B, or NS5A, which by
themselves are membrane-associated (23,
24),5 did not alter the
subcellular localization of the carboxyl-terminally truncated NS5B
protein. Protein-protein interactions within the presumed HCV
replication complex, therefore, do not seem to be sufficient to target
NS5B to the ER membrane. By contrast, poliovirus three-dimensional
polymerase expressed by itself, for example, is not
membrane-associated. In this case, membrane association is believed to
be mediated by interactions with other components of the poliovirus
replication complex, possibly the viral protein 3AB (74, 75). With
respect to related members of the Flaviviridae family, analyses of GB
virus sequences by various transmembrane prediction methods clearly
indicate that the carboxyl terminus of GBV-B NS5B contains a putative
transmembrane domain similar to that observed for HCV (data not shown).
By contrast, in the case of GBV-A and GBV-C/HGV NS5B the presence of a
carboxyl-terminal membrane anchor is ambiguous and should be
investigated experimentally. Interestingly, no transmembrane domain was
predicted for flavi- and pestivirus NS5 and NS5B proteins,
respectively. This is a major difference when compared with
hepaciviruses, suggesting that the RdRps of flavi- and pestiviruses are
membrane-targeted by different mechanisms, if at all.
In the context of the HCV polyprotein, membrane anchoring by the
carboxyl-terminal end, presumably occurring rapidly after release from
the ribosome, could represent a strategy to hold together the
components of the replication complex during polyprotein processing.
Proteolytic cleavage by the NS3-4A complex has been shown both in
heterologous expression systems as well as in cell lines harboring
subgenomic HCV replicons to occur rapidly between NS5A and NS5B,
resulting in a rather stable NS4A-4B-5A precursor that is processed
slowly into the individual products (76). If NS5B has a loose
association with other replicase components anchoring of NS5B to the ER
membrane in a well defined orientation could facilitate low affinity
interactions with the other ER-associated replicase components. Such a
loose association of NS5B with other replicase components may be
important for its multiple roles in initiation of minus and plus strand
RNA synthesis and chain elongation.
Finally, identification of the carboxyl-terminal 21 aa of NS5B as a
signal for targeting and insertion of heterologous proteins to the
cytosolic side of the ER membrane may have a number of interesting
applications. For example, this insertion sequence may be used to
target antiviral effector molecules to the HCV replication complex.
In conclusion, the results presented here define the HCV RdRp as a new
member of the tail-anchored protein family. Elucidation of the
determinants for membrane selectivity and the membrane insertion
mechanism of the HCV RdRp as well as its involvement in formation of
the membrane-associated replication complex may lead to new insights
into fundamental cellular processes and define novel targets for
antiviral intervention.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge Martin Spiess and
Matthias Müller for microsomal membranes and stimulating
discussions; Volker Brass for help with membrane extraction
experiments; Benno Wölk for assistance with confocal laser
scanning microscopy; Christoph Englert for UTA-6 cells; Frauke Fehrmann
and Hans-Georg Kräusslich for plasmid pTM1-ppl; David W. Andrews
for plasmids pSPUTKVampI and pSPCytb5; Hans-Peter Hauri for mAb G1/93
against ERGIC-53; and Kelley Moremen for the antiserum against
mannosidase II.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant Mo 799/1-2 from the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to D. M. and H. E. B.) and by
grants from the United States Public Health Service and the Greenberg Medical Research Foundation (to C. M. R.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medicine
II, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. Tel.: 49 761 270 3510; Fax: 49 761 270 3610; E-mail:
moradpou@ruf.uni-freiburg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 13, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103358200
2
D. Moradpour, et al.,
manuscript in preparation.
3
C. Combet, unpublished data.
4
J. Schmidt-Mende and D. Moradpour, unpublished data.
5
D. Moradpour et al., unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HCV, hepatitis C
virus;
aa, amino acid;
Cb5, cytochrome b5;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
IVTT, in vitro transcription-translation;
mAb, monoclonal
antibody;
NS5B, nonstructural protein 5B;
nt, nucleotide;
ppl, preprolactin;
RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase;
SRP, signal recognition particle;
tTA, tetracycline-controlled
transactivator;
TXR, Texas Red;
Vamp1, vesicle-associated membrane
protein 1;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
World Health Organization.
(1999)
J. Viral Hepat.
6,
35-47[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Moradpour, D.,
Cerny, A.,
Heim, M. H.,
and Blum, H. E.
(2001)
Swiss Med. Wkly.
131,
291-298[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
van Regenmortel, M. H. V., Fauquet, C. M., Bishop, D. H. L., Carstens, E. B., Estes, M. K., Lemon, S. M., Maniloff, J., Mayo, M. A., McGeoch, D. J., Pringle, C. R., and Wickner, R. B.
(eds)
(2000)
Virus Taxonomy. The VIIth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses
, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
|
| 4.
|
Bartenschlager, R.,
and Lohmann, V.
(2000)
J. Gen. Virol.
81,
1631-1648[Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Reed, K. E.,
and Rice, C. M.
(2000)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
242,
55-84[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Lohmann, V.,
Körner, F.,
Koch, J.-O.,
Herian, U.,
Theilmann, L.,
and Bartenschlager, R.
(1999)
Science
285,
110-113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Kolykhalov, A. A.,
Mihalik, K.,
Feinstone, S. M.,
and Rice, C. M.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
2046-2051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Behrens, S.-E.,
Tomei, L.,
and De Francesco, R.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
12-22[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Lohmann, V.,
Körner, F.,
Herian, U.,
and Bartenschlager, R.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
8416-8428[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Yamashita, T.,
Kaneko, S.,
Shirota, Y.,
Qin, W.,
Nomura, T.,
Kobayashi, K.,
and Murakami, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15479-15486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Ferrari, E.,
Wright-Minogue, J.,
Fang, J. W.,
Baroudy, B. M.,
Lau, J. Y.,
and Hong, Z.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
1649-1654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Hagedorn, C. H.,
van Beers, E. H.,
and De Staercke, C.
(2000)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
242,
225-260[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Ago, H.,
Adachi, T.,
Yoshida, A.,
Yamamoto, M.,
Habuka, N.,
Yatsunami, K.,
and Miyano, M.
(1999)
Structure. Fold. Des.
7,
1417-1426[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Bressanelli, S.,
Tomei, L.,
Roussel, A.,
Incitti, I.,
Vitale, R. L.,
Mathieu, M.,
De Francesco, R.,
and Rey, F. A.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
13034-13039[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lesburg, C. A.,
Cable, M. B.,
Ferrari, E.,
Hong, Z.,
Mannarino, A. F.,
and Weber, P. C.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
937-943[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Hwang, S. B.,
Park, K. J.,
Kim, Y. S.,
Sung, Y. C.,
and Lai, M. M.
(1997)
Virology
227,
439-446[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Kim, J.-E.,
Song, W. K.,
Chung, K. M.,
Back, S. H.,
and Jang, S. K.
(1999)
Arch. Virol.
144,
329-343[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Kolykhalov, A. A.,
Agapov, E. V.,
Blight, K. J.,
Mihalik, K.,
Feinstone, S. M.,
and Rice, C. M.
(1997)
Science
277,
570-574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Gossen, M.,
and Bujard, H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5547-5551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Kim, P. K.,
Janiak-Spens, F.,
Trimble, W. S.,
Leber, B.,
and Andrews, D. W.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
8873-8882[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Moradpour, D.,
Englert, C.,
Wakita, T.,
and Wands, J. R.
(1996)
Virology
222,
51-63[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Moradpour, D.,
Kary, P.,
Rice, C. M.,
and Blum, H. E.
(1998)
Hepatology
28,
192-201[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Wölk, B.,
Sansonno, D.,
Kräusslich, H.-G.,
Dammacco, F.,
Rice, C. M.,
Blum, H. E.,
and Moradpour, D.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
2293-2304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Hügle, T.,
Fehrmann, F.,
Bieck, E.,
Kohara, M.,
Kräusslich, H.-G.,
Rice, C. M.,
Blum, H. E.,
and Moradpour, D.
(2001)
Virology
284,
70-81[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Englert, C.,
Hou, X.,
Maheswaran, S.,
Bennett, P.,
Ngwu, C.,
Re, G. G.,
Garvin, A. J.,
Rosner, M. R.,
and Haber, D. A.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
4662-4675[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Morgenstern, J. P.,
and Land, H.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
3587-3596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Chen, C.,
and Okayama, H.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2745-2752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Schweizer, A.,
Fransen, J. A.,
Bachi, T.,
Ginsel, L.,
and Hauri, H. P.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
1643-1653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Moremen, K. W.,
Touster, O.,
and Robbins, P. W.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
16876-16885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Pearson, W. R.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
2444-2448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Blanchet, C.,
Combet, C.,
Geourjon, C.,
and Deléage, G.
(2000)
Bioinformatics
16,
286-287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Rost, B.,
Casadio, R.,
Fariselli, P.,
and Sander, C.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
521-533[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Sonnhammer, E. L. L.,
von Heijne, G.,
and Krogh, A.
(1998)
in
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology
(Glasgow, J.
, Littlejohn, T.
, Major, F.
, Lathrop, R.
, Sankoff, D.
, and Sensen, C., eds)
, pp. 175-182, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA
|
| 35.
|
Cserzo, M.,
Wallin, E.,
Simon, I.,
von Heijne, G.,
and Elofsson, A.
(1997)
Protein Eng.
10,
673-676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Claros, M. G.,
and von Heijne, G.
(1994)
Comput. Appl. Biosci.
269,
26898-26903
|
| 37.
|
Smith, T. F.,
and Waterman, M. S.
(1981)
J. Mol. Biol.
147,
195-197[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Precious, B.,
Young, D. F.,
Bermingham, A.,
Fearns, R.,
Ryan, M.,
and Randall, R. E.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
8001-8010[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Nakabayashi, H.,
Taketa, K.,
Miyano, K.,
Yamane, T.,
and Sato, J.
(1982)
Cancer Res.
42,
3858-3863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Carmo-Fonseca, M.,
Mendes-Soares, L.,
and Campos, I.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
E107-E112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Kretzschmar, E.,
Bui, M.,
and Rose, J. K.
(1996)
Virology
220,
37-45[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Fujiki, Y.,
Hubbard, A. L.,
Fowler, S.,
and Lazarow, P. B.
(1982)
J. Cell Biol.
93,
97-102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Migliaccio, G.,
Nicchitta, C. V.,
and Blobel, G.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
15-25[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Bienz, K.,
Egger, D.,
Pfister, T.,
and Troxler, M.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
2740-2747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Egger, D.,
Pasamontes, L.,
Bolten, R.,
Boyko, V.,
and Bienz, K.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
8675-8683[Abstract]
|
| 46.
|
Westaway, E. G.,
Mackenzie, J. M.,
Kenney, M. T.,
Jones, M. K.,
and Khromykh, A. A.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
6650-6661[Abstract]
|
| 47.
|
Mackenzie, J. M.,
Jones, M. K.,
and Westaway, E. G.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
9555-9567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Egger, D.,
Teterina, N.,
Ehrenfeld, E.,
and Bienz, K.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
6570-6580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Suhy, D. A.,
Giddings, T. H., Jr.,
and Kirkegaard, K.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
8953-8965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Lin, C.,
Wu, J.-W.,
Hsiao, K.,
and Su, M.-S.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
6465-6471[Abstract]
|
| 51.
|
Ishido, S.,
Fujita, T.,
and Hotta, H.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
244,
35-40[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Yao, N.,
Reichert, P.,
Taremi, S. S.,
Prosise, W. W.,
and Weber, P. C.
(1999)
Structure Fold. Des.
7,
1353-1363[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Walter, P.,
and Johnson, A. E.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
10,
87-119[CrossRef]
|
| 54.
|
Kutay, U.,
Hartmann, E.,
and Rapoport, T. A.
(1993)
Trends Cell Biol.
3,
72-75[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Kutay, U.,
Ahnert-Hilger, G.,
Hartmann, E.,
Wiedenmann, B.,
and Rapoport, T. A.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
217-223[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Kim, P. K.,
Hollerbach, C.,
Trimble, S. W.,
Leber, B.,
and Andrews, D. W.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36876-36882[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Janiak, F.,
Leber, B.,
and Andrews, D. W.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9842-9849[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Markland, W.,
and Smith, A. E.
(1987)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
907,
299-321[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Andrews, D. W.,
Gupta, J.,
and Abisdris, G.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4703-4713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
da Fonseca, F. G.,
Wolffe, E. J.,
Weisberg, A.,
and Moss, B.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
7508-7517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 61.
|
Brideau, A. D.,
Banfield, B. W.,
and Enquist, L. W.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
4560-4570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Lemmon, M. A.,
Flanagan, J. M.,
Treutlein, H. R.,
Zhang, J.,
and Engelman, D. M.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
12719-12725[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Li, Z.,
Glibowicka, M.,
Joensson, C.,
and Deber, C. M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
4584-4587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Russ, W. P.,
and Engelman, D. M.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
296,
911-919[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Senes, A.,
Gerstein, M.,
and Engelman, D. M.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
296,
921-936[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 66.
|
Santolini, E.,
Migliaccio, G.,
and La Monica, N.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
3631-3641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 67.
|
Dubuisson, J.
(2000)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
242,
135-148[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 68.
|
Grote, E.,
Hao, J. C.,
Bennett, M. K.,
and Kelly, R. B.
(1995)
Cell
81,
581-589[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 69.
|
Mitoma, J.,
and Ito, A.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
4197-4203[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 70.
|
Yang, M.,
Ellenberg, J.,
Bonifacino, J. S.,
and Weissmann, A. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1970-1975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 71.
|
Rayner, J. C.,
and Pelham, H. R. B.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1832-1841[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 72.
|
Pedrazzini, E.,
Villa, A.,
and Borgese, N.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
4207-4212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 73.
|
Honsho, M.,
Mitoma, J. Y.,
and Ito, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
20860-20866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 74.
|
Towner, J. S.,
Ho, T. V.,
and Semler, B. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26810-26818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 75.
|
Hope, D. A.,
Diamond, S. E.,
and Kirkegaard, K.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
9490-9498[Abstract]
|
| 76.
|
Pietschmann, T.,
Lohmann, V.,
Rutter, G.,
Kurpanek, K.,
and Bartenschlager, R.
(2001)
J. Virol.
75,
1252-1264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 77.
|
Luecke, H.,
Schobert, B.,
Cartailler, J. P.,
Richter, H. T.,
Rosengarth, A.,
Needleman, R.,
and Lanyi, J. K.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
300,
1237-1255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Gouttenoire, V. Castet, R. Montserret, N. Arora, V. Raussens, J.-M. Ruysschaert, E. Diesis, H. E. Blum, F. Penin, and D. Moradpour
Identification of a Novel Determinant for Membrane Association in Hepatitis C Virus Nonstructural Protein 4B
J. Virol.,
June 15, 2009;
83(12):
6257 - 6268.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Stapleford, D. Rapaport, and D. J. Miller
Mitochondrion-Enriched Anionic Phospholipids Facilitate Flock House Virus RNA Polymerase Membrane Association
J. Virol.,
May 1, 2009;
83(9):
4498 - 4507.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Ji, A. Glaser, M. Wernli, J. M. Berke, D. Moradpour, and P. Erb
Suppression of short interfering RNA-mediated gene silencing by the structural proteins of hepatitis C virus
J. Gen. Virol.,
November 1, 2008;
89(11):
2761 - 2766.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Wolk, B. Buchele, D. Moradpour, and C. M. Rice
A Dynamic View of Hepatitis C Virus Replication Complexes
J. Virol.,
November 1, 2008;
82(21):
10519 - 10531.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Weeks and D. J. Miller
The Heat Shock Protein 70 Cochaperone YDJ1 Is Required for Efficient Membrane-Specific Flock House Virus RNA Replication Complex Assembly and Function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Virol.,
February 15, 2008;
82(4):
2004 - 2012.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Watashi, D. Inoue, M. Hijikata, K. Goto, H. H. Aly, and K. Shimotohno
Anti-hepatitis C Virus Activity of Tamoxifen Reveals the Functional Association of Estrogen Receptor with Viral RNA Polymerase NS5B
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 9, 2007;
282(45):
32765 - 32772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lee, Y. Liu, E. Mejia, A. V. Paul, and E. Wimmer
The C-Terminal Hydrophobic Domain of Hepatitis C Virus RNA Polymerase NS5B Can Be Replaced with a Heterologous Domain of Poliovirus Protein 3A
J. Virol.,
November 15, 2006;
80(22):
11343 - 11354.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. H. T. Duong, V. Christen, J. M. Berke, S. H. Penna, D. Moradpour, and M. H. Heim
Upregulation of Protein Phosphatase 2Ac by Hepatitis C Virus Modulates NS3 Helicase Activity through Inhibition of Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 1
J. Virol.,
December 15, 2005;
79(24):
15342 - 15350.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. T. Dye, D. J. Miller, and P. Ahlquist
In Vivo Self-Interaction of Nodavirus RNA Replicase Protein A Revealed by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer
J. Virol.,
July 15, 2005;
79(14):
8909 - 8919.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gosert, W. Jendrsczok, J. M. Berke, V. Brass, H. E. Blum, and D. Moradpour
Characterization of Nonstructural Protein Membrane Anchor Deletion Mutants Expressed in the Context of the Hepatitis C Virus Polyprotein
J. Virol.,
June 15, 2005;
79(12):
7911 - 7917.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Wolk, C. Gremion, N. Ivashkina, O. B. Engler, B. Grabscheid, E. Bieck, H. E. Blum, A. Cerny, and D. Moradpour
Stable human lymphoblastoid cell lines constitutively expressing hepatitis C virus proteins
J. Gen. Virol.,
June 1, 2005;
86(6):
1737 - 1746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Kampmueller and D. J. Miller
The Cellular Chaperone Heat Shock Protein 90 Facilitates Flock House Virus RNA Replication in Drosophila Cells
J. Virol.,
June 1, 2005;
79(11):
6827 - 6837.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. V. Svitkin, A. Pause, M. Lopez-Lastra, S. Perreault, and N. Sonenberg
Complete Translation of the Hepatitis C Virus Genome In Vitro: Membranes Play a Critical Role in the Maturation of All Virus Proteins except for NS3
J. Virol.,
June 1, 2005;
79(11):
6868 - 6881.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Egger and K. Bienz
Intracellular location and translocation of silent and active poliovirus replication complexes
J. Gen. Virol.,
March 1, 2005;
86(3):
707 - 718.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Harcourt, D. Jukneliene, A. Kanjanahaluethai, J. Bechill, K. M. Severson, C. M. Smith, P. A. Rota, and S. C. Baker
Identification of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Replicase Products and Characterization of Papain-Like Protease Activity
J. Virol.,
December 15, 2004;
78(24):
13600 - 13612.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Moradpour, V. Brass, E. Bieck, P. Friebe, R. Gosert, H. E. Blum, R. Bartenschlager, F. Penin, and V. Lohmann
Membrane Association of the RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Is Essential for Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication
J. Virol.,
December 1, 2004;
78(23):
13278 - 13284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-J. Kim, J.-H. Kim, Y.-G. Kim, H.-S. Lim, and J.-W. Oh
Protein Kinase C-related Kinase 2 Regulates Hepatitis C Virus RNA Polymerase Function by Phosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 26, 2004;
279(48):
50031 - 50041.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Delevoye, M. Nilges, A. Dautry-Varsat, and A. Subtil
Conservation of the Biochemical Properties of IncA from Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia caviae: OLIGOMERIZATION OF IncA MEDIATES INTERACTION BETWEEN FACING MEMBRANES
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 5, 2004;
279(45):
46896 - 46906.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lee, H. Shin, E. Wimmer, and A. V. Paul
cis-Acting RNA Signals in the NS5B C-Terminal Coding Sequence of the Hepatitis C Virus Genome
J. Virol.,
October 15, 2004;
78(20):
10865 - 10877.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. H. Ansari, L.-M. Chen, D. Liang, L. H. Gil, W. Zhong, and R. O. Donis
Involvement of a Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus NS5B Locus in Virion Assembly
J. Virol.,
September 15, 2004;
78(18):
9612 - 9623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Schwer, S. Ren, T. Pietschmann, J. Kartenbeck, K. Kaehlcke, R. Bartenschlager, T. S. B. Yen, and M. Ott
Targeting of Hepatitis C Virus Core Protein to Mitochondria through a Novel C-Terminal Localization Motif
J. Virol.,
August 1, 2004;
78(15):
7958 - 7968.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Moradpour, M. J. Evans, R. Gosert, Z. Yuan, H. E. Blum, S. P. Goff, B. D. Lindenbach, and C. M. Rice
Insertion of Green Fluorescent Protein into Nonstructural Protein 5A Allows Direct Visualization of Functional Hepatitis C Virus Replication Complexes
J. Virol.,
July 15, 2004;
78(14):
7400 - 7409.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.-Y. Goh, Y.-J. Tan, S. P. Lim, Y. H. Tan, S. G. Lim, F. Fuller-Pace, and W. Hong
Cellular RNA Helicase p68 Relocalization and Interaction with the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) NS5B Protein and the Potential Role of p68 in HCV RNA Replication
J. Virol.,
May 15, 2004;
78(10):
5288 - 5298.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gao, H. Aizaki, J.-W. He, and M. M. C. Lai
Interactions between Viral Nonstructural Proteins and Host Protein hVAP-33 Mediate the Formation of Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication Complex on Lipid Raft
J. Virol.,
April 1, 2004;
78(7):
3480 - 3488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Lee, J. Choi, J.-h. Ou, and M. M. C. Lai
The C-Terminal Transmembrane Domain of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Polymerase Is Essential for HCV Replication In Vivo
J. Virol.,
April 1, 2004;
78(7):
3797 - 3802.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Shimakami, M. Hijikata, H. Luo, Y. Y. Ma, S. Kaneko, K. Shimotohno, and S. Murakami
Effect of Interaction between Hepatitis C Virus NS5A and NS5B on Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication with the Hepatitis C Virus Replicon
J. Virol.,
March 15, 2004;
78(6):
2738 - 2748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. C. Griffin, R. Harvey, D. S. Clarke, W. S. Barclay, M. Harris, and D. J. Rowlands
A conserved basic loop in hepatitis C virus p7 protein is required for amantadine-sensitive ion channel activity in mammalian cells but is dispensable for localization to mitochondria
J. Gen. Virol.,
February 1, 2004;
85(2):
451 - 461.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. You, D. D. Stump, A. D. Branch, and C. M. Rice
A cis-Acting Replication Element in the Sequence Encoding the NS5B RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Is Required for Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication
J. Virol.,
February 1, 2004;
78(3):
1352 - 1366.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Tomei, S. Altamura, L. Bartholomew, M. Bisbocci, C. Bailey, M. Bosserman, A. Cellucci, E. Forte, I. Incitti, L. Orsatti, et al.
Characterization of the Inhibition of Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication by Nonnucleosides
J. Virol.,
January 15, 2004;
78(2):
938 - 946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Tomei, S. Altamura, L. Bartholomew, A. Biroccio, A. Ceccacci, L. Pacini, F. Narjes, N. Gennari, M. Bisbocci, I. Incitti, et al.
Mechanism of Action and Antiviral Activity of Benzimidazole-Based Allosteric Inhibitors of the Hepatitis C Virus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase
J. Virol.,
December 15, 2003;
77(24):
13225 - 13231.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Miyanari, M. Hijikata, M. Yamaji, M. Hosaka, H. Takahashi, and K. Shimotohno
Hepatitis C Virus Non-structural Proteins in the Probable Membranous Compartment Function in Viral Genome Replication
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 12, 2003;
278(50):
50301 - 50308.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Miller, M. D. Schwartz, B. T. Dye, and P. Ahlquist
Engineered Retargeting of Viral RNA Replication Complexes to an Alternative Intracellular Membrane
J. Virol.,
November 15, 2003;
77(22):
12193 - 12202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. El-Hage and G. Luo
Replication of hepatitis C virus RNA occurs in a membrane-bound replication complex containing nonstructural viral proteins and RNA
J. Gen. Virol.,
October 1, 2003;
84(10):
2761 - 2769.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. J.-P. Leveque, R. B. Johnson, S. Parsons, J. Ren, C. Xie, F. Zhang, and Q. M. Wang
Identification of a C-Terminal Regulatory Motif in Hepatitis C Virus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase: Structural and Biochemical Analysis
J. Virol.,
August 15, 2003;
77(16):
9020 - 9028.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Love, H. E. Parge, X. Yu, M. J. Hickey, W. Diehl, J. Gao, H. Wriggers, A. Ekker, L. Wang, J. A. Thomson, et al.
Crystallographic Identification of a Noncompetitive Inhibitor Binding Site on the Hepatitis C Virus NS5B RNA Polymerase Enzyme
J. Virol.,
July 1, 2003;
77(13):
7575 - 7581.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Elazar, K. H. Cheong, P. Liu, H. B. Greenberg, C. M. Rice, and J. S. Glenn
Amphipathic Helix-Dependent Localization of NS5A Mediates Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication
J. Virol.,
May 15, 2003;
77(10):
6055 - 6061.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Dimitrova, I. Imbert, M. P. Kieny, and C. Schuster
Protein-Protein Interactions between Hepatitis C Virus Nonstructural Proteins
J. Virol.,
May 1, 2003;
77(9):
5401 - 5414.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gosert, D. Egger, V. Lohmann, R. Bartenschlager, H. E. Blum, K. Bienz, and D. Moradpour
Identification of the Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication Complex in Huh-7 Cells Harboring Subgenomic Replicons
J. Virol.,
May 1, 2003;
77(9):
5487 - 5492.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gao, H. Tu, S. T. Shi, K.-J. Lee, M. Asanaka, S. B. Hwang, and M. M. C. Lai
Interaction with a Ubiquitin-Like Protein Enhances the Ubiquitination and Degradation of Hepatitis C Virus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase
J. Virol.,
April 1, 2003;
77(7):
4149 - 4159.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. T. Shi, K.-J. Lee, H. Aizaki, S. B. Hwang, and M. M. C. Lai
Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication Occurs on a Detergent-Resistant Membrane That Cofractionates with Caveolin-2
J. Virol.,
April 1, 2003;
77(7):
4160 - 4168.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. Bost, D. Venable, L. Liu, and B. A. Heinz
Cytoskeletal Requirements for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Synthesis in the HCV Replicon Cell Culture System
J. Virol.,
April 1, 2003;
77(7):
4401 - 4408.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. C. H. Lai, S. Dempsey, J. Y. N. Lau, Z. Hong, and W. Zhong
In Vitro RNA Replication Directed by Replicase Complexes Isolated from the Subgenomic Replicon Cells of Hepatitis C Virus
J. Virol.,
February 1, 2003;
77(3):
2295 - 2300.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Xu, J. Choi, W. Lu, and J.-h. Ou
Hepatitis C Virus F Protein Is a Short-Lived Protein Associated with the Endoplasmic Reticulum
J. Virol.,
December 20, 2002;
77(2):
1578 - 1583.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Piccininni, A. Varaklioti, M. Nardelli, B. Dave, K. D. Raney, and J. E. G. McCarthy
Modulation of the Hepatitis C Virus RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase Activity by the Non-Structural (NS) 3 Helicase and the NS4B Membrane Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 15, 2002;
277(47):
45670 - 45679.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Ivashkina, B. Wolk, V. Lohmann, R. Bartenschlager, H. E. Blum, F. Penin, and D. Moradpour
The Hepatitis C Virus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Membrane Insertion Sequence Is a Transmembrane Segment
J. Virol.,
November 13, 2002;
76(24):
13088 - 13093.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Miller and P. Ahlquist
Flock House Virus RNA Polymerase Is a Transmembrane Protein with Amino-Terminal Sequences Sufficient for Mitochondrial Localization and Membrane Insertion
J. Virol.,
August 28, 2002;
76(19):
9856 - 9867.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. De Tomassi, M. Pizzuti, R. Graziani, A. Sbardellati, S. Altamura, G. Paonessa, and C. Traboni
Cell Clones Selected from the Huh7 Human Hepatoma Cell Line Support Efficient Replication of a Subgenomic GB Virus B Replicon
J. Virol.,
June 27, 2002;
76(15):
7736 - 7746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Egger, B. Wolk, R. Gosert, L. Bianchi, H. E. Blum, D. Moradpour, and K. Bienz
Expression of Hepatitis C Virus Proteins Induces Distinct Membrane Alterations Including a Candidate Viral Replication Complex
J. Virol.,
May 13, 2002;
76(12):
5974 - 5984.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Brass, E. Bieck, R. Montserret, B. Wolk, J. A. Hellings, H. E. Blum, F. Penin, and D. Moradpour
An Amino-terminal Amphipathic alpha -Helix Mediates Membrane Association of the Hepatitis C Virus Nonstructural Protein 5A
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 1, 2002;
277(10):
8130 - 8139.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Moradpour, E. Bieck, T. Hugle, W. Wels, J. Z. Wu, Z. Hong, H. E. Blum, and R. Bartenschlager
Functional Properties of a Monoclonal Antibody Inhibiting the Hepatitis C Virus RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 4, 2002;
277(1):
593 - 601.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|