|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106745200 on September 25, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 48, 44663-44668, November 30, 2001
RNA Editing of the Human Serotonin 5-HT2C
Receptor Alters Receptor-mediated Activation of G13
Protein*
Raymond D.
Price ,
David M.
Weiner§,
Mike S. S.
Chang , and
Elaine
Sanders-Bush ¶
From the Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt
University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6600 and § ACADIA
Pharmaceuticals and the Departments of Neurosciences and Psychiatry,
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92121
Received for publication, July 18, 2001, and in revised form, September 21, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The recent completion of the human genome
predicted the presence of only 30,000 genes, stressing the importance
of mechanisms that increase molecular diversity at the
post-transcriptional level. One such post-transcriptional event is RNA
editing, which generates multiple protein isoforms from a single gene,
often with profound functional consequences. The human serotonin
5-HT2C receptor undergoes RNA editing that creates
multiple receptor isoforms. One consequence of RNA editing of cell
surface receptors may be to alter the pattern of activation of
heterotrimeric G-proteins and thereby shift preferred intracellular
signaling pathways. We examined the ability of the nonedited
5-HT2C receptor isoform (INI) and two extensively edited
isoforms, VSV and VGV, to interact with various G-protein subunits. Two functional assays were utilized: the cell-based
functional assay, Receptor Selection/Amplification TechnologyTM, in which the pharmacological consequences of
co-expression of 5HT2C receptor isoforms with G-protein subunits in fibroblasts were studied, and 5HT2C
receptor-mediated rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton in stable
cell lines. These studies revealed that the nonedited
5-HT2C receptor functionally couples to Gq and
G13. In contrast, coupling to G13 was not
detected for the extensively edited 5-HT2C receptors. Thus,
RNA editing represents a novel mechanism for regulating the pattern of
activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins, molecular switches that
control an enormous variety of biological processes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The monoamine 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin;
5-HT)1 interacts with a large
family of receptors to induce signal transduction events important in
the modulation of neurotransmission (1). The 2C subtype of serotonin
receptor (5-HT2CR) is a member of the G-protein-coupled
receptor superfamily and interacts with Gq to stimulate
phospholipase C, resulting in the production of inositol phosphates and
diacylglycerol (2). RNA transcripts encoding the human
5-HT2CR undergo adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing events at
five positions, termed A, B, C, D, and E (Fig. 1A), altering
the amino acid coding potential within the putative second intracellular loop of the protein (3, 4). We and others have
demonstrated a decrease in agonist potency at the human edited VSV and
VGV isoforms (named for the amino acids at positions 156, 158, and 160)
compared with the nonedited isoform, which codes for INI at these
positions. This decrease in agonist potency is reflected as a rightward
shift in the dose-response curve for inositol phosphate accumulation
(5, 6) and calcium release (7). The decreased agonist potency was
proposed to result from a reduced Gq-protein coupling
efficiency induced by the introduction of these novel amino acids into
the second intracellular loop, a region known to be important for
G-protein coupling (8-16). Another consequence of RNA editing may be
to alter the specificity of activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins and
thereby shift intracellular signaling pathways. To test this
hypothesis, we examined the ability of three 5-HT2CR
isoforms to functionally couple with the subunits of various
heterotrimeric G-proteins of the Gq family (Gq,
G11, G14, G15, and G16)
and the G12 family (G12 and G13)
using the cell-based functional assay, Receptor Selection/Amplification Technology (R-SAT).
Previous R-SAT studies of the co-expression of muscarinic receptors
with Gq/11 (17), G12 (16), G13
(18), and G14 and G152 demonstrate
that efficient receptor/G-protein coupling is paralleled by leftward
shifts in agonist dose-response curves. Therefore, we have examined the
effects of raising G-protein concentrations on the pharmacology of
serotonergic ligands. Since VSV is the predominant 5-HT2CR
isoform expressed in human brain and VGV has the most prominent
phenotypic differences (5, 7), the present R-SAT study focuses on these
two edited receptors. In addition, the ability of both the nonedited
isoform (INI) and the fully edited isoform (VGV) to dynamically
regulate rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton downstream of
G13 activation was examined.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
R-SAT--
NIH-3T3 cells were plated into 96-well plates 1 day
before transfection at a density of 7500 cells/well. Cells were
transfected with 0.5-25 ng of nonedited (INI) or edited (VSV, VGV)
human 5-HT2CR; G subunits (Gq,
G11, G12, G13, G14,
G15, G16); and 25 ng of -galactosidase-pSI
(Promega)/well using Superfect (Qiagen) as a DNA carrier. One day after
transfection, cells were cultured in ligand mixed in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with penicillin (100 units/ml),
streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and 2% Cyto-SF3 (Kemp Laboratories) to a
final volume of 200 µl. After 5 days of incubation, the medium was
removed from the wells, and 200 µl of phosphate-buffered saline
(136.9 mM NaCl, 2.68 mM KCl, 8.09 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.47 mM
KH2PO4, pH 7.4) supplemented with 3.5 mM
o-nitrophenyl- -D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) and
0.5% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma) was added to each well. Plates were then
incubated at room temperature for up to 5 h, and optical density
was recorded at 405 nm using a spectrophotometric plate reader (Biotek
Instruments, Inc.). Curves were generated by least-squares fits with
Prism (GraphPad Software) using the equation,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where X represents the logarithm of concentration,
y is the response, and "top" and "bottom" describe
values for the asymptotic top and bottom of the fitted dose-response
curve. Statistical analysis of EC50 values was conducted
using one-way analysis of variance with Bonferonni post-tests.
In the absence of receptor activity, NIH-3T3 cells grow to a monolayer,
but in the presence of receptor activity, cells overcome contact
inhibition and proliferate. A quantitative measure of cellular
proliferation is obtained by measuring the levels of -galactosidase,
a marker enzyme constitutively expressed by the transfected cells.
R-SAT assays resolve partial agonists from full agonists as well as
inverse agonists, ligands that reduce constitutive activity. Results
obtained using this assay compare well with results obtained using
inositol phosphates, GTPase, and whole tissue assays for a variety of
other receptors (19, 20).
5-HT2C Receptor and G-protein Subunit
Cloning--
5-HT2CRs and G-protein subunits were
cloned using PCR-based methodologies. To generate template for the
5-HT2CR, RNA from human cerebellum was isolated utilizing
the FastTrack mRNA kit from InVitrogen Inc. (Carlsbad, CA).
Poly(A)+ RNA was reverse transcribed utilizing an 18-mer
oligo(dT) primer and Superscript II from Life Technologies, Inc., per
the manufacturer's protocol. Oligodeoxynucleotide primers used were as
follows (all primers are reported in 5'-3' orientation): 5'-CTG ACG
GGA TCC TTC AAA AAC AAC TAA AGG ATG and 3'-CAC TTT TCT AGA CAG CAA TAT TTA CAT TAG TTA. PCR conditions employed 100 ng (~125 pmol) of each
primer, 250 µM dNTPs, 5% Me2SO, 25 ng
of cDNA, 1× Pfu cloned buffer, and 2.5 units of
Pfu Turbo from Stratagene (San Diego, CA). The cycling
conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 5 min and then 40 cycles of
94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 1 min/kilobase. The resultant PCR product was subcloned into the TOPO 2.1 vector from Invitrogen Inc. (Carlsbad, CA) as per the manufacturer's protocols. The sequence of the nonedited INI clone corresponds to GenBankTM accession number U49516. These
initial efforts also yielded 5-HT2C clones encoding the VNV
and VGV isoforms. All receptors were subcloned into the mammalian
expression vector PSi from Promega Inc. (Madison, WI) for R-SAT
studies. Using the PSi-based 5-HT2C VNV construct as a
template, the VSV isoform was generated by the QuikChange site-directed
mutagenesis kit from Stratagene Inc. (San Diego, CA) according to the
manufacturer's protocol. Primers used were 5'-GCA GTG CGT AGT CCT GTT
GAG CAT AGC and 3'-CTC AAC AGG ACT ACG CAC TGC TAC ATA. PCR conditions,
with 30 ng of template plasmid DNA, were as follows: 4 min at 94 °C,
followed by 20 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C,
and 18 min at 72 °C. All receptor constructs were fully
sequence-verified. Cloning of the -subunits of Gq and
G11 (17), G12 (16), and G13 (18)
was described previously. G14 was cloned by PCR from
cDNA generated from NIH-3T3 cell total RNA using
oligodeoxynucleotide primers: 5'-TTC GAG AAG CGT TAG CCT AGA GAT CCG
AGC and 3'-AAG CAC TTG TAG ATC AGG CAG GAA GGG CTC with a 48 °C
annealing temperature. Sequencing of multiple clones revealed that all
differed from the published sequence (GenBankTM accession
number NM_008137) by a cg nucleotide transversion at positions 72 and
73 (adenine in ATG as position 1). All other G-protein subunits
have the transversion at these positions, arguing that the published
G14 sequence may be incorrect. The construct encoding
G15 was generously provided by Dr. Thierry Wurch (21), and
the construct encoding G16 was generously provided by Dr.
Thomas Amatruda III (22).
Stress Fiber Assays--
NIH-3T3 cells stably expressing
5-HT2CR isoforms were serum-starved overnight and incubated
with various ligands or peptides for 30 min at 37 °C, fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde for 10 min, and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100
for 5 min. Nonspecific background was reduced by incubating cells in
1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min. To visualize the cytoskeleton,
cells were stained for polymerized actin by incubation with 1.65 µM Oregon Green-phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Inc.,
Eugene, OR) for 20 min. The glass slides were examined using an
inverted microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 100). The ratio of stress
fiber-positive cells (defined as the distinct presence of stress fibers
overlying a nucleus) relative to the total number of counted cells in
randomly chosen visual fields is reported as a percentage value. A
minimum of 50 cells were included in each experiment, and experiments
were repeated at least four times. Quantification was performed in a
blind manner (i.e. the observer was not informed of the
conditions or cells used in the experiment). Concentrations of
compounds for INI treatments were 1 µM DOI, SB 206553, and LSD; 10 µM clozapine and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA);
and 100 µM membrane-permeable sequence (MPS) Gq and G13
peptides. Treatments for VGV cells were identical, except 10 µM DOI and LSD were used.
Phosphoinositide Hydrolysis Assay--
NIH-3T3 cells stably
expressing the INI receptor isoform were plated in 24-well plates and
incubated for 16-20 h with 2 µCi/ml myo-[3H]inositol (20-25 Ci/mmol; PerkinElmer
Life Sciences) in serum-free, inositol-free Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium to label phospholipid pools. Labeling medium was
aspirated, and the cells were washed twice with Hanks' balanced
salt solution containing 1 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM Mg2+. Cells were treated with peptides
solubilized in Hanks' balanced salt solution
(+Ca2+/Mg2+) at 37 °C for 30 min.
Subsequently, 10 mM lithium chloride was added to the cells
for 10 min prior to agonist activation for 30 min at 37 °C. The
reaction was stopped by aspirating the solution and fixing with 50 µl
of methanol/well. [3H]Inositol monophosphates were
isolated as previously described (23).
Peptide Design and Synthesis--
MPS peptide was based on a
hydrophobic membrane-permeable sequence described previously (2). The
Gq (Gq) and G13 (G13) carboxyl-terminal
peptides were designed based on the last 10 amino acids of the carboxyl
terminus (Gq, amino acids 350-359; G13, amino acids 367-377), a
region of other G subunits that has been identified as a
site of interaction between G-proteins and receptors (24, 25). The MPS
sequence is AAVALLPAVLLALLAK-S; the Gq-mimicking peptide sequence is
CQLNLKEYNLV; the G13-mimicking peptide sequence is CLHDNLKQLME.
Cell Culture--
For the stress fiber assays, NIH-3T3 cells
stably expressing human INI, VSV, and VGV 5-HT2CRs were
generated as described previously (5); receptor densities were 2047, 1292, and 5375 fmol/mg of protein, respectively. Cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine
serum, 100 units of penicillin/ml, and 100 µg of streptomycin/ml
under 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
 |
RESULTS |
Validation of R-SAT Assay--
Utilizing the cell-based assay,
R-SAT, functional interactions between 5-HT2CR isoforms
(Fig. 1A) and the subunits
of various heterotrimeric G-proteins (G ) were probed.
Earlier studies of these edited isoforms have documented decreases in
agonist potency to induce accumulation of inositol phosphates (3, 5, 6)
and to release intracellular stores of calcium (7). As a validation of
the assay, we initially determined if there were similar shifts in
agonist potency in R-SAT. As illustrated in Fig. 1B,
serotonin dose-response curves were shifted rightward for the VSV and
VGV edited isoforms compared with the nonedited INI isoform
(EC50 values of 3, 14, and 104 nM for INI, VSV,
and VGV isoform, respectively), similar to the results of earlier functional studies. In addition, the nonedited INI isoform exhibited dramatic constitutive activity (defined as the ability to promote productive G-protein coupling in the absence of an agonist) (26), such
that there was very little stimulatory effect of 5-HT. The VSV isoform
demonstrated a moderate level of constitutive activity. Ritanserin was
a potent and highly efficacious inverse agonist, essentially
eliminating the constitutive activity of both the INI and VSV isoforms
(Fig. 1C). The fully edited isoform, VGV, had no measurable
constitutive activity. Thus, the results obtained with the R-SAT assay
reproduce and extend previous results obtained with more classical
assays of 5-HT2CR function.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Characterization of INI, VSV, and VGV
isoforms of the 5-HT2CR in R-SAT. A, the
positions of the editing sites within human 5-HT2CR RNA
(top) and the predicted amino acid sequence
(bottom) are shown for the nonedited INI isoform and for the
edited VSV and VGV isoforms. B, serotonin responses observed
with the R-SAT assay of cells transiently expressing the INI, VSV, or
VGV receptor isoform (mean ± S.D.; n = 5).
C, receptor isoforms exhibit dramatically different
constitutive activities. Representative dose-response curves are shown
for serotonin (filled symbols) and ritanserin
(open symbols) for INI (left), VSV
(middle), or VGV (right), with responses at the
highest concentrations of serotonin and ritanserin set at 100 and 0%,
respectively.
|
|
Co-expression of 5-HT2CR and G-protein Subunits--
To investigate potential differences in
receptor/G-protein coupling, various G subunits
(Gq, G11, G12, G13,
G14, G15, G16) were co-transfected
with a single receptor isoform, and the ability of each
G subunit to shift agonist and inverse agonist dose-response curves was compared with receptor alone (i.e.
signaling through endogenous G-proteins). Potency is defined as the
amount of a drug needed to produce a half-maximal effect
(EC50). In the context of the extended ternary complex
model of receptor activation (27), potency depends on a number of
discrete partial reactions: 1) the affinity of the compound for the
receptor; 2) the productive interaction of receptor and G-protein; and
3) activated G-protein interacting with downstream effector molecules.
In this system, steps 1 and 3 are similar for each condition, so any
shift in potency upon the addition of G subunits is a
reflection of receptor/G-protein coupling. Previous R-SAT studies of
the co-expression of muscarinic receptors with Gq/11 (17),
G12 (16), G13 (18), and G14 and
G152 provided evidence that 1) these G-proteins
are expressed under these experimental conditions and 2) efficient
receptor/G-protein coupling can be detected by leftward shifts in
agonist dose-response curves.
Co-expression of the VGV receptor isoform with Gq or
G11 caused a significant shift in serotonin potency
compared with receptor alone, whereas other G subunits
were without effect (Fig. 2; Table
I). Furthermore, no alterations in
serotonin potency were observed with transfection of a 5-fold excess of
G12, G13, G14, G15, and
G16 (data not shown), suggesting that the VGV
receptor/G-protein interaction is specific to Gq and
G11. Serotonin had no effect in cells transfected with
G subunits alone or in untransfected cells (data not
shown), confirming that the responses result from interaction of
heterologously expressed receptors and G-proteins. Similar experiments
with the VSV isoform showed that co-transfection of Gq, but
not other G subunits, caused a significant increase in
5-HT potency (Fig. 3; Table I). Analysis
of dose-response curves for another 5-HT2CR agonist DOI
also revealed that only Gq increased potency when VSV was
co-transfected with G subunits (data not shown). The
potential physiological significance of the apparent difference in
isoform coupling to Gq and G11 is unclear, since these G-proteins typically mediate similar functional
responses (28).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of Gq and
G11, but not other G subunits,
shift 5-HT potency at VGV. Shown are representative agonist
concentration-response curves generated by R-SAT assays of the VGV
receptor isoform co-expressed with various G-protein subunits.
Plotted are the absorbance values of the -galactosidase substrate
ONPG at 405 nm versus ligand concentration, normalized to
the maximum response for each condition. Points are the mean of data
from at least six independent experiments performed in duplicate. The
asterisks indicate conditions significantly different from
receptor alone (see Table I for summary).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effect of G subunits on serotonin and ritanserin potency at
different 5-HT2CR isoforms
Data represent potency values obtained in R-SAT assays utilizing
receptor alone or in the presence of the indicated G subunit,
cultured in the presence of either 5-HT or ritanserin. Data are mean
EC50 values in nM ± S.E.; parentheses indicate
n. * p < 0.05;
** p < 0.001; significantly different from
receptor alone.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Expression of Gq shifts 5-HT
potency at VSV, but other G
subunits do not. Shown are representative agonist
concentration-response curves generated by R-SAT assays of the VSV
receptor isoform co-expressed with various G-protein subunits.
Plotted are the absorbance values of the -galactosidase substrate
ONPG at 405 nm versus ligand concentration, normalized to
the maximum response for each condition. Points are the mean of data
from at least four independent experiments performed in duplicate. The
asterisks indicate conditions significantly different from
receptor alone (see Table I for summary).
|
|
The extended ternary complex model of receptor/G-protein coupling
predicts that increasing the concentration of a constitutively activated receptor or its cognate G-protein should not only increase agonist potency but also decrease inverse agonist potency (27). We
therefore hypothesized that co-transfection of G
subunits that functionally couple to a particular receptor isoform
would cause rightward shifts in inverse agonist dose-response curves, providing a method to determine receptor/G-protein coupling of the
isoforms with significant constitutive activity (INI and VSV). To test
this hypothesis, these isoforms were co-transfected with the various
G subunits, and dose-responses curves were generated using the fully efficacious inverse agonist ritanserin. A significant rightward shift in the ritanserin dose-response curve was observed when
Gq was co-transfected with VSV but not when other
G subunits were co-transfected with VSV (Fig.
4; Table I). These results agree with
previous data utilizing agonists and suggest that the VSV isoform
couples principally to Gq.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Expression of Gq, but not other
G , shifts ritanserin potency at VSV.
Shown are representative inverse agonist concentration-response curves
generated by R-SAT assay of VSV receptor isoform co-expressed with
various G-protein subunits. Plotted are the absorbance values of
the -galactosidase substrate ONPG at 405 nm versus ligand
concentration, normalized to the maximum response for each condition.
Points are the mean of data from at least three independent experiments
performed in duplicate. The asterisks indicate conditions
significantly different from receptor alone (see Table I for
summary).
|
|
Because of the high degree of constitutive activity of the nonedited
INI receptor, we were unable to obtain reproducible dose-response curves for serotonin above agonist-independent activity when
G subunits were co-transfected with the receptor. As
predicted, co-transfection of Gq with INI caused a
rightward shift in the ritanserin dose-response curve compared with
receptor alone (Fig. 5; Table I).
However, co-transfection of G13 or G15 with INI caused a leftward shift in dose-response curves for ritanserin (Fig. 5;
Table I) as well as dose-response curves for another fully efficacious
5-HT2CR inverse agonist, clozapine (data not shown). These
data suggest that the INI receptor can productively interact with
Gq, G13, and G15.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Expression of Gq,
G13, and G15, but not other
G , shift ritanserin potency at INI. Shown
are representative inverse agonist concentration-response curves
generated by R-SAT assay of INI receptor isoform co-expressed with
various G-protein subunits. Plotted are the absorbance values of
the -galactosidase substrate ONPG at 405 nm versus ligand
concentration, normalized to the maximum response for each condition.
Points are the mean of data from at least seven independent experiments
performed in duplicate. The asterisks indicate conditions
significantly different from receptor alone (see Table I for
summary).
|
|
Stress Fiber Formation--
To confirm the apparent alteration in
G13 coupling, we examined receptor-mediated rearrangements
of the actin cytoskeleton, a G13-mediated process important
in cell shape and regulatory responses including chemotaxis,
mitogenesis, and neurite retraction (29, 30). NIH-3T3 cells stably
expressing the INI receptor isoform showed a high level of stress
fibers in the absence of agonist (Fig. 6,
A and C), which was decreased by treatment with the inverse agonists SB 206553 and clozapine (Fig. 6, B and
C). Consistent with the R-SAT results, only a small DOI
signal was detected, presumably due to the high degree of receptor
constitutive activity. Importantly, the addition of a
membrane-permeable peptide (G13) designed to mimic the
receptor/G13 interface and hence block coupling (2),
markedly decreased actin stress fibers in INI-expressing cells (Fig.
6C), whereas the carrier peptide (MPS) alone had no effect.
Although a similar peptide designed to block
receptor/Gq coupling could attenuate
5-HT2CR-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis, the G13
blocking peptide was not effective at blocking this signal (Fig.
6D), thus demonstrating the specificity of the G13 peptide. In contrast, cells stably transfected with the VGV isoform did not show
actin rearrangement in response to the agonists DOI or LSD (Fig.
7, A and C),
whereas LPA, an agonist at an endogenous G13-coupled
receptor (31), produced a 3-fold increase in the number of cells
expressing stress fibers (Fig. 6, B and C). The addition of the G13 blocking peptide attenuated the LPA response, whereas the Gq peptide had no effect (Fig. 7D). These
results confirm that G13 protein-mediated rearrangements of
the actin cytoskeleton occur as a downstream consequence of INI, but
not VGV, receptor activation.

View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Stimulation of INI receptors initiates
rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton downstream of
G13. A and B, stable cell lines
expressing the INI isoform in the absence (basal) or
presence of ligands were incubated with Oregon Green-conjugated
phalloidin. A, INI cells in the absence of ligand
illustrating presence of stress fibers (arrowhead);
B, INI cells after treatment with inverse agonist, SB
206553, showing lack of organized stress fibers. C,
quantification of stress fibers after various drug or peptide
treatments (see "Experimental Procedures"). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.001, significantly different from
basal; #, p < 0.01, significantly different from MPS;
results are the mean of at least four independent experiments.
D, stable INI cell lines were stimulated with 10 nM DOI and assayed for phosphoinositide hydrolysis in the
absence or presence of blocking peptides. **, p < 0.001, significantly different from basal; , p < 0.001, significantly different from DOI; results are the mean of at
least five independent experiments performed in triplicate.
|
|

View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Stimulation of VGV receptors does not cause
rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton via G13.
A and B, stable cell lines expressing the VGV
isoform in the absence (basal) or presence of ligands were
incubated with Oregon Green-conjugated phalloidin. VGV cells showed no
significant change in the expression of stress fibers in response to
5-HT2CR ligands (A) but did show an increase
after LPA treatment (B, arrowhead).
Quantification of stress fibers after various drug (C) or
peptide treatments (D; see "Experimental Procedures").
**, p < 0.001, significantly different from basal; ,
p < 0.001, significantly different from LPA; results
are the mean of at least four independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The original ternary complex model states that the
ligand, the receptor, and the G-protein must interact to form a ternary complex in order to elicit second messenger production. However, recent
revisions have occurred to accommodate the finding that some receptors
have the ability to promote productive G-protein coupling in the
absence of an agonist, termed constitutive activity (27, 32). The
extended ternary complex model predicts that receptors have the
capacity to spontaneously isomerize from an inactive conformation,
termed R, to an active state, R*, with the R* version of the receptor
having the ability to interact with and activate G-proteins. A
relatively large proportion of the nonedited 5-HT2CR exists
in a G-protein-coupled state in the absence of agonist (23, 33). These
results were confirmed in the current work using the R-SAT assay.
Furthermore, this high level of constitutive activity is progressively
eliminated by RNA editing, with the INI receptor being most efficacious
at G-protein coupling, the VSV isoform being intermediate, and VGV
receptors existing predominantly in the uncoupled state (present
results; see Refs. 5, 34, and 35). The isoform-dependent
constitutive activity could have important implications for the
physiological effects of 5-HT by controlling basal tone and sensitivity
at synaptic sites. In addition, region-specific generation of edited
isoforms (3), coupled with reports of altered RNA editing in suicide (36) and schizophrenia patients (37), suggests that the repertoire of
expressed edited 5-HT2CRs may contribute to individual
differences in brain serotonergic signaling and perhaps even responses
to therapeutic agents such as atypical antipsychotic drugs, many of
which have been shown to be inverse agonists at the 5-HT2CR (34, 38).
Serotonergic agonists exhibit a decreased potency for
eliciting inositol phosphate production and calcium release when
interacting with the edited receptor isoforms stably expressed in
NIH-3T3 fibroblasts (5-7). The current results obtained in the R-SAT assay are in agreement, demonstrating decreased agonist potencies for
the edited isoforms (INI > VSV > VGV). The extended ternary complex model predicts that raising the concentration of a
G subunit that productively interacts with the R*
configuration (thereby increasing R*G) would increase agonist potency
because agonists preferentially bind R*. Conversely, this model also
predicts that the potencies of inverse agonists to reverse constitutive activity will decrease as the fraction of R*G increases (32). In
agreement with these predictions, we observed that the addition of
Gq and G11 subunits to cells expressing the VGV
isoform shifted 5-HT dose-response curves leftward (i.e.
increased 5-HT potency), compared with receptor alone. Co-expression of
Gq with the VSV isoform caused an increase in 5-HT potency,
while co-expression of other G subunits (including G11)
did not cause a significant shift in the 5-HT concentration-response
curve. Previous work has shown that co-expressing these G-proteins with
other monoamine receptors in the R-SAT assay can shift agonist potency
(16, 18),2 suggesting that there would be a shift in 5-HT
potency if the 5-HT2CR could efficiently couple to these
G subunits. Consistent with predictions of the effects of increasing
[G ] on inverse agonist potency, we observed a rightward shift in
ritanserin dose-response curves (i.e. a decrease in inverse
agonist potency) at the INI and VSV receptor with Gq
co-transfection. These results are the first experimental evidence that
increasing [G ] can decrease inverse agonist potency.
In contrast, ritanserin potency actually increased significantly when
G13 and G15 were co-transfected with INI but
not with the VSV isoform. This provided an initial suggestion of a
functional interaction between G13 and G15
subunits and the INI isoform but not the VSV isoform. Taken together,
these data support the hypothesis that the INI isoform has the ability
to activate Gq, G13, and G15,
whereas the edited VSV and VGV receptor isoforms can efficiently
activate only the Gq family of G-proteins.
G12/13 proteins, isolated as oncogenes and
cloned by homology to other G-proteins, have been unique in their
failure to regulate known G effectors such as adenylyl cyclase or
phospholipases (reviewed in Ref. 39), although these G-proteins have
been shown to mediate rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton (31).
Therefore, to confirm the apparent alteration in G13
coupling exhibited by edited 5-HT2CR isoforms, we examined
the ability of the 5-HT2CR isoforms to modulate the actin
cytoskeleton. These studies demonstrate that the INI receptor has the
ability to promote actin cytoskeleton rearrangement via activation of
G13, whereas the VGV receptor isoform does not.
Importantly, these data confirm the R-SAT results suggesting an
alteration in the ability of edited isoforms to activate
G13. This differential ability of the 5-HT2CR
edited isoforms to promote actin polymerization has important
implications in the brain, where neurotransmission is dynamically
regulated by cytoskeletal rearrangments. Furthermore, the finding that
5-HT2CR isoforms with three residues altered within the
putative second intracellular loop exhibit reduced functional coupling
to G13 provides the first evidence of a critical role for
the second intracellular loop in coupling to G 12/13-type proteins.
A noteworthy perspective here is that although an acute
response to G12/13 activation results in the rapid
formation of stress fiber and focal adhesion assemblies, a relatively
longer response results in the activation of specific gene expression
(40). The interactions between these different sets of signals may
distinguish G12/13 signaling from other signal transduction
pathways. Thus, transient activation of G12/13 may be
involved in immediate housekeeping responses, such as the regulation of
Na+/H+ exchange, stress fiber formation, ion
channels, cell volume, and shape changes, while a more sustained level
of activation, perhaps mediated by constitutively active receptors, may
lead to cell division and differentiation. Detailed temporal and
spatial analyses of 5-HT2CR isoform profiles and G-protein
signaling differences are needed. For example, the pleiotropic role of
the 5-HT2CR as a growth factor during development (41) and
as a regulator of neuronal excitability in mature animals (42) may
reflect temperospatial differences in RNA editing and subsequent
G-protein coupling capacity.
Whereas RNA editing has been shown to have profound functional
consequences in a number of proteins (43-45), this is the first report
of a change in the pattern of receptor-mediated G-protein activation by
RNA editing. As evidenced by both R-SAT data and stress fiber
formation, extensively edited isoforms of the 5-HT2CR, created by editing at four or five sites, have lost or greatly attenuated their ability to functionally couple to
G13-protein, which may produce functionally distinct
signaling patterns in vivo. Thus, RNA editing is a novel
mechanism for regulation of the pattern of activation of heterotrimeric
G-proteins, molecular switches that control an enormous variety of
biological processes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Mattie Goodman and Kathleen
Rutledge for expert technical assistance, Dr. Ethan Burstein for
critical discussions, and Drs. Jon Backstrom, Erik Barton, Paul Gresch,
Heidi Hamm, and Lee Limbird for critical reading of the manuscript. We
also thank Dr. Thierry Wurch for generously providing the construct encoding G15 and Dr. Thomas Amatruda III for generously
providing the construct encoding G16. Statistical analyses
were performed by the Statistical Core of Vanderbilt University's John
F. Kennedy Center for Research on Human Development.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants MH34007, NS35891, and GM07623.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: 459 Preston
Research Bldg., Dept. of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University,
Nashville, TN 37232-6600. Tel.: 615-936-1685; Fax: 615-343-6532;
E-mail: elaine.bush@mcmail.vanderbilt.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 25, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106745200
2
R. D. Price, D. M. Weiner, M. S. S. Chang, and E. Sanders-Bush, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
5-HT, serotonin;
G-protein, heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein;
5-HT2CR, serotonin 5-HT2C receptor;
R-SAT, Receptor Selection/Amplification TechnologyTM;
DOI, (±)-1-(4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane;
ONPG, o-nitrophenyl- -D-galactopyranoside;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
LPA, lysophosphatidic acid;
MPS, membrane-permeable sequence.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sanders-Bush, E.,
and Canton, H.
(1995)
in
Psychopharmacology: The Fourth Generation of Progress
(Bloom, F. E.
, and Kupfer, D. J., eds)
, pp. 431-41, Raven Press, New York
|
| 2.
|
Chang, M.,
Zhang, L.,
Tam, J. P.,
and Sanders-Bush, E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7021-7029
|
| 3.
|
Burns, C. M.,
Chu, H.,
Rueter, S. M.,
Hutchinson, L. K.,
Canton, H.,
Sanders-Bush, E.,
and Emeson, R. B.
(1997)
Nature
387,
303-308
|
| 4.
|
Niswender, C. M.,
Sanders-Bush, E.,
and Emeson, R. B.
(1998)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
861,
38-48
|
| 5.
|
Niswender, C. M.,
Copeland, S. C.,
Herrick-Davis, K.,
Emeson, R. B.,
and Sanders-Bush, E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9472-9478
|
| 6.
|
Fitzgerald, L. W.,
Iyer, G.,
Conklin, D. S.,
Krause, C. M.,
Marshall, A.,
Patterson, J. P.,
Tran, D. P.,
Jonak, G. J.,
and Hartig, P. R.
(1999)
Neuropsychopharmacology
21,
82S-90S
|
| 7.
|
Price, R. D.,
and Sanders-Bush, E.
(2000)
Mol. Pharmacol.
58,
859-862
|
| 8.
|
Arora, K. K.,
Sakai, A.,
and Catt, K. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
22820-22826
|
| 9.
|
Blin, N.,
Yun, J.,
and Wess, J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17741-17748
|
| 10.
|
Liu, J.,
and Wess, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8772-8778
|
| 11.
|
Gomeza, J.,
Joly, C.,
Kuhn, R.,
Knopfel, T.,
Bockaert, J.,
and Pin, J. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2199-2205
|
| 12.
|
Iida-Klein, A.,
Guo, J.,
Takemura, M.,
Drake, M. T.,
Potts, J. T., Jr.,
Abou-Samra, A.,
Bringhurst, F. R.,
and Segre, G. V.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
6882-6889
|
| 13.
|
Arora, K. K.,
Cheng, Z.,
and Catt, K. J.
(1997)
Mol. Endocrinol.
11,
1203-1212
|
| 14.
|
Verrall, S.,
Ishii, M.,
Chen, M.,
Wang, L.,
Tram, T.,
and Coughlin, S. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
6898-6902
|
| 15.
|
Ballesteros, J.,
Kitanovic, S.,
Guarnieri, F.,
Davies, P.,
Fromme, B. J.,
Konvicka, K.,
Chi, L.,
Millar, R. P.,
Davidson, J. S.,
Weinstein, H.,
and Sealfon, S. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10445-10453
|
| 16.
|
Burstein, E. S.,
Spalding, T. A.,
and Brann, M. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24322-24327
|
| 17.
|
Burstein, E. S.,
Spalding, T. A.,
Brauner-Osborne, H.,
and Brann, M. R.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
363,
261-263
|
| 18.
|
Burstein, E. S.,
Brauner-Osborne, H.,
Spalding, T. A.,
Conklin, B. R.,
and Brann, M. R.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
68,
525-533
|
| 19.
|
Messier, T. L.,
Dorman, C. M.,
Brauner-Osborne, H.,
Eubanks, D.,
and Brann, M. R.
(1995)
Pharmacol. Toxicol.
76,
308-311
|
| 20.
|
Brauner-Osborne, H.,
and Brann, M. R.
(1996)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
295,
93-102
|
| 21.
|
Wurch, T.,
and Pauwels, P. J.
(2000)
J. Neurochem.
75,
1180-1189
|
| 22.
|
Amatruda, T. T., III,
Dragas-Graonic, S.,
Holmes, R.,
and Perez, H. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28010-28013
|
| 23.
|
Barker, E. L.,
Westphal, R. S.,
Schmidt, D.,
and Sanders-Bush, E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
11687-11690
|
| 24.
|
Hamm, H. E.,
and Rarick, H. M.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
237,
423-436
|
| 25.
|
Taylor, J. M.,
and Neubig, R. R.
(1994)
Cell. Signal.
6,
841-849
|
| 26.
|
Kenakin, T.
(1995)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
16,
232-238
|
| 27.
|
Samama, P.,
Cotecchia, S.,
Costa, T.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
4625-4636
|
| 28.
|
Offermanns, S.,
Toombs, C. F.,
Hu, Y. H.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1997)
Nature
389,
183-186
|
| 29.
|
Buhl, A. M.,
Johnson, N. L.,
Dhanasekaran, N.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24631-24634
|
| 30.
|
Katoh, H.,
Aoki, J.,
Yamaguchi, Y.,
Kitano, Y.,
Ichikawa, A.,
and Negishi, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28700-28707
|
| 31.
|
Gohla, A.,
Offermanns, S.,
Wilkie, T. M.,
and Schultz, G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17901-17907
|
| 32.
|
Egan, C.,
Grinde, E.,
Dupre, A.,
Roth, B. L.,
Hake, M.,
Teitler, M.,
and Herrick-Davis, K.
(2000)
Synapse
35,
144-150
|
| 33.
|
Grotewiel, M. S.,
and Sanders-Bush, E.
(1999)
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol.
359,
21-27
|
| 34.
|
Weiner, D. M.,
Burstein, E. S.,
Nash, N.,
Croston, G. E.,
Currier, E. A.,
Vanover, K. E.,
Harvey, S. C.,
Donohue, E.,
Hansen, H. C.,
Andersson, C. M.,
Spalding, T. A.,
Gibson, D. F.,
Krebs-Thomson, K.,
Powell, S. B.,
Geyer, M. A.,
Hacksell, U.,
and Brann, M. R.
(2001)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
299,
268-276
|
| 35.
|
Herrick-Davis, K.,
Grinde, E.,
and Niswender, C. M.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
73,
1711-1717
|
| 36.
|
Niswender, C. M.,
Herrick-Davis, K.,
Dilley, G. E.,
Meltzer, H. Y.,
Overholser, J. C.,
Stockmeier, C. A.,
Emeson, R. B.,
and Sanders-Bush, E.
(2001)
Neuropsychopharmacology
24,
478-491
|
| 37.
|
Sodhi, M.,
Burnet, P.,
Makoff, A.,
Kerwin, R.,
and Harrison, P.
(2001)
Mol. Psychiatry
6,
373-379
|
| 38.
|
Herrick-Davis, K.,
Grinde, E.,
and Teitler, M.
(2000)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
295,
226-232
|
| 39.
|
Dhanasekaran, N.,
and Dermott, J. M.
(1996)
Cell. Signal.
8,
235-245
|
| 40.
|
Zohn, I. M.,
Campbell, S. L.,
Khosravi-Far, R.,
Rossman, K. L.,
and Der, C. J.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
1415-1438
|
| 41.
|
Wang, Y.,
Gu, Q.,
and Cynader, M. S.
(1997)
Exp. Brain Res.
114,
321-328
|
| 42.
|
Tecott, L. H.,
Sun, L. M.,
Akana, S. F.,
Strack, A. M.,
Lowenstein, D. H.,
Dallman, M. F.,
and Julius, D.
(1995)
Nature
374,
542-546
|
| 43.
|
Higuchi, M.,
Maas, S.,
Single, F. N.,
Hartner, J.,
Rozov, A.,
Burnashev, N.,
Feldmeyer, D.,
Sprengel, R.,
and Seeburg, P. H.
(2000)
Nature
406,
78-81
|
| 44.
|
Melcher, T.,
Maas, S.,
Herb, A.,
Sprengel, R.,
Seeburg, P. H.,
and Higuchi, M.
(1996)
Nature
379,
460-464
|
| 45.
|
Rueter, S. M.,
Dawson, T. R.,
and Emeson, R. B.
(1999)
Nature
399,
75-80
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Zhang, L. F. Brass, and D. R. Manning
The Gq and G12 Families of Heterotrimeric G Proteins Report Functional Selectivity
Mol. Pharmacol.,
January 1, 2009;
75(1):
235 - 241.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Singh, R. A. Kesterson, M. M. Jacobs, J. M. Joers, J. C. Gore, and R. B. Emeson
Hyperphagia-mediated Obesity in Transgenic Mice Misexpressing the RNA-editing Enzyme ADAR2
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 3, 2007;
282(31):
22448 - 22459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Marion, R. H. Oakley, K.-M. Kim, M. G. Caron, and L. S. Barak
A beta-Arrestin Binding Determinant Common to the Second Intracellular Loops of Rhodopsin Family G Protein-coupled Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 3, 2006;
281(5):
2932 - 2938.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. De Deurwaerdere, S. Navailles, K. A Berg, W. P. Clarke, and U. Spampinato
Constitutive Activity of the Serotonin2C Receptor Inhibits In Vivo Dopamine Release in the Rat Striatum and Nucleus Accumbens
J. Neurosci.,
March 31, 2004;
24(13):
3235 - 3241.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Marion, D. M. Weiner, and M. G. Caron
RNA Editing Induces Variation in Desensitization and Trafficking of 5-Hydroxytryptamine 2c Receptor Isoforms
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 23, 2004;
279(4):
2945 - 2954.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. McGrew, R. D. Price, E. Hackler, M. S. S. Chang, and E. Sanders-Bush
RNA Editing of the Human Serotonin 5-HT2C Receptor Disrupts Transactivation of the Small G-Protein RhoA
Mol. Pharmacol.,
January 1, 2004;
65(1):
252 - 256.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. L. Sansam, K. S. Wells, and R. B. Emeson
Modulation of RNA editing by functional nucleolar sequestration of ADAR2
PNAS,
November 25, 2003;
100(24):
14018 - 14023.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Sanders-Bush, H. Fentress, and L. Hazelwood
Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptors: Molecular and Genomic Diversity
Mol. Interv.,
September 1, 2003;
3(6):
319 - 330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. L. Parker, J. R. Backstrom, E. Sanders-Bush, and B.-H. Shieh
Agonist-induced Phosphorylation of the Serotonin 5-HT2C Receptor Regulates Its Interaction with Multiple PDZ Protein 1
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 6, 2003;
278(24):
21576 - 21583.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. McGrew, M. S. S. Chang, and E. Sanders-Bush
Phospholipase D Activation by Endogenous 5-Hydroxytryptamine 2C Receptors Is Mediated by Galpha 13 and Pertussis Toxin-Insensitive Gbeta gamma Subunits
Mol. Pharmacol.,
December 1, 2002;
62(6):
1339 - 1343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Manning
Measures of Efficacy Using G Proteins as Endpoints: Differential Engagement of G Proteins through Single Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol.,
September 1, 2002;
62(3):
451 - 452.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Shapiro, K. Kristiansen, D. M. Weiner, W. K. Kroeze, and B. L. Roth
Evidence for a Model of Agonist-induced Activation of 5-Hydroxytryptamine 2A Serotonin Receptors That Involves the Disruption of a Strong Ionic Interaction between Helices 3 and 6
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 22, 2002;
277(13):
11441 - 11449.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|