|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105170200 on September 25, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 48, 44641-44646, November 30, 2001
Butyrate Suppression of Colonocyte NF- B Activation and
Cellular Proteasome Activity*
Lei
Yin,
Gary
Laevsky, and
Charles
Giardina
From the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University
of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
Received for publication, June 6, 2001, and in revised form, August 21, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Butyrate is derived from the microbial metabolism
of dietary fiber in the colon where it plays an important role in
linking colonocyte turnover and differentiation to luminal content. In addition, butyrate appears to have both anti-inflammatory and cancer
chemopreventive activities. Using confocal microscopy and cell
fractionation studies, butyrate pretreatment of a human colon cell line
(HT-29 cells) inhibited the tumor necrosis factor- (TNF- )-induced
nuclear translocation of the proinflammatory transcription factor
NF- B. Butyrate inhibited NF- B DNA binding within 30 min of
TNF- stimulation, consistent with an inhibition of nuclear translocation. I B·NF- B complexes extracted from
butyrate-treated cells were relatively resistant to in
vitro dissociation by deoxycholate, suggesting a change in
cellular I B composition. Butyrate treatment increased p100
expression, an I B that was not degraded upon TNF- treatment.
Butyrate also reduced the extent of TNF- -induced I B- degradation and enhanced the presence of ubiquitin-conjugated I B- . The suppression of I B- degradation corresponded with a
reduction in cellular proteasome activity as determined by in vitro proteasome assays and the increased presence of
ubiquitin-conjugated proteins. The butyrate suppression of I B-
degradation and proteasome activity may derive from its ability to
inhibit histone deacetylases since the specific deacetylase inhibitor
trichostatin A had similar effects. These results suggest a potential
mechanism for the anti-inflammatory activity of butyrate and
demonstrate the interplay between short chain fatty acids and cellular
proteasome activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Butyrate and other short chain fatty acids are generated in the
intestine by the bacterial metabolism of dietary fiber. Short chain
fatty acids benefit the colonic mucosa in a number of ways (1-5).
Colonocytes utilize short chain fatty acids as their primary energy
source, and evidence has been obtained that they undergo apoptosis in
its absence (2, 5-7). Interestingly, short chain fatty acids,
particularly butyrate, have the opposite effect on transformed
cells in culture, inducing rather than suppressing apoptosis (2,
8-10). The ability of butyrate to induce cancer cell apoptosis may
contribute to the cancer preventive activities of dietary fiber (1, 5,
6, 11, 12). Short chain fatty acids can also suppress intestinal
inflammation: butyrate is effective for treating selected inflammatory
conditions of the distal alimentary tract (13-15). Many aspects of
intestinal health and function clearly depend on the appropriate levels
of short chain fatty acids in the lumen. Understanding the effects of
short chain fatty acids on normal and transformed colonocytes could
provide insight into the mechanisms that maintain intestinal health and function.
It is not clear how all the beneficial aspects of short chain fatty
acids are achieved. Considerable attention has focused on the
influence of butyrate on cellular gene expression, derived in part from
its ability to inhibit histone deacetylases (16, 17). Histone
acetylation plays a central role in regulating gene expression, and
cellular treatment with butyrate stabilizes histones in their
acetylated state. In addition, a number of transcription factors are
directly regulated by acetylation, and butyrate can enhance their
activity (including GATA-1 and p53) (18-21). We and others have
reported that butyrate can modulate the activity of the transcription
factor NF- B in a number of different cell types including colon
cancer cell lines, cells isolated from the lamina propria of the colon,
and macrophages (22-25). The ability of butyrate to modulate NF- B
activity may arise from its ability to inhibit protein deacetylases.
This conclusion is based on the finding that the specific deacetylase
inhibitor trichostatin A
(TSA)1 also modulates NF- B
activity and that propionate, a weaker deacetylase inhibitor, is less
effective than butyrate in altering NF- B activity (25). The ability
of butyrate to modulate NF- B activity resonates with its proposed
cancer chemopreventive and anti-inflammatory activities since NF- B
regulates genes involved in controlling cell proliferation, cell death,
immune response, and inflammatory responses. We have been particularly
interested in the mechanism by which butyrate influences NF- B
activation since understanding this mechanism could reveal how
colonocyte growth and inflammatory responses are designed to sense
luminal content. For this reason we have been studying the mechanism by
which butyrate influences NF- B activation in the human colon-derived
HT-29 cell line.
NF- B is regulated through the binding of inhibitory molecules
referred to collectively as I Bs (26-28). There are a number of
I Bs, including I B- , I B- , I B- , p105, and p100.
NF- B activation usually requires the
phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination and subsequent
proteasome degradation of one or more I B molecules (29-32). Here we
provide evidence that butyrate prevents the entrance of NF- B into
the nucleus triggered by TNF- in part by suppressing cellular
proteasome activity. Butyrate therefore influences the cell in a manner
similar to the relatively new class of cancer chemotherapeutic and
anti-inflammatory agents, the proteasome inhibitors (33-37).
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Treatments--
HT-29 cells were purchased from
American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and were propagated in
McCoy's 5A medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum,
nonessential amino acids, streptomycin (50 µg/ml), and penicillin (50 units/ml). All media were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc.
TNF- was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) and used at a
final concentration of 100 ng/ml. MG-132 was purchased from Calbiochem
and used at a final concentration of 60 µM. Sodium
butyrate was used at a final concentration of 4 mM. All
butyrate treatments were performed for ~24 h prior to further
manipulation of the cells. TSA, purchased from Calbiochem, was used at
a 10 µM concentration with TSA preincubations also performed for ~24 h.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
Nuclear
extracts were prepared based on a previously reported protocol with
minor modifications as described in Inan et al. (25). For
the DNA binding assays, double strand NF- B DNA oligonucleotide (Promega, Madison, WI) were end-labeled with [ -32P]
adenosine triphosphate (3000 Ci/mmol at 10 mCi/ml, Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) using T4 polynucleotide kinase. Binding reactions were
performed by mixing 7.5 µg of nuclear extract (in 7.5 µl) with 2.5 µg of poly(dIdC) and 1 µg of bovine serum albumin to give a final
volume of 14 µl. After a 15-min incubation on ice, 40 fmol of labeled
oligonucleotide (1 µl) was added to each reaction mixture. Reaction
mixtures were then transferred to room temperature for an additional 15 min. Reaction products were separated on a 4% polyacrylamide/Tris
borate/EDTA gel and analyzed by autoradiography. EMSA and immunoblot
images were scanned and quantified using NIH Image software. For
supershift experiments, 1 µl (0.2 µg) of antibody was preincubated
with cellular extract on ice for 30 min. After this preincubation, the
binding reaction was performed as usual. The p65 C-20 and p50 N-19
supershifting antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology
(Santa Cruz, CA). Evidence for the specificity of the supershifting
antibodies comes from the observation that they do not supershift
nonspecific protein·DNA complexes observed on the EMSA gel, and they
do not bind to nonspecific proteins on an immunoblot. In addition,
antibodies against the other three NF- B subunits do not supershift
the TNF- -activated NF- B complexes from HT-29 cells, providing
evidence that p65 and p50 are the predominant NF- B subunits active
in these cells (25). For deoxycholate activation (38, 39), 10 µg of
cytosolic extract was first incubated with deoxycholate at a final
concentration of 0.6% for 10 min at 4 °C. One microliter of 10%
Nonidet P-40 was then added, and the incubation continued for another
10 min at 4 °C. After this pretreatment, the supershift assay or
regular binding reaction was performed as usual.
Immunoblotting and Immunofluorescence--
For immunoblotting
studies, 25 µg of cytoplasmic or nuclear protein (quantified by the
Bio-Rad protein assay) was denatured under reducing conditions,
separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and transferred to
nitrocellulose by voltage gradient transfer. The resulting blots were
blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk. Specific proteins were detected with
appropriate antibodies using enhanced chemiluminescence detection
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology) as recommended by the manufacturer.
Immunoblotting antibodies against p52/p100 (K-27) and I B- (C-21)
were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. For immunofluorescence,
HT-29 cells were grown on glass coverslips to 50-70% confluence.
Following appropriate treatments, the cells were washed with cold
phosphate-buffered saline and fixed with 100% methanol for 30 min at
20 °C. The methanol was removed, and permeabilizing reagent (0.3%
Triton X-100, 2 mM EGTA, and 5 mM Pipes)
was added to the surface of cells for 5 min at 4 °C. Goat serum
(10%) diluted in phosphate-buffered saline was used to block
nonspecific binding for 30 min following permeabilization. After
blocking, the cells were incubated with a rabbit anti-p65 antibody
(C-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a 1:200 dilution followed by
incubation with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-rabbit
immunoglobulin (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.). Confocal
imaging of cells was performed using a Bio-Rad MRC 600 microscope
equipped with a 25-milliwatt krypton-argon laser.
Immunoprecipitation--
Cytosolic extract was prepared from
control or butyrate-treated cells using a Nonidet P-40-containing lysis
buffer (0.1% Nonidet P-40, 10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 M sucrose, 2 µg/ml
leupeptin, 10 µM clasto-lactacystin
-lactone (Calbiochem)). Cytosolic extract (200 µl) was precleared
with 10 µl of protein A-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and then incubated with 3 µl of an anti-ubiquitin rabbit antibody (Calbiochem) overnight on ice. To demonstrate that the anti-ubiquitin immunoprecipitation was specific, control immunoprecipitation reactions
were performed with a rabbit antibody raised against I B- (N-20,
Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Precipitation was performed by incubating
extracts with 30 µl of protein A-Sepharose (3 h at 4 °C),
centrifuging for 1 min at 12,000 × g, and then washing the pellet three times with ice cold lysis buffer. The pellets were
then suspended in 60 µl of SDS gel loading buffer and analyzed by
immunoblotting using an I B- antibody (C-21, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Proteasome Activity Assay--
Proteasome activity in cytosolic
extracts was quantified using the fluorogenic proteasome substrate
Suc-LLVY-AMC (Calbiochem) (40). Cytosolic extract (10 µg of protein
in 5 µl) was incubated in a 100-µl reaction containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.035% SDS,
and 70 µM Suc-LLVY-AMC at room temperature for 30 min.
Fluorescence was measured in a microtiter plate fluorometer (excitation, 360 nm; emission, 460 nm).
Proteasome-dependent activity was determined by performing
the assay in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor
clasto-lactacystin -lactone (final concentration, 10 µM) (Calbiochem). Proteasome activity values shown were
derived by subtracting the fluorescence obtained in the presence of
this inhibitor from the values obtained in its absence. Assays were performed in triplicate, and statistical significance was determined with a paired Student's t test.
 |
RESULTS |
Butyrate Treatment Inhibits the TNF- -induced Nuclear
Translocation of NF- B--
Previous reports have indicated that the
treatment of HT-29 cells with butyrate for 24 h dampens their
ability to activate NF- B in response to TNF- stimulation (25).
NF- B activation can be regulated at numerous steps, including its
translocation into the nucleus. To determine whether nuclear
translocation was being suppressed in butyrate-treated cells, the
cellular localization of the NF- B p65 subunit was determined by
immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy. As shown in Fig.
1A, treatment of HT-29 cells
with TNF- alone resulted in the translocation of some of the
cellular p65 into the nucleus. As has been described by other groups,
p65 translocation into the nucleus is only partial in stimulated HT-29
cells and a large fraction of NF- B remains in the cytoplasm (41).
Treatment of the HT-29 cells with 4 mM butyrate for 24 h prior to TNF- stimulation prevented much of the TNF- -induced nuclear translocation of the p65 subunit (Fig. 1A). To
confirm these data, a cell fractionation study was performed (Fig.
1B). In unstimulated cells, most of the cellular p65 was
found in the cytosolic fraction of HT-29 cells. After TNF-
stimulation of HT-29 cells, a small fraction of the total cellular p65
appeared in the nuclear fraction. Consistent with the
immunocytochemical analysis, pretreatment of cells with butyrate
reduced the nuclear translocation of p65 into the nucleus by ~50%.
The inhibition of nuclear translocation is not observed for I B-
or I B- , two proteins that can also shuttle between the cytoplasm
and nucleus (Ref. 25 and data not shown). These data indicate that
butyrate inhibits a step in NF- B activation at or prior to nuclear
translocation.

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, subcellular localization of the
NF- B p65 subunit in HT-29 cells as determined by immunocytochemistry
and confocal microscopy. HT-29 cells were preincubated with 4 mM butyrate for ~24 h and stimulated with TNF-
(TNF) for 30 min as indicated. Cell treatments were
performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." In all
panels a 400 × magnification is shown. B, subcellular
localization of the NF- B p65 subunit in HT-29 cells as determined by
cellular fractionation. HT-29 cells were treated as described in
A. Cellular proteins (25 µg) were then fractionated into
cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, which were then analyzed by
immunoblotting. Proteins from control cells (C),
TNF- -treated cells (T), butyrate-treated cells
(B), or cells treated with TNF- and butyrate
(T/B) are shown.
|
|
Fig. 2A shows the influence of
butyrate on the NF- B DNA binding activity induced by TNF- . The
butyrate inhibition of NF- B nuclear translocation (shown in Fig. 1)
corresponded with a decrease in its DNA binding activity (with an
estimated inhibition of 75%). The time course analysis shown in Fig.
2A revealed a consistent level of inhibition, consistent
with a model in which butyrate suppresses the movement of NF- B from
the cytoplasm to the nucleus (as opposed to an increase in the rate of
NF- B nuclear export). Also shown in Fig. 2B is a DNA
competition analysis, which demonstrated that the protein·DNA complex
inhibited by butyrate is a specific NF- B complex. The butyrate
suppression of NF- B DNA binding activity is reflected in a reduced
level of NF- B-regulated gene expression (24, 25).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
A, butyrate suppresses NF- B
activation at early and late time points after TNF- treatment. HT-29
cells were pretreated with or without butyrate (4 mM) as
described under "Experimental Procedures" and then stimulated by
TNF- for the indicated lengths of time. EMSA analysis was then
performed to measure NF- B DNA binding activity. The two NF- B
complexes formed in HT-29 cells (p65·p50 and p50·p50) are
indicated. B, a DNA competition reaction to show that the
NF- B DNA binding activity induced by TNF- is specific. Nuclear
extract prepared from TNF- -stimulated HT-29 cells was incubated with
a 50-fold excess of cold competitor DNA containing an NF- B or AP-1
binding site (as indicated). Competition for the radioactive NF- B
oligonucleotide binding is observed only with the cold NF- B
oligonucleotide.
|
|
Butyrate Influences Cellular I B Composition--
A number
of different I B molecules control NF- B activity in HT-29 cells,
and it is possible that butyrate is suppressing NF- B nuclear
translocation by altering the I B composition of the cytoplasm. To
determine whether this was the case, we first characterized the
I B·NF- B complexes extracted from control and butyrate-treated
cells. The I B·NF- B complexes can be disrupted in
vitro by incubation of cytosolic extracts with deoxycholate (38,
39). The level of NF- B DNA binding activity activated in
vitro by deoxycholate was consistently lower in extracts from butyrate-treated cells (Fig.
3A). The identity of the
deoxycholate-activated DNA binding activity as NF- B was confirmed by
a supershift reaction using antibodies that have previously been shown
to specifically recognize the p65 and p50 NF- B subunits (Fig.
3A). Fig. 3B shows that the level of p65 was the
same in butyrate-treated and control cells. These data suggest that
there is an alteration in the composition of I B·NF- B complexes
in butyrate-treated cells with butyrate inducing the formation of
complexes that are relatively resistant to deoxycholate
dissociation.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Top panel, characterization of
NF- B·I B complexes in the cytoplasm of control and
butyrate-treated HT-29 cells by in vitro deoxycholate
activation. Cytosolic extracts were activated with 1% deoxycholate and
then tested for DNA binding activity by EMSA. Extracts were prepared
from butyrate or control cells as indicated. Anti-p65 or anti-p50
antibodies were included in the binding reaction for supershift
analysis (as indicated). Bottom panel, immunoblotting assay
shows the level of the p65 subunit found in the cytoplasm of the
control and butyrate-treated HT-29 cells used for deoxycholate
activation.
|
|
To determine how I B·NF- B complexes might be altered in
butyrate-treated HT-29 cells, we determined the expression levels of a
number of known I Bs by immunoblotting. We were unable to detect
increased expression of I B- , I B- , or p105 (data not shown).
The p100 I B, however, was increased in HT-29 cells treated with
butyrate, and it was not degraded upon TNF- treatment (Fig. 4A). The resistance of p100 to
TNF- -induced degradation has been reported in other cell types as
well (42). I B- was also influenced by butyrate treatment. In
control cells, I B- was completely degraded in response to TNF-
(at 15 min), whereas its degradation was dampened in butyrate-treated
cells (Fig. 4A). In addition, butyrate treatment of HT-29
cells caused a number of larger proteins to appear on the I B-
immunoblot (marked with an asterisk in Fig. 4A).
One possibility is that some of these larger bands are ubiquitinated
forms of I B- , which could appear as a result of decreased
proteasome activity. An overlapping set of bands also appeared in cells
treated with the MG-132 proteasome inhibitor (although intensities of
the individual bands differ). Additional evidence for the accumulation
of ubiquitinated I B- after butyrate treatment was obtained by
performing an immunoprecipitation experiment (Fig. 4B). An
anti-ubiquitin antibody precipitated more I B- from
butyrate-treated cells than from control cells (relative to the amount
of unconjugated I B- in the extract, Fig. 4B). The
finding that an antibody against I B- could not precipitate I B- -reactive proteins under the same immunoprecipitation
conditions supports the specificity of the anti-ubiquitin
immunoprecipitation. These results suggested that butyrate may be
interfering with proteasomal degradation of I B- .

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A, the butyrate influence on p100 and
I B- levels in HT-29 cells. Cells were pretreated with 4 mM butyrate and then stimulated by TNF- for the
indicated lengths of time. Cytosolic proteins were then analyzed by
immunoblotting for p100 and I B- as indicated. Also shown are the
results of an experiment in which HT-29 cells were pretreated with the
proteasome inhibitor MG-132 prior to TNF- treatment. The
asterisk indicates larger proteins that bind to the
I B- antibody in butyrate- and MG-132-treated cells. B,
immunoprecipitation to determine the levels of ubiquitinated I B-
in control and butyrate-treated cells. The top panel is an
immunoblot that shows the I B- levels in the cytosolic extracts of
control and butyrate-treated cells. These extracts were
immunoprecipitated with an anti-ubiquitin antibody (+ anti-Ub). The immunoprecipitates were then analyzed by
immunoblotting with an anti-I B- antibody (bottom
panel). The right-most panel of B shows the
results of a control immunoprecipitation reaction performed with an
anti-I B- antibody. The I B- antibody does not precipitate
I B- -reactive proteins, indicating that the precipitation reaction
performed with the anti-ubiquitin antibody is specific.
|
|
Butyrate Suppresses Proteasome Activity in the Cell--
To
determine whether butyrate was affecting proteasome activity in the
cell, cytosolic extracts prepared from control and butyrate-treated
HT-29 cells were tested for proteasome activity using the synthetic
substrate Suc-LLVY-AMC (40). As shown in Fig.
5A, butyrate treatment
decreased proteasome activity in the extract by ~40%. Since a
decrease in proteasome activity may generally increase the presence of
polyubiquitinated proteins in the cell, a blot of cytosolic proteins
from control and butyrate-treated cells was probed with an
anti-ubiquitin antibody (Fig. 5B). Exposure of the HT-29
cells to butyrate resulted in the accumulation of ubiquitin-conjugated
proteins. These data indicate butyrate suppresses proteasome activity
in HT-29 cells.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
A, proteasome activity was suppressed in
HT-29 cells after exposure to butyrate. Cell lysates were prepared from
untreated (0), butyrate-treated (BA), or
TNF- -treated (TNF) HT-29 cells and analyzed for
proteasome activity. The butyrate reduction of proteasome activity was
significant (**, p < 0.01). B,
ubiquitinated proteins found in the extracts of control, butyrate
(BA)- and TNF- (TNF)-treated cells. The level
of protein ubiquitination in these extracts was determined by
immunoblotting with an anti-ubiquitin antibody. Duplicate samples were
analyzed. C, MG-132 suppressed NF- B activation induced by
TNF- in HT-29 cells. The cells were incubated with MG-132 followed
by treatment with TNF- for 30 min (as indicated). EMSA was then
performed to measure NF- B DNA binding activity. Duplicate
samples were analyzed.
|
|
Since NF- B activation in the absence of I B degradation has been
reported (41, 43), we determined whether proteasome activity was
required for NF- B activation by TNF- in HT-29 cells. As shown
in Fig. 5C, the MG-132 proteasome inhibitor was able to
suppress both TNF- -induced NF- B activation (Fig. 5C)
and I B- degradation (Fig. 4A). The ability of butyrate
to suppress proteasome activity could therefore contribute to the
inhibition of NF- B activation by TNF- .
Deacetylase Inhibition and NF- B Activation--
Butyrate
influences a number of cellular activities, including ion transport,
glutathione synthesis, reactive oxygen generation, and protein
acetylation (16, 46-50). We have reported previously that the
influence of butyrate on NF- B activation arises from its ability to
inhibit histone deacetylases (25). We therefore determined whether the
effects of butyrate on p100 expression, I B- degradation, and
proteasome activity were also obtained with the deacetylase inhibitor
TSA. As shown in Fig. 6, TSA was able to
inhibit proteasome activity (Fig. 6A), suppress
TNF- -induced I B- degradation (Fig. 6B), and
increase p100 expression (Fig. 6B). These data are
consistent with a model in which the influence of butyrate on NF- B
activation and proteasome activity derives from its ability to inhibit
histone deacetylases. It should be noted, however, that butyrate and
TSA might be accomplishing these outcomes through different molecular
mechanisms.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A, the influence of the histone
deacetylase inhibitor TSA and butyrate (BA) on the
proteasome activity in HT-29 cells. Cells were pretreated with TSA or
butyrate for ~24 h. Proteasome activity in cell extracts was then
determined. The reduction of proteasome activity by TSA and butyrate
was found to be significant (**, p < 0.01).
B, immunoblotting shows that TSA also increased p100 levels
(top panel) and suppressed I B- degradation and
enhanced the formation of larger I B- forms (bottom
panel). The bracket on the bottom panel
indicates the position of the larger I B- forms.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Cells of the gastrointestinal tract constantly interact with the
contents of the lumen. These contents range from food and bacterial
antigens to pathogenic and nonpathogenic bacteria. Bacteria in the gut
also produce a number of metabolites and products that can be either
beneficial or harmful, such as vitamin K and lipopolysaccharides. For
the proper functioning of the gastrointestinal tract, cells must sense
and respond appropriately to the contents of the lumen. One molecule
found at relatively high concentrations in the colonic lumen is
butyrate. Butyrate is an energy molecule for colonic epithelial cells,
serving as a substrate for mitochondrial -oxidation pathways.
Evidence is also accumulating that colonic epithelial cells sense
butyrate directly and adjust gene expression and signal transduction
pathways in response to its presence (51-58). These changes in signal
transduction and gene expression impact colonocyte proliferation,
differentiation, and death. Evidence has also been obtained that the
influence of butyrate on gene expression and signal transduction serves
to suppress inflammation in the colon. For example, epithelial cells in
inflamed colonic tissue are often found to be deficient for butyrate
metabolism (59-61). Moreover, direct application of butyrate to
inflamed tissue by irrigation can be an effective means of suppressing
intestinal inflammation (14, 15). Determining how butyrate influences
inflammatory signal transduction pathways and gene expression may
therefore provide insight into how inflammatory responses are regulated in the colon.
We have been studying how the NF- B signal transduction pathway is
influenced by butyrate in the HT-29 cell culture model. Our analysis
indicates that butyrate influences NF- B in part by preventing the
complete degradation of I B- by reducing proteasome activity in
the cell. Whether this is the only mechanism by which butyrate
influences NF- B activation is not clear. We also found that the
levels of the p100 I B are increased upon butyrate treatment, but it
is not clear whether the butyrate reduction in proteasome activity is
solely responsible for the accumulation of p100. Our findings suggest
that alterations in the cellular proteasome activity may influence the
sensitivity of the colon to inflammatory stimuli.
Although this report is the first to demonstrate the influence of
butyrate on cellular proteasome activity, other groups have reported
that butyrate stabilizes I B- in macrophages and nonepithelial cells isolated from colonic lamina propria (22, 23). The increase in
I B- stability reported by other groups may also be the result of
a lower proteasome activity in butyrate-treated cells. Interestingly, NF- B inhibition by butyrate has been observed in Caco-2 cells without any apparent change in I B- degradation (24). Butyrate does, however, increase I B- levels in Caco-2 cells without
affecting I B- mRNA levels (24). This response may be
due in part to an enhanced stabilization of the I B- protein
through a decrease in cellular proteasome activity. In a number of
instances, NF- B activation has been found to occur in the absence of
I B- degradation by the proteasome. These proteasome-independent
pathways for NF- B activation have been observed in some colon cell
lines (43), and we predict that these pathways would not be inhibited
by butyrate.
There are a number of potential mechanisms by which butyrate could
influence the proteasome. The core mammalian 20 S proteasome has four
stacked rings, each containing seven subunits (62). The two inner rings
are each composed of seven distinct subunits, and the outer rings
are each composed of seven distinct subunits. In addition, there
are genes that encode three nonessential subunits, two of which are
interferon- -inducible. Butyrate may suppress proteasome activity by
reducing the expression of one or more of these 17 core subunits (63,
64). This possibility seems feasible given that the actions of butyrate
appear to be mediated through its ability to inhibit deacetylases:
histone deacetylation can have a multifaceted impact on cellular gene expression. However, the post-transcriptional modulation of proteasome activity is also possible. Regardless of the exact mechanism of the
activity of butyrate, the identification of the proteasome as a
potential target of butyrate is interesting from a pharmacological viewpoint since proteasome inhibitors represent a promising new class
of anti-inflammatory and anticancer drugs (33, 65, 67). These
activities have long been associated with butyrate (14, 15) and
butyrogenic dietary fiber (5, 6, 68-71).
Although our studies have focused of NF- B regulation, the decrease
in proteasome activity we describe here could impact a number of
colonocyte and colon cancer cell activities. For example, many proteins
that regulate the cell cycle (e.g. cyclins and -catenin) (72-76) and cell death (e.g. p53) are regulated by the
ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (72, 77-79, 81-83). The butyrate
suppression of proteasome activity might therefore contribute to the
alterations in colonocyte proliferation observed in animals fed a high
fiber diet (66, 68, 69, 80, 84, 85) as well as the ability of butyrate to induce colon cancer cell apoptosis (9, 45). The proteasome is also
involved in antigen processing, so the suppression of cellular
proteasome activity by butyrate might impact the antigen-presenting function of colonic epithelial cells (44). Exactly how extensive these
and other processes are impacted by a decreased proteasome activity
remains to be determined.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular and
Cell Biology, 75 North Eagleville Rd., U-125, University of
Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269. Tel.: 860-486-0454; Fax: 860-486-4331; E-mail: Giardina@uconnvm.uconn.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 25, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105170200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TSA, trichostatin A;
TNF- , tumor necrosis factor- ;
NF- B, nuclear
factor- B;
I B, inhibitor- B;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility
shift assay;
Pipes, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
Suc-LLVY-AMC, N-succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Velazquez, O. C.,
and Rombeau, J. L.
(1997)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
427,
169-181
|
| 2.
|
Hague, A.,
Butt, A. J.,
and Paraskeva, C.
(1996)
Proc. Nutr. Soc.
55,
937-943
|
| 3.
|
Hodin, R.
(2000)
Gastroenterology
118,
798-801
|
| 4.
|
Velazquez, O. C.,
Lederer, H. M.,
and Rombeau, J. L.
(1997)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
427,
123-134
|
| 5.
|
Velazquez, O. C.,
Lederer, H. M.,
and Rombeau, J. L.
(1996)
Dig. Dis. Sci.
41,
727-739
|
| 6.
|
Hassig, C. A.,
Tong, J. K.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1997)
Chem. Biol.
4,
783-789
|
| 7.
|
Luciano, L.,
Hass, R.,
Busche, R.,
von Engelhardt, W.,
and Reale, E.
(1996)
Cell Tissue Res.
286,
81-92
|
| 8.
|
Avivi-Green, C.,
Polak-Charcon, S.,
Madar, Z.,
and Schwartz, B.
(2000)
Oncol. Res.
12,
83-95
|
| 9.
|
Hague, A.,
Manning, A. M.,
Hanlon, K. A.,
Huschtscha, L. I.,
Hart, D.,
and Paraskeva, C.
(1993)
Int. J. Cancer
55,
498-505
|
| 10.
|
Thomas, G. L.,
Henley, A.,
Rowland, T. C.,
Sahai, A.,
Griffin, M.,
and Birckbichler, P. J.
(1996)
In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim.
32,
505-513
|
| 11.
|
Whiteley, L. O.,
and Klurfeld, D. M.
(2000)
Nutr. Cancer
36,
131-149
|
| 12.
|
Csordas, A.
(1996)
Eur. J. Cancer Prev.
5,
221-231
|
| 13.
|
Kanauchi, O.,
Iwanaga, T.,
Mitsuyama, K.,
Saiki, T.,
Tsuruta, O.,
Noguchi, K.,
and Toyonaga, A.
(1999)
J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.
14,
880-888
|
| 14.
|
Scheppach, W.,
Sommer, H.,
Kirchner, T.,
Paganelli, G. M.,
Bartram, P.,
Christl, S.,
Richter, F.,
Dusel, G.,
and Kasper, H.
(1992)
Gastroenterology
103,
51-56
|
| 15.
|
Wachtershauser, A.,
and Stein, J.
(2000)
Eur. J. Nutr.
39,
164-171
|
| 16.
|
Boffa, L. C.,
Vidali, G.,
Mann, R. S.,
and Allfrey, V. G.
(1978)
J. Biol. Chem.
253,
3364-3366
|
| 17.
|
Sealy, L.,
and Chalkley, R.
(1978)
Cell
14,
115-121
|
| 18.
|
Liu, L.,
Scolnick, D. M.,
Trievel, R. C.,
Zhang, H. B.,
Marmorstein, R.,
Halazonetis, T. D.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1202-1209
|
| 19.
|
Gu, W.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1997)
Cell
90,
595-606
|
| 20.
|
Boyes, J.,
Byfield, P.,
Nakatani, Y.,
and Ogryzko, V.
(1998)
Nature
396,
594-598
|
| 21.
|
Luo, J.,
Su, F.,
Chen, D.,
Shiloh, A.,
and Gu, W.
(2000)
Nature
408,
377-381
|
| 22.
|
Chakravortty, D.,
Koide, N.,
Kato, Y.,
Sugiyama, T.,
Mu, M. M.,
Yoshida, T.,
and Yokochi, T.
(2000)
J. Endotoxin Res.
6,
243-247
|
| 23.
|
Segain, J. P.,
Raingeard de la Bletiere, D.,
Bourreille, A.,
Leray, V.,
Gervois, N.,
Rosales, C.,
Ferrier, L.,
Bonnet, C.,
Blottiere, H. M.,
and Galmiche, J. P.
(2000)
Gut
47,
397-403
|
| 24.
|
Wu, G. D.,
Huang, N.,
Wen, X.,
Keilbaugh, S. A.,
and Yang, H.
(1999)
J. Leukoc. Biol.
66,
1049-1056
|
| 25.
|
Inan, M. S.,
Rasoulpour, R. J.,
Yin, L.,
Hubbard, A. K.,
Rosenberg, D. W.,
and Giardina, C.
(2000)
Gastroenterology
118,
724-734
|
| 26.
|
Baeuerle, P. A.
(1998)
Cell
95,
729-731
|
| 27.
|
Gilmore, T. D.,
Koedood, M.,
Piffat, K. A.,
and White, D. W.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
1367-1378
|
| 28.
|
Gerondakis, S.,
Grossmann, M.,
Nakamura, Y.,
Pohl, T.,
and Grumont, R.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6888-6895
|
| 29.
|
Hatakeyama, S.,
Kitagawa, M.,
Nakayama, K.,
Shirane, M.,
Matsumoto, M.,
Hattori, K.,
Higashi, H.,
Nakano, H.,
Okumura, K.,
Onoe, K.,
Good, R. A.,
and Nakayama, K.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3859-3863
|
| 30.
|
Crinelli, R.,
Bianchi, M.,
Gentilini, L.,
Magnani, M.,
and Hiscott, J.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
263,
202-211
|
| 31.
|
Krappmann, D.,
Wulczyn, F. G.,
and Scheidereit, C.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6716-6726
|
| 32.
|
Miyamoto, S.,
Seufzer, B. J.,
and Shumway, S. D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
19-29
|
| 33.
|
Adams, J.,
Palombella, V. J.,
and Elliott, P. J.
(2000)
Investig. New Drugs
18,
109-121
|
| 34.
|
Hallahan, D. E.,
and Teng, M.
(2000)
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
47,
859-860
|
| 35.
|
Meng, L.,
Mohan, R.,
Kwok, B. H.,
Elofsson, M.,
Sin, N.,
and Crews, C. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
10403-10408
|
| 36.
|
Phillips, J. B.,
Williams, A. J.,
Adams, J.,
Elliott, P. J.,
and Tortella, F. C.
(2000)
Stroke
31,
1686-1693
|
| 37.
|
Ciechanover, A.,
Orian, A.,
and Schwartz, A. L.
(2000)
J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl.
34,
40-51
|
| 38.
|
Baeuerle, P. A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1988)
Science
242,
540-546
|
| 39.
|
Baeuerle, P. A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1989)
Genes Dev.
3,
1689-1698
|
| 40.
|
Rock, K. L.,
Gramm, C.,
Rothstein, L.,
Clark, K.,
Stein, R.,
Dick, L.,
Hwang, D.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1994)
Cell
78,
761-771
|
| 41.
|
Jobin, C.,
Haskill, S.,
Mayer, L.,
Panja, A.,
and Sartor, R. B.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
158,
226-234
|
| 42.
|
Dejardin, E.,
Deregowski, V.,
Chapelier, M.,
Jacobs, N.,
Gielen, J.,
Merville, M. P.,
and Bours, V.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
2567-2577
|
| 43.
|
Wilson, L.,
Szabo, C.,
and Salzman, A. L.
(1999)
Gastroenterology
117,
106-114
|
| 44.
|
Michalek, M. T.,
Grant, E. P.,
Gramm, C.,
Goldberg, A. L.,
and Rock, K. L.
(1993)
Nature
363,
552-554
|
| 45.
|
Scheppach, W.,
Bartram, H. P.,
and Richter, F.
(1995)
Eur. J. Cancer
31A,
1077-1080
|
| 46.
|
Umesaki, Y.,
Yajima, T.,
Yokokura, T.,
and Mutai, M.
(1979)
Pfluegers Arch.
379,
43-47
|
| 47.
|
Edmonds, C. J.
(1982)
Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
299,
575-584
|
| 48.
|
Binder, H. J.,
and Mehta, P.
(1989)
Gastroenterology
96,
989-996
|
| 49.
|
Benard, O.,
and Balasubramanian, K. A.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
170,
109-114
|
| 50.
|
Giardina, C.,
and Inan, M. S.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1401,
277-288
|
| 51.
|
Souleimani, A.,
and Asselin, C.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
193,
330-336
|
| 52.
|
Petit, J. M.,
Chauffert, B.,
Dimanche-Boitrel, M. T.,
Genne, P.,
Duchamp, O.,
and Martin, F.
(1993)
Anticancer Res.
13,
487-490
|
| 53.
|
Souleimani, A.,
and Asselin, C.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
326,
45-50
|
| 54.
|
Gope, R.,
and Gope, M. L.
(1993)
Cell. Mol. Biol. (Noisy-Le-Grand)
39,
589-597
|
| 55.
|
Antalis, T. M.,
and Reeder, J. A.
(1995)
Int. J. Cancer
62,
619-626
|
| 56.
|
Nakano, K.,
Mizuno, T.,
Sowa, Y.,
Orita, T.,
Yoshino, T.,
Okuyama, Y.,
Fujita, T.,
Ohtani-Fujita, N.,
Matsukawa, Y.,
Tokino, T.,
Yamagishi, H.,
Oka, T.,
Nomura, H.,
and Sakai, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22199-22206
|
| 57.
|
Schwartz, B.,
Avivi-Green, C.,
and Polak-Charcon, S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
188,
21-30
|
| 58.
|
Barshishat, M.,
Polak-Charcon, S.,
and Schwartz, B.
(2000)
Br. J. Cancer
82,
195-203
|
| 59.
|
Chapman, M. A.,
Grahn, M. F.,
Boyle, M. A.,
Hutton, M.,
Rogers, J.,
and Williams, N. S.
(1994)
Gut
35,
73-76
|
| 60.
|
Chapman, M. A.,
Grahn, M. F.,
Hutton, M.,
and Williams, N. S.
(1995)
Br. J. Surg.
82,
36-38
|
| 61.
|
Chapman, M. A.,
and Grahn, M. F.
(1994)
Gut
35,
1152-1153
|
| 62.
|
Rubin, D. M.,
and Finley, D.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
854-858
|
| 63.
|
Ullrich, O.,
Reinheckel, T.,
Sitte, N.,
Hass, R.,
Grune, T.,
and Davies, K. J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6223-6228
|
| 64.
|
Williams, A.,
Sun, X.,
Fischer, J. E.,
and Hasselgren, P. O.
(1999)
Surgery
126,
744-750
|
| 65.
|
Lee, D. H.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
397-403
|
| 66.
|
Howard, M. D.,
Gordon, D. T.,
Garleb, K. A.,
and Kerley, M. S.
(1995)
J. Nutr.
125,
2604-2609
|
| 67.
|
Tomoda, H.,
and Omura, S.
(2000)
Yakugaku Zasshi
120,
935-949
|
| 68.
|
Jacobs, L. R.
(1987)
Prev. Med.
16,
566-571
|
| 69.
|
Jacobs, L. R.,
and Lupton, J. R.
(1986)
Cancer Res.
46,
1727-1734
|
| 70.
|
Compher, C. W.,
Frankel, W. L.,
Tazelaar, J.,
Lawson, J. A.,
McKinney, S.,
Segall, S.,
Kinosian, B. P.,
Williams, N. N.,
and Rombeau, J. L.
(1999)
JPEN (J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr.)
23,
269-278
|
| 71.
|
Takahashi, T.,
Satou, M.,
Watanabe, N.,
Sakaitani, Y.,
Takagi, A.,
Uchida, K.,
Ikeda, M.,
Moriyama, R.,
Matsumoto, K.,
and Morotomi, M.
(1999)
Cancer Lett.
141,
139-146
|
| 72.
|
Rolfe, M.,
Chiu, M. I.,
and Pagano, M.
(1997)
J. Mol. Med.
75,
5-17
|
| 73.
|
Hershko, A.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
788-799
|
| 74.
|
Aberle, H.,
Bauer, A.,
Stappert, J.,
Kispert, A.,
and Kemler, R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
3797-3804
|
| 75.
|
Easwaran, V.,
Song, V.,
Polakis, P.,
and Byers, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16641-16645
|
| 76.
|
Salomon, D.,
Sacco, P. A.,
Roy, S. G.,
Simcha, I.,
Johnson, K. R.,
Wheelock, M. J.,
and Ben-Ze'ev, A.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
1325-1335
|
| 77.
|
Shinohara, K.,
Tomioka, M.,
Nakano, H.,
Tone, S.,
Ito, H.,
and Kawashima, S.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
317,
385-388
|
| 78.
|
Maki, C. G.,
Huibregtse, J. M.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
2649-2654
|
| 79.
|
Pahl, H. L.,
and Baeuerle, P. A.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
340-347
|
| 80.
|
Jacobs, L. R.,
and Lupton, J. R.
(1984)
Am. J. Physiol.
246,
G378-G385
|
| 81.
|
Kubbutat, M. H.,
Jones, S. N.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1997)
Nature
387,
299-303
|
| 82.
|
Lopes, U. G.,
Erhardt, P.,
Yao, R.,
and Cooper, G. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12893-12896
|
| 83.
|
Spataro, V.,
Norbury, C.,
and Harris, A. L.
(1998)
Br. J. Cancer
77,
448-455
|
| 84.
|
Boffa, L. C.,
Lupton, J. R.,
Mariani, M. R.,
Ceppi, M.,
Newmark, H. L.,
Scalmati, A.,
and Lipkin, M.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
5906-5912
|
| 85.
|
Jacobs, L. R.,
and White, F. A.
(1983)
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
37,
945-953
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kumar, H. Wu, L. S. Collier-Hyams, Y.-M. Kwon, J. M. Hanson, and A. S. Neish
The Bacterial Fermentation Product Butyrate Influences Epithelial Signaling via Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Changes in Cullin-1 Neddylation
J. Immunol.,
January 1, 2009;
182(1):
538 - 546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Pellicciotta, X. Cortez-Gonzalez, R. Sasik, Y. Reiter, G. Hardiman, P. Langlade-Demoyen, and M. Zanetti
Presentation of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase, a Self-Tumor Antigen, is Down-regulated by Histone Deacetylase Inhibition
Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2008;
68(19):
8085 - 8093.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Roque, E. Boncoeur, V. Saint-Criq, E. Bonvin, A. Clement, O. Tabary, and J. Jacquot
Proinflammatory Effect of Sodium 4-Phenylbutyrate in {Delta}F508-Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Lung Epithelial Cells: Involvement of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Protein Kinase 1/2 and c-Jun-NH2-Terminal Kinase Signaling
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
September 1, 2008;
326(3):
949 - 956.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Sebastian, M. Serra, A. Yeramian, N. Serrat, J. Lloberas, and A. Celada
Deacetylase Activity Is Required for STAT5-Dependent GM-CSF Functional Activity in Macrophages and Differentiation to Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol.,
May 1, 2008;
180(9):
5898 - 5906.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Nakamura, I. Matsushita, E. Kosaka, T. Kondo, and T. Kimura
Anti-arthritic effects of combined treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitor and low-intensity ultrasound in the presence of microbubbles in human rheumatoid synovial cells
Rheumatology,
April 1, 2008;
47(4):
418 - 424.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wang, S. A. Mahmud, P. B. Bitterman, Y. Huo, and A. Slungaard
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Suppress TF-{kappa}B-dependent Agonist-driven Tissue Factor Expression in Endothelial Cells and Monocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 28, 2007;
282(39):
28408 - 28418.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Klampfer, J. Huang, S. Shirasawa, T. Sasazuki, and L. Augenlicht
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Induce Cell Death Selectively in Cells That Harbor Activated kRasV12: The Role of Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription 1 and p21
Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2007;
67(18):
8477 - 8485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Cilloni, G. Martinelli, F. Messa, M. Baccarani, and G. Saglio
Nuclear factor {kappa}B as a target for new drug development in myeloid malignancies
Haematologica,
September 1, 2007;
92(9):
1224 - 1229.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Wang, Y. Zhou, X. Wang, D. H. Chung, and B. M. Evers
Regulation of PTEN Expression in Intestinal Epithelial Cells by c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Activation and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Inhibition
Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2007;
67(16):
7773 - 7781.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Duan, J. Friedman, L. Nottingham, Z. Chen, G. Ara, and C. Van Waes
Nuclear factor-{kappa}B p65 small interfering RNA or proteasome inhibitor bortezomib sensitizes head and neck squamous cell carcinomas to classic histone deacetylase inhibitors and novel histone deacetylase inhibitor PXD101
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
January 1, 2007;
6(1):
37 - 50.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Scanlan, F. Shanahan, C. O'Mahony, and J. R. Marchesi
Culture-Independent Analyses of Temporal Variation of the Dominant Fecal Microbiota and Targeted Bacterial Subgroups in Crohn's Disease
J. Clin. Microbiol.,
November 1, 2006;
44(11):
3980 - 3988.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Parhar, K. A. Baer, K. Parker, and M. J. Ropeleski
Short-chain fatty acid mediated phosphorylation of heat shock protein 25: effects on camptothecin-induced apoptosis
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
August 1, 2006;
291(2):
G178 - G188.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hubert-Buron, J. Leblond, A. Jacquot, P. Ducrotte, P. Dechelotte, and M. Coeffier
Glutamine Pretreatment Reduces IL-8 Production in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells by Limiting I{kappa}B{alpha} Ubiquitination
J. Nutr.,
June 1, 2006;
136(6):
1461 - 1465.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Imre, V. Gekeler, A. Leja, T. Beckers, and M. Boehm
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Suppress the Inducibility of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B by Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Receptor-1 Down-regulation.
Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2006;
66(10):
5409 - 5418.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Takada, A. Gillenwater, H. Ichikawa, and B. B. Aggarwal
Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid Potentiates Apoptosis, Inhibits Invasion, and Abolishes Osteoclastogenesis by Suppressing Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Activation
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 3, 2006;
281(9):
5612 - 5622.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. T. Efuet and K. Keyomarsi
Farnesyl and Geranylgeranyl Transferase Inhibitors Induce G1 Arrest by Targeting the Proteasome
Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2006;
66(2):
1040 - 1051.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nakamura, T. Kukita, T. Shobuike, K. Nagata, Z. Wu, K. Ogawa, T. Hotokebuchi, O. Kohashi, and A. Kukita
Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase Suppresses Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Destruction by Inducing IFN-{beta} Production
J. Immunol.,
November 1, 2005;
175(9):
5809 - 5816.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. S. Collier-Hyams, V. Sloane, B. C. Batten, and A. S. Neish
Cutting Edge: Bacterial Modulation of Epithelial Signaling via Changes in Neddylation of Cullin-1
J. Immunol.,
October 1, 2005;
175(7):
4194 - 4198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Dai, M. Rahmani, P. Dent, and S. Grant
Blockade of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor-Induced RelA/p65 Acetylation and NF-{kappa}B Activation Potentiates Apoptosis in Leukemia Cells through a Process Mediated by Oxidative Damage, XIAP Downregulation, and c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase 1 Activation
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 1, 2005;
25(13):
5429 - 5444.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Tong, L. Yin, S. Joshi, D. W. Rosenberg, and C. Giardina
Cyclooxygenase-2 Regulation in Colon Cancer Cells: MODULATION OF RNA POLYMERASE II ELONGATION BY HISTONE DEACETYLASE INHIBITORS
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 22, 2005;
280(16):
15503 - 15509.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Hu and N. H. Colburn
Histone Deacetylase Inhibition Down-Regulates Cyclin D1 Transcription by Inhibiting Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B/p65 DNA Binding
Mol. Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2005;
3(2):
100 - 109.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yuan, F. J. Liddle, S. Mahajan, and D. A. Frank
IL-6-induced survival of colorectal carcinoma cells is inhibited by butyrate through down-regulation of the IL-6 receptor
Carcinogenesis,
November 1, 2004;
25(11):
2247 - 2255.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-Y. Pei, Y. Dai, and S. Grant
Synergistic Induction of Oxidative Injury and Apoptosis in Human Multiple Myeloma Cells by the Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2004;
10(11):
3839 - 3852.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Yu, M. Rahmani, D. Conrad, M. Subler, P. Dent, and S. Grant
The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib interacts synergistically with histone deacetylase inhibitors to induce apoptosis in Bcr/Abl+ cells sensitive and resistant to STI571
Blood,
November 15, 2003;
102(10):
3765 - 3774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Catley, E. Weisberg, Y.-T. Tai, P. Atadja, S. Remiszewski, T. Hideshima, N. Mitsiades, R. Shringarpure, R. LeBlanc, D. Chauhan, et al.
NVP-LAQ824 is a potent novel histone deacetylase inhibitor with significant activity against multiple myeloma
Blood,
October 1, 2003;
102(7):
2615 - 2622.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Adam, V. Quivy, F. Bex, A. Chariot, Y. Collette, C. Vanhulle, S. Schoonbroodt, V. Goffin, T. L.-A. Nguyen, G. Gloire, et al.
Potentiation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Induced NF-{kappa}B Activation by Deacetylase Inhibitors Is Associated with a Delayed Cytoplasmic Reappearance of I{kappa}B{alpha}
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
September 1, 2003;
23(17):
6200 - 6209.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Klampfer, J. Huang, T. Sasazuki, S. Shirasawa, and L. Augenlicht
Inhibition of Interferon {gamma} Signaling by the Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyrate
Mol. Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2003;
1(11):
855 - 862.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Boren, W.-N. P. Lee, S. Bassilian, J. J. Centelles, S. Lim, S. Ahmed, L. G. Boros, and M. Cascante
The Stable Isotope-based Dynamic Metabolic Profile of Butyrate-induced HT29 Cell Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 1, 2003;
278(31):
28395 - 28402.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Shi, A. Hoeflich, H. Flaswinkel, M. Stojkovic, E. Wolf, and V. Zakhartchenko
Induction of a Senescent-Like Phenotype Does Not Confer the Ability of Bovine Immortal Cells to Support the Development of Nuclear Transfer Embryos
Biol Reprod,
July 1, 2003;
69(1):
301 - 309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Venkatraman, B. S. Ramakrishna, R. V. Shaji, N. S. N. Kumar, A. Pulimood, and S. Patra
Amelioration of dextran sulfate colitis by butyrate: role of heat shock protein 70 and NF-{kappa}B
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
June 9, 2003;
285(1):
G177 - G184.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Md. M. Rahman, A. Kukita, T. Kukita, T. Shobuike, T. Nakamura, and O. Kohashi
Two histone deacetylase inhibitors, trichostatin A and sodium butyrate, suppress differentiation into osteoclasts but not into macrophages
Blood,
May 1, 2003;
101(9):
3451 - 3459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kennedy, K. Byth, C. L. Clarke, and A. deFazio
Cell Proliferation in the Normal Mouse Mammary Gland and Inhibition by Phenylbutyrate
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
October 1, 2002;
1(12):
1025 - 1033.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lu, R. A. Forbes, and A. Verma
Hypoxia-inducible Factor 1 Activation by Aerobic Glycolysis Implicates the Warburg Effect in Carcinogenesis
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 21, 2002;
277(26):
23111 - 23115.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|